Terminal Report

RAISING FREE-RANGE NATIVE CHICKEN COMPLEMENTED UNDER

COCONUT FARMING SYSTEM AT NWSSU AGRICULTURAL AREA

COLLEGES : COLLEGE OF AGRICULTURE AND TECHNOLOGY

COLLEGE OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE AND SCIENCES
COLLEGE OF EDUCATION

Project Leader : Sance J. Secondez, MSc

Members : Vercelle A. Docdoc, EdD

Armando A. Alviola, PhD
Julie Ann D. Edraga, EdD
Rexor H. Magbutay, MAEd
Phil Harold L. Mercurio, MSc

Total Project Cost : 191,700.00

Source of Fund : Philippine Coconut Authority (PCA)

Duration : 1 year

RATIONALE

A multi-commodity farming system presents more advantages to farmers than a mono-

cropping system. However, the commodity mix must fit into the particular farmer’s capability,
resources and needs, as well as the social, economic and environmental forces around him.

It is typical of Filipino small farmers to strive for self-sufficiency and self-reliance in their
everyday needs. Foremost among these needs is food. Thus, in the Philippines, many
traditional farmers raise vegetables or fruit trees, a few chickens or ducks, and two or three pigs,
goats or other ruminants on his piece of land besides the main crop.

Philippine native chicken (Gallus domesticus) is the most common fowl found in the
backyards of most rural households. It is a mixture of different breeds and believed to have
descended from the domesticated red jungle fowl. These chickens are well adapted to the
tropical condition and usually raised under a scavenging system. They are perceived to be
tolerant with the common chicken diseases and parasites.

The meat of native chicken is increasingly preferred because of its suitability in native
dishes and can be considered as a healthy alternative to commercial chicken meat due to fewer
antibiotics and artificial hormones present in the chicken’s system. The price for a kilogram of
native chicken is also higher compared to the commercial chicken.

Research on meat production worldwide indicates that poultry is the fastest growing
livestock sector, especially in the developing countries (Delgado et al, 1999; Taha, 2003;
Landes et al, 2004; Conroy, 2004.
 The outlook for the Philippine native chicken industry appears optimistic because the
demand for chicken products is expected to increase along with population and income growth
(DA and NAFC 2002 a, b). According to the Philippines Department of Agriculture’s Bureau of
Agricultural Statistics, domestic chicken production increased by 2.53% in 2018 and is projected
to expand again. Demand for chicken meat is also forecast to rise this year as a result of a
projected improvement in the Philippine economy and a growing population. The Philippine
poultry sector, valued at about P144 billion, expanded by 10% in 2009 and represents about
14% of total agricultural production in the country. Chicken production, valued at P98 billion and
the primary source of growth in this sector, went up by 10% (Bureau of Agricultural Statistics).
The backyard poultry sector, which is defined by the Bureau of Agricultural Statistics (BAS
1987) as having less than 100 birds per household, deserves more attention because it
comprises the majority of the poultry inventory in the Philippines. For example, the backyard
production of native chickens accounted for about 54% of the total chicken inventory in 2005
(BAS 2006a). According to the Philippines Bureau of Statistics (BAS), the poultry subsector
grew by 3.72 % in 2010 and accounted for 14.93 % of total agricultural production. Chicken and
egg production has steadily grown over the past few years. Native chickens accounted for 47 %
of the chicken inventory, broilers 34%, and layers 19 % in 2010. On the other hand, as of 2012,
price of native chicken increased with insufficient supply.

Thus, this project “RAISING FREE-RANGE NATIVE CHICKEN COMPLEMENTED

UNDER COCONUT FARMING SYSTEM” will be a great opportunity to develop the coconut-
animal production system to increase profitability of our local farmers.

OBJECTIVES

This extension project will be conducted with the following objectives:

1. To establish a demonstration site of free range and native chicken complemented under
coconut farming system;
2. To evaluate the growth and laying performance of free range native chicken
3. To evaluate the cost and return analysis of free range native chicken production.
4. To disseminate and introduce the technologies (technical and basic management skills)
to our farmers in order for them to recognize the potential of native chicken in the
locality.

THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK

This proposal is anchored with the corporate priorities and in pursuit of the sustainable
development of a globally competitive coconut and other oil palm industry of Philippine Coconut
Authority (PCA) which shall vigorously implement the Coconut Inter-cropping Project in support
of PCA's Coconut Industry Development Roadmap.

The coconut-animal production system is based on the premise that the animal
component is beneficial to coconut production and productivity and that the income from the
integrated system is greater (Reynolds, 1988). Coconut farmers can increase their profitability
while reducing financial risks by adopting an integrated farming system that includes animals or
intercrops. In coconut-animal production systems, the general rule is to plant the coconut
component at the traditional spacing and adjust the animal stocking rate to the available space.
The animal component is often treated as an aid (especially in weed control and the provision of
additional income) to the coconut enterprise which takes priority (Reynolds, 1988).
 Native Chicken (Gallus gallus domesticus). Zoologically, the native chicken belongs to
the genus Gallus of the family Phasianae. The domestic chicken is simply called Gallus
domesticus. The wild ancestors of the domestic chicken probably originated in Southeast Asia,
and four species of these wild jungle fowls are still known in the area. These are: Gallus gallus,
the red jungle fowl; Gallus layette, the Ceylonese jungle fowl; Gallus sonnerati, the gray jungle
fowl; and Gallus various, the black or green jungle fowl. However, the red jungle fowl has the
widest distribution of the wild species and may well be the chief ancestor of the modern breeds
(Nesheim et al., 1979).

According to the Food and Fertilizer Technology center for the Asia and Pacific Region,
native animals have provided valuable contributions in the cultural, social, and economic status
of farming communities in the rural areas. Aside from providing them with an alternative source
of livelihood, these animals have been known to contain high quality protein.
The growing population around the world prompted the demand for producing more
which led to intensive farming, making use of exotic commercial breeds and hybrids. But with
people becoming more conscious of their health, natural products exhibit for choosing native
chicken and pig when it comes to animal production.

Native Chickens possess almost the same advantageous characteristics like the native
pigs. But aside from those, they also have the ability to look for their own foods, hence intensive
production is not that much needed. Feeding them is easy as readily – available local feeds
such as corn, palay, rice bran, kitchen leftovers, grasses or even insects and worms are
palatable to them. They can also be beneficial for those who are planting other agricultural
crops because they aid in improving soil fertility (Brion, A.C.B., 2012). Some of the Philippine
native chickens that are raised in the backyard of many farmers in the rural areas still resemble
their wild ancestral type. They are nervous, flighty, but the female has strong maternal instincts.
They are hardy and can reproduce and survive with minimal care and management (Arboleda,
1987).

In the Philippines, native chickens constitute a large portion of the total chicken
population. For many years, these chickens have been part of the natural setting and provide
additional sources of income for so many rural farmers (Lambio, 1993).

Slowly, the value of native chicken is being recognized. In addition to its common
contribution in the form of eggs and meat, a source of additional income to the rural farmers
during lean months of the year, and as object for recreation in the form of cockfighting, many
people in the urban areas are now looking at the native chicken as a source of nutritious food.
City residents who lead a more sedentary life prefer foods that are low in cholesterol. Their
preference is now shifting to eggs coming from native chicken which, being small, are also
believed to supply a small amount of cholesterol. Aside from that, native birds and eggs are
tastier and more savory than the improved breeds. This explains why, kilo for kilo, native poultry
products are more costly than the exotic breeds (Cocjin, 1989). It is estimated that 54.74% of
the total chicken population of the country are Native Chicken distributed as follows: Western
Visayas, 13.32%; Southern Mindanao, 10.63%; Southern Tagalog, 9.51%; Central Visayas,
10.36%; Cagayan Valley, 9.29% (UPLB,2001). A native chicken lays 40 – 60 eggs in a year.
However, recent findings showed that when properly managed and fed with the right quality and
amount of feeds, the native hen can produce as much as 130 – 200 eggs in a year (PCCARD,
1998).
 According to Rose Canastra of CIMPC in 2008, chicken is the cheapest source of
protein. There is a great demand for organic chicken abroad and even in the Philippines alone
of which the need cannot be met. The demand for chicken is around 635 million every year

METHODOLOGY

Establishment of a Demonstration Site for Free-Range Native Chicken

Breeds Selection

Rhode Island Red (RIR) males and female Local Indigenous chickens are used as parent
stocks for this project. Below are some guides used in selecting the parent stock:

Hens’ body conformation are selected based on the shape of a banana blossom. Shape of the
breast to the tip of the keel area should feel like that of a banana blossom; no physical
deformities; well-groomed; have alert eyes and red comb; wide and pliable vent; and good
mothering ability. The RIR is masculine in appearance, aggressive but caring, and have a big
and proportionate body since the rooster contributes 50% of the characteristics of the chicks.
(Figure 1)

Figure 1. Initial conditioning and quarantining of the male RIR and female
hens
Site Selection

The site should be flat and not in a tough terrain. Separately, the site is planted with
grasses and legumes for enough pasture for free range chicken. There is an easy access to
clean water and electricity while maintaining the biosecurity of the site. A range will be provided
with net to keep the chickens safe and secured. (Figure 2)

Figure 2. Ranging net is installed to keep the chickens safe and secured
 Figure 3. Well-ventilated housing

Housing

When raising chicken whether for family consumption or for the market, it would be good
practice to provide the birds with housing for their safety against draft and other bad elements
that may adversely affect their production. The house is well-ventilated and is protected against
strong wind or inclement weather (Figure 3). The site should not prone to flooding, away from
dense human population and main roads, secure from theft and harmful animals (Figure 4). The
project is located in an urban area, and conform with the zoning of the locality.

Figure 4. Site is not prone to flooding

There are lots of plants that can be used as wind breakers such as banana, fruit trees
and many others (Figure 5). These plants not only give shade and protection, but also fruits and
source of naturally occurring feedstuffs. Shed type of roofing is highly recommended for this
purpose. The housing gives the comfort needed by chicken for there is free circulation of air in
and out of the building.
Figure 5. Plants that surrounds the poultry house

A roll-up curtain (kenaf) is provided so that in times of bad weather, it can be pull down
to give protection to the chickens (Figure 6).

Figure 6. Protecting the birds using the roll-up curtain

Chicks aging from day old to 30 days are put inside the brooder where temperature can
be adjusted to meet the comfort zone of the chicks. But in places without electricity or when the
raiser wants to save on expenses, fostering is ideal.
Intensive brooding (Figure 7) may be provided from day old to 15 days after which, the
chicks can be on free range together with their foster hen. During the night, the chicks with there
are put inside the brooder for nocturnal predators and also to account the number of chicks. It is
at this stage that chicks require intensive care. The future of the project lies on the rate of
chicks’ survival. The higher the rate of survival, the greater is the number of chicken that can be
sold after three and a half to four months.

Figure 7. Two-week old chicks at brooding stage

Chicks were separated from the older ones to protect them from crushing and have
enough room for feeding. They are weak to protect themselves from the older ones, giving them
less chance of getting the right amount of feeds during feeding. Besides, their body defense
mechanism is not well developed yet, hence, are less resistant to diseases and parasite
infestation. At one month and a half months of age, chicks are grown together with the rest of
the flock until they are ready for market. At this age, they were already hardened and were
expected to adapt to the environment and the competition from the older members of the flock.
Housing for breeder was also used for growers and fatteners. Cleanliness is strictly maintained
in and out of the house. Vaccination Remove dirt, feces, and unnecessary things inside the
house. This is one way of protecting the flock from diseases and infestation of parasites
including vaccination (Figure 8).

Figure 8. Medicating and vaccinating birds at grower stage

Equipment

Besides just fencing off a range and building a house for the chickens, this project also
purchased a variety of equipment to support the chicken. Among other items, this farming
venture need drinkers, feeders, brooding equipment, heaters and heating bulbs and a solar light
is also recommended if in case there is no electricity in the area (Figure 9).

Figure 9. Equipment used in this project

Bedding/Litter

Beddings are material used for the comfort of the hens and chicks (Figure 10). It is
especially important during the brooding stage. Generally, the bedding (or litter) was changed
on a regular basis with the frequency depending on how heavily it gets contaminated. Usually, it
should be changed anywhere between two to three weeks. One thing to make sure is that the
bedding to be used in the free range chicken house provides for proper ventilation. Some of the
materials that can be used as litter include sawdust, rice straw, and rice hull.

Figure 10. Preparing the beddings for brooding of day-old-chicks

Stock Selection
 To raise productive native chickens, select pullet from a healthy and broody from flocks
that are fast growers and high egg producers. One rooster is selected to a flock of 5-7 hens to
produce the satisfactory number of fertile eggs for hatching. Hen start laying eggs between 18-
20 weeks of age. A native chicken raised under free range is expected to lay 40-60 eggs per
year. A natural method of brooding will be used to produce fertile eggs. In the case where a
natural method is not a productive process, an incubator may be used. (Figure 11)

Figure 11. Selection of stocks

Feeds and Feeding

Despite the fact that native chicken can live with little care, supplemental feeding was
performed. This method assisted the chickens in meeting their nutrient requirements in order to
produce eggs (Figure 12). The availability of naturally occurring feedstuffs varies throughout the
year. Continuous free-ranging of chickens depletes resources as well, especially if the number
of chickens exceeds the carrying capacity of the range. Following were feedstuffs formulated for
home-mixed rations: rice bran, kangkong or kamote tops, banana stems, and trichanthera leaf
meal. (Figure 13). Depending on availability, rice bran and other feedstuffs were also mixed. In
general, commercial feeds are mixed so as not to compromise the nutrient consumed by the
chickens.

Figure 12. Eggs produced

 Figure 13. Preparing home-mixed rations.

Cleaning & Disinfecting the Area

Cleaning the house, drinkers, and other equipment properly is critical to the biosecurity
of a free range chicken farming venture (Figure 14). The birds were protected from infections
and other diseases, and they were given an ideal environment in which to grow. The following
steps were suggested for this project to ensure the cleanliness of the chicken:
• Providing a foot bath for visitors to dip and disinfect their feet before entering the farm.
• Regularly clean the equipment and supplies, as well as the range and chicken house. In
addition to the above, detergents and disinfecting materials such as chlorine and powder soap
were used to disinfect.

Figure 14. Cleaning and disinfecting the poultry and the equipment
Evaluate the Growth and Laying Performance of Free Range Native Chicken Production

Growth Performance
Body weight has an important role in the development of the hen and the emphasis was
focused on an undisturbed growth rate during the first eight weeks of a hen’s life. Breeder
pullets obtained a minimum body weight to initiate egg production, although the unlimited
feeding chickens obtain this body weight by 14 or 15 weeks, they did not begin laying until they
are 24 or 25 weeks old.

There was a direct relationship between the degree of feed limited and the length of the
delay in the onset of lay. Pullets on the low body weight profile entered lay 7 days later than
pullet on the high body weight profile. These findings suggests that unlimited feeding chickens
are dependent on reaching a critical age to initiate sexual development as opposed to feed-
restricted chickens that are dependent on reaching a critical body weight and body composition
threshold.

According to the findings of Sandilands et al.2019, the desired growth curve poultry to
20 weeks can be achieved via an ad libitum feeding regime, meaning that quantitative feed
limited as presently practiced in chickens, may not be required to avoid the negative health,
welfare and reproduction consequences that are associated with fast growth. Aggressive
chickens were found to grow larger and more quickly whereas passive chickens remain smaller
and under more severe limited condition due to reduced feed access and these observations
suggests that eating behavior could also contribute to the variability in flock body weight.

Figure 15. Determining the body weight of birds

Egg production
The chickens reached the maximum rate (84.5%) of lay at 28 weeks of age while
observing when they will attained their peak egg production (85%). Chickens were observed to
have moderate increase in feed intake that conformed to the findings of Robinson et al. which
reflected that even small degrees of over or under feeding might negatively affect egg and chick
production. Marshaly et al. also explained that the egg production was inversely related to level
of temperature in which the temperatures that exceed 32 oc would normally result in a decline in
egg production (Table 1).

Egg quality and weight

The egg quality was not affected by the different feeding regimes in chickens.
Richards et al. indicates that low incidences of abnormal eggs in hens and concluded that egg
weight is better for hens that were given unlimited access to feed over those rationed either
once or twice a day. Feeding level contributed substantially to egg size.

Table 1. Egg production under optimal conditions at the onset of laying

Laying stage Egg production Egg size Average feed intake

(week) (%) (Pe, Pu,S, M,L,XL) (g)
21 76 L,XL 105
20 75 M,L 100
19 74 M,L 103
18 73 M,L 100
17 73 M,L 101
16 68 M,L 100
15 71 M,L 100
14 71 M 100
13 68 M 100
12 59 M 95
11 49 M 94
10 40 M 98
9 30 S,M 96
8 30 S 97
7 35 S 94
6 21 Pu,S 91
5 22 Pu 90
4 5 Pu 87
3 6 Pe,Pu 90
2 5 Pe 88
1 1 Pe 85

Evaluate the Cost and Return of Free Range Native Chicken Production

This project's expenses and expected income have been assessed. The cost of farm aid
is lower on this project, as reflected in the project Income Statement (Table 3), because the
parent stocks used were 20 hens and 4 roosters, and the labor expense was automatically
assumed to be deducted from egg sales. Furthermore, the cost of chicks at 65 pesos per head
was automatically counted as project sales. For the next phase of this project, these chicks will
be given away for free to the target clientele. If possible, 150 chicks will be distributed per target
barangay. The criteria for selecting beneficiaries will be presented in the project's next phase
 Table 3. Projected Income Statement

PROJECTED INCOME STATEMENT

Projected Income Statement, 20 hens native chicken , 4 male RIR
(18 months cycle)
Item Year 1 Year 2
Income from sales of good eggs (20 hds x 38 eggs x 8.00/egg 6,080.00 3,040.00
75% hatch from 150 eggs=112 x 20 hens=2,240 x 60.00/hd 134,400.00 67,200.00
Income from culled chickens, 10% mortality 150/hd (18 x 150) - 2,700.00
Gross sales 140,480.00 72,940.00
Less: Costs of Goods Sold
Foundation stocks 15,600.00 -
Feeds (45kg/hen @15.00/kg 13,500.00 7,695.00
Biologics (vaccines/meds) 5,840.00 2,920.00
Direct labor (550/ month) 9,900.00 4,950.00
Total costs of goods sold 44,840.00 15,565
Less: Operating expenses
Repair and Maintenance - 311.00
Building cost/yr (10 yrs lifespan, straight line) 2,000.00 1,000.00
Utilities (water, electricity) 3,000.00 1,500.00
Total operating expenses 5,000.00 2, 811.00

Total production costs 49,840.00 18,376.00

Average price of egg 7.84 6.03.00
Net profit before interest 45,800.00 54,564.00
Less: Interest expense
Net Income (%) 32.6 74.81
ROI (%) 1.02 3.51

Disseminate and Introduce the Technologies

Focused Group Discussion (FGD)

Focused group discussion (FGD) was one of the best methods used in this extension
project to thoroughly understand an issue, particularly for those who were either positively or
negatively affected by a community action/work.
First, a courtesy call was placed to the Barangay Captain. The project leader and
members presented the objectives and plans for the community extension program to the
barangay captain. The Barangay Captain encouraged interested members of the community to
participate in this project, and a Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) was later signed between
the Project Team and the target barangay beneficiaries.

Training Seminar

A training seminar is essential for presenting and introducing technologies that will
benefit the target clientele. Brooding, housing, and feed formulation technologies were
presented (See the picture evidences at the last section of this terminal report).

Timetable of Implementation

Month
Activities
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
 FGD
Courtesy Call
MOA Signing
Introduction of
Technologies
Trainings and Seminars
Terminal Report Writing

Sustainability Plan
 Initiated collaboration and solicited ideas from other agencies in order to significantly
improved or expand the project. (Figure 16)
 Observed how local businesses used and benefited from technology.
 Created two model barangays capable of sustaining the identified technologies.

Monitoring and Evaluation Plan

 Created a plan for monitoring and evaluation
 Oversee the program's implementation
 Held several meetings with project beneficiaries to keep them up to date on the project's
progress.
 Maintain a record of project activities.

Figure 16. Meeting with the City Veterinary Office for the expansion of project
 HIGHLIGHTS OF IMPLEMENTATION / ACCOMPLISHMENTS

 Signing of Memorandum of Agreement

A Memorandum of Agreement, or MOA, is a written formal understanding of the parties'
agreement. It specifies the parties' obligations and commitments, as well as allocating and
minimizing each party's risks. The Northwest Samar State University and the target beneficiary
barangays-(A) Barangay Limarayon and (B) Barangay Oquendo Poblacion-understood that
each party has its own responsibilities for the project as a result of this agreed partnership. A
MOA legally documents all of the outcomes and milestones that both parties desired to achieve.

The MOA was signed by the Barangay Captain, who represented the target barangay
beneficiaries, and witnessed by the Barangay Kagawad and some community members.

A. MOA Signing between NwSSU Project Team and Brgy Limarayon represented by Brgy
Captain Hon. Joel B. Manuales
 B. MOA Signing between NwSSU Project Team and Brgy Oquendo Poblacion
represented by Brgy Captain Hon. Jaime Y. Hernandez

 Focus Group Discussion

A focus group discussion (FGD) was held as a preliminary qualitative research

method in an interactive group setting, probing perceptions, opinions, beliefs, and
attitudes for our extension project. Members of the group were allowed to talk with one
another in order to come up with a solution. The project leader ensured that the
discussion stayed on topic and did not deviate.

Based on our FGD conducted to two barangays, this is the first time that the
target beneficiaries will experience that the academe reach out the community for the
extension projects. An activity that allowed them to draw their ideal poultry farm made
them realized that even most of them already raised native chicken or go into poultry
farming in their backyards, there are technologies that they may apply to make their
poultry farming more productive.

It was also discussed that poultry farming is a great help looking at the problems
encountered in the livestock industry, specifically the African Swine Fever. Eggs and
poultry meat were recognized by the community as one of their favourite foods served
in the table due to its available nutrients.

The community promised their willingness to cooperate in this project by

attending the meetings, seminars and skills training that the Project Team will give
them.
 C. Consultation Meeting and FGD with Barangay Council
Participants
The project's target or beneficiaries of this project includes the community,
women or farmer associations in Barangay Oquendo Poblacion and Barangay
Limarayon. The community were given an initial training seminar on the introduction of
technologies in poultry farming. This was conducted by the Project Leader, Ms. Sance
J. Secondez and was assisted by the members.

The training on feed formulation has been discussed and trained with the target
beneficiaries of the community. It was emphasized during the training that the feed
sources should be established first before they will be given with the chickens to be
raised on the second phase of this project.

Training Output
Below were some of the outputs of the participants during the training seminar:

1. The participants discovered the significance of raising poultry animals. They were
taught that important factors to consider when engaging in poultry farming
included breed selection, housing, range, and management practices.
2. The participants learned the significance of egg and meat as protein sources in
the human diet.
3. They were able to identify common feedstuffs available in the community that
could be used as mixed rations for the
4. Following their hands-on training in feed formulation, the participants were
already equipped with the knowledge and skills needed to engage in poultry
farming.
5. They were able to identify the assistance that government agencies are working
on to improve the poultry industry in the Philippines.
6. Select participants learned how to put together a range net to protect birds from
predators.
7. Some farmers were instructed on proper vaccination techniques.
8. The participants were grateful that poultry raising is a simple yet profitable way to
supplement the family's income.
Pre-test and Post-test Results

The beneficiaries were evaluated both before and after the training by
administering pre- and post-tests. Pre-tests use a comprehensive assessment to track
the beneficiaries' progress over time (D). It can show a beneficiaries level of
understanding before and after instruction, even while instruction is still happening. The
resource persons were able to track the beneficiaries' development from one area to
the next and between topics by comparing pre- and post-tests. Beneficiaries in this
project meet expectations after being taught. Even when a beneficiary does not
demonstrate proficiency on a post-test, pre-tests show that participants' scores have
improved. No amount of progress was overlooked, and evaluation was not limited to a
few simple questions

Table 4: Pre-test and Post-test Results Using Paired T-test Result

Pre-test and Post-test Paired Differences t df Sig

Results Mean Std SEM 95% Confidence (2-
(Paired T-test) Dev Interval of the Diff tailed)
Lower Upper
Introduction of -1.242 .836 .236 -1.636 -.711 - 11 .000*
Technologies to Poultry
Farming
- - 6.123 6.431
Housing and Feed - 1.27623 .46235 - - - 11 .000*
Formulation
3.25126 3.48517 1.93556 8.432

Management - 1.27623 .46235 - - 11 .001*

Practices
1.56400 2.48517 .93556 5.658

The post-test scores of the participants improved, according to the table. This
also revealed that the training seminar they attended improved their skills and
knowledge of poultry farming, practices, and fundamental technologies.

After the training seminars were conducted, it was expected that the participants
improved their knowledge and skills and the application of what they have learned must
be seen on the Phase II.

The beneficiaries were evaluated both before and after the training by
administering pre- and post-tests. Pre-tests use a comprehensive assessment to track
the beneficiaries' progress over time. It can show a beneficiaries level of understanding
before and after instruction, even while instruction is still happening. The resource
persons were able to track the beneficiaries' development from one area to the next
and between topics by comparing pre- and post-tests. Beneficiaries in this project meet
expectations after being taught. Even when a beneficiary does not demonstrate
proficiency on a post-test, pre-tests show that participants' scores have improved. No
amount of progress was overlooked, and evaluation was not limited to a few simple
questions.
 D. Administrat
ion of pre-test

MONITORING AND EVALUATION INSTRUMENT

Post Training Evaluation Results

Training Materials (Mga Materyal sa Pagsasanay): 4 3 2 1

1. All training materials are relevant to the course objectives. 95 5
Ang lahat ng mga materyales sa pagsasanay ay may kaugnayan sa
mga layunin ng kurso.

2. All training materials are well prepared, organized and user-friendly. 98 2

Ang lahat ng mga materyales sa pagsasanay ay mahusay na inihanda,
organisado at madaling gamitin.

3. The contents were up-to-date, accurate and error-free. 95 5

Ang mga nilalaman ay napapanahon, tumpak at walang mali.

4. All needed training materials were complete and issued on time. 98 2

Ang lahat ng kinakailangang materyales sa pagsasanay ay kumpleto at
naibigay sa oras.

5. The hand-outs looked professional and are of high quality. 98 2

Ang mga hand-out ay mukhang propesyonal at may mataas na kalidad.

Comments: Mga Komento

________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________
Subject Matter Expert/s/Resource Speakers 4 3 2 1
Subject Matter Expert/s/Resource Speakers

1. The SME or resource speaker is knowledgeable enough. 96 4

Ang SME o resource speaker ay may sapat na kaalaman.
 2.
The SME or resource speaker showed consistency of the 97 3
content/discussion to the objectives of the program.
Ang SME o resource speaker ay nagpakita ng pagkakapare-pareho ng
nilalaman/talakayan sa mga layunin ng programa.
3. The SME or resource speaker responds to the questions of the 98 2
participants for clarification.
Ang SME o resource speaker ay tumutugon sa mga tanong ng mga
kalahok para sa paglilinaw.

4. The SME or resource speaker established positive or friendly learning 98 2

environment.
Ang SME o resource speaker ay nagtatag ng positibo o magiliw na
kapaligiran sa pag-aaral.

5. The SME or resource speaker encouraged maximum participation from 98 2

the participants.
Hinikayat ng SME o resource speaker ang maximum na partisipasyon
mula sa mga kalahok.

Comments:Mga Komento
________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________
4 3 2 1

Venue and Accommodation (Lugar at Akomodasyon)

1. The venue was well ventilated and conducive for learning. 100
Maganda ang bentilasyon ng venue at kaaya-aya para sa pag-aaral.

2. The venue was comfortable with adequate space for session activities. 100
Ang lugar ay komportable na may sapat na espasyo para sa mga
aktibidad sa session.

3. The venue/accommodation was comfortable with sanitary and hygienic 98 2

conditions.
Ang venue/accommodation ay komportable sa sanitary at hygienic na
kondisyon.

4. The venue has adequate facilities necessary for the conduct of the 91 9
course needs by the participants and these are accessible to them.

Ang lugar ay may sapat na mga pasilidad na kailangan para sa

pagsasagawa ng mga pangangailangan ng kurso ng mga kalahok at
ang mga ito ay naa-access sa kanila.

5. The meals served were nutritious, palatable, and sufficient in quantity 96 4

and quality.
Ang mga pagkaing inihain ay masustansya, masarap, at sapat sa dami
at kalidad.

Comments:Mga Komento
____________________________________________________
Over-all Evaluation: Pangkalahatang Pagsusuri 4 3 2 1
1. Generally, what is your over-all evaluation of this particular course? 97 3
Sa pangkalahatan, ano ang iyong pangkalahatang pagsusuri sa
partikular na kursong ito?

Given the questions below, please provide your honest response:

Sa mga tanong sa ibaba, mangyaring ibigay ang iyong tapat na tugon:

1. What is the most valuable lesson you have learned from this course?
Ano ang pinakamahalagang aral na natutunan mo sa kursong ito?
Breed selection is one of the most important criteria in poultry raising.

2. How will this learning help you with your work?

Paano makatutulong ang pag-aaral na ito sa iyong trabaho?
This will serve as my guide.

3. What further recommendations can you suggest for the improvement of this training?
Anong mga karagdagang rekomendasyon ang maaari mong imungkahi para sa pagpapabuti ng
pagsasanay na ito?
Dispersal of chickens to community in order to apply what we have learned.

According
. to the findings, 97 percent of the participants in general gained knowledge and skills that
they will use when engaging in poultry farming

Process of Identification of Partner Communities

1. Community visits and needs assessment
 2. Initial meeting or consultation meeting with the barangay captain for possible
partnerships
3. MOA Signing

Process of Conducting Monitoring and Evaluation

The monitoring and evaluation of the project was done before, during and after the completion of
the project

 Ex-ante/ before implementation: Identification of problem that the project will aim to
alleviate and assessment of the area within which the project will be implemented.

 During implementation: make periodic checks or field evaluation

 Ex-post or after completion: demonstrate that the objectives of the project that have been
achieved as planned

E. Community visit

IMPLEMENTATION CHECKLIST

RAISING FREE-RANGE NATIVE CHICKEN COMPLEMENTED UNDER COCNUT

FARMING SYSTEM AT NWSSU AGRICULTURAL AREA

Ex-ante Implementation

Month Things To Do Specifications Remarks

1 Prepare the Project Proposal (approved), Special Order Done
and Project/Training Design
FGD/ Project Team meeting Done
1-3 Courtesy Call Done
Requisition supplies and materials Done
Prepare and print training materials Done
Identify target barangay and participants and MOA Done
Signing
1-3 Confirm participants Done
Check training kits, materials and supplies Done
Check equipment Laptop, projector, Done
etc...
Check venue and its set-up Done
During Project Implementation

Month Things To Do Specifications Remarks

4 Check facilitator Done
Check presentations Done
4-9 Training Seminar Done
Conduct opening ceremonies Done
Conduct Pre-Test Done
Introduce facilitator/s Done
Document the activities N/A
Print certificates Done
Conduct Post-test and Post Training Done
Evaluation
Conduct closing ceremonies Done
Issue certificate and participant directory Done
Safe keep equipment, materials, supplies Done

Post Implementation

Month Things To Do Specifications Remarks

10-12 Summarize and file Training Outputs Done
Prepare Terminal Report Done

Equipment and or Materials

Okay Before Okay After
Event Event Equipment/Material
Checked Checked Laptop, projector, speaker, training materials

Monitoring and Evaluation Framework

Objectives Activities Indicators Means of Assumptions

verification
To establish a Breeds and stocks selection, Parent Site visit Established range and
demonstration site housing establishment, stocks site for raising the
of free range and beddings and litter acquisition poultry species
native chicken preparation, cleaning and
complemented disinfecting the area.
under coconut
farming system
To evaluate the Measuring body weight and Body weight Egg Sustainable feeding
growth and laying monitoring of egg and egg production supply
performance of free production and hatching
 range native chicken production percentage rate

To evaluate the cost Monitor the income and Increasing Income Stable egg production
and return analysis expenses production Statement
of free range native
chicken production

To disseminate and Focus Group discussion Conduct of Post training Participants’

introduce the Training needs assessment Training evaluation commitment
technologies Pre test seminar
(technical and basic Post test
management skills)
to our farmers in
order for them to
recognize the
potential of native
chicken in the
locality

OTHER COMMENTS OF THE PARTICIPANTS:

Through this training, participants learned how to properly manage and construct a proper
poultry house, including their feeds.

This training assisted participants in deciding how many chickens to raise.

The training was well received by the participants.

SUMMARY AND CONCLUSION

This extension project, titled "Raising of Free-Range Native Chicken Complemented

Under Coconut Farming System," met all of its objectives: to establish a demonstration site of
free range native chicken complemented under coconut farming system; to evaluate the growth
and laying performance of free range native chicken; to evaluate the cost and return analysis of
free range native chicken production; and to disseminate and introduce the technologies
(technical and management).

The Project Team is made up of faculty members from the College of Arts and Sciences,
now known as the College of Criminal Justice and Sciences, the College of Agriculture and
Technology, and the College of Education. Despite of the hectic schedule of the faculty
members, the time for extension works still has been given with opportunity that the
technologies present in the locality will be introduced to the community beneficiaries. Teamwork
and cooperation are always required for the success of any extension project.

Northwest Samar State University's extension project focused on identifying native

chicken as a potential source of livelihood in the area. At the same time, poultry farmers should
consider the following factors before embarking on this type of farming. The assistance of
barangay captains, as well as the cooperation of student participants and community members,
has been acknowledged as critical to the project's success.

Based on the findings of this project, it was rated as outstanding by the participants and
the rest was rated by the participants as very satisfactory. This only indicates that the activity
was well-implemented by the extension agents, with an overall rating of 97 percent. Overall, the
project was a success due to the active participation and involvement of the community.

As a result, this extension project concludes that raising free-range native chickens
supplemented by a coconut farming system is beneficial to the community. This coconut-animal
production system benefits coconut production and productivity, and the integrated system
generates more income. Coconut farmers can boost their profits while lowering their financial
risks by implementing an integrated farming system that includes animals or intercrops. The
general rule in coconut-animal production systems is to plant the coconut component at the
traditional spacing and adjust the animal stocking rate to the available space. The animal
component is frequently regarded as a supplement (particularly in terms of weed control and the
generation of additional income) to the coconut enterprise, which takes precedence.

IMPLICATIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

This extension project simply implied that a multi-commodity farming system provides

farmers with more benefits than a mono-cropping system. However, the commodity mix must fit
into the particular farmer’s capability, resources and needs, as well as the social, economic and
environmental forces around the farmer.

The project's community beneficiaries are very excited for Phase II. The application of
what they have been trained and experienced is their weapon, and regardless of whether the
pandemic continues, the source of family income will be increased.

The Project Team is confident that the initial steps taken through the initiatives of
Northwest Samar State University and the Philippine Coconut Authority will encourage our
beneficiaries to continue working together, particularly in the second phase of this project.
 Despite the project's high mortality rate due to uncontrollable factors such as floods,
typhoons, strong winds, and sudden temperature changes, the projected income statement is
positive .The parent stocks chicken will be transferred to the assigned location after the NWSSU
Agricultural area is built and fenced, ensuring that the birds are safe and protected from theft
and predators. If 300 heads of chicks are sufficient for dispersal on the target two (2) beneficiary
barangays, it is recommended that the parent stocks be turned over to the University IGP
premises to prepare these animals for transfer in the university's agricultural assigned area as
part of the demo farm.

The project Team recommended that Phase II of this project focus on the actual hands-
on and application of the skills learned by the poultry farmers, based on the positive results of
this extension project.

SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS AND EVIDENCES

The output for feed formulation has been actively done by the participants

Planning of the Project Team

Focused Group Discussions together with the target community

beneficiaries
 The
conduct of the Training Needs Assessment prior the training seminar

Message from the Project Leader during the seminar

Actual training on feed formulation

 Testimony and impression of the participants

Giving of certificates to the participants

Happy and grateful participants showing their certificates

References:

AVANTE, D.C., 1989. The Performance of the Philippine Native Chicken and other Breeds for
Eggs and Meat in the Philippines. Food and Fertilizer Technology Center Extension Bulletin No.
290. Pp. 11-14.

BAS. 2004b.Chicken industry performance report, January-December2003. Livestock and

Poultry Statistics Division, BAS, Department of Agriculture, June 2004 (available at
http://www.bas.gov.ph/download_now.php?id=62)

Bureau of Agricultural Statistics (BAS). 1987. Backyard Livestock and Poultry Survey:
Manual of Operations. Department of Agriculture. Diliman, Quezon City. 2005. Supply and
Utilization Accounts. Department of Agriculture. Diliman, Quezon City. 2006a. Chicken Industry
Performance Report, January-December 2005. Livestock and Poultry Statistics Division, BAS,
Department of Agriculture, May 2006

CASTELLA, C., EGUIENTA, Y., C. MARTIN, P. LECOMTE, O. HUSSON (2002). Crop-

livestock interactions in northern Vietnam: Issues, diversity of farmers' responses, and
alternatives for sustainable integration of animals in upland agricultural systems.
International Rice Research Institute (IRRI), DAPO 7777, Metro Manila, Philippines.

CHOPRAKARN, K., S. THAMMABUTR, and W. SURIYACHANTRATONG (1983). Problems

and Approach Relating to Improving of Thai Indigenous Chickens.
In Proceedings of the First Seminar on Thai Indigenous Chickens, KhonKaen, Thailand
Northeastern Regional Office of Agriculture.in the 21st (Vol. 4, p. 60â).

CONROY, C. 2004. “Livestock Sector Growth and Poverty, with Particular Reference to India”.
Natural Resource Institute

DELGADO, C., M. ROSEGRANT, H. STEIFELD, S. EHUI and C. COURBOIS. 1999.

“Livestock to 2020 – The Next Food Revolution.” Food, Agriculture and Environment Discussion
Paper 28. IFPRI/FAO/ILRI.

Department of Agriculture and National Agricultural and Fishery Council (DA & NAFC).
2002a. Broiler Industry Master Plan. Quezon City, Philippines, June 2002

DEVENDRA, C. and C.C. SEVILLA (2002) Availability and use of feed resources in crop-
animal systems in Asia.,: Agricultural Systems, 71: 59-73.

LAMBIO, A.L. 2005. “The Future Prospects for Smallholder Native Chicken Producers in the
Philippines”. Elpidio Quirino Professorial Chair Lecture.24 June 2005. ADSC Lecture Hall,
UPLB-CA.

LANDES, M., S. PERSAND, and J. DYCK. 2004. “India’s Poultry Sector: Development and
Prospects. ERS, USDA, Agricultural and Trade Report WRS-04-03.

PCARRD. 2003. “The Philippine Native Chickens.” In Greenfields Magazine September 2003. p
10-11.

PINOY FARMER 2008.Native Chicken Production in the Philippines

REYNOLDS, S. 1997. Integration of Animal Production in Coconut Plantations.

AGP.FAO. Rome, Italy.

TAHA, F.A. 2003. “The Poultry Sector in Middle-Income Countries and its Feed Requirements:
The Case of Egypt”. Outlook Report No. WRS03-02. Economic Research Service, USDA.
 TERMINAL REPORT OF EXTENSION PROJECT
“RAISING FREE-RANGE NATIVE CHICKEN COMPLEMENTED UNDER COCONUT
FARMING SYSTEM AT NWSSU AGRICULTURAL AREA”

Prepared by:

SANCE J. SECONDEZ, MSc ARMANDO A. ALVIOLA, PhD

Project Leader Member

VERCELLE A. DOCDOC, EdD JULIE ANN D. EDRAGA, EdD

Member Member

REXOR H. MAGBUTAY, MAEd PHIL HAROLD MERCURIO, MSc

Member Member

Noted:

LORELIE F. TANGARAN, DM ARMANDO A. ALVIOLA, PhD JANNEL C. ALVIOLA, PhD

Dean, CAT Dean, CCJS Dean, CoEd

Recommending Approval:

CATHERINE B. RODRIGUEZ, DALT RIZ RUPERT ORTIZ, PhD

Director, Extension Services VP, REEA

Approved:
BENJAMIN L. PECAYO, EdD
University President