Complaint
Complaint
Mia Castañeda
Plaintiff
THE PARTIES
Page 1 of 15
counsel’s address at the VICA Law Office, 3rd Floor,
The Manor Hotel, Camp John Hay, Baguio City. 2.
Defendant Primo Guevarra is of legal age, single, and
a resident of #51, Outlook Drive, Baguio City, where he
may be served court processes and other pertinent
documents.
Page 2 of 15
trees, and a stable for horses was earlier built by
her ancestors.
7. Likewise attached are the separate Tax Declarations
of the House built thereon and the stable for
horses, hereto attached as “ANNEX D” and
“ANNEX E”, respectively.
8. Plaintiff’s family, including her ascendants, has been
living in the said house and occupying the same
land for a quite a time, and thus, they were able
to secure a certificate of title in their favor, which
is registered under her name.
9. Due to the exigencies of the nature of the Plaintiff’s
profession, they moved to Quezon City sometime
around 2002.
10. Ever since they moved to Quezon City, the house
built thereon has served as a vacation house
whenever the Plaintiff’s family visited Baguio City
during the summer season of the year.
11. Once every quarter of the year, Plaintiff employs
some utility workers to do a regular cleaning and
maintenance of the house.
12. Sometime around early 2019, seeing a great
potential for investment, she decided to start a bed
and breakfast hotel business, utilizing the said
house, renovating the same, and building a spa
services house within the property as well.
13. In January 2020, Plaintiff has engaged the services
of JMM Contractors, Inc., a contractor engaged in
the business of building and constructions. Before
signing the engagement contract, Plaintiff and
Page 3 of 15
Bogart Atihao, the chief engineer of JMM, went to
the location of the property for preliminary
observations. Soon thereafter, Plaintiff and JMM
discussed the plans and details of the renovation
and construction.
14. On March 21, 2020, the project and construction
plan has been finalized. Immediately on the same
day, some personnel of the said contractor went to
the said property to do an onsite survey for
preliminary observations.
15. When the personnel went to the said property, they
saw that there was another structure built thereon,
near the stable for horses, made of wood, and saw
a number of construction workers inside therein.
16. The personnel also observed that the construction
workers were cutting the pine trees serving as a
boundary between Plaintiff’s and Defendant’s
respective lots.
17. Mr. Atihao immediately informed the Plaintiff that
day that they cannot start excavation since a
dwelling was built on the spot where they intended
to do excavate. He also informed Plaintiff that there
were construction workers who were cutting trees.
18. On July 18, 2020, when travel restrictions were
relatively relaxed, Plaintiff was able to personally
travel to Baguio City to witness the said structures
in her property, to which she has personally
witnessed the same.
19. During the time that Plaintiff went to her property,
she saw that the construction workers were cutting
Page 4 of 15
the nearby Pine trees within the boundaries of her
property, totaling to more or less 15 pine trees. 20.
Aggrieved, Plaintiff confronted the said construction
workers and asked who employed them to cut the
trees. The construction workers pointed out that it was
Defendant who employed their services to cut the said
trees, who lived in the adjacent lot. 21. Plaintiff also
inquired why the construction workers constructed their
dwelling in the stable for horses. The construction
workers responded that it was Defendant who
specifically directed them to construct shelter therein,
saying that the said property is owned by him.
22. On that same date, Plaintiff went to the office of the
Barangay Captain of Camp John Hay to inform the
encroachment of the property by the Defendant, by
cutting trees located thereon and ordering &
misrepresenting to the construction workers that
the land was his.
23. On July 20, 2020, the Barangay Captain sent a
letter to the Defendant ordering him to appear
before him to explain his presence in the said
parcel of land.
24. The letter that was sent out appeared to be futile
as the Defendant did not heed to such order.
However, the cutting of trees and the occupation of
the construction workers persisted in the property.
25. On July 22, Plaintiff, together with Barangay
Captain Manuel de la Cruz, went to the said
property so that the latter can personally order the
Page 5 of 15
stoppage of the cutting of the trees, and to inform
the construction workers that the said property was
indeed owned by the Plaintiff, and not by the
Defendant, and that they needed to relocate their
dwelling.
26. The construction workers, in response, were
insistent that they were just acting upon the orders
of Defendant, who, according to one of the
workers, insisted that the land was his, and
ordered them to even improve the structure of
their dwelling.
27. At that point in time, around 2 more pine trees were
cut down, and one was about to be cut, if not for
the arrival of the Plaintiff and the Barangay
Captain.
28. On September 30, 2020, Plaintiff, through counsel,
sent a Formal Demand Letter to vacate the
premises encroached by Defendant through stealth
and a fraudulent strategy of representing that the
land was his, and the cutting of trees located
thereon, without the consent and permission of the
Plaintiff, attached hereto as “ANNEX F” and made
integral part hereto.
29. As of this writing, Defendant did not heed the call
as asserted in the Demand letter.
30. Likewise, around 30 pine trees are now additionally
cut, without any apparent intent of the Defendant
to stop or desist, as manifested by the continuous
presence of the construction workers, including
their tools and materials.
31. Due to the urgency of the situation, and the motion
of the Plaintiff before this Court for the issuance of
Page 6 of 15
preliminary injunctive relief, Plaintiff was not able
to avail of the Barangay Conciliation proceedings
before the Barangay anymore.
Demand for
Reasonable Rents
Facts in support of
the Motion for the
Issuance of a
Preliminary
Mandatory and
Prohibitory
Page 7 of 15
Injunction and/or
Temporary
Restraining Order
Page 8 of 15
40. The Plaintiff is entitled to the relief demanded, and
the whole of such relief consists in restraining the
commission perpetually.
41. The continuance of the acts of the Defendant
complained of during the litigation would probably
work injustice to the Plaintiff.
42. Plaintiff is ready and willing to file a bond executed
to the enjoined defendant, in an amount to be fixed
by the court, to the effect that the Plaintiff will pay
to such party all damages which the latter may
sustain by reason of the injunction or temporary
restraining order if the court should finally decide
that the applicant was not entitled thereto.
Page 9 of 15
property during their first visit, and that they only
came to know of defendant’s unlawful possession
over the land on March 21, 2020 hereby attached
as “ANNEX H” and made integral part hereto;
46. The TRANSFER CERTIFICATE OF TITLE NO.
98765 is hereby offered to prove that the plaintiff,
as the registered owner of the parcel of land, has
the right to possess to the exclusion of the
Defendant who currently occupies the same
illegally;
47. The SURVEY PLAN is hereby offered to prove the
meets and bounds of the property covered by the
aforementioned title registered under the name of
the Plaintiff, and that the portion being occupied by
the Defendant is within the boundaries of the
property of the Plaintiff;
48. The TAX DECLARATION NO. 01-0088-000718 is
being offered as evidence to prove that the
ancestral home located within the premises of the
property is registered under the name of the
Plaintiff and that the plaintiff has prior possession
of the subject property by exercising her rights
over the same;
49. The TAX DECLARATION NO. 01-00088-000989 is
hereby offered to prove that the Plaintiff is the
owner and rightful possessor of the stable and that
occupation of the same by the construction
workers hired by the Defendant is illegal;
50. The DEMAND LETTER DATED SEPTEMBER 30,
2020 is hereby being offered to prove that the
Page 10 of 15
Plaintiff formally demanded that the Defendant
vacate the subject property;
51. The following OFFICIAL RECEIPTS FROM THE
CITY TREASURER OF BAGUIO is hereby offered
to prove that the plaintiff is not remiss on her
obligation to pay real property taxes over her
subject properties, hereto attached as “ANNEX I,”
“ANNEX J” and “ANNEX K”, respectively:
i. OR No. 8637474 for the payment of real
property taxes over the land;
ii. OR No. 8637475 for the payment of real
property taxes over the building erected
thereon; and
iii. OR No. 8637476 for the payment of real
property taxes over the stable erected
thereon.
PRAYER
Page 11 of 15
termination of the case, or until the
Defendant vacates the property, whichever
comes first, representing damages in the form of
reasonable rents for the occupation of the former
over the latter’s property, and;
4. Ordering the Defendant to pay the sum of Seventy
Five Thousand Pesos (Php 75,000)
representing Attorney’s fees.
By:
Page 12 of 15
Atty. Elijah Roland A.
Cosalan Roll of Attorneys No.
321456
IBP Lifetime Membership No. 22433 PTR
No. 222333/ 09-02-2020, Baguio City
MCLE Compliance (on process)
Page 13 of 15
VERIFICATION AND CERTIFICATION AGAINST
FORUM-SHOPPING
I, MIA CASTAÑEDA, of legal age, Filipino, single, and a
resident of the Philippines, after having been duly sworn to in
accordance with law hereby depose and state that:
Page 14 of 15
mia castaneda
MIA CASTAÑEDA
Affiant
Kid K. Ulafu
Notary Public for the City of Baguio
Until 2022
Roll of Attorney No. 111222
IBP Lifetime No. 312451
PTR No. 22314124/ 08-02-2020, Baguio City
MCLE Compliance No.214521
Kulafu Law
Room 314, Laperal Building, Session Road
Baguio City
Tel. No. 610-7578
Page 15 of 15
Judicial Form No. 109-D (Revised 2009)
3
0
0
0
0
0
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
0
0
0
9
Land Registration
0
"ANNEX A"
Authority
REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES
Transfer
Certificate of Title
OWNER’S DUPLICATE OWNER’S DUPLICATE OWNER’S
Case No.: Record No.: 0001 Case No. 1 Orig. Reg. Date: 06-05-1990
Decree No.: 0001
Original RD: Baguio City OCT No.: OCT-0001
Volume No.: A-1 Page No.: 001
Original Owner:
This certificate is a transfer from TRANSFER CERTIFICATE OF TITLE
000001 which is/are cancelled by virtue hereof in so far as the
above-described land is concerned.
"ANNEX B"
"ANNEX C"
"ANNEX D"
"ANNEX E"
"ANNEX F"
September 30,
2020
Mr. Guevarra:
Greetings!
This letter is sent in relation to the concern of our client, Ms. Mia
Castañeda, pertaining to your illegal encroachment of her property located at
#52 Outlook Drive, Baguio City.
We also urge you to cease and desist from cutting the pine trees
located within her property. Take note that the decision on how the trees
shall be utilized exclusively belongs to her, being the rightful owner of the
land where it stands.
Your failure to act upon this matter on or before the said date shall be
construed as an illegal refusal on your part, which shall be the basis for filing
the appropriate legal case/s against you.
Mia Castaneda
Plaintiff,
Civil Case No. ______
- versus -
For: Ejectment
(Forcible Entry)
with Damages
Primo Guevarra
Respondent
x ---------------------------------------- x
1
PRELIMINARY STATEMENT
AFFIDAVIT PROPER
Q5: Ms. Witness, you claimed earlier that you are the owner
of the property-in-dispute which has been allegedly
encroached upon. What document do you have with you
which would prove your claim of ownership over the
said property-in-dispute?
A: Atty., I have with me the title of the property. It says here
that the property is covered by TCT No. 98765 and the
title is in my name po which is Mia Castaneda.
2
A: The lot has an area of 980 square meter property and is
located at Outlook Drive, Baguio City. Erected on the
land is our ancestral summer house and it is surrounded
by many pine trees. There also is an old stable for
horses located on the property, Atty.
Q12: Upon seeing your property, what did you find out?
3
A: I found out that what my contractors were saying was
true. There are indeed construction workers and they
converted my stable into their barracks. So I went to
confront them and they told me that they were
employed by Mr. Primo.
4
A: Yes. The receiving copy is with me dated July 20, 2020.
Q24: Madam Witness, when was the last time you saw your
property prior to this day?
A: Last January 2020 po, Atty.
5
BAGUIO CITY; October 29, 2020.
mia castaneda
Mia Castaneda
Affiant
6
SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO before me, this 29th
day of October, 2020 in Baguio City by MIA CASTAÑEDA
exhibiting as competent proof of identity her Philippine
Passport, with number ASS2214452 valid until December
2021.
Kid K. Ulafu
Notary Public for the City of Baguio
Until 2022
Roll of Attorney No. 111222
IBP Lifetime No. 312451
PTR No. 22314124/ 08-02-2020, Baguio City
MCLE Compliance No.214521
Kulafu Law
Room 314, Laperal Building, Session Road
Baguio City
Tel. No. 610-7578
Mia Castaneda
Plaintiff,
Civil Case No. ______
- versus -
For: Ejectment
(Forcible Entry)
with Damages
Primo Guevarra
Respondent
x ---------------------------------------- x
PRELIMINARY STATEMENT
1
answering their questions fully conscious that I do so
under oath and may face criminal liability for false
testimony and perjury.
AFFIDAVIT PROPER
2
A: Yes, we did Atty. Ms. Mia Castaneda brought us there for
us to have an idea of her desired outcome.
Q10: While you were there, who were occupying the property
she owns?
A: None, Atty. No one was residing in the old house and it
was confirmed by Ms. Castaneda. Even the stable was
empty.
Q13: After accepting the project, did you start right away? A:
No Atty. She was still raising funds at that time. She said
that she will just give her go signal before we can go to the
property.
Q18: How many pine trees were already taken down when
you arrived?
A: More or less 5 pine trees, Atty.
3
A: I thought that the construction workers were hired by Ms.
Mia so I talked to them to clear things out. However, it
appears that it was not Ms. Mia who hired them, but one
Mr. Primo Guevarra.
Q20: After your conversation with the workers, what did you
do next?
A: I immediately called Ms. Mia and told her what exactly
happened: that we cannot proceed with the excavation
since the stable was the barracks of construction
workers employed by Guevarra, and that they have
already taken down 5 pine trees.
bogart atihao
Bogart Atihao
Affiant
5
SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO before me, this 29th
day of October, 2020 in Baguio City by BOGART ATIHAO
exhibiting as competent proof of identity her Philippine
Passport, with number ASS2214453 valid until December
2021.
Kid K. Ulafu
Notary Public for the City of Baguio
Until 2022
Roll of Attorney No. 111222
IBP Lifetime No. 312451
PTR No. 22314124/ 08-02-2020, Baguio City
MCLE Compliance No.214521
Kulafu Law
Room 314, Laperal Building, Session Road
Baguio City
Tel. No. 610-7578
6
"ANNEX I"
OFFICIAL RECEIPT
Republic of the Philippines
City of Baguio
OFFICE OF THE CITY TREASURER
PAYOR
01/20/2020 BAG
8637474 No. FUND AND
MIA CASTANEDA
NATURE OF 2940.00
COLLECTION
RP Tax
TD No. TOTAL
01-00088-003 AMOUNT
310
ACCOUNT 2940.00
CODE
AMOUNT IN WORDS
only
• Cash
• Check
• Money Order
two thousand nine
hundred forty pesos
Collecting Officer
NOTE: Write the number and date of this receipt on the back of the treasury warrant, check, or money order received.
"ANNEX J"
OFFICIAL RECEIPT
RP Tax
TD No. TOTAL
01-0088-0007 AMOUNT
18
ACCOUNT 822.50
CODE
AMOUNT IN WORDS
and 50/100
• Cash
• Check
• Money Order
eight hundred
twenty-two pesos
Collecting Officer
NOTE: Write the number and date of this receipt on the back of the treasury warrant, check, or money order received.
"ANNEX K"
OFFICIAL RECEIPT
PAYOR
01/20/2020 BAG
8637476 No. FUND AND
MIA CASTANEDA
NATURE OF 01-00088-000
COLLECTION
989
ACCOUNT
RP Tax CODE
TD No.
111.25 111.25
TOTAL
AMOUNT
AMOUNT IN WORDS
and 25/100
• Cash
• Check
• Money Order
eight hundred
twenty-two pesos
Collecting Officer
NOTE: Write the number and date of this receipt on the back of the treasury warrant, check, or money order received.
2 lowest 2 4 6 8 10
Completeness of Form
TOTAL