Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 11 views

    Lab Report Requirement and Assessment Critieria

    Uploaded by

    Lee Gilbert
    The document provides guidelines for submitting a laboratory report, including required sections and evaluation criteria. It states that the report should include a cover page, index, description of procedures, test data and analysis, discussion, and conclusion. It also outlines a marking scheme that awards points for experimental records (20%), data analysis (30%), discussion and conclusion (30%), and presentation (20%). Descriptors are given for excelling in each category. Proper formatting, organization, and referencing are expected.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Lab Report Requirement and Assessment Critieria

    Uploaded by

    Lee Gilbert
    11 views3 pages
    The document provides guidelines for submitting a laboratory report, including required sections and evaluation criteria. It states that the report should include a cover page, index, description of procedures, test data and analysis, discussion, and conclusion. It also outlines a marking scheme that awards points for experimental records (20%), data analysis (30%), discussion and conclusion (30%), and presentation (20%). Descriptors are given for excelling in each category. Proper formatting, organization, and referencing are expected.

    Original Description:

    Lab Report Requirement

    Original Title

    Lab Report Requirement and Assessment Critieria (1)

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    The document provides guidelines for submitting a laboratory report, including required sections and evaluation criteria. It states that the report should include a cover page, index, description of procedures, test data and analysis, discussion, and conclusion. It also outlines a marking scheme that awards points for experimental records (20%), data analysis (30%), discussion and conclusion (30%), and presentation (20%). Descriptors are given for excelling in each category. Proper formatting, organization, and referencing are expected.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    11 views3 pages

    Lab Report Requirement and Assessment Critieria

    Uploaded by

    Lee Gilbert
    The document provides guidelines for submitting a laboratory report, including required sections and evaluation criteria. It states that the report should include a cover page, index, description of procedures, test data and analysis, discussion, and conclusion. It also outlines a marking scheme that awards points for experimental records (20%), data analysis (30%), discussion and conclusion (30%), and presentation (20%). Descriptors are given for excelling in each category. Proper formatting, organization, and referencing are expected.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    of 3

    1 Report

    Each group shall prepare and submit a laboratory report with the following
    contents:
    (a) A cover page (a template is attached)
    (b) An index showing the sections, subsections and page numbers
    (c) Experimental setup and procedures
     A brief description of the experimental setup and test procedures
    with annotated photos/diagrams
    (d) Data and analysis
     The test data, graphs and calculations in the Worksheets
    properly completed and indexed.
     Additional calculations, graphs, charts, diagrams, etc. where
    necessary, to analyze the data.
     Annotated photos/diagrams, where necessary, showing the test
    results or observations.
    (e) Discussion
    (f) Conclusion and Recommendations

    2 Marking Scheme
    Your performance will be assessed with the following marking scheme:
    (a) Quality of the experimental record (20%)
     The experimental setup is clearly illustrated with annotated
    diagrams/photos with comprehensive descriptions.
     Any deviations in the setup and procedures from that specified in the
    Instructions are properly recorded.
     All required data are properly taken and recorded using appropriate
    units and accuracy, and are presented clearly and neatly.
     Observations, if any, are clearly described and, where appropriate,
    with the aides of annotated diagrams/photos with salient results
    highlighted.
    (b) Data analysis (30%)
     The experimental data are appropriately analyzed and presented in
    appropriate manners, e.g. tables, charts, graph, ratios, etc., to
    facilitate interpretation or comparison.
     Appropriate theories are adopted and properly presented.
     The working of the calculations, procedures in evaluation and
    methodology of analysis are presented logically and in
    comprehensible manner.
    (c) Discussion, conclusion and recommendation (30%)
     The results and/or observations are appropriately interpreted and
    evaluated.
     Relevant theories are applied to discuss the validity or implications
    of the results and/or observations.
     The experimental setup and procedures are reviewed with proposal
    for improvements.
     Conclusion and recommendations are drawn from the discussion
    and presented in a precise and concise manner.
    (d) Report presentation (20%)
     The report is presented in good English, and properly organized and
    structured.
     All the tables, graphs, charts, diagrams, photos, etc. are properly
    numbered and are referred to in the text.
     Relevant literatures are properly referenced.
     Appropriate and consistent format is applied throughout the report,
    including, font style, font size, line spacing, margin, paper size,
    headings, pagination, etc.
     
     
    Hong Kong Institute of Vocational Education (Morrison Hill)
    Department of Construction
    Laboratory Report

    Experiment Title:
    Date:
    Time:
    Programme/Class:

    Reported by:
    Student Name Student Number Contribution Signed by
    (Note 1) (Note 2) the student
    (Note 3)

    Total:
    Notes:
    1. The number of team members should not be more than 6 or less than 4; unless otherwise approved by the
    Lecturer, marks will be deducted for large and small teams.
    2. Estimate the percentage of contribution you have made to the laboratory work and report. The total sum of
    the percentages of all members should be equal to 100%.
    3. You have to signify your agreement by signing on this form.

    Marks (to be filled in by the Lecturer)


    Description Weighting Score
    (a) Quality of the experimental record 20%
    (b) Data analysis 30%
    (c) Discussion, conclusion and recommendations 30%
    (d) Report presentation 20%
    Total: 100%

    You might also like