Human Rights Udhr Class Assignment

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 2

The Protection of Human Rights Act, 1993 defines Human Rights as: “human

rights” means the rights relating to life, liberty, equality and dignity of the
individual guaranteed by the Constitution or embodied in the International
Covenants and enforceable by courts in India”.

The Human Rights in India originated long time ago. It can easily be recognized
from the principles of Buddhism, Jainism. Hindu religious books and religious
texts like Gita, Vedas, Arthasatra and Dharmashstra also contained provisions
of human rights. Muslim rulers like Akbar and Jahangir were also very much
appreciated for his regard for rights and justice. During the early British era, the
people suffered a great violation of several rights and this led to the birth of
modern Human Rights jurisprudence in India.

On January 24, 1947, Constituent Assembly voted to form an advisory


committee on Fundamental Rights with Sardar Patel as the Chairman. Drafted
list of rights were prepared by Dr. B. R. Ambedkar, B. N. Rau, K. T. Shah,
Harman Singh, K. M. Musnshi and the Congress expert committee. Although
there were few amendments proposed, there was almost no disagreement on
the principles incorporated. The rights in the Universal Declaration of Human
Rights were almost completely covered in the Indian Constitution either in
Fundamental Rights or Directive Principles of State Policy. Nineteen
fundamental rights were covered in Motilal Nehru Committee Report, 1928 out
of which ten appear in the Fundamental Rights whereas three of them appear as
Fundamental Duties.

India had signed the Universal Declaration on Human Rights January 01, 1942.
Part III of the Constitution India ‘also referred as magna carta’ contains the
Fundamental rights. These are the rights which are directly enforceable against
the state in case of any violation. Article 13(2) prohibits state from making any
law in violation of the Fundamental Rights. It always provides that if a part of
law made is against the Fundamental Rights, that part would be declared as
void. If the void part cannot be separated from the main act, the whole act may
be declared as void.

In the case of Keshvanand Bharti v. State of Kerela, the apex court observed:
“The Universal Declaration of Human Rights may not be a legally binding
instrument but it shows how India understood the nature of human rights at the
time the Constitution was adopted.”

In the case of Chairman, Railway Board & Ors. v. Chandrima Das & Ors., it was
observed that UDHR has been recognized as Model code of conduct adopted by
United Nations General Assembly. The principles may have to be read if needed
in domestic jurisprudence.

From a deep study of the Part III and Part IV of the Indian Constitution, it is
easily evident that almost all of the rights provided in UDHR (Universal
Declaration on Human Rights) are covered in these two parts.

You might also like