MNS105204
MNS105204
MNS105204
I. Introduction.................................................................................................... 5
3
quality of education from different perspectives/perspectives: students, parents,
lecturers, and employers. In most of the components of the model (empathy,
responsiveness, trust, tangible means, service capacity), students' expectations are
higher than what they get.
The difference between perception and expectation appears in two components
including tangible means and service capacity. Tran Xuan Kien studied the factors
affecting the satisfaction of 260 students at Thai Nguyen University of Economics
and Business Administration. Nguyen Thi Tham (2010) questioned students at the
University of Natural Sciences - Vietnam National University about their
satisfaction with training activities. Student satisfaction is determined by the
following components, in order of decreasing influence, according to the regression
analysis' findings: first, the training program's appropriateness and responsiveness,
then the training program itself. The teachers' competence and devotion, the general
abilities that students acquire after finishing the course, the school's response, and,
finally, the learning equipment and conditions.
As a result, this survey offers readers with an overview of the factors that impact
student satisfaction with the course, which may be used to improve future courses.
The strategy is based on the administration of a brief questionnaire to all students
who have taken an International School course. The question system goes into
further depth, focusing on teacher assessments, study materials, and tests.
4
Two research questions which should be answered are:
1. Does the outcome of the evaluation assist the student in improving his or her
academic performance?
2. How satisfied are you with the course material in terms of meeting the
knowledge, attitude, and skill objectives?
5
The findings of the poll would only be utilized for internal research. The data you
submit will be kept absolutely private.
Please contact the information below if you have questionaires or comments:
• Researcher: Nguyen Tung Lan_19071396
• Phone Number: 0389665999
• E-mail Address: [email protected]
II. General information
1. How old are you?
A. 19 years old
B. 20 years old
C. 21 years old
D. 22 years old
E. Over 22 years old
2. What year are you a collage student?
A. First year
B. Second year
C. Third year
D. Forth year
a. Others( fifth year or postgraduate)
3. What is your major? (Write down your answer)
.....................................................................................................................................
4. What is your hometown?...............................................................................
5. Are you religious?
A. Yes
B. No
6. What is your gender?
6
A. Male
B. Female
7.What is your subject status?
A.This is the first time you enter the course.
B.Because you have failed the exam before, you enter the course again.
C.You passed the course with a bad score so you enter the course again to improve
your score.
III. Evaluating satisfaction of the course
1. Does instructor apply diverse and effective the teaching methods?
a. Yes b. No
1. What sources of learning materials that you feel are the most useful and
efficient?
a. School library
b. Provivded by instructor
c. Internet
d. Others
2. How do you evaluate the support of library resources?
a. Very unsatisfied b. Unsatisfied c. Normal d. Satisfied e. Very satisfied
3. How do you agree the support of IT resources?
a. Very agree b. Agree c. Normal d. Disagree e. Very disagree
4. Which language does the instructor use to deliver the lecture content?
(You can choose more than 1 answer if necessary)
Vietnamese
English
Korean
Japanese
Germany
7
5. Do the facilities in classroom support well to the course? (Please skip this
question if you enter online class)
a. Yes b. No
6. Does the method of evaluation correctly represent the student's
knowledge and abilities?
a. Yes b. No
7. How do you evaluate the assessment result help student improve
academic performance?
a. Very unsatisfied b. Unsatisfied c. Normal d. Satisfied e. Very satisfied
8. How is your satisfaction level with course content that can meet the
objectives of knowledge, attitudes and skills?
a. Very unsatisfied b. Unsatisfied c. Normal d. Satisfied e. Very satisfied
9. What is your general opinion about this course?
……………………………………………………………………………………
2. Contact information
It is useful information for us to contact to you
1. Your Telephone Number
...............................................................................................................................
2. Your E-mail
...............................................................................................................................
3. Link Facebook or Instagram
………………………………………………………………………………….
4. Your recommends
...............................................................................................................................
8
1. The google form is attached below. Please access the link for a more detailed
look at this survey:
https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSf8en4eYMPcgfYopwv7q45d2ty-
uMVZappO-MJi_t9LkscTDw/viewform?usp=pp_url
2. Nabil El-Hilali, Sara Al-Jaber, Lina Hussein (2015), Students’ Satisfaction and
Achievement and Absorption Capacity in Higher Education, Procedia - Social and
Behavioral Sciences, Volume 177, Pages 420-427, ISSN 1877-0428. Available at:
doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.02.384 [Accessed on January 9, 2022]
3. Dhaqane, M. K., & Afrah, N. A. (2016). Satisfaction of Students and Academic
Performance in Benadir University. Journal of Education and Practice, 7(24), 59-
63. Available at: eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1112855 [ Accessed on January 9, 2022]
[1].Oliver, R. L. & W. O. Bearden, “Disconfirmation Processes and Consumer
Evaluations in Product Usage”, Journal of Business Research, 13 (1985), 235-246.
[2].Kotler, P. and Armstrong, G. Principles of Marketing, 14th Edition, Global
Edition, Pearson Prentice Hall, (2012).
[3].Marzo-Navarro, M., Iglesias, M. & Torres, M., 2005. A new management
element for universities: satisfaction with the offered courses. International Journal
of Educational Management, 19(6), pp. 505-526.