Master Budgeting Outline
Master Budgeting Outline
Master Budgeting Outline
But for the purpose of our illustrative example, GMG Power Corporation
does not maintain a finished goods inventory since power cannot be stored.
So the budgeted production quantity is equivalent to sales quantity.
Slides 12
The Schedule 3 contains the direct materials purchases budget for GMG
Power Corporation. The only raw material included in that budget is a
coal mineral, which is the major material used to generate power. The
remaining raw materials, such as silica sand and limestone, are relatively
insignificant and are included in variable manufacturing overhead. Notice
that materials requirements are first determined in units (MT kilograms)
and then translated into peso by multiplying by the appropriate unit cost.
Also note that the management of GMG Power Corporation wants to
maintain ending inventories of raw materials equal to 20% of the
following quarter’s production needs.
As with the production budget, the amounts listed under the Year
column are not always the sum of the quarterly amounts. The desired
ending inventory of raw materials for the year is the same as the desired
ending inventory of raw materials for the fourth quarter. Likewise, the
beginning inventory of raw materials for the year is the same as the
beginning inventory of raw materials for the first quarter. The direct
materials purchases budget is usually accompanied by a schedule of
expected cash disbursements for raw materials. This schedule is needed
to prepare the overall cash budget. Disbursements for raw materials
consist of payments for purchases on account in prior periods plus any
payments for purchases in the current budget period. Schedule 3
contains such a schedule of cash disbursements. Ordinarily, companies
do not immediately pay their suppliers. At GMG, the policy is to pay for
70% of purchase in the quarter in which the purchase is made and 30% in
the following quarter.
For GMG, the direct labor cost is at fixed amount since the GMG is
machine intensive.
Cash Budget
o Once the operating budgets (sales, production, etc.) have
been established, the cash budget and other financial budgets
can be prepared. A cash budget is a detailed plan that shows
how cash resources will be acquired and used over some
specified time period. Observe from Exhibit 9–2 that all of the
operating budgets have an impact on the cash budget. In the
case of the sales budget, the impact comes from the planned
cash receipts to be received from sales. In the case of the
other budgets, the impact comes from the planned cash
expenditures within the budgets themselves.
Opportunity Costing
Opportunity cost is the potential benefit that is given up when one alternative is
selected over another. To illustrate this important concept, consider the following
examples:
Example 1
Vicki, a university student, has a part-time job that pays her $200 per week. She
would like to spend a week at the beach during the study break, and her employer
has agreed to give her the time off, but without pay. The $200 in lost wages would
be an opportunity cost of taking the week off to be at the beach.
Example 2
Steve is employed with a company that pays him a salary of $40,000 per year. He is
thinking about leaving the company and returning to school. Since returning to
school would require that he give up his $40,000 salary, the forgone salary is an
opportunity cost of getting further education.
Differential Analysis
o Decisions involve choosing among alternatives. In business decisions, each
alternative has certain costs and benefits that must be compared to the costs
and benefits of the other available alternatives. A difference in costs
between any two alternatives is known as a differential cost. A difference in
revenues between any two alternatives is known as differential revenue.
An outside supplier has offered to sell OSN Cycles 8,000 shifter per year at a price of
only $19 each. Should the company stop producing the shifters internally and start
purchasing them from the outside supplier? To approach the decision from a
financial point of view, the manager should again focus on the differential costs. As
we have seen, the differential costs can be obtained by eliminating those costs that
are not avoidable—that is, by eliminating (1) the sunk costs and (2) the future costs
that will continue regardless of whether the shifters are produced internally or
purchased outside. The costs that remain after making these eliminations are the
costs that are avoidable to the company by purchasing outside. If these avoidable
costs are less than the outside purchase price, then the company should continue to
manufacture its own shifters and reject the outside supplier’s offer. That is, the
company should purchase outside only if the outside purchase price is less than the
costs that can be avoided internally as a result of stopping production of the shifters.
Looking at the data above, note first that depreciation of special equipment is listed
as one of the costs of producing the shifters internally. Since the equipment has
already been purchased, this depreciation is a sunk cost and is therefore irrelevant.
If the equipment could be sold, its salvage value would be relevant. Or if the
machine could be used to make other products, this could be relevant as well.
However, we will assume that the equipment has no salvage value and that it has no
other use except in making the heavy-duty gear shifters. Also note that the company
is allocating a portion of its general overhead costs to the shifters. Any portion of
this general overhead cost that would actually be eliminated if the gear shifters were
purchased rather than made is relevant in the analysis. However, it is likely that the
general overhead costs allocated to the gear shifters are in fact common to all items
produced in the factory and would continue unchanged even if the shifters were
purchased from outside. Such allocated common costs are not differential costs
(because they do not differ between the make and buy alternatives) and should be
eliminated from the analysis along with the sunk costs. The variable costs of
producing the shifters (materials, labor, and variable overhead) are differential costs,
because they can be avoided by buying the shifters from the outside supplier. If the
supervisor can be laid off and her salary avoided by buying the shifters, then her
salary will be a differential cost and relevant to the decision. Assuming that both the
variable costs and the supervisor’s salary can be avoided by buying from the outside
supplier, the analysis takes the form shown in Exhibit 12–5. Since it costs $5 less per
unit to continue to make the shifters, OSN Cycles should reject the outside supplier’s
offer. However, there is one additional factor that the company may wish to
consider before coming to a final decision. This factor is the opportunity cost of the
space now being used to produce the shifters. If the space now being used to
produce the shifters would otherwise be idle , then OSN Cycles should continue to
produce its own shifters and the supplier’s offer should be rejected, as stated above.
Idle space that has no alternative use has an opportunity cost of zero. But what if the
space now being used to produce shifters could be used for some other purpose? In
that case, the space has an opportunity cost that must be considered in assessing
the desirability of the supplier’s offer. What is this opportunity cost? It is the
segment margin that could be derived from the best alternative use of the space. To
illustrate, assume that the space now being used to produce shifters could be used
to produce disc brakes that would generate a segment margin of $60,000 per year.
Under these conditions, OSN Cycles would be better off to accept the supplier’s offer
and to use the available space to produce the new product line:
Opportunity costs are not recorded in the accounts of an organization because they do not
represent actual dollar outlays. Rather, they represent economic benefits that are forgone as a
result of pursuing a particular course of action. Because of this opportunity costs are often
erroneously ignored by managers when making decisions. The opportunity costs of OSN Cycles
are sufficiently large in this case to make continued production of the shifters very costly from
an economic point of view.
To illustrate, OSN Cycles has just received a request from the police department of a large
Canadian city to produce 100 specially modified mountain bikes at a price of $560 each. The
bikes would be used to patrol some of the more densely populated residential sections of the
city. OSN Cycles can easily modify its City Cruiser model to fit the specifications of the police
department. The normal selling price of the City Cruiser bike is $700, and its unit product cost is
$564, as shown below:
The variable portion of the above manufacturing overhead is $12 per unit. The order would
have no effect on the company’s total fixed manufacturing overhead costs. The modifications to
the bikes consist of welded brackets to hold radios, nightsticks, and other gear. These
modifications would require $34 in incremental variable costs per unit. In addition, the
company would have to pay a graphic design studio $1,200 to design and cut stencils that
would be used for spray painting the police department’s logo and other identifying marks on
the bikes.
This order should have no effect on the company’s other sales. The production manager says
that he can handle the special order without disrupting any of the regular scheduled
production. What effect would accepting this order have on the company’s operating income?
Only the incremental costs and benefits are relevant. Since the existing fixed manufacturing
overhead costs would not be affected by the order, they are not incremental costs and
therefore are not relevant. The incremental operating income can be computed as follows:
Therefore, even though the price on the special order ($560) is below the normal unit product
cost ($564) and the order would require incurring additional costs, it would result in an increase
in operating income. In general, a special order is profitable as long as the incremental revenue
from the special order exceeds the incremental costs of the order. However, in performing the
analysis it is important to make sure that there is indeed idle capacity and that the special order
does not affect the company’s ability to meet normal demand. For example, what if OSN Cycles
is already operating at 100% of capacity and normally sells all the bikes it can produce for $700
each? What is the opportunity cost of accepting the order? Should the company accept the
$560 price? If not, what is the minimum price it should accept? To answer these questions, the
analysis can be conducted as follows:
Since the total relevant costs of $746 exceed the offer price of $560, OSN Cycles should decline
the offer. Indeed, to be no worse off from a financial perspective, the minimum price that
should be charged on the special order is $746 per bike. At this price, management should be
indifferent between filling the special order and continuing to sell all it can produce to regular
customers.