Aboriginal

CHAPTER III.
THE PRE-TOLTEC PERIOD OF ABORIGINAL HISTORY.
TZENDAL TRADITION OF THE VOTANIC

SUBDIVISION OF THE SUBJECT
EMPIRE BOOK AND ITS CONTENTS AS REPORTED BY
VOTAN S
NUNEZ DE LA VEGA, CABRERA, AND ORDONEZ TESTIMONY OF
MANNERS AND CUSTOMS, RELIGION, LANGUAGES, AND MONU
MENTS OF THE CIVILIZED NATIONS RESPECTING THE PRIMITIVE
MAYA PEOPLES THE QUICHE RECORD, OR POPOL VUH CIVIL
IZING EFFORTS OF GUCUMATZ AND HIS FOLLOWERS EXPLOITS
OF HUNAHPU AND XBALANQUE CONQUEST OF XlBALBA MIGRA
TION FROM TULAN ZUIVA, THE SEVEN CAVES MEANING OF THE
QUICHE TRADITION NAHUA TRADITIONS THE TOLTECS IN TA-
MOANCHAN ACCORDING TO SAHAGUN THE CODEX CHIMALPO-
POCA PRE-TOLTEC NATIONS IN MEXICO OLMECS AND XICA-
LANCAS THE QUINAMES CHOLULA AND QUETZALCOATL THE
TOTONACS TEOTIHUACAN OTOMIS, MIZTECS, ZAPOTECS, AND
HUASTECS THE TOLTECS IN HUEHUE TLAPALLAN MIGRATION
TO ANAHUAC THE CHICHIMECS IN AMAQUEMECAN ANCIENT
HOME OF THE NAHUATLACAS AND AZTECS PRIMITIVE ANNALS
OF YUCATAN CONCLUSIONS.
In order to render more vivid than it would other

wise have been a picture of Nahua and Maya insti
tutions as they were found in the sixteenth century,
I have devoted one chapter of a preceding volume to
an outline view of aboriginal history; to fill in so far
as possible its details, is my remaining task. The
sketch alluded to will prove convenient here, since
it will enable me at various points to refer intelli
gibly and yet briefly to events somewhat in advance

(156)
DIVISION OF THE SUBJECT. 157
of their chronologic order. As has been stated, the

sixth century is the most remote period to which we
are carried in the annals of Anahuac by traditions
sufficiently definite to be considered in a strict sense
as historic records. Prior to the sixth century there
were doubtless other periods of Nahua greatness, for
there is little evidence to indicate that this was the
first appearance in Mexico of this progressive people,
but previous development cannot be definitely fol
lowed in a historical sense although affording oc
casional glimpses which supply interesting matter for
antiquarian speculation.
In the southern regions, where the Maya culture
flourished, or what may be considered geographically as
Central America, we have seen that the chronologic
record is much less extensive and perfect even than in
the north, taking us back in an oft-broken line only a
few centuries beyond the Conquest. Yet we have caught
traditional glimpses far back in the misty past of a
mighty aboriginal empire in these tropical lands, of the
earlier and grander stages of Maya culture, of Yotan,
of Xibalba, of even the early periods of Nahua civiliza
tion and power. Palenque, Copan, and their com
panions in ruin, the wonderful material monuments of
the ancient epoch, proving it to be no mere creation
of the imagination, have been described and pictured.
With the breaking-up of the Maya empire into sep
arate nations at an unknown date, the aboriginal his
tory of Central America as a whole ceases, and down
to a period closely preceding the Conquest, we have
only an occasional event, the memory of which is pre
served in the traditions of two or three nations.
The history of the Native Races may be most con

veniently subdivided as follows; 1st. The Pre-Toltec
Period, embracing the semi-mythic traditions of the

earliest civilization, extending down to a date al
ways preceding the sixth century, but varying in
different parts of the territory when the more prop-
158 THE PRE-TOLTEC PERIOD.
erly historic annals of the different nations begin, and

including also the few traditions referring to pre-Tol-
tec nations north of Tehuantepec. 2d. The Toltec
Period, referring like the two following periods to
Andhuac alone, and extending down to the eleventh
century. 3d. The Chichimec Period, extending from
the eleventh century to the formation of the tri-partite
alliance between the Aztecs, Acolhuas, and Tepanecs
in the fifteenth century. 4th. The Aztec Period,
that of Aztec supremacy during the century preced
ing the Conquest. 5th. The annals of such Nahua
nations outside the limits of the Aztec Empire proper
as cannot be conveniently included in the preceding
divisions. 6th. Historical traditions of the Wild
Tribes of the north. 7th. The Quiche- Cakchiquel
nations of Guatemala. 8th. Miscellaneous nations
and tribes of Central America. 9th. The Maya na
tions of Yucatan.
The first division, the Pre-Toltec Period, to which
the present chapter is devoted, will include the few
vague traditions that seem to point to the cradle of
American civilization, to the Votanic empire, to Xi-
balba, and to the deeds of the civilizers, or culture-
heroes, in Tabasco and Chiapas. Who can estimate
the volumes that would be required for a full narra
tion of all that actually occurred within this period,
had the record been made or preserved ; the develop
ment, from germs whose nature is unknown, of Amer
ican civilization; the struggles and misfortunes of
infant colonies the exploits of native heroes plots of
; ;
ambition, glorious success, utter failure; the rise and

fall of princes and of empires; wars, triumphs, de
feats; oppression and revolt; political combinations

and intrigues; religious strife between the fanatic
devotees of rival divinities; seasons of plenty and of
famine; earthquake, flood, and pestilence a tangled
network of events spread over the centuries; to re
late all that we may know of it a chapter will suffice.
VOTAN AND HIS DEEDS. 159
I have told in another volume the mythic tale of

Votan, the culture-hero, how he came to America
1
and apportioned the land among the people. He

came by divine command from Valum Chivim by
way of Valum Votan, built a great city of Nachan,
city of the serpents so called from his own name,
for he was of the race of Chan, a Serpent and
founded a great empire in the Usumacinta region,
which he seems to have ruled over as did his descend
ants or followers for many centuries. He was not
the first man in
regarded in the native traditions as
America ; he found the country peopled, as did all the
culture-heroes, but by his teachings and by the aid of
his companions he firmly established his own ideas of
religion and government. So far as his memory was
preserved by tradition he was a civilizer, a law -giver,
the introducer of the Maya culture, worshiped more
over, after his disappearance, as a god. He came by
sea from the east, but with the locality whence he
started I have nothing to do here; neither is it neces
sary to indulge in speculation respecting the four mys
terious visits which he paid after his arrival in Amer
ica to his original home in the Old World, where it is
gravely asserted he was present at the building of
Solomon s temple and saw the ruins of the tower of
Babel. His reported acts in the New World, whose
people he came to civilize, were the dividing or ap
;
portioning the lands among the people; their

of
instruction in the new institutions they were required
to adopt; the building of a great city, Nachan, after
wards the metropolis of an empire the reception of;
a new band of disciples of his own race, who were al

lowed to share in the success already achieved by his
enterprise; the subdividing of his empire after its
power had become wide-spread in the land into several
allied monarchies subordinate in a certain degree to
Nachan, among whose capitals were Tulan, Mayapan,
and Chiquimula; the construction of a subterranean
1
Vol. iii., p. 450, et seq.
road or snake hole from the barranca of Zuqui to

Tzequil the deposit of a great treasure with tapirs as
;
sacred animals in a house of gloom at Huehuetan

in Soconusco, protected by guardians called tlapianes,
at whose head was a Lady Superior; and finally the
writing of a book in which was inscribed a complete
record of all he had done, with a defense or proof of
his claims to be considered one of the Chanes, or Ser
2
pents.
This document is the authority, indirectly, for
nearly all that isknown from Tzendal sources of Vo-

tan and his empire. Francisco Nunez de la Vega,
Bishop of Chiapas, claims to have had in his posses
sion3and to have read this historical tract. He does
not describe it, but from his having been able to read
the contents, it would seem to have been, if genuine,
not the original in hieroglyphics but an interpretation
in European letters, although still perhaps in the
Tzendal language. Of the contents, besides a general
statement of Votan s coming as the first man sent by
God to portion out the land, and some of his experi
ences in the Old World, this author says nothing-
definite. He claims to have had much knowledge of
Tzendal antiquity derived from the work mentioned
and other native writings, but he feared to perpetuate
thisknowledge lest it might "confirm more strongly
an idolatrous superstition." He is the only authority
for the deposit of the treasure in the Dark House at
Huehuetan, without saying expressly that he derived
his information from Votan s writings. This treasure,
consisting of aboriginal relics, the bishop felt it to be
his duty to destroy, and it was publicly burned in
1691. It is not altogether improbable that a genuine
Maya document similar to the Manuscript Troano or
Dresden Codexf preserved from the early times, may
part of his work that this record was not writ
2 Ordonez states in one
ten by Votan himself, but by his descendant in the

eighth or ninth genera
tion. Brasseur de Bourbourg, in Popol Vuh, p. Ixxxvii.
3 Constituciones
Dioccsanas del Obispado de Chiappas. Rome, 1702.
4 See vol. ii., pp. 771-4.
THE BOOK OF VOTAN. 161
have found a native interpreter at the time of the

Conquest, and have escaped in its disguise of Span
ish letters the destruction that overtook its com
panions.
The next notice of this manuscript is found in the
writings of Dr Paul Felix Cabrera, who in the
5
last part of the eighteenth century found it in the
possession of Don Ramon de Ordonez y Aguiar, a

native and resident of Ciudad Real in Chiapas. 6 He
describes the document as consisting of "five or six
folios of common quarto paper, written in
ordinary
characters in the Tzendal language, an evident proof
of its having been copied from the original in hiero
7
glyphics, shortly after the conquest." The manu
script, according to Cabrera, recounted Votan s ar
rival with seven families, to whom he apportioned
the lands; his voyages to the Old World; and his
reception of the new-comers. Returning from one
of his voyages he found seven other families of the
"
Tzequil nation, who had joined the first

inhabitants,
and recognized in them the same origin as his own,
that of the Culebras.
is, He speaks of the place
where they built their first town, which, from its
founders, received the name of Tzequil; he affirms
the having taught them refinement of manners in
the use of the table, table-cloth, etc.; that, in return
for these, they taught him the knowledge of God and
of his worship; his first ideas of a king and obedi-
5 Teatro Critico Americano, p. 32, et seq.

6 See vol. iv., p. 289.
7 At the top of the first leaf, the two continents are painted in differ
ent colours, in two small squares, placed parallel to each other in the
angles: the one representing Europe, Asia, and Africa is marked with two
large SS; upon the upper arms of two hars drawn from the opposite angles
of each square, forming the point of union in the centre; that which in
dicates America has two SS placed horizontally on the hars, but I am not
certain whether upon the upper or lower bars, but I believe upon the latter.
When speaking of the places he had visited on the old continent, he marks
them on the margin of each chapter, with an upright S, and those of Ame
rica with an horizontal S. Between these squares stands the title of his
history "Proof that I am Culebra" (a snake), which title he proves in the
body of his work, by saying that he is Culebra, because he is Chivim. Ca
brera, Teatro, pp. 33-4.
ence to him; and that he was chosen captain of all

these united families."
Ordonez, at the time of Cabrera s visit, was en
gaged in writing his great History of the Heaven
and Earth, 8 a work, as the learned Doctor predicts,
to be perfect in its kind, as will completely aston
"so
ish the world." The manuscript was never published,
part of the historical portion was lost, and the re

maining fragments or copies of them fell into the
hands of Brasseur de Bourbourg, whose writings
contain all that is known of their contents; and it
must be confessed that from these fragments little or
nothing of value has been extracted by the abbe
in addition to what Nunez de la Vega and Cabrera
had already made known. Ordonez was familiar
with the Tzendal lanûaê
o o and character, with the
ancient monuments of his native state, and was zeal
ously devoted to antiquarian researches; he had ex
cellent opportunities to collect and record such scraps
of knowledge as the Tzendal tribes had preserved
from the days of their ancestors greatness;9 but his
enthusiasm seems rather to have led him to profitless
speculations on the original population of the New
World and progress from Chaldea immediately
"its
after the confusion of tongues."

Even after reject
ing the absurd theories and speculations which seem
to have constituted the bulk of his writings, one can
not help looking with some distrust on the few tradi
tional statements respecting Votan not given by other
3 Historia del
Cielo y de la Tierra, MS. See vol. iv., p. 289, for addi
tional notes respecting this author.
9 Un estudio de inuchos ratos (mas de treinta anos). acorn paiiado de la
. . .
constante aplicacion con qne me dedique d entender las frases de que nsaron
los Indios en sn primitive gentilismo, principalniente en la historia que de
su establecimieuto en esta region que nosotros llamamos America, escribio
Votan, la cual consegui, de les mismos Indios (qnienes me la franqueaTon),
y sobre todo, la conveniencia que resulta de una prolixa combinacion dc la
sitnacion dc aquella ciudad (Palenque), de la disposicion y arquitectnra de
sus ediftcios, de la antigiiedad de sus geroglificos, y finalmente de las pro-
ducciones de su terreno, con las noticias que, a costa de porfiadas diligen-
cias, habia adquirido; crei que me tenian en estado de despertar un sistema
nada nuevo, pero olvidado. Ordonez, MS., in Brasseur de Bourbourg,
Cartas, p. 7.
TZENDAL TRADITIONS. 163
authors, and thinking of possible transformations that

may have been effected in Tzendal fables under the
pens of two writers like Ordonez and Brasseur, both
honest investigators, but of that enthusiastic class of
antiquarians who experience few or no difficulties.
The few items of information respecting the Yo-
tanic period not already mentioned, some of them not
in themselves improbable, but few traceable to any
very definite native source, are the following The :
date of the foundation of the empire, according to

Ordonez, was about 1000 B. C. Whether he had any
other reason for this supposition than his theory that
the building of Solomon s temple, attributed by some
writers to that period, took place during Votan s life,
is uncertain. The name Tzequiles, applied to Votan s
followers by the aborigines, or rather, it would seem,
by the first to the second division of the Serpents is
said to mean in Tzendal men with petticoats, and to
have been applied to the new-comers by reason of
their peculiar dress. 10 To them was given, after the
permanent establishment of the empire, one of the
great kingdoms into which it was divided, with Tulan
as their capital city. This kingdom with two others,
whose capitals were Mayapan in Yucatan and Chiqui-
mula, possibly Copan, in Honduras, were allied with,
yet to a certain degree subordinate to, the original em
pire whose
capital and ruled by Vo-
was Nachan, built
tan himself and his descendants. The only names which
seem to have been applied in the Tzendal traditions
to the people and their capital city were Chanes, or
Serpents, and Nachan, or City of Serpents; but these
names acquire considerable historical importance when
it is noted that
they are the exact equivalents of Cul-
huas and Culhuacan, names which will be found so
exasperatingly prevalent in the Nahua traditions of
10
Ordonez, as represented by Cabrera Teatro, p. 96 claims that the
name Tzequiles has precisely the same meaning as Nahuatlacas in the
Nahua dialect, and he applies the name to a Nahua rather than a Maya
people, with much reason as will appear later, although Brasseur is of a
contrary opinion. Hist. Nat. Civ., torn, i., p. 70.
the north. Ordonez claims, however, that the name

Quiche, at a later period that of a Guatemalan king
dom, was also in these earlier times applied to Votan s
11
empire.
Of Votan s death there is no tradition, nor is any
thing definite reported of his successors, save, what is
perhaps only a conjecture, that their names are re
12
corded in the Tzendal calendar as the names of days,
the order being that of their succession. In this case
it is necessary to suppose that Yotan had two prede
cessors, Igh and Imox; and in fact Brasseur claims

to find in one document a statement that Igh brought
the first colony to America. 13 Chinax, the last but
two of the line, a great soldier, is said to have been
14
put to death by a rival of another nation. Nunez
de la Vega notes the existence of a family of Votans
in his time, claiming direct descent from the great
founder; and Brasseur states that a wild tribe of the
region are yet known as Chanes.
15
Such are the vague memories of the Chiapan past

so far as they were preserved by the natives of the
region, and collected by Europeans. The nature of
the traditions themselves, the sources whence they
sprang, the medium through which they are given to
us, are not such as to inspire great confidence in the
accuracy of the details related, although some of the tra
ditions are not improbable and were very likely founded
on actual occurrences. But whatever value may be
11 Brasseur de Bourbourg, Cartas, p. 10.

!2 For list see vol. ii., p. 767.
13
Cartas, p. 71.
i*
Pineda, Descrip. Chiapas, in Soc. Mex. Geog., Boletin, torn, iii., pp.
343-6; Brasseur de Bourbourg, Hist. Nat. Civ., torn, i., pp. 95-7.
15
Cabrera, Teatro, p. 30; Brasseur de Bourbourg, Popol Vuh, p. cix. ;
Carbajal Espinosa, Hist. Mex., torn, i., p. 165; See on Votan and his empire,
besides the works that have been mentioned in this chapter, Juairos,
Hist. Guat., p. 208; Clavigero, Storia Ant. del Messico, torn, i., pp. 150-1,
torn, iv., pp. 15-16; Boturini, Idea, pp. 114-5; Brasseur de Bourbourg,
Popol Vuh, introd; Id., Esquisses; Id., Palenque; Fontaine s How the
World was Peopled,]). 136; Tschudi s Peruvian Antiq., pp. 11-15; Dome-
nech s Deserts, vol. i., p. 10, et seq.; Levy, Nicaragua, p. 4; Priest s Amer.
Antiq., pp. 248-9; Beaufotfs Mex. Illust., pp. 218-21; Farcy, Discours, in
Antiq. Mex., torn, i., div. i., p. 43.
THE VOTANIC EMPIRE. 365
attached to their details, the traditions in question have

great weight in establishing two general propositions
the existence in the remote past of a great and
powerful empire in the TJsumacinta region, and a gen
eral belief among the subjects of that empire that the
beginning of their greatness was due to a hero or
demi-god called Yotan. They point clearly to the
appearance and growth of a great race, nation, or dy
nasty; and they carry us 110 farther. Respecting the
questions who or what was Votan, man or mythic
creation, populator, colonizer, civilizer, missionary, con
queror, foreign or native born? When, how, and
whence did he come to the central tierra caliente?
Who were the people among whom he wrought his
mighty deeds, and what was their past history? we
are left to simple conjecture, conjecture of a class
which falls without the limits of my present purpose,
and to which the first chapter of this volume has been
devoted. Doubtless the Votanic was not the first
period of American civilization and power, but none
earlier is known to us. In addition to the Tzendal
traditions there are several other authorities bearing
more or less directly on this primitive empire, which
I proceed to investigate.
In the second volume of this work I have de

scribed the physique, character, manners and cus
toms, arts, and institutions of the civilized nations of
our territory, dividing them into two great families
or groups, the Mayas and the Nahuas, "the former
the more ancient, the latter the more recent and
wide-spread." The many contrasts observed between
the institutions of the northern and southern nations
seemed sufficiently marked to outweigh the fre
quently recurring resemblances, and to justify me in
the opinion there expressed that their culture had
either been distinct from the beginning, or what is
more probable and for my purpose practically the
same thing that it had progressed in different paths
for a long time previous to the coming of the Span

iards. The contrasts observed were attributed to a
distinct origin of the two national groups, or, with
more probability, to their long separation; while the
analogies were to be referred either to unity of origin,
to the tendency of humanity to like development
under like circumstances, to frequent communication
and friction by commerce or war, or still better, to the
influence of all these causes combined.
The picture presented in the third volume of the
myths and languages of the same nations favored the
view previously taken. In the religious fancies, di
vinities, forms of worship, ideas of a future state,
physical, animal, and creation myths, to which the
first part of the volume was devoted, the
analogies,
it is true, seemed somewhat stronger and the con
trasts less striking than in the characteristics previ
ously portrayed; this was perhaps because the myths
of any people point farther back into their past than
do the so-called manners and customs; but in the
consideration of languages which followed, the con
trasts between the two groups came out more dis
tinctly marked than at any previous stage of the
investigation. A very large proportion of the tongues
of the civilized nations were found to belong more or
less closely to one or the other of two linguistic fam
ilies.
Finally, in the fourth volume a study of ma
terial relics tended very strongly to confirm the
opinion before arrived at respecting the development

of Maya and Nahua culture in distinct channels, at
least during the historic period. I need not repeat
here even en resume the facts exhibited in the pre
ceding volumes, nor the lessons that have at different
points been drawn from them; but I may briefly
mention some general conclusions founded on the
preceding matter which bear on my present purpose
of historical investigation. First, as already stated,
the Maya and Nahua nations have been within tra
ditionally historic times practically distinct, although
THE MAYAS AND NAHUAS. 167
coming constantly in contact. Second, this fact is

directly opposed to the once accepted theory of a
civilized people, corning from the far north, gradually
moving southward with frequent halts, constantly

increasing in power and culture, until the highest
point of civilization was reached in Chiapas, Hon
duras, and Yucatan, or as many believed in South
America. Third, the theory alluded to is rendered
altogether untenable by the want of ruins in Cali
fornia and the great north-west; by the utter want
of resemblance between New Mexican and Mexican
monuments; by the failure to discover either Aztec
or Maya dialects in the north; and finally by the
strong contrasts between the Nahuas and Mayas,
both in language and in monuments of antiquity.
Fourth, the monuments of the south are not only dif
ferent from but much more ancient than those of Ana"-
huac, and cannot possibly have been built by the
Toltecs after their migration from Anahuac in the
eleventh century, even if such a migration took place.
Fifth, these monuments, like those of the north, were
built by the ancestors of the people found in posses
sion of the country at the Conquest, and not by an
extinct race or in remote antiquity. 16 Sixth, the cities
of Palenque, Ococingo, and Copan, at least, were un
occupied when the Spaniards came; the natives of
the neighboring region knew nothing of their origin
even if they were aware of their existence, and no
notice whatever of the existence of such cities appears
in the annals of the surrounding civilized nations dur
ing the eight or nine centuries preceding the Con
quest ; that is, the nation that built Palenque was not
one of those found by Europeans in the country, but
its greatness had practically departed before the rise
of the Quiche, Cakchiquel, and Yucatan powers.
Seventh, the many resemblances that have been noted
between Nahua and Maya beliefs, institutions, arts,
16 On the Antiquity of Copan, the ruins of Yucatan, and Palenque, see
vol. iv., pp. 104, 280-5, 359-62.
and may be consistently accounted for by the

relics,
theory that at some period long preceding the sixth
century the two peoples were practically one so far as
their institutions were concerned, although they are
of themselves not sufficient to prove the theory.
Eighth, the oldest civilization in America which has
left any traces for our consideration, whatever may
have been its pre-historic origin, was that in the
Usumacinta region represented by the Palenque
17
group of ruins.
It is not likely that Americanistes of the present
day will disagree materially with the preceding con
clusions, especially as they do not positively assert
the southern origin of the Nahua peoples or deny
their traditional migration from the north. The .gen
eral theory alluded to of a great migration from north
to south, and the theory of a civilized race of foreign
origin extinct long before the Conquest, will find few
defenders in view of the results of modern research.
It is true that many writers attribute more or less
positively the grand ruins of Central America to the
Toltecs after their migration southward in the eleventh
century; but their decision has been generally reached
without even considering the possible existence of any
other civilized nation in the annals of American an
tiquity. Their studies have shown them that Palen
que was not the work of an extinct race, and they
have consequently attributed the ruins to the oldest
people mentioned in the popular version of American
traditional history the Toltecs, and the more nat
urally because that people, according to the tradition,
had migrated southward. Mr Stephens, who arrived
at this conclusion in the manner indicated, admits that
from a study of the ruins themselves he would have
assigned the foundation of the cities to a much more
remote period. 18
17 The monuments of the Mississippi present stronger internal evidence
of great antiquity than any others in America, although it hy no means
follows that they are older than Palenque and Copan. Vol. iv., p. 790.
Yucatan, vol. ii., pp. 454-5. By a careful study of Mr Stephens
18
MONUMENTS AND INSTITUTIONS. 169
Thus the monumental relics of Central America by

themselves and by comparisons with other American
ruins, point directly to the existence of a great em
pire in the Palenque region; and the observed phe
nomena of myths, language, and institutions agree
perfectly with such a conclusion, which, however, un
aided, they could not have established. may then We
accept as a reality the Votanic Maya empire on the
authority of the native traditions confirmed by the
tangible records of ruined cities, and by the condition
of the southern civilized nations in the sixteenth cen
tury. It is more than probable that Palenque was
the capital, as Ordonez believes the Nachan of the
Votanic epoch and not improbable that Ococingo,
Copan, and some of the older Yucatec cities were the
centres of contemporaneous, perhaps allied powers. 19
conclusions, it will appear evident to the reader that he ascribes the
Central American ruins to the Toltecs, simply as the oldest nations on
the continent of America, of which we have any knowledge, and that he
reconciles their condition at the time of his exploration with their recent
origin, chiefly by a consideration of the Yucatan ruins, most of which
doubtless do not date back to the Votanic empire, and many of which were
fitill occupied at the
coming of the first Spaniards.
19
Although in the general view, Vol. ii., chap, ii., I have classed the
Toltecs among the Nahua nations, it will be noticed that the preceding con
clusions of the present chapter are independent of such a classification,
and are not necessarily opposed to the theory, held by some, that the cities
of Central America were built by the Toltecs before they assumed a promi
nent position among the nations of Anahuac. The following notes bear
more or less directly on points involved in the preceding text. Mr Tylor,
Anahuac, pp. 189-93; Researches, p. 184, believes that the civilization of
Mexico and Central America were originally independent although modi
fied by contact one with the other, and attributes the Central American
cities to a people who flourished long before the Toltecs, and whose descen
dants are the Mayas. Yet he favors the climatic theory of the origin and
growth of civilization, according to which the culture of the south must
have been brought from the Mexican tierra templada. I have no objection
to offer to this theory. It is in the Usumacinta region that the Maya civi
lization has left its first record both traditional and monumental; and that
is sufficientfor my present purpose. Orozco y Berra, Geografia, pp.
124-5, concludes from his linguistic researches that the Palenque
etc.,
civilization was much older than the Toltec and distinct from it. Hcll-
wald, in Smithsonian JKept., 1866, pp. 340-1, pronounces the Palenque cul
ture the oldest in America, with no resemblance to that of the Nahuas.
He rejects the theory that the ruins were the work of migrating Toltecs.
Palenque will probably some day decide the question of American civiliza
tion. It only awaits a Champollion. Charnay, Ruines Amer., p. 439. The
ruins in the south have undoubted claims to the highest antiquity. Brad
ford Amer. An tig., p. 199. The Usumacinta seems a kind of central
s
point for the high culture of Central America. Midler, Amerikaniscltc Ur-
religionen, p. 456.
I pass next to the traditions of the Quiche nations

as preserved in the Popol Vuh, or National Book, and
known to the world through the Spanish translation
of Ximenez and the French of Brasseur de Bour-
20
bourg. These traditions, the authenticity and gen
eral accuracy of which there is no reason to doubt,
constitute a hopelessly entangled network of mythic
tales, without chronology, but with apparent although
vague references here and there, to actual events in
the primitive history of the peoples whose descend
ants were the Quiches and Cakchiquels, and with a
more continuous account in the closing chapters, of the
Quiche annals of a much later period, immediately
preceding the Conquest. In the introduction we read :
"This is the
origin of the ancient history of Quiche.
Here we write the annals of the past, the beginning
of all that has taken place in the city of Quiche,
among the tribes of the Quiche nations. Behold we
bring about the manifestation of what was in obscu
rity, its first dawning by the will of the Creator and
of the Former, of Him who begets and of Him who
gives being. Their names are Hunahpu Vuch
1
shooter of the blowpipe at the opossum, Hunahpu
Utiu shooter of the blowpipe at the coyote/ Zaki
Nirna Tzyiz great white pricker, Tepeu the dom-
inator, and Gucumutz the plumed serpent; Heart
of the Lakes, Heart of the Sea, Master of the Ver
dant Planisphere, Master of the Azure Surface.
Thus it is that these also are named, sung, and cele
brated the grandmother and the grandfather, whose
names are Xpiyacoc and Xmucane, preserver and pro-
tectrice twice grandmother and twice grandfather, as
;
it stated in the Quiche annals; concerning whom

is
was related all that they did afterwards in the light
of life, in the light of the word, (civilization). Be
hold that which we shall write after the word of God,
and in Christianity; we shall bring it to light because
20 See for a bibliographical notice of the

vol. iii., pp. 42-4, note 1, Popol
Vuh.
TRADITIONS OF THE QUICHES. 171
the Popol Vuh, the national book, is no longer visible,

in which it was clearly seen that we came from be
yond the sea the narrative of our life in the land of

shadow, and how we saw the light and life/ as it is
called. It is the first book, written in olden times;
but its view is hidden from him who sees and thinks.
Wonderful is its appearance, and the narrative of the
time when he (the Creator) finished everything in
21
heaven and on earth."
Then
follows an account, which has already been
22
presented in a condensed translation, of a time when
all was and there was yet no earth, and no
silent,
living thing, only the immobility and silence of a
boundless sea, on the surface of which floated the
Creator and his companion deities named above, in
cluding Gucumatz, the plumed serpent. Then the
light appeared and the earth with its vegetation was
created by Gucumatz and the Dominator at the word
of Hurakan, Heart of Heaven, the Thunderbolt.
Life and fecundity were given to the animals and
birds, who were distributed as guardians of the for
ests and mountains, and called upon to speak and
praise the names of those that had made them; but
the poor animals, after efforts twice repeated, could
not obey, and were assigned a position far below that
which they had been intended to fill. Two attempts
at the creation of intelligent beings followed, both
failures. First man was made of earth, and although
he could speak, he was intellectually stupid and
physically clumsy, unable to stand erect, and soon
mingled with the water like a man of mud. He was
destroyed by the disgusted creators. The sorcerers,
Xpiyacoc and Xmucane, grandmothers of the sun and
of the moon, were consulted in the second creation,
and the chief of Toltecat is mentioned in addition to
the names already given. Lots were cast, all needful
precautions were taken, and man was made again of
Popol Vuh, pp. 1-5; Ximenez, Hist. Ind. Guat., pp. 4-5.
21
22 Vol. iii., pp. 44-7.

wood and pith but he lacked intelligence, led a use

;
less life, and forgot the Heart of Heaven. They

became numerous on the face of the earth, but the
gods were wroth and sent upon them a flood, and a
resinous shower from heaven their houses refused to
;
cover them, the trees shook them from the branches

where they sought shelter, the animals and even the
household implements turned against the poor wooden
men, reviling and persecuting them, until all were de
stroyed, save a few who remained as a memorial in
the form of apes. 23
At this point the character of the narrative
changes
somewhat, and, although an account of a third and
24
final creation of man, given on a
subsequent page,
should, in the opinion of Brasseur, be introduced here,
I proceed with a resume of the Quiche tradition in
the order of its arrangement in both the Spanish and
French version, devoting a paragraph to each chapter
of the French translation.
There was sky and earth, but little light; and a
man named Vucub Cakix, seven aras, or paroquets,
was puffed up with pride and said, "those that were
drowned were like supernatural beings; 25 now will I
be great above all created beings. I am their sun and
their moon; great is my splendor." He was not the
sun, nor did his view reach over the whole earth, but
lie was proud of his riches. This was when the flood
destroyed the wooden manikins. Now we will tell
when Vucub Cakix was defeated and man was made.
This is the cause of his destruction by two young
men, Hunahpu (or Hunhunahpu) and Xbalanque,
little tiger, who were really gods, and thought it not
good that Vucub Cakix should swell with pride and
Heart of Heaven; and they plotted against
offend the
his and wealth. He had two sons, Zipacna and
life
Cabrakan, the earthquake, by his wife Chimalmat.

23
Popol VuJi. pp. 5-31; Ximencz, Hist. Lid. Gnat., pp. 5-14.
24
Popol Vith, p. 195, et seq.
25
Or, as Brasseur translates, the remnant of those that were drowned.
etc.
VUCUB CAKIX AND ZIPACNA. 173
Zipacna s work was to roll the great mountains which

he made in a night, and which Cabrakan shook at
will. The death of the father and son was resolved
upon by the two young men.
Vucub Cakix was shot by them while eating the
fruit called nanze in a tree-top, and his jaw broken,
although in revenge he carried home the arm of Hun-

ahpu, which he hung over the fire. But an old man
and an old woman, Zaki Nim Ak and Zaki Nima
Tzyiz divinities already named, in human disguise
were induced by the two young men to volunteer
their services in curing the jaw of Vucub Cakix, who
seems to have been a king, for they found him on his
throne howling with pain. They pulled out his broken
teeth of precious stones, in which he took great pride,
substituting grains of maize; they dimmed his eyes,
took away his riches, and recovered the missing arm.
Then the king died as did his wife, and the purpose
of Hunahpu and Xbalanque was accomplished against
him who was proud and regarded not the will of the
Heart of Heaven.
These are the deeds of Zipacna, son of Vucub
Cakix, who claimed to be creator of the mountains.
Bathing at the river-side he found four hundred
young men striving in vain to carry away a tree
which they had cut. Generously he bore the burden
for them, and was invited to join their band, being
an orphan; but they soon plotted against him, cast
ing a tree upon him in a deep pit they had employed
him to dig. He cunningly took refuge in a branch
gallery, cut off his hair and nails for the ants to
carry up to his foes, waited until the four hundred
had become intoxicated in their rejoicing at his
supposed death, emerged from the pit, and toppled
over their house upon them so that not one escaped.
But in his turn Zipacna was conquered by Hun
ahpu and Xbalanque, who were grieved that the four
hundred had perished. Zipacna, bearing the mount
ains by night, wandered in the day by the river and
lived on fish and crabs; by an artificial crab his two

foes enticed him in a time of hunger to crawl on all
fours into a cavern at the bottom of a ravine, where
the mountain, previously mined, fell upon him.
Thus perished and was turned to stone, at the foot
of Mt Meavan, the self-styled maker of the mount
ains, the second who by his pride displeased the
deities.
One only now remained, Cabrakan. "
It is I who
destroy the mountains," he said; but it was the will
of Hurakan, the thunderbolt, that his pride also
should be humbled, and the order was given to Hun-
ahpu and Xbalanque. They found him at his favor
ite employment of overturning the hills, enticed him
eastward to exhibit his skill and overthrow a partic
ularly high mountain which they claimed to have
seen, killed a bird with their blowpipe on the way,
and poisoned it with earth before it was given Cabra
kan to eat. Thus was his strength destroyed; he
failed to move the mountain, was tied, and buried.
Thus ends the first of the four divisions of the Po-
pol Vuli Next we are to hear something of the
birth and family of Hunaphu and Xbalanque. The
recital is, however, to be covered with mystery, and
only half is to be told of the relation of their father. 27

Xpiyacoc and Xmucane had two sons, Hunlmnahpu
and Vukub Hunahpu, the first being as the French
translation unintelligibly renders it a sort of double
personage. The former had also by his wife Xbakiyalo
two sons, Hunbatz and Hunchouen, very wise, great
artists,and skillful in all things; the latter never
married. All four spent the day in playing at dice
and at ball, and Voc, the messenger of Hurakan,
came to see them, Voc who remained not far from
here nor far from Xibalba. 28 After the death of Xba-
26
pp. 31-67;Ximenez, Hist. Ind. Gnat., pp. 15-29.
27
Xiinenez, p. 20, conveys the idea, however, that it is only from ignor
ance that so little is told, and not from a desire to be mysterious.
28 Ximenez
renders this word by inttcrno, or hell. No satisfactory
meaning can be derived from its etymology.
THE IMMACULATE CONCEPTION. 175
kiyalo, thetwo played ball, journeying toward Xibalba,

having Hunbatz and Hunchouen behind, and
left
this became known to Hun Came and Vukub Came,
monarchs of Xibalba, who called together the council
of the empire and sent to summon them or to chal
lenge them to a game of ball, that they might be
defeated and disgraced.
The messengers were owls, four in number; and
the players, after a sad parting from their mother,
Xmucane, and from the young Hunbatz and Hun
chouen, followed them down the steep road to Xi
balba from the ball-ground of Nimxob Carchah. 29
Crossing ravines and rivers, including one of blood,
they came to the royal palace of Xibalba, and saluted
two wooden figures as monarchs, to the great amuse
ment of the latter and the assembled princes. Then
the brothers were invited to a place on the seat of
honor, which proved to be a red-hot stone, and the
contortions of the guests when they sat upon it pro
voked a new burst of laughter which well-nigh re
sulted in apoplexy. Five ordeals are here mentioned
as existing in Xibalba, to the first of which only,
that of the House of Gloom, 30 were the brothers
subjected; then they were sacrificed and their bodies
buried together. But the head of Hunhunahpu was
hung in a tree, which at once became covered with
gourds from which the head could not be distin
guished, and it was forbidden to all in Xibalba to
approach that tree.
But Xquiq, a virgin princess, daughter of Cuch-
umaquiq, heard of the tree, and went alone to taste
the forbidden fruit. Into her outstretched hand the
head of Hunhunahpu spat, and the spittle caused
the young girl to conceive, and she returned home,
after a promise from the head that no harm should
result to her. All this was by the order of Hura-
29
Carchah is the name of an Indian town in Vera Paz.
30 Casa lobrcga, maison, tcncbrctisc. It will be remembered that Votan
is said to have established a House of Gloom at Hueliuetan. See p. 160.
kan. After six months her condition was observed

by her father, and in spite of her protestations that
she had known no man, the owls, the royal mes
sengers, were ordered to sacrifice her and bring back
her heart in a vase. She persuaded and bribed the
royal officers, however, by the promise of future
emoluments, to carry back to the kings the coagu
lated sap of the blood-wort instead of her blood and
heart, and she escaped;- thus were Hun Came and
Vukub Came tricked by this young girl.
Xquiq, far advanced in pregnancy, went for pro
where Xmucane was living with
tection to the place
the young Hunbatz and Hunchouen. The old
woman was not disposed at first to credit the
stranger s tale that she was with child by Hunhun-
ahpu, and therefore entitled to protection as a grand
daughter at the hands of Xmucane; but by calling
upon the gods and gathering a basket of maize
where no maize was growing, the young girl proved
the justice of her claim, and was received by the
great grandmother of her unborn children.
The virgin mother brought forth twin sons, and they
were named Hunahpu and Xbalanque. From their
very birth they were ill-treated. They were turned
out of the house by their grandmother for crying, and
throughout childhood and youth were abused by Hun
batz and Hunchouen, by reason of jealousy. They
passed their time shooting birds in the mountains with
their blowpipes, while their brothers, great musicians,
painters, and sculptors, remained at home singing and
playing the flute. But at last Hunbatz and Hun
chouen were changed by the young heroes into mon
keys. Xmucane was filled Avith sadness, and she was
offered the privilege of beholding again the faces of
her favorite grandsons, if she could do so without
laughing; but their grimaces and antics were too ludi
crous; the old lady failed in three interviews to re
strain her laughter, and Hunbatz and Hunchouen
appeared no more. Hunahpu and Xbalanque became
HUNAHPU AND XBALANQUE. 177
in their turn musicians and played the air of hunahpu

31
qoy, the monkey of Hunahpu.
The work undertaken by the twins was the
first
clearing of a milpa or cornfield. It was not very

difficult on the first day, for their enchanted tools
worked by themselves while the young agricultur
ists went hunting, taking care to put dirt on their
faces and to pretend to be at work when their grand
mother brought their lunch at noon. In the night,
however, the wild beasts met and replaced all the
trees and shrubbery that the brothers had removed.
Hunahpu and Xbalanque watched for them the next
night, but in spite of their efforts the beasts all
escaped although the deer and rabbit lost their tails
except the rat, which was caught in a handkerchief.
The rat s life was spared by the youths and in return
this animal revealed the glorious deeds of their fathers
and uncles, their games at ball, and the existence of
a ball of India rubber with other implements of the
game which they had left about the house. All of
the implements and the ball came into their posses
sion with the knowledge of the secret.
Joyful at their discovery Hunahpu and Xbalanque
went away to play in the ball-ground of their fathers,
and the monarchs of Xibalba, Hun Came and Yukub
Came, heard them and were angry, and sent messen
gers to summon them as their fathers had been sum
moned to play at Xibalba. The messengers came to
the house of Xmucane, who, filled with alarm, dis
patched a louse to carry the summons to her grand
sons. On the way the louse
consented, to insure
greater speed, to be swallowed by a
toad, the toad by
a serpent, and the serpent by the great bird Voc. On
arrival a series of vomitings ensued, until the toad
was free; but in spite of his most desperate efforts he
could not throw up the louse, who, it seems, had
played him a trick, lodged in his gums, and not been
31 A
ballet, according to Brasseur, still performed by the natives of
Guatemala, clad in wooden masks and peculiar costumes.
VOL. V. 12
swallowed at all. However, the message was de

livered, and the players returned home to take leave
of their grandmother and mother. Before their de
parture they planted each a cane in the middle of the
house, the fate of which should depend upon their
own, since it would wither at their death.
The ball-players set out for Xibalba by the route
their fathers had followed, passing the bloody river
and the river Papuhya but they sent in advance an
;
animal called Xan, with a hair of Hunahpu s leg to

prick the kings and princes. Thus they detected the
artificial men of wood, and also learned the names of
all the princes by their exclamations and mutual in
quiries when pricked. On their arrival at court they

refused to salute the manikins or to sit upon the red-
hot stone; they even passed through the first ordeal
in the House of Gloom, thus thrice avoiding the
tricks which had been played upon their fathers.
The kings were astonished and very angry, and the
game of ball was played, and those of Xibalba were
beaten. Then Hun Came and Vukub Came required
the victors to bring them four bouquets of flowers, or
dering the guards of the royal gardens to watch most
carefully,and committed Hunahpu and his brother to
the House of Lances the second ordeal where the
lancers were directed to kill them. Yet a swarm of
ants in the brothers service entered easily the royal
gardens, the lancers were bribed, and the sons of
Xquiq were still victorious. Those of Xibalba turned
pale, and the owls, guards of the royal gardens, were
punished by having their lips split.
Hunahpu and Xbalanque were subjected to the
third ordeal in the House of Cold, but warmed by
burning pine-cones they were not frozen. So in the
fourth and fifth ordeals, since they passed a night in
the House of Tigers and in the House of Fire with
out suffering injury; but in the House of Bats, al
though the occupants did them no harm, Hunahpu s
DEATH OF THE TWIN BROTHERS. 179
head was cut off by Camazotz, ruler of bats/ who

came from on high.
The beheading of Hunahpu was by no means fatal,
but after a combination of events utterly unintelligible,
including an assemblage of all the animals, achieve
ments particularly brilliant by the turtle and rabbit,
and another contest at ball-playing, the heroes came
out uninjured from all the ordeals to which they
were subjected in Xibalba.
At last, instructing two sorcerers, Xulu and Pacam,
that those of Xibalba had failed because the brutes
were not on their side, and directing them also what
to do with their bones, Hunahpu and Xbalanque
stretched themselves voluntarily face down on a fu
neral pile, still in Xibalba, and died together. Their
bones were pulverized and thrown into the river,
where they sank and were changed into fine young
men.
On the fifth day they re-appeared, like man-fishes;
and on the day following in the form of ragged old
men, dancing, burning and restoring houses, killing
and restoring each other to life, and performing other
wonderful things. They were induced to exhibit
their skill before the princes of Xibalba, killing and
o the king O and restoring
1
resuscitating O s dogf,
o burning O
the royal .palace; then a man was made the subject
of their art, Hunahpu was cut in pieces and brought
to life by Xbalanque. Finally, the rnonarchs of Xi
balba wished to experience personally the temporary
death; Hun Came, the highest in rank, was first
killed, then Vukub Came, but life was not restored to
them the two shooters of the blow-pipe had avenged
;
the wrongsO of their fathers; the monarchs of Xibalba

y
had fallen.
Having announced their true names and motives,

the two brothers pronounced sentence on the princes
of Xibalba. Their ball was to appear no more in
the favorite game, they were to perform menial
service, with only the beasts of the woods as vassals,
and this was to be their punishment for the wrongs

they had done; yet strangely enough, they were to
be invoked thereafter as gods, or rather demons, ac
cording to Ximenez. The character of the Xibalbans
is here described. They were fond of war, of fright-
/ O
ful aspect, ugly as owls, inspiring evil and discord;
faithless, hypocritical, and tyrants, they were both
black and white, painting their faces, moreover, with
divers colors. But their power was ruined and their
domination ceased. Meanwhile, the grandmother
Xmucane at home watched
the growth of the canes,
and was alternately with grief and joy, as these
filled
withered and again became green according to the
32
varying fortunes of the grandsons in Xibalba.
Finally, to return to Xibalba, Hunahpu and Xba-
lanque rendered the fitting funeral honors to their
fathers who had perished there, but who now
mounted to heaven and took their places as the sun
and moon; and the four hundred young men killed
by Zipacna became stars in the skies. Thus ends
the second division of the National Book of the
33
Quiches.
The first chapter of the third division relates an
other and final creation of man from maize, in Paxil,
or Cayala, land of divided and stagnant waters, and
has already been translated in full in another volume. 3 *
According to Brasseur s opinion it should follow the
account of the preceding creations, 35 and precede the
narrative of the struggle with Xibalba; but was in
troduced here at the beginning of the Quiche migra
tions intentionally in order to attach the later Quiche
32 The
place whence the brothers started to contend against the princes of
Xibalba, seems to have been Utatlan in Guatemala see vol. iv., pp. 124-8
for Gumarcaah the Quiche name of that place is said to signify house
of old withered canes. Moreover, Torquemada and Las Casas have pre
served the tradition that Exbalanqnen (Xbalanque) set out from Utatlan
for the conquest of hell. Monarq. Ind., torn, ii., p. 53; Hist. Apologctica,
MS., cap. 125. Xibalba doubtless had the signification of the infernal
regions in the popular traditions.
si
34 See vol.
ii., pp. 716-7.
3 * See
p. 172.
MIGRATION FROM TULAN. 181
nations more closely to the heroic epochs of their his

tory. The remaining chapters of the division have
36
also been translated in substance. In them are re
lated the adventures of Balani-Quitze, Balam-Agab,
Mahucutah, and Iqi-Balam, the product of the final
creation by Gucumatz and his companion deities, and
the founders of the Quiche nations. The people mul
tiplied greatly in a region called the East, and mi
grated in search of gods to Tulan-Zuiva, the seven
caves, where four gods were assigned to the four
leaders; namely, Tohil, Avilix, Hacavitz, and Nicah-
tagah. Here their language was changed or divided,
and the division into separate nations was established.
Suffering from cold and endeavors to obtain fire while
they were awaiting the sun, are the points most dwelt
upon during their stay in Tulan, and in connection
with these troubles the coming of an envoy from Xi-
balba is mentioned, 37 which circumstance may indicate
that Tulan was in the Xibalban region. But they
determined to abandon or were driven from Tulan,
and after a tedious journey, including apparently a
crossing of the sea, they reached Mt Hacavitz, where
at last they beheld the sun. Mt Hacavitz was ap
parently in Guatemala, and the events mentioned in
the record as having occurred subsequently to the
arrival there, although many are of a mythical nature
and few can be assigned to any definite epoch, may
best be referred to the more modern history of the
Quiche -Cakchiquel nations in Guatemala, to be
treated in a future chapter.
The events preceding the rising of the sun on Mt
Hacavitz, are not easily connected with the exploits
of Hunahpu and Xbalanque; but to suppose that they
follow in chronologic
O order, and that the traditions in
question reflect vaguely the history of the heroes or
tribes that prevailed against Xibalba is at least as
consistent as any theory that can be formed. The
36 Vol. iii. , pp. 47-54.
37
Popol Vuh, pp. 221-2.
chief objection is the implied crossing of the sea dur
ing the migration from Tulan, which may be an in

terpolation. A lamentation which they chanted on
Mt Hacavitz has considerable historical importance.
"Alas," they said, "we were ruined in Tulan, we
were separated, and our brothers still remain behind.
Truly we have beheld the sun, but they, where are
they now that the dawn has appeared? Truly Tohil
is the name of the god of the Yaqui nation, who was
called Yolcuat Quitzalcuat (Quetzalcoatl) when we
parted yonder in Tulan. Behold whence we set out
together, behold the common cradle of our race,
whence we have come. Then they remembered their
brothers far behind them, the nation of the Yaqui
whom their dawn enlightened
O in the countries now
called Mexico. There was also a part of the nation
which they left in the east, and Tepeu and Oliman
"
were the places where they remained.

A
Cakchiquel record of what would seem to be the
same primitive traditions contained in the Popol Vuh,
exists but has never been published. It is only known
through an occasional reference or quotation in the
writings of Brasseur de Bourbourg. From one of
these references 39 we learn that the barbarian Utiu,
Jackal, or Coyote, that conducted Gucumatz to Paxil
where maize was discovered, was killed by one of the
heroes or deities; hence the name Hunahpu Utiu,
shooter of the blowpipe at the coyote. The follow
ing quotation from the same document refers to the
name Tulan, which with its different spellings occurs
so perplexingly often in all the primitive traditions of
American civilization. persons came from "Four
Tulan, from the direction of the rising sun, that is

one Tulan. There is another Tulan in Xibalbay and
another where the sun sets, and it is there that we
came; and in the direction of the setting sun there is
another where is the srod: so that there are four
<->
38
39 Notes to Popol Vuh, pp. Ixxxv, ccliv.
MEANING OF THE QUICHE TRADITIONS. 183
Tulans; and it is where the sun sets that we came to

Tulan, from the other side of the sea where this Tulan
is, and it is there that we were
conceived and begot
40
ten by our mothers and our fathers."
Such in a condensed form are the tales that make
up the primitive annals of the Quiche nations of
Guatemala. We
may be very sure that, be they
marvelous or common-place, each is founded on an
actual occurrence, and has its meaning. That mean
ing, so far as details are concerned, has been doubt
less in most instances lost. We
may only hope to
extract from the tenor of the record as a whole, a
general idea respecting the nature of the
historic
events thus vaguely recorded; and even this would
be perhaps a hopeless task, were it not for the aid
derived from the Tzendal traditions, with monu
mental, and linguistic arguments al
institutional,
ready considered, and the Nahua records yet to be
examined. It is not altogether visionary to behold in
the successive creations by Gucumatz, the plumed
serpent, and his companions, as we have done in the
coming of Votan, the introduction or growth of a new
civilization, new forms of government or religion, new
habits of life in America; even if we cannot admit
literally the arrival at a definite time and place
of a civ-
ilizer, Gucumatz, or hope to reasonably explain each
of his actions. It is not necessary to decide whether
the new culture was indigenous or of foreign origin; or
even to suppose it radically different from any that
preceded or were contemporaneous with it. We
need not go back to ancient times to see partisans or
devotees attach the greatest importance to the slight
est differences in government or
religion, looking
with pity or hatred on that are indifferent or
all
opposed. Thus in the traditions before us opponents

and rivals are pictured as the powers of darkness,
while tribes that cling to the freedom of the forests
and are slow to accept the blessings of civilized life,
40
/(/., pp. xci-ii.
184 THE PKE-TOLTEC PERIOD.
are almost invariably spoken of as brutes. The final

creation of man, and the discovery of maize as an
essential element in his composition, refer apparently
to the introduction among or adoption by the new
people or new sect of agriculture as a means of sup
port, but possibly to the creation of a high rank of
secular or religious rulers. Utm, the Jackal, a bar
barian, led Gucumatz and his companions to Paxil
Cayala where maize was found, but was killed by the
new-comers in the troubles that ensued. Early in
the narrative, however, the existence of a rival power,
the great empire of Xibalba, almost synonymous with
the infernal regions, is explicitly indicated, and a
large portion of the Popol Vuh is devoted to the
struggle between the two. The princes and nations
of Xibalba, symbolized in Vukub Cakix, Zipacna,
Cabrakan, Hun Came, and Vukub Came, were nu
merous and powerful, but, since the history is written
by enemies, they were of course bad. Their chief
fault, their unpardonable sin, consisted in being
puffed up with pride against the Heart of Heaven,
in refusing to accept the views of the new sect.
Consequently the nations and chiefs that had arrayed
themselves on the side of Gucumatz, represented by
Xbalanque and Hunahpu, of several generations,
struggle long and desperately to humble their own
enemies and those of the supreme god, Hurakan.
The oft-repeated struggles are symbolized by games
at ball between the rival chiefs. The ball grounds
O
or halls are battle-fields. The animals of the forests
often take a prominent part on one side or the other;
that is, the savage tribes are employed as allies.
Occasionally men are for some offense or stupidity
changed to monkeys, or tribes allied with the self-
styled reformers and civilizers prove false to their
allegiance and return to the wild freedom of the
mountains. It is difficult, if not impossible, to de
termine the meaning of that portion of the narrative
which recounts the immaculate conception of the
CONQUEST OF XIBALBA. 185
princess Xquiq; but Brasseur, not without reason,

sees in the birth of Hunahpu and Xbalanque from a
Xibalban mother, an indication that the rival nations
became more or less mixed by intermarriage. The
same author conjectures that the quarrels between
the two twins and their elder half-brothers record
dissensions that arose between the chiefs of pure and
mixed blood. After a long series of wars with vary
ing results, symbolized by the repeated games of ball,
and the ordeals to which Xbalanque and his brother
were successively subjected, the princes of Xibalba
were defeated. From the terms in which the victory
is described in the tradition, the general impression
is conveyed that it was not a conquest involving the
destruction of cities and the extermination or enslav
ing of the people; but rather the overthrow of a
dynasty; the transfer of the supreme power to na
tions that formerly occupied subordinate positions.
The chief feature in the celebration of the triumph
was the apotheosis of the heroes who had fallen
during the struggle.
After the triumph of Gucumatz followers, the
written tradition is practically silent. Of the great
ness of the newly constituted empire we know noth
ing; the record only re-opens when misfortune has
again come upon the nations and they are forced to
abandon Tulan for new homes. Neither their defeats
nor the names of their conquerors were thought wor
thy of a place in the annals of the Quiche nations,
afterwards so powerful in Guatemala; yet we can
hardly doubt that the princes of Xibalba contributed
to their overthrow. Forced to leave Tulan, spoken of
as the cradle of their race, they migrated in three
divisions, one towards the mountain!? of Guatemala,
one towards Mexico, and the third toward the east by
way of Tepeu and Oliman, which the Cakchiquel man
uscript is said to locate on the boundary of Peten and
Yucatan.
The Quiche traditions, then, point clearly to, 1st,
the existence in times of a great empire

ancient
somewhere America, called Xibalba by its
in Central
enemies ; 2d, the growth of a rival neighboring power ;
3d, a long struggle extending through several gen

and resulting in the downfall of the
erations at least,
Xibalban kings; 4th, a subsequent scattering, the
cause of which is not stated, but was evidently war,
civil or foreign, of the formerly victorious nations
from Tulan, their chief city or province; 5th, the
identification of a portion of the migrating chiefs with
the founders of the Quiche-Cakchiquel nations in pos
session of Guatemala at the Conquest. The National
Book, unaided, would hardly suffice to determine the
location of Xibalba, Avhich was very likely the name
of a capital city as well as of the empire. Utatlan,
in the Guatemalan highlands, is clearly pointed out
as the place whence Xbalanque set out for its con
quest, and several other names of localities in Guate
mala are also mentioned, but it should be noted that
the tradition comes through Guatemalan sources, and
it is not necessary even to suppose that Utatlan was
the centre of the forces that struggled against the
powers of darkness. Yet since we know .through
Tzendal traditions and monumental relics, of the great
Votanic empire of the Chanes, which formerly in
cluded the region of Palenque, there can hardly be
room for hesitation in identifying the two powers.
The description of Paxil Cayala, divided and stagnant
waters, "amost excellent land, full of good things,
.
where the white and yellow maize did abound, also

the cacao, where were sapotes and many fruits, and
honey; where all was overflowing with the best of
food," agrees at least as well with the Usumacinta
region as with* any other in Central America. The
very steep descent by which Xbalanque reached Xi
balba from Utatlan, corresponds perfectly with the
topography of the country towards the Usumacinta.
The statement that in the final migration from Tulan
to Guatemala, two parties were left behind, one of
XIBALBA THE VOTANIC EMPIRE. ,
187
which went to Mexico, and the other was left in the

east, also seems to point in the same direction. The
Cakchiqud Manuscript tells us that there was a Tulan
in Xibalba, evidently the one whence the final migra
tion took place, arid from the Tzendal tradition
through Ordonez we have learned that Tulha, or Tu
lan, was one of the great cities of Votan s Empire.
Finally there is absolutely nothing in the narrative
which points to any other location.
Xibalba was then the Empire of the Serpents, to
which tradition assigns Votan as a founder; the same
name was applied also to its capital city Nachan, prob
ably identical with Palenque; and Tulan, or Tulha,
the centre of nations which were successively subjects,
allies, rivals, and conquerors of the imperial city, may
be conjecturally identified with the ruined Ococingo
or Copan. Vukub Cakix, the last but two of the
Xibalban monarchs was" perhaps the same as Chinax
;
who occupied the same position in the Tzendal tra

dition and calendar. But who were the followers of
Gucurnatz, the nations before whose leaders, Hunah-
pu and Xbalanque, the pride of Xibalba was humbled,
and to whom the traditions thus far studied have
assigned no name? It is most natural to identify
them with the Tzequiles, who, according to the tra
dition, arrived during Votan s absence, gave his fol
lowers new ideas of government and religion, were
assigned lands, and became a powerful people with
Tulan as their capital. This makes the Tzendal tra
dition much more intelligible and complete, and agrees
much better with the Quiche record, than the oppo
site one adopted without any apparent reason by
Brasseur de Bourbourg. According to the Quiche
chant of lamentation, one division of the refugees from
Tulan went north to Mexico, where they found their
dawn/ their greatness. This seems to point toward
the Nahua nations, which alone achieved greatness in
Mexico during historic times. The tribes which mi
grated northward are called, in the Popol Vuh, Yaqui,
a name which according to Brasseur de Bourbourg,

has much the same signification etymologically as
Nahuatl, and was commonly applied by the Maya-
Quiche peoples of Central America to the Mexi
cans. Moreover, their god, Tohil, was called by
these Yaqui tribes, even while they were yet in Tulan,
Yolcuat Quitzalcuat, while the most prominent of
the Nahua divinities is well known to the readers of
the preceding volumes to have been Quetzalcoatl.
Chanes, the only name given to the subjects of Votan
and his successors, is the equivalent of Culhuas, a
word which, especially in composition, is of frequent
occurrence in all the native tongues. Culhuacan was
one of the most celebrated cities of Andhuac, as the
Acolhuas were among the most noted peoples. Again
Tulan Zuiva is defined as the Seven Caves, in the
Nahua tongues Chicomoztoc, which the Aztecs are well
known to have claimed as a former home. One of the
divinities engaged in the creation, or in the propaga
tion of the new doctrines in the region of Xibalba was
the chief of Toltecat, another name prominent in all
Nahua traditions as that of their most famous nation,
the Toltecs; and finally Gucumatz, the great leader of
Xibalba s conquerors, was identical, with Quetzalcoatl,
since both names signify equally the plumed ser
pent, the former in Quiche the latter in Aztec.
,
These facts seem significant and naturally direct our

attention to an examination of the early Nahua re
cords.
The records of the Nahua nations, so far as they

relate to the pre-Toltec period, if more extensive and
numerous, are not less confused than those of the
south. To bring into any semblance of order this
mass of contradictory semi-mythical, semi-historic de
tails, to point out and defend the historic meaning of
each aboriginal tale, is an impossible task which I do
not propose to undertake. The only practicable course
is to present the
leading points of these early tradi-
THE NAHUAS IN TAMOANCHAN. 189
tions as they are given by the best authorities, and to

draw from them, as I have done from the Tzendal and
Quiche records, some general conclusions respecting
the most probable course of primitive history; for
conclusions of a very general nature, and bearing on
probabilities only, are all that we can expect to reach
respecting pre-Toltec America. Sahagun, justly es
teemed as one of the best authorities, speaks in sub-,
stance as follows: 41
Countless years ago the first settlers arrived in New
Spain. Coming in ships by sea, they approached a
northern port and because they disembarked there it
;
was or Panoaia,
called Panutla, place where they
arrived who came by sea, now corruptly called Pan-
tlan (Panuco) and from this port they began to follow
;
the coast, beholding the snowy sierras and the vol

canoes, until they reached the province of Guatemala;
being guided by a priest carrying their god, with
whom .he continually took counsel respecting what
they ought to do. They came to settle in Tamo-
anchan, where they remained a long time, and never
ceased to have their wise men, or prophets, called
amoxoaque, which means men learned in the ancient
paintings, who, although they came at the same time,
did not remain with the rest in Tamoanchan; since
leaving them there, they re-embarked and carried
away with them all the paintings w hich they had
T
brought relating to religious rites and mechanical arts.

Before their departure they spoke as follows "Know :
that our god commands you to remain here in these

lands, of which he makes you masters and gives you
possession. He returns to the place whence he and
we came; but he will come back to visit you when it
shall be time for the world to come to an end; mean
time you will await him in these lands, possessing
them and all contained in them, since for this purpose
you came hither; remain therefore, for we go with
our god." Thus they departed with their god wrapped
41
Sahagun, Hist. Gen., torn, iii., lib. x., pp. 139-45.
in blankets, towards the east, taking all the paintings.

Of the wise men only four remained, Oxomoco, Cipac-
tonal, Tlaltetecui, and Xuchicaoaca, who, after the
others had departed, consulted together, saying: A
time will come when there will be light for the direc
tion of this republic; but during the absence of our
god, how shall the people be ruled ? What order will
there be in all things, since the wise men carried away
their paintings by which they governed ? Therefore
did they invent judicial astrology and the art of in
terpreting dreams they composed the calendar, which
;
was followed during the rule of the Toltecs, Mexicans,

Tepanecs, and Chichimecs. By this calendar, how
ever,it is not
possible to ascertain how long they re
mained in Tamoanchan, although this was known by
the paintings burned in the time of the Mexican ruler,
Itzcoatl, in whose reign the lords and princes agreed
that 9,11 should be burned that they might not fall
into the hands of the vulgar and be unappreciated.
From Tamoanchan they went to sacrifice at Teotihua-
can, where they built two mountains in honor of the
sun and moon, and where they elected their rulers,
and buried the lords and princes, ordering the tumuli,
stillto be seen, to be made over their graves. Some
description of the mounds follows, with the statement
that they were the work of giants. The town of
Teotl, or god, was called Teotihuacan, because the
princes who were buried there were made gods after
death, and were thought not to have died but to have
waked from a sleep. From Tamoanchan certain fam
ilies went to settle the provinces called Olmeca Vix-
toti. Here are given some details of these Olmecs
and of the Huastecs, to be spoken of later.
After the centre of power had been a long time in
Tamoanchan, it was afterwards transferred to the
town called Xumiltepec. Here the lords and priests
and the old men discovered it to be the will of their
god that they should not remain always in Xumilte
pec, but that they were to go farther; thus all grad-
THE NAHUA TRADITIONS. 191
ually started on their migration, having first repaired

to Teotihuacan to choose their leaders and wise men.
In this migration they came to the valley of the
Seven Caves. There is no account of the time they
remained there, but finally the Toltecs were told by
their god that they must return (that is towards Teo
tihuacan, or Anahuac), which they did and came to
Tollancingo (Tularicingo), and finally to Tulan (Tol-
lan).
In the introduction to the same work 42 we are told
also that the first settlers came from towards Florida,
followed the coast, and landed at the port of Panuco.
They came in search of the terrestrial paradise/
were called Tamoanchan, which means we seek our
house, and settled near the highest mountains they
found. "In
coming southward to seek the earthly
paradise, they did not err, since it is the
opinion of
those that know
that it is under the equinoxial line."
In Sahagun s version of the tradition we find Ta
43
moanchan, the first home of the Nahua nations in
America, definitely located down the coast from Pa
nuco in the province of Guatemala. The coast region
of Tabasco was probably included in this author s
time in Guatemala; at least it is as near Guatemala
as the new-comers could get by following the coast.
The location therefore agrees with that of Xibalba
and the Votanic empire as derived from other
sources; and in fact the whole narrative may with
great plausibility be applied to the events described
in the Quiche tradition the arrival of Gucumatz
and his companions (although Sahagun does not
name Quetzalcoatl as the leader of the immigrants),
the growth of a great power in the central region,
and the final forced migration from Tulan Zuiva, the
Seven Caves. The absence of the name Tulan, as
42
Tom. i., p. xviii.
43
According to Brasseur cle Bourbourg, Hist. Nat. Civ., torn, i., p. 59,
the name should be Temoanchan to agree exactly with Sahagun s
definition,
vamos a nuestra casa. The same author heard an Indian of Guatemala
define the name as an earthly paradise. Popol Vuh, pp. Ixxviii-lxxix.
applied to a city or county in Central America, from

the northern traditions as they have been preserved
for our examination, may be very satisfactorily ac
counted for by the fact that another great city
founded much later in Anahuac, the capital of the
Toltec monarchy, was also called Tollan consequently ;
such traditions as the Spaniards gathered from the

natives respecting a Tulan, were naturally referred by
them to the later city. It is to be noted, moreover,
in this connection, that the descriptions given by the
Spanish writers of Tollan, with its luxuriant vegeta
tion, and birds of brilliant plumage, often apply
much better to the southern than to the northern
Anahuac. In addition to the points mentioned in
the Quiche record, we learn from Sahagun that the
Toltec calendar wâs invented or introduced during
the stay in that southern country of Tamoanchan 44 ;
that the Nahna power in the south extended north

to Anahuac and embraced Teotihuacan, a holy city
and religious centre, even in those remote times;
that the Olmecs, Miztecs, and Huastecs belonged to
the same group of nations and their rise or appear
ance to the same period; and that from the Seven
Caves the Toltecs migrated that is their centre or
capital was transferred to Tulancingo, and later to
Tollan. All these points we shall find confirmed more
or less directly by other authorities.
A very important Nahua record, written in Aztec

with Spanish letters by an anonymous native author,
and copied by Ixtlilxochitl, which belonged to the
famous Boturini collection, is the Codex Chimalpo-
45
poca. Unfortunately it has never been published,
44 Brasseur believes that the Oxomoco and Cipactonal of the Nahua
myth, are the same as the Xpiyacoc and Xmncane of the Popol Vuh, since
the former are two of the inventors of the calendar, while the latter are
called grandmothers of the sun and light. Popol Vuh, pp. 4, 20.
45 Una Historia de los Rcynos dc Culhuacan, y Mexico, en lengua Na-
huatl, y papel Enropeo de Autor Anonymo, y tiene anadida nna Breve Re
lation de los Dioses, y liitos de la Gentilidad en lengua Castellana, etc.
Esta todo copiado de letra de Don Fernando de Alba y le falta la primera
THE CODEX CHIMALPOPOCA. 193
and itscontents are only known by occasional refer

ences in the works of Brasseur de Bourbourg, who
had a copy of the document. From the passages
quoted by the abbe I take the following brief ac
count, which seems of some importance in connection
with the preceding:
"This is the
beginning of the history of things
which came to pass long ago, of the division of the
earth, the property of all, its origin and its founda
tion, as well as the manner in which the sun divided
it six times four hundred plus one hundred plus thir
teen years ago to-day, the twenty-second of May,

1558." "Earth and the heavens -were formed in the
year Ce Tochtli but man had already been created

;
four times. God formed him of ashes, but Quetzal-

coatl had perfected him." After the flood men wr ere
46
changed into dogs. After a new and successful at
tempt at creation, all began to serve the gods, called
Apantecutli, master of the rivers/ Huictlollinqui,
"
he who causes the earth to shake, Tlallamanac, he

who presides on the earth, and Tzontemoc, he whose
hair descends. Quetzalcoatl remained alone. Then
they said, "the vassals of the gods are born they have ;
already begun to serve but they added, "what

us,"
will you eat, O gods?" and Quetzalcoatl went to search

for means of subsistence. At that time Azcatl, the
ant, going to Tonacatepetl, mount of our subsist
ence, for maize, was met by Quetzalcoatl, who said,
foja. Boturini, Catdlogo, pp. 17-18. M. Aubin, qui possede les copies
faites par Gama et Pichardo, ajoute au sujet de ce document: "Cette
histoire, composee en 1563 et en 1579, par un ecrivain de Quauhtitlan
et non par Fernando de Alba (Ixtlilxochitl), comm.e 1 a era Pichardo,
n est guere moins precieuse que les precedentes (in Brasseur s list), et
remonte, annee par annee, au moins jusqu a Fan 751 de J.C. A la suite
de ces annales se trouve 1 histoire anonyme (! Histoire des soleils), d oii
Gama a extrait le texte mexicain de la tradition sur les soleils." Bras
seur de Bourbourg, Hist. Nat. Civ., torn, i., p. Ixxix. Id., Popol Vuh, p.
;
xi.
Chichime or dogs, a transformation which may not improbably have
46
something to do with the origin of the name Chichimecs, a name applied to

so many tribes in all parts of the country. The/ Codex Qhimalpopoca, how
ever, speaks also of a transformation into monkeys .as .a result of a great
hurricane. Popol Vuh, p. Ixxx.
VOL. V. 13
"where hast thou been to obtain that thing? Tell

me." At first the Ant would not tell, but the
Plumed Serpent insisted, and repeated, "whither
shall I Then they went there together, Quet-
go?"
47
zalcoatl metamorphosing himself into a black ant.
48
Tlaltlauhqui Azcatl, the yellow ant, accompanied
Quetzalcoatl respectfully, as they went to seek maize
and brought it to Tamoanchan. Then the gods
began to eat, and put some of the maize in our
mouths that we might become strong. 49 The same
record implies that Quetzalcoatl afterwards became
obnoxious to his companions and abandoned them. 50
In this document we have evidently an account of
substantially the same events that are recorded in
the Tzendal and Quiche records: the division of the
earth by the Sun in the year 955 B.C., or as Ordonez
interprets the Tzendal tradition, by Votan about
1000 B.C. the formation of the earth by the su
;
preme being, and the successive creations of man, or

attempts to introduce civilization among savages
through the agency of Quetzalcoatl, acts ascribed by
the Quiche tradition to the same person under the
name of Gucumatz; the flood and resulting trans
formation of men into dogs, instead of monkeys as in
the Popol Vuhj symbolizing perhaps the relapse into
savagism of partially civilized tribes; the adoption
of agriculture represented in both traditions as an
expedition by Quetzalcoatl, or Gucumatz, in search of
maize. According to the Popol Vidi he sought the
maize in Paxil and Cayala, divided and stagnant
waters, by the aid of Utiu, the coyote; while in
the Nah.ua tradition, .aided by Azcatl, the ant, he
finds the desired food in Tonacatepetl, mount of our
subsistence. Finally, the Codex Chimalpopoca iden-
47
Or, as Brasseur suggests, adopting the customs of the people in order
to obtain the entree of
Tonacatepetl and the secret of their agriculture.
18
Molina, Vocabulario, translates the name, red ant.
49 Codex
Chimalpopoca. in Brasseur de Bourbourg, Hist. Nat. Civ., torn,
i., pp. 53-9, 70-1.
*
Id., p. 117.
PRIMITIVE NATIONS OF MEXICO. 195
tifies the home of the Nahua nations, whence the

search for maize was made, with Tamoanchan, which
Sahagun has clearly located in Tabasco.
Before considering the traditions that relate the

migration of the Toltecs proper to Tollan in Anahuac,
it will be most convenient to
give the little that is
known of those nations that are supposed to have
preceded the Toltecs in Mexico. The chief of these
are the Quinames, Olmecs, Xicalancas, Totonacs,
51
Huastecs, Miztecs, Zapotecs, and Otomis. The
Olmecs and Xicalancas, who are sometimes rep
resented as two nations, sometimes as divisions of
the same nation, are regarded by all the authorities
as Nahuas, speaking the same language as the Tol
tecs, but settled in Ariahuac long before the estab
lishment of the Toltec Empire at Tollan. As nations
they both became extinct before the Spanish Con
quest, as did the Toltecs, but there is little doubt
that their descendants under new names and in new
national combinations still lived in Puebla, southern
Vera Cruz, and Tabasco the region traditionally set
tled by them down to the coming of the Spaniards.
They are regarded as the first of the Nahua nations
in this region and are first noticed
by tradition on the
south-eastern coasts, whither they had come in ships
from the east. Sahagun, as we have seen, identifies
them with certain families of the Nahuas who set out
from Tamoanchan to settle in the northern coast re
gion. Ixtlilxochitl tells us they occupied the land in
the third age of the world, landing on the east coast as
51 The
Cuicatecs, Triquis, Chinantecs, Mazatecs, Chatinos, Papabucos,
Soltecos, Chontales, and Cohuixcas, in the south-western regions, are re
garded by Orozco y Berra as fragments of pre-Toltec nations. Geografia,
pp. 121, 126. Prichard, Nat. Hist. Man, vol. ii., p. 512, adds the Coras,
lepanecs, and Tarascos. The Codices Vaticanus and Tellerianus, give
the names of the tribes that migrated from the seven caves, as Olmecs,
Xicalancas, Chichimecs, Nonohualcas, Michinacas, Conixcas, Totonacs,
and Cuextecas. The Nonohualcas and Xicalancas, however, were prob
ably the same, and we shall see later that Chichimecs was probably never
a tribal name at all. Gallatin, in Amer. Ethno. Soc., Transact., vol. i., p.
135.
52
far as the land of muddy water/ or in the
Papuha,
region about the Laguna de Terminos. Veytia names
Panuco as their landing-place, and gives the date as
a few years after the regulation of the calendar,
63
already noticed in Sahagun s record. Their national
names are derived from that of their first rulers Ol-
mecatl and Xicalancatl. Two ancient cities called
Xicalanco are reported on the gulf coast one of them, ;
which flourished nearly or quite down to the time of

the Conquest, and whose ruins are still said to be vis
ible,
54
was just below Vera Cruz; the other, probably
the more ancient, stood at the point which still bears
the name of Xicalanco at the entrance to the La
guna de Terminos. This whole region is also said to
have borne the name of Anahuac Xicalanco. 55 Men-
56
dieta and Torquemada relate that the followers of
Xicalancatl peopled the region towards the Goazaco-
alco, where stood the two cities referred to. The peo
ple of that part of the country were generally known
at the time of the Conquest as Nonohualcas. The
chief development of this people, or of its Olmec
branch, was, so far as recorded in tradition, in the
state of Puebla further north and inland.
This tradition of the arrival of strangers on the
eastern coast, and the growth of the Olmec and Xi-
calanca powers on and north of the isthmus, in view
of the facts that these nations are universally regard
ed as Nahuas and as the first of the race to settle in
Anahuac, cannot be considered as distinct from that
given by Sahagun respecting the Nahua race, espe
cially as the latter author speaks of the departure of
certain families from Tamoanchan to settle in the
52
Rclaciones, in KingsborougTi s Mex. Antiq., vol. ix., p. 459. Papuhya,
river of mud, is a name also applied by the Quiche tradition to a river
apparently in this region. See p. 178; Popol Vuh, pp. 140-1. Brasseur in
the same work, pp. Ixxii., Ixxvii-viii., refers to Las Casas. Jlist. ApoL,
torn, iii., cap. cxxiii-iv., as
relating
the arrival of these nations under
Quetzalcoatl and twenty chiefs at Point Xicalanco.
53
Veytia, Hist. Ant. Mej. y torn, i., p. 150.
54 See vol. iv., p. 434.
55 See vol. ii., p. 112.
56 Hist. Ecles., p. 146; Monarg. Ind., torn, i., p. 32.
OLMECS AND XICALANCAS. 197
provinces of Olmeca Vixtoti. It is most natural to

suppose that the new power extended gradually north
ward to Puebla as well as inland into Chiapas, where
it came more directly in contact with its
great rival.
This view of the matter is likewise supported by the
fact that Quetzalcoatl, the culture-hero, is said to have
wrought his great works in the time of the Olmecs

and Xicalancas according to some traditions to have
been their leader when they arrived on the coast.
Sahagun also applies the name Tlalocan, land of
riches, or terrestrial paradise, to this south-eastern
57
region, implying its identity with Tamoanchan.
Our knowledge of Olmec history subsequent to
their first
appearance, is few events
confined to a
which occurred in Puebla. Here, chiefly on the Rio
Atoyac near Puebla de los Angeles and Cholula,
they found the Quinames, or giants, a powerful peo
ple who long kept them subordinate in rank and
power, or, as the tradition expresses it, enslaved
them. These Quinames, as Ixtlilxochitl states, were
survivors of the great destruction which closed the
second age of the world. They were, according to
"more like brutes than rational
Veytia, beings; their
food was raw meat of birds and beasts which they
hunted indiscriminately, fruits and wild herbs, since
they cultivated nothing; but they knew how to make
pulque with which to make themselves drunk; going
entirely naked with disheveled hair." They were
cruel and proud, yet they received the strangers
kindly, perhaps through fear of their great numbers,
they being so few, and magnanimously permitted
them to settle in their lands. The Olmecs were
67
Sahagun, Hist. Gen., torn, i., lib. iii., p. 264, torn, iii., lib. x., p. 136:
Camargo, Hist. Tlux.,\\\ Nouvclles Annettes des Voy., 1843, torn, xcviii.,
pp. 135-7, is the only author who differs materially in his account of the
arrival and establishment of the Olmecs and Xicalancas. He states that in
company with the Zacatecs they came from the Seven Caves, passed through
Mexico, Tochimilco, Atlixco, Calpan, and Huexotziiico, founding their chief
settlement in Tlascala where the village of Natividad now stands. See vol.
iv.,pp. 478-9, for notice of ruins. Gomara, Conq. Hex., fol. 299-300, also
brings these nations from the Seven Caves.
treated well enough at first, although they looked

with terror upon the giants. The latter, aware of
the fear they inspired, became more and more inso
lent, claiming that as lords and masters of the land
they were showing the strangers a great favor in per
mitting them to live there. As a recompense for
this kindness they obliged the Olmecs to serve as
slaves, neither hunting nor fishing themselves, but
depending on their new servants for a subsistence.
Thus ill- treated, the Nahuas soon found their condi
tion insupportable. Another great cause of offence
was that the Quinames were addicted to sodomy, a
vice which they refused to abandon even when they
were offered the wives and daughters of the new
comers. At last it was resolved at a council of the
Olmec chiefs to free themselves once for all from
their oppressors. The means adopted were peculiar.
The giants were invited to a magnificent banquet;
the richest food and the most tempting native bev
erages were set before the guests; all gathered at the
feast, and as a result of their unrestrained appetites
were soon stretched senseless like so many blocks of
wood on the ground. Thus they became an easy
prey to the reformers, and perished to a man. The
Olmecs were free and the day of their national pros
perity dawned.
The Quinames, traditionally assigned as the first
inhabitants of nearly every part of the country, have
been the subject of much discussion among the Span
ish writers. Veytia indeed rejects the idea that a
race of giants actually existed, and Clavigero consid
ers their existence as a race very doubtful, although
O that there Avere doubtless individuals of

1
admitting
great size. Most other writers of this class accept
more or less literally the tradition of the giants who
were the first dwellers in the land, deeming the dis
covery of large bones in various localities and the
scriptural tales of giants in other parts of the world,
to be sufficient corroborative authority. Veytia thinks
THE QUINAMES, OR GIANTS. 199
the Quinames were probably of the same race as the

Toltecs, but were tribes cast out for their sloth; Ixt-
lilxochitl records the opinion entertained by some
that they were descended from the Chichimecs. The
former fixes the date of their destruction as 107, the
latter as 299, A. D. Oviedo adopts the conclusion of
Mendoza that the giants probably came from the
Strait of Magellan, the only place where such beings
were known to exist. Boturini saw no reason to
doubt the existence of the giants. Being large in
stature, they could out-travel the rest of mankind,
and thus became naturally the first settlers of distant
parts of the world. Torquemada, followed by Veytia,
identifies them with a similar race that traditionally
appeared at a very early time in Peru, where they

were destroyed by fire from heaven. 58
The Quinames were of course not giants, and it is
not at all probable that they were savage tribes. Such
tribes are described as animals rather than giants in
the American traditionary annals. The spirit of the
narrative, the great power ascribed to the Quinames,
their kind reception of the strangers, their growing
insolence, even their vices, point clearly, here as in
Chiapas, to a powerful nation, at first feared as mas
ters, then hated as rivals, but finally ruled as subjects
by the newly risen power. While it is impossible to
decide authoritatively in the matter, it may be re
garded as more than likely that this foe Avas a branch
of that overthrown in the south; that the Xibalban
power, as well as that of the Nahuas, extended far
the Quinames as having been killed while eating and drinking, by the
Tlascaltecs who had taken possession of their arms. He says they yielded
125; Brasseur de Bourbourg, Hist. Nat. Civ., torn, i., pp. 66, 153-4; Id.,
Popol Vuh, pp. Ixviii., cxxvii.; Id., Esquisses, p. 12; Granadps y Galvez,
Tardcs Amer., pp. 15, 21; Bios, Compend. Hist. Mcx.. p. 5; Pineda, in Soc.
Mex. G-eog., Boletin, torn, iii., p. 346; Pimentcl, in Dice. Univ., torn, x.,
p. 610.
towards Anahuac in the early days; that the great

struggle was carried on in the north as well as in
the south.
About the time the Quinames were defeated, the
pyramid of Cholula was erected under the direction
of a chief named Xelhua. The occasion of its being
built seems to have been connected in some way with
a flood, probably that mentioned in the Quiche tra
dition, the reports of which may or may not be
founded on an actual inundation more than usually
disastrous in a country subject to periodical overflow.
The authorities are not agreed whether the mighty
mound was intended as a memorial monument in
honor of the builder s salvation from a former flood,
or as a place of refuge in case the floodgates of the
skies should again be opened; neither is it settled
whether Xelhua was an Olmec or a Quiname chief
tain, although most authors incline to the former
opinion. Pedro de los Hios tells us that the bricks
for the construction of the pyramid were manu
factured at Tlalrnanalco and passed by a line of men
from hand to hand for a distance of several leagues.
O
Of course the Spanish writers have not failed to
connect this pyramid in some way with the Hebrew
traditions respecting the tower of Babel, especially
as work on the Cholula tower was stopped by fire,
sent from heaven by the irritated deities. 59
During the Olmec period, that is, the earliest
period of Nahua power, the great Quetzalcoatl ap
peared. We
have seen that in the Popol Vuli and
Codex Chimalpopoca this being is represented as the
half-divinity, half- hero, who came at the head of the
first Nahuas to America from across the sea. Other
On
building of Cholula pyramid, see Codex Mexicano, in Kingsbor-
59
Mex. Antiq., vol. v., p. 172; Ixtlilxochitl, in Id., vol. ix., pp. 200,
ottgli s
459; Gondra, in Prescott, Hist. Cong. Mex., torn, iii., pp. 45, 69; Vcytia,
Hist. Ant. Mej., torn, i., pp. 15, 18, 153; Boturini, Idea, pp. 113-14; tium-
boldt, Melanges, p. 553; Id., Vues, torn, i., p. 114; Popol Vuh, p. cxxv. ;
Brasseur de Bourbourg, Hist. Nat. Civ., torn, i., pp. 153, 301-3; Orozco y
Berra, Gcografia, p. 132; Gallatin, in Amer. Ethno. Soc., Transact., vol.
i. , p. 167.
QUETZALCOATL, THE CULTURE-HERO. 201
authorities imply rather that he came later from the

east or north, in the period of the greatest Olmec
prosperity, after the rival Quinames had been de
feated. To such differences in detail no great im
portance to be attached; since all that can be
is
definitely learned from these traditions is the facts

that Quetzalcoatl, or Gucumatz, was the most prom
inent of the Nahua heroes, and that his existence is
to be attributed to this earliest period, known in
Mexico as Olmec, but without a distinctive name
in the south. Quetzalcoatl was a white, bearded
man, just, and holy, who taught by
venerable,
precept and example the paths of virtue in all
the Nahua cities, particularly in Cholula. His
teachings, according to the traditions, had much in
common with those of Christ in the Old World, and
most of the Spanish writers firmly believed him
to be identical with one of the Christian apostles,
probably St Thomas. During his stay in this region
his doctrines do not seem to have met with a satis
factory reception, and he left disheartened. He pre
dicted before his departure great calamities, and
promised to return in a future year Ce Acatl, at
which time his doctrines were to be fully accepted,
and his descendants were to possess the land. Mon-
tezuma is known to have regarded the coming of
Cortes and the Spaniards as a fulfillment of this
prediction, and in his speech to the new-comers states
further that after his first visit Quetzalcoatl had
60
already once returned, and attempted unsuccessfully
to induce his followers to go back with him across
the sea. The first part of the prophet s prediction
actually came to pass, as traditions tell us, for only a
few days after his departure occurred the earthquake
which destroyed the pyramid at Cholula, the Amer
ican Babel, and ushered in the new or fourth age of
fire, according to Ixtlilxochitl. On the ruins of the
Quetzalcoatl however
60 is not named.
CorUs, Cartas, p. 86.
pyramid was built a temple to Quetzalcoatl, who was

afterwards worshiped as a god. 61
We
shall find very similar traditions of another
Quetzalcoatl who appeared much later, during the
Toltec period, and who also made Cholula a centre of
his reform. As we shall see, the evidence is tolerably
conclusive that the two are not the same, yet it is
more than likely that the traditions respecting them
have been considerably mixed both in native and Eu
ropean hands. After the time of Quetzalcoatl we
know nothing of Olmec or Xicalaiica history down to
the establishment of the Toltec empire, when these
nations were still in possession of the country of Puebla
and Tlascala. Boturini conjectures that, being driven
from Mexico, they migrated to the Antilles and to
South America. There is not, however, the slightest
necessity to suppose that the Olmecs ever left the
country at all. Their institutions and language were
the same as that of the Toltec peoples that nominally
succeeded them, and although like the Toltecs they
became extinct as a nation, yet there is no reason to
doubt that their descendants lived long in the land,
and took part in the new political combinations that
make up Nahua history down to the Conquest. 62
Respecting Quetzalcoatl in his mythological aspects as a divinity, see
61
vol. iii., pp. 248-87. The story of his visit to the Olmecs is told in Ixtlilxo-
chitl, in Kingsborougli, vol. ix., pp. 206, 459; Vcytia, Hist. Ant. Mej., torn,
i.,pp. 155-6, 161-204.
62
Boturini, Idea, p. 135; Clavigero, Storia Ant. del Messico, torn, iv.,
p. 52, torn, i., p. 147. Between Chiapas and Zacatecas is a vast space, of
which the only notion given us by history is the fact that the Olmecs, Xi
calancas, and Zapotecs lived in the region of Puebla and Tlascala. They
were the primitive peoples, that is, the first known. Orozco y Berra, Geo-
grafia, pp. 124-5. The Xicalancas founded Atlixco and Itzucan, but mi
grated to South America. The Olmecs who had been driven to the gulf
coasts followed them. Carbajal Espinosa, Hist. Mcx., torn, i., p. 242. The
Xicalancas possessed the country before the Chichimecs, by whom they
were regarded as enemies. Ixtlilxochitl, in Kingsboroitgk s Mcx. Antiq.,
vol. ix., p. 461. Mexicans, Culhuas, Tepanecs, Olmecs, Xicalancas, Taras-
cos, and Chichimecs wereall of the same race and language. Camargo,
Hist. Tlax., in Nouvelles Annales des Voy., 1843, torn, xcviii., pp. 131,
135, 138. See also Brasseur de Bourbourg, Hist. Nat. Civ., torn, i., pp.
67, 196, torn, iii., p. 9; Bradford s Amer. Antiq., pp. 200, 213; Hellwald,
in Smithsonian Eept., 1866, p. 337; Midler, Rciftcn, torn, iii., pp. 33-4.
The Olmecs passed from Mexico to Guatemala, which they conquered.
Alcedo, Dice., torn, iii., p. 374. Palenque, the oldest American city,
THE TOTONACS AND TEOTIHUACAN. 203
The Totonacs are included by the authorities among

the primitive, or Pre-Toltec nations in Anahuac. At
the time of the Conquest they occupied central Yera
Cruz, their chief city being Zempoala; but they
claimed to have migrated from the valley of Mexico,
and to have lived long near the banks of Lake Tez-
cuco, where they built the pyramids at Teotihuacan,
a place already noticed as a religious centre in this
early period. Torquemada seems to be the original
authority for the Totonac traditions respecting their
primitive history, having obtained his information
from an aged native. His brief account, quoted in
substance by all others who have mentioned the sub
ject, is as follows: "Of their
origin they say that
they set out from the place called Chicomoztoc, or
Seven Caves, together with the Xalpanecs and that ;
they were twenty divisions, or families, as many of

one as of the other; and although thus divided into
families, they were all of one language and of the
same customs. They say they started from that
place, leaving the Chichimecs still shut up there and ;
they directed their journey towards this part of Mex

ico, and having arrived at the plains on the lake, they
halted at the place where Teotihuacan now is; and
they affirm that they built these two temples which
were dedicated to the sun and moon. Here they re
mained for some time, but either not contented with
the place, or with a desire to pass to other places,
they went to Atenamitic, where Zacatlan now stands."
Thence they gradually moved eastward until at last
they settled on the coast in their present location.
That the pyramids of Teotihuacan 63 were built by the
Nahuas the Olmecs or one of their companion na
tions and became their religious centre and the
burial-place of their kings and priests long before the
was built by the Olmecs, a mixture of yellow aborigines and the first white
immigrants. Viollet-le-Duc, in Charnay, Ruines Amer., p. 45. The Maza-
huas and Olmecs belong to the aborigines of Guatemala. Miiller, Aine-
rikct)dschc Urreligionen, p. 456.
63 For
description see vol. iv., pp. 529-44.
establishment of the empire of Tollan, there can be

but little doubt; nor is it improbable that the Toto-
nacs were, as they claim to be, a pre-Toltec tribe in
Analiuac; but that they were in this early time a
Nahua tribe, a nation contemporaneous with the 01-
mecs and of the same institutions, that they were the
builders of Teotihuacan, is only proved by their own
claim as recorded by Torquemada. This evidence
must probably be regarded as insufficient in view of
the fact that the Totonac language is wholly distinct
from the Nahua. 64 It is true that, as will be seen
later, all the ancient tribes, that adopted more or less
the Nahua institutions, and joined in the struggle
against the rival Maya powers, did not speak the
same language ; but it is also very probable that many
nations in later times, when the Nahua power as rep
resented by the Aztecs had become so predominant,
claimed ancient Nahua affinities to which they had
no right. 65 In addition to what has already been said
respecting Teotihuacan, only one event is mentioned
in its pre-Toltec history, the apotheosis of Nana-
huatzin, an event which probably preceded rather
than followed the erection of the pyramids. The
strange fable respecting this event, already related in
a preceding volume, 66 is, briefly, to the effect that the
gods were assembled at Teotihuacan for the purpose
of inducing the sun to appear and illumine their dark
ness. A
great fire having been kindled, and the an
nouncement made that the honors of apotheosis would
64 Brasseur de
Bourbourg, Hist. Nat. Civ., torn, i., p. 56, pronounces
the Totonac very like the Maya.
Orozcp y Berra, Geografia, p. 127,
deems the relationship donhtfnl. See vol. iii., pp. 776-7.
65 On the see
Totonacs, Torquemada, Monarq. Ind., toin. i., p. 278; Pi-
mentel, Cuadro, torn.!., pp. 223-7; Clavigero, StoriaAnt. del Mcssico, torn,
iv., pp. 51-2; Brasseur de Bourbourg, Hist. Nat. Civ., torn, i., pp. 151-61,
torn, iii., pp. 350-1. This author says that the Totonacs came from the north
at about the same time as the Olmecs came from the south. There seems
to be no authority for this save the popular opinion that locates Chicomoztoc
in the north. Orozco y Berra, Geografia, pp. 120, 140. The Aztecs at
tributed Teotihuacan, Cholula, Papantla, etc., to the Toltecs because
they were the oldest people they knew; but they may have been built be
fore the Toltec invasion. Humboldt, Vues, torn, i., p. 98.
66 Vol.
iii., p. 60, et seq.
APOTHEOSIS OF NANAHUATZIN. 205
be given to him who should give himself up as a liv

ing sacrifice, Nanahuatzin threw himself into the fire,
was instantly devoured and transformed into the sun,
which at once appeared in the east. Metztli followed
the example of Nanahuatzin, and took his place in
the heavens as the moon, less brilliant than his com
panion, since the heat of the fire had somewhat
abated before his sacrifice. The true historic signifi
cation of this account we cannot hope to ascertain,
yet it is of great interest, since it seems to point to
the introduction in these regions of sun-worship and
of human sacrifice; indeed, the Codex Chimalpopoca,
according to Brasseur, expressly states that "then
began divine immolation at Teotihuacan." The same
authority gives this event also as the beginning of a
new chronologic period called Nahui Ollin Tonatiuh,
the sun in its four movements, thus suggesting some
connection between this assemblage and that men
tioned by Sahagun as having taken place in the south,
when the new calendar was invented. The remark in
the same document that "on that day the kings did
tremble," may point to this epoch as that of the great
revolution carried on chiefly in Chiapas, but which
may have extended to Anahuac by which the kings
of Xibalba were overthrown; especially since the nar
rative of the sacrifice at Teotihuacan bears a striking
resemblance to the apotheosis of Hunhunahpu and
his fellow-heroes at Xibalba. 67
So far as the other so-called primitive nations of

New Spain are concerned, little can be said, except
that they claim and have always been credited with
a very ancient residence in this land, dating back far
beyond the beginning of the historic period. The
Otorm s, one division of whom are known as Maza-
huas, differ entirely from the Nahua nations in lan-
67
Brasseur de Bourboiiry, Hist. Nat. Civ., torn, i., pp. 180-8; Popol
I-tt/t, pp. cxlii-iii.; Boturini, Idea, pp. 37-41; see also references in vol.
iii., p. GO, ct seq.
guage, having possibly a slight linguistic affinity with

the Totonacs, and although far from being savages,
they have always been to a certain extent an outcast
and oppressed race, the Jews of Anahuac, as one
writer terms them, down-trodden in succession by
Toltec, Chichimec, and Aztec. They probably occu
pied a very large portion of Anahuac and the sur
rounding mountains, when the Toltecs proper es
tablished their power. Ixtlilxochitl, followed by
Veytia, represents the Otomis, though differing in
lanonaGfe,
O & *
O been one of the Acolhua tribes
as having"
that made their appearance in Anahuac many cen
turies later, but the event referred to as their coming
to the country at that period, may probably be their
coining down from the mountains and adopting more
68
or less the civilized life of the Acolhuas at Tezcuco.
The Miztecs and Zapotecs are simply mentioned
by the authorities in connection with the Olmecs and
Xicalancas as having occupied the south-eastern
region during the primitive period. Later they be
came powerful nations in the country now consti
tuting the state of Oajaca, and were probably at
least the equals of the Aztecs in civilization. Their
own annals do not, so far as they may be interpreted,
reach back to the pre-Toltec times, and although
they may very likely have come in contact with the
Olmecs Puebla, or even have been their allies,
in
receiving from them or with them the elements of

Nahua culture, yet the fact that their languages are
distinct from the Nahua, shows that they like the
Totonacs were not, as some authors imply, simply a
branch of the Nahua people in Tamoanchan. It is
fis
On the Otomis, sec Clavigero, Storia Ant. del Mcssico, torn, i., pp.
147-8, torn, iv., p. 51; Veytia, Hist. Ant. Mej., torn, ii., p. 39; Alegrc,
Hist. Comp. de Jesus, torn, i., p. 90; Ixtlilxochitl, in KiagsborongJCs Mex.
Antiq., vol. ix., p. 210; Carbajal Espinosa, Hist. Mex., torn, i., p. 243;
Brasseur de Bourbourg, Hist. Nat. Civ., torn, i., pp. 156-9, 196, torn, ii.,
p. 235, torn, iii., p. 56; Motolinia, in Icazbalceta, Col. de Doc., torn, i., p.
9; Orozco y Bcrra, Gcografia, pp. 120, 136-7; Pimentel, Cuadro, torn, i., pp.
117-18; Gondra, in Prescott, Hist. Conq. Mex., torn, iii., p. 20; Prichard s
Nat. Hist. Man, vol. ii., p. 512.
THE HUASTECS IN VERA CRUZ. 207
more natural to suppose that these three nations were

either wild tribes, or, if partially civilized, connected
with the Maya, Xibalban, or Quiname nations, and
that they accepted more or less fully the Nahua
ideas after the Olmec nations had risen to power in
Anahuac. The statement of Brasseur that the tribes
of Oajaca received their civilization from the two
brothers of Xibalba s conquerors, Hunbatz and Hun-
chouen, is probably unfounded, since nothing of the
kind appears in the chapter of Garcia s work to
which the abbe refers. 69
To the Huastecs of Northern Yera Cruz, the pre
ceding remarks may also be applied, save that their
language, while distinct from the Nahua, is also
very evidently connected with the great Maya lin
guistic family of the south. Yet the ruins of Huas-
tec and Totonac Yera Cruz, 70 are more like the
Nahua monuments than like those of Yucatan or
Chiapas, showing how powerful was the influence of
the Nahua element in the north. The only historical
tradition relating
O to the Huastecs is the followino-
^
from Sahagun: In the time of the Olmecs, after the
art of making pulque had been invented in the moun
tain called thereafter Popoconaltepetl, mountain of
foam, the inventors prepared a banquet on the same
mountain. All the principal old men and old women
were invited, and before each guest were placed four
cups of the new wine, the quantity deemed sufficient
69
Sahagun, Hist. Gen., torn, iii., lib. x., p. 136, heads a paragraph Ol-
mecas, VixtotiandMixtecas, speaking of all together, and applying to them
the name Tenimes, or those who speak a barbarous tongue. Orozco y Berra,
Geografia, pp. 120, 125, 133, speaks of the Uhnecas or Mixtecs, and
thinks they were driven from their former position by the first Nahua in
vasion, driving out in turn the Chuchones. He pronounces the Miztec
and Zapotec kindred tongues, and states that these nations joined their
fortunes from an early period. Veytia, Hist. Ant. Mcj., torn, i., p. 150,
says the Zapotecs are reported to have come with the Olmecs and Xica-
lancas. Clavigcro, Storia Ant. del Messico, torn, i., p. 150; Brasseur dc
Bourbourg, Hist. Nat. Civ., torn, i., p. 154; Id., Popol Vuh, p. cclv.; Gar
cia, Origen de los Ind., pp. 327-8; Mayer s Mex. Aztec, etc., vol. L, p. 98;
Hclhuald, in Smithsonian Re2)t., 1866, p. 337; Pimcntcl, Cuadro torn i
p. 37.
70 See vol. iv., p. 425, et seq.
208 THE PRE-TQLTEC PERIOD.
to exhibit the excellence of the newly-discovered bev

erage, and to cheer without inebriating the digni
taries present. But one chief, Cuextecatl by name,
was so rash as to indulge in a fifth cup, and was
moved thereby to discard the maxtli which consti
tuted his court dress, and to conduct himself in a
very indecorous manner; so much so that after re
covering his sound sense, he was forced by very
shame to flee with all his followers, and all those of
his language, to the region of Panuco, where they
settled, and were called from their leader Cuextecas,
afterwards Guaxtecas or Huastecs. 71
I now come to what may be termed the regular

annals of that branch of the Nahua nations which
finally established a kingdom in Anahuac with Tollan
for a capital, and which acquired the name of Toltec.
These annals will be found not more satisfactory or
less mythical than the traditions that have been
given in the preceding pages, although in their more

salient points they seem to agree with those tradi
tions. They were recorded in a most careless and
confused manner by the native writer Fernando de
Alva Ixtlilxochitl, who derived his information from
the documents which survived the destruction by the
Spanish priests. The comments of later writers, and
their attempts to reconcile this author s statements
one with another and all with scriptural traditions
and with the favorite theory of a general migration
from the north, have still further confused the sub
ject. I have no hope of being able to reduce Ixtlil-
xochitl s statements to perfect order, or to explain
the exact historical meaning of each statement; still,
by the omission of a large amount of profitless con-
71
Saliagun, Hist. Gen., torn, iii., lib. x., pp. 142-3; Smiicr s Cent. Amer.,
pp. 310-17. Huaxtlan means where the luiaxi (a kind of fruit) abounds.
Pimcntel, Cuadro, torn, i., pp. 5-6; Orozco y Bcrra, Geogra.fia, p. 141; Gal-
latin, in Amcr. Ethno. Soc., Transact., vol. i., p. 173; Brinton, in Hist.
Mag., n. s., vol. i., p. 16; PricharcVs Nat. Hist. Man, vol. ii., p. 513; Id.,
Researches, vol. v., p. 342, 345.
THE TOLTECS IN HUEHUE TLAPALLAN. 209
jecture, scriptural comparison, and hopelessly entan

gled chronology, the tradition may be somewhat
simplified so as to yield, as other traditions have
done, some items of general information respecting
the primitive Nahua period.
At the end of the first age of the world or the sun
of waters, as we are told by Ixtlilxochitl, the earth
was visited by a flood which covered even the most
lofty mountains. After the repeopling of the earth
by the descendants of a few families who escaped de
struction, the building of a tower as a protection
against a possible future catastrophe of similar nature,
and the confusion of tongues and consequent scatter
ing of the population for all these things were
found in the native traditions by Catholic ingenuity
seven families speaking the same language kept to
gether in their wanderings for many years; and after
crossing broad lands and seas, enduring great hard
ships, they reached the country of Huehue Tlapallan,
or Old Tlapallan; which they found to be fertile
and desirable to dwell in. 72 The second age, the
suri of air, terminated with a great hurricane which
swept away trees, rocks, houses, and people, although

many men and women escaped, chiefly such as took
O in caves which the hurricane could not reach.
refuge
After several days the survivors came out to find a
multitude of apes living in the land; and all this time
they were in darkness, seeing neither the sun nor
moon. The next event recorded, although Yeytia
72 The date of the arrival in Huehue

Tlapallan is given by Ixtlilxochitl
in his first Toltec relation (p. 322) as 2236 years after the creation, or 520
years after the flood. That is, it occurred long before the Christian era.
In other places (pp. 206, 459) the same author represents the Toltecs as
banished from their country and migrating to Huitlapalan in California on
the South Sea in 387 A. D., whence they continued their journey to Tulan-
cingo. Now, although I attach very little importance to this author s
chronology, and shall enter into no discussion with a view either to recon
cile or overthrow it, yet it is plain that this last statement, notwithstand
ing the use of the name Huitlapalan, refers to a migration long subsequent
to that mentioned in the text. The date 387 A.B., therefore, given by
Gallatin, (in Schooleraff8 Arch., vol. v., p. 96) and Miiller, (Reisen, torn.
Hi., p. 97), as that of the arrival in Huehue Tlapallan, according to Ixtlil
xochitl, is calculated to corivev a false impression.
VOL. V. U
makes it precede the hurricane, is the stopping of the

sun for a whole day in his course, as at the command
of Joshua in the mythology of the Old World.
"When the mosquito, however, saw the sun thus
suspended and pensive, he addressed him saying,
Lord of the world, why art thou thus motionless,
and doest not thy duty as is commanded thee ? Dost
thou wish to destroy the world as is thy wont ? Then
seeing that he was yet silent and made no response, the
insect went up and stung him in the leg, whereupon
he, feeling himself stung, started anew on his accus
tomed coarse."
Next occurred an earthquake which swallowed up
and destroyed all the Quinames, or giants at least
all who
those lived in the coast regions together
with many of the Toltecs and of their neighbors the
Chichimecs. After the destruction of these Philis
being at peace with all this new world, all the
"
tines,
wise Toltecs, both the astrologers and those of other
arts, assembled in Huehue TJapallan, the chief city
of their dominion, where they treated of many things,
the calamities they had suffered and the movements
of the heavens since the creation of the world, and of
many other things, which on account of their histories
having been burned, have not been ascertained further
than what has been written here, among which they
added the bissextile to regulate
O the solar vear with the
/
equinox, and many other curiosities as will be seen in

their tables and arrangement of years, months, weeks,
days, signs, and planets as they understood them."
One hundred and sixteen years after this regula
tion or invention of the Toltec calendar, "the sun
and moon were eclipsed, the earth shook, and the
rocks were rent asunder, and many other things and
signs happened, though there was no loss of life.
This was in the year Ce Calli, which, the chronology
being reduced to our systems, proves to be the same
date when Christ our Lord suffered" (33 A.D.)
Three hundred and five years later, when the em-
EXILE OF THE TOLTECS. 211
pire had been long at peace, Chalcatzin and Tlaca-

mihtzin, chief descendants of the royal house of the
Toltecs, raised a revolt for the purpose of deposing
the legitimate successor to the throne. The rebel
lious chiefs were after long wars driven out of their
city Tlachicatzin in Huehue Tlapallan, with all their

numerous families and allies. They were pursued by
their kindred of the city or country of Tlaxicoluican
for sixty leagues, to a place discovered by Cecatzin,
which they named Tlapallanconco or little Tlapal
lan. The struggle by which the rebels were con
quered lasted eight years, or thirteen, according to
Veytia and they were accompanied on their forced
migration by five other chiefs. The departure from
Huehue Tlapallan seems to have taken place in the
fifthor sixth century. 73
74
They remained at Tlapallanconco three years,
and towards the end of their stay the seven chief
tains assembled to deliberate whether they should
remain there permanently or go farther. Then rose a
great astrologer, named Hu email, or Huematzin, say
ing that according to their histories they had suffered
great persecutions from heaven, but that these had
always been followed by great prosperity; that their
persecutions had always occurred in the year Ce Tec-
patl, but that year once passed, great blessings en
sued; that their trouble was a great evil immediately
preceding the daw n of a greater good, and conse
T
quently it did not behoove them to remain so near

73
Ixtlilxochitl, p. 322, says it was 305 years after the death of Christ,
or about 3.38 A. D. ; but on the same page he again makes the date 439 A.
D. Veytia, torn, i., p. 208, dates the rebellion 583, the exile 596, and the
founding of Tlapallanconco 604 A. D. Clavigero, torn, iv., p. 46, gives
544 as the date of departure, but on p. 126 of torn, i., he gives 596, agree
ing with Veytia. Muller, in his tables, Eeisen, torn, iii., p. 97, dates the
outbreak of war 427, the departure 439, the migration 447 A. D. Brasseur,
Popol Vuh, p. civ., gives the last of the fourth century as the date of the
Toltec migration. Cabrera, Teatro, pp. 90-1, makes the date 181 B. C.
544 A. D., one of Clavigero s dates, is that which has, perhaps, been most
commonly adopted by modern writers.
74
Brasseur, Hist. Nat. Civ., torn, i., p. 126, writes this name Tlapal-
lantonco; and in Popol Vuh, p. clix., he insists that it should be Tlapal-
lantzinco. Muller, Reisen, torn, iii., p. 98, calls it also Tlappallanzingo.
their enemies. Moreover, his astrology had taught

him that towards the rising sun there was a broad
and happy land, where the Quinames had lived for
many years, but so long a time had now passed since
their destruction that the country was depopulated;
besides, the fierce Chichimecs, their neighbors, rarely
penetrated those regions. The planet which ruled
the destinies of that new country yet lacked many
years of carrying out its threats, and in the meantime
they and their descendants to the tenth generation
might enjoy a golden and prosperous century. Again,
the threatening planet did not rule their nation, but
that of the giants, so that possibly it might do no
great injury even to their descendants. He advised
that some colonists be left here to people the country,
become their vassals, and in time to turn upon their
enemies and recover their native land and original
power. These and other things did Hueman counsel,
and they seemed good to the seven chiefs; so that
after three years were passed, or eleven years from
the time when they left Huehue Tlapallan, they started
on their migration. The first stopping-place, about
seventy leagues distant and reached in twelve days
was Hueyxalan great sandy as Veytia interprets
it a place discovered by Cohuatzon where they re
mained four years. They next halted after a journey
of twenty days at Xalisco, a country about a hundred
leagues farther east or as Veytia says west near
the seashore. They lived eight years in this land,
which was discovered by Ziuhcohuatl. Other twenty
days and hundred leagues took them to Chimalhua-
can Atenco on the coast where there were certain
islands, and here they dwelt five years. At the start
they had taken a vow, under penalty of severe punish
ment, to have no intercourse with their wives for
twenty-three years; but as the time was now expired
they began here to increase and multiply. After the
five years they resumed their journey eastward for
eighteen days or eighty leagues to Toxpan, discovered

THE TOLTEC MIGRATION. 213
by Mezotzin, where they lived for five years also.

Quiyahuitztlan Anahuac, discovered by Acapichtzin
was twenty days journey or a hundred leagues east of
Toxpan, also on the coast, with inlets so that they
were obliged to pass in boats from one place to another.
They remained here six years suffering great hard
ships. The next halting-place was Zacatlan, distant
eighteen days or eighty leagues in a direction not
stated. Chalcatzin was the discoverer, and during
the first of their seven years stay here just fifty-two
years, or a xiuhtlalpilli, after their wars began a son
was born to the chief, and named from the place Za-
capantzin. At Totzapan, eighty leagues distance from
Zacatlan, they lived six years, in the last of which a
son named Totzapantzin was born to Cecatzin, who
discovered this place. This was just fifty-two years
after they left their native country. Twenty-eight
days or one hundred and forty leagues brought them
to Tepetla, Cohuatzon being the discoverer for the
second time, where they remained seven years. At
Mazatepec eighteen days or eighty leagues distant,
discovered by Ziuhcohuatl, they tarried eight years;
at Ziuhcohuatl, at the same distance, discovered
by
Tlapalmetzin, also eight years; at Yztachuexucha,
twenty days or one hundred leagues northward, dis
covered by Metzotzin, twenty-six years. Finally a
journey of eighteen days or eighty leagues brought
them to Tulancingo written also Tulantzinco and
Tollantzinco discovered by Acapichtzin. Here they
built a house sufficiently large to contain all the
people, and remained eighteen years before transfer
ring their capital to Tollan farther east and establish
ing what was afterwards known as the Toltec empire.
The third year of their stay in Tulancingo completed
an age, or one hundred and four years since the depart
ure from their country. 75 According to Ixtlilxochitl,
75
Ixtlilxochitl, p. 324, makes this third year 543, and their arrival in
Tulancingo consequently 540 A. D. or as
; implied on p. 307, 487 A. D. ;
is"
or adding 104 years to the first date

given by this author in note 71, we
have 442 A. D. Veytia, torn, i., p. 221, 697 A. D. Id., after Boturini, in
the Toltecs reached Andhuac in the sixth century, or
according to Veytia and others who have attempted

to reconstruct his chronology, near the end of the
seventh century. 76
This tradition of the Toltecs affords in itself no
sufficient data from which to locate accurately Hue-
hue Tlapallan, their most ancient home in America.
The name is interpreted as ancient red land, or land of
color/ and might perhaps apply as well to the north as
to the south. Pedro de Alvarado writing from Santi
ago, or Old Guatemala, to Cortes in 1524, announces
his intention to set out in a few months to explore the
country of Tapalan "which is in the interior fifteen
days march from here. It is pretended that the
77
capital is as large as Mexico." This indicates that
at the time of the Conquest the name was still
applied to a region which may correspond very well
to Honduras. Peten, or Tabasco. Ixtlilxochitl him
self, in relating the expeditions on which his ancestor
of the same name accompanied Cortes, mentions one
to "Tlapalan, a province which lies toward Ihueras,"
or Ibueras, being the former name of Honduras. 78
Brasseur says that "Mexican geography at the time
of the discovery applied this name only to the
provinces north of Guatemala, between the tribu-
Tezcoco en los Ultimas Tiempos, 687 A. D. Miiller, Reisen, torn, iii., p.
97,558 A. D. Clavigero, torn, iv., p. 51, 648 A. D., or torn, i., p. 126, 700
A. D.
parts of his work Ixtlilxochitl has a very different account
76 In other
of this migration to the effect that the Toltecs were banished from their
country, sailed and coasted on the South Sea, arrived at Huitlapalan or
Huitlapatlan the Gulf of California, or a place on the coast of California
in 387 A. D., coasted Xalisco, arrived at Guatulco, then at Tochtepec or
Turlitepeque on the North Sea, and finally at Tulancingo. Pp. 206-7, 459-60.
On the Toltec migration see Ixtlilxochitl, in Kigsborougli?s Mex. Antiq.,
vol. ix., pp. 321-4; Veytia, Hist, Ant. Mej., torn, i., pp. 6-33, 139, 157,
205-21, 231; Clavigero, Storia Ant. del Messico, torn, i., p. 126, torn, iv., pp.
46, 51; Torquemada, Monarq. Ind., torn, i., pp. 36-7; Boturini, Idea, pp.
136-7; Carbajal Espinosa, Hist. Mex., torn, i., pp. 216-18; Brasseur de Bour-
bourg, Hist. Nat. Civ., torn, i., pp. 100, 126; Popol Vuh, pp. civ., clix-xi. ;
Id., Esquisscs, pp. 11, 13-14; Gallatin, in Amer. Ethno. Soc., Transact.,
vol. i., p.203; Bradford s Amer. Antiq., p. 202; Miiller, Reisen, torn, iii.,
pp. 91-7.
77
Alvarado, in Ternaux-Compans, Voy., serie i., torn, x., p. 147; Id.,
in Ramusio, Navigationi, torn, iii., fol. 303.
Ixtlilxochitl, in Kingsborough s Mex. Antiq., vol. ix.,
78
p. 446.
THE COUNTRY X)F HUEHUE TLAPALLAN. 215
taries of theRio Usumacinta and Honduras;" and

also that the country was spoken of by authors at
the time of the Conquest as Tlapallan de Cortes, on
account of Cortes expedition to Honduras, but he
mentions no authors except those I have referred
79
to. The same author believes that the name Tla-
pallanconco given by Ixtlilxochitl to the first station,
sixty leagues from Huehue Tlapallan, should be
Tlapallantzinco. He tells us tiiat the Guatemalan
histories mentions such a city conquered by the
Quiches in Soconusco on the coast, at a point not far
from sixty leagues distant from the Ococingo region. 80
Again, according to Sahagun and Torquemada, when
Quetzalcoatl, the second of the name, who flourished
while the Toltecs were at Tollan, left the country, he
embarked or disappeared on the gulf coast near the
Goazacoalco River, announcing his intention to go to
Tlapallan. This would certainly favor the idea that
Tlapallan was a southern country.
On the other hand, the eastward direction attrib
uted to the migration from Tlapallanconco to Ana-
huac is not consistent with any Central American
location of the starting-place; but, in connection
with the fact that Xalisco is given as the second
station about a hundred and seventy leagues distant
from Tlapallanconco, wôuld agree somewhat better
with the theory generally adopted by the Spanish
writers that the original home of the Toltecs was in
the north-west, probably on the Gulf of California;
yet the name Tlapallan has never been found in the
north-west. 81 Material relics of any great empire
are wanting in that region, at least beyond Quemada
in Zacatecas, and the itinerary is full of inconsist
encies which prove it to be unreliable as a historic
record. For instance, an eastern course of a hun-
79
Popol Vuh, pp. Ixiv., cxii., cxxvi-viii.
so
Id., p. clix.
81The discovery of a town of similar name by Cortes, doubtingly re
ported by Veytia, Hist. Ant. Mej., torn, i., p. 23, and others, seems to rest
on no authority whatever.
dred leagues to any point on the coast of Jalisco

would be an impossibility; the next two moves led
a hundred leagues down the Pacific Coast, and then
across the continent to Toxpan, or Tuxpan, on the
gulf coast in Vera Cruz; then, although Tuxpan is
on the eastern coast, the migration continued still a
hundred leagues eastward, another impossibility of
course. How they returned to the states of Vera
Cruz and Mexico, where the other stations would
seem to be located, does not appear. In fact the
tradition of this migration as it reads, so far as di
rections, distances, and names are concerned, is mean
ingless,
O a fact due either to the carelessness of the
compiler or the scantiness of his materials. In
trinsically then the evidence, while not conclusive,
favors the idea that Huehue Tlapallan was in the
south.
Comparing the Toltec tradition with those that
have been already given, we find, except in names, a
strong resemblance in general features. In the suc
cessive creations and destructions of men; the apes
that peopled the land after one of the destructions;
the ancient settlement and growth to power of the
Toltecs in a fertile country named Huehue Tlapallan;
the destruction of a rival power, that of the Quinames;
the regulation or invention of the calendar by an assem
blage of wise men in Huehue Tlapallan and a final
;
forced migration to new homes in all these features

the tradition seems to represent a vague memory of
events already familiar to us as having occurred in
the central region; in the Votanic empire of the Tzen-
dal traditions; in the Xibalba, Paxil, and Tulan
Zuiva, or Seven Caves, of the Quiche record; and
especially in theTamoanchan and Tonacatepetl of the
annals gathered by Sahagun.
In opposition to those analogies we have the fact
that the Spanish writers locate Huehue Tlapallan in
the north, as they do also the original homes of all
the nations that are reported by native tradition to
SOUTHERN ORIGIN OF THE TOLTECS. 217
have migrated successively into Anahuac. It is not

probable that this idea of a northern origin was a pure
invention of the Spaniards; they doubtless found
among the Aztecs with whom they came in contact
what seemed to them a prevalent popular notion that
the ancestors of the race came from the north. Yet
the tradition given by Sahagun and referring to a
time long prior to the Toltec migration of the fifth or
sixth century relating to the first appearance of the
Nahua civilizers on the gulf coast, whither they had
come by sea from the north-east, probably from Flori
da, would have been perhaps a sufficient foundation
for such a popular idea; and the not improbable fact
that the Aztecs proper and some other nations, prom
inent in rank and power at the time of the Conquest,
did actually come into Andhuac from the region im
mediately adjoining it on the north or north-west,
would certainly have contributed to confirm that idea.
In other words the Aztecs when questioned by the
Spaniards may have replied that they came from the
north, referring in most cases to the latest move of
their nation into Anahuac, but possibly in some in
stances to the vague traditions of their fathers respect
ing the very earliest periods of their existence as a
race. The Spaniards at once connected the reported
northern origin with the world-peopling migration
from Central Asia after the confusion of tongues; and
since the old and new world were supposed to be con
nected or nearly so in the north, they found the native
tradition strongly confirmed by the scriptures. When
the theory of successive migrations from the north,
thus confirmed, had once been established in their
minds, nothing could overthrow it; it became in a cer
tain sense a part of their religion. Each migration
subsequently found recorded in the native annals, as
means of communication between the conquerors and
conquered became perfected, was at once given a
north-to-south direction. The natives themselves
were in many instances not unwilling to please their
masters by orthodox interpretations of their picture-

writings. Finally the ruins of Quemada, the Casas
Grandes of Chihuahua, and the adobe buildings on
the Gila were discovered doubtless traces left by mi
grating nations, and thus the last doubt on the sub
ject, if any could exist, was removed even from the
minds of later and more intelligent class of Spanish
writers, like Clavigero and Veytia. 82
In the Toltec tradition we have found the Chichi-

mecs mentioned as a powerful and fierce people and
their neighbors in Huehue Tlapallan. Since this is
the first mention of that famous people, since all the
best authorities insist that the Toltecs and Chichimecs
were of the same blood and language, and since the
Chichimecs afterwards succeeded the Toltecs in And-
huac, we naturally turn to the Chichimec traditions
of their early home for additional information respecting
Huehue Tlapallan, although the Chichimec migration
occurring several centuries later would come chrono
logically beyond the limits of this chapter. Our
search in this direction for data from which to deter
mine the location of the ancient Nahua empire is,
however, fruitless. Although Ixtlilxochitl is still the
chief authority, we have no mention of Huehue Tlap
allan. The country or a country, for it is not cer-
82 The Nahuas state that

they came from the north-west. Mendieta,
Hist. Ecles., p. 147; Torquemada, Monarq. Ind., torn, i., p. 33. The tra
dition of the Toltecs will not allow us to fix either date, locality, or source
of their migration, but the north is vaguely given as the source. Gallaiin,
in Amer. Ethno. Soc., Transact., vol. i., p. 203. Huehue Tlapallan situated
north-west of the Gila. Humboldt, Vues, torn, i., p. 204. Not in the Gila
Valley. Smith s Human Species, p. 250. Tradition shows Huehue Tlapallan,
miserable like all nations abandoned to luxury and power, unable to feed its
children, casting them forth. Ramirez, in. RevistaOientifieri, torn, i., p. 21.
Brasseur de Bourbourg, Popol Vuh, p. clix., speaks of Tlaxi Coliuhcan,
mentioned by Ixtlilxochitl, as the old capital of the Quinames, or Palenque.
He perhaps has no other reason for this than the resemblance of the names
Coliuhcan and Colhuacan. He says, Hist. Nat. Civ., torn, i., p. 100, that
Huehue Tlapallan may be translated land of colors or land of nobles.
Throughout his works he places this country in the south, identifying it
with Xibalba. It is proved incontestably that the Toltecs came from
Tulha, whose ruins are seen near Ococingo. Id., Cartas, p. 28. Cabrera,
Teatro, p. 94, thinks Tlapalla must have been in the south-east.
THE PRIMITIVE CHICHIMECS. 219
tain that it was the original Chichimec home and not

one located in central Mexico, although some of the
traditions seem to point to primitive times of im
mense extent, is called Amaquemecan: one of its chief
cities seems to have borne the same name, and an
other city was Oyome. The names Necuametl and
Nacuix are also applied to the country by Ixtlilxochitl,
and he further states that the Chichimecs came like
the other nations from Chicomoztoc. Some fourteen
kings are named as having ruled over the kingdom,
beginning with Chichimecatl who brought the people
to the country and from whom they took their
name. Nothing is known of the reigns of any ex
cept the last three, the first of whom is reported to
have sent his son at the request of the Toltecs to be
come the first king in Tollan. Ixtlilxochitl in his ac
count of the sending for this king says that the Chi
chimecs were at that time in the region of Panuco,
and that fear of hostility from them was the chief
motive of the Toltecs in inviting a Chichimec to rule
over them. It is not, however, stated that the Chi
chimec capital was in that part of the country. When
at last the empire came into the hands of two brothers,
one of whom Xolotl, with all his people, decided to
migrate, not one of their halting-places is named,
until they had journeyed for a whole year and reached
the vicinity of Anahuac; consequently there is no
clue to the course of their migration. Besides the
statement that the Chichimecs came from the Seven
Caves, and another by Yeytia that the kings w ore
r
quetzal- feathers, there seems to be absolutely nothing

in the tradition to indicate whether Amaquemecan
was in the north or south. Yet the Spanish writers
have no hesitation in fixing the direction, although
disagreeing somewhat about the locality. From two
to three hundred leagues north of Jalisco, beyond New
Mexico, and in Alaska are some of the decisions in
this matter, decisions resting on authority that the
reader already understands. It seems probable that
the original Nahua empire whether it be

great
calledHuehue Tlapallan, Tamoanchan, Tulan, or
Amaquemecan, was the Chichimec empire that is,
that the Toltecs or revolting branch constituted but a
small portion of the Chichimec or Nahua people. 83
The Chichimec migration was followed by many

others at irregular intervals, ending with that of the
Aztecs, all of which will be spoken of in their proper
place. The chronologic order attributed by tradition
to these migrations is not to be relied on, giving, as
may be supposed, only a vague idea of the order in
which the different nations acquired some prominence
in and about the valley of Mexico. In its ancient
centre not in Andhuac, whether it was in the north
or south the primitive Nahua power was over
thrown, or from that centre it was transferred to be
re-established by exiled princes and their descendants
on the Mexican plateaux. This transfer, whose na
ture we may vaguely comprehend, but of whose
details we know nothing, is the event or series of
events referred to by the various migration- tradi
tions. The recollections of these events assumed
different forms in the traditions of different tribes
until each nation claimed or were deemed by the
Spaniards to claim a distinct migration from its
former home. The accounts of the migrations fol
lowing the Toltec will be given in their proper place,
and here we have only to notice that the Seven
83
Ixtlilxochitl, in Kingsbor outfit s Mex. Antiq., vol. ix., pp. 208-9, 217,
333, 335-7, 392-4, 450; Veytia, Hist. Ant. Mej., torn, i., pp. 25, 139, 231,
301-2, torn, ii., pp. 3-7; Torquemada, Monarq. Lid., torn, i., pp. 38-40.
Brasseur, Hist. Nat. Civ., torn, i., pp. 125-6, thinks that Chalcatzin and
Tlacamitzin were the successors of Xhunahpa left by Xbalanque in com
mand of the Nahuas, and that they were defeated and exiled by the mon
arch of Xibalba. For details and further references respecting the Chichi
mec migration see a future chapter. The Chichimec kings were: Chichi-
mecatl, Mixcohuatl, Huitzilopochtli, Hueinac, Nauhyotl, Quauhtepetla,
Nonohualca, Huetzin, Quauhtonal, Masatzin, Quetzal, Icoatzin, Mozelo-
quitzin, Tlamacatzin in one place Nequametl and Namocuix are named
instead of Chichhnecatl. Ixtlilxochitl, p. 394; Veytia, torn, i., p. 231; Car-
baj al Espinosa, Hist. Mex., torn, i., pp. 225-6; Muller, Ecisen, torn, in., pp.
43-4.
MIGRATION FROM THE SOUTH. 221
Caves are mentioned as a starting-place or station in

most if not all of these migrations, and that the
only names that appear in the traditions applied to
the ancient Nahua dwelling-place are Aztlan, Cul-
huacan or Teo Culhuacan, and Aquilasco. These
names are perhaps applied to cities in the ancient
home, but it is by no means certain, as will appear
later, that they did not all belong to localities in cen
tral Mexico. At least neither the names nor the
events of the migrations as reported afford any proof
of geographical location. The analogy between Cul
huacan and Culiacan is not a strong argument in favor
of a north-western location, or at most does not out
weigh the identity of the names Culhuacan and Na-
chan. A palm-tree painted on the picture-writing
supposed to record one of the migrations, in connec
tion with the starting-place, as has been remarked by
several authorities, seems to favor the idea that the
point of departure was in the south rather than in
the north, and would certainly be a circumstance of
considerable weight against an extreme northern lo
cation for Aztlan.
The Abbe Brasseur de Bourbourg attempts to
reconcile the general fact shown by all the earlier tra
ditions that the primitive Nahua power was in the
south, with the idea of a migration
O from the north
apparently entertained by each of the nations of Ana-
huac and by the Spanish writers. According to his
idea the Nahuas, overcome by the monarchs of Xi-
balba, were driven from Chiapas, dwelt a few years on
the Pacific coast at Tlapallantzinco, and thence mi
grated north-westward in different bands, following
the general direction of the coast, to Sonora and Up
per California. Along this route, as this author
claims, distinct traces of their migration are apparent,
referring perhaps, although he does not say so, to lin
guistic traces. In this northern region, about the
Gulf of California, they established great kingdoms
and built great cities, each Nahua colony becoming a
centre of civilization to the wild tribes with whom it

came in contact. From this region, to places in which
the names Teo Culhuacan, Aztlan, etc., of the tradi
tions may be applied, the different Nahua nations de
scended into Anahuac in successive migrations from
the seventh to the twelfth century, impelled by civil
convulsions or the pressure of outside and warlike
84
tribes.
I am inclined to find in the abbe s theory a state
ment too definite perhaps of a general fact. That
is, the Nahua power established in eastern and south
eastern Mexico by the Olmec tribes almost simul
taneously with its growth in the south was after its
overthrow in Central America established by exiled
nobles over western and north-western Mexico. I
find no evidence, however, that the Nahua power ever
became settled and flourishing farther north than Du-
rango and Sirialoa, although the influence of their in
stitutions may, not improbably, have extended to the
Sonora tribes; into California and the far north-west
the Nahuas never penetrated. If a Nahua empire or
political power ever really existed in the north-west,
its centre was probably in the region of Quemada, in
Zacatecas and Jalisco. Soon, however, the valley of
Mexico became the political centre, and the subse
quent history of the country was essentially a history
of Anahuac. The modern aboriginal annals of each
nation dated from its rise to notice in Anahuac, arid
in the traditions of previous history imperfectly com
municated to the Spaniards, their former greatness in
the south, their defeat and exile, their life in outside
provinces, and their settlement in the valley were
sadly confused.
Bourbourg, Hist. Nat. Civ., torn. i.. pp. 126, 170-80; Id.,
84 Brasseur de
Cartas, pp. 31-4; Id., Popol Vnh, pp. clix-clxi. Brasseur gives a report
of the ruins of a northern Tula in California, which of course is unfounded.
He thinks the 6patas, Yaquis, Mayos, and Tarahurnares are remnants of
the old Toltec populations in this region. He does not attribute the ruins
of the New Mexican and Arizona group to the Toltecs, at least not at this
early period. Bradford also, Amer. Antiq., p. 202, speaks of the first age
as diffusing population from the centre through the north, to return in a
reflux of numerous tribes in the second age.
ANNALS OF YUCATAN. 223
Mendieta, Torquemada, Gomara, and others, record

the popular tradition of the settlement of Mexico as
follows An old man Iztac Mixcohuatl. by his wife
:
Ilancueitl, in Chicomoztoc, or the Seven Caves, had

six sons, Xelhua, Tenuch, Ulmecatl, Xicalancatl,
Mixtecatl, and Otomitl. Termch s descendants were
the Aztecs; Xelhua gave his name to no nation, but
his followers settled at various points in the south
east; the others founded the nations which took their
names. Mendieta adds that by another wife the
same old man had a son named Quetzalcoatl. 85 Pi
neda tells us that a nephew of Votan divided the land
of Anahuac. 86 According to Arlegui the Toltecs
came from the west and divided New Spain between
their seven families. 87 I believe I have now given
all the important traditions that seem to
belong to
the pre-Toltec period in Mexico, and I deem it un
necessary to refer to the authors who merely give an
abridged version of the same accounts, many of them
confining themselves to the simple statement that the
Toltecs, a very skillful people, came first from the
north and settled in the region afterwards known as
New Spain.
Returning to the south,

it
only remains to examine
briefly the primitive Maya annals of Yucatan, which
confirm in a few points those of other peoples, so far
as they relate to the great American centre of civil
ization in the south. These annals will be given in
full elsewhere; a
very general view, with especial
reference to the points referred to, will suffice here.
A prevalent belief among the Mayas at the time of
the Conquest was, that the peninsula was settled in
ancient times by two races, one from the east, the
other from the west. It is not implied that they
85
Mendieta, Hist. Ecles., pp. 145-6; Torquemada, Monarq. Tnd., toni.
i., pp. 32-3;Gomara, Conq. Mcx., fol. 299-300; Prichardls Nat, Hist.
Wan, vol. ii., p. 514; Brasseur dc Bourbourg, Popol Vuh, pp. xxix.-xxx.
*Descrip. Chiapas, in Soc. Mex. Geog., Bolctin, torn, iii., p. 344.
87 Ckrdn.
Zacatecas, pp. 6-7.
came at the same

period, bat rather that the migra
tion from the east preceded that from the west by
many centuries. Lizana tells us that in ancient
times the east was called ccnial, or little descent,
and the west nohenial, or great descent, believing
that these names indicate the comparative numbers
of the respective colonies. Lahda and Herrera re
cord a tradition that the oldest inhabitants came from
the east, the sea being divided to afford them a pas
sage. Cogolludo concludes, contrary to the opinion
of Lizana, that the colony from the east must have
been much more numerous as well as more ancient
than the other, because of the universal use of the
Maya language and of Maya names of places through
out the peninsula a conclusion that carries little
weight, since it rests mainly on the assumption that
those who came from the west spoke the Aztec lan
guage, an assumption for which there is no authority
whatever.
The personage whose name appears first in the
Maya tradition is Zamna, son of the chief deity, who
taught the people, invented the hieroglyphic alpha
bet, and gave a name to each locality in Yucatan.
His anything is known of it, was pre
role, so far as
cisely the same as that of Votan in Chiapas. Zamna
is reported to have lived long in the land and to have
been buried at the close of his career at Izamal.
During his life he founded Mayapan, standard (or
capital) of Maya, Maya being the native name of
the country and signifying according to some authori
ties land without water a city which was several
times ruined and rebuilt after its founder s time.
Zamna may be most naturally connected with the
traditional migration from the east. Cogolludo, it is
true, states that he was at the head of the other
colony, and this statement is repeated in one place by
Brasseur, but as the Spanish writer directly contra
dicts his statement on the same page, not much im
portance is to be attached to it. Vague as it is, the
ZAMNA S EMPIRE. 225
tradition of Zarnna" and his followers from the east

seems identical with that of Yotan. If we suppose
that such persons as Zamna and Votan actually had
an existence a supposition which like its opposite
forms no part of this chapter it would be impossible
to determine whether the two were the same, or Zam-
n& the companion, disciple, or descendant of Votan;
but we may well believe that the period, the empire,
the institutions alluded to in the Maya record are the
same as those connected with the Votanic or Xibalban
traditions. The ancient power whose centre was in
Chiapas, Tabasco, and Honduras, extended north

eastward into Yucatan as it did north-westward into
Anahuac. Ordonez states, as usual without giving
his authority, that Mayapan was one of the allied
capitals, which with Nachan and Tulan constituted
the Votanic empire. The fact that the name of the
Gocomes, the most ancient people, or at least the
oldest line of kings and nobles, in Yucatan signifies in
the Nahua tongue serpents, like the name Chanes
applied to Votan sfollowers, may have some signifi
cance, although in the Maya tongue Cocome is also
said to mean listener.
At an unknown date, but subsequent to that of
Zamnd s rule, we find three brothers, the Itzaob,
reigning at Chichen over a people called from them
the Itzas, as the city also was called thereafter Chi
chen Itza. They came from the west, were just and
chaste men, and their reign a long and glorious one.
One of them, however, having finally left the coun
try, the others gave themselves up to immoral prac
tices, and were put to death. Notwithstanding the
fact that the brothers came, according to the Spanish
writers, from the west, there is much reason to sup
pose that the nation whose capital was. at Chichen,
was an ancient people dating back, to the time of Zam-
since the most satisfactory interpretation of the
na",
name Itza is that it came from Ytzamna, the

more ancient form of the great founder s name. Con-
VOL. V. 15
nected with the three brothers in a manner not clearly

defined by the tradition either ruling conjointly with
them or more probably coming into power immedi
ately after their downfall was Cukulcan, who also
came from the west, who was also famous for the
purity of his life, and whose teachings in fact were
identical with those of Quetzalcoatl among the Nahua
peoples. He also is credited with the founding, or
re-fon nding of Mayapan, which under his rule became
the political centre of the whole country, although
Chichen still retained great prominence. Cukulcan
having raised the country to a condition of the highest
prosperity, finally abandoned Yucatan for some un
known motive and returned westward, disappearing at
Champoton, or Potonchan, on the coast, where he dwelt
for some time and where a temple in his honor was
afterwards erected. After his departure the Cocome
princes came into power, their capital being still
Maya-
pan.
The identity in character, teachings, and actions
between Cukulcan and Quetzalcoatl, suggests the
first appearance in Yucatan, at this time, of Nahua
tribes or Nahua institutions, corresponding to a cer
tain extent with the appearance of the Olmecs and
Xicalancas in Anahuac, and indicating that the Na
hua influence was exerted during its earliest period
of development in the north-east as well as in the
north-west. Indeed, Veytia records a tradition to
the effect that Yucatan was settled by the Olmecs
and Xicalancas driven from Mexico at the coming of
the Toltecs; this author justly rejects the latter part
of this report, but expresses his belief that bands
from these nations did actually settle in the penin
sula. When to the analogies already noticed be
tween Quetzalcoatl and Cukulcan we add the fact
that their names are etymologically identical, both
signifying plumed serpent, little reason remains to
doubt that the Maya (tradition refers, like the others
that have been noticed, to the first coming into
prominence of the Nahuas in America.
THE TUTUL XIUS IN YUCATAN. 227
The next prominent event in Yucatan history, as

it is also the last that has any special bearing upon
the period now under consideration, and the most
important in that connection, is the arrival of the
Tutul Xius. According"
to the traditions of the
natives as recorded by the Spaniards, this peaceful
but highly cultivated people came from the south,
perhaps from Chiapas, after wandering for forty years
in the unsettled and mountainous portions of the
country, and settled near Mayapan. The Cocomes,

successors to the Itza brothers and Cukulcan, having
at the time governed the country long and prosper
ously, received the new-comers kindly and formed an

alliance with them, an alliance which continued for
a long time until the Cocome kings, becoming tyranni
cal, were overthrown by a revolution in which the
Tutul Xius were the most prominent actors. It is,
however, with their arrival and not with their sub
sequent actions that we have to do here. The mere
tradition of their arrival after a long migration from
the southern highlands would at best furnish only
slight grounds for the conjecture of the Spaniards
that they came from Chiapas; but another document
unknown to the Spanish missionary-authors throws
great light upon this people, and invests their appear
ance in Yucatan with increased importance. The
document referred to is the Maya manuscript trans
lated by Pio Perez, first published in Mr Stephens
work on Yucatan, and later with the work of Bishop
Landa, which begins as follows: "This is the series
of katunes elapsed since the four Tutul Xius departed
from the house of Nonoual, which was west of Zuina,
and came from the land of Tulapan. Four katunes
passed after they set out before they arrived here with
Holonchan Tepeuh and his companions, before they
reached this peninsula; the 8 Ahau had passed, the
6 Ahau, the 4 Ahau, and the 2 Ahau eighty-one
years before they arrived in this peninsula, eighty-one
years that they spent in their journey from their
country to this peninsula of Chacnouitan." Here we

find it
distinctly stated that this people came from
Tulapan, capital of Tula, the very place from which,
according to the Quiche record, the Nahua nations
migrated, and it is more than likely that Zuina should
be Zuiva, defined in the Popol Vuh as the Seven
Caves. This, in connection with the Quiche lamen
tation over that division of their brothers which they
had left in the east, is amply sufficient to identify the
Tutul Xius as one of the Nahua tribes that migrated
from the original centre. The family of Nonoual
seems to have given a name to the tribes that occu
pied Tabasco down to the Conquest. This document
assumes to give the date of the Tutul Xiu migration,
a most important date, since it is also that of the
overthrow of Nahua power in Chiapas and its trans
fer toAnahuac; but until the Maya system of Ahau
katunes 88 shall have been the object of much addi
tional research, there is little hope of arriving at
an accurate interpretation of the date. Sr Perez
gives it as 144 A. D. The Abbe Brasseur, relying
on the same document, gives the date repeatedly as
171 A.D.; but in his translation of the document in
Landa s work he concluded that it should be 401
A.D., reckoning each Ahau katun as twenty years,
and remarking that this date agrees much better than
the earlier one with Ixtlilxochitl s chronology. Of
the Perez manuscript Mr Gal latin remarks that it
contains all we know of the history and chronology of
Yucatan. To ascertain dates is out of the question;
but it is probable that the events are stated in their
89
respective order.
88 See vol. ii., pp. 762-5.
Las Casas, Hist. Apologetica, MS., cap. 123; Torquemada, Monarq. Ind.,
torn, ii., 52; Vcijiia, Hist. Ant. Mcj., torn, i., p. 237; Hcrrera, Hist,
p.
Gen., dec. iv., lib. x., cap. ii. Tcrnaux-Compans. in Nouvclles Annalcs
;
des Voy., 1843, torn, xcvii.., pp. 31-6. Perez, in Landa, Relation, pp. 420-3;
1
Id., in Stephens Yucatan, vol. ii., pp. 4C5-9; Brasseur de Bourbourg, Hist.
Nat. Civ., torn, i., pp. 68, 76-80, 126-7; Id., Popol Vuh, pp. Ixxix, clv.-vi.;
OVERTHROW OF THE NAHUAS. 229
A Mexican document, known only through Bras-

seur de Bourbourg, and by him called the Codex
Gondra, furnishes some additional information re
specting the overthrow of the Nahua power in Cen
tral America, and especially respecting the house of
Nonoual alluded to in the Perez document. I quote
from the author named as follows The manuscript
:
"
begins with a description of the twenty wards of the

great city of Tollan, or Tulhd, Huey Tollan; but it
gives the names of only the first twelve, the trans
lator, who apparently attached but little importance
to names, having deemed it proper to omit the other
eight. The author relates the events that precipi
tated the ruin of the throne, occasioned by the mi
nority of the last Chane prince, whose guardianship
was claimed by two powerful families, one called the
Chichimec-Toltecs, and the other the Chichimecs of
Nonohualco. The quarrel terminated in the insur
rection of the latter and the assassination of the
young monarch. But the prince was beloved by the
people, and on account of the popular indignation
the murderers were forced to flee by night with all
their followers. On their departure from Tulha,
Xelhua, the chief the Nonohualcos, went to consult
the oracle of Culhuacan, [Palenque?] which enjoined
him to depart. On the way he did penance for his
crime, and after several defeats at the hands of the
tribes through whose lands he was forced to pass, he
at last founded the kingdom of the Nonohualcos,
fixing the capital at Quetzaltepec in the mountains

about the country of the Zoques, who were conquered
by his successors. The author gives the names of
the thirteen princes who occupied the throne after
Xelhua with the leading events of their reigns. But
while Xelhua was establishing a new empire, leyx-
cohuatl, chief of the Toltec party, who had seized
upon the power after the death of the young king of
A
Id., Cartas, p. 13; Gallatin, in mer. Etkno. Soc., Transact., vol. i., pp.
171-3; Orozco y Berra, Geografia, p. 128.
Tulha, of which he had been the principal cause, was

forced after a few years of power to abandon in his
turn the capital, with all his followers, to avoid the
vengeance of the people. He went into exile with
the Toltecs, and the manuscript gives their itinerary
as far as Tlachihualtepec, or Cholula, at the time
occupied by the Olmecs and Xicalancas, who ruled
the whole Aztec plateau." 9
I have placed before the reader such historical

traditions of the civilized nations as seem to bear
upon the earliest period of their development. Their
exact meaning, so far as details are concerned, is with
the aid of existing authorities beyond the reach of
the most careful study, and. no attempt has been
made to attach a definite significance to each abo
riginal tale, or to form from all a symmetrical chron
ologic whole; indeed, their interpretation has not
been carried so far in many cases as the authorities
seemed with considerable plausibility to justify.
Taking up one after another the annals of the leading
nations as recorded by the best authorities, I have
endeavored to point out only the apparent general
significance of each. The evidence thus elicited by a
separate examination of each witness has pointed
with varying force, but with great uniformity of di
rection towards the Central or Usumacinta region,
not necessarily as the original cradle of American civ
ilization, bub as the most ancient home to which it can
be traced by traditional, monumental, and linguistic
records. In obtaining this evidence there has been
no occasion to resort to the sifting process of rejecting
all testimony seemingly opposed to a preconceived
theory. Almost the only argument against the gen

eral tenor of the traditions, monuments, and languages,
90 Brnsseur dc Bourboiirgr, Cartas, pp. 27-8. The abbe seems to have

made but little ifany use of the Codex Gondra in his subsequent works;
although it may be supposed that from it, and indeed from the very portion
above quoted, he takes his account of the closing events of the Toltec em
pire in Anahuac to be given in a future chapter.
GENERAL CONCLUSIONS. 231
has been the prevalent idea among Spanish writers

favoring a migration from the north; and the force of
this argument has proved to be more apparent than
real. Comparison of the records one with another
has greatly strengthened the evidence derived from
them separately; and the cumulative proof afforded
by their successive examination has been deemed suffi
cient to confirm the general conclusions of the preced
ing pages, which may be expressed as follows:
Throughout several centuries preceding the Chris
tian era, and perhaps one or two centuries following,
there flourished in Central America the great Maya
empire of the Chanes, Culhuas, or Serpents, known
to its foes as Xibalba, with its centre in Chiapas at or
near Palenque, and with several allied capitals in the
surrounding region. Its first establishment at a re
mote period91 was attributed by the people to a being
called Votan, who was afterwards worshiped as a god.
Whether such a person as Votan ever had an actual
existence; who, or what he was; whence, or how, or
among what people the civilization attributed to him
was introduced -we can only form vague conjectures.
America was certainly peopled before the Votanic
era, and that most likely by civilized as well as savage
tribes, but pre- Votanic nations have left absolutely no
92
record. Perhaps the most reasonable conjecture is
that the Votanic power was of gradual growth, at
first humble and subordinate, but constantly increas
ing, overcoming, absorbing, succeeding other powers
as others in later times succeeded, absorbed, and over
came it. The Votanic institutions can only be known
by the traces they may be supposed to have left in
those of the later Maya nations. The prevailing lan
guage was doubtless either the Maya, the Tzendal, or
91 About 1000 B. C.
by Ordonez, and 955 B. C. by the Codex Chimal-
popoca, are the only definite dates given for this establishment.
92
Brasseur, Hist. Nat. Civ., torn, i., p. 44, speaks of cyclopean ruins in
Central America left by civilized nations preceding or contemporary with
those among whom Votan introduced his culture; but this is purely imag
inary; there are ruins which may ante-date the epoch in question, but none
to which there is any good reason for assigning so great an antiquity.
a mother-tongue from which these as well as the

Quiche, Cakchiquel, and others of the same linguistic
family, have sprung; although it is not unlikely that
the empire embraced some nations speaking other
languages. From its centre in the Usumacinta region
the Votanic power was gradually extended north
westward towards Anahuac, where its subjects vaguely
appear in tradition as Quinames, or giants. It also
penetrated north-eastward into Yucatan, where Zam-
na was its reputed founder, and the Cocomes and Itzas
probably its subjects. In other regions where its in
fluence was doubtless felt it seems to have left no
definite traces.
Much of our knowledge respecting the original
Maya empire is drawn from the traditions of a rival
power. It is not quite certain even that any of the
ruined temples or palaces in the central region were
entirely the work of the ancient people before they
came under Nahua influences; the differences noted
in the monuments referred to suggest the effects of
such influences exerted in different degrees. 93 The
Maya empire seems to have been in the height of its
prosperity when the rival Nahua power came into
prominence, perhaps two or three centuries before
94
Christ. The origin of the new people and of the
93 It
may be well to give here the conclusions of M. Viollet-le-Duc, the
distinguished French architect, respecting these ruins and their builders,
although they carry the matter back to the question of origin, and conse
quently beyond the sphere of this chapter. This author s conclusions are
professedly based on an examination of material monuments, but were
doubtless much affected, like those of other late writers, including myself,
by the study of Brasseur s works.
The whole continent was peopled with wild tribes of yellow blood from
Asia via the north-west at a very remote period. About 1000 B. C., the
Culhuas, a mixed race of black and white blood appeared from the east and
introduced agriculture and a slight degree of civilization. Soon after the
Culhuas, the Nahuas appeared, a white race coming from the north of Eu
rope via the Mississippi Valley, Florida, and West Indies, in successive
migrations. Palenque was built by the yellow races under a strong influ
ence of the Culhuas and a very slight Nahua influence; the cities of Yuca
tan were built when the Nahuas had conquered their rivals and the influ
ence of the white race had become predominant; Mitla owes its origin to a
still more recent period, and was built by a migrating tribe in which the
yellow blood seems to have predominated. Viollet-le-Duc, in Charnay,

Jluines Amer.
94 A document, for the authenticity of which even Brasseur de Bour-
new institutions is as deeply shrouded in mystery as

is that of their predecessors, although the nature of
the institutions themselves is well known to us in a
later and doubtless somewhat modified state of de
velopment. The language of the nations among
which these institutions were first established was
doubtless the Nahua, or old Aztec. The Plumed
Serpent, known in different tongues as Quetzalcoatl,
Gucumatz, and Cukulcan, was the being who tradi
tionally founded the new order of things. The
Nahua power grew up side by side with its Xibalban
predecessor, having its capital Tulan apparently in
Chiapas. Like the Maya power, it was not confined
to its original home, but was borne by the Olmec
colonies towards Anahuac, where it came in contact
with that of the Quinanies; and in the person of
Cukulcan it penetrated the peninsula of Yucatan to
exert its influence upon the Itzas and Cocomes. The
two powers seem not to have been on unfriendly
terms at first. In fact there is much reason to sus
pect that their respective institutions did not differ
radically, and that their rivalry developed into open
hostility only after the Nahuas had succeeded in in
troducing their ideas among so many Maya nations,

and in reducing to a life of civilization so many wild
tribes, that they had acquired a balance of political
power. For it is certain that, whatever may have
been true of the Maya culture, the Nahua institu

tions and power were by no means confined to nations
of the Nahua language, and that some of the leading
nations which accepted the Nahua ideas of religion
and government spoke other and even Maya tongues.
The struggle on the part of the Xibalbans seems to
have been that of an old effete monarchy against a
young and progressive people. Whatever its cause,
bourg declines to vouch, dates the first appearance of the Nahuas at 279 B.
C. The abbe thinks that event was probably during the century before
Christ; but he, it must be remembered, accepts the coming of Quetzal
coatl and his followers and the introduction of a new civilization literally.
Hist. Nat. Civ., torn, i., p. 101.
the result of the conquest was the overthrow of the

Yotanic monarchs at a date which may be approxi
mately fixed within a century before or after the
beginning of our era.
95
From that time the ancient
empire disappears from traditional history, and there
is no conclusive evidence that the Xibalban kings or
their descendants ever renewed the struggle. Yet
we read of no great destruction or enslavement or
migration of the Chanes resulting from the Nahua
victory. The result was only a change of dynasty
accompanied by the introduction of some new features
in government and religious rites. The old civiliza
tion was merged in the new, and practically lost its
identity; so much so that all the many nationalities
that in later times traced their origin to this central
region were proud, whatever their language, to claim
relationship with the successful Nahuas, whose insti
tutions they had adopted and whose power they had
shared.
Respecting the ensuing period of Nahua greatness
in Central America nothing is recorded save that it
ended in revolt, disaster, and a general scattering of
the tribes at some period probably preceding the fifth
century. The national names that appear in connec
tion with the closing struggles are the Toltecs, Chichi-
mecs, Quiches, Nonohualcas, and Tutul Xius, none of
them apparently identical with the Xibalbans. In
deed there seems to be very little reason to suppose
that this final struggle was a renewal of the old con
test between the followers of Yotan and Quetzalcoatl,
although Brasseur de Bourbourg seems inclined to
take that view of it; but a series of civil wars be
tween rival Nahua tribes, or tribes that had accepted
Nahua government, seems rather to have been the
agency that brought about their final forced migra
tions. Of the subsequent history of the nations that
95 I find no
authority for Brasseur de Bourbourg s opinion that the fall
of Xibalba preceded the final scattering of the Nahua nations by only one
century.
finally remained masters of their central home noth

known;
is it may be conjectured that the Tzen-
ing
dales and Chiapanecs found by the Spaniards in that
part of the country were their somewhat degenerate
descendants. Of the tribes that were successively
defeated and forced to seek new homes, those that
spoke the Maya dialects, although considering them
selves Nahuas, seem to have settled chiefly in the
south and east. 96 Some of them afterwards rose to
great prominence in Guatemala and Yucatan, and
their annals will form the subject of future chap
ters. The Nahua-speaking tribes as a rule established
themselves in Anahuac and in the western and north
western parts of Mexico, as their companion tribes, the
Olmecs and Xicalancas, had already established them
selves in the south-eastern region. The valley of
Mexico and the country immediately adjoining soon
became the centre of the Nahuas in Mexico; its his
tory or that of the nations that successively rose to
power there, will be continued in the following chap
ter.
From this epoch of separation in Chiapas the
Mayas of the south and the Nahuas of the north
were practically distinct peoples, as they have been
considered in the preceding volumes of this work.
At the date of separation all were in a certain sense
Nahua nations, and the Nahuas proper had doubtless
been considerably affected by the ancient peoples
whom they had overcome or converted, and with
whom they had so long associated hence the analo
:
gies that appear between the institutions and monu

ments of the north and south. Of the contrasts that
also appear, some date back to original differences be
tween the two rival powers ; others result from devel
opment and progress in different paths, during the
96Orozco y Berra, Geografia, pp. 128-9, judges from the occurrence of

Nahua names in Guatemala that nations speaking Nahua were formerly
located there, and were overcome either by Maya-speaking tribes that they
found in the country, or by others that invaded the country after them.
ten centuries that elapsed before the coming of the

Spaniards.
Bradford, Squier, Tylor, Viollet-le-Duc, Bartlett,
97
and may be mentioned with Brasseur de
Mtiller,
Bourbourg among the authorities who practically
agree with the conclusions expressed above, at least
so far as the southern origin of the Nahua culture is
concerned. It is true that the Abbe Brasseur s gen
eral conclusions differ in many points from those that
I have given; that his opinions expressed in different
works and even in different parts of the same work
differ most perplexingly from each other; that his
theories in many of their details rest on foundations
that seem purely imaginary; that his style, while
fascinating to the general reader, is most confusing to
the student; and that his citations of authorities are
often inaccurate; yet he must be regarded as the
true originator of the views advanced in this chapter,
inasmuch as the material from which they are built
up was largely the fruit of his investigations, and his
researches have done more than those of all other
writers combined to throw light on primitive Amer
ican history.
97 Amerikanische Urreligioncn, p. 524. Some of these writers, how

ever, believe strongly in a migration of tribes from the north, although
attributing the Nahua culture to the south.

Aboriginal

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Aboriginal

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Aboriginal

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

CHAPTER III.

THE PRE-TOLTEC PERIOD OF ABORIGINAL HISTORY.

TZENDAL TRADITION OF THE VOTANIC

In order to render more vivid than it would other

gibly and yet briefly to events somewhat in advance

of their chronologic order. As has been stated, the

The history of the Native Races may be most con

Period, embracing the semi-mythic traditions of the

erly historic annals of the different nations begin, and

ambition, glorious success, utter failure; the rise and

feats; oppression and revolt; political combinations

I have told in another volume the mythic tale of

and apportioned the land among the people. He

portioning the lands among the people; their

a new band of disciples of his own race, who were al

road or snake hole from the barranca of Zuqui to

sacred animals in a house of gloom at Huehuetan

nearly all that isknown from Tzendal sources of Vo-

ten by Votan himself, but by his descendant in the

have found a native interpreter at the time of the

last part of the eighteenth century found it in the

possession of Don Ramon de Ordonez y Aguiar, a

Tzequil nation, who had joined the first

5 Teatro Critico Americano, p. 32, et seq.

ence to him; and that he was chosen captain of all

ish the world.&quot; The manuscript was never published,

part of the historical portion was lost, and the re

after the confusion of tongues.&quot;

authors, and thinking of possible transformations that

date of the foundation of the empire, according to

the north. Ordonez claims, however, that the name

cessors, Igh and Imox; and in fact Brasseur claims

Such are the vague memories of the Chiapan past

11 Brasseur de Bourbourg, Cartas, p. 10.

attached to their details, the traditions in question have

In the second volume of this work I have de

for a long time previous to the coming of the Span

opinion before arrived at respecting the development

coming constantly in contact. Second, this fact is

moving southward with frequent halts, constantly

and may be consistently accounted for by the

Thus the monumental relics of Central America by

I pass next to the traditions of the Quiche nations

it stated in the Quiche annals; concerning whom

20 See for a bibliographical notice of the

the Popol Vuh, the national book, is no longer visible,

yond the sea the narrative of our life in the land of

22 Vol. iii., pp. 44-7.

wood and pith but he lacked intelligence, led a use

less life, and forgot the Heart of Heaven. They

cover them, the trees shook them from the branches

Cabrakan, the earthquake, by his wife Chimalmat.

Zipacna s work was to roll the great mountains which

although in revenge he carried home the arm of Hun-

lived on fish and crabs; by an artificial crab his two

only half is to be told of the relation of their father. 27

kiyalo, thetwo played ball, journeying toward Xibalba,

kan. After six months her condition was observed

ish the world." The manuscript was never published,

after the confusion of tongues."

already begun to serve but they added, "what

will you eat, O gods?" and Quetzalcoatl went to search

"where hast thou been to obtain that thing? Tell