Corporate Governance
Corporate Governance
Corporate Governance
b. The students shall have an insight into the general concepts of corporate governance and its
application and learn constructing a solution in each situation.
c. Understand the role and responsibilities of the BOD, Promoter and its group, majority shareholders
and minority protection and auditors of the company.
d. To make students understand the corporate governance law and practice at national and international
context
e. To know the governance factors and regulatory framework and best practices and legal compliance.
Sahara India Real Estate Corp. Ltd. &Ors v SEBI &Anr, (2013) 1 SCC 1
Vodafone International Holdings B.V. v UOI &Anr., (2012) 6 SCC 613
Reliance Natural Resources Ltd. v Reliance Industries Ltd, (2010) 7 SCC 1
Price Waterhouse & Co. & others v SEBI, 2019 Indlaw SAT 90
UmeshKhariwala v SEBI, 2019 Indlaw SAT 86
UNIT 2
2.1 Family Run business - Control-mechanisms to keep firm control on the corporate 08
entity - Boardroom Diversity / Dynamics - management accountability to the Board
and Board accountability to shareholders
Private and Public Company – Listed and Unlisted Company - Not-for-profit sector
and Corporate Governance - Primary and Secondary market Development
Cases:
Cyrus Investments Pvt. Ltd. & another v Tata Sons Ltd. & others, 2017 Indlaw
NCLAT 126
2.2 Group Entities / Cross-holdings - Pyramiding corporate establishments - Corporate
governance requirements with respect to subsidiary of listed entity - Management of
the unlisted subsidiary
2.3 Role of market intermediaries in Corporate Governance
Cases:
a) Videocon International Ltd. v SEBI & Others, 2002 Indlaw SAT 14; 2002 (3) CLC
1000
b) Samir C. Arora v SEBI, 2004 Indlaw SAT 43; [2005] 125 Comp Cas 409
c) Almondz Global Securities Ltd & others v SEBI, 2016 Indlaw SAT 119
d) Financial Technologies (India) Ltd v SEBI, 2014 Indlaw SAT 54
e) K. M. Venkateswaran v SEBI, 2005 Indlaw SAT 114
f) Manmohan Shetty v SEBI, 2011 Indlaw SAT 18
UNIT 3
3.1 Corporate Governance System Worldwide – Theories 10
Corporate Governance in International Scenario
a. Anglo-American Unitary Model
b. European dual model (multi-stakeholder model)
c. Japan’s multi-stake holding model
d. Management- focused unitary model
e. Indian managing agency model
3,2 US Model
The Public Company Accounting Reform and Investor Protection Act of 2002
DAMODARAM SANJIVAYYA NATIONAL LAW UNIVERSITY
(Sarbanes-Oxley Act); Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act
of 2010 (the Dodd-Frank Act)
UK law and Corporate Governance - UK Corporate Governance Code (2018)
a. Cadbury Committee (1992)
b. Greenbury Committee (1995)
c. Hampel Committee (1998)
OECD Principles of Corporate Governance
3.3 Cross-Country comparison - Cross-Border investment by foreign investors - Investor
protection and home bias
a) Revlon, Inc. v Macandrews& Forbes Holdings, Inc., 506 A.2d 173 (Del. 1986)
b) Paramount Communications, Inc. v Time, Inc., 571 A.2d 1140 (Del. 1989)
c) The Walt Disney Company Derivative Litigation, In re Walt Disney Co. Derivative
Litigation, 907 A.2d 693 (Del. Ch. 2005)
UNIT 4
4 Corporate Governance - Development in India 12
a. Kumar Mangalam Committee
b. Indian model of Corporate Governance
c. RBI Committee on Corporate Governance
d. CII Code on Corporate Governance
e. N.R. Narayana Murthy Committee
f. Naresh Chandra Committee
g. Irani Committee
UNIT 5
5 A. Clause 49 of the Listing Agreement 20
B. SEBI (Listing Obligations and Disclosure Requirements) Regulations, 2015
Corporate Governance Under LODR Regulations
1. Shareholder participation in key corporate governance decisions - protection for
minority shareholders
2. Role of stakeholders in corporate governance
3. Responsibilities of the Board of Directors & Auditors (Internal & External
auditors)
4. Obligations with respect to
a. Independent & Nominee Directors
b. Employees (Senior Management - KMP - Promoters)
5. Composition of its BOD’s - Constitution of Committees
a. Audit Committee
b. Nomination & Remuneration Committee
c. Stakeholders Relationship Committee
d. Remuneration Committee
e. Risk Management Committee
DAMODARAM SANJIVAYYA NATIONAL LAW UNIVERSITY
19. Lyman Johnson, Law and Legal Theory in the History of Corporate Responsibility:
Corporate Personhood, 35 Seattle U. L. Rev. 1135 (2012)