India-Gig-Workers - Life-Mercy-Platforms-Algorithms
India-Gig-Workers - Life-Mercy-Platforms-Algorithms
India-Gig-Workers - Life-Mercy-Platforms-Algorithms
India’s gig workforce is growing rapidly. According to a 2021 report by BCG & Michael and Susan
Dell Foundation, our gig economy is poised for 300% growth in three to four years, with 90 million
gig workers (henceforth ‘giggers’) expected by 2031. As many as 135 million Indian jobs were lost
during the COVID-19 pandemic, accentuating the demand for gigs. Add to this 4 million employable
youth entering the workforce annually, and it is easy to see why gigs seem attractive to millennials
and ‘zoomers’.
Giggers with technical and/or abstraction skills (like IT professionals) belong to the ‘skilled’ category,
while those like Uber drivers are termed ‘unskilled’. Perceived ‘autonomy’ attracts giggers: workers
choose their pace by picking micro-fragments of work called ‘gigs’ from different organisations and
delivering them based on contractual requirements. But while boundary-less careers seem exciting,
long-term psychological and socio-economic implications of gigs require scrutiny, given how the
fragmented nature of this world of work disrupts conventional economic structures.
Snapshot
● Beyond just employees and contractors, 'gig work' introduces additional complexity via a
triadic work relationship between the employer, the algorithmic platform, and an on-demand
workforce.
● With algorithms taking over the HR manager’s role, giggers become peripheral to the
platform, managed to virtual anonymity using a low-commitment, ‘arms-length’ approach.
● Gig structures hardly allow for the need for human connection to be fulfilled; relationships are
created and terminated rapidly, affording no time to generate loyalty and trust.
● Lack of professional development results in frustration when giggers seek traditional
employment. An intellectually stagnant workforce may constitute a social liability.
ADVERTISEMENT
How do giggers fare? The expectation to be always ‘on’ means that giggers work long hours. Due to
a lack of organisational affiliation, they receive no social or regulatory protections. With algorithms
taking over the HR manager’s role, giggers become peripheral to the platform, managed to virtual
anonymity using a low-commitment, ‘arms-length’ approach. There is little union representation and
collective voice. Incidents of food delivery workers being injured in accidents abound, and yet, they
receive no insurance benefits from the platform. This has raised academic and policy debates
around the need to improve the job and life quality of giggers.
Platforms, now cognisant of giggers’ need for professional relationships and career development,
are offering options: UberWorks allows drivers to connect with local businesses for work, while
Deliveroo riding academy offers mentoring and online courses. Although these efforts attempt to
address giggers’ occupational concerns, the key consideration, of precarity, remains unaddressed.
Policymakers must continue focusing on giggers’ lived experiences to ensure that they address
foundational challenges arising in this new, dynamic world of work.
(Anjana Karumathil has received her PhD in organisational behavior from the Indian Institute of
Management, Bangalore, MBA with Distinction from the University of Strathclyde, Glasgow and
BTech from the National Institute of Technology. Ritu Tripathi is Assistant Professor at the Indian
Institute of Management, Bangalore. She received her BA and MA in Psychology from the University
of Allahabad, India, and another Master’s and a PhD in Psychology from the University of Illinois at
Chicago, USA, where she was also the recipient of the Dean’s Scholar Award.)
(This is an opinion article and the views expressed are the author's own. The Quint neither endorses
nor is responsible for them.)