Cities in Nature by Lam Khee Poh and Khoo Teng Chye
Cities in Nature by Lam Khee Poh and Khoo Teng Chye
Cities in Nature by Lam Khee Poh and Khoo Teng Chye
approach which has shaped modern Singapore for reserved areas designated for government func-
more than five decades. The subsequent section tions and commercial activities (Fig. 1).
documents Singapore’s transformation from a The area around Fort Canning (formerly
Garden City to a City in Nature, even as a very known as Government Hill), Singapore River,
high-density city. and the Padang were reserved strictly for govern-
ment use. Fort Canning was identified as Raffles’
place of residence and also became an important
Singapore’s Urban Transformation: communication center with a lighthouse and a
From Mudflats to Metropolis telegraph office. Fort Canning was converted
into a fort in 1860 and was further upgraded into
The archaeological excavations from the Singapore an artillery fort within a few years. Commercial
River and Fort Canning Hill have suggested that activities were planned to take place at the “Com-
Singapore as a city probably dates back 700 years mercial Square,” which was later renamed as Raf-
(National Heritage Board 2020). A wide variety of fles Place. Inspired by the greenery in Calcutta,
trade wares were unearthed and shed light on Raffles advocated for greenery in Singapore, to
Singapore’s history as a harbor and trade settle- give the impression of prosperity. Greenery
ment. The city of Singapore came about upon the was provided in parklands and gardens, especially
signing of an official treaty, on 6 February 1819, at the Botanic Gardens and the Padang.
between Raffles and both Sultan Hussein and When conceiving the town plan, Raffles might
Temenggong Abdul Rahman. Planning for the have been inspired by the Renaissance ideals of
growth of the early settlement was based on Raf- urban planning, where radial streets outstretched
fles’ vision of Singapore as a port city and strategic from a strategic point of governmental power.
British trading post for South East Asia Such a model was first implemented in Florence
(Makepeace et al. 1991). Raffles’ land-use plan and was widely imitated in European cities.
for Singapore, published in 1828, was known as Influenced by early established cities, such as
the Jackson Plan. It focused on the downtown area, Barcelona and Paris, the paved streets were laid
around the Singapore River, spanning from Telok out in right angles to create a grid pattern to
Ayer to the Kallang River. The key features of the celebrate the hierarchy of streets and to improve
town plan include a grid layout for the road net- drainage, urban sanitation, hygiene, fire safety and
work, which accentuate the clear segregation of facilitate policing and troop movement. The
residential communities by ethnic group, and the Padang, Raffles Place, Fort Canning, and the
4 Cities in Nature
Cities in Nature, Fig. 1 The 1828 Jackson Plan (2020). (Source: National Heritage Board)
street grid pattern, found in the city center, are demarcation of forest reserves was not spatially
reminders of Singapore’s colonial legacy and are systematic.
today conserved as the Civic District. The competing land use needs resulted in the
Under British administration, planning was revocation of all the forest reserves in 1936.
largely ad hoc and mainly confined to the control Although most reserves had been depleted due to
of private developments before the Second World over-harvesting of timber for economic develop-
War. This resulted in haphazard growth, over- ment by 1937, Bukit Timah Forest Reserve was
crowding, and acute housing shortage in the cen- retained as it was under the administration of the
tral city. By early 1900’s, slums had infused into Singapore Botanic Gardens. Over the next three
the older sectors of the city and the roads were decades, the Kranji and Pandan mangrove reserves
unable to handle the automobiles. Rapiddefor- were intermittently re-gazetted, but were eventu-
estation continued as the town grew and cash ally still released for development upon
crops became more popular (Corlett 1992). With Singapore’s independence. The protection of
limited regulations over forest clearance activi- Bukit Timah Forest Reserve was strengthened
ties, most of Singapore’s forests were felled to finally, with the enactment of a Nature Reserves
set up gambier plantations. Ordinance and the establishment of a Nature
Sir Nathaniel Cantley was appointed Singapore’s Reserves Board in 1951. Today, Singapore’s four
first Superintendent of the Forest Department in remaining nature reserv es are Bukit Timah, Sungei
the 1880s, when only 7% of Singapore’s primary Buloh, Labrador, and the Central Catchment.
forests remained. He managed to establish 14 forest To address the poor urban living conditions as
reserves formally, which occupied around 11% of the city center was overcrowded with slums, the
Singapore’s land area. By salvaging what was left authorities established the Singapore Improve-
regardless of the reserves’ locations, Cantley’s initial ment Trust (SIT), in 1927. The enactment of the
Cities in Nature 5
Singapore Improvement Ordinance and the crea- In 1959, Mr Lee Kuan Yew set out a strong
tion of a Master Plan Committee facilitated the political mandate to remake Singapore into a
detailed study of the urban issues to draw up a new “First World oasis in a Third World region,”
master plan. Despite the completion of 23,000 with his vision of a clean, green, and modern
housing units and limited road improvement city that was not a concrete jungle and a home
works, before dissolving SIT in 1959, the housing where people could live in well-integrated, high-
supply was still insufficient due to rapid popula- rise communities, and not in ghettoes (Lee 2000).
tion increase. SIT’s limited accomplishments was This manifested into an era of continuous official
because it had no mandate to undertake the overall involvement on comprehensive and systematic
physical planning to regulate development until programmed exercise of urban development for
1951. However, the Master Plan, adopted in 1958, Singapore with a multi-ethnic society but without
did not achieve the desired outcomes as it was resources. In a 2012 interview by the CLC, he
based on traditional ideas of town planning that said, “I am pleased that we redeveloped the city
were more suited to United Kingdom, rather than when there was a chance to do it... That was a
that of a rapidly growing Asian city. By the time chance of a lifetime (Liu 2012).”
the Planning Ordinance (now known as the Plan- Mr Lee was mindful to avoid the duplication of
ning Act) was implemented on 1 February 1960, residential high-rise towers, built in Great Britain
to lay down the basic legal framework controlling after the Second World War, which eventually
the use and development of land set out by the became high-rise slums. The high-rise
1958 Master Plan, it was already too late and had towers were meant to resolve the crumbling and
limited impact on the city’s development (Fig. 2). unsanitary nineteenth-century dwellings and
Cities in Nature, Fig. 2 1958 Master Plan (Source: Urban Redevelopment Authority)
6 Cities in Nature
replace buildings destroyed during the war. safeguards prevented the fragmentation of com-
Influenced by Corbusier’s high-rise architecture, munities and crime within the poor enclaves. This
the towers were surrounded by public open space physical landscape, integrated with parks and
to promote social interactions and were deemed open spaces, connected seamlessly by roads
cheaper to build, as they shared similar population lined with trees, and the demographic mix has
density as the terraced housings they replaced. created a distinctive character of Singapore soci-
However, when the towers deteriorated over the ety. Singapore became more liveable even as it
years, they were perceived as undesirable urbanized.
low-cost housings, and the rising crime levels With HDB breaking the backbone of the severe
within the vicinity increased their unpopularity. housing crunch with its delivery of 55,000 flats in
Hence, the HDB apartments (or flats, as they the first five years, and the acquisition of land for
are commonly referred to locally) evolved in quite urban renewal in the city center, the Government
a different way, by fostering a greater mix of was in a position to plan more ambitiously for the
ethnic groups well as income groups. Mr Lee growth of the city. It sought technical assistance
was very clear that each town must have a mix and advice from the United Nations (UN) in the
of flats that catered to different income groups. early 1960s. This led to the establishment of a
Hence, different flat types from rental flats, 2 to State and City Planning Department (SCPD) in
5 rooms flats, and executive condominiums are 1967, to prepare a comprehensive, long-term
built for catering different housing needs. Within urban development plan for Singapore. Working
the HDB Towns, land has been safeguarded in the with an UN appointed team, the SCPD group
planning for private condominiums to provide comprised a diverse mix of agencies, with multi-
additional housing options to complement the disciplinary expertise, such as the Public Works
HDB’s home ownership scheme. The provision Department (PWD) and the Urban Renewal
of planned community facilities like schools, Department (URD), set up under HDB in 1964
libraries, community centers, and social facilities to “rejuvenate the old core of the city by making
(i.e., childcare and senior care centers) enhance better use of land. . . by rebuilding the city
the conveniences of the residents. The HDB completely.” This laid the foundations for an inte-
Towns are managed by Town Councils, which grated approach to urban planning that would
maintain and improve the common property of eventually be realized as the Concept Plan
the residential and commercial properties to keep of 1971.
them in a state of good and serviceable condition
(MND 2020). The service and conservancy The 1971 Concept Plan: A Radical Plan
charges (S&CC) collected from residents and for a Modern City (Garden City)
commercial operators fund the Town Councils’ In contrast to the 1958 Masterplan, the Concept
operational costs. Learning from the ethnically- Plan 1971 envisioned the comprehensive devel-
charged violence in the 1960s, such town man- opment of residential estates with varied densities,
agement arrangements help to build social cohe- commercial centers, and industrial areas, in a ring
sion and a sense of community to ensure harmony formation around the central water catchment area
within a diverse society. To avoid ethnic enclaves (Fig. 3). A network of expressways and a mass
from re-forming in certain housing estates, the rapid transit (MRT) system were planned, to
introduction of Ethnic Integration Policy (EIP) in improve the overall connectivity for Singapore.
1989 ensures a mix of ethnic groups at both the It provided the framework to build the infrastruc-
apartment block and town level. The mixing of the tures such as utilities, port, airport, industrial
races also contributed to the even spread of the parks, new towns, and greenery. Both the
less well-off or under privilege families in all Pan-Island Expressway (PIE) and the Changi Air-
estates. The social mixing and the preventing of port Terminal 1 were completed in 1981, while the
enclave formation in HDB estates have remained MRT network was opened in 1987.
an important principle in Singapore. These
Cities in Nature 7
Cities in Nature, Fig. 3 The Concept Plans of 1971, 1991, and 2001. (Source: Urban Redevelopment Authority)
8 Cities in Nature
Cities in Nature, Fig. 4 The lushly planted Toa Payoh Town Park is located in Toa Payoh Town, the first satellite town
comprehensively planned and developed by HDB. (Source: Derek Loei)
The clear hallmark of the Concept plan was the With the completion of most proposals from
structure that it laid for modern Singapore which Concept Plan 1971 by 1989, a formal process was
remains to this day: a central business district set up to involve all ministries and agencies, pro-
ringed by 26 HDB towns and estates around the fessional institutes, trade associations, and the
Central Catchment Nature reserve and with well- community, to prepare for Concept Plan 1991.
planned regional, town parks and other greenery The process includes the Concept Plan review
to achieve a Garden City despite a doubling of the on every decade, with a mid-term review every
population. How this was achieved is elaborated 5 years. The Concept Plan 1991 crystalized the
in the next section (Fig. 4). new aspirations to become a “Tropical City of
Excellence” and focused on a “decentralization
The 1991 Concept Plan and the Reformed strategy” to bring jobs closer to homes. The devel-
Urban Planning System (City in a Garden) opment of the four regional commercial centers in
Key policy changes in the late 1980s laid the Woodlands, Tampines, Jurong East, and Seletar,
foundations of today’s urban planning system. had progressively eased the congestions in the city
An updated Concept Plan was completed in center. By emphasizing the quality-of-life aspira-
1991 and several major changes were made to tions, Concept Plan 1991 envisioned a Singapore
create a more formal and transparent urban plan- that balanced work and play, culture and com-
ning system, which remains essentially the system merce. Furthermore, the nature, waterbodies, and
till today. urban development within Singapore are
interfaced and integrated seamlessly. The
Cities in Nature 9
Cities in Nature, Fig. 6 Singapore’s urban systems approach. (Source: Centre for Liveable Cities)
Liveable and Sustainable Cities Framework by are easily measurable policy goals, are supported
the Centre for Liveable Cities (CLC) by two elements: an integrated approach to plan-
Singapore’s evolving approach to urban planning ning and development and dynamic urban gover-
in the past decades has been documented by the nance. This approach is further elaborated in the
CLC (Fig. 5). Back then, Singapore’s pioneering next section, that is, the way Singapore trans-
leaders did not have a particular framework in mind formed from a Garden City to an aspiring City in
or a written set of principles and guidelines when Nature (Fig. 6).
they started to build Singapore (Khoo 2012). CLC
facilitated in-depth interviews with the key individ-
uals to capture their tacit knowledge and document Liveability and Density: The Journey
the roles of key pioneers and the enabling processes from Garden City to a City in Nature
and innovative policies that contributed positively
to Singapore’s key urban systems and urban devel- This section elaborates on the green and blue
opment. The Urban Systems Studies distilled the characteristics of Singapore’s urban transforma-
principles that were applied in solving urban chal- tion; which is a key element of achieving liveabil-
lenges like water, transport, housing, the environ- ity even as the city densified. Figure 7 showed the
ment, and industrial infrastructure. These progression as Singapore developed from Garden
principles have been consolidated in the CLC Live- City to City in Nature in terms of higher density
ability Framework. and liveability. This apparent contradiction of
The urban systems approach that Singapore becoming more green and in harmony in nature
has adopted builds on the urban planning theories even with higher density has been possible with
mentioned in section 1 (Table 1). It is an approach the urban systems approach depicted in the Live-
probably more relevant to rapidly growing high- ability Framework.
density cities than any particular theory of city
planning. The three liveability outcomes, which
Cities in Nature 11
Cities in Nature, Fig. 7 Nature provision as the means to achieving high liveability even as urban density increases.
(Source: Centre for Liveable Cities)
Cities in Nature, Fig. 8 Quality greening for the harsh concrete urban infrastructures. (Source: Derek Loei)
Cities in Nature, Fig. 9 Green cover comparison between Singapore in 1986 and 2007. (Source: National Parks Board)
than 250 ha of greenery, consisting of urban Nature Park (Loo 2015) being gazetted as nature
farms, communal gardens, and green walls, to reserves in 2002.
reduce the environmental ambient temperature
and provide visual relief to the community. City of Garden and Waters
Complimenting LUSH is the SGIS, which pro- Singapore has an annual rainfall of 2.4 m across
vides funding to developers, to encourage the the island. However, Singapore’s limited land
increase of greenery provision on built structures. could not collect and store all that rain water for
Despite Singapore’s intense urbanization, its the population. Building more reservoirs is not
green cover increased from 36% in 1986 to 47% feasible since land is required for other more
in 2007. With holistic master planning, gover- pressing needs, such as housing. The scarcity of
nance and careful design, both the LUSH and land and water in Singapore was overcome by the
SGIS, have contributed to the mainstreaming of efficient planning and use of land resources.
pervasive greenery in Singapore (Fig. 9). Singapore’s National Water Agency (PUB)
Beside enhancing the hardware infrastructures, worked with many agencies to manage land use
the Community in Bloom (CIB) initiative and and environmental pollutions, again using a sys-
programs from the Centre for Urban Greenery tems approach. This made it possible to harvest
and Ecology (CUGE) were launched to provide rain from the most urbanized water catchments
the community and industry partners with more and built 17 urban reservoirs by damming river
awareness, knowledge, and hands-on experience. estuaries, something which was earlier thought to
The Garden City Fund (GCF) was set up as a be impossible because of the extensive land and
registered charity and Institution of a Public Char- water pollutions. Two-thirds of Singapore’s land
acter (IPC) in 2002, to partner and facilitate orga- area is now a water catchment. The Marina Bar-
nizations and individuals to contribute to rage, built at a cost of S$226 million (Tortajada
Singapore’s greening (National Parks Board 2018) and completed only in 4 years in 2008,
2002). The donations were used to promote con- formed Singapore’s 15th reservoir and first reser-
servation, research, outreach, and education ini- voir in the world to harvest rainwater in the central
tiatives. There was also increasing pressure from business district, with a catchment area of about
the public to preserve Singapore’s rich history and one-sixth the size of Singapore, or 10,000 ha
natural environment. These interactions between (Figs. 10 and 11).
the local Nature Groups and the public agencies Beyond recognizing water as a resource, Singa-
led to increased awareness of Singapore’s natural pore unlocked the potential of water as an urban
assets, leading to both Labrador Park (Tan and asset by visioning the re-naturalization of
Cornelius-Takahama 1997) and Sungei Buloh Singapore’s engineered waterways, such as drains,
14 Cities in Nature
Cities in Nature, Fig. 10 Location of Singapore’s water catchment areas and reservoirs. (Source: PUB, Singapore’s
National Water Agency)
canals, and stormwater collection ponds. This built reservoirs into beautiful recreational spaces where
upon the efforts by the Waterbodies Design Panel people can be close to water and naturally become
(WDP), an advisory body within the government in stewards of the waterways (Centre for Liveable
1989, chaired by Dr Liu Thai Ker, to advise on the Cities 2019). Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong
design and aesthetics of major waterways (Tan coined the inspirational phrase “a City of Gardens
et al. 2009). By involving the Ministry of Environ- and Water” when he launched the ABC Waters
ment, Urban Redevelopment Authority, Housing Exhibition in 2007. He advocated that more
and Development Board, the WDP provided posi- should be done and commented, “To realise the
tive benchmarks by creating outstanding projects, exciting potential of ABC Waters, we should
such as Sungei Api Api, located in Pasir Ris Town. mainstream it in our vision for the future.”
Instead of a typical monsoon canal, the Sungei Api Besides launching demonstration projects in
Api was designed as a scenic river lined with lush Bedok, Kallang River, and MacRitchie reservoir,
mangroves. The success of the WDP facilitated the PUB partnered agencies to conduct proof-of con-
URA to draw up a Parks and Water Bodies Plan to cept pilot projects to test specific ideas. One such
drive the implementation of re-naturalizing example was the implementation of rain gardens
Singapore’s engineered waterways. at Balam Estate. The project was possible due to
the planned infrastructure works of Pelton Canal
The ABC Waters Journey diversion to make way for the Kallang-Paya Lebar
In 2006, the PUB launched the Active, Beautiful, Expressway (KPE) tunnel in 2001. Upon the com-
Clean Waters (ABC Waters) Programme (PUB pletion of the KPE tunnel, upgrading of Pelton
2006) to improve water quality, enhance liveabil- Canal, and realignment of adjacent vehicular
ity, and transform Singapore’s canals, rivers, and roads in 2008, the new open spaces at Balam
Cities in Nature 15
Cities in Nature, Fig. 11 Marina Reservoir forms Singapore’s 15th reservoir. (Source: Derek Loei)
Cities in Nature,
Fig. 12 Schematic section
of Pelton Canal and the
KPE Tunnel. (Source:
Housing & Development
Board)
Estate were re-landscaped. The reinstatement to other agencies and the general public. Such
works involved HDB, PUB, LTA, NParks, and consultations enhanced the understanding of the
Marine Parade Town Council, to incorporate the functions and benefits of ABC Waters and
rain gardens into the new landscapes (Fig. 12). avoided the misperceptions of the rain gardens
Extensive community consultations were car- as possible mosquito breeding ground.
ried out during the design process to improve the When PUB launched the ABC Waters Certifi-
designs and to show the viability of ABC Waters cation Scheme in 2010, both private and public
16 Cities in Nature
developers are encouraged to adopt ABC Waters otters. This type of living environment, with out-
design features in their projects. To cultivate the door learning opportunities, and urban lifestyle is
industry and mainstream ABC Waters, the devel- rarely experienced by most other city dwellers.
opers are provided with recognition and allowed
to promote their “certified” ABC Waters projects. ABC Waters’ Contributions to City in Nature
The PUB also shared the design guidelines and The ABC Waters Programme systematically build
engineering procedures including technical stan- on the good work of the Waterbodies Design
dards, in the public domain, and partnered the Panel (WDP), by institutionalizing the Blue in
Institution of Engineers Singapore (IES) to con- the city in the same way that the Green has been
duct seminars and professional programs to train achieved through the Garden City and City in a
and certify professionals. Since then, the local Garden strategies. It was guided by an overarch-
institutes of higher learning (IHLs) comprising ing master plan and was being implemented on a
universities and polytechnics, have introduced larger scale. By developing small-scale pilot pro-
ABC Waters design into their curriculums. jects and demonstration sites, the ABC Waters
In the flagship Kallang River at Bishan-Ang Programme is able to innovate systemically to
Mo Kio Park, PUB and NParks introduced a com- ensure that all new ideas could keep stormwater
bination of softscapes, natural materials, and civil flowing efficiently and at the same time, gauge the
engineering solutions to create a softer and more level of involvement by communities. Guided by
natural appearance for the waterway. Designed as research, pilot projects, and experts, the ABC
a flood plain, the once utilitarian concrete canal is Waters Design Guidelines were published and reg-
now a useable park space. During dry days, the ularly updated as new projects were completed.
flow of water is confined to a narrow stream that Recognizing the need to provide quality out-
park users can access and explore, improving the door environment to create pleasing high-density
park user experience. During a storm event, the living, HDB worked with PUB and stakeholders
adjacent park area functions as a conveyance to push the creative boundaries of landscape
channel to carry the run-off downstream steadily. design to bring many firsts to the HDB public
The stormwater surge in January 2017 validated housing estates (Table 2) (Fig. 13).
its capacity to hold and slow down runoff. Addi-
tionally, a hedonic pricing analysis carried out by
the Ministry of Environment and Water Resources Cities in Nature, Table 2 Examples of ABC Waters
assessed that this project had a positive and statis- projects located in the heartlands
tically significant impact on property prices there. No Projects Completion Date
The estimated total impact was at $157 million, 1 1st Bioretention System 2008
more than offsetting its implementation cost of in SG: Balam Estate
$76 million (Ministry of Environment and Water Raingarden
Resources 2016). A 2018 study by Future Cities 2 1st Neighbourhood Park- 2009
scale ABC Waters:
Laboratory at Singapore-ETH Centre and Greenwood Sanctuary @
National University of Singapore estimated that Admiralty
the presence of green spaces could account for 3 1st Precinct-scale ABC 2015
$179 million in value of all homes sold during Waters: Waterway Ridges @
Punggol
2013 to 2014, due to the positive effect coming
4 1st Public Integrated 2018
almost entirely from managed vegetation sur- Development with Skyrise
rounding the estate (Au-Yong 2018). Beyond the ABC Waters: Kampung
monetary value, re-naturalized riverscape now Admiralty
provides opportunities for the community to 5 1st Estate-scale ABC Waters: Estimated to be
have a closer interaction with water. It is common Bidadari Estate completed in
2025
to see families walking towards the stream to
catch fishes and spot wildlife such as egrets and
Cities in Nature 17
Cities in Nature, Fig. 13 Wide range of ABC Waters design implemented in HDB. (Source: Housing & Development
Board)
Cities in Nature, Fig. 14 Bishan Ang Mo Kio Park is an early example of implementing nature-based solution in the
urban landscape. Source: Derek Loei]
Singapore had laid out mitigation and adaption • Extend Singapore’s natural capital
strategies in the Singapore Climate Action Plan • Intensify nature in our gardens and parks
(2020) and the Singapore Green Plan 2030. It • Restore nature into the urban landscape
has formulated “City in Nature” plans to provide • Strengthen connectivity between our green
citizens with a better quality of life, while spaces
co-existing with the biodiversity (Heng 2020).
Nature-based solutions are applied to restore Strategy 1: Extend Singapore’s Natural Capital
nature into the city for liveability, sustainability, Singapore has consciously left four zones of high
and well-being, seeking to attain climate, ecolog- biodiversity relatively untouched, each character-
ical, and social resilience. (Fig. 14). ized by different ecosystems. These four Biodi-
versity Core Areas house the majority of the
The Implementation Strategy native biodiversity, as well as Singapore’s four
With the integration of the green and blue strate- Nature Reserves. The nature reserves occupy a
gies, Singapore continues to build upon its strong land area of 3347 ha, which is about 4.6% of
foundation, to restore nature into Singapore’s Singapore’s total area. Singapore’s coastal waters
urban fabric, with an urban systems approach. are home to over 250 species of hard corals, which
Four key strategies have been identified to guide is roughly one third of the world’s total num-
Singapore towards fulfilling the vision of City in ber. Various coastal and marine habitats ranging
Nature: from the rocky shore of Labrador Nature Reserve
Cities in Nature 19
Cities in Nature, Fig. 15 The four biodiversity core areas of Singapore. (Source: National Parks Board)
to the mangroves and mudflats of Sungei Buloh along roads and park connectors, and ABC Waters
Wetland Reserve, and Sisters’ Islands Marine along all major canals, will enhance the ecological
Park, contribute to biodiversity and recreation connectivity across Singapore. By softening the
options in Singapore (Fig. 15). urban matrix sufficiently, nature and biodiversity
can permeate our everyday experience, increasing
Growing the Nature Park Network As the the city’s liveability (Figs. 16 and 17).
most valuable parts of the natural ecosystems
reside in the core biodiversity areas, it is important Strategy 2: Intensify Nature in Our Gardens
to extend such natural capitals beyond the bound- and Parks
ary of the nature reserves, to other areas of Singa- Singapore is intensifying nature in the public
pore. The Nature Park Network seeks to create parks and gardens by incorporating biophilic
rustic and forested nature parks, around the nature design, nature inspired planting designs, and con-
reserves, to act as buffer to mitigate the impact of serving more native flora to create positive impact
urbanization. on health and well-being. More waterways and
The new Nature Parks provide complementary water bodies in existing parks will be naturalized
habitats for the flora and fauna from Nature and function as floodplains to protect homes and
Reserves and serve as compatible nature-based properties from flooding while supporting biodi-
recreation for the population. With more than versity. The plans include the implementation of
350 ha of Nature Parks currently, Singapore therapeutic landscapes, nature playgardens for
plans to provide an additional 200 ha of nature children, naturalized waterways, and conservation
parks by 2030. These new nature parks allow the of mangrove areas and species recovery and hab-
community to enjoy a myriad of nature-based itat restoration.
recreational activities such as bird watching and
trekking. The mainstreaming of Nature Ways
20 Cities in Nature
Jln Gemala
Cities in Nature, Fig. 17 (Right) Details of Sungei Buloh Nature Park Network (NPN). (Source: National Parks Board)
Cities in Nature, Fig. 18 A therapeutic garden located at Bishan-Ang Mo Kio Park. (Source: Derek Loei)
Species Recovery and Habitat Strategy 3: Restore Nature into the Urban
Restoration The ongoing biodiversity conserva- Landscape
tion efforts have enabled Singaporeans to encoun-
ter rare plant and animal species, such as the Industrial Estates: Bringing Nature Back Built
Hairless Rambutan (Nephelium maingayi), urban hard surfaces such as roads typically absorb
Straw headed Bulbul (Pycnonotus zeylanicus), and retain a lot of heat from solar radiation.
and Tiger Tail Seahorse (Hippocampus comes).
Cities in Nature 23
Cities in Nature, Fig. 26 Right) A PCN located in Sembawang Town. (Source: Derek Loei)
industry organisations to restructure operations to allotment gardening scheme have been expanded,
increase productivity. CUGE is also working with as part of the Growing with Edibles initiative. The
the Animal & Veterinary Service (AVS) to jointly distribution of complimentary packets of seeds to
develop relevant trainings, to enhance the skills households and the wealth of online resources on
and knowledge on animal welfare, health, ecol- gardening encourage the growing of produce at
ogy, and behavior. home. The Community in Nature initiative,
launched in 2011, is continuing to involve more
Inspire Communities to Cocreate and Be Stew- educational institutes and partners to participate in
ards of Nature The success of a City in Nature is citizen science projects and reforestation efforts.
to forge closer bonds within the community, Furthermore, NParks will take the lead to intro-
through active participations and stewardship of duce options for up to 25,000 youths to participate
the greenery and biodiversity. With the building of in biodiversity conservation yearly, through the
more parks, communities can partake in the Youth@SGNature initiative (Ng 2020). (Fig. 27).
design, building, management, and programming
of parks within their estates through the “Friends
of the Parks initiative,” which aims to promote What Does the Future Holds?
greater stewardship in the management of the
green spaces. This ground-led initiative As Singapore strives to recover from the current
spearheaded by the community will complement pandemic to be a City in Nature, these are key
the “OneMillionTrees movement” (Co 2020b). issues to address :
The Community in Bloom program and the
26 Cities in Nature
Cities in Nature, Fig. 27 An example of allotment garden found in Bishan Ang Mo Kio Park. Source Derek Loei
(a) Planning a Postpandemic City Central Business Districts (CBDs). With the
When COVID-19 first emerged in Singa- mainstreaming of remote working, there is a
pore in January 2020, it was the start of a need to review the design of CBDs, homes,
series of unprecedented closures and restric- and public transport networks to consider the
tions (Goh 2020). Beyond Singapore, the human experience and the innate need to
world faced serious challenges and drastic come together creatively and socially in
changes both socially and economically. The shared spaces.
cities with high population densities and con- The URA has already in its latest Concept
centration of activities were more vulnerable Plan or Long Term Plan as it is now called,
due to COVID-19’s ability to spread rapidly planned for an increasingly polycentric city
within confined spaces and there was no with new centers like Jurong Lake District,
known vaccine for the new virus then. These subregional centers like Paya Lebar as well
cities grappled with issues such as access to as the Greater Southern Waterfront, with
quality healthcare, trust in government, and 30 km of coastline which extends from Pasir
ensuring the population complied with mask- Panjang to Marina East (Co 2019). The
wearing and safe management measures. urgency to develop these new centers will
With the implementation of Work-From- probably be greater postpandemic to increase
Home and Home-Based-Study, there are the city’s resilience.
fewer people on the streets, transport nodes, (b) Care for the People: General Wellness and
public spaces, commercial centers, and the Mental Health
Cities in Nature 27
Amin, H. (2021). First look: New features open at Singa- Heng, M. (2020). Parliament: More nature parks, park
pore Botanic Gardens’ Gallop Extension. CNA. http:// connectors as Singapore transforms into city in nature
www.channelnewsasia.com/news/singapore/botanic- in next decade. The Straits Times. https://www.
gardens-gallop-extension-playground-first- straitstimes.com/politics/parliament-more-nature-
look-14392014 parks-park-connectors-as-singapore-transforms-into-
Attorney-General’s Chambers. (2001). Search within leg- city-in-nature-in
islation: Parks and Trees Act. Singapore Statutes Hermesauto. (2015). Stretch of Kallang River to be trans-
Online: Parks and Trees Act. https://sso.agc.gov.sg/ formed from concrete canal to cascading stream. The
Act/PTA2005. Straits Times. https://www.straitstimes.com/singapore/
Au-Yong, R. (2018). Green the colour of money where environment/stretch-of-kallang-river-to-be-trans
property is concerned? The Straits Times. https://www. formed-from-concrete-canal-to-cascading
straitstimes.com/singapore/green-the-colour-of- Juraimi, F. (2019). NParks unveils 10-year action plan to
money-where-property-is-concerned make Singapore’s rainforests more resilient. CNA.
Beatley, T. (2011). Biophilic cities integrating nature into http://www.channelnewsasia.com/news/singapore/
urban design and planning. Island Press. nparks-unveils-10-year-action-plan-to-make-singa
Centre for Liveable Cities. (2019). Active, Beautiful, Clean pore-s-11167608
Waters (ABC Waters) Programme. Infopedia. https:// Khoo, T. C. (2012). The CLC framework for liveable and
eresources.nlb.gov.sg/infopedia/articles/SIP_2019-08- sustainable cities. Urban Solution Issue 1. https://www.
21_203240.html clc.gov.sg/docs/default-source/urban-solutions/urb-
Chong, C. (2021). Feeding wildlife a major reason for sol-iss-1-pdfs/researchandreports-the-clc-framework-
spike in wild animal numbers: NParks. The Straits for-liveable-and-sustainable-cities.pdf
Times. http://www.straitstimes.com/singapore/feeding- Lee, K. Y. (2000). From Third World to first: The Singa-
wildlife-a-major-reason-for-spike-in-wild-animal-num pore story, 1965–2000: Singapore and the Asian eco-
bers-nparks nomic boom. HarperCollins Publishers.
Choo, F. (2019, April 13). Coast-to-Coast trail launched. Liu, T. K. (2012). Lee Kuan Yew: The chance of a lifetime.
The Straits Times. https://www.straitstimes.com/singa Urban Solutions Issue 2. https://www.clc.gov.sg/docs/
pore/environment/coast-to-coast-trail-launched default-source/urban-solutions/urb-sol-iss-2-pdfs/inter
Co, C. (2019). NDR 2019: New attractions, housing and view-lee-kuan-yew.pdf
office spaces to be developed in Greater Southern Loo, J. (2015). Sungei Buloh Wetland Reserve. Infopedia.
Waterfront. CNA. https://www.channelnewsasia.com/ https://eresources.nlb.gov.sg/infopedia/articles/SIP_
news/singapore/ndr-2019-greater-southern-waterfront- 566_2005-02-01.html
pulau-brani-sentosa-keppel-11819376 Makepeace, W., Brooke, G. E., & Braddell, R. St. J. (Eds.).
Co, C. (2020a). Singapore to plant 170,000 more trees in (1991). One hundred years of Singapore (pp. 6–7).
industrial estates over the next 10 years. CNA. http:// Singapore: Oxford University Press. (Call no.:
www.channelnewsasia.com/news/singapore/170000- RSING 959.57 ONE-[HIS]).
more-trees-industrial-estates-cooling- Marshall, A. (2010). How cities work: Suburbs, sprawl,
therapeutic-13374114 and the roads not taken (pp. 44–45). University of
Co, C. (2020b). Singapore to plant 1 million trees, develop Texas Press. ISBN 0292792433.
more gardens and parks by 2030. CNA. https://www. Master Plan 1958. Republic of Singapore – Master Plan
channelnewsasia.com/news/singapore/singapore-to- 1958. (n.d.). https://www.ura.gov.sg/dc/mp58/
plant-1-million-trees-develop-more-gardens- mp58map_index.htm.
and-12500858 Ministry of Environment and Water Resources. (2016). A
Corlett, R. (1992). The ecological transformation of Sin- policymaker’s toolkit for policy design and evaluation.
gapore, 1819-1990. Journal of Biogeography, 19(4), Cost-benefit analysis: Hedonic Pricing Study for ABC
411–420. https://doi.org/10.2307/2845569 Waters. Extracted from CLC Insights City-in-Nature
Dempsey, N. (2010). Revisiting the compact city? Built MND. (2020, July 30). About Town Councils. MND.
Environment (1978-), 36(1), 4-8. Retrieved July https://www.mnd.gov.sg/our-work/regulating-town-
19, 2021, from http://www.jstor.org/stable/23289980 councils/about-town-councils
Dreier, P. (2006). Jane Jacobs’ radical legacy. Jane Jacobs’ Mohan, M. (2018). New stat board to oversee food safety
radical legacy. https://web.archive.org/web/20060 and security; AVA to be disbanded. CNA. http://www.
928205849/http://www.nhi.org/online/issues/146/ channelnewsasia.com/news/singapore/new-statutory-
janejacobslegacy.html board-singapore-food-agency-ava-
Encyclopedia Britannica, inc. (1998, July 20). Garden city. disbanded-10563864
Encyclopedia Britannica. https://www.britannica.com/ Mohan, M. (2021). Engineering solutions to tackle rising
topic/garden-city-urban-planning sea levels important but more research vital: Experts.
Goh, T. (2020). Six months of Covid-19 in Singapore: A CNA. http://www.channelnewsasia.com/news/singa
timeline. The Straits Times. http://www.straitstimes. pore/climate-change-rising-sea-levels-research-
com/singapore/six-months-of-covid-19-in-singapore- poldering-ndr2019-11822204
a-timeline
Cities in Nature 29