Nutritive and Sensory Properties of Okra Fortified Instant Fufu
Nutritive and Sensory Properties of Okra Fortified Instant Fufu
Nutritive and Sensory Properties of Okra Fortified Instant Fufu
1*
Gbadegesin, A. R., 1Odunlade, T. V. and 2Otunola, E. T.
1
Department of Food Science and Technology, Obafemi Awolowo University, Ile-Ife, Nigeria
2
Department of Food Science and Engineering, Ladoke Akintola University of Technology,
Ogbomoso, Nigeria
*Corresponding author.
Email: [email protected]
1032 Gbadegesin et al./IFRJ 25(3): 1031-1035
retted part was allowed to sediment overnight and represented like extremely and 1 represented dislike
then dewatered and dried in a cabinet dryer at 50°C extremely.
for 48 h. The dried cake, after dehydration, was
milled to instant powdery fufu using a disc attrition Statistical analysis
mill (2A Premier mill, Hunt and Co., UK). The software of statistical package for social
sciences (SPSS), version 16.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago,
Preparation of ground dried okra seeds IL, USA), was used to analyze all obtained data.
The seeds of okra were removed after laterally All the data were subjected to one-way analysis of
slicing the already washed freshly harvested matured variance while Duncan’s multiple range test was used
okra. The seeds were dried in an electric oven set for separation of means at 95% confidence level.
(Gallenkamp hot air oven, OVB 305, UK) at 50°C
for 24 h. The dried okra seeds were further roasted Results and Discussion
in the forced air oven at 160°C for 10 min, ground
and sieved. Proximate composition
The proximate composition of fufu and okra-
Preparation of instant fufu fortified with ground fortified-fufu samples are presented in Table 1. The
dried okra seeds protein content increased significantly (p˂0.05) with
The instant fufu and ground dried okra seeds of increase in fortification levels. The unfortified cassava
ratio 100:0, 95:5, 90:10, 85:15 and 80:20% (w/w) flour recorded the lowest protein content of 3.64%
were individually mixed using an electric mixer which was lower to 4.23% reported by Adeniran et
(Model KM300, Kenwood, UK). al. (2012) for cassava starch. Meanwhile, the sample
with the highest fortification level of 20% had the
Proximate analysis highest (11.13%) protein content. The fortification of
Proximate analysis was carried out on instant fufu with okra seed flour from 5 to 20% increased
fufu and the fortified samples using AOAC (2010) the protein content by 50 and 206%, respectively.
methods 925.10, 920.53, 920.39, 923.03 and 962.09 This increase in protein content is an indication that
for moisture, protein, fat, ash and crude fibre the fortification of instant fufu with okra seed flour
contents, respectively. The total carbohydrate content could contribute in the reduction of protein energy
was determined by difference (Mbaeyi-Nwaoha and malnutrition which is often associated with the over
Obetta, 2016). reliance on the unfortified fufu.
The fat content of the highest fortified sample
Mineral analysis had the highest value of 6.29% while the unfortified
Minerals (calcium, iron, and magnesium) of sample had the lowest value of 0.37%. This suggests
the samples were determined using Flame Atomic that okra seed flour contributed significantly to the
Absorption Spectrophotometer (Onoja et al., 2014). fat content of the samples. The fat content observed
for the unfortified instant fufu (0.37%) in this study
Physicochemical properties agreed with the 0.35% reported by Hussein et al.
pH and water absorption capacities of the (2012) for instant fufu. The fat content of 20% okra-
samples were analysed using the methods described fortified-fufu sample with the highest fat content
by Adepeju et al. (2011) and Sathe and Salunkhe (6.29%) was not higher than the recommended upper
(1981), respectively. limit of 10% for complementary/composite food
(Odunlade, 2016).
Sensory evaluation The carbohydrate and fibre contents of the samples
Each of the instant fufu samples was poured which ranged between 65.20 to 76.90% and 10.16 to
gradually into boiling water in a cooking pot and 11.80%, respectively reduced as fortification levels
stirred until a smooth paste was formed. It was increased. The reduction in carbohydrate contents of
covered for 3 min so as to cook properly. The samples the samples with increase in okra seed flour addition
were coded and presented to the evaluators for is somewhat beneficial because of its effects on
assessment. The sensory evaluation was conducted protein energy malnutrition. The carbohydrate and
using a descriptive-quantitative sensory analysis by fibre contents of the fortifying agent (okra seed) are
a 15 judge semi-trained sensory panel. The sensory lower than those of cassava tuber.
properties of taste, texture, appearance, flavor, The ash content of the sample also increased
colour, and acceptability were assessed. The scores with increase in fortification level which indicates
were based on a nine-point hedonic scale, where 9 that the mineral contents of the instant fufu samples
Gbadegesin et al./IFRJ 25(3): 1031-1035 1033
Means along a column with the same superscript are not significantly different (p>0.05)
A 100% Instant fufu and 0% okra seed flour B 95% fufu and 5% okra seed flour
C 90% fufu and 10% okra seed flour D 85% fufu and 15% okra seed flour
E 80% fufu and 20% okra seed flour
Table 2. Physicochemical properties of fufu and okra- The water absorption capacity (WAC) of
fortified-fufu samples the samples ranged between 271 and 283%. The
unfortified instant fufu sample had the least WAC
while 20% okra-fortified-fufu sample recorded the
highest WAC. There was an increase in the water
absorption capacity of the samples as fortification
increased. Adetuyi and Adelabu (2011) also
reported increase in water absorption capacity with
the addition of okra seed to plantain flour. Water
absorption capacity had been reported to be a function
of the nutritive component of foods namely protein
Means along a column with the same superscript are not and carbohydrate (Odunlade, 2016). The increase
significantly different (p>0.05) in the water absorption capacity of the fufu samples
upon fortification could be attributed to the increase
A 100% Instant fufu and 0% okra seed flour
B 95% fufu and 5% okra seed flour
and decrease in protein and carbohydrate contents,
C 90% fufu and 10% okra seed flour respectively (Chandra and Samsher, 2013).
D 85% fufu and 15% okra seed flour
E 80% fufu and 20% okra seed flour Mineral composition of fufu and fortified fufu
samples
would increase with okra addition. This is because The results of the mineral composition of fufu
ash content is more of a measure of the minerals in and fortified fufu samples are presented in Table
foods (Pomeranz and Meloan, 2004). The moisture 3. The values for calcium for the samples ranged
of all the samples ranged between 4.75 and 5.90% between 30.15 and 43.27 mg/100 g. The iron and
which were lower than the recommended upper limit magnesium contents of the samples ranged between
of 15% for floury foods (Codex Stan 152-1985). 2.10 to 3.40 mg/100 g and 19.10 to 26.50 mg/100
This therefore suggests that all the samples would g, respectively. It was largely observed that the
not deteriorate quickly as a result of its low moisture evaluated mineral contents significantly (p<0.05)
content (Makinde and Ladipo, 2012) because the increased with increase in inclusion level of roasted
samples were sufficiently dried. floury okra seeds.
Physicochemical properties of fufu and fortified fufu Sensory evaluation of fufu and okra-fortified-fufu
samples samples
The results for the physicochemical properties of The results of sensory evaluation of fufu and
fufu and okra-fortified-fufu samples are presented in okra-fortified-fufu samples are presented in Table
Table 2. The pH of all the samples ranged between 4. The 100% instant fufu and 5% okra-fortified-fufu
5.42 and 5.55. The pH of the unfortified instant fufu samples were not largely significantly different from
was 5.42 which agreed with the range reported by each other in terms of taste, texture, and flavour.
Achi and Akomas (2006) and Oyedeji et al. (2013) They, however, differ significantly in terms of colour,
for fufu samples. The addition of okra did not appearance and acceptability. Sample with 20% okra
considerably influence the pH of the fufu samples.
1034 Gbadegesin et al./IFRJ 25(3): 1031-1035
Means along a column with the same superscript are not significantly different (p>0.05)
A 100% Instant fufu and 0% okra seed flour B 95% fufu and 5% okra seed flour
C 90% fufu and 10% okra seed flour D 85% fufu and 15% okra seed flour
E 80% fufu and 20% okra seed flour
Means along a column with the same superscript are not significantly different (p>0.05)
A 100% Instant fufu and 0% okra seed flour B 95% fufu and 5% okra seed flour
C 90% fufu and 10% okra seed flour D 85% fufu and 15% okra seed flour
E 80% fufu and 20% okra seed flour