Module 6
Module 6
“Good and just society is neither the thesis of capitalism nor the antithesis of
communism, but a socially conscious democracy which reconciles the truths of
individualism and collectivism.”
- Martin Luther King, Jr.
INTRODUCTION
Throughout history, people have been trying to create an improved, fair, and equal
system of justice, not only to better society in which one lives, but to also find a sense of
meaning in what responsibilities people should hold within their civilizations in order to
create this just way of living. For a society to live in harmony and peace, there are some rights
and freedom that the people are entitled to which makes them work towards a just society.
ANALYSIS. One Minute Paper!
1. As a student, how can you help in educating the people about sustainable development
using a social media platform?
__________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________
3. If given a chance to change your citizenship, would you change it? Why? Or why not?
__________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________
LESSON 1 SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT
ABSTRACTION
I. Sustainable
The name sustainability is derived from the Latin “sustinere” (to hold; sub,
under). Sustain can mean "maintain", "support", or "endure". Modern use of the term
sustainability is broad and difficult to define precisely. Originally, sustainability means
making only such use of natural, renewable resources that people can continue to rely on their
yields in the long term. Moving towards sustainability is also a social challenge that entails
international and national law, urban planning and transport, supply chain management,
local and individual lifestyles and ethical consumerism. Ways of living more sustainably can
take many forms from reorganizing living conditions (e.g., ecovillages, eco-municipalities
and sustainable cities), reappraising economic sectors (permaculture, green building,
sustainable agriculture), or work practices (sustainable architecture), using science to
develop new technologies (green technologies, renewable energy and sustainable fission and
fusion power), or designing systems in a flexible and reversible manner, and adjusting
individual lifestyles that conserve natural resources.
However, sustainability is most often defined as meeting the needs of the present
without compromising the ability of future generations to meet theirs. It has three main
pillars: economic, environmental, and social. These three pillars are informally referred to as
people, planet and profits.
The triple bottom line (TBL) consists of social equity, economic, and
environmental factors. The phrase, "people, planet, and profit" to describe the triple bottom
line and the goal of sustainability, was coined by John Elkington in 1994 while at Sustain
Ability and was later used as the title of the Anglo-Dutch oil company Shell's first
sustainability report in 1997. As a result, one country in which the 3P concept took deep root
was The Netherlands.
The planet, environmental bottom line, or natural capital bottom line refers to
sustainable environmental practices. A TBL company endeavors to benefit the natural order
as much as possible or at the least do no harm and minimize environmental impact. A TBL
endeavor reduces its ecological footprint by, among other things, carefully managing its
consumption of energy and non-renewables and reducing manufacturing waste as well as
rendering waste less toxic before disposing of it in a safe and legal manner. "Cradle to grave"
is uppermost in the thoughts of TBL manufacturing businesses, which typically conduct a life
cycle assessment of products to determine what the true environmental cost is from the
growth and harvesting of raw materials to manufacture to distribution to eventual disposal
by the end user. Currently, the cost of disposing of non-degradable or toxic products is born
financially by governments and environmentally by the residents near the disposal site and
elsewhere. In TBL thinking, an enterprise which produces and markets a product which will
create a waste problem should not be given a free ride by society. It would be more equitable
for the business which manufactures and sells a problematic product to bear part of the cost
of its ultimate disposal.
Moreover, the ecological bottom line is akin to the concept of eco-capitalism, also
known as green capitalism2. This is the view that capital exists in nature as "natural capital"
(ecosystems that have ecological yield) on which all wealth depends, and therefore,
governments should use market-based policy instruments (such as a carbon tax) to resolve
environmental problems.
The term “development” is very broad. It may refer to business such as business
development, career development, green development, organizational or professional
development. It often uses in biology and medicine (human development, youth development
or personal development) or could be find also in computing such as artificial development,
web development or software development.
However, the development in which we will focus in our module is the social
science development or more specifically, the sustainable development. Before to explain
what actually this mean, let´s see a small definition on the term “development”.
Development is a process that creates growth, progress, positive change or the
addition of physical, economic, environmental, social and demographic components. The
purpose of development is a rise in the level and quality of life of the population, and the
creation or expansion of local regional income and employment opportunities, without
damaging the resources of the environment. Development is visible and useful, not
necessarily immediately, and includes an aspect of quality change and the creation of
conditions for a continuation of that change.
A multitude of meanings is attached to the idea of development because the term
is complex, contested, ambiguous, and elusive.
The development could be seen also as political term and it has a range of
meanings that depend on the context in which the term is used, and it may also be used to
reflect and to justify a variety of different agendas held by different people or organizations.
The idea of development articulated by the World Bank, for instance, is very different from
that promoted by Greenpeace activists. This point has important implications for the task of
understanding sustainable development, because much of the confusion about the meaning
of the term 'sustainable development' arises because people hold very different ideas about
the meaning of 'development' (Adams 2009).
Another important point is that development is a process rather than an outcome:
it is dynamic in that it involves a change from one state or condition to another. Ideally, such
a change is a positive one - an improvement of some sort (for instance, an improvement in
maternal health). Furthermore, development is often regarded as something that is done by
one group (such as a development agency) to another (such as rural farmers in a developing
country). Again, this demonstrates that development is a political process, because it raises
questions about who has the power to do what to whom.
But development is not simply about the interactions between human groups; it
also involves the natural environment. So, from another point of view, development is about
the conversion of natural resources into cultural resources. This conversion has taken place
throughout the history of human societies, although the process has generally increased in
pace and complexity with time. If we use a system diagram to illustrate - in very general terms
- what an economy does, we see that the basic function of an economy is to convert natural
resources (in the forms of raw materials and energy) into products and services that are useful
to humans. Inevitably, because conversion processes are never totally efficient, some waste
is produced which is usually discarded into the environment as various forms of pollution.
Therefore, the environment is both a source and a sink in relation to economic processes: it
is a source of raw materials and energy and a sink for pollution, as illustrated in the picture
below.
The fact that economic growth means an increase in the throughput of an economy raises
several issues:
• Whilst some raw materials (such as air) are ubiquitous and others are readily available,
many raw materials are scarce and their availability cannot be guaranteed indefinitely.
• Similarly, some sources of energy (such as the wind) are renewable and freely
available, whilst others (such as fossil fuels) are non-renewable and finite.
• Most pollution sinks have a limited capacity to absorb the waste by-products of
economic processes.
• In affluent societies, problems of overconsumption have emerged and questions are
now being raised about the extent to which the acquisition of additional products and
services actually improves well-being in those societies.
• The concept of 'needs', in particular, the essential needs of the world's poor, to which
overriding priority should be given; and
• The idea of limitations imposed by the state of technology and social organization on
the environment's ability to meet present and future needs.
However, after this report the concept of sustainable development has developed
beyond the initial intergenerational framework to focus more on the goal of "socially inclusive
and environmentally sustainable economic growth". In 1992, the UN Conference on
Environment and Development published the Earth Charter, which outlines the building of
a just, sustainable, and peaceful global society in the 21st century. The action plan Agenda 21
for sustainable development identified information, integration, and participation as key
building blocks to help countries achieve development that recognizes these interdependent
pillars. It was created after the Earth Summit held in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, in 1992.
Moreover, it is an action agenda for the UN, other multilateral organizations, and individual
governments around the world that can be executed at local, national, and global levels.
Agenda 21 is a 350-page document divided into 40 chapters that have been
grouped into 4 sections:
Each goal had specific targets, and dates for achieving those targets. The 8 goals were
measured by 21 targets. To accelerate progress, the G8 finance ministers agreed in June 2005
to provide enough funds to the World Bank, the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and the
African Development Bank to cancel $40 to $55 billion in debt owed by members of the
heavily indebted poor countries to allow them to redirect resources to programs for
improving health and education and for alleviating poverty.
Although there have been major advancements and improvements achieving
some of the MDGs even before the deadline of 2015, the progress has been uneven between
the countries. In 2012 the UN Secretary-General established the "UN System Task Team on
the Post-2015 UN Development Agenda", bringing together more than 60 UN agencies and
international organizations to focus and work on sustainable development. Some countries
achieved many goals, while others were not on track to realize any. A UN conference in
September 2010 reviewed progress to date and adopted a global plan to achieve the eight
goals by their target date. New commitments targeted women's and children's health, and
new initiatives in the worldwide battle against poverty, hunger and disease.
The Post-2015 Development Agenda was a process from 2012 to 2015 led by the
United Nations to define the future global development framework that would succeed the
Millennium Development Goals. The SDGs were developed to succeed the Millennium
Development Goals (MDGs) which ended in 2015. The gaps and shortcomings of MDG Goal
8 (To develop a global partnership for development) led to identifying a problematic "donor-
recipient" relationship. Instead, the new SDGs favor collective action by all countries.
3. Today I learned
__________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________
LESSON 2 GLOBAL FOOD SECURITY
ABSTRACTION
Food security is centered on the premise “that all people at all times have access
(including physical, social and economic) to sufficient, safe and nutritious food necessary to
lead active and healthy lives” (FAO 2009). Essentially, humans should not have to rely on
stealing, scavenging, or obtaining emergency supplies for food. When populations face food
insecurity they are living with the absence of food security.
The region in the world to experience the greatest threat of food security is Sub-
Saharan Africa. However, food security is something that every country and region on Earth
must contend with.
Closely tied to food security is the concept of malnutrition. Rebekah Paci-Green and
Gigi Berardi remind us that food security “can be considered as access to a daily minimum
amount of culturally appropriate calories” (2015, pg. 686). Most people associate
malnutrition solely with chronic hunger (also known as energy deficiency), which afflicts
more than a billion people on the planet (McDonald 2010). There are, however, still two other
types of malnutrition: nutrient deficiencies and excessive energy intake. Nutrient
deficiencies, associated with deficiencies in key vitamins, lead to higher maternal death rates,
blindness, birth defects, and greater susceptibility to diseases. Excessive net energy intake is
when people take in energy rich foods that are nutrient poor. Combining these foods with
very little exercise often leads to obesity and chronic diseases such as Type 2 Diabetes (Sage
2010).
Factors Influencing Food Security
Brian McDonald, author of Food Security, identified five factors presently influencing
food security. These factors, which include population growth, changing diets/food
consumption, global food prices, climate change, and changing technology will be described
in greater detail below.
1. Population Growth. Earth’s human population has increased from 1.7 billion in
1900 to more than 7 billion people in 2016. Much of our population growth comes
from regions in the global south as well as urban areas. However, given our growing
population, scientists predict that we will still have enough food to feed the world’s
population. Albeit efforts to provide enough food to feed this population will
continue to put pressure on Earth’s resources (Godfray et al., 2010; McDonald
2010).
4. Climate Change
One of the greatest concerns in food security is climate change, which will continue
to put pressure on the environment. Growing seasons will extend in some regions
(particularly the mid-to high latitudes i.e. North America, Russia, and Central Asia)
while being reduced in others due to drought, heat waves, hurricanes, and floods.
5. Changing Technology
A number of innovations in technology have led to changes in food security.
Scientists have made advancements in agriculture and food production alongside
greater refinement in crop breeding. Improvements in irrigation are leading to less
water waste, and machinery has replaced animal and human muscle.
In addition to these five factors, Paci-Green and Berardi (2015) further elaborate on
the negative impacts of food security to also include conflict and natural hazards:
1. Civil conflict or limited access to food-producing resources, especially land, results
in food deficits.
2. Natural hazards strike vulnerable populations, whether that is a broad segment of
a community or, more frequently, its marginalized members.
3. Food quality is compromised, due to either (1) or (2) above, or to inadequate quality
of food (little fresh produce, poor protein sources, low-nutrient calories) and/or
reasonably priced retail outlets selling high quality foods.
Charles Godfrey and others remind us that while we can continue to be optimistic in
scientific and technological innovation for our global food system, we must also be cautious
of growing greenhouse gas emissions and increasing water scarcity, which will pose
enormous challenges to sustainably producing food in the future (2010). In addition,
McDonald argues that in order to create food security, we must uncouple the global food
system and address food insecurity at a range of scales. “Individuals and communities can
define problems, prioritize efforts, increase transparency, and develop solutions” . Education
is key to informing people about their food choices, how their food was produced, its
nutritional value, and the overall ecological footprint of their food (often including the
distance it has traveled).
ACTIVITY. Read, Think and Pick!
3. Malnutrition resulting from energy rich, nutrient poor foods combined with reduced
physical activities best describes
a. Energy Deficiencies
b. Nutrient deficiencies
c. Excessive net energy intake
d. None of the Above
5. What region of the world experiences the greatest threat to food security?
a. Sub-Saharan Africa
b. Europe
c. SE Asia
d. North America
Answer the following questions.
1. In today’s scenario, what can you do to ensure the safety of foods you consume every
day?
__________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________
ABSTRACTION
The preceding list could be much longer and more detailed; global citizenship covers
a lot of ground. Thus, it is useful to consider the term global citizenship as shorthand for the
habits of mind and complex learning associated with global education. The concept is useful
and important in several respects.
First, a focus on global citizenship puts the spotlight on why internationalization is
central to a quality education and emphasizes that internationalization is a means, not an
end. Serious consideration of the goals of internationalization makes student learning the key
concern rather than counting inputs.
Second, the benefits of encouraging students to consider their responsibilities to their
communities and to the world redound to them, institutions, and society. As Altinay (2010,
1) put it, "a university education which does not provide effective tools and forums for
students to think through their responsibilities and rights as one of the several billions on
planet Earth, and along the way develop their moral compass, would be a failure."
Strengthening institutional commitment to serving society enriches the institution, affirms
its relevance and contributions to society, and benefits communities (however expansive the
definition) and the lives of their members.
Third, the concept of global citizenship creates conceptual and practical connections
rather than cleavages. The commonalities between what happens at home and "over there"
become visible. The characteristics that human beings share is balanced against the
differences that are so conspicuous. On a practical level, global citizenship provides a concept
that can create bridges between the work of internationalization and multicultural education.
Although these efforts have different histories and trajectories, they also share important
goals of cultural empathy and intercultural competence (Olson et al. 2007).
No concept or term is trouble-free; no idea goes uncontested by some faculty member
or group. For better or for worse, global citizenship will undoubtedly provoke disagreements
that reflect larger academic and philosophical debates. There is plenty of skepticism about
global citizenship. Some object to any concept that suggests a diminished role for the nation
and allegiance to it or the ascendancy of global governance systems. The idea of developing
students' moral compasses can raise questions about whose values and morals and how
institutions undertake this delicate task. Some students will choose not to accept
responsibility for the fate of others far away or may see inequality as an irremediable fact of
life. Some faculty will stand by the efficacy and wisdom of the market; others will see
redressing inequality as the key issue for the future of humankind. And so on.
Such debates, sometimes civil or acrimonious, are, for better or worse, the stuff of
academe. Implementing new ideas—even if they have been around for a very long time as in
the case of global citizenship—can be slow and painful. However, if colleges and universities
can produce graduates with the knowledge and the disposition to be global citizens, the world
would certainly be a better place.
ACTIVITY. Mind Map!
Map the words that are related/connected to the word “citizenship” using a
mind map below. Place the word citizenship in the middle and put all the related words in
the circles around the center. Add shapes if desired.