Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 45 views

    Sample PIIILS

    Uploaded by

    Mel Masculino
    The document summarizes the results of an acceptability test of a Registrar Transaction Management System (RTMS). It found the system to be highly acceptable overall based on its performance efficiency, reliability, functional suitability, and usability. Specifically, it received a highly acceptable rating for performance efficiency, functional suitability, and usability. It received a moderately acceptable rating for reliability. The small standard deviation indicates respondents' perceptions were similar. However, the study had limitations in its respondent scope and criteria tested. Further testing is recommended.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Sample PIIILS

    Uploaded by

    Mel Masculino
    45 views2 pages
    The document summarizes the results of an acceptability test of a Registrar Transaction Management System (RTMS). It found the system to be highly acceptable overall based on its performance efficiency, reliability, functional suitability, and usability. Specifically, it received a highly acceptable rating for performance efficiency, functional suitability, and usability. It received a moderately acceptable rating for reliability. The small standard deviation indicates respondents' perceptions were similar. However, the study had limitations in its respondent scope and criteria tested. Further testing is recommended.

    Original Description:

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    The document summarizes the results of an acceptability test of a Registrar Transaction Management System (RTMS). It found the system to be highly acceptable overall based on its performance efficiency, reliability, functional suitability, and usability. Specifically, it received a highly acceptable rating for performance efficiency, functional suitability, and usability. It received a moderately acceptable rating for reliability. The small standard deviation indicates respondents' perceptions were similar. However, the study had limitations in its respondent scope and criteria tested. Further testing is recommended.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    45 views2 pages

    Sample PIIILS

    Uploaded by

    Mel Masculino
    The document summarizes the results of an acceptability test of a Registrar Transaction Management System (RTMS). It found the system to be highly acceptable overall based on its performance efficiency, reliability, functional suitability, and usability. Specifically, it received a highly acceptable rating for performance efficiency, functional suitability, and usability. It received a moderately acceptable rating for reliability. The small standard deviation indicates respondents' perceptions were similar. However, the study had limitations in its respondent scope and criteria tested. Further testing is recommended.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    of 2

    Table 1

    SUMMARY OF RESULT ON LEVEL OF ACCEPTABILITY


    Acceptability Indicator Weighted Mean Standard Level of Acceptability
    Deviation
    Performance Efficiency 4.29 0.65 Highly Acceptable
    Reliability 4.18 0.51 Moderately Acceptable
    Functional Suitability 4.33 0.42 Highly Acceptable
    Usability 4.27 0.35 Highly Acceptable
    Average 4.27 0.48 Highly Acceptable

    In average, the overall result of acceptability testing as shown in Table 1 is Highly Acceptable
    (4.27) with respect to the performance efficiency, reliability, functional suitability, and usability of the
    developed Registrar Transaction Management System (RTMS). Further, Table 1 reveals an overall
    standard deviation of 0.48 across the measured criteria.
    This result shows that in overall, RTMS conforms to the requirements of the end-users in terms of
    performance efficiency, reliability, functional suitability, and usability. In terms of performance
    efficiency, RTMS gained a high level of acceptability for having the ability to use computing resources
    efficiently while performing its functionalities. In terms of reliability, RTMS gained a moderate level of
    acceptability for having the ability to perform its functions under specified condition for a specified
    period of time wherein in it can withstand or recover once failure happened. In terms of functional
    suitability, RTMS gained a high level of acceptability for having functions that meets the stated
    functional requirements under specified conditions. In terms of usability, RTMS gained a high level of
    acceptability for being learnable, easy to operate and control and provide a satisfying and pleasing
    interaction for both expert and novice users. Lastly, the small standard deviation value (0.48) indicates
    that the responses did not deviate at all from the mean. This only suggests that perception of each of the
    respondents with respect to the measured criteria is somewhat almost alike with each other, therefore in
    general the end-users agree that the RTMS is highly acceptable.
    The aforementioned results were gained since the researcher carefully examined the transaction
    process in the office of the registrar in terms of credential or record request and carefully identify the
    functional requirements to automate the transactions. Further, the end-users were well informed about the
    problem to be solved and how the new RTMS will be able to solve these problems. This interpretation is
    being supported by Vlassenroot, Sven and Karel Brookhui[2020] where the researchers stated that
    “the level of acceptability can depend on how well informed the respondents are about the problem and
    about the (new) device that is introduced to solve the problem”[p.2]. Indeed, the RTMS earned a Highly
    Acceptable result.
    It only suggests that the system is good enough that it satisfy all the identified needs and
    functional requirements set by the end-users. Thereby, to gain a highly acceptable rating from end-users,
    it is vital to always consider to satisfy the needs and functional requirements set by the end-users.
    However, due to time constraints, the scope of the respondents who shared their perceptions on
    the level of acceptability of RTMS was only limited. The researcher can still further validate the result of
    this study by extending the scope of respondents who will try to assess the system’s level of acceptability.
    Further, the ISO criteria used to evaluate the level of acceptability were limited only to performance
    efficiency, reliability, functional suitability, and usability. With that, it is suggested that further
    acceptability testing will be conducted using other ISO based criteria.
    Therefore, RTMS meets the end-user’s functional requirements thereby highly acceptable to the
    end-user in terms of performance efficiency, reliability, functional suitability and usability.

    You might also like