Albert Livingston - ADI Lab 11
Albert Livingston - ADI Lab 11
Albert Livingston - ADI Lab 11
Teacher Notes
The Content
An ecosystem includes all the living and nonliving pieces of a particular area of the planet.
The living parts of an ecosystem include the plants, insects, bacteria, mammals, birds, and
other living organisms present in an area. The nonliving pieces of an ecosystem include the
rocks, water sources, gases in the air, and constructed structures like buildings and roads.
All of the pieces of a specific ecosystem will connect and work together in different ways
so the living members can try to survive in that ecosystem. An important set of relation-
ships in an ecosystem involves eating to survive. How living things eat in an ecosystem is
important to understand because eating involves the transfer of energy.
Living things in an ecosystem must eat other living things in the ecosystem to get the
energy they need to survive. The only organisms that do not have to eat other organisms
for their energy are called producers. Producers are organisms that create their own food by
harvesting energy from other sources, such as the Sun. Plants are the most common type
of producers found in an ecosystem. Bacteria can also be considered producers, especially
if they use chlorophyll to harvest solar energy in a manner similar to plants. Another term
used to describe producers is autotrophs, which are organisms that produce the organic
molecules they need to survive using light or chemical energy. Producers in some ecosys-
tems, such as deep-sea hydrothermal vent communities, use chemicals instead of light to
produce the energy and matter they need to survive.
Argument-Driven Inquiry in Life Science: Lab Investigations for Grades 6–8 183
Copyright © 2015 NSTA. All rights reserved. For more information, go to www.nsta.org/permissions.
TO PURCHASE THIS BOOK, please visit www.nsta.org/store/product_detail.aspx?id=10.2505/9781938946240
LAB 11
a keystone predator is removed from an ecosystem, the balance is upset and competition
between top-level consumers can cause the ecosystem to fail.
The level of consumer that an organism is also influences how much energy it can access
in an ecosystem. The amount of energy available to an ecosystem is determined by the
number of producer species present. As energy transfers from one level of the food web to
another (or up one “link” in a specific food chain), only 10% of the total energy available
from the lower level becomes usable energy at the next higher level. This 10% energy
principle for ecosystems helps explain why some species are more prevalent in certain
ecosystems than others. Primary consumers have access to much more energy because
they eat the producers directly and, thus, can support higher population levels in that
ecosystem. On the other hand, high-level consumers, such as keystone predators, have
to eat a lot more to meet their energy needs because their main prey also have to eat a
lot more to meet their energy needs. The ability of a species to have several sources of
food for energy also influences how large a population of that species an ecosystem can
support. The ability of a species to use several food sources (and be involved in multiple
food chains) is an important concept that this investigation will help students explore.
By understanding the food web of a certain ecosystem, scientists can also understand
the impact human activity can have on that ecosystem. There are many situations in
which humans try to remove a certain type of organism from an ecosystem, often for
reasons involving public health or managing resources. Humans can add chemicals to
an ecosystem that can get rid of certain plants or insects from an ecosystem. They can
also hunt larger organisms that may be a higher-level organism in an ecosystem’s food
web. However, eliminating one type of organism from an ecosystem will have an impact
on other organisms in that system. The scenario used to frame this investigation in the
“Your Task” section of the Lab Handout reflects this tension and provides students with a
real-world connection to the guiding question.
Timeline
The instructional time needed to implement this lab investigation is 130–200 minutes.
Appendix 2 (p. 355) provides options for implementing this lab investigation over sev-
eral class periods. Option C (200 minutes) should be used if students are unfamiliar with
scientific writing, because this option provides extra instructional time for scaffolding the
writing process. You can scaffold the writing process by modeling, providing examples,
and providing hints as students write each section of the report. Option D (130 minutes)
should be used if students are familiar with scientific writing and have the skills needed to
write an investigation report on their own. In option D, students complete stage 6 (writing
the investigation report) and stage 8 (revising the investigation report) as homework.
TABLE 11.1
Materials list
Item Quantity
Slides of marsh ecosystem organisms 1 per group
Safety Precautions
Follow all normal lab safety rules.
• Food webs model the many feeding interactions that occur in an ecosystem.
• Producers and consumers have different roles in an ecosystem food web, based on
their relationships to other organisms.
• Although one food source may be removed from an ecosystem, many species have
multiple food sources, which can limit the change to the overall structure of the
food web.
We recommend that you review these concepts during the explicit and reflective discus-
sion to help students make this connection.
Argument-Driven Inquiry in Life Science: Lab Investigations for Grades 6–8 185
Copyright © 2015 NSTA. All rights reserved. For more information, go to www.nsta.org/permissions.
TO PURCHASE THIS BOOK, please visit www.nsta.org/store/product_detail.aspx?id=10.2505/9781938946240
LAB 11
• What were some of the strengths of your investigation? What made it scientific?
• What were some of the weaknesses of your investigation? What made it less scientific?
• If you were to do this investigation again, what would you do to address the
weaknesses in your investigation? What could you do to make it more scientific?
Crosscutting Concepts
This investigation is aligned with two crosscutting concepts found in A Framework for
K−12 Science Education, and you should review these concepts during the explicit and
reflective discussion.
• Systems and system models: It is critical for scientists to be able to define the system
under study (e.g., the components of an ecosystem) and then make a model of it to
understand it. Models can be physical, conceptual, or mathematical.
• Energy and matter: Flows, cycles, and conservation: In science it is important to track
how energy and matter move into, out of, and within systems.
• The influence of society and culture on science: Science is influenced by the society
and culture in which it is practiced because science is a human endeavor.
Cultural values and expectations determine what scientists choose to investigate,
how investigations are conducted, how research findings are interpreted, and
what people see as implications. People also view some research as being more
important than others because of cultural values and current events.
• The importance of imagination and creativity in science: Students should learn that
developing explanations for or models of natural phenomena and then figuring
out how they can be put to the test of reality is as creative as writing poetry,
composing music, or designing skyscrapers. Scientists must also use their
imagination and creativity to figure out new ways to test ideas and collect or
analyze data.
Topic Connections
Table 11.2 provides an overview of the scientific practices, crosscutting concepts, disciplinary
core ideas, and supporting ideas at the heart of this lab investigation. In addition, it lists NOS
and NOSI concepts for the explicit and reflective discussion. Finally, it lists literacy and math-
ematics skills (CCSS ELA and CCSS Mathematics) that are addressed during the investigation.
TABLE 11.2
Lab 11 alignment with standards
Literacy connections • Reading: Key ideas and details, craft and structure, integration of
(CCSS ELA) knowledge and ideas
• Writing: Text types and purposes, production and distribution of
writing, research to build and present knowledge, range of writing
• Speaking and listening: Comprehension and collaboration,
presentation of knowledge and ideas
Argument-Driven Inquiry in Life Science: Lab Investigations for Grades 6–8 187
Copyright © 2015 NSTA. All rights reserved. For more information, go to www.nsta.org/permissions.
TO PURCHASE THIS BOOK, please visit www.nsta.org/store/product_detail.aspx?id=10.2505/9781938946240
LAB 11
Lab Handout
By understanding the food web of a certain ecosystem, scientists can also understand
the impact human activity can have on that ecosystem. There are many situations in
which humans try to remove a certain type of organism from an ecosystem, often for
reasons involving public health or managing resources. Humans can add chemicals to an
ecosystem that can get rid of certain plants or insects from an ecosystem. They can also
hunt larger organisms that may be a higher-level organism in an ecosystem’s food web.
However, eliminating one type of organism from an ecosystem will have an impact on
other organisms in that system.
Your Task
Explore the different roles of organisms in a specific ecosystem. A town has to decide
which organism it should remove from its local ecosystem, which includes a swampy
marsh. Many residents are worried about the mosquitoes that heavily populate the marsh.
Others are concerned with the growth in algae and other weedlike plants in the marsh. Still
other residents believe that the ducks in the marsh are a problem and should be hunted.
Removing any one of these organisms, or others present in the marsh, will change the food
web of the ecosystem. Your investigation should determine which organisms the town
should remove to limit the amount of change to the existing food web.
The guiding question of this investigation is, Which member of an ecosystem would
affect the food web the most if removed?
Materials
You will use slides of marsh ecosystem organisms during your investigation.
Safety Precautions
Follow all normal lab safety rules.
Getting Started
Your teacher can provide you with a copy of slides that have information about the different
organisms in the marsh ecosystem. Use these slides to analyze what changes might occur
to the original food web for the marsh when any one of the organisms is removed from it.
To answer the guiding question, you must determine what type of data you need to
collect, how you will collect it, and how you will analyze it. To determine what type of data
you need to collect, think about the following questions:
• What information on the slides relates most to the food web of the marsh?
• How will you represent the data you use in different ways?
Argument-Driven Inquiry in Life Science: Lab Investigations for Grades 6–8 189
Copyright © 2015 NSTA. All rights reserved. For more information, go to www.nsta.org/permissions.
TO PURCHASE THIS BOOK, please visit www.nsta.org/store/product_detail.aspx?id=10.2505/9781938946240
LAB 11
• What type of measurements or observations will you need to record during your
investigation?
To determine how you will analyze your data, think about the following questions:
• How will you understand what the current food web looks like?
• Do you need to analyze all the different organisms, or should you focus on types
of organisms?
• What type of graph could you create to help make sense of your data?
Initial Argument
Once your group has finished collecting and analyzing your data, you will need to develop
an initial argument. Your argument must include a claim, evidence to support your claim,
and a justification of the evidence. The claim is your group’s answer to the guiding ques-
tion. The evidence is an analysis and interpretation of your
FIGURE L11.2 data. Finally, the justification of the evidence is why your group
Argument presentation on a whiteboard thinks the evidence matters. The justification of the evidence is
important because scientists can use different kinds of evidence
The Guiding Question:
to support their claims. Your group will create your initial
argument on a whiteboard. Your whiteboard should include all
Our Claim:
the information shown in Figure L11.2.
is to look for mistakes so these mistakes can be fixed and they can make their argument
better. The argumentation session is also a good time to think about ways you can make
your initial argument better. Scientists must share and critique arguments like this to
develop new ideas.
To critique an argument, you might need more information than what is included on
the whiteboard. You will therefore need to ask the presenter lots of questions. Here are
some good questions to ask:
• What did your group do to collect the data? Why do you think that way is the best
way to do it?
• What did your group do to analyze the data? Why did your group decide to
analyze it that way?
• What other ways of analyzing and interpreting the data did your group talk
about?
• Why did your group decide to present your evidence in that way?
• What other claims did your group discuss before you decided on that one? Why
did your group abandon those other ideas?
• How sure are you that your group’s claim is accurate? What could you do to be
more certain?
Once the argumentation session is complete, you will have a chance to meet with your
group and revise your original argument. Your group might need to gather more data or
design a way to test one or more alternative claims as part of this process. Remember, your
goal at this stage of the investigation is to develop the most valid or acceptable answer to
the research question!
Report
Once you have completed your research, you will need to prepare an investigation report
that consists of three sections that provide answers to the following questions:
2. What did you do during your investigation and why did you conduct your
investigation in this way?
Your report should answer these questions in two pages or less. The report must be
typed, and any diagrams, figures, or tables should be embedded into the document. Be
sure to write in a persuasive style; you are trying to convince others that your claim is
acceptable or valid!
Argument-Driven Inquiry in Life Science: Lab Investigations for Grades 6–8 191
Copyright © 2015 NSTA. All rights reserved. For more information, go to www.nsta.org/permissions.
TO PURCHASE THIS BOOK, please visit www.nsta.org/store/product_detail.aspx?id=10.2505/9781938946240
LAB 11
Checkout Questions
2. The images below represent two food webs from different ecosystems that have
similar animals. Which population of foxes would be least impacted by a drought
that caused the grass to die in their ecosystem? Explain your reasoning.
3. Society and culture often influence how scientists go about their work.
Explain your answer, using an example from your investigation about food webs
and ecosystems.
4. Scientists are very creative when they investigate the natural world.
Explain your answer, using an example from your investigation about food webs
and ecosystems.
5. Scientists develop models to help them understand the natural world. Explain
how a food web acts like a model and explain why such a model would be useful
to scientists.
6. When scientists study the natural world, they often need to keep track of how
matter and energy move through a system. Explain why understanding the flow
of matter and energy is important, using an example from your investigation
about food webs and ecosystems.
Argument-Driven Inquiry in Life Science: Lab Investigations for Grades 6–8 193
Copyright © 2015 NSTA. All rights reserved. For more information, go to www.nsta.org/permissions.
TO PURCHASE THIS BOOK, please visit www.nsta.org/store/product_detail.aspx?id=10.2505/9781938946240
LAB 12
Teacher Notes
The Content
Ecosystems include all the living and nonliving things in a certain area. All living things
in an ecosystem are called biotic factors. Biotic factors include the plants and animals in the
ecosystem, as well as smaller organisms such as bacteria and fungi. All nonliving things in
an ecosystem are referred to as abiotic factors. Abiotic factors include the water, soil, rocks,
and air found in the ecosystem, as well as chemicals. Water or air in an ecosystem is made
up of many different chemicals. They include chemicals that are important for humans and
animals to survive, such as the oxygen (O2) we breathe and water molecules (H2O). The
air also contains other gases that other organisms use, such as carbon dioxide (CO2) used
by plants and nitrogen gas (N2) used by bacteria. As living things use these chemicals for
getting energy to survive, they will also release other chemicals that have similar elements,
such as urea (CO(NH2)2) and phosphates (PO43–). Living things release these chemicals into
an ecosystem, usually through waste they produce or through decomposition after they
die. All of this activity means that different chemicals move between living and nonliving
parts of an ecosystem.
The patterns of movement of matter through the living and nonliving parts of an
ecosystem are known as biogeochemical cycles. The “bio” aspects of these cycles involve
living things, and the “geo” aspects of these cycles involve nonliving things. All aspects of
these cycles involve chemicals that are different forms of matter. There are several major
chemical elements that cycle through ecosystems, including carbon, nitrogen, phosphorus,
and sulfur. Figure 12.1 provides a representation of the way carbon cycles through an
ecosystem. The figures in the Lab 12 Reference Sheet describe the movement of nitrogen
and phosphorus through ecosystems. Scientists have developed these models to make