MID-YEAR REVIEW FORM (MRF) for Teacher I-III

Name of Employee: STELLA MARIE H. SOPLITO Name of Rater: MERLO A. MACATIMPAG

Position: TEACHER I Position: TEACHER-IN-CHARGE
Bureau/Center/Service/Division: SAMAR Date of Review: FEBRUARY 07, 2023
Rating Period: AUGUST 22, 2022- FEBRUARY 03, 2023

Weight
Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline per Means of Verification
Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Review
KRA
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks Results
Basic 1. Content 1. Applied 7% Classroom Quality
Education Knowledge knowledge of Observation Tool
Services and Pedagogy content within and (COT) rating sheet/s or
across curriculum inter -observer
teaching areas agreement form/s done
(PPST 1.1.2) through onsite / face-to- Efficiency
face / in-person
classroom observation
 If onsite / face-to-face / Timeliness
in-person classes are
not implemented,

 through
observation of
synchronous /
asynchronous
teaching in other
modalities; or

 through
observation of a
demonstration
teaching* via
LAC session.

2. Used a range of 7% Classroom Observation Quality

teaching strategies Tool (COT) rating
that enhance sheet/s or inter -
learner observer agreement
achievement in form/s done through Efficiency
literacy and onsite / face-to-face / in-
numeracy skills. person classroom
(PPST 1.4.2) observation
Timeliness
If onsite / face-to-face /
in-person classes are
not implemented,
 through
observation of
synchronous /
asynchronous
teaching in other
modalities; or
 through
observation of a
 demonstration
teaching* via
LAC session.
3. Applied a range 7% Classroom Quality
of teaching Observation Tool
strategies to (COT) rating sheet/s or
develop critical and inter -observer
creative thinking, agreement form/s done
as well as other through onsite / face-to- Efficiency
higher-order face / in-person
thinking skills. classroom observation
(PPST 1.5.2) If onsite / face-to-face /
in-person classes are
not implemented, Timeliness
 through
observation of
synchronous /
asynchronous
teaching in other
modalities; or
 through
observation of a
demonstration
teaching* via
LAC session.

Weight
Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline per Means of Verification
Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Review
KRA
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks Results
4. Managed 7% Classroom Quality
classroom structure Observation Tool
to engage learners, (COT) rating sheet/s or
individually or in inter -observer
groups, in agreement form/s done
 meaningful through onsite / face-to-
exploration, face / in-person Efficiency
discovery and classroom observation
hands-on activities
within a range of If onsite / face-to-face /
physical learning in-person classes are
environments. PPST not implemented,
1.5.2)  through Timeliness
observation of
synchronous /
asynchronous
teaching in other
modalities; or

 through
observation of a
demonstration
teaching* via
LAC session.

Basic 2. Learning 5. Managed learner 7% Classroom Quality

Education Environment behavior Observation Tool
Services and Diversity constructively by (COT) rating sheet/s or
of Learners applying positive inter -observer
and non- violent agreement form/s done
discipline to ensure through onsite / face-to- Efficiency
learning-focused face / in-person
environments. classroom observation
(PPST 2.6.2) If onsite / face-to-face /
in-person classes are
not implemented,
 through Timeliness
observation of
synchronous /
 asynchronous
teaching in other
modalities; or
 through
observation of a
demonstration
teaching* via
LAC session.
6. Used 7% Classroom Quality
differentiated, Observation Tool
developmentally (COT) rating sheet/s or
appropriate learning inter -observer
experiences to agreement form/s done
address learners' through onsite / face-to-
gender needs. face / in-person Efficiency
strengths, interests classroom observation
and experiences. If onsite / face-to-face /
(PPST 3.1.2) in-person classes are
not implemented,
 through
observation of
Timeliness
synchronous /
asynchronous
teaching in other
modalities; or
 through
observation of a
demonstration
teaching* via
LAC session.
Weight
Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline per Means of Verification
Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Review
KRA
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks Results
Basic 3. Curriculum 7. Planned, 7% Classroom Quality
Education and Planning managed and Observation Tool
Services implemented (COT) rating sheet/s or
developmentally inter -observer
sequenced teaching agreement form/s done
and learning through onsite / face-to-
processes to meet face / in-person Efficiency
curriculum classroom observation
requirements and
varied teaching If onsite / face-to-face /
contexts. (PPST in-person classes are
4.1.2) not implemented,
Timeliness
 through
observation of
synchronous /
asynchronous
teaching in other
modalities; or

 through
observation of a
demonstration
teaching* via
LAC session.

8. Participated in 7% 1. Proof/s of Quality

collegial discussions attendance in
that use teacher and LAC sessions /
learner feedback to FGDs / meetings
enrich teaching / other collegial
practice. (PPST discussions
4.4.2) 2. Minutes of LAC
sessions / FGDs
/ meetings /
other collegial
discussions on
use of teacher
and learner
Efficiency
 feedback to
enrich teaching Timeliness
practice
3. Reflection notes
of teachers on
their
demonstration of
teaching
practices
following
participation
from LAC
sessions / FGDs
/ meetings /
other collegial
discussions that
use teacher and
learner feedback
to enrich
teaching
practice, with
proof/s of
attendance
4. Any equivalent
ALS
form/document
that highlights
the objective

Weight
Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline per Means of Verification
Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Review
KRA
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks Results
9. Selected, 7% Classroom Quality
developed, Observation Tool
organized and used (COT) rating sheet/s or
appropriate teaching inter -observer
and learning agreement form/s done Efficiency
 resources, including through onsite / face-to-
ICT, to address face / in-person
learning goals. classroom observation
(PPST 4.5.2) Timeliness
If onsite / face-to-face /
in-person classes are
not implemented,

 through
observation of
synchronous /
asynchronous
teaching in other
modalities; or

 through
observation of a
demonstration
teaching* via
LAC session.

Basic 4. Assessment 10. Designed, 7% Classroom Quality

Education and Reporting selected, organized Observation Tool
Services and use diagnostic, (COT) rating sheet/s or
formative and inter -observer
summative agreement form/s done Efficiency
assessment through onsite / face-to-
strategies consistent face / in-person
with curriculum classroom observation
requirements. If onsite / face-to-face / Timeliness
(PPST 5.1.2) in-person classes are
not implemented,
 through
observation of
synchronous /
asynchronous
teaching in other
modalities; or
 through
observation of a
 demonstration
teaching* via
LAC session.

11. Monitored and 7% Any one (1) of the Quality

evaluated learner following:
progress and ▪ Individual
achievement using Learning
learner attainment Monitoring Plan
data. (PPST 5.2.2) (ILMP)
▪ Peer
assessment data
▪ Sample of
learners' output
with reflection /
self-assessment
▪ Progress
charts/anecdotal
records
▪ Class/e-class
record/grading
sheets Timeliness
▪ Lesson plans Efficiency
showing index of
mastery
▪ Frequency of
errors with
identified
least/most
mastered skills
▪ Any equivalent
ALS
form/document
that highlights
the objective
(e.g., Individual
Learning
Agreement
 (ILA), ALS
Assessment
Form 2)
▪ Others (Please
specify and
provide
annotations)
Weight
Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline per Means of Verification
Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Review
KRA
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks Results
12. Communicated 7% ▪ Any one (1) of Quality
promptly and clearly the following:
the learners’ needs, ▪ A sample of
progress and corrected test
achievement to key paper of a learner
stakeholders, in a learning area
including with parent's or Timeliness
parents/guardians. guardian's
(PPST 5.4.2) signature and
date of receipt
▪ Minutes of
meetings with
key stakeholders
(e.g., PTA, SGC,
SPT, CPC) with
proof of
attendance
▪ Report card with
parent's or
guardian's
signature in all
quarters
supported by
minutes of
meeting
▪ Communication
with key
stakeholders
(e.g. ,
 parents/guardian
s, co-teachers,
LGU) using
various
modalities
▪ Anecdotal record
showing entries
per quarter
▪ Any equivalent
ALS
form/document
that highlights the
objective
▪ Others (Please
specify and
provide
annotations)
Basic 5. Personal 13. Applied a 7% A reflection/journal entry Quality
Education Growth and personal philosophy that highlights the
Services Professional of teaching that is application of a learner-
Development learner-centered. centered teaching
(PPST 7.1.2) philosophy in the lesson
plan or community work.
Timeliness

Weight
Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline per Means of Verification
Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Review
KRA
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks Results
14. Set professional 7% ▪ Certification from Quality
development goals the ICT Efficiency
based on the Coordinator /
Philippine School Head /
Professional Focal Person in
Standards for charge of e-SAT
Teachers. (PPST ▪ IPCRF-DP
7.5.2) ▪ Mid-year Review
Form (MRF)
▪ Updated IPCRF- Timeliness
DP from Phase II
 Weight Mid-year Review Rating
Mid-year
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline per Means of Verification Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal)
Performance Review
KRA Rating
Target Remarks Rating Remarks Results

Basic Plus Factor 15. Performed 2% Any one (1) of the Quality
Education various related following:
Services works / activities
● committee
that contribute to
involvement;
the teaching-
learning ● involvement as
module/learning
material writer/
validator;

● involvement as a
resource
person/speaker/l
earning
facilitator in the
RO/SDO/school-
initiated Efficiency
TV/radio-based
instruction;

● book or journal
authorship/co-
authorship/
contributorship;

● advisorship/ Timeliness
coordinatorship/
chairpersonship

● participation in
demonstration
teaching;
 ● participation as
research
presenter in a
forum/
conference;

● mentorship of
pre-service/in-
service
teachers;

● conducted
research within
the rating period;

● Others (please
specify) with
annotation on
how it
contributed to
the teaching-
learning
process.

MERLO A. MACATIMPAG STELLA MARIE H. SOPLITO ELOISA R. ZARTIGA

Rater Ratee Approving Authority