Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 90 views

    Display PDF

    Uploaded by

    HARMAN PREET singh
    1) Paramjit, the applicant, filed an application for anticipatory bail in relation to an FIR registered under sections 306 and 34 of the IPC for allegedly abetting the suicide of Navdeep Singh. 2) Navdeep Singh had named the applicant, along with his mother-in-law, brother-in-law, and brother-in-law's friend in his dying declaration and a video recorded before his death for interfering in his married life and pressuring him, which led to his suicide. 3) The court dismissed the anticipatory bail application based on the serious nature of allegations in the dying declaration and FIR, noting that the allegations needed to be properly investigated.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Display PDF

    Uploaded by

    HARMAN PREET singh
    90 views6 pages
    1) Paramjit, the applicant, filed an application for anticipatory bail in relation to an FIR registered under sections 306 and 34 of the IPC for allegedly abetting the suicide of Navdeep Singh. 2) Navdeep Singh had named the applicant, along with his mother-in-law, brother-in-law, and brother-in-law's friend in his dying declaration and a video recorded before his death for interfering in his married life and pressuring him, which led to his suicide. 3) The court dismissed the anticipatory bail application based on the serious nature of allegations in the dying declaration and FIR, noting that the allegations needed to be properly investigated.

    Original Title

    display_pdf (1)

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    1) Paramjit, the applicant, filed an application for anticipatory bail in relation to an FIR registered under sections 306 and 34 of the IPC for allegedly abetting the suicide of Navdeep Singh. 2) Navdeep Singh had named the applicant, along with his mother-in-law, brother-in-law, and brother-in-law's friend in his dying declaration and a video recorded before his death for interfering in his married life and pressuring him, which led to his suicide. 3) The court dismissed the anticipatory bail application based on the serious nature of allegations in the dying declaration and FIR, noting that the allegations needed to be properly investigated.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    90 views6 pages

    Display PDF

    Uploaded by

    HARMAN PREET singh
    1) Paramjit, the applicant, filed an application for anticipatory bail in relation to an FIR registered under sections 306 and 34 of the IPC for allegedly abetting the suicide of Navdeep Singh. 2) Navdeep Singh had named the applicant, along with his mother-in-law, brother-in-law, and brother-in-law's friend in his dying declaration and a video recorded before his death for interfering in his married life and pressuring him, which led to his suicide. 3) The court dismissed the anticipatory bail application based on the serious nature of allegations in the dying declaration and FIR, noting that the allegations needed to be properly investigated.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    You are on page 1of 6

    1

    In the court of Mrs. Neelam Arora, Addl. Sessions Judge,


    Hoshiarpur, UID No. PB0091

    CIS No. : BA/2374/2021


    CNR No. PBH0010065852021
    Date of order: 12.10.2021

    Paramjit aged about 35 years son of S. Bhan Parkash r/o village


    Bulandpur, District Jalandhar.

    Accused-applicant

    Versus
    State of Punjab
    Respondent.

    FIR No. 156 dated 19.09.2021


    U/s 306, 34 IPC, 1860
    P.S. Sadar, Hoshiarpur.

    FIRST APPLICATION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL UNDER


    SECTION 438 CR.P.C.

    Present: Shri A.P.S. Pathania Adv., counsel for applicant/accused.


    Sh. Rajneesh, Addl. PP for the State
    Sh. M.P.Singh Adv., counsel for complainant

    ORDER:

    This order of mine shall dispose off application under Section

    438 Cr.PC, moved by aforesaid applicant/accused, seeking anticipatory

    bail in the present case bearing FIR No. 156 dated 19.9.2021, under

    Section 306, 34 IPC, 1860, PS Sadar, Hoshiarpur.

    2. Notice of the bail application was issued to the

    respondent/State and the record was requisitioned.

    3. The learned counsel for applicant/accused has argued that

    applicant/accused is innocent and false FIR has been registered against the

    accused. The deceased and his wife were living separately at a distance of
    2

    about 50 K.M. from each other at the time of alleged suicide. It is

    submitted that co-accused Hina Teji was receiving threats on phone from

    the person that he will commit suicide by consuming some poisonous

    substance. In this regard, Hina Teji had moved a complaint to nearby P.P.

    Surya Enclave, Jalandhar on 18.09.2021 and she informed her father-in-

    law about the conduct of deceased but the family of deceased did not take

    care of him and allowed him to commit suicide. In fact, deceased was

    doing the business of D.J and Tent House and was a drug addict. During

    COVID-19 his business was not running and due to that reason, he was

    under depression and due to that reason he might have committed suicide

    but he has not attributed anything against applicant in the FIR or in the

    alleged statement. Thus, there is no allegation of abetment against

    applicant and section 107 IPC is not attracted. It is submitted by learned

    counsel for applicant/accused that applicant/accused is neither family

    member nor in contact with the deceased and he is Human Rights activist

    and was member of Panchayat, which was convened to settle the dispute

    between the parties and it is further submitted by learned counsel for

    applicant/accused that applicant has got no role to play in this case. It is

    further submitted that applicant/accused is ready to join investigation. Ld.

    Counsel for applicant/accused placed reliance upon case law i.e. Ranjit

    Kaur Vs. State of Pb., CRM M 42391 of 2019 (O&M) d/d 05.11.2019,

    Saroj Vs. State of Haryana, CRM M 7828 of 2011 (O&M) d/d

    18.04.2011, Puneet Singh & another Vs. State of Pb., CRM M 9026 of

    1999 D/d 20.08.1999, Hemawati Vs. State of Himachal Pardesh, Cr.


    3

    MP (M) No. 1113 of 2020 D/d 14.07.2020. A prayer for allowing the

    present bail application.

    4. On the other hand, the learned Addl. PP for the State being

    assisted by Sh. M.P. Singh Advocate appearing for complainant have

    resisted the bail application by submitting that Navdeep Singh deceased

    has suffered dying declaration before his death, in which he has clearly

    alleged that his mother in law Kiran, brother in law Kunal and Paramjit

    Pammi, the friend of his brother in law do not let his wife to join him, due

    to which, he has consumed some poisonous substance and took this step

    as he was compelled by them to do so and this dying declaration stands

    signed by Doctor and the complainant. Further it is argued that deceased

    Navdeep Singh has named all the accused in the video graphy prepared by

    him before his death and also named the applicant, whose name also finds

    mention in the FIR itself. It is submitted that there are clear allegations

    against applicant/accused and he is not entitled to be released on bail.

    Hence, it is prayed that bail application may be dismissed.

    5. Heard. Perused the record and the pen drive attached in the

    connected bail application i.e. BA/2333/2021 titled as “Heena Teji Vs.

    State” fixed for today. The record shows that the complainant Ravinder

    Singh levelled allegations in the FIR that his brother Navdeep Singh was

    married to Hina Teji d/o Tirath Ram on 1.11.2019. After about six months

    of marriage, Hina along with her mother Kiran, her brother Kunal and

    Kunal’s friend Parmajit @ Pammi started interfering in the married life of

    Navdeep Singh, due to which there remained disturbance in the family. All

    the aforesaid persons started pressurizing Navdeep to live separate from


    4

    his other family members and to purchase a house in the name of Hina.

    But Navdeep did not agree for the same, after which since October 2020,

    Hina started residing most of time in her parental house at Jalandhar.

    Panchayats were convened for settlement of the dispute, but to no effect.

    Rather, the accused started threatening to implicate Navdeep in false

    cases, due to which, Navdeep perturbed and on 18.9.2021, being fed up

    with the behaviour of aforesaid persons, he consumed poisonous

    substance and later he died in the hospital. The complainant further

    alleged that before his death, his brother Navdeep also got recorded his

    statement in the IVY Hospital, Hoshiarpur in his presence and in the

    presence of Doctor holding the accused responsible for his death. Also the

    complainant alleged that his brother Navdeep has ended his life by

    consuming some poisonous substance being fed up with his wife Hina,

    mother in law Kiran, brother in law Kunal and Kunal’s friend Paramjit @

    Pammi. The record shows that there is dying declaration suffered by

    deceased Navdeep Singh before his death in IVY Hospital, Hoshiarpur on

    19.9.2021 at 12.25 am, which stands signed by the Doctor and the

    complainant, wherein he has stated that his mother in law Kiran, brother

    in law Kunal and Paramjit Pammi, the friend of his brother in law do not

    let his wife to join him, due to which, he has consumed some poisonous

    substance and took this step as he was compelled by them to do so. In the

    video prepared by deceased before committing suicide, placed by learned

    counsel for complainant in the connected bail application, he has named

    all his relatives along with present applicant. Therefore, there are serious

    and direct allegations levelled by deceased Navdeep Singh in his dying


    5

    declaration against the applicant/accused in the FIR. The case laws relied

    upon by the learned counsel for applicant are not applicable to the facts

    and circumstances of the present case being distinct in nature. The entire

    allegations levelled by deceased Navdeep Singh in his dying declaration

    and by the complainant in the FIR, need to be investigated by the

    Investigating Agency properly. The record shows that bail application of

    co-accused Kunal Teji has already been dismissed by this court vide order

    dated 28.09.2021. So, in the light of above mentioned facts, circumstances

    of the case and the serious nature of allegations, this Court does not deem

    it a fit case, where discretionary relief of anticipatory bail can be granted

    to the applicant/accused. Accordingly, the application in hand is

    dismissed. Police record be returned. File be consigned to the record

    room.

    Announced: (Neelam Arora)


    Dt. 12.10.2021 Addl. Sessions Judge
    (Rupesh Sharma) Hoshiarpur
    Stenographer-II UID No. PB0091
    6

    Paramjit Vs. State (BA/2332/2021)

    Present: Shri A.P.S. Pathania Adv., counsel for applicant/accused.


    Sh. Rajneesh, Addl. PP for the State
    Sh. M.P.Singh Adv., counsel for complainant

    Record produced. Arguments heard. Vide my separate


    detailed order of even date, bail application filed by the applicant has been
    dismissed, as stated therein. Record be returned. File be consigned to the
    Record Room.
    Announced: (Neelam Arora)
    Dt. 12.10.2021 Addl. Sessions Judge
    (Rupesh) Hoshiarpur
    Stenographer-II UID No. PB0091

    You might also like