An Assessment of Factors Affecting Employees

ST.
MARY’S UNIVERSITY
SCHOOL OF GRADUATE STUDIES
AN ASSESSMENT OF FACTORS AFFECTING EMPLOYEES’

TURNOVER INTENTION IN ETHIOPIAN REVENUES AND
CUSTOMS AUTHORITY
BY:
BEZA LEMMA
MAY, 2019
ADDIS ABABA, ETHIOPIA
CUSTOMS AUTHORITY
BY:
BEZA LEMMA
A THESIS SUBMITTED TO ST. MARY’S UNIVERSITY, SCHOOL

OF GRADUATE STUDIES IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE
REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF BUSINESS
ADMINISTRATION (MBA)
MAY, 2019
ADDIS ABABA, ETHIOPIA
An Assessment of Factors Affecting Employees’ Turnover Intention
ST. MARY’S UNIVERSITY

SCHOOL OF GRADUATE STUDIES

CUSTOMS AUTHORITY
By
BEZA LEMMA
APPROVED BY BOARD OF EXAMINERS
________________________
Dean, Graduate Studies Signature and Date
________________________
Advisor Signature and Date
________________________ _______________
External Examiner Signature and Date
________________________ _______________
Internal Examiner Signature and Date
St. Mary’s University Page i

Statement of Declaration
I, Beza Lemma Dibaba, declare that this thesis entitled "An assessment of factors affecting
employees’ turnover intention: In Ethiopian Revenues and Customs Authority Kaliti Branch" is
the outcome of my own effort and study. All sources of materials used for the study have been
duly acknowledged. I have produced it independently except for the guidance and suggestion of
the research advisor. This study has not been submitted for any degree in this University or any
other University.
Beza Lemma Dibaba

Name
_______________________
Signature
______________________
Date
St. Mary’s University Page ii

ENDORSEMENT
This thesis has been submitted to St. Mary’s University, School of Graduate Studies for
examination with my approval as an advisor at the University.
Goitom Abraham (Asst. Prof) _______________________
Advisor Signature and Date
St. Mary’s University, Addis Ababa
St. Mary’s University Page iii

Table of Contents
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ................................................................................................................................ vi
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS ................................................................................................. vii
LIST OF TABLES ........................................................................................................................................... viii
ABSTRACT..................................................................................................................................................... ix
CHAPTER ONE ............................................................................................................................................... 1
INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................................. 1
1.1. Background of the Study .............................................................................................................. 1
1.2. Background of the Organization ................................................................................................... 2
1.3. Statement of the Problem.............................................................................................................. 5
1.4. Research Questions....................................................................................................................... 6
1.5. Objectives of the Study................................................................................................................. 6
1.5.1. General Objective ............................................................................................................ 6
1.5.2. Specific Objectives .......................................................................................................... 7
1.6. Operational definition of terms ..................................................................................................... 7
1.7. Significance of the Study .............................................................................................................. 7
1.8. Delimitation/ Scope of the study .................................................................................................. 8
1.9. Organization of the Research Report ............................................................................................ 8
CHAPTER TWO .............................................................................................................................................. 9
REVIEW OF RELATED LITRETURE................................................................................................................... 9
2.1. Theoretical Literature Review ...................................................................................................... 9
2.1.1. The Concept of Turnover ................................................................................................ 9
2.2. Types of Turnover ...................................................................................................................... 10
2.2.1. Voluntary Turnover vs Involuntary Turnover ............................................................... 10
2.2.2. Functional Turnovers vs Dysfunctional Turnovers ....................................................... 10
2.2.3. Avoidable Turnover vs Unavoidable Turnovers ........................................................... 11
2.3. Turnover Intention ...................................................................................................................... 11
2.4. Causes of Staff Turnover Intention............................................................................................. 11
2.4.1. Job Stress ....................................................................................................................... 11
2.4.2. Stress and Turnover Intention........................................................................................ 12
2.4.3. Work Overload and Turnover Intention ........................................................................ 14
2.4.4. Working Environment and Turnover Intention ............................................................. 14
2.5. Empirical literature review ......................................................................................................... 15
CHAPTER THREE .......................................................................................................................................... 18
St. Mary’s University Page iv

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODOLOGY ................................................................................................... 18

3.1. Research Design and Approach .................................................................................................. 18
3.2. Population, Sample Size and Sampling Techniques ................................................................... 18
3.3. Source of data ............................................................................................................................. 19
3.4. Methods and Instruments of Data Collection ............................................................................. 19
3.5. Reliability and Validity .............................................................................................................. 20
3.5.1. Reliability Assurance ..................................................................................................... 20
3.5.2. Validity Assurance ........................................................................................................ 21
3.6. Method of Data Analysis ............................................................................................................ 22
3.7. Ethical Considerations ................................................................................................................ 23
CHAPTER FOUR ........................................................................................................................................... 24
DATA PRESENTATION AND ANALYSIS ......................................................................................................... 24
4.1. Descriptive Analysis .................................................................................................................... 25
4.1.1. Respondents’ Characteristic .......................................................................................... 25
4.2. Analysis of the interview ............................................................................................................ 33
4.2.1. View of Management and Employees on Turnover at ERCA Kaliti Branch ................ 33
4.2.2. Reasons for Turnover of Employees ............................................................................. 34
4.2.3. Costs and Retention Mechanisms of Turnover at ERCA .............................................. 34
4.3. Correlation Analysis ................................................................................................................... 35
4.4. Regression Analysis ................................................................................................................... 37
CHAPTER FIVE ............................................................................................................................................. 40
SUMMARY, CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS ............................................................................... 40
5.1. Summary of the major findings .................................................................................................. 40
5.2. Conclusion .................................................................................................................................. 41
5.3. Recommendations ...................................................................................................................... 43
References ..................................................................................................................................................... i
APPENDIX A .................................................................................................................................................... i
APPENDIX B ................................................................................................................................................... v
APPENDIX C .................................................................................................................................................. vi
St. Mary’s University Page v

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
I take this opportunity to thank the Almighty God for His limitless blessing in my life
and bringing me to this end through many ups and down by giving me His unconditional
love and strength.
My sincere appreciation and gratitude goes to my advisor, Goitom Abraham (Asst.

Professor) for his valuable guidance and counsel throughout the whole process of the
study. I also wish to offer special thanks to Dr. Terefe Feyera and W/ro Tsigemariam
Belayneh who have been providing me with priceless supports and for their necessary
assistance in my demand throughout the study.
Finally, I would like to give special thanks to all my families and friends who directly or
indirectly involved and not mentioned by name in this study.
St. Mary’s University Page vi

LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS
ERCA-Ethiopian Revenues and Customs Authority
HRD-Human Resource Department
SPSS- Statistical Package for Social Sciences
SMU-St. Mary’s University
St. Mary’s University Page vii

LIST OF TABLES
Table 3.1: Reliability Coefficients of Research Measures (Cronbach’s Alpha) ......................................... 21
Table 4.1: Demographic Characteristic of the Respondents ....................................................................... 25
Table 4.2: Job Stress Related Item .............................................................................................................. 26
Table 4.3: Work Overload Related Item ..................................................................................................... 28
Table 4.4: Working Environment Related Item .......................................................................................... 30
Table 4.5: Turnover Intention Related Item................................................................................................ 32
Table 4.6: Correlation between independent and dependent variables ....................................................... 36
Table 4.7: Regression Analysis between Independent and Dependent Variable ........................................ 37
Table 4.8: ANOVA of turnover intention ................................................................................................... 37
Table 4.9: Regression for turnover intention .............................................................................................. 38
St. Mary’s University Page viii

ABSTRACT
This thesis was entitled “An Assessment of factors affecting employees’ turnover intention: In
Ethiopian Revenues and Customs Authority (ERCA), Kaliti Branch. The general objective of the
study was, therefore, to identify the factors that are significantly arising employees’ turnover
intention at ERCA Kaliti branch. More specifically, it was meant to: identify the level of
turnover intention of the current employees; examine to what extent the management of ERCA is
aware about the determinant factors of employees’ turnover; identify the factors that drive
employees’ turnover intention; and examine the strategies in place to minimize employees’
turnover intention at ERCA Kaliti branch. In relation to factors that drive employees’ turnover
intention, three variables were proposed to be linked to it namely job stress, work overload, and
working environment. The population of the study was employees of ERCA, which were 688 in
size. Out of this, a sample of 253 was taken using simple random sampling technique. In addition
to existing employees, some the management bodies of ERCA were also selected by using
purposive sampling technique. As part of methods and instruments of data collection, structured
survey questionnaire and semi-structured interview guide were used for employees and the
management of the organization respectively. To analyze the data obtained from the survey
questionnaire descriptive statistics (mean) and inferential statistics (Pearson Correlation and
linear regressions were used). The inferential analysis was essentially needed so as to establish
the relationship between the independent variable (job stress, work overload, and working
environment) and dependent variable (turnover intention). The data collected from the
management through interview method were also analyzed qualitatively in the form of
presentation of the narrative accounts. The key findings revealed that: a) the turnover over
intention is as high as 4.3 out of a five point scale; b) the management of the ERCA had no
sufficient awareness about the turnover intentions of the Company and the key determinants
needed thereof; c) the independent variables (i.e. job stress, work overload and work place
environment each) are found to have statistically significant correlation with turnover intention.
The regression analysis also revealed that the three independent variables in group predict
68.7% of the variations in the turnover intentions with particular reference to ERCA although
working environment has the highest contribution. Therefore, the general conclusion is that
working environment plays a pivotal role in determining employees’ turnover intention.
Consequently, management should work towards creating smooth and conducive working
environment which may include, among others, forming inter personal relationship among
informal groups, availing facilities needed at work place, etc. Furthermore, since the majority of
the works done in ERCA is risk full there must be some protection and security programs for
employees working in the risky positions.
Keywords: Job Stress, Work Overload, Working Environment, Turnover Intention.
St. Mary’s University Page ix

CHAPTER ONE
INTRODUCTION
1.1. Background of the Study
According to the definition of Jucioous human resource management is planning, organizing,

directing and controlling of the procurement, development, compensation, integration,
maintenance and separation of human resources to the end that individual, organizational and
societal objectives are accomplished (Mahaparo, 2010, pp., 3). The difficulty in doing the above
process effectively may lead to employee turnover in which the accomplishment of
organizational objectives may become difficult.
Employee turnover, as defined by Hom and Griffeth (1994), is ‘voluntary terminations of

members from organizations’. On the other hand, Loquercio (2006), observed that staff turnover
is the proportion of staff leaving in a given time period but prior to the anticipated end of their
contract. According to Singh (1994), staff turnover is the rate of change in the working staffs of a
concern during a defined period.
Turnover is a serious and costly problem but it is rarely seen as such by the people who could
take action to prevent it (Jenkins, 1988). In broader sense, turnover refers to the movement of
into and out of the organization by the workforce (Fhippo, 1980). Managers must be cognizant of
the effects that working conditions have on employees job satisfaction and commitment levels
since there is significant economic impact with an organization losing any one of its
critical employees. Combined with direct and indirect costs, the total cost of employee turnover
is a minimum of one year’s pay and benefits or a maximum of two years pay and benefits of an
employee (Fitz-enz, 1997). About 58% of organizations claim that they are experiencing
difficulty retaining these employees (Hale, 1998). The challenge, then, is to develop a
corporate culture that is extrinsically rewarding resulting in workforce of highly satisfied
and effectively committed workers.
Ethiopian revenue and customs authority as a government department has diverse mandates and
functions. The authority’s mission is carried out by a number of departmental units and regional
offices. Different services are delivered to customers through a network of regional/district
offices and service points. The base for these services is human resource.
St. Mary’s University Page 1

But when comparing the number of employees hired and the number of employees leaving out
the authority, the rate of turnover is decreasing since 2006 E.C. According to the data of human
resource department of the authority about 12,361 employees are working now but there was a
lot of recruitment process done by the authority to replace the employees that left out the
authority with different reasons from different branches of the authority all over Ethiopia. This
shows that an employee turnover is a very alarming problem for the authority to achieve its
mission and vision as a whole; but the authority chooses to replace employees rather than finding
and solving the problem for the high turnover rate.
Thus, high turnover is always a symptom of problem that something is wrong within the
organization and/or may be an indicator of better opportunities elsewhere outside the
organization. Moreover, studies reveal that excessively high turnover of employees can result in
unacceptable replacement costs through recruitment, selection, training and socialization,
employment relocation, and additional supervision. Furthermore, too much turnover can have an
adverse effect on recruiting efforts in that prospective staff wants to know why the former
employee left or were discharged impacts negatively on those remaining employee creating a
feeling that may be something is wrong with the organization or that opportunities are better
elsewhere. In general, turnover can affect the whole human resource management process
(Pennington and Edward, 2000; Taylor, 1998).This study was ,therefore, initiated to determine
and/ or identify the factors that contribute for employees turnover intention and suggest
corrective measures, accordingly.
1.2. Background of the Organization
The Ethiopian Revenues and Customs Authority (ERCA) was established by the proclamation
No .587/2008 on 14 July 2008, by the merger of the Ministry of Revenue, Ethiopian Customs
Authority and the Federal Inland Revenue Authority for the purpose of enhancing the
mobilization of government revenues, while providing effective tax and Customs administration
and sustainability in revenue collection. The main objective of the establishment of ERCA was
to streamline the public revenue generation function by bringing the relevant agencies under the
umbrella of the central revenue collector body.

This structuring aimed at improving service delivering, facilitating trade, enforcing the tax and
customs laws and thereby enhancing mobilization of Government revenue in sustainable manner.
A study called "Business Process Re-engineering" had taken place before the merger of the
foregoing administrations. The study was undertaken for a year and half beginning from
November 2007 by teams of officials selected from within the administration.
The study has looked into the selected key business processes and has come across inefficient
organizational structure and unnecessary complicated procedures that permitted insufficient
service delivery. The study has also indicated that there was corruption within the
administrations and that smuggling and tax evasion were serious problems. These problems have
depressed the attempt of the foregoing administrations to be successful in achieving their
objectives.
Documents for the import and export goods were processed through the former tax and customs
administration and due to the inefficient procedures, these goods were subject to delay at exit or
entry points of the former customs Authority. Owing to it, importers or exporters viewed the
former customs procedure with disfavor or looks as an impediment for international trade. The
former tax and customs administration also has long been criticized for lack of efficient and
effective system to control tax evasion.
The administration had inefficient system to control taxpayers who fail to declare their actual
income in order to reduce their tax bill and the federal government's revenue. The former
administration was also far behind in protecting investors from adverse effects of contraband and
illegal practices. In its proposal, the team has suggested merger of the foregoing three
administrations.
The researcher believed that it would be better if the three administrations merged, forming a
single powerful organization to increase modern and equitable tax and customs administration
system, effective resource utilization and quick service delivery. Presently, the Authority is
exercising the powers and duties that were granted to the Ministry of Revenue, the Federal
Inland Revenue Authority and the Customs Authority by existing laws.

The Addis Ababa City Tax Administration and ERCA have signed a memorandum of
understanding in January 2011 to gain support from ERCA. The main objective of the agreement
is to enhance the capacity of tax administration of the city to collect its revenue effectively and
efficiently. Based on the agreement, the administration part of the city tax administration is
temporarily merged to ERCA; the revenue collected is to the Addis Ababa city government
administration.
Ethiopian revenue and customs authority has been experiencing the different functions of human
resource management practices at different levels including the planning, staffing, recruiting,
training and employee benefit functions. Currently, the authority has 12, 361 employees of which
most of them were recruited through the process of selecting students having a CGPA of 2.75
and above from different fields of studies from higher education institutions/ universities. After
selecting them the authority gives an induction training for about 45 days which costs a lot.
Those selected and trained employees through the above recruitment process are assigned to
different work units such as tax collection and assessment, tax audit, law enforcement and
customer service. These tasks are the main reason of which the authority is established to
accomplish.
ERCA kaliti customs branch will possess different kinds of recruitment process of such as
employees who have a diploma and less than diploma are recruited through the vacancy
announcement made through under branch, whereas, the employees who have degree are
recruited and assigned to the branch from head office. Since Ethiopian Revenue and Customs
authority Kaliti branch is one of the branch offices it is also established to accomplish the
authority’s vision, mission and objectives.
According to the data of human resource department of Kaliti branch office there were 688
employees under it in 2010 E.C. But when turnover is seen around the rate is getting higher from
time to time for 1%, 1.8%, 2.3%, 3.5%, 4.8% of employees hired have left the organization
starting from 2006 up to 2010, respectively. This shows that the employee turnover is high on the
employees who have degree and above which have a great contribution for the authority’s vision,
mission and objectives to be achieved. This study is, therefore, intended to examining the
turnover intention of employees so that the possible solution will be taken by the authority to
reduce the employee turnover problem.

1.3. Statement of the Problem

In today’s competitive business world, it is considered to be an important task to manage
employee turnover for any organization. These days, the cost of staff turnover becomes
one of the major concerns of organizations both in financial and non-financial terms. It is
also crucial for any organization to retain its talented employees. Every organization wished to
have high productivity, fewer turnovers and to be profitable. Managing turnover successfully is a
must to achieve the above goals (Heneman, 1998).
Ethiopian revenue and customs authority is an organization giving service of collecting and
administrating domestic taxes and duties using a lot of human resource. ERCA has its own
employee recruitment process and procedures. One and the most frequently used recruitment
practice is through selecting students who graduate from higher educational institutions
(universities) in Ethiopia, particularly starting from 1999 E.C. Ethiopian Revenues and Customs
Authority has recruited new graduates based on their CGPA, i.e. students having CGPA of 2.75
and above are selected and trained. Induction training is organized for 45 days to familiarize
make them with the country’s policies, strategies, rules and regulations that prevail in the
authority. The authority has 12,361 employees serving on different departments.
As staff turnover is a crucial problem for most public organizations in Ethiopia, Ethiopian
Revenue and Customs Authority is facing similar problem of high employee turnover rate.
According to the research done by the human resource department of the authority to know how
the trend is growing as a whole around 1%, 1.8%, 2.3%, 3.5%, 4.8% of employees hired have
left the organization starting from 2006 up to 2010, respectively, and in order to replace the
terminated employees, the authority has incurred a lot of costs. This increasing trend in employee
turnover is a crucial problem for a public service giving organization which has a lot of goals and
objectives to accomplish throughout the years.
The authority has a branch office in Kaliti. The branch office is also facing high employee
turnover rate. Since the employees have great potential and are trained with high expensive costs,
the employee turnover within the authority must be seen as crucial and immediate solution
seeking problem. The observed reality is that there are 688 employees in the authority in Kaliti

branch level, as the date for the year 2010 indicate. But when turnover is considered the rate is
growing up throughout the year starting from 2006 E.C. Starting from 2006 up to 2010 the
employee turnover ranges from 3% in 2006 to 15% in 2010, due to different reasons, and
replacement process took place which is costly to the branch. Since the terminated employees
have a great potential, well trained and recruited through the above mentioned recruiting
procedure which is expensive, this issue must be taken as an issue that seeks immediate solution.
There is one study done in the Authority at country level, the study tried to determine how many
employees leave the organization at Head Office level as well as branch level. But the study
didn’t consider why employees leave the organization and didn’t suggest about what must be
done to minimize the rate of turnover. So this study is planned to fill this gap. Thus, this study is
aimed to pinpoint and provide possible suggestions that can help to reduce the problems
associated with high staff’s turnover in the Ethiopian Revenue and Customs Authority Kaliti
branch office, by identifying the factors that contribute for high employee turnover intention.
1.4. Research Questions
This study entails to address the following research questions:
 What is the intention of the current employees’ to leave the company at ERCA Kaliti
branch?
 To what extent is the management of ERCA Kaliti branch aware about the determinant
factors of employees’ turnover?
 What are the factors that drive the turnover intention of employees’ at ERCA Kaliti
branch?
 What strategies are currently in place to minimize employees’ turnover at ERCA Kaliti
branch?
1.5. Objectives of the Study

This section deals with the general and specific objectives of the study, which deals with the
research topic and research questions respectively.
1.5.1. General Objective

The main objective of this study is to identify the factors that are significantly affecting
employee’s turnover intention ERCA kaliti branch and to suggest possible solutions to minimize
staff’s turnover intention.

1.5.2. Specific Objectives
 To identify the level of turnover intention of the current employees’ of ERCA Kaliti
branch.
 To examine to what extent the management of ERCA Kaliti branch is aware about the
determinant factors of employees’ turnover.
 To identify the factors those drive the turnover intention of employees’ at ERC Kaliti
branch.
 To examine what strategies are currently in place to minimize employees’ turnover
intention at ERCA Kaliti branch.
1.6. Operational definition of terms
The researcher used the following operational definitions of basic terms for this specific
research:
 Turnover: It is the movement of employees out of an organization (Stan, 1991).
 Employee Turnover Intention: Defines as “employees’ desire or willingness to leave an

organization” (Cuskelly & Boag, 2001).
 Working Environment: an environment that is related to safe and motivating workplace

and adequacy of the resource needed to achieve the stated objectives (Chan et al., 2000).
 Work overload: the amount of that is allocated to an employee to do (Andrew et al., 2008).
1.7. Significance of the Study
This study were gone to assess determinant factors that are significantly affecting
employees’ turnover intention in ERCA Kaliti branch office, and it provides important
information about the existing problem of staff management in this organization. The study also
provides sufficient data about the determinant of staff turnover intention and the means for
minimizing staffs turnover intention. Moreover, this study laid ground for future
researchers and also to provide information for ultimate beneficiaries (e.g. ERCA, policy
makers, other researcher, etc.).

1.8. Delimitation/ Scope of the study
This study covers only ERCA Kaliti customs branch. It would have been more convenient if
the study was made in all branches of Ethiopia Revenue and Customs Authority Office in
Addis Ababa City. But due to time and financial constraints the research was limited to the
Kaliti branch office. In terms of time bound this study was confided to assessment of five
years (2006-2010 E.C). In terms of key variable used for this study are working environment,
job stress and work overload were mainly focused to. Focus was given to these variables
because during the preliminary assessment made in the proposal development phase,
employees were mainly mentioning these issues as matters of concern to them. In line with the
reflection of the employees, there were also some empirical studies which show that these
three variables could determine employees’ turnover intention (Qureshi, 2012). Finally,
regarding units of study only existing employees and management body were involved in the
study and ex-employees are omitted.
1.9. Organization of the Research Report
The paper is organized in five chapters. Chapter one incorporate introduction part such as,
background of the study, background of the organization, statement of the problem, research
questions, general and specific objectives of the study, delimitations of the study, definition of
key terms and significance of the study. Chapter two reviews the theoretical and empirical
literature review related to this specific study. Chapter three discusses the methodology and
model specification part. The fourth chapter deals with data analysis and interpretation of the
study. Finally, the summary, conclusions and recommendations are treated in chapter five.

CHAPTER TWO
REVIEW OF RELATED LITRETURE
2.1. Theoretical Literature Review
2.1.1. The Concept of Turnover
According to Ivancevich and Glueck, staff turnover is the net result of the exit of some employees
and entrance of others to the organization (Ivancevich & Gluech, 1998).Employee turnover is the
rotation of workers around the labor market, between firms, jobs and occupations, and between
the states of employment and unemployment (Abassi & Hollman, 2000). Staff turnover that can
occur in any organization might be either voluntary or involuntary. Voluntary turnover refers to
termination initiated by employees while involuntary turnover is the one in which employee has
no choice in the termination as it might be due to long term sickness, death, moving overseas, or
employer-initiated termination (Heneman, 1998).
According to Hamermesh (2001), staff turnover encompasses personnel moves including layoffs,
firings and promotions. While the idea of staff turnover is harrowing for many businesses, the
desire for a stable bottom line often trumps relationships with long time employees. In many
cases, staff turnover is limited by union representation and employee contracts. According to
Hamermesh (2001), every manager, supervisor and business owner has to understand the
complexities of staff turnover before making the first personnel decision. An incorrect promotion
or firing can lead to lost productivity as well as diminished loyalty from employees. The function
of staff turnover is to keep essential personnel in positions best suited to their skills (Mullins,
2005). According to Booth and Hamer (2007), staff turnover may entail consolidating positions
and creating new jobs that reflect the new challenges facing an organization.
According to McConnel (2004), firings and layoffs are used to reduce wages and benefits
payments that are diverted elsewhere in the organization. According to Mathis and Jackson
(2007), staff turnover can be broken down into internal and external types. Internal staff turnover
strategies involve promoting current employees, adding new responsibilities to job titles and
bringing in entry-level employees due to company growth. External staff turnover implies that
employees are leaving the company to seek new jobs, raise families or enter retirement.

Employees’ turnover is a much studied phenomenon Shaw et al. (1998).But there is no standard
reason why people leave organization. Employee turnover is the rotation of workers around the
labor market; between firms, jobs and occupations; and between the states of employment and
unemployment Abassi et al. (2000).
Most of the above scholars have defined staff turnover in terms of the indefinite period
(permanent) employment contract made between employer and employee. As a result they
have assumed the in and out movement of all staffs without considering the type of employment.
However, Loquercio et al. (2006) definition excludes the expected termination of contractual
employees which is much more expected and the general characteristics of most civil services.
Staff turnover that can occur in any organization might be either voluntary or involuntary. Voluntary
turnover is refers to termination initiated by employees while involuntary turnover is the one in
which employee has no choice in the termination as it might be due to long term sickness, death,
moving overseas, or employer-initiated termination (Heinemann et al, 1998).
2.2. Types of Turnover
2.2.1. Voluntary Turnover vs Involuntary Turnover
Though there are many causes for staff turnover in an organization, all of them have not negative
impact on the well-functioning of an organization. Organizations should differentiate
between voluntary and involuntary turnovers and take actions on the one that they have
control. Voluntary turnovers are those caused by the interest of the emplo yee (e.g. to take
job in other organization for better salary) while involuntary turnovers are the decision of
management to quit employees from work (e.g. dismissal for gross misconduct). In general, all
resignations not formally initiated by employers are voluntary resignations. Voluntary turnovers
are further distinguished between functional and dysfunctional turnovers. (Stephen, 1998, pp.
228).
2.2.2. Functional Turnovers vs Dysfunctional Turnovers
Functional turnovers are the resignation of substandard performers and dysfunctional turnovers
are refers to the exit of effective performers. (Loquercio, et al., 2006). They also classified
dysfunctional turnover, which is the most concern of management due to its negative impact

on the organization’s general performance, into avoidable turnover (caused by lower

compensation, poor working condition, etc).
2.2.3. Avoidable Turnover vs Unavoidable Turnovers
A turnover that happens in avoidable circumstances is called ‘Avoidable Turnover’, the

turnover is avoidable when the company does have control-employees choose to leave
because the company is not satisfying their job or career needs and unavoidable turnovers (like
family moves, serious illness, death, etc) over which the organization has little or no influence.
(Taylor, 1998). Therefore, management should give special attention to avoidable turnover over
which it has control and improves the situation and then staffs retention.
2.3. Turnover Intention

Focusing on the causes of employee intention to stay or leave has been one of the recent
research approaches in an organizational turnover literature” (Martin, 1979). According to
Naumann (1992), turnover as it “typically refers to the separation of an employee from the
firm’’. Conversely turnover intention is defined as a conscious and deliberate willingness to
leave the organization (Tett & Meyer, 1993). Although, there is no standard frame work for
understanding the employees turnover process as whole, a wide range of factors have been
found useful in interpreting employee turnover (Henry, 2007; Kevin & Adrian, 2004). On the
job turnover factors such as communication at workplace, environment, assignment given,
salary and benefit received not satisfy the employee. The employee will dissatisfy if the
assignment received is too many and at the same time they need to meet dateline (Silva,
2006).
2.4. Causes of Staff Turnover Intention
2.4.1. Job Stress
Stress is a term with which everyone is familiar; in fact modern times have been called as the
“age of anxiety and stress” (Coleman, 1976) however it is notoriously difficult to define.
There are many definitions in the literature and the term is often used to describe feelings of
fatigue, distress and inability to cope. Nevertheless, Beehr & Newman (1978), had defined
stress as a situation which will force a person had to deviate from normal functioning due to

the change (i.e. disrupt or enhance) in his/her psychological and / or physiological condition,
such that the person is forced to deviate from normal functioning.” Work overload has a
strong influence on work exhaustion” and sooner or later causes a number of disease. General
stress includes “three scales measuring general stress, emotional stress and social stress with
their consequences” (Davis, Orzeck & Keelan, 2006).
Job stress refers to the pressure or tension exerted on a material object. It is the body’s way of
responding to a challenge. In literature, it has been expressed in numerous ways which include
the feelings of distress, disturbance and fatigue. According to Kavanagh (2005), stress is
defined as ‘’a non-specific response of the body to a stimulus or event’ ’in organization it is a
situation where workers find it hard to adapt themselves to the work and hence the result is
biological and psychological disorders (Hsieh et al., 2004). It is feeling of discomfort that
shows itself as a first level outcome of organization and job (Parker and Decottis,1983).A
variety of studies regarding stress have been conducted by different researchers around the
world. It has been found to be phenomenon that is bound to happen (White, 2006).It forces a
person to deviate from his / her normal behavior (Beehr, 1976), feel exhaustion and ultimately
lead to fatal diseases (Wofford et al., 1999).
2.4.1.1. Symptoms of Stress
Stress reveals itself in a variety of ways. A person may experience headache, anxiety,
insomnia, recurring cold or flu and feeling of frustration, etc. (Elizabeth Scott, 2009; Niosh,
1999). The prolonged stress may impair the body’s immunity system, raise the blood pressure
and eventually result in hypertension, abnormal functioning of adrenal gland, tiredness and
weakness of muscles disorder in digestive system, dizziness and disturbance of sleep habit
(Palmer and Dryden, 1994).The causes of stress different research findings have been
reported to include work overload , burden of responsibility, role ambiguity, role conflict
,financial insecurity , lack of feedback , coping with sudden change , etc.
2.4.2. Stress and Turnover Intention

Stress among employees and their turnover intention have always been important issues for
managers. Studies have attempted to answer the question of what determines people’s

intention to quit by investing possible antecedents of employees intentions to quit. Firth et al.
(2004) identified that experience of job related stress; the range factors that lead to job related
stress (stressors) make employees to quit the organization. An unstable, unsecured work
environment that includes job security, continuity, procedural justice deviate the employees
satisfaction level, insert to stress at work and as a result increase their turnover intention (Ali
& Baloch, 2008). Mano & Shay, (2004) argue that financial insecure condition of employees
generates stress among them and they often quit from organization due financial reasons in
order to search the better opportunities. Role stressors also lead to employees’ turnover. This
causes uncertainty about what our role should be. It can be a result of misunderstanding what
is expected, how to meet the expectations, or the employee thinking the job should be
different (Kahn et al., 1964). Insufficient information on how to perform the job adequately,
unclear expectation of peers and supervisors, extensive job pressures and lack of consensus on
job functions or duties may cause employees to feel less involved and less satisfied with their
jobs and careers, less committed to their organizations, undergo stress and eventually display
a propensity to leave the organization (Tor et al., 1997). Lack of job security and status
dissimilarity among employees and the same level also cause stress which may lead their
intention to leave the organization (Brook, 1973; Erikson & Gunderson, 1972; Kahn, et al.,
1964).
Turnover may be the consequence of numerous factors but stress is considered to be the most
important one (Leontaridi and ward, 2002).Stress is the outcome of tensions and according to
Cote and Morgan (2002), it can aggravate the employee turnover. The job-related tension
badly influences job satisfaction that can be lead to high turnover intentions (Kemery et al.,
1987). The mental stress enhances turnover intention. On the other hand, leaving intentions
reduce in case of work satisfaction (Otis and Pelletier, 2005).There has been a close
relationship between stress levels and intentions to leave (Leontaridi and Ward, 2002).Job
stress is directly related to turnover intention (Wiliams, 2003).Greater stress increases the
ratio of employees intention to quit their job (Kavangah, 2005; Cropanzano et al., 2003).”The
amount of stress has a significant positive effect on turnover intention’’ (Layne et al., 2004).

2.4.3. Work Overload and Turnover Intention

‘’Workload refers to the amount of work that is allocated to an employee to do’’ (Qureshi et
al., 2012). A number of researchers have supported a positive relationship between workload,
stress and turnover intention. Glaser et al. found that significant relationships between
workload and stress and stress and turnover, this research assumes that stress will play an
arbitrator role between workload and turnover intentions. Work overload has a significant
impact on work exhaustion (Alhja et al., 2007). In an increasingly competitive environment,
work overload is not an uncommon issue faced by most of the employees. It is considered to
be a real problem in most every organization (Altaf & Awan, 2011).The cause of stress
happens to me be the work overload resulting from time constraint and complexity of work
(Mazioum et al., 2008).Burnout is the consequence of lesser job satisfaction (Nirel et al.,
2008) and increased withdrawal of retained employees would be obvious in job dissatisfaction
(Sheridan and Abelson, 1983). A direct relationship has been found between work load, stress
and turnover intention (Wefaldet al., 2008).
2.4.4. Working Environment and Turnover Intention

One among high turnover factors within the workplace is organization working environment
which comprise communication at work place, political environment, colleagues and manager
behavior will not satisfy the employee (Paula Silva, 2006).unfavorable and poor working
conditions are cited as a major reason for high turnover intention among employees (Milman,
2002). The quality of supervision was a significant influence on intent to leave across settings.
Little supervision and less support from manager in conducting the assignment will lead
towards high level of stress and turnover intention (Shah et al., 2010).
Poor working conditions are reported to be a crucial factor for high turnover intention
(Miliman, 2002) the flexible work arrangements result a higher job satisfaction which in turn
paves way of reduced quitting intentions (Menall et al., 2010). The guts of supervision had a
drastic effect turnover intentions, in different organization (Brannon et al., 2007) absence
proper supervision appropriate support from the authority towards accomplishment of
assigned take will instrumental in causing high stress and intentions to leave (Yahaya et al.,
2009).

2.5. Empirical literature review

Research also indicates that HR practices such as pay, benefits and training are negatively related
to turnover because they motivate employees and "lock" them to their jobs (Lazear 1986;
Madrian, 1994; Gruber & Madrian, 1994). Training can define roles more clearly to employees,
thereby reducing job stress. Organizations with substantial training opportunities should thus
have lower involuntary turnover rates. The foregoing shows that HR practices seem to be
negatively associated with voluntary turnover which forms the basis for the first hypothesis:
Empirical studies such as those conducted by Shaw et al. (1998) indicate that involuntary
turnover is affected by staffing practices (recruitment and selection process) and employee
monitoring (performance appraisal). Similarly, Schmidt and Hunter (1983) argue that the
attention organizations pay their employee selection affects the quality of those recruited. This is
reflected in the staffing process – the selection ratio (that is how selective the organization can
be) and the validity of the selection process. Using valid selection procedures is likely to result in
to better-informed recruitment and selection decisions leading to lower involuntary turnover.
Huselid (1995) showed that selective staffing practices are related to total turnover.
In the case of monitoring employee performance, the use of performance appraisal is a way
organizations keep track of the contributions of each employee (Murphy & Cleveland, 1991).
This enables the organization to terminate an employee when his/her contribution is less than
desirable. In sum, organizations with effective performance appraisal systems are likely to be
able to track down and terminate poor performers. Thus, effective processes of employee
selection coupled with performance-based pay system are likely to enable managers to reduce
involuntary turnover.
According to research done by Vuyisile Mabindisa, 1998, Durban University of technology Staff
turnover is caused by lack of opportunities for career development, remuneration and working
condition. Staff turnover if not taken into consideration will damage the image of the
organization, where customers will lose trust in the organization.
Staff retention is of interest to employers because of the implications of high staff turnover.
Dibble (1999) argues that retention of employees needs to be managed and identifies
remuneration, development, career opportunity, work environment, performance management

and work ,family and flex time as areas that have an effect on retention of employees. Studies
have identified an array of factors that influence employee retention. Gaiduk etal., (2009)
observed that previous studies have found that employee intentions to remain with an
organization are influenced by three major groups of variable which are: employee personal
characteristics such as gender, age, position level; the nature of an employee’s current job; and
adequate working arrangements including such aspects as the quality of current supervision,
opportunities for promotion, available training, and quality of communication within the
organization.
In a study of retention of employees in Australian Organizations, Chew (2004) established that

younger employees focused on remuneration, training and development, career advancement,
challenging work, growth opportunities and recognition. For older employees autonomy,
opportunities to mentor and job challenge were of great importance. A study of 139 academics
from Jordanian University (Al- Omari et al., 2009) established that job satisfaction and
organizational commitment had a significant positive effect on intention to stay among the
academic staff. A study by Daly et al. (2006) on turnover intention of academics in public urban
universities, established that structural factors such as faculty work environment, autonomy,
communication, distributive justice and workload were related to intent to stay. A study of
academics in Makerere University, (Amutuhaire, 2010) established that remuneration and tenure
influenced their retention. Locally, Kipkebut (2010) in a study on organizational commitment
and job satisfaction of employees in universities in Kenya established that role conflict,
promotional opportunities, age were some of the factors that influenced employee intention to
quit the university. These findings reflect a mixture of internal and external factors.
According to the research done by Vuyisile Mabindisa, (2013) Durban University the reasons for
employee turnover in public sector are prevalence of low salary and benefit, lack of recognition
by the top management, work load, over time work and lack of training. To minimize high
employee turnover top management should ensure that a reasonable salary is paid to employees
in the organization, should provide a benefit that will attract the best employees to remain in the
organization in order to improve service delivery and should also appreciate employee’s input in
the organization when they meet organizational goals.

Conceptual Frame Work

Job stress
Work Overload
Turnover Intention
Working Environment
Figure 1. Adopted from Qureshi et al. (2012)
According to research done by (Qureshi et al., 2012) on textile sector on Pakistan the most
reasons for employees to leave the organization is working environment, work overload, job
stress. As a result of the finding employee turnover intentions are positively related with the job
stress, work overload, While negative relationship with working environment. The above
mentioned reasons as employee’s qualification decrease their chance of staying will decrease.
The researcher was focus on only key variables because during the preliminary assessment
made in the proposal development phase, employees were mainly mentioning these issues as
matters of concern to them. In line with the reflection of the employees, there were also some
empirical studies which show that these three variables could determine employees’ turnover
intention (Qureshi, 2012).

CHAPTER THREE
RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODOLOGY
This chapter deals with the research design and methodology that was used for gathering and
analyzing data for the study. It contains research design, sampling method, the population and
sample size, source of data and data collection instrument used, data collection procedure
followed and data analysis techniques employed.
3.1. Research Design and Approach
In order to achieve the objective of the study the research design used descriptive and
explanatory type of research design. Descriptive statics analysis is used to describe respondents
and their perception on variables identified and it is also explanatory statics analysis as the
research seeks to discover relationship between the independent and dependent variables which
means determinant factors and employee turnover intention.
The mixed research approach, particularly the concurrent embedded mixed method strategy was
used in this study to identify the determinant factors of employee turnover intention. In order to
find answers to the research questions, the researcher were deploy quantitative and qualitative
data.
3.2. Population, Sample Size and Sampling Techniques
The population of the study was employees of ERCA, which were 688 in size. Sample size
decision was determined using Yamane, (1967) as cited in Glenn, (2012) because it is commonly
used by researchers. Accordingly, the sample size was determined using the formula as indicated
below;
𝑁
n=
1 + 𝑁(𝑒)2
Source: Glenn D. (2013)
Where, N=population e=margin errors and n=sample size. With 95% confidence interval and at
5% error margin, the sample size for a population of 688 was found to be as follow:
n = ___688____ = 253
2
1+688 (0.05)

For the sake of selection of the members simple random sampling technique was used.
Regarding the administration of this, 688 lots were prepared by the name of the employees from
which 253 selections were conducted with the guidance of one senior employees of the
company. In addition to existing employees, the management bodies of ERCA were also selected
by using purposive sampling technique.
3.3. Source of data
To conduct this research, information obtained from both primary and secondary data sources
were used. The primary data was collected from employees that are currently working in the
organization and the management of the organization.
The secondary data obtained from written materials like: academic books, journals, research
papers, internet resources for literature review.
3.4. Methods and Instruments of Data Collection
The primary data were particularly collected through the distribution of questionnaire to
employees and the administration of structured interview with the human resource officials.
Regarding procedures followed, permission was secured from ERCA after letter of request was
issued by SMU. Then, copies of the questionnaire were distributed to the respondents with the
support of an employee assigned for the researcher for this given mission. Questions were
systematically categorized so that respondents could easily understand and express their feelings.
The type of questions that were raised in the question was close ended with the structured
format. The researcher used Likert scale that enabled to understand respondent’s level of
agreement with each question. Each question allocated to five point Likert Scales ranging from
strongly agree to strongly disagree.
In each questionnaire, Likert-type scales were developed by utilizing the item analysis approach
wherein a particular item is evaluated on the basis of how well it discriminates between those
persons whose total score is high and those whose score is low. The respondent indicates his/her
agreement or disagreement with each statement in the instrument. The overall score represents
the respondent’s position on the continuum of favorable/ unfavourableness towards an issue. In a
Likert scale, a respondent was asked to respond to each of the statements in terms of several

degrees, usually five degrees of agreement or disagreement. Respondents responded in any one
of the following ways: (i) strongly agree, (ii) agree, (iii) neutral, (iv) disagree, (v) strongly
disagree.
The procedure followed for developing a Likert-type scale is as follows:
(i) As a first step, the researcher collected a large number of statements which are
relevant to the issue being studied and each of the statements expresses definite
favorableness or favorableness to a particular point of view.
(ii) After the statements have been gathered, a pilot survey was administered to a number
of subjects.
(iii) The response to various statements was scored in such a way that a response indicative
of the most favorable attitude was given the highest score of 5 and that with the most
unfavorable attitude was given the lowest score, say, of 1.
(iv) Then the total score of each respondent was obtained by adding his scores that he/she
received for separate statements.
3.5. Reliability and Validity
In a study it is important to show that the quality of the study is good. In any market research
process, it is paramount to use “good” measures. Good measures are those that consistently
measure what they are supposed to measure (Mooi and Sarstedt, 2011).
3.5.1. Reliability Assurance
Reliability is the degree to which what researchers measure is free from random error (Mooi and
Sarstedt 2011) and it is concerned with the consistency or stability of the score obtained from a
measure or assessment over time and across settings or conditions. If the measurement is
reliable, then there is less chance that the obtained score is due to random factors and
measurement error (Marczyk et al. 2005).
Accordingly, before distributing the questionnaire, the researcher made a pilot study, then the
researcher randomly select 15 participants from kaliti branch office. Among 15 questionnaires

distributed, 10 returned. Based on the result of the pilot study the reliability of the questions was
checked. To this effect, Cronbach's alpha (α) was used in this study to test the reliability (internal
consistency) of the measure. The test score as depicted in table 3.1 reveals that Cronbach's alpha
for the entire items was 0.918. Usually, reliability coefficients should be at least ‘.70’ and the
higher is the better. All the major research measures met Nunnally’s (1978) internal consistency
(reliability) standard. Therefore, subjects to the specific and unusual limitations associated with
this type of research, the research instrument appears reliable and valid. In short the test score for
both the scale and the subscales are greater than 0.7 in all cases; hence were found be reliable.
Table 3.1: Reliability Coefficients of Research Measures (Cronbach’s Alpha)

Items Cronbach's Alpha N of Items
Job Stress .792 8
Work Overload .783 6
Working Environment .873 6
Turnover Intention .721 6
Overall Reliability .918 26
Source: Own survey (2019)
3.5.2. Validity Assurance
Validity refers to whether we are measuring what we want to measure (Mooi and Sarstedt,
2011). It is related to research methodology because its primary purpose is to increase the
accuracy and usefulness of findings by eliminating or controlling as many confounding variables
as possible, which allows for greater confidence in the findings of any given study (Marczyk et
al., 2005).
Attempts were made in this study to ensure at least two aspects of validity namely, face-validity
and content validity. To ensure face validity the draft of the questionnaire was initially given to
the researcher advisor and one expert in the area of human resource management. A few
feedbacks were obtained from both parties and corrections were made on the questionnaire
accordingly. Concerning the content validity of the study, the researcher reviewed extensive

literature review as per the suggestion of Quresh et al., (2012) so as to explore the theoretical
constructs of factors affecting turnover intention. Consequently, the researcher asserts that the
research was being conducting after making sure that the instrument of data collection used
herein could meet both reliability and validity requirements.
3.6. Method of Data Analysis
Before conducting the actual analysis, the data was first collected and coded in order to make
easy for further analysis. The coded data was captured on computer and the captured data was
analyzed using frequencies, percentage, mean, correlation analysis, and regression analysis. This
study investigated the relation between employee turnover and its determinant factors using
Pearson’s correlation coefficient with the help of Statistical Package for the Social Science
(SPSS) version 20 for windows in frequencies and percentage and analyzed data was displayed
in tables. The inferential statics analysis was applied so as to establish the relationship between
the independent variable (job stress, work overload, and working environment) and dependent
variable (turnover intention).
In order to carry out inferential statics analysis, a number of tools were employed. The statistical
methods that were used under this study include frequencies, descriptive statistics, bivariate
correlation analysis (two-tiled) and Regression analysis.
i. Frequencies were used to determine the number and percentage of background
information about employees.
ii. Bivariate Correlation Analysis (two-tiled) was used; the Pearson correlation
coefficient was carried out to determine the extent to which values of two variables
(each identified determinants factors of turnover Vs. turnover intention) are related.
In this case, it was used to assess the association between determinants factors of
turnover, turnover intention.
iii. Regression analysis was used to identify the relationship between the independent
variable (job stress, work overload, and working environment) and dependent
variable (turnover intention).

3.7. Ethical Considerations
Regarding ethical consideration an attempt was made to ensure all respondents to keep their
identity and responses as confidential in order for all the information to be given in full
confidence. The questionnaire was distributed based on willingness of each respondent. In
addition, the purpose of the questionnaire and interview was clearly indicated beforehand within
questions. On the other hand, the study was conducted with the consent of the managements. The
researcher has also tried to use polite words when writing the research report and care was taken
not to disappoint the target organization and those involved in the study. In addition, great care
was taken to avoid plagiarism. To this end all sources consulted have been duly acknowledged.

CHAPTER FOUR
DATA PRESENTATION AND ANALYSIS
The main aim of this study is to identify the factors that are significantly affecting employee
turnover of ERCA Kaliti branch. To show this the researcher followed a various steps such us
data collection, coding, feeding the data in to SPSS 20, analyzing using different statistical
approaches such as frequency, descriptive statistics, reliability test and correlation test and
regression to test the significances.
The primary data was collected through distribution of questionnaire to the current employees.
The total population 688 employees currently working in the organization the sample size is 253
had taken the questionnaire but only 212 employees has responded which accounts 83.79% of
the population. According to Saunders (2002), a response rate of 70% and above for
questionnaire survey is sufficient to carry out the analysis.
The data presentation and analysis part of this study consists of three main and broad parts, i.e.
part one discusses about the discussion of the demographic data of the employees currently
working in the organization and descriptive analysis. Part two consist of correlation test and
regression test of the relationship between determinant of turnover intention and employee
turnover intention. Part three deal with the responses of interview made with HRD of ERCA
Kaliti branch and the management staffs of the organization to what were extent the management
staff aware about the determinant of employee turnover intention.

4.1. Descriptive Analysis
4.1.1. Respondents’ Characteristic
The personal information of respondents obtained from returned questionnaires summarized and
described as follows.
Table 4.1: Demographic Characteristic of the Respondents

Percentage
No. Item
Measurement Frequency Valid % Cumulative %
Male 138 65.1 65.1

1 Gender Female 74 34.9 100.0
Total 212 100.0 -
18- 25 91 42.9 42.9
2 Age 26-35 95 44.8 87.7
36-45 26 12.3 100.0
Total 212 100.0 -
Diploma 22 10.4 10.4
3 Academic BA/BSC 128 60.4 70.8
Qualification MA/MSC 62 29.2 100.0
Total 212 100.0 -
1-5 Years 124 58.5 58.5
4 Working 6-10 Years 76 35.8 94.3
Experience 11-15 Years 12 5.7 100.0
Total 212 100.0 -
Source: Own Survey, 2019
Before starting the analysis of the data some background information such as demographic data,
is useful in order to make the analysis more meaningful for the readers. Accordingly, in table 4.1
(item 1) it is revealed that the sample consisted of 212 respondents and in terms of gender,
respondents were roughly proportionate between male and female, even though the numbers of
male respondents were a bit higher (male 65.1 % and female 34.9 %). Regarding the age of
respondents, as seen in item 2 of the same table the sample population was largely dominated by
the age group of 26-35 (44.8 %) followed by the group between the age of 18-25 (42.9%).This
implies that most of the sample respondents were middle aged. The rest of the respondents
consisted, 26 (12.3 %) with the age of 36-45. This data shows that more than half of the
employees working in ERCA are young and energetic employees.
As depicted in item 3 table 4.1, the largest group of the sample population comprised first-degree
holders, which is 60.4% of the total respondents; followed by second-degree holders which
comprised 29.2% and Diploma holders, which is 10.4% .This shows that the majority of the
respondents were with sufficient educational background. As indicated in item 4 of table 4.1 the
experience of the respondents in the organization. 124 of the respondent employees have an
experience of less than 5 years consisting around 58.5% of the total respondents and 76
employees have the experience of greater than or equal to 6 years but less than or equal to 10
years, this accounts for 35.8% of the total respondents. Only 12 respondent employees have an
experience of greater than or equal to 11 years but less than or equal to 15 years consisting of
5.7% of the total respondents.
Table 4.2: Job Stress Related Item
Level of Respondents Agreements Mean

S.N Item SD D N A SA Total
F(n) 60 25 14 99 14 212
1. I often feel stress at work. 3.44
% 28.3 11.8% 6.6% 46.7% 6.6% 100
2. The job difficulty usually brings me F(n) 51 28 17 71 45 3.26 212
sleeplessness. % 24.1% 13.2% 8% 33.5% 21.2% 100
My job makes me nervous. F(n) 60 20 24 94 14 212
3. % 28.3% 9.4% 11.3% 44.3% 6.6% 3.49 100
I feel exhausted after daily work. F(n) 70 18 10 98 16 212
4. % 33.1% 8.5% 4.7% 46.2% 7.5% 3.45 100
It’s helpful for my health if I F(n) 60 28 20 80 24 212
5. change my job. % 28.3% 13.2% 9.4% 37.7% 11.3% 3.23 100
I feel weak and dispirited at work. F(n) - 36 18 112 46 212
3.88
6. % - 17.0% 8.5% 52.8% 21.7% 100
7. I feel more hot tempered at work. F(n) 51 28 17 71 45 3.34 212
% 24.1% 13.2% 8% 33.5% 21.2% 100
8. I feel depressed and unhappy at F(n) - 49 14 92 57 3.84 212
work. % - 23.1% 6.6% 43.4% 26.9% 100
Aggregate Mean = 3.492

Accordingly, in table 4.2 (item 1) it is revealed that the frequency and percentage distribution of
agreement and disagreement on the determinants factors of turnover intention 40.1% of the
respondents’ responded disagree or strongly disagree, 6.6% of the respondents’ responded
neutral, 53.3% respondents agree or strongly disagree they often feel stress at work.
Regarding the second item of table 4.2, 37.3% of the respondents disagreed or strongly disagree
to the same statement difficulty usually brings sleeplessness, whereas, 8% of the respondents’
responded neutral and 54.7% of the respondents agree or strongly agree. Even if the mean score
obtained i.e, the central tendency is towards neutrally, the fact that more than half of the
respondents agreed to the statement imply that there are perceived gaps in relation to the job
content.
Likewise, concerning item 3 of the same table 37.7% of the respondents disagree or strongly
disagree on the on the jobs makes nervous ,11.3% being neutral and 50.9 % of the respondents
agree or strongly agree on the nature of jobs makes nervous. This indicates that employee gets
high workload are also one of the reasons for turnover intention in the workplace.
As depicted in item 4 of the same table 41.6% of the respondents disagree or strongly disagree
on they feel exhausted after daily work, 4.7% remain neutral and 53.7% agree or strongly agree
on the feel exhausted after daily work.
As depicted in item 5 of the same table 41.5% of the respondents responded disagree or strongly
disagree, 9.4% remain neutral whereas 49% of the respondents agree or strongly agree on its
helpful for my health if i change my job.
As depicted in item 6 of the same table 17.0% of the respondents disagree that feel weak and
dispirited at work is not the reason why employees leave the organization, 8.5% of the
respondents are neutral whether feel weak and dispirited at work is causes employee turnover
intention to stay or not and 74.5% of the respondents agree or strongly agree that job stress is one
of the causes for employees to left the organization.

on the on hot tempered at work ,8% being neutral and 54.7% of the respondents agree or strongly
agree on the nature of hot tempered at work.
As indicated in item 8 of table 4.2 the respondents disagree on they feel depressed and unhappy
at work 23.1%, 6.6% remain neutral and 70.3% agree or strongly agree on the feel depressed and
unhappy at work.
Table 4.3: Work Overload Related Item

S. Level of Respondents Agreements Total
N Item SD(1) D(2) N(3) A(4) SA(5) Mean
Freq’ - 34 18 107 53 212
I experience excessive
1. work pressure % - 16% 8.5% 50.0% 25.0% 3.92 100
age
Freq’ - 30 19 125 38 3.86 212
2. I work for long hours,
on overtime and even % - 14.2% 9.0% 59.0% 17.9% 100
on holidays age
Freq’ - 34 18 104 56 212
3. I am unable to meet
out the demands of my % - 16% 8.5% 49.1% 26.4% 3.93 100
job age
Freq’ - 33 20 121 38 212
4. I spend so long at work
that my outside % - 15.6% 9.4% 57.1% 17.9% 3.83 100
relationships are age
suffering.
Freq’ - 34 18 107 53 212
5. I am so busy I find it
increasingly difficult to % - 16% 8.5% 50.5% 25.0% 3.92 100
concentrate on the job age
in front of me.
6. Freq’ - 21 18 92 81 212
I feel tired during the
day due to excessive % - 9.9% 8.5% 43.4% 38.2% 4.11 100
work load age
The above table 4.3 shows that 16% of the respondents disagree with experience excessive work
pressure in the organization 8.5% remain neutral whereas 75% of the respondents agree or
strongly agree on excessive work pressure.

Regarding the second item of table 4.3, shows that 14.2% of the respondents disagree on work
for long hours, on overtime and even holiday in ERCA, whereas 9.0% of the respondents are
being neutral and whereas 76.9% of the respondents are agree or strongly agree that working for
long hour is cause of turnover intention to left in the organization.
Likewise, concerning item 3 of the same table 16.0% of the respondents disagree that unable to
meet out the demand of job, while 8.5% of the respondents being neutral and 75.5% of the
respondents agree or strongly agree on due to work load it is difficult to meet out the demand of
the job.
As depicted in item 4 the same table 15.6% of the respondents disagree on spend so long at work
at work employees outside relationship is suffering while 9.4% of the respondents being neutral
and 75% of the respondents agree or strongly agree on the spend so long at work is cause for
turnover intention to left the organization.
As indicated in item 5 the same table 16.0% of the respondents disagree on it is difficult to
concentrate on job in the organization while 8.5% being neutral on the subject and the rest of
75.5% of the respondents agree or strongly agree on difficult to concentrate on job due to work
overload in the organization.
As depicted in item 6 of the same table 9.9% of the respondents disagree on feel tired during the
day due to excessive work load at work while 8.5% being neutral and the majority of the
respondents 81.6% agree or strongly agree on there is excessive work overload is one of the
cause for employees left in the organization. The above table also shows that the majority of the
employees agreed on job work overload. Therefore, this implies that due to excessive work
pressure employees face work overload.

Table 4.4: Working Environment Related Item

Level of Respondents Agreements
S.N Item SD(1) D(2) N(3) A(4) SA(5) Mean Total
I feel comfortable to Freq’ - 30 17 90 75 212
1. work with the latest % age - 14.1% 8.0% 42.5% 35.4% 3.99 100
technologies in the
organization.
I feel insecure in the Freq’ - 45 17 90 60 212
2. working % age - 21.2% 8.0% 42.5% 28.3% 3.78 100
environment.
I experience Freq’ - 25 18 76 93 212
3. unwelcome verbal 3.55
% age - 11.8 8.5% 35.8% 43.9% 100
and physical conduct
from my boss.
I am not able to Freq’ 20 17 10 90 75 212
4. receive support from 3.86
% age 9.4% 8.0% 4.7% 42.5% 35.4% 100
my boss, colleague
and juniors.
My relationship with Freq’ - 20 10 86 96 212
5. colleagues and peers % age - 9.4% 4.7% 40.6% 45.3% 4.22 100
is not smooth and
cordial.
Working environment Freq’ - 12 11 97 92 212
6. of team is not good for 4.27
career growth. %age - 5.7% 5.2% 45.8% 43.4% 100
The above table 4.4 shows the frequency and percentage distribution of agreement and
disagreement on the determinants factors of turnover intention 14.1% of the respondents’
responded disagree, whereas 8.0% responded being neutral on the subject, the majority of the
respondent 77.9% agree or strongly agree this implies that they are interesting to work with
latest technologies in the organization.
Regarding the second item of the same table 21.2% of the respondents disagreed that they feel
insecure in the working environment whereas 70.8% of the respondents agree or strongly agree
on they feel insecure in working environment, 8.0% of the respondents being neutral. This shows
that the majority of the respondent agreed that the working environment was not conducive for
employees’ environment including the offices is unattractive. There exists insufficient spaces for

all employees to get their own place, office and utilities that help the employees perform their
jobs. Therefore this shows that the employees feel insecure in the working environment.
This can be affirmed with the empirical data as 11.8% of the respondents responded disagree,
8.5% remain neutral and whereas 79.7% of the respondents agree or strongly agree on there is
unwelcome verbal and physical conduct from manager of organization.
that the employees not able to receive support from boss, colleagues and juniors, 4.7% of the
respondents are neutral on the subject and 77.9% of the respondents agree or strongly agree that
one of the causes for employees to left the organization there is lack of interpersonal relation
between employees and between employees, colleagues and managers.
Likewise, concerning item 5 of the same table 9.4% the respondents disagree with the statement
4.7% of respondent being neutral on the subject and 85.9% of the respondent agree or strongly
agree that poor interpersonal relation between employees and between employees and managers.
This shows that a lack of interpersonal support or poor working relationships leading to a sense
of isolation.
As indicated in item 6 of table 4.4 the respondents disagree on working environment is not good
for career growth 5.7%; whereas, 5.2% being neutral on the subject and 89.2% of the respondent
agree or strongly agree that not satisfied with working environment in the organization.

Table 4.5: Turnover Intention Related Item

S. Level of Respondents Agreements
N Item SD(1) D(2) N(3) A(4) SA(5) Mean Total
I like to resign myself Freq’ 10 74 9 99 20 212
1 from the current job. 46.7% 9.4% 4.33
% 4.7% 34.9% 4.2% 100
age
I will probably resign Freq’ 7 90 13 100 2 212
2 myself from the current 4.31
% 3.3% 42.5% 6.1% 47.2% 0.9% 100
job in a year.
age
3. I like to work for some Freq’ 14 87 5 92 14 212
other company. % 6.6% 41.0% 2.4% 43.4% 6.6% 4.29 100
age
4. I like to switch to other Freq’ 14 64 22 92 20 212
business or sector. 4.28
% 6.6% 30.2% 10.4% 43.4% 9.4% 100
age
5 I have actually looked for Freq’ 11 20 10 96 75 4.29 212
other jobs after I entered % 5.2% 9.4% 4.7% 45.3% 35.4% 100
the current company age
6. I don’t like to continue in Freq’ 32 9 11 73 87 4.05 212
the organization for a
% 15.1% 4.2% 5.2% 34.4% 41.0% 100
long period.
age
According to Item - 1 of the above table 4.5 shows that 39.6% of the respondents disagree or
strongly disagree respectively about quitting from current job, whereas, 4.2% of the respondent
being neutral. On the contrary, 56.1% of the respondent agree or strongly agree that resign from
current job.
Item - 2 of the table indicates 45.8% of the respondents disagree or strongly disagree probably
resign from my current job in a year, 6.1% neutral and 48.1% of the respondent agree or strongly
agree respectively.
As displayed in Item - 3 of the table, 47.6% the respondents disagree or strongly disagree about
looking for some other company. 2.4% of the respondent being neutral. Whereas, the majority of
the respondent 50% agree or strongly agree with the statement they are interesting to work some
other company.

Along with Item - 4 of the table, 36.8% the respondents disagree or strongly disagree about they
are interested to switch to other business or sector. However, 52.8% of the respondent agree or
strongly agree respectively. Whereas, 10.4% neutral about the issue.
Item - 5 of the table, 14.6% disagree or strongly disagree about they are actually looked for other
jobs after i entered the current company. Whereas 4.7% of the respondent being neutral, 80.7 %
the respondent are agree or strongly agree they are looking for other alternative jobs.
Along with Item - 6 of the table, 19.3% disagree or strongly disagree about they are not
interested to stay in the organization for a long period. However, 75.4% of the respondent agree
or strongly agree respectively. Whereas, 5.2% neutral about the issue.
Therefore, generally seeing most of the current employees have an intention to leave due to the
above mention determinant factors of employee’s turnover intention job stress, work overload
and working environment within the organization and also for a better job in the market.
The mean indicates to what extent the sample group on average agrees or does not agree with the
different statement. The lower the mean, the more the respondents disagree with the statement.
The higher the mean, the more the respondents agree with the statement. (Marczyk et al. 2005).
Based on the above table 4.5, turnover intention has the highest mean score of 4.257 followed by
working environment with a mean score of 3.945. Work overload next scoring 3.9300 mean
value which was also followed by job stress was the least variable with mean score of 3.492.
4.2. Analysis of the interview
4.2.1. View of Management and Employees on Turnover at ERCA Kaliti Branch
The following result shows interview made with human resource department head of ERCA
Kaliti branch on the issues of related to the major reason of turnover and determinant factor
of employee turnover and what retention mechanisms are made.

4.2.2. Reasons for Turnover of Employees
According to the information given from the management and human resource department of the
organization they both are aware of intensive turnover of professional employees. According to
HRD (Human Resource Department) the employee turnover made for the organization difficult
achieve its mission as per plan. The view of the HRD is currently the organization is losing its
employees due to the availability of alternative and better jobs in the market, also the employees
was recruited through their CGPA which is greater than 2.75 the employees are more
competitive and wanted by the other governmental and non-governmental organizations such as
Commercial Bank, Ethiopian Telecommunication, Ethiopian Airlines, other privately owned
Banks and NGO’s. Those organizations pay more salary and give them better allowances and
fringe benefits. According to the HRD and management staffs the reason the employees put
when they leave the organization via the exit interview is another reasons rather than mentioning
that they got a better job elsewhere in order to get a good resignation letter and recommendation.
Apart from the salary and benefits the employees leave the organization due to the working
condition and lack of facilities that can mitigate the working condition and hardship especially
out of office work like inspection and controlling department. In addition to the above reasons
the HRD is aware of another reason making employees to leave is the riskiness of the job.
According to the HRD the job that majority of the employees do confronts them directly to the
illegal actors like contrabandists, tax fraud and illegal traders which makes employees to fear
because the organization have no security protection programs or facilities.
Apart from problems stated above, HRD and management stated that there are no
difficulties with training and development, employee relation are smooth, existence of equal
opportunities for promotion, career development, impartial grievance handling mechanisms
and others job assignment of the organization is based on performance status and skill that they
have.
4.2.3. Costs and Retention Mechanisms of Turnover at ERCA
The management and HRD believe that the open vacant places created due to employee turnover
must be filled. But to do so the organization will have incurred different costs such as the

advertisement cost though newspapers, the cost of recruitment and interview, cost of training.
The management and HRD also believe that the cost also include time for each process done to
hire new employee.
With regard to the retention mechanism the management and responsible bodies of the
organization it is trying to maintain stable work force through various mechanisms. In the first
place full orientation is given for new employees when they are hired about working condition of
the organization, duties and responsibilities in each one of position will be explained according
to HRD and management staffs the benefit and salary improvement are made in the organization
in last year, but most the employees’ didn’t satisfy the salary increment as compared different
sector such as Commercial Bank of Ethiopian, Ethiopian Airlines, Ethiopian
Telecommunication, privately owned banks and insurances and different NGO’s.
According to management and HRD of ERCA, the organization is trying to maintain

stable work force through informing the exact working environment such as the working place
and its distance, the benefits they will get, the hardship they may face.
4.3. Correlation Analysis
A correlation coefficient is a very useful means to summarize the relationship between two
variables with a single number that falls between -1 and +1 (Field 2005). A correlation
analysis with Pearson’s correlation coefficient was conducted on all the independent and
dependent variables in this study to explore the relationship between variables. According to
guidelines suggested by Field (2005) to interpret the strength of relationship between variables,
the correlation coefficient(r) is as follows: if the correlation coefficient falls between 0.1 to 0.29,
it is weak; 0.3 to 0.49 is moderate; and > 0.5 is strong relationship between variables.
In this study, bivariate Pearson correlation was used to examine the relationship between each of
the independent variables and the dependent variable using a two tailed test of statistical
significance at the level of 99% confidence and significance < 0.01.

Table 4.6: Correlation between independent and dependent variables

Working
Work Turnover
Job Stress Environm
Overload Intention
ent
Pearson
1
Correlation
Job Stress
Sig. (2-tailed) .000
Pearson
Work .535** 1
Correlation
Overload
Sig. (2-tailed) .000
Pearson
Working - .787** .553** 1
Correlation
Environment
Sig. (2-tailed) .000 .000
Pearson
Turnover .570** .539** -.813** 1
Correlation
Intention
Sig. (2-tailed) .000 .000 .000
From the results shown in table 4.6 above, each variable correlated perfectly with itself with
coefficients value of +1.00. The correlation matrix shows that there is a strong, negative
significant relationship between working environment and turnover intention with a value of r=
-0.813 at 0.01 significant level. This implies that a healthy and relaxed work environment would
help in employee’s retention and ultimately reduced turnover intention.
The results of Pearson correlation matrix also shows that there is a strong positive relationship
between job stress and turnover intention; between work overload and turnover intention
r=0.570, r=0.539 respectively. The correlation between job stress and work environment is
proved to be positive and significant relationship with dependent variable which means the
increase in job stress results that leads to increase turnover intention. The same finding was
obtained between work overload and turnover intention. While working environment is negative
relationship with employee turnover intention. The strength of correlation is highest for working
environment followed by job stress with turnover intention and work overload. The correlation is
also significant at .01 level two tailed. This shows that good and health work environment will
lead to the less employee turnover intention.

4.4. Regression Analysis
Table 4.7: Regression Analysis between Independent and Dependent Variable
Adjusted R Std. Error of the

Model R R Square
Square Estimate
1 .831a .691 .687 .29662

a. Predictors: (Constant), Job stress, Work overload, Working environment.
b. Dependent Variable: Turnover Intention
The regression model presents how much of the variance in the measure of turnover intention is
explained by the underlying dimensions of turnover intention (the model). Adjusted R square was
used to measure the percentage of variance in the turnover intention explained by job stress, work
overload and working environment with turnover intention. Based on table 4.7 above, the model
or the predictor variables have accounted for 68.70% (adjusted R square of 68.70% with
estimated standard deviation 0.29662) of the variance in the criterion variable (turnover
intention). The other variables that were not considered in this study contribute about 31.3% of
the variability of turnover intention.
Table 4.8: ANOVA of turnover intention

Sum of Mean
Model Df F Sig.
Squares Square
1 Regression 40.938 3 13.646 155.094 .000b
Residual 18.301 208 .088
Total 59.239 211

a. Predictors: (Constant), Job stress, Work overload, Working environment.
b. Dependent Variable: Turnover Intention

From the linear regression equation, the standard regression coefficient (beta weight) was
determined to compare the effect of each independent variable has on the variability of the
overall turnover intention. The regression coefficient explains the average amount of change in

dependent variable that is caused by a unit of change in the independent variable. The larger
value of Beta coefficient that an independent variable has, the more support to the independent
variable as the more important determinant in predicting the dependent variable. Tables 4.8
provide the results of the regression analysis.
Table 4.9: Regression for turnover intention

Coefficientsa
Unstandardized Standardized
Coefficients Coefficients
Model T Sig.
B Std. Error Beta
1 (Constant) 0.714 0.174 4.108 .000
Job Stress -0.242 .068 -0.226 -3.550 .000
Work Overload .144 .042 .161 3.418 .001
Working Environment .952 .068 - . 902 13.965 .000
a. Dependent Variable: Turnover Intention
According to Table 4.9 above, the regression standardized coefficients for the three dependent
variables, i.e. job stress, work overload, and working environment with turnover intention are
-0.226, 0.161 and -0.902 respectively. Their significance levels are 0.000, 0.001, and 0.000
respectively, which are less than 0.05. This indicates significant relationship between them and
the dependent variable (turnover intention). Since, coefficients of the predictor variables are
statistically significant a less than five percent. The result also indicated that working
environment is the most important factor influencing turnover intention in Ethiopian Revenue
and Customs Authority Kaliti branch.

Finally, the t-test showed that job stress, work overload and working environment with turnover
intention were perceived to be important to decrease turnover intention to stay or quit the
organization. The result showed that from the mentioned three factors that influencing turnover
intention to stay or quit it affected by the three of them; job stress, work overload and working
environment.

CHAPTER FIVE
SUMMARY, CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
The purpose of the study was to examine the factors that are significantly affecting employee
turnover intention ERCA Kaliti branch. In this chapter of the study, summary of findings,
conclusion drawn, and recommendations of the study are stated.
5.1. Summary of the major findings
From the demographic characteristics of the respondents, female 34.9% and male 65.1%
respondents were roughly proportionate. Besides, respondents participated in the survey were
middle aged between 26-35 (44.8%). Regarding educational back ground, majority have got first
degree and above. In terms of years of service experience, the majority 60.4% have the
experience between 1 to 5 years with their current organization.
 The employees’ turnover intention rate 80.7% is high as evidenced turnover intention,
working environment, work overload and job stress with a mean score of 4.3, 3.945, 3.93,
and 3.49, respectively.
 Management staffs and HRD of the organization is aware of skilled manpower turnover
that the organization is facing. Most management staffs and HRD of the organization
believe that the low salary and benefit package, nature of job in ERCA made employees
to leave the organization. And also the management staffs are aware of the different cost
incurred due to high employee turnover rate, such as cost of advertisement, cost of
interview and cost of training and development for new staff members.
 The key factors affecting employees’ turnover intention shows that the three independent
variables job stress, work overload and working environment. Working environment is
the most significant factor that influence turnover intention in ERCA Kaliti branch.
 The retention mechanisms designed by the organization to minimize employee turnover
intention according to HRD and management staffs there is no relevant retention strategy
has been in place at ERCA.

5.2. Conclusion
This study was conducted with the view to: identify the level of turnover intention of the current
employees; to examine to what extent the management of ERCA is aware about the determinant
factors of employees’ turnover; to identify the factors that drive employees’ turnover intention;
and to examine the strategies in place to minimize employees’ turnover intention at ERCA Kaliti
branch.
In relation to determining the extent of the turnover intention of the current employees, from the
score obtained and percentage values, it can be inferred that the intention is high to the level that
it would be considered treating for the company. When employees’ intention is as high as this, it
could be a strong signal for the Company that it faced a threatening situation whereby it could
lose its workforce. This would ultimately is linked to the possibility to affect the sustainability of
the Company itself. Therefore, it is possible to conclude that ERCA has faced a serious challenge
with respect to the possibility to lose its key employees and for that matter the possibility to
pursue its mission sustainably.
Beyond determining the turnover intention, attempts were also made to examine whether the
management bodies were well aware about the existing state of the employees’ sense of
belongingness with ERCA. From the analysis of the interview result and the narrations made
thereon, it can be concluded that the management members are not as such ware about the degree
of turnover intention. Even if it is a natural order that in every company turnover is an avoidable
situation, it matters whether a company has the ability to proactively anticipate the possibility to
lose its key employees or not. If not proactively, at least reacting to such tough situations is a
mandatory requirement. That is, when the possibility to lose its employees is observed to be
high, the Company is required to devise a system whereby its employee could stay out there.
However, the assessment result revealed that the management of the company is neither
proactively nor reactively making sense of the turnover intention at ERCA.
Concerning key factors affecting employees’ turnover intention with practical reference to
ERCA, as examined through inferential analysis, three factors were found to have significant
impact both individually and collectively. The correlation of turnover intention with the three
variable tested in this study were found to be significant and strong. From the regression analysis

also it was found out that the variations in the independent variables (working environment,
work overload and job stress) could have the possibility to predict about sixty eight percent of
the variations in the dependent variable (turnover intention). The fact that a negative and strong
correlation existed between working environment and turnover intention imply that the two
variables have inverse relationship, i.e., when the working environment is perceived to be bad,
the turnover intention is expected to be high. The same was found to be true between job stress
and turnover intention. The regression coefficient also confirmed the same. Therefore, for the
high turnover intention observed at ERCA, the perceived undesirable working environment, the
perceived existing work stress and work overload have been found to have a strong effect size.
Finally, it can be concluded that no relevant retention strategy has been in place at ERCA. Where
strong retention efforts and strategies exist, the turnover intention rate is expected to be low.
Even if the management members claim that the organization has a retention strategy, it has not
been perceived to be strong as seen by employees. So, this could also be additional factor which
may hamper the efficacy of employees and leading them to develop the intent to leave the
organization.

5.3. Recommendations
In general market place, organizations worldwide relay on their employees in order to compete
favorably and gain competitive advantage. There is growing need to public sector organizations
in Ethiopia to improve on service delivery. To be able to do this effectively, managers in public
sector organizations most devices a practical means of retaining key employees whose expertise
is critical to service delivery. One of achieving this is to motivate these employees through
comprehensive and proactive retention program.
 Since the management of the organization is aware of skilled manpower turnover,

it could strongly work on retention mechanisms like reduce employees job stress,
arrange good working environment, giving promotions, sharing benefits based on
their performance, giving clear path for career advancement.
 Management should work towards creating smooth and conducive inter personal
relationship since informal group contribute to effectiveness of work carried out by
employees of the organization.
 Since the majority of the works done in ERCA is risk full there must be some protection
and security programs for employees working in the risky positions.
 Finally the HRM Directorate should develop employee retention mechanism especially
for skilled manpower; since they are the back bone of the organization. The organization
should improve its benefit strategies. Benefits include house and transport allowances,
bones when success is achieved etc. Currently other financial institutions like banks and
insurances practices this well and to be competitive, ERCA should also give it
employee’s those benefits.

References
Ahuja,M.K., Chudoba K.M., Kacmar,C.J., Mcknight,D.h.,& George,J.F.(2007). IT road warriors;

balancing work family conflict, job autonomy, and work overload to mitigate turnover
intention. MIS Quarterly Vol.31 (1), pp.1-17.
Bittel, L.R. and Newstrom, J.W. (2002). What every supervisor should know. 6thEdition. New York:
McGraw Hill Publishing Company.
Booth, S. and Hamer, K. (2007). Labor turnover in the retail industry: Predicting the role of
individual, organizational and environmental factors. International Journal of Retail and
Distribution Management. 35(4), 289–307.
Booyens, S.W. (2000). Dimensions of nursing management. Kenwyn: Juta.
Carrel, M.R., Elbert, N.F. Hatfield, R.D., Grobler, P.A., Max, M. and Van der Schyf, S. (2000).
Human Resource Management in South Africa. Cape Town: University Press.
Del Val, M.P. and Fuentes, C.M. (2003). Resistance to change: A literature review and empirical
study. Management Decision, 41(2), 148–155.
Ekinci, A. and Riley, F. (2000). Fundamental of management: Essentials concepts and applications.
4th Edition. New Jersey: Pearson Prentice Hall.
Erasmus, B. J., Loedolff, P. V. S., Mda, T. and Nel, P. S. (2006). Management Training and
Development. Cape Town: Oxford University Press.
Erasmus, B., Van Wyk, M. and Schenk, H. (2003). Human Resource Management Theory and
Practice. Cape Town: Juta and Co. Ltd.
Falkenburg, K. and Schyns, T. (2007). Work satisfaction, organizational commitment and

withdrawal behaviors. Management Research News, 30 (10), 708–711.
George, J.M. and Jones, G.R. (2002). Understanding and managing organizational behavior. 3rd
Edition. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
Grobler, P.A., Warnich, S., Carrell, M.R., Elbert, N.F. and Hartfield, R.D. (2002). Human Resource
Management. 2nd Edition. Cornwall: TJ International.
Habeck, M.M., Kroger, F. and Tram, M.R. (2000). After the merger. London: Prentice Hall.
Hamermesh, D. (2001). The changing distribution of job satisfaction. Journal of Human Resources,
36 (1), 140–151.
Harrison, R. and Kessels, J. (2004). Human Resource Development in a Knowledge Economy: An

Organizational View. New York: MacMillan.

Heizer, J. and Render, B. (2006). Operations management. 8th Edition. New Jersey: Pearson
Prentice Hall.
Hope, K. (2003). Employee Perceptions of Leadership and Performance Management in the

Botswana Public Service. Public Personnel Management. 32(2), 111-117.
Hopkins, H. (2005). A challenge to managers: Five ways to improve employee morale. Executive
Development, 8 (7), 26–90.
Ichniowski, J. (2004). Human Resource Management in Business Context Employee involvement.

Online. Available at:http://www.hrmguide.co.uk/jobmarket/turnover_cost.htm Date
accessed: 11August 2009.
Ivancevich, J.M. and Matteson, M.T. (2004). Organizational Behavior and Management. 2nd
Edition. New York: Irwin Inc.
Kavanagh, J.,2005.Stress and performance a review the literature and its applicability to the military
DTIC Document.
Kirschenbaum, A. and Weisberg, J. (2002). Employee turnover intentions and job destination
choices. Journal of organizational behavior, 23(1), 316109-389.
Luthans, F. (2002). Absenteeism and the collective bargaining agreement: An empirical test.
Academic of Management Journal, 24(2), 425-431.
Milman,A.(2002), “Hourly employee retention in the attraction industry: research from small and
medium –size facilitates in Orlando,Florida’’,Journal of Leisure Property,Vol.2,pp.40-51.
Martin, T.N. (1979).A Contextual Model of Employee Turnover Intentions. The academy of
Management Journal, Vol.22 (2), pp.313-324.
Mathis, R.B. and Jackson, J.H. (2007). Human Resource Management. 10thEdition. Singapore:
Thomson Asia Pty Ltd.
McConnell, R.C. (2004). Managing employee performance. Journal of HealthCare Manager, 23 (3),
273–283.
Mouton, J. (2001). How to Succeed in Your Master’s and Doctoral Studies: A South Africa Guide
and Resource Book. Pretoria: Van Schaik.
Mullins, G.E. (2001). Mergers and Acquisitions: Boon or Bane, Division of Business and
Economics. Stevens Point: University of Wisconsin.
Mullins, J.L. (2005). Management and Organizational Behavior. 4th Edition. London: Pitman
Publishing.
Naumann,E.(1992).A Conceptual Model of Expatriate Turnover. Journal of International Business

Studies, Vol.23 (3), pp.499-531.

Nel, P.S., Van Dyk, P.S., Haasbroek, G.D., Schulltz, H.B., Sono, T. and Werner, A. (2004). Human
Resources Management. 6th Edition. Cape Town: Oxford University Press.
Neo, A.R., Hollanbeck, R.J., Gerhart, B. and Wright, P.M. (2006). Human Resource Management.
3rd Edition. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Niosh, (1999).Stress at Work.U.S.National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, DHHS
(Niosh) Publication Number 99-101.
Page, N. (2001). Costs of staff turnover. Online. Available at:

http://www.bestbooks.biz/htm/emoloyee_involvement.htm
Palmer,S.& Dryden,W.(1995). Counseling for Stress problems. London: Sage. Copyright, S.Palmer,
1995.
Park, R.A. (2003). The revolving door of staff turnover. Podiatry Management. Online. Available
from: http://www.findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_mOLMB/IS_2_22/ai_97995746./
Robbins, S.P. (2003). Organizational Behavior: Concepts, Controversies and Applications. 8th
Edition. London: Prentice Hall.
Robbins, S.P. and Decenzo, D.A. (2001). Fundamentals of Management. 3rdEdition. New Jersey:
Prentice-Hall.
Russell, E. and Bvuma, D. (2001). Alternative service delivery and public service transformation in
South Africa. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 14 (3), 43-55.
Smit, P.J. and de Cronje, G.J. (2003). Management principles: A contemporary edition for Africa.
3rd Edition. Cape Town: Juta.
Steers, R.M. (2002). Organizational effectiveness: A behavioral view. Santa Monica, CA: Goodyear.
Taylor, P.J. (2007) Absenteeism – causes and control. New York: Pearson Education.
Tyani, B.I.N. (2001). Absenteeism: A nursing service problem in the Republic of Transkei. Pretoria:
UNISA Press.
Van Tiem, D.M. Moseley, J.L. and Dessinger, J.C. (2003). Performance Improvement Interventions:
Enhancing people, processes and Organizations through Performance Technology. Mumbai:
Jaico Publishing House.

APPENDIX A
ST. MARY’S UNIVERSITY
SCHOOL OF GRADUATE STUDIES PROGRAM
MBA PROGRAM
Questionnaire to be completed by respondents currently working in the

organization.
Dear Respondent
The researcher is a graduate student pursuing a Master of Art degree in Business Administration
in General Management at St Mary University. The researcher is also conducting a research
study on “Factors Determining Employee’s Turnover Intention the case of ERCA Kaliti Customs
Branch”. The main aim of this study is to identify the factors that are significantly affecting
employee turnover intention of ERCA kaliti branch and to suggest possible solutions to minimize
staff’s turnover. As you have been selected as a respondent you are kindly requested to answer
the questions below displaying in good faith. The study is purely for academic purpose and all
information provided will be treated confidential. Please feel free to express your feelings in an
open manner. Your honest responses are very important for the success of this study. Your
prompt response will be highly appreciated.
1. Please tick one of the correct answers with an (X)

2. Answer all questions.

Section A: Demographic factors

1. Gender
Male (1) Female (2)
2. Age
18-25 years (1) 26-35 years (2) 36-45 years (3) 46-55 years (4) 56 and above (5)
3. Academic Qualification
10+2 (1) 10+3 (2) (3) Diploma BA/BSC (4) MA/MSC (5)
4. Work Experience
1-5 years (1) 6-10 years (2) 11-15 years (3) 16-20 years (4) 21 and above (5)
Section B
Please tick the correct answer (X)

Strongly Agree (SA), Agree (A), Neutral (N), Disagree (D) and Strongly Disagree (SD)
No ITEM SD(1) D(2) N(3) A(4) SA(5)
1. Job Stress
Q1.1 I often feel stress at work.
Q1.2 The job difficulty usually brings me sleeplessness.
Q1.3 My job makes me nervous.

Q1.4 I feel exhausted after daily work.
Q1.5 It’s helpful for my health if I change my job.
Q1.6 I feel weak and dispirited at work.
Q1.7 I feel more hot tempered at work.
Q1.8 I feel depressed and unhappy at work.
2. Work Overload SD(1) D(2) N(3) A(4) SA(5)
Q2.1 I experience excessive work pressure.
Q2.2 I work for long hours, on overtime and even on holidays.
Q2.3 I am unable to meet out the demands of my job.
Q2.4 I spend so long at work that my outside relationships are

suffering.
Q2.5 I am so busy I find it increasingly difficult to concentrate

on the job in front of me.
Q2.6 I feel tired during the day due to excessive work load.
3. Working Environment SD(1) D(2) N(3) A(4) SA(5)
Q3.1 I feel comfortable to work with latest technologies in the

organization.
Q3.2
I feel insecure in the working environment.
Q3.3
I experience unwelcome verbal and physical conduct from
my boss.

Q3.4
I am not able to receive support from my boss, colleagues
and juniors.
Q3.5
My relationship with colleagues and peers is not smooth
and cordial.
Q3.6
Working environment of team is not good for career
growth.
4. Turnover Intention SD(1) D(2) N(3) A(4) SA(5)
Q4.1 I like to resign myself from the current job.
Q4.2 I will probably resign myself from the current job in a year.
Q4.3 I like to work for some other company.
Q4.4 I like to switch to other business or sector.
Q4.5 I have actually looked for other jobs after I entered the
current company.
Q4.6 I don’t like to continue in the organization for a long

period.
Thank you!!!!
St. Mary’s University Page iv

APPENDIX B
St. Mary’s University
II. Interview Question to Concerned Body (Department of Human Resource Directorate

and Management) of ERCA Kaliti Customs Branch
1. Is the management aware of the major determinants of turnover in the organization?
2. What do you think are the major reasons for turnover of employees?
3. What retention mechanisms the organization made to proactively retain existing employees?
4. What costs the organization experience due to turnover?
St. Mary’s University Page v

APPENDIX C
Age of Respondent
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid 18-25 Years 91 42.9 42.9 42.9
26-35 Years 95 44.8 44.8 87.7

36-45 Years 26 12.3 12.3 100.0
Total 212 100.0 100.0
Gender of Respondent
Cumulative
Valid Male 138 65.1 65.1 65.1
Female 74 34.9 34.9 100.0
Total 212 100.0 100.0
Academic Qualification of Respondent

Cumulative
Valid Diploma 22 10.4 10.4 10.4
BA/BSC 128 60.4 60.4 70.8
MA/MSC 62 29.2 29.2 100.0
Total 212 100.0 100.0
St. Mary’s University Page vi

Work Experience of Respondent

Cumulative
Valid 1-5 Years 119 56.1 56.1 56.1
6-10 Years 65 30.7 30.7 86.8
11-15 Years 12 5.7 5.7 92.5
16-20 Years 16 7.5 7.5 100.0
Total 212 100.0 100.0
I often feel stress at work

Cumulative
Strongly Disagree 60 28.3 28.3 28.3
Valid Neutral 14 6.6 6.6 34.9
Disagree 25 11.8 11.8 46.7
Agree 99 46.7 46.7 93.4
Strongly Agree 14 6.6 6.6 100.0
Total 212 100.0 100.0
The job difficulty usually brings me sleeplessness

Cumulative
Valid Strongly Disagree 51 24.1 24.1 24.1
Disagree 28 13.2 13.2 37.3
Neutral 17 8 8 45.3
Agree 71 33.5 33.5 78.8
Strongly Agree 45 45 21.2 100.0
Total 212 100.0 100.0
St. Mary’s University Page vii

My job makes me nervous

Valid Cumulative
Frequency Percent Percent Percent
Disagree 20 9.4 9.4 37.7
Neutral 24 11.3 11.3 49.1
Agree 94 44.3 44.3 93.4
Total 212 100.0 100.0
I feel exhausted after daily work

Frequen Cumulative
cy Percent Valid Percent Percent
Disagree 18 8.5 8.5 41.5
Neutral 8 4.7 4.7 45.3
Agree 98 46.2 46.2 91.5
Total 212 100.0 100.0
It's helpful for my health if i change my job

Cumulative
Disagree 28 13.2 13.2 41.5
Neutral 20 9.4 9.4 50.9
Agree 80 37.7 37.7 88.7
Strongly Agree 24 11.3 11.3 100.0
Total 212 100.0 100.0
St. Mary’s University Page viii

I feel weak and dispirited at work

Frequenc Percent Valid Cumulative
y Percent Percent
Vali Disagree 36 17.0 17.0 17.0
d
Neutral 18 8.5 8.5 25.5
Agree 112 52.8 52.8 78.3
Strongly 46 21.7 21.7 100.0

Agree
Total 212 100.0 100.0
I feel more hot-tempered at work

Cumulative
Disagree 28 13.2 13.2 37.3
Neutral 17 8 8 45.3
Agree 71 33.5 33.5 100.0
Total 212 100.0 100.0
I feel depressed and unhappy at work

Cumulative
Valid Disagree 49 23.1 23.1 23.1
Neutral 14 6.6 6.6 29.7
Agree 92 43.4 43.4 73.1
Strongly Agree 57 26.9 26.9 100.0
Total 212 100.0 100.0
I experience excessive work pressure

Cumulative
Neutral 18 8.5 8.5 24.5
Agree 107 50.5 50.5 75.0
Strongly Agree 53 25.0 25.0 100.0
Total 212 100.0 100.0
St. Mary’s University Page ix

I work for long hours, on overtime and even on holiday

Cumulative
Neutral 19 9.0 9.0 23.1
Agree 125 59.0 59.0 82.1
Strongly Agree 38 17.9 17.9 100.0
Total 212 100.0 100.0
I am unable to meet out the demands of my job

Cumulative
Neutral 18 8.5 8.5 24.5
Agree 104 49.1 49.1 73.6
Strongly Agree 56 26.4 26.4 100.0
Total 212 100.0 100.0
I spend so long at work that my outside relationships are suffering

Cumulative
Neutral 20 9.4 9.4 25.0
Agree 121 57.1 57.1 82.1
Strongly Agree 38 17.9 17.9 100.0
Total 212 100.0 100.0
I am so busy I find it increasingly difficult to concentrate on the

job in front of me
Valid Cumulative
Frequency Percent Percent Percent
Neutral 18 8.5 8.5 24.5
Agree 107 50.5 50.5 75.0
Strongly 53 25.0 25.0 100.0
Agree
Total 212 100.0 100.0
St. Mary’s University Page x

I feel tired during the day due to excessive work load

Cumulative
Neutral 18 8.5 8.5 18.4
Agree 92 43.4 43.4 61.8
Strongly Agree 81 38.2 38.2 100.0
Total 212 100.0 100.0
I feel comfortable to work with latest technologies in the

organization
Cumulative
Neutral 17 8.0 8.0 22.2
Agree 90 42.5 42.5 64.6
Strongly Agree 75 35.4 35.4 100.0
Total 212 100.0 100.0
I feel insecure in the working environment

Cumulative
Neutral 17 8.0 8.0 29.3
Agree 90 42.5 42.5 71.7
Strongly Agree 60 28.3 28.3 100.0
Total 212 100.0 100.0
I experience unwelcome verbal and physical conduct from my boss

Cumulative
Neutral 18 8.5 8.5 20.3
Agree 76 35.8 35.8 56.1
Strongly Agree 93 43.9 43.9 100.0
Total 212 100.0 100.0
St. Mary’s University Page xi

I am not able to receive support from my boss, colleagues and

juniors
Cumulative
Disagree 17 8.0 8.0 17.4
Neutral 10 4.7 4.7 22.2
Agree 90 42.5 42.5 64.6
Strongly Agree 75 35.4 35.4 100.0
Total 212 100.0 100.0
My relationship with colleagues and peers is not smooth and

cordial
Cumulative
Neutral 10 4.7 4.7 14.2
Agree 86 40.6 40.6 54.7
Strongly Agree 96 45.3 45.3 100.0
Total 212 100.0 100.0
Working environment of team is not good for career growth

Cumulative
Neutral 11 5.2 5.2 10.8
Agree 97 45.8 45.8 56.6
Strongly Agree 92 43.4 43.4 100.0
Total 212 100.0 100.0
St. Mary’s University Page xii

I like to resign myself from the current job

Cumulative
Valid Strongly 10 4.7 4.7 4.7
Disagree
Disagree 74 34.9 34.9 39.6
Neutral 9 4.2 4.2 43.9
Agree 99 46.7 46.7 90.6
Total 212 100.0 100.0
I will probably resign myself from the current job in a year

Cumulative
Disagree
Disagree 90 42.5 42.5 45.8
Neutral 13 6.1 6.1 51.9
Agree 100 47.2 47.2 99.1
Total 212 100.0 100.0
I like to work for some other company

Cumulative
Disagree
Disagree 87 41.0 41.0 47.6
Neutral 5 2.4 2.4 50.0
Agree 92 43.4 43.4 93.4
Total 212 100.0 100.0
St. Mary’s University Page xiii

I like to switch to other business or sector

Cumulative
Disagree
Disagree 64 30.2 30.2 36.8
Neutral 22 10.4 10.4 47.2
Agree 92 43.4 43.4 90.6
Total 212 100.0 100.0
I have actually looked for other jobs after i entered the current
company
Cumulative
Disagree
Disagree 20 9.4 9.4 14.6
Neutral 10 4.7 4.7 19.3
Agree 96 45.3 45.3 64.6
Strongly Agree 75 35.4 35.4 100.0
Total 212 100.0 100.0
I don't like to continue in the organization for a long period

Cumulative
Disagree
Disagree 9 4.2 4.2 19.3
Neutral 11 5.2 5.2 24.5
Agree 73 34.4 34.4 59.0
Strongly Agree 87 41.0 41.0 100.0
Total 212 100.0 100.0
St. Mary’s University Page xiv

Reliability Statistics
Cronbach's
Alpha N of Items
.918 26
Cronbach's
Alpha N of Items
.792 8
Cronbach's
Alpha N of Items
.783 6
Cronbach's
Alpha N of Items
.873 6
Cronbach's
Alpha N of Items
.721 6
St. Mary’s University Page xv

Correlations
Job_Stress Work_Overload Working_Environment Turnover_Intention
Job_Stress Pearson Correlation 1 .535** -.787** .570**
Sig. (2-tailed) .000 .000 .000
N 212 212 212 212
Work_Overload Pearson Correlation .535** 1 .553** .539**
Sig. (2-tailed) .000 .000 .000
N 212 212 212 212
Working_Environment Pearson Correlation .787** .553** 1 .813**
Sig. (2-tailed) .000 .000 .000
N 212 212 212 212
Turnover_Intention Pearson Correlation .570** .539** -.813** 1
Sig. (2-tailed) .000 .000 .000
N 212 212 212 212
**. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).
Model Summary
Adjusted R
Model R R Square Square Std. Error of the Estimate
1 .831a .691 .687 .29662
a. Predictors: (Constant), Working_Environment, Work_Overload, Job_Stress
ANOVAa
Model Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig.
1 Regression 40.938 3 13.646 155.094 .000b
Residual 18.301 208 .088
Total 59.239 211
a. Dependent Variable: Turnover_Intention
b. Predictors: (Constant), Working_Environment, Work_Overload, Job_Stress
Coefficientsa
Standardized
Unstandardized Coefficients Coefficients
Model B Std. Error Beta t Sig.
1 (Constant) .714 .174 4.108 .000
Job_Stress -.242 .068 -.226 -3.550 .000
Work_Overload .144 .042 .161 3.418 .001
Working_Environment -.952 .068 -.902 13.965 .000
a. Dependent Variable: Turnover_Intention
St. Mary’s University Page xvi

An Assessment of Factors Affecting Employees

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

An Assessment of Factors Affecting Employees

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

An Assessment of Factors Affecting Employees

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

ST.

AN ASSESSMENT OF FACTORS AFFECTING EMPLOYEES’

A THESIS SUBMITTED TO ST. MARY’S UNIVERSITY, SCHOOL

ST. MARY’S UNIVERSITY

AN ASSESSMENT OF FACTORS AFFECTING EMPLOYEES’

APPROVED BY BOARD OF EXAMINERS

St. Mary’s University Page i

Beza Lemma Dibaba

St. Mary’s University Page ii

Goitom Abraham (Asst. Prof) _______________________

Advisor Signature and Date

St. Mary’s University, Addis Ababa

St. Mary’s University Page iii

St. Mary’s University Page iv

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODOLOGY ................................................................................................... 18

St. Mary’s University Page v

My sincere appreciation and gratitude goes to my advisor, Goitom Abraham (Asst.

St. Mary’s University Page vi

LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS

ERCA-Ethiopian Revenues and Customs Authority

HRD-Human Resource Department

SPSS- Statistical Package for Social Sciences

SMU-St. Mary’s University

St. Mary’s University Page vii

Table 3.1: Reliability Coefficients of Research Measures (Cronbach’s Alpha) ......................................... 21

Table 4.1: Demographic Characteristic of the Respondents ....................................................................... 25

Table 4.2: Job Stress Related Item .............................................................................................................. 26

Table 4.3: Work Overload Related Item ..................................................................................................... 28

Table 4.4: Working Environment Related Item .......................................................................................... 30

Table 4.5: Turnover Intention Related Item................................................................................................ 32

Table 4.6: Correlation between independent and dependent variables ....................................................... 36

Table 4.8: ANOVA of turnover intention ................................................................................................... 37

Table 4.9: Regression for turnover intention .............................................................................................. 38

St. Mary’s University Page viii

Keywords: Job Stress, Work Overload, Working Environment, Turnover Intention.

St. Mary’s University Page ix

According to the definition of Jucioous human resource management is planning, organizing,

Employee turnover, as defined by Hom and Griffeth (1994), is ‘voluntary terminations of

St. Mary’s University Page 1

1.2. Background of the Organization

St. Mary’s University Page 2

St. Mary’s University Page 3

St. Mary’s University Page 4

1.3. Statement of the Problem

St. Mary’s University Page 5

1.4. Research Questions

This study entails to address the following research questions:

1.5. Objectives of the Study

1.5.1. General Objective

St. Mary’s University Page 6

1.5.2. Specific Objectives

1.6. Operational definition of terms

 Turnover: It is the movement of employees out of an organization (Stan, 1991).

 Employee Turnover Intention: Defines as “employees’ desire or willingness to leave an

 Working Environment: an environment that is related to safe and motivating workplace

1.7. Significance of the Study

St. Mary’s University Page 7

1.8. Delimitation/ Scope of the study

1.9. Organization of the Research Report