Scribd
Upload
29 views

Unit 2.3

Normalization is the process of organizing data in a database to minimize redundancy. It involves breaking tables into smaller tables and linking them through relationships. There are several normal forms including 1NF, 2NF, 3NF and BCNF. Each normal form adds additional rules to reduce duplication and avoid anomalies that can occur during data modification.

Uploaded by

Ughrisha V
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
29 views

Unit 2.3

Normalization is the process of organizing data in a database to minimize redundancy. It involves breaking tables into smaller tables and linking them through relationships. There are several normal forms including 1NF, 2NF, 3NF and BCNF. Each normal form adds additional rules to reduce duplication and avoid anomalies that can occur during data modification.

Uploaded by

Ughrisha V
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 15

NORMALIZATION

Normalization
• Normalization is the process of organizing the data in the database.
• Normalization is used to minimize the redundancy from a relation or set of
relations. It is also used to eliminate the undesirable characteristics like Insertion,
Update and Deletion Anomalies.
• Normalization divides the larger table into the smaller table and links them using
relationship.
• The normal form is used to reduce redundancy from the database table.
Normal Forms

Normal Forms

1NF 2NF 3NF BCNF


Normal Forms

Normal Description
Form
1 NF A relation is in 1NF if it contains an atomic value.
2 NF A relation will be in 2NF if it is in 1NF and all non-key attributes
are fully functional dependent on the primary key.
3 NF A relation will be in 3NF if it is in 2NF and no transition
dependency exists.
BCNF A relation will be in BCNF if every functional dependency X → Y,
X is the super key of the table.
1NF
• A relation will be 1NF if it contains an atomic value.
• It states that an attribute of a table cannot hold multiple values. It must hold only
single-valued attribute.
• First normal form disallows the multi-valued attribute, composite attribute, and their
combinations.
• Example: EMPLOYEE is not in 1NF because of multi-valued attribute EMP_PHONE.
EMPLOYEE table:
EMP_ID EMP_NAME EMP_PHONE EMP_STATE

14 John 7272826385, UP
9064738238

20 Harry 8574783832 Bihar

12 Sam 7390372389, Punjab


8589830302
1NF

• The decomposition of the EMPLOYEE table into 1NF has been shown below:

EMP_ID EMP_NAME EMP_PHONE EMP_STATE

14 John 7272826385 UP

14 John 9064738238 UP

20 Harry 8574783832 Bihar

12 Sam 7390372389 Punjab

12 Sam 8589830302 Punjab


2NF
• In the 2NF, relational must be in 1NF.
• In the second normal form, all non-key attributes (attributes other than primary key)
are fully functional dependent on the primary key
• Example: Let's assume, a school can store the data of teachers and the subjects they
teach. In a school, a teacher can teach more than one subject.
TEACHER table
TEACHER_ID SUBJECT TEACHER_AGE

25 Chemistry 30
25 Biology 30
47 English 35
83 Math 38
83 Computer 38

In the given table, non-prime attribute TEACHER_AGE is dependent on TEACHER_ID which


is a proper subset of a candidate key. That's why it violates the rule for 2NF.
2NF
• To convert the given table into 2NF, we decompose it into two tables:
TEACHER_DETAIL table:
TEACHER_ID TEACHER_AGE

25 30
47 35
83 38

TEACHER_SUBJECT table:

TEACHER_ID SUBJECT

25 Chemistry
25 Biology
47 English
83 Math
83 Computer
3NF
• A relation will be in 3NF if it is in 2NF and not contain any transitive dependency.
• 3NF is used to reduce the data duplication.
• If there is no transitive dependency for non-prime attributes, then the relation must be in third normal
form.
• Transitive dependency  one non-prime attribute is dependent on another non-prime attribute
• A relation is in third normal form if it holds function dependency X → Y.
• X is a super key; Y is a prime attribute, i.e., each element of Y is part of some candidate key.
EMPLOYEE_DETAIL table:

EMP_ID EMP_NAME EMP_ZIP EMP_STATE EMP_CITY

222 Harry 201010 UP Noida


333 Stephan 02228 US Boston
444 Lan 60007 US Chicago
555 Katharine 06389 UK Norwich
666 John 462007 MP Bhopal
3NF
Super key in the table above:
• {EMP_ID}, {EMP_ID, EMP_NAME}, {EMP_ID, EMP_NAME, EMP_ZIP}....so on
Candidate key: {EMP_ID}
• Non-prime attributes: In the given table, all attributes except EMP_ID are non-prime.
• Here, EMP_STATE & EMP_CITY dependent on EMP_ZIP and EMP_ZIP dependent on EMP_ID. The non-prime
attributes (EMP_STATE, EMP_CITY) transitively dependent on super key(EMP_ID). It violates the rule of third
normal form.
• That's why we need to move the EMP_CITY and EMP_STATE to the new <EMPLOYEE_ZIP> table, with
EMP_ZIP as a Primary key.

EMP_ID EMP_NAME EMP_ZIP

222 Harry 201010


333 Stephan 02228
444 Lan 60007
555 Katharine 06389
666 John 462007
3NF

EMPLOYEE_ZIP table:

EMP_ZIP EMP_STATE EMP_CITY

201010 UP Noida
02228 US Boston
60007 US Chicago
06389 UK Norwich
462007 MP Bhopal
BCNF-Boyce Codd NF
• BCNF is the advance version of 3NF. It is stricter than 3NF.
• A table is in BCNF if every functional dependency X → Y, X is the super key of the table.
• For BCNF, the table should be in 3NF, and for every FD, LHS is super key.
Example: Let's assume there is a company where employees work in more than one department.
EMPLOYEE table:

EMP_ID EMP_COUN EMP_DEPT DEPT_TYPE EMP_DEPT_


TRY NO

264 India Designing D394 283


264 India Testing D394 300
364 UK Stores D283 232
364 UK Developing D283 549
BCNF

• In the above table Functional dependencies are as follows:


• EMP_ID → EMP_COUNTRY
• EMP_DEPT → {DEPT_TYPE, EMP_DEPT_NO}
• Candidate key: {EMP-ID, EMP-DEPT}
• The table is not in BCNF because neither EMP_DEPT nor EMP_ID alone are keys.
• To convert the given table into BCNF, we decompose it into three tables:
BCNF
EMP_DEPT table:
EMP_COUNTRY table:
EMP_DEPT DEPT_TYPE EMP_DEPT_NO

EMP_ID EMP_COUNTRY Designing D394 283

264 India Testing D394 300

364 UK Stores D283 232


Developing D283 549

EMP_DEPT_MAPPING table:

EMP_ID EMP_DEPT

264 283
264 300
364 232
364 549
BCNF

Functional dependencies:
• EMP_ID → EMP_COUNTRY
• EMP_DEPT → {DEPT_TYPE, EMP_DEPT_NO}
Candidate keys:

For the first table: EMP_ID


For the second table: EMP_DEPT
For the third table: {EMP_ID, EMP_DEPT}
• Now, this is in BCNF because left side part of both the functional dependencies is a key.

You might also like