This document introduces Euler's theorem, which generalizes Fermat's theorem to composite moduli. It defines the Euler phi function φ(n), which counts the numbers less than n that are relatively prime to n. Euler's theorem states that if a and n are relatively prime, then aφ(n) = 1 (mod n). This reduces expressions like an (mod n) to simpler forms. Examples are given to demonstrate computing expressions modulo n using Euler's theorem.
This document introduces Euler's theorem, which generalizes Fermat's theorem to composite moduli. It defines the Euler phi function φ(n), which counts the numbers less than n that are relatively prime to n. Euler's theorem states that if a and n are relatively prime, then aφ(n) = 1 (mod n). This reduces expressions like an (mod n) to simpler forms. Examples are given to demonstrate computing expressions modulo n using Euler's theorem.
This document introduces Euler's theorem, which generalizes Fermat's theorem to composite moduli. It defines the Euler phi function φ(n), which counts the numbers less than n that are relatively prime to n. Euler's theorem states that if a and n are relatively prime, then aφ(n) = 1 (mod n). This reduces expressions like an (mod n) to simpler forms. Examples are given to demonstrate computing expressions modulo n using Euler's theorem.
This document introduces Euler's theorem, which generalizes Fermat's theorem to composite moduli. It defines the Euler phi function φ(n), which counts the numbers less than n that are relatively prime to n. Euler's theorem states that if a and n are relatively prime, then aφ(n) = 1 (mod n). This reduces expressions like an (mod n) to simpler forms. Examples are given to demonstrate computing expressions modulo n using Euler's theorem.
Euler’s Theorem Euler’s theorem generalizes Fermat’s theorem to the case where the modulus is composite.
The key point of the proof of Fermat’s theorem was that if p is prime, {1, 2, . . . , p − 1} are relatively prime to p. This suggests that in the general case, it might be useful to look at the numbers less than the modulus n which are relatively prime to n. This motivates the following definition.
Definition. The Euler φ-function is the function on positive integers defined by
φ(n) = (the number of integers in {1, 2, . . . , n − 1} which are relatively prime to n).
For example, φ(24) = 8, because there are eight positive integers less than 24 which are relatively prime to 24: 1, 5, 7, 11, 13, 17, 19, 23 On the other hand, φ(11) = 10, because all of the numbers in {1, . . . , 10} are relatively prime to 11. Here is a graph of (n, φ(n)) for 1 ≤ n ≤ 5000:
5000
4000
3000
2000
1000
1000 2000 3000 4000 5000
You can see that the function jumps around a little, but the data points are bounded above by the line y = x. A point will be nearly on this line whenever n is prime, and since there are infinitely many primes, there will always be points near it. Later, I’ll derive a formula for computing φ(n) in terms of the prime factorization of n.
Proposition.
(a) If p is prime, φ(p) = p − 1.
(b) If p is prime and n ≥ 1, then φ(pn ) = pn − pn−1 .
(c) φ(n) counts the elements in {1, 2, . . . , n − 1} which are invertible mod n.
Proof. (a) If p is prime, then all of the numbers {1, . . . , p − 1} are relatively prime to p. Hence, φ(p) = p − 1.
(b) There are pn elements in {1, 2, . . . , pn }. An element of this set is not relatively prime to p if and only if it’s divisible by p. The elements of this set which are divisible by p are
1 · p, 2 · p, 3 · p, . . . , pn−1 · p.
1 (Note that pn−1 ·p = pn is the last element of the set.) Thus, there are pn−1 elements of the set which are divisible by p, i.e. pn−1 elements of the set which are not relatively prime to p. Hence, there are pn − pn−1 elements of the set which are relatively prime to p. (The definition of φ(pn ) applies to the set {1, 2, . . . , pn − 1}, whereas I just counted the numbers from 1 to p . But this isn’t a problem, because I counted pn in the set, but then subtracted it off since it was not n
relatively prime to p.)
(c) (a, n) = 1 if and only if ax = 1 (mod n) for some x, so a is relatively prime to n if and only if a is invertible mod n. Now φ(n) is the number of elements in {1, 2, . . . , n − 1} which are relatively prime to n, so φ(n) is also the number of elements in {1, 2, . . . , n − 1} which are invertible mod n.
Definition. A reduced residue system mod n is a set of numbers
a1 , a2 , . . . , aφ(n)
such that:
(a) If i 6= j, then ai 6= aj (mod n). That is, the a’s are distinct mod n.
(b) For each i, (ai , n) = 1. That is, all the a’s are relatively prime to n.
Thus, a reduced residue system contains exactly one representative for each number relatively prime to n. Compare this to a complete residue system mod n, which contains exactly one representative to every number mod n.
As an example, {1, 5, 7, 11} is a reduced residue system mod 12. So is {−11, 17, 31, −1}. On the other hand, {0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11} is a complete residue system mod 12.
Lemma. Let φ(n) = k, and let {a1 , . . . , ak } be a reduced residue system mod n.
(a) For all m, {a1 + mn, . . . , ak + mn} is a reduced residue system mod n.
(b) If (m, n) = 1, {ma1 , . . . , mak } is a reduced residue system mod n.
Proof. (a) This is clear, since ai = ai + mn (mod n) for all i.
(b) Since (m, n) = 1, I may find x such that mx = 1 (mod n). Since (ai , n) = 1, so I may find bi such that ai bi = 1 (mod n). Then (xbi )(ami ) = (mx)(ai bi ) = 1 (mod n), which proves that ami is invertible mod n. Hence, (ami , n) = 1 — the ma’s are relatively prime to n. Now if mai = maj (mod n), then xmai = xmaj (mod n), or ai = aj (mod n). Since the a’s were distinct mod n, this is only possible of i = j. Hence, the ma’s are also distinct mod n. Therefore, {ma1 , . . . , mak } is a reduced residue system mod n.
Corollary. Let φ(n) = k, and let {a1 , . . . , ak } be a reduced residue system mod n. Suppose (s, n) = 1, and let t be any integer. Then the following is a reduced residue system mod n:
{sa1 + tn, sa2 + tn, . . . , sak + tn}
Here are some examples of these results. {1, 5} is a reduced residue system mod 6. Adding 12 = 2 · 6 to each number, I get {13, 17}, another reduced residue system mod 6. Since (6, 25) = 1, I may multiply the original system by 25 to obtain {25, 125}, another reduced residue system. Finally, {25 + 12, 125 + 12} = {37, 137} is yet another reduced residue system mod 12.
Theorem. (Euler) Let n > 0, (a, n) = 1. Then
aφ(n) = 1 (mod n) .
2 Remark. If n is prime, then φ(n) = n − 1, and Euler’s theorem says an−1 = 1 (mod n), which is Fermat’s theorem.
Proof. Let φ(n) = k, and let {a1 , . . . , ak } be a reduced residue system mod n. I may assume that the ai ’s lie in the range {1, . . . , n − 1}. Since (a, n) = 1, {aa1 , . . . , aak } is another reduced residue system mod n. Since this is the same set of numbers mod n as the original system, the two systems must have the same product mod n:
(aa1 ) · · · (aak ) = a1 · · · ak (mod n) , ak (a1 · · · ak ) = a1 · · · ak (mod n) .
1 · · · ak , I get Now each ai is invertible mod n, so multiplying both sides by a−1 −1
ak = 1 (mod n) , or aφ(n) = 1 (mod n) .
As an example, φ(40) = 16, and (9, 40) = 1. Hence, Euler’s theorem says that 916 = 1 (mod 40). Similarly, 2116 = 1 (mod 40). Example. Reduce 37103 (mod 40) to a number in the range {0, 1, . . . 39}.
