Determinants of Facebook Adoption and It's Impact
Determinants of Facebook Adoption and It's Impact
Determinants of Facebook Adoption and It's Impact
https://www.emerald.com/insight/1328-7265.htm
JSIT
24,3 Determinants of Facebook
adoption and its impact on
service-based small and medium
246 enterprise performance in
Received 18 November 2020
Revised 31 August 2021
northwestern Nigeria
11 March 2022
Accepted 15 June 2022 Idris Na’umma Abdullahi
School of Computer Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Penang, Malaysia and
Department of Computer Sciences, Federal College of Education Kano,
Kano, Nigeria, and
Mohd Heikal Husin, Ahmad Suhaimi Baharudin and
Nor Athiyah Abdullah
School of Computer Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Penang, Malaysia
Abstract
Purpose – This study aims to examine the determinants of Facebook adoption and its impact on the
performance of service-based small and medium enterprises (SMEs) in northwestern Nigeria. The mediating
effect of Facebook adoption between the determinants of Facebook adoption and the performance of the SMEs
was examined.
Design/methodology/approach – A comprehensive framework was built using the technology –
organisation–environment framework integrated with the resource-based view theory. Data were collected
from 165 SME decision-makers using an online survey. The hypothesised relationships were tested using
partial least squares structural equation modelling.
Findings – Facebook adoption exerted a positive impact on the financial and non-financial performance of
the SMEs. The important determinants of Facebook adoption were relative advantage, perceived risks, top
management support, organisational readiness and government support. The mediating effect of Facebook
adoption between these determinants and financial and non-financial performance was confirmed.
Research limitations/implications – The findings contribute to better insight into the determinants of
Facebook adoption and its impact on the financial and non-financial performance of SMEs. The findings can inspire
and guide SMEs on adopting Facebook as a marketing strategy to improve performance and reduce failure rates.
Originality/value – The findings confirm the potential of adopting Facebook for enhancing the
performance of SMEs. This is arguably among the first empirical studies to test the mediating effect of
Facebook adoption.
Keywords Determinants, Facebook adoption, Service-based SMEs, Performance,
Developing countries, Services SMEs
Paper type Research paper
In this paper, the literature on Facebook was reviewed for marketing and customer
relationship management articles. Subsequently, the existing empirical literature was
reviewed to support the integrative theoretical framework and hypothesised relationships.
Following this, the adopted research methodology was clarified, the results were presented
248 and the findings and theoretical and practical implications were discussed. Lastly, the
limitations were presented, followed by suggestions for future research directions and the
presentation of the conclusion.
The results are expected to advance theoretical knowledge of Facebook adoption by
service-based SMEs in developing countries and yield practical insight on how Facebook
adoption by such SMEs to improve their performance can be stimulated.
2. Literature review
2.1 Facebook for marketing and customer relationship management
Adopting Facebook provides SMEs with a modern means of improving their marketing
capabilities. Facebook enables real-time and interactive communication between SMEs and
customers (Ali Qalati et al., 2021). SMEs that adopted Facebook built strong and sustainable
connections with their customers (Oni, 2021) and were able to promote their business
to customers irrespective of time and geographic location (Odoom et al., 2017). Buwule (2019)
has stated that adopting Facebook enables SMEs to collect customer feedback on their
products or services and use the information to improve to meet customers’ needs (Odoom
et al., 2017). Tajudeen et al. (2018) have asserted that adopting Facebook increases customer
satisfaction and loyalty.
Eze et al. (2021) acknowledged that adopting Facebook empowers customers to
participate in product decisions, share the marketing messages of SMEs and spread positive
word-of-mouth electronically, driving purchase decisions and new customers to the SMEs.
Adopting Facebook also enables SMEs to use their limited resources to enhance their
marketing capabilities and gain numerous benefits, such as increasing sales, reducing
marketing costs, increasing profits and ultimately improving business performance (Ali
Qalati et al., 2021). Other investigators have stated that adopting Facebook helps SMEs
enhance their corporate image, reputation, trustworthiness and credibility (Kalkan and
Çetinkaya Bozkurt, 2017). Furthermore, adopting Facebook enables SMEs to improve
efficiency and build brand awareness and visibility (Parveen et al., 2015). Moreover, it
confers a competitive advantage (Alshamaila, 2018).
ORGANIZATIONAL FACTORS
H2a Financial
performance 249
Top management
support H7
H3a
Facebook
Organizational adoption
readiness H4a H8 Non-financial
H5a performance
ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS
3.4 Facebook adoption and the financial performance of small and medium enterprises
Financial performance indicates the level of monetary achievement of organisational
objectives (Khalique et al., 2018). Facebook adoption has been operationalised based on the
system-centred approach (Burton-Jones and Gallivan, 2007). Hence, the measures for
Facebook adoption are based on the tasks for which SMEs use Facebook. There are many
reasons SMEs adopt Facebook, including attracting customers, advertising products and
services, building customer relationships, creating brand awareness and receiving customer
feedback (Odoom et al., 2017). Although Akuz et al. (2020) have reported that social media
did not affect the performance of SMEs, numerous empirical studies in Nigeria have verified
the positive role of adopting Facebook on the financial performance of SMEs. Specifically,
Gwadabe (2017) determined a positive impact of social media adoption on the sales and
profits of northwestern Nigerian SMEs.
Ibekwe et al. (2019) documented the positive influence of adopting Facebook on
increasing the profits of Nigerian telecommunication firms and reducing their marketing
costs. Adopting Facebook impacted the performance of Nigerian automobile dealers
positively via increased sales and profits and a larger market share (Nwokah and Aeenee,
2017). When SMEs become committed to Facebook adoption through regular Facebook
page updates, timely response to customer inquiries and comments and identifying and
responding to customer needs, it is probable that the SMEs will generate consistent sales
and profit growth and reduce marketing costs. Therefore, it was hypothesised that:
3.5 Facebook adoption and the non-financial performance of small and medium enterprises
Non-financial performance is an indicator of the non-monetary performance of an
organisation (Khalique et al., 2018). Franco et al. (2016) have stated that the impact of
organisational social media adoption on both financial and non-financial performance
should be evaluated. Oyewobi et al. (2021) have reported that adopting Facebook exerted a
positive influence on the performance of Nigerian construction firms in terms of customer
relationship management and improved information accessibility. Moreover, Morah and
Omojola (2018) have confirmed that adopting Facebook enhanced customer relationship
management, market accessibility and reduced marketing costs for Nigerian SMEs in the
cities of Lagos and Onisha. In Oyo State, Nigeria, Facebook enabled SMEs to build brand
awareness, augment organisational reputation and improve service feedback (Ladokun,
2019). SMEs that use Facebook effectively to form a strong customer relationship and
identify and respond to customer needs are likely to enhance service efficiency, customer
satisfaction and loyalty, organisational reputation and market share. Hence, it is proposed Determinants
that: of Facebook
H8. Facebook adoption has a positive effect on non-financial performance. adoption
4. Research methodology
4.1 Population and sampling technique
The study population consisted of all service-based SMEs in northwestern Nigeria. As there
was no sampling frame, respondent selection was guided by combining convenient and
purposive sampling techniques (Sekaran and Bougie, 2016). Specifically, data were collected
from the decision-makers of service-based SMEs, namely, the SMEs owners or chief
JSIT executive officers (CEOs), marketing managers and information technology (IT) managers,
24,3 as they possess the authority to decide on Facebook adoption by their SME.
5. Results
5.1 Demographic information
Table 1 reveals the respondents’ profiles (67.9% male and 32.1% female). Up to 39.4% of the
respondents were between the ages of 41 and 50 years old. The highest education level for
58.2% of the respondents was a bachelor’s degree. Most respondents (53.9%) were SME
owners. Many respondents (40.6%) had > 20 years of experience with their present SME.
More respondents (28.5%) had worked with SMEs for 21–25 years.
Variable Frequency (N = 165) (%)
Determinants
of Facebook
Gender adoption
Male 112 67.9
Female 53 32.1
Age (years)
#30 8 4.9
31–40 52 31.5 255
41–50 65 39.4
51–60 37 22.4
>60 3 1.8
Education
Secondary school and below 22 13.3
Certificate and diploma 31 18.8
Bachelor’s degree 96 58.2
Master’s degree 15 9.1
PhD 1 0.6
Job position
SME owner 89 53.9
Marketing manager 57 34.6
IT manager 19 11.5
Duration at current SME (years)
<5 9 5.4
5–10 14 8.5
11–15 32 19.4
16–20 43 26.1
>20 67 40.6
Total years of experience
<10 12 7.3
10–15 34 20.6 Table 1.
16–20 47 28.5 Respondents’
21–25 43 26.0 demographic
>25 29 17.6 information
demonstrates that the loadings of all the items were > 0.7, except that for ORG4, ORG5,
RAD3, RAD5, RAD7 and TMS2, which were removed due to low loadings. Table 3
demonstrates that the AVE values exceeded the 0.50 threshold for all constructs
(Fornell and Larcker, 1981). Hence, convergent validity was confirmed (Henseler et al.,
2016). At the construct level, all internal consistency reliability measures confirmed the
reliability. Table 3 demonstrates that for all constructs, Cronbach’s a was > 0.7, as
required by Sekaran and Bougie (2016). rho_A was the most reliable measure of
internal consistency reliability (Hair et al., 2019), which was > 0.7 for all constructs, as
required by Henseler et al. (2015). The composite reliability (CR) for all constructs
was > 0.70 (Hair et al., 2017). Hence, the measurement model satisfied the internal
consistency reliability criteria.
Discriminant validity was assessed via the heterotrait-monotrait (HTMT) method, the
most reliable measure of discriminant validity (Henseler et al., 2015). Table 4 demonstrates
that all HTMT ratios were below the 0.90 cut-off point, as recommended by Mohammad
et al. (2019). Therefore, discriminant validity was confirmed. Hence, the convergent validity,
internal consistency reliability and discriminant validity were supported by the statistical
analysis. Thus, the measurement model satisfied all validation criteria. Subsequently, the
structural model was evaluated (Hair et al., 2017).
Convergent validity Internal consistency reliability
Determinants
Variable Item Loading AVE Cronbach’s a rho_A CR of Facebook
adoption
Competitive pressure (CPP) CPP1 0.828 0.657 0.739 0.743 0.851
CPP2 0.792
CPP3 0.811
Financial performance (FNP) FNP1 0.772 0.592 0.861 0.864 0.897
FNP2 0.759 257
FNP3 0.733
FNP4 0.715
Government support (GBS) GBS1 0.819 0.555 0.733 0.736 0.833
GBS2 0.731
GBS3 0.814
Non-financial performance (NFP) NFP1 0.748 0.622 0.701 0.719 0.831
NFP2 0.762
NFP3 0.790
NFP4 0.801
NFP5 0.796
Organisational readiness (ORG) ORG1 0.811 0.608 0.839 0.843 0.886
ORG2 0.745
ORG3 0.867
Perceived risks (PRI) PRI1 0.872 0.655 0.736 0.753 0.85
PRI2 0.871
PRI3 0.840
Relative advantage (RAD) RAD1 0.802 0.741 0.826 0.827 0.896
RAD2 0.748
RAD4 0.753
RAD6 0.737
Top management support (TMS) TMS1 0.765 0.579 0.757 0.759 0.846
TMS3 0.847
TMS4 0.816
Facebook adoption (FAD) FAD1 0.733 0.656 0.737 0.738 0.851
FAD2 0.738
FAD3 0.779
FAD4 0.831
FAD5 0.823
FAD6 0.704
Notes: Adequate AVE was achieved by all constructs after ORG4, ORG5, RAD3, RAD5, RAD7 and TMS2 Table 3.
had been deleted due to low loadings: CPP (0.657), FNP (0.592), GBS (0.555), NFP (0.622), ORG (0.608), PRI Measurement model
(0.655), RAD (0.741), TMS (0.579) and FAD (0.656). This confirmed the convergent validity of the constructs evaluation results
Std. Std. t- p-
Hypothesis Relationship b error value value Decision f2 R2 Q2 VIF
H1a RAD ! FAD 0.216 0.050 4.318 0.000 Supported 0.108 0.753 0.412 1.739
H2a PRI ! FAD 0.160 0.057 2.811 0.002 Supported 0.064 1.637
H3a TMS ! FAD 0.305 0.053 5.806 0.000 Supported 0.225 1.674
H4a ORG ! FAD 0.173 0.058 2.983 0.001 Supported 0.076 1.609
H5a CPP ! FAD 0.086 0.061 1.424 0.079 Not supported 0.012 2.457
Table 5. H6a GBS ! FAD 0.208 0.054 3.817 0.000 Supported 0.108 1.619
Hypotheses testing: H7 FAD ! FNP 0.614 0.067 9.185 0.000 Supported 0.606 0.377 0.194 1.000
direct effects H8 FAD ! NFP 0.653 0.053 12.383 0.000 Supported 0.744 0.427 0.238 1.000
The effect of the predictor variables on Facebook adoption yielded an R2 of 0.753. In other
words, the combined effects of all predictor variables could explain 75.3% of the variance in
Facebook adoption, indicating a substantial level of predictive accuracy (Hair et al., 2019).
Facebook adoption explained 37.7 and 42.7% of the variance in financial and non-financial
performance, respectively.
The hypothesised relations were directional. Therefore, the significance of the path
coefficients was determined via bootstrapping using a one-tailed t-test using 5,000 resamples
as per the recommendation by Henseler et al. (2016). Table 5 demonstrates the bootstrapping
results for the hypothesised relationships. Except for H5 ( b = 0.086, t = 1.424, p = 0.079), all
relationships yielded critical t-values of > 2.58, supporting the relationships in H1, H2, H3,
H4, H6, H7 and H8. Specifically, relative advantage ( b = 0.216, t = 4.318, p = 0.000),
perceived risk ( b = 0.160, t = 2.811, p = 0.002), top management support ( b = 0.305, t =
5.806, p = 0.000), organisational readiness ( b = 0.173, t = 2.983, p = 0.001), government
support ( b = 0.208, t = 3.817, p = 0.000) and Facebook adoption to financial performance ( b =
0.614, t = 9.185, p = 0.000), Facebook adoption to non-financial performance ( b = 0.653, t =
12.383, p = 0.000) were all significant and in the proposed directions.
The predictive relevance Q2 value of the model was determined using the blindfolding
procedure. A Q2 value of < 0 implies that a model for endogenous constructs lacks
predictive relevance (Hair et al., 2017). Q2 values exceeding 0, 0.25 and 0.50 represent small,
medium and large predictive relevance, respectively, of a PLS path model (Hair et al., 2019).
Table 5 demonstrates that the Q2 values were all > 0, where the Q2 was 0.412, 0.194 and
Determinants
of Facebook
adoption
259
Figure 2.
PLS path model of the
study
(H4c: b = 0.116, t = 2.949, p = 0.002) and government support (H6c: b = 0.136, t = 3.592, p =
0.000). Nonetheless, adopting Facebook did not mediate the relationship between competitive
pressure (H5c: b = 0.056, t = 1.414, p = 0.079) and non-financial performance. Thus, except for
H5c, H1c–H6c were supported.
6. Discussion
This study used TOE framework–RBV theory integration to explore the Facebook adoption
determinants and the direct impact of Facebook adoption on the financial and non-financial
performance of service-based SMEs in northwestern Nigeria. Furthermore, the mediating
role of Facebook adoption between the determinants and the performances of the SMEs was
assessed.
This study yielded three result categories. Firstly, from the TOE framework perspective,
in the technological context, the results supported the proposed association between relative
advantage and Facebook adoption (H1a), which is consistent with the TOE framework and
other research (Alshamaila, 2018). Relative advantage was the second most significant
predictor of Facebook adoption, indicating that understanding the benefits of adopting
Facebook would have a great impact on enhancing Facebook adoption by SMEs (Ainin
et al., 2015). Perceived risk exerted a significant negative effect on Facebook adoption (H2a),
which aligns with the TOE framework and prior studies (Omenugha, 2018). The result
suggested that the perception of risks related to Facebook adoption exerts an inhibitory
effect on Facebook adoption by SMEs. Hence, risk perception among SMEs should be
mitigated to enhance Facebook adoption.
In the organisational context, the findings demonstrate that top management support
exerted the strongest positive and significant impact on Facebook adoption (H3a),
supporting the TOE framework and past studies (Matikiti et al., 2018). The finding
demonstrated that Facebook adoption is possible only when supported by SME owners or
executive officers. Organisational readiness was a significant positive determinant of
Facebook adoption (H4a), which is similar to prior empirical research (Jambulingamis et al.,
2015). This result demonstrated that Nigerian service-based SMEs want to be certain that
they possess the required financial and technical skills before adopting Facebook (Faloye,
2014).
In the environmental context, competitive pressure was not significant (H5a), which
contradicts previous findings (Abedin, 2015). A possible explanation is that Nigerian SMEs
demonstrate a low level of Facebook adoption (Abubakar et al., 2017). Therefore, the positive
impact of Facebook adoption from their neighbouring competitors might be less obvious to Determinants
them. It was also verified that government support was a significant and positive of Facebook
determinant of Facebook adoption (H6a), reinforcing the TOE framework and past studies
(Ogbo et al., 2019). This result revealed that government assistance in the form of an
adoption
enabling environment, training for SME owners and financial assistance would enhance
Facebook adoption among service-based SMEs.
Secondly, from the RBV theory, the study demonstrated the significant positive impact
of adopting Facebook on the financial performance of SMEs (H7), supporting the RBV 261
theory and some previous studies (Cao et al., 2018). This outcome demonstrates that
effective Facebook adoption will aid the enhancement of SME financial performance, such
as increasing sales and profits and reducing marketing costs. Facebook adoption was also
confirmed to exert a significant positive influence on the non-financial performance of SMEs
(H8), which agrees with the RBV theory and previous research (Alalwan et al., 2017). The
results demonstrated that effective Facebook adoption will improve the non-financial
performance of SMEs, such as better customer relationships and brand awareness. Lastly,
analysis of the mediating effect of Facebook adoption revealed that, apart from competitive
pressure, adopting Facebook mediated the relationships between all TOE factors and
financial and non-financial performance.
8. Conclusion
This study used the TOE framework and RBV theory integration to examine the
determinants of Facebook adoption and the immediate impact thereof on the financial
and non-financial performance of service-based SMEs in northwestern Nigeria. The
mediating effect of Facebook adoption on the relationships between the Facebook
adoption determinants and SME performance was assessed. It is proposed that
Facebook permits resource-limited service-based SMEs in developing countries to
communicate effectively with customers and other business stakeholders to enhance
business performance. Specifically, how Facebook enables service-based SME
enhancement of customer relationships and loyalty; brand awareness creation; and
benefits such as improved market share, reduced marketing cost and increased sales
and profits was highlighted.
The determinants presented Nigerian service-based SME decision-makers with insight
into factors on which to focus for effective Facebook adoption. The results suggested that
adopting Facebook would have a significant effect on SME financial and non-financial
performance. Furthermore, its mediating effect between all important determinants and
financial and non-financial performance was confirmed. Lastly, this study presented
important theoretical and practical implications for SME decision-makers and policymakers
and Facebook developers.
References Determinants
Abdullahi, M.S., Jakada, B.A. and Kabir, S. (2016), “Challenges affecting the performance of small and of Facebook
medium enterprises (SMEs) in Nigeria”, Journal of Human Capital Development (JHCD), Vol. 9
No. 2, pp. 21-46, available at: https://journal.utem.edu.my/index.php/jhcd/article/view/1922/1157
adoption
Abedin, B. (2015), “Adoption of Facebook for customer relationship management for SMEs: exploring
the underlying motivations”, Strategic Customer Relationship Management in the Age of Social
Media, IGI Global, pp. 60-71.
Abubakar, M.K., Patricia, M.N., Samuel, O.O. and Totolo, A. (2017), “Factors affecting adoption of
263
social media by women’s non-governmental organisations (WNGOs)”, International Journal of
Library and Information Science, Vol. 9 No. 9, pp. 96-106, doi: 10.5897/IJLIS2017.0783.
Adegbuyi, O.A., Akinyele, F. and Akinyele, S. (2015), “Effect of social media marketing on small scale
business performance in ota-metropolis, Nigeria”, International Journal of Social Sciences and
Management, Vol. 2 No. 3, pp. 275-283, doi: 10.3126/ijssm.v2i3.12721.
Afolabi, A., Ojelabi, R.A. and Oyeyipo, O. (2018), “An analysis of social media marketing of indigenous
construction firms in Nigeria: a tool for sustainable growth”, International Journal of Construction
Supply Chain Management, Vol. 8 No. 2, pp. 60-72, doi: 10.14424/ijcscm802018-60-72.
Agwu, E. (2018), “An investigative analysis of factors influencing ebusiness adoption and maintenance
of commercial websites in Nigeria”, available at SSRN 3112757. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.3112757
Ahani, A., Rahim, N.Z.A. and Nilashi, M. (2017), “Forecasting social CRM adoption in SMEs: a
combined SEM-neural network method”, Computers in Human Behavior, Vol. 75, pp. 560-578,
doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2017.05.032.
Ainin, S., Parveen, F., Moghavvemi, S., Jaafar, N.I. and Mohd Shuib, N.L. (2015), “Factors influencing
the use of social media by SMEs and its performance outcomes”, Industrial Management and
Data Systems, Vol. 115 No. 3, pp. 570-588, doi: 10.1108/imds-07-2014-0205.
Akuz, M., Isaac, O.M. and Abdullahi, A.I. (2020), “Effect of electronic marketing on the performance of
SMEs in Karu local government area, Nasarawa state of Nigeria”, FUO Quarterly Journal of
Contemporary Research, Vol. 8 No. 2, available at: www.academia.edu/44335585.
Alalwan, A.A., Rana, N.P., Dwivedi, Y.K. and Algharabat, R. (2017), “Social media in marketing: a
review and analysis of the existing literature”, Telematics and Informatics, Vol. 34 No. 7,
pp. 1177-1190, doi: 10.1016/j.tele.2017.05.008.
Ali Qalati, S., Li, W., Ahmed, N., Ali Mirani, M. and Khan, A. (2021), “Examining the factors affecting
SME performance: the mediating role of social media adoption”, Sustainability, Vol. 13 No. 1,
p. 75, doi: 10.3390/su13010075.
Alsaad, A., Mohamad, R. and Ismail, N.A. (2017), “The moderating role of trust in business to business
electronic commerce (B2B EC) adoption”, Computers in Human Behavior, Vol. 68, pp. 157-169,
doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2016.11.040.
Alshamaila, Y. (2018), “Social network site usage by small- and medium-sized businesses:
understanding the motivations and barriers”, Modern Applied Science, Vol. 12 No. 3,
doi: 10.5539/mas.v12n3p41.
Apulu, I., Latham, A. and Moreton, R. (2011), “Factors affecting the effective utilisation and adoption of
sophisticated ICT solutions: case studies of SMEs in Lagos, Nigeria”, Journal of Systems and
Information Technology, Vol. 13 No. 2, pp. 125-143, doi: 10.1108/13287261111135972.
Awa, H.O., Ukoha, O., Emecheta, B.C. and Liu, S. (2016), “Using T-O-E theoretical framework to study
the adoption of ERP solution”, Cogent Business and Management, Vol. 3 No. 1, doi: 10.1080/
23311975.2016.1196571.
Barney, J. (1991), “Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage”, Journal of Management,
Vol. 17 No. 1, pp. 99-120, doi: 10.1177/014920639101700108.
Burton-Jones, A. and Gallivan, M.J. (2007), “Toward a deeper understanding of system usage in
organizations: a multilevel perspective”, MIS Quarterly, Vol. 31 No. 4, pp. 657-679.
JSIT Buwule, R.S. (2019), Re-engineering research and innovation information in university libraries in
Uganda for small and medium enterprises.
24,3
Cant, M.C. and Wiid, J.A. (2016), “The use of traditional marketing tools by SMEs in an emerging
economy: a South African perspective”, Problems and Perspectives in Management, Vol. 14 No. 1,
p. 64, doi: 10.21511/ppm.14(1).2016.07.
Cao, Y., Ajjan, H., Hong, P. and Le, T. (2018), “Using social media for competitive business outcomes”, Journal
of Advances in Management Research, Vol. 15 No. 2, pp. 211-235, doi: 10.1108/jamr-05-2017-0060.
264
Chang, S.E., Shen, W.-C. and Liu, A.Y. (2016), “Why mobile users trust smartphone social networking
services? A PLS-SEM approach”, Journal of Business Research, Vol. 69 No. 11, pp. 4890-4895,
doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.04.048.
Eze, S.C., Chinedu-Eze, V.C. and Awa, H.O. (2021), “Key success factors (KSFs) underlying the adoption
of social media marketing technology”, SAGE Open, Vol. 11 No. 2, p. 21582440211006695,
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0260145.
Eze, S.C., Chinedu-Eze, V.C., Bello, A.O., Inegbedion, H., Nwanji, T. and Asamu, F. (2019), “Mobile marketing
technology adoption in service SMEs: a multi-perspective framework”, Journal of Science and
Technology Policy Management, Vol. 10 No. 3, pp. 569-596, doi: 10.1108/JSTPM-11-2018-0105.
Faloye, D.O. (2014), “The adoption of e-commerce in small businesses: an empirical evidence from retail
sector in Nigeria”, Journal of Business and Retail Management Research, Vol. 8 No. 2, doi:
10.24052/JBRMR/167.
Fornell, C. and Larcker, D.F. (1981), Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and
Measurement Error: Algebra and Statistics, SAGE Publications Sage CA, Los Angeles, CA.
Franco, M., Haase, H. and Pereira, A. (2016), “Empirical study about the role of social networks in SME
performance”, Journal of Systems and Information Technology, Vol. 18 No. 4, pp. 383-403,
doi: 10.1108/JSIT-06-2016-0036.
Gutierrez, A., Boukrami, E. and Lumsden, R. (2015), “Technological, organisational and environmental
factors influencing managers’ decision to adopt cloud computing in the UK”, Journal of
Enterprise Information Management, Vol. 28 No. 6, pp. 788-807, doi: 10.1108/jeim-01-2015-0001.
Gwadabe, M.L. (2017), “Adoption of web 2.0 marketing: an exploratory study about the Nigerian
SME’s”, International Journal of Information Systems in the Service Sector (IJISSS), Vol. 9 No. 4,
pp. 44-59, doi: 10.4018/978-1-7998-9020-1.ch041.
Hair, J.F., Jr, Matthews, L.M., Matthews, R.L. and Marko, S. (2017), “PLS-SEM or CB-SEM: updated
guidelines on which method to use”, International Journal of Multivariate Data Analysis, Vol. 1
No. 2, doi: 10.1504/IJMDA.2017.10008574.
Hair, J.F., Hult, G.T.M., Ringle, C.M., Sarstedt, M. and Thiele, K.O. (2017), “Mirror, mirror on the wall: a
comparative evaluation of composite-based structural equation modeling methods”, Journal of
the Academy of Marketing Science, Vol. 45 No. 5, pp. 616-632, doi: 10.1007/s11747-017-0517-x.
Hair, J.F., Risher, J.J., Sarstedt, M. and Ringle, C.M. (2019), “When to use and how to report the results of
PLS-SEM”, European Business Review, Vol. 31 No. 1, pp. 2-24, doi: 10.1108/ebr-11-2018-0203.
Henseler, J., Hubona, G. and Ray, P.A. (2016), “Using PLS path modeling in new technology research:
updated guidelines”, Industrial Management and Data Systems, Vol. 116 No. 1, pp. 2-20,
doi: 10.1108/IMDS-09-2015-0382.
Henseler, J., Ringle, C.M. and Sarstedt, M. (2015), “A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in
variance-based structural equation modeling”, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science,
Vol. 43 No. 1, pp. 115-135, doi: 10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8.
Ibekwe, U.J., Agbaeze, E.K., Peace, N., Abner, I.P., Kelvin-Iloafu, L.E. and Akpan, E.E. (2019), “Social
media adoption and performance of telecommunication firms in Nigeria: from innovation
diffusion theory to technology acceptance model”, International Journal of Mechanical
Engineering and Technology, Vol. 10 No. 12, available at: http://iaeme.com/Home/issue/IJMET?
Volume=10&Issue=12
Ihesiene, U.C. and Akpojaro, J. (2015), “A critical evaluation of SMEs attitudes towards information Determinants
technology integration in Nigeria”, image, Vol. 4 No. 11, doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.10116.07046.
of Facebook
Jambulingamis, M., Sumathi, C. and Rajagopal, G.R. (2015), “Barriers of venturing into Facebook
commerce among SMEs”, The Journal of Internet Banking and Commerce, Vol. 01 No. S2,
adoption
doi: 10.4172/1204-5357.s2-008.
Kalkan, A. and Çetinkaya Bozkurt, Ö. (2017), “The use of social media in SMEs: a case study for
Burdur, Turkey”, International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147-4478),
Vol. 6 No. 3, doi: 10.20525/ijrbs.v6i3.710. 265
Khalique, M., Bontis, N., Shaari, J.A.N.B., Yaacob, M.R. and Ngah, R. (2018), “Intellectual capital and
organisational performance in Malaysian knowledge-intensive SMEs”, International Journal of
Learning and Intellectual Capital, Vol. 15 No. 1, pp. 20-36, doi: 10.1504/IJLIC.2018.088345.
Kim, S.H., Jang, S.Y. and Yang, K.H. (2017), “Analysis of the determinants of software-as-a-service
adoption in small businesses: risks, benefits, and organizational and environmental factors”,
Journal of Small Business Management, Vol. 55 No. 2, pp. 303-325, doi: 10.1111/jsbm.12304.
Kock, N. (2015), “Common method bias in PLS-SEM: a full collinearity assessment approach”,
International Journal of e-Collaboration (IJeC), Vol. 11 No. 4, pp. 1-10, doi: 10.4018/
ijec.2015100101.
Ladokun, I.O. (2019), “Exploring social media as a strategy for small and medium enterprises (SMEs)
performance: evidence from Oyo state, Nigeria”, South Asian Journal of Social Studies and
Economics, Vol. 3 No. 4, pp. 1-8, doi: 10.9734/SAJSSE/2019/v3i430110.
Maduku, D.K., Mpinganjira, M. and Duh, H. (2016), “Understanding mobile marketing adoption
intention by South African SMEs: a multi-perspective framework”, International Journal of
Information Management, Vol. 36 No. 5, pp. 711-723, doi: 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2016.04.018.
Matikiti, R., Mpinganjira, M. and Roberts-Lombard, M. (2018), “Application of the technology
acceptance model and the technology – organisation – environment model to examine social
media marketing use in the South African tourism industry”, South African Journal of
Information Management, Vol. 20 No. 1, pp. 1-12, doi: 10.4102/sajim.v20i1.790.
Mohammad, J., Quoquab, F., Halimah, S. and Thurasamy, R. (2019), “Workplace internet leisure and
employees’ productivity: the mediating role of employee satisfaction”, Internet Research, Vol. 29
No. 4, pp. 725-748, doi: 10.1108/IntR-05-2017-0191.
Morah, D.N. and Omojola, O. (2018), “Social media use and entrepreneurship development in Nigeria:
lagos and Onitsha in focus”, International Journal of Advance Study and Research Work, Vol. 1
No. 5, pp. 15-26, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.1420101.
Nwokah, N.G. and Aeenee, F.L. (2017), “Social media marketing and business success of automobile
dealers in Rivers state”, American Journal of Industrial and Business Management, Vol. 07
No. 12, pp. 1298-1319, doi: 10.4236/ajibm.2017.712092.
Odoom, R., Anning-Dorson, T. and Acheampong, G. (2017), “Antecedents of social media usage
and performance benefits in small- and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs)”, Journal of
Enterprise Information Management, Vol. 30 No. 3, pp. 383-399, doi: 10.1108/jeim-04-2016-
0088.
Ogbo, A., Igwe, A., Ezeobi, J., Modebe, N. and Kalu, E.U. (2019), “The impact of social entrepreneurship
on the sustainability of selected small and medium enterprises in Nigeria”, Advances in
Research, Vol. 19 No. 2, pp. 1-15, doi: 10.9734/AIR/2019/v19i230116.
Okundaye, K., Fan, S.K. and Dwyer, R.J. (2019), “Impact of information and communication technology
in Nigerian small-to medium-sized enterprises”, Journal of Economics, Finance and
Administrative Science, Vol. 24 No. 47, pp. 29-46, doi: 10.1108/JEFAS-08-2018-0086.
Olanrewaju, A.-S.T., Hossain, M.A., Whiteside, N. and Mercieca, P. (2020), “Social media and
entrepreneurship research: a literature review”, International Journal of Information
Management, Vol. 50 No. 2020, pp. 90-110, doi: 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.05.011.
JSIT Ologhodo, C., Oleghe, O., Ugbaje, O., Odianosen, R.-R. and Jos, O.L. (2020), “Impact of accounting
information systems on operational performance of Nigeria small scale business enterprises”,
24,3 International Journal of Creative Research Thoughts, Vol. 8 No. 6, pp. 2960-2973, available at:
https://ijcrt.org/papers/IJCRT2006407.pdf
Omenugha, N.O. (2018), “The utilization of digital platforms for marketing in the Nigerian
entertainment and media (E&M) industry: prospects and challenges”, Case Studies in Business
and Management, Vol. 5 No. 1, pp. 60-79, doi: 10.5296/csbm.v5i1.13240, ISSN 2333-3324.
266 Omotosho, B.J. (2020), “Small scale craft workers and the use of social media platforms for business
performance in southwest Nigeria”, Journal of Small Business and Entrepreneurship, pp. 1-16,
doi: 10.1080/08276331.2020.1764732.
Oni, O. (2021), “Small- and medium-sized enterprises’ engagement with social media for corporate
communication”, in Camilleri, M.A. (Ed.) Strategic Corporate Communication in the Digital Age,
Emerald Publishing Limited, pp. 217-234.
Oyewobi, L.O., Olorunyomi, O.S., Jimoh, R.A. and Rotimi, J.O.B. (2021), “Impact of social media usage on
performance of construction businesses (CBs) in Abuja, Nigeria”, Journal of Financial Management
of Property and Construction, Vol. 26 No. 2, pp. 257-278, doi: 10.1108/JFMPC-05-2020-0042.
Parveen, F., Jaafar, N.I. and Ainin, S. (2015), “Social media usage and organizational performance:
reflections of Malaysian social media managers”, Telematics and Informatics, Vol. 32 No. 1,
pp. 67-78, doi: 10.1016/j.tele.2014.03.001.
Podsakoff, N. (2003), “Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature
and recommended remedies”, Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 88 No. 5, pp. 879-903,
doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879.
Podsakoff, P.M., MacKenzie, S.B. and Podsakoff, N.P. (2012), “Sources of method bias in social science
research and recommendations on how to control it”, Annual Review of Psychology, Vol. 63 No. 1,
pp. 539-569, doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-120710-100452.
Potnis, D. and Deosthali, K. (2014), “Factors influencing adoption of web 1.0, web 2.0, and mobile
technologies by the growth engine of the US economy”, First Monday, Vol. 19 No. 9, doi: 10.5210/
fm.v19i9.5419.
Preacher, K.J. and Hayes, A.F. (2008), “Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and
comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models”, Behavior Research Methods, Vol. 40
No. 3, pp. 879-891, doi: 10.3758/BRM.40.3.879.
Puklavec, B., Oliveira, T. and Popovic, A. (2018), “Understanding the determinants of business
intelligence system adoption stages: an empirical study of SMEs”, Industrial Management and
Data Systems, Vol. 118 No. 1, pp. 236-261, doi: 10.1108/IMDS-05-2017-0170.
Radulovich, L., Javalgi, R.G. and Scherer, R.F. (2018), “Intangible resources influencing the international
performance of professional service SMEs in an emerging market: evidence from India”,
International Marketing Review, Vol. 35 No. 1, pp. 113-135, doi: 10.1108/IMR-06-2016-0130.
Rashid, M.K., Niazi, A.A.K. and Khan, I. (2020), “Investigating the antecedents and impact of social
media usage on the performance of women-owned SMEs in Pakistan”, NUML International
Journal of Business and Management, Vol. 15 No. 1, pp. 15-29, available at: www.researchgate.
net/publication/342840688
Sekaran, U. and Bougie, R. (2016), Research Methods for Business: A Skill Building Approach, John
Wiley and Sons.
Shim, S., Lee, B. and Kim, S.L. (2018), “Rival precedence and open platform adoption: an empirical
analysis”, International Journal of Information Management, Vol. 38 No. 1, pp. 217-231,
doi: 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2017.10.001.
Shmueli, G., Sarstedt, M., Hair, J.F., Cheah, J.-H., Ting, H., Vaithilingam, S. and Ringle, C.M. (2019),
“Predictive model assessment in PLS-SEM: guidelines for using PLSpredict”, European Journal
of Marketing, Vol. 53 No. 11, pp. 2322-2347, doi: 10.1108/ejm-02-2019-0189.
SMEDAN (2013), “SMEDAN and national bureau of statistics collaborative survey: selected findings”, Determinants
National Survey on Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises in Nigeria, pp. 1-50, available at:
www.smedan.gov.ng/images/PDF/2013-MSME-Survey-Summary-Report.pdf of Facebook
Stats, I. (2020), “World internet usage and population statistics 2020”, Internet World Stats, available at: adoption
www.internetworldstats.com/stats1.htm
Sutomo, E., Rahman, N.S.A. and Romli, A.B. (2020), “Determination of the influence factors on social
commerce in SME: a review”, International Journal of Software Engineering and Computer
Systems, Vol. 6 No. 2, pp. 23-32, doi: 10.15282/ijsecs.6.2.2020.4.0073. 267
Tajudeen, F.P., Jaafar, N.I. and Ainin, S. (2018), “Understanding the impact of social media usage
among organizations”, Information and Management, Vol. 55 No. 3, pp. 308-321, doi: 10.1016/j.
im.2017.08.004.
Tornatzky, L.G., Fleischer, M. and Chakrabarti, A. (1990), “The processes of technological innovation.
Issues in organization and management series”, Lexington Books, available at: www.amazon.
com/Processes-Technological-Innovation-Organization-Management/dp/0669203483 (accessed
10 June 2019).
Trainor, K.J., Andzulis, J.M., Rapp, A. and Agnihotri, R. (2014), “Social media technology usage and
customer relationship performance: a capabilities-based examination of social CRM”, Journal of
Business Research, Vol. 67 No. 6, pp. 1201-1208, doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2013.05.002.
Yang, Z., Sun, J., Zhang, Y. and Wang, Y. (2015), “Understanding SaaS adoption from the perspective of
organizational users: a tripod readiness model”, Computers in Human Behavior, Vol. 45,
pp. 254-264, doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2014.12.022. (April 2015).
Corresponding author
Idris Na’umma Abdullahi can be contacted at: [email protected]
For instructions on how to order reprints of this article, please visit our website:
www.emeraldgrouppublishing.com/licensing/reprints.htm
Or contact us for further details: [email protected]