Term Paper Seni2
Term Paper Seni2
Term Paper Seni2
financing mix or capital structure for his/her firm. Capital structure decision is the mix
of debt and equity that a company uses to finance its business (Damodaran,
2001). Capital structure has been a major issue in financial economics ever since
Modigliani and Miller showed in 1958 that given frictionless markets,homogeneous
expectations; capital structure decision of the firm is irrelevant. Modigliani and Miller
(M & M) (1958) wrote a paper on the irrelevance of capital structure that inspired
researchers to debate on this subject. This debate is still continuing. However, with the
passage of time, new dimensions have been added tothe question of relevance or
irrelevance of capital structure. MM declared that in a world of frictionless capital
markets, there would be no optimal financial structure (Schwartz & Aronson, 1967).
This theory later became known as the “Theory of Irrelevance”. In MM’sover-
simplified world, no capital structure mix is betterthan another. MM’s Proposition-II
attempted to answer the question of why there was an increased rate ofreturn when the
debt ratio was increased. It stated that the increased expected rate of return generated
by debt financing is exactly offset by the risk incurred, regardless of the financing mix
chosen. The relationship of the capital structure decisions with the firm performance
Was highlighted by a number of theories mainly, the agency theory, information
asymmetry theory, signaling theory and the tradeoff theory. The most important
among them is the agency problem that exists because ownership (shareholders)
And control (management) of firms lies with different people for most of the firms.
And for that reason, managers are not motivated to apply maximum efforts and are
more interested in personal gains or policies that suit their own interests and thus
results in the loss of value for the firm and harm shareholder’s interests.
Therefore, debt finance act as a controlling tool to restrict the opportunistic behavior
for personal gain by managers. It reduces the free cash flows with the firm by
Paying fixed interest payments and forces managers to avoid negative investments and
work in the interest of shareholders (Jensen and Meckling (1976)).
II. Objectives
The general objective of this study will be to investigate the impact of capital structure
on the financial performance of selected commercial banks in
Ethiopia.
The Specific Objectives of the study are:
1. To investigate the relationship between capital structure and financial performance
of selected commercial banks in Ethiopia.
2. To evaluate the effect of debt ratio, total debt to equity and loan to deposit in the
capital structure on financial performance of selected commercial banks.
3. To examine the effect of bank’s size and tangibility on financial performance.
Litrature Review Main body
b) Review of related empirical studies
Since the pioneering work of Modigliani and
Miller (1958), the financing decision of capital structure
and their impact on financial performance has been a
major field in the corporate finance literature. Since then,
numerous studies have attempted to investigate the
relationship between capital structure and financial
performance of the firms. Even though, the area of