JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide
range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and
facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected].
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at
https://about.jstor.org/terms
The MIT Press is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to TDR (1988-
)
John W Casson
Italy, 1913-1915
In 1915 an Italian futurist manifesto on the theatre, written by F.T. Marinetti,
Emilio Settimelli, and Bruno Corra insisted on a new theatre that is "born of
improvisation, lightninglike intuition, from suggestive and revealing actuality.
We believe that a thing is valuable to the extent that it is improvised, not exten-
sively prepared" (in Drain 1995:2o). Nothing should get in the way of the
artist's natural talent: "he must be preoccupied with creating synthetic expres-
sions of cerebral energy that have the absolute value of novelty":
In an earlier manifesto (1913) Marinetti described the variety theatre as: "a
cumulus of events unfolded at great speed [...] and now let's have a look at
the Balkans: King Nicholas, Enver-Bey, [...] fistfights between Serbs and
Io7
Bulgars [...] instructive, satirical pantomimes [...] a more or less amusing news-
paper" (172-73).
Living Newspapers kept their illiterate audiences in touch with the is-
sues of the day. The subjects were by no means always topical or politi-
cal. [...] Often a Living Newspaper could include an item or two of more
general educational content such as the dramatized Fight Against Typhus
[...] or looking after and breeding hens. (Leach 1994:84, 169)
While many Soviet Living Newspapers were written, the actors did impro-
vise when necessary:
The style of acting resembled the old troupes of strolling players and was
often rooted in improvisation based on character types. Because the news
changed day by day the actors often had only time to agree on the form
of the sketch before going on stage, and performing in the open air they
frequently had to cope with interjections and heckling from the audi-
ence. On one occasion an agitator interrupted the performance to an-
nounce the defeat of Denikin. The audience burst out cheering and the
actors improvised a scene of Denikin dancing, then being chased off by
Red Army soldiers. (Leach 1994:84)
The Blue Blouse group was hugely successful: "In its first two months of
existence Blue Blouse performed to 8o0,00ooo people" (Stourac and McCreery
1986:39).
Other groups started up on the same pattern [...] eventually more than
five thousand Blue Blouse groups were active, with a membership of
00,000ooo. [...] In 1927 Blue Blouse visited Germany, where the workers'
theatre movement was already practising similar techniques [...]. (Drain
1995:183)
In 1922, the year before Yuzhanin set up Blue Blouse, Moreno established Das
Stegreiftheater (Theatre of Spontaneity) in Vienna. The first edition of his book
on this experimental theatre, Das Stegreiftheater, was published in 1924. One of the
methods for promoting spontaneity Moreno used was to base improvisations on
the day's news: in 1925 he called this the "dramatized newspaper" (in the 1947
edition of the Theatre of Spontaneity he calls it "living newspaper"). Given the time
it takes to write and publish a book it seems likely that Moreno was creating the-
atre from the news in 1923 or even from 1921 (see Marineau 1989:70-72).
Vienna lies halfway between Italy and Russia: is it not possible, even likely,
that Moreno would have heard of the futurists' ideas? The futurist manifesto
quoted above shows spontaneity was an important source of creative energy
for these artists as well. Central to Moreno's developing ideas was the concept
of spontaneity: Moreno explained that the idea of using the news of the day as
a source for the Theatre of Spontaneity was to counter the suspicion of critics
who supposed, when the performance was successful, that the pieces were re-
hearsed. Moreno "turned his actors into journalists, sending them into the
streets of Vienna to pick up news of incidents there, or bring in national or
international events and disasters of all kinds" (Zerka Moreno 1997). Jonathan
Fox points out that the Russian Theatre was known in Vienna: the 1924 New
Theatre Festival program featured an article by R.F. Muller on "Die Neue
Russiche Buhne." Muller knew and reviewed Moreno's Stegreiftheater en-
thusiastically (Fox in Buer 1994) so it is highly likely that he and Moreno had
discussed these parallel theatre developments. Russian theatre influences were
certainly felt in Vienna: as early as 1906 Stanislavski's theatre concerned with
psychological truth, the Moscow Art Theatre, had toured the cities of Ger-
many and Austria (Sayler 1922:65; Casson 1999).
Rene Marineau states that Moreno "also toured Germany with his group"
(1989:77-78): this must have been in 1923/24, three or four years before Blue
Blouse's German tour, when "the workers' theatre movement were already
practicing similar techniques" (Drain 1995:183). Did Moreno influence them
or did the idea of Living Newspaper also occur simultaneously to the German
theatre creators? Moreno published a paper on his "invention" in Berlin in
1925, which he quotes in a footnote of his Psychodrama, First Volume:
The theatre for spontaneity has the task of serving the moment. It reports
the daily events but not with actual earnestness of parliaments, courts and
newspapers but freed-in a "Stegreif" sense-from the machinery of
personal incentives as interests. (Moreno 1983:77)
The heading "The Living Newspaper" on this page in the later version is not
in the 1924 original German edition. Only in 1947 did Moreno use the term
"Living Newspaper" in the substantially rewritten American edition of The
Theatre of Spontaneity.
Perhaps we need to regard these related theatre forms as two different meth-
ods: Yazhanin's being a Living Newspaper and Moreno's being a Dramatized
Newspaper. The possibility of a link between them however is intriguing.
Zerka Moreno, responding to an earlier version of this paper, wrote:
Moreno told me that two of his followers, a young man and a girl, both
declared Marxists, went to Russia in the early '2os, hoping to assist in the
revolution. They returned a few months later to Vienna, rather disillu-
sioned because they had in fact started The Living Newspaper format in
Moscow; they were very soon stopped by the powers-that-be at the time
as they insisted on knowing ahead of time "what the contents were go-
ing to be." You can imagine that there was no room for spontaneity
there. Indeed, it was one of the factors that seriously influenced Moreno
to shake off the dust of Europe and head west to the new world where
he hoped spontaneity would be better accepted. (1997)
words "living newspaper." The words used to describe his performances sug-
gest that Moreno was calling his work "impromptu" and "dramatized news-
paper." In the New York Evening World Telegram, 28 March 1931: "To obviate
the suspicion of previous rehearsals Dr. Moreno's troupe will dramatize news
events of the day." In the New York Times, 6 April 1931: "a newspaper
drama." In the New York Morning Telegraph, 7 April 1931: "The impromptu
players will present a spontaneous dramatization of a newspaper" (in Moreno
[1946] 1985:357-58).
The idea of the Living Newspaper had in fact already arrived in the U.S.A.
As early as 1927 Mike Gold, an American writer who had worked in Germany
with Bertolt Brecht and Ernst Toller writing a Living Newspaper, had been try-
ing to set up a workers' theatre in the U.S.A. (Cosgrove 1982). In the early
1930S small theatre groups of the workers' movement (Rebel Players in Los An-
geles, Vanguard Group in Philadelphia, Jack London Group in Newark, Solidar-
ity Players in Boston) were attempting to do Living Newspapers, inspired
directly by Blue Blouse. There was even a group who called themselves Boston
Blue Blouses (Cosgrove 1982:38-39). From 1935 to 1936 a major national
project using Living Newspaper was created by the Federal Theatre Project, a
government-funded employment scheme for theatre workers that was part of
the Work Projects Administration (WPA, 1935-1943) created after the 1930s
Great Depression. It was Hallie Flanagan who suggested the idea: "I suggested
the plan of dramatizing contemporary events in a series of living newspapers"
(1969:20). She had traveled to the Soviet Union in 1926 and seen Blue Blouse
(Cosgrove 1982). Joseph Losey, a film director, claimed it to have been his own
concept (Styan 1996:179). The playwright Elmer Rice is also credited with hav-
ing introduced the concept of the Living Newspaper (Styan 1996:11I). He was
the state director of the Federal Theatre Project in New York in 1935. Elmer
Rice had twice traveled to study theatre in the Soviet Union (Styan 1996:11I)
and so may also have picked up the idea from Blue Blouse. A number of Ger-
man immigrants, fleeing Nazi persecution, were also involved in agitprop
groups in the U.S.A. in the early 1930s (e.g., J. Bohne, director of Prolet
Buhne). European ideas crossed the Atlantic and took root in American soil.
The Federal Theatre Project form of Living Newspaper was scripted in ad-
vance. A 1935 reviewer reported:
The dramatization of the news stories had liveliness and vitality, the two
short plays were skilful intensifications of social problems, and [...] it was
eminently successful acting for it gave an unusual sense of reality to the
material it had at hand, and that is what acting is for. (in Flanagan
1969:167)
something for which we will be grateful for many years to come, some-
thing which will mean a tremendous amount in the future, socially, and
in the education and growing up of America [...] far more than any
amount of speeches which [...] I-or even the President-might make.
(in Flanagan 1969:222)
Styan has a photograph of this play, showing a very substantial realistic set of a
tenement building (1996:180).
These Living Newspapers then were repeatable performances, given night
after night. They were not the news of the day, as Moreno had intended, in-
stantly improvised each time. They were scripts that could be refined, played
again, and thus become "cultural conserves"--scripts that are still available and
have been performed as recently as 1984 (Brown 1989:viii). Moreno criticized
the Living Newspapers of the WPA as well as the March of Time, a newsreel
documentary series. The latter was shown in cinemas and used both live foot-
age and reconstructions of events as performed by actors. Moreno denounced
both for their lack of spontaneity and for trivializing and distorting his original
concept ([1946] 1985:358). He may not have realized that, despite the similar-
ity of the ideas, the source of the American Living Newspapers of the Federal
Theatre Project was (through Flanagan, Rice, and others) Blue Blouse. The
use by filmmakers of fakery-of models and actors to re-create news stories of
which they had no live film-had been going on since the 19th century. The
March of Time was heir to experiments to recreate news that began in the I89os
with actors used to film scenes from the Dreyfus scandal. The film company of
Charles and Emile Pathe staged a fond farewell between actors impersonating
Dreyfus and his wife before he was sent to Devil's Island (1894); they filmed
actors in reconstructions of the Boxer rebellion in China (19oo); and replicated
the sinking of the Lusitania (I915; Large Door Productions 1997). Eisenstein is
perhaps the most famous filmmaker to re-create news: his use of montage and
his historical reconstruction of the Russian Revolution in the Battleship
Potemkin (1925) raised the art to the level of masterpiece. He also, as we have
seen, was influenced by the futurists and created Living Newspaper theatre.
There were already established links between American theatre creators and
their Russian colleagues (see Sayler 1922). Russian and German theatre cre-
ators had emigrated to the U.S.A. in the 1920o and '3os due to the political
upheavals in their countries, so it seems certain that they, and not Moreno,
were the source of the American Living Newspapers. However, as Moreno
worked with actors in Vienna and New York, his influence cannot be entirely
ruled out.
Britain, 1935-1956
The first piece in Living Newspaper format performed in Britain was a
poem by American Communist V.J. Jerome, adapted by the Rebel Players in
1935. In this play the "truth behind the headlines is acted out in brief, inter-
cutting scenes. The text was changing constantly to keep up with events and
the writer Simon Blumenfeld remembers scripting a completely new version
at Unity" (Chambers 1989:41).
The Unity Theatre, formed in 1935 as the first "relatively stable Labour
movement theatre group" (Bradby and McCormick 1978:98), created the Liv-
ing Newspaper Busmen, a play about the trial of busmen's strike leaders before
the union executive. The Unity had direct links with the American Living
Newspaper creators: "Arthur Arendt, author of Triple A Plowed Under, came
to Unity to share his experiences. He pointed out that Living Newspapers
should not be a substitute for a pamphlet and could not be dashed off in 24
hours or even 24 days" (Chambers 1989:141). This reveals the gulf between
Arendt and Moreno's ideas.
John Allen, who had directed Newsboy for Unity was keen to attempt a
wholly British Living Newspaper in which we would be more adventur-
ous than the Americans in the use of music and verse and dance. [...]
The group engaged in a process of "total" theatre in which the form and
content were shaping each other under the impact of diverse influences.
They wanted to emulate on stage the effect of The March of Time news-
reel from America [...].
The style of the production owed much to the work of German the-
atre-Piscator, Kaiser, Toller-and was explicitly non-naturalistic. The
back of the stage was painted with a honeycomb of eight-foot squares
which corresponded to different levels of a three-dimensional construc-
tion set and formed separate acting areas, including rare use of the pro-
jecting cubes at the sides of the stage to bring actors out into the
audience. These different areas could be lit in turn, alternating with the
action forestage, giving a cinematic quality to the juxtaposition of scenes.
Details of the dispute were projected in graph form and the Voice of the
Living Newspaper, off stage in the flies above, would comment and link
the action like a chorus. (141-43)
As Arendt had said, such a complex production took time to make and
Busmen was performed in 1938, a year after the events it reported: a rather late
edition!
nutrition, disease, and human and legal rights. By celebrating the peoples' suc-
cess stories (Black Marketeer [i980] showed how the people of one area ex-
posed and had arrested a man who was profiteering from kerosene), they
ensure that such stories, which might not be in the printed newspapers of the
richer classes, are powerfully told and their lessons learned.
Boal developed his own Newspaper Theatre in Peru, within a literacy program:
In their book on People's Theatre, David Bradby and John McCormick de-
scribe Triple A:
This is very much like Moreno's idea of sociodrama, the difference being that
in Arendt's Triple A it was done by a theatre company using a prepared script.
Living Newspaper, whether created by Moreno or others, was a theatre form
wherein a company of actors presented the news to an audience. In a
sociodrama, Moreno would involve members of the whole group-audience
and trained auxiliaries-who would spontaneously take on roles to explore
social issues of concern to the group. Sociodrama is a creative action method
used today in group therapy and education. There is no separate audience: it
is the drama of the group, usually exploring through hypothetical, fictional
situations--perhaps based on current events-those matters that concern
group members.
In the evolution of Moreno's theory and practice, the Living Newspaper oc-
cupies a crucial place. While many elements of the psychodrama process were
implicit in earlier ideas and activities, it was one particular session that showed
Moreno the therapeutic potential of theatre. It was a Living Newspaper perfor-
mance that must have taken place between 1922 and 1924. Moreno writes:
speaks the most abusive language and when I get angry with her, as I did
last night, she hits me with her fists." "Wait," I said, "you come to the
theatre as usual, I will try a remedy." When Barbara came back-stage that
night, ready to play in one of her usual roles of pure womanhood, I
stopped her. "Look Barbara, you have done marvelously until now, but I
am afraid you are getting stale. People would like to see you in roles in
which you portray the nearness to the soil, the rawness of human nature,
its vulgarity and stupidity, its cynical reality, people not only as they are,
but worse than they are, people as they are when driven to extremes by
unusual circumstances. Do you want to try it?" "Yes," she said enthusias-
tically, "I'm glad you mention it. I felt for a while that I have to give our
audience a new experience. But do you think I can do it?" "I have con-
fidence in you," I replied, "the news just came in that a girl in Ottakring
(a slum district in Vienna), soliciting men on the street, had been at-
tacked and killed by a stranger. He is still at large, the police is searching
for him. You are the streetwalker. Here (pointing to Richard, one of our
male actors) is the apache. Get the scene ready." A street was improvised
on the stage, a cafe, two lights. Barbara went on. George was in his usual
seat in the front row, highly excited. Richard, in the role of the apache,
came out of the cafe with Barbara and followed her. They had an en-
counter, which rapidly developed into a heated argument. It was about
money. Suddenly Barbara changed to a manner of acting totally unex-
pected of her. She swore like a trooper, punching at the man, kicking
him in the leg repeatedly. I saw George half rising, anxiously raising his
arm at me, but the apache got wild and began to chase Barbara. Suddenly
he grabbed a knife, a prop, from his inside jacket pocket. He chased her
in circles, closer and closer. She acted so well that she gave the impres-
sion of being really scared. The audience got up, roaring, "Stop it, stop
it." But he did not stop until she was supposedly "murdered." After the
scene Barbara was exuberant with joy, she embraced George and they
went home in ecstasy. From then on she continued to act in such roles
of the lower depth. George came to see me the following day. He in-
stantly understood it was therapy. She played as domestics, lonely spin-
sters, revengeful wives, spiteful sweethearts, barmaids and gun molls.
George gave me daily reports. "Well," he told me after a few sessions,
"something is happening to her. She still has her fits of temper at home
but they have lost their intensity. They are shorter and in the midst of
them she often smiles, and, as yesterday, she remembers similar scenes
which she did on the stage and she laughs and I laugh with her because I
too remember. It is as if we see each other in a psychological mirror. We
both laugh. At times she begins to laugh before she has the fit, anticipat-
ing what will happen. She warms up to it finally but it lacks the usual
heat." It was like a catharsis coming from humour and laughter. I contin-
ued the treatment, assigning roles to her more carefully, according to her
needs and his. One day George confessed the effect which these sessions
had upon him as he watched them and absorbed the analysis which I
gave afterwards. "Looking at her productions on the stage made me
more tolerant of Barbara, less impatient." That evening I told Barbara
how much progress she had made as an actress and asked her whether she
would not like to act on the stage with George. They did this and the
duets on the stage which appeared as part of our official program, re-
sembled more and more the scenes which they daily had at home.
Gradually her family and his, scenes from her childhood, their dreams
and plans for the future were portrayed. After every performance some
spectators would come up to me, asking why the Barbara-George scenes
touched them more deeply than the others (audience therapy). Some
months later, Barbara and George sat alone with me in the theatre. They
had found themselves and each other for the first time. I analysed the de-
velopment of their psychodrama, session after session, and told them the
story of their cure. ([1946] 1985:5)
The bad news is that Barbara and George separated soon after they had
worked with Moreno and five years later George killed himself (Marineau
1989:77). The good news is that Moreno learned much from their work with
him and continued to develop psychodrama. Living Newspaper had shown
him the possible therapeutic value of people playing roles other than their
usual role and this was the basis of role reversal.
During the three-hour session the results were electrifying. Many of the
psychiatrists in the group were refugees from Germany who had them-
selves lost family members in the death camps supervised by Eichmann.
[...] People stood up crying, attacking me in my role with terrible curses
and accusations. The important outcome [...] was the deep-reaching ca-
tharsis within the group and the expression of hidden feelings about the
catastrophe that up until then had been festering in the souls of the par-
ticipants. (1978:182)
The newspapers were brought to life in this drama. Feelings of anger, grief,
and guilt were expressed, insights were gained, and the experience of power-
Does a living newspaper have anything to offer at the end of the twenti-
eth century when multi-channel T.V. and the Internet reign supreme?
Six participants select from the day's news a theme exploring whether a
man can change his destiny. His life story develops. In the different
scenes some roles are played stereotypically, some typically and some
atypically as people find their own dramas become intertwined with the
roles they are playing. This leads to some self-learning which emerges in
the sharing, followed by a discussion on roles and sociodrama. The ses-
sion finishes with an appreciative round of applause-the newspaper still
lives! (Wiener 1997)
Later in the workshop, "to nurture a renewed sense of vision and inspire dis-
cussion about political values," she encouraged the groups to create an ideal
newspaper on a large posterboard:
In Conclusion
It seems that there are two forms of theatre here: one scripted and the other
spontaneous, and it would be better if Moreno's was called "dramatized news-
paper" (his own preferred title) to distinguish it from the scripted "living
newspaper." It seems that the Living Newspaper movement, which from 1919
to 1940 was a global, creative, revolutionary theatre, owed nothing to
Moreno and it is more likely that he picked up the idea from reports of the
futurists' experiments in Russia from 1919 to 1921. S. Cosgrove, (1982) who
has written the most thorough history of Living Newspapers, does not men-
tion Moreno at all. Jonathan Fox concludes:
Moreno was correct to distinguish his version from the Russian variety:
he was not interested in a recitation of official reports, but of the
dramatisation of "life itself"; he was not concerned to impart informa-
tion, but to uncover the human truths hidden in daily happenings. Like-
wise, he was correct to distinguish what he did from the American
Living Newspaper. [...] Moreno's [...] had little to do with propaganda or
reportage. Its thrust was psychological, like the best theatrical art. He had
no message. He was interested in a flow of feeling, in connections, and
the wisdom of the human heart. (in Buer 1994:15-16)
Fox's Playback Theatre is the current theatre form-which has now spread
around the world-that comes closest to Moreno's idea of spontaneous the-
atre: a dramatized newspaper for the people's stories (see Fox 1986; Salas
1993). But no one has a monopoly on good ideas. Roy's Jagran and Boal's
Newspaper Theatre are related forms that also empower their audiences to
achieve personal and social change.
Notes
I. Stourac and McCreery are quoting from the Blue Blouse Magazine, 1925, 23/24:8-9.
2. Stourac and McCreery cite this as reported in the Blue Blouse Magazine, 1925, 23/24:5.
References
Bannister, Anne
1995 "Images and Action." In Dramatherapy with Children and Adolescents, edited by
Sue Jennings, 169-85. London: Routledge.
Boal, Augusto
1979 Theatre of the Oppressed. New York: Urizen Books.
Bradby, David, and John McCormick
1978 People's Theatre. London: Croom Helm.
Brown, Lorraine, ed.
1989 Liberty Deferred and Other Living Newspapers of the 1930s. Fairfax, VA: George
Mason University Press.
Casson, John
1999 "Evreinoff and Moreno: Monodrama and Psychodrama, Parallel Develop-
ments or Hidden Influences?" Journal of the British Psychodrama Association 14,
1/2:20-30.
Chambers, Colin
1989 The Story of Unity Theatre. London: Lawrence and Wishart.
Cosgrove, S.
1982 "The Living Newspaper: History, Production and Form." PhD diss., Hull
University.
Drain, Richard
1995 Twentieth Century Theatre: A Sourcebook. London: Routledge.
Flanagan, Hallie
1969 Arena: The Story of the Federal Theatre. New York: Limelight Editions.
Fox, Jonathan
1986 Acts of Service, Spontaneity, Commitment, Tradition in the Nonscripted Theatre.
New Paltz, NY: Tusitala Publishing.
Howarth, Peter
1987 "Origins of Psychodrama, The Living Newspaper (Lebendige Zeitung)."
Journal of the British Psychodrama Association, 2, 2 (Spring):I4-I7.
Leach, Robert
1994 Revolutionary Theatre. London: Routledge.
Marineau, Rene
1989 Jacob Levy Moreno 1889-1974. London: Tavistock/Routledge.
Moreno, Jacob Levy
1924 Das Stegreiftheater. Berlin/Postsdam: Kiepenheuer Verlag.
1925 Rede vor dem Richter. Berlin: Gustav Kiepenheuer Verlag.
1983 [1947] The Theatre of Spontaneity. Ambler, PA: Beacon House Inc.
1985 [1946] Psychodrama, First Volume. Ambler, PA: Beacon House Inc.
Moreno, Zerka
1997 Personal communication with author.
Salas, Jo
1993 Improvising Real Life: Personal Stories in Playback Theatre. Dubuque, IA:
Kendal/Hunt.
Sayler, Oliver M.
1922 The Russian Theatre. New York: Brentano's.
Wiener, Ron
1997 Personal communication with author.
Yablonsky, Louis
1978 Psychodrama. Stuttgart: Kleet-Cotta.