Audit

AUDIT
FullCoverageofICAIStudyMat
Chapterwise&AttemptWiseQ&AsBifurcation
IncludesAllIllustrations,Theory&PracticalQ&A
s
AllPastPapers,MTPs&RTPsincluded
https://t.me/caraviagarwaloriginal
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
CA FINAL AUDIT COMPILER 5.0
PAPER – 3: ADVANCED AUDITING AND PROFESSIONAL ETHICS
JOIN CA RAVI AGARWAL'S MENTORING PROGRAM TO CRACK YOUR CA EXAMS IN ONE ATTEMPT
+91-8334866117 or visit http://www.caraviagarwal.com| Join our Telegram Channel https://t.me/caraviagarwaloriginal

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
SA 200 – Overall Objectives of the Independent Auditor and the

Conduct of an Audit in Accordance with Standards on Auditing
1. ( JULY 2021 PAPER)

M/s SG & Co. Chartered Accountants were appointed as Statutory Auditors of XYZ Limited for the F.Y 2020-
2021. The Company implemented internal controls for prevention and early detection of any fraudulent
activity. Auditors carried out test of controls and found out no major observations. After the completion of
audit, audit report was submitted by the auditors and audited results were issued. Fraud pertaining to the
area of inventory came to light subsequently for the period covered by audit and auditors were asked to
make submission as to why audit failed to identify such fraud. Auditors submitted that because of inherent
limitations of audit, it is not possible to get persuasive evidence of certain matters like fraud. Do you think
auditor made correct statement? Also discuss certain subject matters or assertions where it is difficult to
detect material misstatements due to potential effects of inherent limitations.
ANSWER
Certain assertions or subject matters where it is difficult to detect material misstatements due to
potential effects of inherent limitations -
As per SA 200 - “Overall Objectives of the Independent Auditor and the Conduct of an Audit in Accordance
with Standards on Auditing” and as per SQC 1 because of the inherent limitations of an audit, there is an
3

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
unavoidable risk that some material misstatements of the financial statements may not be detected, even
though the audit is properly planned and performed in accordance with SAs.
Accordingly, the subsequent discovery of a material misstatement of the financial statements resulting
from fraud or error does not by itself indicate a failure to conduct an audit in accordance with SAs.
However, the inherent limitations of an audit are not a justification for the auditor to be satisfied with less-
than-persuasive audit evidence.
Whether the auditor has performed an audit in accordance with SAs is determined by the audit procedures
performed in the circumstances, the sufficiency and appropriateness of the audit evidence obtained as a
result thereof and the suitability of the auditor’s report based on an evaluation of that evidence in the light
of the overall objectives of the auditor.
In view of above, it can be concluded that auditors did not give correct statement.
In the case of certain assertions or subject matters, the potential effects of the inherent limitations on the
auditor’s ability to detect material misstatements are particularly significant. Such assertions or subject
matters include:
(i) Fraud, particularly fraud involving senior management or collusion.

(ii) The existence and completeness of related party relationships and transactions.
(iii) The occurrence of non-compliance with laws and regulations.
(iv) Future events or conditions that may cause an entity to cease to continue as a going concern.
2. ( MTP- NOV 2021)
Mr. S & Mr. J are a senior and junior articled assistant respectively, in a renowned audit firm. Both were
assigned statutory audit of a manufacturing company. Mr. S instructed his junior to draft an audit plan by
taking reference from a similar client (a partnership firm) who was engaged in the same business. Mr. J was
confused as to how that reference could suit in this case, since the nature and extent of planning would
vary for both clients. After few days, the audit work commenced. During the course of the audit, certain
events took place, which made Mr. J to rethink about the audit plan initially designed. He approached Mr. S
and enquired about when would an audit plan require a change. Comment about both the situations face
by Mr. J in the above situation
ANSWER
SA 200 “Overall Objectives of the Independent Auditor and the Conduct of an Audit in
accordance with Standards on Auditing” states that in order to achieve the overall objectives of the audit,
the auditor shall use the objectives stated in relevant SAs in planning and performing the audit. Without a
careful plan, the overall objective of an audit may not be achieved. The audit planning is necessary to
conduct an effective audit, in an efficient and timely manner. So far as the nature of planning is concerned,
it would vary according to-
(i) Size and Complexity of the Auditee - If the size and complexity of organization of whichaudit is to be
conducted is large, then much more planning activities would be required as compared to an entity whose
size and complexity is small.
(ii) Past Experience & Expertise - The key engagement team members’ previous experience &
expertise also contributes towards variation in planning activities.
4

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
(iii) Change in Circumstances - Another factor contributing towards variation in planning

activities is change in circumstances.
Changes to Audit Planning: The auditor should update and change the overall audit strategy
and audit plan as necessary during the course of the audit. The auditor may need to modify the
overall audit strategy and audit plan due to the factors such as (i) result of unexpected events,
(ii) changes in conditions, or (iii) the audit evidence obtained from the results of audit procedures. Further,
the auditor would also have to modify the nature, timing & extent of further audit procedures, based on
the revised considerations of assessed risks. This may be the case when information coming to the auditor
differs significantly from the information when he planned the audit process.
In addition to the above, there may be possibilities of change in law, notifications, government
policies, which warrants updation of overall audit strategy and audit plan.
2A (APRIL 2022 MTP)
Yupee (P) Ltd. got incorporated on 15th May 2021 and Mr. Harsh, the director of Yupee (P) Ltd. proposed
to Kamal & Co. on 24th May 2021, for being appointed as its statutory auditor. Mr. Kamal, the sole
proprietor of Kamal & Co., after checking the compliance with all the statutory requirements, accepted the
said offer and issued an audit engagement letter vide email to Yupee (P) Ltd.
Mr. Harsh found all terms of audit engagement to be proper but in the paragraph relating to auditor’s
responsibly in the engagement letter, as produced below:-
“We will conduct our audit in accordance with Standards on Auditing (SAs), issued by the Institute of
Chartered Accountants of India (ICAI). Those Standards require that we comply with ethical requirements
and plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are
free from material misstatement.”
Certain queries raised in his mind that what does reasonable assurance meant? Which Standard on
Auditing requires the auditor to obtain such reasonable assurance? Is it possible to give absolute assurance
on such financial statements?
Assuming that you are Mr. Kamal, the newly appointed statutory auditor of Yupee (P) Ltd. Please address
to the queries of Mr. Harsh as stated above. (5 Marks)
ANSWER:
As per SA 200, “Overall Objectives of the Independent Auditor and the Conduct of an Audit in
Accordance with Standards on Auditing”, the auditor is required:-
“To obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements as a whole are free from material
misstatement, whether due to fraud or error, thereby enabling the auditor to express an opinion on
whether the financial statements are prepared, in all material respects, in accordance with an applicable
financial reporting framework.”
Reasonable assurance is a high level of assurance and is less than absolute assurance. It is obtained when
the auditor has obtained sufficient appropriate audit evidence to reduce audit risk (i.e., the risk that the
5

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
auditor expresses an inappropriate opinion when the financial statements are materially misstated) to an
acceptably low level.
The auditor is not expected to, and cannot, reduce audit risk to zero and cannot therefore obtain absolute
assurance that the financial statements are free from material misstatement due to fraud or error. This is
because there are inherent limitations of an audit, which result in most of the audit evidence on which the
auditor draws conclusions and bases the auditor’s opinion being persuasive rather than conclusive. The
inherent limitations of an audit arise from:
• The nature of financial reporting;
• The nature of audit procedures; and
• The need for the audit to be conducted within a reasonable period of time and at a reasonable cost.
SA 210 – Agreeing to the terms of audit engagement

3. RTP Nov 2019 Qn no 12
Mr. Ram Kapoor, Chartered Accountant, has been appointed as the statutory auditor by XYZ
Private Limited for the audit of their financial statements for the year 2018-19. The company
has mentioned in the audit terms that they will not be able to provide internal audit reports to
Mr. Ram during the course of audit. Further, company also imposed some limitation on scope
of Mr. Ram.
What are the preconditions Mr. Ram should ensure before accepting/ refusing the proposal?
Also advise, whether Mr. Ram should accept the proposed audit engagement?
Answer
As per SA 210 “Agreeing the Terms of Audit Engagements”, in order to establish whether the
preconditions for an audit are present, the auditor shall:
(a) Determine whether the financial reporting framework to be applied in the preparation of the
financial statements is acceptable; and
(b) Obtain the agreement of management that it acknowledges and understands its responsibility
(i) For the preparation of the financial statements in accordance with the applicable financial
reporting framework, including where relevant their fair presentation;
(ii) For such internal control as management determines is necessary to enable the preparation of
financial statements that are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error; and
(iii) To provide the auditor with:
• Access to all information of which management is aware that is relevant to the preparation of the
financial statements such as records, documentation and other matters;
• Additional information that the auditor may request from management for the purpose of the
audit; and
• Unrestricted access to persons within the entity from whom the auditor determines it necessary
6

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
to obtain audit evidence.
Further, if management or those charged with governance impose a limitation on the scope of
the auditor’s work in the terms of a proposed audit engagement such that the auditor believes
the limitation will result in the auditor disclaiming an opinion on the financial statements, the
auditor shall not accept such a limited engagement as an audit engagement, unless required by
law or regulation to do so.
In addition if the preconditions for an audit are not present, the auditor shall discuss the matter
with management. Unless required by law or regulation to do so, the auditor shall not accept the
proposed audit engagement.
In the instant case, Mr. Ram should not accept the appointment as statutory auditor of XYZ
Private Limited due to limitation imposed on his scope of work.
4. MTP-Apr-19 Qn No 5(a) 4 Marks:

AKJ Ltd. is a small-sized 30 years old company having business of manufacturing of pipes.
Company has a plant based out of Dehradun and have their corporate office in Delhi. Recently
the company appointed new firm of Chartered Accountants as their statutory auditors. The
statutory auditors want to enter into an engagement letter with the company in respect of their
services but the management has contended that since the statutory audit is mandated by law,
engagement letter may not be required. Auditors did not agree to this and have shared a format
of engagement letter with the management for their reference before getting that signed. In
this respect management would like to understand that as per SA 210 (auditing standard
referred to by the auditors), if the agreed terms of the engagement shall be recorded in an
engagement letter or other suitable form of written agreement, what should be included in
terms of agreed audit engagement letter?
Answer:
As per SA 210 Agreeing the Terms of Audit Engagements The auditor shall agree the terms of the
audit engagement with management or those charged with governance, as appropriate. The
agreed terms of the audit engagement shall be recorded in an audit engagement letter or other
suitable form of written agreement and shall include:
(i) The objective and scope of the audit of the financial statements;
(ii) The responsibilities of the auditor;
(iii) The responsibilities of management;
(iv) Identification of the applicable financial reporting framework for the preparation of the financial
statements; and
(v) Reference to the expected form and content of any reports to be issued by the auditor and a
statement that there may be circumstances in which a report may differ from its expected form
and content.
7

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
5. May 2019 Qn no 2(c) 5 Marks
A professional accountant in public practice is always subject to various threats in compliance

with fundamental principles of his profession and you, as a professional accountant, are worried
about engagement specific threat in your audit assignment of M/s Soft Ltd. and want to
implement some measures to eliminate and reduce the same. Enumerate some engagement
specific safeguards which you may introduce in your work environment to ward off such
threats.
Answer
Engagement-specific safeguards in the work environment may include:
• Involving an additional professional accountant to review the work done or otherwise advise as
necessary.
• Consulting an independent third party, such as a committee of independent directors, a
professional regulatory body or another professional accountant.
• Discussing ethical issues with those charged with governance of the client.
• Disclosing to those charged with governance of the client the nature of services provided and
extent of fees charged.
• Involving another firm to perform or re-perform part of the engagement.
• Rotating senior assurance team personnel.
6.(RTP Nov’2020 Q No 13(a))
MEA Limited is a listed company having its operation across India. MEA Limited appointed Mr.
X, Mr. Y and Mr. Z, as its joint auditors for the year 2019-20. After making sure that all of them
are qualified to be appointed as statutory auditor, MEA Limited issued engagement letter to all
of them. But Mr. X was not clear on some points, so he requested MEA Limited to slightly
change the terms of his engagement. This change will not impact the ultimate opinion on the
financial statement. The engagement letter contains the details on objective and scope of audit,
responsibilities of auditor and identification of framework applicable. It also contains the
reference to expected form and content of report from all three joint auditors. In your opinion
what was the discrepancy in the Audit engagement letter issued by MEA Limited
Answer
Agreement on Audit Engagement Terms : As per SA 210, “Agreeing the Terms of Audit
Engagements”, the auditor shall agree the terms of the audit engagement with management or
those charged with governance, as appropriate.
Subject to prescribed details under Law or Regulations, the agreed terms of the audit engagement
shall be recorded in an audit engagement letter or other suitable form of written agreement and
shall include:
8

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
(iv) Identification of the applicable financial reporting framework for the preparation of the
financial statements; and
and content.
In the given scenario, MEA Limited appointed Mr. X, Mr. Y and Mr. Z, as its joint auditors for the
year 2019-20 and issued engagement letter to all of them. The engagement letter contains the
details on objective and scope of audit, responsibilities of auditor, identification of framework
applicable and reference to expected form and content of report from all three joint auditors.
However, engagement letter issued by MEA Ltd. does not specify the responsibilities of
management, whereas as per SA 210, it should also specify responsibilities of management
7. ( MTP- NOV 2021)
Sudharma Limited is a listed company having its operation across India. Sudharma Limited appointed Mr. S,
Mr. D and Mr. M, as its joint auditors for the year 2019-20. After making sure that all of them are qualified
to be appointed as statutory auditor, Sudharma Limited issued engagement letter to all of them. But Mr. S
was not clear on some points, so he requested Sudharma Limited to slightly change the terms of his
engagement. This change will not impact the ultimate opinion on the financial statement. The engagement
letter contains the details on objective and scope of audit, responsibilities of auditor and identification of
framework applicable. It also contains the reference to expected form and content of report from all three
joint auditors. In your opinion what was the discrepancy in the Audit engagement letter issued by
Sudharma Limited?
ANSWER
Agreement on Audit Engagement Terms : As per SA 210, “Agreeing the Terms of Audit Engagements”, the
auditor shall agree the terms of the audit engagement with management or those charged with
governance, as appropriate.
Subject to prescribed details under Law or Regulations, the agreed terms of the audit engagement shall be
recorded in an audit engagement letter or other suitable form of written agreement and shall include:
statements; and
(v) Reference to the expected form and content of any reports to be issued by the auditor and a statement
that there may be circumstances in which a report may differ from its expected form and content.
In the given scenario, Sudharma Limited appointed Mr. S, Mr. D and Mr. M, as its joint auditors for the year
2019-20 and issued engagement letter to all of them. The engagement letter contains the details on
objective and scope of audit, responsibilities of auditor, identification of framework applicable and
reference to expected form and content of report from all three joint auditors. However, engagement
letter issued by Sudharma Ltd. does not specify the responsibilities of management, whereas as per SA 210,
it should also specify responsibilities of management.
9

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
7A(SEPT 2022 MTP)
NEW Limited is a listed company having its operation across India. NEW Limited appointed Mr. N, Mr. E and
Mr. W, as its joint auditors for the year 2021-22. After making sure that all of them are qualified to be
appointed as statutory auditor, NEW Limited issued engagement letter to all of them. But Mr. N was not
clear on some points, so he requested NEW Limited to slightly change the terms of his engagement. This
change will not impact the ultimate opinion on the financial statement. The engagement letter contains the
details on objective and scope of audit, responsibilities of auditor and identification of framework
applicable. It also contains the reference to expected form and content of report from all three joint
auditors. In your opinion what was the discrepancy in the Audit engagement letter issued by NEW Limited?
ANSWER :
Agreement on Audit Engagement Terms: As per SA 210, “Agreeing the Terms of Audit Engagements”, the
auditor shall agree the terms of the audit engagement with management or those charged with
governance, as appropriate.
Subject to prescribed details under Law or Regulations, the agreed terms of the audit engagement shall be
recorded in an audit engagement letter or other suitable form of written agreement and shall include:
statements; and
statement that there may be circumstances in which a report may differ from its expected form and
content.
In the given scenario, NEW Limited appointed Mr. N, Mr. E and Mr. W, as its joint auditors for the year
2021-22 and issued engagement letter to all of them. The engagement letter contains the details on
objective and scope of audit, responsibilities of auditor, identification of framework applicable and
reference to expected form and content of report from all three joint auditors. However, engagement
letter issued by NEW Ltd. does not specify the responsibilities of management, whereas as per SA 210, it
should also specify responsibilities of management.
SA 220 - Quality Control for an Audit of Financial Statements

Multiple Choice Questions
8. MTP Apr 19 Qn no 19 (2 Marks)
Don’t Pay for Fun (DPF)’ is a start-up who is trying to get funding from investors. One of the
investor s has expressed interest in looking at the investment proposal but has insisted that the
proposal also contain DPF’s financial statements which are audited by an independent
auditor. DPF engages CA Abhishek to conduct an independent audit and Abhishek issues an
10

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
engagement letter for the independent audit to the owner of DPF which is duly acknowledged.
DPF while finalising the financial statements is facing some difficulties so its owner requests
Abhishek to provide advice as it needs to furnish the proposal to the investor fast. Since Abhishek
is already engaged in the audit of the transactions, he assists DPF’s accounting officer and the
financial statements are finalised. Abhishek also completes the audit and presents the audit
report which is provided to the investor. Has the condition set by the investor been fulfilled?
a. No, the investor had asked for independent audit.
b. Yes, as the audit report is issued after proper audit engagement letter and also examination of the
books of accounts.
c. No, because CA Abhishek did not change the terms of engagement to include the advice part
alongwith the independent audit. In order for his audit report to be independent, he should have
charged separate fees for the advice.
d. Yes, DPF has hired a qualified CA to conduct the audit. Not only there is no evidence to suggest
that the auditor allowed any misrepresentation, but the auditor himself advised DPF in finalising
the financial statements which speaks highly of the quality of financial statements.
Answer: Option (a) No, the investor had asked for independent audit.
9. MTP Oct 2019 Qn no 19 (2 Marks)

One of your audit client Vernon Co with a year ending 31 March 2019 is planning to prepare the
financial statements from the next year as per Indian Accounting Standards (Ind AS). The finance
director of Vernon Co has contacted the audit engagement partner, asking if your firm can
provide training on Ind AS to the accounts department of the entity. This will help them to
understand all the provisions of Ind AS and the transition process will be easier.
Which of the following options needs to be considered by the audit engagement partner?
(a) The issue is whether there is a self-interest threat, as the auditor will receive separate training
fees for the service provided. The audit partner should decline the training assignm ent.
(b) The issue is whether the audit firm would be likely to possess the requisite competence to
provide such training to the staff of the entity. The audit partner should decline not all the
qualified people are good trainers.
(c) The audit partner could go ahead with the training service and disclose the fact in its audit
report about the service provided during the period. This will safeguard and reduce the threat
to an acceptable level.
(d) The audit partner needs to assess the materiality of the figure, and the degree of subjectivity
involved. If it considers that safeguards like using separate personnel, could reduce the threat
to an acceptable level, then it can go ahead with both the audit and the training assignment.
Answer: (d) The audit partner needs to assess the materiality of the figure, and the degree of subjectivity
involved. If it considers that safeguards like using separate personnel, could reduce the threat to an
acceptable level, then it can go ahead with both the audit and the training assignment.
10. RTP Nov 2019 Qn no 7 and Study Material

VKPL & Associates, a firm of Chartered Accountants, have been operating for the last 5 years
11

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
having its office in Gurgaon. The firm has staff of around 25 persons with 3 Partners.
The firm has been offering statutory audit, risk advisory and tax services to its various clients.
The major work of the firm is for taxation services. The audit partners also discussed that the
firm needs to work significantly to improve the quality of the services they offer and that would
also help the firm to grown its business. Considering this objective, the firm started training
programmes for the
staff which were made mandatory to be attended.
During one of the training programmes on quality, a topic was discussed regarding the
information that should be obtained by the firm before accepting an engagement with a new
client, when deciding whether to continue an existing engagement, and when considering
acceptance of a new engagement with an existing client. It was explained that the following
points may assist the engagement partner in determining whether the conclusions reached
regarding the acceptance and continuance of client relationships and audit engagements are
appropriate (as per SA 220):
(i) The integrity of the principal owners, key management and those charged with governance of
the entity;
(ii) The qualification of all the employees of the entity;
(iii) Whether the engagement team is competent to perform the audit engagement and has the
necessary capabilities, including time and resources;
(iv) The remuneration offered by the entity to its various consultants;
(v) Whether the firm and the engagement team can comply with relevant ethical requirements;
and
(vi) Significant matters that have arisen during the current or previous audit engagement, and their
implications for continuing the relationship.
We would like to understand from you which of the above mentioned points are relevant for
the topic under discussion or not?
(a) i, ii, iv and v.
(b) ii, iv, v and vi.
(c) iii, iv, v and vi.
(d) i, iii, v and vi.
Answer: Option D
11. MTP Mar 2019 Qn no 18 (2 Marks)

You are a manager in the audit department of Narang & Co, and you are dealing with several
ethical and professional matters raised at recent management meetings, all of which relate to
audit clients of your firm:
One of your client Bernwood Co has a year ending 31 March 2018. During this year, the company
established a pension plan for its employees, and this year end the company will be recognising
for the first time a pension deficit on the balance sheet, in accordance with Ind AS 19 Employee
Benefits. The finance director of Bernwood Co has contacted the audit engagement partner,
12

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
asking if your firm can provide an actuarial valuation service in respect of the amount recognised.
Which of the following options need to be considered by the audit engagement partner?
(a) The issue is whether there is a self-review threat, as the valuation of the amount recognised
would be recorded in the financial statements. The audit partner should decline the work of
valuation service.
(b) The issue is whether the audit firm would be likely to possess the requisite competence to provide
such a valuation service. The audit partner should decline since not professionally qualified to
provide the valuation service.
(c) Narang & Co. needs to assess the materiality of the figure, and the degree of subjectivity
involved. If it considers that safeguards like using separate personnel, performing a second
partner review, could reduce the threat to an acceptable level, then it can go ahead with both
the audit and the valuation service.
(d) The audit partner could go ahead with the valuation service and disclose the fact in its audit
report about the service provided during the period. This will safeguard and reduce the threat to
an acceptable level.
Answer: (c) Narang & Co. needs to assess the materiality of the figure, and the degree of
subjectivity involved. If it considers that safeguards like using separate personnel, performing a
second partner review, could reduce the threat to an acceptable level, then it can go ahead with
both the audit and the valuation service.
Descriptive Questions
MTP Apr 18 Qn no.1(a) 5 Marks
12. Rishikumar & Co. has been appointed as an auditor of PK Ltd. for the financial year 2016
-17. CA. Kumar, one of the partners of M/s Rishikumar & Co., completed entire routine audit
work by 29th May, 2017. Unfortunately, on the very next morning, while roving towards office
of PK Ltd. to sign final audit report, he met with a road accident and died. CA. Rishi, another
partner of M/s Rishikumar & Co., therefore, signed the accounts of PK Ltd., without reviewing
the work performed by CA. Kumar. Advise, whether CA. Rishi is right in expressing an opinion on
financial statements the audit of which is performed by another auditor.
Answer
Relying on Work Performed by Another Auditor: As per SA 220 “Quality Control for an Audit of
Financial Statements”, an engagement partner taking over an audit during the engagement may
apply the review procedures such as the work has been performed in accordance with professional
standards and regulatory and legal requirements; significant matters have been raised for further
consideration;
appropriate consultations have taken place and the resulting conclusions have been documented
and implemented; there is a need to revise the nature, timing and extent of work performed; the
work performed supports the conclusions reached and is appropriately documented; the
evidence obtained is sufficient and appropriate to support the auditor’s report; and the objectives
of the engagement procedures have been achieved.
Further, one of the basic principles, which govern the auditor’s professional responsibilities and
which should be complied with wherever an audit is carried, is that when the auditor delegates
work to assistants or uses work performed by other auditor and experts, he will continue to be
13

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
responsible for forming and expressing his opinion on the financial information. However, he will
be entitled to rely on work performed by others, provided he exercises adequate skill and care
and is not aware of any reason to believe that he should not have so rel ied. This is the fundamental
principle which is ethically required as per Code of Ethics.
However, the auditor should carefully direct, supervise and review work delegated. He should
obtain reasonable assurance that work performed by other auditors/experts and assistants is
adequate for his purpose.
In the given case, all the auditing procedures before the moment of signing of final report have
been performed by CA. Kumar. However, the report could not be signed by him due to his
unfortunate death. Later on, CA. Rishi signed the report relying on the work performed by CA.
Kumar.
Here, CA. Rishi is allowed to sign the audit report, though, will be responsible for expressing the
opinion. He may rely on the work performed by CA. Kumar provided he further exercises adequate
skill and due care and review the work performed by him as required in compliance with SA 220.
13.MTP-OCT-18 Qn No 1(a) 5 Marks:
OP & Associates are the statutory auditors of BB Ltd. BB Ltd is a listed company and started its
operations 5 years back. The field work during the audit of the financial statements of the
company for the year ended March 31, 2018 got completed on May 1, 2018. The auditor’s
report was dated May 12, 2018. During the documentation review of the engagement, it was
observed that the engagement quality control review was completed on May 15, 2018.
Engagement partner had completed his reviews in entirety by May 10, 2018. Comment.
Answer:
Review by Engagement Partner: As per SA 220, “Quality Control for an Audit of Financial
Statements”, the engagement partner shall take responsibility for reviews being performed in
accordance with the firm’s review policies and procedures. For audits of financial statements of
listed entities, the engagement partner shall:
• Determine that an engagement quality control reviewer has been appointed;
• Discuss significant matters arising during the audit engagement,
including those identified during the engagement quality control review, with the engagement
quality control reviewer; and
Not date the auditor’s report until the completion of the engagement quality control review. SA
700, “Forming an Opinion and Reporting on Financial Statements”, requires the auditor’s report
to be dated no earlier than the date on which the auditor has obtained sufficient appropriate
evidence on which to base the auditor’s opinion on the financial statements. In cases of an audit
of financial statements of listed entities
where the engagement meets the criteria for an engagement quality control review, such a review
assists the auditor in determining whether sufficient appropriate evidence has been obtained.
Conducting the engagement quality control review in a timely manner at appropriate stages
during the engagement allows significant matters to be promptly resolved to the engagement
14

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
quality control reviewer’s satisfaction on or before the date of the auditor’s report.
In the instant case, OP & Associates are the statutory auditors of a listed company BB Ltd. Which
started its operations 5 years back. The field work during the audit of the financial statements of
the company for the year ended March 31, 2018 got completed on May 1, 2018. The auditor’s
report was dated May 12, 2018. During the documentation review of the engagement, i t was
observed that the engagement quality control review was completed on May 15 , 2018.
Thus, in the given case, signing of auditor’s report i.e. on May 12, 2018 which is before the
completion of review engagement quality control review i.e. May 15, 2018, is not in order.
14. RTP May 2019 Qn no 11(C), MTP-OCT-19 Qn No 6(c) 4 Marks:
During the audit of FMP Ltd, a listed company, Engagement Partner (EP) completed his reviews
and also ensured compliance with independence requirements that apply to the audit
engagement. The engagement files were also reviewed by the Engagement Quality Control
Reviewer (EQCR) except the independence assessment documentation. Engagement Partner
was of the view that matters related to independence assessment are the responsibility of the
Engagement Partner and not Engagement Quality Control Reviewer. Engagement Quality Control
Reviewer objected to this and refused to sign off the documentation. Please advise as per SA 220.
(ALSO IN STUDY MAT)
Answer
As per SA 220, Engagement Partner shall form a conclusion on compliance with independence
requirements that apply to the audit engagement. In doing so, Engagement Partner shall:
• Obtain relevant information from the firm and, where applicable, network firms, to identify and
evaluate circumstances and relationships that create threats to independence;
• Evaluate information on identified breaches, if any, of the firm’s independence policies and
procedures to determine whether they create a threat to independence for the audit engagement;
and
• Take appropriate action to eliminate such threats or reduce them to an acceptable level by
applying safeguards, or, if considered appropriate, to withdraw from the audit engagement,
where withdrawal is permitted by law or regulation. The engagement partner shall promptly
report to the firm any inability to resolve the matter for appropriate action.
Engagement Partner shall take responsibility for reviews being performed in accordance with the
firm’s review policies and procedures.
As per SA 220, “Quality Control for Audit of Financial Statements”, for audits of financial statements
of listed entities, Engagement Quality Control Reviewer (EQCR), on performing an engagement
quality control review, shall also consider the engagement team’s evaluation of the firm’s
independence in relation to the audit engagement.
In the given case, Engagement Partner is not right. The independence assessment documentation
should also be given to Engagement Quality Control Reviewer for his review.
15. (PAST EXAM MAY 2018)

Distinguish
15

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
(i) Self-interest threat from self-review threat in an Assurance Engagement
(ii) Reasonable Assurance Engagement from Limited Assurance Engagement
ANSWER
(i) Self Interest Threat and Self Review Threat in an Assurance Engagement
Self Interest Threat: Self-interest threats, which may occur as a result of the financial or other interests of a
professional accountant or of a relative.
Circumstances that may create self-interest threats

• A financial interest in a client or jointly holding a financial interest with a client.
• Undue dependence on total fees from a client.
• Having a close business relationship with a client.
• Concern about the possibility of losing a client.
• Potential employment with a client.
• Contingent fees relating to an assurance engagement.
Self-Review Threat: Self-review threats, which may occur when a previous judgment needs to be re-
evaluated by the professional accountant responsible for that judgment;
Examples of circumstances that may create self-review threats
1. The discovery of a significant error during a re-evaluation of the work of the professional accountant in
public practice.
2. Reporting on the operation of financial systems after being involved in their design or implementation.
3. Having prepared the original data used to generate records that are the subject matter of the
engagement.
4. A member of the assurance team being, or having recently been, a director or officer of that client.
5. A member of the assurance team being, or having recently been, employed by the client in a position to
exert direct and significant influence over the subject matter of the engagement.
6. Performing a service for a client that directly affects the subject matter of the assurance engagement.
(ii) Reasonable Assurance Engagement and Limited Assurance Engagement :
Limited Assurance Reasonable Assurance
1 The practitioner should designing and The practitioner should designing and
perform procedures to address the subject perform procedures to address the
matter and to subject matter and to obtain limited
obtain limited assurance to support and to assurance to support and obtain limited
obtain limited assurance to support the assurance to support the practitioner’s
practitioner’s conclusion. conclusion.
16

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
2 In obtaining an understanding of the In obtaining an understanding of the

underlying subject matter and other underlying subject matter and other
engagement circumstances, the practitioner engagement circumstances, the
should consider the process used to prepare practitioner should obtain an
the subject matter information. understanding of internal control over
the preparation of the subject matter
information relevant to the engagement.
3. Based on the practitioner’s understanding, Based on the practitioner’s
the practitioner should: understanding the practitioner should:
(a) Identify areas where a material (a) Identify and assess the risks of
misstatement of the subject matter material misstatement in the subject
information is likely to arise; matter information; and
(b) Design and perform procedures to (b) Design and perform procedures to
address the areas and to obtain limited respond to the assessed risks and to
assurance to support the practitioner’s obtain reasonable assurance to support
conclusion. the practitioner’s opinion.
15A(OCT 2022 MTP)
NEMI Limited (manufacturer of textile goods) got an order of manufacturing of PPE kits in December
2021. But there was shortage of machinery and manpower to accomplish the ordered requirement of PPE
kits. NEMI Limited approached another manufacturing unit Rathnemi Limited for purchase of the unit.
Rathnemi Limited was interested in the sale of unit, so the deal went through, and NEMI Limited acquired
ninety five percent shares of Rathnemi Limited. The new management of Rathnemi Limited proposed and
appointed Mani Associates, Chartered Accountants, (already auditors of NEMI Limited) as new auditors of
Rathnemi Limited. Mani Associates accepted the assignment without considering information whether the
conclusions reached regarding the acceptance and continuance of client relationships and audit
engagements are appropriate. Comment with respect to appropriate Standard on Auditing what type of
information assists the engagements partner in determining whether the conclusions reached regarding
the acceptance and continuance of client relationships and audit engagements are appropriate or not?
ANSWER :
Acceptance and Continuance of Client Relationships and Audit Engagements : As per SA 220, “Quality
Control for an Audit of Financial Statements” , SQC 1, “Quality Control for Firms that Perform Audits and
Reviews of Historical Financial Information, and Other Assurance and Related Services Engagements”,
requires the firm to obtain information considered necessary in the circumstances before accepting an
engagement with a new client, when deciding whether to continue an existing engagement, and when
considering acceptance of a new engagement with an existing client.
Information such as the following assists the engagement partner in determining whether the conclusions
reached regarding the acceptance and continuance of client relationships and audit engagements are
appropriate:
(i) The integrity of the principal owners, key management and those charged with governance of the
entity.
(ii) Whether the engagement team is competent to perform the audit engagement and has the
necessary capabilities, including time and resources.
17

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
(iii) Whether the firm and the engagement team can comply with relevant ethical requirements; and
(iv) Significant matters that have arisen during the current or previous audit engagement, and their
implications for continuing the relationship.
15B (MAY 2022 RTP)
During the audit of Mahaveer Ltd, a listed company, Engagement Partner (EP) completed his reviews and
also ensured compliance with independence requirements that apply to the audit engagement. The
engagement files were also reviewed by the Engagement Quality Control Reviewer (EQCR) except the
independence assessment documentation. Engagement Partner was of the view that matters related to
independence assessment are the responsibility of the Engagement Partner and not Engagement Quality
Control Reviewer. Engagement Quality Control Reviewer objected to this and refused to sign off the
documentation. Please advise as per SA 220.
ANSWER :
As per SA 220, Engagement Partner shall form a conclusion on compliance with independence
requirements that apply to the audit engagement. In doing so, the Engagement Partner shall:
• Obtain relevant information from the firm and, where applicable, network f irms, to identify and
evaluate circumstances and relationships that create threats to independence;
• Evaluate information on identified breaches, if any, of the firm’s independence policies and
procedures to determine whether they create a threat to independence for the audit engagement; and
• Take appropriate action to eliminate such threats or reduce them to an acceptable level by applying
safeguards, or, if considered appropriate, to withdraw from the audit engagement, where withdrawal is
permitted by law or regulation. The engagement partner shall promptly report to the firm any inability to
resolve the matter for appropriate action.
Engagement Partner shall take responsibility for reviews being performed in
accordance with the firm’s review policies and procedures.
As per SA 220, “Quality Control for Audit of Financial Statements”, for audits of financial statements of
listed entities, Engagement Quality Control Reviewer (EQCR), on performing an engagement quality control
review, shall also consider the engagement team’s evaluation of the firm’s independence in relation to the
audit engagement.
In the given case, the Engagement Partner is not right. The independence assessment documentation
should also be given to Engagement Quality Control Reviewer for his review.
SQC 1 – Quality Control of Firms that perform audit and reviews historical
information and other assurance related service engagements
16. RTP May 2019 Qn no 11(b)
BSS & Associates is a partnership firm of Chartered Accountants which was established five years
back. The firm was offering only advisory services at the beginning, however, after audit rotation
18

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
and advent of GST, firm sees lot of potential in these areas also and started looking for
opportunities in these areas also. These services being assurance in nature, the firm required
some internal restructuring and set up some policies and procedures for compliance year on
year.
The firm started getting new clients for these new services and is now looking to obtain such
information as it considers necessary in the circumstances before accepting an engagement with
a new client, when deciding whether to continue an existing engagement, and when considering
acceptance of a new engagement with an existing client. Where issues have been identified,
and the firm decides to accept or continue the client relationship or a specific engagement, it
has been setting up a process to document how the issues were resolved.
The firm is now looking to work with only select clients which are in line with the policies of the
firm. The firm understands that the extent of knowledge it will have regarding the integrity of a
client will grow within the context of an ongoing relationship with that client. With regard to the
integrity of a client, you are required to give some examples of the matters to be considered by
the firm as per the requirements of SQC 1.
Nov 2019 Qn no 1(C) 4 Marks

MB & Associates is a partnership firm of Chartered Accountants which was established seven
years back. The firm is getting new clients and has also, been offered new engagement services
with existing clients. The firm is concerned about obtaining such information as it considers
necessary in the circumstances before accepting an engagement with a new client and
acceptance of a new engagement with an existing client. The firm is looking to work with only
select clients to adhere to the Quality Control Standards. Guide MB & Associates about the
matters to be considered with regard to the integrity of a client, as per the requirements of SQC
1
Answer
The firm should obtain such information as it considers necessary in the circumstances before
accepting an engagement with a new client, when deciding whether to continue an existing
engagement, and when considering acceptance of a new engagement with an existing client.
Where issues have been identified, and the firm decides to accept or continue the client
relationship or a specific engagement, it should document how the issues were resolved.
With regard to the integrity of a client, matters that the firm considers include, for example:
➢ The identity and business reputation of the client’s principal owners, key management, related
parties and those charged with its governance.
➢ The nature of the client’s operations, including its business practices.
➢ Information concerning the attitude of the client’s principal owners, key management and those
charged with its governance towards such matters as aggressive interpretation of accounting
standards and the internal control environment.
➢ Whether the client is aggressively concerned with maintaining the firm’s fees as
low as possible.
➢ Indications of an inappropriate limitation in the scope of work.
19

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
➢ Indications that the client might be involved in money laundering or other criminal activities.
➢ The reasons for the proposed appointment of the firm and non-reappointment of the previous firm.
The extent of knowledge a firm will have regarding the integrity of a client will generally grow
within the context of an ongoing relationship with that client.
17. M/s NK & Co., Chartered Accountants were appointed as Statutory Auditors of Fresh Juice Limited for
the F.Y 2019-2020. The previous year's audit was conducted by M/s. LP & Associates. After the audit was
completed and report submitted, it was found that closing balances of last financial year i.e., 2018-19
were incorrectly brought forward. It was found that M/s NK & Co. did not apply any audit procedures to
ensure that correct opening balances have been brought forward to the current period.
Accordingly, a complaint was filed against NK & Co. in relation to this matter. You are required to inform
what policies are required to be implemented by NK & Co. for dealing with such complaints and
allegations as required by Standard on Quality Control (SQC). (5 Marks)
(past exam jan 2021)
ANSWER
In the given question, NK & Co. did not apply audit procedures to ensure that opening balances had been
correctly brought forward. A complaint was filed against the auditors in this context. As per Standard on
Quality Control (SQC) 1 “Quality Control for Firms that Perform Audits and Reviews of Historical Financial
Information, and Other Assurance and Related Services Engagements”,
(i) The firm should establish policies and procedures designed to provide it with reasonable assurance that
it deals appropriately with:
(a) Complaints and allegations that the work performed by the firm fails to comply with professional
standards and regulatory and legal requirements; and
(b) Allegations of non-compliance with the firm’s system of quality control.
(ii) Complaints and allegations (which do not include those that are clearly frivolous) may originate from
within or outside the firm. They may be made by firm personnel, clients or other third parties. They may be
received by engagement team members or other firm personnel.
(iii) As part of this process, the firm establishes clearly defined channels for firm personnel to raise any
concerns in a manner that enables them to come forward without fear of reprisals.
(iv) The firm investigates such complaints and allegations in accordance with established policies and
procedures. The investigation is supervised by a partner with sufficient and appropriate experience and
authority within the firm but who is not otherwise involved in the engagement, and includes involving legal
counsel as necessary. Small firms and sole practitioners may use the services of a suitably qualified external
person or another firm to carry out the investigation. Complaints, allegations and the responses to them
are documented.
(v) Where the results of the investigations indicate deficiencies in the design or operation of the firm’s
quality control policies and procedures, or non -compliance with the firm’s system of quality control by an
individual or individuals, the firm takes appropriate action.
20

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s

HK & Co. Chartered Accountants have been auditors of SAT Ltd (a listed entity) for the last 8 financial years.
CA. H, partner of the firm, has been handling the audit assignment very well since the appointment. The
audit work of CA. H and her team is reviewed by a senior partner CA. K to assure that audit is performed in
accordance with professional standards and regulatory and legal requirements. CA. K was out of India for
some personal reasons, so this year CA. G has been asked to review the audit work. In your opinion, what
areas CA. G should consider at the time of review. List any four areas and also comment whether firm is
complying with Standard on Quality Control or not.
ANSWER
Compliance with Standard on Quality Control on review of audit work -
As per SQC 1, an engagement quality control review for audits of financial statements of listed entities
includes considering the following:
(i) The work has been performed in accordance with professional standards and regulatory and legal
requirements;
(ii) Significant matters have been raised for further consideration;
(iii) Appropriate consultations have taken place and the resulting conclusions have been documented and
implemented;
(iv) There is a need to revise the nature, timing and extent of work performed;
(v) The work performed supports the conclusions reached and is appropriately documented;
(vi) The evidence obtained is sufficient and appropriate to support the report; and
(vii) The objectives of the engagement procedures have been achieved.
The firm should establish policies and procedures:
(i) Setting out criteria for determining the need for safeguards to reduce the familiarity threat to an
acceptable level when using the same senior personnel on an assurance engagement over a long period of
time; and
(ii) For all audits of financial statements of listed entities, requiring the rotation of the engagement partner
after a specified period in compliance with the Code.
The familiarity threat is particularly relevant in the context of financial statement audits of listed entities.
For these audits, the engagement partner should be rotated after a pre-defined period, normally not more
than seven years.
From the facts given in the question and from the above stated paras of SQC 1, it can be concluded that
firm is not complying with SQC 1 as Engagement Partner H is continuing for more than 7 years
18Amay2022 EXAM
PQR & Associates, Chartered Accountants, is a partnership firm having 3 partners CA P, CA Q and CA R. PQR
& Associates are appointed as Statutory Auditors of ABC Limited, a listed entity for the financial year 2021-
22 and CA P is appointed as Engagement Partner for the audit of ABC Limited. Before issuing the Audit
Report of ABC Limited, CA P asked CA R to perform Engagement Quality Control Review and is of the view
that his responsibility will be reduced after review by CA R. Whether the contention of CA P is correct?
What are the aspects that need to be considered by CA R while performing Engagement Quality Control
Review for audit of financial statements of ABC Limited?
ANSWER :
As per SQC 1, “Quality Control for Firms that Perform Audit and Reviews of Historical Financial Information,
and other Assurance and Related Services Engagements”, the review does not reduce the responsibilities
21

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
of the engagement partner. Hence, contention of CA. P that after engagement quality control review by CA.
R, his responsibility will be reduced, is not correct.
However, CA. R needs to consider the following aspect while performing Engagement Quality Control
Review for audit of financial statements of a listed entity ABC Ltd.:
1. The engagement team’s evaluation of the firm’s independence in relation to the
specific engagement.
2. Significant risks identified during the engagement and the responses to those risks.
3. Judgments made, particularly with respect to materiality and significant risks.
4. Whether appropriate consultation has taken place on matters involving differences of opinion or
other difficult or contentious matters, and the conclusions arising from those consultations.
5. The significance and disposition of corrected and uncorrected misstatements identified during the
engagement.
6. The matters to be communicated to management and those charged with governance and, where
applicable, other parties such as regulatory bodies.
7. Whether working papers selected for review reflect the work performed in relation to the significant
judgments and support the conclusions reached.
8. The appropriateness of the report to be issued.
Engagement quality control reviews for engagements other than audits of financial statements of listed
entities may, depending on the circumstances, include some or all of these considerations.
18B(OCT 2022 MTP)

Vishudh Sagar & Co. Chartered Accountants have been auditors of JIN Ltd (a listed entity) for the last 8
financial years. CA. Manidhari, partner of the firm, has been handling the audit assignment very well since
the appointment. The audit work of CA. Manidhari and his team is reviewed by a senior partner CA.
Mahendra Sagar to assure that audit is performed in accordance with professional standards and
regulatory and legal requirements. CA. Mahendra was out of India for some personal reasons, so this year
CA. Kushal, who is relatively less experienced team member, has been asked to review the audit work. In
your opinion, what areas CA. Kushal should consider at the time of review. List any four areas and also
comment whether firm is complying with Standard on Quality Control or not.
ANSWER :
Compliance with Standard on Quality Control on review of audit work - As per SQC 1, “Quality Control for
Firms that Perform Audits and Reviews of Historical Financial Information, and Other Assurance and
Related Services Engagements”, review responsibilities are determined on the basis that more experienced
engagement team members, including the engagement partner, review work performed by less
experienced team members. An engagement quality control review for audits of financial statements of
listed entities includes considering the following:
requirements;
(ii) Significant matters have been raised for further consideration;
(iii) Appropriate consultations have taken place and the resulting conclusions have been
documented and implemented;
(iv) There is a need to revise the nature, timing and extent of work performed;
(v) The work performed supports the conclusions reached and is appropriately documented;
(vii) The objectives of the engagement procedures have been achieved.
The firm should establish policies and procedures:
(i) Setting out criteria for determining the need for safeguards to reduce the familiarity threat to an
acceptable level when using the same senior personnel on an assurance engagement over a long period of
time; and
(ii) For all audits of financial statements of listed entities, requiring the rotation of the engagement
partner after a specified period in compliance with the Code.
22

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
The familiarity threat is particularly relevant in the context of financial statement audits of lis ted entities.
For these audits, the engagement partner should be rotated after a pre -defined period, normally not more
than seven years.
From the facts given in the question and from the above stated paras of SQC 1, it can be concluded that
firm is not complying with SQC 1 as Engagement Partner Manidhari is continuing for more than 7 years.
18C MARCH 2022 MTP

M/s Chandra & Co., Chartered Accountants were appointed as Statutory Auditors of Green Essence
Limited for the F.Y 2021-2022. The previous year's audit was conducted by M/s. Nath & Associates. After
the audit was completed and report submitted, it was found that closing balances of last financial year i.e.,
2020-21 were incorrectly brought forward. It was found that M/s Chandra
& Co. did not apply any audit procedures to ensure that correct opening balances have been brought
forward to the current period. Accordingly, a complaint was filed against Chandra & Co. in relation to this
matter.
You are required to inform what policies are required to be implemented by Chandra & Co. for dealing with
such complaints and allegations as required by Standard on Quality Control (SQC).
ANSWER :
In the given question, Chandra & Co. did not apply audit procedures to ensure that opening balances had
been correctly brought forward. A complaint was filed against the auditors in this context. As per Standard
on Quality Control (SQC) 1 “Quality Control for Firms that Perform Audits and Reviews of Historical
Financial Information, and Other Assurance and Related Services Engagements”,
(i) The firm should establish policies and procedures designed to provide it with reasonable assurance
that it deals appropriately with:
(a) Complaints and allegations that the work performed by the firm fails to comply with professional
standards and regulatory and legal requirements; and
(b) Allegations of non-compliance with the firm’s system of quality control.
(ii) Complaints and allegations (which do not include those that are clearly frivolous) may originate from
within or outside the firm. They may be made by firm personnel, clients or other third parties. They may be
received by engagement team members or other firm personnel.
(iii) As part of this process, the firm establishes clearly defined channels for firm personnel to raise any
concerns in a manner that enables them to come forward without fear of reprisals.
(iv) The firm investigates such complaints and allegations in accordance with established policies and
procedures. The investigation is supervised by a partner with sufficient and appropriate experience and
authority within the firm but who is not otherwise involved in the engagement, and includes involving legal
counsel as necessary. Small firms and sole practitioners may use the services of a suitably qualified external
person or another firm to carry out the investigation. Complaints, allegations and the responses to them
are documented.
(v) Where the results of the investigations indicate deficiencies in the design or operation of the firm’s
quality control policies and procedures, or non-compliance with the firm’s system of quality control by an
individual or individuals, the firm takes appropriate action.
SA 230 -Audit Documentation

19. RTP May 2019 Qn no 2
Ram & Shyam Co LLP is an old firm of Chartered Accountants with Ram and Shyam as the audit
partners. The firm has various statutory audit and internal audit engagements which are looked
after by Ram and Shyam respectively. In the previous year ended 31 March 2018, one of the audit
engagements of the firm was picked up for peer review and peer reviewer raised various
23

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
observations regarding the audit documentation. Some of the information regarding audits were
missing from the audit files as per the observation of the peer reviewer.
Ram & Shyam are in the process of establishing a robust mechanism for audit documentation so
that the same is available for a long duration and would lead to audit efficiencies also in the future
years.
Ram and Shyam would like to understand the period for which audit documentation should be
maintained by them as per the Standard on Auditing 230. Please advise.
a. 10 years.
b. 9 years.
c. 8 years.
d. 7 years.
Answer: Option D
20. RTP May 2020 Qn no 11(C)
Mr. PM, a practising Chartered Accountant, has been appointed as an auditor of Truth Pvt. Ltd.
What factors would influence the amount of working papers required to be maintained for the
purpose of his audit?
ANSWER:
Factors Influencing the amount of Working Papers: As per SA 230 “Audit Documentation”, which refers
to the record of audit procedures performed, relevant audit evidence obtained and conclusions the
auditor reached, the amount of audit working papers depend on factors such as-
(i) The size and complexity of the entity.

(ii) The nature of the audit procedures to be performed.
(iii) The identified risks of material misstatement.
(iv) The significance of the audit evidence obtained.
(v) The nature and extent of exceptions identified.
(vi) The need to document a conclusion or the basis for a conclusion not readily determinable from the
documentation of the work performed or audit evidence obtained.
(vii) The audit methodology and tools used.
(viii) Timely preparation of Audit Documentation.
20A (MAY 2022 EXAM)
You are the team leader of 10 members for an audit of a Multinational Company. All the team members
are concerned about audit documentation in order to provide evidence that the audit complies with SAs.
Hence, the team members wish to document every matter concerned. In your opinion it is neither
necessary nor practicable for the auditor to document every matter considered or professional judgement
made in an audit. Further you feel that it is unnecessary for the auditor to document separately compliance
with matters for which compliance is demonstrated by documents included within the audit file. Illustrate
by giving examples with reference to relevant Standard on Auditing.
ANSWER :
24

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
SA 230, “Audit Documentation”, provides evidence that the audit complies with SAs. However, it is
neither necessary nor practicable for the auditor to document every matter considered, or professional
judgment made, in an audit.
For example,
(i) the existence of an adequately documented audit plan demonstrates that the auditor has planned
the audit.
(ii) the existence of a signed engagement letter in the audit file demonstrates that the auditor has
agreed the terms of the audit engagement with management, or where appropriate, those charged with
governance.
(iii) An auditor’s report containing an appropriately qualified opinion demonstrates that the auditor has
complied with the requirement to express a qualified opinion under the circumstances specified in the SAs.
(iv) In relation to requirements that apply generally throughout the audit, there may be a number of
ways in which compliance with them may be demonstrated within the audit file:
• For example, there may be no single way in which the auditor’s professional skepticism is
documented. But the audit documentation may nevertheless provide evidence of the auditor’s exercise of
professional skepticism in accordance with SAs. Such evidence may include specific procedures performed
to corroborate management’s responses to the auditor’s inquiries.
• Similarly, that the engagement partner has taken responsibility for the direction, supervision and
performance of the audit in compliance with the SAs may be evidenced in a number of ways within the
audit documentation. This may include documentation of the engagement partner’s timely involvement in
aspects of the audit, such as participation in the team discussion required by SA 315, “Identifying and
Assessing the Risks of Material Misstatement through Understanding the Entity and Its Environment”
20B (OCT 2022 MTP)
A small concern has approached CA. Ajeet Nath for audit of accounts for year 2021-22. It later on
transpired that preparation of accounts of the concern was outsourced to a third party which was engaged
in preparation of books of this concern on a cloud server and was also prepari ng financial statements. The
discussion amongst partners regarding agreeing to audit engagement remained inconclusive. Which of the
following statements is MOST APPROPRIATE regarding agreeing to audit engagement of small concern?
(a) The management is responsible for preparation of books and financial statements. If management is
not willing to acknowledge it, audit engagement should not be accepted.
(b) The third party has prepared the books and financial statements. It should be acknowledged by third
party and then audit engagement should be accepted.
(c) It is implied that management is responsible for preparation of books and financial statements. No
express acknowledgment from management is necessary. Hence, audit engagement should be accepted.
(d) The management as well as third party should acknowledge joint responsibility for preparation of
books and financial statements. Only then, audit engagement should be accepted.
ANSWER : (A)
25

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
SA240 -The Auditor’s Responsibilities Relating to Fraud in an Audit of

Financial Statements
21. (RTP NOV 2018)
M/s Innocent Limited has entered into a transaction on 25th February, 2018, near year-end,
whereby it has agreed to pay Rs. 5 lakhs per month to Mr. Yuvraj as annual retainer-ship fee
for "engineering consultation". No amount was actually paid, but Rs. 60 lakhs is provided in
books of account as on March 31, 2018.
Your inquiry elicits a response that need-based consultation was obtained round the year, but
there is no documentary or other evidence of receipt of the service. As the auditor of M/s
Innocent Limited, what would be your approach?
As per SA 240 on “The Auditor’s Responsibilities Relating to Fraud in an Audit of Financial

Statements”, fraud can be committed by management overriding controls using such techniques
as Recording fictitious journal entries, particularly close to the end of an accounting period, to
manipulate operating results or achieve other objectives.
Keeping in view the above, it is clear that Company has passed fictitious journal entries near year
end to manipulate the operating results. Also Auditor’s enquiry elicited a response that need-based
consultation was obtained round the year, but there is no documentary or other evidence of receipt
of the service, is not acceptable.
Accordingly, the auditor would adopt the following approach-
If, as a result of a misstatement resulting from fraud or suspected fraud, the auditor encounters
exceptional circumstances that bring into question the auditor’s ability to continue performing the
audit, the auditor shall:
(i) Determine the professional and legal responsibilities applicable in the circumstances, including
whether there is a requirement for the auditor to report to the person or persons who made the
audit appointment or, in some cases, to regulatory authorities;
(ii) Consider whether it is appropriate to withdraw from the engagement, where withdrawal from
the engagement is legally permitted; and
(iii) If the auditor withdraws:
(1) Discuss with the appropriate level of management and those charged with governance, the
auditor’s withdrawal from the engagement and the reasons for the withdrawal; and
(2) Determine whether there is a professional or legal requirement to report to the person or
persons who made the audit appointment or, in some cases, to regulatory authorities, the
auditor’s withdrawal from the engagement and the reasons for the withdrawal.
Further, as per section 143(12) of the Companies Act, 2013, if an auditor of a company, in the
course of the performance of his duties as auditor, has reason to believe that an offence involving
fraud is being or has been committed against the company by officers or employees of the
company, he shall immediately report the matter to the Central Government (in case
26

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
amount of fraud is Rs. 1 crore or above)or Audit Committee or Board in other cases (in case the
amount of fraud involved is less than Rs. 1 crore) within such time and in such manner as may be
prescribed.
The auditor is also required to report as per Clause (x) of Paragraph 3 of CARO, 2020, Whether any
fraud by the company or any fraud on the company by its officers or employees has been noticed
or reported during the year; If yes, the nature and the amount involved is to be indicated.
22. MTP-OCT-19 Qn No 6(a) 5 Marks:
Mr. Shah is reviewing the anti-fraud controls for a construction company. The company has
witnessed a few frauds in the past mainly in the nature of material stolen from the sites and
fake expense vouchers.
Mr. Shah is evaluating options for verifying the process in detecting fraud and the corrective
action to be taken in such cases. As an expert, you are required to advise Mr. Shah as how
inventory fraud occurs and the verification procedure to be followed for detecting the same.
Answer:
Inventory frauds - Inventory frauds are many and varied but here we are concerned with
misappropriation of goods and their concealment.
(i) Employees may simply remove goods from the premises.

(ii) Theft of goods may be concealed by writing them off as damaged goods, etc.
(iii) Inventory records may be manipulated by employees who have committed theft so that book
quantities tally with the actual quantities of inventories in hand.
Verification Procedure for Defalcation of inventory - It may be of trading stock, raw materials,
manufacturing stores, tools or of other similar items (readily) capable of conversion into cash. The
loss may be the result of a theft by an employee once or repeatedly over a long period, when the
same have not been detected. Such thefts usually are possible through collusion among a number
of persons. Therefore, for their detection, the entire system of receipts, storage and despatch
of all goods, etc. should be reviewed to localise the weakness in the system.
The determination of factors which have been responsible for the theft and the establishment of
guilt would be difficult in the absence of:
(a) a system of inventory control, and existence of detailed record of the movement of inventory, or
(b) availability of sufficient data from which such a record can be constructed.
The first step in such an investigation is to establish the different items of inventory defalcated and
their quantities by checking physically the quantities in inventory held and those shown by the
Inventory Book.
Afterwards, all the receipts and issues of inventory recorded in the Inventory Book should be
verified by reference to entries in the Goods Inward and Outward Registers and the documentary
evidence as regards purchases and sales. This would reveal the particulars of inventory not
received but paid for as well as that issued but not charged to customers. Further, entries in respect
of returns, both inward and outward, recorded in the financial books should be checked
27

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
with corresponding entries in the Inventory Book. Also, the totals of the Inventory Book should be
checked. Finally, the shortages observed on physical verification of inventory should be reconciled
with the discrepancies observed on checking the books in the manner mentioned above. In the
case of an industrial concern, issue of raw materials, stores and tools to the factory and receipts
of manufactured goods in the godown also should be verified with relative source documents.
Defalcations of inventory, sometimes, also are committed by the management, by diverting a
part of production and the consequent shortages in production being adjusted by inflating the
wastage in production; similar defalcations of inventories and stores are covered up by inflating
quantities issued for production. For detecting such shortages, the investigating accountant should
take assistance of an engineer. For that he will be more conversant with factors whic h are
responsible for shortage in production and thus will be able to correctly determine the extent to
which the shortage in production has been inflated. In this regard, guidance can also be taken from
past records showing the extent of wastage in production in the past. Similarly, he would be able
to better judge whether the material issued for production was excessive and, if so to what extent.
The per hour capacity of the machine and the time that it took to complete one cycle of production,
also would show whether the issues have been larger than those required.
Study Material
23. (MTP-NOV 2018)
In the course of audit of K Ltd., its auditor Mr. 'N' observed that there was a special audit conducted
at the instance of the management on a possible suspicion of a fraud and requested for a copy of
the report to enable him to report on the fraud aspects. Despite many reminders it was not provided.
In absence of the special audit report, Mr. 'N' insisted that he be provided with at least a written
representation in respect of fraud on/by the company. For this request also, the management
remained silent. Please guide Mr. 'N'.
Auditor’s Responsibilities Relating to Fraud: As per SA 240 on “The Auditor’s Responsibilities
Relating to Fraud in an Audit of Financial Statements”, the auditor is responsible for obtaining
reasonable assurance that the financial statements, taken as a whole, are free from material
misstatement, whether caused by fraud or error.
As per SA 580 “Written Representations”, if management modifies or does not provide the
requested written representations, it may alert the auditor to the possibility that one or more
significant issues may exist.
In the instant case, the auditor observed that there was a special audit conducted at the instance of
the management on a possible suspicion of fraud. Therefore, the auditor requested for special audit
report which was not provided by the management despite of many reminders. The auditor also
insisted for written representation in respect of fraud on/by the company. For this request also
management remained silent.
It may be noted that, if management does not provide one or more of the requested written
representations, the auditor shall discuss the matter with management; re- evaluate the integrity
of management and evaluate the effect that this may have on the reliability of representations
28

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
(oral or written) and audit evidence in general; and take appropriate actions, including determining
the possible effect on the opinion in the auditor’s report.
Further, as per section 143(12) of the Companies Act, 2013, if an auditor of a company, in the course
of the performance of his duties as auditor, has reason to believe that an offence involving fraud is
being or has been committed against the company by officers or employees of the company, he
shall immediately report the matter to the Central Government (in case amount of fraud is Rs. 1
crore or above)or Audit Committee or Board in other cases (in case the amount of fraud involved
is less than Rs. 1 crore) within such time and in such manner as may be prescribed.
(i) Determine the professional and legal responsibilities applicable in the circumstances,
including whether there is a requirement for the auditor to report to the person or persons who
made the audit appointment or, in some cases, to regulatory authorities;
persons who made the audit appointment or, in some cases, to regulatory authorities, the auditor’s
withdrawal from the engagement and the reasons for the withdrawal.
24. In the course of audit of Quick Ltd, you suspect that the management has made misstatements in the
financial statements intentionally to deceive the users and to succumb to pressures to meet market
expectations. Elucidate how the fraudulent financial reporting may be accomplished and also discuss the
techniques of committing fraud by management overriding controls. (5 Marks) (past exam nov 2020)
ANSWER
In the given case, management of Quick Ltd has made intentional misstatements to deceive the users in
order to meet market expectations. Auditor is suspecting such intentional behavior of the management
and in such situations, SA 240 discusses how fraudulent financial reporting may be accomplished and
also discusses techniques of committing fraud by management overriding controls.
As per SA 240 on “The Auditor’s Responsibilities Relating to Fraud in an Audit of Financial Statements”
Fraudulent financial reporting may be accomplished by the following:
29

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
i. Manipulation, falsification (including forgery), or alteration of accounting records or supporting

documentation from which the financial statements are prepared.
ii. Misrepresentation in or intentional omission from, the financial statements of events, transactions or
other significant information.
iii. Intentional misapplication of accounting principles relating to amounts, classification, manner of
presentation, or disclosure.
Fraudulent financial reporting often involves management override of controls that otherwise may appear
to be operating effectively. Fraud can be committed by management overriding controls using such
techniques as:
i. Recording fictitious journal entries, particularly close to the end of an accounting period, to manipulate
operating results or achieve other objectives.
ii. Inappropriately adjusting assumptions and changing judgments used to estimate account balances.
iii. Omitting, advancing or delaying recognition in the financial statements of events and transactions that
have occurred during the reporting period.
iv. Concealing, or not disclosing, facts that could affect the amounts recorded in the financial statements.
v. Engaging in complex transactions that are structured to misrepresent the financial position or financial
performance of the entity.
vi. Altering records and terms related to significant and unusual transactions.
25. ( MTP- NOV 2021)
In the course of audit of Kushal Ltd, you suspect that the management has made misstatements in the
financial statements intentionally to deceive the users and to succumb to pressures to meet market
expectations. Elucidate how the fraudulent financial reporting may be accomplished and also discuss the
techniques of committing fraud by management overriding controls
ANSWER
In the given case, management of Kushal Ltd has made intentional misstatements to deceive the users in
order to meet market expectations. Auditor is suspecting such intentional behavior of the management
and in such situations, SA 240 discusses how fraudulent financial reporting may be accomplished and also
discusses techniques of committing fraud by management overriding controls.
As per SA 240 on “The Auditor’s Responsibilities Relating to Fraud in an Audit of Financial Statements”
Fraudulent financial reporting may be accomplished by the following:
i. Manipulation, falsification (including forgery), or alteration of accounting records or supporting
documentation from which the financial statements are prepared.
ii. Misrepresentation in or intentional omission from, the financial statements of events, transactions or
other significant information.
iii. Intentional misapplication of accounting principles relating to amounts, classification, manner of
30

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
Fraudulent financial reporting often involves management override of controls that otherwise may appear
to be operating effectively. Fraud can be committed by management overriding controls using such
techniques as:
i. Recording fictitious journal entries, particularly close to the end of an accounting period, to manipulate
operating results or achieve other objectives.
ii. Inappropriately adjusting assumptions and changing judgments used to estimate account balances.
iii. Omitting, advancing or delaying recognition in the financial statements of events and transactions that
have occurred during the reporting period.
iv. Concealing, or not disclosing, facts that could affect the amounts recorded in the financial statements.
v. Engaging in complex transactions that are structured to misrepresent the financial position or financial
performance of the entity.
vi. Altering records and terms related to significant and unusual transaction
Q.25 A ( NOV 21 EXAM)
M/s Kumar & Co., Chartered Accountants were appointed as statutory auditors of PC limited for the
financial year 2020-21. During the course of audit, one of the partners CA Kumar observed that there is
misappropriation of assets in the form of theft of entity's inventory and is perpetrated by employees in
relatively small and immaterial amounts. CA Kumar is concerned with the existence of certain
circumstances for increasing the susceptibility of assets to misappropriation.
Guide CA Kumar with respect to Risk factors related to misstatements arising from misappropriation of
assets with reference to relevant Standard on Auditing. (5 Marks)
ANSWER:
Guidance to CA Kumar with respect to risk factors that relate to misstatements arising from
misappropriation of assets as per SA 240 is:
As per SA 240, “The Auditor’s Responsibilities Relating to Fraud in an auditof Financial Statements”,
misappropriation of assets involves the theft of entity’s assets and is often perpetrated by employees in
relatively small and immaterial amounts. However, it can also involve management who are usually more
able to disguise or conceal misappropriations in ways that are difficult to detect.
Misappropriation of assets can be accomplished in a variety of ways including stealing physical assets or
intellectual property (for example, stealing inventory for personal use or for sale, stealing scrap for resale,
colluding with a competitor by disclosing technological data in return for payment).
Risk factors that relate to misstatements arising from misappropriation of assets are also classified
according to the three conditions generally present when fraud exists: incentives/pressures, opportunities,
and attitudes/rationalization.
Incentives/Pressures
Personal financial obligations may create pressure on management or employees with access to cash or
other assets susceptible to theft to misappropriate those assets. Adverse relationships between the entity
and employees with access to cash or other assets susceptible to theft may motivate those employees to
misappropriate those assets. For example, adverse relationships may be created by the following:
31

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
(i) Known or anticipated future employee layoffs.
(ii) Recent or anticipated changes to employee compensation or benefit plans.
(iii) Promotions, compensation, or other rewards inconsistent with expectations.
Opportunities
Certain characteristics or circumstances may increase the susceptibility of assets to misappropriation. For
example, opportunities to misappropriate assets increase when there are the following:
(i) Large amounts of cash on hand or processed.
(ii) Inventory items that are small in size, of high value, or in high demand.
(iii) Easily convertible assets, such as bearer bonds, diamonds, or computer chips.
(iv) Fixed assets which are small in size, marketable, or lacking observable identification of ownership.
Inadequate internal control over assets may increase the susceptibility of misappropriation of those assets.
For example, misappropriation of assets may occur because there is the following:
(i) Inadequate segregation of duties or independent checks.
(ii) Inadequate oversight of senior management expenditures, such as travel and other reimbursements.
(iii) Inadequate management oversight of employees responsible for assets, for example, inadequate
supervision or monitoring of remote locations.
(iv) Inadequate job applicant screening of employees with access to assets.
(v) Inadequate record keeping with respect to assets.
(vi) inadequate system of authorization and approval of transactions (for example, in purchasing).
(vii) Inadequate physical safeguards over cash, investments, inventory, or fixed assets.
(viii) Lack of complete and timely reconciliations of assets.
(ix) Lack of timely and appropriate documentation of transactions, for example, credits for merchandise
returns.
(x) Lack of mandatory vacations for employees performing key control functions.
(xi) Inadequate management understanding of information technology, which enables information

technology employees to perpetrate a misappropriation.
(xii) Inadequate access controls over automated records, including controls over and review of computer
systems event logs.
Attitudes/Rationalizations
(i) Disregard for the need for monitoring or reducing risks related to misappropriations of assets.
32

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
(ii) Disregard for internal control over misappropriation of assets by overriding existing controls or by
failing to take appropriate remedial action on known deficiencies in internal control.
(iii) Behaviour indicating displeasure or dissatisfaction with the entity or its treatment of the employee.
(iv) Changes in behaviour or lifestyle that may indicate assets have been misappropriated.
(v) Tolerance of petty theft.
SA 250 -Consideration of laws and regulations in an audit of financial

statements.
26. MTP Mar 2019 Qn no 17 (2 Marks)
KJA Ltd is in the business of consultancy services. The business of the company has been growing
significantly and considering the nature of business, it becomes subject to various laws and
regulations. Compliances have also increased because of this and management has found this
very difficult to keep in pace with the changing regulatory requirements. The statutory auditors
of the company, Shilpa & Associates, have considered compliance with laws and regulations as
a significant risk for the purpose of their audit.
Auditors had a audit planning meeting with the management and management has understood
that it will be their responsibility including those charged with governance to ensure that the
company’s operations are fully compliant with the provisions of various laws and regulations.
This may also have an impact on the reported amounts and disclosures in the financial
statements of the company.
Management is planning to ensure full compliance and may implement policies and procedures,
wherever required, to assist in the prevention and detection of non-compliance with laws and
regulations. Please suggest among the following which one will not be a policy/ procedure to be
implemented to assist in the prevention and detection of non-compliance with laws and
regulations in accordance with SA 250?
(e) Maintaining a register of significant transactions of the company with comparison to particular
industry and a record of complaints.
(f) Monitoring legal requirements and ensuring that operating procedures are designed to meet
these requirements.
(g) Developing, publicising and following a code of conduct.
(h) Instituting and operating appropriate systems of internal control.
Answer: (e) Maintaining a register of significant transactions of the company with comparison to
particular industry and a record of complaints.
27. May 2018 -4(b)-4 Marks

33

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
As an Auditor of TRP Ltd., you are suspicious that there might be non-compliance with laws and
regulations to which the Company is subject to. Indicate the possible areas or aspects where
you may have to look out for forming an opinion as to whether your suspicion has some basis
to further inquire.
Answer:
Indications of Non-Compliance with Laws and Regulations: When the auditor becomes aware of
the existence of, or information about, the following matters, it may be an indication of non-
compliance with laws and regulations, possible areas or aspects to look out for forming an opinion
are:
➢ Investigations by regulatory organisations and government departments or payment of fines or
penalties.
➢ Payments for unspecified services or loans to consultants, related parties, employees or
government employees.
➢ Sales commissions or agent’s fees that appear excessive in relation to those
ordinarily paid by the entity or in its industry or to the services actually received.
➢ Purchasing at prices significantly above or below market price.
➢ Unusual payments in cash, purchases in the form of cashiers’ cheques payable to
bearer or transfers to numbered bank accounts.
➢ Unusual payments towards legal and retainership fees.
➢ Unusual transactions with companies registered in tax havens.
➢ Payments for goods or services made other than to the country from which the goods or services
originated.
➢ Payments without proper exchange control documentation.
➢ Existence of an information system which fails, whether by design or by accident, to provide an
adequate audit trail or sufficient evidence.
➢ Unauthorised transactions or improperly recorded transactions.
➢ Adverse media comment.
28. RTP MAY 2018 Qn no. 1(d)
While verifying the employee records in a company, it was found that a major portion of the labour
employed was child labour. On questioning the management, the auditor was told that it was outside
his scope of the financial audit to look into the compliance with other laws.
ANSWER
Compliance with Other Laws: As per SA 250, “Consideration of Laws and Regulations in an Audit
of Financial Statements”, the auditor shall obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence
regarding compliance with the provisions of those laws and regulations generally recognised to
have a direct effect on the determination of material amounts and disclosures in the financial
statements including tax and labour laws.
34

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
Further, non-compliance with other laws and regulations may result in fines, litigation or other
consequences for the entity, the costs of which may need to be provided for in the financial
statements, but are not considered to have a direct effect on the financial statements.
In the instant case, major portion of the labour employed in the company was child labour.
While questioning by auditor, reply of the management that it was outside his scope of financial
audit to look into the compliance with other laws is not acceptable as it may have a material
effect on financial statements.
Thus, auditor should ensure the disclosure of above fact and provision for the cost of fines,
litigation or other consequences for the entity. In case if the auditor concludes that non-
compliance has a material effect on the financial statements and has not been adequately
reflected in the financial statements, the auditor shall express a qualified or adverse opinion on
the financial statement.
Study Material
29. R & M Co. wants to be alert on the possibility of non-compliance with Laws and Regulations
during the course of audit of SRS Ltd. R & M Co. seeks your guidance for identifying the indications
of non-compliance with Laws and Regulations
As per SA 250, “Consideration of Laws and Regulations, the auditor shall perform the audit
procedures to help identify instances of non-compliance with other laws and regulations that may
have a material effect on the financial statements by inquiring of management and, where
appropriate, those charged with governance, as to whether the entity is in compliance with such
laws and regulations; and Inspecting correspondence, if any, with the relevant licensing or
regulatory authorities.
However, when the auditor becomes aware of the existence of, or information about, the following
matters, it may also be an indication of non-compliance with laws and regulations:
➢ Investigations by regulatory organisations and government departments or payment of fines
or penalties.
➢ Payments for unspecified services or loans to consultants, related parties, employees or
government employees.
➢ Sales commissions or agent’s fees that appear excessive in relation to those ordinarily paid
by the entity or in its industry or to the services actually received.
➢ Purchasing at prices significantly above or below market price.
➢ Unusual payments in cash, purchases in the form of cashiers’ cheques payable to bearer or
transfers to numbered bank accounts.
➢ Unusual payments towards legal and retainership fees.
➢ Unusual transactions with companies registered in tax havens.
➢ Payments for goods or services made other than to the country from which the goods or
35

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
services originated.
➢ Payments without proper exchange control documentation.
➢ Existence of an information system which fails, whether by design or by accident, to provide
an adequate audit trail or sufficient evidence.
➢ Unauthorised transactions or improperly recorded transactions.
➢ Adverse media comment
30. PQ Limited, a listed entity, is in the business of manufacturing of specialty chemicals. The company
has appointed CA Jazz as CFO of the company. CA Jazz is concerned about compliance with the provisions
of laws and regulations that determine the reported amounts and disclosure in financial statements of
PQ Limited. Accordingly, CA Jazz wants to implement such policies and procedures that can assist him in
the prevention and detection of non-compliance with laws and regulations. Help CA Jazz by citing
examples of such policies and procedures. (5 Marks) ) (past exam nov 2020)
ANSWER
In PQ Ltd, listed entity, CA Jazz has been appointed as CFO. PQ Ltd is in the business of manufacturing of
specialty chemicals. CA Jazz is concerned about compliance with the provisions of Laws and regulations and
wants to implement such policies and procedures that would assist him in prevention and detection of
non-compliance with laws and regulations. CA Jazz is specifically wanting examples of types of policies and
procedures that PQ Ltd may implement so that relevant laws and regulations are properly complied with.
Such examples of policies and procedures are given in SA 250.
As per SA 250, “Consideration of Laws and Regulations in an Audit of Financial Statements”,
The following are examples of the types of policies and procedures PQ Ltd. may implement to assist in the
prevention and detection of non-compliance with laws and regulations:
i. Monitoring legal requirements and ensuring that operating procedures are designed to meet these
requirements.
ii. Instituting and operating appropriate systems of internal control.
iii. Developing, publicizing and following a code of conduct.
iv. Ensuring employees are properly trained and understand the code of conduct
v. Monitoring compliance with the code of conduct and acting appropriately to discipline employees who
fail to comply with it.
vi. Engaging legal advisors to assist in monitoring legal requirements.
vii. Maintaining a register of significant laws and regulations with which the entity has to comply within its
particular industry and a record of complaints.
31. While verifying the employee records in a company, it was found that a major portion of the labour
employed was child labour. On questioning the management, the auditor was told that it was outside his
scope of the financial audit to look into the compliance with other laws. Comment in accordance with
relevant Standards on Auditing. (4 Marks) (mtp – II -july 2021)
ANSWER
Compliance with Other Laws: As per SA 250, “Consideration of Laws and Regulations in an Audit of
Financial Statements”, the auditor shall obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence regarding compliance
36

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
with the provisions of those laws and regulations generally recognised to have a direct effect on the
determination of material amounts and disclosures in the financial statements including tax and labour
laws.
Further, non-compliance with other laws and regulations may result in fines, litigation or other
consequences for the entity, the costs of which may need to be provided for in the financial statements,
but are not considered to have a direct effect on the financial statements.
In the instant case, major portion of the labour employed in the company was child labour. While
questioning by auditor, reply of the management that it was outside his scope of financial audit to look into
the compliance with other laws is not acceptable as it may have a material effect on financial statements.
Thus, auditor should ensure the disclosure of above fact and provision for the cos t of fines,
litigation or other consequences for the entity. In case if the auditor concludes that noncompliance
has a material effect on the financial statements and has not been adequately
the financial statement as per SA 705 “Modifications to the Opinion in the Independent Auditor’s
Report”.
31A(MAY 2022 RTP)
M/s Manidhari & Associates have been appointed as an auditor of JIN Limited, a multinational company
dealing in spare parts. During the course of audit, CA Manidhari is facing many problems including the
problem of not getting the desired information from the management. Accordingly, he decided to
communicate with those charged with the governance about significant difficulties encountered during the
audit. CA Manidhari seeks your guidance on matters which can be considered as significant difficulties as
per SA 260.
ANSWER:
As per SA 260, “Communication with Those Charged with Governance”, significant
difficulties encountered during the audit may include such matters as:
(i)Significant delays by management, the unavailability of entity personnel, or an unwillingness

by management to provide information necessary for the auditor to perform the auditor’s
procedures.
(ii)An unreasonably brief time within which to complete the audit.
(iii)Extensive unexpected effort required to obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence.
(iv)The unavailability of expected information.
(v)Restrictions imposed on the auditor by management.
(vi)Management’s unwillingness to make or extend its assessment of the entity’s ability to

continue as a going concern when requested.
In some circumstances, such difficulties may constitute a scope limitation that leads to a
modification of the auditor’s opinion.as per SA 705 (Revised), Modifications to the Opinion in
the Independent Auditor’s Report.
37

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
31B(MAY 2022 RTP)
CA Abhinanadan is an auditor of KM Private Limited. During the course of audit, CA

Abhinanadan becomes aware of information concerning an instance of non- compliance or
suspected non-compliance with laws and regulations. Being a senior partner of CA.
Abhinanadan, guide him regarding audit procedures to be followed when non-compliance is
identified or suspected.
ANSWER :
As per SA 250, “Consideration of Laws and Regulations in an Audit of Financial Statements”, if

the auditor becomes aware of information concerning an instance of non-compliance or
suspected non-compliance with laws and regulations, the auditor shall obtain:
(i)An understanding of the nature of the act and the circumstances in which it has occurred; and
(ii)Further information to evaluate the possible effect on the financial statements.
If the auditor suspects there may be non-compliance, the auditor shall discuss the matter with
management and, where appropriate, those charged with governance. If management or, as
appropriate, those charged with governance do not provide sufficient information that
supports that the entity is in compliance with laws and regulations and, in the auditor’s
judgment, the effect of the suspected non-compliance may be material to the financial
statements, the auditor shall consider the need to obtain legal advice.
If sufficient information about suspected non-compliance cannot be obtained, the auditor shall
evaluate the effect of the lack of sufficient appropriate audit evidence on the auditor’s opinion.
The auditor shall evaluate the implications of non-compliance in relation to other aspects of the
audit, including the auditor’s risk assessment and the reliability of written representations, and
take appropriate action.
31C (NOV 2022 RTP)
Abhinandan Limited a chemical manufacturing company, having its factory located at Nanded
Village, for the year 2021-22 appointed Subahu & Co. as their statutory auditors. During the
course of the audit, Subahu & Co. identified that Abhinandan Limited received a show cause
notice from National Green Tribunal based on the investigation performed by the regional forest
department for violating environmental laws. Upon gathering a further understanding of the
said matter, it was identified that Abhinandan Limited was dumping toxic solid waste, without
treating it, on the nearby grounds, and because of this, the nearby water bodies were getting
polluted. Based on the preliminary investigation performed by the regional forest department
under the directions of the National Green Tribunal, it was identified that these practices were
carried out since 2009 and a lot of damage has been done to the environment by Abhinandan
Limited. A show cause notice was already issued to Abhinandan Limited by the National Green
38

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
Tribunal for levying the penalty of an amount of Rs. 500 crore. The unaudited profit for the
financial year 2021 -22 of Abhinandan Limited was Rs. 35 crore and the unaudited turnover was
Rs. 100 crore. Upon inquiry it was identified that Abhinandan Limited has disclosed this matter
in the financial statements by way of footnote, the extract of which is provided below:
“The company has received a show cause notice from the National Green Tribunal for some
potential violation of environmental laws and the company’s legal department has assessed and
found that the judgment would be in favour of the company. Accordingly, no provision has been
created for such notices.”
In the light of the above scenario kindly provide what should be the appropriate opti on for the
statutory auditor of the company to report this matter.
ANSWER :
As per SA 250, “Consideration of Laws and Regulations in an Audit of Financial Statements”, the
auditor is required to obtain an understanding and need to evaluate the impact of other laws
and regulations that do not have a direct effect on the determination of the amounts and
disclosures in the financial statements, but compliance with which may be fundamental to the
operating aspects of the business, to an entity’s ability to continue its business, or to avoid
material penalties (for example, compliance with the terms of an operating license, compliance
with regulatory solvency requirements, or compliance with environmental regulations); non-
compliance with such laws and regulations may therefore have a material effect on the financial
statements.
The auditor shall perform the following audit procedures to help identify instances of non -
compliance with other laws and regulations that may have a material effect on the financial
statements:
(a)Inquiring of management and, where appropriate, those charged with governance, as to

whether the entity is in compliance with such laws and regulations; and
(b)Inspecting correspondence, if any, with the relevant licensing or regulatory authorities
As per Section 143(3)(j) read with Rule 11(a), the auditor is required to report whether the
company has disclosed the impact, if any, of pending litigations on its financial position in its
financial statement.
As per SA 570, “Going Concern”, if the auditor concludes that management’s use of the going
concern basis of accounting is appropriate in the circumstances but a material uncertainty
exists, the auditor shall determine whether the financial statements:
(i)Adequately disclose the principal events or conditions that may cast significant doubt on the
entity’s ability to continue as a going concern and management’s plans to deal with these events
or conditions; and
39

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
(ii)Disclose clearly that there is material uncertainty related to events or conditions that may
cast significant doubt on the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern and, therefore, that it
may be unable to realize its assets and discharge its liabilities in the normal course of business.
If adequate disclosure about the material uncertainty is not made in the fi nancial statements,
the auditor shall (a) Express a qualified opinion or adverse opinion, as appropriate, in
accordance with SA 705; and (b) In the Basis for Qualified (Adverse) Opinion section of the
auditor’s report, state that a material uncertainty exists that may cast significant doubt on the
entity’s ability to continue as a going concern and that the financial statements do not
adequately disclose this matter.
In the current scenario, Abhinandan Limited has received a show cause notice from the National
Green Tribunal of an amount which is more than the net profit and the turnover of the company
for the year. In the event of an unfavourable order for Abhinandan Limited, there will be an
impact on Abhinandan Limited’s ability to continue as a going concern.
As a result, appropriate disclosure should be provided by management for such events which
cast significant doubt on the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern. As no appropriate
disclosure has been provided by Abhinandan Limited for such show cause notice, Subahu & Co.
should report this matter in their audit report under “Going Concern Para” as per SA 570 and
under clause (j) of Section 143(3) of the Companies Act, 2013. Also, the auditor is required to
issue an adverse opinion as per SA 705, “Modifications to the Opinion in the Independent
Auditor’s Report”.
SA 265 -Communicating Deficiencies in Internal Control to Those who

Charged with Governance and Management
32. RTP May 2020 Qn no 12(b), MTP-OCT-18 Qn No 5(e) 4 Marks: RTP Nov 18 Qn no 4
During the course of his audit, the auditor noticed material weaknesses in the internal control
system and he wishes to communicate the same to the management. You are required to
elucidate the important points the auditor should keep in the mind while drafting the letter of
weaknesses in internal control system.
Important Points to be kept in Mind While Drafting Letter of Weakness: As per SA 265,
“Communicating Deficiencies in Internal Control to Those who Charged with Governance and
Management”, the auditor shall include in the written communication of significant deficiencies
in internal control -
(i) A description of the deficiencies and an explanation of their potential effects; and
40

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
(ii) Sufficient information to enable those charged with governance and management to understand
the context of the communication.
In other words, the auditor should communicate material weaknesses to the management or the
audit committee, if any, on a timely basis. This communication should be, preferably, in writing
through a letter of weakness or management letter. Important points with regard to such a letter
are as follows-
(1) The letter lists down the area of weaknesses in the system and offers suggestions for
improvement.
(2) It should clearly indicate that it discusses only weaknesses which have come to the attention of
the auditor as a result of his audit and that his examination has not been designed to determine
the adequacy of internal control for management.
(3) This letter serves as a valuable reference document for management for the purpose of revising
the system and insisting on its strict implementation.
(4) The letter may also serve to minimize legal liability in the event of a major defalcation or other
loss resulting from a weakness in internal control.
33. CA. N has been appointed as an auditor of TRP Ltd. While conducting the audit he has identified some
deficiencies in the Internal control. He needs to determine whether a deficiency or combination of
deficiencies in internal control constitutes a "significant deficiency" and has to communicate them in
writing to those charged with Governance and management on a timely basis. Guide CA. N with some
examples of matters to be considered while determining 'significant deficiency' in internal control with
reference to relevant SA. (5 Marks) (past exam nov 2020)
ANSWER
As per SA 265 “Communicating Deficiencies in Internal Control to Those Charged with Governance and
Management”, significant deficiency in internal control means a deficiency or combination of deficiencies
in internal control that, in the auditor’s professional judgement, is of sufficient importance to merit the
attention of those charged with governance.
Examples of matters that CA N, auditor of TRP Ltd may consider in determining whether a deficiency or
combination of deficiencies in internal control constitutes a significant deficiency include:
(1) The likelihood of the deficiencies leading to material misstatements in the financial statements in the
future.
(2) The susceptibility to loss or fraud of the related asset or liability.
(3) The subjectivity and complexity of determining estimated amounts, such as fair value accounting
estimates.
(4) The financial statement amounts exposed to the deficiencies.
(5) The volume of activity that has occurred or could occur in the account balance or class of transactions
exposed to the deficiency or deficiencies.
(6) The importance of the controls to the financial reporting process; for example:
• General monitoring controls (such as oversight of management).
41

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
• Controls over the prevention and detection of fraud.

• Controls over the selection and application of significant accounting policies.
• Controls over significant transactions with related parties.
• Controls over significant transactions outside the entity’s normal course of business.
• Controls over the period-end financial reporting process (such as controls over non-recurring journal
entries).
(7) The cause and frequency of the exceptions detected as a result of the deficiencies in the controls.
(8) The interaction of the deficiency with other deficiencies in internal control.
34. Auditors are required to obtain an understanding of internal control relevant to the audit
when identifying and assessing its effectiveness and risk of material misstatement. During the
course of audit of ABC Ltd., you observed that significant deficiency exists in the internal control
system and you want to ascertain the same. Elucidate the various indicators of significant
deficiencies which will help you in assessing the efficiency of internal control system of the
organization. (5 Marks)
ANSWER
In the given case of ABC Ltd, Auditors, while conducting audit has come across significant deficiency
existing in the internal control system and also auditors wanted to ascertain that deficiency.
As per SA 265, “Communicating Deficiencies in Internal Control to Those Charged with Governance and
Management “, Indicators of significant deficiencies in internal control include, for example:
(i) Evidence of ineffective aspects of the control environment, such as:
(a) Indications that significant transactions in which management is financially interested are not being
appropriately scrutinised by those charged with governance.
(b) Identification of management fraud, whether or not material, that was not prevented by the entity’s
internal control.
(c) Management’s failure to implement appropriate remedial action on significant deficiencies previously
communicated.
(ii) Absence of a risk assessment process within the entity where such a process would ordinarily be
expected to have been established.
(iii) Evidence of an ineffective entity risk assessment process, such as management’s failure to identify a
risk of material misstatement that the auditor would expect the entity’s risk assessment process to have
identified.
(iv) Evidence of an ineffective response to identified significant risks (e.g., absence of controls over such a
risk).
42

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
(v) Misstatements detected by the auditor’s procedures that were not prevented, or detected and
corrected, by the entity’s internal control.
(vi) Disclosure of a material misstatement due to error or fraud as prior period items in the current year’s
Statement of Profit and Loss .
(vii) Evidence of management’s inability to oversee the preparation of the financial statements.
34A (OCT 2022 MTP)

During the course of the audit of Tirthankara Limited, CA. Shreyansh Manager in the audit team identified
that there is significant risk in lease transactions due to complex cross-border sale and lease back
arrangements. This significant risk or risk of material misstatement was not identified in management's risk
assessment process. Upon various inquiries with Management regarding their risk assessment process, it
was identified and concluded by the audit team that the management's risk assessment process is not
effective to identify all the significant risks.
CA. Shreyansh decided that this in combination with other potential deficiencies in internal control
constitutes significant deficiencies in internal control and hence, is required to be communicated to those
charged with governance. However, the engagement partner had a different view regarding the audit of
Tirthankara Limited. According to him, the only matter that is identified and poses significant deficiencies
due to their magnitude is only required to be communicated. Matters of potential misstatements that are
not actual misstatements cannot be termed as significant deficiencies.
You are required to guide CA. Shreyansh with respect to examples of matters that the auditor may consider
in determining whether a deficiency or combination of deficiencies in internal control constitutes a
significant deficiency.
ANSWER :
As per SA 265, “Communicating Deficiencies in Internal Control to Those Charged with Governance and
Management”, significant deficiency in internal control is defined as a deficiency or combination of
deficiencies in internal control that, in the auditor’s professional judgment, is of sufficient importance to
merit the attention of those charged with governance. Also, the significance of a deficiency or a
combination of deficiencies in internal control depends not only on whether a misstatement has actually
occurred but also on the likelihood that a misstatement could occur and the potential magnitude of the
misstatement. Significant deficiencies may therefore exist even though the auditor has not identified
misstatements during the audit.
Examples of matters that the auditor may consider in determining whether a deficiency or
combination of deficiencies in internal control constitutes a significant deficiency include:
•The likelihood of the deficiencies leading to material misstatements in the financial statements in
the future.
•The susceptibility to loss or fraud of the related asset or liability.
•The subjectivity and complexity of determining estimated amounts, such as fair value
accounting estimates.
•The financial statement amounts exposed to the deficiencies.
•The volume of activity that has occurred or could occur in the account balance or class of
transactions exposed to the deficiency or deficiencies.
43

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
SA 299 - Joint Auditors

NMN & Co LLP and ABC & Associates LLP are the joint statutory auditors of BHS Ltd. BHS Ltd.
is a listed company and has been in existence for the last 50 years. Since beginning this
company was audited by MQS & Associates but due to audit rotation, the company had to
bring in new auditors. Considering the size of the company, two auditors were appointed as
joint auditors. Since the company is new to these auditors and the concept of joint auditors to
whom audit work has been divided, management had a discussion and understood that each
joint auditor is responsible only for the work allocated to him, whether or not he has prepared a
separate report on the work performed by him. Advise.
Answer:
SA 299 “Joint Audit of Financial Statements” deals with the professional responsibilities which
the auditors undertake in accepting appointments as joint auditors. The joint auditors are
required to issue common audit report, however, where the joint auditors are in disagreement
with regard to the opinion or any matters to be covered by the audit report, they shall express
their opinion in a separate audit report.
A joint auditor is not bound by the views of the majority of the joint auditors regarding the
opinion or matters to be covered in the audit report and shall express opinion formed by the said
joint auditor in separate audit report in case of disagreement. In such circumstances, the audit
report(s) issued by the joint auditor(s) shall make a reference to the separate audit report(s) issued
by the other joint auditor(s). Further, separate audit report shall also make reference to the audit
report issued by other joint auditors. Such reference shall be made under the heading “Other
Matter Paragraph” as per SA 706, “Emphasis of Matter Paragraphs and Other Matter Paragraphs
in the Independent Auditor’s Report”.
Each joint auditor is entitled to assume that:

• The other joint auditors have carried out their part of the audit work and the work has actually
been performed in accordance with the Standards on Auditing issued by the Institute of Chartered
Accountants of India. It is not necessary for a joint auditor to review the work
performed by other joint auditors or perform any tests in order to ascertain whether the work has
actually been performed in such a manner.
• The other joint auditors have brought to said joint auditor’s notice any departure from applicable
financial reporting framework or significant observations that are relevant to their responsibilities
noticed in the course of the audit.
Where financial statements of a division/branch are audited by one of the joint auditors, the other
joint auditors are entitled to proceed on the basis that such financial statements comply with all
the legal and regulatory requirements and present a true and fair view of the state of affairs and of
44

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
the results of operations of the division/branch concerned.

Before finalizing their audit report, the joint auditors shall discuss and communicate with each other
their respective conclusions that would form the content of the audit report.
36. May 2019 Qn no 1(b) 5 Marks

Dice Ltd. appointed two CA firms MN & Associates and PQ & Co. as joint auditors for conducting
audit for the year ended 31st March, 2019.
In the course of audit, it has been observed that there is a major understatement in the value of
inventory. The inventory valuation work was looked after by MN & Associates but there was no
documentation for the division of the work between the joint auditors.
Comment on the above situation with regard to responsibilities among joint auditors.
Answer
Responsibility and Co-ordination among Joint Auditors: As per SA 299, “Joint Audit of Financial
Statements”, where joint auditors are appointed, they should, by mutual discussion, divide the
audit work among themselves. The division of the work
would usually be in terms of audit identifiable units or specified area. In some cases due to the
nature of the business entity under audit, such a division of the work may not be possible. In such
situations, the division of the work may be with reference to items of assets or liabilities or income
or expenditure or with reference to period of time. The division of the work among joint auditors
as well as the areas of work to be covered by all of them should be adequately documented and
preferably communicated to the entity.
In respect of the audit work divided among the joint auditors, each joint auditor is responsible only
for the work allocated to him, whether or not he has prepared a separate audit of the work
performed by him. On the other hand all the joint auditors are jointly and severally responsible –
(i) The audit work which is not divided among the joint auditors and is carried out by all joint auditors;
(ii) Decisions taken by all the joint auditors under audit planning phase concerning the nature, timing
and extant of the audit procedure to be performed by each of the auditor;
(iii) Matters which are bought to the notice of the joint auditors by any one of them and on which
there is an agreement among the joint auditors;
(iv) Examining that the financial statements of the entity comply with the requirements of the relevant
statute;
(v) Presentation and disclosure of financial statements as required by the applicable financial reporting
framework;
(vi) Ensuring that the audit report complies with the requirements of the relevant statutes, the
applicable Standards on Auditing and the other relevant pronouncements issued by ICAI;
The joint auditors shall also discuss and document the nature, timing, and the extent of the audit
procedures for common and specific allotted areas of audit to be performed by each of the joint
auditors and the same shall be communicated to those charged with governance. After
identification and allocation of work among the joint auditors, the work allocation document shall
45

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
be signed by all the joint auditors and the same shall be communicated to those charged with
governance of the entity.
Hence, in respect of audit work divided among the joint auditors, each joint auditor shall be
responsible only for the work allocated to such joint auditor including proper execution of the
audit procedures.
In the instant case. Dice Ltd. appointed two CA Firms MN & Associates and PQ & Co. as joint auditor
for conducting audit. As observed during the course of audit that there is a major understatement
in the value of inventory and the inventory valuation work was looked after by MN & Associates.
In view of SA 299 MN & Associate will be held responsible for the same as inventory valuation work
was looked after by MN & Associates only. Further, there is violation of SA 299 as the division of
work has not been documented.
Study Material
37. KRP Ltd., at its annual general meeting, appointed Mr. X, Mr. Y and Mr. Z as joint auditors to
conduct auditing for the financial year 2018-19. For the valuation of gratuity scheme of the company,
Mr. X, Mr. Y and Mr. Z wanted to refer their own known Actuaries. Due to difference of opinion, all
the joint auditors consulted their respective Actuaries. Subsequently, major difference was found in
the actuary reports. However, Mr. X agreed to Mr. Y’s actuary report, though, Mr. Z did not. Mr. X
contends that Mr.
Y’s actuary report shall be considered in audit report due to majority of votes. Now, Mr. Z is in
dilemma.
(a) You are required to briefly explain the responsibilities of auditors when they are jointly and
severally responsible in respect of audit conducted by them and also guide Mr. Z in such situation.
(b) Explain the responsibility of auditors, in case, report made by Mr. Y’s actuary, later on, found faulty.
Answer
(a) Difference of Opinion Among Joint Auditors: SA 299 on, “Joint Audit of Financial Statements” deals
with the professional responsibilities, which the auditors undertake in accepting such appointments
as joint auditors. In respect of the work divided amongst the joint auditors, each joint auditor is
responsible only for the work allocated to him, whether or not he has made a separate report on
the work performed by him. On the other hand the joint auditors are jointly and severally
responsible in respect of the audit conducted by them as under:
(i) in respect of the audit work which is not divided among the joint auditors and is carried out by
all of them;
(ii) in respect of decisions taken by all the joint auditors under audit planning in respect of common
audit areas concerning the nature, timing and extent of the audit procedures to be performed
by each of the joint auditors;
(iii) in respect of matters which are brought to the notice of the joint auditors by any one of them
and on which there is an agreement among the joint auditors;
46

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
(iv) for examining that the financial statements of the entity comply with the requirements of the
relevant statute;
(v) for ensuring presentation and disclosure of the financial statements as required by the applicable
financial reporting framework;
(vi) for ensuring that the audit report complies with the requirements of the relevant statutes, the
applicable Standards on Auditing and the other relevant pronouncements issued by ICAI.
(vi) it is the separate and specific responsibility of each joint auditor to study and evaluate the
prevailing system of internal control relating to the work allocated to him, the extent of enquiries
to be made in the course of his audit;
(vii) the responsibility of obtaining and evaluating information and explanation from the management
is generally a joint responsibility of all the auditors;
(viii) each joint auditor is entitled to assure that the other joint auditors have carried out their part of
work in accordance with the generally accepted audit procedures and therefore it would not be
necessary for joint auditor to review the work performed by other joint auditors.
Where, in the course of the audit, a joint auditor comes across matters which are relevant to the
areas of responsibility of other joint auditors and which deserve their attention, or which require
disclosure or require discussion with, or application of judgment by other joint auditors, the said
joint auditor shall communicate the same to all the other joint auditors in writing prior to the
completion of the audit.
Normally, the joint auditors are required to issue common audit report, however, where the joint
auditors are in disagreement with regard to the opinion or any matters to be covered by the audit
report, they shall express their opinion in a separate audit report. A joint auditor is not bound by
the views of the majority of the joint auditors regarding the opinion or matters to be covered in the
audit report and shall express opinion formed by the said joint auditor in separate audit report in
case of disagreement. In such circumstances, the audit report(s) issued by the joint auditor(s) shall
make a reference to the separate audit report(s) issued by the other joint auditor(s). Further,
separate audit report shall also make reference to the audit report issued by other joint auditors.
Such reference shall be made under the heading “Other Matter Paragraph” as per Revised SA
706, “Emphasis of Matter Paragraphs and Other Matter Paragraphs in the Independent Auditor’s
Report”.
In the instant case, there are three auditors, namely, Mr. X, Mr. Y and Mr. Z, jointly appointed as an
auditor of KRP Ltd. For the valuation of gratuity scheme of the Company they referred their own
known Actuaries. Mr. Z (one of the joint auditor) is not satisfied with the report submitted by Mr.
Y’s referred actuary. He is not agreed with the matters to be covered by the report whereas Mr. X
agreed with the same.
Hence, as per SA 299, Mr. Z is suggested to express his own opinion through a separate report
whereas Mr. X and Mr. Y may provide their joint report for the same.
(b) Using the work of an Auditor’s Expert: As per SA 620 “Using the Work of an Auditor’s Expert”, the
expertise of an expert may be required in the actuarial calculation of liabilities associated with
47

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
insurance contracts or employee benefit plans etc., however, the auditor has sole responsibility for
the audit opinion expressed, and that responsibility is not reduced by the auditor’s use of the work
of an auditor’s expert.
The auditor shall evaluate the adequacy of the auditor’s expert’s work for the auditor’s purposes,
including the relevance and reasonableness of that expert’s findings or conclusions, and their
consistency with other audit evidence as per SA 500.
Further, in view of SA 620, if the expert’s work involves use of significant assumptions and methods,
then the relevance and reasonableness of those assumptions and methods must be ensured by the
auditor and if the expert’s work involves the use of source data that is significant to that expert’s
work, the relevance, completeness, and accuracy of that source data in the circumstances must be
verified by the auditor.
In the instant case, Mr. X, Mr. Y and Mr. Z, jointly appointed as an auditor of KRP Ltd., referred their
own known Actuaries for valuation of gratuity scheme. Actuaries are an auditor’s expert as per SA
620. Mr. Y’s referred actuary has provided the gratuity valuation report, which later on found faulty.
Further, Mr. Z is not agreed with this report therefore he submitted a separate audit report
specifically for such gratuity valuation.
In such situation, it was duty of Mr. X, Mr. Y and Mr. Z, before using the gratuity valuation report of
Actuary, to ensure the relevance and reasonableness of assumptions and methods used. They were
also required to examine the relevance, completeness and accuracy of source data used for such
report before expressing their opinion.
Mr. X and Mr. Y will be held responsible for grossly negligence and using such faulty report without
examining the adequacy of expert actuary’s work whereas Mr. Z will not be held liable for the
same due to separate opinion expressed by him.
SA 315 - Identifying and Assessing the Risks of Material Misstatement

through Understanding the Entity and Its Environment
38. Nov 18 Qn no 6(a) 4 Marks

The identified risks are assessed by Auditor as to its significance on account of its likely impact, by
way of material misstatement appearing in financial statements or by affecting internal control
system. What may be the points of indication that may direct the Auditor to judge that the risks
identified may be significant?
Answer
48

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
Points of Indication that may direct the Auditor to Judge that the Risks Identified may be
Significant: As per SA 315“Identifying and Assessing the Risks of Material Misstatement through
Understanding the Entity and Its Environment”, as part of the risk assessment the auditor shall
determine whether any of the risks identified are, in the auditor’s judgment, a significant risk. In
exercising this judgment, the auditor shall exclude the effects of identified controls related to the
risk.
In exercising judgment as to which risks are significant risks, the auditor shall consider at least the
following:
• Whether the risk is a risk of fraud;
• Whether the risk is related to recent significant economic, accounting, or other developments like
changes in regulatory environment, etc., and, therefore, requires specific attention;
• The complexity of transactions;
• Whether the risk involves significant transactions with related parties;
• The degree of subjectivity in the measurement of financial information related to the risk,
especially those measurements involving a wide range of measurement uncertainty; and
• Whether the risk involves significant transactions that are outside the normal course of business
for the entity, or that otherwise appear to be unusual.
When the auditor has determined that a significant risk exists, the auditor shall obtain an
understanding of the entity’s controls, including control activities, relevant to that risk.

Compute the overall Audit Risk if looking to the nature of business there are chances that 40%
bills of services provided would be defalcated, inquiring on the same matter management has
assured that internal control can prevent such defalcation to 75%. At his part the Auditor assesses
that the procedure he could apply in the remaining time to complete Audit gives him satisfaction
level of detection of frauds & error to an extent of 60%. Analyse the Risk of Material
Misstatement and find out the overall Audit Risk.
Answer:
According to SA-200, “Overall Objectives of the Independent Auditor and the Conduct of an
Audit in Accordance with Standards on Auditing”, the Audit Risk is a risk that Auditor will issue an
inappropriate opinion while Financial Statements are materially misstated.
Audit Risk, has two components: Risk of material Misstatement and Detection Risk. The
relationship can be defined as follows.
Audit Risk = Risk of material Misstatement X Detection
Risk
Risk of material Misstatement: - Risk of Material Misstatement is anticipated risk that a material
Misstatement may exist in Financial Statement before start of the Audit. It has two components
Inherent risk and Control risk. The relationship can be defined as
Risk of material Misstatement = Inherent risk X control
risk
Inherent risk: it is a susceptibility of an assertion about account balance; class of transaction,
disclosure towards misstatements which may be either individually or collectively with other
49

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
Misstatement becomes material before considering any related internal control which is 40% in the
given case.
Control risk: it is a risk that there may be chances of material Misstatement even if there is a control
applied by the management and it has prevented defalcation to 75%.
Hence, control risk is 25% (100%-75%)
Risk of material Misstatement: Inherent risk X control risk i.e. 40% X 25 % = 10%
Chances of material Misstatement are reduced to 10% by the internal control applied by
management.
Detection risk: It is a risk that a material Misstatement remained undetected even if all Audit
procedures applied, Detection Risk is 100-60 = 40%
In the given case, overall Audit Risk can be reduced up to 4% as follows: Audit Risk: Risk of Material
Misstatement X Detection Risk = 10X.
40. CA Vipin has been appointed as Statutory Auditor by IG Insurance Co. Ltd. for 3 of its branches for the
F.Y. 2019-2020. Insurance Company is using a software called "Applied Epic" wherein all transactions
(policy issuance, premium receipts, expense of insurance company, incomes, assets and liabilities) are
recorded and financial statements generated at the end of the financial year. CA Vipin not technically
equipped and well versed with technology, decided to follow traditional manual auditing approach and
started the audit. He is of the view that understanding and using the auditee's automated environment
is optional and not required. Do you agree with the approach and views of CA Vipin? (past exam nov
2020)
ANSWER
As per SA315, understanding of the automated environment of a company is required. The auditor’s
understanding of the automated environment should include the following:
i. The applications that are being used by the company;
ii. Details of the IT infrastructure components for each of the application;
iii. The organisation structure and governance;
iv. The policies, procedures and processes followed;
v. IT risks and controls.
The auditor is required to document the understanding of a company’s automated environment as per SA
230. Thus the approach of CA Vipin is not correct considering the above mentioned requirements of SA
315 and SA 230
41. You are engaged by M/s. Real Ltd. as an internal auditor for the financial year 2020-2021.
While applying risk assessment procedures of inquiring from management and various
analytical procedures, you have identified some risks which in your opinion may lead to material
misstatement at the financial level and assertion level. Which factors as an auditor will you
50

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
consider while exercising judgement as to whether such risks are significant risks or not? (5
Marks) (past exam jan 2021)
ANSWER
The internal auditor of Real Ltd. has identified some risks while he was applying risk assessment procedures
and various analytical procedures.
As per SA 315, “Identifying and Assessing the Risks of Material Misstatements through Understanding the
Entity and its Environment”, in exercising judgment as to which risks are significant risks, the auditor shall
consider at least the following:
(1) Whether the risk is a risk of fraud;
(2) Whether the risk is related to recent significant economic, accounting, or other developments like
changes in regulatory environment, etc., and, therefore, requires specific attention;
(3) The complexity of transactions;
(4) Whether the risk involves significant transactions with related parties;
(5) The degree of subjectivity in the measurement of financial information related to the risk, especially
those measurements involving a wide range of measurement uncertainty; and
(6) Whether the risk involves significant transactions that are outside the normal course of business for the
entity, or that otherwise appear to be unusual.
SA 320- Materiality in Planning and Performing an Audit

42. May 2018-1(c) – 5 Marks, MTP-Apr-19 Qn No 2(c) 5 Marks:

Y& Co., Chartered Accountants have come across in the course of audit of a company that
certain machinery had been imported for production of new product. Although the Auditors
have applied the concept of materiality for the Financial Statements as a whole, they now want
to re-evaluate the materiality concept for this transaction involving foreign exchange. Give your
views in this regard?
Answer:
Re-evaluation of the Materiality Concept: In the instant case, Y & Co., as an auditor has applied
the concept of materiality for the financial statements as a whole. But they want to re-evaluate
the materiality concept on the basis of additional information of import of machinery for
production of new product which draws attention to a particular aspect of the company’s
business.
As per SA 320 “Materiality in Planning and Performing an Audit”, while establishing the overall
audit strategy, the auditor shall determine materiality for the financial statement as a whole. He
51

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
should set the benchmark on the basis of which he performs his audit procedure. If, in the specific
circumstances of the entity, there is one or more particular classes of transactions, account
balances or disclosures for which misstatements of lesser amounts than the materiality for the
financial statements as a whole could reasonably be expected to influence the economic decisions
of users taken on the basis of the financial statements, the auditor shall also determine the
materiality level or levels to be applied to those particular classes of transactions, account
balances or disclosures.
The auditor shall revise materiality for the financial statements in the event of becoming aware
of information during the audit that would have caused the auditor to have determined a different
amount (or amounts) initially.
If the auditor concludes a lower materiality for the same, then he should consider the fact that
whether it is necessary to revise performance materiality and whether the nature, timing and
extent of the further audit procedures remain appropriate.
Thus, Y & Co. can re-evaluate the materiality concepts after considering the necessity of such
revision.
43. MTP-Aug-18 Qn No 2(d) 5 Marks:
Mr. X was appointed as the auditor of M/s Easygo Ltd. and intends to apply the concept of
materiality for the financial statements as a whole. Please guide him as to the factors that may
affect the identification of an appropriate benchmark for this purpose.
Answer:
SA 320 “Materiality in Planning and Performing an Audit” prescribes the use of Benchmarks in
Determining Materiality for the Financial Statements as a Whole.
Determining materiality involves the exercise of professional judgment. A percentage is often

applied to a chosen benchmark as a starting point in determining materiality for the financial
statements as a whole. Factors that may affect the identification of an appropriate benchmark
include the following:
(i) The elements of the financial statements (for example, assets, liabilities, equity, revenue,
expenses);
(ii) Whether there are items on which the attention of the users of the particular entity’s financial
statements tends to be focused (for example, for the purpose of evaluating financial
performance users may tend to focus on profit, revenue or net assets);
(iii) The nature of the entity, where the entity is at in its life cycle, and the industry and economic
environment in which the entity operates;
(iv) The entity’s ownership structure and the way it is financed (for example, if an entity is financed
solely by debt rather than equity, users may put more emphasis on assets, and claims on them,
than on the entity’s earnings); and
(v) The relative volatility of the benchmark.
52

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
Study Material
44. As an auditor of RST Ltd. Mr. P applied the concept of materiality for the financial statements
as a whole. On the basis of obtaining additional information of significant contractual
arrangements that draw attention to a particular aspect of a company's business, he wants to re-
evaluate the materiality concept. Please, guide him.
Answer
Re-evaluation of the Materiality Concept: In the instant case, Mr. P, as an auditor of RST Ltd.
has applied the concept of materiality for the financial statements as a whole. But he wants to re-
evaluate the materiality concept on the basis of additional information of significant contractual
arrangements which draws attention to a particular aspect of the company’s business.
As per SA 320 “Materiality in Planning and Performing an Audit”, while establishing the overall
audit strategy, the auditor shall determine materiality for the financial statement as a whole. He
should set the benchmark on the basis of which he performs his audit procedure. If, in the specific
circumstances of the entity, there is one or more particular classes of transactions, account
balances or disclosures for which misstatements of lesser amounts than the materiality for the
financial statements as a whole could reasonably be expected to influence the economic
decisions of users taken on the basis of the financial statements, the auditor shall also determine
the materiality level or levels to be applied to those particular classes of transactions, account
balances or disclosures.
The auditor shall revise materiality for the financial statements in the event of becoming aware
of information during the audit that would have caused the auditor to have determined a
different amount (or amounts) initially.
If the auditor concludes a lower materiality for the same, then he should consider the fact that
whether it is necessary to revise performance materiality and whether the nature, timing and
extent of the further audit procedures remain appropriate.
Thus, Mr. P can re-evaluate the materiality concepts after considering the necessity of such
revision.
44A(APRIL 2022 MTP)
The amount of materiality initially determined needs to be revised as the audit progresses:
(a) If there is a delay in the audit.
(b) In the event of becoming aware of information during the audit that would have caused the
auditor to have determined a different amount (or amounts) initially.
(c) Only in the event of becoming aware of information during the audit that would have caused
the auditor to have determined a higher amount (or amounts) initially.
(d) Only in the event of becoming aware of information during the audit that would have caused
the auditor to have determined a lower amount (or amounts) initially.
ANSWER : B
53

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
SA 330 – The Auditor’s Responses to Assessed Risks

45. RTP May 2019 Qn no 3,
1. KJA Ltd is in the business of manufacturing of tiles and sanitaryware. The company has a large
inventory every year. Annual turnover of the company is INR 3000 crores. The company has 7
plants across India. The management of the company carries out physical verification of
inventory every year at the time of reporting date. During the year ended 31 March 2018, it was
found by the management that the inventory sheets of 31 March 2017 did not include five s
containing details of inventory worth INR 24.5 crores. Management has included this inventory
in the valuation of inventory as of 31 March 2018. Management has also explained that
considering the size of the company this may happen at times as the inventory is huge and lying
at various locations. Morever, the amount of the inventory is insignificant if considered as a
percentage of revenue or inventory. State how you will deal with this matter as an auditor in the
accounts of the company (towards substantive audit procedures and excluding the impact on
auditor’s assessment under Internal Financial Control Framework) for the year ended 31 March
2018.
a. Since the matter is not relevant/ material to current period figures, no reporting in respect of this
matter would be required in the auditors report for the year ended 31 March 2018.
b. Management should restate the financials to adjust the error. Otherwise auditor may modify his
opinion on current year's financial statements considering the materiality.
c. Considering the matter is not relevant/ material to current period figures, the management may
include a note in the financial statements and basis that no reporting in respect of this matter
would be required in the auditors report for the year ended 31 March 2018.
d. Include an emphasis of matter because of the effects or possible effects of the error in the
auditors report for the year ended 31 March 2018.
Answer: Option B
46. RTP Nov 18 Qn no. 1(a), MTP-Oct-19 Qn No 2(a) 4 Marks:
In the course of audit of ZED Ltd, its auditor wants to rely on audit evidence obtained in
previous audit in respect of effectiveness of internal controls instead of retesting the same
during the current audit. As an advisor to the auditor kindly caution him about the factors that
may warrant a re-test of controls.
Answer
As per SA 330 on “The Auditor’s Responses to Assessed Risks”, changes may affect the relevance
of the audit evidence obtained in previous audits such that there may no longer be a basis for
continued reliance.
The auditor’s decision on whether to rely on audit evidence obtained in previous audits for control
is a matter of professional judgment. In addition, the length of time between retesting such
controls is also a matter of professional judgment.
Factors that may warrant a re-test of controls are-
(i) A deficient control environment.
54

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
(ii) Deficient monitoring of controls.

(iii) A significant manual element to the relevant controls.
(iv) Personnel changes that significantly affect the application of the control.
(v) Changing circumstances that indicate the need for changes in the control.
(vi) Deficient general IT-controls.
47. M/s. HK & Co. was appointed as an auditor of GSB Limited, a company operating its
business in telecom sector. As per spectrum allocation agreement with Government, GSB
Limited is required to pay certain percentage of its annual revenue as license fee. GSB Limited
paid the license fee on its core business for last two years. At the end of third year, the
communication was received from Government that it needs to pay agreed percentage on its
total revenues and not only on core business revenues. Matter was disputed a nd went to court
of law. On prudence basis, GSB Limited made a provision on estimated business in its books of
accounts of agreed percentage on non-core business receipts also. The amount of provision was
of such huge amount that the GSB Limited's profit a nd loss account for that quarter reflected
loss due to that provision. How you as an auditor
can evaluate this accounting estimate which involves significant risk and what if Management
has not addressed the effects of estimation uncertainty on provision made? (past exam jan 2021)
(4 Marks)
ANSWER
In the given case, HK & Co. was appointed as an auditor of GSB Ltd., operating in Telecom sector. GSB Ltd
paid the license fee on its core business revenue whereas Govt required it to pay on non-core business
receipts as well. Consequently, the amount of provision was of such a huge amount that GSB Ltd.’s profit
and loss account reflected a lo ss due to that provision. As an auditor evaluation would be done as under:
For accounting estimates that give rise to significant risks, in addition to other substantive procedures
performed to meet the requirements of SA 330, the auditor shall evaluate the following:
(i) How management has considered alternative assumptions or outcomes, and why it has rejected them,
or how management has otherwise addressed estimation uncertainty in making the accounting estimate.
(ii) Whether the significant assumptions used by management are reasonable.
(iii) Where relevant to the reasonableness of the significant assumptions used by management or the
appropriate application of the applicable financial reporting framework, management’s intent to carry out
specific courses of action and its ability to do so.
(iv) If, in the auditor’s judgment, management has not adequately addressed the effects of estimation
uncertainty on the accounting estimates that give rise to significant risks, the auditor shall, if considered
necessary, develop a range with which to evaluate the reasonableness of the accounting estimate .
48. In an initial audit engagement, the auditor will have to satisfy about the sufficiency and
appropriateness of ‘Opening Balances’ to ensure that they are free from misstatements, which
may materially affect the current financial statements. Lay down the audit procedure, you will
55

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
follow in cases (i) when the financial statements are audited for the preceding period by
another auditor; and (ii) when financial statements are audited for the first time.
(II) If, after performing the procedure, you are not satisfied about the correctness of ‘Opening
Balances’; what approach you will adopt in drafting your audit report in two situations
mentioned in (I) above? (rtp- july 2021)
ANSWER
I) (i) Financial Statements Audited by another Auditor – Audit Procedure: If the prior period’s financial
statements were audited by a predecessor auditor, the auditor may be able to obtain sufficient appropriate
audit evidence regarding the opening balances by perusing the copies of the audited financial statements
including the other relevant documents relating to the prior period financial statements such as supporting
schedules to the audited financial statements. Ordinarily, the current auditor can place reliance on the
closing balances contained in the financial statements for the preceding period, except when during the
performance
of audit procedures for the current period the possibility of misstatements in opening balances is indicated.
(ii) Audit of Financial Statements for the First Time – Audit Procedure: When the audit of financial
statements is being conducted for the first time, the auditor has to perform auditing procedures to obtain
sufficient appropriate audit evidence. Since opening balances represent effect of transaction and events of
the preceding period and accounting policies applied in the preceding period, the auditor need to obtain
evidence having regard to nature of opening balances, materiality of the opening balances and accounting
policies. Since it will not be possible for auditor to perform certain procedures, e.g., observing physical
verification of inventories, etc. the auditor may obtain confirmation, etc. and perform suitable procedures
in respect of fixed assets, investments, etc. The auditor can also obtain management representation with
regards to the opening balances.
(II) Drafting Audit Report: If the auditor is unable to obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence regarding
the opening balances, the auditor shall express a qualified opinion or a disclaimer of opinion, as
appropriate. Further, If the auditor concludes that the opening balances contain a misstatement that
materially affects the current period’s financial statements, and the effect of the misstatement is not
properly accounted for or not adequately presented or disclosed, the auditor shall express a qualified
opinion or an adverse opinion
49. M/s Ram Raj & Associates have been appointed as statutory auditors of Venus Ltd. for the FY 2019-
20. During the year, the company has entered into some related party transactions. CA Ram, the
engagement partner has taken a management representation letter regarding the proper accounting,
presentation and disclosure of such related party transactions. Is there any further responsibility of CA
Ram with respect to the other procedures to be performed for related party transactions? (mtp nov 20)
(a) No, there is no further responsibility of CA Ram as the best audit evidence for the related party
transaction is the management representation letter.
(b) No, there is no further responsibility of CA Ram as the audit firm is responsible for verifying the
balances and disclosure of related party transactions. The identification of related party transactions is
the responsibility of the management of Venus Ltd.
56

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
(c) Yes, the audit firm has the responsibility to perform the audit procedures to identify, assess and
respond to the risk of material misstatement arising from the entity’s failure to appropriately account for
related party relationships, transactions and balances, and obtaining merely management
representation letter can be considered to be sufficient appropriate audit evidence.
(d) Yes, the auditor has the responsibility to detect fraud and error with respect to the related party
transactions.
ANSWER- c
49A(MAY 2022 RTP)
In the course of audit of Ambika Ltd, its auditor wants to rely on the audit evidence obtained in the
previous audit in respect of the effectiveness of internal controls instead of retesting the same during the
current audit. As an advisor to the auditor kindly caution him about the factors that may warrant a re-test
of controls.
ANSWER :
As per SA 330 on “The Auditor’s Responses to Assessed Risks”, changes may affect the relevance of the
audit evidence obtained in previous audits such that there may no longer be a basis for continued reliance.
The auditor’s decision on whether to rely on the audit evidence obtained in previous audits for control is a
matter of professional judgment. In addition, the length of time between retesting such controls is also a
matter of professional judgment.
Factors that may warrant a re-test of controls are-
(i) A deficient control environment.
(ii) Deficient monitoring of controls.
(iii) A significant manual element to the relevant controls.
(iv) Personnel changes that significantly affect the application of the control.
(v) Changing circumstances that indicate the need for changes in the control.
(vi) Deficient general IT-controls.
SA 402 - Audit Considerations Relating to an Entity Using a Service Organisation

50. MTP-Oct-19 Qn No 1(a) 4 Marks:

RTP Nov 18 Qn no.2(a)
JIO Ltd. is a mobile phone operating company. Barring the marketing function it had outsourced
the entire operations like maintenance of mobile infrastructure, customer billing, payroll,
accounting functions, etc. Assist the auditor of JIO Ltd. as to how he can obtain an understanding
of how JIO Ltd. uses the services of the outsourced agency in its operations.
MTP-OCT-18 Qn No 6(a) 4 Marks:
57

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
Ganpati Ltd. is a mobile phone operating company. Barring the marketing function it had
outsourced the entire operations like maintenance of mobile infrastructure, customer billing,
payroll, accounting functions, etc. Assist the auditor of Ganpati Ltd. as to how he can obtain an
understanding of how Ganpati Ltd. uses the services of the outsourced agency in its operations.
ANSWER
As per SA 402 on “Audit Considerations Relating to an Entity Using a Service Organisation”, when
obtaining an understanding of the user entity in accordance with SA 315 “Identifying and Assessing the
Risks of Material Misstatement through Understanding the Entity and its Environment”, the user auditor
shall obtain an understanding of how a user entity uses the services of a service organisation in the user
entity’s operations, including:
(i) The nature of the services provided by the service organisation and the significance of those services to
the user entity, including the effect thereof on the user entity’s internal control;
(ii) The nature and materiality of the transactions processed or accounts or financial reporting processes
affected by the service organisation;
(iii) The degree of interaction between the activities of the service organisation and those of the user entity;
and
(iv) The nature of the relationship between the user entity and the service organisation, including the relevant
contractual terms for the activities undertaken by the service organisation.
51.RTP Nov 2020 Q No 13 (b)
ENN Limited is availing the services of APP Private Limited for its payroll operations. Payroll cost
accounts for 65% of total cost for ENN Limited. APP Limited has provided the type 2 report as
specified under SA 402 for its description, design and operating effectiveness of control.
APP Private Limited has also outsourced a material part of payroll operation M/s SMP &
Associates in such a way that M/s SMP & Associates is sub-service organization to ENN Limited.
The Type 2 report which was provided by APP Private Limited was based on carve-out method
as specified under SA 402.
CA Raman while reviewing the unmodified audit report drafted by his assistant found that, a
reference has been made to the work done by the service auditor. CA Raman hence asked his
assistant to remove such reference and modify report accordingly.
Comment whether CA Raman is correct in removing the reference of the work done by service
auditor?
Answer
Reporting by the User Auditor: As per SA 402, “Audit Considerations Relating to an Entity Using a
Service Organisation”, the user auditor shall modify the opinion in the user auditor’s report in
accordance with SA 705, “Modifications to the Opinion in the Independent Auditor’s Report”, if
the user auditor is unable to obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence regarding the services
provided by the service organisation relevant to the audit of the user entity’s financial statements.
The user auditor shall not refer to the work of a service auditor in the user auditor’s report
containing an unmodified opinion unless required by law or regulation to do so.
58

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
If such reference is required by law or regulation, the user auditor’s report shall indicate that the
reference does not diminish the user auditor’s responsibility for the audit opinion.
Thus, in view of above, contention of CA. Raman in removing reference of the work done by service
auditor is in order as in case of unmodified audit report, user auditor cannot refer to the work done
by service auditor.
Study Material
52.When a sub-service organization performs services for a service organization, there are two
alternative methods of presenting the description of controls. The service organization
determines which method will be used. As a user auditor what information would you obtain
about controls at a sub-service organization?
Answer
Controls at a Sub-Service Organisation: In accordance with SA 402 “Audit Considerations relating
to an Entity Using a Service Organisation”, a user entity may use a service organisation that in turn
uses a sub-service organisation to provide some of the services provided to a user entity that are
part of the user entity’s information system relevant to financial reporting. The sub-service
organisation may be a separate entity from the service organisation or may be related to the
service organisation.
A user auditor may need to consider controls at the sub-service organisation. In situations where
one or more sub-service organisations are used, the interaction between the activities of the user
entity and those of the service organisation is expanded to include the interaction between the
user entity, the service organisation and the sub-service organisations. The degree of this
interaction, as well as the nature and materiality of the transactions processed by the service
organisation and the sub-service organisations are the most important factors for the user auditor
to consider in determining the significance of the service organisation’s and sub-service
organisation’s controls to the user entity’s controls.
Further, the user auditor shall determine whether a sufficient understanding of the nature and
significance of the services provided by the service organisation and their effect on the user
entity's internal control relevant to the audit has been obtained to provide a basis for the
identification and assessment of risks of material misstatement.
If the user auditor is unable to obtain a sufficient understanding from the user entity, the user
auditor shall obtain that understanding by application of the following two methods of presenting
description of internal controls i.e. (i) Type 1 report; or (ii) Type 2 report. If a service organisation
uses a subservice organisation, the service auditor's report may either include or exclude the
subservice organisation's relevant control objectives and related controls in the service
organisation's description of its system and in the scope of the service auditor's engagement.
These two methods of reporting are known as the inclusive method and the carve-out method
respectively.
In either method, the service organisation includes in its description of controls a description of
the functions and nature of the processing performed by the sub- service organisation.
59

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
If the Type 1 or Type 2 report excludes the control at a subservice organization and the services
provided by the subservice organization are relevant to the audit of the user entity’s financial
statements, the user auditor is required to apply the requirements of the SA 402 in respect of the
subservice organization.
The nature and extent of work to be performed by the user auditor regarding the services
provided by a subservice organization depend on the nature and significance of those services to
the user entity and relevance of those services to the audit.
53. AMRO Limited is availing the services of ABN Private Limited for its payroll operations. Payroll cost
accounts for 67% of total cost for AMRO Limited. ABN Limited has provided the type 2 report as specified
under SA 402 for its description, design and operating effectiveness of control.
ABN Private Limited has also outsourced a material part of payroll operation M/s RST & Associates in
such a way that M/s RST & Associates is sub-service organization to AMRO Limited. The Type 2 report
which was provided by ABN Private Limited was based on carve-out method as specified under SA 402.
CA Param while reviewing the unmodified audit report drafted by his assistant found that, a reference
has been made to the work done by the service auditor. CA Param hence asked his assistant to remove
such reference and modify report accordingly.
Comment whether CA Param is correct in removing the reference of the work done by service auditor? (5
Marks) (mtp – II -july 2021)
ANSWER
Reporting by the User Auditor: As per SA 402, “Audit Considerations Relating to an Entity Using a Service
Organisation”, the user auditor shall modify the opinion in the user auditor’s report in accordance with SA
705, “Modifications to the Opinion in the Independent Auditor’s Report”, if the user auditor is unable to
obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence regarding the services provided by the service organisation
relevant to the audit of the user entity’s financial statements.
The user auditor shall not refer to the work of a service auditor in the user auditor’s report containing an
unmodified opinion unless required by law or regulation to do so. If such reference is required by law or
regulation, the user auditor’s report shall indicate that the reference does not diminish the user auditor’s
responsibility for the audit opinion. Thus, in view of above, contention of CA. Param in removing reference
of the work done by service auditor is in order as in case of unmodified audit report , user auditor cannot
refer to the work done by service auditor.
54. ( MTP- NOV 2021)

ZED Limited is availing the services of MEA Private Limited for its payroll operations. Payroll cost accounts
for 65% of total cost for ZED Limited. MEA Limited has provided the type 2 report as specified under SA 402
for its description, design and operating effectiveness of control.
MEA Private Limited has also outsourced a material part of payroll operation M/s MPS & Associates in such
a way that M/s MPS & Associates is sub-service organization to ZED Limited. The Type 2 report which was
provided by MEA Private Limited was based on carve-out method as specified under SA 402.
CA Vasu while reviewing the unmodified audit report drafted by his assistant found that, a reference has
been made to the work done by the service auditor. CA Vasu hence asked his assistant to remove such
reference and modify report accordingly.
Comment whether CA Vasu is correct in removing the reference of the work done by service auditor?
ANSWER
60

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
Reporting by the User Auditor: As per SA 402, “Audit Considerations Relating to an Entity Using a Service
Organisation”, the user auditor shall modify the opinion in the user auditor’s report in accordance with SA
705, “Modifications to the Opinion in the Independent Auditor’s Report”, if the user auditor is unable to
obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence regarding the services provided by the service organisation
relevant to the audit of the user entity’s financial statements.
The user auditor shall not refer to the work of a service auditor in the user auditor’s report containing an
unmodified opinion unless required by law or regulation to do so. If such reference is required by law or
regulation, the user auditor’s report shall indicate that the reference does not diminish the user auditor’s
responsibility for the audit opinion. Thus, in view of above, contention of CA. Vasu in removing reference of
the work done by service auditor is in order as in case of unmodified audit report, user auditor cannot refer
to the work done by service auditor.
Q 54A(NOV21 EXAM)
In the course of audit of Tech limited you observed that processing of accounting data was given to
a third party on account of certain considerations like cost reduction, own computer working to full
capacity. Tech Limited used a service organisation to record transactions and process related data.
As an auditor, what would be your considerations regarding the nature and extent of activities
undertaken by service organisation so as to determine whether those activities are relevant to the
audit and, if so, to assess their effect on audit risk.
Discuss with reference to relevant Standard on Auditing. (5 Marks)
ANSWER :
(b) As per SA 402 “Audit Considerations relating to an Entity using a Service Organization”, when
obtaining an understanding of the user entity in accordance with SA 315, the user auditor shall
obtain an understanding of how a user entity uses the services of a service organisation in the user
entity’s operations, including:
(i) The nature of the services provided by the service organisation and the significance of those
services to the user entity, including the effect thereof on the user entity’s internal control;
(ii) The nature and materiality of the transactions processed or accounts or financial reporting
processes affected by the service organisation;
(iii) The degree of interaction between the activities of the service organisation and those of the
user entity; and
(iv) The nature of the relationship between the user entity and the service organisation, including
the relevant contractual terms for the activities undertaken by the service organization.
"Based on above, the auditor will assess the effect on the audit risk and take necessary steps while
conducting the audit".
54B (SEPT2022 MTP)

OM Limited is availing the services of APP Private Limited for its payroll operations. Payroll cost
accounts for 65% of total cost for OM Limited. APP Limited has provided the type 2 report as
specified under SA 402 for its description, design and operating effectiveness of control.
APP Private Limited has also outsourced a material part of payroll operation M/s PMS & Associates
in such a way that M/s PMS & Associates is sub-service organization to OM Limited. The Type 2
61

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
report which was provided by APP Private Limited was based on carve-out method as specified
under SA 402.
CA Sheetal while reviewing the unmodified audit report drafted by his assistant found that, a
reference has been made to the work done by the service auditor. CA Sheetal hence asked his
assistant to remove such reference and modify report accordingly.
Comment whether CA Sheetal is correct in removing the reference of the work done by service
auditor?
ANSWER :
Reporting by the User Auditor: As per SA 402, “Audit Considerations Relating to an Entity Using
a Service Organisation”, the user auditor shall modify the opinion in the user auditor’s report in
accordance with SA 705, “Modifications to the Opinion in the Independent Auditor’s Report”, if the
user auditor is unable to obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence regarding the services
provided by the service organisation relevant to the audit of the user entity’s financial statements.
The user auditor shall not refer to the work of a service auditor in the user auditor’s report
containing an unmodified opinion unless required by law or regulation to do so. If such reference is
required by law or regulation, the user auditor’s report shall indicate that the reference does not
diminish the user auditor’s responsibility for the audit opinion.
Thus, in view of above, contention of CA. Sheetal in removing reference of the work done by service
auditor is in order as in case of unmodified audit report, user auditor cannot refer to the work done
by service auditor.
SA 450-Evaluvation of Misstatements identified during the audit

55. RTP Nov 18 Qn no. 1(b)
In audit plan for TELCO Ltd, as the audit partner you want to highlight the sources of
misstatements arising from other than fraud to your audit team and caution them. Identify the
sources of misstatements.
Answer According to SA 450 “Evaluation of Misstatements identified during the Audit”, the following
are the sources of misstatements arising from other than fraud -
(i) An inaccuracy in gathering or processing data from which the financial statements are prepared;
(ii) An omission of an amount or disclosure;
(iii) An incorrect accounting estimate arising from overlooking, or clear misinterpretation of facts; and
Judgments of management concerning accounting estimates that the auditor considers unreasonable or
the selection and application of accounting policies that the auditor considers inappropriate
55A(MAY 2022 RTP)

In the audit plan for Shetrapal Ltd, as the audit partner you want to highlight the sources of
misstatements, arising from other than fraud, to your audit team and caution them. Identify the
62

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
sources of misstatements.
ANSWER :
According to SA 450 “Evaluation of Misstatements Identified During the Audit”, the following are
the sources of misstatements arising from other than fraud -
(i) An inaccuracy in gathering or processing data from which the financial statements are
prepared;
(ii) An omission of an amount or disclosure;
(iii) An incorrect accounting estimate arising from overlooking, or clear

misinterpretation of facts; and
(iv) Judgments of management concerning accounting estimates that the auditor considers
unreasonable or the selection and application of accounting policies that the auditor considers
inappropriate.
SA – 500 Audit Evidence

56. MTP Mar 2019 Qn no.19 (2 Marks)
You are an audit senior at Ghaisas & Co and are currently performing the final audit of Bingham
Co. for the year ended 31 March 2018. The company is a manufacturer and retailer of table
lamps. The current audit senior is ill, and you have been asked to complete the audit of payroll
in their absence. On arrival at the head office of Bingham Co, you determine the following data
from a review of the current year and prior year audit files:
• As at 31 March 2017, the company had 350 employees
• On 1 April 2017, 10% of staff were made redundant, effective immediately, due to
discontinuation of a product line
• On 1 June 2017, all remaining staff received a 5% pay rise
• Over the course of the year, sales levels met performance targets which resulted in a fixed
bonus of Rs.8,000 being paid to each employee on 31 March 2018.
The following audit evidence has been gathered relating to the accuracy of wages and salaries
for Bingham Co.
(1) Proof in total calculation performed byan audit team member
(2) Written representation from the directors of Bingham Co confirming the accuracyof wages and
salaries
(3) Verbal confirmation from the finance director of Bingham Co confirming the accuracy of wages
and salaries
(4) Recalculation of the gross and net pay for a sample of employees by an internal audit team
member of Bingham Co.
63

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
What is the order of reliability of the audit evidence starting with the MOST RELIABLE first?
(a) Audit evidence - 1, 2, 3, 4
(b) Audit evidence - 1, 4, 2, 3
(c) Audit evidence - 4, 1, 2, 3
(d) Audit evidence - 4, 1, 3, 2
Answer: (b) Audit evidence - 1, 4, 2, 3
57. May 2018-2 (C) - 5 Marks
CA. Needle had been appointed as an Auditor of M/s Fabric Ltd. In the course of audit, it had
been observed that inventory including work-in-process had been valued by Management by
using experts hired by them. Analyse relevant factors to decide as to whether or not to accept
the findings from the work of Management expert in valuation of inventories.
Answer
Evaluating the Work of Management’s Expert: As per SA 500 “Audit Evidence”, when information
to be used as audit evidence has been prepared using the work of a management’s expert, the
auditor shall, to the extent necessary, having regard to the significance of that expert’s work for
the auditor’s purposes-
• Evaluate the competence, capabilities and objectivity of that expert;
• Obtain an understanding of the work of that expert; and
• Evaluate the appropriateness of that expert’s work as audit evidence for the relevant assertion.
The auditor may obtain information regarding the competence, capabilities and objectivity of a
management’s expert from a variety of sources, such as personal experience with previous work
of that expert; discussions with that expert; discussions with others who are familiar with that
expert’s work; knowledge of that expert’s qualifications; published papers or books written by
that expert.
Aspects of the management’s expert’s field relevant to the auditor’s understanding may include
what assumptions and methods are used by the management’s expert, and whether they are
generally accepted within that expert’s field and appropriate for financial reporting purposes.
The auditor may also consider the following while evaluating the appropriateness of the
Management’s expert’s work as audit evidence for the relevant assertion:
(i) The relevance and reasonableness of that expert’s findings or conclusions, their consistency with
other audit evidence, and whether
they have been appropriately reflected in the financial statements;
(ii) If that expert’s work involves use of significant assumptions and methods, the relevance and
reasonableness of those assumptions and methods; and
(iii) If that expert’s work involves significant use of source data, the relevance,
completeness, and accuracy of that source data.
64

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
MTP Apr 18 Qn no.1(b) 5 Marks

58. The auditor of CROX Ltd. accepted the gratuity liability valuation based on the certificate
issued by a qualified actuary. However, the auditor noticed that the retirement age adopted is
65 years as against the existing retirement age of 60 years. The company is considering a
proposal to increase the retirement age to 65 years. Comment.
Answer
Evaluating the Work of Management’s Expert: As per SA 500 “Audit Evidence”, when information
to be used as audit evidence has been prepared using the work of a management’s expert, the
auditor shall, to the extent necessary, having regard to the significance of that expert’s work for
the auditor’s purposes,-
(a) Evaluate the competence, capabilities and objectivity of that expert;
(b) Obtain an understanding of the work of that expert; and
(c) Evaluate the appropriateness of that expert’s work as audit evidence for the relevant assertion.
management’s expert from a variety of sources, such as personal experience with previous work
of that expert; discussions with that expert; discussions with others who are familiar with that
expert’s work; knowledge of that expert’s qualifications; published papers or books written by
that expert.
Aspects of the management’s expert’s field relevant to the auditor’s understanding may include
what assumptions and methods are used by the management’s expert, and whether they are
generally accepted within that expert’s field and appropriate for financial reporting purposes.
The auditor may also consider the following while evaluating the appropriateness of the
management’s expert’s work as audit evidence for the relevant assertion:
(i) The relevance and reasonableness of that expert’s findings or conclusions, their consistency with
other audit evidence, and whether they have been appropriately reflected in the financial
statements;
(iii) If that expert’s work involves significant use of source data, the relevance, completeness, and
accuracy of that source data.
In the instant case, CROX Ltd. accepted the gratuity liability valuation based on the certificate
issued by an expert i.e., a qualified actuary who is management’s expert. Here basis for
computation and valuation is taken as age 65 years by the actuary, which is not correct as company
is considering proposal to increase the retirement age from existing age to 65 years. Therefore,
assumptions and methods used by the management’s expert are not appropriate for financial
reporting purposes. Hence, auditor may qualify the report accordingly.
65

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
59. (RTP MAY 2018)
(MTP-OCT-18 Qn No 6(c) 4 Marks:
MIM & Co. wants to issue a prospectus, to provide potential investors with information about
future expectations of the Company. You are hired by MIM & Co. to examine the projected
financial statements and give report thereon. What audit evidence will be obtained for
reporting on projected financial statements?
Answer:
Audit evidence to be obtained for Reporting on Projected Financial Statements: The auditor
should document matters, which are important in providing evidence to support his report on
examination of prospective financial information, and evidence that such examination was
carried out.
The audit evidence in form of working papers will include:

(1) the sources of information,
(2) basis of forecasts,
(3) the assumptions made in arriving the forecasts,
(4) hypothetical assumptions, evidence supporting the assumptions,
(5) management representations regarding the intended use and distribution of the information,
completeness of material assumptions,
(6) management’s acceptance of its responsibility for the information,
(7) audit plan,
(8) the nature, timing and extent of examination procedures performed, and,
(9) in case the auditor expresses a modified opinion or withdraws from the engagement, the reasons
forming the basis of such decision.
60. CA. Pointer had been appointed as an Auditor of Textile Ltd. During the course of audit, it was
observed that inventory including work-in-process has been valued by the Management by using experts
hired by them. Analyse relevant factors to decide as to whether CA. Pointer should accept or not accept
the findings from the work of Management expert in valuation of inventories. (4 Marks) (mtp nov 20)
ANSWER
Evaluating the Work of Management’s Expert: As per SA 500 “Audit Evidence”, when information to be
used as audit evidence has been prepared using the work of a management’s expert, the auditor shall, to
the extent necessary, having regard to the significance of that expert’s work for the auditor’s purposes-
(1) Evaluate the competence, capabilities and objectivity of that expert;
(2) Obtain an understanding of the work of that expert; and

66

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
(3) Evaluate the appropriateness of that expert’s work as audit evidence for the relevant assertion.
management’s expert from a variety of sources, such as personal experience with previous work of that
expert; discussions with that expert; discussions with others who are familiar with that expert’s work;
knowledge of that expert’s qualifications; published papers or books written by that expert.
Aspects of the management’s expert’s field relevant to the auditor’s understanding may include what
assumptions and methods are used by the management’s expert, and whether they are generally accepted
within that expert’s field and appropriate for financial reporting purposes.
The auditor may also consider the following while evaluating the appropriateness of the management’s
expert’s work as audit evidence for the relevant assertion:
(i) The relevance and reasonableness of that expert’s findings or conclusions, their consistency with other
audit evidence, and whether they have been appropriately reflected in the financial statements;
(iii) If that expert’s work involves significant use of source data, the relevance, completeness, and accuracy
of that source data.
SA 501- Special Considerations for Selected Items
61.RTP May 2018 Qn no.2

XYZ Ltd. supplies navy uniforms across the country. The company has 4 warehouses at different
locations throughout the India and 5 warehouses at the borders. The major stocks are generally
supplied from the borders. XYZ Ltd. appointed M/s MNO & Co. to conduct its audit for the
financial year 2016-17. Mr. O, partner of M/s MNO & Co., attended all the physical inventory
counting conducted throughout the India but could not attend the same at borders due to some
unavoidable reason.
Answer
Special Consideration with Regard to Inventory: As per SA 501 “Audit Evidence- Specific
Considerations for Selected Items”, when inventory is material to the financial statements, the
auditor shall obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence regarding the existence and condition
of inventory by:
(a) Attendance at physical inventory counting, unless impracticable, to:
(1) Evaluate management’s instructions and procedures for recording and controlling the results of
the entity’s physical inventory counting;
(2) Observe the performance of management’s count procedures;
(3) Inspect the inventory; and
67

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
(4) Perform test counts; and

(b) Performing audit procedures over the entity’s final inventory records to determine whether
they accurately reflect actual inventory count results.
Attendance at Physical Inventory Counting Not Practicable: In some cases, attendance at physical
inventory counting may be impracticable. This may be due to factors such as the nature and
location of the inventory, for example, where inventory is held in a location that may pose threats
to the safety of the auditor. The matter of general inconvenience to the auditor, however, is not
sufficient to support a decision by the auditor that attendance is impracticable. Further, as
explained in SA 200 “Overall Objectives of the Independent Auditor and the Conduct of an Audit
in Accordance with Standards on Auditing”, the matter of difficulty, time, or cost involved is not
in itself a valid basis for the auditor to omit an audit procedure for which there is no alternative
or to be satisfied with audit evidence that is less than persuasive.
Further, where attendance is impracticable, alternative audit procedures, for example, inspection
of documentation of the subsequent sale of specific inventory items acquired or purchased prior to
the physical inventory counting, may provide sufficient appropriate audit evidence about the
existence and condition of inventory.
In some cases, though, it may not be possible to obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence
regarding the existence and condition of inventory by performing alternative audit procedures. In
such cases, SA 705 on Modifications to the Opinion in the Independent Auditor’s Report, requires
the auditor to modify the opinion in the auditor’s report as a result of the scope limitation
62. RTP Nov 2019 Qn no 11(b)

Your firm has been appointed as the statutory auditors of GBM Private Limited for the financial
year 2018-19. While verification of company’s inventories as on 31st March 2019, you found that
the significant amount of inventories belonging to the company are held by other parties.
However, the company has kept all the records of the inventories maintained by other parties.
What is your duty as an auditor in order to ensure that third parties are not such with whom the
stock should not be held and the stock as disclosed in company’s records actually belongs to
them?
Answer
Inventory under the Custody and Control of a Third Party: As per SA 501, “Audit Evidence—
Specific Considerations for Selected Items” when inventory under the custody and control of a
third party is material to the financial statements, the auditor shall obtain sufficient appropriate
audit evidence regarding the existence and condition of that inventory by performing one or both
of the following:
(i) Request confirmation from the third party as to the quantities and condition of inventory held on
behalf of the entity.
(ii) Perform inspection or other audit procedures appropriate in the circumstances, for example
where information is obtained that raises doubt about the integrity and objectivity of the third
68

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
party, the auditor may consider it appropriate to perform other audit procedures instead of, or in
addition to, confirmation with the third party. Examples of other audit procedures include:
• Attending, or arranging for another auditor to attend, the third party’s physical counting of
inventory, if practicable.
• Obtaining another auditor’s report, or a service auditor’s report, on the adequacy of the third
party’s internal control for ensuring that inventory is properly counted and adequately safeguarded.
• Inspecting documentation regarding inventory held by third parties, for example, warehouse
receipts.
• Requesting confirmation from other parties when inventory has been pledged as collateral
63. RTP May 2020 Qn no 11(b)

RIM Private Ltd is engaged in the business of manufacturing of water bottles and is experiencing
significant increase in turnover year on year. During the financial year ended 31 March 2019,
the company carried out a detailed physical verification of its inventory and property, plant and
equipment.
You are the auditor of RIM Private Ltd. The inventory as at the end of the year was Rs. 2.25 crores.
Due to unavoidable circumstances, you could not be present at the time of annual physical
verification. Under the above circumstances how would you ensure that the physical
verification conducted by the management was in order?
Answer:
As per SA 501 “Audit Evidence – Additional Considerations for Specific Items”, the auditor should
perform audit procedures, designed to obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence during his
attendance at physical inventory counting. SA 501 is additional guidance to that contained in SA
500, “Audit Evidence”, with respect to certain specific financial statement amounts and other
disclosures.
If the auditor is unable to be present at the physical inventory count on the date planned due to
unforeseen circumstances, the auditor should take or observe some physical counts on an
alternative date and where necessary, perform alternative audit procedures to assess whether
the changes in inventory between the date of physical count and the period end date are correctly
recorded. The auditor would also verify the procedure adopted, treatment given for the
discrepancies noticed during the physical count. The auditor would also ensure that appropriate
cut off procedures were followed by the management. He should also get management’s written
representation on (a) the completeness of information provided regarding the inventory, and (b)
assurance with regard to adherence to laid down procedures for physical inventory count.
64.(a) Moon Ltd. is a dealer in electronic appliances. The Company has a centralised warehouse at the
outskirts of Mumbai. The Auditors of the company M/s JK Associates normally attend the physical
verification of stocks carried out by the Management at the end of the financial year. However, on
account of certain disturbances in the region, the physical inventory counting could not be carried out at
the year end. The stock taking is decided to be done by management at some other date subsequently,
after a month.
69

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
In the light of the above facts:

Enumerate the audit procedures to be considered by M/s JK Associates, if physical inventory counting is
conducted at a date other than the date of the financial statements with reference to the relevant
Standard on Auditing. (5 Marks) (past exam nov 2020)
ANSWER
As per SA 501 “Audit Evidence- Specific Considerations for Selected Items”, when inventory is material to
the financial statements, the auditor shall obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence regarding the
existence and condition of inventory.
For practical reasons, the physical inventory counting may be conducted at a date, or dates, other than the
date of the financial statements. This may be done irrespective of whether management determines
inventory quantities by an annual physical inventory counting or maintains a perpetual inventory system. In
either case, the effectiveness of the design, implementation and maintenance of controls over changes in
inventory determines whether the conduct of physical inventory counting at a date, or dates, other than
the date of the financial statements is appropriate for audit purposes.
If physical inventory counting is conducted at a date other than the date of the financial statements, the
auditor, JK Associates, shall perform the following procedures:
(A) Attendance at physical inventory counting, unless impracticable, to:
(i) Evaluate management’s instructions and procedures for recording and controlling the results of the
entity’s physical inventory counting;
(ii) Observe the performance of management’s count procedures;
(iii) Inspect the inventory; and
(iv) Perform test counts; and
(B) Performing audit procedures over the entity’s final inventory records to determine whether they
accurately reflect actual inventory count results.
In addition to above, auditor shall also perform audit procedures to obtain audit evidence about whether
changes in inventory between the count date and the date of the financial statements are properly
recorded.
Relevant matters for consideration when designing audit procedures to obtain audit evidence about
whether changes in inventory amounts between the count date, or dates, and the final inventory records
are properly recorded include:
1. Whether the perpetual inventory records are properly adjusted.
2. Reliability of the entity’s perpetual inventory records.
3. Reasons for significant differences between the information obtained during the physical count and the
perpetual inventory records
65. (a) Coccyx Ltd. supplies navy uniforms across the country. The Company has 3 warehouses at
different locations throughout the India and 5 warehouses at the borders. The major stocks are generally
supplied from the borders. Coccyx Ltd. appointed M/s OPAQE & Co. to conduct its audit for the financial
year 2020-21. Mr. P, partner of M/s OPAQE & Co., attended all the physical inventory counting
70

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
conducted throughout the India but could not attend the same at borders due to some unavoidable
reason.
You are required to advise M/s OPAQE & Co., (rtp- july 2021)
(I) How sufficient appropriate audit evidence regarding the existence and condition of inventory may be
obtained?
(II) How is an auditor supposed to deal when attendance at physical inventory counting is impracticable?
ANSWER
I) Special Consideration with Regard to Inventory: As per SA 501 “Audit Evidence- Specific Considerations
for Selected Items”, when inventory is material to the financial statements, the auditor shall obtain
sufficient appropriate audit evidence regarding the existence and condition of inventory by:
(1) Attendance at physical inventory counting, unless impracticable, to:
(i) Evaluate management’s instructions and procedures for recording and controlling the results of the
entity’s physical inventory counting;
(ii) Observe the performance of management’s count procedures;
(iii) Inspect the inventory; and
(iv) Perform test counts; and
(2) Performing audit procedures over the entity’s final inventory records to determine whether they
accurately reflect actual inventory count results.
(II) Attendance at Physical Inventory Counting Not Practicable: In some cases, attendance at
physical inventory counting may be impracticable. This may be due to factors such as the nature
and location of the inventory, for example, where inventory is held in a location that may pose
threats to the safety of the auditor. The matter of general inconvenience to the auditor, however, is not
sufficient to support a decision by the auditor that attendance is impracticable. Further, as explained in SA
200 “Overall Objectives of the Independent Auditor and the Conduct of an Audit in Accordance with
Standards on Auditing”, the matter of difficulty, time, or cost involved is not in itself a valid basis for the
auditor to omit an audit procedure for which there is no alternative or to be satisfied with audit evidence
that is less than persuasive.
Further, where attendance is impracticable, alternative audit procedures, for example, inspection of
documentation of the subsequent sale of specific inventory items acquired or purchased prior to the
physical inventory counting, may provide sufficient appropriate audit evidence about the existence and
condition of inventory.
In some cases, though, it may not be possible to obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence regarding the
existence and condition of inventory by performing alternative audit procedures. In such cases, SA 705 on
Modifications to the Opinion in the Independent Auditor’s Report, requires the auditor to modify the
opinion in the auditor’s report as a result of the scope limitation.
65A (OCT 2022 MTP)

The Engagement Partner of the audit team of High Inventory Limited assessed that the inventory is
material with respect to the audit of the financial statement for the current period. Upon inquiring with the
management, the Engagement Partner identified that the management will be performing an annual
physical inventory count at all the warehouses where the entity stores and maintains its inventory.
Moreover, management confirmed in its written representation that they will be performing a 100%
physical count of inventory for the current period.
As a result, the engagement Partner decided not to perform any physical count of inventory as it will be a
duplication of the work. Moreover, he decided that the written representation from management stating
“the inventory exists and is in appropriate physical condition” will be sufficient and appropriate with
respect to audit evidence to conclude that the inventory balance in the financial statement is free from any
material misstatement.
71

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
In the light of SA 501, evaluate whether the decision taken by the Engagement Partner is appropriate or
not.
ANSWER :
As per SA 501,” Audit Evidence - Specific Considerations for Selected Items”, when inventory is material to
the financial statements, the auditor shall obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence regarding the
existence and condition of inventory by:
i. Attendance at physical inventory counting, unless impracticable, to
1. Evaluate management’s instructions and procedures for recording and controlling the
results of the entity’s physical inventory counting.
2. Observe the performance of management’s count procedures.
3. Inspect the inventory; and.
4. Perform test counts; and
ii. Performing audit procedures over the entity’s final inventory records to determine whether they
accurately reflect actual inventory count results
Attendance at physical inventory counting involves:
i. Inspecting the inventory to ascertain its existence and evaluate its condition and perform test
counts.
ii. Observing compliance with management’s instructions and the performance of procedures
for recording and controlling the results of the physical inventory count; and
iii. Obtaining audit evidence as to the reliability of management’s count procedures.
Hence in the given case, the approach of Engagement Partner is not appropriate as when inventory is
material to the financial statements, the auditor shall obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence
regarding the existence and condition of inventory. This should be done by performing various audit
procedures which also includes attending physical count, observing the count, inspecting the inventory and
reperforming physical counts.
SA - 505 External Confirmation

Multiple Choice questions
66.MTP Mar 2019 QN no 20
You are an audit senior of Pendse Accountants and are currently conducting the audit of
Stalwart Co for the year ended 31 March 2018. Below is an extract from the list of supplier
statements as at 31 March 2018 held by the company and corresponding payables ledger
balances at the same date along with some commentary on the noted differences:
Supplier Statement balance Payables ledger balance Rs. Rs.
AB Co 90,000 70,000
CD Co 1,85,000 1,15,000
AB Co: The difference in the balance is due to an invoice which is under dispute due to faulty
goods which were returned on 29 March 2018.
CD Co: The difference in the balance is due to the supplier statement showing an invoice dated
27 March 2018 for Rs. 70,000 which was not recorded in the financial statements until after the
year end. The payables clerk has advised the audit team that the invoice was not received until
3 April 2018.
72

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
The audit manager has asked you to review the full list of trade payables and select balances on
which supplier statement reconciliations will be performed. Which of the following statement is
correct in respect of including or excluding from your sample?
(a) Exclude with material balances at the year-end.
(b) Exclude suppliers which have a high volume of business with Stalwart Co
(c) Include major suppliers with nil balances at the year-end.
(d) Include suppliers where the statement agrees to the ledger.
Answer: (c) Include major suppliers with nil balances at the year-end.
MTP APR 2019 Qn no 2(1 Mark)
67. The audit team has obtained the following results from the trade receivables circularization
of Oak Co for the year ended 31 March 2018.
CustomerBalance as per Balance as per Comment
sales ledger customer
confirmation
Rs. Rs.
M Co 2,25,000 2,25,000
N Co 3,50,000 2,75,000 Invoice raised on 28 March 2018
O Co 6,20,000 4,80,000 Payment made 30 March 2018
P Co 5,35,000 5,35,000 A balance of Rs.45,000 is currently
being disputed by P Co.
R Co 1,78,000 No reply
Which of the following statements in relation to the results of the trade receivables
circularisation is TRUE?
(a) No further audit procedures need to be carried out in relation to the outstanding balances
with M Co. and P Co.
(b) The difference in relation to N Co. represents a timing difference and should be agreed to a pre-
year-end invoice
(c) The difference in relation to O Co. represents a timing difference and should be agreed to pre-
year-end bank statements
(d) Due to the non-reply, the balance with R Co. cannot be verified and a different customer
balance should be selected and circularised
Answer : Option (b) The difference in relation to N Co. represents a timing difference and should
be agreed to a pre- year-end invoice
68. May 2018- 5 (d) 4 Marks

73

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
Neverpermit Limited refuses to allow you to get direct confirmation of the outstanding balances
of trade receivables. You want to ensure on grounds of materiality that at least outstanding
above a threshold limit needs to be confirmed and reconciliation is to be carried out before
finalising the audit. If the Company does not relent, how will you respond?
Answer
SA 505 “External Confirmations”, establishes standards on the auditor’s use of external

confirmation as a means of obtaining audit evidence. If the management refuses to allow the
auditor to a send a confirmation request, the auditor shall:
• Inquire as to Management’s reasons for the refusal, and seek audit evidence as to
their validity and reasonableness,
• Evaluate the implications of management’s refusal on the auditor’s assessment of the relevant
risks of material misstatement, including the risk of fraud, and on the nature, timing and extent
of other audit procedures, and
• Perform alternative audit procedures designed to obtain relevant and reliable audit evidence.
If the auditor concludes that management’s refusal to allow the auditor to send a confirmation
request is unreasonable or the auditor is unable to obtain relevant and reliable audit evidence from
alternative audit procedures, the auditor shall communicate with those in charge of governance in
accordance with SA 260 “Communication with Those Charged with Governance” and also determine
its implication for the audit and his opinion in accordance with SA 705 “Modifications to the Opinion
in the Independent Auditor’s Report”.
A refusal by management to allow the auditor to send a confirmation request is a limitation on

the audit evidence the auditor may wish to obtain. The auditor is therefore required to inquire as
to the reasons for the limitation. A common reason advanced is the existence of a legal dispute or
ongoing negotiation with the intended confirming party, the resolution of which may be affected
by an untimely confirmation request. The auditor is required to seek audit evidence as to the
validity and reasonableness of the reasons because of the risk that management may be
attempting to deny the auditor access to audit evidence that may reveal fraud or error.
69. RTP May 2018 Qn no. 1(c)

During the course of audit of Moon Limited the auditor received some of the confirmation of
the balances of trade payables outstanding in the balance sheet
through external confirmation by negative confirmation request. In the list of trade payables,
there are number of trade payables of small balances except one old outstanding of Rs. 25 Lacs,
of whom, no confirmation on the credit balance received. Comment with respect to Standard
of Auditing.
External Confirmation: As per SA 505, “External Confirmation”, Negative Confirmation is a request

that the confirming party respond directly to the auditor only if the confirming party disagrees
with the information provided in the request.
Negative confirmations provide less persuasive audit evidence than positive confirmations.
74

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
The failure to receive a response to a negative confirmation request does not explicitly indicate
receipt by the intended confirming party of the confirmation request or verification of the
accuracy of the information contained in the request. Accordingly, a failure of a confirming party
to respond to a negative confirmation request provides significantly less persuasive audit
evidence than does a response to a positive confirmation request. Confirming parties also may be
more likely to respond indicating their disagreement with a confirmation request when the
information in the request is not in their favor, and less likely to respond otherwise.
In the instant case, the auditor sent the negative confirmation requesting the trade payables
having outstanding balances in the balance sheet while doing audit of Star Limited. One of the old
outstanding of Rs. 25 lacs has not
sent the confirmation on the credit balance. In case of non response, the auditor may examine
subsequent cash disbursements or correspondence from third parties, and other records, such as
goods received notes. Further non response for negative confirmation request does not means
that there is some misstatement as negative confirmation request itself is to respond to the
auditor only if the confirming party disagrees with the information provided in the request.
But, if the auditor identifies factors that give rise to doubts about the reliability of the response to
the confirmation request, he shall obtain further audit evidence to resolve those doubts.
70. RTP May 2020 Question no 11(A)

Your firm has been appointed as the statutory auditors of AGM Private Limited for the financial
year 2018-19. While verification of company’s trade receivables as on 31 st March 2019,
accountant of AGM Ltd. has requested you, not to send balance confirmations to a particular
group of trade receivables since the said balances are under dispute and the matter is pending
in the Court. As a Statutory Auditor, how would you deal in this situation?
Answer:
SA 505 “External Confirmations”, establishes standards on the auditor’s use of external
confirmation as a means of obtaining audit evidence. If the management refuses to allow the
auditor to a send a confirmation request, the auditor shall:
(i) Inquire as to Management’s reasons for the refusal, and seek audit evidence as to their validity
and reasonableness,
(ii) Evaluate the implications of management’s refusal on the auditor’s assessment of the relevant
risks of material misstatement, including the risk of fraud, and on the nature, timing and extent of
other audit procedures, and
(iii) Perform alternative audit procedures designed to obtain relevant and reliable audit evidence.
If the auditor concludes that management’s refusal to allow the auditor to send a confirmation
request is unreasonable or the auditor is unable to obtain relevant and reliable audit evidence
from alternative audit procedures, the auditor shall communicate with those in charge of
governance and also determine its implication for the audit and his opinion.
Study Material
71. During the course of audit of Star Limited the auditor received some of the confirmation of
75

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
the balances of trade payables outstanding in the balance sheet through external confirmation
by negative confirmation request. In the list of trade payables, there are number of trade payables
of small balances except one, old outstanding of 15 Lacs, of whom, no confirmation on the credit
balance received. Comment with respect to Standard of Auditing.
External Confirmation: As per SA 505, “External Confirmation”, Negative Confirmation is a request
that the confirming party respond directly to the auditor only if the confirming party disagrees
with the information provided in the request. Negative confirmations provide less persuasive audit
evidence than positive confirmations.
The failure to receive a response to a negative confirmation request does not explicitly indicate
receipt by the intended confirming party of the confirmation request or verification of the accuracy
of the information contained in the request. Accordingly, a failure of a confirming party to respond
to a negative confirmation request provides significantly less persuasive audit evidence than does a
response to a positive confirmation request. Confirming parties also may be more likely to respond
indicating their disagreement with a confirmation request when the information in the request is
not in their favor, and less likely to respond otherwise.
In the instant case, the auditor sent the negative confirmation requesting the trade payables having
outstanding balances in the balance sheet while doing audit of Star Limited. One of the old
outstanding of 15 lacs has not sent the confirmation on the credit balance. In case of non response,
the auditor may examine subsequent cash disbursements or correspondence from third parties,
and other records, such as goods received notes.
Further non response for negative confirmation request does not means that there is some
misstatement as negative confirmation request itself is to respond to the auditor only if the
confirming party disagrees with the information provided in the request.But, if the auditor identifies
factors that give rise to doubts about the reliability of the response to the confirmation request, he shall obtain
further audit evidence to resolve those doubts.
Study Material
72. Mr. Z who is appointed as auditor of Elite Co. Ltd. wants to use confirmation request as
audit evidence during the course of audit. What are the factors to be considered by Mr. Z
when designing a confirmation request? Also state the effects of using positive external
confirmation request by Mr. Z.
As per SA 505, “External Confirmation”, factors to be considered when designing confirmation
requests include:
(i) The assertions being addressed.
(ii) Specific identified risks of material misstatement, including fraud risks.
(iii) The layout and presentation of the confirmation request.
(iv) Prior experience on the audit or similar engagements.
(v) The method of communication (for example, in paper form, or by electronic or other
76

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
medium).
(vi) Management’s authorisation or encouragement to the confirming parties to respond

to the auditor. Confirming parties may only be willing to respond to a confirmation request
containing management’s authorisation.
(vii) The ability of the intended confirming party to confirm or provide the requested
information (for example, individual invoice amount versus total balance).
A positive external confirmation request asks the confirming party to reply to the auditor in all
cases, either by indicating the confirming party’s agreement with the given information, or by
asking the confirming party to provide information. A response to a positive confirmation request
ordinarily is expected to provide reliable audit evidence. There is a risk, however, that a confirming
party may reply to the confirmation request without verifying that the information is correct. The
auditor may reduce this risk by using positive confirmation requests that do not state the amount
(or other information) on the confirmation request, and ask the confirming party to fill in the
amount or furnish other information. On the other hand, use of this type of “blank” confirmation
request may result in lower response rates because additional effort is required of the confirming
parties.
73. The audit team has obtained the following results from the trade receivables circularization of Nemi
Co for the year ended 31 March 2021. (mtp – II -july 2021)
Which of the following statements in relation to the results of the trade receivables circularisation is
TRUE?
(a) No further audit procedures need to be carried out in relation to the outstanding balances with AM
Co. and AP Co.
(b) The difference in relation to AN Co. represents a timing difference and should be agreed to a pre-
year-end invoice.
(c) The difference in relation to AO Co. represents a timing difference and should be agreed to pre-year-
end bank statements.
77

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
(d) Due to the non-reply, the balance with AR Co. cannot be verified and a different customer balance
should be selected and circularized.
ANSWER- b
73A(NOV 21 EXAM)
Mr. Agarwal, in the course of audit of PQ Limited, wants to perform external confirmation procedures to
obtain audit evidence. Guide Mr. Agarwal, listing out the factors that may assist him in determining
whether external confirmation procedures are to be performed as substantive audit procedures. (5
Marks)
ANSWER :
Factors that may assist Mr. Agarwal, the auditor in determining whether external confirmation procedures
are to be performed as substantive audit procedures include:
(i) The confirming party’s knowledge of the subject matter – responses may be more reliable if provided
by a person at the confirming party who has the requisite knowledge about the information being
confirmed.
(ii) The ability or willingness of the intended confirming party to respond – for example, the confirming
party:
- May not accept responsibility for responding to a confirmation request;
- May consider responding too costly or time consuming;
- May have concerns about the potential legal liability resulting from responding;
- May account for transactions in different currencies; or
- May operate in an environment where responding to confirmation requests is not a significant

aspect of day-to-day operations.
In such situations, confirming parties may not respond, may respond in a casual manner or may attempt to
restrict the reliance placed on the response.
(iii) The objectivity of the intended confirming party – if the confirming party is a related party of the
entity, responses to confirmation requests may be less reliable.
SA 510 Initial Audit Engagements – Opening Balance

74. MTP-Aug-18 Qn No 4(b) 4 Marks:
You have been appointed as the auditor of Good Health Ltd. for 2017-18 which was audited by
CA Trustworthy in 2016-17. As the Auditor of the company state the steps you would take to
78

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
ensure that the Closing Balances of 2016-17 have been brought to account in 2017-18 as
Opening Balances and the Opening Balances do not contain misstatements.
Answer:
As per SA 510 “Initial Audit Engagements—Opening Balances”, in conducting an initial audit

engagement, the objective of the auditor with respect to opening balances is to obtain sufficient
appropriate audit evidence about whether:
(i) Opening balances contain misstatements that materially affect the current period’s financial
statements; and
(ii) Appropriate accounting policies reflected in the opening balances have been consistently applied
in the current period’s financial statements or changes thereto are properly accounted for and
adequately presented and disclosed in accordance with the applicable financial reporting
framework.
Being new assignment audit evidence regarding opening balances can be obtained by perusing
the copies of the audited financial statements.
For current assets and liabilities some audit evidence can ordinarily be obtained as part of audit
procedures during the current period. For example, the collection/payment of opening balances of
receivables and payables will provide audit evidence as to their existence, rights and obligations,
completeness and valuation at the beginning of the period.
In respect of other assets and liabilities such as fixed assets, investments long term debt, the
auditor will examine the records relating to opening balances. The auditor may also be able to
get confirmation from third parties (e.g., balances of long-term loan obtained from banks).
75. Nov 2019 Qn no 5(C) 4 Marks

Mr. X has been appointed as an auditor of M/s ABC Ltd., Mr. X wants to be satisfied about the
sufficiency and appropriateness of 'Opening Balances' to ensure that they are free from
misstatements. Lay down the audit procedure, Mr. X should follow, in the initial audit
engagement of M/s ABC Ltd. Also suggest the approach to be followed regarding mention in the
audit report if Mr. X is not satisfied about the correctness of 'Opening Balances'?
Answer
Audit Procedures to be followed in case of initial audit engagement: As per SA 510, the auditor shall
obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence about whether the opening balances contain
misstatements that materially affect the current period’s financial statements by:
(i) Determining whether the prior period’s closing balances have been correctly brought forward
to the current period or, when appropriate, any adjustments have been disclosed as prior period
items in the current year’s Statement of Profit and Loss;
(ii) Determining whether the opening balances reflect the application of
appropriate accounting policies; and

79

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
(iii) Performing one or more of the following:

(1) Where the prior year financial statements were audited, perusing the copies of the audited
financial statements including the other relevant documents relating to the prior period financial
statements;
(2) Evaluating whether audit procedures performed in the current period provide evidence relevant
to the opening balances; or
(iv) Performing specific audit procedures to obtain evidence regarding the opening balances.
Approach to be followed regarding mention in the Audit Report: If the auditor is unable to obtain
sufficient appropriate audit evidence regarding the opening balances, the auditor shall express a
qualified opinion or a disclaimer of opinion, as appropriate. Further, If the auditor concludes that
the opening balances contain a misstatement that materially affects the current period’s financial
statements, and the effect of the misstatement is not properly accounted for or not adequately
presented or disclosed, the auditor shall express a qualified opinion or an adverse opinion.
76. MTP Apr 18 Qn no.1(d) 5 Marks, MTP-Oct-19 Qn No 1(b) 6 Marks:

In an initial audit engagement the auditor will have to satisfy about the sufficiency and
appropriateness of ‘Opening Balances' to ensure that they are free from misstatements, which
may materially affect the current financial statements. Lay down the audit procedure, you will
follow, when financial statements are audited for the first time. If, after performing the
procedure, you are not satisfied about the correctness of 'Opening Balances', what approach
you will adopt in drafting your audit report?
Answer
Audit Procedure for ensuring correctness of Opening Balances: As per SA 510 “Initial Audit
Engagements-Opening Balances”, the auditor shall obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence
about whether the opening balances contain misstatements that materially affect the current
period’s financial statements by -
(i) Determining whether the prior period’s closing balances have been correctly brought forward to
the current period or, when appropriate,
any adjustments have been disclosed as prior period items in the current year’s Statement of Profit
and Loss;
(ii) Determining whether the opening balances reflect the application of appropriate accounting policies;
and
(iii) By evaluating whether audit procedures performed in the current period provide evidence
relevant to the opening balances; or performing specific audit procedures to obtain evidence
regarding the opening balances.
If the auditor obtains audit evidence that the opening balances contain misstatements that could
materially affect the current period’s financial statements, the auditor shall perform such
additional audit procedures as are appropriate in the circumstances to determine the effect on
80

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
the current period’s financial statements. If the auditor concludes that such misstatements exist
in the current period’s financial statements, the auditor shall communicate the misstatements
with the appropriate level of management and those charged with governance.
Approach for drafting Audit Report: SA 705 establishes requirements and provides guidance on
circumstances that may result in a modification to the auditor’s opinion on the financial statements,
the type of opinion appropriate in the circumstances, and the content of the auditor’s report when
the auditor’s opinion is modified. The inability of the auditor to obtain sufficient appropriate audit
evidence regarding opening balances may result in one of the following modifications to the opinion
in the auditor’s report:
(a) A qualified opinion or a disclaimer of opinion, as is appropriate in the circumstances; or

(b) Unless prohibited by law or regulation, an opinion which is qualified or disclaimed, as appropriate,
regarding the results of operations, and cash flows, where relevant, and unmodified regarding
State of Affairs.
If the auditor concludes that the opening balances contain a misstatement that materially affects
the current period’s financial statements and the effect of the misstatement is not properly
accounted for or not adequately presented or disclosed, the auditor shall express a qualified
opinion or an adverse opinion, as appropriate, in accordance with SA 705.
77. RTP Nov 18 Qn no 1(C)

CA. Ashutosh has been appointed as an auditor of Awesome Health Ltd. for the financial year
2017-18 which was audited by CA. Amrawati in 2016-17. As the Auditor of Awesome Health Ltd.,
state the steps that CA. Ashutosh would take to
ensure that the Closing Balances of the financial year 2016-17 have been brought to account in
2017-18 as Opening Balances and the Opening Balances do not contain any misstatements.
ANSWER
Obtaining sufficient appropriate audit evidence while conducting Initial Audit Engagement:
According to SA 510 on “Initial Audit Engagements- Opening Balances”, the objective of the
Auditor while conducting an initial audit engagement with respect to opening balances is to obtain
sufficient appropriate audit evidence so that the-
(i) opening balances of the preceding period have been correctly brought forward to the current
period;
(ii) opening balances do not contain any misstatement that materially affect the
current period’s financial statements; and
(iii) appropriate accounting policies reflected in the opening balances have been consistently applied
in the current period’s financial statements, or changes thereto are properly accounted for and
framework.
Being a new assignment, audit evidence regarding opening balances can be obtained by perusing
the copies of the audited financial statements.
81

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
For current assets and liabilities, some audit evidence about opening balances may be obtained
as part of the current period’s audit procedures. For example, the collection/ payment of opening
accounts receivable/ accounts payable during the current period will provide some audit evidence
of their existence, rights and obligations, completeness and valuation at the beginning of the
period.
In respect of other assets and liabilities such as property plant and equipment, investments, long
term debts, the auditor will examine the records relating to opening balances. The auditor may
also be able to get the confirmation from third parties (e.g., balances of long term loan obtained
from banks can be confirmed from the Bank Loan statement).
78. MTP-OCT-18 Qn No 1(d) 5 Marks:
CA. Mack, a recently qualified practicing Chartered Accountant got his first audit assignment
of Captura (P) Ltd. for the financial year 2017-18. He obtained all the relevant appropriate
audit evidence for the items related to Statement of Profit and Loss. However, while auditing
the Balance Sheet items, CA. Mack left out obtaining appropriate audit evidence, say,
confirmations, from the outstanding Accounts Receivable amounting Rs. 145 lakhs, continued
as it is from the last year, on the affirmation of the management that there is no receipts and
further credits during the year. CA. Mack, therefore, excluded from the audit programme, the
audit of accounts receivable on the understanding that it pertains to the preceding year which
was already audited by predecessor auditor. Comment.
Answer:
Verification of Accounts Receivable: As per SA 510 “Initial Audit Engagements – Opening

Balances”, while conducting an initial audit engagement, the objective of the auditor with
respect to opening balances is to obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence about whether-
(i) Opening balances contain misstatements that materially affect the current period’s financial
statements; and
(ii) Appropriate accounting policies reflected in the opening balances have been consistently applied
in the current period’s financial statements, or changes thereto are properly accounted for and
framework.
When the financial statements for the preceding period were audited by another auditor, the
current auditor may be able to obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence regarding opening
balances by perusing the copies of the audited financial statements.
Ordinarily, the current auditor can place reliance on the closing balances contained in the financial
statements for the preceding period, except when during the performance of audit procedures for
the current period the possibility of misstatements in opening balances is indicated.
For current assets and liabilities, some audit evidence about opening balances may be obtained
82

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
as part of the current period’s audit procedures, say, the collection of opening accounts receivable
during the current period will provide some audit evidence of their existence, rights and
obligations, completeness and valuation at the beginning of the period.
In addition, according to SA 580 “Written Representations”, the auditor may consider it necessary
to request management to provide written representations about specific assertions in the
financial statements; in particular, to support an understanding that the auditor has obtained
from other audit evidence of management’s judgment or intent in relation to, or the completeness
of, a specific assertion. Although such written representations provide necessary audit evidence,
they do not provide sufficient appropriate audit evidence on their own for that assertion.
In the given case, the management of Captura (P) Ltd. has restrained CA. Mack, its auditor, from
obtaining appropriate audit evidence for balances of Accounts Receivable outstanding as it is from
the preceding year. CA. Mack, on believing that the preceding year balances have already been
audited and on the statement of the management that there are no receipts and credits during the
current year, therefore excluded the verification of Accounts Receivable from his audit programme.
Thus, CA. Mack should have requested the management to provide written representation for their
views and expressions; and he should also not exclude the audit procedure of closing balances of
Accounts Receivable from his audit programme.
Study Material
79. In an initial audit engagement the auditor will have to satisfy about the sufficiency and
appropriateness of ‘Opening Balances' to ensure that they free from misstatements, which may
materially affect the current financial statements. Lay down the audit procedure, you will follow,
when financial statements are audited for the first time. If, after performing the procedure, you
are not satisfied about the correctness of 'Opening Balances', what approach you will adopt in
drafting your audit report?
Answer
Audit Procedure for ensuring correctness of Opening Balances : As per SA 510 “Initial Audit
Engagements-Opening Balances”, the auditor shall obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence
about whether the opening balances contain misstatements that materially affect the current
period’s financial statements by –
(i) Determining whether the prior period’s closing balances have been correctly brought
forward to the current period or, when appropriate, any adjustments have been disclosed as prior
period items in the current year’s Statement of Profit and Loss;
(ii) Determining whether the opening balances reflect the application of appropriate
accounting policies; and
(iii) By evaluating whether audit procedures performed in the current period provide evidence
relevant to the opening balances; or performing specific audit procedures to obtain evidence
regarding the opening balances.
If the auditor obtains audit evidence that the opening balances contain misstatements that could
materially affect the current period’s financial statements, the auditor shall perform such additional
83

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
audit procedures as are appropriate in the circumstances to determine the effect on the current
period’s financial statements. If the auditor concludes that such misstatements exist in the current
period’s financial statements, the auditor shall communicate the misstatements with the
appropriate level of management and those charged with governance.
Approach for drafting Audit Report: If the auditor concludes that the opening balances contain a
misstatement that materially affects the current period’s financial statements and the effect of the
misstatement is not properly accounted for or not adequately presented or disclosed, the auditor
shall express a qualified opinion or an adverse opinion, as appropriate, in accordance with SA 705
and in case where the auditor is unable to obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence regarding
the opening balances, the auditor shall express a qualified opinion or a disclaimer of opinion, as
appropriate, in accordance with SA 705.
Multiple Choice Question
80. SKJ Private Ltd is engaged in the business of construction. The company has also got some
real estate projects few years back on which it started the work in the last 2 years. The annual
turnover of the company is INR 600 crores and profits of INR 40 crores.
The statutory auditors of the company got rotated by another audit firm due to mandatory audit
rotation requirements as per the Companies Act 2013.
The new statutory auditors of the company started audit of the financial statements for the year
ended 31 March 2019 in May 2019. The audit team also requested the client to provide certain
information on the opening balances to perform their audit procedures.
Initially the management did not provide any information to the auditors on the opening
balances thinking that this is not within the scope of their work, however, after going through the
auditing standards, the management agreed and provided the required information.
Later on, the audit team also started requesting information for the period from 1 April 2019 to
31 May 2019. With this requirement, CFO of the company got very upset and angry and set up a
meeting with the senior members of the audit team. CFO raised a concern that the audit team
has not been doing the work properly and has been asking for unnecessary information like
information on opening balances and then the information for the period after 31 March 2019.
The audit partner explained to the CFO that everything requested by the audit team has been
as per the auditing standards, however, CFO said that in the earlier years, the previous auditors
never asked for such information.
You are requested to give your view in respect of this matter.
(a) The requirement of the auditors for opening balances was valid but for the period after
31 March 2019 is completely wrong as that is out of their scope for the current year’s audit. They
can ask for those details during the audit of next year.
(b) The concern of the CFO was valid. He has seen the previous auditors not performing such
audit procedures and hence the new audit team should also follow the same approach which was
followed by previous auditors as that would lead to efficient in audit.
(c) The audit team should set up a meeting with previous auditors wherein it should be
84

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
assessed why different approach was followed by the previous auditors. On the basis of that
discussion with the previous auditors, next course of action should be decided.
(d) The requirement of the auditors for opening balances as well as for the period after 31
March 2019 is valid. After the requirements of SA 510 and SA 560, audit team is required to
perform these procedures.
Answer: Option: (d) The requirement of the auditors for opening balances as well as for the period
after 31 March 2019 is valid. After the requirements of SA 510 and SA 560, audit team is required
to perform these procedures
81. GHK Associates, Chartered Accountants, conducting the audit of PBS Ltd., a listed company
for the year ended 31.03.2020 is concerned with the presentation and disclosure of segment
information included in Company's Annual Report. GHK Associates want to ensure that methods
adopted by management for determining segment information have resulted in disclosure in
accordance with the applicable financial reporting framework. Guide GHK Associates with
'Examples of Matters' that may be relevant when obtaining an understanding of the methods
used by the management with reference to the relevant Standards on Auditing. (5 Marks) (past
exam jan 2021)
ANSWER
The auditors, GHK Associates wanted to ensure and obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence regarding
the presentation and disclosure of segment information in accordance with the applicable financial
reporting framework by obtaining an understanding of the methods used by management in determining
segment information. SA 501 guides in this regard. As per SA 501- “Audit Evidence—Specific Considerations
for Selected Items”, example of matters that may be relevant when obtaining an understanding of the
methods used by management in determining segment information and whether such methods are likely
to result in disclosure in accordance with the applicable financial reporting framework include:
(i) Sales, transfers and charges between segments, and elimination of inter-segment amounts.
(ii) Comparisons with budgets and other expected results, for example, operating profits as a percentage of
sales.
(iii) The allocation of assets and costs among segments.
(iv) Consistency with prior periods, and the adequacy of the disclosures with respect to inconsistencies.
SA 520 – Analytical Procedures

82. Nov 2018 Qn no 4(b) 4 Marks
In audit of DEF Limited, the Auditor had made use of certain analytical procedures with regard to
certain key data in the Statement of Profit and Loss. The results obtained showed inconsistencies
with other relevant information. State the course of action that the Auditor should take to ensure
that the risk of material misstatement would be contained to a low level fixed as per materiality
85

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
level.
Answer
Investigating Results of Analytical Procedures: As per SA 520, “Analytical Procedures”, if analytical

procedures performed in accordance with this SA identify fluctuations or relationships that are
inconsistent with other relevant information or that differ from expected values by a significant
amount, the auditor shall investigate such differences by:
(i) Inquiring of management and obtaining appropriate audit evidence relevant to

management’s responses; and
(ii) Performing other audit procedures as necessary in the circumstances.
Audit evidence relevant to management’s responses may be obtained by evaluating those

responses taking into account the auditor’s understanding of the entity and its environment, and
with other audit evidence obtained during the course of the audit.
The need to perform other audit procedures may arise when, for example, management is unable
to provide an explanation, or the explanation, together with the audit evidence obtained relevant
to management’s response, is not considered adequate.

83. ZOV is a private limited company engaged in the business of mining. The company’s
operations are fairly large and its turnover is INR 4,000 crores on an annual basis. Due to the
nature of the business and the size of the company, the company has appointed a firm of
Chartered Accountants as its statutory auditors who have the relevant experience of the industry
in which the company has been operating.
During the course of the audit of the financial statements for the year ended 31 March 2019, the
audit team had various observations which resulted in many adjustments in the financial
statements of the company and that was also appreciated by the CFO of the company.
At the time of final reviews of the audit team, the audit partner requested working paper on final
analytical procedures from the engagement team, however, the engagement team explained that
they performed substantive testing procedures which also resulted in some adjustments and the
same was incorporated in the final set of financial statements given to the audit partner for the
review and accordingly there was no need to perform final analytical procedures. Audit partner
was not convinced with this and requested the engagement team to perform this procedure.
Considering that the timeline to conclude the audit was approaching, the audit partner also
requested the CFO that the audit team would need some more time to perform final analytical
procedures. CFO was very impressed with the engagement team and agreed for the time but he
also told the audit partner that work of the team was excellent and hence the audit partner should
avoid these additional procedures.
86

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
You are requested to give your view in respect of this matter as per SA 520.
a) The explanation of the audit team was correct. After doing substantive testing which also
resulted in audit adjustments, there was no need to perform final analytical procedures.
b) The suggestion of CFO should have been considered by the audit partner as the CFO was
observing the work of the engagement team and hence he could assess that better than the
audit partner.
c) The requirement in view of the audit partner was valid. The conclusions drawn from the results
of final analytical procedures are intended to corroborate conclusions formed during the audit
of individual components or elements of the financial statements.
d) The audit team did the right thing by not performing final analytical procedures, however, one
additional procedure in that case should have been - obtain the
document containing the analysis performed by the client on the financial statements. This
document is required to be assembled in the audit file.
Answer: Option :C The requirement in view of the audit partner was valid. The conclusions drawn
from the results of final analytical procedures are intended to corroborate conclusions formed
during the audit of individual components or elements of the financial statements
BDJ Private Ltd was established in 2001 and since then the company’s operations have grown
significantly. The company is based in Kanpur and has branch offices outside Kanpur.
The company is engaged in tours and travels business and because of the nature of the business, it
has voluminous transactions. The annual turnover of the company is INR 700 crores.
During the audit of the financial statements of the company for the year ended 31 March 2019, the
auditors observed wide variation in various details of sales and various expenses as compared to
last year. Various balances of trade receivables, loans and advances, statutory liabilities showed
significant increase and many balances were found to be non- moving which were aged for more
than 3 years.
On the basis of the materiality and planned procedures, the audit team requested the client for
testing of various samples for sales, expenses etc. The client observed that the number of samples
that the team has requested increased as compared to last year and asked the team to cut down
on the number of samples so that it is the same number of samples which were tested in the
previous years.
The audit team did not agree with this and explained various factors which the team had considered
for sample selection and the reasons for changes in the samples and also explained the
requirements of SA 530 to the client but the client still did not agree.
Now there is a situation of deadlock and you are requested to provide your guidance to resolve this
matter.
a. The argument of the client is not valid. Sample selection is based on certain principles as per SA
530 and that is on the assessment of the audit team. It may change year on year and hence the
87

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
client should provide the required information to the audit team.

b. The explanation of the audit team is not valid. Referring SA 530 was not correct in this
case. The audit team should have explained their entire approach around risk assessment to the
client before starting the fieldwork and should have formally shared that with the client in writing.
c. In the given situation, the audit team instead of getting into any arguments should cut down
the number of samples and should increase their procedures around analytical work. That would
resolve the problem.
d. The audit team should make a formal request in writing for these details from the client and if
the client still refuses then they should report this matter to the audit partner. In that case, the
auditing standards require audit partner to check some of the documents which may not be
provided by the client to the audit team.
Answer: Option : a
83A(MARCH 2022 MTP)

………….. approach to sampling has the following characteristics:
I. Random selection of the sample items; and
II. The use of probability theory to evaluate sample results, including measurement of sampling
risk.
(a) Statistical sampling
(b) Non-statistical sampling
(c) Stratified sampling
(d) Haphazard sampling
ANSWER : ( A )
83B(NOV 2022 RTP)
Chintamani Ltd appoints Chintan & Mani as statutory auditors for the financial year 2021 - 2022. Chintan &
Mani seem to have different opinions on Audit approach to be adopted for audit of Chintamani Ltd. Mani is
of the opinion that 100% checking is not required and they can rely on Audit Sampling techniques in order
to provide them a reasonable basis on which they can draw conclusions about the entire population.
Chintan is concerned that whether the use of audit sampling has provided a reasonable basis for
conclusions about the population that has been tested.
You are required to guide Chintan about his role if audit sampling has not provided a reasonable basis for
conclusions about the population that has been tested in accordance with SA 530,
ANSWER :
As per SA 530, “Audit Sampling”, the auditor shall evaluate:
(a) The results of the sample; and
(b) Whether the use of audit sampling has provided a reasonable basis for conclusions about the
population that has been tested.
88

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
If the auditor concludes that audit sampling has not provided a reasonable basis for conclusions about the
population that has been tested, the auditor may:
(I) Request management to investigate misstatements that have been identified and the potential for
further misstatements and to make any necessary adjustments; or
(II) Tailor the nature, timing and extent of those further audit procedures to best achieve the required
assurance. For example, in the case of tests of controls, the auditor might extend the sample size, test an
alternative control or modify related substantive procedures.
SA 540- Auditing Accounting Estimates, Including Fair Value Accounting

Estimates, and Related Disclosures”
May 2018 2(d) 5 Marks
84. While auditing Z Ltd., you observe certain material financial statement assertions have been
based on estimates made by the management. As the auditor how do you minimize the risk of
material misstatements?
Answer
As per SA 540 “Auditing Accounting Estimates, Including Fair Value Accounting Estimates, and Related
Disclosures” , the auditor shall obtain an understanding of the following in order to provide a basis for the
identification and assessment of the risks of material misstatements for accounting estimates:
The requirements of the applicable financial reporting framework relevant to the accounting
estimates, including related disclosures.
(i) How Management identifies those transactions, events and conditions that may give rise to the
need for accounting estimates to be recognised or disclosed, in the financial statements. In
obtaining this understanding, the auditor shall make inquiries of management about changes in
circumstances that may give rise to new, or the need to revise existing, accounting estimates.
(ii) The estimation making process adopted by the management including-
(1) The method, including where applicable the model, used in making the accounting estimates.
(2) Relevant controls.
(3) Whether management has used an expert?
(4) The assumption underlying the accounting estimates.
(5) Whether there has been or ought to have been a change from the prior period in the methods for
making the accounting estimates, and if so, why; and
(6) Whether and, if so, how the management has assessed the effect of estimation uncertainty.
85. RTP May 2019 Qn no.12(a) ( MTP- NOV 2021)

A Pvt Ltd is engaged in the business of real estate. The auditor of the company requested the
information from the management to review the outcome of accounting estimates (like
89

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
estimated costs considered for percentage completion etc) included in the prior period financial
statements and their subsequent re-estimation for the purpose of the current period.
The management has refused the information to the auditor saying that the review of prior period
information should not be done by the auditor. Please advise.
As per SA 540, “Auditing Accounting Estimates, Including Fair Value Accounting Estimates, and
Related Disclosures”, the auditor shall review the outcome of accounting estimates included in the
prior period financial statements, or, where applicable, their subsequent re-estimation for the
purpose of the current period. The nature and extent of the auditor’s review takes account of the
nature of the accounting estimates, and whether the information obtained from the review
would be relevant to identifying and assessing risks of material misstatement of accounting
estimates made in the current period financial statements.
The outcome of an accounting estimate will often differ from the accounting estimate recognised
in the prior period financial statements. By performing risk assessment procedures to identify and
understand the reasons for such differences, the auditor may obtain:
• Information regarding the effectiveness of management’s prior period estimation process, from
which the auditor can judge the likely effectiveness of management’s current process.
• Audit evidence that is pertinent to the re-estimation, in the current period, of prior period
accounting estimates.
• Audit evidence of matters, such as estimation uncertainty, that may be required to be disclosed in
the financial statements.
The review of prior period accounting estimates may also assist the auditor, in the current period,
in identifying circumstances or conditions that increase the susceptibility of accounting estimates
to, or indicate the presence of, possible management bias. The auditor’s professional skepticism
assists in identifying such circumstances or conditions and in determining the nature, timing and
extent of further audit procedures.
However, the review is not intended to call into question the judgments made in the prior periods
that were based on information available at that time.
In the given case, the management is not correct in refusing the relevant information to the
auditor.
87. While auditing REAL Ltd., you observe certain material financial statement assertions have been
based on estimates made by the management. As the auditor how do you minimize the risk of material
misstatements? (4 Marks) (mtp – II -july 2021)
ANSWER
As per SA 540 “Auditing Accounting Estimates, Including Fair Value Accounting Estimates, and Related
Disclosures”, the auditor shall obtain an understanding of the following in order to provide a basis for the
identification and assessment of the risks of material misstatements for accounting estimates:
(i) The requirements of the applicable financial reporting framework relevant to the accounting estimates,
including related disclosures.
90

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
(ii) How Management identifies those transactions, events and conditions that may give rise to the need for
accounting estimates to be recognised or disclosed, in the financial statements.
In obtaining this understanding, the auditor shall make inquiries of management about changes in
(iii) The estimation making process adopted by the management including-
(5) Whether there has been or ought to have been a change from the prior period in the methods for
making the accounting estimates, and if so, why; and
87A (MAY 2022 EXAM)

CA Harry is appointed as a Statutory Auditor of Delist Limited for the financial year 2021-22. M/s
Delist Limited is a listed entity at National Stock Exchange and the financial statements are to be
drawn up in compliance with Ind AS. M/s Delist Limited made certain fair value accounting
estimates on complex financial instruments which are not traded in an active and open market. CA
Harry is concerned with identification and assessment of the risks of material misstatement for
accounting estimates. Guide him with regard to the estimation making process adopted by
management with reference to the relevant Standard on Auditing.
ANSWER :
As per SA 540 “Auditing Accounting Estimates, Including Fair Value Accounting Estimates, and
Related Disclosures”, CA. Harry shall obtain an understanding of the following in order to provide a
basis for the identification and assessment of the risks of material misstatements for accounting
estimates:
The estimation making process adopted by the management including-
(5) Whether there has been or ought to have been a change from the prior period in the methods
for making the accounting estimates, and if so, why; and
SA 550 Related Parties

91

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
Nov 18 Qn no.1(a) 5 Marks

88. You are the Auditor of Power Supply Corporation Limited, a Government Company for the
year ended on 31st March 2018. The turnover of the Company for the period was Rs. 12,000
crores from sale of power. During your audit, you found that the Company had procured Spares
for Transmitters for Rs. 850 crores from abroad through a Corporation by name Procurement and
Supply India Limited which is also owned and controlled by Government of India. The Financial
Statements of the Power Supply Corporation Limited, prepared in compliance with Ind AS for the
year ended on 31/03/2018 did not contain any additional disclosure regarding the procurement
of spares as referred to above. To your query as to whether any disclosure regarding Related Party
Transaction would be required, the Management of the Corporation replied that no such
disclosure would be necessary for transactions between State Controlled Enterprises.
Analyse this issue in finalizing the Audit Report.
Answer
Related Party Disclosures :As per Ind AS 24, “Related Party Disclosures”, a reporting entity is
exempt from the disclosure requirements in relation to related party transactions and outstanding
balances, including commitments, with (i) a government that has control or joint control of, or
significant influence over, the reporting entity; and (ii) another entity that is a related party
because the same government has control or joint control of, or significant influence over, both the
reporting entity and the other entity.
If a reporting entity applies the above exemption, it shall disclose the following about the
transactions and related outstanding balances referred to:
(1) the name of the government and the nature of its relationship with the reporting entity (i.e. control,
joint control or significant influence);
(2) the following information in sufficient detail to enable users of the entity’s financial statements to
understand the effect of related party transactions on its financial statements:
(i) the nature and amount of each individually significant transaction; and
(ii) for other transactions that are collectively, but not individually, significant, a qualitative or
quantitative indication of their extent.
Further, as per SA 550 Related Parties, in forming an opinion on the financial statements in
accordance with SA 700, the auditor shall evaluate whether the identified related party
relationships and transactions have been appropriately accounted for and disclosed in accordance
with the applicable financial reporting framework.
In the instant case, Power Supply Corporation Limited, a Government Company has procured spares
for transmitters for rupees 850 crore from abroad through a corporation namely Procurement and
Supply India Limited which is also owned and controlled by Government of India. Even after applying
the exemption of Ind AS 24, Power Supply Corporation Limited has to disclose the matters specified
above (i.e.name of Government, natures of its relationship with reporting entity, the nature and
amount of transaction etc.). Contention of Management of Corporation regarding no requirement
of disclosure for transactions between State Controlled Enterprise in not tenable.
92

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
MTP-Aug-18 Qn No 1(a) 5 Marks :
89. A firm of a father and a son is receiving Rs. 2 lakhs towards job work done for XYZ Ltd.
during the year ended on 31.03.16. The total job work charges paid by XYZ Ltd. during the year
are over Rs. 50 lakhs. The father is Managing Director of XYZ Ltd. having substantial holding.
The Managing Director told the auditor that since he is not involved in the activities of the firm
and since the amount paid to it is insignificant; there is no need to disclose the transaction. He
further contended that such a payment made in the last year was not disclosed. Advise
whether Managing Director is right in his approach.
Answer: Related Party Disclosures: As per definition given in the AS 18 “Related Party
Disclosures” parties are considered to be related if at any time during the reporting period one
party has the ability to control the other party or exercise significant influence over the other
party in making financial and/or operating decisions. Related party transaction means a transfer
of resources or obligations between related parties, regardless of whether or not a price is
charged.
In the instant case, the managing director of XYZ Ltd. is a partner in the firm with his son which
has been paid Rs. 2 lakhs as job work charges. The managing director is having a substantial holding
in XYZ Ltd. The case is squarely covered by AS 18. According to AS-18, in the case of related party
transactions, the reporting enterprise should disclose the following:
(i) the name of the transacting related party;
(ii) a description of the relationship between the parties;
(iii) a description of the nature of transactions;
(iv) volume of the transactions either as an amount or as an appropriate proportion;
(v) any other elements of the related party transactions necessary for an understanding of the
financial statements;
(vi) the amounts or appropriate proportions of outstanding items pertaining to related parties at the
balance sheet date and provisions for doubtful debts due from such parties at that date; and
(vii) amounts written off or written back in the period in respect of debts due from or to related
parties.”
Further, SA 550 on “Related Parties”, also prescribes the auditor’s responsibilities and audit
procedures regarding related party transactions.
The approach of the managing director is not tenable under the law and accordingly all disclosure
requirements have to be complied with in accordance with the AS 18. Auditor should insist to make
proper disclosure as per the AS and if management refuses, the auditor shall have to modify his
report. Also, it has to be seen whether section 184 of the Companies Act, 2013 regarding disclosure
of interest by director has been complied with. If it is not complied with, the auditor needs to modify
the report appropriately.
90.MTP-Mar-19 Qn No 5(a) 4 Marks:

93

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
JY & Co. is appointed as auditor of Breeze Ltd. JY & Co. seeks your guidance for reviewing the
records and documentation of the company regarding ‘related party transactions in the normal
course of business’. Describe the steps to be followed.
Answer:
Review of Records and Documentation Regarding Related Party Transaction: According to SA

550 “Related Parties”, during the audit, the auditor shall remain alert, when inspecting records or
documents, for arrangements or other information that may indicate the existence of related
party relationships or transactions that management has not previously identified or disclosed to
the auditor.
In particular, the auditor shall inspect the following for indications of the existence of related party
relationships or transactions that management has not previously identified or disclosed to the
auditor:
(a) Bank, legal and third party confirmations obtained as part of the auditor’s procedures;
(b) Minutes of meetings of shareholders and of those charged with governance; and
(c) Such other records or documents as the auditor considers necessary in the circumstances of the
entity.
The auditor may inspect records or documents that may provide information about related party
relationships and transactions, for example entity income tax returns, information supplied by the
entity to regulatory authorities, shareholder registers to identify the entity’s principal shareholders,
statements of conflicts of interest from management and those charged with governance, records
of the entity’s investments and those of its pension plans, contracts and agreements with key
management or those charged with governance, significant contracts and agreements not in the
entity’s ordinary course of business, specific invoices and correspondence from the entity’s
professional advisors, life insurance policies acquired by the entity, significant contracts re-
negotiated by the entity during the period, internal auditors’ reports, documents associated with
the entity’s filings with a securities regulator etc.
91. MTP-OCT-18 Qn No 4(b) 5 Marks:
In the course of audit of QRT Ltd, its statutory auditor wants to be sure of the adequacy of
related party disclosures? Kindly guide the auditor in identifying the possible source of related
party information.
Answer:
Identification of possible sources for Related Parties’ information: As per SA 550 on, “Related
Parties”, the auditor should review information provided by the management of the entity
identifying the names of all known related parties. However, it is the management, which is
primarily responsible for identification of related parties. The duties of an auditor with regard to
reporting of related party transaction as required by Accounting Standard 18 “Related Party
Disclosures” is given in SA 550.
• SA 550 requires that to identify names of all known related parties, the auditor may inspect
94

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
records or documents that may provide information about related party relations hips and
transactions, for example entity income tax returns, information supplied by the entity to
regulatory authorities, shareholder registers to identify the entity’s principal shareholders,
statements of conflicts of interest from management and those charged with governance, records
of the entity’s investments and those of
its pension plans, contracts and agreements with key management or those charged with
governance, significant contracts and agreements not in the entity’s ordinary course of business,
specific invoices and correspondence from the entity’s professional advisors, life insurance
policies acquired by the entity, significant contracts re-negotiated by the entity during the period,
internal auditors’ reports, documents associated with the entity’s filings with a securities
regulator (e.g., prospectuses).
• Some arrangements that may indicate the existence of previously unidentified or undisclosed
related party relationships or transactions as an arrangement involves a formal or informal
agreement between the entity and one or more other parties for such purposes as the
establishment of a business relationship through appropriate vehicles or structures, the conduct
of certain types of transactions under specific terms and conditions or the provision of designated
services or financial support.
Examples of arrangements that may indicate the existence of related party relationships or
transactions that management has not previously identified or disclosed to the auditor include
participation in unincorporated partnerships with other parties, agreements for the provision of
services to certain parties under terms and conditions that are outside the entity’s normal course
of business, guarantees and guarantor relationships etc.
• Obtaining further information on significant transactions outside the entity’s normal course of
business enables the auditor to evaluate whether fraud risk factors, if any, are present and, where
the applicable financial reporting framework establishes related party requirements, to identify
the risks of material misstatement. In addition, the auditor needs to be alert for transactions which
appear unusual in the circumstances and which may indicate the existence of previously
unidentified related parties. Examples of transactions outside the entity’s normal course of
business may include complex equity transactions, such as corporate restructurings or
acquisitions, transactions with offshore entities in jurisdictions with weak corporate laws, the
leasing of premises or the rendering of management services by the entity to another party if no
consideration is exchanged, sales transactions with unusually large discounts or returns,
transactions with circular arrangements, for example, sales with a commitment to repurchase,
transactions under contracts whose terms are changed before expiry etc.
• Finally, the auditor should also obtain a written representation from the management concerning
the completeness of information provided regarding the identification of related parties.
92. (a) Mr. X, while conducting audit of PQR Ltd, comes across certain transactions which according to
him are significant transactions with related parties and identified to be outside the entity's normal
course of business. Guide Mr. X with examples of such transactions and to understand the nature of
significant transactions outside the entity's normal course of business. (5 Marks) (past exam nov 2020)
ANSWER
95

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
In the given case of PQR Ltd, Mr. X, while conducting audit has come across certain significant related party
transaction which are identified to be outside the entity’s normal course of business. Mr. X wants guidance
through examples of such significant transactions which are given in SA 550
As per SA 550 “Related Parties”, examples of transactions outside the entity’s normal course of business
may include:
1. Complex equity transactions, such as corporate restructurings or acquisitions.
2. Transactions with offshore entities in jurisdictions with weak corporate laws.
3. The leasing of premises or the rendering of management services by the entity to another party if no
consideration is exchanged.
4. Sales transactions with unusually large discounts or returns.
5. Transactions with circular arrangements, for example, sales with a commitment to repurchase.
6. Transactions under contracts whose terms are changed before expiry.
93. Whilst the Audit team has identified few matters, they need your advice to conclude on the same.
Engagement Partner have asked them to review the Board minutes and other secretarial/ regulatory
records based on which the following additional matters were brought to the attention of the Partner:-
(i) The long term borrowings from the parent company has no written terms and neither the interest nor
the principal has been repaid so far.
(ii) Certain computers were received from the parent company free of cost, the value of which is Rs. 0.23
lac and no accounting or disclosure of the same has been made in the notes to accounts.
(iii) An amount of Rs. 3.25 Lakhs per month is paid to M/s. WE CARE Associates, a partnership
firm, which is a 'related party' in accordance with the provisions of the Companies Act, 2013 for
the marketing services rendered by them. Based on an independent assessment, the
consideration paid is higher than the arm's length pricing by Rs. 0.25 Lakhs per month. Whilst
the transaction was accounted in the financial statements based on the amounts' paid, no separate
disclosure of this related party transaction has been made in the notes to accounts forming part of the
financial statements highlighting the same as a 'related party' transaction.
Audit Manager has reported that she had asked certain information relating to another 'related party'
transaction (amounting to approx. Rs. 47 lac) but the CFO refused to provide the same since the same is
perceived to be confidential and cannot be shared with the Auditors.
You are required to advise about items to be reported to those charged with governance, where
applicable, based on your audit findings in the given situation. (5 Marks) (mtp nov 20)
ANSWER
As per SA 550, Related Parties, communicating significant matters arising during the audit in connection
with the entity’s related parties helps the auditor to establish a common understanding with those charged
with governance of the nature and resolution of these matters.
96

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
Examples of significant related party matters include, non-disclosure (whether intentional or not) by
management to the auditor of related parties or significant related party transactions, which may alert
those charged with governance to significant related party relationships and transactions of which they
may not have been previously aware; The identification of significant related party transactions that have
not been appropriately authorised and approved, which may give rise to suspected fraud; etc.
It may be noted that unless all of those charged with governance are involved in managing the entity, the
auditor shall communicate with those charged with governance significant matters arising during the audit
in connection with the entity’s related parties.
The auditor is also required to ensure the compliance of Ind AS 24 / AS 18 Related Party Disclosures.
In view of above in the given scenario, the auditor is required to prepare a brief summary of following
items to be reported to those charged with governance in accordance with SA 260 Communication with
Those Charged with Governance:
(i) One of related party transaction amounting 3.25 lac per month i.e. in lieu of marketing services has been
noticed of which amount Rs. 0.25 lac per month is exceeds the arm’s length price has not been disclosed
highlighting the same as related party transactions as per Ind- AS 24 / AS 18 Related Party Disclosures.
(ii) Refusal by CFO of the company to provide the details of related party transaction amounting to rupees
47 lac on the ground that same is perceived to be confidential and cannot be shared with auditors, is not in
order, as denying for the related part details of Rs. 47 lac is imposing limitation of scope of auditor in view
of SA 705.
(iii) Receipt of free of cost Computers and long-term borrowing (on no agreed terms and repayment of
interest and principal) from the Parent Company need separate disclosure in financial statements as per
Ind AS 24 / AS 18 Related Party Disclosures.
Further, in case of all the above cases, the auditor would also need to assess his reporting requirements
under the clauses (xiii) of Paragraph 3 of CARO 2020 with respect to related party transactions that
whether all transactions with the related parties are in compliance with sections 177 and 188 of Companies
Act, 2013 where applicable and the details have been disclosed in the Financial Statements etc., as
required by the applicable Accounting Standards
93A(MAY2022 EXAM)
JKL Limited is engaged in the business of Construction and real estate having various projects across states.
M/s YT & Co, Chartered Accountants have been appointed as Statutory Auditors. Audit Team from M/s YT
& Co for audit of JKL Limited comprises of CA Z-Engagement Partner, CA Q, a paid assistant and 3 Articled
Assistants. During preliminary verification, CA Z observed that huge amount of sub-contract payments were
made to M/s JB Associates, a partnership firm in which Director of JKL Limited is a managing partner. The
engagement team discussed that SA 315 and SA 240 shall include specific consideration of the susceptibility
of the financial statements to material misstatement due to fraud or error that could result from the JKL
Limited's related party relationships and transaction. Highlight the matters that are to be addressed in the
discussion by CA Z with engagement team members with reference to the relevant Standard on Auditing.
(5 Marks)
ANSWER:
As per SA 550 “Related Parties”, the engagement team discussion that SA 315 and SA
240 require shall include specific consideration of the susceptibility of the financial statements to
material misstatement due to fraud or error that could result from the entity’s related party
relationships and transactions.
97

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
Accordingly matters that are to be addressed in the discussion by CA Z among the engagement
team include:
1.The nature and extent of the entity’s relationships and transactions with related parties (using,
for example, the auditor’s record of identified related parties updated after each audit).
2.An emphasis on the importance of maintaining professional skepticism throughout the audit
regarding the potential for material misstatement associated with related party relationships and
transactions.
3.The circumstances or conditions of the entity that may indicate the existence of related party
relationships or transactions that management has not identified or disclosed to the auditor (e.g.,
a complex organisational structure, use of special - purpose entities for off-balance sheet
transactions, or an inadequate information system).
4.The records or documents that may indicate the existence of related party relationships or
transactions.
5.The importance that management and those charged with governance attach to the
identification, appropriate accounting for, and disclosure of related party relationships and
transactions (if the applicable financial reporting framework establishes related party
requirements), and the related risk of management override of relevant controls.
6.In addition, the discussion in the context of fraud may include specific consideration of how
related parties may be involved in fraud. For example:
(a)how special-purpose entities controlled by management might be used to facilitate earnings
management.
(b)how transactions between the entity and a known business partner of a key member of
management could be arranged to facilitate misappropriation of the entity’s assets.
SA 560 Subsequent Events

94. MTP Mar 2018 1(a) 5 Marks

A Co. Ltd. has not included in the Balance Sheet as on 31-03-2017 a sum of Rs. 1.50 crores being amount
in the arrears of salaries and wages payable to the staff for the last 2 years as a result of successful
negotiations which were going on during the last 18 months and concluded on 30-04-2017. The auditor
wants to sign the said Balance Sheet and give the audit report on 31-05-2017. The auditor came to know
the result of the negotiations on 15-05-2017. Advise.
ANSWER
Subsequent Events: This case requires attention to SA 560 “Subsequent Events”,

AS 4 “Contingencies and Events occurring after the Balance Sheet Date” and AS 29 "Provisions,
Contingent liabilities and Contingent Assets".
As per AS 4 “Contingencies and Events occurring after the Balance Sheet Date”, adjustments to
assets and liabilities are required for events occurring after the balance sheet date that provide
additional information materially affecting the determination of the amounts relating to
conditions existing at the balance sheet date. Similarly as per AS 29 "Provisions, Contingent
liabilities and Contingent Assets", future events that may affect the amount required to settle an
obligation should be reflected in the amount of a provision where there is sufficient objective
98

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
evidence that the will occur.

In the instant case, the amount of Rs. 1.50 crores is a material amount and it is the result of an
event, which has occurred after the Balance Sheet date. The facts have become known to the
auditor before the date of issue of the Audit Report and Financial Statements.
The auditor has to perform the procedure to obtain sufficient, appropriate evidence covering the
period from the date of the financial statements i.e. 31 -3-2017 to the date of Auditors Report i.e.
31-05-2017. It will be observed that as a result of long pending negotiations a sum of Rs. 1.50
cores representing arrears of salaries of the year 2015-16 and 2016-17 have not been included in
the financial statements. It is quite clear that the obligation requires provision for outstanding
expenses as per AS 4 and AS 29.
As per SA 560 “Subsequent Events”, the auditor should assure that all events occurring subsequent
to the date of the financial statements and for which the applicable financial reporting framework
requires adjustment or disclosure have been adjusted or disclosed.
So the auditor should request the management to adjust the sum of Rs. 1.50 crores by making
provision for expenses. If the management does not accept the request the auditor should qualify
the audit report.

Amudhan & Co., are the Auditors of XYZ Company Ltd., for the year ended on 31/03/2018. The
Audit Report for that year was signed by the Auditors on 04/05/2018. The Annual General
Meeting was decided to be held during the month of August 2018. On 06/05/2018, the Company
had received a communication from the Central Government that an amount of Rs. 5800 crore
kept pending on account of incentives pertaining to Financial Year 2017-18 had been approved
and the amount would be paid to the Company before the end of May 2018. To a query to Chief
Financial officer of the Company by the Board, it was informed that this amount had not been
recognised in the Audited Financial Statements in view of the same not being released before the
close of the Financial Year and due to uncertainty of receipt. Now, having received the amount,
the Board of Directors wished to include this amount in the Financial Statements of the Company
for the Financial Year ended on 31/03/2018. On 08/05/2018, the Board amended the accounts,
approved the same and requested the Auditor to consider this event and issue a fresh Audit
Report on the Financial Statements for the year ended on 31/03/2018. Analyse the issues
involved and give your views as to whether or not the Auditors could accede to the request of the
Board of Directors.
ANSWER
Facts Which Become Known to the Auditor After the Date of the Auditor’s Report but Before the
Date the Financial Statements are Issued: As per SA 560, “Subsequent Events”, the auditor has no
obligation to perform any audit procedures regarding the financial statements after the date of
the auditor’s report. However, when, after the date of the auditor’s report but before the date the
financial statements are issued, a fact becomes known to the auditor that, had it been known to
the auditor at the date of the auditor’s report, may have caused the auditor to amend the
99

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
auditor’s report, the auditor shall

(i) Discuss the matter with management and, where appropriate, those charged with governance.
(ii) Determine whether the financial statements need amendment and, if so,
(iii) Inquire how management intends to address the matter in the financial statements.
If management amends the financial statements, the auditor shall carry out the audit procedures
necessary in the circumstances on the amendment. Further, the auditor shall extend the audit
procedures and provide a new auditor’s report on the amended financial statements. However, the
new auditor’s report shall not be dated earlier than the date of approval of the amended financial
statements.
In the instant case, XYZ Company Ltd. received an amount of rupees 5800 crore on account of
incentives pertaining to year 2017-18 in the month of May 2018 i.e. after finalisation of financial
statements and signing of audit report. Board of Directors of XYZ Ltd. amended the accounts,
approved the same and requested the Amudhan & Co. (auditor) to consider this event and issue
a fresh audit report on the financial statements for the year ended on 31.03.2018.
After applying the conditions given in SA 560, Amudhan & Co. can issue new audit report subject to
date of audit report which should not be earlier than the date of approval of the amended financial
statements.
96. You are the auditor of PQR Ltd. which is in the business of supplying food products to various airline
companies operating aircrafts in domestic circle only. As per terms of agreement with airlines, the
company needs to stock various non- perishable food items for coming one month (average holding of
inventory to the tune of INR 75 Crores). Also the payment terms have been settled and the company
receives payment in 45 days after the supply of goods. Everything was going-on well till the end of March
2020 when pandemic Covid hit the world and everything came to a standstill. Aviation sector was hit
hard and there were no flights from April 2020 onwards. Consequently, the business of PQR Ltd. also got
severely affected and the scheduled supplies of goods to airlines also were not made.
Also, the liquidity position of airline companies got hit and the scheduled payments were also not
received on due dates. As the auditor of PQR Ltd. what audit procedures would you perform to ensure
that all subsequent events are considered, so that financial statements for the year ended 31.03.2020
represent true and fair view? (past exam nov 2020)
(5 Marks)
ANSWER
As per SA 560 “Subsequent Events”, the auditor shall perform audit procedures designed to obtain
sufficient appropriate audit evidence that all events occurring between the date of the financial statements
and the date of the auditor’s report that require adjustment of, or disclosure in, the financial statements
have been identified. The auditor is not, however, expected to perform additional audit procedures on
matters to which previously applied audit procedures have provided satisfactory conclusions.
The auditor shall perform the procedures required in above paragraph so that they cover the period from
the date of the financial statements to the date of the auditor’s report, or as near as practicable thereto.
Being the auditor of PQR Ltd, to ensure that all subsequent events are considered so that financial
statements for the year ending 31.03.2020 represent true and fair view, the auditor shall take into account
the auditor’s risk assessment in determining the nature and extent of such audit procedures, which shall
100

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
(a) Obtaining an understanding of any procedures management has established to ensure that subsequent
events are identified.
(b) Inquiring of management and, where appropriate, those charged with governance as to whether any
subsequent events have occurred which might affect the financial statements.
(c) Reading minutes, if any, of the meetings, of the entity’s owners, management and those charged with
governance, that have been held after the date of the financial statements and inquiring about matters
discussed at any such meetings for which minutes are not yet available.
(d) Reading the entity’s latest subsequent interim financial statements, if any.
When, as a result of the procedures performed as required above, the auditor identifies events that require
adjustment of, or disclosure in, the financial statements, the auditor shall determine whether each such
event is appropriately reflected in those financial statements.
96A(APRIL 2022 MTP

M/s Krishna Associates, Chartered Accountants, while conducting the audit of Love Kush Ltd want
to conduct an inquiry of management and those charged with governance as to whether any
subsequent events have occurred which might affect the financial statements. Guide M/s Krishna
Associates with the matters where specific inquiries may be conducted to evaluate subsequent
events.
ANSWER :
Specific Inquiries to Evaluate Subsequent Events: As per SA 560, “Subsequent Events”, in inquiring
of management and, where appropriate, those charged with governance, as to whether any
subsequent events have occurred that might affect the financial statements, the auditor may
inquire as to the current status of items that were accounted for on the basis of preliminary or
inconclusive data and may make specific inquiries about the following matters:
(i) Whether new commitments, borrowings or guarantees have been entered into.
(ii) Whether sales or acquisitions of assets have occurred or are planned.
(iii) Whether there have been increases in capital or issuance of debt instruments, such as the
issue of new shares or debentures, or an agreement to merge or liquidate has been made or is
planned.
(iv) Whether any assets have been appropriated by government or destroyed, for example, by fire
or flood.
(v) Whether there have been any developments regarding contingencies.
(vi) Whether any unusual accounting adjustments have been made or are contemplated.
(vii) Whether any events have occurred or are likely to occur that will bring into question the
appropriateness of accounting policies used in the financial statements, as would be the case, for
example, if such events call into question the validity of the going concern assumption.
(viii) Whether any events have occurred that are relevant to the measurement of estimates or
provisions made in the financial statements.
(ix) Whether any events have occurred that are relevant to the recoverability of assets.
101

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
SA 570 Going Concern

97. MTP Apr 2019 Qn no 20 2 Marks
The auditor has determined that there is a significant going concern uncertainty at PQR Ltd. due
to the requirement to refinance the company’s debt. Discussions with the management and the
auditor’s evaluation of management’s plans for future actions in relation to its going concern
assessment have revealed that plans to raise new equity finance are realistic and likely to deal
with the problem. Is it appropriate for PQR Ltd. to prepare its financial statements on a going
concern basis?
a. No, PQR Ltd. cannot prepare its financial statements on a going concern basis because a
significant uncertainty exists.
b. Yes, PQR Ltd. can prepare its financial statements on a going concern basis. However, the
auditor is required to express a qualified opinion.
c. Yes, PQR Ltd. can prepare its financial statements on a going concern basis. No additional
disclosure is necessary in the financial statements or the auditor’s report.
d. Yes, PQR Ltd. can prepare its financial statements on a going concern basis. However,
disclosure of both the nature of the uncertainty and management’s plan is required.
Answer: Option d Yes, PQR Ltd. can prepare its financial statements on a going concern basis.
However, disclosure of both the nature of the uncertainty and management’s plan is required.
98. MTP-Mar 19 Qn No 1(c) 5 Marks:
Rathi Limited had definite plan of its business being closed within a short period from the
close of the accounting year ended on 31st March, 2018. The Financial Statements for the year
ended 31/03/2018 had been prepared on the same basis as it had been in earlier periods with
an additional note that the business of the Company shall cease in near future and the assets
shall be disposed off in accordance with a plan of disposal as decided by the Management. The
Statutory Auditors of the Company indicated this aspect in Key Audit Matters only by a
reference as to a possible cessation of business and making of adjustments, if any, thereto to
be made at the time of cessation only. Comment on the reporting by the Statutory Auditor as
above.
Answer:
Closure of Business: As per SA 570 “Going Concern”, management intentions to liquidate the
entity or to cease operations is one of the event or condition that may cast significant doubt on
the entity’s ability to continue as going concern.
As per SA 570, if events or conditions have been identified that may cast significant doubt on the
102

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
entity’s ability to continue as a going concern but, based on the audit evidence obtained the auditor
concludes that no material uncertainty exists, the auditor shall evaluate whether, in view of the
requirements of the applicable financial reporting framework, the financial statements provide
adequate disclosures about these events or conditions.
Even when no material uncertainty exists, it requires the auditor to evaluate whether, in view of the
requirements of the applicable financial reporting framework, the financial statements provide
adequate disclosure about events or conditions that may cast significant doubt on the entity’s
ability to continue as a going concern.
Further, as per SA 701 “Communicating Key Audit Matters in the Independent Auditor’s Report”,
when matters relating to going concern may be determined to be key audit matters, and explains
that a material uncertainty related to events or conditions that may cast significant doubt on the
entity’s ability to continue as a going concern is, by its nature, a key audit matter. SA 701 also
emphasis on auditor’s responsibility to communicate key audit matters in the auditor’s report.
As per the facts given in the case, intention of the Mishti Limited had definite plan of its business
being closed down within short period from 31st March, 2018. However, financial statements for
the year ended 31.03.2018 had been prepared on the same basis as it had been in earlier periods
with an additional note.
Thus, management intentions to liquidate the entity or to cease operations is one of the event or
condition that may cast significant doubt on the entity’s ability to continue as going concern is a
key audit matter. Therefore, the auditor is required to Communicate the Key Audit Matters in
accordance with SA 570 in above stated manner. Simple reference as to a possible cessation of
business and making of adjustments, if any, he made at the time of cessation only by the auditor
in his report is not sufficient.
99.RTP May 2019, (PAST EXAM NOV 2018)

M/s Airlift Ltd., carrying on the business of Passenger Transportation by air is running into
continuous financial losses as well as reduction in Sales due to stiff competition and frequent
break down of its own aircrafts. The Financial Statements for the Year ended on 31/03/2018 are
to be now finalized. The Management is quite uncertain as to its ability to continue in near future
and has informed the Auditors that having seized of this matter, it had constituted a committee
to study this aspect and to give suggestions for recovery, if any, from this bad situation. Till the
study is completed, according to the Management, the issue involves uncertainty as to its ability
to continue its business and it informs the Auditor that the fact of uncertainty clamping on the
"Going Concern" would suitably be disclosed in notes to accounts. State the reporting
requirement if any, in the Independent Auditor's Report in respect of this matter
Answer
Reporting requirements in case of Uncertainty clamping on the Going Concern: As per SA 570
“Going Concern”, if the auditor concludes that management’s use of the going concern basis of
accounting is appropriate in the circumstances but a material uncertainty exists, the auditor shall
determine whether the financial statements :
103

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
(i)adequately disclose the principal events or conditions that may cast significant doubt on the
entity’s ability to continue as a going concern and management’s plans to deal with these events or
conditions; and (ii) disclose clearly that there is a material uncertainty related to events or
conditions that may cast significant doubt on the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern and,
therefore, that it may be unable to realize its assets and discharge its liabilities in the normal
course of business.
If adequate disclosure about the material uncertainty is made in the financial statements, the
auditor shall express an unmodified opinion and the auditor’s report shall include a separate section
under the heading “Material Uncertainty Related to Going Concern” to:
(i) Draw attention to the note in the financial statements that discloses the matters set out above;
and
(ii) State that these events or conditions indicate that a material uncertainty exists that may cast
significant doubt on the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern and that the auditor’s opinion
is not modified in respect of the matter.
In the instant case, M/s Aircraft Ltd. is running into continuous financial losses as well as reduction
in sales due to stiff competition and frequent break down of its own aircrafts and management of
Aircraft Ltd. is uncertain as of its ability to continue in near future. Therefore, a committee has
been constituted to study this aspect and till the time study is completed management accordingly
decided to suitable disclose this aspect in notes to accounts. Therefore, the auditor should disclose
about the material uncertainty and express an unmodified opinion and in his audit report shall
include a separate section under the heading “Material Uncertainty Related to Going Concern”
to draw attention to the note in the financial statements that discloses the matters set out above;
and state that these events or conditions indicate that a material uncertainty exists that may cast
significant doubt on the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern and that the auditor’s opinion
is not modified in respect of the matter.
100. RTP Nov 2019 Qn no 11(a)
MNO Limited is one of the prominent players in the chemicals industry. The company is a public
company domiciled in India and listed on BSE and NSE. The Company was facing extreme
liquidity constraints and there were multiple indicators that casted doubt over the company’s
ability to continue as a going concern.
The Company was led into insolvency proceedings by consortium of banks led by PNB and the
NCLT ordered the commencement of corporate insolvency process against the Company on 31
August 2018. The company invited prospective lenders, investors and others to submit their
resolution plans to the Resolution Professional (RP) latest by 1 January 2019. The RP reviewed
the resolution plans and ensured conformity with Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code 2016. The
compliant plans were presented to Committee on Creditors (CoC) on 2 February 2019 and the
resolution
Answer
104

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
As per SA 570 Going Concern, if events or conditions have been identified that may cast significant
doubt on the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern, the auditor shall obtain sufficient
appropriate audit evidence to determine whether or not a material uncertainty exists related to
events or conditions that may cast significant doubt on the entity’s ability to continue as a going
concern (hereinafter referred to as “material uncertainty”) through performing additional audit
procedures, including consideration of mitigating factors. These procedures shall include:
(i) Where management has not yet performed an assessment of the entity’s ability to continue as a
going concern, requesting management to make its assessment.
(ii) Evaluating management’s plans for future actions in relation to its going concern assessment,
whether the outcome of these plans is likely to improve the situation and whether management’s
plans are feasible in the circumstances.
(iii) Where the entity has prepared a cash flow forecast, and analysis of the forecast is a significant
factor in considering the future outcome of events or conditions in -
(1) Evaluating the reliability of the underlying data generated to prepare the forecast; and
(2) Determining whether there is adequate support for the assumptions underlying the forecast.
(iv) Considering whether any additional facts or information have become available since the date on
which management made its assessment.
(v) Requesting written representations from management and, where appropriate, those charged
with governance, regarding their plans for future actions and the feasibility of these plans.
The auditor shall evaluate whether sufficient appropriate audit evidence has been obtained
regarding, and shall conclude on, the appropriateness of management’s use of the going concern
basis of accounting in the preparation of the financial statements. If events or conditions have
been identified that may cast significant doubt on the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern
but, based on the audit evidence obtained the auditor concludes that no material uncertainty exists,
the auditor shall evaluate whether, in view of the requirements of the applicable financial reporting
framework, the financial statements provide adequate disclosures about these events or
conditions.
In the instant case, the approval of the resolution plan is a significant mitigating factor to counter
the going concern issues of MNO Ltd. PQR Ltd. has submitted a detailed plan and commitments that
has been given as part of the resolution plan which includes clearance of all outstanding debts
which were leading to negative cash flows. Therefore, it can be said that the events and conditions
are mitigated effectively and there is no material uncertainty in relation to the ability of the
company to continue as a going concern.
Study Material
101. ABC Company files a law suit against Unlucky Company for Rs. 5 crores. The Attorney of
Unlucky Company feels that the suit is without merit, so Unlucky Company merely discloses the
existence of the law suit in the notes accompanying its financial statements. As an auditor of
Unlucky Company, how will you deal with the situation?
Existence of Contingent Liability: As per AS 29 "Provisions, Contingent liabilities and Contingent
105

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
Assets", a contingent liability is a possible obligation that arises from past events and the existence
of which will be confirmed only by the occurrence or non-occurrence of one or more uncertain
future events not wholly within the control of the enterprise.
Further, future events that may affect the amount required to settle an obligation should be
reflected in the amount of a provision where there is sufficient objective evidence that the event
will occur.
As per SA 570 “Going Concern”, there are certain examples of events or conditions that,
individually or collectively, may cast significant doubt about the going concern assumption.
Pending legal or regulatory proceedings against the entity that may, if successful, result in claims
that the entity is unlikely to be able to satisfy is one of the example of such event.
When the auditor concludes that the use of the going concern assumption is appropriate in the
circumstances but a material uncertainty exists, the auditor shall determine whether the financial
statements adequately describe the principal events or conditions that may cast significant doubt
on the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern and management’s plans to deal with these
events or conditions; and disclose clearly that there is a material uncertainty related to events or
conditions that may cast significant doubt on the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern
and, therefore, that it may be unable to realize its assets and discharge its liabilities in the normal
course of business.
In the instant case, ABC Company has filed a law suit against Unlucky Company for 5 crores.
Though, the attorney of Unlucky Company feels that the suit is without merit so the company
merely discloses the existence of law suit in the notes accompanying its financial statements. But
the auditor may evaluate the source data on which basis the opinion is formed. If the auditor finds
the uncertainty, he may request the management to adjust the sum of 5 crore by making provision
for expenses as per AS 29. If the management does not accept the request the auditor should
qualify the audit report.
102. ( MTP- NOV 2021)

OM Ltd. is a company engaged in the business of manufacture of spare parts. Shanti & Associates are the
statutory auditors of the company for the FY 2020-21. During the course of audit, CA Shanti noticed that the
company had a major customer, namely, Korean Mart from South Korea. Owing to an outbreak of war and
subsequent destruction leading to government ban on import and export in South Korea, the demand from
Korean Mart for the products of OM Ltd. ended for an unforeseeable time period. When discussed with the
management, CA Shanti was told that the company is in the process of identifying new customers for their
products. CA Shanti understands that though the use of going concern assumption is appropriate but a
material uncertainty exists with respect to the identification of new customers. This fact is duly reflected in
the financial statements of OM Ltd. for the FY 2020-21. How should CA Shanti deal with this matter in the
auditor’s report for the FY 2020-21 in accordance with relevant Standard on Auditing?
ANSWER
As per SA 570, “Going Concern”, loss of a major market or a key customer is one of the operating indicators
that may cast significant doubt on the company’s ability to continue as a going concern.
In the present case, OM Ltd. has a key customer in South Korea from which the demand for its products has
ended on account of outbreak of war, subsequent destruction and government ban on import and export
106

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
in South Korea. Further, the company has not yet identified new customers and is in the process of doing
the same. As such, the identification of new customer is a material uncertainty that cast a significant doubt
on the company’s ability to continue as a going concern.
However, this matter is duly disclosed by the management of OM Ltd. in the financial statements for the
year ended 31.03.2021.
As such, considering that the going concern assumption is appropriate but a material uncertainty exists
with respect to identification of new customer, CA Shanti should:
(1) Express an unmodified opinion and
(2) Include in his audit report, a separate section under the heading “Material Uncertainty Related to Going
Concern” to:
(i) Draw attention to the note in the financial statements that discloses the matters and
(ii) State that these events or conditions indicate that a material uncertainty exists that may cast
significant doubt on the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern and that the auditor’s opinion is
not modified in respect of the matter.
Thus, CA Shanti should deal with this matter in his auditor’s report in the above mentioned manner.
102A(MARCH 2022 MTP)
Which of the following is not an indicator about material uncertainty over the entity’s ability to
continue
as a going concern:
(a) Net liability or net current liability position.
(b) Cancellation of company’s production license due to change on government policies.
(c) Non-declaration of dividend to equity shareholders.
(d) Substantial operating losses or significant deterioration in the value of assets used to
generate cash flows.
ANSWER : ( C )
SA 580 Written Representations.

103. May 2018 RTP Qn 1(b), MTP-OCT-18 Qn No 1(C) 5 Marks:

In the course of audit of RKP Ltd., its auditor Mr. 'Noor' observed that there was a special audit
conducted at the instance of the management on a possible suspicion of a fraud and requested
for a copy of the report to enable him to report on the fraud aspects. Despite many reminders
it was not provided. In absence of the special audit report, Mr. 'Noor' insisted that he be
provided with at least a written representation in respect of fraud on/by the company. For this
request also, the management remained silent. Please guide Mr. 'Noor'.
Auditor’s Responsibilities Relating to Fraud: As per SA 240 on “The Auditor’s Responsibilities
Relating to Fraud in an Audit of Financial Statements”, the auditor is responsible for obtaining
reasonable assurance that the financial statements, taken as a whole, are free from material
misstatement, whether caused by fraud or error.
As per SA 580 “Written Representations”, if management modifies or does not provide the
requested written representations, it may alert the auditor to the possibility that one or more
107

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
significant issues may exist.
In the instant case, the auditor observed that there was a special audit conducted at the instance
of the management on a possible suspicion of fraud. Therefore, the auditor requested for special
audit report which was not provided by the management despite of many reminders. The auditor
also insisted for written representation in respect of fraud on/by the company. For this request
also management remained silent.
It may be noted that, if management does not provide one or more of the requested written
representations, the auditor shall discuss the matter with management; re- evaluate the
integrity of management and evaluate the effect that this may have on the reliability of
representations (oral or written) and audit evidence in general; and take appropriate actions,
including determining the possible effect on the opinion in the auditor’s report.
company, he shall immediately report the matter to the Central Government (in case amount of
fraud is Rs. 1 crore or above)or Audit Committee or Board in other cases (in case the amount of
fraud involved is less than Rs. 1 crore) within such time and in such manner as may be prescribed.
The auditor is also required to report as per Clause (x) of Paragraph 3 of CARO, 2020, Whether
any fraud by the company or any fraud on the company by its officers or employees has been
noticed or reported during the year; If yes, the nature and the amount involved is to be
indicated.
(i) Determine the professional and legal responsibilities applicable in the circumstances, including
persons who made the audit appointment or, in some cass, to regulatory authorities, the
auditor’s withdrawal from the engagement and the reasons for the withdrawal.
104.RTP May 2019 Qn no 11(a)
PRSH & Co is the statutory auditor of Make My Journey Ltd. The company is in the business of
tours and travels. Annual turnover of the company is INR 2000 crores and profits are INR 190
crores. During the planning meeting of the management and the auditors, it was discussed that
the management needs to provide written representation letter to the auditors for the
108

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
preparation of the financial statements and for the completeness of the information provided to
the auditor. At the time of closure of the audit, there has been some confusion about the
requirements of the written representation letter. Management argued that representation need
not be written, it can also be verbal which has been provided to the audit team during the course
of their audit. Auditors have completed their documentation and hence in a way, representation
based on verbal discussions with the auditors has also got documented. Auditors explained that
this is mandatory to obtain written representation in accordance with the requirements of SA
580. However, still some confusion remains regarding the date and period covered by the written
representation. You are required to advise about the date of and period covered by written
representation in view of SA 580.
Answer
As per SA 580, “Written Representations”, as written representations are necessary audit
evidence, the auditor’s opinion cannot be expressed, and the auditor’s report cannot be dated,
before the date of the written representations.
Furthermore, because the auditor is concerned with events occurring up to the date of the
auditor’s report that may require adjustment to or disclosure in the financial statements, the
written representations are dated as near as practicable to, but not after, the date of the auditor’s
report on the financial statements.
In some circumstances it may be appropriate for the auditor to obtain a written representation
about a specific assertion in the financial statements during the course of the audit. Where this is
the case, it may be necessary to request an updated written representation.
The written representations are for all periods referred to in the auditor’s report because
management needs to reaffirm that the written representations it previously made with respect to
the prior periods remain appropriate. The auditor and management may agree to a form of written
representation that updates written representations relating to the prior periods by addressing
whether there are any changes to such written representations and, if so, what they are.
Situations may arise where current management were not present during all periods referred to in
the auditor’s report. Such persons may assert that they are not in a position to provide some or all
of the written representations because they were not in place during the period. This fact,
however, does not diminish such persons’ responsibilities for the financial statements as a whole.
Accordingly, the requirement for the auditor to request from them written representations that
cover the whole of the relevant period(s) still applies.
105.MTP-Mar 19 Qn No 1(a) 4 Marks:
Statutory auditor of O Ltd requested the management for a written representation in respect of
obsolescence of inventory and warranty obligations recognized by the company in its financial
statements. The management denied the representation on the ground that during the course
of audit, all the required procedures were performed by the auditor and after obtaining
sufficient appropriate audit evidence, auditor has issued a clean report. Please comment.
Answer:
109

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
As per SA 540 Auditing Accounting Estimates, Including Fair Value Accounting Estimates and
Related Disclosures, the auditor shall obtain written representations from the management and,
where appropriate, those charged with governance whether they believe significant assumptions
used in making accounting estimates are reasonable.
Depending on the nature, materiality and extent of estimation uncertainty, written representations
about accounting estimates recognised or disclosed in the financial statements may include
representations:
• About the appropriateness of the measurement processes, including related assumptions and
models, used by management in determining accounting estimates in the context of the applicable
financial reporting framework, and the consistency in application of the processes.
• That the assumptions appropriately reflect management’s intent and ability to carry out specific
courses of action on behalf of the entity, where relevant to the accounting estimates and
disclosures.
• That disclosure related to accounting estimates are complete and appropriate under the
applicable financial reporting framework.
• That no subsequent event requires adjustment to the accounting estimates and disclosures
included in the financial statements.
For those accounting estimates not recognised or disclosed in the financial statements, written
representations may also include representations about:
• The appropriateness of the basis used by management for determining that the recognition or
disclosure criteria of the applicable financial reporting framework have not been met.
• The appropriateness of the basis used by management to overcome the presumption relating to
the use of fair value set forth under the entity’s applicable financial reporting framework, for
those accounting estimates not measured or disclosed at fair value.
Thus, management’s contention on the ground that during the course of audit, all the required
procedures were performed by the auditor and after obtaining sufficient appropriate audit
evidence, auditor has issued a clean report, for not providing written representation is not correct.
The management should provide written representations to the auditor.
Further as per SA 580 Written Representation, if management does not provide one or more of the
requested written representations, the auditor shall
(a) Discuss the matter with management;
(b) Re-evaluate the integrity of management and evaluate the effect that this may have on the
reliability of representations (oral or written) and audit evidence in general; and
(c) Take appropriate actions, including determining the possible effect on the opinion in the auditor’s
report in accordance with SA 705.
106.Nov 2019 Qn no 1(a) 5 Marks

Mr. L while conducting the audit of ABC Ltd., observed that a substantial amount is recognized
in respect of obsolescence of inventory and warranty obligation in the financial statements. Mr.
L wants to obtain written representation from the management to determine whether the
110

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
assumptions and estimates used are reasonable. Guide Mr. L with reference to the relevant
Standard on Auditing.
Answer
Written Representations: As per SA 540, “Auditing Accounting Estimates, Including Fair Value
Accounting Estimates, and Related Disclosures”, the auditor shall obtain written representations
from management and, where appropriate, those charged with governance whether they believe
significant assumptions used in making accounting estimates are reasonable.
SA 580, “Written Representations” discusses the use of written representations. Depending on the
nature, materiality and extent of estimation uncertainty, written representations about accounting
estimates recognised or disclosed in the financial statements may include representations:
(i) About the appropriateness of the measurement processes, including related assumptions and
models, used by management in determining accounting estimates in the context of the
applicable financial reporting framework, and the consistency in application of the processes.
(ii) That the assumptions appropriately reflect management’s intent and ability to carry out specific
courses of action on behalf of the entity, where relevant to the accounting estimates and
disclosures.
(iii) That disclosure related to accounting estimates are complete and appropriate under the
applicable financial reporting framework.
(iv) That no subsequent event requires adjustment to the accounting estimates and disclosures
included in the financial statements.
Study Material
107. An auditor of Sagar Ltd. was not able to get the confirmation about the existence and value
of certain machineries. However, the management gave him a certificate to prove the existence
and value of the machinery as appearing in the books of account. The auditor accepted the same
without any further procedure and signed the audit report. Is he right in his approach?
Validity of Written Representation: The physical verification of fixed assets is the primary
responsibility of the management. The auditor, however, is required to examine the verification
programme adopted by the management. He must satisfy himself about the existence, ownership
and valuation of fixed assets. In the case of Sagar Ltd., the auditor has not been able to verify
the existence and value of some machinery despite the verification procedure followed in routine
audit. He accepted the certificate given to him by the management without making any further
enquiry.
As per SA 580 “Written Representations”, when representation relate to matters which are
material to the financial information, then the auditor should seek corroborative audit evidence
from other sources inside or outside the entity.
He should evaluate whether such representations are reasonable and consistent with other
evidences and should consider whether individuals making such representations can be expected
to be well informed on the matter. “Written Representations” cannot be a substitute for other
audit evidence that the auditor could reasonably expect to be available.
If the auditor is unable to obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence that he believes would be
111

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
available regarding a matter which has or may have a material effect on the financial information,
this will constitute a limitation on the scope of his examination even if he has obtained a
representation from management on the matter. Therefore, the approach adopted by the
auditor is not right.
108. Mokshda & Co is the statutory auditor of Get My Trip Ltd. The company is in the business
of tours and travels. Annual turnover of the company is INR 2765 crore and profits are INR 285
crore. During the planning meeting of the management and the auditors, it was discussed that
the management needs to provide written representation letter to the auditors for the
preparation of the financial statements and for the completeness of the information provided to
the auditor. At the time of closure of the audit, there has been some confusion about the
requirements of the written representation letter. Management argued that representation
need not be written, it can also be verbal which has been provided to the audit team during the
course of their audit. Auditors have completed their documentation and hence in a way,
representation based on verbal discussions with the auditors has also got documented. Auditors
explained that this is mandatory to obtain written representation in accordance with the requirements
of SA 580. However, still some confusion remains regarding the date and period covered by the written
representation. You are required to advise about the date of and period covered by written
representation in view of SA 580. (4 Marks) (mtp – I -july 2021)
ANSWER
As per SA 580, “Written Representations”, as written representations are necessary audit evidence, the
auditor’s opinion cannot be expressed, and the auditor’s report cannot be dated, before the date of the
written representations. Furthermore, because the auditor is concerned with events occurring up to the
date of the auditor’s report that may require adjustment to or disclosure in the financial statements, the
written representations are dated as near as practicable to, but not after, the date of the auditor’s report
on the financial statements.
In some circumstances it may be appropriate for the auditor to obtain a written representation about a
specific assertion in the financial statements during the course of the audit. Where this is the case, it may
be necessary to request an updated written representation.
The written representations are for all periods referred to in the auditor’s report because management
needs to reaffirm that the written representations it previously made with respect to the prior periods
remain appropriate. The auditor and management may agree to a form of written representation that
updates written representations relating to the prior periods by addressing whether there are any changes
to such written representations and, if so, what they are.
Situations may arise where current management were not present during all periods referred to in the
auditor’s report. Such persons may assert that they are not in a position to provide some or all of the
written representations because they were not in place during the period. This fact, however, does not
diminish such persons’ responsibilities for the financial statements as a whole.
Accordingly, the requirement for the auditor to request from them written representations that cover the
whole of the relevant period(s) still applies
SA-600 Using the work of another auditor

MAY 2018 -1(d) – 5 Marks
109. B is the Principal Auditor of ABC Co. Ltd., with 8 branches audited by 8 Branch Auditors. B
wanted to ensure that the works of Branch Auditors were adequate for the purpose of his
112

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
audit. Hence he insisted on Branch Auditors to get familiar with a check list he prepared for
branches and, besides, required them to share the working papers compiled by them for his
review and return. Is Principal Auditor within his right in asking for such sharing of working
papers?
Answer
Using the Work of Another Auditor: When the accounts of the branch are audited by a person
other than the company’s auditor, there is need for a clear understanding of the role of such
auditor and the company’s auditor in relation to the audit of the accounts of the branch and
the audit of the company as a whole; also, there is great necessity for a proper rapport between
these two auditors for the purpose of an effective audit.
In recognition of these needs, the Council of the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India has
dealt with these issues in SA 600, “Using the Work of another Auditor”. It makes clear that in
certain situations, the statute governing the entity may confer a right on the principal auditor to
visit a component and examine the books of account and other records of the said component, if
he thinks it necessary to do so. Where another auditor has been appointed for the component,
the principal auditor would normally be entitled to rely upon the work of such auditor unless
there are special circumstances to make it essential for him to visit the component and/or to
examine the books of account and other records of the said component.
Further, it requires that the principal auditor should perform procedures to obtain sufficient
appropriate audit evidence, that the work of the other auditor is adequate for the principal
auditor's purposes, in the context of the specific assignment. When using the work of another
auditor, the principal auditor should ordinarily perform the following procedures:
• advise the other auditor of the use that is to be made of the other auditor's work and report and
make sufficient arrangements for co-ordination of their efforts at the planning stage of the
audit. The principal auditor would inform the other auditor of matters such as areas requiring
special consideration, procedures for the identification of inter-component transactions that
may require disclosure and the time-table for completion of audit; and
• advise the other auditor of the significant accounting, auditing and reporting requirements and
obtain representation as to compliance with them.
The principal auditor might discuss with the other auditor the audit procedures applied or
review a written summary of the other auditor’s procedures and findings which may be in the
form of a completed questionnaire or check-list. The principal auditor may also wish to visit the
other auditor. The nature, timing and extent of procedures will depend on the circumstances of
the engagement and the principal auditor's knowledge of the professional competence of the
other auditor. This knowledge may have been enhanced from the review of the previous audit
work of the other auditor.
Further, SA 230 issued by ICAI on Audit Documentation, and “Standard on Quality Control (SQC)
1, “Quality Control for Firms that Perform Audits and Reviews of Historical Financial Information,
and Other Assurance and Related Services Engagements”, issued by the Institute, provides that,
unless otherwise specified by law or regulation, audit documentation is the property of the
auditor. He may at his discretion, make portions of, or extracts from, audit documentation
available to clients, provided such disclosure does not undermine the validity of the work
113

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
performed, or, in the case of assurance engagements, the independence of the auditor or of his
personnel.”
In the light of aforesaid, principal auditor was not within his right for asking for such sharing of
working papers. It depends upon the discretion of auditor
110. BETA Ltd is the Subsidiary company of ALPHA Ltd. PQR & Associates has been appointed as auditor
of ALPHA Ltd. for the Financial Year 2019-20 and MNO & Associates has been appointed as auditor of
BETA Ltd for the year 2019-20. Explain the role of PQR & Associates and MNO & Associates as auditors of
the parent company and subsidiary company respectively. (4 Marks) (mtp nov 20)
ANSWER
Role of Auditor in case of Parent Company and Subsidiary Company: As per SA 600 “Using the Work of
Another Auditor”, there should be sufficient liaison between the principal auditor (hereinafter referred as
auditor of Parent Company and the other auditor (hereinafter referred as auditor of Subsidiary Company).
Role of Principal Auditor (PQR & Associates- Auditor of Parent Company):
(i) It is necessary to issue written communication(s) as a principal auditor to the other auditor.
(ii) The principal auditor should advise the other auditor of any matters that come to his attention that he
thinks
may have an important bearing on the other auditor’s work.
(iii) When considered necessary by him, the principal auditor may require the other auditor to answer a
detailed questionnaire regarding matters on which the principal auditor requires information for
discharging his duties.
Role of Other Auditor (MNO & Associates- Auditor of Subsidiary Company):

(i) The other auditor, knowing the context in which his work is to be used by the principal auditor, should
co-ordinate with the principal auditor. For example, by bringing to the principal auditor’s immediate
attention to any significant findings requiring to be dealt with at entity level, adhering to the time-table for
audit of the component, etc.
(ii) He should ensure compliance with the relevant statutory requirements.
(iii) The other auditor should respond to the questionnaire sent by Principal Auditor on a timely basis
111. ( JULY 2021 PAPER)

PQ Limited, a listed entity, headquartered in Mumbai and is having 15 branches all over India. The
Company is in the business of buying paddy grown by farmers directly and processing to produce
final products for selling in domestic as well as international markets. PQ Limited appointed four
firms of Chartered Accountants for audit of its head office and branches. Your firm is one of those
firms. It was agreed that your firm will act as Principal auditor. 'What factors will be considered by
you while accepting the position of Principal auditor ?
ANSWER
Factors to be considered while accepting the position of Principal auditor - SA 600 – Using the
work of Another Auditor –
While accepting the position of Principal Auditor, the auditor should consider whether the
auditor's own participation is sufficient to be able to act as the principal auditor.
114

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
For this purpose, the auditor would consider:

(a) the materiality of the portion of the financial information which the principal auditor audits;
(b) the principal auditor's degree of knowledge regarding the business of the components;
(c) the risk of material misstatements in the financial information of the components audited by
the other auditor; and
(d) the performance of additional procedures as set out in this SA regarding the components
audited by other auditor resulting in the principal auditor having significant participation in such
audit.
111A (MAY 2022EXAM)

CA H was appointed as a Statutory Auditor of MNL Limited, a listed company, which has three
subsidiaries namely M Ltd., N Ltd., L Ltd. and also 15 branches across India. Auditors are duly
appointed for the subsidiaries and branches as well. With regard to the determination of
materiality during the audit of consolidated financial statements, what should be the
considerations of CA H? How he should deal in his report if there are observations (for instance
modification and/or emphasis of matter in accordance with SA 705/706) made by component
auditors?
ANSWER :
CA. H should consider the requirement of SA 600, “Using the Work of Another Auditor”, if he decides
to use the work of another auditor in relation to the audit of consolidated financial statements and
he should comply with the requirements of SA 600.
In carrying out the audit of the standalone financial statements, the computation of materiality for
the purpose of issuing an opinion on the standalone fi nancial statements of each component would
be done component-wise on a standalone basis.
However, with regard to determination of materiality during the audit of consolidated financial
statements (CFS), the auditor should consider the following:
(i) The auditor is required to compute the materiality for the group as a whole. This materiality
should be used to assess the appropriateness of the consolidation adjustments (i.e. permanent
consolidation adjustments and current period consolidation adjustments) that are made by the
management in the preparation of CFS.
(ii) The parent auditor can also use the materiality computed on the group level to determine
whether the component's financial statements are material to the group to determine whether they
should scope in additional components, and consider using the work of other auditors as applicable.
(iii) The principal auditor also computes materiality for each component and communicates to the
component auditor, if he believes is required for true and fair view on CFS.
However, while considering the observations (for instance modification and /or emphasis of
matter in accordance with SA 705/706) of the component auditor in his report on the standalone
financial statements, the principles of SA 600 needs to be considered i.e. the parent auditor
should comply with the requirements of SA 600, “Using the Work of Another Auditor”.
115

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
SA 610 Using the work of Internal Auditor

112. May 2018 6 (c) 4 Marks

Moon Ltd. of which you are the Statutory Auditor, have an internal audit being conducted by an outside
agency. State the factors that weigh considerations in opting to make use of direct assistance of the
internal auditors for the purpose of statutory audit.
ANSWER
Determining the Nature and Extent of Work that Can Be Assigned to Internal Auditors Providing Direct
Assistance: SA 610 ‘Using the work of Internal Auditor’ Deals about the concept of direct assistance of
internal auditor. In determining the nature and extent of work that may be assigned to internal auditors
and the nature, timing and extent of direction, supervision and review that is appropriate in the
circumstances, the external auditor shall consider:
(1) The amount of judgment involved in:
(i) Planning and performing relevant audit procedures; and
(ii) Evaluating the audit evidence gathered;
(2) The assessed risk of material misstatement; and
(3) The external auditor’s evaluation of the existence and significance of threats to the objectivity and level of
competence of the internal auditors who will be providing such assistance.
If using internal auditors to provide direct assistance is not prohibited by law or regulation, and the
external auditor plans to use internal auditors to provide direct assistance on the audit, the external
auditor shall evaluate the existence and significance of threats to objectivity and the level of
competence of the internal auditors who will be providing such assistance.
The external auditor’s evaluation of the existence and significance of threats to the internal
auditors’ objectivity shall include inquiry of the internal auditors regarding interests and
relationships that may create a threat to their objectivity.
113. MTP-OCT-18 Qn No 5(b)(2) 4 Marks:
CA. Amboj, a practicing chartered accountant has been appointed as an internal auditor of
Textile Ltd. He conducted the physical verification of the inventory at the year-end and handed
over the report of such verification to CA. Kishor, the statutory auditor of the Company, for his
view and reporting. Can CA. Kishor rely on such report?
Answer:
Using the Work of Internal Auditor: As per SA 610 “Using the Work of Internal Auditors”, while
determining whether the work of the internal auditors can be used for the purpose of the audit,
the external auditor shall evaluate-
• The extent to which the internal audit function’s organizational status and re levant policies and
procedures support the objectivity of the internal auditors;
• The level of competence of the internal audit function; and
• Whether the internal audit function applies a systematic and disciplined approach, including
quality control.
116

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
Further, the external auditor shall not use the work of the internal audit function if the external
auditor determines that:
• The function’s organizational status and relevant policies and procedures do not
adequately support the objectivity of internal auditors;
• The function lacks sufficient competence; or
• The function does not apply a systematic and disciplined approach, including quality control.
In the instant case, CA. Kishor should ascertain the internal auditor’s scope of verificat ion, area of
coverage and method of verification. He should review the report on physical verification taking
into consideration these factors. If possible he should also test check few items and he can also
observe the procedures performed by the internal auditors.
If the statutory auditor is satisfied about the appropriateness of the verification, he can rely on
the report but if he finds that the verification is not in order, he has to decide otherwise. The final
responsibility to express opinion on the financial statement remains with the statutory auditor.
114.RTP May 2019 Qn no 22(b), MTP-Apr-19 Qn No 4(c) 4 Marks:, MTP-OCT-19 Qn No 4(b) 4 Marks:
OPQ Ltd is in the business of software consultancy. The company has had large balances of
accounts receivables in the past years which have been assessed as area of high risk. For the
year ended 31 March 2018, in respect of the valuation of accounts receivable, the statutory
auditor has assigned the checking of the accuracy of the aging of the accounts receivables and
provision based on ageing to the internal auditor providing direct assistance to him. Please
advise
Answer
As per SA 610 Using the Work of Internal Auditor, the external auditor (Statutory Auditor) shall not
use internal auditors to provide direct assistance to perform procedures that:
(a) Involve making significant judgments in the audit;
(b) Relate to higher assessed risks of material misstatement where the judgment required in
performing the relevant audit procedures or evaluating the audit evidence gathered is more than
limited;
(c) Relate to work with which the internal auditors have been involved and which has already been,
or will be, reported to management or those charged with governance by the internal audit
function; or
(d) Relate to decisions the external auditor makes in accordance with this SA regarding the internal
audit function and the use of its work or direct assistance.
In the given case where the valuation of accounts receivable is assessed as an area of higher risk,
the statutory auditor could assign the checking of the accuracy of the aging to an internal auditor
providing direct assistance. However, because the evaluation of the adequacy of the provision
based on the aging would involve more than limited judgment, it would not be appropriate to
assign that latter procedure to an internal auditor providing direct assistance.
115. RTP May 2020 Qn no 17

Mr. Anand is appointed as statutory auditor of XYZ Ltd. XYZ Ltd is required to appoint internal
117

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
auditor as per statutory provisions given in the Companies Act, 2013 and appointed Mr. Bhola
as its internal auditor.
The external auditor Mr. Anand asked internal auditor to provide direct assistance to him
regarding evaluating significant accounting estimates by the management and assessing the risk
of material misstatements.
(a) Discuss whether Mr. Anand, statutory auditor, can ask direct assistance from Mr. Bhola, internal
auditor as stated above in view of Standards on Auditing.
(b) Will your answer be different, if Mr. Anand ask direct assistance from Mr. Bhola, internal auditor
with respect to external confirmation requests and evaluation of the results of external
confirmation procedures?
Answer:
Direct Assistance from Internal Auditor: As per SA 610 “Using the Work of Internal Auditor”, the
external auditor shall not use internal auditors to provide direct assistance to perform procedures
that Involve making significant judgments in the audit.
Since the external auditor has sole responsibility for the audit opinion expressed, the external
auditor needs to make the significant judgments in the audit engagement.
Significant judgments include the following:
▪ Assessing the risks of material misstatement;

▪ Evaluating the sufficiency of tests performed;
▪ Evaluating the appropriateness of management’s use of the going concern assumption;
▪ Evaluating significant accounting estimates; and
▪ Evaluating the adequacy of disclosures in the financial statements, and other matters affecting the
auditor’s report.
In view of above, Mr. Anand cannot ask direct assistance from internal auditors regarding evaluating
significant accounting estimates and assessing the risk of material misstatements.
Direct Assistance from Internal Auditor in case of External Confirmation Procedures: SA 610 “Using the
Work of Internal Auditor”, provide relevant guidance in determining the nature and extent of work that
may be assigned to internal auditors. In determining the nature of work that may be assigned to internal
auditors, the external auditor is careful to limit such work to those areas that would be appropriate to be
assigned.
Further, in accordance with SA 505, “External Confirmation” the external auditor is required to
maintain control over external confirmation requests and evaluate the results of external
confirmation procedures, it would not be appropriate to assign these responsibilities to internal
auditors. However, internal auditors may assist in assembling information necessary for the
external auditor to resolve exceptions in confirmation responses.
116. CA Ajay was appointed as the statutory auditor of TUV Ltd. at Delhi. TUV Ltd has a branch office at
Pune. A branch auditor, CA Suresh, was appointed to conduct the audit of the Pune branch of TUV Ltd.
CA Ajay provided CA Suresh with a questionnaire regarding the details of the branch office of certain
specific accounts and balances to be filled in by CA Suresh in which indication of material misstatements
are involved. However, CA Suresh denied to fill such questionnaire as he explained that CA Ajay, as the
118

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
principal auditor has no such right. Which is the relevant SA and which of the following course of action
is correct in this regard? (mtp nov 20)
(a) SA 600 is the relevant SA; CA Ajay is correct in asking for information from CA Suresh through a
questionnaire.
(b) SA 610 is the relevant SA; CA Suresh is correct in denying filling such questionnaire as a principal
auditor can refer to branch auditor’s report or other branch records but cannot ask the branch auditor to
provide any specific information by filling a questionnaire.
(c) SA 600 is the relevant SA; CA Suresh is correct in denying filling such questionnaire as CA Ajay instead
of asking CA Suresh to send the filled up questionnaire, should himself verify the specific branch details
as indication of material misstatement is there.
(d) SA 610 is the relevant SA; CA Ajay should seek management’s permission before asking the branch
auditor for any information.
ANSWER- c
117. M/s Viaan Viraj & associates are the statutory auditors of ABC Ltd. for the FY 2019-20. The company
has a strong internal control team. During the course of audit, CA Viaan, the engagement partner found
that the company has factories all across the country. In order to verify the wages expenses at all the
factories, CA Viaan decided to use the Internal Audit Team of the company. He accordingly discussed the
same with Mr. Gaurank, the Chief Internal Auditor of ABC Ltd. to provide him a report on the wages
expenses across all factories. Which of the following requirements as per SA 610 are required to be
fulfilled by CA Viaan prior to using the direct assistance of the Internal Audit Team of the company?
(mtp nov 20)
(a) CA Viaan should obtain written agreement from the management of ABC Ltd. that the internal audit
team will be allowed to follow the statutory auditors’ instructions.
(b) CA Viaan should obtain written agreement from Mr. Gaurank that his team will keep the matters
confidential.
(c) Both a & b
(d) CA Viaan can use the direct assistance of the Internal Audit Team after discussing the same with the
management. No prior written agreement is required. (10 x 1 = 10 Marks
ANSWER- a
118. Mr. Sheetal is appointed as a statutory auditor of Mahi Ltd. Mahi Ltd is required to appoint an
internal auditor as per statutory provisions given in the Companies Act, 2013 and appointed Mr. Kunthu
as its internal auditor. The external auditor Mr. Sheetal asked internal auditor to provide direct
assistance to him regarding evaluating the sufficiency of tests performed and the adequacy of disclosures
in the financial statements and other matters affecting the auditor’s report. Discuss whether Mr. Sheetal,
statutory auditor, can ask direct assistance from Mr. Kunthu, internal auditor as stated above in view of
relevant Standard on Auditing. (4 Marks) (mtp – II -july 2021)
ANSWER
Direct Assistance from Internal Auditor: As per SA 610 “Using the Work of Internal Auditor”,
119

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
the external auditor shall not use internal auditors to provide direct assistance to perform procedures that
Involve making significant judgments in the audit.Since the external auditor has sole responsibility for the
audit opinion expressed, the external auditor needs to make the significant judgments in the audit
engagement.
Assessing the risks of material misstatement;
Evaluating the sufficiency of tests performed;
Evaluating the appropriateness of management’s use of the going concern assumption;
Evaluating significant accounting estimates; and
Evaluating the adequacy of disclosures in the financial statements, and other matters affecting the
auditor’s report
In view of above, Mr. Sheetal cannot ask direct assistance from internal auditors regarding evaluating the
sufficiency of tests performed and the adequacy of disclosures in the financial statements and other
matters affecting the auditor’s report
SA 620 Using the Work of Auditor’s Expert
119. Mar 2018 MTP 1(b) 5 Marks, RTP Nov 18
KRP Ltd., at its annual general meeting, appointed Mr. X, Mr. Y and Mr. Z as joint auditors to
conduct auditing for the financial year 2015-16. For the valuation of gratuity scheme of the
company, Mr. X, Mr. Y and Mr. Z wanted to refer their own known Actuaries. Due to difference
of opinion, all the joint auditors consulted their respective Actuaries. Subsequently, major
difference was found in the actuary reports. However, Mr. X agreed to Mr. Y’s actuary report,
though, Mr. Z did not. Mr. X contends that Mr. Y’s actuary report shall be considered in audit
report due to majority of votes. Now, Mr. Z is in dilemma.
You are required to decide the responsibility of auditors Mr. X and Mr. Z, in case, report made by
Mr. Y’s actuary, later on, found faulty.
Answer
Using the work of an Auditor’s Expert: As per SA 620 “Using the Work of an Auditor’s Expert”, the expertise
of an expert may be required in the actuarial calculation of liabilities associated with insurance contracts
or employee benefit plans etc., however, the auditor has sole responsibility for the audit opinion
expressed, and that responsibility is not reduced by the auditor’s use of the work of an auditor’s expert.
consistency with other audit evidence as per SA 500.
120

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
Further, in view of SA 620, if the expert’s work involves use of significant assumptions and
methods, then the relevance and reasonableness of those assumptions and methods must be
ensured by the auditor and if the expert’s work involves the use of source data that is significant
to that expert’s work, the relevance, completeness, and accuracy of that source data in the
circumstances must be verified by the auditor.
In the instant case, Mr. A, Mr. B and Miss C, jointly appointed as an auditor of PRS Ltd., referred
their own known Actuaries for valuation of gratuity scheme. Actuaries are an auditor’s expert as
per SA 620. Mr. B’s referred actuary has provided the gratuity valuation report, which later on
found faulty. Further, Miss C being not agreed with Mr. B’s report, submitted separate audit
report specifically for such gratuity valuation.
In such situation, it was duty of Mr. A, Mr. B and Miss C, before using the gratuity valuation report
of Actuary, to ensure the relevance and reasonableness of assumptions and methods used.
They were also required to examine the relevance, completeness and accuracy of source data used
for such report before expressing their opinion.
Mr. A and Mr. B will be held responsible for grossly negligence and using such faulty report
without examining the adequacy of expert actuary’s work whereas Miss C will not be held liable
for the same due to separate opinion expressed by her.
120. RTP May 2019 Qn no 12(b), MTP-OCT-18 Qn No 2(d) 4 Marks: MTP-Mar 2019 Qn No 6(c) 5
Marks:
X Ltd had a net worth of INR 1300 crores because of which Ind AS became applicable to them.
The company had various derivative contracts – options, forward contracts, interest rate swaps
etc. which were required to be fair valued for which company got the fair valuation done through
an external third party. The statutory auditors of the company involved an auditor’s expert to
audit valuation of derivatives. Auditor and auditor’s expert were new to each other i.e. they were
working for the first time together but developed a good bonding during the course of the
audit. The auditor did not enter into any formal agreement with the auditor’s expert. Please
advise.
Answer
As per SA 620, Using the work of an Auditor’s Expert, the nature, scope and objectives of the
auditor’s expert’s work may vary considerably with the circumstances, as may the respective roles
and responsibilities of the auditor and the auditor’s expert, and the nature, timing and extent of
communication between the auditor and the auditor’s expert. It is therefore required that these
matters are agreed between the auditor and the auditor’s expert.
In certain situations, the need for a detailed agreement in writing is required like -
• The auditor’s expert will have access to sensitive or confidential entity information.
• The matter to which the auditor’s expert’s work relates is highly complex.
• The auditor has not previously used work performed by that expert.
• The greater the extent of the auditor’s expert’s work, and its significance in the
121

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
context of the audit.
In the given case, considering the complexity involved in the valuation and volume of derivatives
and also due to the fact that the auditor and auditor’s expert were new to each other, auditor should
have signed a formal agreement/ engagement letter with the auditor’s expert in respect of the
work assigned to him.
121. Nov 18 Qn no.2(d) 5 Marks

State what may be the evaluative or review procedures that the Statutory Auditor may do before
concluding as to relevance and reasonableness of Auditor's Expert work for using it for his
audit purposes.
May 2019 Qn no 2(a) 5 Marks
CA Dabu has been appointed as an auditor of M/s MAP Technocraft Ltd. to conduct statutory
audit. While conducting audit, he came across some difficulties which the management could
not explain to him properly and, therefore, he decided to take
services of Mr. Jay, an engineering consultant. Mr. Jay performed his work and submitted
details to CA Dabu. State the specific procedure which CA Dabu should follow to evaluate the
adequacy of work performed by Mr. Jay.
Answer
Evaluating the Adequacy of the Auditor’s Expert’s Work: As per SA 620 on “Using the Work of an
Auditor’s Expert”, specific procedures to evaluate the adequacy of the auditor’s expert’s work for
the auditor’s purposes may include:
• Inquiries of the auditor’s expert.
• Reviewing the auditor’s expert’s working papers and reports.
• Corroborative procedures, such as:
o Observing the auditor’s expert’s work;
o Examining published data, such as statistical reports from reputable, authoritative sources;
o Confirming relevant matters with third parties;
o Performing detailed analytical procedures; and
o Re-performing calculations.
• Discussion with another expert with relevant expertise when, for example, the findings
or conclusions of the auditor’s expert are not consistent with other audit evidence.
• Discussing the auditor’s expert’s report with management.

122

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
Therefore, as per SA 620 on “Using the Work of an Auditor’s Expert”, the auditor shall evaluate the
adequacy of the auditor’s expert’s work for the auditor’s purposes, including:
(i) The relevance and reasonableness of that expert’s findings or conclusions, and their consistency
with other audit evidence;
reasonableness of those assumptions and methods in the circumstances; and
(iii) If that expert’s work involves the use of source data that is significant to that expert’s work, the
relevance, completeness, and accuracy of that source data.
If the auditor determines that the work of the auditor’s expert is not adequate for the auditor’s
purposes, the auditor shall:
(i) Agree with that expert on the nature and extent of further work to be performed by that expert;
or
(ii) Perform further audit procedures appropriate to the circumstances.
122. MTP-Apr-19 Qn No 1(c) 4 Marks:

O Ltd. is in the business of manufacturing of steel. The manufacturing process requires raw
material as iron ore for which large stock was maintained by the company at year end – 31
March 2019. The nature of raw material is such that its physical verification requires
involvement of an expert. Management hired their expert for stock take and auditors also
involved auditor’s expert for the stock take.
The auditor observed that the work of the auditor’s expert was not adequate for auditor’s
purposes and the auditor could not resolve the matter through additional audit procedures which
included further work performed by both the auditor’s expert and the auditor.
Basis above, the auditor concluded that it would be necessary to express a modified opinion in
the auditor’s report because the auditor has not obtained sufficient appropriate audit evidence.
However, the auditor issued a clean report and included the name of the expert in his report to
reduce his responsibility for the audit opinion. Comment.
Answer:
As per SA 620, Using the work of an Auditor’s Expert, if the auditor concludes that the work of
the auditor’s expert is not adequate for the auditor’s purposes and the auditor cannot resolve the
matter through the additional audit, which may involve further work being performed by both the
expert and the auditor, or include employing or engaging another expert, it may be necessary to
express a modified opinion in the auditor’s report in accordance with SA 705 because the auditor
has not obtained sufficient appropriate audit evidence
In addition, the auditor shall not refer to the work of an auditor’s expert in an auditor’s report
containing an unmodified opinion unless required by law or regulation to do so. If such reference
is required by law or regulation, the auditor shall indicate in the auditor’s report that the reference
does not reduce the auditor’s responsibility for the audit opinion.
123

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
If the auditor makes reference to the work of an auditor’s expert in the auditor’s report because
such reference is relevant to an understanding of a modification to the auditor’s opinion, the
auditor shall indicate in the auditor’s report that such reference does not reduce the auditor’s
responsibility for that opinion.
In the given case, the auditor cannot reduce his responsibility by referring the name of auditor’s
expert and thereby issuing a clean report. Auditor should have issued a modified report and could
have given reference to the work of an auditor’s expert in that report if such reference was
relevant to understanding of a modification to the auditor’s opinion but even in that case the auditor
should have indicated in his report that such reference of auditor’s expert does not reduce his
responsibility for that opinion.
123. Rajul Ltd had a net worth of INR 2500 crores because of which Ind AS became applicable to them.
The company had various derivative contracts – options, forward contracts, interest rate swaps etc.
which were required to be fair valued for which company got the fair valuation done through an external
third party. The statutory auditors of the company involved an auditor’s expert to audit valuation of
derivatives. Auditor and auditor’s expert were new to each other i.e., they were working for the first
time together but developed a good bonding during the course of the audit. The auditor did not enter
into any formal agreement with the auditor’s expert. Please advise. (5 Marks) (mtp – I -july 2021)
ANSWER
As per SA 620, Using the work of an Auditor’s Expert, the nature, scope and objectives of the auditor’s
expert’s work may vary considerably with the circumstances, as may the respective roles and
responsibilities of the auditor and the auditor’s expert, and the nature, timing and extent of
communication between the auditor and the auditor’s expert. It is therefore required that these matters
are agreed between the auditor and the auditor’s expert.
In certain situations, the need for a detailed agreement in writing is required like -
• The auditor’s expert will have access to sensitive or confidential entity information.
• The matter to which the auditor’s expert’s work relates is highly complex.
• The auditor has not previously used work performed by that expert.
• The greater the extent of the auditor’s expert’s work, and its significance in the context of the audit.
In the given case, considering the complexity involved in the valuation and volume of derivatives and also
due to the fact that the auditor and auditor’s expert were new to each other, auditor should have signed a
formal agreement/ engagement letter with the auditor’s expert in respect of the work assigned to him
123A(SEPT2022 MTP)
While auditing the complete set of consolidated financial statements of Moksh Ltd., a listed
company, using a fair presentation framework, XYZ & Co., a Chartered Accountant firm, discovered
that the consolidated financial statements are materially misstated due to the non-consolidation of
one of the subsidiary. The material misstatement is deemed to be pervasive to the consolidated
financial statements. The effects of the misstatement on the consolidated financial statements
could not be determined because it was not practicable to do so. Thus, XYZ & Co. decided to provide
an adverse opinion for the same and further determined that, there are no key audit matters other
than the matter to be described in the Basis for Adverse Opinion section. Comment whether XYZ &
Co. needs to report under SA 701 ‘Communicating Key Audit Matters in the Independent Auditor’s
Report’?
124

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
ANSWER :
SA 700 establishes requirements and provides guidance on forming an opinion on the financial
statements. Communicating key audit matters is not a substitute for disclosures in the financial
statements that the applicable financial reporting framework requires management to make, or
that are otherwise necessary to achieve fair presentation. SA 705, “Modifications to the Opinion in
the Independent Auditor’s Report”, addresses circumstances in which the auditor concludes that
there is a material misstatement relating to the appropriateness or adequacy of disclosures in the
financial statements.
When the auditor expresses a qualified or adverse opinion in accordance with SA 705, presenting
the description of a matter giving rise to a modified opinion in the Basis for Qualified (Adverse)
Opinion section helps to promote intended users’ understanding and to identify such circumstances
when they occur. Separating the communication of this matter from other key audit matters
described in the Key Audit Matters section, therefore, gives it the appropriate prominence in the
auditor’s report.
Further, when the auditor expresses a qualified or adverse opinion, communicating other key audit
matters would still be relevant to enhancing intended users’ understanding of the audit, and
therefore the requirements to determine key audit matters apply. However, as an adverse opinion
is expressed in circumstances when the auditor has concluded that misstatements, individually or
in the aggregate, are both material and pervasive to the financial statements depending on the
significance of the matter(s) giving rise to an adverse opinion, the auditor may determine that no
other matters are key audit matters.
In the given situation Moksh Ltd., a listed company, has not consolidated one of its subsidiary.
Further, Consolidated Financial Statements of Moksh Ltd. Are materially misstated due to such non-
consolidation. The material misstatement is also deemed to be material and pervasive and effect of
the failure to consolidate have not been determined. In the given situation it is appropriate to give
Adverse Opinion by XYZ & Co., a Chartered Accountant Firm.
Since, in the given case, Adverse Opinion is being expressed thus XYZ & Co. can communicate Key
Audit Matter in given below manner:
Key Audit Matters: Except for the matter described in the Basis for Adverse Opinion section, we
have determined that there are no other key audit matters to communicate in our report.
123B (SEPT 2022 MTP)

“What constitutes a ‘true and fair view’ is the matter of an auditor’s judgement in particular
circumstances of a case.” Do you agree? Enlist the requirements you as an auditor will observe to
ensure true and fair view.
ANSWER :
(b) Significance of True and Fair: SA 700 “Forming an Opinion and Reporting on Financial
Statements”, requires the auditor to form an opinion on the financial statements based on an
evaluation of the conclusions drawn from the audit evidence obtained; and express clearly that
opinion through a written report that also describes the basis for the opinion. The auditor is
required to express his opinion on the financial statements that it gives a true and fair view in
conformity with the accounting principles generally accepted in India (a) in the case of the Balance
125

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
Sheet, of the state of affairs of the Company as at March 31, 20XX; (b) in the case of the Statement
of Profit and Loss, of the profit/ loss for the year ended on that date; and (c) in the case of the Cash
Flow Statement, of the cash flows for the year ended on that date.
In the context of audit of a company, the accounts of a company shall be deemed as not disclosing
a true and fair view, if they do not disclose any matters which are required to be disclosed by virtue
of provisions of Schedule III to that Act, or by virtue of a notification or an order of the Central
Government modifying the disclosure requirements. Therefore, the auditor will have to see that the
accounts are drawn up in conformity with the provisions of Schedule III of the Companies Act, 2013
and whether they contain all the matters required to be disclosed therein. In case of companies
which are governed by special Acts, the auditor should see whether the disclosure requirements of
the governing Act are complied with.
It must be noted that the disclosure requirements laid down by the law are the minimum
requirements. If certain information is vital for presenting a true and fair view, the accounts should
disclose it even though there may not be a specific legal provision to do so. Thus, what constitutes
a ‘true and fair’ view is the matter of an auditor’s judgment in the particular circumstances of a case.
In more specific terms, to ensure true and fair view, an auditor has to see:
(i) that the assets are neither undervalued or overvalued, according to the applicable accounting
principles,
(ii) no material asset is omitted;
(iii) the charge, if any, on assets are disclosed;
(iv) material liabilities should not be omitted;
(v) the statement of profit and loss discloses all the matters required to be disclosed by Part II of
Schedule III
(vi) the balance sheet has been prepared in accordance with Part I of Schedule III;
(vi) accounting policies have been followed consistently; and
(vii) all unusual, exceptional or non-recurring items have been disclosed separately.
SA –701 Communicating Key audit matters in the independent

auditor’s report
124. MTP Apr 2019 QN no 1
While auditing the complete set of consolidated financial statements of Tulips Ltd., a listed
company, using a fair presentation framework, M/s Pintu & Co., a Chartered Accountant firm,
discovered that the consolidated financial statements are materially misstated due to the non-
consolidation of a subsidiary. The material misstatement is deemed to be pervasive to the
consolidated financial statements. The effects of the misstatement on the consolidated
financial statements have not been determined because it was not practicable to do so.
Thus, M/s Pintu & Co. decided to provide an adverse opinion for the same and further
determined that, there are no key audit matters other than the matter to be described in the
126

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
Basis for Adverse Opinion section. Comment whether M/s Pintu & Co. needs to report under
SA 701 ‘Communicating Key Audit Matters in the Independent Auditor’s Report’?
(e) M/s Pintu & Co. have the option to follow SA 701, thus, need not to report any key audit matters.
(f) SA 701 is mandatory in the case of audit of listed entities, however, as there are no key audit
matters other than the matter to be described in the Basis for Adverse Opinion section, no ‘Key
Audit Matters’ para needs to be stated under audit report.
(g) SA 701 is mandatory in the case of audit of listed entities, however, as there are no key audit
matters other than the matter to be described in the Basis for Adverse Opinion section, M/s
Pintu & Co. shall state, under ‘Key Audit Matters’ para, that ‘except for the matter described in
the Basis for Adverse Opinion section, we have determined that there are no other key audit
matters to communicate in our report.’
(h) M/s Pintu & Co. is under compulsion to follow SA 701 as the audit is of a listed company and shall
report under ‘Key Audit Matters’ para the matter same as stated in ‘Adverse Opinion’ para
regarding non- consolidation of a subsidiary.
Answer: Option C SA 701 is mandatory in the case of audit of listed entities, however, as there are
no key audit matters other than the matter to be described in the Basis for Adverse Opinion
section, M/s Pintu & Co. shall state, under ‘Key Audit Matters’ para, that ‘except for the matter
described in the Basis for Adverse Opinion section, we have determined that there are no other
key audit matters to communicate in our report.’
125. RTP Nov’2020 Q No 12

Before concluding the audit, there was a difference of opinion between the audit committee
and the auditors as to which among the following are the areas which the auditor should take
into account to determine “Key Audit Matter” as per SA 701:
(I) The effect on audit of significant transactions that took place in the FY.
(II) Areas of high risk as assessed and reported by management’s expert.
(III) Significant auditor judgement relating to areas in the financials that involved significant
management judgement.
As per SA 701- Communicating Key audit matters in the Independent auditor’s Report, which
among the above-mentioned areas should CA & Co. take into account to determine “Key Audit
Matter”?
(a) (I) & (III)
(b) (II) only
(c) (I) & (II)
(d) (I), (II) & (III)
Answer: a) (I) & (III)
127

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
MAY 2018- 1(a) -5 Marks, (mtp- nov 2019)
126. Toddle Limited had definite plan of its business being closed within a short period from
the close of the accounting year ended on 31st March, 2017. The Financial Statements for the
year ended 31/03/2017 had been prepared on the same basis as it had been in earlier periods
with an additional note that the business of the Company shall cease in near future and the
assets shall be disposed off in accordance with a plan of disposal as decided by the
Management. The Statutory Auditors of the Company indicated this aspect in Key Audit
Matters only by a reference as to a possible cessation of business and making of adjustments,
if any, thereto to be made at the time of cessation only. Comment on the reporting by the
Statutory Auditor as above.
Answer:
Closure of Business: As per SA 570 “Going Concern”, management intentions to liquidate the
entity or to cease operations is one of the event or condition that may cast significant doubt on
the entity’s ability to continue as going concern.
As per SA 570, if events or conditions have been identified that may cast significant doubt on the
entity’s ability to continue as a going concern but, based on the audit evidence obtained the
auditor concludes that no material uncertainty exists, the auditor shall evaluate whether, in view
of the requirements of the applicable financial reporting framework, the financial statements
provide adequate disclosures about these events or conditions.
Even when no material uncertainty exists, it requires the auditor to evaluate whether, in view of
the requirements of the applicable financial reporting framework, the financial statements
provide adequate disclosure about events or conditions that may cast significant doubt on the
entity’s ability to continue as a going concern.
Further, as per SA 701 “Communicating Key Audit Matters in the Independent Auditor’s Report”,
when matters relating to going concern may be determined to be key audit matters, and
explains that a material uncertainty related to events or conditions that may cast significant
doubt on the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern is, by its nature, a key audit matter.
SA 701 also emphasises on auditor’s responsibility to communicate key audit matters in the
auditor’s report.
As per the facts given in the case, intention of the Toddle Limited had definite plan of its business
being closed down within short period from 31 March, 2017. However, financial statements for
the year ended 31.03.2017 had been prepared on the same basis as it had been in earlier periods
with an additional note.
Thus, management intentions to liquidate the entity or to cease operations is one of the event
or condition that may cast significant doubt on the entity’s ability to continue as going concern is
a key audit matter. Therefore, the auditor is required to Communicate the Key Audit Matters in
accordance with SA 570 in above stated manner. Simple reference as to a possible cessation of
business and making of adjustments, if any, be made at the time of cessation only by the
auditor in his report is not sufficient.
128

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
127. RTP May 2018 Qn no. 20(d)

Key Audit Matters and Circumstances in Which a Matter Determined to Be a Key Audit Matter Is Not
Communicated in the Auditor’s Report.
Answer
Key Audit Matters— As per SA 701, “Communicating Key Audit Matters in the Independent
Auditor’s Report (New)”, those matters that, in the auditor’s professional judgment, were of
most significance in the audit of the financial statements of the current period. Key audit matters
are selected from matters
communicated with those charged with governance.

Circumstances in Which a Matter Determined to Be a Key Audit Matter Is Not Communicated in
the Auditor’s Report: The auditor shall describe each key audit matter in the auditor’s report unless:
(i) Law or regulation precludes public disclosure about the matter; or

(ii) In extremely rare circumstances, the auditor determines that the matter should not be
communicated in the auditor’s report because the adverse consequences of doing so would
reasonably be expected to outweigh the public interest benefits of such communication. This shall
not apply if the entity has publicly disclosed information about the matter.
128. MTP Apr 18 Qn no 6(a) 4 Marks
“The auditor shall determine, from the matters communicated with those charged with
governance, those matters that required significant auditor attention in performing the audit.
In making this determination, the auditor shall take into account the key factors”. You are
required to define key audit matters and briefly discuss the factors determining the key audit
matters.
Answer
Definition of Key Audit Matters : SA 701 “Communicating Key Audit Matters in the Independent
Auditor’s Report”, define Key audit matters as matters that, in the auditor’s professional
judgment, were of most significance in the audit of the financial statements of the current period.
Key audit matters are selected from matters communicated with those charged with governance.
Factors determining Key Audit Matters: As per SA 701 the auditor shall determine, from the
matters communicated with those charged with governance, those matters that required significant
auditor attention in performing the audit. In making this determination, the auditor shall take into
account the following:
(i) Areas of higher assessed risk of material misstatement, or significant risks identified in accordance
with SA 315 Identifying and Assessing the Risks of Material Misstatement through Understanding
the Entity and Its Environment.
(ii) Significant auditor judgments relating to areas in the financial statements that involved significant
management judgment, including accounting estimates that have been identified as having high
estimation uncertainty.
The effect on the audit of significant events or transactions that occurred during the period.
129. RTP Nov 18 Qn no 20(a)
129

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
Write a short note on the purpose of communicating key audit matters.

Answer
Purpose of Communicating Key Audit Matters: The purpose of communicating key audit matters
is to enhance the communicative value of the auditor’s report by providing greater transparency
about the audit that was performed. Communicating key audit matters provides additional
information to intended users of the financial statements (“intended users”) to assist them in
understanding those matters that, in the auditor’s professional judgment, were of most
significance in the audit of the financial statements of the current period.
Communicating key audit matters may also assist intended users in understanding the entity and
areas of significant management judgment in the audited financial statements.
130. MTP-Oct-19 Qn No 1(c) 4 Marks:

AKY Ltd. is a listed company engaged in the business of software and is one of the largest company
operating in this sector in India. The company’s annual turnover is Rs. 40,000 crores with profits
of Rs. 5,000 crores. Due to the nature of the business and the size of the company, the operations
of the company are spread out in India as well as outside India. The company’s contracts with its
various customers are quite complicated and different. During the course of the audit, the audit
team spends significant time on audit of revenue – be it planning, execution or conclusion. This
matter was also discussed with management at various stages of audit. The efforts towards audit
of revenue also involve significant involvement of senior members of the audit team including the
audit partner.
After completion of audit for the year ended 31 March 2019, the audit partner was discussing
significant matters with the management wherein they also communicated to the management
that he plans to include revenue recognition as key audit matter in his audit report. The
management did not agree with revenue recognition to be shown as key audit matter in the audit
report. Comment.
Answer:
Determining Key Audit Matters: SA 701, “Communicating Key Audit Matters in the
Independent Auditor’s Report”, deals with the auditor’s responsibility to communicate key audit
matters in the auditor’s report. It is intended to address both the auditor’s judgment as to what to
communicate in the auditor’s report and the form and content of such communication.
The auditor shall determine, from the matters communicated with those charged with governance,
those matters that required significant auditor attention in performing the audit. In making this
determination, the auditor shall take into account the following:
(i) Areas of higher assessed risk of material misstatement, or significant risks identified in accordance
with SA 315 Identifying and Assessing the Risks of Material Misstatement through Understanding
the Entity and Its Environment.
management judgment, including accounting estimates that have been identified as having high
estimation uncertainty.
(iii) The effect on the audit of significant events or transactions that occurred during the period.
130

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
The auditor shall determine which of the matters determined in accordance with above were of
most significance in the audit of the financial statements of the current period and therefore are
the key audit matters.
In the instant case, AKY Ltd., a listed company engaged in the business of software and its contracts
with its various customers are also quite complicated and different. Further, the audit team
spends significant time on audit of revenue and efforts towards audit of revenue also involve
significant involvement of senior members of the audit team including audit partner during audit.
This matter was also discussed with management at various stages. After completion of audit, the
audit partner communicated the management regarding inclusion of paragraph on revenue
recognition as key audit matter in his audit report.
In view of SA 701, the assessment of the auditor is valid as above matter qualifies to be a key audit
matter in the opinion of auditor. Hence, it should be reported accordingly by the auditor in his audit
report.
130A(APRIL 2022 MTP)

As per SA 701- Communicating Key audit matters in the Independent auditor’s Report, which among
the following areas should CA & Co. take into account to determine “Key Audit Matter”?
(i) The effect on audit of significant transactions that took place in the financial year.
(ii) Areas of high risk as assessed and reported by management’s expert.
(iii) Significant auditor judgement relating to areas in the financials that involved significant
management judgement.
(a) (i) & (ii)
(b) (ii) only
(c) (i) & (iii)
(d) (i), (ii) & (iii)
ANSWER : ( C )
SA 705 – Modifications to the opinion in the independent auditor’s

report.
MTP Apr 2019 QN no 11 (2 Marks)
131. BC Ltd. is the business of manpower consulting. The company has a huge cash and bank balance
including fixed deposits with banks. During the course of audit of the financial statements of the
company for the year ended 31 March 2017, auditors circulated independent bank balance
confirmations. The auditors received all the balance (covering fixed deposits) confirmations
independently. Auditors observed that the fixed deposits balances as per the independent
balance confirmation did not match with the books balances in some cases. Management
produced the fixed deposit certificates to the auditors wherein the balances of fixed assets
matched with the balances as per the books. How should the auditor deal with this matter?
131

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
(a) Auditor should qualify the audit report in respect of differences in book balances of fixed
deposits vis a vis independent balance confirmations.
(b) Auditor should consider the fixed deposit certificates produced by the management and basis
that any differences in book balances of fixed deposits vis a vis independent balance
confirmations should be ignored.
(c) Auditor should consider the documentation provided by the management i.e. the fixed deposit
certificates, however, independent balance confirmations is also required to be considered by the
auditor which shows various difference. The auditor should obtain balance confirmations again.
(d) Auditor should consider the documentation provided by the management i.e. the fixed deposit
certificates, however, independent balance confirmations is also required to be considered by the
auditor which shows various difference. The auditor should look to perform alternate
procedures and basis that the matter should be looked at.
Answer: (d) Auditor should consider the documentation provided by the management i.e. the fixed
deposit certificates, however, independent balance confirmations is also required to be considered
by the auditor which shows various difference. The auditor should look to perform alternate
procedures and basis that the matter should be looked at.
MTP Apr 2019 QN no 12 ( 2 Marks)

132. SBC Private Limited appointed Mr. Vijay, Chartered Accountant as auditor of the company
for the year 2017-18. While verifying the accounts Mr. Vijay noticed that the company has neither
made any provision for accrued gratuity liability nor obtained the actuarial valuation thereon.
Mr. Vijay obtained the actuarial valuation and includes the matter in his Audit Report to the
Company’s Board of Directors mentioning the amount of accrued liability not provided for. The
Board agreed with the auditor’s observation and the amount of liability quantified by him. But
the auditor didn’t disclose the same in his audit report to Member’s. One of the members raised
an objection on the audit report stating that it does not represent a true and fair view as even
though the company has not maintained proper books of accounts as per accounting standards,
the auditor has not qualified his report. Whether the auditor is require to give a qualified opinion
in his report to members on non-provision of gratuity in company’s accounts when the same has
already been included in the report to Company’s Board of Directors?
a) As the auditor has already disclosed the matter of non-provisioning in his report to Company’s
Board of Directors, there is no need to disclose the same in report to Member’s u/s 143 of the
Companies Act, 2013.
b) Non-provisioning for accruing gratuity is in contravention to applicable Accounting Standard
(AS-15), therefore the auditor should qualify his report to members through a paragraph on
failure of management to quantify the amount of liability.
c) The auditor should revise the accounts as per the actuarial valuation obtained by him and the
revised accounts only should be presented before the Board of Directors and Members. The
auditor is not required to qualify his report.
d) U/s 143 of the Companies Act, 2013, the auditor should qualify his report to members only
when the matter reported by the auditor is answered in the negative or with a qualification by
the Board. In the above case the board agreed with the auditor’s observation so he need not
132

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
qualify his report.

Answer: (d) U/s 143 of the Companies Act, 2013, the auditor should qualify his report to members
only when the matter reported by the auditor is answered in the negative or with a qualification
by the Board. In the above case the board agreed with the auditor’s observation so he need not
qualify his report.
MTP Apr 2019 Qn no 13 (2 Marks)
133. AHKPL Ltd. is an unlisted company in the business of the real estate following Accounting
Standards. The company recognizes revenue on the basis of percentage completion as per AS
7. The company has various residential and commercial projects at different locations for which
separate profitability statements are prepared by the management. Profitability statements are
based on estimated costs of the projects. While reviewing the profitability statements, statutory
auditors observed that the profitability of the projects have been fluctuating significantly year on
year and the prime reason for that is the change in the estimated costs. As per the auditors,
frequent changes are made by the management in the estimated costs to increase the
percentage completion and through which revenue and profit numbers are manipulated. The
auditors are not satisfied with the profitability statements of two major projects which account
for 50% of the total turnover of the company. Management tried to explain the auditors saying
that the changes would happen because of the dynamics of the industry which have been
changing significantly and are unfavourable to the industry as a whole. All of this is leading to
changes in the estimated costs. How should the auditors deal with this matter?
a. Management’s view seems reasonable. Estimated costs are only estimates which are subject to
changes and hence the auditors should drop this matter.
b. The auditors view seems reasonable and if the management does not agree, the auditors should
issue qualified report.
c. The auditors should consider the impact of the adjustment on the financial statements and if the
impact is pervasive, the auditor should issue adverse opinion.
d. The auditors should consider the impact of the adjustment on the financial statements and may
take the adjustment to unadjusted entry in the management representation letter and basis that
issue a clean report.
Answer: (c) The auditors should consider the impact of the adjustment on the financial statements
and if the impact is pervasive, the auditor should issue adverse opinion.

134. OPP & Co LLP is the statutory auditor of ABBA Private Limited. The company has an annual
turnover of INR 1000 crores and profits of INR 250 crores. The company is planning to get listed
next year. The company appointed OPP & CO LLP as new auditors to have a fresh look on their
financial systems so that the financial reporting can be improved wherever required.
During the course of audit, the auditors have been facing lot of challenges to obtain sufficient
appropriate audit evidence and have discussed the same with the management. Now the
auditors are determining the implications. Please suggest which one of the following should
not be the implication in respect of this matter.
133

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
(a) If the auditor concludes that the possible effects on the financial statements of undetected
misstatements, if any, could be material but not pervasive, the auditor shall qualify the opinion.
(b) If the auditor concludes that the possible effects on the financial statements of undetected
misstatements, if any, could be both material and pervasive so that a qualification of the opinion
would be inadequate to communicate the gravity of the situation, the auditor shall withdraw
from the audit, where practicable and possible under applicable law or regulation.
(c) If the auditor concludes that the possible effects on the financial statements of undetected
from the audit, where practicable and possible under applicable law or regulation. If withdrawal
from the audit before issuing the auditor’s report is not practicable or possible, disclaim an
opinion on the financial statements.
(d) If the auditor concludes that the possible effects on the financial statements of undetected
from the audit, where practicable and possible under applicable law or regulation. If withdrawal
from the audit before issuing the auditor’s report is not practicable or possible, report the matter
to the Registrar of Companies.
Answer: (d) If the auditor concludes that the possible effects on the financial statements of
undetected misstatements, if any, could be both material and pervasive so that a qualification of
the opinion would be inadequate to communicate the gravity of the situation, the auditor shall
withdraw from the audit, where practicable and possible under applicable law or regulation. If
withdrawal from the audit before issuing the auditor’s report is not practicable or possible, report
the matter to the Registrar of Companies.
MTP Oct 2019 Qn no 16 (2 Marks)

135. While conducting the current year audit of Finco Ltd, the auditor obtains audit evidence that
a material misstatement exists in the prior period financial statements. This misstatement was
related to recognition of research and development expenditure. The provisions of Ind AS 38
Intangible Assets relating to capitalisation of development expenditure was not applied properly.
On this, unmodified opinion had been previously issued. The current auditor verified that the
misstatement had not been dealt with as required under Ind AS 8 Accounting Policies, Changes
in Accounting Estimates and Errors. Accordingly, the current auditor will:
(e) Express a qualified or an adverse opinion in the auditor’s report on the current period financial
statements modified with respect to the corresponding figures included therein.
(f) Express an unmodified opinion in the auditor’s report on the current period financial statements
since it was related to the prior year.
(g) Express a qualified opinion in the auditor’s report on the current period financial statements,
modified with respect to the corresponding figures included therein.
(h) Express an adverse opinion in the auditor’s report on the current period financial statements,
(i) Answer: (a) Express a qualified or an adverse opinion in the auditor’s report on the current period financial
134

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
136 MTP Mar 2018 MTP 1 (c) 5 Marks
As an auditor of ABC Limited, in view of given circumstances, you are required to draft
disclaimer of opinion and basis for disclaimer of opinion due to the Auditor’s Inability to Obtain
Sufficient Appropriate Audit Evidence about Multiple Elements of the Financial Statement.
• Audit of a complete set of financial statements of an entity other than a company incorporated
under the Companies Act, 2013, using a fair presentation framework. The audit is not a group
audit (i.e., SA 600, does not apply).
• The financial statements are prepared by management of the entity in accordance with the
Accounting Standards issued by the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India (a general
purpose framework).
• The terms of the audit engagement reflect the description of management’s responsibility for
the financial statements in SA 210.
• The auditor was unable to obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence about multiple
elements of the financial statements, that is, the auditor was also unable to obtain audit
evidence about the entity’s inventories and accounts receivable. The possible effects of this
inability to obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence are deemed to be both material and
pervasive to the financial statements.
• The relevant ethical requirements that apply to the audit are ICAI’s Code of Ethics and
applicable law/regulation
• Those responsible for oversight of the financial statements differ from those responsible for
the preparation of the financial statements.
• A more limited description of the auditor’s responsibilities section is required.
• In addition to the audit of the financial statements, the auditor has other reporting
responsibilities required under relevant law/ regulation.
Answer
Disclaimer of Opinion: We were engaged to audit the financial statements of ABC & Associates (“the
entity”), which comprise the balance sheet as at March 31, 20XX, the statement of Profit and Loss, (the
statement of changes in equity)(where applicable) and statement of cash flows for the year then ended,
and notes to the financial statements, including a summary of significant accounting policies.
We do not express an opinion on the accompanying financial statements of the entity. Because
of the significance of the matters described in the Basis for Disclaimer of Opinion section of our
report, we have not been able to obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence to provide a basis
for an audit opinion on these financial statements.
Basis for Disclaimer of Opinion
We were not appointed as auditors of the Company until after March 31, 20X1 and thus did not
observe the counting of physical inventories at the beginning and end of the year. We were
unable to satisfy ourselves by alternative means concerning the inventory quantities held at
March 31, 20X0 and 20X1, which are stated in the Balance Sheets at Rs. xxx and Rs. xxx,
135

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
respectively. In addition, the introduction of a new computerized accounts receivable system in

September 20X1 resulted in numerous errors in accounts receivable. As of the date of our report,
management was still in the process of rectifying the system deficiencies and correcting the
errors. We were unable to confirm or verify by alternative means accounts receivable included
in the Balance Sheet at a total amount of Rs. xxx as at March 31, 20X1. As a result of these matters,
we were unable to determine whether any adjustments might have been found necessary in
respect of recorded or unrecorded inventories and accounts receivable, and the elements making
up the statement of Profit and Loss (and statement of cash flows)( Where applicable).
137.Apr 18 MTP 1(C) 5 Marks

As an auditor of XYZ Limited, in view of given circumstances, you are required to draft Adverse
Opinion and basis for adverse opinion due to a Material Misstatement of the Consolidated
Financial Statements.
• Audit of a complete set of consolidated financial statements of a listed company (incorporated
under the Companies Act, 2013) using a fair presentation framework. The audit is a group audit
of an entity with subsidiaries (i.e., SA 600 applies).
• The consolidated financial statements are prepared by management of the entity in accordance
with the Accounting Standards prescribed under section 133 of the Companies Act, 2013 (a
general purpose framework).
the consolidated financial statements in SA 210.
• The consolidated financial statements are materially misstated due to the non-consolidation
of a subsidiary. The material misstatement is deemed to be pervasive to the consolidated
financial statements. The effects of the misstatement on the consolidated financial statements
have not been determined because it was not practicable to do so (i.e., an adverse opinion is
appropriate).
• The relevant ethical requirements that apply to the audit are the ICAI’s Code of Ethics and the
provisions of the Companies Act, 2013.
• Based on the audit evidence obtained, the auditor has concluded that a material uncertainty
does not exist related to events or conditions that may cast significant doubt on the entity’s
ability to continue as a going concern in accordance with SA 570 (Revised).
• SA 701 applies; however, the auditor has determined that there are no key audit matters other
than the matter described in the Basis for Adverse Opinion section.
• Those responsible for oversight of the consolidated financial statements differ from those
responsible for the preparation of the consolidated financial statements.
• In addition to the audit of the consolidated financial statements, the auditor has other
reporting responsibilities required under the Companies Act, 2013.
Adverse Opinion : We have audited the accompanying consolidated financial statements of XYZ
Company Limited (hereinafter referred to as the “Holding Company”) and its subsidiaries (the
Holding Company and its subsidiaries together referred to as “the Group”), its associates and
jointly controlled entities, which comprise the consolidated balance sheet as at March 31, 2XXX,
the consolidated statement of profit and Loss, (consolidated statement of changes in
equity){where applicable} and the consolidated statement of cash flows for the year then ended,
136

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
and notes to the consolidated financial statements, including a summary of significant accounting
policies (hereinafter referred to as the “consolidated financial statements”).
In our opinion and to the best of our information and according to the explanations given to us,
because of the significance of the matter discussed in the Basis for Adverse Opinion section of our
report, the accompanying consolidated financial statements do not give a true and fair view in
conformity with the accounting principles generally accepted in India, of their consolidated state of
affairs of the Group, its associates and jointly controlled entities, as at March 31, 20XX, of its
consolidated profit/loss, (consolidated position of changes in equity) ){where applicable} and the
consolidated cash flows for the year then ended.
Basis for Adverse Opinion
As explained in Note X, the Group has not consolidated subsidiary PQR Company that the Group
acquired during 20XX because it has not yet been able to determine the fair values of certain of
the subsidiary’s material assets and liabilities at the acquisition date. This investment is therefore
accounted for on a cost basis. Under the accounting principles generally accepted in India, the
Group should have consolidated this subsidiary and accounted for the acquisition based on
provisional amounts. Had PQR Company been consolidated, many elements in the accompanying
consolidated financial statements would have been materially affected. The effects on the
consolidated financial statements of the failure to consolidate have not been determined.
We conducted our audit in accordance with Standards on Auditing (SAs) specified under section
143(10) of the Companies Act, 2013. Our responsibilities under those Standards are further
described in the Auditor’s Responsibilities for the Audit of the Consolidated Financial Statements
section of our report. We are independent of the Group, its associates and jointly controlled
entities, in accordance with the Code of Ethics and provisions of the Companies Act, 2013 that are
relevant to our audit of the consolidated financial statements in India under the Companies Act,
2013, and we have fulfilled our other ethical responsibilities in accordance with the Code of Ethics
and the requirements under the Companies act, 2013. We believe that the audit evidence we have
obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our adverse opinion.
138. MTP-Aug-18 Qn No 1(C) 5 Marks:
As an auditor of ABC Limited, in view of given circumstances, you are required to draft
qualified opinion and basis for qualified opinion due to the departure from the applicable
Financial Reporting Framework:
• Audit of a complete set of financial statements of a company other than a listed company
(registered under the Companies Act, 2013) using a fair presentation framework.
• The financial statements are prepared by management of the entity in accordance with the
Accounting Standards prescribed under section 133 of the Companies Act, 2013 (a general-
purpose framework).
the financial statements in SA 210.
137

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
• A departure from the applicable financial reporting framework resulted in a qualified opinion.
• The relevant ethical requirements that apply to the audit are the ICAI’s Code of Ethics and
the provisions of the Companies Act, 2013.
• Based on the audit evidence obtained, the auditor has concluded that a material uncertainty
does not exist related to events or conditions that may cast significant doubt on the entity’s
ability to continue as a going concern in accordance with SA 570 (Revised).
• Between the date of the financial statements and the date of the auditor’s report, there was a
fire in the entity’s production facilities, which was disclosed by the entity as a subsequent event.
In the auditor’s judgment, the matter is of such importance that it is fundamental to users’
understanding of the financial statements. The matter did not require significant auditor
attention in the audit of the financial statements in the current period.
Answer:
Qualified Opinion
We have audited the standalone financial statements of ABC Limited (“the Company”), which
comprise the balance sheet as at March 31, 20X1, and the statement of Profit and Loss, (statement
of changes in equity) and the statement of cash flows for the year then ended, and notes to the
financial statements, including a summary of significant accounting policies and other explanatory
information (in which are included the Returns for the year ended on that date audited by the
branch auditors of the Company’s branches located at (location of branches))2.
except for the effects of the matter described in the Basis for Qualified Opinion section of our report,
the aforesaid financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, or give a true and fair view
in conformity with the accounting principles generally accepted in India of the state of affairs of the
Company as at March 31st, 2XXX and profit/loss, (changes in equity) and its cash flows for the year
ended on that date.
Basis for Qualified Opinion
The Company’s short-term marketable securities are carried in the statement of financial position
at xxx. Management has not marked these securities to market but has instead stated them at
cost, which constitutes a departure from the Accounting Standards prescribed in section 133 of
the Companies Act, 2013. The Company’s records indicate that had management marked the
marketable securities to market, the Company would have recognized an unrealized loss of Rs.xxx
in the statement of comprehensive income for the year. The carrying amount of the securities in
the statement of financial position would have been reduced by the same amount at March 31,
20X1, and income tax, net income and shareholders’ equity would have been reduced by Rs.xxx,
Rs.xxx and Rs.xxx, respectively.
We conducted our audit in accordance with Standards on Auditing (SAs). Our
responsibilities under those standards are further described in the Auditor’s Responsibilities for
the Audit of the Financial Statements section of our report. We are independent of the Company
in accordance with the ethical requirements that are relevant to our audit of the financial
statements under the provisions of the Companies Act, 2013, and we have fulfilled our other
138

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
ethical responsibilities in accordance with these requirements and the ICAI’s Code of Ethics. We
believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis
for our qualified opinion.
The auditor is not required, and has otherwise not decided, to communicate key audit matters
in accordance with SA 701.
• Those responsible for oversight of the financial statements differ from those responsible for the
preparation of the financial statements.
• In addition to the audit of the financial statements, the auditor has other reporting
responsibilities required under the Companies Act, 2013.
139. MTP-Apr-19 Qn No 1(b) 4 Marks:

ADKS & Co LLP are the newly appointed statutory auditors of PKK Ltd. During the course of
audit, the statutory auditors have come across certain significant observations which they
believe could lead to material misstatement of financial statements. Management has a
different view and does not concur with the view of the statutory auditors. Considering this the
statutory auditors are determining as to how to address these observations in terms of their
reporting requirement. Please advise
Answer:
As per SA 705, if the auditor concludes that, based on the audit evidence obtained, the financial
statements as a whole are not free from material misstatement or the auditor is unable to obtain
sufficient appropriate audit evidence to conclude that the financial statements as a whole are free
from material misstatement, the auditor shall modify the opinion in his report.
The auditor in such a case needs to determine the modification as follows:
(i) Qualified Opinion: The auditor shall express a qualified opinion when:
(a) The auditor, having obtained sufficient appropriate audit evidence, concludes that misstatements,
individually or in the aggregate, are material, but not pervasive, to the financial statements; or
(b) The auditor is unable to obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence on which to base the opinion,
but the auditor concludes that the possible effects on the financial statements of undetected
misstatements, if any, could be material but not pervasive.
(ii) Adverse Opinion: The auditor shall express an adverse opinion when the auditor, having obtained
sufficient appropriate audit evidence, concludes that misstatements, individually or in the
aggregate, are both material and pervasive to the financial statements
(iii) Disclaimer of Opinion: The auditor shall disclaim an opinion when the auditor is unable to obtain
sufficient appropriate audit evidence on which to base the opinion, and the auditor concludes that
the possible effects on the financial statements of undetected misstatements, if any, could be
both material and pervasive. The auditor shall disclaim an opinion when, in extremely rare
circumstances involving multiple uncertainties, the auditor concludes that, notwithstanding having
obtained sufficient appropriate audit evidence regarding each of the individual uncertainties, it is
not possible to form an opinion on the financial statements due to the potential interaction of
139

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
the uncertainties and their possible cumulative effect on the financial statements.
If, after accepting the engagement, the auditor becomes aware that management has imposed
a limitation on the scope of the audit that the auditor considers likely to result in the need to express
a qualified opinion or to disclaim an opinion on the financial statements, the auditor shall request
that management remove the limitation.
If management refuses to remove the limitation, the auditor shall communicate the matter to
those charged with governance, unless all of those charged with governance are involved in
managing the entity, and determine whether it is possible to perform alternative procedures to
obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence.
140. May 2019 Qn no 1(C)4 marks
After accepting the statutory audit of M/s All in One Ltd., a departmental store, you became
aware of the fact that management of the company have imposed certain limitations on the
scope of your assurance function which may adversely affect and result in your inability to
obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence to discharge your responsibility required by the
statute. Indicate the consequences and your response to the limitations imposed by the
management on your scope.
Answer
Consequence of an Inability to Obtain Sufficient Appropriate Audit Evidence Due to a
Management-Imposed Limitation after the Auditor Has Accepted the Engagement: As per SA
705, Modification to the Opinion in the Independent Auditor’s Report”, if, after accepting the
engagement, the auditor becomes aware that management has imposed a limitation on the scope
of the audit that the auditor considers likely to result in the need to express a qualified opinion or
to disclaim an opinion on the financial statements, the auditor shall request that management
remove the limitation.
If management refuses to remove the prescribed limitation, the auditor shall communicate the
matter to those charged with governance, unless all of those charged with governance are involved
in managing the entity and determine whether it is possible to perform alternative procedures to
If the auditor is unable to obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence, the auditor shall determine the
implications as follows:
(i) If the auditor concludes that the possible effects on the financial statements of undetected
misstatements, if any, could be material but not pervasive, the auditor shall qualify the opinion;
or
(ii) If the auditor concludes that the possible effects on the financial statements of undetected
would be inadequate to communicate the gravity of the situation, the auditor shall:
1. Withdraw from the audit, where practicable and possible under applicable law or regulation; or
2. If withdrawal from the audit before issuing the auditor’s report is not practicable or possible,
disclaim an opinion on the financial statements.
140

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
If the auditor withdraws as discussed above, before withdrawing, the auditor shall communicate to
those charged with governance any matters regarding misstatements identified during the audit
that would have given rise to a modification of the opinion.

ALM Associates has been appointed as auditor of M/s Hary Ltd. which acquired 55% shares-in M/s
Sam Ltd. on 15th October, 2018. During audit of Harry Ltd., the auditors found that the company
has not prepared consolidated financial statements because on the date of acquisition the fair
value of certain assets & liabilities has not been ascertained which is significant and are accounted
for on estimated basis only. Help ALM Associates in framing opinion paragraph of audit report.
Answer
Opinion Paragraph of Audit Report: In the instant case, M/s Hary Ltd. acquired 55% shares in M/s
Sam Ltd. and the company did not prepare the consolidated financial statements because on the
date of acquisition the fair value of certain assets and liabilities has not been ascertained. Therefore,
accounting is done on estimate basis only which is not correct as the financial statements are
materially misstated due to non-consolidation of subsidiary. The material misstatement is
deemed to be pervasive to the consolidated financial statements. Thus, the auditor shall express an
adverse opinion when the auditor, having obtained sufficient appropriate audit evidences,
concludes that misstatements, individually or in the aggregate, are both material and pervasive to
Adverse Opinion
In our opinion and to the best of our information and according to the explanations given to
us, because of the significance of the matter discussed in the Basis for Adverse Opinion section of
our report, the accompanying consolidated financial statements do not give a true and fair view
in conformity with the accounting principles generally accepted in India, of their consolidated
state of affairs of the Group, its associates and jointly controlled entities, as at March 31, 2019,
of its consolidated profit/loss, (consolidated position of changes in equity) and the consolidated
cash flows for the year then ended.
Basis for Adverse Opinion is given below:
As explained in Note X, the M/s Hary Ltd. has not consolidated subsidiary M/s Sam Ltd.
that the M/s Hary Ltd acquired during 2018 because it has not yet been able to determine the
fair values of certain of the subsidiary’s material assets and liabilities at the acquisition date. This
investment is therefore accounted for on an estimate basis. Under the accounting principles
generally accepted in India, the Group should have consolidated this subsidiary and accounted for
the acquisition based on provisional amounts. Had M/s Sam Ltd. been consolidated, many
elements in the accompanying consolidated financial statements would have been materially
affected. The effects on the consolidated financial statements of the failure to consolidate have
not been determined.
142. (PAST EXAM NOV 2018)

141

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
A professional accountant is often required to give certificates or report for special purposes
required by various authorities and statute and he needs to take careful evaluation of such
engagement. However, issuing such special purpose certificates or reports has some inherent
limitations which could limit his review and evaluation. Enumerate some of the limitations
associated with such special purpose report or certificates.
ANSWER
Inherent Limitations: A practitioner is expected to provide either a reasonable assurance (about whether
the subject matter of examination is materially misstated) or a limited assurance (stating that nothing has
come to the practitioner’s attention that causes the practitioner to believe that the subject matter is
materially misstated) since it is difficult to reduce engagement risk to zero due to inherent limitations of
the audit. The inherent limitations could arise from:
(i) the nature of financial reporting;
(ii) the use of selective testing;
(iii) the inherent limitations of internal controls;
(iv) the fact that much of the evidence available to the practitioner is persuasive rather than conclusive;
(v) the nature of procedures to be performed in a specific situation;
(vi) the use of professional judgment in gathering and evaluating evidence and forming conclusions based
on that evidence;
(vii) in some cases, the characteristics of the underlying subject matter when evaluated or measured
against the criteria; and
(viii) the need for the engagement to be conducted within a reasonable period of time and at a reasonable
cost.
Therefore, whenever a practitioner is required to give a “certificate” or a “report” for special purpose, the
practitioner needs to undertake a careful evaluation of the scope of the engagement, i.e., whether the
practitioner would be able to provide reasonable assurance or limited assurance on the subject matter.
143. While verifying the salary expense of employees, the auditor has been asked to rely on the values as
per SAP software and some hard copy reports and documents as the HRMS package (source software)
has become corrupt during the year and the management is not having any data backup. How should the
auditor deal with this issue? (mtp – II -july 2021)
(a) The auditor should issue a disclaimer of opinion as records are destroyed and he is unable to obtain
sufficient appropriate audit evidence.
(b) The auditor should perform alternative procedures to obtain sufficient and appropriate audit
evidence before disclaiming the opinion.
142

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
(c) The auditor should issue an adverse opinion stating that it is deficiency in internal controls.
(d) The auditor can rely on the SAP data and there is no need for qualification of report.
ANSWER- b
Q144A (NOV 2021 EXAM)

CA Madhu is the statutory auditor of Lakshmi Ltd. for the Financial year 2020 -21. In respect of
loans and advances of Rs. 75 Lakh given to Srinian Pvt. Ltd., the Company has not furnished any
agreement to CA Madhu and in absence of the same, he is unable to verify the terms of
repayment, chargeability of interest and other terms.
Justify the type of opinion which CA Madhu should give in such situation. Also, Draft an
appropriate Opinion paragraph and Basis of opinion paragraph.
ANSWER ;
In the present case, with respect to loans and advances of Rs. 75 Lacs given to Sriman Pvt.
Limited, the Company has not furnished any agreement to CA Madhu. In the absence of such an
agreement, CA Madhu is unable to verify the terms of repayment, chargeability of interest and
other terms. For an auditor, while verifying any loans and advances, one of the most important
audit evidence is the loan agreement. Therefore, the absence of such document in the present
case, tantamount to a material misstatement in the financial statements of the company.
However, the inability of CA Madhu to obtain such audit evidence is though material but not
pervasive so as to require him to give a disclaimer of opinion.
Thus, in the present case, CA Madhu should give a qualified opinion
The relevant extract of the Qualified Opinion Paragraph and Basis for Qualified Opinion
paragraph is as under:
Qualified Opinion
except for the effects of the matter described in the Basis for Qualified Opinion section of our
report, the financial statements of Lakshmi Limited give a true and fair view in conformity with
the accounting principles generally accepted in India, of the state of affairs of the Company as
on 31.03.2021 and profit/ loss for the year ended on that date.
The Company is unable to furnish the loan agreement with respect to loans and advances of Rs.
75 Lacs given to Sriman Pvt Limited. Consequently, in the absence of such an agreement, we are
unable to verify the terms of repayment, chargeability of interest and other terms.
Q144B (OCT 2022 MTP)

143

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
CA.K is appointed statutory auditor of SEEK INDIA LTD under Companies Act, 2013 for the first
time. The company is preparing its accounts keeping in view applicable requirements of Division
II of Schedule III of Companies Act, 2013. On scrutiny of financial statements of company put up
for audit, it was noticed that notes to accounts show ageing of trade payables as per amended
requirements of Schedule III of the Companies Act, 2013.
The ageing schedule forming part of notes is as under: -
Outstanding for following periods from due date of payment (Rs. In crore)
Particulars Less than 1 1-2 years 2-3 years More than Total
year 3 years
MSME NIL NIL NIL NIL NIL
Others 2 4 3 1 10
Disputed dues-MSME NIL NIL NIL NIL NIL
Disputed dues-others NIL NIL NIL NIL NIL
Besides above, current ratio, debt-equity ratio, trade payables turnover ratio and net profit ratio
disclosed in notes to accounts have slipped drastically as compared to last year and from
standard norms. Most of the key financial ratios are in red. There is no other relevant
information concerning above in notes to accounts.
Further, on reviewing bank statement of cash credit limit (against hypothecation of paid stocks),
it was noticed that there is no debit transaction in the month of March,2022. On inquiry, he
came to know that stock audit of company was conducted in the month of January,2022 and
stock auditors have commented vide their report dated 25.2.2022 that company had negative
drawing power due to high creditors. Accordingly, the bankers have refused further debits in
cash credit account from start of March,2022. There is no information in this respect in financial
statements and notes to accounts.
Discuss how CA K should deal with above for reporting in his audit report under the Companies
Act, 2013.
ANSWER :
In the given situation, it is clear from the ageing schedule that company is not able to pay its
creditors on time. Outstanding to creditors for a period of 1 year or more account for 80% of
total dues to the creditors of the company from due date of payment. Most of key financial
ratios are adverse.
Further, bankers have refused further debits in cash credit account due to negative drawing
power from March 2022. Cash credit loans are repayable on demand. There is no other
information or disclosure available how the company plans to run its business without bank
finance.
All the above factors are indicators that a material uncertainty exists that may cast a significant
doubt on the company’s ability to continue as going concern. There is no express disclosure of
144
this fact in financial statements.


for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
Therefore, it is a situation where material uncertainty exists which has cast a significant doubt
on
company’s ability to continue as going concern in accordance with SA 570, “Going Concern”.
Keeping in view above the fact that although a material uncertainty exists casting a significant
doubt on the ability of company to continue as going concern, adequate disclosure of material
uncertainty is not made in financial statements, CA K shall give qualified or adverse opinion in
accordance with SA-705, “Modifications to the Opinion in the Independent Auditor’s Report”
144C (MARCH 2022 MTP)
In the financial year 2020-21, Shreyansh Ltd. faced an extraordinary event (earthquake), which
destroyed a lot of business activity of the company. These circumstances indicate material
uncertainty on the company’s ability to continue as going concern. Due to such event it may not
be possible for the company to realize its assets or pay off the liabilities during the regular
course of its business. The financial statement and notes to the financial statements of the
company do no t disclose this fact. What kind of opinion should the statutory auditor of
Shreyansh Ltd. issue in such circumstances and why? Also, draft the opinion and basis for
opinion para for the same.
ANSWER :
In the present case, there exists a material uncertainty that cast a significant doubt on the
company’s ability to continue as going concern and the same is not disclosed in the financial
statements of Shreyansh Ltd.
As such, the financial statements of Shreyansh Ltd. for the FY 2020 -21 are materially misstated
and the effect of the misstatement is so material and pervasive on the financial statements that
giving only a qualified opinion will be insufficient and therefore the statutory auditor of
Shreyansh Ltd . should issue an adverse opinion.
The relevant extract of the Adverse Opinion Paragraph and Basis for Adverse Opinion paragraph
is as under:
Adverse Opinion
In our opinion, because of the omission of the information mentioned in the Basis for Adverse
Opinion section of our report, the accompanying financial statements do not present fairly, the
financial position of Shreyansh Ltd. as at March 31, 2021, and of its financial performance and
its cash flows for the year then ended in accordance with the Accounting Standards issued by
the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India.
Shreyansh Ltd. has faced an extraordinary event (earthquake), which destroyed a lot of business
activity of the company. Due to such event it may not be possible for the company to realize its
assets or pay off the liabilities during the regular course of its business. This situation indicates
that a material uncertainty exists that may cast significant doubt on the Company’s ability to
145

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
continue as a going concern. The financial statement and notes to the financial statements of
the company do not disclose this fact.
144D(MARCH 2022 MTP)
M/s Brahmi and Associates have been appointed as the statutory auditor of Prompton Leaves
Limited, a manufacturer of gas geysers for the FY 2021-22. During the course of audit, the
auditor found that two customer complaints have been filed against the company in the FY
2021-22, for the use of sub standard pipes and wires in manufacture of gas geysers. The gas
geyser blasted at high temperature leading to severe injuries to the family of complainant along
with damage to their property. They have sought a demand of rupees 10 crore. However, the
lawyer of Prompton Leaves Limited believes that such claim is unsustainable as the incident
occurred due to short circuit at both the complainants place. The management of Prompton
Leaves Limited accordingly did not include any reference to the litigation in the financial
statements. The auditor obtained legal advice from some independent lawyer according to
whom the outcome of the case is not ascertainable as of now.
(a) The statutory auditor should give an unqualified opinion.
(b) The statutory auditor should give an unqualified opinion with Emphasis of Matter
paragraph.
(c) The statutory auditor should withdraw from the audit engagement.
(d) The statutory auditor should give a qualified opinion.
ANSWER : ( D )
144E(APRIL 2022 MTP)
After accepting the statutory audit of M/s All-in-All Ltd., a departmental store, you became
aware of the fact that management of the company have imposed certain limitations on the
scope of your assurance function which may adversely affect and result in your inability to
obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence to discharge your responsibility required by the
statute. Indicate the consequences and your response to the limitations imposed by the
management on your scope.
ANSWER :
Consequence of an Inability to Obtain Sufficient Appropriate Audit Evidence Due to a

Management-Imposed Limitation after the Auditor Has Accepted the Engagement: As per SA
705, Modification to the Opinion in the Independent Auditor’s Report”, if, after accepting the
engagement, the auditor becomes aware that management has imposed a limitation on the
scope of the audit that the auditor considers likely to result in the need to express a qualified
opinion or to disclaim an opinion on the financial statements, the auditor shall request that
management remove the limitation.
If management refuses to remove the prescribed limitation, the auditor shall communicate the
matter to those charged with governance, unless all of those charged with governance are
146

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
involved in managing the entity and determine whether it is possible to perform alternative
procedures to obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence.
If the auditor is unable to obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence, the auditor shall
determine the implications as follows:
(i) If the auditor concludes that the possible effects on the financial statements of
undetected misstatements, if any, could be material but not pervasive, the auditor shall qualify
the opinion; or
(ii) If the auditor concludes that the possible effects on the financial statements of
undetected misstatements, if any, could be both material and pervasive so that a qualification
of the opinion would be inadequate to communicate the gravity of the situation, the auditor
shall:
1. Withdraw from the audit, where practicable and possible under applicable law or
regulation; or
2. If withdrawal from the audit before issuing the auditor’s report is not practicable or
possible, disclaim an opinion on the financial statements.
If the auditor withdraws as discussed above, before withdrawing, the auditor shall communicate
to those charged with governance any matters regarding misstatements identified during the
audit that would have given rise to a modification of the opinion.
144E ( APRIL 2022 MTP)
While verifying the salary expense of employees, the auditor has been asked to rely on the
values as per SAP software and some hard copy reports and documents as the HRMS package
(source software) has become corrupt during the year and the management is not having any
data backup. How should the auditor deal with the same?
(a) The auditor should issue a qualified opinion as records are destroyed and he is unable to
(b) The auditor should perform alternative procedures to obtain sufficient and
appropriate audit evidence before disclaiming the opinion.
(c) The auditor should issue an adverse opinion stating that it is deficiency in internal
controls.
(d) The auditor can rely on the SAP data and there is no need for qualification of report.
ANSWER : B
144F (MAY 2022 RTP)
Moon Ltd. is a company engaged in the manufacture of iron and steel bars. VP & Associates are
the statutory auditors of Moon Ltd. for the FY 2021 -22. During the course of audit, CA Vikash,
the engagement partner, found that the Company’s financing arrangements have expired, and
147

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
the amount outstanding was payable on March 31, 2022. The Company has been unable to re-
negotiate or obtain replacement financing and is considering filing for bankruptcy. These events
indicate a material uncertainty that may cast significant doubt on the Company’s ability to
continue as a going concern and therefore it may be unable to realize its assets and discharge
its liabilities in the normal course of business. The financial statements (and notes thereto) do
not disclose this fact. What opinion should CA Vikash express in the case of Moon Ltd.?
(a) Unmodified opinion.
(b) Qualified opinion.
(c) Adverse opinion.
(d) Disclaimer of opinion.
ANSWER : C
SA 706 Emphasis of Matter Paragraph and other matter paragraph

144. APP Ltd. is listed on National Stock Exchange in India. Post audit rotation, KYP & Co LLP have
been appointed as the statutory auditors of APP Ltd. The company has a pending litigation in
respect of service tax matter which has been going on for long time now and exposure of the
company towards that litigation is very significant.
The new auditors got the exposure of this case evaluated by involving their in-house tax experts
who have shared a view that the exposure of the company would be medium. As per the
requirements of accounting standards, medium exposure would be considered as a possible
impact for which probability is 50%. The company has been disclosing this as a contingent
liability in the previous years. However, the new auditors are of the view that this is a significant
matter that requires user’s attention by disclosing this in the financial statements and it is of such
importance that it is fundamental to user’s understanding of financial statements. Further there
is a material uncertainty in respect of this matter (i.e. demand raised by service tax
department).
Basis this, auditors want to include Emphasis of matter (EOM) in their report. Management is of
the view that since this was not reported by previous auditors as EOM, hence it should not be
included by new auditors also and also being a listed company, it is not appropriate to include
EOM in the first year of audit by a new firm.
Please suggest which of the following is correct.
a. EOM should be included by new auditors.
b. EOM should not be included by new auditors if the previous auditors have not given that.
c. EOM should not be given, however, there should be a disclosure of this matter in the financial
statements and also the fact that auditors are in the first year of audit and this matter would
require detailed evaluation.
148

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
d. Auditors should quality the report instead of EOM.
Answer: Option (a) EOM should be included by new auditors.
145. PAST EXAM NOV 2018
There are certain circumstances in which Emphasis of Matter in Auditor's Report is mandated
to be included. Explain this statement in the light of mandatory requirements of matters that
are to be emphasised in Auditor's Report when the Audit Report is on Financial Statements
prepared in accordance with Special Purpose Framework.
ANSWER
Circumstances in which Emphasis of Matter Paragraph in Auditor’s Report is mandated in case of

Financial Statements prepared in accordance with a Special Purpose Framework: As per SA 706,
“Emphasis of Matter Paragraphs and Other Matter Paragraphs in the Independent Auditor’s Report”
and/or SA 800, “Special Considerations—Audits of Financial Statements Prepared in Accordance with
Special Purpose Frameworks”, the auditor’s report on special purpose financial statements shall include an
Emphasis of Matter paragraph alerting users of the auditor’s report that the financial statements are
prepared in accordance with a special purpose frame work and that, as a result, the financial statements
may not be suitable for another purpose. The auditor shall include this paragraph under an appropriate
heading.
The special purpose financial statements may be used for purposes other than those for which they were
intended. For example, a regulator may require certain entities to place the special purpose financial
statements on public record. To avoid mis under standings, the auditor alerts users of the auditor’s report
that the financial statements are prepared in accordance with a special purpose frame work and, therefore,
may not be suitable for another purpose.
Restriction on Distribution or Use: In addition to the alert required above, the auditor may consider it
appropriate to indicate that he auditor’s report is intended solely for the specific users. Depending on the
law or regulation of the particular jurisdiction, this may be achieved by restricting the distribution or use of
the auditor’s report. In these circumstances, the emphasis of matter paragraph given above maybe
expanded to include these other matters, and the heading may be modified accordingly.
SA 710 Comparative Information – Corresponding Figures and

Comparative Financial Statements
146 Mar 2018 1(d) 5 Marks
The audit report of P Ltd. for the year 2016-17 contained a qualification regarding non-provision of
doubtful debts. As the statutory auditor of the company for the year 2017-18, decide how would you
report, if :
149

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
1. The company does not make provision for doubtful debts in 2017-18?
2. The company makes adequate provision for doubtful debts in 2017-18?
Answer
Auditor’s responsibilities in cases where audit report for an earlier year is qualified is given in SA
710 “Comparative Information – Corresponding Figures and Comparative Financial Statements”.
As per SA 710, When the auditor’s report on the prior period, as previously issued, included a
qualified opinion, a disclaimer of opinion, or an adverse opinion and the matter which gave rise
to the modified opinion is resolved and properly accounted for or disclosed in the financial
statements in accordance with the applicable financial reporting framework, the auditor’s opinion
on the current period need not refer to the previous modification.
SA 710 further states that if the auditor’s report on the prior period, as previously issued, included
a qualified opinion and the matter which gave rise to the modification is unresolved, the auditor
shall modify the auditor’s opinion on the current period’s financial statements. In the Basis for
Modification paragraph in the auditor’s report, the auditor shall either:
• Refer to both the current period’s figures and the corresponding figures in the description of the
matter giving rise to the modification when the effects or possible effects of the matter on the
current period’s figures are material; or
• In other cases, explain that the audit opinion has been modified because of the effects or possible
effects of the unresolved matter on the comparability of the current period’s figures and the
corresponding figures.
In the instant Case, if P Ltd. does not make provision for doubtful debts the auditor will have to
modify his report for both current and previous year’s figures as mentioned above. If however,
the provision is made, the auditor need not refer to the earlier year’s modification.
147 RTP Nov 18 Qn no 20(d)

Write Short note on the auditor’s responsibilities regarding comparatives
Auditor’s responsibilities regarding comparatives: SA 710, “Comparative Information –
Corresponding Figures and Comparative Financial Statements”, establishes standards on the
auditor’s responsibilities regarding comparatives.
The auditor shall determine whether the financial statements include the comparative information
required by the applicable financial reporting framework and whether such information is
appropriately classified. For this purpose, the auditor shall evaluate whether:
(i) The comparative information agrees with the amounts and other disclosures presented in the
prior period; and
(ii) The accounting policies reflected in the comparative information are consistent with those
applied in the current period or, if there have been changes in accounting policies, whether those
changes have been properly accounted for and adequately presented and disclosed.
If the auditor becomes aware of a possible material misstatement in the comparative information
while performing the current period audit, the auditor shall perform such additional audit
procedures as are necessary in the circumstances to obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence
to determine whether a material misstatement exists. If the auditor had audited the prior period’s
financial statements, the auditor shall also follow the relevant requirements of SA 560 (Revised).
150

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
As required by SA 580 (Revised), the auditor shall request written representations for all periods
referred to in the auditor’s opinion. The auditor shall also obtain a specific written representation
regarding any prior period item that is separately disclosed in the current year’s statement of
profit and loss.
148. It was observed from the modified audit report of the financial statements of ULFA Ltd. for the year
ended 31st March, 2019 that depreciation of Rs. 4.25 crore for the year 2018-2019 had been charged off
to the Statement of Profit and Loss instead of including it in "carrying value of asset under construction".
State in relation to the audit for the year ended 31st March 2020, whether such modification in the
previous year's audit report would have any audit implication for the current year i.e. FY 2019-20 and if
yes, how the auditor is required to deal with the same in his audit report for the current year? (5 Marks)
(mtp nov 20)
ANSWER
Auditor’s responsibility in cases where audit report for an earlier year is qualified is given in SA 710
“Comparative Information – Corresponding Figures and Comparative Financial Statements”.
As per SA 710, when the auditor’s report on the prior period, as previously issued, included a qualified
opinion, a disclaimer of opinion, or an adverse opinion and the matter which gave rise to the modified
opinion is resolved and properly accounted for or disclosed in the financial statements in accordance with
the applicable financial reporting framework, the auditor’s opinion on the current period need not refer to
the previous modification.
SA 710 further states that if the auditor’s report on the prior period, as previously issued, included a
qualified opinion and the matter which gave rise to the modification is unresolved, the auditor shall modify
the auditor’s opinion on the current period’s financial statements. In the Basis for Modification paragraph
in the auditor’s report, the auditor shall either:
Refer to both the current period’s figures and the corresponding figures in the
descriptionofthemattergivingrisetothemodificationwhentheeffectsorpossible effects of the matter on the
current period’s figures are material; or
In other cases, explain that the audit opinion has been modified because of the effects or possible effects
of the unresolved matter on the comparability of the current period’s figures and the corresponding
figures.
In the instant case, if ULFA Ltd. does not correct the treatment of depreciation to the extent of rupees 4.25
crore for previous year, the auditor will have to modify his report for both current and previous year’s
figures as mentioned above. If, however, the figures and provisions are corrected, the auditor need not
consider to the earlier year’s modification.
149. CA Ram identified that there was a misstatement last year and the same is still not corrected.
Although unmodified audit report was issued last year by CA Ram. Guide CA Ram on the audit opinion
considering the fact that the last year’s misstatement has been identified in the current year and
unmodified opinion was issued in the last year? (mtp – I -july 2021)
(a) In accordance with SA 710, CA Ram should give unmodified opinion, but include Other matters
paragraph in the audit report as last year’s profit is being reflected in reserve and surplus.
(b) In accordance with SA 710, CA Ram should seek legal opinion.

151

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
(c) In accordance with SA 710, CA Ram should qualify current period audit report with respect to
corresponding figures only.
(d) In accordance with SA 710, CA Ram should give unmodified opinion, but last period’s modified
opinion should be highlighted in Emphasis of matter paragraph.
ANSWER- c
SAE 3400 The Examination of Prospective Financial Statement

150.Study Material
T & Co. wants to issue a prospectus, to provide potential investors with information about
future expectations of the Company. You are hired by T & Co. to examine the projected financial
statements and give report thereon. What things you will consider before accepting the audit
engagement and what audit evidence will be obtained for reporting on projected financial
statements?
Projected Financial Statements: As per SAE 3400, “The Examination of Prospective Financial
Information”, the answer is divided into two parts i.e. (i) the things to be considered before
accepting the engagement and (ii) audit evidence to be obtained for reporting on projected
(i) Acceptance of Engagement: As per SAE 3400, “The Examination of Prospective Financial
Information”, before accepting an engagement to examine prospective financial information, the
auditor would consider, amongst other things:
(1) the intended use of the information;
(2) whether the information will be for general or limited distribution;
(3) the nature of the assumptions, that is, whether they are best-estimates or hypothetical
assumptions;
(4) the elements to be included in the information; and
(5) the period covered by the information.
Further, the auditor should not accept, or should withdraw from, an engagement when the
assumptions are clearly unrealistic or when the auditor believes that the prospective financial
information will be inappropriate for its intended use.
In accordance with SA 210, “Terms of Audit Engagement”, it is necessary that the auditor and the
client should agree on the terms of the engagement.
Audit evidence to be obtained for Reporting on Projected Financial Statements: The auditor should
document matters, which are important in providing evidence to support his report on examination
of prospective financial information, and evidence that such examination was carried out.
152

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
The audit evidence in form of working papers will include:

(6) the sources of information,
(7) basis of forecasts,
(8) the assumptions made in arriving the forecasts,
(9) hypothetical assumptions, evidence supporting the assumptions,
(10)management representations regarding the intended use and istribution of the information,
completeness of material assumptions,
(11) management’s acceptance of its responsibility for the information,
(12) audit plan,
(13) the nature, timing and extent of examination procedures performed, and,
(14) in case the auditor expresses a modified opinion or withdraws from the engagement, the
reasons forming the basis of such decision.
You are engaged by M/s Active Ltd. to examine and report on prospective financial
information which the management of the company has prepared for presentation at an
Investor meet program organized by a State Government to attract investment in their state.
The company in its vision document descripted various plans and proposals of the company
with projected financial goals and means to achieve the same and various benefits accruing to
the economic development of the State. What important matters will be considered by you
while determining the nature, timing and extent of examination procedure to be applied in the
review of the same?
ANSWER
Examination Procedures: As per SAE 3400, “The Examination of Prospective Financial Information”, when
determining the nature, timing and extent of examination procedures, the auditor should consider matters
such as:
(i) the knowledge obtained during any previous engagements;
(ii) management’s competence regarding the preparation of prospective financial information;
(iii) the likelihood of material misstatement;
(iv) the extent to which the prospective financial information is affected by the management’s judgment;
153

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
(v) the sources of information considered by the management for the purpose, their adequacy, reliability of
the underlying data, including data derived from third parties, such as industry statistics, to support the
assumptions;
(vi) the stability of entity’s business; and
(vii) the engagement team’s experience with the business and the industry in which the entity operates and
with reporting on prospective financial information.
151A(OCT 2022 MTP)

BREW Ltd., FMCG Company having its tea gardens in northeastern states of the country is
exclusively dealing in blending, processing, packing and selling of various brands of Tea. During
the year under audit, the company entered into joint venture for purchasing Tea Gardens in Sri
Lanka and Kenya. M/s PM & Associates are the statutory auditors of the company for the financial
year 2021-22. During the course of audit, the audit team was unable to obtain sufficient
appropriate evidence about a single element of the consolidated financial statement being
Joint venture investment in Dharma Ltd. representing over 91% of the group’s net assets having
both material and pervasive possible effect to the consolidated financial statements. The group’s
investment in Dharma Ltd. is carried at Rs. 115 crore in the group’s consolidated balance sheet.
Draft the opinion paragraph and basis of opinion paragraph to be included in the Independent
Auditor’s report.
ANSWER :
M/s PM & Associates are unable to obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence about the
financial information of a joint venture investment that represents over 91% of the group’s net
assets. The possible effects of this inability to obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence are
both material and pervasive to the consolidated financial statements. Therefore, the statutory
auditor should issue a disclaimer of opinion.
The relevant extract of the Disclaimer of Opinion Paragraph and Basis for Disclaimer of Opinion
Disclaimer of Opinion
We were engaged to audit the accompanying consolidated financial statements of BREW Ltd.,
(hereinafter referred to as the “Holding Company”) and its subsidiaries (the Holding Company and
its subsidiaries together referred to as “the Group), which comprise the consolidated balance
sheet as at March 31, 2022, the consolidated statement of Profit and Loss, (consolidated
statement of changes in equity) and consolidated statement of cash flows for the year then ended,
and notes to the consolidated financial statements, including a summary of significant accounting
policies (hereinafter referred to as the “Consolidated Financial Statements”).
We do not express an opinion on the accompanying consolidated financial statements of the
Group. Because of the significance of the matter described in the Basis for Disclaimer of Opinion
section of our report, we have not been able to obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence to
provide a basis for an audit opinion on these consolidated financial statements.
154

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
The Group’s investment in its joint venture Dharma Ltd. Company is carried at Rs. 115 crore on
the Group’s consolidated balance sheet, which represents over 91% of the Group’s net assets as
at March 31, 2022. We were not allowed access to the management and the auditors of Dharma
Ltd. Company, including Dharma Ltd.’s auditors’ audit documentation. As a result, we were unable
to determine whether any adjustments were necessary in respect of the Group’s proportional
share of Dharma Ltd.’s assets that it controls jointly, its proportional share of Dharma Ltd.’s
liabilities for which it is jointly responsible, its proportional share of Dharma Ltd.’s income and
expenses for the year, (and the elements making up the consolidated statement of changes in
equity) and the consolidated cash flow statement.
151B (OCT 2022 MTP)

Difficult Books Limited is engaged in manufacturing of active pharmaceutical ingredients. Due
to change in laws and regulations, every company engaged in manufacturing in active
pharmaceutical ingredients would now require production capacity license which will restrict
the production of companies. Management of the company assessed the impact of the change
in law over the financial position of company and appropriately disclosed the same in the
Audit Team of the company evaluated management's disclosure and found it appropriate and
sufficient. However, considering the said matter as most important and fundamental to users
understanding regarding financial statement the audit team decided to disclose the same in
Other Matter Paragraph.
You as an Engagement Partner are required to guide the Audit Team with respect to reporting
of the said matter in Audit Report.
ANSWER :
As per SA 706, “Emphasis of Matter Paragraphs and Other Matter Paragraphs in the Independent
Auditor’s Report” if the auditor considers it necessary to draw users’ attention to a matter
presented or disclosed in the financial statements that, in the auditor’s judgment, is of such
importance t hat it is fundamental to users’ understanding of the financial statements, the auditor
shall include an Emphasis of Matter paragraph in the auditor’s report provided:
(i)The auditor would not be required to modify the opinion in accordance with SA 705 as a result
of the matter; and
(ii)When SA 701 applies, the matter has not been determined to be a key audit matter to be
communicated in the auditor’s report.
In the instant case, since Difficult Books Limited is engaged in manufacturing of active
pharmaceutical ingredients, would now require production capacity license which will restrict the
production of companies, due to change in laws and regulations. Management of the Difficult
Books Limited assessed the impact of the change in law over the financial position of company
and appropriately disclosed the same in the financial statement.
Audit team of the Difficult Books Limited evaluated management's disclosure and found it
appropriate and sufficient. However, considering the said matter as most important and
fundamental to users understanding regarding financial statement the audit team decided to
disclose the same.
155

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
The said matter is already disclosed and presented appropriately in financial statement and is of
such importance that is fundamental to the users understanding of the financial statement and
hence, it required to be disclosed under Emphasis of Matter paragraph.
Therefore, decision of audit team to disclose the same in Other Matter Paragraph is not in order,
it should be disclosed in Emphasis of Matter Paragraph.
SA720 The Auditor’s Responsibility in Relation to Other Information

LMP Associates, Chartered Accountants, conducting the audit of PQR Ltd., a listed Company for
the year ended 31st March 2019 is concerned with the auditor's responsibilities relating to other
information, both financial and non-financial, included in the Company’s annual report.
While reading other information, LMP Associates considers whether there is a material
inconsistency between other information and the financial statements. As a basis for the
consideration the auditor shall evaluate their consistency, compare selected amounts or other
items in the other information with such amounts or other items in the financial statements.
Guide LMP Associates with examples of "Amounts" or "other items" that may be included in the
"other information" with reference to SA 720.
Examples of Amounts or Other Items that May Be Included in the Other Information:
As per SA 720 “The Auditor’s Responsibility in Relation to Other Information”, the following are
examples of amounts and other items that may be included in other information. This list is not
intended to be exhaustive.
Amounts
(i) Items in a summary of key financial results, such as net income, earnings per share, dividends,
sales and other operating revenues, and purchases and operating expenses.
(ii) Selected operating data, such as income from continuing operations by major operating area, or
sales by geographical segment or product line.
(iii) Special items, such as asset dispositions, litigation provisions, asset impairments, tax adjustments,
environmental remediation provisions, and restructuring and reorganization expenses.
(iv) Liquidity and capital resource information, such as cash, cash equivalents and marketable
securities; dividends; and debt, capital lease and minority interest obligations.
(v) Capital expenditures by segment or division.
(vi) Amounts involved in, and related financial effects of, off-balance sheet arrangements.
(vii) Amounts involved in guarantees, contractual obligations, legal or environmental claims, and other
contingencies.
(viii) Financial measures or ratios, such as gross margin, return on average capital employed, return on
average shareholders’ equity, current ratio, interest coverage ratio and debt ratio. Some of these
may be directly reconcilable to the financial statements.
156

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
Other Items
(i) Explanations of critical accounting estimates and related assumptions.
(ii) Identification of related parties and descriptions of transactions with them.

(iii) Articulation of the entity’s policies or approach to manage commodity, foreign exchange or
interest rate risks, such as through the use of forward contracts, interest rate swaps, or other
financial instruments.
(iv) Descriptions of the nature of off-balance sheet arrangements.
(v) Descriptions of guarantees, indemnifications, contractual obligations, litigation or environmental
liability cases, and other contingencies, including management’s qualitative assessments of the
entity’s related exposures.
(vi) Descriptions of changes in legal or regulatory requirements, such as new tax or environmental
regulations, that have materially impacted the entity’s operations or fiscal position, or will have a
material impact on the entity’s future financial prospects.
(vii) Management’s qualitative assessments of the impacts of new financial reporting standards that
have come into effect during the period, or will come into effect in the following period, on the
entity’s financial results, financial position and cash flows.
(viii) General descriptions of the business environment and outlook.
(ix) Overview of strategy.
(x) Descriptions of trends in market prices of key commodities or raw materials.
(xi) Contrasts of supply, demand and regulatory circumstances between geographic regions.
(xii) Explanations of specific factors influencing the entity’s profitability in specific segments.
153. GS & Co., Chartered Accountants, have been appointed Statutory Auditors of MAP Ltd. for the F.Y
2019-20. The audit team has completed the audit and is in the process of preparing audit report
Management of the company has also prepared draft annual report.
Audit in-charge was going through the draft annual report and observed that the company has
included an item in its Annual Report indicating downward trend in market prices of key
commodities/raw material as compared to previous year. However, the actual profit margin of
the company as reported in financial statements has gone in the reverse direction. Audit
Manager discussed this issue with partner of the firm who in reply said that auditors are not
covered with such disclosures made by the management in its annual report, it being the
responsibility of the management. Do you think that the partner is correct in his approach on this
issue.
Discuss with reference to relevant Standard on Auditing the Auditor's duties with regard to reporting. (4
Marks) (past exam nov 2020)
ANSWER
Responding When the Auditor Concludes That a Material Misstatement of the Other Information Exists:
As per SA 720, “The Auditor’s Responsibility in Relation to Other Information”, Descriptions of trends in
market prices of key commodities or raw materials is an example of amounts or other Items that may be
Included in the other information.
157

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
The auditor’s discussion with management about a material inconsistency (or other information
that appears to be materially misstated) may include requesting management to provide support
for the basis of management’s statements in the other information. Based on management’s
further information or explanations, the auditor may be satisfied that the other information is not
materially misstated. For example, management explanations may indicate reasonable and
sufficient grounds for valid differences of judgment Auditor’s duties with regard to reporting in the
given case are given hereunder:
As per SA 720, “The Auditor’s Responsibility in Relation to Other Information”, if the auditor concludes
that a material misstatement of the other information exists, the auditor shall request management to
correct the other information. If management:
(i) Agrees to make the correction, the auditor shall determine that the correction has been made; or
(ii) Refuses to make the correction, the auditor shall communicate the matter with those charged with
governance and request that the correction be made.
Contention of the partner of the firm that auditors are not concerned with such disclosures made by the
management in its annual report, is incorrect.
154. Comment on the following:
(a) ING Associates, Chartered Accountants, conducting the audit of XYZ Ltd., a listed Company for the
year ended 31st March 2020 is concerned with the auditor's responsibilities relating to misstatements in
other information, both financial and non-financial, included in the Company’s annual report. While
reading other information, ING Associates considers whether there is any material misstatement of the
other information in the Company. After performing their procedures, the auditor concludes that a
material misstatement of the other information exists. ING Associates discussed with the Management
about the other information that appeared to be materially misstated to the auditor and also requested
management to provide evidence for the basis of management’s statements in the other information
along with supporting documents. Guide ING Associates as to how to respond to that material
misstatement of other information obtained prior to the date of auditor’s report. Will your answer be
different in case ING Associates conclude the same after the date of auditor’s report? (5 Marks) (mtp
nov 20)
ANSWER
As per SA 720, “The Auditor’s Responsibility in Relation to Other Information”, if the auditor concludes
that a material misstatement of the other information exists, the auditor shall request management to
correct the other information. If management:
governance and request that the correction be made
If the auditor concludes that a material misstatement exists in other information obtained prior to the
date of the auditor’s report, and the other information is not corrected after communicating with those
charged with governance, the auditor shall take appropriate action, including:
158

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
(i) Considering the implications for the auditor’s report and communicating with those charged with
governance about how the auditor plans to address the material misstatement in the auditor’s report;
(ii) Withdrawing from the engagement, where withdrawal is possible under applicable law or regulation.
If the auditor concludes that a material misstatement exists in other information obtained after the date
of the auditor’s report, the auditor shall:
(i) If the other information is corrected, perform the procedures necessary in the circumstances; or
(ii) If the other information is not corrected after communicating with those charged with governance, take
appropriate action considering the auditor’s legal rights and obligations, to seek to have the uncorrected
material misstatement appropriately brought to the attention of users for whom the auditor’s report is
prepared
155. ANUSHA Associates, Chartered Accountants, conducting the audit of Rishabh Ltd., a listed company
for the year ended 31st March 2021 is concerned with the auditor's responsibilities relating to other
information, both financial and non-financial, included in the Company’s annual report.
While reading other information, ANUSHA Associates considers whether there is a material inconsistency
between other information and the financial statements. As a basis for the consideration the auditor
shall evaluate their consistency, compare selected amounts or other items in the other information with
such amounts or other items in the financial statements.
Guide ANUSHA Associates with examples of "Amounts" or "other items" that may be included in the
"other information" with reference to SA 720. (5 Marks) (mtp – II -july 2021)
ANSWER
Examples of Amounts or Other Items that May Be Included in the Other Information: As per SA 720 “The
Auditor’s Responsibility in Relation to Other Information”, the following are examples of amounts and
other items that may be included in other information. This list is not intended to be exhaustive.
Amounts
(i) Items in a summary of key financial results, such as net income, earnings per share, dividends, sales and
other operating revenues, and purchases and operating expenses.
(ii) Selected operating data, such as income from continuing operations by major operating area, or sales
by geographical segment or product line.
(iii) Special items, such as asset dispositions, litigation provisions, asset impairments, tax adjustments,
environmental remediation provisions, and restructuring and reorganization expenses.
(iv) Liquidity and capital resource information, such as cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities;
dividends; and debt, capital lease and minority interest obligations.
(v) Capital expenditures by segment or division.

159

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
(vi) Amounts involved in, and related financial effects of, off -balance sheet arrangements.
(vii) Amounts involved in guarantees, contractual obligations, legal or environmental claims, and other
contingencies.
(viii) Financial measures or ratios, such as gross margin, return on average capital employed, return on
average shareholders’ equity, current ratio, interest coverage ratio and debt ratio. Some of these may be
directly reconcilable to the financial statements.
Other Items
(i) Explanations of critical accounting estimates and related assumptions.
(ii) Identification of related parties and descriptions of transactions with them.
(iii) Articulation of the entity’s policies or approach to manage commodity, foreign exchange or interest
rate risks, such as through the use of forward contracts, interest rate swaps, or other financial instruments.
(iv) Descriptions of the nature of off-balance sheet arrangements.
(v) Descriptions of guarantees, indemnifications, contractual obligations, litigation or environmental

liability cases, and other contingencies, including management’s qualitative assessments of the entity’s
related exposures.
(vi) Descriptions of changes in legal or regulatory requirements, such as new tax or environmental
regulations, that have materially impacted the entity’s operations or fiscal position, or will have a material
impact on the entity’s future financial prospects.
(vii) Management’s qualitative assessments of the impacts of new financial reporting standards that have
come into effect during the period, or will come into effect in the following period, on the entity’s financial
results, financial position and cash flows.
(viii) General descriptions of the business environment and outlook.
(ix) Overview of strategy.
(x) Descriptions of trends in market prices of key commodities or raw materials.
(xi) Contrasts of supply, demand and regulatory circumstances between geographic regions.
(xii) Explanations of specific factors influencing the entity’s profitability in specific segments.
156. (rtp- nov 2021)

The audit report of Kolsi (P) Ltd. for F.Y. 2020-21 was issued by Bishnoi & Co. on 25th July, 2021.
160
However, a case was filed against Kolsi (P) Ltd. on 4th August, 2021, with the Civil Court, with

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
respect to an incident caused in its factory on 17th January, 2021, the outcome of which may
result in paying heavy penalty by Kolsi (P) Ltd.
Mr. Raj Bishnoi, the partner of Bishnoi & Co., discussed the said matter with the management
and it was determined to amend the financial statements for F.Y. 2020-21. Further, Mr. Raj
inquired how the management intended to address the said matter in the financial statements
to which he was told that the said matter was going to be disclosed as a “Contingent Liability for
a Court case” to the foot note in the balance sheet with no additional disclosures.
The management told Mr. Raj that such disclosure was enough as he would further going a
description of the said court case and its outcome in the ‘Emphasis of Matter’ paragraph in his
amended audit report.
In the context of aforesaid case scenario, please answer the following questions:-
(a) Whether Mr. Raj on behalf of Bishnoi & Co., has properly adhered to his responsibilities in
accordance with SA 560, on becoming aware of the court case filed against Kolsi (P) Ltd.?
(b) Whether the contention of management of Kolsi (P) Ltd. is valid with respect to the
disclosure of the court case in the financial statements?
ANSWER
(a) As per SA 560, ‘Subsequent Events’, the auditor has no obligation to perform any audit procedures
regarding the financial statements after the date of the auditor’s report. However, when, after the date of
the auditor’s report but before the date the financial statements are issued, a fact becomes known to the
auditor that, had it been known to the auditor at the date of the auditor’s report, may have caused the
auditor to amend the auditor’s report, the auditor shall:
(1) Discuss the matter with management and, where appropriate, those charged with governance.
(2) Determine whether the financial statements need amendment and, if so,
(3) Inquire how management intends to address the matter in the financial statements.
In the given case, on becoming aware of the court case filed against Kolsi (P) Ltd., Mr. Raj discussed the said
matter with the management and it was determined to amend the financial statements. Also, he inquired
how the management intended to address the said matter in the financial statements.
However, If management does not take the necessary steps to ensure that anyone in receipt of
the previously issued financial statements is informed of the situation and does not amend the
financial statements in circumstances where Mr. Raj (hereinafter referred as ‘the auditor’)
believes they need to be amended, the auditor shall notify management and, those charged with
governance (unless all of those charged with governance are involved in managing the entity), that the
auditor will seek to prevent future reliance on the auditor’s report. If despite such notification the
management or those charged with governance do not take these necessary steps, the auditor shall take
appropriate action to seek to prevent reliance on the auditor’s report in accordance with SA 560.
(b) As per SA 706, ‘Emphasis of Matter Paragraphs and Other Matter Paragraphs in the Independent
Auditor’s Report’, an Emphasis of Matter paragraph is not a substitute for:
(a) A modified opinion in accordance with SA 705 (Revised) when required by the circumstances of a
specific audit engagement;
(b) Disclosures in the financial statements that the applicable financial reporting framework requires
management to make, or that are otherwise necessary to achieve fair presentation; or
(c) Reporting in accordance with SA 570 (Revised) when a material uncertainty exists relating to events or
conditions that may cast significant doubt on an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern.
In the given case, the management of Kolsi (P) Ltd. has presumed that as the auditor was going to provide a
description of the said court case and its outcome in the ‘Emphasis of Matter’ paragraph in his amended
audit report, there was no further need for it to provide additional disclosures about the court case in the
The said contention of management of Kolsi (P) Ltd. is not valid as ‘Emphasis of Matter’ paragraph cannot
be used as a substitute for disclosures required to be made in the financial statements as per the applicable
161

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
financial reporting framework or that is otherwise necessary to achieve fair presentation, which is the
responsibility of the management.
157. (rtp- nov 2021)

While formulating the audit plan and responding to the risks of material misstatement
identified and assessed in related party transaction and relationships, Ms. K the engagement
manager of the audit team of ABC Limited, decided to rely upon the internal controls placed for
identification and disclosure of related party relationships and transactions in accordance with
the applicable financial reporting framework.
You are requested to guide Ms. K regarding the necessity to test the controls to obtain sufficient
and appropriate audit evidence. Also guide, whether Ms. K can use the audit evidence obtained,
regarding operative effectiveness of control on identification and disclosure of related party
relationships and transactions, in the interim period.
ANSWER
As per SA 550, “Related Parties”, according to para on “Responses to the risks of material misstatement
associated with related party relationships and transactions”, the auditor should design and performs
further audit procedures to obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence about the assessed risks of
material misstatement associated with related party relationships and transactions.
Further, as per SA 330, “The Auditor’s Responses to Assessed Risks”, the auditor shall design and perform
tests of controls to obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence as to the operating effectiveness of relevant
controls when:
(a) the auditor’s assessment of risks of material misstatement at the assertion level includes an expectation
that the controls are operating effectively (i.e., the auditor intends to rely on the operating effectiveness of
controls in determining the nature, timing and extent of substantive procedures); or
(b) Substantive procedures alone cannot provide sufficient appropriate audit evidence at the assertion
level.
In designing and performing tests of controls, the auditor shall obtain more persuasive audit evidence the
greater the reliance the auditor places on the effectiveness of a control. Moreover, the auditor shall test
controls for the particular time, or throughout the period, for which the auditor intends to rely on those
controls, subject to when the auditor obtains audit evidence about the operating effectiveness of controls
during an interim period, and the timing of test of controls over significant risks, in order to provide an
appropriate basis for the auditor’s intended reliance.
When the auditor obtains audit evidence about the operating effectiveness of controls during an interim
period, the auditor shall:
(a) Obtain audit evidence about significant changes to those controls subsequent to the interim period; and
(b) Determine the additional audit evidence to be obtained for the remaining period.
In the current case, Ms. K shall design and perform tests of controls to obtain sufficient appropriate audit
evidence as to the operating effectiveness of relevant controls as she intends to rely on the operating
effectiveness of controls in determining the nature, timing and extent of substantive procedures.
Further, she is also required to obtain the audit evidence about significant changes to those controls
subsequent to the interim period along with the additional audit evidence to be obtained for the remaining
period in accordance with the requirements of Standards on Auditing as discussed above.
158. ( MTP- NOV 2021)

162

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
Jinchandra & Co., Chartered Accountants, have been appointed Statutory Auditors of Gurudeva Ltd. for the
F.Y. 2020-21. The audit team has completed the audit and is in the process of preparing audit report
Management of the company has also prepared draft annual report.
Audit in-charge was going through the draft annual report and observed that the company has included an
item in its Annual Report indicating downward trend in market prices of key commodities/raw material as
compared to previous year. However, the actual profit margin of the company as reported in financial
statements has gone in the reverse direction. Audit Manager discussed this issue with partner of the firm
who in reply said that auditors are not covered with such disclosures made by the management in its
annual report, it being the responsibility of the management.
Do you think that the partner is correct in his approach on this issue?
Discuss with reference to relevant Standard on Auditing the Auditor's duties with regard to reporting.
ANSWER
As per SA 720, “The Auditor’s Responsibility in Relation to Other Information”, descriptions of trends in
market prices of key commodities or raw materials is an example of amounts or other Items that may be
Included in the other information. The auditor’s discussion with management about a material
inconsistency (or other information that appears to be materially misstated) may include requesting
management to provide support for the basis of management’s statements in the other information. Based
on management’s further information or explanations, the auditor may be satisfied that the other
information is not materially misstated. For example, management explanations may indicate reasonable
and sufficient grounds for valid differences of judgment.
Auditor’s duties with regard to reporting in the given case are given hereunder:
As per SA 720, “The Auditor’s Responsibility in Relation to Other Information”, if the auditor concludes that
a material misstatement of the other information exists, the auditor shall request management to correct
the other information. If management:
governance and request that the correction be made.
Contention of the partner of the firm that auditors are not concerned with such disclosures made
by the management in its annual report, is incorrect.
163

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
164

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s

1. MTP Apr 2019 Qn no 17 (2 Marks)
NT 22 Group is a large group comprising of 22 subsidiary companies, 14 associate companies
and 19 joint ventures. NT Ltd. is the holding company which is also listed on Bombay Stock
Exchange and New York Stock Exchange. The Group prepares its consolidated financial
statements every quarter for various reporting requirements – SEBI (Stock and Exchange Board
of India), Stock Exchanges, Registrar of Companies in India and others. The turnover of the Group
is INR 15,000 crores and many of its components have significant operations at standalone level.
The Group is audited by one audit firm, Seema & Co LLP. For the purpose of group audit of the
current year, the auditors have considered perfoming testing of journal entries across the group
to address the significant risk, however, the auditors are facing challenges to perform this audit
procedure across the group because of the volume and limitation of resources. Please suggest
the correct options in respect of this matter.
a. The Group auditors have a choice to test journal entries of the components which is also backed
up by the auditing standards.
b. The Group auditors must test journal entries of all components.
c. The Group auditors need not test journal entries of components requiring analytical response at
group level.
d. The Group auditors need not test journal entries of components scoped with comprehensive
approach.
Answer: Option (c) The Group auditors need not test journal entries of components requiring
analytical response at group level.
165

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
2.MTP oct 2019 QN no 9 (1 Mark)

CA Sameer, after developing the audit strategy for Menka Ltd., develops an audit plan but finds
a need to revise the materiality levels set earlier and therefore a deviation from the already set
audit strategy is felt necessary. In this case, he should
a) Continue with the Audit Plan without considering the Audit Strategy
b) Drop the audit and withdraw from the engagement
c) First Modify the audit strategy and thereafter prepare the audit plan according to the modified
strategy.
d) Devise a new audit plan and then, change the strategy as per the Revised Plan.
Answer: Option (c)First Modify the audit strategy and thereafter prepare the audit plan according to the
modified strategy.
3. RTP May 2018 Qn no.3
Loud, a movie theatre complex, is the foremost theatre located in Delhi. Along with the sale of
tickets over the counter and online booking, the major proportion of income is from the cafe
shops, pubs etc. located in the complex. Its ‘other income’ includes advertisements exhibited
within/outside the premises such as hoarding, banners, slides, short films etc. The facility for
parking of vehicles is also provided in the basement of the premises.
Loud appointed your firm as the auditor of the entity. Being the head of the audit team, you
are therefore required to draw an audit programme initially in respect of its revenue and
expenditure considering the above mentioned facts along with other relevant points related
to a complex.
Nov 2019 Qn no 3(b) 5 Marks

Cineplex, a movie theatre complex, is the foremost theatre located in Delhi. Along with the
sale of tickets over the counter and online booking, the major proportion of income is from the
cafe, shops, pubs etc. located in the complex.
Its other income includes advertisements exhibited within/outside the premises such as
hoardings, banners, slides, short films etc. The facility for parking of vehicles is also provided in
the basement of the premises.
Cineplex appointed your firm as the auditor of the entity. Being the head of the audit team,
you are, therefore, required to draw an audit programme initially in respect of its revenue and
expenditure considering the above mentioned facts along with other relevant points relating
to a complex.
Answer
166

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
Audit Programme of a Complex:

(i) Peruse the Memorandum of Association and Articles of Association of the entity.
(ii) Ensure the object clause permits the entity to engage in this type of business.
(iii) In the case of income from sale of tickets:
(1) Verify the control system as to how it is ensured that the collections on sale of tickets of various
shows are properly accounted.
(2) Verify the system of relating to online booking of various shows and the system of realization of
money.
(3) Check that there is overall system of reconciliation of collections with the number of seats
available for different shows on a day.
(iv) Verify the internal control system and its effectiveness relating to the income from café, shops,
pubs, game zone etc., located within the multiplex.
(v) Verify the system of control exercised relating to the income receivable from advertisements
exhibited within the premises and inside the hall such as hoarding, banners, slides, short films etc.
(vi) Verify the system of collection from the parking areas in respect of the vehicles parked by the
customers.
(vii) In the case of payment to the distributors verify the system of payment which may be either
through out right payment or percentage of collection or a combination of both. Ensure at the
time of settlement any payment of advance made to the distributor is also adjusted against the
amount due.
(viii) Verify the system of payment of salaries and other benefits to the employees and ensure that
statutory requirements are complied with.
(ix) Verify the payments effected in respect of the maintenance of the building and ensure the same
is in order.
(x) Verify the insurance premium paid and ensure it covers the entire assets.
4. MTP Apr 18 Qn no.2(d) 5 Marks

XY Ltd. is a manufacturing company, provided following details of wastages of raw materials in
percentage, for various months. You have been asked to enquire into causes of abnormal
wastage of raw materials. Draw out an audit plan.
Wastage percentage are
July 2017 2.5%
Aug 2017 2.7%
Sep 2017 2.4%
Oct 2017 8.1%
Answer
167

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
Audit Plan to locate the Abnormal Wastage of Raw Material: To locate the reasons for the abnormal
wastage, the auditor should first of all assess the general requirements as under:
(i) Procure a list of raw materials, showing the names and detailed characteristics of each raw material.
(ii) Obtain the standard consumption figures, and ascertain the basis according to which normal wastage
figures have been worked out. Examine the break-up of a normal wastage into that in process, storage
and handling stages. Also obtain control reports, if any, in respect of manufacturing costs with reference
to predetermined standards.
(iii) Examine the various records maintained for recording separately the various lots purchased and
identification of each lot with actual material consumption and for ascertaining actual wastage figures
therein.
(iv) Obtain reports of Preventive Maintenance Programme of machinery to ensure that the quality of goods
manufacture is not of sub-standard nature or leads to high scrap work.
(v) Assess whether personnel employed are properly trained and working efficiently.
(vi) See whether quality control techniques have been consistent or have undergone any change.
(vii) Examine inventory plans and procedures in report of transportation storage efficiency, deterioration,
pilferage and whether the same are audited regularly.
(viii) Examine whether the basis adopted for calculating wastage for September is the same as was adopted for
the other three months.
(ix) Obtain a statement showing break up of wastage figures in storage, handling and process for the four
months under reference and compare the results of the analysis for each of the four months.
In addition, some specific reasons for abnormal wastage in process may be considered by the auditor are as
under:
(i) Examine laboratory reports and inspection reports to find out if raw materials purchased were of a poor
quality or were of sub-standard quality. This will be most useful if it is possible to identify the wastage out
of each lot that has been purchased.
(ii) Machine breakdown, power failure, etc. may also result into loss of materials in process. Check the
machine utilisation statements.
(iii) A high rate of rejections in the finished lots may also be responsible for abnormal wastage; therefore,
examine the inspectors’ reports in respect of inspection carried out on the completion of each stage of
work or process.
(iv) It is possible that the wastage may have occurred because the particular lot out of which issues were made
was lying in the store for a long time, leading to deterioration in quality or because of a change in the
weather which may have led to the deterioration. Compare the wastage figures.
(v) Abnormal wastage in storage and handling may arise due to the following reasons:
Write offs on account of reconciliation of physical and book inventories: In case of periodical
physical inventory taking, such write offs will be reflected only in the month such
reconciliation takes place.
(1) Accidental, theft or fire losses in storage: The auditor should examine the possibility of these for the
purpose.
(vi) Examine whether any new production line was taken up during the month in respect of which standard
input-output ratio is yet to be set-up.
168

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
INDO Bank appointed your firm of Chartered Accountants as a branch auditor for the financial
year 2018-19. Being head-in-charge of the assignment, while planning, you distributed the work
among your team members and assigned Mr. Pary for verification of bills payable. However,
Mr. Pary, being fresh to the bank audits, needs your guidance. Kindly guide.
Answer:
Bills Payable: Evaluate the existence, effectiveness and continuity of internal controls over bills
payable. Such controls should usually include the following-
• Drafts, mail transfers, traveller’s cheques, etc. should be made out in standard printed forms.
• Unused forms relating to drafts, traveller’s cheques, etc. should be kept under the custody of
a responsible officer.
• The bank should have a reliable private code known only to the responsible officers of its branches,
coding and decoding of the telegrams should be done only by such officers.
• The signatures on a demand draft should be checked by an officer with the specimen signature
book.
• All the telegraphic transfers and demand drafts issued by a branch should be immediately
confirmed by advices to the branches concerned. On payment of these instruments, the paying
branch should send a debit advice to the originating branch.
Examine an appropriate sample of outstanding items comprised in bills payable accounts with the
relevant registers. Reasons for old outstanding debits in respect of drafts or other similar
instruments paid without advice should be ascertained.
Correspondence with other branches after the year-end (e.g., responding advices received from
other branches, advices received from other branches in respect of drafts issued by the branch
and paid by the other branches without advice) should be examined specially in so far as large
value items outstanding on the balance sheet date are concerned.
6. RTP Nov 18 Qn no 3(A)

Key phases in the audit execution stage are Execution Planning, Risk and Control Evaluation,
Testing and Reporting. Explain.
Answer
Execution Planning: Prior to commencement of an audit engagement, it is important to lay down
the roadmap for audit execution to ensure timely and quality audit results. The auditors need to
plan their work in order to carry out the audit in an effective, efficient and timely manner. A
detailed audit program is prepared laying down the audit objectives, scope and audit approach.
The manpower requirement, audit team qualifications, and the time element, etc. are some of
the important considerations during execution planning.
169

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
In order to plan effectively, the auditor may need some more information about the audit area.
A preliminary survey would help in gathering the required information.
1. Risk and Control Evaluation: For each segment of audit, the auditors should conduct a detailed
risk and control assessment i.e. list the risks that must be reviewed in that segment, capture for
each risk the controls that exist or those that are needed to protect against the risk and show for
each control, the work steps required to test the effectiveness of the controls. While making Risk
& Control assessment it is necessary to borne in mind Materiality levels as the same is linked with
Audit Risks.
3 Testing: Once a comprehensive understanding is gained of the key risks and the controls to be
evaluated in a given audit area, the auditors should test the operating effectiveness of the controls
to determine whether controls are operating as designed. There are multiple test methods which
can be used to arrive at the conclusions on the effectiveness of the controls
4 Reporting: SA 700, “Forming an Opinion and Reporting on Financial Statements” establishes

standards on the form and content of the auditor’s report issued as a result of an audit performed
by an auditor of the financial statements of an entity. The auditor should review and assess the
conclusions drawn from the audit evidence obtained as the basis for the expression of an opinion
on the financial statements. This review and assessment involves considering whether the
financial statements have been prepared in accordance with an acceptable financial reporting
framework applicable to the entity under audit. It is also necessary to consider whether the
financial statements comply with the relevant statutory requirements such as compliance of
Provisions & Enactments of the Company Law, Accounting Standards framed by ICAI, latest
Guidelines etc.
The auditor’s report should contain a clear written expression of opinion on the financial
statements taken as a whole. A measure of uniformity in the form and content of the auditor’s
report is desirable because it helps to promote the reader’s understanding of the auditor’s report
and to identify unusual circumstances when they occur. A statute governing the entity or a
regulator may require the auditor to include certain matters in the audit report or prescribe the
form in which the auditor should issue his report.
5 Other Important Considerations: In addition to above, there are certain other consideration
which auditor is required to take care while executing the audit such as using the work of other
auditor, using the work of an auditor’s expert etc.
Study Material
7. (MTP MAY 2018)
While auditing Z Ltd., you observe certain material financial statement assertions have been
based on estimates made by the management. As the auditor how do you minimize the risk of
material misstatements?
Answer
170

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
As per SA 540 “Auditing Accounting Estimates, Including Fair Value Accounting Estimates, and
Related Disclosures”, the auditor shall obtain an understanding of the following in order to
provide a basis for the identification and assessment of the risks of material misstatements for
accounting estimates:
• The requirements of the applicable financial reporting framework relevant to the accounting
estimates, including related disclosures.
• How Management identifies those transactions, events and conditions that may give rise to
the need for accounting estimates to be recognised or disclosed, in the financial statements. In
obtaining this understanding, the auditor shall make inquiries of management about changes in
• The estimation making process adopted by the management including-
• The method, including where applicable the model, used in making the accounting
estimates.
• Relevant controls.
• Whether management has used an expert?
• The assumption underlying the accounting estimates.
• Whether there has been or ought to have been a change from the prior period in the
methods for making the accounting estimates, and if so, why; and
• Whether and, if so, how the management has assessed the effect of estimation
uncertainty.
8. (MTP MAY 2018)

KRP Ltd., at its annual general meeting, appointed Mr. X, Mr. Y and Mr. Z as joint auditors to
conduct auditing for the financial year 2018-19. For the valuation of gratuity scheme of the
company, Mr. X, Mr. Y and Mr. Z wanted to refer their own known Actuaries. Due to difference
of opinion, all the joint auditors consulted their respective Actuaries. Subsequently, major
difference was found in the actuary reports. However, Mr. X agreed to Mr. Y’s actuary report,
though, Mr. Z did not. Mr. X contends that Mr. Y’s actuary report shall be considered in audit
report due to majority of votes. Now, Mr. Z is in dilemma. Explain the responsibility of
auditors, in case, report made by Mr. Y’s actuary, later on, found faulty.
Answer
Using the work of an Auditor’s Expert: As per SA 620 “Using the Work of an Auditor’s Expert”, the
expertise of an expert may be required in the actuarial calculation of liabilities associated with
insurance contracts or employee benefit plans etc., however, the auditor has sole responsibility
for the audit opinion expressed, and that responsibility is not reduced by the auditor’s use of the
work of an auditor’s expert.
171

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
consistency with other audit evidence as per SA 500. Further, in view of SA 620, if the expert’s
work involves use of significant assumptions and methods, then the relevance and reasonableness
of those assumptions and methods must be ensured by the auditor and if the expert’s work
involves the use of source data that is significant to that expert’s work, the relevance,
completeness, and accuracy of that source data in the circumstances must be verified by the
auditor.
In the instant case, Mr. X, Mr. Y and Mr. Z, jointly appointed as an auditor of KRP Ltd., referred
their own known Actuaries for valuation of gratuity scheme. Actuaries are an auditor’s expert as
per SA 620. Mr. Y’s referred actuary has provided the gratuity valuation report, which later on
found faulty. Further, Mr. Z is not agreed with this report therefore he submitted a separate audit
report specifically for such gratuity valuation.
In such situation, it was duty of Mr. X, Mr. Y and Mr. Z, before using the gratuity valuation report
of Actuary, to ensure the relevance and reasonableness of assumptions and methods used. They
were also required to examine the relevance, completeness and accuracy of source data used for
such report before expressing their opinion.
Mr. X and Mr. Y will be held responsible for grossly negligence and using such faulty report without
examining the adequacy of expert actuary’s work whereas Mr. Z will not be held liable for the
same due to separate opinion expressed by him.
9. A & Co. was appointed as auditor of Great Airways Ltd. As the audit partner what factors shall be
considered in the development of overall audit plan?
Answer
Development of an overall plan - Overall plan is basically intended to provide direction for audit
work programming and includes the determination of timing, manpower development and co-
ordination of work with the client, other auditors and other experts. The auditor should consider
the following matters in developing his overall plan for the expected scope and conduct of the
audit:
(i) Terms of his engagement and any statutory responsibilities.
(ii) Nature and timing of reports or other communications.
(iii) Applicable Legal or Statutory requirements.
(iv) Accounting policies adopted by the clients and changes, if any, in those policies.
(v) The effects of new accounting and auditing pronouncement on the audit.
(vi) Identification of significant audit areas.
(vii) Setting of materiality levels for the audit purpose
(viii)Conditions requiring special attention such as the possibility of material error or fraud or
involvement of parties in whom directors or persons who are substantial owners of the entity are
interested and with whom transactions are likely.
172

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
(ix) Degree of reliance to be placed on the accounting system and internal control.
(x) Possible rotation of emphasis on specific audit areas.
(xi) Nature and extent of audit evidence to be obtained.
(xii) Work of the internal auditors and the extent of reliance on their work, if any in the audit.
(xiii)Involvement of other auditors in the audit of subsidiaries or branches of the client and
involvement of experts.
(xiv)Allocation of works to be undertaken between joint auditors and the procedures for its
control and review.
(xv) Establishing and coordinating staffing requirements.
10. As an auditor of garment manufacturing company for the last five years, you have observed that
new venture of online shopping has been added by the company during current year. What factors
would be considered by you in formulating the audit strategy of the company?
Answer
Formulation of Audit Strategy: While formulating the audit strategy for a company, following
factors may be considered -
Specific Factors for Online Shopping:
The auditor shall also obtain an understanding of the information system including the related
business processes due to new venture of online shopping in the following areas:
(i) The classes of transactions in the entity’s operations that are significant to the
financial statements;
(ii) The procedures, within both information technology (IT) and manual systems, by
which those transactions are initiated, recorded, processed, corrected as necessary, transferred
to the general ledger and reported in the financial statements;
(iii) The related accounting records, supporting information and specific accounts in the
financial statements that are used to initiate, record, process and report transactions; this
includes the correction of incorrect information and how information is transferred to the
general ledger. The records may be in either manual or electronic form;
(iv) How the information system captures events and conditions, other than transactions,
that are significant to the financial statements;
Controls surrounding journal entries, including non-standard journal entries used to record non-
recurring, unusual transactions or adjustments
11. AKJ Ltd is a small-sized 30 years old company having business of manufacturing of pipes.
Company has a plant based out of Dehradun and have their corporate office in Delhi. Recently
the company appointed new firm of Chartered Accountants as their statutory auditors.
The statutory auditors want to enter into an engagement letter with the company in respect of
their services but the management has contended that since the statutory audit is mandated
173

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
by law, engagement letter may not be required. Auditors did not agree to this and have shared
a format of engagement letter with the management for their reference before getting that
signed. In this respect management would like to understand that as per SA 210 (auditing
standard referred to by the auditors), if the agreed terms of the engagement shall be recorded in
an engagement letter or other suitable form of written agreement, what should be included in
terms of agreed audit engagement letter?
Answer:
As per SA 210 ‘Agreeing the Terms of Audit Engagements’, the auditor shall agree the terms of the
audit engagement with management or those charged with governance, as appropriate.
The agreed terms of the audit engagement shall be recorded in an audit engagement letter or
other suitable form of written agreement and shall include:
(iv) Identification of the applicable financial reporting framework for the preparation of the
financial statements; and
and content.
12. AK & Co, a firm of Chartered Accountants, have been operating for the last 6 years. Due to the
quality of service offered by the firm, it has made its name and is quite renowned especially in
Southern India where its head office is located. The firm has a staff size of 240 including graduates,
Chartered Accountants, Management Consultants, Company Secretaries and lawyers.
The firm has 3 branches other than head office at Bangalore, Chennai and Pune. The firm has got
many clients for statutory audit over the period and ensures that to maintain the quality of
work, proper planning is done by each team before starting any engagement.
One of the engagement team, picked up for statutory audit of Sun Private Ltd, was involved in
the process of planning of audit for the financial year ended 31 March, 2019.
The audit for the financial year ended 31 March, 2018 was conducted by a different engagement
team. However, the engagement team of Sun Private Ltd for the current year has got the industry
experience. The audit team is confused during the planning work and would like to have your
views on following points. Please advise by answering one of them.
(a) The engagement team should consult the previous year’s engagement team during
the course of their planning.
(b) The engagement team should be independent and hence cannot consult the
previous year’s engagement team during the course of their planning.
174

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
(c) The engagement team needs to maintain confidentiality and hence cannot consult
the previous year’s engagement team during the course of their planning.
(d) Only the Partner who is going to sign the audit report may consult the previous
year’s audit team.
Answer: Option: (a)
13. Kshitij Private Ltd is a company based out of Kochi having operations primarily in Europe.
Because of the nature of the operations of the company, it is required to prepare its financial
statements as per International Standards for reporting to the local regulatory authorities over
there.
Since the business is based in Europe, the audit team is also required to visit the locations
wherever the company has offices and is accordingly required to perform certain audit
procedures over there.
During the audit of this company for the financial year ended 31 March, 2019, the auditors, who
had planned their work appropriately and had a large team for conducting the audit, were facing
lot of challenges at various stages.
They were also required to revisit their materiality level during the course of the work.
However, at the time of final reviews when this was discussed with the Audit Partner (Audit
Incharge), he was not convinced with the approach of the audit team wherein they reassessed
their plans continuously resulting in waste of time.
In this situation, please advise which one of the following would be correct.
(a) Audit Partner being the senior most team member is right and same thing should be
considered by audit team by documenting it in the audit file.
(b) Audit Partner’s view is not correct as the audit team did the right thing.
(c) Audit Partner was correct, however, during the course of an audit which required visits at
various locations it was mandatory.
(d) Audit Partner’s view is not correct because the materiality was revised by the audit team
which is a big thing and same should have been considered by the audit partner.
Answer: Option: (b)
14. RJ Private Limited having its office at Bangalore and operations spread across Southern India,
had a discussion with its statutory auditors regarding the audit plan and the timelines.
In the past years, there have been significant delays in completion of audit work and the
management wanted that for the current year, audit should get completed on time. For doing
this, the audit team suggested that the information for the purpose of audit should be ready on
time and only then the timelines as agreed can be achieved.
175

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
On the basis of the discussions with the client & the auditors and internal discussions amongst
the audit team members, a detailed audit programme was prepared by the audit team for the
current year’s audit. But the audit team discussed that they will not document this audit
programme till the completion of the audit work because at various stages, the work may require
changes. If the audit team documents the audit programme then it would create problems later
on at the time of assembly of the audit file wherein the audit team would have to show the
changes made by them in the audit programme during the course of the audit.
You are required to share your views in respect of this understanding and approach of the auditor.
(a) The decision of audit team regarding not documenting the audit programme is very
good as this would avoid unnecessary problems of documentation of changes made in the audit
programme at the time of assembly of file.
(b) Instead of considering the audit programme, the audit team could have prepared a
checklist. In case of a checklist, such problem will not arise. Because in case of a checklist if any
changes are made then the final checklist can be kept in the file along with old working checklist
used during the audit.
(c) The approach of the audit team not to document audit programme is not correct.
The audit team needs to document it properly at the time of planning stage itself and any changes
made after that should also be documented with explanations.
(d) The decision of audit team not to document the audit programme is not correct. Their
concern that the changes may arise in the audit programme is valid, however, to take care of that
the audit team can take approval from the ICAI later on when those changes will be made. The
audit team will have to document the changes and the approval note of the ICAI.
Answer: Option: ( c)
15. KJ Private Ltd has a business of pharmaceuticals and has an annual turnover of INR 1,500
crores. During the last few years, considering the environment in which the company operates,
its profit have reduced and are still reducing. Hence the management has been looking at various
ways to cut the costs.
AD & Associates are the statutory auditors of the company and RM & Associates are the internal
auditors of the company Initially the company did not want to appoint any internal auditors to
save costs, however, at insistence of the statutory auditors, the company appointed the internal
auditors.
During the course of the statutory audit for the financial year ended 31 March, 2019, the statutory
auditors requested for the detailed working papers of the internal auditors which the internal
auditors refused. However, the statutory auditors told the management if the same are not
provided then they would qualify their report.
In this situation, please advise which of the following would be correct.
176

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
(a) The statutory auditors should review the detailed working papers but they cannot qualify
their report on this ground.
(b)The statutory auditors may review the detailed working papers and even after that they may
qualify their report.
( c)The statutory auditors are not required to go to the extent of review of detailed working
papers of internal auditors.
(d)The statutory auditors may review the detailed working papers of internal auditors but for
that purpose they would require prior approval of the ICAI.
Answer: Option : ( c)
16. RIM Private Ltd is engaged in the business of manufacturing of steel having annual turnover
of INR 10,000 crores. The company is very capital intensive and has its plants at two locations –
Mohali and Hosur. During the year ended 31 March, 2019, the company carried out a detailed
physical verification of its property, plant and equipment and also reassessed their useful lives
by engaging a consultant. The consultant submitted its report to the management on
21 April, 2019. The statutory auditors of the company started their audit work from May 2019
and when this information was given to them regarding the physical verification and the
reassessment of the useful lives of property, plant and equipment, the auditors told the
management that the consultant should have submitted its report to the auditors also
independently. Further, in the absence of this direct communication of the report of the
consultant to the auditors, the audit team would have to review the work of the consultant which
is not efficient but it cannot be avoided now. Management did not agree with both the points
of the auditors that the consultant should have shared report with the auditors directly and that
the auditors need to review the work of the consultant. The management would like to have
your views on this matter.
(a) The view of the management seems to be correct because there is no such
requirement that any consultant of the company should share his report directly with the auditor.
Also when the consultant has already submitted a detailed report, no further review is required
on that.
(b) Both the management and auditors are not correct. The auditor is not supposed to
receive the report directly. Further, the auditor needs to review the work of the consultant
irrespective of the fact whether he received the report directly or not.
(c) The auditor’s requirements are reasonable because he carries duty in respect of audit
of financial statements and by not getting report directly from the consultant he would not know
whether it belongs to that consultant or not. And now only because of this lack of proper
communication the auditor would have to review the work of the consultant.
(d) Both management and auditors should find a solution to this problem. The
management may request the consultant to send the report to the auditor directly now. On the
basis of the same, the auditor can avoid unnecessary procedure related to review of report of the
177

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
consultant.
Answer: Option : (b)
17. During the process of extracting the exception reports, the auditors noted numerous purchase
entries without valid purchase orders. In terms of percentage, about 40% of purchases were made
without valid purchase orders whereas few purchase orders were validated after the actual purchase.
Also, there was no reconciliation between the goods received and the goods ordered. You are required
to briefly explain the audit procedures to address the validity of account balance level. (4 Marks) (mtp –
II -july 2021)
ANSWER
In the given scenario, the auditors noted numerous purchase entries without valid purchase
orders during the process of extracting the exception reports. Further, in terms of percentage,
about 40% of purchases were made without valid purchase orders and also few purchase orders
were validated after the actual purchase. Also there was no reconciliation between the goods
received and the goods ordered.
Audit Procedures: The following procedures may address the validity of the account balance:
Make a selection of the purchases, review correspondence with the vendors, purchase requisitions
(internal document) and reconciliations of their accounts.
Review Vendor listing along with the ageing details. Follow up the material amounts paid before the
normal credit period and analyse the reasons for exceptions.
Meet with the company's Purchase officer and obtain responses to our inquiries regarding the purchases
made without purchase orders.
Discuss the summary of such issues with the client
18.(mtp – I -july 2021)
Well & Associates, an audit firm, was selected for the purpose of Quality Review by the Quality Review
Board (QRB) as it was having many of statutory audit assignments of clients engaged into sectors
identified as prone to fraud.
There were adverse findings by the Technical Reviewer in the Quality review conducted in the past of
Mr. Ramesh an engagement partner of Well & Associates because of which the QRB selected 5 audit
engagements of the firm for Quality review.
Mr. Jay, a practicing CA for more than 25 years was appointed as the Technical Reviewer to conduct the
Quality Review of the said firm and accordingly, Mr. Jay, after conducting the Quality review with a team
of 3 assistants, submitted his preliminary report to Well & Associates with qualifications as under:
Sr. No. Description of Qualifications

1 The AFUR (Audit Firm Under Review) had not obtained a written
confirmation of compliance with its policies and procedures on
independence from all firm personnel for the past 2 financial
years.
2 The AFUR had established the policies and procedures for
assembling of the final audit file in accordance with the time
limit prescribed in SA 230 but there were delays observed in the
same. (Please Refer Note, as below, for the same)
3 For two of the audit engagements of the AFUR, no engagement
documentations were available for the same and as per the
178

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
statement of the partner of the AFUR, after retaining them for 4

years and 6 years, respectively, were sent to the Principal
Auditors of the said audit engagements.
4 There were also instances of delays observed in communicating
the significant deficiencies to those charged with governance.
(Please Refer Note, as below, for the same)
5 The AFUR had revised its performance materiality level in case
of one of its statutory audit assignments with respect to
auditing of Financial Leasing transactions and the AFUR had only
documented such revision in the performance materiality level.
Note:
Name of the Type of Date of Date of Date of Date of

entity under Entity Approval Audit Report assembly of written
audit of Financial Final Audit communicati
AFUR Statements File on of
significant
deficiencies
in internal
control by
AFUR
Req Ltd. Listed 31.05.2021 25.06.2021 03.09.2021 05.06.2021
TIMCO (P) Unlisted 15.06.2021 18.08.2021 05.11.2021 25.08.2021
Ltd.
Gles Pvt. Ltd. Unlisted 16.07.2021 28.07.2021 15.09.2021 18.09.2021
Findey Ltd. Listed 12.05.2021 01.06.2021 01.08.2021 05.05.2021
DM Ltd. Unlisted 25.04.2021 18.05.2021 25.06.2021 04.07.2021
On the basis of the abovementioned facts, you are required to answer the following MCQs:
Multiple Choice Questions (5 questions of 2 Marks each):
1. Well & Associates should have obtained a written confirmation of compliance with its policies and
procedures on independence from all of its firm personnel as per requirements of which Statue /
Standard and in what frequency?
(a) As per the requirements of Council Central Guidelines, 2008, at least annually, Well & Associates
should have obtained a written confirmation from all of its firm personnel.
(b) As per the requirements of Standard on Quality Control 1 at least annually, Well & Associates should
have obtained a written confirmation from all of its firm personnel.
(c) As per the requirements of SA 220 at least annually, Well & Associates should have obtained a
written confirmation from all of its firm personnel.
179

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
(d) As per the requirements of Code of Ethics at least half yearly, Well & Associates should have obtained
a written confirmation from all of its firm personnel.
ANSWER- b
2. In case of which entities under audit of Well & Associates, there was delay in assembly of Final Audit
File?
(a) Req Ltd., TIMCO (P) Ltd., Gles Pvt. Ltd. and Findey Ltd., respectively.
(b) Req Ltd., TIMCO (P) Ltd. and Findey Ltd., respectively.
(c) Req Ltd. and TIMCO (P) Ltd., respectively.
(d) Req Ltd., TIMCO (P) Ltd., Gles Pvt. Ltd., Findey Ltd. and DM Ltd., respectively.
ANSWER- b
3. In case of which entities under audit of Well & Associates, there was delay in written communication
of significant deficiencies in internal control?
(a) TIMCO (P) Ltd., Gles Pvt. Ltd. and DM Ltd., respectively.
(b) Req Ltd., TIMCO (P) Ltd., Gles Pvt. Ltd. and DM Ltd., respectively.
(c) DM Ltd.
(d) Req Ltd., Gles Pvt. Ltd. and DM Ltd., respectively
ANSWER- d
4. For at least how many more years, Well & Associates should have retained the engagement
documentation in respect of the two audit engagements as referred above?
(a) 3 years and 1 year, respectively.
(b) 4 years and 2 years, respectively.
(c) 1 year and for other audit engagement documentation was retained for requisite period.
(d) 6 years and 4 years, respectively.
ANSWER- a
180

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
5. How many audit engagements of Well & Associates the QRB might have selected if there were no
adverse findings by the Technical Reviewer in the Quality review conducted in the past of Mr. Ramesh,
partner of Well & Associates?
(a) QRB might have selected up to 3 audit engagements of Well & Associates for review and not more
than 2 audit engagements of Mr. Ramesh.
(b) QRB might have selected up to 5 audit engagements of Well & Associates for review and not more
than 1 audit engagement of Mr. Ramesh
(c) QRB might have selected up to 5 audit engagements of Well & Associates for review and not more
than 2 audit engagements of Mr. Ramesh
(d) QRB might have selected up to 3 audit engagements of Well & Associates for review and not more
than 1 audit engagement of Mr. Ramesh. (10 x 2 = 20 Marks)
ANSWER- d
19. Entertainment Paradise, a movie theatre complex, is the foremost theatre located in Chennai. Along
with the sale of tickets over the counter and online booking, the major proportion of income is from the
cafe, shops, pubs etc. located in the complex. Its other income includes advertisements exhibited
within/outside the premises such as hoardings, banners, slides, short films etc. The facility for parking of
vehicles is also provided in the basement of the premises.
Entertainment Paradise appointed your firm as the auditor of the entity. Being the head of the audit
team, you are, therefore, required to draw an audit programme initially in respect of its revenue and
expenditure considering the above mentioned facts along with other relevant points relating to a
complex. (5 Marks) (mtp – I -july 2021)
ANSWER
Audit Programme of Movie Theatre Complex:
(i) Peruse the Memorandum of Association and Articles of Association of the entity.
(ii) Ensure the object clause permits the entity to engage in this type of business.
(iii) In the case of income from sale of tickets:
(1) Verify the control system as to how it is ensured that the collections on sale of tickets of various shows
are
properly and accurately accounted.
(2) Verify the system relating to online booking of various shows and the system of realization of money.
(3) Check that there is overall system of reconciliation of collections with the number of seats available for
different shows in a day.
181

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
(iv) Verify the internal control system and its effectiveness relating to the income from café, shops, pubs,
game zone etc., located within the multiplex.
(v) Verify the system of control exercised relating to the income receivable from advertisements exhibited
within the premises and inside the hall such as hoarding, banners, slides, short films etc.
(vi) Verify the system of collection from the parking areas in respect of the vehicles parked by the
customers.
(vii) In the case of payment to the distributors verify the system of payment which may be either through
out right payment or percentage of collection or a combination of both. Ensure at the time of settlement,
any payment of advance made to the distributor is also adjusted against the amount due.
(viii) Verify the system of payment of salaries and other benefits to the employees and ensure that
statutory requirements are complied with.
(ix) Verify the payments effected in respect of the maintenance of the building and ensure the same is in
order.
(x) Verify the insurance premium paid and ensure it covers the entire assets
20. (mtp – II -july 2021)

Andy & Co; a reputed Chartered Accountants firm is appointed as a statutory auditor of Manava
Swaroopam Limited. The Company is into manufacturing of copper products. The company has advanced
in all its endeavours by supplying million Copper units. The company has incorporated another company
“Daiva Swaroopam Private Limited” by investing 45% in the share capital of the company and at the
same time having 100% control over the Board of Directors as per the agreement with the majority
shareholder. The company is listed in the US Stock Exchange but in the process of listing in the Indian
Stock Exchanges, having a net worth of INR 245 crore. The product is promoted by Ali Baba, as its
product Brand Ambassador. You are the audit manager in-charge of the audit team this year and your 1st
year trainee asks you the following questions listed down. He has also noted down some of the
questions for you to answer to discuss the impact on the planning stage after understanding the entity
and its environment:
• The company is required to appoint the Internal Auditor as per provisions of the Companies Act, 2013
and the company complied with the same by delegating the duties to an employee, who joined the
company as 1st year Architect. The audit team is planning to use the work performed by the Internal
Audit function as the reports given by him are designed in a marvellous fashion. Even the Board of
Directors are astonished by the design of the Internal Audit report.
• The company is planning to use the working papers of the previous auditor by demanding the audit
working papers from him citing the confidentiality clause. The auditor also plans to use the same for
testing the opening balances during the year. The previous year auditor having been appointed as the
auditor of subsidiary; the company plans to use his work for verifying the investment balance during the
year.
182

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
1. The engagement partner has requested you to comment upon the usage of work of Internal auditor by
the engagement team in accordance with relevant Standard on Auditing:
(a) As the work done by the internal auditor is marvellously designed and presented the same can be
considered to the extent the statutory auditor can use it. As the work is highly appreciated even by the
Board of Directors, the same should be definitely used by Andy & Co.
(b) The work done by the Internal Auditor need to be assessed for the sufficiency and should be used to
avoid the double work. The audit team of Andy & Co need to reduce the unnecessary work as the same
has been performed by the other auditor.
(c) The auditor is required to assess the competence and professional care of the work performed by the
Internal Auditor. Thus, the auditor Andy & Co needs to reconsider the audit strategy and cannot use the
work of the Internal Auditor.
(d) The work performed by the internal auditor can be used by the External Auditor in this case if the
architect is not an employee of the company but is in private practice.
ANSWER- c
2. The Trainee asked whether the audit team is to perform any procedures over the investment in Daiva
Swaroopam Private Limited:
(a) The company need to prepare the consolidated financial statements and the same need to be audited
by the auditor and the auditor needs to consider the financial information and also assess regarding the
need to use of the work of the component auditor.
(b) The auditor needs to perform audit procedures over the balances in investments and transactions
with its related party.
(c) The auditor need not perform any procedures as the investment in Daiva Swaroopam Private Limited
has already been made in the previous year.
(d) Both (a) & (b).
ANSWER- d
3. The trainee asked about role of auditor in case the investment in Daiva Swaroopam Private Limited is
increased to 60% in the next year:
(a) The auditor need not do any additional procedures compared to this year except for audit procedures
over the increase in Investment value and its disclosures in the Financial Statements.
(b) The auditor should also audit the group consolidated financial statements as the consolidation
183
becomes applicable for the company being the investment is raised from 45% to 60%.

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
(c) The auditor needs to audit the subsidiary’s books of accounts to get comfort over the balances in the
material subsidiary. Thus, the audit strategy will change for verifying the investment.
(d) The auditor can either on its own, audit the subsidiary or use the work of another auditor to get
comfort over the balances in the subsidiary from the next year.
ANSWER- a
4. The company has requested its previous auditor to give back its audit documentation (“working
papers”) and warned the previous auditor with legal notice to submit them back to the company
showing the confidentiality clause:
(a) The previous auditor is bound to return the workpapers as the company has raised the confidentiality
clause over the audit firm. Thus, the SA – 230 is not applicable in such scenario as the original owner
itself is requesting to return the working papers.
(b) The auditor has a right over its working paper, and he is the owner of the workpapers but he cannot
give the workpapers to any person even at the request of the company.
(c) The auditor has a right over its working paper, and he is the owner of the workpapers and he may
give at his discretion make available the workpapers to the company.
(d) The auditor has a right over its working papers but the owner of them is the company. He should
make available the workpapers to the company at its request and SQC-1 mandates the auditor to make
copies made available to its clients.
ANSWER- c
5. The trainee asked you whether the IND AS is applicable to the group or not?
(a) Yes, but only Manava Swaroopam Limited need to prepare its financial statements as per the
Companies (Indian Accounting Standards Rules), 2015.
(b) Yes, the Company Manava Swaroopam Limited and its subsidiaries (including associates) need to
prepare its financial statements as per the Companies (Indian Accounting Standards Rules), 2015.
(c) The Company is not required to prepare financial statements as per Companies (Indian Accounting
Standards Rules), 2015 as the company’s net worth is below 250 crore and is not listed in any recognised
stock exchange in India.
(d) The Company is required to prepare books of accounts as per US GAAP as it is listed in US Stock
Exchange and get the books audited by the CPA but not the Indian Chartered Accountant.
(10 x 2 = 20 Marks)
184
ANSWER- b

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s

The auditors are required to understand, evaluate and validate the entity level controls as a part of audit
engagement, the result of which has an impact on the nature, timing and extent of other audit procedures.
In evaluating the effect of such control, existence, effectiveness and assessment of the whistle-blower policy
in the company is very important. Specify the procedure you would perform for an understanding and
evaluation of such whistle-blower policy.
ANSWER
Procedure for understanding and evaluation of whistle-blower policy -
Auditors are required to understand, evaluate and validate the entity level controls as a part of an audit
engagement. The results of testing entity level controls could have an impact on the nature, timing and
extent of other audit procedures including testing of controls. For example, when the entity level controls
at a company are effective, the auditor may consider reducing the number of samples in the test of
controls and where the auditor finds the entity level controls ineffective, the auditor may consider to
increase the rigour of testing by increasing sample sizes. In small and less complex companies, the entity
level controls may not formally defined or documented. In such situations, the auditor should design audit
procedures accordingly to obtain evidence of the existence and effectiveness of entity level controls.
The following example shows how the auditor performs an understanding and evaluation of the whistle-
blower policy in a company:
(i) Does the company have a whistle-blower policy?

(ii) Is this policy documented and approved?
(iii) Has the whistle-blower policy been communicated to all the employees?
(iv) Are employees aware of this policy and understand its purpose and their obligations?
(v) Has the company taken measures viz., training, to make the employees understand the contents and
purpose of the policy?
(vi) Does the company monitor effectiveness of the policy from time-to-time?
(vii) How does the company deal with deviations and non-compliance?

Milk Ltd. is engaged in the business of manufacturing and distribution of various milk products like cheese,
curd, paneer, etc. Government made certain changes in rules and regulations relating to this sector,
consequently management decided to go for expansion. Management was looking for some financial
investor, who can fund some part of the proposed expansion. Mr. X is interested in the venture and appoints
you to act as an advisor to the proposed investment in the business of Milk Ltd. You have to investigate the
audited financial statements and ensure that the valuation of shares of the company on the basis of audited
financial statements is appropriate. What process will be used for checking and whether you can put reliance
on already audited statement of accounts?
ANSWER
Process used for checking and reliance on already audited statement of accounts -
Following process may be carried out-
185

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
1. If the statements of account produced before the investigator were not audited by a qualified
accountant, then of course there arises a natural duty to get the figures in the accounts properly checked
and verified.
2. However, when the accounts produced to the investigator have been specially prepared by a
professional accountant, who knows or ought to have known that these were prepared for purposes of the
investigation, he could accept them as correct relying on the principle of liability to third parties.
3. Nevertheless, it would be prudent to see first that such accounts were prepared with objectivity and that
no bias has crept in to give advantage to the person on whose behalf these were prepared.
Whether the investigator can put reliance on the already audited statement of account - If the investigation
has been launched because of some doubt in the audited statement of account, no question of reliance on
the audited statement of account arises. However, if the investigator has been requested to establish value
of a business or a share or the amount of goodwill payable by an incoming partner, ordinarily the investigator
would be entitled to put reliance on audited materials made available to him unless, in the course of his test
verification, he finds the audit to have been carried on very casually or unless his terms of appointment
clearly require to test everything afresh.
23. ( MTP- NOV 2021)

You have been appointed as auditor of ARHAM Ltd. After having determined the audit objectives, now you
have been requested to draft audit criteria. What are the sources that you will use while doing the task?
ANSWER
Determining Audit Criteria - Audit criteria are the standards used to determine whether a program meets
or exceeds expectations. It provides a context for understanding the results of the audit. Audit criteria are
reasonable and attainable standards of performance against which economy, efficiency and effectiveness
of programmes and activities can be assessed.
The audit criteria may be sought to be obtained from the following sources:
(i) procedure manuals of the entity.
(ii) policies, standards, directives and guidelines.
(iii) criteria used by the same entity or other entities in similar activities or programmes.
(iv) independent expert opinion and know how.
(v) new or established scientific knowledge and other reliable information.
(vi) general management and subject matter literature and research papers.
24(MARCH 2022 MTP)

M/s. Sumati & Co. was appointed as an auditor of Mati Limited, a company operating its business in telecom
sector. As per spectrum allocation agreement with Government, Mati Limited is required to pay certain
percentage of its annual revenue as license fee. Mati Limited paid the license fee on its core business for last
two years. At the end of third year, the communication was received from Government that it needs to pay
agreed percentage on its total revenues and not only on core business revenues. Matter was disputed and
went to court of law. On prudence basis, Mati Limited made a provision on estimated business in its books
of accounts of agreed percentage on non - core business receipts also. The amount of provision was of such
huge amount that the Mati Limited's profit and loss account for that quarter reflected loss due to that
provision. How you as an auditor can evaluate this accounting estimate which involves significant risk and
what if Management has not addressed the effects of estimation uncertainty on provision made?
ANSWER :
In the given case, Sumati & Co. was appointed as an auditor of Mati Ltd., operating in Telecom sector. GSB
186

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
Ltd paid the license fee on its core business revenue whereas Govt required it to pay on non-core business
receipts as well. Consequently, the amount of provision was of such a huge amount that Mati Ltd.’s profit
and loss account reflected a loss due to that provision. As an auditor evaluation would be done as under:
For accounting estimates that give rise to significant risks, in addition to other substantive procedures
performed to meet the requirements of SA 330, the auditor shall evaluate the following:
(i)How management has considered alternative assumptions or outcomes, and why it has rejected them, or
how management has otherwise addressed estimation uncertainty in making the accounting estimate.
(ii)Whether the significant assumptions used by management are reasonable.
(iii)Where relevant to the reasonableness of the significant assumptions used by management or the
appropriate application of the applicable financial reporting framework, management’s intent to carry out
specific courses of action and its ability to do so.
(iv)If, in the auditor’s judgment, management has not adequately addressed the effects of estimation
uncertainty on the accounting estimates that give rise to significant risks, the auditor shall, if considered
necessary, develop a range with which to evaluate the reasonableness of the accounting estimate.
25 (MARCH 2022 MTP)

EROS, a movie theatre complex, is the foremost theatre located in Bangalore. Along with the sale of tickets
over the counter and online booking, the major proportion of income is from the cafe, shops, pubs etc.
located in the complex. Its other income includes advertisements exhibited within/outside the premises
such as hoardings, banners, slides, short films etc. The facility for parking of vehicles is also provided in the
basement of the premises. EROS appointed your firm as the auditor of the entity. Being the head of the audit
team, you are, therefore, required to draw an audit programme initially in respect of its revenue and
expenditure considering the above mentioned facts along with other relevant points relating to a complex.
ANSWER :
Audit Programme of Movie Theatre Complex:
(i)Peruse the Memorandum of Association and Articles of Association of the entity.
(ii)Ensure the object clause permits the entity to engage in this type of business.
(iii)In the case of income from sale of tickets:
(1)Verify the control system as to how it is ensured that the collections on sale of tickets of various shows
are properly accounted.
(2)Verify the system of relating to online booking of various shows and the system of realization of money.
(3)Check that there is overall system of reconciliation of collections with the number of seats available for
different shows on a day.
(iv)Verify the internal control system and its effectiveness relating to the income from café, shops, pubs,
game zone etc., located within the multiplex.
(v)Verify the system of control exercised relating to the income receivable from advertisements exhibited
within the premises and inside the hall such as hoarding, banners, slides, short films etc.
(vi)Verify the system of collection from the parking areas in respect of the vehicles parked by the customers.
(vii)In the case of payment to the distributors verify the system of payment which may be either through out
right payment or percentage of collection or a combination of both. Ensure at the time of settlement any
payment of advance made to the distributor is also adjusted against the amount due.
(viii)Verify the system of payment of salaries and other benefits to the employees and ensure that statutory
requirements are complied with.
(ix)Verify the payments effected in respect of the maintenance of the building and ensure the same is in
order.
(x)Verify the insurance premium paid and ensure it covers the entire assets.
187

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
26(APRIL 2022 MTP)

The auditors are required to understand, evaluate and validate the entity level controls as a part of audit
engagement, the result of which has an impact on the nature, timing and extent of other audit procedures.
In evaluating the effect of such control, existence, effectiveness and assessment of the whistle-blower policy
in the company is very important. Specify the procedure you would perform for an understanding and
evaluation of such whistle-blower policy.
ANSWER:
Procedure for understanding and evaluation of whistle-blower policy - Auditors are required to understand,
evaluate and validate the entity level controls as a part of an audit engagement. The results of testing entity
level controls could have an impact on the nature, timing and extent of other audit procedures including
testing of controls. For example, when the entity level controls at a company are effective, the auditor may
consider reducing the number of samples in the test of controls and where the auditor finds the entity level
controls ineffective, the auditor may consider to increase the rigour of testing by increasing sample sizes. In
small and less complex companies, the entity level controls may not formally defined or documented. In such
situations, the auditor should design audit procedures accordingly to obtain evidence of the existence and
effectiveness of entity level controls.
The following example shows how the auditor performs an understanding and evaluation of the whistle-
blower policy in a company:
(i)Does the company have a whistle-blower policy?
(ii)Is this policy documented and approved?
(iii)Has the whistle-blower policy been communicated to all the employees?
(iv)Are employees aware of this policy and understand its purpose and their obligations?
(v)Has the company taken measures viz., training, to make the employees understand the contents and
purpose of the policy?
(vi)Does the company monitor effectiveness of the policy from time-to-time?
(vii)How does the company deal with deviations and non-compliance?
27 (April 2022 MTP)

Darshan Ltd. is a manufacturing company, provided following details of wastages of raw materials in
percentage, for various months. You have been asked to enquire into causes of abnormal wastage of raw
materials. Draw out an audit plan.
Wastage percentage are
July 2021 1.3%
Aug 2021 1.6%
Sep 2021 1.5%
Oct 2021 3.9%
ANSWER :
Audit Plan to locate the Abnormal Wastage of Raw Material: To locate the reasons for the abnormal wastage,
the auditor of Darshan Ltd. should first assess the general requirements as under:
(i)Procure a list of raw materials, showing the names and detailed characteristics of each raw material.
(ii)Obtain the standard consumption figures, and ascertain the basis according to which normal wastage
figures have been worked out. Examine the break-up of a normal wastage into that in process, storage and
handling stages. Also obtain control reports, if any, in respect of manufacturing costs with reference to
predetermined standards.
(iii)Examine the various records maintained for recording separately the various lots purchased and
identification of each lot with actual material consumption and for ascertaining actual wastage figures
therein.
188

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
(iv) Obtain reports of Preventive Maintenance Programme of machinery to ensure that the quality of goods
manufacture is not of sub-standard nature or leads to high scrappage work.
(v)Assess whether personnel employed are properly trained and working efficiently.
(vi)See whether quality control techniques have been consistent or have undergone any change.
(vii)Examine inventory plans and procedures in report of transportation storage efficiency, deterioration,
pilferage and whether the same are audited regularly.
(viii)Examine whether the basis adopted for calculating wastage for September is the same as was adopted
for the other three months.
(ix)Obtain a statement showing break up of wastage figures in storage, handling and process for the four
months under reference and compare the results of the analysis for each of the four months.
In addition, some specific reasons for abnormal wastage in process may be considered by the auditor are as
under:
(i)Examine laboratory reports and inspection reports to find out if raw materials purchased were of a poor
quality or were of sub-standard quality. This will be most useful if it is possible to identify the wastage out of
each lot that has been purchased.
(ii)Machine breakdown, power failure, etc. may also result into loss of materials in process. Check the
machine utilisation statements.
(iii)A high rate of rejections in the finished lots may also be responsible for abnormal wastage; therefore,
examine the inspectors’ reports in respect of inspection carried out on the completion of each stage of work
or process.
(iv)It is possible that the wastage may have occurred because the particular lot out of which issues were
made was lying in the store for a long time, leading to deterioration in quality or because of a change in the
weather which may have led to the deterioration. Compare the wastage figures.
(v)Abnormal wastage in storage and handling may arise due to the following reasons:
(1)Write offs on account of reconciliation of physical and book inventories: In case of periodical physical
inventory taking, such write offs will be reflected only in the month such reconciliation takes place.
(2)Accidental, theft or fire losses in storage: The auditor should examine the possibility of these for the
purpose.
(vi)Examine whether any new production line was taken up during the month in respect of which standard
input-output ratio is yet to be set-up.
189

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
190

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s

1.MTP Oct 2019 Qn no 18 (2 Marks)
You are the audit senior in charge of the audit of Swandive Co, and have been informed by your
audit manager that during the current year a fraud occurred at the client. A payroll clerk sets up
fictitious employees and the wages were paid into the clerk’s own bank account. This clerk has
subsequentlyleft the company, but the audit manager is concerned that additional frauds have
taken place in the wages department. Which of the following audit procedures would be
undertaken during the audit of wages as a result of the manager’s assessment of the increased risk
of fraud?
(1) Discuss with the payroll manager the nature of the payroll fraud, how it occurred and the
financial
impact of amounts incorrectly paid into the payroll clerk’s bank account.
(2) Review the supporting documentation to confirm the total of the fraudulent payments made
and assess the materiality of this misstatement.
(3) Review and test the internal controls surrounding setting up of and payments to new joiners to
assess whether further frauds may have occurred.
(4) Review the legal action taken by the management against the payroll clerk who was involved
in the fraud and see whether he is punished for his actions.
(a) Audit procedures 1,2,3
(b) Audit procedures 2,3,4
(c) Audit procedures 1,3,4
(d) Audit procedures 1,2,4
191

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
Answer: (a) Audit procedures 1,2,3.
(a) While commencing the statutory audit of Alex Co. Ltd., what would you consider as an auditor to
assess risk of material misstatement and responses to such risks?
(b) Prabhu Ltd., a manufacturing concern wants to develop internal control system. You are an expert
in developing the internal control system, hereby called to brief about the same. In view of above, you
are required to brief about internal control system and inherent limitations of the internal control?
Answer
Considerations of Auditor for Assessing the Risk of Material Misstatement: As per SA 315
“Identifying and Assessing the Risk of Material Misstatement through understanding the Entity
and its Environment”, the auditor shall identify and assess the risks of material misstatement at
the financial statement level; and the assertion level for classes of transactions, account balances,
and disclosures to provide a basis for designing and performing further audit procedures. For this
purpose, the auditor shall:
(i) Identify risks throughout the process of obtaining an understanding of the entity and its
environment, including relevant controls that relate to the risks, and by considering the classes of
transactions, account balances, and disclosures in the financial statements;
(i) Assess the identified risks, and evaluate whether they relate more pervasively to the financial
statements as a whole and potentially affect many assertions;
(ii) Relate the identified risks to what can go wrong at the assertion level, taking account of relevant
controls that the auditor intends to test; and
(iii) Consider the likelihood of misstatement, including the possibility of multiple misstatements, and
whether the potential misstatement is of a magnitude that could result in a material
misstatement.
Auditor’s Responses to the Assessed Risk of Material Misstatement: According to SA 330 “The
Auditor’s Responses to Assessed Risks”, the auditor shall design and implement overall responses
to address the assessed risks of material misstatement. In designing the audit procedures to be
performed, the auditor shall:
(i) Consider the reasons for the assessment given to the risk of material misstatement at the
assertion level for each class of transactions, account balance, and disclosure, including:
(1) The likelihood of material misstatement due to the particular characteristics of the relevant class
of transactions, account balance, or disclosure; and
(2) Whether the risk assessment takes into account the relevant controls, thereby requiring the
auditor to obtain audit evidence to determine whether the controls are operating effectively; and
(ii) Obtain more persuasive audit evidence the higher the auditor’s assessment of risk.
192

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
(b)Internal Control System and its Inherent Limitations: As per Guidance Note on Audit of
Internal Financial Control over Financial Reporting, internal controls are a system consisting of
specific policies and procedures designed to provide management with reasonable assurance that
the goals and objectives it believes important to the entity will be met.
"Internal Control System" means all the policies and procedures (internal controls) adopted by
the management of an entity to assist in achieving management's objective of ensuring, as far as
practicable, the orderly and efficient conduct of its business, including adherence to management
policies, the safeguarding of assets, the prevention and detection of fraud and error, the accuracy
and completeness of the accounting records, and the timely preparation of reliable financial
information.
To state whether a set of financial statements presents a true and fair view, it is essential to
benchmark and check the financial statements for compliance with the framework. The
Accounting Standards specified under the Companies Act, 1956 (which are deemed to be
applicable as per Section 133 of the 2013 Act, read with Rule 7 of Companies (Accounts) Rules,
2014) is one of the criteria constituting the financial reporting framework on which companies
prepare and present their financial statements under the Act and against which the auditors
evaluate if the financial statements present a true and fair view of the state of affairs and the
results of operations of the company in an audit of the financial statements carried out under the
Act.
The fundamental therefore is that effective internal control is a process effected by people that
supports the organization in several ways, enabling it to provide reasonable assurance regarding
risk and to assist in the achievement of objectives.
Fundamental to a system of internal control is that it is integral to the activities of the company, and
not something practiced in isolation.
An internal control system:
 Facilitates the effectiveness and efficiency of operations.

 Helps ensure the reliability of internal and external financial reporting.
 Assists compliance with laws and regulations.
 Helps safeguarding the assets of the entity.
Limitations of Internal Control - Internal control, no matter how effective, can provide an entity
with only reasonable assurance and not absolute assurance about achieving the entity’s
operational, financial reporting and compliance objectives. Internal control systems are subject to
certain inherent limitations, such as:
 Management's consideration that the cost of an internal control does not exceed the expected
benefits to be derived.
 The fact that most internal controls do not tend to be directed at transactions of unusual nature.
The potential for human error, such as, due to carelessness, distraction, mistakes of judgement
and misunderstanding of instructions.
 The possibility of circumvention of internal controls through collusion with employees or with
193

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
parties outside the entity.

 The possibility that a person responsible for exercising an internal control could abuse that
responsibility, for example, a member of management overriding an internal control.
 Manipulations by management with respect to transactions or estimates and judgements
required in the preparation of financial statements.
3. MTP-Aug-18 Qn No 5(b) 4 Marks:

XYZ Hospital Private Ltd. is engaged in running a hospital of 200 Beds since last 20 years.
Revenue Track of the hospital for last 3 years is as under:
2015-16 - 20 Crores
2016-17 25 Crores
2017-18 35 Crores
Hospital has its own Pharmacy, Laboratory, Blood Bank, Radiology & General Stores. Its
management suspects that leakages/theft is happening in Pharmacy, Radiology, Laboratory and
General Stores departments. It seeks advice of RST & Co.,
Internal Auditors of the Company, as to how it can Institute/Improve its Internal Control. In this
context, Management wants to understand the concept of components of Internal Control
Structure in detail. Advise.
Answer:
The Internal Control structure in an organization is referred to as the policies and procedures
established by the entity to provide reasonable assurance that the objectives are achieved. The
control structure in an organization basically has the following components:
1. Control Environment - Control environment covers the effect of various factors like management
attitude; awareness and actions for establishing, enhancing or mitigating the effectiveness of
specific policies and procedures.
2. Accounting System - Accounting system means the series of task and records of an entity by which
transactions are processed for maintaining financial records. Such system identifies, assemble,
analyze, calculate, classify, record, summarize and report transactions and other events.
3. Control Procedure - Policies and procedures means those policies and procedures in addition to
the control environment and accounting systems which the management has established to
achieve the entity’s specific objectives.
In this regard, the management is responsible for maintaining an adequate accounting system
incorporating various internal controls to the extent that they are appropriate to the size and
nature of the business. There should be reasonable assurance for the auditor that the accounting
system is adequate and that all the accounting information required to be recorded has in fact
been recorded.
194

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
Internal controls normally contribute to such assurance. The auditor should gain an
understanding of the accounting system and related internal controls and should study and
evaluate the operation of those internal controls upon which he wishes to rely in determining
the nature, timing and extent of other audit procedures. Where the auditor concludes that he
can rely on certain internal controls, he could reduce his substantive procedures which
otherwise may be required and may also differ as to the nature and timing.
Specific Requirement under SA 315 - “Identifying and Assessing the Risks of Material
Misstatement through Understanding the Entity and its Environment” deals with the auditor’s
responsibility to identify and assess the risks of material misstatement in the financial statements,
through understanding the entity and its environment, including the entity’s internal control.
4.RTP May 2019 Qn no 13

ST Ltd is a growing company and currently engaged in the business of manufacturing of tiles. The
company is planning to expand and diversify its operations. The management has increased the
focus on the internal controls to ensure better governance. The management had a discussion
with the statutory auditors to ensure the steps required to be taken so that the statutory audit
is risk based and focused on areas of greatest risk to the achievement of the company’s
objectives.
Please advise the management and the auditor on the steps that should be taken for the same.
MTP-OCT-18 Qn No 4(b) 5 Marks:, (MTP- NOV 2019)
ST Ltd is a growing company and currently engaged in the business of manufacturing of tiles.
The company is planning to expand and diversify its operations. The management has increased
the focus on the internal controls to ensure better governance. The management had a
discussion with the statutory auditors to ensure the steps required to be taken so that the
statutory audit is risk based and focused on areas of greatest risk to the achievement of the
company’s objectives. Please advise the management and the auditor on the steps that should
be taken for the same.
Answer
Audit should be risk-based or focused on areas of greatest risk to the achievement of the audited
entity’s objectives. Risk-based audit (RBA) is an approach to audit that analyzes audit risks, sets
materiality thresholds based on audit risk analysis and develops audit programmes that allocate a
larger portion of audit resources to high-risk areas.
RBA consists of four main phases starting with the identification and prioritization of risks, to the
determination of residual risk, reduction of residual risk to acceptable level and the reporting to
auditee of audit results. These are achieved through the following:
Step 1 - Understand auditee operations to identify and prioritize risks: Understanding auditee
operations involves processes for reviewing and understanding the audited organization’s risk
management processes for its strategies, framework of operations, operational performance and
195

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
information process framework, in order to identify and prioritize the error and fraud risks that
impact the audit of financial statements.
The environment in which the auditee operates, the information required to monitor changes in
the environment, and the process or activities integral to the audited entity’s success in meeting its
objectives are the key factors to an understanding of agency risks. Likewise, a performance review
of the audited entity’s delivery of service by comparing expectations against actual results may also
aid in understanding agency operations.
Step 2 - Assess auditee management strategies and controls to determine residual audit risk:
Assessment of management risk strategies and controls is the determination as to how controls
within the auditee are designed. The role of internal audit in promoting a sound accounting
system and internal control is recognized, thus the SAI should evaluate the effectiveness of internal
audit to determine the extent to which reliance can be placed upon it in the conduct of substantive
tests.
Step 3 - Manage residual risk to reduce it to acceptable level: Management of residual risk
requires the design and execution of a risk reduction approach that is efficient and effective to bring
down residual audit risk to an acceptable level. This includes the design and execution of necessary
audit procedures and substantive testing to obtain evidence in support of transactions and balances.
More resources should be allocated to areas of high audit risks, which were earlier known through
the analytical procedures undertaken.
Step 4 - Inform auditee of audit results through appropriate report: The results of audit shall be
communicated by the auditor to the audited entity. The auditor must immediately communicate
to the auditee reportable conditions that have been observed even before completion of the audit,
such as weaknesses in the internal control system, deficiencies in the design and operation of
internal controls that affect the organization’s ability to record, process, summarize and report
financial data.
5. May 2019 Qn no.4(a) 5 Marks

A newly qualified professional has received his first appointment as auditor of a large company
and is very much concerned about the effectiveness of internal control and wants to assess and
evaluate the control environment as· part of his audit program. Towards achieving his objective,
he seeks your help in knowing the Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) of assessment and
evaluation of control.
OR
(NOV 21 EXAM)
During the course of audit of Fortune Ltd., CA Prasad is concerned with the quality and
effectiveness of internal control. Towards achieving his objective he wants to assess and
evaluate the control environment. Guide CA Prasad with well-defined set of the Standard
196

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
Operating Procedures in the assessment and evaluation of control. (5 Marks)

Answer
Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs): A well-defined set of SOPs helps define role,
responsibilities, process & controls & thus helps clearly communicate the operating controls to
all touch points of a process. The controls are likely to be clearly understood & consistently applied
even during employee turnover.
(i) Enterprise Risk Management: An organization which has robust process to identify & mitigate
risks across the enterprise & its periodical review will assist in early identification of gaps & taking
effective control measures. In such organizations, surprises of failures in controls is likely to be few.
(ii) Segregation of Job Responsibilities: A key element of control is that multiple activities in a
transaction/decision should not be concentrated with one individual. Segregation of duties is an
important element of control such that no two commercial activities should be conducted by the
same person.
(iii) Job Rotation in Sensitive Areas: Any job carried out by the same person over a long period of
time is likely to lead to complacency & possible misuse in sensitive areas. It is therefore important
that in key commercial functions, the job rotation is regularly followed to avoid degeneration of
controls. For example, if the same buyer continues to conduct purchase function for long period, it
is likely that he gets into comfort zone with existing vendors & hence does not exercise adequate
controls in terms of vendor development, competitive quotes etc.
(iv) Delegation of Financial Powers Document: As the organization grows, it needs to delegate the
financial & other powers to their employees. A clearly defined document on delegation of powers
allows controls to be clearly operated without being dependent on individuals.
(v) Information Technology based Controls: With the advent of computers & enterprise resource
planning (ERP) systems, it is much easier to embed controls through the system instead of being
human dependent. The failure rate for IT embedded controls is likely to be low, is likely to have
better audit trail & is thus easier to monitor. For example, at the stage of customer invoicing,
application of correct rates in invoices or credit control can all be exercised directly through IT
system improving control environment.

BSF Limited is engaged in the business of trading leather goods. You are the internal auditor of
the company for the year 2018-19. In order to review internal controls of the sales department
of the company, you visited the department and noticed the work division as follows:
(1) An officer was handling the sales ledger and cash receipts.
(2) Another official was handling dispatch of goods and issuance of Delivery challans.
(3) One more officer was there to handle customer/ debtor accounts and issue of receipts.
197

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
• As an internal auditor you are required to briefly discuss the general condition pertaining to
the internal check system.
• Do you think that there was proper division of work? If not, why?
Internal Check System: The general condition pertaining to the internal check system may be
summarized as under:
(i) no single person should have complete control over any important aspect of the business
operation. Every employee’s action should come under the review of another person.
(ii) Staff duties should be rotated from time to time so that members do not perform the same
function for a considerable length of time.
(iii) Every member of the staff should be encouraged to go on leave at least once a year.
(iv) Persons having physical custody of assets must not be permitted to have access to the books of
accounts.
(v) There should exist an accounting control in respect of each class of assets, in addition, there
should be periodical inspection so as to establish their physical condition.
(vi) Mechanical devices should be used, where ever practicable to prevent loss or misappropriation
of cash.
(vii) Budgetary control should be exercised and wide deviations observed should be reconciled.
(viii) For inventory taking, at the close of the year, trading activities should, if
possible be suspended, and it should be done by staff belonging to several sections of the
organization.
(ix) The financial and administrative powers should be distributed very judiciously among different
officers and the manner in which those are actually exercised should be reviewed periodically.
(x) Procedures should be laid down for periodical verification and testing of different sections of
accounting records to ensure that they are accurate.
(a) Division of Work: Company has not done proper division of work as:
(i) the receipts of cash should not be handled by the official handling sales ledger.
(ii) delivery challans should be verified by an authorised official other than the officer handling
despatch of goods.

The Entity’s Risk Assessment Process includes how management identifies business risks
relevant to the preparation of financial statements in accordance with the entity’s applicable
financial reporting framework, estimates their significance, assesses the likelihood of
occurrence and decides upon actions to respond to and manage them and the results thereof.
Elucidate the circumstances in which risks can arise or change.
Answer
Entity’s Risk Assessment Process: Risks can arise or change due to circumstances such as the
following-
198

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
(i) Changes in operating environment: Changes in the regulatory or operating environment can
result in changes in competitive pressures and significantly different risks.
(ii) New personnel: New personnel may have a different focus on or understanding of internal
control.
(iii) New or revamped information systems: Significant and rapid changes in information systems can
change the risk relating to internal control.
(iv) Rapid growth: Significant and rapid expansion of operations can strain controls and increase the
risk of a breakdown in controls.
(v) New technology: Incorporating new technologies into production processes or information
systems may change the risk associated with internal control.
(vi) New business models, products, or activities: Entering into business areas or transactions with
which an entity has little experience may introduce new risks associated with internal control.
(vii) Corporate restructurings: Restructurings may be accompanied by staff reductions and changes in
supervision and segregation of duties that may change the risk associated with internal control.
(viii) Expanded foreign operations: The expansion or acquisition of foreign operations carries new and
often unique risks that may affect internal control, for example, additional or changed risks from
foreign currency transactions.
(ix) New accounting pronouncements: Adoption of new accounting principles or changing accounting
principles may affect risks in preparing financial statements..
8. RTP May 2020 Qn no 12(a)

Navjeevan Hospital is a multi-speciality hospital which has been facing a lot of pilferage and
troubles regarding their inventory maintenance and control. On investigation into the matter it
was found that the person in charge of inventory inflow and outflow from the store house is
also responsible for purchases and maintaining inventory records. According to you, which basis
system of control has been violated? Also list down the other general conditions pertaining to
such system which needs to be maintained and checked by the management.
Basic system of Control: Internal Checks and Internal Audit are important constituents of
Accounting Controls. Internal check system implies organization of the overall system of book-
keeping and arrangement of Staff duties in such a way that no one person can carry through a
transaction and record every aspect thereof.
In the given case of Navjeevan Hospital, the person-in-charge of inventory inflow and outflow
from the store house is also responsible for purchases and maintaining inventory records. Thus,
one of the basic system of control i.e. internal check which includes segregation of duties or
maker and checker has been violated where transaction processing are allocated to different
persons in such a manner that no one person can carry through the completion of a transaction
from start to finish or the work of one person is made complimentary to the work of another
person.
The general condition pertaining to the internal check system may be summarized as under-
199

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
(i) No single person should have complete control over any important aspect of the business
(iv) Every member of the staff should be encouraged to go on leave at least once a year. Persons having
physical custody of assets must not be permitted to have access to the books of accounts.
(v) There should exist an accounting control in respect of each class of
assets, in addition, there should be periodical inspection so as to establish their physical
condition.
of cash.
(viii) For inventory taking, at the close of the year, trading activities should, if possible be suspended,
and it should be done by staff belonging to several sections of the organization.
Study Material
9. Briefly describe the various stages of a Risk Assessment process.
Answer
Risk Assessment is one of the most critical components of Enterprise Risk Management. The risk
assessment process involves considerations for qualitative and quantitative factors, definition
of key performance and risk indicators, risk appetite, risk scores, scales and maps, use of data &
metrics and benchmarking. The various stages in a Risk Assessment process are as follows:
• Define Business Objectives and Goals;
• Identify events that affect achievement of business objectives;
• Assess likelihood and impact;
• Respond and mitigate risks;
Assess residual risk.
10. What are the components of an internal control framework ?

Answer
There are five components of an internal control framework. They are as follows:
• Control Environment;
200

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
• Risk Assessment;
• Information & Communication;
• Monitoring;
• Control Activities
11. During the course of his audit, the auditor noticed material weaknesses in the internal
control system and he wishes to communicate the same to the management. You are required
to elucidate the important points the auditor should keep in the mind while drafting the letter
of weaknesses in internal control system.
Answer
Important Points to be kept in Mind While Drafting Letter of Weakness: As per SA 265,
“Communicating Deficiencies in Internal Control to Those who Charged with Governance and
Management”, the auditor shall include in the written communication of significant deficiencies
in internal control -
(i) A description of the deficiencies and an explanation of their potential effects; and
(ii) Sufficient information to enable those charged with governance and management to
understand the context of the communication.
In other words, the auditor should communicate material weaknesses to the management or the
audit committee, if any, on a timely basis. This communication should be, preferably, in writing
through a letter of weakness or management letter. Important points with regard to such a letter
are as follows-
(1) The letter lists down the area of weaknesses in the system and offers suggestions for
improvement.
(2) It should clearly indicate that it discusses only weaknesses which have come to the attention of the
auditor as a result of his audit and that his examination has not been designed to determine the
adequacy of internal control for management.
(3) This letter serves as a valuable reference document for management for the purpose of revising the
system and insisting on its strict implementation.
(4) The letter may also serve to minimize legal liability in the event of a major defalcation or other loss
resulting from a weakness in internal control.
12. SA 315, “Identifying and Assessing the Risks of Material Misstatement Through Understanding the
Entity and Its Environment” categorises the types of assertions used by the auditor to consider the
different types of potential misstatements that may occur. Briefly explain with example.
Answer:
The major components of audit risk are described in the Table below
201

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
Nature Description Commentary

Inherent Risk Susceptibility of an These are the business and other
assertion to a risks that arise from the entity’s
misstatement that could objectives, nature of operations
be material, individually and industry, the regulatory
or when aggregated with environment in which it operates
other misstatements, and its size and complexity.
assuming that
there are no related The risks of material
controls. misstatement will vary based on
Inherent risk is addressed the nature of the account balance
at both the financial or class of transaction.
statement level and at the Risks of particular concern to the
assertion level. auditor might include:
For example, • Complex calculations which
technological could be misstated;
developments might make • High value inventory;
a particular product • Accounting estimates that are
obsolete, thereby causing subject to significant
inventory to be more measurement uncertainty;
susceptible to • Lack of sufficient working capital
overstatement. to continue operations;
• A declining or volatile industry
with many business failures; and
• Technological developments
that might make a particular
product obsolete.
Control Risk (Do internal Risk that the entity’s The entity should identify and
controls in place mitigate internal control system assess its business and other
the inherent risks?) will not prevent, or detect risks (such as fraud) and
and correct on a timely respond by designing and
basis, a misstatement that implementing a system of
could be material, internal control.
individually or when Entity level controls such as
aggregated with other board oversight, IT general
misstatements. controls, and HR policies are
pervasive to all assertions
whereas activity level controls
generally, relate to specific
assertions.
Some control risk will always
exist because of the inherent
limitations of any internal
control system.
The auditor is required to
understand the entity’s
internal control and perform
202

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
procedures to assess the risks

of material misstatement at
the assertion level.
detection Risk This is the risk that the The auditor identifies
auditor will not detect a assertions where there are
misstatement that exists risks of material misstatement
in an assertion that could and concentrates audit
be material, either procedures on those areas.
individually or when In designing and evaluating the
aggregated with other results of performing
misstatements. The procedures, the auditor should
acceptable level of consider the possibility of:
detection risk for a given • Selecting an inappropriate
level of audit risk bears an audit procedure;
inverse relationship to the • Misapplying an appropriate
risks of material audit procedure; or
misstatement at the • Misinterpreting the results
assertion level from an audit procedure.
Example:-. If the top accountant is not competent enough for the assigned tasks, it is quite possible
that errors could occur in the financial statements. However, the nature of such errors will not often
be confined to a single account balance, transaction stream or disclosure. In addition, the error is
not likely be confined to a single assertion such as the completeness of sales. It could easily relate
to other assertions such as accuracy, existence and valuation.
13. Explain briefly the Flow Chart technique for evaluation of the Internal Control system.
Answer:
The flow charting technique can also be resorted to for evaluation of the internal control system. It is a
graphic presentation of internal controls in the organisation and is normally drawn up to show the controls
in each section or sub-section. As distinct from a narrative form, it provides the most concise and
comprehensive way for reviewing the internal controls and the evaluator’s findings. In a flow chart,
narratives, though cannot perhaps be totally banished are reduced to the minimum and by that process, it
can successfully bring the whole control structure, specially the essential parts thereof, in a condensed but
wholly meaningful manner. It gives a bird’s eye view of the system and is drawn up as a result of the auditor’s
review thereof. It should, however, not be understood that details are not reflected in a flow chart. Every
detail relevant from the control point of view and the details about how an operation is performed can be
included in the flow chart. Essentially a flow chart is a diagram full with lines and symbols and, if judicious
use of them can be made, it is probably the most effective way of presenting the state of internal controls in
the client’s organisation.
203

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
Drawing of a flow chart - A flow chart is normally a horizontal one in which documents and activities are
shown to flow horizontally from section to section and the concerned sections are shown as the vertical
column heads; in appropriate cases an individual also may be shown as the vertical column head. Care should
be taken to see that the first column head is devoted to the section or the individual wherefrom a transaction
originates and the placements of other column heads should be in the order of the actual flow of the
transaction.
It has been started earlier that a flow chart is a symbolic representation the flow of activity and related
documents through the section from origin to conclusion. These can be sales, purchases, wages, production,
etc. Each one of the main functions is to be linked with related functions for making a complete course.
Purchase is to be linked with trade payables and payments; sales with trade receivables and collections. By
this process, a flow chart will become self contained, complete and meaningful for evaluation of internal
controls.
14. Compute the overall Audit Risk if looking to the nature of business there are chances that 40% bills of
services provided would be defalcated, inquiring on the same matter management has assured that
internal control can prevent such defalcation to 75%.At his part the Auditor assesses that the procedure
he could apply in the remaining time to complete Audit gives him satisfaction level of detection of frauds
& error to an extent of 60%. Analyse the Risk of Material Misstatement and find out the overall Audit Risk.
Answer:
According to SA-200, “Overall Objectives of the Independent Auditor and the Conduct of an Audit
in Accordance with Standards on Auditing”, the Audit Risk is a risk that Auditor will issue an
inappropriate opinion while Financial Statements are materially misstated.
Audit Risk, has two components: Risk of material Misstatement and Detection Risk. The
204

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
relationship can be defined as follows. Audit Risk = Risk of material Misstatement X Detection Risk
Misstatement may exist in Financial Statement before start of the Audit. It has two components
Inherent risk and Control risk. The relationship can be defined as
Risk of material Misstatement = Inherent risk X control risk

Inherent risk: it is a susceptibility of an assertion about account balance; class of transaction,
disclosure towards misstatements which may be either individually or collectively with other
Misstatement becomes material before considering any related internal control which is 40% in
the given case.
Control risk: it is a risk that there may be chances of material Misstatement even if there is a
control applied by the management and it has prevented defalcation to 75%.
Chances of material Misstatement are reduced to 10% by the internal control applied by
management.
Detection risk: It is a risk that a material Misstatement remained undetected even if all Audit
procedures applied, Detection Risk is 100-60=40%
In the given case, overall Audit Risk can be reduced up to 4% as follows:
Audit Risk: Risk of Material Misstatement X Detection Risk = 10X 40% = 4%
15. Y Co. Ltd. has five entertainment centers to provide recreational facilities for public especially for
children and youngsters at 5 different locations in the peripheral of 200 kilometers. Collections are made
in cash. Specify the adequate system towards collection of money.
Answer:
The auditor’s objective in a risk-based audit is to obtain reasonable assurance that no material
misstatements whether caused by fraud or errors exist in the financial statements.
This involves the following three key steps:
• Assessing the risks of material misstatement in the financial statements
• Designing and performing further audit procedures that respond to assessed risks and reduce
the risks of material misstatements in the financial statements to an acceptably low level; and
• Issuing an appropriate audit report based on the audit findings.
The risk-based audit process is presented in three distinct phases:
Risk assessment. Risk response; and Reporting.
205

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
206

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
16. The effectiveness of controls cannot rise above the integrity and ethical values of the people
who create, administer, and monitor them. Explain.
Answer:
Communication and enforcement of integrity and ethical values:
The effectiveness of controls cannot rise above the integrity and ethical values of the people who create,
administer, and monitor them. Integrity and ethical behavior are the product of the entity’s ethical and
behavioral standards, how they are communicated, and how they are reinforced in practice. The
enforcement of integrity and ethical values includes, for example, management actions to eliminate or
mitigate incentives or temptations that might prompt personnel to engage in dishonest, illegal, or unethical
acts. The communication of entity policies on integrity and ethical values may include the communication of
behavioral standards to personnel through policy statements and codes of conduct and by example.
17. Your engagement team is seeking advice from you as engagement partner regarding steps for risk
identification. Elaborate.
Answer:
Steps for Risk Identification

➢ Assess the significance of the assessed risk, impact of its occurrence and also revise the
materiality accordingly for the specific account balance.
➢ Determine the likelihood for assessed risk to occur and its impact on our auditing procedures.
207

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
➢ Document the assertions that are effected.
➢ Consider the impact of the risk on each of the assertions
➢ (completeness, existence, accuracy, validity, valuation and presentation) relevant to the

account balance, class of transactions, or disclosure.
➢ Identify the degree of Significant risks that would require separate attention and response by
the auditor. Planned audit procedures should directly address these risks.
➢ Enquire and document the management’s response.
➢ Consider the nature of the internal control system in place and its possible effectiveness in
mitigating the risks involved. Ensure the controls :
❖ Routine in nature (occur daily) or periodic such as monthly.
❖ Designed to prevent or detect and correct errors.
❖ Manual or automated.
➢ Consider any unique characteristics of the risk.
➢ Consider the existence of any particular characteristics (inherent risks) in the class of
transactions, account balance or disclosure that need to be addressed in designing further audit
procedures.
➢ Examples could include high value inventory, complex contractual agreements, absence of a
paper trail on certain transaction streams or a large percentage of sales coming from a single
customer
18. Raj Private Limited is engaged in the business of retail and has its retail outlets c oncentrated
towards Northern India. Currently, the company has 59 outlets and the plan of the management is to
take this to at least 100 over the next 2 years.
The company is audited by Raj & Associates, a firm of Chartered Accountants, who have been operating
for over 20 years, however, they don’t have much experience in the retail sector. Because of this fact
the audit team decided to plan efficiently for the audit of the financial statements of the company for
the year ended 31 March 2019, being their first year of audit.
During the course of risk assessment by the auditors, it was discussed that the company is operating in
an industry where the operations are not very complicated and mostly the processes are known to all.
Considering the same they decided that assessment of inherent risk should not be done for this company
as that would be inefficient. However, the auditors will take due care of the control risks. The same
assessment was deliberated upon and after lot of discussions it was finalized like this.
In the given situation, please advise which one of the following would be correct.
(a) The assessment of audit team is correct.
208

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
(b) The assessment of audit team is wrong considering the fact that this is a private company wherein
such assessment is not possible.
(c) The assessment of audit team is wrong for this company.
(d) The assessment of audit team is correct considering the fact that this has been thoroughly discussed.
Answer: Option : ( c)
19. Kshitij Private Ltd is a company based out of Noida having operations in India and Dubai. The
company’s operations in Dubai have increase over the last 2 years and the management is earning very
good profits.
Because of the profits, the management also planned that they should now focus on strengthening of
internal controls of the company and for that purpose they have discussed with the statutory auditors
to carry out the audit for the financial year ended 31 March 2019 very rigorously.
The report on internal financial controls is also applicable to the company and hence the auditors during
the course of their work asked for Risk-control matrices from the company. During the year ended 31
March 2018, Risk-control matrix was not available with the company and was prepared in a draft
manner and the same was shared with the audit team during that year and the auditors completed their
work on the basis of that.
However, for the year ended 31 March 2019, the auditors would like to have robust documentation and
are not ready to accept the same Risk-control matrices.
In the given situation, please suggest what should be the course of action.
(a)The request of audit team is correct and the management should provide that.
(b)The requirement of audit team is not justified considering the fact that last year same documentation
was used by them.
( c)The requirement of audit team is not justified considering the fact that it’s a private company and
auditor anyways is required to perform rigorous audit procedures.
(d)In case of a private company on which internal financial controls report is required, the auditor is
not allowed to take any Risk-control matrix from the management. Seems to be an ethical issue.
Answer: Option : ( a)
20. SK Private Limited is a medium-sized company having operations in Jharkhand. The company
manufactures some parts and sells that to various dealers on ex-works basis. The financial statements
of the company are prepared as per Ind AS and internal financial controls report is also applicable on
the same.
During the course of audit of the financial statements for the year ended 31 March 2019, the
management of the company had a detailed discussion with the auditors for audit planning.
Further it was also decided that any observations of the auditors should also be discussed with the
management before conclusion by the audit team which was not done in the past years.
Considering this, the auditors started the risk assessment and requested the management to share
their documentation for the same on which the management said that they don’t have any risks and if
209

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
the auditors come across any such thing they can discuss that with the management.
But the auditors were not convinced with the view of the management and the same thing has happened
in the past years as well.
You are required to provide your inputs to resolve this matter.
(a)The requirement of the audit team is not correct.
(b)The view of the management is correct because of the applicability of Ind AS.
( c)The view of the management is correct because of the applicability of internal financial controls
reporting.
(d)The view of the management is not correct.
Answer: Option: (d)
21. AJ Private Ltd is in the business of telecom and have significant operations across India
predominantly in Northern India.
The statutory auditors of the company have been continuing for the last 3 years and have been issuing
clean report.
For the financial year ended 31 March 2019, the statutory auditors commenced their work in March
2019 as per discussions with the management and with a plan to complete the audit by first week of
May 2019.
The audit team concluded the work as per the agreed timelines and the financial statements and audit
report were signed on 5 May 2019 along with the engagement letter for the financial year ended 31
March 2019.
In the given situation, please advise which of the following would be correct.
(a)The engagement letter should have been signed before commencing the audit work.
(b)The engagement letter should have been signed at least a day before signing the audit report.
( c)The engagement letter should have been signed at least a day before signing the financial
statements.
(d)The engagement letter is optional in case of a private company and hence can be signed anytime.
Answer: Option : (a)
22. RIM Private Ltd is engaged in the business of manufacturing of water bottles and is experiencing
significant increase in turnover year on year. It is a subsidiary of RIM Gmbh, based out of Germany.
During the financial year ended 31 March 2019, the company carried out a detailed physical verification
of its inventory and property, plant and equipment.
During the year, various other activities were carried out to increase efficiency in operations and
reductions of costs.
The statutory auditors of the company started their audit work from April 2019 and requested for a
210

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
documentation on changes in processes and activities during the year as well as any resultant impact
of the same on management controls.
The management of the company told the auditors that all such documentation is maintained by the
parent company as this is a closely held private company and even though internal financial controls
reporting is applicable on this company, the parent company is taking due care of each and every
process.
The auditors did not agree with the views of the management. Please advise both the management and
the auditors.
(a) The auditors should look for documentation as per Sarbanes Oxley in this case.
(b) The auditors are correct in this case and the management should provide the required
documentation.
( c) The auditors are correct in this case and the management should provide the required
documentation. However, in case the parent company is covered by Sarbanes Oxley then it can be
ignored by the auditors.
(d) The management is correct.
Answer: Option : (b)
23. Explain the concept of Integrated framework issued by Committee of the Sponsoring
Organisations of the Treadway Commission (COSO Framework) duly mentioning its four
out of five components and discuss the three category of objectives that can be achieved
as per COSO framework. (5 Marks) (past exam jan 2021)
ANSWER
Concept of COSO:
COSO’s Internal Control – Integrated Framework was introduced in 1992 as guidance on
how to establish better controls so companies can achieve their objectives. COSO categorizes entity-level
objectives into operations, financial reporting, and compliance. The
framework includes more than 20 basic principles representing the fundamental concepts
associated with its five components: control environment, risk assessment, control
activities, information and communication, and monitoring. Some of the principles include
key elements for compliance, such as integrity and ethical values, authorities and
responsibilities, policies and procedures, and reporting deficiencies.
Five Components of COSO are as follows:
(i) Control Environment
(ii) Risk Assessment
(iii) Control Activities
(iv) Information and Communication
(v) Monitoring
211

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
The COSO Framework is designed to be used by organizations to assess the effectiveness

of the system of internal control to achieve objectives as determined by management. The
Framework lists three categories of objectives as below:
1 Operations Objectives – related to the effectiveness and efficiency of the entity’s operations, including
operational and financial performance goals, and safeguarding assets against loss.
2 Reporting Objectives – related to internal and external financial and non-financial reporting to
stakeholders, which would encompass reliability, timeliness, transparency, or other terms as established by
regulators, standard setters, or the entity’s policies.
3 Compliance objectives – In the Framework, the compliance objective was described as “relating to the
entity’s compliance with applicable laws and regulations.” The Framework considers the increased
demands and complexities in laws, regulations, and accounting standards.
24. Compute the overall Audit Risk if looking to the nature of business there are chances that 40% bills
of services provided would be defalcated, inquiring on the same matter management has assured that
internal control can prevent such defalcation to 75%. On his part the Auditor assesses that the procedure
he could apply in the remaining time to complete Audit gives him satisfaction level of detection of frauds
& error to an extent of 60%. Analyse the Risk of Material Misstatement and find out the overall Audit
Risk. (4 Marks)
ANSWER
According to SA-200, “Overall Objectives of the Independent Auditor and the Conduct of an Audit in
Accordance with Standards on Auditing”, the Audit Risk is a risk that Auditor will issue an inappropriate
opinion while Financial Statements are materially misstated.
Audit Risk has two components namely: Risk of material Misstatement and Detection Risk.
The relationship can be defined as follows.

Audit Risk = Risk of material Misstatement x Detection Risk
Misstatement may exist in Financial Statement before start of the Audit. It has two components namely
Inherent risk and Control risk.
The relationship can be defined as

Risk of material Misstatement = Inherent risk X control risk
Inherent risk: it is a susceptibility of an assertion about account balance; class of transaction, disclosure
towards misstatements which may be either individually or collectively with other Misstatement becomes
material before considering any related internal control which is 40% in the given case.
Control risk: it is a risk that there may be chances of material Misstatement even if there is a control
applied by the management and it has prevented defalcation to 75%.
Chances of material Misstatement are reduced to 10% by the internal control applied by management.
212

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
Detection risk: It is a risk that a material Misstatement remained undetected even if all Audit procedures
were applied, Detection Risk is 100-60=40%
In the given case, overall Audit Risk can be reduced up to 4% as follows:
Audit Risk: Risk of Material Misstatement X Detection Risk = 10X 40% = 4%
25. The acceptable detection risk needs to be ______ in order to reduce the audit risk to ______ in the
area of inventories management and handling. (mtp – I -july 2021)
(a) low in order to reduce audit risk to an acceptably high level.
(b) high in order to reduce audit risk to an acceptably high level.
(c) low in order to reduce audit risk to an acceptably low level.
(d) high in order to reduce audit risk to an acceptably low level. (10 x 1 = 10 Marks)
ANSWER- c
26. (mtp – II -july 2021)

Arogya Pradhan Limited is a public company incorporated in September 2011 with a registered office in
Chennai. The company is in business of Healthcare services. The company has 151 Ayurvedic clinics and
303 Ayurvedic pharmacies throughout the country.
In the previous year, company achieved turnover of Rs. 3,000 crore and had earned the Net Profit of Rs.
25 crore. The company had borrowed a term loan of Rs. 100 crore from State Bank of India.
M/s Bright Moon LLP are appointed as statutory Auditors of the company for the year 2019 -20. After
completing the initial engagement procedures and audit planning, the audit team started with the
verificati on of Internal Financial Controls of the company.
While understanding the controls established by the management in the ‘Revenue Process’, the audit
team observed that there is only one Review Control wherein 20 executives had to prepare the sales
invoice and Mr. Darshan - Sales Manager, had to review and authorise all the invoices. It was observed
that on many occasions, Mr. Darshan had more than 1000 invoices to authorise in a single day. Further,
he has frequently asked 2 senior most executive to review pending invoices and he has relied on them by
directly giving his authorization on the invoice. It was observed that Mr. Darshan did not take any leave
during the entire year. It was observed that Mr. Darshan’s performance bonus was linked with number
of invoices authorised by him. In addition, Mr. Darshan was the sole authority to approve the sales
commission and sales discount which was to be applied by the customers.
The audit team has set Rs. 30 crore as materiality based on 1% of Turnover. For selecting the samples,
Mr. Santosh – Audit Executive, used the below mentioned formula:-
Mr. Santosh selected 30 samples for the verification of above mentioned “Review Control”. It was
observed that out of 30 samples, 20 samples had irregularities in invoices which was clearly due to
improper functioning of review control. The amount of irregularity in 20 invoices amounted to Rs. 4
crore. The auditor
213

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
still issued the clean audit report and took the written representation letter from the management for
efficient implementation of Internal Financial Controls.
1. Is the Control “Designed” appropriately?
(a) No, because there are irregularities amounting to Rs. 4 crore in the samples selected by Auditor s.
(b) No, because Mr. Darshan’s performance bonus is linked with number of invoices authorised.
(c) No, because there are no leave taken by Mr. Darshan during the entire year.
(d) Yes. ‘Review Control’ is designed appropriately.
ANSWER- b
2. Is the Control “Implemented” effectively?
(a) No, because Mr. Darshan delegates his work of review to other executives who are senior in
experience.
(b) No, because Mr. Darshan is heavily burdened with excessive work.
(c) No, because Mr. Darshan is authorized to finalize sales commission and sales discount.
(d) Yes. ‘Review Control’ is implemented appropriately.
ANSWER- a
3. In the above case, to whom should M/s Bright Moon LLP report first?
(a) To ROC.
(b) To Central Government u/s 143(12) of Companies Act, 2013 as the impact in above case is more than
Rs. 1 crore.
(c) To Those Charged with Governance.
(d) To Shareholders as they are the appointing authority.
ANSWER- c
4. How samples are to be selected for the purpose of verification of Internal Financial Control?
214

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
(a) Monetary Unit Sampling.
(b) Sampling based on Materiality.
(c) Sampling based on probability of default of the control.
(d) Sampling based on frequency of functioning of control.
ANSWER- d
5. In the current scenario, how should M/s Bright Moon LLP report?
(a) Clean Report with Other Matter paragraph.
(b) Clean Report with Emphasis of Matter paragraph.
(c) Clean Report with reporting in Key Audit Matter.
(d) Qualified Report (both main report and ICFR report).
ANSWER- d

CA Gudia has been appointed as Management Auditor of XYZ Ltd. The principal reason for her
appointment is that current managerial decisions are not up to the mark, especially in relation to
investments made by the Company. The Company is going to make huge investments in one of
the ventures identified. Management Auditor was required to ensure that systems and
procedures of Company are working effectively and meeting the requirements. What aspects
should be considered by CA Gudia to determine that the systems and procedures are meeting
current requirements?
ANSWER
Aspects to be considered by Management auditor to determine that the systems and
procedures are meeting current requirements -
CA Gudia should proceed as under :
The evaluation of a system or a procedure actually includes three separate considerations. First, is
the system or procedure meeting all of the current requirements? Second, is it operating
effectively? And third, what is the degree of effectiveness?
To determine whether the system or procedure is meeting current requirements, the following
among other things should be considered:
1. Is the system or procedure designed to promote the achievement of the company’s objectives,
and is it accomplished effectively?
2. Does the system or procedure operate within the framework of the organisational structure?
215

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
3. Does the system or procedure adequately provide methods of control in order to obtain
maximum performance with the least expenditure of time and effort?
4. Do the routines designated in the system or procedures indicate performance in a logical

sequence?
5. Does the system or procedure provide the means for effective coordination between one
department and another?
6. Have all required functions been established?
7. Has the necessary authority been designated to carry out responsibilities?
8. Can any changes be made to improve effectiveness?
The important thing is to make sure that the system or procedure is designed to meet the desired
results
28 (MAY 2022 EXAM)

Mr. K has been appointed as statutory auditor of SK Limited for issuing an audit opinion on
financial statements and internal controls over financial reporting (ICFR) for the year ended March
31, 2022 under the Companies Act, 2013. Guide Mr. K to prepare a checklist in the form of
questions for testing internal control over cash and bank balances. When forming an opinion on
ICFR is it necessary for Mr. K to test the transactions only at the balance sheet date? (5 Marks)
ANSWER:
In the given case of SK Limited, the appointed auditor Mr. K would prepare checklist for testing
internal control over cash and bank balances. An illustrative set of questions to be answered by
the audit staff is as follows:
Have you checked that the cashier -
(i) is not responsible for opening the incoming mails;
(ii) does not authorise any of the ledgers;
(iii) does not authorise any expenditure or receipt;
(iv) does not sign cheques;
(v) takes his annual leave regularly;
(vi) inks and balances the cash book every day;
(vii) verifies physical cash balance with the book figure daily at the end of the day;
(viii) prepares monthly bank reconciliation statement;
(ix) holds no other funds or investment;
(x) holds no unnecessary balance in hand;
(xi) does not pay money without looking into compliance with proper procedure and due
authorisation; and
(xii) has tendered proper security or has executed a fidelity bond?
In the given situation, Mr. K is Statutory Auditor of SK Limited for issuing opinion on financial
statements and internal control over financial reporting. He should surely test transactions during
the financial year and not just as at the balance sheet date, though the extent of testing at or near
the balance sheet date may be higher. From the discussion given above, it can be concluded that it
would not be necessary for Mr. K to test the transactions only at the balance sheet date.
216

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
29(SEPT 2022 MTP)

During the planning stage of audit of Mobile & Cell Limited, the statutory auditor of the company,
ABC & Co, decided:
1. To evaluate whether to use the work of internal audit function to gather sufficient and
appropriate audit evidence for the purpose of expressing opinion on the financial statement of the
company.
2. To perform test counts on a sample basis for Inventory Balance which was material. Also,
the audit team will inquire management to provide copies of management’s completed physical
inventory count which will assist them in performing subsequent procedures required to
determine whether inventory records accurately reflect actual inventory count results.
3. To perform substantive analytical procedures to gather sufficient and appropriate audit
evidence for payroll cost. Audit team decided to recalculate the payroll cost by multiplying the
total employees of the company with the average pay-out per employee.
4. To perform substantive procedures over the direct expenses which were assessed as a
material with respect to the financial statement as a whole. Moreover, the number of
items/transactions in direct expense were huge and of were of non-homogenous nature. As a
result, audit team decided to select some samples from each identified strata disaggregated to the
lowest level based on their characteristics.
5. The performance materiality for assessing any misstatement was fixed at Rs. 10,00,000/-.
During the audit phase the audit team identified that
I. The internal audit function reports directly to the management and they do not have any
direct communication with the those charged with governance or an officer with the appropriate
authority. Also, all the findings of internal audit function are first reported to the management and
then the management decides what to report to those charged with governance from the findings
of internal audit function.
II. Since last three years the company is making cash losses and is facing liquidity crisis.
Moreover, there was a huge loan instalment due for repayment in next three months. Considering
the company’s liquidity profile, it was evident that company will default the upcoming loan
instalment and the payment of interest there on. When inquired with the management as to how
they will deal with this situation and how they will consider the impact of these events on
management’s assumption of going concern, the management contended that the company
would raise more funds through issue of fresh equity in the primary market to manage the
liquidity requirements.
III. Moreover, there was an ongoing litigation on Company and its Officers for misappropriation
of loan funds. As a result, after analysing the SEBI Listing Requirements, it was evident that
company was not in position to issue fresh equity in the primary market.
IV. In one of the direct tax litigations, the adjudicating authority issued an unfavourable order
against the company because of which the company was now required to pay huge fines and
interest to the Tax Authority. The amount of fine and interest there on was material.
V. The engagement manager identified that the total payroll costs booked for the period was
Rs. 30,00,000/- for total 150 employees employed throughout the year from the payroll records &
register . Engagement manager was able to identify that the average pay-out per employee was
Rs. 20,500/-. Also, the independent expectation developed for the payroll cost was between Rs.
30,00,000/- to Rs. 32,00,000/- for the year.
VI. The Audit team performed the testing of direct expense and following is the outcome:
217

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
Strata Name Balance as Total of No of Exception Reason for

per books sample Samples amount in exception
value samples
Freight Expense ` 5,00,000 ` 1,00,000 10 ` 25,000 one invoice was
incorrectly booked
Loading Charges ` 4,00,000 ` 80,000 15 `0 NA
Shipping Charges ` 9,00,000 ` 2,70,000 10 `0 NA
Packaging ` 8,00,000 ` 2,40,000 5 ` 3,000 No documents were
Expense available for the said
samples
Storing Expense ` 12,00,000 ` 1,20,000 10 ` 8,000 Warehouse charges
were booked as
storing expense.
Wrong classification.
Total ` 38,00,000 ` 8,10,000 50 ` 36,000 Projected
misstatement was
` 1,68,889/-(36,000 /
8,10,000 x 38,00,000).
VII. Management allowed auditor to attend the physical inventory count, however,
management did not allow audit team to perform any other procedure during the physical count.
When inquired from management regarding the denial to the auditor from performing additional
audit procedures along with attending the inventory count, the management explained that the
inventory consists of very unstable chemicals and inflammable gases which require handling with
skill and care. Any carelessness in handling the inventory can result in catastrophe. As a result, due
to safety standards and policies, the management cannot allow the auditor to perform additional
audit procedures.
1. Auditor of the company decided to draw attention of the users of the audit report on the
existence of the material uncertainty related to events that have casted significant doubts on the
entity’s ability to continue as going concern by disclosing the same in other matter paragraph. As
an Engagement Quality Control Reviewer, guide the Auditor about the correct way of disclosing
the existence of the material uncertainty related to events that have casted significant doubts on
the entity’s ability to continue as going concern when the management has not made appropriate
disclosure of a material uncertainty in the financial statement.
(a) When the management has not made appropriate disclosure of a material uncertainty in the
financial statement and there exists a material uncertainty related to events that have casted
significant doubts on the entity’s ability to continue as going concern then the auditor should
disclose the same in “Key Audit Matter” section in Audit Report only. No other disclosure is
required.
(b) Disclosure of the material uncertainty in the financial statement is the responsibility of the
management and the auditor should not comment on the same.
(c) When the management has not made appropriate disclosure of a material uncertainty in the
express a qualified or adverse opinion and should mention in the Basis of Qualified / Adverse
Opinion section of the Audit Report about existence of the material uncertainty .
(d) When the management has not made appropriate disclosure of a material uncertainty in the
218

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
express an unmodified opinion and should obtain the written representation about existence of
the material uncertainty from management.
2. In view of current scenario, which of the following requirements as per SA 610 are required to
be fulfilled by Statutory Auditors of the Company, prior to using the direct assistance of the
Internal Audit Team?
(a) Statutory Auditors should obtain written agreement from the management of the Company.
that the
internal audit team will be allowed to follow the statutory auditors’ instructions.
(b) Statutory auditors should obtain written agreement from internal audit team that his team
will keep the matters confidential.
(c) Both a & b.
(d) Statutory Auditors can use the direct assistance of the internal audit team after discussing
the same with the management. No prior written agreement is required.
3. Considering the inherent limitation with respect to the inventory count, the audit team decided
not to perform any other procedure or not to obtain any documentary evidence from
management with respect to inventory. Guide the audit team in the current scenario by selecting
the appropriate option from below:
(a) If the auditor has not obtained sufficient appropriate audit evidence as to a material
financial statement assertion, the auditor shall not attempt to obtain further audit evidence.
(b) If the auditor has not obtained sufficient appropriate audit evidence as to a material
financial statement assertion, the auditor shall attempt to obtain further audit evidence. If the
auditor is unable to obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence, the auditor shall express a
qualified opinion or a disclaimer of opinion.
(c) In case where audit team is not able to obtain sufficient and appropriate audit evidence as
to a material financial statement assertion, then the auditor should appoint management’s expert
and should try to obtain required evidence from such expert.
(d) In case where audit team is not able to obtain sufficient and appropriate audit evidence as
to a material financial statement assertion, then the auditor should communicate to management
and should obtain written representation from them.
4. Based on the recalculation performed by the audit team, the total payroll cost arrived for the
period was
Rs. 30,75,000/. Analyse and guide the audit team with respect to the results obtained from the
substantive analytical procedure by selecting the appropriate option from below:
(a) The difference identified between the payroll costs derived through substantive analytical
procedure and the expectation developed is material based on the materiality fixed by the audit
team and hence it requires further investigation.
(b) The amount derived through substantive analytical procedure is not in congruence with the
total amount of the payroll cost booked for the period. Hence the audit team should investigate
the reasons for the difference between the amount derived and the actual cost booked.
(c) The total payroll cost arrived is well within the expectation developed and the difference
between the amount recorded and the amount derived through substantive analytical procedure
is not material. Hence, it does not require any further investigation.
(d) The difference identified between the amount derived through substantive analytical
procedure and amount developed as an expectation is significant and the audit team should
obtain appropriate written representation from management with respect to the completeness
and accuracy of the amount derived through substantive analytical procedure.
219

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
5. Based on the above outcome of the direct expense testing the audit team decided to project
the total misstatement on the entire balance considered for testing. As per the calculation
performed, the projected misstatement was Rs. 1,68,889/-. Kindly analyse and guide the audit
team with respect to the results obtained from the substantive testing by selecting the
appropriate option from below:
(a) The projected misstatement calculated is appropriate. Moreover, Based on the performance
materiality and projected misstatement the auditor should modify his opinion.
(b) When a class of transactions or account balance has been divided into strata, then the
misstatement is required to be projected for each stratum separately. Hence, the audit team’s
approach is incorrect with respect to the calculation of projected misstatement. The Audit team
should recalculate the projected misstatement and then they should consider its impact on overall
audit opinion based on the materiality.
(c) The audit team should have considered the exception of Rs. 8,000/- twice while calculating
the projected misstatement, as the error is regarding wrong classification and the same will affect
two class of transactions or balances. Hence audit team should consider revising the projected
misstatement and then they should consider its impact on overall audit opinion based on the
materiality.
(d) Audit team has appropriately calculated the projected misstatement. However, before
modifying the audit opinion the audit team should obtain written representation with respect to
the completeness and accuracy of the direct expense balance which could serve as a sufficient and
appropriate.
ANSWER :
1. C
2. C
3. B
4. C
5. B
30 (MARCH 2022 MTP)

M/s Sati and Associates were appointed as the statutory auditors of Power King Limited for
the audit o f financial year 2021-22. Power King Limited has a power generating plant in
Sikkim. At the time of accepting the engagement, it was decided among the engagement
partner (CA Sati) and the management that since CA Sati and his team is doing the audit of a
client having power plant in Sikkim for the first time, it will be the duty of the management to
update the audit team regarding all the taxes and statutes applicable to units situated in
Sikkim. Which of the following is correct in this regard?
(a) The engagement team, being the auditor of Sikkim based power plant for the first
time can always
rely on the management’s information and can work accordingly.
(b) The engagement team should understand the Power King Limited business
environment and should obtain knowledge about the laws and statutes applicable in this case.
(c) The engagement team should not accept the audit of such power plant situated in
Sikkim of which he has no prior knowledge.
(d) The engagement team can very well accept the audit of Power King Limited and with
respect to aspects related to Sikkim law he can give disclaimer of opinion, if required.
ANSWER : ( B )
220

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
31 ( MARCH 2022 MTP)

PRS Ltd. issued a prospectus in respect of an IPO which had the auditor’s report on the
financial statements for the year ended 31st March 2021. The issue was fully subscribed.
During this year, there was an abnormal rise in the profits of the company for which it was
found later on that it was because of manipulated sales in which there was participation of
whole-time director and other top officials of the company. On discovery of this fact, the
company offered to refund all moneys to the subscribers of the shares and sued the auditors
for the damages alleging that the auditors failed to examine and ascertain any satisfactory
explanation for steep increase in the rate of profits and related accounts. The company
emphasized that the auditor should have proceeded with suspicion and should not have
followed selected verification. The auditors were able to prove that they found internal
controls to be satisfactory and did not find any circumstance to arouse suspicion. The company
was not able to prove that auditors were negligent in performance of their duties. Please
suggest your views on this.
(a) The stand of the company was correct in this case. Considering the nature of the
work, the Auditors should have proceeded with suspicion and should not have followed
selected verification.
(b) The approach of the auditors looks reasonable in this case. The auditors found
internal controls to be satisfactory and also did not find any circumstance to arouse suspicion
and hence they performed their procedures on the basis of selected verification.
(c) In the given case, the auditors should have involved various experts along with them
to help them on their audit procedures. Prospectus is one area wherein management involves
various experts and hence the auditors should also have done that. In the given case, by not
involving the experts the auditors did not perform their job in a professional manner. If they
had involved experts like forensic experts etc., the manipulation could have been detected.
Hence the auditors should be held liable.
(d) In case of such type of engagements, the focus is always on the management
controls. If the controls are found to be effective, then an auditor can never be held liab le in
respect of any deficiency or misstatement or fraud.
ANSWER: ( B )
32(APRIL 2022 MTP)

Samyak Limited is engaged in the business of trading leather goods. You are the internal
auditor of the company for the year 2021-22. In order to review internal controls of the Sales
Department of the company, you visited the Department and noticed the work division as
follows:
(3) One more officer was there to handle customer/ debtor accounts and issue of
receipts.
As an internal auditor, you are required to briefly discuss the general condition pertaining to
the internal check prevalent in internal control system. Do you think that there was proper
division of work in Samyak Limited? If not, why?
ANSWER :
The general condition pertaining to the internal check system may be summarized as under:
(i)no single person should have complete control over any important aspect of the business
221

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
(ii) Staff duties should be rotated from time to time so that members do not perform
the same function for a considerable length of time.
(iv) Persons having physical custody of assets must not be permitted to have access to
the books of accounts.
(v) There should exist an accounting control in respect of each class of assets, in
addition, there should be periodical inspection so as to establish their physical condition.
(vi) Mechanical devices should be used, wherever practicable to prevent loss or
misappropriation of cash.
(vii) Budgetary control should be exercised and wide deviations observed should be
reconciled.
(viii) For inventory taking, at the close of the year, trading activities should, if
possible be suspended, and it should be done by staff belonging to several sections of the
organization.
(ix) The financial and administrative powers should be distributed very judiciously among
different officers and the manner in which those are actually exercised should be reviewed
periodically.
(x) Procedures should be laid down for periodical verification and testing of different
sections of accounting records to ensure that they are accurate.
In the given scenario, Samyak Limited has not done proper division of work as:
(i)the receipts of cash should not be handled by the official handling sales ledger and
(ii) delivery challans should be verified by an authorised official other than the officer
handling despatch of goods.
33 (MAY 2022 RTP)
Match the following terms to their definitions:
(i) Accounting Estimates 1 The susceptibility of an accounting estimate
and related disclosures to an inherent lack
of precision in its measurement.
(ii) Estimation uncertainty 2 A lack of neutrality by management in the
preparation and presentation of
information.
(iii) Management bias 3 An approximation of a monetary amount in
the absence of a precise means of
measurement.
(iv) Measurement objective for fair 4 To forecast the outcome of one or more
value Accounting Estimates transactions, events or conditions.
(a) (i)-3, (ii)-1, (iii) - 2, (iv)- 4.

(b) (i)-2, (ii)-1, (iii) - 3, (iv)- 4.
(c) (i)-1, (ii)-3, (iii) - 2, (iv)- 4.
(d) (i)-4, (ii)-1, (iii) - 2, (iv)- 3.
ANSWER : A
34 (MAY 2022 RTP)

PADHAM Ltd is engaged in the business of manufacturing of carpets. The company is planning to expand
and diversify its operations. The management has increased the focus on internal controls to ensure better
222

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
governance. The management discussed with the statutory auditors to ensure the steps required to be
taken so that the statutory audit is risk based and focused on areas of greatest risk to the achievement of
the company’s objectives.
(a) Name the key steps and phases involved in Risk Based Audit.
(b) Also, discuss the steps to be taken for the risk assessment phase of the audit.
ANSWER :
(a) The auditor’s objective in a risk-based audit is to obtain reasonable assurance that no material
misstatements whether caused by fraud or errors exist in the financial statements.
This involves the following three key steps:
• Assessing the risks of material misstatement in the financial statements
• Designing and performing further audit procedures that respond to assessed risks and reduce the
risks of material misstatements in the financial statements to an acceptably low level; and
• Issuing an appropriate audit report based on the audit findings. The risk-based audit process is
presented in three distinct phases: Risk assessment.
Risk response; and Reporting.
(b) The risk assessment phase of the audit involves the following steps:
• Performing client acceptance or continuance procedures;
• Planning the overall engagement;
• Performing risk assessment procedures to understand the business and identify inherent and control
risks;
• Identifying relevant internal control procedures and assessing their design and implementation
(those controls that would prevent material misstatements from occurring or detect and correct
misstatements after they have occurred);
• Assessing the risks of material misstatement in the financial statements;
• Identifying the significant risks that require special audit consideration and those risks for which
substantive procedures alone are not sufficient;
• Communicating any material weaknesses in the design and implementation of internal control to
management and those charged with governance; and
• Making an informed assessment of the risks of material misstatement at the financial statement
level and at the assertion level.
35(NOV 2022 RTP)

Arihant Limited was engaged in the business of owning and managing hotels and resorts, selling tourism
packages and performing airline bookings for corporate and individuals. It appointed Upadhyay & Co. as its
statutory auditor for the financial year 2021-22. While planning the audit, the audit team decided that the
risk of improper revenue recognition from hotel business should not be treated as a fraud risk. This
conclusion was based on the assessment of earlier years, wherein no fraud was identified in revenue
recorded from such business. While testing the internal financial controls over the process of revenue
recognition, it was identified that the controls are not properly designed to mitigate the risk of fraud and
risk of improper revenue recognition. As a result, the audit team decided to perform additional substantive
testing. However, the audit team still were to the conclusion that there is no risk of fraud in revenue
recognition. During the course of substantive testing, it was identified that the management did not
account for revenue received from corporate hotel bookings amounting to Rs. 35 crore. These amounts
were partially received in the company’s bank accounts and partially received in the CFO’s personal
account. The amounts received in the bank account of the company were disclosed as advances
received against the future bookings.
In the light of above scenario, kindly guide the statutory auditors with respect to their responsibility
relating to fraud in an audit of a financial statement.
ANSWER :
As per SA 240, “The Auditor’s Responsibilities Relating to Fraud in an Audit of Financial Statements” and SA
315, “Identifying and Assessing the Risks of Material Misstatement Through Understanding the Entity and
Its Environment”, the auditor shall identify and assess the risks of material misstatement due to fraud at
223

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
the financial statement level, and at the assertion level for classes of transactions, account balances and
disclosures. When identifying and assessing the risks of material misstatement due to fraud, the auditor
shall , based on a presumption that there are risks of fraud in revenue recognition, evaluate which types of
revenue, revenue transactions or assertions give rise to such risks.
In accordance with SA 240, “The Auditor’s Responsibilities Relating to Fraud in an Audit of Financial
Statements” and 330,” The Auditor’s Responses to Assessed Risks” the auditor shall determine overall
responses to address the assessed risks of material misstatement due to fraud at the financial statement
level and assertion level.
The presumption that there are risks of fraud in revenue recognition may be rebutted. For example, the
auditor may conclude that there is no risk of material misstatement due to fraud relating to revenue
recognition in the case where there is a single type of simple revenue transaction, for example, leasehold
revenue from a single unit rental property. However, when there is a complex revenue structure or when
there is lack of controls on revenue recognition, then there is a high probability of fraud risk in revenue
recognition.
Obtaining an understanding of the entity and its environment, including the entity’s internal control
(referred to hereafter as an “understanding of the entity”), is a continuous, dynamic process of gathering,
updating and analysing information throughout the audit.
In the current scenario, the company was earning revenue from multiple streams. Also, it was identified
that the controls are not properly designed to mitigate the risk of fraud and risk of improper revenue
recognition. During the year it was identified that the management did not account for revenue from
corporate hotel bookings amounting to Rs. 35 crore. These amounts were partially received in the
company’s bank accounts and partially received in the CFO’s personal account. The amounts received in
the bank account of the company were disclosed as advances received against future bookings.
Therefore, the auditor while performing the risk assessment procedures should consider the complexity
and nature of the revenue for determining the fraud risks in revenue recognition. Also, there were no
adequate controls addressing the risk of improper revenue recognition or fraud risk, the audit team
rebutted the fraud risk. Moreover, the audit team should have recognised fraud risk by identifying the
deficiencies of internal control over the revenue recognition process and should have treated the risk of
improper revenue recognition as a significant risk. Also, as per Section 143(12), the auditor is required to
report all the frauds identified during the course of the audit involving amounts above Rs. 1 crore within
the prescribed time frame to the Central Government.
224

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
225

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s

1. RTP May 2019 Question No.7
You have only eight working hours for raw material inventory verification. Based on your observation
during these eight hours, you have to form an opinion with respect to the correctness of inventory value
calculated by the management. The company uses ERP system for updating and recording raw material
inventory. The ERP system of the company has passed all the ITGC checks and inventory rates are
calculated by ERP on moving average price (MAP) basis. The company has done ABC analysis of all raw
material inventory items and has vast number of items in each category. You will form your opinion based
on
a. Based on ABC analysis, check physical inventory of all “A” class items during allotted
time and matching it with ERP stock.
b. Understand the process of recording of inventory in ERP to ascertain potential weaknesses and checking
physical inventory of mostly “A” class items, some “B” class items and some “C” class items.
c. Check physical inventory of “A” class items as much as possible along with certain “B” class items and
certain “C” class items on sample basis in value wise descending order, compare the physical stock with
ERP system, and tabulate the result. The exercise should be continued till the end of allotted eight hours.
d. Check physical stock of only those items, which have standard packaging so that verification is faster
considering the eight hour time limit.
Answer: Option C
Which of the following is an example of Direct Entity level control

a. Ethics policy
b. Human resource policy
c. Business performance reviews
226

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
d. Job roles & responsibilities of employees

Answer:C Business performance reviews
3.RTP Nov 2019 Qn no 3

KJ Private Ltd. is engaged in the business of e-commerce wherein most of the operations are
automated. The company has SAP at its ERP package and is planning to upgrade the SAP version.
Currently, the version of SAP being used is fine but the higher version would lead to increased
efficiencies and hence the company is considering this plan which will also involve a huge outlay.
KPP & Associates, were appointed as the statutory auditors of this company for the year ended
31 March 2019 and the statutory audit firm has been working in this industry for long but most
of the work which the firm did was more of risk advisory or internal audit.
For the first time, this audit will be conducted and that’s why the audit team started obtaining
understanding of the operations of the company which included understanding of the SAP
system of the company.
However, the management of the company was not comfortable with this approach of the audit
team particularly because audit team was spending good time on understanding of the IT
systems of the company.
The management suggested that the auditors should limit their understanding and should
perform audit procedures rather than getting into business/ operations.
But the auditors have a different view on this matter and because of which work has got stuck.In
the given situation, please suggest what should be the course of action.
a. The approach of audit team to obtain detailed understanding of the company before starting
with the audit procedures is absolutely fine. If the auditors don’t understand the systems
properly the audit procedures may not be appropriate.
b. The management’s concern regarding the approach of the auditors seems reasonable. The
auditors are spending time on understanding of the systems/ business and not performing their
audit procedures.
c. This being a private company and that too into the business of e-commerce, the auditors should
have knowledge about the operations of the company through their understanding of the
industry and hence should not get into this process of obtaining detailed understanding at the
client place.
d. The audit team could have planned their work differently. They should involve IT experts who
would have knowledge of the systems of the company and hence lot of time can be saved.
Further in case of such type of industry, involvement of IT experts is anyways required
mandatorily as per the legal requirements.
ANSWER : Option A
4.May 2018-4(d) – 4 Marks

227

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
While evaluating the risks and controls at entity level, the Auditor should take cognizance of
the prevalent direct and indirect entity level controls operating in the entity. Explain what they
pertain to, with few example.
ANSWER
Entity Level Risks and Controls: There are direct entity level controls and indirect entity level
controls.
(i) Direct ELCs operate at a level higher than business activity or transaction level such as a business
process or sub-process level, account balance level, at a sufficient level of precision, to prevent,
detect or correct a misstatement in a timely manner.
Examples Include:
• Business performance reviews;

• Monitoring of effectiveness of controls activities by Internal Audit function;
(ii) Indirect ELCs do not relate to any specific business process, transaction or account balance and
hence, cannot prevent or detect misstatements. However, they contribute indirectly to the
effective operation of direct ELC and other control activities.
Examples include:
• Company code of conduct and ethics policies;

• Human resource policies;
• Employee job roles & responsibilities.
5. RTP May 2018 Qn no.5, MTP Aug 2018 QN no 4(d)4 Marks

In a controls-based audit, the audit approach can be classified into three broad phases comprising of
planning, execution, and completion. You are required to briefly explain the relevant considerations of
every phase in above audit approach in case of automated environment.
Answer
In a controls-based audit, the audit approach can be classified into three broad phases
comprising of planning, execution, and completion. In this approach, the considerations of
automated environment will be relevant at every phase as given below:
Risk Assessment Process
• Identify significant accounts and disclosures.
• Qualitative and Quantitative considerations.

• Relevant Financial Statement Assertions (FSA).
• Identify likely sources of misstatement.
• Consider risk arising from use of IT systems.
Understand and Evaluate
• Document understanding of business processes using Flowcharts / Narratives.

228

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
• Prepare Risk and Control Matrices (RCM).

• Understand design of controls by performing walkthrough of end-to-end process.
• Process wide considerations for Entity Level Controls, Segregation of Duties.
• IT General Controls, Application Controls.
Test for Operating Effectiveness
• Assess Nature, Timing and Extent (NTE) of controls testing.

• Assess reliability of source data; completeness of population.
• Testing of key reports and spreadsheets.
• Sample testing.
• Consider competence and independence of staff /team performing controls testing.
Reporting
• Evaluate Control Deficiencies.
• Significant deficiencies, Material weaknesses.
• Remediation of control weaknesses.
• Internal Controls Memo (ICM) or Management Letter.
• Auditor’s report.
6. MTP Mar 2018 Qn no.4(d) 4 Marks
Describe application controls and give three examples of automated application controls.
Answer
Application Controls are automated or manual controls that operate at a business process level.
Automated Application controls are embedded into IT applications viz., ERPs and help in ensuring the
completeness, accuracy and integrity of data in those systems. Examples of automated applications
include:
• Edit checks and validation of input data;
• Sequence number checks;
• User limit checks;
• Reasonableness checks;
• Mandatory data fields.
7.RTP Nov 18 Qn no. 5, MTP-OCT-18 Qn No 4(d) 5 Marks:
A real-time environment is a type of automated environment in which business operations and

transactions are initiated, processed and recorded immediately as they happen without delay. It has
several critical IT components that enable anytime, anywhere transactions to take place. You are
required to name the components and its example of real-time environment.
Answer
229

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
Real Time Environment: IT Components: To facilitate transactions in real-time, it is essential to have the
systems, networks and applications available during all times. A real- time environment has several critical
IT components that enable anytime, anywhere transactions to take place. Any failure even in one
component could render the real-time system unavailable and could result in a loss of revenue. IT
Components include:
(i) Applications: For example, ERP applications SAP, Oracle R12, Core banking applications.
(ii) Middleware.: For example, Webservers like Apache, ATM switches.
(iii) Networks: For example, Wide Area Networks, Internet hosting.
(iv) Hardware: For example, Data centers, Backup and Storage devices, Power supply.
8.NOV 18 Qn no 4(d) 4 Marks

“The audit cycle consists of Planning, Execution and Completion. The automation in processing of
business transactions has considerations to be weighed by Auditor at every phase of this cycle."
Enumerate the focal points of such considerations when auditing in automated environment
Answer
Consideration of Automated Environment at Each Phase of Audit Cycle: In a controls- based audit,
the audit approach can be classified into three broad phases comprising of planning, execution,
and completion. In this approach, the considerations of automated environment will be relevant at
every phase as given below:
during risk assessment, the auditor should consider risk arising from the use of IT systems at the
company;
when obtaining an understanding of the business process and performing walkthroughs the use
of IT systems and applications should be considered;
while assessing the entity level controls the aspects related to IT governance need to be
understood and reviewed;
pervasive controls including segregation of duties, general IT controls and applications should be
considered and reviewed;
during testing phase, the results of general IT controls would impact the nature, timing and extent
of testing;
when testing of reports and information produced by the entity (IPE) generated through IT
systems and applications;
at completion stage, evaluation of control deficiencies may require using data analytics and
CAATs.

In an automated environment, the data stored and processed in systems can be used to get
various insights into the way business operates. This data can be useful for preparation of
management information system (MIS) reports and electronic dashboards that give a high-level
snapshot of business performance. In view of above you are required to briefly discuss the
230

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
meaning of data analytics and example of circumstances when auditing in an automated

environment, auditors can apply the concepts of data analytics.
Answer
Data Analytics: Generating and preparing meaningful information from raw system data using
processes, tools, and techniques is known as Data Analytics. The data analytics methods used in an
audit are known as Computer Assisted Auditing Techniques or CAATs. When auditing in an
automated environment, auditors can apply the concepts of data analytics for several aspects of an
audit including the following:
• preliminary analytics;
• risk assessment;
• control testing;
• non-standard journal analysis;
• evaluation of deficiencies;
• fraud risk assessment.
10. May 2019 Qn no5(a)(i) 5 Marks

The volatility, unpredictability and pace of fast changes that exists in the automated environment
today is far greater than in the past and consequently it throws more risk to business which
requires them to have a need to continuously manage such risks. State various risks which an
enterprise may have to face and manage.
Answer
Various Risk: Businesses today operate in a dynamic environment. The volatility, unpredictability
and pace of changes that exist in the business environment today is far greater than in the past.
Some of the reasons for this dynamic environment include globalization, use of technology, new
regulatory requirements, etc. Because of this dynamic environment the associated risks to
business have also increased and companies have a need to continuously manage risks.
Examples of risks include:
• Market Risks;
• Regulatory & Compliance Risks;
• Technology& Security Risks;
• Financial Reporting Risks;
• Operational Risks;
• Credit Risk;
• Business Partner Risk;
• Product or Project Risk;
• Environmental Risks.
231

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
11. RTP Nov 2019 14

“Generating and preparing meaningful information from raw system data using processes,
tools, and techniques is known as Data Analytics and the data analytics methods used in an
audit are known as Computer Assisted Auditing Techniques or CAATs.” You are required to give
a suggested approach to get the benefit from the use of CAATs
Answer
There are several steps that should be followed to achieve success with CAATs and any of the
supporting tools. A suggested approach to benefit from the use of CAATs is given below:
• Understand Business Environment including IT;
• Define the Objectives and Criteria;
• Identify Source and Format of Data;
• Extract Data;
• Verify the Completeness and Accuracy of Extracted Data;
• Apply Criteria on Data Obtained;
• Validate and Confirm Results.
12.Nov 2019 Qn no 3(C) 4 Marks

In a controls-based audit, the audit approach can be classified into three broad phases
comprising of planning, execution, and completion. You are required to briefly explain the
relevant considerations for every phase in above audit approach in case of an automated
environment.
Answer
In a controls-based audit, the audit approach can be classified into three broad phases comprising
of planning, execution, and completion. In this approach, the considerations of automated
environment will be relevant at every phase as given below:
(i) during risk assessment, the auditor should consider risk arising from the use of IT systems at
the company;
(ii) when obtaining an understanding of the business process and performing walkthroughs the use
of IT systems and applications should be considered;
(iii) while assessing the entity level controls the aspects related to IT governance need to be
understood and reviewed;
(iv) pervasive controls including segregation of duties, general IT controls and applications should
be considered and reviewed;
(v) during testing phase, the results of general IT controls would impact the nature, timing and
extent of testing;
(vi) when testing of reports and information produced by the entity (IPE) generated through IT
systems and applications;
(vii) at completion stage, evaluation of control deficiencies may require using data analytics and
232

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
CAATs.
Alternative Answer
In a controls-based audit, the audit approach can be classified into three broad phases comprising
of planning, execution, and completion. In this approach, the considerations of automated
environment will be relevant at every phase as given below:
Risk Assessment Process
• Identify significant accounts and disclosures.

• Qualitative and Quantitative considerations.
• Relevant Financial Statement Assertions (FSA).
• Identify likely sources of misstatement.
• Consider risk arising from use of IT systems.
Understand and Evaluate
• Document understanding of business processes using Flowcharts / Narratives.
• Prepare Risk and Control Matrices (RCM).

• Understand design of controls by performing walkthrough of end-to-end process.
• Process wide considerations for Entity Level Controls, Segregation of Duties.

• IT General Controls, Application Controls.
Test for Operating Effectiveness
• Assess Nature, Timing and Extent (NTE) of controls testing.

• Assess reliability of source data; completeness of population.
• Testing of key reports and spreadsheets.
• Sample testing.
• Consider competence and independence of staff /team performing controls testing.
Reporting
• Evaluate Control Deficiencies.

• Significant deficiencies, Material weaknesses.
• Remediation of control weaknesses.
• Internal Controls Memo (ICM) or Management Letter.
• Auditor’s report.
13.RTP May 2020 Qn no 20(d)
Understanding and documenting automated environment
Answer:
Understanding and Documenting Automated Environment: Understanding of the automated
environment of a company is required as per SA 315. The auditor’s understanding of the automated
environment should include the following:
233

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
• The applications that are being used by the company;

• Details of the IT infrastructure components for each of the application;
• The organisation structure and governance;
• The policies, procedures and processes followed;
• IT risks and controls.
The auditor is required to document the understanding of a company’s automated environment
as per SA 230
Study Material
14. What are the components of an internal control framework?
Answer
There are five components of an internal control framework. They are as follows:
• Control Environment;
• Risk Assessment;
• Information & Communication;
• Monitoring;
• Control Activities.
15. Describe application controls and give three examples of automated application controls?
Answer
completeness, accuracy and integrity of data in those systems. Examples of automated applications
include:
• Sequence number checks;
• User limit checks;
• Reasonableness checks;
16. In an automated environment, the data stored and processed in systems can be used to get various
insights into the way business operates. This data can be useful for preparation of management
information system (MIS) reports and electronic dashboards that give a high-level snapshot of business
performance. In view of above you are required to briefly discuss the meaning of data analytics and
example of circumstances when auditing in an automated environment, auditors can apply the concepts
of data analytics.
Answer:
234

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
completeness, accuracy and integrity of data in those systems.
Examples of automated applications include:
• Sequence number check;
• Limit check;
• Reasonableness check;
• Format check;
17. In a risk-based audit, the audit approach can be classified into three broad phases comprising of
planning, execution, and completion. You are required to briefly explain the relevant considerations for
every phase in above audit approach in case of an automated environment.
Answer:
In a controls-based audit in an automated environment, the audit approach can be classified into three
broad phases comprising of planning, execution, and completion. In this approach, the considerations of
automated environment will be relevant at every phase as given below:
• during risk assessment, the auditor should consider risk arising from the use of IT systems at the
company;
• when obtaining an understanding of the business process and performing walkthroughs the use of IT
systems and applications should be considered;
• while assessing the entity level controls the aspects related to IT governance need to be understood
and reviewed;
• pervasive controls including segregation of duties, general IT controls and applications should be
considered and reviewed;
• during testing phase, the results of general IT controls would impact the nature, timing and extent of
testing;
• when testing of reports and information produced by the entity (IPE) generated through IT systems and
applications;
• at completion stage, evaluation of control deficiencies may require using data analytics and CAATs.
18. A Company is using ERP for all its business processes including Procurement, Sales, Finance and
Reporting. You are required to explain the Statutory Auditor’s approach to identify the risks associated
with the IT systems.
Answer:
The Auditor should understand and document each of the business processes in form of narratives and / or
flowcharts. The next process will be to identify areas / events that can lead to risks, viz. manual Invoicing
and accounting once goods are dispatched could lead to incorrect Invoicing and accounting and hence is a
235

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
‘risk’. The Auditor should also analyse the risks i.e. the impact it will have if materializes. Next will be
prioritization in terms of probability of how often the risks will materialize.
19. Explain some of the International IT related Standards, Guidelines and Framework.
Answer:
Given below are some of the common standards and guidelines that are relevant in this context include:
Standards on Auditing issued by the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India, are
required to be followed for an audit of financial statements.
Section 143 of Companies Act 2013 requires statutory auditors to provide an Independent
Opinion on the Design and Operating Effectiveness of Internal Financial Controls Over Financial
Reporting (IFC-FR) of the company as at Balance Sheet date. For this purpose, the Guidance Note on
Audit of Internal Financial Controls Over Financial Reporting issued by the Institute of Chartered
Accountants of India, provides the framework, guidelines and procedures for an audit of financial
statements.
Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002, commonly known as SOX, is a requirement in America. Section 404 of this
act requires public listed companies to implement, assess and ensure effectiveness of internal controls
over financial reporting and auditors independent opinion on the design and operating effectiveness of
internal controls over financial reporting (ICFR) – which is similar to the requirements of IFC-FR for Indian
companies. Similar legal and statutory requirements over internal controls exist in several other
countries including Japan, China, European Countries, etc.
ISO 27001:2013 is the Information Security Management System (ISMS) standard issued by the
International Organization for Standardization (ISO). This standard provides the framework, guidelines
and procedures for implementing information security and related controls in a company. For example,
this standard covers password security, application security, physical security, backup and recovery, that
are relevant when auditing in an automated environment.
ITIL (Information Technology Infrastructure Library) and ISO 20000 provide a set of best practice
processes and procedures for IT service management in a company. For example, change management,
incident management, problem management, IT operations, IT asset management are some of the areas
that could be relevant to audit.
The Payment Card Industry – Data Security Standard or PCI-DSS, is the most widely adopted information
security standard for the payment cards industry. Any company that is involved in the storage, retrieval,
transmission or handling of credit card/debit card information are required to implement the security
controls in accordance with this standard.
The American Institute of Certified Public Accountants has published a framework under the
Statements on Standards for Attest Engagements (SSAE) No.16 for reporting on controls at a service
organisation that include ❖ SOC 1 for reporting on controls at a service organization relevant to user
entities’ internal control over financial reporting (ICFR). ❖ SOC 2 and SOC 3 for reporting on controls at a
service organization relevant to security, availability, processing integrity, confidentiality or privacy i.e.,
controls other than ICFR. ❖ While SOC 1 and SOC 2 are restricted use reports, SOC 3 is general use
report.
Control Objectives for Information and Related Technologies (CoBIT) is best practice IT Governance and
Management framework published by Information Systems Audit and Control Association. CoBIT
236

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
provides the required tools, resources and guidelines that are relevant to IT governance, risk, compliance
and information security.
The Cybersecurity Framework (CSF) published by the National Institute of Standards and Technology is
one of the most popular framework for improving critical infrastructure cybersecurity. This framework
provides a set of standards and best practices for companies to manage cybersecurity risks.
20. Explain Application Controls and General IT Controls.

Answer:
Application Controls: Application controls include both automated or manual controls that operate at a
business process level. Application controls can be preventive as well as detective in nature and are
designed to ensure the integrity of the accounting records. application controls relate to procedures used
to initiate, record, process and report transactions or other financial data. The se controls help ensure that
transactions occurred, are authorised, and are completely and accurately recorded and processed.
completeness, accuracy and integrity of data in those systems. Examples of automated applications include
edit checks and validation of input data, sequence number check, limit check, format check, range check,
reasonableness check, mandatory data fields, existence check etc.

21. KPL Private Limited is a large software company based out of Hyderabad. The annual turnover of
the company is INR 2,100 crores. The company sells software and is also involved in the implementation
of those softwares for its clients.
The major chunk of the revenue though comes from sale of software only. The company works on a
completely paper-less office and accordingly, most of the documents are available in soft copy.
During the financial year ended 31 March 2019, the auditors during the course of their audit obtained
various audit evidences some of which were in hard copy but mostly in soft copy.
On conclusion of the audit, the auditors are in a dilemma whether to maintain their documentation
entirely in hard copy or soft copy or can it be mixed of both.
After consultations with various persons, the auditors stood that the documentation for this company,
being operated in fully automated environment should be in soft copy only.
Please advise whether this understanding is correct.
(a) This is a matter of documentation of audit evidence for a client working in fully automated
environment and hence it should be in soft copy only.
(b) As per the requirements of auditing standards, this documentation can be in a mix of both soft and
hard copy.
(c) Since the client is operating in a fully automated environment, it would be important to check with
them because all this documentation has come from the client only.
(d) As per the requirements of auditing standards, documentation is not required in case of a client
working in automated environment because everything is automated and can be accessed easily at
any point of time.
237

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
Answer: Option: ( b)
22. KJ Private Ltd is engaged in the business of e-commerce wherein most of the operations are
automated. The company has SAP at its ERP package and is planning to upgrade the SAP version.
Currently, the version of SAP being used is fine but the higher version would lead to inc reased
efficiencies and hence the company is considering this plan which will also involve a huge outlay.
KPP & Associates, were appointed as the statutory auditors of this company for the year ended 31
March 2019 and the statutory audit firm has been working in this industry for long but most of the
work which the firm did was more of risk advisory or internal audit.
For the first time, this audit will be conducted and that’s why the audit team started obtaining
understanding of the operations of the company which included understanding of the SAP system of
the company.
However, the management of the company was not comfortable with this approach of the audit team
particularly because audit team was spending good time on understanding of the IT syste ms of the
company.
The management suggested that the auditors should limit their understanding and should perform
audit procedures rather than getting into business/ operations.
But the auditors have a different view on this matter and because of which work has got stuck. In the
given situation, please suggest what should be the course of action.
(a) The approach of audit team to obtain detailed understanding of the company before starting with
the audit procedures is absolutely fine. If the auditors don’t understand the systems properly the
audit procedures may not be appropriate.
(b) The management’s concern regarding the approach of the auditors seems reasonable. The auditors
are spending time on understanding of the systems/ business and not performing their audit
procedures.
(c) This being a private company and that too into the business of e-commerce, the auditors should have
knowledge about the operations of the company through their understanding of the industry and
hence should not get into this process of obtaining detailed understanding at the client place.
(d) The audit team could have planned their work differently. They should involve IT experts who would
have knowledge of the systems of the company and hence lot of time can be saved. Further in case
of such type of industry, involvement of IT experts is anyways required mandatorily as per the legal
requirements.
Answer:Option: ( a)
23. AR Private Limited is a medium-sized company engaged in the business of trading of electronic
equipments. The company has various warehouses where all of these equipments are kept and has an
inventory levels of generally 2-3 months.
The internal environment of the company is driven by various processes some of them are manual and
238

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
some automated. Accordingly, the management has also set up various controls both manual and
automated and is comfortable with their design and operating effectiveness.
During the course of audit of the financial statements for the year ended 31 March 2019, the auditors
raised various queries regarding various processes where the controls were operating effectively. This
was because of the fact that auditor was considering either only manual controls or only automated
controls in a process.
As per the auditor, the management should have adopted the same approach and hence he would like
to increase the substantive audit procedures because they had a view that as per the current approach
of the management, controls should be considered as ineffective irrespective of the fact that the testing
which the audit team had performed resulted in the controls being effective.
Currently, the concern was regarding the approach on which management was also stuck on their point.
You are required to provide your inputs to resolve this matter.
(a)The approach of the management doesn’t seem to be correct because of the nature of the operations
of the company. The current approach which the management has followed can be accepted only in case
of manufacturing industry.
(b)The management should have discussed their approach with the auditors before appointing them.
The Companies Act 2013 provide specific guidance on these matters wherein the management of the
company can follow such approach by taking pre- approval from their auditors and in such a case, the
report of the auditors is always clean.
(c)The approach of the management is completely fine. The auditors need to correct their understanding
of the internal controls and the application of internal controls. A process can not be limited to have
either only manual control or automated control.
(d)Considering the size of the company, such matters should be ignored by the auditors. Even if the
approach of the management is not correct, it would not have any impact on the work of the auditors
because all such matters get resolved at the time when auditors perform final analytical procedures.
Answer: Option: ( C)
24. AJ Private Ltd is in the business of construction and infrastructure having an annual turnover of INR
1,100 crores. The operations of the company are run efficiently driven by the well laid out policies and
procedures. The processes of the company are very strong and are well documented and properly
communicated to its employees, as required.
The management had also done a detailed risk assessment in the earlier years and currently the risk
management system of the company is considered to be very effective. The internal controls include
both automated and manual.
During the course of the audit of the financial statements of the company for the financial year ended
31 March 2019, the statutory auditors did their risk assessment and also reviewed the general IT controls
which were found to be effective.
239

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
Considering the same, one of the senior audit team members asked the team to start performing the
substantive audit procedures taking the approach that controls are effective.
However, the audit team did not find this approach correct and discussed that they should also check
the effectiveness of other manual and automated controls by testing them and then move on to
substantive testing.
The audit team recently had a training on the internal controls and hence their understanding was
different from the audit senior.
This led to a conflicting situation between the audit senior and remaining audit team. In the given
situation, please advise which of the following would be correct.
(a)The audit senior is correct because general IT controls were found to be effective and hence no further
work may be required on controls.
(b)The view of the audit team looks fine because without testing of internal controls covering all types
of controls (manual and automated), those controls can not be said to be operating effectively.
( c)The audit senior seems reasonable in his approach because general IT controls were found to be
effective. However, it would be more appropriate to also test application controls before concluding on
the effectiveness of the controls.
(d)The argument of the audit team looks better because every audit requires significant time to be spent
on testing of internal controls and by only covering general IT controls, it would be difficult to justify this
requirement later on in the audit file.
Answer: Option: (b)
25. RIM Private Ltd is engaged in the business of manufacturing of cranes and other construction
equipments. The nature of the operations are such that purchases are quite significant even though the
sales may or may not be very significant, in terms of number of transactions during the year.
The company’s statutory auditors, have also obtained certain audit tools to help the audit team on
various audit procedures to bring efficiency in various audits.
During the course of the audit of the financial statements for the financial year ended 31 March 2019,
the auditors used those audit tools (also known as computed assisted audit techniques) for sampling
procedures and data analytics.
The outcome of the tools resulted in some analysis and requirements which the audit team requested
from the client. However, the client refused to provide any such information.
because as per the client all these tools were those of the auditor and any outcome of the same needs
to be handled by themselves instead of asking the management.
The auditors have suggested that such an attitude of non-cooperation would not help the either party
and would defeat the objective of the audit. The management of the company is, however, ready to
provide any other information to the auditors.
In this situation, please advise both the management and the auditors.
(a)Since the management is ready to provide any other information, the auditor should obtain this
240

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
information as well by not disclosing the management that it is outcome of any audit tool.
(b)The view of the management is correct because audit tools are there to support the auditors and not
to lead to increased work for the management.
( c)The auditors are correct because by using audit tools they are performing their audit
procedures.
(d)The auditors should ignore all these tools and plan their audit procedures accordingly.
Answer: Option: ( C)
26. (a) “Generating and preparing meaningful information from raw system data using processes, tools,
and techniques is known as Data Analytics and the data analytics methods used in an audit are known as
Computer Assisted Auditing Techniques or CAATs.” You are required to give illustration of a suggested
approach to get the benefits from the use of CAATs. (4 Marks) (mtp nov 20)
ANSWER
Generating and preparing meaningful information from raw system data using processes, tools, and
techniques is known as Data Analytics. The data analytics methods used in an audit are known as Computer
Assisted Auditing Techniques or CAATs.
There are several steps that should be followed to achieve success with CAATs and any of the supporting
tools. A suggested approach to benefit from the use of CAATs is given in the illustration below:
Understand Business Environment including IT
Define the Objectives and Criteria
Identify Source and Format of Data
Extract Data
Verify the Completeness and Accuracy of Extracted Data
Apply Criteria on Data Obtained
Validate and Confirm Results
Report and Document Results and Conclusions [SA 230]
27. A real-time environment is a type of automated environment in which business operations

and transactions are initiated, processed and recorded immediately (without any delay) as they
happen. It has several critical IT components that enable anytime, anywhere transactions to
take place. You are required to name the components and its example of real-time
environment. (4 Marks) (mtp – I -july 2021)
ANSWER
Real Time Environment: IT Components: To facilitate transactions in real-time, it is essential to have the
systems, networks and applications available during all times. A real-time environment has several critical
IT components that enable anytime, anywhere transactions to take place. Any failure even in one
component could render the real-time system unavailable and could result in a loss of revenue. IT
241
Components include:

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
(i) Applications: For example, ERP applications SAP, Oracle E-Business Suite, Core banking applications.
(ii) Middleware.: For example, Webservers like Apache, Oracle Fusion, IIS.
(iii) Networks: For example, Wide Area Networks, Local Area Network.
(iv) Hardware: For example, Servers, Backup and Storage devices
28. ABC Private Limited uses in-house developed application system for Accounting. The auditor
observed that user ID and password is mandatory to access the application system and felt that this is a
good control. What type of control is this? (mtp – II -july 2021)
(a) IT General Control.
(b) Application Control.
(c) Detective Control.
(d) Preventive Control.
ANSWER- d
29 (NOV21 EXAM)
Long Age Foundations Ltd. (LAF), a pharmaceutical company, collected the data from some hospitals and
their experts tried to understand medical needs of elderly people. After complete study, their experts
developed an application where LAF will provide complete health care after charging a nominal amount
from the customers, if customers download this application in their mobile phones. CA P in his audit has
used data analytics method also known as Computer Assisted audit techniques.
ANSWER :
The data analytics methods used in an audit are known as Computer Assisted Auditing Techniques or
CAATs. There are several steps that should be followed to achieve success with CAATs and any of the
supporting tools. A suggested approach to benefit from the use of CAATs is as given below:
- Understand Business Environment including IT
- Define the objectives and criteria
- Identify source and format of data
- Extract Data
- Verify the completeness and Accuracy of Extracted data
- Apply Criteria on data obtained.
- Validate and confirm results.
- Report and document results and conclusions (SA 230)
30 MAY 2022 EXAM

Beta Hotel operates in an automated environment and uses application softwares for front desk, Guest
reservations, Restaurant and kitchen orders and billing for which CA Anil has been appointed as an auditor.
Guide CA Anil the various key aspects that needs to be considered by him while understanding of the
automated environment of the Company in accordance with SA 315. Is he required to document the same?
If yes, illustrate by giving one example.
ANSWER :
Understanding and Documenting Automated Environment: Understanding of the automated environment
of a company is required as per SA 315. The auditor’s understanding of the automated environment should
242


for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
1. The applications that are being used by the company;

2. Details of the IT infrastructure components for each of the application;
3. The organisation structure and governance;
4. The policies, procedures and processes followed;
5. IT risks and controls.
The auditor is required to document the understanding of a company’s automated environment as per SA
230. The illustration below is an example of how an auditor can document details of an automated
environment:
Application Used for Database Operating Network Server and
System Storage
SAP ECC/ Integrated Oracle HP-UX LAN, HP Server
HANA application 19c WAN and NAS
software
REVS Front Desk, MS-SQL Windows In-house HP Server
Guest Server 2016 developed Internal HDD
Reservations 2018 Server
KOTS Restaurant MS-SQL Windows In-house HP Server
and Kitchen Server 2016 developed Internal HDD
Orders 2018 Server
BILLSYS Billing Oracle Windows Packaged HP Server

12c 2016 Software Internal HDD
Server
31 (OCT 2022 MTP)

techniques is known as Data Analytics and the data analytics methods used in an audit are known as
Computer Assisted Auditing Techniques or CAATs.” You are required to give illustration of a suggested
approach to get the benefit from the use of CAATs.
ANSWER :
techniques is known as Data Analytics.
The data analytics methods used in an audit are known as Computer Assisted Auditing Techniques or
CAATs. There are several steps that should be followed to achieve success with CAATs and any of the
supporting tools. A suggested approach to benefit from the use of CAATs is given in the illustration below:
• Understand Business Environment including IT
• Define the Objectives and Criteria
• Identify Source and Format of Data
• Extract Data
• Verify the Completeness and Accuracy of Extracted Data
• Apply Criteria on Data Obtained
• Validate and Confirm Results
• Report and Document Results and Conclusions [SA 230]
32 (OCT 2022 MTP)

Chandana Private Limited is engaged in trading of parts of machineries used in boiler plants. Company has
seen growth of 58% in the sales and management expecting similar growth in next 3 financial years and is
planning to onboard new dealers in order to achieve management goal. Purchase department also expects
to develop new suppliers in order to meet customer demands.
243

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
Internal auditor of the company has identified frequent changes in the bank account and other master
details of suppliers. At this expansion planning phase, company has no defined control to provid e
assurance on said supplier master changes. Management agreed to develop the process of monthly
detailed review of supplier master changes done in supplier master by Finance assistant in order to ensure
authorized changes in supplier master.
One of the members from the Management would like to know that above controls falls under which
category:
(a) Automated control.
(b) Preventive control.
(c) Detective control.
(d) Compensating control.
ANSWER : ( C )
33 (SEPT 2022 MTP)

SIDH Private Limited uses in-house developed application system for Accounting. The auditor observed that
user ID and password is mandatory to access the application system and felt that this is a good control.
What type of control is this?
(a) IT General Control.
(b) Application Control.
(c) Detective Control.
(d) Preventive Control.
ANSWER : ( D )
34 (MARCH 2022 MTP)

The volatility, unpredictability and pace of fast changes that exists in the automated environment today is
far greater than in the past and consequently it throws more risk to business which requires them to have a
need to continuously manage such risks. State various risks which an enterprise may have to face and
manage. (4 Marks)
ANSWER :
Various Risk: Businesses today operate in a dynamic environment. The volatility, unpredictability and pace
of changes that exist in the business environment today is far greater than in the past. Some of the reasons
for this dynamic environment include globalization, use of technology, new regulatory requirements, etc.
Because of this dynamic environment the associated risks to business have also increased and companies
have a need to continuously manage risks.
Examples of risks include:
• Market Risks;
• Regulatory & Compliance Risks;
• Technology & Security Risks;
• Financial Reporting Risks;
• Operational Risks;
• Credit Risk;
• Business Partner Risk;
• Product or Project Risk;
• Environmental Risks.
35(march 2022MTP)
Which of the following is an example of Direct Entity level control
A. Company code of conduct and ethics policies.
B. Human resource policies.
244
C. Job roles & responsibilities of employees.


for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
D. Monitoring of effectiveness of controls activities by Internal Audit function.

ANSWER : ( D )
36(MAY 2022 RTP)

You came to know that the data stored and processed in systems can be used to get various insights into
the way business operates in an automated environment. This data can be useful for the preparation of
management information system (MIS) reports and electronic dashboards that give a high-level snapshot
of business performance. In view of above you are required to briefly discuss the meaning of data analytics
and example of circumstances when auditing in an automated environment, auditors can apply the
concepts of data analytics.
ANSWER :
Data Analytics: Generating and preparing meaningful information from raw system data using processes,
tools, and techniques is known as Data Analytics. The data analytics methods used in an audit are known as
Computer Assisted Auditing Techniques or CAATs. When auditing in an automated environment, auditors
can apply the concepts of data analytics for several aspects of an audit including the following:
• preliminary analytics;
• risk assessment;
• control testing;
• non-standard journal analysis;
• evaluation of deficiencies;
• fraud risk assessment.
37(NOV 2022 RTP)

M/s RST & Associates have been appointed as auditors of ADI Ltd. for the financial year 2021-22. The
processes, operations, accounting and decisions are carried out by using computers in ADI Ltd. M/s RST &
Associates understand that there are several aspects that they should consider to determine the level of
automation and complexity in the business environment of ADI Ltd. While planning the audit work, the
engagement partners discussed with the audit staff about the various types of controls in the automated
environment that are put in place to mitigate the IT risks and to maintain the confidentiality, integrity,
availability and security of data such as General IT Controls; Application Controls; and IT-Dependent
Controls.
You are required to briefly explain:
(i) General IT Controls.
(ii) Application Controls.
(iii) IT-Dependent Controls.
ANSWER :
The controls that are put in place to mitigate the IT risks and to maintain the confidentiality, integrity,
availability and security of data are General IT Controls, Application Controls and IT-Dependent Controls.
General IT Controls: “General IT controls are policies and procedures that relate to many applications and
support the effective functioning of application controls. They apply to mainframe, miniframe, and end-
user environment. General IT controls that maintain the integrity of information and security of data
commonly include controls over the following:” (SA 315)
• Data center and network operations;
• System software acquisition, change and maintenance
• Program change;
• Access security;
• Application system acquisition, development, and maintenance (Business
Applications).
These are IT controls generally implemented to mitigate the IT specific risks and applied commonly across
multiple IT systems, applications and business processes. Hence, General IT controls are known as
“pervasive” controls or “indirect” controls.
245

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
Application Controls: Application controls include both automated or manual controls that operate at a
business process level. Application controls can be preventive as well as detective in nature and are
designed to ensure the integrity of the accounting records. application controls relate to procedures used
to initiate, record, process and report transactions or other financial data. These controls help ensure that
transactions occurred, are authorised, and are completely and accurately recorded and processed.
completeness, accuracy and integrity of data in those systems. Examples of automated applications include
edit checks and validation of input data, sequence number check, limit check, format check, range check,
reasonableness check, mandatory data fields, existence check etc.
IT dependent controls: IT dependent controls are basically manual controls that make use of some form of
data or information or report produced from IT systems and applications. In this case, even though the
control is performed manually, the design and effectiveness of such controls depend on the reliability of
source data.
Due to the inherent dependency on Information Technology, the effectiveness and reliability of Automated
application controls and IT dependent controls require the General IT Controls to be effective.
246

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
247

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s

WCO Private Ltd is a joint venture of WCO Gmbh and MSON Ltd. WCO Gmbh is a company based
out of Germany and is also listed in Germany. WCO Gmbh prepares its financial statements as
per IFRS. MSON Ltd is a company based out of India and is also listed in India. MSON Ltd prepares
its financial statements as per Ind AS. For the purpose of reporting of financial information to
WCO Gmbh and MSON Ltd for consolidation purposes, WCO Private Ltd uses reporting package
(which comprises of balance sheet, profit and loss and other notes to accounts). WCO Private Ltd
prepares its financial statements as per Ind AS.
WCO Private Ltd has taken useful life of some fixed assets in its Ind AS financial statements
based on their useful lives which is different from the useful lives of similar nature fixed assets
taken by WCO Gmbh (in line with their accounting policies). The reporting package of WCO
Private Ltd is audited before reporting to WCO Gmbh. The auditor audits the reporting package
which is prepared in line with the Group accounting policies of WCO Gmbh and mentions in his
report that the reporting package has been prepared as per the Group accounting policies of
WCO Gmbh.
WCO Private Ltd makes an adjustment for changes in useful lives in the reporting package on the
basis of Group accounting policies of WCO Gmbh.
The auditor has asked the management to take same useful lives of fixed assets in the reporting
package which have also been taken by them in its Ind AS financial statements. Management
has not agreed with the view of the auditor. Please suggest the right course of action.
a. Position taken by the management is correct.
b. Position suggested by the auditor is correct and if the management does not agree then auditor
248

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
may have to modify his report on the basis of materiality.

c. The matter relates to an estimate (i.e. useful life) which may be subject to changes under
different GAAPs and hence auditor should ignore this point.
d. The report would be for special purpose which should always be a clean report
Answer: Option (a)
RTP MAY 2019 QN NO6

2. DCHI Ltd is in the business of optics and imaging products. It is a wholly owned subsidiary of Japanese
company, DCHJ Ltd. DCHI Ltd has many expatriates (Expats) working in the company whose tenure range
from 2 to 5 years. During the course of audit of financial statements of the company, the statutory auditors
observed that the company has not been deducting and depositing the TDS (tax deducted at source) on
salaries of expats. The auditors assessed that the impact of this can be significant as the company has
many expats and salary amount is significant. Management explained that TDS on salary of expats would
lead to unnecessary hassles to the expats and they serve the company only for a short period. How should
the auditors of DCHI Ltd deal with this matter?
a. Considering this as a statutory non-compliance, the auditor should look at the significance of the matter
and accordingly should report the same in CARO.
b. Considering this as a statutory non-compliance, the auditor should look at the significance of the matter
and accordingly should consider reporting this in the main report along with CARO.
c. The auditor should agree to the management’s view as the expats are temporary workers and this may
not be convenient for the management.
d. Since the matter relates to statutory liability only, the reporting requirements do not arise till the time
this becomes disputed.
Answer: Option B
RTP May 19 Qn no 8
3. ABC Pvt Ltd had turnover of Rs. 39 crores as at 31 March 2018. The Company had taken a loan of Rs. 39
crores from various banks and financial institutions during the year ended 31 March 2018. These loans
were paid by the Company before 31 March 2018. The Company is of the view that the auditors’ reporting
on adequacy and operating effectiveness of internal financial controls (IFC) under Section 143(3)(i) of
the Companies Act, 2013 would not be required. The auditors of the Company have a different view. What
should be correct option?
a. The turnover of ABC Pvt Ltd is below required threshold and hence IFC will not be applicable.
b. The turnover of ABC Pvt Ltd is below required threshold and loan amount was fully paid before year end
i.e. 31 March 2018. Hence IFC will not be applicable.
c. The turnover of ABC Pvt Ltd is below required threshold but loan amount was above required threshold.
Irrespective of the fact that loan was outstanding as at 31 March 2018 or not, IFC would be applicable.
249

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
d. In the given case because of the repayment of the loan before year end i.e. 31 March 2018, applicability
of IFC becomes optional.
Answer: Option C
MTP Mar 2019 Qn no 11 (2 Marks)

4. XY & Co. is a chartered firm with two partners Mr. X and Mr. Y. The firm was appointed auditor
for 35
companies in the year 2017 and Mr. X was having total 19 audits in his name. Mr. Y was also
partner in EFY & Co. Where he was appointed auditor in 4 companies. On 4th August 2017, Mr.
X met with an accident and died. The firm was reconstituted with Mr. Y as the proprietor of new
firm and the audits of the new firm reduced to 16. The new firm, in which Mr. Y is the proprietor,
accepted the audit of a Private Limited Company having paid up capital of Rs. 52 crores on 30th
August 2017. EFY & Co., another chartered firm, contended that Mr. Y cannot accept the
appointment of Private Limited Company as he has already crossed the ceiling of 20 company
audits in that year. Do you think that EFY & Co.’s claim is valid?
(e) EFY & Co.’s claim is valid as MR. Y has already been appointed auditor for 20 companies i.e. 16
in the reconstituted firm and 4 in EFY & Co.
(f) Mr. Y cannot accept the audit of Private Limited Company in the year in which there is change
in the constitution of firm, therefore the claim of EFY & Co. is valid.
(g) Mr. Y can accept the audit as the ceiling of 20 company audits is applicable for each firm in
which the chartered accountant is a partner or proprietor.
(h) EFY & Co.’s claim is void as the ceiling of 20 company audits doesn’t include audit of private
company having paid up capital less than Rs. 100 crores.
Answer: (h) EFY & Co.’s claim is void as the ceiling of 20 company audits doesn’t include audit of private
company having paid up capital less than Rs. 100 crores.
MTP Apr 2019 Qn no 7 (1 Mark)

5. One afternoon in the first week of June 2018, there was a heated discussion between the audit
engagement partner of Shah & associates and the finance director of Pecker & Co. The discussion
was mainly on non-co-operation of the company staff to provide the relevant information to the
auditors. The staff thought that the auditors were a hindrance in their routine work. The finance
director called an urgent meeting to discuss the removal of the auditor Shah & Associates. Within
the next week the partner of Shah & Associates was called and informed that they are no more
the auditors of Pecker & Co. Comment if the removal of the auditor was proper in accordance
with the Companies Act, 2013.
a) Yes, the finance director was correct in the procedure of the removal of auditors by a simple
board meeting discussion.
b) No, the removal of auditors before the expiry of the term should be done with the prior
250

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
permission from the Central Government.

c) Once appointed, the board of directors cannot remove the present auditors of the company.
d) Yes, Pecker & Co is not a government company, hence the board of directors can remove the
auditors by themselves.
Answer: (b) No, the removal of auditors before the expiry of the term should be done with the
prior permission from the Central Government.

6. Garg Ltd. has declared dividend of 9% on 15 April 2018, for the year ended 31 March 2018. The
company has not paid or the warrant in respect thereof has not been posted till date 30 June
2018 to any shareholder whose is entitled to the payment of the dividend. Which of the
following is correct in respect of the effect of non-payment of dividend?
(a) Garg Ltd. shall be liable to pay simple interest of 15% p.a. during the period for which the
default continues.
(b) Garg Ltd. shall be liable to pay simple interest of 18% p.a. during the period for which the
default continues.
(c) Garg Ltd. can still make the payment of dividend by 31 July 2018, with no interest
applicable.
(d) Garg Ltd. can still make the payment of dividend by 15 July 2018, with no interest
applicable.
Answer: (b) Garg Ltd. shall be liable to pay simple interest of 18% p.a. during the period for
which the default continues.

7. TSV & Co, Chartered Accountants is an audit firm having two partners CA T and CA V. The firm
TSV & Co. is already holding an appointment as auditors of 36 public companies and none of the
partners hold any company audits in their personal capacity or as partners with another firm.
TSV & Co. has been offered the appointment as auditors of 7 more private limited companies. Of
the seven, one is a company with a paid up share capital of Rs. 150 crores, five are “Small
Companies” as per the Companies Act and one is a “Dormant Company”. Determine the number
of companies out of 7 for which TSV & Co. can accept the appointment as an auditor.
(a) 5
(b) 6
(c) 7
251

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
(d) 1
Answer: (c) -7
MTP Apr 2019 QN no 5 (1 Mark), (RTP NOV 2020)

8 FAC Chartered Accountants was appointed as statutory auditors by KMG Ltd. for the audit of
their financial statements. During the course of audit the auditors noticed a fraud of Rs. 120
lakhs done by an officer of the company. The officer sanctioned and made the payment to fake
vendors for purchase of fixed assets; however the assets were not entered in the Fixed Assets
Register. The auditor reported the fraud in his audit report to the shareholders of the company
presented in the Annual General Meeting, but did not mentioned the name of the parties
involved. The Board of Directors of the com pany asked ICAI to take necessary action against the
auditor as he has not complied with his duty to report fraud as per Section 143(12) of the
What is the duty of the auditor as per Companies Act in reporting the fraud done by officers or
employees of the company?
a) As per Companies Act, 2013, as the amount of fraud is more than 100 lacs; the auditor should
have reported the matter within 2 days of his knowledge to the Board of Directors/ Audit
committee of the company seeking their reply or observations within 45 days. After completion
of 45 days the auditor should forward his report to the Central Government along with the reply
if any received from Board/ Audit Committee.
b) As per Companies Act, in the course of audit if the auditor has reason to believe that a fraud has
been conducted by the officers or employees of the company, the auditor shall report the matter
to the Central Government immediately.
c) The auditor’s duty is restricted to reporting the fraud to shareholders and he is not required to
report the matter to Board of Directors/ Audit Committee/ Central Government.
d) The auditor can submit his report on fraud to shareholders but is required to mention the name
of the parties involved in fraud, as per Section 143(12) of the Companies Act, 2013.
Answer: Option (a) As per Companies Act, 2013, as the amount of fraud is more than 100 lacs;
the auditor should have reported the matter within 2 days of his knowledge to the Board of
Directors/ Audit committee of the company seeking their reply or observations within 45 days.
After completion of 45 days the auditor should forward his report to the Central Government along
with the reply if any received from Board/ Audit Committee.
MTP Oct 2019 QN no 3 (1 Mark)

9. OPE Ltd issued a prospectus in respect of an IPO which had the auditor’s report on the
financial statements for the year ended 31 March 2019. The issue was fully subscribed.
During this year, there was an abnormal rise in the profits of the company for which it was
252

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
found later on that it was because of manipulated sales in which there was participation of
Whole-time director and other top officials of the company. On discovery of this fact, the
company offered to refund all moneys to the subscribers of the shares and sued the auditors
for the damages alleging that the auditors failed to examine and ascertain any satisfactory
explanation for steep increase in the rate of profits and related accounts. The company
emphasized that the auditor should have proceeded with suspicion and should not have followed
selected verification. The auditors were able to prove that they found internal controls to be
satisfactory and did not find any circumstance to arouse suspicion.
The company was not able to prove that auditors were negligent in performance of their duties.
Which of the following is correct:
a) The stand of the company was correct in this case. Considering the nature of the work, the
Auditors should have proceeded with suspicion and should not have followed selected
verification.
b) The approach of the auditors look reasonable in this case. The auditors found internal controls
to be satisfactory and also did not find any circumstance to arouse suspicion and hence they
performed their procedures on the basis of selected verification.
c) In the given case, the auditors should have involved various experts along with them to help
them on their audit procedures. Prospectus is one area wherein management involves various
experts and hence the auditors should also have done that. In the given case, by not involving
the experts the auditors did not perform their job in a professional manner. If they had involved
experts like forensic experts etc, the manipulation could have been detected. Hence the auditors
should be held liable.
d) In case of such type of engagements, the focus is always on the management controls. If the
controls are found to be effective then an auditor can never be held liable in respect of any
deficiency or misstatement or fraud.
Answer: Option(b) The approach of the auditors look reasonable in this case. The auditors found internal
controls to be satisfactory and also did not find any circumstance to arouse suspicion and hence they
performed their procedures on the basis of selected verification.
MTP Oct 2019 QN no 12 (2 Marks)

10. KIC Ltd is a company engaged in the business of general insurance and has been in existence
for over 15 years. The company has a subsidiary company, PIC Ltd, which is also engaged in the
business of insurance other than general insurance.
The previous statutory auditors of PIC Ltd have completed their tenure as an auditor and
accordingly have resigned and the management of PIC Ltd is looking for new statutory auditors.
KB & Associates, a firm of Chartered Accountants, have vast experience of audit of insurance
companies and would like to get appointed as auditor of PIC Ltd. KB & Associates is a large firm
and have also employed experts – engineers, valuers, lawyers for various client services. The firm
is evaluating as to what should be the criteria for get appointed as auditors of PIC Ltd because in
253

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
the past they have audited only the holding companies and considering a subsidiary company
for the first time. In this context, please help the firm by answering which of the following options
would be correct?
(a) KB & Associates, a firm of Chartered Accountants, should be appointed by the Board of Directors
of PIC Ltd and should ensure that they don’t take up audit of more than 2 insurance companies.
(b) KB & Associates can take up the audit if the firm is appointed by the Comptroller and Auditor
General of India and should ensure that they don’t take up audit of more than 3 insurance
companies.
(c) KB & Associates cannot take audit of PIC Ltd because they have employed experts which is not
permitted by the IRDAI Guidelines.
(d) KB & Associates can take up audit of PIC Ltd by ensuring that they are eligible to be appointed as
per the criteria laid down in the Companies Act 2013 for audit of subsidiary companies and they
would need to submit a certificate in this respect to the ICAI.
Answer: (b) KB & Associates can take up the audit if the firm is appointed by the Comptroller and Auditor
General of India and should ensure that they don’t take up audit of more than 3 insurance companies.

11. KJ Private Ltd has a business of pharmaceuticals and has an annual turnover of INR 1,500
crores. During the last few years, considering the environment in which the company operates,
its profit has reduced and is still falling. Hence the management has been looking at various ways
to cut the costs.
AD & Associates are the statutory auditors of the companyand RM & Associates are the internal
auditors of the company.
Initially the company did not want to appoint any internal auditors to save costs, however, at
insistence of the statutory auditors, the company appointed the internal auditors.
During the course of the statutory audit for the financial year ended 31 March, 2019, the
statutory auditors requested for the detailed working papers of the internal auditors which the
internal auditors refused. However, the statutory auditors told the management if the same are
not provided then they would qualify their report.
In this situation, please advise which of the following would be correct.
a. The statutory auditors should review the detailed working papers but they cannot qualify their
report on this ground.
b. The statutory auditors may review the detailed working papers and even after that they may
qualify their report.
c. The statutory auditors are not required to go to the extent of review of detailed working papers
of internal auditors.
d. The statutory auditors may review the detailed working papers of internal auditors but for that
purpose they would require prior approval of the ICAI.
Answer: (c) The statutory auditors are not required to go to the extent of review of detailed working papers
of internal auditors.
254

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
12. AJ Private Ltd. was incorporated on 21 March, 2018 and has limited operations. However,
the capital induction in the company was huge because it would be capital intensive. The
companyis in the process to set up a plant in Karnataka which should be completed by 31 May,
2019. T he company’s management prepared its financial statements for the year ended 31
March, 2019. The auditors were also called to start the work in April 2019. The auditors would
be able to complete their work by 31 May, 2019 and accordingly would issue their audit report
by 1st week of June, 2019 as per the plan agreed with the management. The auditors have
some observations related to preparations of financial statements which are not in
compliance with Schedule III and most importantly the point related to capitalization of the
plant as Property, Plant and Equipment in the financial statements for the year ended 31
March, 2019. Please suggest which of the following statements would be correct.
(a) The compliance of Schedule III shall start from 1 April 2019 for this company as per Companies
Accounts (Amendment) Rules 2016.
(b) The compliance of Schedule III shall start from first financial period, however, some
exemptions would be applicable as per Companies Accounts Rules 2014.
(c) There should be full compliance of Schedule III and plant should be kept as CWIP as per
Schedule III.
(d) There should be full compliance of Schedule III and plant should be shown as PPE as per Schedule
III.
Answer: (c) There should be full compliance of Schedule III and plant should be kept as CWIP as per
Schedule III.
RTP Nov 2019 Qn no 6

13. The audit of Selby & Co is at the last stage, where your team member is looking at the
presentation of items in the financial statements. You have instructed the team member to
follow the general instructions given under Schedule III of the Companies Act, 2013 for the
preparation and presentation of financial statements. The team member has shown you the
following list where the company has not adhered to the general instructions given in Schedule
III. Which of the following from the list is not as per Division I of Schedule III.
(a) The company had Rs. 32,500 in deferred tax liability and Rs. 12,500 in deferred tax asset arising
from income taxes levied under the same governing taxation laws. The financial statements
include both the above figures at non-current liabilities and non- current assets respectively.
(b) The company had a loss in the current year, this debit balance of statement of profit and loss
was shown as a negative figure under the head “Surplus” in the notes to the financial
statements.
(c) In the current year the company had issued a performance guarantee and counter guarantees,
but these were not disclosed as contingent liability in the notes in the financial statements.
255

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
(d) The company has clubbed all other expenses under the head ‘Other expenses on the basis of
one percent of the revenue from operations or Rs. 1,00,000 whichever is higher to be disclosed
separately.
Answer: Option A
14.MAY 2018- 3(b) – 5 Marks
Beneathminerals Limited is a Public Sector Company engaged in extraction of minerals from

land. It has to pump out water in the first layer of the soil if the minerals are to be excavated.
The Company pumps out water and diverts the water through a water course constructed by it
to nearby villages and the water is allowed to be used by villagers for drinking purposes. The
cost of construction of water course amounted to Rs. 5.25 crores and the Company had
disclosed this amount as CSR expenses in the Statement of Profit and Loss. Comment.
ANSWER
Corporate Social Responsibility Expenses: Company (Corporate Social Responsibility Policy)
Rules, 2014 mandated the corporate entities that the expenditure incurred for Corporate Social
Responsibility (CSR) should not be the expenditure incurred for the activities in the ordinary
course of business. If expenditure incurred is for the activities in the ordinary course of business,
then it will not be qualified as expenditure incurred on CSR activities.
In the instant case, Beneathminerals Limited is a public sector company which is engaged in
extraction of mineral from land, for that it has to pump out water in the first layer of the soil if the
minerals are to be excavated. The company pumps out water and diverts the water through a
water course constructed by it to nearby villages and the water is allowed to be used by villagers
for drinking purposes. Company has disclosed the cost of construction of water course as CSR
expenses in the statement of Profit and Loss, which is not correct as this expenditure incurred for
the construction of water course is included in the ordinary course of activities of business.
Therefore, the treatment done by showing the cost of construction of water course as CSR expense
is not correct.
15. May 2018 -6(b) 4 Marks, MTP-Apr-19 Qn No 3(b) 4 Marks:

Tee & Co., a firm of Chartered Accountants had been appointed by C & AG to conduct statutory
audit of M/s Rare Airlines Limited, a Public Sector Company. They would like to check certain
mandatory propriety points as required under section 143(1) of the Companies Act, 2013. List
the areas of check to meet these requirements.
RTP Nov 2019 Qn no 25(b)
Areas of propriety audit under Section 143(1) of the Companies Act, 2013
Answer:
Mandatory Propriety Points under section 143 (1) of the Companies Act, 2013: The
requirement of the provisions of section 143(1) is essentially propriety-oriented as much as some
256

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
specific dubious practices are required to be looked into by the auditor. Areas of propriety audit
under the provisions of Section 143(1) may be following:
(i) Whether the terms on which secured loans and secured advances have been made are
prejudicial to the interests of the company or its members”: It may be appreciated that the terms
of loans include such matters as security, interest, repayment period and other business
considerations. The auditor has to inquire whether the terms are such that they can be adjudged
as prejudicial to the legitimate interest of the company or of its shareholders.
This is a process of judging a situation by reference to certain objective standards or reasonableness
whether the terms entered into are prejudicial or not, not only to the company but also to the
shareholders.
(ii) Whether transactions of the company which are represented merely by book entries are
prejudicial to the interests of the company: This proposition has got to be inquired into by
reference to the effects of the book entries, unsupported by transactions, on the legitimate interests
of the company. The auditor has to exercise his judgment based on certain objective standards. It
is also possible that some transactions may not adversely affect the interests of the company. The
auditor has to judiciously consider what does and does not constitute the interest of the company.
(iii) Whether investment of companies, other than a banking or an investment company, in the form
of shares, debentures and other securities have been sold at a price lower than the cost:
Apparently, this is a matter of verification by the auditor. The intention, however, is not known
whether loss has occurred due to the sale. The auditor is required to inquire into circumstances of
sale of investments that resulted in loss. Obviously, the duty cast on him is propriety based, i.e.,
reasonableness of the decision to sell at a loss. It involves exercise of judgment having regard to
the circumstances in which the company was placed at the time of making the sale.
(iv) Whether loans and advances made by the company have been shown as deposits. Again,
considering the propriety element, rationalizing the proper disclosure of loans and advance given
by company is made:
(v) Whether personal expenses have been charged to revenue: It is an accepted principle that
expenses which are not business expenses should not be charged to revenue. The effect of
charging personal expenses to the business is to distort the profitability of the company and to
secure a personal gain at the cost of the company. Obviously, propriety is involved in this; charging
personal expenses to business account is highly improper and abusive hence this provision.
(vi) In case it is stated in the books and papers of the company that shares have been allotted for
cash, whether cash has actually been received in respect of such allotmen t, and if no cash
actually received, whether the position in books of account and balance sheet so stated is
correct, regular and not misleading: A control has been set up to verify the receipt of cash in case
of allotment of shares for cash. Further, if cash is not received, the books of accounts and statement
of affairs shows the true picture.
16.MTP-Aug-18 Qn No 3(C) 5 Marks:
Z Ltd changed its employee remuneration policy from 1st of April 2017 to S provide for 12%
contribution to provident fund on leave encashment also. As per the leave encashment policy
the employees can either utilize or encash it. As at 31st March 18 the company obtained an
257

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
actuarial valuation for leave encashment liability. However, it did not provide for 12% PF
contribution on it. The auditor of the company wants it to be provided but the management
replied that as and when the employees availed leave encashment, the provident fund
contribution was made. The company further contends that this is the correct treatment as it
is not sure whether the employees will avail leave encashment or utilize it. Comment.
Answer:
As per Para 11 of AS-15 on “Employee Benefits”, issued by the Institute of Chartered

Accountants of India, an enterprise should recognize the expected cost of short-term employee
benefits in the form of compensated absences in the case of accumulating compensated
absences, when the employees render service that increases their entitlement to future
compensated absences.
Since the company obtained actuarial valuation for leave encashment, it is obvious that the
compensated absences are accumulating in nature. An enterprise should measure the expected
cost of accumulating compensated absences as the additional amount that the enterprise expects
to pay as a result of the unused entitlement that has accumulated at the balance sheet date.
Here, Z Ltd will accumulate the amount of leave encashment benefits as it is the liability of the
company to provide 12% PF on amount of leave encashment. Hence the contention of the auditor
is correct that full provision should be provided by the company.
17. RTP May 2018 Qn no 6(a).

(a) Excellent Limited, a Company incorporated in India and listed with SEBI, has a scheme for
payment of settlement allowance to retiring employees. Under the scheme, retiring employees
are entitled to reimbursement of certain travel expenses for the class they are entitled to as per
company rules and regulations. Employees are also entitled to claim a lump-sum payment to
cover expenses on food and stay during the travel. The Company also gives option to employees
that they can claim a lump-sum amount equal to three months pay last drawn.
Excellent Limited have following accounting policies to record these travel expenses:
(i) Settlement allowance does not depend upon the length of service of employee. It is restricted
to employee's eligibility under the travel rule of the company therefore all travel expenses fall
under the category of defined contribution plans.
(ii) Since it is not related to the length of service of the employees, it is difficult to estimate reliably
and there is no present obligation to pay employees as per AS
29 "Provisions, Contingent Liabilities and Contingent Assets", hence it is accounted for on claim
basis.
You are statutory auditor of Excellent Limited. What would be your guidance to audit team?
Answer
Treatment of Employee Benefits Expenses: The present case falls under the category of defined benefit
scheme under AS 15 “Employee Benefits”. The said scheme encompasses cases where payment promised
to be made to an employee at or near retirement presents significant difficulties in the determination of
periodic charge to the statement of profit and loss. The contention of the Company that the settlement
258

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
allowance will be accounted for on claim basis is not correct even if company’s obligation under the
scheme is uncertain and requires estimation. In estimating the obligation, assumptions may need to be
made regarding future conditions and events, which are largely outside the company’s control. Thus,
• Settlement allowance payable by the company is a defined retirement benefit, covered by AS 15.
• A provision should be made every year in the accounts for the accruing liability on account of settlement
allowance. The amount of provision should be calculated according to actuarial valuation.
• Where, however, the amount of provision so determined is not material, the company can follow some
other method of accounting for settlement allowances.
18.RTP May 2018 Qn no. 6(b)

C Ltd. appointed CA Innocent as a statutory auditor for the company for the current financial year.
Further the company offered him the services of actuarial, investment advisory and investment banking
which was also approved by the Board of Directors.
Answer
Services not to be Rendered by the Auditor: Section 144 of the Companies Act, 2013 prescribes
certain services not to be rendered by the auditor. An auditor appointed under this Act shall
provide to the company only such other services as are approved by the Board of Directors or
the audit committee, as the case may be, but which shall not include any of the following services
(whether such services are rendered directly or indirectly to the company or its holding company
or subsidiary company), namely:
(i) accounting and book keeping services;
(ii) internal audit;
(iii) design and implementation of any financial information system;
(iv) actuarial services;
(v) investment advisory services;

(vi) investment banking services;
(vii) rendering of outsourced financial services;

(viii) management services; and
(ix) any other kind of services as may be prescribed.
Further section 141(3)(i) of the Companies Act, 2013 also disqualify a person for appointment as
an auditor of a company who is engaged as on the date of appointment in consulting and
specialized services as provided in section 144.
In the given case, CA Innocent was appointed as an auditor of C Ltd. He was offered additional
services of actuarial, investment advisory and investment banking which was also approved by the
Board of Directors. The auditor is advised not to accept the services as these services are specifically
notified in the services not to be rendered by him as an auditor as per section 144 of the Act.
19. RTP May 2018 Qn no. 6(c)

259

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
Ram Ltd. is a private company. Its balance sheet shows paid up share capital of Rs. 5 crore and
public borrowings of Rs. 100 crore. The company appointed M/s Shyam & Co., a chartered
accountant firm, as the statutory auditor in its annual general meeting held at the end of
September, 2017 for 11 years.
You are required to state the provisions related to - rotation of auditors and cooling off period
as per the section 139(2) of the Companies Act, 2013 in case of an individual auditor or an audit
firm, both, and comment upon the facts of the case provided above with respect to aforesaid
provisions.
Answer
a) Rotation of Auditor & Cooling Off Period Provisions: The provision related to Rotation of Auditor
& Cooling Off Period is newly inserted by section 139(2) of the Companies Act, 2013 read with
Rule 5 of the Companies (Audit & Auditors) Rules, 2014, which is discussed as under:
The provisions related to rotation of auditor are applicable to those companies which are prescribed
in Companies (Audit and Auditors) Rules, 2014, which prescribes the following classes of companies
including Listed companies, but excluding one person companies and small companies, namely:-
• all unlisted public companies having paid up share capital of Rs.10 crore or more;
• all private limited companies having paid up share capital of Rs.50 crore or more;
• all companies having paid up share capital of below threshold limit mentioned above, but having
public borrowings from financial institutions, banks or public deposits of Rs. 50 crores or more.
As per Section 139(2) of the Companies Act, 2013, no listed company or a company belonging to
such class or classes of companies as mentioned above, shall appoint or re-appoint-
(a) an individual as auditor for more than one term of 5 consecutive years; and
(b) an audit firm as auditor for more than two terms of 5 consecutive years.
In the given case, Ram Ltd. is a private company having paid up share capital of Rs. 5 crore and
public borrowings of Rs. 100 crore. The company has appointed M/s Shyam & Co., a chartered
accountant firm, as the statutory auditor in its AGM held at the end of September, 2017 for 11 years.
The provisions relating to rotation of auditor will be applicable as the public borrowings exceeds
Rs. 50 crore. Therefore, Ram (P) Ltd. can appoint M/s Shyam & Co. as an auditor of the company
for not more than one term of five consecutive years twice i.e. M/s Shyam & Co. shall hold office
from the conclusion of this meeting upto conclusion of sixth AGM to be held in the year 2022 and
thereafter can be re- appointed as auditor for one more term of five years i.e. upto year 2027. The
appointment shall be subject to ratification by members at every annual general meeting of the
company. As a result, the appointment of M/s Shyam & Co. made by Ram Ltd. for 11 years is void.
20. MTP Mar 2018 2(C) 5 Marks/new study mat (just year difference)
The Balance Sheet of G Ltd. as at 31st March 16 is as under. Comment on the presentation in terms of
Schedule III.
260

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
Particulars Note 31st March, 16 31st March, 15

No.
Equity & Liabilities
Share Capital 1 XXX XXX
Reserves & Surplus 2 0 0
Employee stock option outstanding 3 XXX XXX
Share application money refundable 4 XXX XXX
Non-Current Liabilities XXX XXX
Deferred tax liability (Arising from 5 XXX XXX
Indian Income Tax)
Current Liabilities
Trade Payables 6 XXX XXX
Total XXXX XXXX
Assets
Non-Current Assets
Fixed Assets-Tangible 7 XXX XXX
CWIP (including capital advances) 8 XXX XXX
Current Assets
Trade Receivables 9 XXX XXX
Deferred Tax Asset (Arising from Indian 10 XXX XXX
Income Tax)
Debit balance of Statement of Profit XXX XXX
and Loss
Total XXXX XXXX
Answer
I. Share Capital & Reserve & Surplus are to be reflected under the heading “Shareholders’ funds”,
which is not shown while preparing the balance sheet. Although it is a part of Equity and
Liabilities yet it must be shown under head “shareholders’ funds”. The heading “Shareholders’
funds” is missing in the balance sheet given in the question.
II. Reserve & Surplus is showing zero balance, which is not correct in the given case. Debit balance
of statement of Profit & Loss should be shown as a negative figure under the head ‘Surplus’.
The balance of ‘Reserves and Surplus’, after adjusting negative balance of surplus shall be shown
under the head ‘Reserves and Surplus’ even if the resulting figure is in the negative.
III. Schedule III requires that Employee Stock Option outstanding should be disclosed under the
heading “Reserves and Surplus”
IV. Share application money refundable shall be shown under the sub-heading “Other Current
Liabilities”. As this is refundable and not pending for allotment, hence it is not a part of equity.
V. Deferred Tax Liability has been correctly shown under Non-Current Liabilities. But Deferred tax
assets and deferred tax liabilities, both, cannot be shown in balance sheet because only the net
balance of Deferred Tax Liability or Asset is to be shown.
VI. Under the main heading of Non-Current Assets, Fixed Assets are further classified as under:
i. Tangible assets
261

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
ii. Intangible assets

iii. Capital work in Progress
iv. Intangible assets under development.
Keeping in view the above, the CWIP shall be shown under Fixed Assets as Capital Work in
Progress. The amount of Capital advances included in CWIP shall be disclosed under the sub-
heading “Long term loans and advances” under the heading Non-Current Assets.
V. Deferred Tax Asset shall be shown under Non-Current Asset. It should be the net balance of
Deferred Tax Asset after adjusting the balance of deferred tax liability
Vi. Subsequent to the notification of Ministry of Corporate Affairs dated October 11, 2018 under
Section 467(1) of the Companies Act, 2013, Trade Payables should be disclosed as follows:-
(A) total outstanding dues of micro enterprises and small enterprises; and
(B) total outstanding dues of creditors other than micro enterprises and small enterprises.”
21.MTP Mar 2018 Qn no.4(b) 4 Marks

The Managing Director of the Company has committed a “Teeming and Lading” Fraud. The amount
involved has been however subsequently after the year end deposited in the company. As a Statutory
Auditor, how would you deal?
Answer
Fraud Committed by Managing Director: The Managing Director of the company has committed
a “Teeming and Lading” fraud. The fact that the amount involved has been subsequently
deposited after the year end is not important because the auditor is required to perform his
responsibilities as laid down in SA 240, “The Auditor’s responsibilities relating to Fraud in an Audit
of Financial Statements”.
First of all, as per SA 240, the auditor needs to perform procedures whether the financial
statements are materially misstated. Because an instance of fraud cannot be considered as an
isolated occurrence and it becomes important for the auditor to perform audit procedures and
revise the audit risk assessment.
Secondly, the auditor needs to consider the impact of fraud on financial statements and its
disclosure in the audit report. Thirdly, the auditor should communicate the matter to the
Chairman and Board of Directors. Finally, in view of the fact that the fraud has been committed
at the highest level of management, it affects the reliability of audit evidence previously obtained
since there is a genuine doubt about representations of management.
company, he shall immediately report the matter to the Central Government (in case amount of
fraud is Rs. 1 crore or above)or Audit Committee or Board in other cases (in case the amount of
fraud involved is less than Rs. 1 crore) within such time and in such manner as may be
262

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
prescribed.
The auditor is also required to report as per Clause (x) of Paragraph 3 of CARO, 2020, Whether
any fraud by the company or any fraud on the company by its officers or employees has been
noticed or reported during the year; If yes, the nature and the amount involved is to be
indicated.
22. MTP Apr 18 Qn no.3(d) 5 Marks

As a statutory auditor of a company, comment on the accounting policy on Revenue Recognition
for a company engaged in manufacture and sale of chemical products was stated as "Revenue
is recognized only when it can be reliably measured and it is reasonable to expect ultimate
collection".
Answer
Revenue Recognition: As per AS 9 Revenue Recognition, in a transaction involving the sale of
goods, performance should be regarded as being achieved when the following conditions have
been fulfilled:
(i) the seller of goods has transferred to the buyer the property in the goods for a price or all
significant risks and rewards of ownership have been transferred to the buyer and the seller
retains no effective control of the goods transferred to a degree usually associated with
ownership; and
(ii) no significant uncertainty exists regarding the amount of the consideration that will be derived
from the sale of the goods.
Therefore, revenue from sales transactions should be recognised when the requirements as to
performance set out above is satisfied, provided that at the time of performance it is not
unreasonable to expect ultimate collection.
If at the time of raising of any claim uncertainty regarding collection exist, then revenue
recognition should be postponed.
In the instant case, the company is engaged in manufacturing and sale of chemical products, and
made disclosure in accounting policy on recognition of revenue as per AS 1 stating that revenue is
recognized only when it can be reliably measured and it is reasonable to expect ultimate
collection, is not correct. As accounting policy
disclosed is not covering the aspect of transfer of risk and reward for the purpose of revenue
recognition. Therefore, auditor should modify the report accordingly.

Miranda Spinning Mills Ltd. is a sick company and has accumulated losses of Rs.10 crores. The
263

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
company has Rs.12 crores in its share Premium Account. The Management desires to adjust the
accumulated losses against the share premium balance. Advise the company giving your
reasons.
Answer
Application of Share Premium Account: Section 52 of the Companies Act, 2013 (herein after
referred as the Act) deals with the application of premium received on issue of shares. Sub-section
(1) of the said section provides that where a company issues shares at a premium, whether for
cash or otherwise, a sum equal to the aggregate amount of the premium received on those shares
shall be transferred to an account called “Securities Premium Account” and the provisions of this
Act relating to reduction of share capital of a company except as provided in this section shall
apply as if the securities premium account was the paid up share capital of the company. Sub-
section (2) of the said section provides that notwithstanding anything contained in sub-section
(1), securities premium account may be applied by the company for issue of bonus shares; writing
off the preliminary expenses; writing off the expenses of, or the commission paid or discount
allowed on, any issue of shares or debentures of the company; in providing for the premium
payable on redemption of any redeemable preference shares or any debentures of the company;
for the purchase of its own shares or other securities. In view of these provisions of the Companies
Act, 2013, it is not permitted to adjust its accumulated losses against the securities premium
account.
24. RTP Nov 18 Qn no.6(b)
Comment on the following with reference to Schedule III to the Companies Act, 2013:
(i) A company has disclosed performance guarantee and counter guarantees as Contingent
Liabilities.
(ii) The parent company has recognized in the current year’s financial statement, dividend declared
by its subsidiary after the balance sheet date.
(I) A contingent liability in respect of guarantees arises when a company issues guarantees to
another person on behalf of a third party e.g. when it undertakes to guarantee the loan given
to a subsidiary or to another company or gives a guarantee that another company will
perform its contractual obligations.
However, where a company undertakes to perform its own obligations, and for this purpose
issues, what is called a "guarantee", it does not represent a contingent liability and it is
misleading to show such items as contingent liabilities in the Balance sheet. For various reasons,
it is customary for guarantees to be issued by Bankers e.g. for payment of insurance premia,
deferred payments to foreign suppliers, letters of credit, etc. For this purpose, the company
issues a "counter-guarantee" to its Bankers. Such "counter- guarantee" is not really a guarantee
at all, but is an undertaking to perform what is in any event the obligation of the company,
namely, to pay the insurance premia when demanded or to make deferred payments when due.
Hence, such performance guarantees and counter-guarantees should not be disclosed as
contingent liabilities.
264

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
(II) The Schedule III does not prescribe to recognise dividend declared by subsidiary company as
given in the scenario. Accordingly, dividend income from subsidiary companies should be
recognised in accordance with AS-9, i.e. only when they have a right to receive the same on or
before the Balance sheet date. Normally, the right to receive is established only when the
dividend is approved by the shareholder at the AGM of the investee company. Therefore,
treatment done by the company is not in order
25.MTP-Aug-18 Qn No 2(C) 5 Marks:
Comment on the following with reference to Schedule III to the Companies Act, 2013:
(i) A company has disclosed performance guarantee and counter guarantees as Contingent
Liabilities.
(ii) A company has clubbed all other expenses under the head ‘Other Expenses” on the basis of
1 percent of total revenue or Rs.5,000 whichever is higher.
(iii) A company has shown Deferred Tax Liability under Non-Current Liabilities and Deferred tax
assets under Non-Current Asset in balance sheet.
Answer:
(i) A contingent liability in respect of guarantees arises when a company issues guarantees to
another person on behalf of a third party e.g. when it undertakes to guarantee the loan given
to a subsidiary or to another company or gives a guarantee that another company will perform
its contractual obligations.
issues, what is called a "guarantee", it does not represent a contingent liability and it is misleading
to show such items as contingent liabilities in the Balance sheet. For various reasons, it is
customary for guarantees to be issued by Bankers e.g. for payment of insurance premia, deferred
payments to foreign suppliers, letters of credit, etc. For this purpose, the company issues a
"counter-
guarantee" to its Bankers. Such "counter-guarantee" is not really a guarantee at all but is an
undertaking to perform what is in any event the obligation of the company, namely, to pay the
insurance premia when demanded or to make deferred payments when due. Hence, such
performance guarantees and counter-guarantees should not be disclosed as contingent liabilities.
(ii) All other expenses not classified under other heads will be classified under "Other Expenses". For
this purpose, any item of expenditure which exceeds one percent of the revenue from operations
or Rs. 1,00,000 whichever is higher, needs to be disclosed separately. The given treatment in the
scenario is not in order.
(iii) Deferred Tax Liability should be shown under Non-Current Liabilities. Deferred Tax Asset shall be
shown under Non-Current Asset. But Deferred tax assets and deferred tax liabilities, both, cannot
be shown in balance sheet because only the net balance of Deferred Tax Liability or Asset is to be
shown. Thus, DTA and DTL shown separately in the balance sheet by the company is not correct.
265

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
A contingent liability in respect of guarantees arises when a company issues guarantees to

another person on behalf of a third party e.g. when it undertakes to guarantee the loan given to
a subsidiary or to another company or gives a guarantee that another company will perform its
contractual obligations.
issues, what is called a "guarantee", it does not represent a contingent liability and it is misleading
to show such items as contingent liabilities in the Balance sheet. For various reasons, it is
customary for guarantees to be issued by Bankers e.g. for payment of insurance premia, deferred
payments to foreign suppliers, letters of credit, etc. For this purpose, the company issues a
"counter-guarantee" to its Bankers. Such "counter-guarantee" is not really a guarantee at all but
is an undertaking to perform what is in any event the obligation of the company, namely, to pay
the insurance premia when demanded or to make deferred payments when due. Hence, such
performance guarantees and counter-guarantees should not be disclosed as contingent liabilities.
(iv) All other expenses not classified under other heads will be classified under "Other Expenses". For
this purpose, any item of expenditure which exceeds one percent of the revenue from operations
or Rs. 1,00,000 whichever is higher, needs to be disclosed separately. The given treatment in the
scenario is not in order.
(v) Deferred Tax Liability should be shown under Non-Current Liabilities. Deferred Tax Asset shall be
shown under Non-Current Asset. But Deferred tax assets and deferred tax liabilities, both, cannot
be shown in balance sheet because only the net balance of Deferred Tax Liability or Asset is to be
shown. Thus, DTA and DTL shown separately in the balance sheet by the company is not correct.
26. MTP-OCT-18 Qn No 3(c) 5 Marks:
Zed Ltd. has flexi deposit linked current account with various banks. Cheques are issued from
the current account and as per the requirements of funds, the flexi deposits are encashed and
transferred to current accounts. As of 31st March, 2018 certain cheques issued to vendors are
not presented for payment resulting in the credit balance in the books of the company. The
management wants to present the book overdraft under current liabilities and flexi deposits
under cash & bank balances. Comment.
Answer:
Presentation of Book Overdraft as per Schedule III to the Companies Act, 2013: The
instructions in accordance with which current assets being “cash and cash equivalents” should
be made out to Part I of Schedule III to the Companies Act, 2013 states as follows:
• Cash and cash equivalents shall be classified as:

(a) Balances with banks;
(b) Cheques, drafts on hand;
(c) Cash on hand;
(d) Others (specify nature).
• Earmarked balances with banks (for example, for unpaid dividend) shall be separately stated.
266

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
• Balances with banks to the extent held as margin money or security against the borrowings,
guarantees, other commitments shall be disclosed separately.
• Repatriation restrictions, if any, in respect of cash and bank balances shall be separately stated.
• Bank deposits with more than 12 months maturity shall be disclosed separately.
From the facts of the case it is evident that in substance the position is that the composite bank
balance including the balance in flexi deposit accounts are positive, even though physical set-off
has not been made as on the balance sheet date. Further the bank has got the right to set off of
flexi deposits against the cheques issued and hence it would be more informative and useful to
the readers of the financial statements to disclose the book credit balance as a set -off from the
flexi deposit accounts.
The disclosure of the said book credit balance as book overdraft under the head current liabilities
as proposed by the management is not correct.
27. Nov 18 Qn no.2(C) 5 Marks
During the financial year ended on 31/03/2018, LM Private Limited had borrowed from a
Nationalized Bank, a term loan of Rs. 120 lakhs consisting of Rs. 100 lakhs for purchase of a
machinery for the new plant and Rs. 20 lakhs for erection expenses. As on the date of 31st
March, 2018, the total of capital and free reserves of the Company was Rs. 50 lakhs and turnover
for the year 2017-18 was Rs. 750 lakhs. The Bank paid Rs. 100 lakhs to the vendor of the
Company for the supply of machinery on 31/12/2017. The machinery had reached the yard of
the Company. On 28/02/2018, the Company had drawn the balance of loan viz.Rs 20 lakhs to the
credit of its current account maintained with the Bank and utilized the full amount for renovating
its administrative office building. The machinery had been kept as capital stock under
construction. Comment as to reporting issues, if any, that the Auditor should be concerned with
for the financial year ended on 31/03/2018, in this respect.
Answer
Applicability of CARO , 2020 and Utilisation of Term Loan: CARO ,2020 specifically exempts a
private limited company, not being a subsidiary company of a public company, having a paid up
capital , reserves & surplus not more than rupees one crore as on balance sheet date and which
does not have total borrowing exceeding rupees one crore from any bank or financial institution at
any point of time during the year and which does not have a total revenue as disclosed in Schedule
III to the companies Act 2013 exceeding Rs 10 crore during the financial year as per financial
statements.
In the case of LM Pvt. Ltd, it has paid up capital of rupees 50 lacs which is below the specified limit
of rupees 1 crore and turnover is rupees 7.5 crore which is also less than specified rupees 10 crore.
However, there is total borrowing of rupees 1.20 crore which is more than rupees 1 crore and
exceeding the specified limits of rupees 1 crore. Hence CARO, 2016 will be applicable to LM Pvt.
Ltd.
As per clause (ix) of Para 3 of CARO 2020, an auditor need to state in his report that whether the
term loans were applied for the purpose for which the loans were obtained. If not, the details
together with delays or default and subsequent rectification, if any, as may be applicable, be
267

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
reported.
The auditor should examine the terms and conditions subject to which the company has obtained
the term loans. The auditor may also examine the proposal for grant of loan made to the bank.
As mentioned above, normally, the end use of the funds raised by term loans is mentioned in the
sanction letter or documents containing the terms and conditions of the loan. The auditor should
ascertain the purpose for which term loans were sanctioned. The auditor should also compare the
purpose for which term loans were sanctioned with the actual utilization of the loans. The auditor
should obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence regarding the utilization of the amounts raised.
If the auditor finds that the funds have not been utilized for the purpose for which they were
obtained, the auditor’s report should state the fact.
In the present case, the term loan obtained by LM Private Ltd. amounting rupees 20 lakh have not
been utilized for erection expenses instead its utilized for renovating its administrative office
building. Further, assuming that erection work has not been done and machinery is not being
installed, disclosure of the same as Capital Stock under construction is in order.
Here, the auditor should report the fact in his report that pending utilization of the term loan for
erection expenses, the funds were temporarily used for the purpose other than the purpose for
which the loan was sanctioned as per clause (ix) of Para 3 of CARO, 2020.
28. NOV 18 Qn no 3(c)

ABC Limited is in the practice of maintaining consistent dividend payment over a minimum of
14%. The Financial year 2017-18 was so very bad for the Company that it was not possible for the
Company to maintain the payment of consistent dividend as above. The Management, being
hopeful of recovery of its performance in next year, felt that the depreciation of the year to the
extent of 75% alone be charged to the Statement of Profit and Loss and the remaining 25% be
kept in a separate account code in the Balance Sheet- 'Debit Balances Adjustable against Revenue
account'.
The Management was of the view that it would be in fair practice of accounting if the
depreciation for asset is charged before the expiry of the lifes of assets and the amount parked
in asset code as above would unfailingly be adjusted to Revenue before the close of next financial
year anyway. Analyse the issues involved and state how the Auditor should decide on this matter.
Answer
Provision of Depreciation :Section 123(1) of the Companies Act, 2013 provides that dividend
cannot be declared or paid by a company for any financial year except out of profits of the
company for that year arrived at after providing for depreciation in accordance with the provisions
of Section 123(2), or out of the profits or the company for any previous financial year or years
arrived at after providing for depreciation in the manner aforementioned and remaining
undistributed, or out of both. Further, it is the duty of auditor to check whether the depreciation
was provided according to provision of AS 10 / IND AS 16/Schedule II to the Act.
In the instant case, ABC Limited is in the practice of maintaining consistent dividend payment over
a minimum of 14%. Due to bad financial condition, company has not provided for dividend for the
268

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
year 2017-18. In addition to this management has also taken decision to charge 75% of the
depreciation in the statement of Profit and Loss whereas 25% of the depreciation amount kept in a
separate account code in the Balance Sheet – ‘Debit Balances Adjustable against Revenue
Account’.
Contention of management that it would be in fair practice of accounting where the depreciation
of asset is charged before the expiry of the life of assets and the amount parked in asset code
would unfailingly be adjusted to revenue before the close of next financial year is not tenable.
The practice of the company in not charging the depreciation and accumulating 25% of it in a
debit balance for being written of in the next year is not an acceptable accounting treatment. If
dividend is declared in such situation, it would mean payment out of capital.
Therefore, the auditor of the company should ensure the compliance of provisions of section 123
and Schedule II. In case the management does not comply with the provisions and does not charge
the 100% depreciation the auditor of the company shall suggest the management for the same and
if management refuses, the auditor should qualify his report accordingly.
29. RTP May 2019 Qn no 15(a)

MKc LLP is a newly set up LLP (Limited Liability Partnership). The operations of the LLP have
been picking up and management is currently in the process of setting up processes and
procedures in place. As per the understanding of the management of the LLP, its accounts would
not be required to be audited mandatory because of its operations but still the management has
decided that they would get the accounts audited voluntarily. In this regard, the management
would like to understand some of the aspects which they should consider not only limited to
audit but also about the maintenance of books of accounts as per the relevant laws. Please
advise.
An LLP shall be under obligation to maintain annual accounts reflecting true and fair view of its
state of affairs. The accounts of every LLP shall be audited in accordance with Rule 24 of LLP Rules
2009. Such rules, inter-alia, provides that any LLP, whose turnover does not exceed, in any financial
year, forty lakh rupees, or whose contribution does not exceed twenty five lakh rupees, is not
required to get its accounts audited. However, if the partners of such limited liability partnership
decide to get the accounts of such LLP audited, the accounts shall be audited only in accordance
with such rule.
Appointment of Auditor: The auditor may be appointed by the designated partners of the LLP –
1. At any time for the first financial year but before the end of first financial year,
2. At least thirty days prior to the end of each financial year (other than the first financial year),
3. To fill the causal vacancy in the office of auditor,
4. To fill the casual vacancy caused by removal of auditor.

269

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
The partners may appoint the auditors if the designated partners have failed to appoint them.
LLPs are required to maintain books of accounts which shall contain -
1. Particulars of all sums of money received and expended by the LLP and the matters in respect of
which the receipt and expenditure takes place,
2. A record of the assets and liabilities of the LLP,
3. Statements of costs of goods purchased, inventories, work-in-progress, finished goods and costs
of goods sold,
4. Any other particulars which the partners may decide.
Auditor’s Duty Regarding audit of LLP
• The auditor should get definite instructions in writing as to the work to be performed by him
• The auditor should mention-
(a)Whether the records of the firm appear to be correct and reliable
(b) Whether he was able to obtain all information & explanation necessary for his work.
(c)Whether any restrictions has been imposed upon him.
• The auditor should read the LLP agreement & note the following provisions
(a) Nature of the business of the LLP

(b) Amount of capital contributed by each partner
(c) Interest – in respect of additional capital contributed
(d) Duration of partnership
(e) Drawings allowed to the partners
(f) Salaries, commission etc payable to partners
(g) Borrowing powers of the LLP
(h) Rights & duties of partners
(i) Method of settlement of accounts between partners at the time of admission, retirement,
admission etc.
(j) Any loans advanced by the partners
(k) Profit sharing ratio.
30. RTP May 19 Qn no 15(b)

AARK Ltd is a large-sized listed company having annual turnover of INR 4000 crores. The company
also has a plan to get listed on New York Stock Exchange next year. The company has paid good
amount of dividend during the year to its shareholders which is significantly higher as compared
to earlier years. The statutory auditors would like to focus on this aspect at the time of their
270

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
statutory audit.
Please advise the relevant procedures that the statutory auditors should perform in respect of
this area.
Answer
The auditor should obtain appropriate audit evidence as regard to audit of payment of
dividends. The procedures include:
(a) Check whether dividend was declared out of profits arrived at after providing for depreciation
as per Section 123(2).
(b) Check whether:
(i) the depreciation was provided according to provisions of Schedule II to the Companies Act,
2013.
(ii) a board resolution recommending dividend was passed.
(iii) the dividend was declared only in the AGM.
(iv) thedividend declared in the general meeting does not exceed the amount recommended by
the Board.
(v) register of members was closed as per the provisions of section 91 of the Companies Act,
2013.
(vi) dividend has been paid in the prescribed manner within 30 days of time to the registered
holder or to their order (Section 127).
(vii) Amount of dividend deposited in a separate bank account within 5 days from the date of
declaration of dividend.
(viii) intimation sent to stock exchange, in case of listed company.
(ix) were there any complaints regarding non-payment or delay in payment of dividend? If, so,
whether corrective action was taken.
(c) Examine that the accounting and disclosure procedures have been complied with related to the
declaration and payment of dividend like depreciation has been provided before declaration,
disclosure has been made by way of notes to the accounts etc.
(d) Inspect that the dividend has been paid only out of “free reserves” i.e. the reserves which, as
per the latest audited balance sheet of a company, are available for distribution as dividend
except- any amount representing unrealized gains, notional gains or revaluation of assets,
whether shown as a reserve or otherwise, or any change in carrying amount of an asset or of a
liability recognized in equity, including surplus in statement of profit and loss on measurement
of the asset or the liability at fair value, as laid down under third proviso to Section 123(1) read
with Section 2(43) of the Act.
(e) If dividend has been paid out of accumulated profits, earned by it in previous years and
transferred to the reserves, in case of inadequacy or absence of profits in any financial years,
verify that the rules related to such distribution has been complied i.e. the maximum amount
271

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
allowable to be distributed as a dividend in case of inadequate or no profit as required by second

proviso to Section 123(1) of the Act.
(f) Check the procedures that have been followed for the payment of unclaimed dividend out of
unpaid dividend account.
(g) Verify that, if any money transferred to Unpaid Dividend Account has remained unpaid or
unclaimed for a period of 7 years from the date of such transfer then, whether it has been
transferred by the company along with interest accrued, if any, thereon to the Investor
Education and Protection Fund established under section 125(1) of the Act and a statement
regarding such transfer has also been sent to the authority which administers such fund.
(h) In case the company has outsourced the activity to the Service Organisation, check that all the
compliances with laws, regulations, accounting and disclosure related to the dividends have
been made appropriately.
31.May 2019 Qn no 4(b) 4 Marks

PQ & Co. is an audit firm with P and Q as partners. For the financial year 2018-19, the firm has
been appointed as statutory auditor of M/s Mango Orchards Hotel Ltd. The audit firm is a regular
customer of the hotel and the partners usually stay in the same hotel at various locations in the
course of travelling for their various professional assignments. Normally, payments for such stay
are settled against quarterly bills raised by the company. Give your comment with respect to the
Answer
Indebtedness to the Company: According to the section 141(3)(d)(ii) of the Companies Act, 2013,
a person who is indebted to the company for an amount exceeding Rs. 5,00,000 shall be
disqualified to act as an auditor of such company and further under section 141(4) he shall vacate
his office of auditor when he incurs this disqualification subsequent to his appointment.
Further a person or a firm who directly or indirectly has business relationship with a company or
its subsidiary or its holding or associate company, is also not qualified to be appointed as auditor of
the company. But here business relationship does not include commercial transactions which are
in the ordinary course of the business of the company at arm’s length price.
However, where the person has liquidated his debt before the appointment date, there is no
disqualification to be construed for such appointment.
In the given case, PQ & Co., an audit firm with P & Q as partners is appointed as statutory auditor of
M/s Mango Orchards Hotel Ltd. and the audit firm is a regular customer of the hotel and the
partners usually stay in the same hotel at various locations. They also settle the payments for such
stay against quarterly bills raised by the company. Assuming the balance amount at any time during
the year due to the hotel does not exceed the prescribed limits of rupees 5,00,000, PQ & Co., is not
disqualified to be appointed as statutory auditor of M/s Mango Orchards Hotel Ltd as per section
141(3)(d)(ii), in the absence of the same the auditor shall be disqualified to act as an auditor and
shall vacate his office of auditor when he incurs this disqualification subsequent to the appointment.
272

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
Since in term of section 141(3)(e) of Companies Act, 2013 PQ & Co. is not a person or a firm who,
whether directly or indirectly, has business relationship with the company, or its subsidiary, or its
holding or associate company or subsidiary of such holding company or associate company of such
nature as may be prescribed, the auditor shall not be disqualified to act as an auditor and shall
not required to vacate his office of auditor.
32. May 2019 Qn no 6(a) 5 Marks

Pearl Ltd. is an exporter of precious and semi-precious stones. The turnover of the company is
Rs. 150 crore, out of which Rs. 105 crore is from export business and remaining Rs 45 crore from
domestic sales. Amount received from export business is all in foreign currency. Directors of Pearl
Ltd. are of the opinion that cost audit is not applicable to their company as maximum revenue has
been generated from export business. Give your opinion.
Answer
Cost Audit Rules not to apply in certain cases: The requirement for cost audit shall not be
applicable to a company whose revenue from exports, in foreign exchange, exceeds seventy-five
per cent of its total revenue, which is operating from SEZ and which is engaged in the generation
of electricity for captive consumption through captive generating plant. (as per Rule 3 of the
Companies (Cost Records and Audit) Rules, 2014).
In the instant case, Pearl Ltd. is an exporter of precious and semi-precious stones and the turnover
of the companyis rupees 150 crore out of which rupees 105 crore i.e. 70% is from export business
and remaining rupees 45 crore i.e. 30% from domestic sales. It is neither operating from SEZ nor
involved in captive power generation.
Thus, opinion of director is not tenable as revenue from exports in foreign exchanges is below
prescribed limit. Therefore, cost audit is applicable on Pearl Ltd. as per Rule 3 of the Companies
(Cost Records and Audit) Rules, 2014. Pearl Ltd. has to appoint cost auditor to get the cost accounts
of the company audited.
33. RTP Nov 2019 Qn no 15, MTP Oct 2018 Qn no 2(C) 4 Marks
“ABC & Co.” is an Audit Firm having partners “Mr. A”, “Mr. B” and “Mr. C”, Chartered
Accountants. “Mr. A”, “Mr. B” and “Mr. C” are holding appointment as an Auditor in 4, 6 and
10 Companies respectively.
(i) Provide the maximum number of Audits remaining in the name of “ABC & Co.”
(ii) Provide the maximum number of Audits remaining in the name of individual partner i.e. Mr. A,
Mr. B and Mr. C.
(iii) Can ABC & Co. accept the appointment as an auditor in 60 private companies having paid-up
share capital less than Rs. 100 crore which has not committed default in filing its financial
statements under section 137 or annual return under section 92 of the Companies Act with the
Registrar, 2 small companies and 1 dormant company?
(iv) Would your answer be different, if out of those 60 private companies, 45 companies are having
paid-up share capital of Rs. 110 crore each?
273

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
Fact of the Case: In the instant case, Mr. A is holding appointment in 4 companies, whereas Mr. B
is having appointment in 6 Companies and Mr. C is having appointment in 10 Companies. In
aggregate all three partners are having 20 audits.
Provisions and Explanations: As per section 141(3)(g) of the Companies Act, 2013, a person shall
not be eligible for appointment as an auditor if he is in full time employment elsewhere or a
person or a partner of a firm holding appointment as its auditor, if such person or partner is at the
date of such appointment or reappointment holding appointment as auditor of more than twenty
companies other than one person companies, dormant companies, small companies and private
companies having paid-up share capital less than Rs. 100 crore (private company which has not
committed a default in filing its financial statements under section 137 of the said Act or annual
return under section 92 of the said Act with the Registrar). As per section 141(3)(g), this limit of 20
company audits is per person. In the case of an audit firm having 3 partners, the overall ceiling will
be 3 × 20 = 60 company audits. Sometimes, a chartered accountant is a partner in a number of
auditing firms. In such a case, all the firms in which he is partner or proprietor will be together
entitled to 20 company audits on his account.
Conclusion:
(I) Therefore, ABC & Co. can hold appointment as an auditor of 40 more companies:
Total Number of Audits available to the Firm = 20*3 =60
Number of Audits already taken by all the partners

In their individual capacity = 4+6+10 =20
Remaining number of Audits available to the Firm =40
(II) With reference to above provisions an auditor can hold more appointment as auditor = ceiling
limit as per section 141(3)(g)- already holding appointments as an auditor. Hence (1) Mr. A can
hold: 20 - 4 = 16 more audits. (2) Mr. B can hold 20-6 = 14 more audits and (3) Mr. C can hold
20-10 = 10 more audits.
(III) In view of above discussed provisions, ABC & Co. can hold appointment as an auditor in all the
60 private companies having paid-up share capital less than Rs.100 crore (private company
which has not committed a default in filing its financial statements under section 137 of the said
Act or annual return under section 92 of the said Act with the Registrar), 2 small companies and
1 dormant company as these are excluded from the ceiling limit of company audits given under
section 141(3)(g) of the Companies Act, 2013.
(IV) As per fact of the case, ABC & Co. is already having 20 company audits and they can also accept
40 more company audits. In addition they can also conduct the audit of one person companies,
small companies, dormant companies and private companies having paid up share capital less
than Rs. 100 crores (private company which has not committed a default in filing its financial
statements under section 137 of the said Act or annual return under section 92 of the said Act
with the Registrar). In the given case, out of the 60 private companies ABC & Co. is offered, 45
companies having paid-up share capital of Rs. 110 crore each.
Therefore, ABC & Co. can also accept the appointment as an auditor for 2 small companies, 1
dormant company, 15 private companies having paid-up share capital less than Rs. 100 crore
(private company which has not committed a default in filing its financial statements under
section 137 of the said Act or annual return under section 92 of the said Act with the Registrar.”)
274

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
and 40 private companies having paid-up share capital of Rs. 110 crore each in addition to above
20 company audits already holding.
34. MTP Oct 2019 Qn no 6(b) 5 Marks
As an auditor, how would you deal with the following situations:
(i) Nick Ltd. is a subsidiary of Ajanta Ltd., whose 20% shares have been held by Central Government,
25% by Uttar Pradesh Government and 10% by Madhya Pradesh Government. Nick Ltd. appointed
Mr. Prem as its statutory auditor.
(ii) Contravene Ltd. appointed CA Innocent as an auditor for the company for the current financial
year. Further the company offered him the services of actuarial, investment advisory and
investment banking which was also approved by the Board of Directors.
Answer:
(i) According to Section 139(7) of the Companies Act, 2013, the auditors of a government
company shall be appointed or re-appointed by the Comptroller and Auditor General of
India(C&AG). As per section 2(45), a Government company is
defined as any company in which not less than 51% of the total voting power is held by the
Central Government or by any State Government or Governments or partly by the Central
Government and partly by one or more State Governments and includes a company which is a
subsidiary of a Government Company as thus defined.
In the given case, Ajanta Ltd is a government company as its 20% shares have been held by Central
Government, 25% by U.P. State Government and 10% by M.P.
State Government. Total 55% shares have been held by Central and State governments, therefore,
it is a Government company.Nick Ltd. is a subsidiary company of Ajanta Ltd. Hence, Nick Ltd. is
covered in the definition of a government company. Therefore, auditor of Nick Ltd. can be
appointed only by C&AG.
Consequently, appointment of Mr. Prem is invalid and he should not give acceptance to the
Directors of Nick Ltd.
(ii)Services not to be Rendered by the Auditor: Section 144 of the Companies Act, 2013
prescribes certain services not to be rendered by the auditor. An auditor appointed under the Act
shall provide to the company only such other services as are approved by the Board of Directors
or the audit committee, as the case may be, but which shall not include any of the following
services (whether such services are rendered directly or indirectly to the company or its
holding company or subsidiary company), namely:

275

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s

(v) investment advisory services;
Further section 141(3)(i) of the Companies Act, 2013 also disqualifies a person for appointment as
an auditor of a company who is engaged as on the date of appointment in consulting and specialized
services as provided in section 144.
In the given case, CA Innocent was appointed as an auditor of Contravene Ltd. He was offered
additional services of actuarial, investment advisory and investment banking which was also
approved by the Board of Directors. The auditor is advised not to accept the services as these
services are specifically notified in the services not to be rendered by him as an auditor as per
section 144 of the Act.
35. RTP Nov 2019 Qn no 15(b)

Bhishm Limited decided to appoint Mr. Rajvir, chartered accountant, as the branch auditor for
the audit of its Lucknow branch accounts for the year 2018-19. The decision to appoint branch
auditor was taken by way of Board Resolution in the meeting of Board of Directors of the
company, held in April 2018, subject to shareholders’ approval in AGM of the company scheduled
to be held in June 2018. Meanwhile, the Principal Auditor of the company raised an objection that
the branch auditor cannot be appointed without his consent. Advise, whether the objection
raised by company auditor is valid.
Answer
Appointment of Branch Auditor: Section 143 (8) of the Companies Act, 2013, prescribes the duties
and powers of the company’s auditor with reference to the audit of the branch and the branch
auditor. Where a company has a branch office, the accounts of that office shall be audited either
by the auditor appointed for the company (herein referred to as the company's auditor) under
this Act or by any other person qualified for appointment as an auditor of the company under this
Act and appointed as such under section 139.
In case of subsequent appointment of auditor, section 139(1) of the Act provides that every
company shall, at the first annual general meeting appoint an individual or a firm as an auditor
who shall hold office from the conclusion of that meeting till the conclusion of its sixth annual
general meeting.
In the instant case, Bhishm Limited decided to appoint Mr. Rajvir, chartered accountant, as the
branch auditor for the audit of its Lucknow branch accounts and the decision to appoint branch
auditor was taken by way of Board Resolution in the meeting of Board of Directors of the company
subject to shareholders’ approval in AGM of the company.
Thus, objection raised by company auditor is not valid as per section 143(8) of the companies Act,
2013 and the Board has authority to appoint branch auditor but should be approved by
shareholders in General Meeting.
276

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
36. MTP-Apr-19 Qn No 2(b) 5 Marks:

Director (Finance) of Alpha Ltd. is of the opinion that total trade payables mentioned in the
financial statement is sufficient disclosure in the Balance Sheet as per Part I of Schedule III to
the Companies Act, 2013. They did not mention details regarding Micro, Small and Medium
Enterprises (MSME). Give your view as statutory auditor of the Company and state the details
required to be disclosed in notes regarding MSME.
Answer:
Details required to be disclosed in Notes regarding MSME: Opinion of Director (Finance) of

Alpha Ltd. that total trade payables mentioned in the financial statement is sufficient disclosure
in the Balance Sheet as per Part I of Schedule III to the Companies Act, 2013, is not correct. The
following details relating to Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises shall be disclosed by Alpha
Ltd. in the notes:
(i) the principal amount and the interest due thereon (to be shown separately) remaining unpaid to
any supplier at the end of each accounting year;
(ii) the amount of interest paid by the buyer as per Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises
Development Act, 2006, along with the amount of the payment made to the supplier beyond the
appointed day during each accounting year;
(iii) the amount of interest due and payable for the period of delay in making payment (which have
been paid but beyond the appointed day during the year) but without adding the interest specified
under the Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Development Act, 2006;
(iv) the amount of interest accrued and remaining unpaid at the end of each accounting year; and
(v) the amount of further interest remaining due and payable even in the succeeding years, until such
date when the interest dues above are actually paid to the small enterprise, for the purpose of
disallowance of a deductible expenditure as per Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises
Development Act, 2006.
37.Nov 2019 Qn no 2(b) 5 Marks

CA. G, was appointed by DP Ltd., as Statutory Auditor. While doing the audit of DP Ltd., CA. G
observed that certain loans and advances were made without proper securities; certain trade
receivables and trade payables were adjusted inter se; and personal expenses were charged to
revenue. As a company auditor comment on the, reporting responsibilities of CA. G.
Answer
(a) Duty of Auditor to Inquire on certain matters: Section 143(1) of the Companies Act, 2013
requires the auditor to make an enquiry in respect of specified matters during the course of his
audit. Since the law requires the auditor to make an enquiry, the Institute opined that the auditor
is not required to report on the matters specified in sub-section (1) unless he has any special
comments to make on any of the items referred to therein. If the auditor is satisfied as a result of
the enquiries, he has no further duty to report that he is so satisfied. It is to be noted that the
auditor is required to make only enquiries and not investigate into the matters referred to therein.
277

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
The opinion of the Research Committee of the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India on
section 143(1) of the Companies Act, 2013 is worth considering and reproduced below:
“The auditor is not required to report on the matters specified in sub-section (1) unless he has
any special comments to make on any of the items referred to therein. If he is satisfied as a result
of the inquiries, he has no further duty to report that he is so satisfied. In such a case, the content
of the Auditor’s Report will remain exactly the same as the auditor has to inquire and apply his
mind to the information elicited by the enquiry, in deciding whether or not any reference needs
to be made in his report. In our opinion, it is in this light that the auditor has to consider his duties
under section 143(1).”
Clause (a) of Section 143(1) requires the auditor to inquire: “Whether loans and advances made
by the company on the basis of security have been properly secured and whether the terms on
which they have been made are prejudicial to the interests of the company or its members”.
If the auditor finds that the loans and advances have not been properly secured, he may enter an
adverse comment in the report but cannot probably doubt the true view of the accounts by
reference to this fact so long the loans and advances are properly described and presented in
terms of Part I of Schedule III to the Companies Act. Further the auditor to inquire whether or not
the terms on which the loans or advances have been made are prejudicial to the interests of the
company or its members. If it is, he should qualify his report.
If trade receivables and trade payables are adjusted inter se, this amounts to merely book entries.
The auditor, as per clause (b) of section 143(1), should enquire “whether transactions of the
company which are represented merely by book entries are prejudicial to the interests of the
company”. This proposition has got to be inquired into by reference to the effects of the book
entries, unsupported by transactions, on the legitimate interests of the company. The auditor has
to exercise his judgment based on certain objecti ve standards”.
Regarding Personal Expenses, Clause (e) of section 143(1) requires the auditor to inquire:
“Whether personal expenses have been charged to revenue account”. The charging to revenue of
such personal expenses, either on the basis of the company’s contractual obligations, or in
accordance with accepted business practice, is perfectly normal and legitimate or does not call for
any special comment by the auditor. Where, however, personal expenses not covered by
contractual obligations or by accepted business practice are incurred by the company and charged
to revenue account, it would be the duty of the auditor to report thereon. It suffices to say that if
the auditor finds that personal expenses have been charged to revenue and if the amounts are
material, he should qualify his report also.
38. MTP-Aug-18 Qn No 1(b) 5 Marks: (MTP NOV 2019)
As an auditor of a company registered under section 8 of the Companies Act, 2013 you find that
as per the notification of the Ministry of Corporate Affairs regarding applicability of Indian
Accounting Standards (Ind-AS), the company has to prepare its financial statements for the
278

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
year ended 31st March, 2018 under Ind-AS. The management of the company is however of
the strong view that being a section 8 company having charitable objects, Ind-AS cannot apply
to the company. The financial statements are therefore prepared by the management under the
earlier GAAP and a note for the same is given in the financial statements. How would you report
on these financial statements?
MTP-OCT-18 Qn No 3(b) 5 Marks:,Nov 2019 Qn no 3(a) 5 Marks
As an auditor of a company registered under section 8 of the Companies Act, 2013 , you find that as per
the notification of the Ministry of Corporate Affairs regarding applicability of Indian According
Standards (Ind-AS), the company has to prepare its financial statements for the year ended 31st March,
2019 under Ind-AS. The management of the company is, however, of the strong view that being a section
8 company having charitable objects, Ind-AS cannot apply to the company. The financial statements are,
therefore, prepared by the management under the earlier GAAP and a note for the same is given in the
financial statements. How would you report on these financial statements?
Answer
Applicability of IND AS: Section 129(1) of the Companies Act, 2013, governs the requirements to
be satisfied by financial statements. The provisions thereunder which should be complied with
are:
• financial statements shall, give a true and fair view of the state of affairs of the company or
companies as at the end of financial year, comply with the notified accounting standards under
section 133 and be in such form or forms specified in Schedule III to the Companies Act, 2013 and
• the items contained in such financial statements shall be in accordance with the accounting
standards.
Further, as per section 133 of the Companies Act, 2013, the Central Government has notified
Companies (Indian Accounting Standards) Rules, 2015 dated 16.02.2015 in exercise of the powers
conferred by section 133. The said rules list the Indian Accounting Standards (Ind AS) and the class
of companies required to comply with the Ind AS while preparation of their financial statements.
Here, it may be noted that the companies covered under Section 8 are required to comply the
provisions of the Companies Act, 2013, unless and until any exemption is provided. Therefore,
companies registered under Section 8 are not exempted from the requirements of section 133
and section 129 of the Companies Act, 2013.
In the given case, only contention of management that being a section 8 company having charitable
object, Ind-AS cannot apply to the company, therefore financial statements prepared under the
earlier GAAP and a note for the same is given, is not tenable.
However, the auditor is required to ensure the applicable monetary limits w.r.t Ind- AS and need
to advise the management to prepare the financial statements as per Ind-AS accordingly. In case
of non-compliance the auditor should report accordingly.
279

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
39. (RTP- NOV 2020)
Petro Ltd. is engaged in generation of electricity for captive consumption through Captive Generating
Plant. The Company also maintains cost records in its books of account as required under Cost Records and
Audit Rules. Mr. Xylo, friend of Managing Director of the Company, suggested name of his brother, who is
a Cost Accountant in Practice, for the purpose of cost audit. However, the statutory auditor of the
company, is of the view that the Company is not legally required to conduct cost audit. Now, the Managing
Director is in dilemma about the requirement of cost audit. Being an expert in cost records and audit rules,
you are required to guide in this regard
ANSWER
Applicability of Provisions related to Cost Records and Audit: The provisions relating to cost records and
audit are governed by section 148 of the Companies Act, 2013 read with the Companies (Cost Records and
Audit) Rules, 2014.The audit conducted under this section shall be in addition to the audit conducted under
section 143.
Rule 3 of the Companies (Cost Records and Audit) Rules, 2014 provides the classes of companies, engaged
in the production of goods or providing services, required to include cost records in their books of account.
However, the requirement for cost audit under these rules shall not be applicable to a company which is
covered under Rule 3, and,
(i) whose revenue from exports, in foreign exchange, exceeds 75 per cent of its total revenue;
or
(ii) which is operating from a special economic zone.
(iii) which is engaged in generation of electricity for captive consumption through Captive Generating Plant.
In the given case, Petro Ltd. is engaged in generation of electricity for captive consumption through Captive
Generating Plant. Therefore, Petro Ltd. is not required to conduct cost audit as it is falling under the
exemption criteria. Hence, the opinion of statutory auditor of the Company regarding non-applicability of
cost audit is correct
40. (RTP-NOV 2020)
AKB Associates, a renowned audit firm in the field of CA practice for past two decades. The firm was
appointed to conduct statutory audit of Rica Ltd. an unlisted company, which is engaged in the business
of paper manufacturing. It decided to commence the audit for the recently concluded financial year.
Once after making significant progress in the audit, the auditors made the following observations:
Observation 1: The management had disclosed in the financials that, during the year, one of the
warehouses of the Company was affected due to a major flood. As a result of the same, the Company
had incurred some losses. But the management was of the view that it was not material.
Observation 2: Due to flood, few records maintained by the Company with respect to a particular
transaction was completely destroyed and there was no duplicate record maintained by the Company.
However, those details were not pervasive, but material.
You are required to advise, whether AKB Associates should report Observation 1 and 2 in its audit report?
If so, under which heading should it be reported?
ANSWER
280

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
Observation 1 - The management had disclosed in the financials that, during the year, one of the
warehouses of the Company was affected due to a major flood. As a result of the same, the Company
had incurred some losses. But the management was of the view that it was not material:
As per SA 706, “Emphasis of Matter Paragraph & Other Matter Paragraph in the Independent Auditor’s
Report”, an Emphasis of Matter Paragraph refers to matter appropriately disclosed in the financials, that in
the auditor’s judgement is of such importance that it is fundamental to users’ understanding of the
financials.
Hence, in this case, the auditor shall report about the consequences of the flood which affected the
Company’s warehouse under Emphasis of Matter Paragraph.
Observation 2 - Due to flood, few records maintained by the Company with respect to a particular
transaction was completely destroyed and there was no duplicate record maintained by the Company.
However, those details were not pervasive, but material: As per SA 705, “Modification to Opinion in the
Independent Auditor’s Report”, where the auditor is unable to obtain sufficient and appropriate audit
evidence and where such mater is material but not pervasive, the auditor shall issue a qualified opinion.
Thus, in the given situation, on account of flood few records pertaining to particular transactions was
completely destroyed and in the absence of duplicate records, the auditor was unable to obtain sufficient
and appropriate audit evidence and those details were material but not pervasive. Therefore, in accordance
with SA 705, the auditor is required to issue qualified opinion
Study Material
41.The Balance Sheet of G Ltd. as at 31st March, 20 is as under. Comment on the presentation
in terms of Schedule III.
Heading Note No. 31st March, 20 31st March, 19
Equity & Liabilities

Share Capital 1 XXX 0 XXX XXX XXX
Reserves & Surplus 2 XXX XXX 0
Employee stock option outstanding Share 3 XXX
application money refundable Non-Current 4 XXX
Liabilities XXX XXXX XXX
Deferred tax liability (Arising from Indian 5 XXX
Income Tax)
Current Liabilities XXX XXX
Trade Payables 6 XXX
Total Assets XXX XXX XXXX
Non-Current Assets
Fixed Assets-Tangible XXX
CWIP (including capital advances) 7 XXX
XXXX
Current Assets 8 XXX
Trade Receivables
Deferred Tax Asset (Arising from Indian Income 9 XXX
Tax)
10
281

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
Debit balance of Statement of Profit and Loss XXX

Total
XXX
XXXX
Answer
Following Errors are noticed in presentation as per Schedule III:
(i) Share Capital and Reserve & Surplus are to be reflected under the heading “Shareholders’
funds”, which is not shown while preparing the balance sheet. Although it is a part of Equity and
Liabilities yet it must be shown under head “shareholders’ funds”. The heading “Shareholders’
funds” is missing in the balance sheet given in the question.
(ii) Reserve & Surplus is showing zero balance, which is not correct in the given case. Debit
balance of statement of Profit & Loss should be shown as a negative figure under the head ‘Surplus’.
The balance of ‘Reserves and Surplus’, after adjusting negative balance of surplus shall be shown
under the head ‘Reserves and Surplus’ even if the resulting figure is in the negative.
(iii) Schedule III requires that Employee Stock Option outstanding should be disclosed under the
heading “Reserves and Surplus”.
(iv) Share application money refundable shall be shown under the sub-heading “Other Current
Liabilities”. As this is refundable and not pending for allotment, hence it is not a part of equity.
(v) Deferred Tax Liability has been correctly shown under Non-Current Liabilities. But Deferred
tax assets and deferred tax liabilities, both, cannot be shown in balance sheet because only the net
balance of Deferred Tax Liability or Asset is to be shown if the enterprise has a legally enforceable
right to set off assets against liabilities representing current tax; and it relates to the same governing
tax laws.
(vi) Under the main heading of Non-Current Assets, Property, Plant and Equipment are further
classified as under:
(a) Tangible assets
(b) Intangible assets
(c) Capital work in Progress
(d) Intangible assets under development.
Keeping in view the above, the CWIP shall be shown under Property, Plant and Equipment as Capital
Work in Progress. The amount of Capital advances included in CWIP shall be disclosed under the
sub-heading “Long term loans and advances” under the heading Non-Current Assets.
Subsequent to the notification of Ministry of Corporate Affairs dated October 11, 2018 under
Section 467(1) of the Companies Act, 2013, the words “Fixed assets” shall be substituted with the
words “Property, Plant and Equipment”.
282

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
(e) Deferred Tax Asset shall be shown under Non-Current Asset. It should be the net balance of
Deferred Tax Asset after adjusting the balance of deferred tax liability if the enterprise has a legally
enforceable right to set off assets against liabilities representing current tax; and it relates to the
same governing tax laws.
(f) Subsequent to the notification of Ministry of Corporate Affairs dated October 11, 2018 under
Section 467(1) of the Companies Act, 2013, Trade Payables should be disclosed as follows:-
(A) total outstanding dues of micro enterprises and small enterprises; and
(B) total outstanding dues of creditors other than micro enterprises and small enterprises.”
42.Z Ltd. changed its employee remuneration policy from 1st April, 2018 to provide for 12%
contribution to provident fund on leave encashment also. As per the leave encashment policy,
the employees can either utilize or encash it. As at 31st March, 19, the company obtained an
actuarial valuation for leave encashment
liability. However, it did not provide for 12% PF contribution on it. The auditor of the company
wants it to be provided but the management replied that as and when the employees availed
leave encashment, the provident fund contribution was made. The company further contends
that this is the correct treatment as it is not sure whether the employees will avail leave
encashment or utilize it. Comment
Answer
As per Para 11 of AS-15 on “Employee Benefits”, issued by the Institute of Chartered Accountants
of India, an enterprise should recognize the expected cost of short-term employee benefits in the
form of compensated absences in the case of accumulating compensated absences, when the
employees render service that increases their entitlement to future compensated absences.
Since the company obtained actuarial valuation for leave encashment, it is obvious that the
compensated absences are accumulating in nature. An enterprise should measure the expected
cost of accumulating compensated absences as the additional amount that the enterprise expects
to pay as a result of the unused entitlement that has accumulated at the balance sheet date.
Here, Z Ltd. will accumulate the amount of leave encashment benefits as it is the liability of the
company to provide 12% PF on amount of leave encashment. Hence the contention of the auditor
is correct that full provision should be provided by the company.
43 K Ltd. had 5 subsidiaries as at 31st March, 2020 and the investments in-subsidiaries are
considered as long term and valued at cost. Two of the subsidiaries had their net worth eroded
as at 31st March 19 and the prospects of their recovery are very bleak and the other three
subsidiaries are doing exceptionally well. The company did not provide for the decline in the value
of investments in two subsidiaries because the overall investment portfolio in subsidiaries did not
suffer any decline as the other three subsidiaries are doing exceptionally well. Comment.
283

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
Answer
As per AS-13 “Accounting for Investments” issued by the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India,
long-term investments are usually of individual importance to the investing enterprise. The carrying
amount of long-term investments is therefore determined on an individual investment basis.
Investments classified as long term investments should be carried in the financial statements at
cost. However, provision for diminution shall be made to recognize a decline, other than temporary,
in the value of the investments, such reduction being determined and made for each investment
individually Keeping in view the above, K Ltd. should provide for the decline in the value of
investments in two subsidiaries despite the fact that the overall investment portfolio in subsidiaries
did not suffer any decline.
44.While adopting the accounts for the year, the Board of Directors of Sunrise Ltd. decided to
consider the Interim Dividend declared @15% as final dividend and did not consider transfer of
Profit to reserves.
Answer
Declaration of Interim Dividend: Section 123(3) of the Companies Act, 2013 provides that the
Board of Directors of a company may declare interim dividend during any financial year out of the
surplus in the Statement of Profit and Loss and out of profits of the financial year in which such
interim dividend is sought to be declared. The amount of dividend including interim dividend should
be deposited in a separate bank account within five days from the declaration of such dividend for
the compliance of Section 123(4) of the said Act.
Based on Section 2(35) of the Act, it can be said that since interim dividend is also a dividend,
companies should provide for depreciation as required by Section 123 before declaration of interim
dividend. However, the first proviso to Section 123(1) provides that a company may, before the
declaration of any dividend in any financial year, transfer such percentage of its profit for that
financial year as it may consider appropriate to the reserves of the company irrespective of the size
of the declared dividend i.e. the company is not mandatorily required to transfer the profit to the
reserves, it is an option available to the company to transfer such percentage.
In the instant case, the Board has decided to pay interim dividend @15% of the paid- up capital.
Assuming that the company has complied with the depreciation requirement, the interim dividend
can be declared without transferring such percentage of its profits to the reserves of the company.
45.MG Pvt. Ltd. seeks your advice while preparing the financial statements i.e. the general
instructions to be followed while preparing Balance Sheet under Companies Act, 2013 in respect
of current assets and liabilities.
Answer
General Instructions for Preparation of Balance Sheet:
( i) General Instruction in respect of Current Assets: An asset shall be classified as current when it
284

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
satisfies any of the following criteria-

(1) it is expected to be realized in, or is intended for sale or consumption in, the company’s
normal operating cycle;
(2) it is held primarily for the purpose of being traded;
(3) it is expected to be realized within twelve months after the reporting date; or
(4) it is cash or cash equivalent unless it is restricted from being exchanged or used to settle a
liability for at least twelve months after the reporting date.
(iii) General Instruction in respect of Current Liabilities: A liability shall be classified as current
when it satisfies any of the following criteria-
(1) it is expected to be settled in the company’s normal operating cycle;
(2) it is held primarily for the purpose of being traded;

(3) it is due to be settled within twelve months after the reporting date; or
(4) the company does not have an unconditional right to defer settlement of the liability for at least
twelve months after the reporting date. Terms of a liability that could, at the option of the
counterparty, result in its settlement by the issue of equity instruments do not affect its
classification.
46. As an auditor, how would you deal with the following situations:
(a)Ram and Hanuman Associates, Chartered Accountants in practice, have been appointed as Statutory
Auditor of Krishna Ltd. for the accounting year 2018-2019. Mr. Hanuman, a partner of Ram and Hanuman
Associates, holds 100 equity shares of Shiva Ltd., a subsidiary company of Krishna Ltd.
(b)Nick Ltd. is a subsidiary of Ajanta Ltd., whose 20% shares have been held by Central Government, 25%
by Uttar Pradesh Government and 10% by Madhya Pradesh Government. Nick Ltd. appointed Mr. Prem
as its statutory auditor.
( c)Contravene Ltd. appointed CA Innocent as an auditor for the company for the current financial year.
Further the company offered him the services of actuarial, investment advisory and investment banking
which was also approved by the Board of Directors.
(d)Mr. Amar, a Chartered Accountant, bought a car financed at Rs. 7,00,000 by Chaudhary Finance Ltd.,
which is a holding company of Charan Ltd. and Das Ltd. He has been the statutory auditor of Das Ltd.
and continues to be even after taking the loan.
Answer
(a) Auditor Holding Securities of a Company: As per sub-section (3)(d)(i) of Section 141 of the
Companies Act, 2013 along with Rule 10 of the Companies (Audit and Auditors) Rule, 2014, a person
285

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
shall not be eligible for appointment as an auditor of a company, who, or his relative or partner is
holding any security of or interest in the company or its subsidiary, or of its holding or associate
company or a subsidiary of such holding company. Provided that the relative may hold security or
interest in the company of face value not exceeding rupees one lakh.
Also, as per sub-section (4) of Section 141 of the Companies Act, 2013, where a person appointed
as an auditor of a company incurs any of the disqualifications mentioned in sub-section (3) after his
appointment,
he shall vacate his office as such auditor and such vacation shall be deemed to be a casual vacancy
in the office of the auditor.
In the present case, Mr. Hanuman, Chartered Accountant, a partner of M/s Ram and Hanuman
Associates, holds 100 equity shares of Shiva Ltd. which is a subsidiary of Krishna Ltd. Therefore, the
firm, M/s Ram and Hanuman Associates would be disqualified to be appointed as statutory auditor
of Krishna Ltd., as per section 141(3)(d)(i), which is the holding company of Shiva Ltd., because Mr.
Hanuman, one of the partners, is holding equity shares of its subsidiary.
(b) According to Section 139(7) of the Companies Act, 2013, the auditors of a government company
shall be appointed or re-appointed by the Comptroller and Auditor General of India(C&AG). As
per section 2(45), a Government company is defined as any company in which not less than 51%
of the total voting power is held by the Central Government or by any State Government or
Governments or partly by the Central Government and partly by one or more State Governments
and includes a company which is a subsidiary of a Government Company as thus defined.
In the given case, Ajanta Ltd is a government company as its 20% shares have been held by Central
Government, 25% by U.P. State Government and 10% by M.P. State Government. Total 55% shares
have been held by Central and State governments, therefore, it is a Government company.
Nick Ltd. is a subsidiary company of Ajanta Ltd. Hence, Nick Ltd. is covered in the definition of a
government company. Therefore, auditor of Nick Ltd. can be appointed only by C&AG.
(c) Services not to be Rendered by the Auditor: Section 144 of the Companies Act, 2013 prescribes
certain services not to be rendered by the auditor. An auditor appointed under the Act shall
provide to the company only such other services as are approved by the Board of Directors or the
audit committee, as the case may be, but which shall not include any of the following services
(whether such services are rendered directly or indirectly to the company or its holding company
or subsidiary company), namely:
investment advisory services;
286
(v)

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s

Further section 141(3)(i) of the Companies Act, 2013 also disqualifies a person for appointment as
an auditor of a company who is engaged as on the date of appointment in consulting and specialized
services as provided in section 144.
In the given case, CA Innocent was appointed as an auditor of Contravene Ltd. He was offered
additional services of actuarial, investment advisory and investment banking which was also
approved by the Board of Directors. The auditor is advised not to accept the services as these
services are specifically notified in the services not to be rendered by him as an auditor as per
section 144 of the Act.
(d) According to section 141(3)(d)(ii) of the Companies Act, 2013, a person is not eligible for
appointment as auditor of any company, if he is indebted to the company, or its subsidiary, or
its holding or associate company or a subsidiary of such holding company, in excess of rupees
five lakh.
In the given case, Mr. Amar is disqualified to act as an auditor under section 141(3)(d)(ii) as he is
indebted to Chaudhary Finance Ltd. for more than Rs. 5,00,000. Also, according to section
141(3)(d)(ii), he cannot act as an auditor of any subsidiary of Chaudhary Finance Ltd. i.e. he is also
disqualified to work in Charan Ltd. & Das Ltd. Therefore, he has to vacate his office in Das Ltd. even
though it is a subsidiary of Chaudhary Finance Ltd.
Hence audit work performed by Mr. Amar as an auditor is invalid, he should vacate his office
immediately and Das Ltd. should appoint another auditor for the company
47.Astha Pvt. Ltd. has fully paid capital of Rs. 140 lakhs. During the year, the company had
borrowed Rs. 15 lakhs each from a bank and a financial institution. It had the turnover (Net of
GST Rs. 50 lakhs which is credited to a separate account) of Rs. 475 lakhs. Will Companies
(Auditor’s Report) Order, 2020 be applicable to Astha Pvt. Ltd.?
Answer
Applicability of CARO, 2020: The CARO, 2020 specifically exempts a private limited company, not
being a subsidiary or holding company of a public company, having a paid up capital and reserves
and surplus not more than rupees one crore as on the balance sheet date and which does not have
total borrowings exceeding rupees one crore from any bank or financial institution at any point of
time during the financial year and which does not have a total revenue as disclosed in Scheduled III
to the Companies Act, 2013 (including revenue from discontinuing operations) exceeding rupees
ten crore during the financial year as per the financial statements.
287

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
In the case of Astha Pvt. Ltd., it has outstanding loan of Rs. 30 lakhs (Rs. 15 lakhs + Rs. 15 lakhs)
collectively from bank and financial institution which is less than Rs. 1 crore rupees and turnover is
Rs. 475 lakhs i.e. also less than Rs. 10crores and not exceeding the limit. However,it has paid capital
of Rs. 140 lakhs i.e. more than Rs. 1 crore.
Thus, considering its paid up capital which is exceeding the prescribed limit for exemption, CARO,
2020 will be applicable to Astha Pvt. Ltd.
48.Under CARO, 2020, as a statutory auditor, how would you report on the following:
(i) k for Rs. 80 lakhs for acquiring R&D equipment, out of which Rs. 15 lakh was used to buy a car for
use of the
(ii) Physical verification of only 40% of items of inventory has been conducted by the company. The
balance 60% will be conducted in next year due to lack of time and resources.
Answer
Utilisation of Term Loans: According to clause (ix) of Para 3 of CARO, 2020, the auditor is required to
report “whether term loans were applied for the purposes for which those were obtained. If not, the
amount of loan so diverted and the purpose for which it is used may be reported”.
The auditor should examine the terms and conditions of the term loan with the actual utilisation of the
loans. If the auditor finds that the fund has not been utilized for the purpose for which they were
obtained, the report should state the fact.
In the instant case, term loan taken for the purpose of R&D equipment has been utilized for the purchase
of car which has no relation with R&D equipment.
Therefore, car though used for R&D Director cannot be considered as R&D equipment. The auditor should
state the fact in his report as per Paragraph 3 clause (ix) of the CARO 2020, that out of the term loan
taken for R&D equipment, Rs. 15 lakhs was not utilised for the intended purpose of acquiring R&D
equipment.
Physical Verification of Inventory: Clause (ii) of Para 3 of CARO, 2020 requires the auditor to report
on whether physical verification of inventory has been conducted at reasonable intervals by the
management. Physical verification of inventory is the responsibility of the management which
should normally verify all material items at least once in a year and more often in appropriate cases.
The auditor in order to satisfy himself about verification at reasonable intervals should examine the
adequacy of evidence and record of verification.
In the given case, the above requirement of CARO, 2020 has not been fulfilled as such and the
auditor should point out the specific areas where he believes the procedure of inventory verification
is not reasonable. He may consider the impact on financial statement and report accordingly.
49.T Pvt. Ltd.’s paid up capital & reserves are less than Rs. 50 lakhs and it has no outstanding loan
exceeding Rs. 25 lakhs from any bank or financial institution. Its sales are Rs. 6 crores before
288

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
deducting trade discount Rs. 10 lakhs and sales returns Rs. 95 lakhs. The services rendered by
the company amounted to Rs. 10 lakhs. The company contends that reporting under Companies
Auditor’s Reports Order (CARO) is not applicable. Discuss.
Applicability of CARO, 2020: The CARO, 2020 specifically exempts a private limited company, not
being a subsidiary or holding company of a public company, having a paid up capital and reserves
and surplus not more than rupees one crore as on the balance sheet date and which does not have
total borrowings exceeding rupees one crore from any bank or financial institution at any point of
time during the financial year and which does not have a total revenue as disclosed in Scheduled III
to the
Companies Act, 2013 (including revenue from discontinuing operations) exceeding rupees ten crore
during the financial year as per the financial statements.
In the given case, paid up capital and reserves of T Pvt. Ltd. are less than Rs. 1 crore and has no loan
outstanding exceeding Rs. one crore from any bank or financial institution.
Further, its total revenue as disclosed in Scheduled III to the Companies Act, 2013 (including revenue
from discontinuing operations) is not exceeding rupees ten crore during the financial year as per
Thus CARO 2020 will not be applicable to T Pvt. Ltd.
50.The financial statements of MP Ltd. as on March 31, 2020 are to be prepared under Division Il
of Schedule III to the Companies Act, 2013. Comment on the disclosure compliances for MP Ltd.
from the following information in the financial statements which are required to be drawn up in
compliance with Ind AS.
(i) Property, Plant and Equipment include Rs. 2.50 crore for a boiler-plant under construction.
(ii) Cash and cash equivalents include Rs. 1.25 crore deposited with a nationalized bank on 31st
March, 2020 for 18 months. It is shown under current assets.
(iii) Non-current assets include under caption "Biological assets other than bearer Plants" a sum
of Rs. 1.50 crore being cost of cultivation for bringing to yield level, the cashewnut trees whose
yield period, according to estimate shall not be less than 10 years.
Answer:
(i) Disclosure of Boiler Plant under Construction: Boiler plant under construction should be shown
under the heading ‘Capital Work in Progress’ instead of Property
Plan and Equipment. Thus, inclusion of value of boiler plant under construction in Property Plan
and Equipment is not in order.
(ii) Disclosure of Cash and Cash Equivalents deposited with Nationalised Bank: Bank deposits
with more than 12 months maturity shall be disclosed under 'Other financial assets'. Therefore,
disclosure of deposits rupees 1.25 crores in a nationalised bank for 18 months as Cash and Cash
Equivalents is not in order as per Division II of Schedule III.
(iii) Disclosure of Cost of Cultivation for bringing to yield level the Cashewnut trees: Cost of 1.5
289

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
crore rupees for Cultivation for bringing to yield level, the cashewnut trees whose yield period is
more than one period will form part of ‘Bearer Plant’. Hence it will not be considered as ‘Biological
Assets other than bearer plant’. Therefore, it should be shown under the heading ‘Property Plant
and Equipment’ as Bearer Plant as per Division II of Schedule III.
51.What are the reporting requirements in the audit report under the Companies Act, 2013 /
CARO, 2020 for the following situations?
(i) A fraud has been committed against the company by a vendor of the company.
(ii) The company has committed a major fraud on its customer and the case is pending in the
court.
Answer:
Reporting Requirements in the Audit Report under the Companies Act, 2013 / CARO 2020 :
According to Clause (xi) (a) of Para 3 of CARO 2020 , the auditor is required to report whether any
fraud by the company or any fraud on the company has been noticed or reported during the year.
If yes, the nature and the amount involved is to be indicated; Further, as per Clause (xi) (b) of Para
3 of CARO 2020 , whether any report under sub-section (12) of section 143 of the Companies Act
has been filed by the auditors in Form ADT-4 as prescribed under rule 13 of Companies (Audit and
Auditors) Rules, 2014 with the Central Government;
As per section 143(12)s of the Companies Act, 2013, if an auditor of a company, in the course of
the performance of his duties as auditor, has reason to believe that an offence involving fraud is
being or has been committed against the company by officers or employees of the company, he
shall immediately report the matter to the Central Government (in case amount of fraud is rupees
1 crore or above) or Audit Committee or Board in other cases (in case the amount of fraud
involved is less than rupees 1 crore) within such time and in such manner as may be prescribed.
(i) Fraud committed against the company by a vendor of the Company: In case employees or
management are involved in fraud committed by vendor, reporting has to be done in accordance
with CARO 2020 and as per section 143 (12) of the Companies Act, 2013. Suspected fraud by
vendors, customers and other third parties should be dealt with in accordance with SA 240.
Therefore, reporting has to be done in accordance with SA 240, “The Auditor’s Responsibilities
relating to Fraud in an audit of Financial Statements”.
(ii) Company has committed major fraud on its customer of which case is pending in the court: Major
fraud committed by the company on its customer has to be reported in accordance with Clause (xi)
of Para 3 of CARO 2020 .
52. A term loan was obtained from a bank for Rs. 80 lakhs for acquiring R&D equipment, out of which Rs.
15 lakh was used to buy a car for use of the concerned director who was looking at the R&D activities. As
a statutory auditor, how would you report under CARO 2016.
ANSWER
290

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
Utilisation of Term Loans: According to clause (ix) of Para 3 of CARO, 2020, the auditor is required to report
“whether term loans were applied for the purposes for which those were obtained. If not, the amount of
loan so diverted and the purpose for which it is used may be reported”.
The auditor should examine the terms and conditions of the term loan with the actual utilisation of the
loans. If the auditor finds that the fund has not been utilized for the purpose for which they were obtained,
the report should state the fact.
In the instant case, term loan taken for the purpose of R&D equipment has been utilized for the purchase
of car which has no relation with R&D equipment.
Therefore, car though used for R&D Director cannot be considered as R&D equipment. The auditor should
state the fact in his report as per Paragraph 3 clause (ix) of the CARO 2016, that out of the term loan taken
for R&D equipment, Rs. 15 lakhs was not utilised for the intended purpose of acquiring R&D equipment
53. Physical verification of only 40% of items of inventory has been conducted by the company. The
balance 60% will be conducted in next year due to lack of time and resources. As a statutory auditor, how
would you report under CARO 2020
ANSWER
Physical Verification of Inventory: Clause (ii) of Para 3 of CARO, 2020 requires the auditor to report on
whether physical verification of inventory has been conducted at reasonable intervals by the management.
Physical verification of inventory is the responsibility of the management which should normally verify all
material items at least once in a year and more often in appropriate cases. The auditor in order to satisfy
himself about verification at reasonable intervals should examine the adequacy of evidence and record of
verification.
In the given case, the above requirement of CARO, 2020 has not been fulfilled as such and the auditor should
point out the specific areas where he believes the procedure of inventory verification is not reasonable. He
may consider the impact thereof on financial statements and his report accordingly

ABC Limited is in the practice of maintaining consistent dividend payment over a minimum of 14%. The
Financial year 2019-20 was so very bad for the Company that it was not possible for the Company to
maintain the payment of consistent dividend as above. The Management, being hopeful of recovery of its
performance in next year, felt that the depreciation of the year to the extent of 75% alone be charged to
the Statement of Profit and Loss and the remaining 25% be kept in a separate account code in the Balance
Sheet- 'Debit Balances Adjustable against Revenue account'.
The Management was of the view that it would be in fair practice of accounting if the depreciation for
asset is charged before the expiry of the life of assets and the amount parked in asset code as above would
unfailingly be adjusted to Revenue before the close of next financial year anyway. Analyse the issues
involved and state how the Auditor should decide on this matter.
ANSWER
Provision of Depreciation : Section 123(1) of the Companies Act, 2013 provides that dividend cannot be
declared or paid by a company for any financial year except out of profits of the company for that year
arrived at after providing for depreciation in accordance with the provisions of Section 123(2), or out of the
291

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
profits or the company for any previous financial year or years arrived at after providing for depreciation in
the manner aforementioned and remaining undistributed, or out of both.
Further, it is the duty of auditor to check whether the depreciation was provided according to provision of
AS 10 / IND AS 16/Schedule II to the Act.
In the instant case, ABC Limited is in the practice of maintaining consistent dividend payment over a
minimum of 14%. Due to bad financial condition, company has not provided for dividend for the year 2019-
20. In addition to this management has also taken decision to charge 75% of the depreciation in the
statement of Profit and Loss whereas 25% of the depreciation amount kept in a separate account code in
the Balance Sheet – ‘Debit Balances Adjustable against Revenue Account’.
Contention of management that it would be in fair practice of accounting where the depreciation
on asset is charged before the expiry of the life of assets and the amount parked in asset code
would unfailingly be adjusted to revenue before the close of next financial year is not tenable.
The practice of the company in not charging the depreciation and accumulating 25% of it in a debit balance
for being written off in the next year is not an acceptable accounting treatment. If dividend is declared in
such situation, it would mean payment out of capital.
Therefore, the auditor of the company should ensure the compliance of provisions of section 123 and
Schedule II. In case the management does not comply with the provisions and does not charge the 100%
depreciation, the auditor of the company should suggest the management for the same and if management
refuses, the auditor should qualify his report accordingly.
55. Pearl Ltd. is an exporter of precious and semi-precious stones. The turnover of the company is Rs. 150
crore, out of which Rs. 105 crore is from export business and remaining Rs. 45 crore from domestic sales.
Amount received from export business is all in foreign currency. Directors of Pearl Ltd. are of the opinion
that cost audit is not applicable to their company as maximum revenue has been generated from export
business. Give your opinion.
ANSWER
Cost Audit Rules not to apply in certain cases: The requirement for cost audit shall not be applicable to a
company whose revenue from exports, in foreign exchange, exceeds seventy-five per cent of its total
revenue (as per Rule 3 of the Companies (Cost Records and Audit) Rules, 2014).
In the instant case, Peral Ltd. is an exporter of precious and semi-precious stones and the turnover of the
company is rupees 150 crore out of which rupees 105 crore i.e. 70% is from export business and remaining
rupees 45 crore i.e. 30% from domestic sales.
Thus, opinion of director is not tenable as revenue from exports in foreign exchanges is below prescribed
limit. Therefore, cost audit is applicable on Pearl Ltd. as per Rule 3 of the Companies (Cost Records and Audit)
Rules, 2014. Pearl Ltd. has to appoint cost auditor to get the cost accounts of the company audited.
56. Whether the Nidhi Company has complied with the Net Owned Funds to Deposits in the ratio of 1:20
to meet out the liability and whether the Nidhi Company is maintaining ten per cent unencumbered term
deposits as specified in the Nidhi Rules, 2014 to meet out the liability? [Paragraph 3(xii)]
Ans. Relevant Provisions

292

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
(a) This clause requires the auditor to report whether, in the case of a Nidhi Company, net-owned funds to
deposit liability ratio is more than 1:20 and the Nidhi Company is maintaining ten per cent unencumbered
term deposits as specified in the Nidhi Rules 2014 to meet out the liability.
(b) Section 406(1) of the Act defines “Nidhi” to mean a company which has been incorporated as a Nidhi
with the object of cultivating the habit of thrift and savings amongst its members, receiving deposits from,
and lending to, its members only, for their mutual benefit, and which complies with such rules as are
prescribed by the Central Government for regulation of such class of companies.
(c) It may be noted that MCA on 31st March 2014, vide its Notification No. GSR 258(E) notified the ‘Nidhi
Rules 2014’, which came into force on the first day of April 2014. These Rules apply to Nidhi company
incorporated as a Nidhi pursuant to the provisions of Section 406 of the Act and also to the Nidhi
companies declared under sub-section (1) of section 620A of the Companies Act 1956.
Audit Procedures and Reporting
(d) It may be noted that Rule 5(1) prescribes the requirements for minimum number of members, net
owned fund etc. As per Rule 5(1) every Nidhi shall, within a period of one year from the commencement of
these rules, ensure that it has—
(i) not less than two hundred members;
(ii) net owned funds of ten lakh rupees or more;
(iii) unencumbered term deposits of not less than ten per cent of the outstanding deposits as specified in
Rule 14; and
(iv) ratio of net owned funds to deposits of not more than 1:20. The auditor should note that as such a
Nidhi Company can accept deposits not exceeding twenty times of its net owned funds as per last audited
balance sheet. Furthermore, as per Rule 14, every Nidhi is to invest and continue to keep invested, in
encumbered term deposits with a Scheduled commercial bank (other than a co-operative bank or a
regional rural bank), or post office deposits in its own name an amount which shall not be less than ten per
cent of the deposits outstanding at the close of business on the last working day of the second preceding
month, which needs to be examined.
(e) As per Rule 3(d), Net Owned Funds are defined as the aggregate of paid up equity share capital and free
reserves as reduced by accumulated losses and intangible assets appearing in the last audited balance
sheet: Provided that, the amount representing the proceeds of issue of preference shares, shall not be
included for calculating Net Owned Funds.
(f) A Nidhi company can accept fixed deposits, recurring deposits accounts and savings deposits from its
members in accordance with the directions notified by the Central Government. The aggregate of such
deposits is referred to as “deposit liability”.
(g) The auditor should ask the management to provide the computation of the deposit liability and net
owned funds on the basis of the requirements contained herein above. This would enable him to verify
that the ratio of deposit liability to net owned funds is in accordance with the requirements prescribed in
this regard. The auditor should verify the ratio using the figures of net owned funds and deposit liability
computed in accordance with what is stated above. The comments of the auditor should be based upon
such a statement provided by the management and verification of the same by the auditor.
293

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
(h) The auditor may report, incorporating the following as at the balance sheet date:- (i) In case of shortfall
in the ratio of net owned funds to the deposits, report the amount of shortfall and state the actual ratio of
net owned funds to the deposits. (ii) In case of shortfall with regard to the minimum amount of 10% as
unencumbered term deposits, as specified in Nidhi Rules 2014, report the amount thereof.
57. Whether any fraud by the company or any fraud on the company by its officers or employees has
been noticed or reported during the year; If yes, the nature and the amount involved is to be indicated?
[Paragraph 3(x)]
Ans. Relevant Provisions
(a) This clause requires the auditor to report whether any fraud by the company or any fraud on the company
by its officers or employees has been noticed or reported during the year. If yes, the auditor is required to
state the amount involved and the nature of fraud. The clause does not require the auditor to discover such
frauds. The scope of auditor’s inquiry under this clause is restricted to frauds ‘noticed or reported’ during
the year. The use of the words “noticed or reported” indicates that the management of the company should
have the knowledge about the frauds by the company or on the company by its Officer and employees that
have occurred during the period covered by the auditor’s report. It may be noted that this clause of the
Order, by requiring the auditor to report whether any fraud by the company or on the company by its Officer
or employees has been noticed or reported, does not relieve the auditor from his responsibility to consider
fraud and error in an audit of financial statements. In other words, irrespective of the auditor’s comments
under this clause, the
auditor is also required to comply with the requirements of Standard on Auditing (SA) 240,
“The Auditor’s Responsibility Relating to Fraud in an Audit of Financial Statements”. In this context, the
auditor should also have regard to the Guidance Note on Reporting on Fraud under Section 143(12) of the
Companies Act, 2013, issued by ICAI.
(b) The term "fraud" refers to an intentional act by one or more individuals among management, those
charged with governance, employees, involving the use of deception to obtain an unjust or illegal
advantage. Although fraud is a broad legal concept, the auditor is concerned with fraudulent acts that
cause a material misstatement in the financial statements. Misstatement of the financial statements may
not be the objective of some frauds. Auditors do not make legal determinations of whether fraud has
actually occurred. Fraud involving one or more members of management or those charged with
governance is referred to as "management fraud"; fraud involving only employees including officers of the
entity is referred to as "employee fraud". In either case, there may be collusion with third parties outside
the entity. In fact, generally speaking, the “management fraud” can be construed as “fraud by the
company”.
(c) Two types of intentional misstatements are relevant to the auditor's consideration of fraud -
misstatements resulting from fraudulent financial reporting and misstatements resulting from
misappropriation of assets.
(d) Fraudulent financial reporting involves intentional misstatements or omissions of amounts or

disclosures in financial statements to deceive financial statement users. Fraudulent financial reporting may
involve:
294

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
(i) Deception such as manipulation, falsification, or alteration of accounting records or supporting

documents from which the financial statements are prepared.
(ii) Misrepresentation in, or intentional omission from, the financial statements of events, transactions or
other significant information
(iii) Intentional misapplication of accounting principles relating to measurement, recognition, classification,

(e) Misappropriation of assets involves the theft of an entity's assets. Misappropriation of assets can be
accomplished in a variety of ways (including embezzling receipts, stealing physical or intangible assets, or
causing an entity to pay for goods and services not received); it is often accompanied by false or misleading
records or documents in order to conceal the fact that the assets are missing.
(f) Fraudulent financial reporting may be committed by the company because management is under
pressure, from sources outside or inside the entity, to achieve an expected (and perhaps unrealistic) earnings
target particularly when the consequences to management of failing to meet financial goals can be
significant. The auditor must appreciate that a perceived opportunity for fraudulent financial reporting or
misappropriation of assets may exist when an individual believes internal control could be circumvented, for
example, because the individual is in a position of trust or has knowledge of specific weaknesses in the
internal control system.
(l) Where the auditor notices that any fraud by the company or on the company by its officers or
employees has been noticed by or reported during the year, the auditor should, apart from reporting the
existence of fraud, also required to report, the nature of fraud and amount involved. For reporting under
this clause, the auditor may consider the following: (i) This clause requires all frauds noticed or reported
during the year shall be reported indicating the nature and amount involved. As specified the fraud by the
company or on the company by its officers or employees are only covered. (ii) Of the frauds covered under
section 143(12) of the Act, only noticed frauds shall be included here and not the suspected frauds. (iii)
While reporting under this clause with regard to the nature and the amount involved of the frauds noticed
or reported, the auditor may also consider the principles of materiality outlined in Standards on Auditing.
58. Whether the company has entered into any non-cash transactions with directors or persons
connected with him and if so, whether the provisions of section 192 of Companies Act, 2013 have been
complied with? [Paragraph 3(xv)]
Ans. Relevant Provisions:
(a) Section 192 of the Act deals with restriction on non-cash transactions involving directors or persons
connected with them. The section prohibits the company from entering into following types of
arrangements unless it meets the conditions laid out in the said section:
i. An arrangement by which a director of the company or its holding, subsidiary or associate company or a
person connected with such director acquires or is to acquire assets for consideration other than cash,
from the company.
295

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
ii. An arrangement by which the company acquires or is to acquire assets for consideration other than cash,
from such director or person so connected.
(b) Arrangements, as discussed herein above, can only be entered by the company on fulfillment of the
conditions laid out in Section 192 of the Act which are as under:
i. The company should have obtained prior approval for such arrangement through a resolution of the
company in general meeting.
ii. In case the concerned director or the person connected therewith, is also a director of its holding
company, a similar approval should have been obtained by the holding company through a resolution at its
general meeting.
(c) The reporting requirements under this clause are in two parts. The first part requires the auditor to report
on whether the company has entered into any non-cash transactions with the directors or any persons
connected with such director/s. The second part of the clause requires the auditor to report whether the
provisions of section 192 of the Act have been complied with. Therefore, the second part of the clause
becomes reportable only if the answer to the first part is in affirmative.
d) In other words, such transactions involving change in the assets or liabilities of a company but not
involving “cash” or cash equivalents” as defined under Accounting Standard (AS) 3, “Cash Flow Statement”
may be construed as non-cash transactions. At this point, it may be appropriate to also refer to the
definition and discussion on “non-cash transactions” & “cash and cash equivalents”, as given in AS 3.
(e) There may be a situation where the acquisition of the asset takes place in one year and the
corresponding liability is created in the financial statements, the corresponding settlement in the following
year. The said transaction will not be considered as non-cash transaction. Further, mergers under Court
schemes would be entered into subject to requisite approvals of Court etc., would not be considered non-
cash transactions.
(f) The term “person connected with the director” has not been defined in the Act, or the Rules thereunder.
Instead, the term “to any other person in whom the director is interested” is defined in the Explanation to
sub section
(1) of section 185 of the Act, which is reproduced as under and may be used as the reference point for
reporting under this clause.
“(a) any director of the lending company, or of a company which is its holding company or any partner or
relative of any such director;
(b) any firm in which any such director or relative is a partner;
(c) any private company of which any such director is a director or member;
(d) any body corporate at a general meeting of which not less than twenty-five per cent. of the total voting
power may be exercised or controlled by any such director, or by two or more such directors, together; or
(e) any body corporate, the Board of directors, managing director or manager, whereof is accustomed to
296

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
act in accordance with the directions or instructions of the Board, or of any director or directors, of the
lending company.”
(g) Section 2(77) of the Companies Act, 2013 read with Rule 4 of the Companies (Specification of Definition
Details) Rules, 2014 defines the term “relative”. As per the aforesaid section 2(77), “Relative, with
reference to any person, means anyone who is related to another, if –
(i) they are members of a Hindu Undivided Family;
(ii) they are husband and wife; or
(iii) one person is related to the other in such manner as may be prescribed” As per Rule 4 of the
Companies (Specification of Definition Details) Rules, 2014, a person shall be deemed to be the relative of
another, if he or she is related to another in the following manner, namely –
(i) Father, including step father
(ii) Mother, including step mother
(iii) Son, including step son
(iv) Son’s wife
(v) Daughter
(vi) Daughter’s husband
(vii) Brother, including step brother
(viii) Sister, including step sister
(h) The term “acquire” simply means to come into possession of something. A thing that cannot be sold
cannot be acquired. Thus, an acquisition would necessarily involve existence of two parties and a transfer
of rights and/or obligations in a thing. In the context of section 192 of the Act, this transfer is between the
company and the director and/or a person connected with a director. Such “director” is not restricted to
being a director of the concerned company, but extends to director of a holding company, subsidiary or
associate of the company under question.
(i) As provided in section 192, the acquisition by/from the company has to be that of an “asset”. Further,
the term assets should be construed to have the same meaning as described in the Framework for
Preparation and Presentation of Financial Statements, issued by the Institute of Chartered Accountants of
India. The auditor would need to evaluate whether the subject matter of acquisition by/ from the company
satisfies the characteristic of an “asset”.
Audit Procedures and Reporting

(j) For reporting on the first leg of the reporting clause, the starting point of the auditor’s procedures could
be obtaining a management representation as to whether the company has undertaken any non-cash
transactions with the directors or persons connected with the directors, as envisaged in section 192(1) of the
Act. The auditor would need to corroborate the management representation with sufficient appropriate
audit evidence. A scrutiny of the following books of account, records and documents could provide source
297

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
of such audit evidence to the auditor as to the existence of such non cash transactions as well as persons
connected with the Directors:
Persons connected with Director Acquisition by/ From Company

Form No. MBP 1, Notice of Interest by Form No. MBP 2, Register of Loans, Guarantee,
Director, filed pursuant to the Security and Acquisition Made by the Company, filed
Companies (Meetings of Board and Its pursuant to the Companies (Meetings of Board and
Powers) Rules, 2014 [Ref: Sec 184(1) Its Powers) Rules, 2014 [Ref: Sec 186(9) and Rule
and Rule 9(1)] 12(1)]
Form No. MBP 4, Register of Contracts with Related
Party and Contracts and Bodies etc. in
which Directors are Interested, filed pursuant to the
Companies (Meetings of Board and Its Powers)
Rules, 2014 [Ref: Sec 189(1) and Rule 16(1)]
Movements in the Fixed Asset Register
Minutes book of the General Meeting and Meetings

of Directors
Report on Annual General Meeting pursuant to

Companies (Management and Administration) Rules,
2014 {Ref Sec 121(1) and Rule 31(2)}
MCQ
59. Re-opening of accounts on Court’s or Tribunal’s orders: Section 130 of the Companies Act, 2013 states
that a company shall not re-open its books of account and not recast its financial statements, unless an
application in this regard is made by the Central Government, the Income-tax authorities, the
Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI), any other statutory regulatory body or authority or any
person concerned and an order is made by a court of competent jurisdiction or the Tribunal to
the effect that Jain Ltd. has an annual turnover of Rs. 350 crores and has been into losses for the last 2
years. The operations of the company are good. Due to some technology changes, the company started
facing competition and hence started incurring losses. The company plans to revive in the next 1-2
years with the improvements in its processes. During the year ended 31 March, 2019, the management of
the company came across certain transactions relating to the financial year ended 31 March 2018 which
were erroneously missed to be accounted for.
This would result into losses and hence the management is considering to take this to the right financial
year and for that purpose to re-open its accounts for the financial year ended 31 March 2018. Please
advise.
a. The position of the management is correct.
b. The action of the management is correct, however, the reason behind reopening the accounts of
298

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
last year does not seem to be correct.

c. The action of the management would have been correct had it been advised by the auditors of the
company and for the same management should have taken approval from SEBI.
d. The action of the management is not correct.
Answer: Option: (d) The action of the management is not correct.
60. Rimmi Ltd. was set up initially as a private limited company. Subsequently, it got converted into a
public company. The company’s management has plans of expansion but the business was not growing in
an organic manner. Therefore, the management decided to acquire the competitors. During the financial
year ended 31 March, 2019, the company acquired two companies in India and France in September,
2018 and January, 2019 respectively. The company controls both of these companies as per the criterias
laid down in the Companies Act 2013 as well as the applicable accounting standards.
The management started discussions with the auditors regarding the audit wherein it was also pointed
out by the auditors that the management should also prepare consolidated financial statements (CFS), if
they want. Management needs your advise on the same.
a. Management must prepare the CFS as per the requirements of the Companies Act, 2013.
b. Management has a choice not to prepare CFS but should go for that considering that its true
performance and financial position can then be demonstrated.
c. Management could have prepared CFS if the acquired companies would have completed at least one
year post acquisition.
d. Management must prepare CFS but it should include only the company acquired in India.
Answer: Option: (a) Management must prepare the CFS as per the requirements of the Companies Act,
2013.
61.K Pvt Ltd. has been providing marketing support services to its parent company based out of Ireland.
The company’s operations are not large and have remained stable over the last few years. Recently the
parent company was acquired by another company and the new investor wanted to reassess whether
the company in India should continue or should be shut down considering the legal compliances. It was
advised to the new investor that the company should be converted into LLP. In December 2018, the new
management decided that they would get the company converted into LLP and also discussed that
matter with their statutory auditors. The management is expecting that the LLP conversion would get
completed by February 2019 and wants that the auditors should audit the financial statements of the
LLP at the year end because conversion is only an administrative process and hence it would not impact
their work.
a. The management would need to get the financial statements audited from new auditor appointed by
CAG in case of LLP.
b. The management would need to appoint new auditor and the new auditor can audit LLP at year end
in one go – both for the period it was a company and then when it became LLP.
c. The auditor of the company should audit the company before its conversion and then the new auditor
for LLP would audit LLP separately.
299

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
d. The auditor of the company should audit the company before its conversion and then the new auditor
for LLP would audit LLP separately. But this is a choice available to the auditor.
Answer:
Option: ( c) The auditor of the company should audit the company before its conversion and then the new
auditor for LLP would audit LLP separately
62. AJ Private Ltd. was incorporated on 21 March, 2018 and has limited operations. However, the
capital induction in the company was huge because it would be capital intensive. The company is in
the process to set up a plant in Karnataka which should be completed by 31 May, 2019. The
company’s management prepared its financial statements for the year ended 31 March, 2019. The
auditors were also called to start the work in April 2019. The auditors would be able to complete their
work by 31 May, 2019 and accordingly would issue their audit report by 1st week of June, 2019 as per
the plan agreed with the management. The auditors have some observations related to preparations
of financial statements which are not in compliance with Schedule III and most importantly the point
related to capitalization of the plant as Property, Plant and Equipment in the financial statements
for the year ended 31 March, 2019. Please suggest which of the following statements would be
correct.
a. The compliance of Schedule III shall start from 1 April 2019 for this company as per Companies
Accounts (Amendment) Rules 2016.
b. The compliance of Schedule III shall start from first financial period, however, some exemptions
would be applicable as per Companies Accounts Rules 2014.
c. There should be full compliance of Schedule III and plant should be kept as CWIP as per Schedule III.
d. There should be full compliance of Schedule III and plant should be shown as PPE as per Schedule III.
Answer: Option: ( c) There should be full compliance of Schedule III and plant should be kept as CWIP as
per Schedule III.
63. SHRD Private Ltd is engaged in the business of software and consultancy. The company has an
annual turnover of Rs. 2,000 crores but its profit margins are not very good as compared to the
industry standards. For the financial year ended 31 March 2019, the company proposed appointment
of its statutory auditors at its general meeting, however, the remuneration was not finalized.
The statutory auditors completed the engagement formalities including the engagement letter
between the company and the auditors and it was decided that the engagement letter be signed
without fee i.e. with the clause that the fee to be mutually decided.
Please provide your views on this.
a. Such engagement letter is not valid.

300

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
b. Engagement letter with such arrangement is valid.
c. Engagement letter should specify the fee of last year, if applicable, if the fee for the current year is
not yet finalized at the time of signing of the engagement letter.
d. Engagement letter should specify 10% increase in the fee as compared to last year as per the norms
of the ICAI, in case the fee is not finalized at the time of signing of the engagement letter.
Answer: Option: (b) Engagement letter with such arrangement is valid.
64. The Property, Plant and Equipment of Peer Ltd. included Rs.39.61 crore of earth removing machines
of outdated technology which had been retired from active use and had been kept for disposal after
knock down. These assets appeared at residual value and had been last inspected seven years back. As
an Auditor, what may be your reporting concern in view of CARO, 2020 on matters specified above? (4
ANSWER
Disclosure in Audit Report: The auditor is required to specifically include certain matters as per
CARO, 2020 under section 143 of the Companies Act, 2013.
According to clause (i) (a) of CARO, 2020 the auditor has to comment whether the company is
maintaining proper records showing full particulars, including quantitative details and situation of
fixed assets; and as per clause (i) (b) whether these fixed assets have been physically verified by
the management at reasonable intervals; whether any material discrepancies were noticed on
such verification and if so, whether the same have been properly dealt with in the books of
account;
In the given case, Peer Ltd. has intention to sale its earth removing machines of outdated
technology which had been retired from active use and had been kept for disposal after knock
down and these assets are appearing at residual value. Further, inspection of such machines
(though it is a retired machine, however value is 39.61 crore which is material amount) was done
seven years back, is not in compliance with CARO, 2020.
Hence, this fact needs to be disclosed in the Audit Report as per clause (i) (a) and (b) of Paragraph 3 of
CARO 2020
65. M/s PC & Co., Chartered Accountants are the statutory auditors of various categories of companies
and bodies corporate. In exercise of the powers conferred under sub-sections (2) and (4) of section 132,
of the Companies Act, 2013 the Central Government made the National Financial Reporting Authority
Rules, 2018 (NFRA Rules) (MCA Notification dated 13 November 2018). The audit firm seeks your
guidance on the applicability of those categories of companies and bodies corporate which are covered
by NFRA Rules.
(5 Marks) (past exam nov 2020)
ANSWER
As per NFRA rules, NFRA shall have power to monitor and enforce compliance with accounting standards
and auditing standards, oversee the quality of service under sub-section (2) of section 132 or undertake
301

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
investigation under sub-section (4) of such section of the auditors of the following class of companies and
bodies corporate:
(a) companies whose securities are listed on any stock exchange in India or outside India;
(b) unlisted public companies having paid-up capital of not less than rupees five hundred crores or having
annual turnover of not less than rupees one thousand crores or having, in aggregate, outstanding loans,
debentures and deposits of not less than rupees five hundred crores as on the 31st March of immediately
preceding financial year;
(c) insurance companies, banking companies, companies engaged in the generation or supply of electricity,
companies governed by any special Act for the time being in force or bodies corporate incorporated by an
Act in accordance with clauses (b), (c), (d), (e) and (f) of section 1 (4) of the Companies Act, 2013;
(d) any body corporate or company or person, or any class of bodies corporate or companies or persons, on
a reference made to the NFRA by the Central Government in public interest; and
(e) a body corporate incorporated or registered outside India, which is a subsidiary or associate company of
any company or body corporate incorporated or registered in India as referred to in clauses (a) to (d)
above, if the income or net-worth of such subsidiary or associate company exceeds 20% of the
consolidated income or consolidated net-worth of such company or the body corporate, as the case may
be, referred to in clauses (a) to (d) above
66. In the course of audit of MM Ltd. for the financial year ended 31st March, 2019, your audit team has
identified the following matter:
All amount of Rs. 4 Lakh per month for the marketing services rendered is paid to M/s. MG Associates, a
partnership firm in which Director of MM Ltd. is also a managing partner, with a profit sharing ratio of
30%. Based on an independent assessment, the consideration paid is higher than the arm's length pricing
by Rs. 1.50 Lakh per month. Whilst the transaction was accounted in the financial statements based on
the amounts paid, no separate disclosure has been made in the notes forming part of the accounts.
Give your comments for reporting under CARO 2016. (4 Marks) (past exam nov 2020)
ANSWER
According to clause (xiii) of Para 3 of CARO, 2020, whether all transactions with the related parties are in
compliance with sections 177 and 188 of Companies Act, 2013 where applicable and the details have been
disclosed in the Financial Statements etc., as required by the applicable accounting standards.
Therefore the duty of the auditor, under this clause is to report
i. Whether all transactions with the related parties are in compliance with section 177 and 188 of the
Companies Act,2013:
ii. Whether related party disclosures as required by relevant Accounting Standards (AS 18, as may be
applicable) are disclosed in the financial statements.
In the Instant case, MG Associates is a related party and also rendering marketing services to MM Ltd. in
return of Consideration of Rs. 4 Lakhs which is related party transaction. No separate disclosure has been
made in the notes to accounts in this context, which was required to be made.
In view of above, Auditor shall report under the above clause as under:
302

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
1. Nature of the related party relationship and the underlying transaction-MG Associates is a partnership
firm in which Director of MM Ltd is also a managing partner, with a profit sharing ratio of 30 %. Payment
of Rs. 4 Lakhs to MG Associates is a related party transaction.
2. Amount involved is Consideration for the Marketing services rendered by MG Associates (Rs. 4 Lakhs
p.m.) is higher than the arm’s length pricing by Rs. 1.50 Lakh p.m. (Rs. 18 Lakhs p.a.)
67. RAJUL & Co.” is an Audit Firm having partners “Mr. R”, “Mr. A”, “Mr. J”, “Mr. U” and “Mr. L”,
Chartered Accountants. “Mr. R”, “Mr. A”, “Mr. J”, “Mr. U” and “Mr. L” are holding appointment as an
Auditor in 4, 5, 6, 10 and 15 Companies respectively.
(i) Provide the maximum number of Audits remaining in the name of “RAJUL & Co.”
(ii) Provide the maximum number of Audits remaining in the name of individual partner i.e. “Mr. R”, “Mr.
A”, “Mr. J”, “Mr. U” and “Mr. L”.
(iii) Can RAJUL & Co. accept the appointment as an auditor in 80 private companies having paid-up share
capital less than Rs. 100 crore which has not committed default in filing its financial statements under
section 137 or annual return under section 92 of the Companies Act with the Registrar, 2 small
companies and 1 dormant company?
(iv) Would your answer be different, if out of those 80 private companies, 65 companies are having paid-
up share capital of Rs. 115 crore each? (6 Marks) (mtp – II -july 2021)
ANSWER
In the instant case, Mr. R is holding appointment in 4 companies, Mr. A is holding appointment in
5 companies, Mr. J is holding appointment in 6 companies, whereas Mr. U is having appointment
in 10 Companies and Mr. L is having appointment in 15 Companies. In aggregate all five partners
are having 40 audits.
Provisions and Explanations: As per section 141(3)(g) of the Companies Act, 2013, a person
shall not be eligible for appointment as an auditor if he is in full time employment elsewhere or a
person or a partner of a firm holding appointment as its auditor, if such person or partner is at the
date of such appointment or reappointment holding appointment as auditor of more than twenty
companies other than one person companies, dormant companies, small companies and private
companies having paid-up share capital less than Rs. 100 crore (private company which has not
committed a default in filing its financial statements under section 137 of the said Act or annual
return under section 92 of the said Act with the Registrar).
As per section 141(3)(g), this limit of 20 company audits is per person. In the case of an audit
firm having 5 partners, the overall ceiling will be 5 × 20 = 100 company audits. Some times, a
Chartered Accountant is a partner in a number of auditing firms. In such a case, all the firms in
which he is partner or proprietor will be together entitled to 20 company audits on his account.
Conclusion:
(i) Therefore, RAJUL & Co. can hold appointment as an auditor of 60 more companies:
Total Number of Audits available to the Firm = 20*5 = 100
Number of Audits already taken by all the partners
In their individual capacity = 4+5+6+10+15 = 40
Remaining number of Audits available to the Firm = 60
303

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
(ii) With reference to above provisions, an auditor can hold more appointment as auditor = ceiling limit as
per section 141(3)(g)- already holding appointments as an auditor.
Hence
(1) Mr. R can hold: 20 - 4 = 16 more audits.

(2) Mr. A can hold: 20 - 5 = 15 more audits.
(3) Mr. J can hold: 20 - 6 = 14 more audits.
(4) Mr. U can hold 20-10 = 10 more audits and
(5) Mr. L can hold 20-15 = 5 more audits.
(iii) In view of above discussed provisions, RAJUL & Co. can hold appointment as an auditor in all the 80
private companies having paid-up share capital less than Rs. 100 crore (private company which has not
committed a default in filing its financial statements under section 137 of the said Act or annual return
under section 92 of the said Act with the Registrar), 2 small companies and 1 dormant company as these
are excluded from the ceiling limit of company audits given under section 141(3)(g) of the Companies Act,
2013.
(iv) As per fact of the case, RAJUL & Co. is already having 40 company audits and they can accept only 60
more company audits. In addition, they can also conduct the audit of one person companies, small
companies, dormant companies and private companies having paid up share capital less than Rs. 100
crores (private company which has not committed a default in filing its financial statements under section
137 of the said Act or annual ret urn under section 92 of the said Act with the Registrar) . In the given case,
out of the 80 private companies RAJUL & Co. is being offered, 65 companies have paid-up share capital of
Rs. 115 crore each.
Therefore, RAJUL & Co. can accept the appointment as an auditor for 2 small companies, 1 dormant
company, 15 private companies having paid-up share capital less than Rs. 100 crore (private company
which has not committed a default in filing its financial statements under section 137 of the said Act or
annual return under section 92 of the said Act with the Registrar.”) and 60 private companies having paid-
up share capital of Rs. 115 crore each in addition to above 40 company audits already held.
68. (rtp- july 2021)
Victor & Co; a reputed Chartered Accountants firm is appointed as a Statutory auditor of Copper Man
Creations Limited. The Company is into manufacturing of robotic products. The Company has advanced
in all its endeavours by supplying million Copper suits. The Company has started the production of
version 10 under its flagship and tags it as “Why to worry about a vehicle, when you have steel man”.
The main idea of the Company evolved after the promoter watched the Marvel series Iron Man. The
product has been promoted by Robert Downy Jr as its product Brand Ambassador. The Company expects
itself to manufacture these prototypes and expects the old prototypes to be obsolete due to the demand
for version 10. Each version of the product has a separate department and promotes their sales under
the single flagship of ‘Copper Man’ and thus, the managerial decision making is left to each version
manager. You have assigned the ‘Fixed Assets area’ to Mr. Mamma Mia and he came out to you with the
following points.
You need to answer the questions raised by him and go through the notes prepared to reach a
reasonable conclusion over Property, Plant and Equipment FSLI (Financial Statement caption):
304

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
• The Company is holding the property in its name in Andaman & Nicobar while the land is registered in
another person’s name. The property is in dispute for the past 20 years. This is the major plant for the
Company and it is the critical success factor for the client. The Company’s 80% of the revenue is derived
from this factory. When enquired with management, it would have to incur huge costs to relocate and
the present advantageous conditions of the plant are very critical for the product manufactured. The
Company has not conducted the physical verification of fixed assets since last 10 years but it has
conducted the verification at other locations every year. When enquired with management, the
Company explained it is highly impossible as the plant is 24*7 running and it couldn’t be halted as the
restart of operations will cost huge amounts and a month’s time to get the Company back to current
position.
• The audit team has come across a transaction where the Company is enjoying the property rent free.
The audit team is of the opinion that the provisions of Benami transactions (Prohibition) Act, 1988 might
apply in such scenario. This should be evaluated as part of CARO reporting. No other procedures in this
regard need to be performed.
The Company follows the depreciation policy as per the Schedule II across all the factories even when the
factory at Andaman & Nicobar is the only factory that runs 24*7. The useful life has been taken as it is
mentioned in the Schedule II without modifications and the Company’s future prospects are good, there
are no impairment indications.
On the basis of the abovementioned facts, you are required to choose the most appropriate answer for
the following MCQs:
Question No.: (6-10)
1. The audit team has asked you about the Benami Transaction:
(a) There is no requirement for the auditor to report the transaction as there are no proceedings initiated
or pending against the Company under the Benami Transactions (Prohibition) Act, 1988.
(b) As the auditor is not sure about the transaction and did not gather proper evidence, he can ignore the
transaction. The auditor needs to obtain the representation letter and note the same as a follow up point
for the next year audit.
(c) The auditor needs to obtain the additional evidence about the transaction. He needs to assess the
situation as to its impact over the financial statements along-with consideration of SA 250. Thus, he
should consider the seriousness of matter and should assess the impact of the same over the report even
though it is not required to be reported as part of CARO.
(d) The auditor needs to report such matter as a part of CARO as it might turn into a potential issue
under the Benami Transactions (Prohibition) Act, 1988.
ANSWER- c
2. The audit team has asked you about the implications of dispute on the Property, Plant and Equipment
and whether any additional considerations/reporting are needed for the same:
(a) The dispute on account of Property, Plant and Equipment is a civil case and one or the other Company
may face such consequences. Thus, no additional audit procedures are required. However, auditor may
report this fact under CARO.
305

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
(b) The Property, Plant and Equipment is in dispute and the Company has to incur huge costs to identify
the ideal plant with same conditions. Thus, this might amount to material uncertainty on the Company’s
side to continue as a going concern. Thus, he needs to report the same. However, he need not to report
under CARO.
(c) The Property, Plant and Equipment is under dispute, the auditor needs to report it as a key audit
matter and request the Company to disclose it in notes to accounts in a single line that the property is in
dispute. However, he need not to report under CARO.
(d) The Company’s major line of business is from the factory, which is under dispute, the audit
team need to consider the status of the case and assess its implications over the going concern
assumption of the Company if it loses its case. It should also report it as part of Sec 143(3) about
the Company’s financial transactions or matters which have an adverse impact on the functioning of
the Company. It also needs to be reported as per CARO.
ANSWER- d
3. The audit team has asked you about the impairment of assets of the Company.
(a) The Company has no impairment condition as the Company expects positive future cash flows from
the assets and thus no need to assess the impairment.
(b) The Company need to assess the impairment condition for the assets and need to assess the fair
value of the assets used to generate income from the older versions. The auditee needs to take a
decision based on the cash inflows of a Company as a whole for assessing the existence of the
impairment condition.
(c) There exists an impairment condition as the Company does not expect much business from the older
versions due to anticipation of the huge demand of the new product. The Company need to assess the
cash inflows at each version level.
(d) The Company need not assess impairment of assets as this is very common in dynamic industries
where the older versions become obsolete when the new one is introduced by the Company.
ANSWER- c
4. The audit team is sceptical about the Depreciation policy followed by the Company for the Andaman
and Nicobar plant:
(a) As the Company is following the Schedule II, the depreciation policy and the useful life is in line with
the Companies Act, 2013. Hence the Company’s depreciation policy is good to go.
(b) As the Company is operating the plant 24*7, it will be eligible for extra shift depreciation as per
Schedule II. For the assets where the condition of extra shift depreciation does not exist, the Company
will be eligible to claim 50% extra depreciation as per schedule II.
(c) As the Schedule III is applicable for the whole Company, the policy including useful life for the assets
need to be same. There cannot be different useful lives for different assets across different locations.
Thus, the depreciation policy of the Company is good to go.
306

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
(d) As the Company is operating the plant 24*7, it will be referred to as continuous process plant. For the
assets where the condition of extra shift depreciation does not exist, the Company will not be eligible to
claim 100% extra depreciation as per Schedule II.
ANSWER- d
5. The audit team has raised a question over hiring an international brand ambassador for an Indian
product and raised concerns over the contract of the same:
(a) The auditor has no role to play in such scenario as the selection of brand ambassador and the
running the business lies with the management. The auditor needs to go through the
agreements entered, payments made etc.
(b) The auditor needs to inform the Central Government as this might constitute a serious non-
compliance of laws and regulations. The auditor should also assess the integrity of the management
about the appointment of the foreign brand ambassador.
(c) As per the SA 250, “Consideration of laws and regulations in an audit of Financials Statements” the
auditor needs to assess such matters as it is a legal violation to hire an international brand ambassador
ignoring the local people. The audit team need to consider the same and report in its audit report about
such implications.
(d) The auditor needs to qualify its audit report as the Company is against the “Vocal for Local” policy.
The auditor needs to highlight the same in its audit report as this may lead to a serious brand
deterioration of the Company.
ANSWER- a
69. Below is an extract from the list of supplier statements as at 31st March 2020 held by the Company
and corresponding payables ledger balances at the same date along with some commentary on the
noted differences: (rtp- july 2021)
Supplier Statement balance Payables ledger

Rs. '000 balance
Rs. '000
Cete Company 80 60
Lice Company 185 115
The difference in the balance of Cete Company is due to an invoice which is under dispute due to
defective goods which were returned on 30th March 2020. Which of the following audit procedures
should be carried out to confirm the balance owing to Cete Company?
(I) Review post year-end credit notes for evidence of acceptance of return.
(II) Inspect pre year-end goods returned note in respect of the items sent back to the supplier
(III) Inspect post year-end cash book for evidence that the amount has been settled.
307

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
(a) 1, 2 and 3.
(b) 1 and 3 only.
(c) 1 and 2 only.
(d) 2 and 3 only.
ANSWER- c
70. Direction by Tribunal in case auditor acted in a fraudulent manner. (rtp- july 2021) (rtp- nov 2021)
ANSWER
Direction by Tribunal in case auditor acted in a fraudulent manner: As per sub-section (5) of the section
140, the Tribunal either suo motu or on an application made to it by the Central Government or by any
person concerned, if it is satisfied that the auditor of a company has, whether directly or indirectly, acted in
a fraudulent manner or abetted or colluded in any fraud by, or in relation to, the company or its directors
or officers, it may, by order, direct the company to change its auditors.
However, if the application is made by the Central Government and the Tribunal is satisfied that any
change of the auditor is required, it shall within fifteen days of receipt of such application, make an order
that he shall not function as an auditor and the Central Government may appoint another auditor in his
place.
It may be noted that an auditor, whether individual or firm, against whom final order has been passed by
the Tribunal under this section shall not be eligible to be appointed as an auditor of any company for a
period of five years from the date of passing of the order and the auditor shall also be liable for action
under section 447.
It is hereby clarified that the case of a firm, the liability shall be of the firm and that of every partner or
partners who acted in a fraudulent manner or abetted or colluded in any fraud by, or in relation to, the
company or its director or officers.
71. VAS Ltd, a subsidiary of KEP Ltd. is engaged in the business of manufacturing fertilizers. 15% shares of
KEP Ltd are held by the Central Government, 25% by Kerala Government and 20% by Karnataka
Government. M/s ABC & Associate, a firm of Chartered Accountants, has been appointed as first
statutory auditor of VAS Ltd by its Board of Directors. You are required to suggest which of the following
statements would be correct. (mtp nov 20)
(a) The first auditor of VAS Ltd shall be appointed by the Comptroller and Auditor- General of India
within 60 days from the date of registration.
(b) The first auditor of VAS Ltd shall be appointed by the Comptroller and Auditor- General of India
within 180 days from the date of registration.
(c) The first auditor of VAS Ltd shall be appointed by members in EGM within 30 days from the date of
registration.
(d) The first auditor of VAS Ltd shall be appointed by the Board of Directors within 30 days from the date
of registration.
308

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
ANSWER- a
72. R Limited has been paying dividend consistently over 15% year on year. The Financial year 2019-20
was so very bad for the Company and it was not possible for the Company to maintain the payment of
consistent dividend as mentioned above. The Management, being hopeful of recovery of its performance
in next year, felt that the depreciation of the year to the extent of 65% alone be charged to the
Statement of Profit and Loss and the remaining 35% be kept in a separate account code in the Balance
Sheet- 'Debit Balances Adjustable against Revenue account'. The Management was of the view that it
would be fair practice of accounting if the depreciation for assets is charged before the expiry of the life
of assets and the amount parked in asset code as above would unfailingly be adjusted to Revenue before
the close of next financial year anyway. Analyse the issues involved and state how the Auditor should
decide on this matter. (5 Marks)
(mtp nov 20)
ANSWER
Provision of Depreciation :Section 123(1) of the Companies Act, 2013 provides that dividend cannot be
declared or paid by a company for any financial year except out of profits of the company for that year
arrived at after providing for depreciation in accordance with the provisions of Section 123(2), or out of the
profits or the company for any previous financial year or years arrived at after providing for depreciation in
the manner aforementioned and remaining undistributed, or out of both. Further, it is the duty of auditor
to check whether the depreciation was provided according to provision of AS 10 / IND AS 16/Schedule II to
the Act.
In the instant case, R Limited is in the practice of maintaining consistent dividend payment over a minimum
of 15%. Due to bad financial condition, company has not provided for dividend for the year 2019-20. In
addition to this management has also taken decision to charge 65% of the depreciation in the statement of
Profit and Loss whereas 35% of the depreciation amount kept in a separate account code in the Balance
Sheet – ‘Debit Balances Adjustable against Revenue Account’.
Contention of management that it would be in fair practice of accounting where the depreciation of asset is
charged before the expiry of the life of assets and the amount parked in asset code would unfailingly be
adjusted to revenue before the close of next financial year is not tenable.
The practice of the company in not charging the depreciation and accumulating 35% of it in a debit balance
for being written of in the next year is not an acceptable accounting treatment. If dividend is declared in
such situation, it would mean payment out of capital.
Therefore, the auditor of the company should ensure the compliance of provisions of section 123 and
Schedule II. In case the management does not comply with the provisions and does not charge the 100%
depreciation, the auditor of the company should discuss and suggest the correct treatment to the
management and if the management refuses to correct, the auditor should qualify his report accordingly.
73. AJ Associates a chartered accountant firm is acting as an auditor of the XYZ Ltd. Provisions of the cost
audit are also applicable to the XYZ Ltd. Two years ago, ABC Associates was appointed as cost auditor of
the XYZ Ltd. However, this year due to some reason the Cost Auditor firm resigned. The management
being of the opinion that AJ Associates being the auditor of the company knows everything about the
309
company so AJ Associates should be appointed as the cost auditor of the XYZ Ltd for the current year.

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
Select the correct statement with respect to the appointment of AJ Associates as the cost auditor of the
Company? (mtp – II -july 2021)
(i) Practicing CA/CWA/CMA can be appointed as cost auditor of the company, so appointment of AJ
Associates as cost auditor being a company auditor is valid.
(ii) Only Practicing CWA/CMA can be appointed as cost auditor of the company, but appointment of AJ
Associates as cost auditor being a company auditor is invalid.
(iii) Company Auditor can be appointed as cost auditor subject to fulfilment of certain conditions as
specified under section 148 of the Companies Act 2013.
(iv) Company Auditor cannot be appointed as cost auditor of the company.
(a) (i) and (ii).
(b) (ii) and (iv).
(c) (ii) and (iii).
(d) (i) and (iv).
ANSWER- b
74. VM Ltd., a company wholly owned by Central Government was disinvested during the previous year,
resulting in 45% of the shares being held by public. The shares were also listed on the BSE. Since the
shares were listed, all the listing requirements were applicable, including publication of quarterly results,
submission of information to the BSE etc.
Gautam, the Finance Manager of the Company is of the opinion that now the company is subject to
stringent control by BSE and the markets, therefore the auditing requirements of a limited company in
private sector under the Companies Act 2013 would be applicable to the company and the C&AG will not
have any role to play. Comment. (4 Marks) (mtp – I -july 2021)
ANSWER
Section 2(45) of the Companies Act, 2013, defines a “Government Company” as a company in which not
less than 51% of the total voting power is held by the Central Government or by any State Government or
Governments or partly by the Central Government and partly by one or more State Governments, and
includes a company which is a subsidiary company of such a Government company. The auditors of these
government companies are firms of Chartered Accountants, appointed by the Comptroller & Auditor
General, who gives the auditor directions on the manner in which the audit should be conducted by them.
In the given scenario, VM Ltd., a company wholly owned by Central Government was disinvested during the
previous year, resulting in 45% of the shares being held by public. Since, shares were listed on the BSE
therefore all the listing requirements were applicable.
Opinion of Finance Manager of the Company Mr. Gautam that since company is subject to stringent control
by BSE and the markets, therefore the auditing requirements of a limited company in private sector under
the Companies Act 2013 would be applicable to the Company and the C&AG will not have any role to play,
is not correct as listing of company’s shares on a stock exchange is irrelevant for this purpose
310

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
75. Mr. Raj, the engagement partner of R.O.K. & Co., in connection with statutory audit of Waria Ltd.,
had assigned the responsibility of enquiring into propriety matters of the Company as required by
section 143(1) of the Companies Act, 2013, to Mr. Samay, an engagement team member. Mr. Samay
while making such enquiries, was having following queries, as tabulated below, which he ought to get
resolved from Mr. Raj, as follows:- (mtp – I -july 2021)
Sr. No. Query of Mr. Samay

1 What documents to be seen in case of loan given by the company in lieu of
hypothecation of goods from lender as a security for the purpose of reporting as per
clause (a) of section 143(1) of the Companies Act, 2013?
2 What shall be the cost of Debentures and Bonus Shares sold by the company for which
the cost is not ascertainable for the purpose of reporting as per clause (c) of section
143(1) of the Companies Act, 2013?
3 Whether the shares allotted by Waria Ltd. against a loan taken by it from a NBFC can
be considered to be allotted for cash for the purpose of reporting as per clause (f) of
section 143(1) of the Companies Act, 2013?
Assuming that you are Mr. Raj the engagement partner, please provide answer to the queries of Mr.
Samay? (6 Marks)
ANSWER
Sr. No. Query of Mr. Samay Response to Query

1 What documents to be seen in case of loan Mr. Samay should see deed of
given by the company in lieu of Hypothecation or other document
hypothecation of goods from lender as a creating the charge, together with a
security for the purpose of reporting as per statement of stocks held at the balance
clause (a) of section 143(1) of the sheet date in order.
Companies Act, 2013?
2 What shall be the cost of Debentures and For Debentures sold: Where the cost of
Bonus Shares sold by the company for debentures sold is not ascertainable, the
which the cost is not ascertainable for the book value thereof at the date of sale may
purpose of reporting as per clause (c) of be treated as the cost for the purposes of
section 143(1) of the Companies Act, 2013? this clause.
For Bonus Shares sold: When bonus shares
are received, the number of shares in the
portfolio would be increased by the bonus
shares while the cost of the total portfolio
would remain the same as before. The
result would be that the average cost per
unit of the total holding would come down
proportionately. The usual accounting
practice for apportioning the cost of a part
of the total holding on the sale thereof is
to take it at its average cost.
311

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
3 Whether the shares allotted by Waria Ltd. The law on the subject has hitherto been
against a loan taken by it from a NBFC can that, where the consideration for the issue
be considered to be allotted for cash for of shares is an adjustment against a bona
the purpose of reporting as per clause (f) of fide debt payable in money on demand by
section 143(1) of the Companies Act, 2013? the company, the shares are deemed to
have been subscribed in cash (vide the
decision in Spargo’s Case – 1873, 8, Ch. A.
407). According to the legal opinion
obtained by the ICAI, the expression
“shares allotted for cash” may also include
shares allotted against a debt. Therefore,
in cases which are covered by the decision
in Spargo’s case, no comment is required
by the auditor, even though the company
may have in the Return of Allotment
under Section 75, shown such shares as
allotted against adjustment of a debt.
Thus, the shares allotted by Waria Ltd.
against a loan taken by it from a NBFC can
be considered to be allotted for cash.
76. (mtp – I -july 2021)

CA D was a practicing Chartered Accountant in Kolkata from last 15 years. He was appointed as
the statutory auditor of Giant Motors Ltd, a listed entity, which was involved in the business of
manufacturing of motor cars for FY 2021-22. CA D was appointed as joint auditor along with CA
T and CA P. They have divided the responsibility for conducting audit in accordance with SA 299. As
the company has huge amount of property, plant and equipment, it was decided that all 3 auditors will
verify the records relevant to property, plant and equipment. While forming an opinion, CA D was having
a different opinion on property, plant and equipment but CA T and CA P were having same opinion. CA D
wants to qualify capitalisation of post-acquisition costs incurred on machinery whereas CA T and CA P
were of the opinion that the treatment done by Giant Motor is correct. Both of them contended that as
they are forming a majority,
CA D will have to certify common audit report which is in accordance with the opinion of CA T and CA P.
While assessing the applicability of CARO, 2020, CA D found that issued share capital of Giant Motors Ltd
is Rs. 500 crore along with Rs. 30 crore of calls which are being unpaid as they are receivable from retail
investors. In the month of July 2021, Giant Motors Ltd. forfeited shares of worth Rs. 10 crore.
There were no reserve and surplus as it was transferred to parent entity. Also, along with equity shares
of Rs. 300 crore, there was preference share capital of Rs. 200 crore. CA T while reporting under clause
(vi) of CARO, 2016 did not report anything under clause (vi) of CARO 2020 as the government has not
ordered Giant Motors Ltd. to conduct cost audit for its books of account. Hence CA T did not report
anything under clause (vi). Giant Motors Ltd has a total number of 11 directors. Mr. Talent is the
Executive Chairman of the company. Out of 11 directors, 5 were independent directors.
Mrs. D was not aware that CA D was the statutory auditor of Giant Motors Ltd. She purchased shares of
Giant Motors Ltd worth Rs. 1,50,000 (book value) on 3rd October 2020 but when she came to know
about the statutory auditor of Giant Motors Ltd, she sold her shares on 10th November 2022. One of the
shareholders of Giant Motors Ltd contended that CA D is disqualified and shall vacate his office of
statutory auditor.
312

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
1. Can you please guide whether CA D really needs to go with the opinion formed by CA T and CA P or
not?
(a) CA D will have to go with the opinion formed by majority auditors.
(b) CA D can add a separate audit opinion paragraph in the common audit report and the same should be
highlighted in emphasis of matter paragraph.
(c) CA D can go with the opinion formed by the majority auditors, but CA D had a difference of opinion
should be highlighted in emphasis of matter paragraph.
(d) CA D can altogether issue a separate audit report and reference of other audit report issued by
majority auditors should be made in the emphasis of matter paragraph.
ANSWER- d
2. What should have been CA D’s opinion on applicability of CARO, 2020 for FY 2021-22 assuming
forfeited shares are not included in equity share capital?
(a) CARO will be applicable as paid up share capital and reserves are Rs. 480 crore which is more than Rs.
1 crore.
(b) CARO will be applicable as paid up share capital and reserves are Rs. 480 crore which is more than Rs.
10 crore.
(c) CARO will be applicable as paid up share capital and reserves are Rs. 280 crore which is more than Rs.
1 crore.
(d) CARO will be applicable as paid up share capital and reserves are Rs. 280 crore which is more than Rs.
10 crore.
ANSWER- a
3. Was the approach followed by CA T for not reporting under clause (vi) of CARO correct?
(a) Yes, as reporting under said clause is required only if the Giant Motors Ltd were ordered by
government to conduct cost audit under section 148(1).
(b) Yes, reporting under this clause is only applicable to entities involved in production of electricity.
313

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
(c) No, Clause (vi) should be reported irrespective of whether Giant Motors Limited has been ordered to
conduct cost audit by the Central Government or not.
(d) No, should be reported only if there is any discrepancy found while examining the cost records.
ANSWER- c
4. Was there any non-compliance on the part of Giant Motors Ltd in case of appointment of independent
directors?
(a) No, there was no non- compliance as independent directors were more than 2 directors specified in
the Companies Act, 2013.
(b) Yes, there was a non-compliance as there should have been more than 6 independent directors
specified in Regulation 17 and Regulation 17A.
(c) No, there was no non-compliance as independent directors were 5, which is more than 2/3 of the
total directors in accordance with Regulations 17 and Regulation 17A.
(d) Yes, there was a non-compliance as all the directors should have been independent directors except
the Chairman of the company.
ANSWER- b
5. Was the contention of shareholder that CA D should vacate the office of statutory auditor correct?
(a) No, as Mrs. D has sold the shares within a grace period of 60 days.
(b) No, as Mrs. D is holding shares of less than book value of Rs. 2,00,000.
(c) Yes, as Mrs. D has purchased shares which are more than book value of Rs.1,00,000.
(d) Yes, as Mrs. D hold share during the financial year and his husband is statutory auditor of Giant
Motors Ltd.
ANSWER- a
77. (RTP- NOV 2021)

Kiwspack Ltd. is an unlisted public company incorporated in the year 2009, having 90 shareholders with
an equity share capital of ₹ 27 lakhs. There are total four directors in its board.
For the financial year 2020-21 as well as for the quarter ended on 30th June, 2021, Kiwspack Ltd. had
suffered a loss. Despite of such loss, the board of Kiwspack Ltd. declared a total interim dividend of ₹ 20
lakhs for quarter ended March, 2021 on 25th April, 2021.
314

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
The details of dividends declared by Kiwspack Ltd. during preceding financial years are tabulated, as
below:-
Financial Year Rate of Dividend
Declared
2019-20 12%
2018-19 16%
2017-18 10%
2016-17 15%
2015-16 20%
2014-15 14%
The said dividend was paid to the shareholders on 10th June, 2021, through account payee cheque, by
withdrawing an amount of 5% from the total free reserves available with Kiwspack Ltd. The balance of
free reserves after such withdrawal fell to 20% of its paid up share capital as appearing in the latest
audited financial statements.
One of the shareholders, Mr. Mahesh, had submitted a transfer deed to the company on 28th April,
2021, for registration relating to transfer of all shares held by him in Kiwspack Ltd. in the name of Mr.
Govardhan, along with an authorization letter for paying the amount of dividend on his shares to Mr.
Govardhan.
However, till 10th June, 2020, due to certain reasons, Kiwspack Ltd. could not register the aforesaid
transfer of shares in the name of Mr. Govardhan.
The dividend remaining unpaid of ₹ 2 lakhs was transferred to the unpaid dividend account by the
company on 15th June, 2021.
Kiwspack Ltd. prepared a statement on 30th September, 2021, containing the names of shareholders to
whom payment of dividend had remained pending, their last known addresses and the amount of
dividend to be paid to them. The said statement was placed on the same date on the company’s website
and also on the website approved by the Central Government for this purpose.
Rao & Co. is the statutory auditor of Kiwspack Ltd. for F.Y. 2020-21 which issued its audit report on 30th
June, 2021 on the financial statements approved on 20th June, 2021.
Question No.: (1-5)
1. At what maximum rate, the board of Kiwspack Ltd. would have declared the interim dividend for
quarter ended March, 2021?
(a) 10.6%.
(b) 12.67%.
(c) 14.5%.
(d) 15%.
ANSWER- b
2. How much amount of interest shall be payable by Kiwspack Ltd. for delay in payment of dividend to
the shareholders?
(a) ₹ 13,151.
315

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
(b) ₹ 8,877.
(c) ₹ 10,521.
(d) ₹ 15,781.
ANSWER- d
3. In which account, Kiwspack Ltd. would have transferred the dividend amount in relation to shares
which were held by Mr. Mahesh?
(a) Account of Mr. Mahesh.
(b) Account of Mr. Govardhan.
(c) Unpaid Dividend Account.
(d) Investor Education and Protection Fund.
ANSWER- b
4. How much maximum amount of fine could be levied on every director of the company who was
knowingly a party to the default in payment of dividend to the shareholders?
(a) ₹ 9,000.
(b) ₹ 11,000.
(c) ₹ 16,000.
(d) ₹ 1,00,000.
ANSWER- c
5. By what date, the unpaid or unclaimed dividend amount should have been transferred to Unpaid
Dividend Account and also by what date, the statement in relation to details of such Unpaid Dividend
should have been prepared by Kiwspack Ltd. and placed on its website?
(a) 01st June, 2021 and 13th September, 2021, respectively.
(b) 25th May, 2021 and 15th July, 2021, respectively.
(c) 01st June, 2021 and 15th July, 2021, respectively.
(d) 25th May, 2021 and 13th September, 2021, respectively.
ANSWER- a
78. (RTP- NOV 2021)

AB & Co. were appointed auditors for NOME Limited, a listed company, for the term of two five
consecutive years from 2010-11, 2011-12, 2012-13, 2013-14, 2014-15, 2015-16, 2016-17, 2017-
18, 2018-19, 2019-20. As per the provision of the section 139(2)(b) “No listed company or a
company belonging to such class or classes of companies as may be prescribed, shall appoint or
re-appoint an audit firm as auditor for more than two terms of five consecutive years”.
316

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
Hence, Management of NOME Limited reached out (based on the recommendation of Audit
Committee) to BCD & Co. for their nomination as the appointment of Statutory Auditor for the
financial year 2020-21. However, BCD & Co. did not provide any written consent to such
appointment neither they provided a certificate that the appointment, if made, shall be in
accordance with the conditions laid in the Act and Rules therein.
Still the management went ahead and proposed an appointment in AGM and BCD & Co. were
appointed as an auditor for the financial year 2020-21. Post appointment, those charged with
governance identified that majority of the partners in the BCD & Co. are same which were there
in AB & Co. Now, fearing the contravention of the provision of Companies Act, 2013.
Management, on guidance of those charged with governance, decided to file a complaint with
tribunal under section 140(5) of the Companies Act against statutory auditors.
You are required to guide the BCD & Co. regarding the contravention of the provisions of the
Companies Act, 2013 with respect to appointment of Auditor.
ANSWER
As per section 139(1) of the Companies Act, 2013, every company shall, at the first annual general
meeting, appoint an individual or a firm as an auditor who shall hold office from the conclusion of
that meeting till the conclusion of its sixth annual general meeting and thereafter till the
conclusion of every sixth meeting and the manner and procedure of selection of auditors by the
members of the company at such meeting shall be such as may be prescribed.
It may be noted further that before such appointment is made, the written consent of the auditor
to such appointment, and a certificate from him or it that the appointment, if made, shall be in
accordance with the conditions as may be prescribed, shall be obtained from the auditor.
It may also be noted that the certificate shall also indicate whether the auditor satisfies the
criteria provided in section 141 of the Companies Act, 2013.
Further, as per section 139(2), “(2) No listed company or a company belonging to such class or
classes of companies as may be prescribed, shall appoint or re-appoint (a) an individual as auditor
for more than one term of five consecutive years; and (b) an audit firm as auditor for more than
two terms of five consecutive years.
It may also be noted further that as on the date of appointment no audit firm having a common
partner or partners to the other audit firm, whose tenure has expired in a company immediately
preceding the financial year, shall be appointed as auditor of the same company for a period of
five years:”
In the current case, while appointing the auditors of the company a written consent of the auditor
to such appointment was not obtained. Moreover a certificate from him that the appointment if
made shall be in accordance with the conditions laid down in the Act and Rules was also not
obtained. Further, majority of the partners of AB & Co. were partners in BCD & Co. AB & Co.
already served two terms of five consecutive years i.e., from 2010-11 to 2019-20 as a statutory
auditor of the company.
317

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
Hence, BCD & Co. were not eligible to be appointed as an auditor of NOME Limited as all partners
of BCD & Co are partner of AB & Co. who have already served two terms of five consecutive years
as an auditor of NOME Limited. Since, before the appointment of Statutory Auditor, the
management should have obtained the required certification and written consent from BCD & Co.,
therefore, in this case both, the management and the auditors have contravened the provision of
the Companies Act, 2013 as a result fine as per section 147 of Companies Act will be applicable i.e.
if any of the provisions of sections 139 to 146 (both inclusive) is contravened, the company shall
be punishable with fine which shall not be less than twenty-five thousand rupees but which may
extend to five lakh rupees and every officer of the company who is in default shall be punishable
with fine which shall not be less than ten thousand rupees but which may extend to one lakh
rupees. If an auditor of a company contravenes any of the provisions of section 139, section 144
or section 145, the auditor shall be punishable with fine which shall not be less than twenty-five
thousand rupees, but which may extend to five lakh rupees or four times the remuneration of the
auditor, whichever is less.
It may be noted that if an auditor has contravened such provisions knowingly or willfully with the
intention to deceive the company or its shareholders or creditors or tax authorities, he shall be
punishable with imprisonment for a term which may extend to one year and with fine which shall
not be less than fifty thousand rupees, but which may extend to twenty-five lakh rupees or eight
times the remuneration of the auditor, whichever is less.

M/s ALM Ltd. is into the business of trading of toys since 2001. The company was performing well
till year 2015 and after that sales started showing downward trend. The Company had borrowed
working capital funds from LP Bank Ltd. On 01.08.2020, account of the borrower was classified as
NPA. Bank appointed forensic auditor, to identify, if any diversion of funds is there or not. Forensic
auditor confirmed the diversion of funds. Matter went to the court of law and company was asked
to recast its financial statements for the last 5 years. Management contended that Companies Act,
2013 does not allow recasting for more than three preceding financial years. Do you agree with
the views of the management?
ANSWER
Recasting of financial statements -

Re-opening of accounts on Court’s or Tribunal’s orders: Section 130 of the Companies Act, 2013
states that a company shall not re-open its books of account and not recast its financial
statements, unless an application in this regard is made by the Central Government, the Income-
tax authorities, the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI), any other statutory regulatory
body or authority or any person concerned and an order is made by a court of competent
jurisdiction or the Tribunal to the effect that—
(i) the relevant earlier accounts were prepared in a fraudulent manner; or
(ii) the affairs of the company were mismanaged during the relevant period, casting a doubt on
the reliability of financial statements.
318

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
The Order for reopening of accounts not to be made beyond eight financial years immediately
preceding the current financial year unless and until Government has, under Section 128(5),
issued a direction for keeping books of account longer than 8 years, reopening of accounts can be
made for such longer period.
However, a notice shall be given by the Court or Tribunal in this regard and shall take into
consideration the representations, if any.
Keeping in view above, the contention of the ALM Ltd that the Companies Act, 2013 does not
allow recasting for more than three preceding financial years is incorrect.
M/s GH & Associates have been appointed as Central Statutory Auditors of BNB Bank, a
nationalized bank, headquartered in New Delhi for the F.Y 2020-2021. Bank functions in
automated environment using "FLC Software". While preparing audit report, one of the partner
highlighted that some matters covered by Companies Act, 2013 and the requirements of
Companies (Auditor's Report), Order, 2016 reporting: You are required to answer the following:
(j) To which authority auditors should submit their audit report?
(ii) List the matters covered under Companies Act, 2013 and
(iii) Reporting under Companies (Auditor's Report), Order, 2020.
ANSWER
(i) Authority to whom Auditors to submit their Audit Report -

In the case of a nationalised bank, the auditor is required to make a report to the Central
Government.
So, GH & Associates, Central Statutory Auditors of BNB Bank- a nationalized bank, would be
required to submit their report to Central Govt.
(ii) The auditor of a banking company is also required to state in the report the matters covered by
Section 143 of the Companies Act, 2013.
1. Report on adequacy and operating effectiveness of Internal Controls over Financial Reporting in
case of banks which are registered as companies under the Companies Act in terms of Section
143(3)(i) of the Companies Act, 2013 which is normally to be given as an Annexure to the main
audit report as per the Guidance Note on Audit of Internal Financial Controls over Financial
Reporting issued by the ICAI.
2. Report on whether any serious irregularity was noticed in the working of the bank which
requires immediate attention (in accordance with sec 143(12) of the Companies Act, 2013.)
3. As per reporting requirements cast through Rule 11 of the Companies (Audit and Auditors)
Rules, 2014 the auditor’s report shall also include their views and comments on the following
matters, namely:
(a) Whether the bank has disclosed the impact, if any, of the pending litigations on its financial
position in its financial statements.
319

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
(b) Whether the bank has made provision, as required under the law or accounting standards, for
material foreseeable losses, if any, on long term contracts including derivative contracts.
(c) Whether there has been any delay in transferring amounts, required to be transferred to the
Investor Education and Protection Fund by the bank.
(iii) Reporting requirements relating to the Companies (Auditor’s Report) Order, 2020 are not
applicable to a banking company as defined in clause (c) of section 5 of the Banking Regulation
Act, 1949.
81. ( MTP- NOV 2021)

Rishabh Finance Ltd. is a Non-Banking Finance Company and was in the business of accepting
public deposits and giving loans since 2015. The company was having net owned funds of ₹
1,50,00,000/-(one crore fifty lakh) and was not having registration certificate from RBI and applied
for it on 30th March 2022. The company appointed Mr. Gautam as its statutory auditors for the
year 2021-22. Advise the auditor with reference to auditor procedures to be taken and reporting
requirements on the same in view of CARO 2020?
ANSWER
As per Clause (xvi) of Paragraph 3 of CARO 2020, the auditor is required to report that “whether
the company is required to be registered under section 45-IA of the Reserve Bank of India Act,
1934 and if so, whether the registration has been obtained.”
The auditor is required to examine whether the company is engaged in the business which attract
the requirements of the registration. The registration is required where the financing activity is a
principal business of the company. The RBI restrict companies from carrying on the business of a
non-banking financial institution without obtaining the certificate of registration.
Audit Procedures and Reporting:

(i) The auditor should examine the transactions of the company with relation to the activities
covered under the RBI Act and directions related to the Non-Banking Financial Companies.
(ii) The financial statements should be examined to ascertain whether company’s financial assets
constitute more than 50 per cent of the total assets and income from financial assets constitute
more than 50 per cent of the gross income.
(iii) Whether the company has net owned funds as required for the registration as NBFC.
(iv) Whether the company has obtained the registration as NBFC, if not, the reasons should be
sought from the management and documented.
(v) The auditor should report incorporating the following:-
(1) Whether the registration is required under section 45-IA of the RBI Act, 1934.
(2) If so, whether it has obtained the registration.
(3) If the registration not obtained, reasons thereof.

320

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
In the instant case Rishabh Finance Ltd. is a Non Banking Finance Company and was in the
business of accepting public deposits and giving loans since 2015. The company was having net
owned funds of ₹ 1,50,00,000/-(one crore fifty lakhs) which is less in comparison to the prescribed
limit i.e. 2 crore rupees and was also not having registration certificate from RBI (though applied
for it on 30th March 2022). The auditor is required to report on the same as per Clause (xvi) of
Paragraph 3 of CARO 2020.
82. ( MTP- NOV 2021)

Gem Ltd. is an exporter of precious and semi-precious stones. The turnover of the company is ₹ 150 crore,
out of which ₹ 105 crore is from export business and remaining ₹ 45 crore from domestic sales. Amount
received from export business is all in foreign currency. Directors of Gem Ltd. are of the opinion that cost
audit is not applicable to their company as maximum revenue has been generated from export business.
Give your opinion.
ANSWER
Cost Audit Rules not to apply in certain cases: The requirement for cost audit shall not be applicable to a
company whose revenue from exports, in foreign exchange, exceeds seventy-five per cent of its total
revenue (as per Rule 3 of the Companies (Cost Records and Audit) Rules, 2014).
In the instant case, Gem Ltd. is an exporter of precious and semi-precious stones and the turnover of the
company is rupees 150 crore out of which rupees 105 crore i.e. 70% is from export business and remaining
rupees 45 crore i.e. 30% from domestic sales. Thus, opinion of director is not tenable as revenue from
exports in foreign exchanges is below prescribed limit. Therefore, cost audit is applicable on Gem Ltd. as
per Rule 3 of the Companies (Cost Records and Audit) Rules, 2014. Gem Ltd. has to appoint cost auditor to
get the cost accounts of the company audited.
83. ( MTP- NOV 2021)

Whilst the Audit team has identified various matters, they need your advice to include the same in
your audit report in view of CARO 2016: -
(i) The Company is in the process of selling its office along with the freehold land available at Pune
and is actively on the lookout for potential buyers. Whilst the same was purchased at ₹ 20 Lakh in
2006, the current market value is ₹ 200 Lakh. This property is pending to be registered in the
name of the Company, due to certain procedural issues associated with the Registration though
the Company is having a valid possession and has paid its purchase cost in full. The Company has
disclosed this amount under Fixed Assets though no disclosure of non-registration is made in the
notes forming part of the accounts.
(ii) The Internal Auditor of the Company has identified a fraud in the recruitment of employees by
the HR department wherein certain sums were alleged to have been taken as kick-back from the
employees for taking them on board with the Company. After due investigation, the concerned HR
Manager was sacked. The amount of such kickbacks is expected to be in the range of ₹13.50 Lakh.
ANSWER
(i) As per clause (i) (c) of para 3 of CARO 2020 the auditor is required to report, “whether the
title deeds of immovable properties are held in the name of the company. If not, provide the
details thereof.”
321

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
In the present case, the Company has office along with freehold land in Pune. Though
company has paid its purchase cost in full however, this property is pending to be registered in the
name of the company i.e. title deed is not in the name of Company since 2006.
Therefore, the auditor is required to report the same in accordance with clause (i)(c) of para
3 of CARO 2020.
The reporting under this clause, where the title deeds of the immovable property are not
held in the name of the Company, may be made incorporating following details, in the form
of a table or otherwise in case of land:-
total number of cases,
whether leasehold / freehold,
gross block and net block, (as at Balance Sheet date), and
remarks, if any.
(ii) As per clause Clause (x) of para 3 of CARO 2020 the auditor is required to report, “whether
any fraud by the company or any fraud on the Company by its officers or employees has
been noticed or reported during the year; If yes, the nature and the amount involved is to be
indicated.”
In the instant case, a fraud has been identified in recruitment of employees by the HR
Department wherein certain sums were alleged to have been taken as kickback from the
company of amounting rupees approx. 13.50 lakh. The auditor is required to report on the
same in accordance with clause (x) of para 3 of CARO 2020.
83. ( MTP- NOV 2021)

Mr. Bharat was appointed as statutory auditor of N Limited and O Limited. Both the Companies
were having their base in Mumbai they had recently listed their shares on the Stock Exchange. For
the financial year 2020-21, Mr. Bharat had signed limited review reports for each quarter, till the
quarter ended 31st December 2020 for both the companies. Owing to his personal commitments
and increased workload, he tendered his resignation to N Limited on 30th January 2021 and asked
the Company to appoint another auditor to issue audit report for the remaining quarter and the
FY 2020-21 as a whole. But the management of the Company did not accept the same.
Mr. Bharat continued to as act as auditor for O limited. During the 1st week of March 2021, Mrs. D
(wife of Mr. Bharat) had borrowed a sum of Rs. 5.85 lakh from the Company for her personal use.
Having come to know about this, Mr. Bharat immediately informed the management that he had
been disqualified to act as auditor and told them that he won ’t issue audit report for last quarter.
But management of the Company argued that it’s the legal responsibility of Mr. Bharat to do the
same.
Whether contention of management of N Limited and O Limited is justified in asking Mr. Bharat to
issue audit report for the last quarter and the FY 2020-21 as a whole, despite his resignation?
Please comment on the above.
ANSWER
322

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
In the given scenario, Mr. Bharat was appointed as statutory auditor of two listed entities i.e., N
Limited and O Limited. For the financial year 2020-21, Mr. Bharat had signed limited review
reports for first three quarter i.e., till the quarter ended 31st December 2020 for both the
companies. Owing to his personal commitments and increased workload, he resigned from N
Limited and asked the Company to appoint another auditor to issue audit report for the remaining
quarter and audit report for the FY 2020-21.
Further, Mr. Bharat immediately informed the management of O Limited that he had been
disqualified to act as auditor and told them that he won ’t issue audit report for last quarter as
Mrs. D (wife of Mr. Bharat) had borrowed a sum of ₹ 5.85 lakh from the Company for her personal
use.
As per SEBI LODR Regulations, if the auditor has signed the limited review/ audit report for the
first three quarters of a financial year, then the auditor shall, before such resignation, issue the
limited review/ audit report for the last quarter of such financial year as well as the audit report
for such financial year. This provision will not apply if the auditor is disqualified due to Section 141
of the Companies Act, 2013.
Thus, in the given situation, in view of above conditions to be complied with upon resignation of
the statutory auditor of a listed entity/material subsidiary with respect to limited review / audit
report as per SEBI LODR Regulations, Mr. Bharat is required to issue the audit report for the last
quarter and audit report for the year 2020-21 for N Limited as he has issued audit report for the
first three quarters whereas Mr. Bharat is not required to issue the audit report for remaining
quarter and audit report for the year 2020-21 as a whole for O Limited as he is disqualified under
section 141 of Companies Act.
Accordingly, contention of Management of N Limited is correct and tenable for issuing the audit
report for remaining quarter and audit report for financial year 2020-21 however, contention of
management of O Limited is not correct regarding the legal responsibility of Mr. Bharat to issue
audit report for remaining quarter and for the whole year.
84(NOV21 EXAM)
Mr. Khanna has been appointed as statutory auditor of RST Ltd. for the financial year ended 31st
March, 2021. The financial statements of RST Ltd. are to be drawn up in compliance of the
Companies (Indian Accounting Standards) Rules, 2015. The Chief financial officer is of the view
that the disclosure requirements specified under Division II of Schedule III of the Companies Act,
2013 are complete and no other additional disclosures shall be made in the Notes or by way of
additional statements. Advise on the General instructions to be considered by RST Ltd. while
preparing its financial statements.
ANSWER :
General Instructions for Preparation of Financial Statement of a Company required to comply with
Ind-AS:
323

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
1. Every company to which Indian Accounting Standards apply, shall prepare its financial
statements in accordance with this Schedule or with such modification as may be required under
certain circumstances.
2. Where compliance with the requirements of the Act including Indian Accounting Standards
(except the option of presenting assets and liabilities in the order of liquidity as provided by
the relevant Ind AS) as applicable to the companies require any change in treatment or disclosure
including addition, amendment substitution or deletion in the head or sub-head or any changes
inter se, in the financial statements or statements forming part thereof, the same shall be made
and the requirements under this Schedule shall stand modified accordingly.
3. The disclosure requirements specified in this Schedule are in addition to and not in
substitution of the disclosure requirements specified in the Indian Accounting Standards.
Additional disclosures specified in the Indian Accounting Standards shall be made in the Notes or
by way of additional statement or statements unless required to be disclosed on the face of the
Financial Statements. Similarly, all other disclosures as required by the Companies Act, 2013 shall
be made in the Notes in addition to the requirements set out in this Schedule.
4. (i) Notes shall contain information in addition to that presented in the Financial
Statements and shall provide where required-
(a) narrative description or disaggregation of items recognised in those statements;

and
(b) information about items that do not qualify for recognition in those statements.
(ii) Each item on the face of the Balance Sheet, Statement of Changes in Equity and Statement of
Profit and Loss shall be cross-referenced to any related information in the Notes. In preparing the
Financial Statements including the Notes, a balance shall be maintained between providing
excessive detail that may not assist users of Financial Statements and not providing important
information as a result of too much aggregation.
5. Financial Statements shall contain the corresponding amounts (comparatives) for the
immediately preceding reporting period for all items shown in the Financial Statement including
Notes except in the case of first Financial Statements laid before the company after
incorporation.
6. Financial Statements shall disclose all 'material' items, i.e. the items if they could.
Individually or collectively, influence the economic decisions that users make on the basis of the
financial statements. Materiality depends on the size or nature of the item or a combination of
both, to be judged in the particular circumstances.
7. Where any Act or Regulation requires specific disclosure to be made in the standalone
financial statement of a company, the said disclosure shall be made in addition to those required
under this Schedule.
324

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
85(MAY 2022EXAM)
Jam Private Limited was engaged in business of manufacture of Cycles. CA Roy was appointed as a
Statutory Auditor of the Company for the financial year 2021-22. During the year under audit, Jam
Private Limited obtained working capital facilities from ABC Bank Limited for Rs. 10 crore
hypothecating the Stock of goods as primary security. On inquiry CA Roy was informed by
management that stock statements are furnished periodically to ABC Bank Limited and the details
of submission of quarterly stock statement are as follows:
Period of Stock Value as per Books Stock Value as per quarterly

Quarter of Account as at the end of statement submitted to ABC Bank
the quarter Limited as at the end of quarter
(` in crores) (` in crore)
Q1-2021-22 11.50 14.00
Q2-2021-22 14.75 17.00
Q3-2021-22 11.50 14.00
Q4-2021-22 15.25 15.25
The management of Jam Private Limited did not disclose the above variations in notes to accounts
forming part financial Statements of the Company for the year 2021 -22. The management replied
that there are no variations as on the Balance sheet date and further they are of the view that
stock statement furnished to bank is only a formality and computed arbitrarily only for the
purpose of securing higher drawing power and hence statutory auditors need not be bothered.
Is the contention of the management valid? As a Statutory Auditor how CA Roy should deal and
discuss the disclosure/reporting requirements if any, as per the Companies Act, 2013 and CARO,
2020. (5 Marks)
ANSWER :
As per clause (vii) of point Y of Schedule III to the Companies Act, 2013 - Division I - Financial
Statements for a company whose financial statements are required to comply with the Companies
(Accounting Standard) Rules, 2006, “where the company has borrowings from banks or financial
institutions on the basis of security of current assets, it shall disclose the following :
(a) whether quarterly returns or statements of current assets filed by the company with banks
or financial institutions are in agreement with the books of accounts.
(b) if not, summary of reconciliation and reasons of material discrepancies, if any to be

adequately disclosed.
Further, as per para 3(ii) (b) of CARO 2020, the auditor is required to report whether during any
point of time of the year, the company has been sanctioned working capital limits in excess of five
crore rupees, in aggregate, from banks or financial institutions on the basis of security of current
assets; whether the quarterly returns or statements filed by the company with such banks or
325

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
financial institutions are in agreement with the books of account of the Company, if not, give
details.
The above clause requires CA Roy to comment on whether during any point of time of the year,
the company has been sanctioned working capital limits in excess of Rs. 5 crores in aggregate. Jam
(P) Ltd. has been sanctioned working capital facilities/limit of Rs. 10 crores which is apparently in
excess of Rs. 5 crores.
Secondly, whether the quarterly returns filed by the Jam (P) Ltd. company with ABC Bank Ltd. are
in agreement with the book of accounts of the company.
According to the data given in the instant situation, it is clear that there are variations in Quarter
1, Quarter 2 & Quarter 3 requiring reporting under this clause because of difference in stock value
as per Book of Accounts & Stock Value as per Quarterly returns submitted to ABC Bank Ltd.
Therefore, Contention of the management is not valid.
CA. Roy should report the differences as per the Companies Act, 2013 and CARO 2020 as follows:
Stock value as per Stock value as per Variation

Book Accounts quarterly statement
(` in Crore) Submitted to ABC Bank
Ltd. (` in Crore)
Q-1 11.50 14.00 Excess reporting of stock
to Bank by 2.50 crore
to Bank by 2.25 Crore
to bank by 2.50 crore
86(OCT 2022 MTP)
Arihant Ltd. is into the business of trading of dolls since 2004. The company was performing well
till year 2015 and after that sales started showing downward trend. The Company had borrowed
working capital funds from LP Bank Ltd. On 17.10.2021, account of the borrower was classified as
NPA. Bank appointed forensic auditor, to identify, if any diversion of funds is there or not. Forensic
auditor confirmed the diversion of funds. Matter went to the court of law and company was asked
to recast its financial statements for the last 6 years. Management contended that Companies Act,
2013 does not allow recasting for more than five preceding financial years. Do you agree with the
views of the management?
ANSWER :
Recasting of financial statements - Re-opening of accounts on Court’s or Tribunal’s orders:

326

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
Section 130 of the Companies Act, 2013 states that a company shall not re-open its books of
account and not recast its financial statements, unless an application in this regard is made by the
Central Government, the Income-tax authorities, the Securities and Exchange Board of India
(SEBI), any other statutory regulatory body or authority or any person concerned and an order is
made by a court of competent jurisdiction or the Tribunal to the effect that—
(i) the relevant earlier accounts were prepared in a fraudulent manner; or
(ii) the affairs of the company were mismanaged during the relevant period, casting a doubt on
the reliability of financial statements.
The Order for reopening of accounts not to be made beyond eight f inancial years immediately
preceding the current financial year unless and until Government has, under Section 128(5),
issued a direction for keeping books of account longer than 8 years, reopening of accounts can be
made for such longer period.
However, a notice shall be given by the Court or Tribunal in this regard and shall take into
consideration the representations, if any.
Keeping in view above, the contention of the Arihant Ltd. that the Companies Act, 2013 does not
allow recasting for more than five preceding financial years is incorrect.
87(OCT 2022 MTP)
CA. A, the auditor of XYZ Limited resigned from the post due to his personal reasons. CA. B was
appointed as the subsequent auditor of the company by the Board of Directors. During the
conclusion of the audit for the FY, should CA. B mention about CA. A ’s resignation in the
Companies (Auditor’s Report) Order 2020?
(a) Yes. As per clause (xviii) of para 3 of CARO, CA. B should report the resignation of CA. A and
state if he has taken into consideration the issues or objections raised by CA. A.
(b) No. Since the resignation of CA. A is due to his own personal reason, the same need not be
reported under CARO.
(c) Yes. As per clause (xxi) of para 1 of CARO, CA. B should report the resignation of CA. A and
state if he has taken into consideration the issues or objections raised by CA. A.
(d) No. CARO 2020 does not state any requirements to report resignation of auditor. However,
the same needs to be mentioned by CA. B in the Audit Report under Other Matter Paragraph, as
per SA 706.
ANSWER : (A)
88 (OCT 2022 MTP)

327

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
CA. Ansh, the auditor of Rajul Limited, a company in which Government of Puducherry holds 49%
& a Central PSU holds 51% of the shares, resigned from the post on 1st June 2021 due to his
personal reasons. CA. Babu was appointed as the subsequent auditor of the company by the
board of directors on 16th June 2021. One of the shareholders came to know about this
information and contended that this appointment is not valid as per the provisions of Companies
Act. Is the contention of the shareholder, right? If so, why?
(a) No. The appointment of shareholder is valid since the appointment is made within 30 days
from the date of resignation of CA. Ansh.
(b) Yes. The appointment of shareholder is not valid. Since the appointment is made within 30
days from the date of resignation of CA. Ansh, it should have been done by the shareholders and
not the board of directors. Board of directors can make the appointment only i f no auditor is
appointed even beyond 60 days.
(c) Yes. Since the appointment is made within 30 days from the date of resignation of CA. Ansh,
it should have been done by C&AG and not by the Board of directors. Board of Directors can make
the appointment only if no auditor is appointed even beyond 30 days.
(d) Yes. The appointment of shareholder is not valid. Since the appointment is made within 30
days from the date of resignation of CA. Ansh, it should have been done by the shareholders and
not the board of directors. Board of directors can make the appointment only if no auditor is
appointed even beyond 30 days.
ANSWER : (C )
89 ( OCT 2022 MTP)
CA. Kamlesh Dutta was appointed as the engagement partner on behalf of Dutta & Associates for
conducting the statutory audit for 3rd consecutive year of Pramat Limited, an unlisted public
company, with a turnover of
Rs. 35 crore during F.Y. 2019-20.
From F.Y. 2020-21 onwards, Pramat Limited had voluntarily adopted to prepare its financial
statements as per Division II of Schedule III of the Companies Act, 2013, due to which Dutta &
Associates had revised the terms of audit engagement for the current audit engagement. As per
the revised terms, it was decided that the auditor’s report on the financial statements will
incorporate a paragraph in accordance with SA 706, drawing users’ attention to the additional
disclosures. Moreover, it was decided that management will also present appropriate disclosures
in Financial Statement with respect to this change.
While auditing the entity, CA. Kamlesh came across a business policy of Pramat Limited that
required to invest some portion of its money earned in its business in securities of different blue-
chip companies and due to this reason, almost 55% of Pramat Limited’s total assets consisted of
328

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
such investments. These securities transactions were handled by its broker company, River
Securities Private Limited (RSPL). RSPL was also performing necessary investment account
reconciliations and was also preparing the MTM gain and loss calculation for the entity. Pramat
Limited used to rely upon the calculations performed by RSPL and based on that they pass the
MTM entry for their current investments every month. Pramat Limited were relying on the
controls present in RSPL for the preparation of this entry. They also listed controls present in RSPL
in their Risk Control Matrix as key controls.
The engagement quality reviewer, CA. Tushar, recommended CA. Kamlesh to obtain a Type 2
report from the management of RSPL to which CA. Kamlesh said that it was not required to do so
as management was already comfortable with the controls present in RSPL.
Further while conducting the audit, CA. Kamlesh observed that investments in certain securities
were sold at a price less than at which they were acquired and he didn’t report on such matter as
per Section 143(1) of the Companies Act, 2013, without even considering to inquire into the
propriety aspect of the same.
CA. Kamlesh made the following observations while examining the financial statements prepared
by the company as per Division II of Schedule III of the Companies Act, 2013, for the first time: -
(1) Other non-operating income and expenses related to it were shown separately in the
statement of Profit and Loss.
(2) Trade payables (payable after 12 months) and Deferred tax liabilities were shown directly
under the
head “Non-Current Liabilities”.
While finalizing the audit report, CA. Kamlesh prepared a letter containing key important
points to be communicated to Those Charged with the Governance and Audit Committee of the
entity. This letter was prepared in addition to the audit report. The audit team was of the view
that for the above-mentioned letter the audit team is required to generate UDIN.
1. While finalizing the audit report CA. Kamlesh decided to present the early adoption of IND
AS under the “Other Matter Paragraph” as in the auditor’s judgment, is relevant to users’
understanding of the audit, the auditor’s responsibilities or the auditor’s report. Kindly guide CA.
Kamlesh with respect to correct reporting in the Audit Report as per SA 706:
(a) No disclosure is required as it is voluntary adoption of Division II of Schedule III of the

(b) The Audit team should report the change in the “Emphasis of Matter Paragraph” because, in
the auditor’s judgment, it is of such importance that it is fundamental to users’ understanding of
329

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
(c) The Audit team should report the change in the “Other Matter Paragraph” because, in the
auditor’s judgment, it is of such importance that it is fundamental to users’ understanding of the
(d) The Audit team should qualify as per SA 705 the said change as it was not required to be
implemented and this will create unnecessary confusion for the read.
2. CA. Kamlesh ’s risk assessment includes an expectation that controls at the service
organization are operating effectively and he contended that there was no requirement to obtain
a Type 2 report. Kindly guide CA. Kamlesh with respect to the requirement of SA 402
(a) CA. Kamlesh ’s contention is correct as Management has comfort over the controls at service
organization for the transactions and activities which are processed there.
(b) When the user auditor’s risk assessment includes an expectation that controls at the service
organization are operating effectively, the user auditor shall obtain audit evidence about the
operating effectiveness of those controls which may include by obtaining Type 2 report.
(c) It depends upon the auditor’s judgment and the recommendation of the engagement
quality reviewer is not binding upon Audit team. As a result, CA. Kamlesh ’s decision will be
considered correct and appropriate.
(d) As no services are outsourced to the broker company and hence there is no need to obtain
the type 2 report.
3. Whether it is justifiable that CA. Kamlesh didn’t report on the matter with respect to sale of
investments even without inquiring for the same?
(a) No, as at least CA. Kamlesh should have inquired into to such a propriety matter in order to
satisfy that such sales were bona-fide.
(b) Yes, as it is not mandatory for the auditor to report on the matters prescribed under the said
section.
(c) No, he should have at least consulted CA. Tushar before doing so.
(d) Yes, as the relevant clause for the reporting is not applicable in case of Pramat Limited.
4. Identify the errors, if any, in the preparation of financial statements by the company as per
Division II of Schedule III of the Companies Act, 2013, from the observations made by CA. Kamlesh.
(a) Other non-operating income should have been shown by netting off the expenses related to
it and trade payables and Deferred tax liabilities should be shown under the sub-heading ‘Financial
Liabilities’ under the head ‘Non-current liabilities’.
330

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
(b) Trade payables and Deferred tax liabilities should be shown under the sub-heading ‘Financial
Liabilities’ under the head ‘Non-current liabilities’.
(c) Other non-operating income should have been shown by netting off the expenses related to
it and trade payables should be shown under the sub-heading ‘Financial Liabilities’ under the head
‘Non- current liabilities’.
(d) Trade payables should be shown under the sub-heading ‘Financial Liabilities’ under the head
‘Non-
current liabilities’.
5. CA. Kamlesh was not sure with respect to the UDIN requirement for the letter to Those
Charged with Governance containing important audit topics and findings for discussion. Kindly
guide CA. Kamlesh with respect to UDIN requirements for this letter.
(a) Separate UDINs are to be generated for the Statutory audit report and Letter to Those Ch
arged with Governance.
(b) UDIN is only required for the Statutory Audit Report, but it is not required for the
communication performed by Auditor as per SA 260 and SA 265.
(c) One single UDIN is required to be generated for all items for this Client. UDINs are required
to be generated Client wise instead of report-wise.
(d) One single UDIN will be generated for the whole year for this engagement which may
include various communication by auditor to management and Those Charged with Governance.
ANSWER :
1. B
2. B
3. D
4. C
5. B
90 (sept 2022 MTP)

Mr. Kartik a practicing Chartered Accountant was engaged in conducting statutory audits, data
privacy assessments and other trade compliance risk assessments for his clients. As a result, he
had good knowledge of the laws and regulations applicable to an entity operating digital
space. In 2022, some of his clients approached him and asked him to share his knowledge and
guide them in which Technology Company they should invest in. Mr. Kartik considered their
request and started providing paid advisory regarding investment in Technology and Fintech
Sector stock. By the end of FY 2022, Mr. Kartik’s clients made a good amount of profit based
on the advice provided by Mr. Kartik.
331

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
The overall income (gross) earned by Mr. Kartik is mentioned below:

Client Name Statutory Audit Other Advisory Investment Advisory
Service Fee Service Fee Service Fee
Fondue Forte Pvt Ltd - 6,57,000 2,36,200
Home Made Pvt Ltd 7,50,000 - 6,75,000
Home Fresh Pvt Ltd (Fully owned 3,45,000 - 12,50,000
subsidiary of Home Made Pvt Ltd.)
Whether Mr. Kartik can do so?

(a) Mr. Kartik is allowed to provide investment advisory services to its clients under
section 144 of the Companies Act 2013. Hence, Mr. Kartik is not liable for professional
misconduct.
(b) Mr. Kartik cannot provide investment advisory services directly or indirectly to the
company or its holding company or subsidiary company as per section 144 of the Companies
Act 2013. Moreover, a Chartered Accountant in Practice is not permitted to render any service
which is out of the scope of the approved Management Consultancy Service.
(c) Mr. Kartik can provide investment advisory services directly or indirectly to the
Act 2013 up toRs. 50,00,000 in each calendar year. Hence, Mr. Kartik is not liable for
professional misconduct.
(d) Mr. Kartik can provide investment advisory services directly or indirectly to the
Act 2013 up toRs. 5,00,000 in each calendar year. Hence, Mr. Kartik is liable for professional
misconduct.
ANSWER : (B )
91(SEPT2022 MTP)
KFintech Pvt Ltd was having paid-up share capital and reserves of Rs. 150 lakh including paid-
up share capital of Rs. 90 lakh at the end of FY 20-21. During FY 21-22, KFintech borrowed Rs.
80 Lakh from Bank A and Rs. 140 Lakh from Bank B. The amount borrowed from Bank B was
repaid during the same FY. For FY 20-21 the turnover of the company was Rs. 1,850 lakh.
Select the appropriate option with respect to the applicability of CARO 2020:
(a) CARO 2020 will be applicable as the paid-up capital and reserves exceeding the limit
specified in the Order i.e., one crore rupees.
(b) CARO 2020 will be applicable as the company has paid-up capital and reserves
exceeding the limit specified in the Order i.e., one crore rupees and have total borrowings
exceeding one crore rupees from any bank or financial institution at any point of time during
the financial year.
(c) CARO 2020 will not be applicable as the company repaid the amount borrowed from
bank B before the end of the financial year and hence, the borrowings do not exceed the limit
specified in the Order.
332

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
(d) CARO 2020 will not be applicable as the company will fall under the exemption
provided in the Order for Small Company as per section 2(85) of the Companies Act 2013.
ANSWER : ( D )
92(SEPT 2022 MTP)

ADI Ltd. is engaged in the business of providing management consultancy services and have
been in operation for the last 15 years. The company’s financial reporting process is very good
and its statutory auditors always issued clean report on the audit of the financial statements of
the company. The auditors were required to be rotated due to mandatory audit rotation
requirement of the Companies Act 2013.
RNJ & Associates, a firm of Chartered Accountants, was appointed as the new auditor of the
company for a term of 5 years and have to start their first audit for the financial year ended 31
March 2022.
The auditors had a detailed and clear discussion with the management that they will perform
their audit procedures in respect of opening balances along with the audit procedures for the
financial year ended 31 March 2022.
Management agreed with that and the audit was completed as per the plan.
The auditors did not have any significant observations and hence they communicated to the
management that their report will be clean. Management was quite happy with this and also
requested the auditors to share draft report before issuing the final report.
In the draft audit report, all the particulars were fine except ‘ other matters paragraph’
wherein the auditors gave a reference that the financial statements for the comparative year
ended 31 March 2021 was audited by another auditor. Management asked the audit team to
remove this paragraph as the auditors had performed all the audit procedures on opening
balances also. But the auditors did not agree with the management.
Please advise the auditor or the management whoever is incorrect with the right guidance.
(a) The contention of the management is valid. After performing all the audit
procedures, an auditor should not pass on the responsibility to another auditor by including
such references in his audit report.
(b) Any auditor has two options, either to perform audit procedures on opening
balances or given such reference of another auditor in his report. An auditor can not mix up
the things like this auditor has done. It is completely unprofessional.
(c) In the given situation even if the auditor wants to give such reference, the
management and the auditor should have taken approval from the previous auditor at the
time of appointment of new auditor. In this case, it cannot be done.
(d) The report of the auditor is absolutely correct and is in line with the auditing
standards. An auditor is required to include such reference in his report as per the
requirements of the auditing standard.
ANSWER : ( D )
333

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
93 (MARCH 2022MTP)
Mr. Shripal, a practising Chartered Accountant, has been appointed as an auditor of Rani Ltd
on 12th June, 2021 for the year ended 31st March, 2022. The following persons have done
following transactions in securities of Rani Ltd.:
➢ Daughter of Mr. Shripal Purchase of Securities on 10th September, 2021 of face
value of
Rs. 45,000 (market value Rs. 90,000).
➢ Husband of daughter of Mr. Shripal: Purchase of Securities on 10th December, 2021
of face value of Rs. 90,000 (market value Rs. 1,90,000).
All the above securities were sold on 18th February, 2022 for Rs. 3,00,000. Discuss the
implications of the above on the appointment of Mr. Shripal. (5 Marks)
ANSWER :
Implications of relatives' securities holding on the Appointment of the Auditor: According to
Section 141(3)(d)(i) of the Companies Act, 2013, read with Rule 10, an auditor is disqualified to
be appointed as an auditor if the auditor or his relative holds securities or interest in the
company of face value exceeding Rs. 100,000.
Further the definition of relative also includes daughter and a daughter's husband. Both are
covered in the definition of relative as defined by the Companies Act 2013.
Thus, the disqualifications will be applicable as the relative/s are holding securities of face
value of more than Rs. 100,000 and market value is not important.
It is also to note that in the event of acquiring any security or interest by a relative above the
threshold prescribed, the corrective action to maintain the limits as specified above can be
taken by the auditor within 60 days of such acquisition or interest. The same has however not
been done.
In the instant case, Daughter of Mr. Shripal purchased the securities on 10th September 2021
of face value of Rs. 45,000 and husband of daughter of Mr. Shripal purchased the securities on
10th of December, 2021 of face value of Rs. 90,000. Aggregating the value of holding of
securities exceeds the limits mentioned in proviso to section 141(3)(d)(i) i.e. Rs. 1,00,000.
Further, corrective action taken by Husband of Daughter of Mr. Shripal on 18th February, is
also not in accordance with prescribed grace period of 60 days.
Therefore, CA. Shripal will be disqualified for appointment as an auditor of Raja Ltd. as per
section 141(3)(d)(i) and he shall vacate his office.
94 (MARCH 2022 MTP)

The Auditor of Rapid Limited succumbed to the pressure of the management in certifying the
financials with an over stated figure of turnover by not adhering to the cut-off principles of the
time scale for the transactions of the year. On taking cognizance of this act of the auditor, the
Tribunal under the Companies Act, 2013 initiated the proceedings against him. Briefly list the
powers of the Tribunal in this respect including those relating to making orders against the
Auditor found to be guilty.
ANSWER :
334

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
Power of Tribunal in case Auditor acted in a Fraudulent Manner: As per sub-section (5) of the
section 140 of the Companies Act, 2013, the Tribunal either suo motu or on an application
made to it by the Central Government or by any person concerned, if it is satisfied that the
auditor of a company has, whether directly or indirectly, acted in a fraudulent manner or
abetted or colluded in any fraud by, or in relation to, the company or its directors or officers, it
may, by order, direct t he company to change its auditors.
However, if the application is made by the Central Government and the Tribunal is satisfied
that any change of the auditor is required, it shall within fifteen days of receipt of such
application, make an order that he shall not function as an auditor and the Central
Government may appoint another auditor in his place.
It may be noted that an auditor, whether individual or firm, against whom final order has been
passed by the Tribunal under this section shall not be eligible to be appointed as an auditor of
any company for a period of five years from the date of passing of the order and the auditor
shall also be liable for action under section 447 of the said Act.
It is hereby clarified that in the case of a firm, the liability shall be of the firm and that of every
partner or partners who acted in a fraudulent manner or abetted or colluded in any fraud by,
or in relation to, the company or its director or officers.
95(APRIL 2022 MTP)

While reporting under clause (ii) of Paragraph 3 of CARO 2020, which of the following is
correct:
(a) The 10% threshold for reporting must be applied on a gross basis before adjusting
excesses and shortages within the class of an inventory and must be based on value for each
class of Inventory.
(b) The 10% threshold for reporting must be applied on a gross basis before adjusting
excesses and shortages within the class of an inventory and must be based on value for all
classes of Inventory.
(c) The 10% threshold for reporting must be applied on a net basis after adjusting
excesses and shortages within the class of an inventory and must be based on value for each
class of Inventory.
(d) The 10% threshold for reporting must be applied on a net basis after adjusting
excesses and shortages within the class of an inventory and must be based on value for all
classes of Inventory.
ANSWER : ( C )
96 (MAY 2022 RTP)

AMc LLP is a newly set up LLP (Limited Liability Partnership). The operations of the LLP have
been picking up and management is currently in the process of setting up processes and
procedures in place. As per the understanding of the management of the LLP, it s accounts
would not be required to be audited mandatory because of its operations but still , the
management has decided that they would get the accounts audited voluntarily. In this regard,
335

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
the management would like to understand some of the aspects which they should consider
not only limited to audit but also about the maintenance of books of accounts as per the
relevant laws. Please advise.
ANSWER :
An LLP shall be under obligation to maintain annual accounts reflecting a true and fair view of
its state of affairs. The accounts of every LLP shall be audited in accordance with Rule 24 of LLP
Rules 2009. Such rules, inter-alia, provides that any LLP, whose turnover does not exceed, in
any financial year, forty lakh rupees, or whose contribution does not exceed twenty five lakh
rupees, is not required to get its accounts audited. However, if the partners of such limited
liability partnership decide to get the accounts of such LLP audited, the accounts shall be
audited only in accordance with such rule.
Appointment of Auditor: The auditor may be appointed by the designated partners of the LLP
–
1. At any time for the first financial year but before end of the first financial year,
2. At least thirty days prior to the end of each financial year (other than the first financial year),
3. To fill the casual vacancy in the office of auditor,
4. To fill the casual vacancy caused by the removal of an auditor.
The partners may appoint the auditors if the designated partners have failed to appoint them.
LLPs are required to maintain books of accounts which shall contain -
1. Particulars of all sums of money received and expended by the LLP and the matters in
respect of which the receipt and expenditure takes place,
2. A record of the assets and liabilities of the LLP,
3. Statements of costs of goods purchased, inventories, work-in-progress, finished goods
and costs of goods sold,
4. Any other particulars which the partners may decide.
The auditor should read the LLP agreement & note the following provisions
(a) Nature of the business of the LLP
(b) Amount of capital contributed by each partner
(c) Interest – in respect of additional capital contributed
(d) Duration of partnership
(e) Drawings allowed to the partners
(f) Salaries, commission etc payable to partners
(g) Borrowing powers of the LLP
(h) Rights & duties of partners
(i)Method of settlement of accounts between partners at the time of admission,
retirement, admission etc.
(j)Any loans advanced by the partners
(k) Profit sharing ratio.
97(MAY 2022 RTP)

336

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
Mr. Arjun was appointed as the engagement partner on behalf of Bhism & Co., a Chartered
Accountant Firm, for conducting statutory audit assignment of Sinwar Ltd., unlisted public
company.
Mr. Brijesh, one of the senior engagement team members, was given the responsibility to
audit the matters as per the requirements of CARO, 2020 and in that connection, he made the
following observations, that may be relevant for reporting as per the said Order:-
Sr. Observations
No.
(a) One of the Plant and Equipment taken on a lease (‘right of use’ asset) by Sinwar
Ltd. was revalued based on the valuation by a registered valuer and the net
carrying value of Plant and Equipment in aggregate was changed from ` 4 crore
to ` 4.45 crore.
(b) During the year under consideration, cash credit limit of ` 5.5 crore was
sanctioned to Sinwar Ltd. by DMC Bank based on the security of current assets
which was reduced to ` 4.5 crore after 6 months. In this connection, quarterly
returns have been filed by the company with the DMC bank which are in
agreement with Books of Accounts.
You are required to examine the contention of Mr. Brijesh regarding reporting of the above
observations in accordance with CARO 2020.
ANSWER :
Matters to be reported by Mr. Brijesh as per CARO, 2020 are as follows:-
(a) According to Clause (i) (d) of Para 3 of CARO 2020, the auditor is required to report
whether the company has revalued its Property, Plant and Equipment (including Right of Use
assets) or intangible assets or both during the year and, if so, whether the revaluation is based
on the valuation by a Registered Valuer; specify the amount of change, if the change is 10% or
more in the aggregate of the net carrying value of each class of Property, Plant and Equipment
or intangible assets;
In the given situation, Sinwar Ltd. has revalued one of the Plant and Equipment taken
on a lease (‘right of use’ asset) based on the valuation by a registered valuer. The amount of
change in the value of such Plant and Equipment is Rs. 45 lakh. As the net carrying value of
Plant and Equipment in aggregate was changed from Rs. 4 crore to
Rs. 4.45 crore i.e. change was 10% or more.
Thus, the auditor is required to report the amount of change of Rs. 45 lakh in
accordance with Clause (i) (d) of Para 3 of CARO 2020.
(b) As per Clause (ii) (b) of Para 3 of CARO 2020, the auditor is required to report
whether during any point of time of the year, the company has been sanctioned working
capital limits in excess of five crore rupees, in aggregate, from banks or financial institutions on
the basis of security of current assets; whether the quarterly returns or statements filed by the
company with such banks or financial institutions are in agreement with the books of account
of the Company, if not, give details;
337

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
In the instant case, Sinwar Ltd. has been sanctioned a cash credit limit of Rs. 5.5 crore
by DMC Bank during the year under consideration, which is exceeding the prescribed limit of
Rs. 5 crore based on the security of current assets. Further, quarterly returns have also been
filed by the company with the DMC bank in this connection which is in agreement with Books
of Accounts.
In view of the above, the auditor is required to report the same in accordance with
Clause (ii) (b) of Para 3 of CARO 2020
98(NOV 2022 RTP)

While auditing with respect to compliance with CARO, 2020, Mr. Omprakash, for additional
reporting purpose, observed the following, relevant to Para 3(vii) of CARO, 2020:
Statutory Dues Undispute Date Payable Date Paid
d Amount
(` in lakh)
Provident Fund 1.5 24th September, 2021 27th March, 2022
GST 2.45 23rd October, 2021 24th April, 2022
Customs Duty 0.65 20th September, 2021 10th April, 2022
Income Tax Demand for 0.55 18th October, 2021 Not Paid till date
A.Y. 2019-20
Also, a representation was made to GST Department for waiving a penalty of Rs. 1 lakh for late
payment of GST demand. What total amount of statutory dues need to be reported by Mr.
Omprakash as per Para 3 of CARO?
(a) Rs. 3.10 lakh.
(b) 0.65 lakh.
(c) Rs. 3.65 lakh.
(d) Rs. 2.70 lakh.
ANSWER : B
99(NOV 2022 RTP)
The Balance Sheet Extract of Siddha Limited, required to prepare financial statement under
Ind-AS, as at 31st March, 2022 is as under. Comment on the presentation in terms of
Division II of Schedule III to the Companies Act, 2013.
338

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
Particulars As at 31st March, 2022 As at 31st March, 2021

Property Plant and Equipment
Trademark xxxx xxxx
Other Non-current Assets
Bank deposit with more than 12 xxxx xxxx
months maturity
Equity
Share Options Outstanding Account xxxx xxxx
Other Current Liabilities
Application money received for xxxx xxxx
allotment of securities to the extent
refundable and interest accrued
thereon.
ANSWER :
Following Errors have been noticed in presentation, as per Division II of Schedule III:
(i) “Trademark” is not to be classified under “Property Plant and Equipment” since they are
specifically to be disclosed under ‘Other Intangible Assets" as per Division II of Schedule III.
(ii) “Bank deposit with more than 12 months maturity" is not to be classified under "Other Non-
current Assets” since they are specifically to be disclosed under “Other Financial Assets” as per
Division II of Schedule III.
(iii) “Share Option Outstanding Accounts” is not to be classified under “Equity", since it has to be
disclosed under “Other Equity" as per Division II of Schedule III.
(iv) Interest accrued thereon” is not to be classified under "Other non-current assets”, since they
are specifically to be disclosed under the head “Other Financial Liabilities” as per Division II of
Schedule III.
100 (NOV 2022 RTP)
Gautam Limited had borrowed Rs. 1000 crore from XYZ Bank, the principal of which was repayable
after 5 years and interest was payable at the end of each year. For 4 years, Gautam Limited paid
the interest amount on time. Gautam Limited defaulted the 5th instalment of interest
payment and principal which was due on June 30, 2021. On March 31, 2021, Gautam Limited
approached XYZ bank and MNO bank to restructure the existing liability. As a result, the existing
principal and outstanding and overdue interest was restructured into a new loan amounting to
Rs. 1,100 crore. The management did not provide any disclosure for the default on the loan on the
belief that the old loan ceased to exist and the new loan has maturity after 5 years.
During the statutory audit for the financial year 2021-22, KP & Co. identified this transaction and
obtained the relevant documents and understanding. Based on the underlying documents, it was
339

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
identified that the said restructuring agreement was approved and signed on April 8, 2022, by
both of the banks. As a result, on March 31, 2022, the restructuring was still not approved.
In the light of the above scenario, kindly guide the statutory auditors in the reporting of this
transaction.
ANSWER :
As per Clause 3(ix) of CARO 2020, the auditor is required to report whether the company has
defaulted in repayment of loans or other borrowings or in the payment of interest thereon to any
lender, if yes, the period and the amount of default to be reported as per the format below.
Nature of Name of Amount not Whether No. of days Remarks, if

borrowing, lender paid on due principal or delay or any
including date interest unpaid
debt
securities
lender wise
details to be
provided in
case of
defaults to
banks,
financial
institutions
and
Government.
In the given case, the company Gautam Limited defaulted in payment of the principal amount of
the loan due of Rs. 1000 crore on 30 June 2021 and the interest instalment of
Rs. 100 crore. The said default continued till the end of the year and on 8 April 2022, a
restructuring agreement was signed by the banks and company for re-structuring the outstanding
loan. Moreover, no disclosure was provided by the company with respect to the said matter.
Hence the auditor is required to report the same matter under Clause (ix) of Para 3 of CARO 2020,
i.e., whether the company has defaulted in repayment of loans or other borrowings or in the
payment of interest thereon to any lender, if yes, then provide the details of the period and the
amount of default. Also, the auditor needs to consider the impact of such non-disclosure and the
non-compliance with the financial reporting framework and accordingly the auditor needs to
either issue a qualified opinion or an adverse opinion as per SA 705, “Modifications to the Opinion
in the Independent Auditor’s Report”
340

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
1.MTP Mar 2019 QN no 1 (2 Marks)

One of your team members has recently qualified as a chartered accountant and joined your
team to audit a portfolio of audit clients who are private companies. One of the clients Surrey
Pvt. Ltd. is a hotel in the small town near Jaipur. The revenue generated for the current year
ended is Rs.10.5 crores and the entity is not a holding or subsidiary of any public company. The
owner of the business Mr. Hazelwood runs this family business from last 10 years. Your team
member is keen to know whether Surrey Pvt . Ltd is required to comment on the matter
prescribed under CARO 2020. Which of your explanations to him are correct?
a) The entity’s revenue exceeds Rs.10 crores. Hence, no need to comment on the matter prescribed
under
CARO 2020.
b) The entity is not a holding or subsidiary of any public company, hence no need to comment on
the matter prescribed under CARO 2020.
c) The entity’s revenue for the year is Rs.10.5 cr which exceed the limit of Rs.10 cr. Hence, the
entity has to provide the comment on the matter prescribed under CARO 2020.
d) The entity is not a holding or subsidiary of any public company, hence there is a need to
comment on the matter prescribed under CARO 2020.
Answer: (c) The entity’s revenue for the year is Rs.10.5 cr which exceed the limit of Rs.10 cr.
Hence, the entity has to provide the comment on the matter prescribed under CARO 2020.
2.MTP Oct 2019 QN no 17 2 Marks

341

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
Honeywell Ltd, a listed company pays its key managerial persons the remuneration in excess of
the limits which have been prescribed under 197 of the Companies Act, 2013 without obtaining
the necessary approvals from the regulatory authority. In this circumstance, the auditor while
reporting under CARO 2020 is required to state:
a) Name of the managerial persons to whom the remuneration has been paid in excess of limits
and the amount involved.
b) Name of the managerial persons to whom the remuneration in excess of limits are paid and the
steps taken by the company for securing refund of the same.
c) The maximum remuneration payable and amount paid in excess of the maximum
remuneration to the managerial persons.
d) The amount involved and steps taken by the company for securing the refund of the same.
Answer: Option (d) The amount involved and steps taken by the company for securing the refund of the
same.
MAY 2018 1 (b) – 5 Marks
3.The Property, Plant and Equipment of ABC Ltd. Included Rs. 25.75 crores of earth removing
machines of outdated technology which had been retired from active use and had been kept
for disposal after knock down. These assets appeared at residual value and had been last
inspected ten years back. As an Auditor, what may be your reporting concern as regards
matters specified above?
Answer
Disclosure in Audit Report: The auditor is required to specifically include certain matters as per
CARO, 2020 under section 143 of the Companies Act, 2013.
According to clause (i) (a) of CARO, 2020 the auditor has to comment whether the company is
maintaining proper records showing full particulars, including quantitative details and situation
of fixed assets; and as per clause (i) (b) whether these fixed assets have been physically verified
by the management at reasonable intervals; whether any material discrepancies were noticed on
such verification and if so, whether the same have been properly dealt with in the books of
account;
In the given case, ABC Ltd. has intention to sale its earth removing machines of outdated technology
which had been retired from active use and had been kept for disposal after knock down and these
assets are appearing at residual value. Further, inspection of such machines (though it is a retired
machine, however value is Rs. 25.75 crores which is material amount) was done 10 years back, is
not in compliance with CARO, 2020.
Hence, this fact needs to be disclosed in the Audit Report as per clause (i) (a) and (b) of Paragraph
3 of CARO 2020.
342

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
4.RTP May 2018 Qn no. 7(a) and Study Material
Compare and explain the following:

I. Reporting to Shareholders vs. Reporting to those Charged with Governance
II. Audit Qualification vs. Emphasis of Matter.
ANSWER
(a) (i) Reporting to Shareholders vs. Reporting to those Charged with Governance:
REPORT
Reporting to Shareholders ng to those Charged with Governance
• Section 143 of the Companies Act, 2013 deals with

• Standard on Auditing 260 deals with the
the provisions relating to reporting to provisions relating to reporting to those Charged
Shareholders. Thus, it is a Statutory Audit Report with Governance.
which is addressed to the members.
• Statutory Audit Report is on true and fair view and

• It is a reporting on matters those charged with
as per prescribed Format. governance like scope of audit, audit
procedures, audit
modifications, etc.
• Statutory Audit Reports are in public domain. • Reporting to those Charged with Governance is
an internal document i.e. private report.
(ii) Audit Qualification vs. Emphasis of Matter:
REPORT
Audit Qualification Emphasis of Matter
• Standard on Auditing 705 “Modifications to• the Standard on Auditing 706 “Emphasis of Matter
Opinion in the Independent Auditor’s Report”, Paragraphs and Other Matter Paragraphs in the
deals with the provisions relating to Audit Independent Auditor’s Report” deals with the
Qualification. provisions relating to Emphasis of Matter.
• Audit Qualifications are also known as “subject

• to Emphasis of Matter is a paragraph which is
report” or “except that report”. included in auditor’s report to draw users’
attention to important matter(s) which are
already disclosed in Financial Statements and
are fundamental to users’ for understanding of
Financial Statements.
343

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
• Audit Qualifications are given when auditor • is Emphasis of Matter is a paragraph which is
having reservations on some of the items out of issued when there is a uncertainty relating to
the financial statements as a whole i.e. Auditor’s future outcome of exceptional litigation,
Judgment about the Pervasiveness of the Effects or regulatory action, etc.; or there is early
Possible Effects on the Financial Statements application (where permitted) of a new
relating to if the impact of material misstatements accounting standard that has a pervasive effect
is not pervasive on the financial statements but is on the financial statements in advance of its
present at some levels of the financial statements, effective date.
qualified report is issued.
5.(RTP NOV 2018)

“There are numerous situations where regulatory authorities like SEBI, ROC, Income Tax, Central
Board of Excise and Customs (CBEC), Reserve Bank of India etc. requires a professional accounting
firm or the statutory auditor of the organization to provide opinion on certain specific matters
which are provided by the organisation as part of statutory requirements.” In view of above give
few examples of various types of Certificates produced before such regulating authorities.
ANSWER
There are numerous situations where regulatory authorities like SEBI, ROC, Income Tax, Central Board of
Excise and Customs (CBEC), Reserve Bank of India etc. requires professional accounting firm or the statutory
auditor of the organization to provide opinion on certain specific matters which are provided by the
organisation as part of statutory requirements.
Sr. No. Authorities Examples of Various types of Certificates
1. Reserve Bank of India
• Certificate of unhedged foreign currency
exposure as at year end
• Certificate for adherence to guidelines as per
RBI circular
• Annual activity certificate for branch office,
Liaison office, Project office etc.
• Certificate of probable exposure
2. Companies Act, 2013 Certificate pursuant to proviso to Section 230(7) of the

Companies Act, 2013 in relating to accounting
treatment prescribed under the Scheme of
Arrangement.
3. Income Tax Act, 1961 Reporting on Expenditure incurred on R&D Centre
approved under Section 35(2AB)
4. SEBI Certificate for accounting treatment in case of a

merger of two entities or reorganization, Income Tax
authorities requires auditor to certify amount eligible
Minimum Alternative tax under Section 115JB of
Income tax Act, 1961
344

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
5. Others
• Certificate for net worth required for a tender
document
• Certificate for value of fixed assets in a
particular location required by a regulatory agency to
process tax incentives
• Certificate of service tax refund or VAT refund
Study Material
ILLUSTRATIONS
6. CA Sameer is the statutory auditor of Tram Fram Ltd. for the FY 2020-21. While concluding the
audit CA Sameer decided to issue an unmodified opinion, though he also concluded that a
material uncertainity exists with respect to the company’s ability to continue as a going concern
on account of a pending litigation related to labour laws. He is of the view that the company has
made appropriate disclosures with respect to such pending litigation in the notes to accounts
annexed to the financial statements of Tram Fram Ltd. for the FY 2020-21. Explain how CA
Sameer will deal with the above situation in his auditor’s report (draft the relevant portion of
the auditor’s report.)
Solution:
Material Uncertainty Related to Going Concern

We draw attention to Note 10 in the financial statements, which indicates that the outcome of a
litigation on account of labour laws is pending in case of the company during the year 31 March,
2021. As stated in Note 11, this event or condition, indicate that a material uncertainty exists that
may cast significant doubt on the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. Our opinion is
not modified in respect of this matter.
7. XYZ Ltd. is a company engaged in the manufacture of cranes. CA Sudhir is the statutory auditor of the
company for the FY 2020-21. The company has taken long term funding for fixed capital requirements
and short term funding for its working capital requirements. During the course of audit, CA Sudhir found
that the company’s financing arrangements are about to expire and the company is unable to re-
negotiate or obtain the replacement financing. As such the company may be unable to realize its assets
and discharge its liabilities in the normal course of business. Notes to accounts annexed to the financial
statements discuss the magnitude of financing arrangements, the expiration and the total financing
arrangements; however the financial statements do not include discussion on the impact or the
availability of refinancing. Thus, the financial statements (and notes thereto) do not fully disclose this
fact. What kind of opinion should CA Sudhir issue in case of XYZ Ltd.?
ANSWER:
In the present case, XYZ Ltd. is unable to re- negotiate or obtain the replacement financing for its long term and
short term funding requirements. This situation indicates the existence of a material uncertainty that may cast
significant doubt on the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern and therefore, XYZ Ltd. may be unable
345

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
to realize its assets and discharge its liabilities in the normal course of business. Further, the financial statements
of XYZ Ltd. do not disclose this fact adequately.
Thus, the financial statements of XYZ Ltd. are materially misstated due to the inadequate disclosure of the
material uncertainty. CA Sudhir will express a qualified opinion as the effects on the financial statements of
this inadequate disclosure are material but not pervasive to the financial statements.
The relevant extract of the Qualified Opinion Paragraph and Basis for Qualified Opinion paragraph is as
under:
Qualified Opinion
In our opinion and to the best of our information and according to the explanations given to us, except for
the incomplete disclosure of the information referred to in the Basis for Qualified Opinion section of our
report, the aforesaid standalone financial statements give the information required by the Act in the manner so
required and give a true and fair view in conformity with the accounting principles generally accepted in India, of
the state of affairs of XYZ Ltd. as at March 31, 2021, and profit/loss, for the year ended on that date.
As discussed in Note 6, the Company’s financing arrangements are about to expire and the Company has
been unable to conclude renegotiations or obtain replacement financing. This situation indicates that a
material uncertainty exists that may cast significant doubt on the Company’s ability to continue as a going
concern. The financial statements do not adequately disclose this matter.
8. ABC Ltd. is a company engaged in the manufacture of iron and steel bars. PP & Associates are
the statutory auditors of ABC Ltd. for the FY 2020-21. During the course of audit, CA Prakash, the
engagement partner, found that the Company’s financing arrangements have expired and the
amount outstanding was payable on March 31, 2021. The Company has been unable to re-
negotiate or obtain replacement financing and is considering filing for bankruptcy. These events
indicate a material uncertainty that may cast significant doubt on the Company’s ability to
continue as a going concern and therefore it may be unable to realize its assets and discharge its
liabilities in the normal course of business. The financial statements (and notes thereto) do not
disclose this fact. What opinion should CA Prakash express in case of ABC Ltd.?
SOLUTION:
In the present case based on the audit evidence obtained, CA Prakash has concluded that a material uncertainty
exists related to events or conditions that may cast significant doubt on the entity’s ability to continue as a going
concern, and the entity is considering bankruptcy. The financial statements of ABC Ltd. omit the required
disclosures relating to the material uncertainty.
In such circumstances, CA Prakash should express an adverse opinion because the effects on the financial
statements of such omission are material and pervasive.
The relevant extract of the Adverse Opinion Paragraph and Basis for Adverse Opinion paragraph is as
under:
Adverse Opinion
346

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
financial position of the entity as at March 31, 2021, and of its financial performance and its cash
flows for the year then ended in accordance with the Accounting Standards issued by the Institute of
Chartered Accountants of India.
The financing arrangements of ABC Ltd. has expired and the amount outstanding was payable on March 31,
2021. The entity has been unable to conclude re-negotiations or obtain replacement financing and is
considering filing for bankruptcy. This situation indicates that a material uncertainty exists that may cast
significant doubt on the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. The financial statements do not
adequately disclose this fact.
9 MNO Ltd. is a power generating company having its plants in the north eastern
states of the country. For the FY 2020-21, M/s PRT & Associates are the statutory
auditors of the company. During the course of audit, the audit team was unable to
obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence about a single element of the
consolidated financial statements. That is, the auditor was also unable to obtain
audit evidence about the financial information of a joint venture investment (in XYZ
Ltd.) that represents over 90% of the entity’s net assets. What kind of opinion
should the statutory auditors issue in such case?
ANSWER:
M/s PRT & Associates are unable to obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence about the financial information
of a joint venture investment that represents over 90% of the entity’s net assets. The possible effects of this
inability to obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence are both material and pervasive to the consolidated
Therefore, the statutory auditor should issue a disclaimer of opinion.
The relevant extract of the Disclaimer of Opinion Paragraph and Basis for Disclaimer of
Opinion paragraph is as under:
We do not express an opinion on the accompanying financial statements of MNO Ltd. Because of the
significance of the matters described in the Basis for Disclaimer of Opinion section of our report, we have not
been able to obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence to provide a basis for an audit opinion on these

The Group’s investment in its joint venture XYZ Company is carried at Rs. 95 crores on the Group’s
consolidated balance sheet, which represents over 90% of the Group’s net assets as at March 31, 2021. We
were not allowed access to the management and the auditors of XYZ Company, including XYZ Company’s
auditors’ audit documentation. As a result, we were unable to determine whether any adjustments were
necessary in respect of the Group’s proportional share of XYZ Company’s assets that it controls jointly, its
proportional share of XYZ Company’s liabilities for which it is jointly responsible, its proportional share of
XYZ’s income and expenses for the year, (and the elements making up the consolidated statement of changes
in equity) and the consolidated cash flow statement
10.CA Yash is the statutory auditor of Laksmi Vardhan Limited for the FY 2020-21. In respect of loans and
advances of Rs. 55,00,000/- given to Sarvagya Private Limited, the Company has not furnished any agreement
to CA Yash and in absence of the same, he is unable to verify the terms of repayment, chargeability of interest
and other terms.
What kind of opinion should CA Yash give in such situation?
347

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
SOLUTION:
In the present case, with respect to loans and advances of Rs. 55,00,000/- given to Sarvagya Private Limited, the
Company has not furnished any agreement to CA Yash. In absence of such agreement, CA Yash is unable to verify
the terms of repayment, chargeability of interest and other terms. For an auditor, while verifying any loans and
advances, one of the most important audit evidences is the loan agreement. Therefore, the absence of such
document in the present case, tantamount to a material misstatement in the financial statements of the company.
However, the inability of CA Yash to obtain such audit evidence is though material but not pervasive so as to
require him to give a disclaimer of opinion.
Thus, in the present case, CA Yash should give a qualified opinion
The relevant extract of the Qualified Opinion Paragraph and Basis for Qualified Opinion paragraph is as
under:
Qualified Opinion
In our opinion and to the best of our information and according to the explanations given to us, except for the
effects of the matter described in the Basis for Qualified Opinion section of our report, the financial statements
of Laksmi Vardhan Limited give a true and fair view in conformity with the accounting principles generally accepted
in India, of the state of affairs of the Company as on 31.03.2021 and profit/ loss for the year ended on that date.
The Company is unable to furnish the loan agreement with respect to loans and advances of Rs.
55,00,000/- given to Sarvagya Private Limited. Consequently, in absence of such agreement, we are unable
to verify the terms of repayment, chargeability of interest and other terms
11. In the financial year 2020-21, MSD Ltd. faced an extraordinary event (earthquake), which
destroyed a lot of business activity of the company. These circumstances indicate material
uncertainty on the company’s ability to continue as going concern. Due to such event it may not
be possible for the company to realize its assets or pay off the liabilities during the regular course
of its business. The financial statement and notes to the financial statements of the company do
not disclose this fact. What kind of opinion should the statutory auditor of MSD Ltd. issue in such
circumstances?
SOLUTION:
In the present case, there exists a material uncertainty that cast a significant doubt on the company’s ability
to continue as going concern and the same is not disclosed in the financial statements of MSD Ltd.
As such, the financial statements of MSD Ltd. for the FY 2020-21 are materially misstated and the effect of the
misstatement is so material and pervasive on the financial statements that giving only a qualified opinion will be
insufficient and therefore the statutory auditor of MSD Ltd. should issue an adverse opinion.
The relevant extract of the Adverse Opinion Paragraph and Basis for Adverse Opinion paragraph is as
under:
Adverse Opinion
financial position of MSD Ltd. as at March 31, 2021, and of its financial performance and its cash
flows for the year then ended in accordance with the Accounting Standards issued by the Institute of
Chartered Accountants of India.

MSD Ltd. has faced an extraordinary event (earthquake), which destroyed a lot of business activity of the
company. Due to such event it may not be possible for the company to realize its assets or pay off the
liabilities during the regular course of its business. This situation indicates that a material uncertainty exists
348

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
that may cast significant doubt on the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. The financial
statement and notes to the financial statements of the company do not disclose this fact.
12. CA Abhimanyu is the statutory auditor of PQR Ltd. for the FY 2020-21. During the course of audit CA
Abhimanyu noticed the following:
1. With respect to the debtors amounting to Rs. 150 crores, no balance confirmation was received by the
audit team. Further, there have been defaults on the payment obligations by debtors on the due dates
during the year under audit. The Company has created a provision for doubtful debts to the tune of Rs. 25
Cr. during the year under audit. The Company has stated
that the provision is based on receivables which are older than 36 months, which according to the audit
team is inadequate and as such the audit team is unable to ascertain the carrying value of trade
receivables.
2. Further, in respect of Inventories (which constitutes 40% of the total assets of the company), during the
reporting period, the management has not undertaken physical verification of inventories at periodic
intervals. Also, the Company has not maintained adequate inventory records at the factory. The audit team
was unable to undertake the physical inventory count as such the value of inventory could not be verified.
Under the above circumstances what kind of opinion should CA Abhimanyu give?
SOLUTION:
In the present case, CA Abhimanyu is unable to obtain sufficient and appropriate audit evidence with respect
to the following:
1. The balance confirmation with respect to debtors amounting to Rs. 150 crores is not available. Further
there has been default in payment by the debtors and the provision so made is not adequate. The audit team
is also unable ascertain the carrying value of trade receivables.
2. With respect to 40% of the company’s inventory, neither the physical verification has been done by the
management nor are adequate inventory records maintained. The audit team is also unable to undertake
the physical inventory count as such the value of inventory could not be verified.
In the above two circumstances the auditor is unable to obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence on which
to base the opinion, and the possible effects on the financial statements of undetected misstatements, if
any, could be both material and pervasive.
Thus, CA Abhimanyu should give a Disclaimer of Opinion.
The relevant extract of the Disclaimer of Opinion Paragraph and Basis for Disclaimer of Opinion paragraph
is as under:
We do not express an opinion on the accompanying financial statements of PQR Ltd. Because of the
significance of the matters described in the Basis for Disclaimer of Opinion section of our report, we have
not been able to obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence to provide a basis for an audit opinion on these

We are unable to obtain balance confirmation with respect to the debtors amounting to Rs. 150 crores. Further,
there have been defaults on the payment obligations by debtors on the due dates during the year under audit.
349
The Company has created a provision for doubtful debts to the tune of Rs. 25 Cr. during the year under audit

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
which is inadequate in the circumstances of the company. The carrying value of trade receivables could not be
ascertained.
Further, in respect of Inventories (which constitutes 40% of the total assets of the company), during the
reporting period, the management has not undertaken physical verification of inventories at periodic
intervals. Also, the Company has not maintained adequate inventory records at the factory. We were unable
to undertake the physical inventory count and as such the value of inventory could not be verified.
13. In respect of the audit of BDS Ltd., the statutory auditor of the company noticed some matters. The
statutory auditor wants to draw the user’s attention towards such matters, though his opinion is not
modified in respect of such matters. Draft the relevant paragraphs of the audit report for the following
matters:
i. The company has a plan to resume its construction activities with respect to one of its thermal power
project, The activity of such power plant was suspended in the FY 2018-19. The thermal power project
comprises of the plant and equipment amounting to Rs. 5.95 crore and capital work in progress of Rs.
147.50 crore.
ii. The financial statements of 5 branches are included in the Standalone Financial Statements of BDS Ltd.
whose financial statements reflect total assets of Rs. 90 crores as at 31.03.2021 and total revenue from
operations of Rs. 40 crores for the year ended on that date. The financial statements of these branches
have been audited by the branch auditors.
SOLUTION:
Emphasis of Matter
We draw attention to the following note of the standalone financial statements:
Note 27 regarding the plans of the Company to resume construction/developmental activities of a thermal
power project. The carrying amounts related to the project as at 31st March, 2021 comprise of plant and
equipment of Rs. 5.95 crore and capital work in progress of Rs. 147.50 crore.
Our opinion is not modified in respect of this matter.
Other Matter
We did not audit the financial statements of 5 branches included in the Standalone Financial Statements of the
company whose financial statements reflect total assets of Rs. 90 crores as at 31.03.2021 and total revenue from
operations of Rs. 40 crores for the year ended on that date. The financial statements of these branches have been
audited by the branch auditors whose reports have been furnished to us, and our opinion in so far as it relates to
the amounts and disclosures included in respect of these branches, is based solely on the report of the branch
auditors.
Our opinion is not modified in respect of this matter.
QUESTIONS
14. Write a short note on Certificate for Special Purpose vs. Audit Report.
Certificate for Special Purpose vs. Audit Report: A certificate is a written confirmation of the accuracy
of the facts stated therein and does not involve any estimate or opinion. The term ‘certificate’ is,
therefore, used where the auditor verifies the accuracy of facts. An auditor may thus, certify the
circulation figures of a newspaper or the value of imports or exports of a company. An auditor’s
certificate represents that he has verified certain figures and is in a position to vouch safe their
accuracy as per his examination of documents and books of account. A report, on the other hand,
350

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
is a formal statement usually made after an enquiry, examination or review of specified matters
under report and includes the reporting auditor’s opinion thereon. Thus, when a reporting auditor
issues a certificate, he is responsible for the factual accuracy of what is stated therein. On the
other hand, when a reporting auditor gives a report, he is responsible for ensuring that the report
is based on factual data, that his opinion is in due accordance with facts, and that it is arrived at
by the application of due care and skill. The ‘report’ involves expression of opinion which may
differ from one professional to another. There is no question of exactitude in case of a report
since the information contained therein is based on estimates and involves judgement element.
15. Under the applicable Standards on Auditing, in what circumstances does the report of the statutory
auditor require modifications? What are the types of modifications possible to the said report?
ANSWER:
Types of Modified Opinions as per SA 705:
(i) Qualified Opinion
(ii) Adverse Opinion
(iii) Disclaimer of Opinion
The auditor shall modify the opinion in The auditor is unable to obtain sufficient
the auditor’s report when: The auditor appropriate audit evidence to conclude
concludes that, based on the audit that the financial statements as a whole
evidence obtained, the financial are free from material misstatement
statements as a whole are not free from
material misstatement; or
16. Write a short note on Emphasis of matter paragraph in Audit Reports.

ANSWER:
If the auditor considers it necessary to draw users’ attention to a matter presented or disclosed
in the financial statements that, in the auditor’s judgment, is of such importance that it is
fundamental to users’ understanding of the financial statements, the auditor shall include an
Emphasis of Matter paragraph in the auditor’s report provided:
(a) The auditor would not be required to modify the opinion in accordance with SA 705 (Revised)
as a result of the matter; and
(b) When SA 701 applies, the matter has not been determined to be a key audit matter to be
communicated in the auditor’s report.. These circumstances may include: • When a financial
reporting framework prescribed by law or regulation would be unacceptable but for the fact that
it is prescribed by law or regulation. • To alert users that the financial statements are prepared in
accordance with a special purpose framework.
17. KPI Ltd is a joint venture of KPI Inc, a company based in US, and OPQ Ltd, a company based
in Japan (hereinafter referred to as ‘JV partners’). KPI Ltd was registered in India and is
operating as a marketing support company for KPI Inc. All the costs of KPI Ltd are incurred in
351

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
India and entire revenue of KPI Inc is generated in USD. The entire funding requirements of KPI
Ltd are taken care of by the JV partners. Since KPI Ltd is based in India, hence it is also required
to get its financial statements audited. The company appointed new auditors for the audit of
the financial statements for the year ended 31 March 2020 after doing all appointment
formalities wherein auditors are required to ensure compliance with Standards on Auditing and
Internal Standards on Auditing.
As an expert you are required to advise the auditor about the requirements regarding auditor’s
report for audits conducted in accordance with both Standards on Auditing issued by ICAI and
International Standards on Auditing
ANSWER:
An auditor may be required to conduct an audit in accordance with, in addition to the Standards
on Auditing issued by ICAI, the International Standards on Auditing or auditing standards of any
other jurisdiction. If this is the case, the auditor’s report may refer to Standards on Auditing in
addition to the International Standards on Auditing or auditing standards of such other
jurisdiction, but the auditor shall do so only if:
(a) There is no conflict between the requirements in the ISAs or such auditing standards of other
jurisdiction and those in SAs that would lead the auditor:
(i) to form a different opinion, or
(ii) not to include an Emphasis of Matter paragraph or Other Matter paragraph that,
in the particular circumstances, is required by SAs; and
(b) The auditor’s report includes, at a minimum, each of the elements set out in Auditor’s Report
Prescribed by Law or Regulation discussed above when the auditor uses the layout or wording
specified by the Standards on Auditing. However, reference to “law or regulation” in above
paragraph shall be read as reference to the Standards on Auditing. The auditor’s report shall
thereby identify such Standards on Auditing.
When the auditor’s report refers to both the ISAs or the auditing standards of a specific
jurisdiction and the Standards on Auditing issued by ICAI, the auditor’s report shall clearly identify
the same including the jurisdiction of origin of the other auditing standards.
18. TUV Ltd. is a company engaged in the business of manufacture of spare parts. Saroj & Associates are
the statutory auditors of the company for the FY 2020-21. During the course of audit, CA Saroj noticed
that the company had a major customer, namely, Korean Mart from South Korea. Owing to an outbreak
of war and subsequent destruction leading to government ban on import and export in South Korea, the
demand from Korean Mart for the products of TUV Ltd. ended for an unforeseeable time period.
When discussed with the management, CA Saroj was told that the company is in the process of
identifying new customers for their products. CA Saroj understands that though the use of going concern
assumption is appropriate but a material uncertainty exists with respect to the identification of new
customers. This fact is duly reflected in the financial statements of TUV Ltd. for the FY 2020-21.
How should CA Saroj deal with this matter in the auditor’s report for the FY 2020-21?
352

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
ANSWER:
As per SA 570, “Going Concern”, loss of a major market or a key customer is one of the operating indicators
that may cast significant doubt on the company’s ability to continue as a going concern.
In the present case, TUV Ltd. has a key customer in South Korea from which the demand for its products
has ended on account of outbreak of war, subsequent destruction and government ban on import and
export in South Korea. Further, the company has not yet identified new customers and is in the process of
doing the same. As such, the identification of new customer is a material uncertainty that cast a significant
doubt on the company’s ability to continue as a going concern.
However, this matter is duly disclosed by the management of TUV Ltd. in the financial statements for the
year ended 31.03.2021.
As such, considering that the going concern assumption is appropriate but a material uncertainty exists
with respect to identification of new customer, CA Saroj should:
(1) Express an unmodified opinion and
(2) Include in his audit report, a separate section under the heading “Material Uncertainty Related to Going
Concern” to:
(i) Draw attention to the note in the financial statements that discloses the matters and
(ii) State that these events or conditions indicate that a material uncertainty exists that may cast significant
doubt on the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern and that the auditor’s opinion is not modified in
respect of the matter.
Thus, CA Saroj should deal with this matter in his auditor’s report in the above mentioned manner.
19. Sun Moon Ltd. is a power generating company which uses coal as raw material for its power
generating plant. The company has been allotted coal blocks in the state of Jharkhand and Odhisa.
During the FY 2020-21, a scam regarding allotment of coal blocks was unveiled leading to a ban on the
allotment of coal blocks to various companies including Sun Moon Ltd. This happened in the month of
December 2020 and as such entire power generation process of Sun Moon Ltd, came to a halt in that
month. As a result of such ban, and the resultant stop of the production process, many key managerial
personnel of the company left the company. There were delays in the of payment of wages and salaries
and the banks from whom the company had taken funds for project financing also decided not to extend
further finance or to fund further working capital requirements of the company.
Further, when discussed with the management, the statutory auditor understood that the company had
no action plan to mitigate such circumstances. Further, all such circumstances were not reflected the the
financial statements of Sun Moon Ltd. What course of action should the statutory auditor of the
company consider in such situation?
ANSWER:
SA 570- “Going Concern” deals with the auditor’s responsibilities in the audit of financial statements
relating to going concern and the implications for the auditor’s report.
The auditor’s responsibilities are to obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence regarding, and conclude
on, the appropriateness of management’s use of the going concern basis of accounting in the preparation
of the financial statements,
and to conclude, based on the audit evidence obtained, whether a material uncertainty exists about the
entity’s ability to continue as a going concern.
When the use of Going Concern Basis of Accounting Is Inappropriate i.e. if the financial statements have
been prepared using the going concern basis of accounting but, in the auditor’s judgment, management’s
353

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
use of the going concern basis of accounting in the preparation of the financial statements is inappropriate,
the auditor shall express an adverse opinion.
Also when adequate Disclosure of a Material Uncertainty Is Not Made in the Financial Statements the
auditor shall:
(i) Express a qualified opinion or adverse opinion, as appropriate, in accordance with SA 705 (Revised); and
(ii) In the Basis for Qualified (Adverse) Opinion section of the auditor’s report, state that a material
uncertainty exists that may cast significant doubt on the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern and
that the financial statements do not adequately disclose this matter.
In the present case, the following circumstances indicate the inability of Sun Moon Ltd. to continue as a
going concern:
• Ban on the allotment of coal blocks

• Halt in power generation
• Key Managerial Personnel leaving the company.
• Banks decided not to extend further finance and not to fund the working capital requirements of the
company.
• Non availability of sound action plan to mitigate such circumstances.
Therefore, considering the above factors it is clear that the going concern basis is inappropriate for the
company. Further, such circumstances are not reflected in the financial statements of the company. As
such, the statutory auditor of Sun Moon Ltd. should:
(1). Express an adverse opinion in accordance with SA 705 ( Revised) and
(2). In the Basis of Opinion paragraph of the auditor’s report, the statutory auditor should state that a
material uncertainty exists that may cast significant doubt on the entity’s ability to continue as a going
concern and that the financial statements do not adequately disclose this matter.
20.CA Omkar is the statutory auditor of Sabhyata Ltd. for the FY 2020-21. The company is engaged in the
business of manufacture of floor tiles. During the course of audit, CA Omkar obtained certain audit
evidence which were not consistent with the affirmation made in the financial statements. Discuss as to
how CA Omkar should deal with the situation in the auditor’s report.
ANSWER:
SA 705 deals with the auditor’s responsibility to issue an appropriate report in circumstances when, in
forming an opinion in accordance with SA 700 (Revised), the auditor concludes that a modification to the
auditor’s opinion on the financial statements is necessary.
The decision regarding which type of modified opinion is appropriate depends upon:
(a) The nature of the matter giving rise to the modification, that is, whether the financial statements are
materially misstated or, in the case of an inability to obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence, may be
materially misstated; and
(b) The auditor’s judgment about the pervasiveness of the effects or possible effects of the matter on the
Further, the auditor shall modify the opinion in the auditor’s report when the auditor concludes that based
on the audit evidence obtained, the financial statements as a whole are not free from material
misstatement.
In the present case, during the course of audit, CA Omkar obtained certain audit evidence which were not
consistent with the affirmation made in the financial statements. Therefore, CA Omkar should modify his
report in accordance with SA 705- “Modifications To The Opinion In The Independent Auditor’s Report.
354

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
CA Omkar should issue either a qualified opinion or an adverse opinion depending upon the circumstances
of the case:
(a) CA Omkar shall express a qualified opinion when, having obtained sufficient appropriate audit evidence,
he concludes that misstatements, individually or in the aggregate, are material, but not pervasive, to the
financial statements
(b) CA Omkar shall express an adverse opinion, when the auditor, having obtained sufficient appropriate
audit evidence, concludes that misstatements, individually or in the aggregate, are both material and
pervasive to the financial statements.
Thus, since CA Omkar has obtained audit evidence which are inconsistent with the affirmations made in the
financial statement, CA Omkar should modify his opinion as per the circumstances of the case.

21. KPI Ltd is a joint venture of KPI Inc, a company based in US, and OPQ Ltd, a company based
in Japan (hereinafter referred to as ‘JV partners’). KPI Ltd was registered in India and is
operating as a marketing support company for KPI Inc. All the costs of KPI Ltd are incurred in
India and entire revenue of KPI Inc is generated in USD. The entire funding requirements of KPI
Ltd are taken care of by the JV partners. Since KPI Ltd is based in India, hence it is also required
to get its financial statements audited.
The company appointed new auditors for the audit of the financial statements for the year
ended 31 March 2019 after doing all appointment formalities wherein auditors also confirmed
their eligibility for appointment including independence.
The statutory auditors have completed their audit and did not come up any significant
observations. Management of KPI Ltd was also very pleased with the working style of the
auditors.
When the auditors issued their final audit report, the management observed that the auditors
did not state anything related to their compliance in respect of ethical requirements regarding
independence etc. Further, the audit report was also silent on the requirement related to
auditor’s communication with those charged with governance in respect of matters related
to planned scope & timing of audit and any significant findings.
The management requested that the auditors should revisit their report and should include
these points in their report, however, as per the auditors all these communications were
already completed by them and hence they were not
required to form part of the audit report On the basis of above mentioned facts, please suggest
which of the following should be correct.
(a) The auditing standards do not require the auditors to comment on the points which the
management is requesting i.e. ethical requirements or matters related to planned scope &
timing of audit or any significant findings etc. However, if the auditor wants to include that on
the basis of his agreed terms with the management, he may do so.
(b) The auditing standards require the auditors to comment on the points which the
355

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
management is requesting i.e. ethical requirements or matters related to planned scope &
timing of audit or any significant findings etc. Hence, the auditors should issue rectified report.
(c) The ethical requirements are already completed by the auditors at the time of
appointment itself. Since the audit is completed, there is no need to comment on the planned
scope & timing of audit. Since there are no significant findings so this communication is also not
possible. Hence, the auditors need not revisit their report.
(d) The ethical requirements are already completed by the auditors at the time of
appointment itself and there are no significant findings, hence, there is no need to comment on
these points. However, the auditors should state that they communicate with those charged
with governance regarding the planned scope & timing of audit. Therefore, the auditors should
revisit their report.
Answer:-c
LMN & Co LLP is a large firm of Chartered Accountants having its offices based in Delhi, Pune,
Chandigarh and Bangalore.
22. The firm has staff of around 300 with 28 Partners. The firm has also created various
departments for various services that it offers – statutory audit, risk advisory, mergers &
acquisitions, indirect tax and direct tax, where dedicated teams are working who are specialized
in those fields.
The firm is also considering to create departments on the basis of industry sectors so that the
staff can become specialized into specific industries as the same would help in the objective of
the firm i.e. to offer best quality service to its various clients.
Statutory audit department of the firm has 13 partners across various offices in India out of
which 6 are based in Delhi office.
The audit team of one of the prestigious clients, KSH Ltd, has concluded that audit where audit
partner was AD Jain. As per the agreed timelines, the financial statements and the audit report
were planned to be signed on 30 June, 2019, however, on 29 June, 2019, AD Jain was required
to move out of India due to some exigency and would be back to India after a month’s time.
He was also not accessible during this period. The management of KSH Ltd discussed the matter
with another partner of the audit firm, SK Gupta, who eventually signed the audit report on 30
June, 2019 even though he was not part of the audit team which was involved in the fieldwork.
We would like to understand your views in respect of this matter.
(e) The management in such a case should have waited for AD Jain to come back and then get the
report signed. The audit report in this case would be considered to be invalid.
(f) SK Gupta signed the audit report considering the client was prestigious for the firm which was
unethical.
356

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
(g) Signing of the audit report as per the agreed timelines by SK Gupta was fine as he was also the
audit partner of the firm.
(h) Signing of audit report by any other person interferes with the concept of clarity of
responsibility.
Answer: (B) SK Gupta signed the audit report considering the client was prestigious for the firm
which was unethical
(RTP NOV 2019)

23. RBJ Ltd is a listed company engaged in the business of software and is one of the largest
company operating in this sector in India. The company’s annual turnover is INR 40,000 crores
with profits of INR 5,000 crores. Due to the nature of the business and the size of the company,
the operations of the company are spread out in India as well as outside India.
Outside India, the company is focusing more on US and European markets and the company
has been able to establish its good reputation in these markets as well.
During the course of the audit, the audit team spends significant time on audit of revenue – be
it planning, execution or conclusion. The audit team for this engagement is generally very big
i.e. a team of approx. 70-80 members. The company’s contracts with its various customers are
quite complicated and different. The efforts towards audit of revenue also involve significant
involvement of senior members of the audit team including the audit partner.
After completion of audit for the year ended 31 March 2019, the audit partner was discussing
significant matters with the management wherein he also communicated to the management
that he plans to include revenue recognition as key audit matter in his audit report. The
management was quite surprised to understand this from the auditor and did not agree with
revenue recognition to be shown as key audit matter in the audit report. As per the
management, the auditors didn’t have any modification and such a matter getting reported as
key audit matter would not go down well with various stakeholders and would significantly
impact the financial positions of the company in the market. The auditors were not able to
convince the management in respect of this point and there was a difference of opinion.
(a) You are requested to give your view in respect of this matter The concern of the
management is valid. For such a large sized company, such type of matter getting reported
as key audit matter is not appropriate.
(b) The assessment of the auditor is valid. Such a matter qualifies to be a key audit matter and
hence should be reported accordingly by the auditor in his audit report.
(c) Reporting revenue as key audit matter when the auditor does not have observation in
that area leading to any modification in his report, would not be appropriate.
(d) This being the first year of reporting of key audit matters, the auditor should take a soft
stand and should avoid reporting such controversial matters in his report.
Answer: ( C) Reporting revenue as key audit matter when the auditor does not have
357

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
observation in that area leading to any modification in his report, would not be appropriate.
(RTP NOV 2019)

24. BDJ Ltd is engaged in the business of providing management consultancy services and have
been in operation for the last 15 years. The company’s financial reporting process is very good
and its statutory auditors always issued clean report on the audit of the financial statements of
the company. The auditors were required to be rotated due to mandatory audit rotation
requirement of the Companies Act 2013.
RNJ & Associates, a firm of Chartered Accountants, was appointed as the new auditor of the
company for a term of 5 years and have to start their first audit for the financial year ended 31
March 2019. The auditors had a detailed and clear discussion with the management that they
will perform their audit procedures in respect of opening balances along with the audit
procedures for the financial year ended 31 March 2019.
Management agreed with that and the audit was completed as per the plan.
The auditors did not have any significant observations and hence they communicated to the
management that their report will be clean. Management was quite happy with this and also
requested the auditors to share draft report before issuing the final report.
In the draft audit report, all the particulars were fine except ‘other matters paragraph’ wherein
the auditors gave a reference that the financial statements for the comparative year ended 31
March 2018 was audited by another auditor. Management asked the audit team to remove this
paragraph as the auditors had performed all the audit procedures on opening balances also.
But the auditors did not agree with the management.
Please advise the auditor or the management whoever is incorrect with the right guidance.
(a) The contention of the management is valid. After performing all the audit procedures, an
auditor should not pass on the responsibility to another auditor by including such references in
his audit report.
(b) Any auditor has two options, either to perform audit procedures on opening balances or
given such reference of another auditor in his report. An auditor can not mix up the things
like this auditor has done. It is completely unprofessional.
(c) In the given situation even if the auditor wants to give such reference, the
management and the auditor should have taken approval from the previous auditor at the
time of appointment of new auditor. In this case, it cannot be done.
(d) The report of the auditor is absolutely correct and is in line with the auditing
standards. An auditor is required to include such reference in his report as per the requirements
of the auditing standard.
Answer: ( b) Any auditor has two options, either to perform audit procedures on opening balances
358

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
or given such reference of another auditor in his report. An auditor can not mix up the things
25. SKJ Private Ltd has an annual turnover of INR 200 crores and profits of INR 25 crores. The
company is engaged in the business of textiles and has fairly stable operations over the years.
There has not been much growth in the company in the last few years despite the attempts of
the management. Currently the management is more focused towards cost cutting and has
been considering all the options to achieve that objective.
The statutory auditors of the company have been auditing the financial statements for the last
3 years and have issued clean reports over these years.
During the financial year ended 31 March 2019, management got a large project from a new
customer which resulted in significant increase in the turnover of the company. However, the
profitability of the company did not improve much because the margins in the contract were
not high.
The statutory auditors during the course of their audit of financial statements for the year ended
31 March 2019 (their fourth year of audit) did not agree with the revenue recognition criteria
followed by the company. Since the matter was significant, lot of discussions/ debates
happened between the auditor and the management. But it was finally agreed that the auditors
would qualify their audit report.
Auditors wanted that the management should explain this matter in detail in the notes to
accounts to the financial statement over which the auditors are qualifying the audit report.
However, the management had a different view. Management said that if the auditor is
qualifying his report then why should the management also highlight that matter in the financial
statement and hence refused to include any note for the same.
Because of this conflict, audit is not getting concluded. You are requested to give your view in
respect of this matter so that the matter gets concluded.
(a) In the given situation, if the management does not agree to give a note in the financial
statements then the auditor should not hold the audit report. However, in such a case, the
auditor would need to give disclaimer of opinion in his report instead of qualification.
(b) The argument of the management seems correct. Auditor cannot do both the things i.e. to
qualify and then also get that highlighted in the financial statements. That note would not be
beneficial for the users of the financial statements.
(c) In case of such matters related to revenue recognition, it is always better to give detailed
explanation in the notes to accounts to the financial statements. If the explanation is
satisfactory then the auditor should also consider giving emphasis of matter instead of
qualification.
(d) The requirement of the auditor is beneficial for the company because by giving an explanation
of the matter, on which auditor has given a qualification, in the notes to accounts, the
359

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
management would be able to explain their perspective/ point of view to the users of the
financial statements. In that case, auditor while giving the qualification can give reference to
the notes to accounts otherwise the entire matter would form part of the audit report.
However, the auditor should
not hold his report if the management does not want to give any explanation in the notes to
accounts.
Answer: (d) Any auditor has two options, either to perform audit procedures on opening balances
or given such reference of another auditor in his report. An auditor can not mix up the things
26. While conducting the current year audit of Finco Ltd, the auditor obtains audit evidence
that a material misstatement exists in the prior period financial statements. This misstatement
was related to recognition of research and development expenditure. The provisions of Ind AS
38 Intangible Assets relating to capitalisation of development expenditure was not applied
properly. On this, unmodified opinion had been previously issued. The current auditor verified
that the misstatement had not been dealt with as required under Ind AS 8 Accounting Policies,
Changes in Accounting Estimates and Errors. Accordingly, the current auditor will:
(a) Express an unmodified opinion in the auditor’s report on the current period financial
statements since it was related to the prior year.
(b) Express a qualified opinion in the auditor’s report on the current period financial statements,
(c) Express a qualified or an adverse opinion in the auditor’s report on the current period financial
(d) Express an adverse opinion in the auditor’s report on the current period financial statements,
Answer: ( c)
27. RTP May 2018 Qn no.7(b)
C Limited has defaulted in repayment of dues to a financial institution during the financial year
2021-22 and the same remained outstanding as at March 31, 2022. However, the Company
settled the total outstanding dues including interest in April, 2022 subsequent to the year end
and before completion of the audit. Discuss how you would deal with this matter and draft a
suitable Auditor's Report.
ANSWER
Reporting for Default in Repayment of Dues: As per the general instructions for preparation of
Balance Sheet, provided under Schedule III to the Companies Act, 2013, terms of repayment of
term loans and other loans is required to be disclosed in the notes to accounts. It also requires
360

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
specifying the period and amount of continuing default as on the balance sheet date in
repayment of loans and interest, separately in each case.
Further, as per clause (viii) of Para 3 of CARO, 2020, the auditor of a company has to state in his
report whether the Company has defaulted in repayment of dues to a financial institution or bank
or debentures holders and if yes, the period and amount of default to be reported.
In the given case, C Ltd. has defaulted in repayments of dues to a financial institution during the
financial year 2021-22 which remain outstanding as at March 31, 2022. However, the company
has settled the total outstanding dues including interest in April, 2022 but, the dues were
outstanding as at March 31, 2022. Therefore, it needs to be reported in the notes to accounts.
The draft report for above matter is as under:
“The company has taken a loan during the year, from a financial institution amounting to Rs. XXXX
@ X% p.a. which is repayable by monthly installment of Rs. XXXX for XX months.
The company has defaulted in repayment of dues including interest to a financial institution during
the financial year 2020-21 amounting to Rs. XXXX which remained outstanding as at March 31,
2022. The period of default is XXX days. However, the outstanding sum was settled by the company
in April, 2022.”
28.RTP May 2018 Qn no.7(c)
Relevant Notes given by the management in the financial statements of India Branch Office of
ABC Limited are:
• Income tax authorities have raised demands (including interest upto the date of demand)
aggregating to Rs. 100 crores and Rs. 40 crores respectively for assessment year 2013-14 based
on report by auditors consequent to conduct of special audit as directed under section 142(2A)
of the Income tax Act, 1961 and in addition, have also initiated penalty proceedings against the
Company. The Company has contested these demands before the Commissioner of Income tax
(Appeals) and has also filed applications for stay of penalty proceedings and the same are
currently pending disposal.
Based on review of underlying documents and legal inputs, the management has assessed that
there is probability of likely outflow to the extent of Rs. 50 crores (including interest liability till
date of stay of payment of Rs. 15 crores) in relation to the above demands and has accounted for
the same in these financial statements. With respect to further liability of Rs. 50 crores, the
management believes that it has the necessary documents to furnish to the tax authorities and
basis the expert’s inputs believes that Company has good chances of success of receiving the
judgments in its favour. Further, the management believes that the likelihood of penalties being
imposed against the Company is not probable and accordingly, no adjustments are considered
necessary in these financial statements.
As at March 31, 2017, the Company has accumulated losses of Rs. 150 crores against equity of
Rs. 100 crores and also net current liabilities of Rs. 35 crores. The management is of the view
that the current year losses are primarily attributable to income tax liabilities devolving on the
Company, as discussed under paragraph XX. As per the management assessment, it is likely to
generateRs. ___ and Rs. from the operations during the financial years ending March 31, 2018
and March 31, 2019 respectively. Further, the Company’s key shareholders have confirmed that
they shall provide continuing financial support to the Company’s day to day operations so as to
361

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
enable the Company to pay off its debts, as and when they fall due. Accordingly, these financial
statements have been prepared on a going concern basis.
As an auditor of ABC Limited, you are required to draft emphasis of matter para in the given
situation on the basis of analysis of above notes (when there is material tax litigation that casts
significant doubt on the entity being regarded as going concern)
Answer
Emphasis of Matters Para:
• We draw attention to Note XX, regarding certain income-tax demands of Rs. 100 crores pending
in various stages of assessments/ appeals. The management based upon expert’s advice
believes that no demand or liability including interest and penalty on account of settlement of
assessment/ appeals of the pending matters by the Income tax authorities is likely to devolve on
the Company, in addition to those already provided for in these financial statements. Pending
the final outcome of the aforesaid matters, no further adjustments have been made in these
financial statements in this regard.
• Note XX of the financial statements that as at March 31, 2017, the Company has accumulated
losses of Rs. 150 crores against equity of Rs. 100 crores and also net current liabilities of Rs. 35
crores. These conditions indicate the existence of a material uncertainty that may cast
significant doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern, which is
dependent
on establishing profitable operations and obtaining continuing financial support from its key
shareholders. These mitigating factors have been more fully discussed in Note XX of the
accompanying financial statements, in view of which the accompanying financial statements
have been prepared under the going concern assumption, and consequently, no further
adjustments have been made in these financial statements.
Our opinion is not modified in respect of the above matters.
29. MTP-Aug-18 Qn No 1(d) 5 Marks:
During the course of audit of CT Ltd. for the financial year 2017-18, it is noticed that Rs. 3.00
lakhs of employee contribution and Rs. 7.50 lakhs of employer contribution towards employee
state insurance contribution have been accounted in the books of accounts in respective heads.
Whereas, it was found that Rs. 5.00 lakhs only has been deposited with ESIC department during
the year ended 31st March, 2018. The Finance Manager informed the auditor that due to
financial crunch they have not deposited the amount due but will deposit the amount overdue
along with interest as and when financial position improves. Comment as a statutory auditor
MTP Apr 18 Qn no.2(C) 5 Marks
During the course of audit of GST Ltd. for the financial year 2017 -18, it has noticed that
Rs. 3.00 lakhs of employee contribution and Rs. 8.50 lakhs of employer contribution towards
employee state insurance contribution have been accounted in the books of accounts in
respective heads. Whereas, it was found that Rs. 4.50 lakhs only has been deposited with ESIC
362

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
department during the year ended 31st March, 2018. The Finance Manager informed the
auditor that due to financial crunch they have not deposited the amount due, but will deposit
the amount overdue along with interest as and when financial position improves. Comment
as a statutory auditor.
Answer
Non-Compliance of Laws and Regulations & Reporting Requirements: As per SA 250
“Consideration of Laws and Regulations in an Audit of Financial Statement”, it is the responsibility
of management, with the oversight of those charged with governance, to ensure that the entity’s
operations are conducted in accordance with the provisions of laws and regulations, including
compliance with the provisions of laws and regulations that determine the reported amounts and
disclosures in an entity’s financial statements. The auditor is responsible for obtaining reasonable
assurance that the financial statements, taken as a whole, are free from material misstatement,
whether caused by fraud or error. In conducting an audit of financial statements, the auditor takes
into account the applicable legal and regulatory framework. If the auditor concludes that the non
- compliance has a material effect on the financial statements, and has not been adequately
Further, the auditor is required to report under clause (vii)(a) of Para 3 of CARO, 2016 whether the
company is regular in depositing undisputed statutory dues including provident fund,employees'
state insurance, income-tax, sales-tax, service tax, duty of customs, duty of excise, value added
tax, cess and any other statutory dues to the appropriate authorities and if not, the extent of the
arrears of outstanding statutory dues as on the last day of the financial year concerned for a period
of more than six months from the date they became payable, shall be indicated by the auditor.
In the instant case, even though accrual principles have been followed, disclosure of non-payment
is necessary. The auditor should disclose the fact of non-payment of rupees 6.50 lakhs in his report.
30.MTP-OCT-18 Qn No 1(b) 5 Marks:
XYZ Pvt. Ltd. has submitted the financial statements for the year ended 31 -3-18 for audit. The
audit assistant observes and brings to your notice that the company's records show following
dues:
Income Tax relating to Assessment Year 2014-15 Rs. 125 lacs - Appeal is pending before Hon'ble
ITAT since 30-9-16.
Customs duty Rs. 85 lakhs - Demand notice received on 15-9-17 but no action has been taken to
pay or appeal. Comment.
Answer:
Non-Compliance of Laws and Regulations: As per SA 250 “Consideration of Laws and
Regulations in an Audit of Financial Statement”, it is the responsibility of management, with the
oversight of those charged with governance, to ensure that the entity’s operations are
conducted in accordance with the provisions of laws and regulations, including compliance with
the provisions of laws and regulations that determine the reported amounts and disclosures in
an entity’s financial statements.
363

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
The auditor is responsible for obtaining reasonable assurance that the financial statements, taken
as a whole, are free from material misstatement, whether caused by fraud or error. In conducting
an audit of financial statements, the auditor takes into account the applicable legal and regulatory
framework. Owing to the inherent limitations of an audit, there is an unavoidable risk that some
material misstatements in the financial statements may not be detected, even though the audit is
properly planned and performed in accordance with the SAs.
If the auditor concludes that the non-compliance has a material effect on the financial statements,
and has not been adequately reflected in the financial statements, the auditor shall express a
qualified or adverse opinion on the financial statements.
Further, the auditor is required to report on certain matters specified in Para 3 of CARO, 2020
under section 143 of the Companies Act, 2013.
One of such matter is non-payment of dues to Government, on account of any dispute. As per clause
(vii)(b) of Para 3 of CARO, 2016, in case dues of income tax or sales tax or service tax or duty of
customs or duty of excise or value added tax have not been deposited on account of any dispute,
then the amounts involved and the forum where dispute is pending shall be mentioned.
In the present case, there is Income Tax demand of Rs. 125 Lacs and the company has gone for
an appeal, it needs considerations as to whether the entire demand is disputed, because it is
difficult to presume that the demand by Income Tax authority is without any basis.
Therefore, as per AS 29 “Provisions, Contingent Liabilities and Contingent Assets”, partly to the
extent the company considers that the demand is based on some logical basis, that amount may
be provided for and the remaining may be disclosed as the contingent liability. Further, it should
be brought to notice of the members by reporting.
Additionally, the demand notice has been received for Customs duty of Rs. 85 lakhs and is
outstanding on the closure of financial year, for which no action has been taken by the
management. Therefore, it should also be brought to notice of the members by reporting.
Whilst the Audit team has identified various matters, they need your advice to include the same
in your audit report in view of CARO 2022:-
(i)Physical verification of only 40% of items of inventory has been conducted bythe company. The
balance 60% will be conducted in next year due to lack of time and resources.
(iI) An amount of Rs. 3.25 Lakhs per month is paid to M/s. WE CARE Associates, a partnership firm,
which is a 'related party' in accordance with the provisions of the Companies Act, 2013 for the
marketing services rendered by them. Based on an independent assessment, the consideration
paid is higher than the arm's length pricing by Rs. 0.25 Lakhs per month. Whilst the transaction
was accounted in the financial statements based on the amounts' paid, no separate disclosure
has been made in the notes forming part of the accounts highlighting the same as a 'related party'
transaction.
Answer:
Physical Verification of Inventory: Clause (ii) of Para 3 of CARO, 2020 requires the auditor to
report on whether physical verification of inventory has been conducted at reasonable intervals
364

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
by the management. Physical verification of inventory is the responsibility of the management

which should normally verify all material items at least once in a year and more often in
appropriate cases. The auditor in order to satisfy himself about verification at reasonable
intervals should examine the adequacy of evidence and record of verification. In the given case,
the above requirement of CARO, 2020 has not been fulfilled as such and the auditor should point
out the specific areas where he believes the procedure of inventory verification is not reasonable.
He may consider the impact on financial statement and report accordingly.
(ii) As per clause (xiii) of para 3 of CARO 2020, the auditor is required to report, “whether all
transactions with the related parties are in compliance with sections 177 and 188 of Companies
required by the applicable accounting standards;” Therefore, the duty of the auditor, under this
clause is to report (i)Whether all transactions with the related parties are in compliance with
section 177 and 188 of the Companies Act, 2013 (“Act”); (ii) Whether related party disclosures as
required by relevant Accounting Standards (AS 18, as may be applicable) are disclosed in the
In the present case, the auditor is required to report as per clause xiii of para 3 of CARO 2020, as
one of related party transaction amounting 3.25 lakhs per month i.e. in lieu of marketing services
has been noticed of which amount Rs. 0.25 lakh per month is exceeding the arm’s length price has
not been disclosed highlighting the same as related party transactions as per AS 18. Thus, the
auditor is required to report accordingly.
32. MTP-Mar 2019 Qn No 6(b) 6 Marks:
Abhimanyu Finance Ltd. is a Non Banking Finance Company and was in the business of
accepting public deposits and giving loans. The company was having net owned funds of
Rs.1,50,00,000/ - (one crore fifty lakhs) and was not having registration certificate from RBI and
applied for it on 30th March 2018. The company appointed Mr. Kabra as its statutory auditors
for the year 2017-18. Advise the auditor with reference to auditor procedures to be taken and
reporting requirements on the same in view of CARO 2020?
Answer:
As per Clause (xvi) of Paragraph 3 of CARO 2020, the auditor is required to report that
“whether the company is required to be registered under section 45-IA of the Reserve Bank of
India Act, 1934 and if so, whether the registration has been obtained.”
The auditor is required to examine whether the company is engaged in the business which attract
the requirements of the registration. The registration is required where the financing activity is a
principal business of the company. The RBI restrict companies from carrying on the business of a
non-banking financial institution without obtaining the certificate of registration.
(i) The auditor should examine the transactions of the company with relation to the activities covered
365
under the RBI Act and directions related to the Non-Banking Financial Companies.

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
(iv) Whether the company has obtained the registration as NBFC, if not, the reasons should be sought
from the management and documented.
(1) Whether the registration is required under section 45-IA of the RBI Act, 1934. SIf so, whether it has
obtained the registration.
(2) If the registration not obtained, reasons thereof.
In the instant case Abhimanyu Finance Ltd. is aNon Banking Finance Company and was in the
business of accepting public deposits and giving loans since 2015. The company was having net
owned funds of Rs.1,50,00,000/-(one crore fifty lakhs) which is less in comparison to the prescribed
limit i.e. 2 crore rupees and was also not having registration certificate from RBI (though applied
for it on 30th March 2018). The auditor is required to reporton the sameas per Clause (xvi) of
Paragraph3 of CARO 2016.
33. RTP Nov 18 Qn no 7 , RTP May 2020 Qn no 13(b)
“When the auditor modifies the audit opinion, the auditor shall use the heading “Qualified
Opinion,” “Adverse Opinion,” or “Disclaimer of Opinion,” as appropriate, for the Opinion
section.” As an expert you are required to brief the special considerations required for
expressing:
(a) Qualified Opinion;
(b) Adverse Opinion and
(c) Disclaimer of Opinion.
Answer
(a) Special consideration required for expressing Qualified Opinion: When the auditor expresses
a qualified opinion due to a material misstatement in the financial statements, the auditor shall
state that, in the auditor’s opinion, except for the effects of the matter(s) described in the Basis
for Qualified Opinion section
(a) When reporting in accordance with a fair presentation framework, the accompanying financial
statements present fairly, in all material respects (or give a true and fair view of) […] in accordance
with [the applicable financial reporting framework]; or
(b) When reporting in accordance with a compliance framework, the accompanying financial
statements have been prepared, in all material respects, in accordance with [the applicable
financial reporting framework].
366

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
When the modification arises from an inability to obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence, the
auditor shall use the corresponding phrase “except for the possible effects of the matter(s) ...” for
the modified opinion.
(b) Special consideration needed for expressing Adverse Opinion: When the auditor expresses an
adverse opinion, the auditor shall state that, in the auditor’s opinion, because of the significance
of the matter(s) described in the Basis for Adverse Opinion section:
(i) When reporting in accordance with a fair presentation framework, the accompanying financial
statements do not present fairly (or give a true and fair view of) […] in accordance with [the
applicable financial reporting framework]; or
(ii) When reporting in accordance with a compliance framework, the accompanying financial
statements have not been prepared, in all material respects, in accordance with [the applicable
financial reporting framework].
(c) Special consideration is required for expressing Disclaimer of Opinion: When the auditor
disclaims an opinion due to an inability to obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence, the auditor
shall:
(i) State that the auditor does not express an opinion on the accompanying financial statements;
(ii) State that, because of the significance of the matter(s) described in the Basis for Disclaimer of
Opinion section, the auditor has not been able to obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence to
provide a basis for an audit opinion on the financial statements; and
(iii) Amend the statement required in SA 700 (Revised), which indicates that the financial statements
have been audited, to state that the auditor was engaged to audit the financial statements.
Unless required by law or regulation, when the auditor disclaims an opinion on the financial
statements, the auditor’s report shall not include a Key Audit Matters section in accordance with
SA 701.
34. MTP-Mar 2019 Qn No 4(a) 5 Marks:

Whilst the Audit team has identified various matters, they need your advice to include the
same in your audit report in view of CARO 2020:-
(i) The long term borrowings from the parent has no agreed terms and neither the interest nor the
principal has been repaid so far.
(ii) The Internal Auditor of the Company has identified a fraud in the recruitment of employees by
employees for taking them on board with the Company. After due investigation, the concerned HR
Manager was sacked. The amount of such kickbacks is expected to be in the range of Rs.12 Lakhs.
Answer:
(i) As per clause (xiii) of para 3 of CARO 2020 the auditor is required to report, “whether all
367

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
required by the applicable accounting standards”.
In the present case, the auditor is required to report as per clause xiii of para 3 of CARO 2020 receipt
of long term borrowing from Parent Company which is transactions with the related party.
(ii) As per clause Clause (x) of para 3 of CARO 2020 the auditor is required to report, “whether
any fraud by the company or any fraud on the Company by its officers or employees has been
noticed or reported during the year; If yes, the nature and the amount involved is to be indicated.”
In the instant case, a fraud has been identified in recruitment of employees by the HR Department
wherein certain sums were alleged to have been taken as kickback from the company of amounting
rupees approx. 12 lakh. The auditor is required to report on the same in accordance with clause
(x) of para 3 of CARO 2020 .

XYZ Pvt. Ltd. has submitted the financial statements for the year ended 31-3-19 for audit. The
audit assistant observes and brings to your notice that the company's records show following
dues:
• Income Tax relating to Assessment Year 2015-16 rupees 125 lacs - Appeal is pending before
Hon'ble ITAT since 30-9-17.
• Customs duty rupees 85 lakhs - Demand notice received on 15-9-18 but no action has been taken
to pay or appeal.
As an auditor, how would you bring this fact to the members?
Answer:
Non-Compliance of Laws and Regulations: As per SA 250 “Consideration of Laws and Regulations
in an Audit of Financial Statement”, it is the responsibility of management, with the oversight of
those charged with governance, to ensure that the entity’s operations are conducted in
accordance with the provisions of laws and regulations, including compliance with the provisions
of laws and regulations that determine the reported amounts and disclosures in an entity’s
The auditor is responsible for obtaining reasonable assurance that the financial statements, taken
as a whole, are free from material misstatement, whether caused by fraud or error. In conducting
an audit of financial statements, the auditor takes into account the applicable legal and regulatory
framework. Owing to the inherent limitations of an audit, there is an unavoidable risk that some
material misstatements in the financial statements may not be detected, even though the audit is
properly planned and performed in accordance with the SAs.
If the auditor concludes that the non-compliance has a material effect on the financial statements,
and has not been adequately reflected in the financial statements, the auditor shall express a
qualified or adverse opinion on the financial statements.
Further, the auditor is required to report on certain matters specified in Para 3 of CARO, 2020
under section 143 of the Companies Act, 2013.
368

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
One of such matter is non-payment of dues to Government, on account of any dispute. As per
clause (vii)(b) of Para 3 of CARO, 2020, in case dues of income tax or sales tax or service tax or duty
of customs or duty of excise or value added tax have not been deposited on account of any dispute,
then the amounts involved and the forum where dispute is pending shall be mentioned. {A mere
representation to the concerned Department shall not be treated as a dispute.}
In the present case, there is Income Tax demand of Rs. 125 Lacs and the company has gone for
an appeal, it needs considerations as to whether the entire demand is disputed, because it is
difficult to presume that the demand by Income Tax authority is without any basis.
Therefore, as per AS 29 “Provisions, Contingent Liabilities and Contingent Assets”, partly to the
extent the company considers that the demand is based on some logical basis, that amount may
be provided for and the remaining may be disclosed as the contingent liability. Further, it should be
brought to notice of the members by reporting.
Additionally, the demand notice has been received for Customs duty of Rs. 85 lakhs and is
outstanding on the closure of financial year, for which no action has been taken by the
management. Therefore, it should also be brought to notice of the members by reporting.
36. RTP May 2019 Qn no 16, (MTP- NOV 2021)

Whilst the Audit team has identified various matters, they need your advice to include the same
in your audit report in view of CARO 2020:-
(a) The long term borrowings from the parent has no agreed terms and neither the interest nor the
principal has been repaid so far.
(b) The Company is in the process of selling its office along with the freehold land available at
Chandigarh and is actively on the lookout for potential buyers. Whilst the same was purchased at
Rs. 25 Lakhs in 2008, the current market value is Rs. 250 Lakhs,
This property is pending to be registered in the name of the Company, due to certain procedural
issues associated with the Registration though the Company is having a valid possession and has
paid its purchase cost in full. The Company has disclosed this amount under Fixed Assets though
no disclosure of non-registration is made in the notes forming part of the accounts.
(c) An amount of Rs. 3.25 Lakhs per month is paid to M/s. WE CARE Associates, a partnership firm,
which is a 'related party' in accordance with the provisions of the Companies Act, 2013 for the
marketing services rendered by them. Based on an independent assessment, the consideration
paid is higher than the arm's length pricing by Rs. 0.25 Lakhs per month. Whilst the transaction
was accounted in the financial statements based on the amounts' paid, no separate disclosure
has been made in the notes forming part of the accounts highlighting the same as a 'related
party' transaction.
(d) The Internal Auditor of the Company has identified a fraud in the recruitment of employees by
employees for taking them on board with the Company. After due investigation, the concerned
HR Manager was sacked. The amount of such kickbacks is expected to be in the range of Rs. 12
Lakhs.
369

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
Answer
a) As per clause (xiii) of para 3 of CARO 2020 the auditor is required to report, “whether all
required by the applicable accounting standards”.
In the present case, the auditor is required to report as per clause xiii of para 3 of CARO 2020
regarding receipt of long term borrowing from Parent Company which qualifies as a transaction
with the related party.
b) As per clause (i) (c) of para 3 of CARO 2020 the auditor is required to report, “whether the title deeds
of immovable properties are held in the name of the company. If not, provide the details thereof.”
In the present case, the Company has office along with freehold land in Chandigarh. Though
company has paid its purchase cost in full however, this property is pending to be registered in
the name of the company i.e. title deed is not in the name of Company since 2008. Therefore, the
auditor is required to report the same in accordance with clause (i)(c) of para 3 of CARO 2020.
The reporting under this clause, where the title deeds of the immovable property are not held in
the name of the Company, may be made incorporating following details, in the form of a table or
otherwise in case of land:-
• total number of cases,
• whether leasehold / freehold,
• gross block and net block, (as at Balance Sheet date), and
• remarks, if any.
C) As per clause (xiii) of para 3 of CARO 2020, the auditor is required to report, “whether all
required by the applicable accounting standards;”
Therefore, the duty of the auditor, under this clause is to report (i)Whether all transactions with
the related parties are in compliance with section 177 and 188 of the Companies Act, 2013 (“Act”);
(ii) Whether related party disclosures as required by relevant Accounting Standards (AS 18, as
may be applicable) are disclosed in the financial statements.
In the present case, the auditor is required to report as per clause xiii of para 3 of CARO 2020, as
one of related party transaction amounting 3.25 lakhs per month i.e. in lieu of marketing services
has been noticed of which amount Rs. 0.25 lakh per month is exceeding the arm’s length price has
not been disclosed highlighting the same as related party transactions as per AS 18. Thus, the
auditor is required to report accordingly.
D) As per clause Clause (x) of para 3 of CARO 2020 the auditor is required to report, “whether any fraud
by the company or any fraud on the Company by its officers or employees has been noticed or
reported during the year; If yes, the nature and the amount involved is to be indicated.”
In the instant case, a fraud has been identified in recruitment of employees by the HR Department
wherein certain sums were alleged to have been taken as kickback from the company of amounting
rupees approx. 12 lakh. The auditor is required to report on the same in accordance with clause (x)
of para 3 of CARO 2020.
370

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
37. RTP Nov 2019 Qn no 16(a)

Under CARO, 2020, as a statutory auditor, how would you report?
(i) RPS Ltd. has entered into non-cash transactions with Mr. Rahul, son of director, which is an
arrangement by which the RPS Ltd. is in process to acquire assets for consideration other than
cash.
(ii) NSP Limited has its factory building, appearing as fixed assets in its financial statements in the
name of one of its director who was overlooking the manufacturing activities.
Answer
(i) Non-cash Transactions with Relative of Director: As per Clause (xv) of paragraph 3 of CARO,
2020, the auditor is required to report “whether the company has entered into any non-cash
transactions with directors or persons connected with him and if so, whether the provisions of
section 192 of Companies Act, 2013 have been complied with”.
Section 192 of the said Act deals with restriction on non-cash transactions involving directors or
persons connected with them. The section prohibits the company from entering into such types of
arrangements unless it is an arrangement by which the company acquires or is to acquire assets for
consideration other than cash, from such director or person so connected.
In the instant case, RPS Ltd. has entered into non-cash transactions with Mr. Rahul, son of director
which is an arrangement by which RPS Ltd. is in process to acquire assets for consideration other
than cash. In the above situation the provisions of section 192 of Companies Act, 2013 have been
complied with.
However, the reporting requirements under this clause are given in two parts. The first part
requires the auditor to report on whether the company has entered into any non-cash
transactions with the directors or any persons connected with such director/s. The second part of
the clause requires the auditor to report whether the provisions of section 192 of the Act have
been complied with. Therefore, the second part of the clause becomes reportable only if the
answer to the first part is in affirmative.
In the given situation, RPS Ltd. has entered into non-cash transactions with Mr. Rahul, son of
director which is affirmative answer to the first part of the Clause(xv) of Paragraph 3 of CARO, 2020,
thus, reporting is required for the same. Draft report is given below.
According to the information and explanations given to us, the Company has entered into non-cash
transactions with Mr. Rahul, son of one of the directors during the year, for the acquisition of assets,
which in our opinion is covered under the provisions of Section 192 of the Companies Act, 2013.
(ii) Title deeds of Immovable Property in the name of Director: As per Clause (i)(c) of Paragraph 3 of
the CARO, 2020, the auditor is required to report on whether the title deeds of immovable
properties are held in the name of the company. If not, provide the details thereof.
The auditor should verify the title deeds available and reconcile the same with the fixed assets
register. The scrutiny of the title deeds of the immovable property may reveal a number of
discrepancies between the details in the fixed assets register and the details available in the title
deeds. This may be due to various reasons which needs to be examined.
371

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
In the given case, NSP Limited has its factory building, appearing as fixed assets in its financial
statements in the name of director. Thus, the auditor shall report on the same under Clause (i)(c)
of Paragraph 3 of the CARO, 2020.
The reporting under this clause, where the title deeds of the immovable property are not held in
the name of the Company, may be made incorporating following details, in the form of a table or
otherwise:
A:In case of land:-

• whether leasehold / freehold,
• gross block and net block, (as at Balance Sheet date), and
B:In case of Buildings:-

• gross block & net block, (as at Balance Sheet date) and
38. RTP Nov 2019 Qn no 16(b)

KPI Ltd. is a company on which International Standards on Auditing are applicable along with
Standard on Auditing issued by the ICAI. The company appointed new auditors for the audit of
the financial statements year ended 31 March 2019 after doing all appointment formalities.
Therefore, the auditor’s report referred the International Standard on Auditing in addition to the
Standard on Auditing issued by the ICAI.
As an expert, you are required to advise the auditor regarding auditor’s report for audits
conducted in accordance with both the Standards.
Answer
Auditor’s Report for Audits Conducted in Accordance with Both Standards on Auditing Issued
by ICAI and International Standards on Auditing or Auditing Standards of Any Other
Jurisdiction: As per SA 700, “Forming an Opinion and Reporting on Financial Statements”, an
auditor may be required to conduct an audit in accordance with, in addition to the Standards
on Auditing issued by ICAI, the International Standards on Auditing or auditing standards of any
other
jurisdiction. If this is the case, the auditor’s report may refer to Standards on Auditing in
addition to the International Standards on Auditing or auditing standards of such other
jurisdiction, but the auditor shall do so only if:
(a) There is no conflict between the requirements in the ISAs or such auditing standards of other
jurisdiction and those in SAs that would lead the auditor:
(i) to form a different opinion, or
(ii) not to include an Emphasis of Matter paragraph or Other Matter paragraph that,
in the particular circumstances, is required by SAs; and
(b) The auditor’s report includes, at a minimum, each of the elements set out in Auditor’s Report
372

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
Prescribed by Law or Regulation discussed above when the auditor uses the layout or wording
specified by the Standards on Auditing. However, reference to “law or regulation” in above
paragraph shall be read as reference to the Standards on Auditing. The auditor’s report shall
thereby identify such Standards on Auditing.
When the auditor’s report refers to both the ISAs or the auditing standards of a specific
jurisdiction and the Standards on Auditing issued by ICAI, the auditor’s report shall clearly identify
the same including the jurisdiction of origin of the other auditing standards.
39. RTP May 2020 QN no 13(c)

The auditor’s inability to obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence (also referred to as a
limitation on the scope of the audit) may arise from:
(i) Circumstances beyond the control of the entity;
(ii) Circumstances relating to the nature or timing of the auditor’s work; or
(iii) Limits imposed by the management
Explain with the help of examples.
Answer:
The auditor’s inability to obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence (also referred to fas a
limitation on the scope of the audit) may arise from:
(i) Circumstances beyond the control of the entity;
(ii) Circumstances relating to the nature or timing of the auditor’s work; or
(iii) Limitations imposed by management.
An inability to perform a specific procedure does not constitute a limitation on the scope of the
audit if the auditor is able to obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence by performing
alternative procedures. Limitations imposed by management may have other implications for the
audit, such as for the auditor’s assessment of fraud risks and consideration of engagement
continuance.
Examples of circumstances beyond the control of the entity include when:
• The entity’s accounting records have been destroyed.
• The accounting records of a significant component have been seized indefinitely by
governmental authorities.
Examples of circumstances relating to the nature or timing of the auditor’s work include when:
• The entity is required to use the equity method of accounting for an associated entity, and the
auditor is unable to obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence about the latter’s financial
information to evaluate whether the equity method has been appropriately applied.
• The timing of the auditor’s appointment is such that the auditor is unable to observe the
counting of the physical inventories.
• The auditor determines that performing substantive procedures alone is not sufficient, but the
entity’s controls are not effective.
373
Examples of an inability to obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence arising from a limitation on

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
the scope of the audit imposed by management include when:

• Management prevents the auditor from observing the counting of the physical inventory.
40. The audit team is preparing to conduct audit for ABC Company for the period ending 31.3.2020.
However, the audit team has not received its audit fees from ABC Company for its audit concluded for
the period ended 31.3.2019. The audit team might be tempted to issue a favorable report so that ABC
Company is able to secure a loan to settle the fees outstanding for their 31.3.2019 audit. The audit team
is not complying the fundamental principles of auditing hence hindering the Auditor's Independence.
Explain the types of
threats that may hinder Auditor's Independence while issuing Audit Report. (5 Marks) (past exam jan
2021)
ANSWER
In the given case of ABC Company, audit team is preparing to conduct its audit for the F.Y ending on
31.03.2020. Audit firm did not receive its fees for the F.Y ending on 31.03.2019.
Audit team is tempted to issue a favorable report so that auditee can secure a loan to settle auditor’s
outstanding fees. The audit team did not comply with fundamental principles of auditing and hence
compromising Auditor’s Independence.
Compliance with the fundamental principles may potentially be threatened by a broad range of
circumstances. Many threats fall into the following categories:
The Code of Ethics for Professional Accountants prepared by the International Federation of Accountants
(IFAC) identifies five types of threats. These are:
1. Self-interest threats, which occur when an auditing firm, its partner or associate could benefit from a
financial interest in an audit client. Examples include (i) direct financial interest or materially significant
indirect financial interest in a client, (ii) loan or guarantee to or from the concerned client, (iii) undue
dependence on a client’s fees and, hence, concerns about losing the engagement, (iv) close business
relationship with an audit client, (v) potential employment with the client, and (vi) contingent fees for the
audit engagement.
2. Self-review threats, which occur when during a review of any judgement or conclusion reached in a
previous audit or non-audit engagement (Non audit services include any professional services provided to
an entity by an auditor, other than audit or review of the financial statements. These include management
services, internal
audit, investment advisory service, design and implementation of information technology systems etc.), or
when a member of the audit team was previously a director or senior employee of the client. Instances
where such threats come into play are (i) when an auditor is having recently been a director or senior
officer of the
company, and (ii) when auditors perform services that are themselves subject matters of audit.
3. Advocacy threats, which occur when the auditor promotes, or is perceived to promote, a client’s opinion
to a point where people may believe that objectivity is getting compromised, and e.g. when an auditor
deals with shares or securities of the audited company, or becomes the client’s advocate in litigation and
third party
disputes.
4. Familiarity threats are self-evident, and occur when auditors form relationships with the client where
they end up being too sympathetic to the client’s interests. This can occur in many ways: (i) close relative of
374

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
the audit team working in a senior position in the client company, (ii) former partner of the audit firm being
a director or senior employee of the client, (iii) long association between specific auditors and their specific
client counterparts, and (iv) acceptance of significant gifts or hospitality from the client company, its
directors or employees.
5. Intimidation threats, which occur when auditors are deterred from acting objectively with an adequate
degree of professional skepticism. Basically, these could happen because of threat of replacement over
disagreements with the application of accounting principles, or pressure to disproportionately reduce work
in response to reduced audit fees.
41. Star Ltd. is a power generating company which uses coal as raw material for its power generating
plant. The Company has been allotted coal blocks in the state of Jharkhand and Odisha. During the FY
2020-21, a scam regarding allotment of coal blocks was unveiled leading to a ban on the allotment of
coal blocks to various companies including Star Ltd.
This happened in the month of December 2020 and as such entire power generation process of Star Ltd,
came to a halt in that month. As a result of such ban, and the resultant stoppage of the production
process, many key managerial personnel of the company left the Company. There were delays in the of
payment of wages and salaries and the banks from whom the Company had taken funds for project
financing also decided not to extend further finance or to fund further working capital requirements of
the Company.
Further, when discussed with the management, the statutory auditor understood that the Company had
no action plan to mitigate such circumstances. Further, all such circumstances were not reflected the
financial statements of Star Ltd. What course of action should the statutory auditor of the Company
consider in such situation? course of action should the statutory (rtp- july 2021)
ANSWER
SA 570- “Going Concern” deals with the auditor’s responsibilities in the audit of financial statements
relating to going concern and the implications for the auditor’s report.
The auditor’s responsibilities are to obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence regarding, and conclude
on, the appropriateness of management’s use of the going concern basis of accounting in the preparation
of the financial statements, and to conclude, based on the audit evidence obtained, whether a material
uncertainty exists about the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern.
When the use of going concern basis of accounting is inappropriate i.e., if the financial statements have
been prepared using the going concern basis of accounting but, in the auditor’s judgment, management’s
use of the going concern basis of accounting in the preparation of the financial statements is inappropriate,
the auditor shall express an adverse opinion.
Also, when adequate disclosure of a material uncertainty is not made in the financial statements the
auditor shall express a qualified opinion or adverse opinion, as appropriate, in accordance with SA 705
(Revised); and in the Basis for Qualified (Adverse) Opinion section of the auditor’s report, state that a
concern and that the financial statements do not adequately disclose this matter.
In the present case, the following circumstances indicate the inability of Star Ltd. to continue as a going
concern:
• Ban on the allotment of coal blocks
• Halt in power generation
375

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
• Key Managerial Personnel leaving the Company.

• Banks decided not to extend further finance and not to fund the working capital requirements of the
Company.
• Non availability of sound action plan to mitigate such circumstances.
Therefore, considering the above factors it is clear that the going concern basis is inappropriate for the
Company. Further, such circumstances are not reflected in the financial statements of the Company. As
such, the statutory auditor of Star Ltd. should:
(1) Express an adverse opinion in accordance with SA 705 (Revised) and
(2) In the Basis of Opinion paragraph of the auditor’s report, the statutory auditor should state that a
concern and that the financial statements do not adequately disclose this matter
42. (mtp nov 20)

MINSAN Ltd, an unlisted company in South India, is engaged in the business of spice oil extraction. Total
paid up capital of the company is Rs. 9 Crore. Details of annual turnover and profit of the company for
the last 3 years are given below:
Year ended Turnover (Rs. in crore) Profit (loss)before tax

(Rs. in crore)
31-03-2018 527.21 (Audited) 50.16
31-03-2019 301.37 ( Audited) 01.25
31-03-2020 104.13 ( provisional) (10.25)
The company is using conventional method for extraction of oil from spices. This requires more human
intervention and hence, cost of production is high as compared to innovative method used by other new
companies. Though the company had significant growth in the past years, it has not done well over the
last two financial years due to competition.
A new competitor viz, Natural Extracts Ltd, had come in the market during the year 2018 and by the end
of March, 2019, they captured around 75% of market share by offering the product at a reduced price.
They use new machinery which allows whole range of automated extraction method, thus, minimizing
manual steps and reducing cost of labour.
In order to reduce cost of production and thereby re-capture the market, the management of MINSAN
Ltd has planned to erect a new plant with an automatic machine. The estimated cost of plant &
machinery is Rs. 90 lac. The company approached SA Bank Ltd for a term loan of Rs. 80 lac which would
be repaid in 5 years. On 28-
12-2019, the bank had sanctioned the loan; and disbursed Rs. 40 lac till 31st March, 2020.
MINSAN Ltd has appointed M/s Check & Check, Chartered Accountants, as auditors of the company at its
AGM held on 18-09-2019 for a period of 5 years. As agreed, the audit team commenced their audit work
for the year 2019-2020 in February, 2020 and completed the work by the end of May, 2020. The audit
team submitted following findings to the engagement partner:
➢ PX Ltd, one of the material suppliers, filed a case against the company on 12-09-2019 for a
compensation of Rs. 3 crore.
➢ Company has made an estimate for allowance of debtors @5%.
➢ 70% of the value of inventory was only covered in physical verification during the year 2019-20 due to
outbreak of Novel Corona Virus (COVID-19) and subsequent lockdown thereof.
376

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
➢ Company got a show cause notice from State Pollution Control Board for the contravention of the
provisions of Hazardous and waste Management Rule.
➢ Three incidence of fraud noticed (Total Rs. 1.02 crore)- fraud committed by the Purchase manager Rs.
85 Lakh, by Accounts manager Rs. 15 Lakh and by a cashier Rs. 2 lac.
As an auditor of MINSAN Ltd for the year 2019-20, answer the following questions based on the facts
given in the above paragraph:
1. Though the company had significant growth in the past years, it has not done well over the last two
financial years. As per SA 570, there are certain events or conditions that individually or collectively may
cast significant doubt about the going concern assumptions. In order to assess whether MINSAN Ltd is a
going concern or not, which of the following audit procedures should NOT be performed?
(a) Analysis and discuss with the management of the company to find out whether installation of new
plant and machinery would enable the company to reduce cost of production.
(b) Inquire the company’s legal counsel regarding existence of legal litigation and claim against the
company, reasonableness of management assessments of their outcome and estimate of their financial
implication.
(c) Evaluating management’s future plan and strategy to increase market share of product.
(d) Analysis and discuss the company’s cash flow and profit of the previous years with the projected
accounts.
ANSWER- d
2. Company has made an estimate for allowance of debtors @5%. Some financial statement items
cannot be measured precisely but can only be estimated. The nature and reliability of information
available to management to support the making of an accounting estimate varies widely, which thereby
affects the degree of estimating uncertainty associated with accounting estimates. Please advise which
among the following may have higher estimate uncertainty and higher risk as per SA 540?
(a) Judgments about the outcome of pending litigation with PX Ltd against the company.
(b) Estimates made for inventory obsolescence that are frequently made and updated.
(c) A model used to measure the accounting estimates is well known and the assumptions to the model
are observable in market place.
(d) Accounting estimate made for allowance for doubtful debts where the result of the auditors review
of similar accounting estimates made in the prior period financial statements do not indicate any
substantial difference between the original accounting estimate and the actual outcome.
ANSWER- a
3. The company in the notes accompanying its financial statements disclosed the existence of suit filed
against the company with full details. Based on the audit evidence obtained, it is necessary to draw
user’s attention to the matter presented in the financial statement by way of clear additional
communication as there is an uncertainty relating to the future outcome of the litigation. In this
situation, which of the following reporting option would be correct if auditor is satisfied with the
conclusions reached by the management and this matter is fundamental to the reader of financial
statements?
377

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
(a) Include an Emphasis of Matter paragraph in Auditors report having a clear reference to the matter
being emphasized and issue a qualified opinion.
(b) Include in the Basis for Adverse opinion paragraph and issue an adverse opinion having a clear
reference to the matter referred in the notes on accounts.
(c) Include in the Basis for Disclaimer of opinion paragraph having a clear reference to the matter and
issue a disclaimer opinion.
(d) Include an Emphasis of Matter Paragraph in Auditors report having a clear reference to the matter
being emphasized and to where relevant disclosures that fully describe the matter can be found in the
ANSWER- d
4. Company got a show cause notice from State Pollution Control Board. As per SA 250, the auditor shall
perform the audit procedures to help identify instances of non-compliance with other laws and
regulations that may have a material effect on the financial statements. As the audit team of the
company became aware of information concerning an instance of non-compliance with law, what would
NOT be the audit procedure to be performed?
(a) Understand the nature of the act and circumstances in which it has occurred and obtain further
information to evaluate the possible effect on the financial statement.
(b) Discuss the matter with management and if they do not provide sufficient information; and if the
effect of non-compliance seems to be material, legal advice may be obtained.
(c) Monitoring legal requirement and compliance with code of conduct and ensuring that operating
procedures are designed to assist in the prevention of non-compliance with law and regulation and
report accordingly.
(d) Evaluate the implication of non-compliance in relation to other aspects of audit including risk
assessment and reliability of written representation and take appropriate action.
ANSWER- c
5. The company had availed some amount of loan for new plant and machinery during the year under
audit. Out of the total loan sanctioned an amount of Rs. 25 lac was earmarked for the purchase of the
machinery-Oil Extractor; but, the company has acquired an improved model of machinery, viz, Oil
extractor with Dryer in its stead. State which of the reporting option would be correct.
(a) State the fact in CARO report that out of term loan taken for machinery-Oil Extractor, Rs. 25 Lakh was
not utilized for acquiring the machinery for which it was sanctioned.
(b) Ask the management to change terms and condition of term loan as the company has acquired a
different machinery. Report under CARO, if the management does not agree with the demand.
(c) State the fact in CARO report that the term loan taken has been applied for the purpose for which it
was sanctioned.
378

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
(d) State the fact in CARO report that the term loan taken has not been applied for the purpose for which
it was sanctioned. Also qualify the report as there are misstatements that are material but not pervasive.
(5 x 2 = 10 Marks)
ANSWER- c
43. CA Kamal is the statutory auditor of Autocover Ltd. for the FY 2020-21. The company is engaged in
the business of manufacture of car accessories. CA Kamal noticed that the inventories of the company
amounting to Rs. 46 crores (equal to 25% of the total assets of the company) at the end of the year do
not exist. Also, sales amounting to Rs. 33 crores (equal to 10% of the total sales during the year) have not
actually occurred. CA Kamal noticed both the material discrepancies just before the finalisation of the
audit report for the year ending 31.03.2021. CA. Kamal considers that the above misstatement would
distort the true and fair view to a greater extent. (mtp – I -july 2021)
What is correct course of action that CA Kamal should consider in such a situation?
(a) CA Kamal should consider withdrawing from the audit engagement or issuing a disclaimer of opinion
for the FY 2020-21.
(b) CA Kamal should consider issuing an adverse opinion and mentioning both the material discrepancies
in the basis for adverse opinion paragraph of the auditor’s report.
(c) CA Kamal should ask the management to explain both the discrepancies in the notes to accounts and
he himself should highlight the matter in the Key Audit matter paragraph of the auditor’s report.
(d) CA Kamal should give a qualified opinion along with the specific mention of the matters in the
Emphasis of matter paragraph in the auditor’s report along with appropriate disclosure in the notes to
accounts to be made by the management of Autocover Ltd.
ANSWER- b
44. Preparing the financial statements in accordance with the applicable financial reporting framework is
the responsibility of the management of ABC Ltd. Which of the following is correct in regard to the
disclosure of such management responsibility? (mtp – I -july 2021)
(a) This is implied responsibility of management and is presumed in an audit of financial statements and
therefore need not be specifically mentioned anywhere.
(b) The management may undertake to accept such responsibility through an engagement letter itself.
(c) The auditor’s report should describe the management responsibility in a section with heading
“responsibility of management for financial statements”.
(d) The auditor’s report should refer to the responsibility of auditors and not that of the management as
the same is obvious.
ANSWER- c
45. During the conduct of audit, it was found that the management has intentionally made material
misstatements in the several items of the financial statements to deceive the users of the financial
statements, to reduce the pressures of meeting market expectations and to increase the reputation of
the company. What would be the implications on the auditor’s report if no adjustments are made to the
financial statements regarding the misstatements made by the management?(mtp – II -july 2021)
(a) The auditor would issue a qualified audit opinion stating that ‘except for’ these matters the financial
statements are fairly presented. The auditor should also include a ‘Basis for Qualified Opinion’ paragraph
below the opinion paragraph.
379

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
(b) The auditor would issue an adverse audit opinion stating that ‘except for’ these matters the financial
statements are fairly presented. The auditor should also include a ‘Basis for Qualified Opinion’ paragraph
below the opinion paragraph.
(c) The auditor would issue an adverse audit opinion stating that financial statements ‘do not give a true
and fair view’. The auditor should also include a ‘Basis for Adverse Opinion’ paragraph below the opinion
paragraph
(d) The auditor would issue an adverse audit opinion stating that financial statements ‘do not give a true
and fair view’. The auditor should also include a ‘Basis for Qualified Opinion’ paragraph below the
opinion paragraph.
ANSWER- c
46. ( RTP- NOV 2021)
Mr. Hemant Ramsey was appointed as the engagement partner for conducting the audit of
Kshetra Lap Ltd. for F.Y. 2020-21, on behalf of Ramsey & Associates. Mr. Vishay Tyagi was
appointed as the engagement quality control reviewer by the firm for the said audit.
During F.Y. 2020-21, there was an implementation of ERP system in a phased manner, in Kshetra
Lap Ltd. due to which some of its business processes got automated. As a result of the
implementation of such a system, there was a significant effect on the auditor’s overall audit
strategy. Mr. Hemant discussed the implementation of such a system with Mr. Vishay and also
told him that such a matter may be a key audit matter to be reported in the audit report.
Mr. Vishay considered the significance of such matter but however he was of the opinion that
such a matter did not appear to link with the matters disclosed in the financial statements and
so there was no need to disclose such matter as a key audit matter.
Whether the contention of Mr. Vishay is proper with respect to the matters to be
communicated as a key audit matter?
ANSWER
As per SA 701, ‘Communicating Key Audit Matters in the Independent Auditor’s Report’, the auditor shall
determine, from the matters communicated with those charged with governance, those matters that
required significant auditor attention in performing the audit. In making this determination, the auditor
shall take into account the following:
(i) Areas of higher assessed risk of material misstatement, or significant risks identified in accordance with
SA 315.
management judgment, including accounting estimates that have been identified as having high estimation
uncertainty.
(iii) The effect on the audit of significant events or transactions that occurred during the period.
The auditor shall determine which of the aforesaid matters considered were of most significance in the
audit of the financial statements of the current period and therefore are the key audit matters.
These aforesaid considerations focus on the nature of matters communicated with those charged with
governance. Such matters are often linked to matters disclosed in the financial statements and are
380

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
intended to reflect areas of the audit of the financial statements that may be of particular interest to
intended users.
The fact that these considerations are required is not intended to imply that matters related to them are
always key audit matters; rather, matters related to such specific considerations are key audit matters only
if they are determined to be of most significance in the audit.
In addition to matters that relate to the specific required considerations, there may be other matters
communicated with those charged with governance that required significant auditor attention and that
therefore may be determined to be key audit matters. Such matters may include, for example, matters
relevant to the audit that was performed that may not be required to be disclosed in the financial
statements. For example, the implementation of a new IT system (or significant changes to an existing IT
system) during the period may be an area of significant auditor attention, in particular if such a change had
a significant effect on the auditor’s overall audit strategy or related to a significant risk (e.g., changes to a
system affecting revenue recognition).
In the given case, there was implementation of ERP system in the company due to which some of its
business processes got automated and which had a significant effect on the auditor’s overall audit strategy
during the period.
Accordingly, such a matter can be considered as a key audit matter if according to Mr. Hemant, such a
matter required significant attention that had affected his overall audit strategy.
Thus, the contention of Mr. Vishay is not proper as matters that do not link with the matters disclosed in
the financial statements can also be considered as a key audit matter if it required significant attention of
the auditor which had an impact on its audit.
CA S has been appointed as Statutory Auditor of SRT Ltd. for the financial year 2020-2021. The
Company while preparing financial statements for the year under audit prepared one additional
profit and loss account that disclosed specific items of expenditure and included the same as an
appendix to the financial statements. CA. S has not been able to understand this as the additional
profit and loss account is not covered under applicable financial reporting framework. Guide him
as to how he should deal with this issue while reporting on the financial statements of SRT Ltd.
ANSWER
If supplementary information that is not required by the applicable financial reporting framework
is presented with the audited financial statements, the auditor shall evaluate whether, in the
auditor’s professional judgment, supplementary information is nevertheless an integral part of the
financial statements due to its nature or how it is presented. When it is an integral part of the
financial statements, the supplementary information shall be covered by the auditor’s opinion.
If supplementary information that is not required by the applicable financial reporting framework
is not considered an integral part of the audited financial statements, the auditor shall evaluate
whether such supplementary information is presented in a way that sufficiently and clearly
differentiates it from the audited financial statements. If this is not the case, then the auditor shall
ask management to change how the unaudited supplementary information is presented.
381

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
If management refuses to do so, the auditor shall identify the unaudited supplementary
information and explain in the auditor’s report that such supplementary information has not been
audited.
When an additional profit and loss account that discloses specific items of expenditure is disclosed
as a separate schedule, included as an appendix to the financial statements, the auditor may
consider this to be supplementary information that can be clearly differentiated from the financial
statements.
Thus, additional profit and loss account is not considered an integral part of the audited financial
statements and the auditor shall evaluate that supplementary information is presented in a way
that sufficiently and clearly differentiates it from the audited financial statements.
ABC Ltd. has been dealing in tyres since 1995. The Company envisaged to expand its business and
wanted to manufacture the tyres besides trading. Accordingly, the machinery was imported,
installed and manufacturing operations commenced. The Government also gave certain incentives
like power subsidy, land acquisition subsidy, etc. After 2 years of operations, Company received a
notice from the Income Tax authorities to pay tax on incentive received in the form of power
subsidy. The demand notice was served for ₹ 150.00 Lakhs.
The Company, however, filed an appeal with higher tax authorities against the demand and the
matter is undecided as on 31.03 .2021. Legal team of the Company anticipated that tax liability
might mature. The Company has not made a provision of anticipated tax liability. Considering the
provisions of Companies Act, 2013, how an auditor of ABC Ltd. should see this matter and report
in audit report, if required?
ANSWER
Audit report - Legal team anticipated tax liability but the company did not make any provision for
that -
The Council of the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India has taken note of the fact that there
is a practice prevalent whereby companies do not make provision for tax even when such a
liability is anticipated. It has expressed the view that on an overall consideration of the relevant
provisions of law, non-provision for tax (where a liability is anticipated) would amount to
contravention of the provisions of Sections 128 and 129 of the Companies Act, 2013.
Accordingly, it is necessary for the auditor to qualify his report and such qualification should bring
out the manner in which the accounts do not disclose a “true and fair” view of the state of affairs
of the company and the profit or loss of the company.
Applying the above to the facts given in the question, auditor should qualify his report.
An example of the manner in which the report on the balance sheet and the Statement of Profit
and Loss may be qualified in this respect is given below: “The company has not provided for
taxation in respect of its profits and the estimated aggregate amount of taxation not so provided
382

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
for is ₹ ............including.............for the Year ended on ..............To the extent of such non-provision
for the year, the profits of the Company for the financial year under report have been overstated
and to the extent of such aggregate non-provision, the reserves of the company appearing in the
said balance sheet have been over-stated and the current liabilities and provisions appearing in
the said balance sheet have been understated”.

MN & Associates, Chartered Accountants have been appointed as statutory Auditors of Cotton Ltd. for the
F.Y 2020-2021. The Company is into the business of yarn manufacturing. For this purpose, cotton ginning is
also done within the factory premises. Raw cotton is purchased from local market and processed in-house.
The Company received a notice from the State Government to deposit market development fee for the last
5 years to the tune of ₹ 10.00 crores. The Company and all other organizations in the same business have
not deposited the market development fee, taking shelter of an old circular issued by the Government. The
trade association met with the government officials to resolve the matter and agreed to deposit the same
prospectively. However, the matter relating to payment of development fee for the last 5 years is pending
before the Government as at the end of the financial year. The Company, however, disclosed the same in
notes to accounts, as contingent liability, without quantifying the effect and proper explanation. If the
liability is provided in the books of accounts, entire reserves will be wiped off. Auditor seeks your guidance
as to how this disclosure affects them while forming an opinion on financial statements.
ANSWER
Forming an opinion and reporting on financial statements –

As per Ind AS 37, “Provisions, Contingent Liabilities and Contingent Assets”, an entity should disclose for
each class of contingent liability at the end of the reporting period a brief description of the nature of the
contingent liability and, where practicable.
(a) an estimate of its financial effect, measured in the standard;
(b) an indication of the uncertainties relating to the amount or timing of any outflow; and
(c) the possibility of any reimbursement.
SA – 700 - Forming an opinion and reporting on financial statements:
The auditor shall evaluate whether in view of the requirements of the applicable financial reporting
framework –
(i) The financial statements adequately disclose the significant accounting policies selected and applied;
(ii) The accounting policies selected and applied are consistent with the applicable financial reporting
framework and are appropriate;
(iii) The accounting estimates made by the management are reasonable;
(iv) The information presented in the financial statements is relevant, reliable, comparable and
understandable;
(v) The financial statements provide adequate disclosures to enable the intended users to understand the
effect of material transactions and events on the information conveyed in the financial statements.
If financial statements prepared in accordance with the requirements of a fair presentation framework do
not achieve fair presentation, the auditor shall discuss the matter with management and, depending on the
requirements of the applicable financial reporting framework and how the matter is resolved, shall
determine whether it is necessary to modify the opinion in the auditor’s report in accordance with SA 705.
383

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
In the present case, auditor may consider modifying his opinion considering the financial effect of liability
not disclosed properly.
50. ( MTP- NOV 2021)

As an Auditor of TRP Ltd., you are suspicious that there might be non-compliance with laws and regulations
to which the Company is subject to. Indicate the possible areas or aspects where you may have to look out
for forming an opinion as to whether your suspicion has some basis to further inquire
ANSWER
Indications of Non-Compliance with Laws and Regulations: When the auditor becomes aware of the
existence of, or information about, the following matters, it may be an indication of non-compliance with
laws and regulations, possible areas or aspects to look out for forming an opinion are:
Investigations by regulatory organisations and government departments or payment of fines or

penalties.
Payments for unspecified services or loans to consultants, related parties, employees or government
employees.
Sales commissions or agent’s fees that appear excessive in relation to those ordinarily paid by the entity
or in its industry or to the services actually received.
Purchasing at prices significantly above or below market price.
Unusual payments in cash, purchases in the form of cashiers’ cheques payable to bearer or transfers to
numbered bank accounts.
Unusual payments towards legal and retainership fees.
Unusual transactions with companies registered in tax havens.
Payments for goods or services made other than to the country from which the goods or services
originated.
Payments without proper exchange control documentation.
Existence of an information system which fails, whether by design or by accident, to provide an adequate
audit trail or sufficient evidence.
Unauthorised transactions or improperly recorded transactions.

Adverse media comment
51 (SEPT2022 MTP)
RST Ltd. has been dealing in tyres since 1995. The Company envisaged to expand its business and
wanted to manufacture the tyres besides trading. Accordingly, the machinery was imported,
installed and manufacturing operations commenced. The Government also gave certain incentives
like power subsidy, land acquisition subsidy, etc. After 2 years of operations, Company received a
384

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
notice from the Income Tax authorities to pay tax on incentive received in the form of power
subsidy. The demand notice was served for Rs. 150.00 Lakhs.
The Company, however, filed an appeal with higher tax authorities against the demand and the
matter is undecided as on 31.03.2022. Legal team of the Company anticipated that tax liability
might mature. The Company has not made a provision of anticipated tax liability. Considering the
provisions of Companies Act, 2013, how an auditor of RST Ltd. should see this matter and report in
audit report, if required?
ANSWER:
Audit report - Legal team anticipated tax liability but the company did not make any
provision for that - The Council of the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India has taken note
of the fact that there is a practice prevalent whereby companies do not make provision for tax
even when such a liability is anticipated. It has expressed the view that on an overall consideration
of the relevant provisions of law, non-provision for tax (where a liability is anticipated) would
amount to contravention of the provisions of Sections 128 and 129 of the Companies Act, 2013.
Accordingly, it is necessary for the auditor to qualify his report and such qualification should bring
out the manner in which the accounts do not disclose a “true and fair” view of the state of affairs
of the company and the profit or loss of the company.
Applying the above to the facts given in the question, auditor should qualify his report.
An example of the manner in which the report on the balance sheet and the Statement of Profit
and Loss may be qualified in this respect is given below: “The company has not provided for
taxation in respect of its profits and the estimated aggregate amount of taxation not so provided
for is Rs. ............including.............for the Year ended on ..............To the extent of such non-
provision for the year, the profits of the Company for the financial year under report have been
overstated and to the extent of such aggregate non-provision, the reserves of the company
appearing in the said balance sheet have been over-stated and the current liabilities and
provisions appearing in the said balance sheet have been understated”.
52(MAY 2022 RTP)
(a) You have been appointed as an auditor of Dharmnath & Sons for FY 2020-21, as entity other
than a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 2013, using a fair presentation
framework. Appointment had been made in the month of April, 2021. The financial statements
have been prepared by the management in accordance with the Accounting Standards. The
management had introduced the new computerized accounts receivable system from November
2020 and still in the implementation phase and thus management is in the process of rectifying
system deficiencies and correcting the errors. At the time of implementation of a new system, the
earlier system of accounting of receivables had been discarded. The auditor was unable to obtain
sufficient appropriate audit evidence about the entity’s accounts receivable and inventories. The
385

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
possible effects of the inability to obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence are deemed to be
both material and pervasive to the financial statements. Write the opinion paragraph and basis of
opinion paragraph to be included in the Independent Auditor’s Report.
(b) What is the auditor’s responsibility to report a key audit matter for which there are no
relevant disclosures in the financial statements?
(c) Where should the placement of the key audit matters section be in the auditor’s
report?
ANSWER :
(a) Opinion Paragraph
We were engaged to audit the financial statements of Dharmnath & Sons (“the entity”),
which comprise the balance sheet as at March 31, 2021, the statement of Profit and Loss, (the
statement of changes in equity) and the statement of cash flows for the year then ended, and
notes to the financial statements, including a summary of significant accounting policies.
We do not express an opinion on the accompanying financial statements of the entity. Because of
the significance of the matters described in the Basis for Disclaimer of Opinion section of our
We were not appointed as auditors of the Company until after March 31, 2021, and thus did not
observe the counting of physical inventories at the beginning and end of the year. We were
unable to satisfy ourselves by alternative means concerning the inventory quantities held at
March 31, 2020, and 2021, which are stated in the Balance Sheets at Rs. xxx and Rs. xxx,
respectively. In addition, the introduction of a new computerized accounts receivable system in
November 2020 resulted in numerous errors in accounts receivable. As of the date of our report,
management was still in the process of rectifying the system deficiencies and correcting the
errors. We were unable to confirm or verify by alternative means accounts receivable included in
the Balance Sheet at a total amount of Rs. xxx as at March 31, 2021. As a result of these matters,
we were unable to determine whether any adjustments might have been found necessary in
respect of recorded or unrecorded inventories and accounts receivable, and the elements making
up the statement of Profit and Loss (and statement of cash flows)
(b) When communicating key audit matters, the fact that there are no disclosures in the
financial statements related to a matter determined to be a key audit matter does not relieve the
auditor from the requirement to communicate it. An auditor may determine a key audit matter
386

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
related to the audit for which relevant disclosure requirements do not exist in the applicable
financial reporting framework. For example, the implementation of a new IT system (or significant
changes to an existing IT system) during the period may be an area of significant auditor attention,
in particular, if such a change had a significant effect on the auditor’s overall audit strategy or
related to significant risk (e.g., changes to a system affecting revenue recognition
Also, if an auditor determines that it is necessary to include information about the entity in order
to effectively describe a key audit matter that has not been disclosed by management and
management does not agree to disclose that information, the auditor should reconsider the
adequacy of the disclosures in accordance with applicable financial reporting framework. The
auditor should communicate the matter as a key audit matter unless law or regulation precludes
public disclosure about the matter or in extremely rare circumstances, the auditor determines
that the matter should not be communicated in the auditor’s report because the
adverse consequences of doing so would reasonably be expected to outweigh the public interest
benefits of such communication.
(c) Generally, the Key Audit Matters section is required to be placed after the Basis for
Opinion paragraph and before the Management’s Responsibility paragraph.
In case, ‘Material uncertainty relating to going concern’ section is required as per SA
570(Revised), then KAM section is placed after that section.
Further, regarding placement of KAM section, SA 706 (Revised), “Emphasis of Matter Paragraphs
and Other Matter Paragraphs in the Independent Auditor’s Report” provides as under:
When a Key Audit Matters section is presented in the auditor’s report, an Emphasis of Matter
(EOM) paragraph may be presented either directly before or after the Key Audit Matters section,
based on the auditor’s judgment as to the relative significance of the information included in the
Emphasis of Matter paragraph. The auditor may also add further context to the heading
“Emphasis of Matter”, such as “Emphasis of Matter – Subsequent Event”, to differentiate the
Emphasis of Matter paragraph from the individual matters described in the Key Audit Matters
section.
53 (NOV 2022 RTP)
(a) CA Bahubali is the statutory auditor of Bharat Ltd. for the FY 2021-22. During the course of
audit CA Bahubali noticed the following:
(i) With respect to the debtors amounting to Rs. 240 crore, no balance confirmation was
received by the audit team. Further, there have been defaults on the payment obligations by
debtors on the due dates during the year under audit. The Company has created a provision for
doubtful debts to the tune of Rs.40 crore during the year under audit. The Company has stated
that the provision is based on receivables which are older than 39 months, which according to the
387

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
audit team is inadequate and as such the audit team is unable to ascertain the carrying value of
trade receivables.
(ii) In respect of Inventories (which constitutes 38% of the total assets of the company), during
the reporting period, the management has not undertaken physical verification of inventories at
periodic intervals. Also, the Company has not maintained adequate inventory records at the
factory. The audit team was unable to undertake the physical inventory count as such the value of
inventory could not be verified.
Under the above circumstances what kind of opinion should CA Bahubali give? Write the opinion
paragraph and basis of opinion paragraph to be included in the Independent Auditor’s Report.
(b) How should auditor give description of auditor’s responsibilities for the audit of the financial
statements when the auditor disclaims an opinion on the financial statements?
ANSWER :
(a) In the present case, CA Bahubali is unable to obtain sufficient and appropriate audit
evidence with respect to the following:
(i) The balance confirmation with respect to debtors amounting to Rs. 240 crore is not
available. Further there has been default in payment by the debtors and the provision so made is
not adequate. The audit team is also unable ascertain the carrying value of trade receivables.
(ii) With respect to 38% of the company’s inventory, neither the physical verification has been
done by the management nor are adequate inventory records maintained. The audit team is also
unable to undertake the physical inventory count as such the value of inventory could not be
verified.
In the above two circumstances the auditor is unable to obtain sufficient appropriate audit
evidence on which to base the opinion, and the possible effects on the financial statements of
undetected misstatements, if any, could be both material and pervasive.
Thus, CA Bahubali should give a Disclaimer of Opinion.
The relevant extract of the Disclaimer of Opinion Paragraph and Basis for Disclaimer of Opinion
We do not express an opinion on the accompanying financial statements of Bharat Ltd. Because of
the significance of the matters described in the Basis for Disclaimer of Opinion section of our

388

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
We are unable to obtain balance confirmation with respect to the debtors amounting to Rs. 240
crore. Further, there have been defaults on the payment obligations by debtors on the due dates
during the year under audit. The Company has created a provision for doubtful debts to the tune
of Rs. 40 crore during the year under audit which is inadequate in the circumstances of the
company. The carrying value of trade receivables could not be ascertained.
Further, in respect of Inventories (which constitutes 38% of the total assets of the company),
during the reporting period, the management has not undertaken physical verification of
inventories at periodic intervals. Also, the Company has not maintained adequate inventory
records at the factory. We were unable to undertake the physical inventory count and as such the
value of inventory could not be verified.
(b) When the auditor disclaims an opinion on the financial statements due to an inability to
obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence, the auditor shall amend the description of the
auditor’s responsibilities required by SA 700, “Forming an Opinion and Reporting on Financial
Statements”, to include only the following:
(i) A statement that the auditor’s responsibility is to conduct an audit of the entity’s financial
statements in accordance with Standards on Auditing and to issue an auditor’s report;
(ii) A statement that, however, because of the matter(s) described in the Basis for Disclaimer of
Opinion section, the auditor was not able to obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence to
provide a basis for an audit opinion on the financial statements; and
(iii) The statement about auditor independence and other ethical responsibilities required in SA
700.
389

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s

MTP Mar 2019 Qn no 3 (1 Mark)
1. High Limited is a public limited company engaged in the manufacturing of watches. The
company has appointed CA. Eshaan as statutory auditor of the company for the year 2018-19. On
verification of the composition of Board of Directors of the company, the auditor observed that
during the reporting period in one of the board meeting the chairman was non-executive
director and less than one-third of the Board comprised of Independent Directors. The auditor
wants to examine the effect of changes in the composition of the Board and/or its chairman and
its impact on compliance throughout the reporting period. But the management restricts the
auditor from examining the same. Whether the auditor has right to examine the effect of
changes in composition of board?
(a) The auditor has no right to verify the composition of Board and examine the effect of changes
in the composition since it is not related with preparation of financial statements.
(b) The auditor should verify the composition of Board and examine its impact on compliance
throughout the reporting period as a part of certifying compliance with the requirements of
corporate governance.
(c) The management’s act is void, as the auditor is appointed by Board of Directors only so the
auditor
should necessarily verify the composition of Board and its impact on compliance.
(d) Since High Limited is a public limited company, its Board composition has to be compulsorily
Answer:(b) The auditor should verify the composition of Board and examine its impact on
compliance throughout the reporting period as a part of certifying compliance with the
requirements of corporate governance.
390

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
MTP Oct 2019 QN no 7 (1 Mark)

2. The auditor should ensure that the board of directors of the top 100 listed entities shall
comprise of –
(a) not less than 7 directors.
(b) not less than 4 directors.
(c) not less than 6 directors.
(d) not less than 2 directors
Answer: (c) not less than 6 directors
3.May 2018 5(c) – 4 Marks
M/s AIl-in-One Limited is a large-sized listed Indian Company with focus on design and delivery
of custom made Information Technology applications for various business entities in India and
abroad. The Management wants to know whether they are required to constitute Risk
Management Committee as per LODR, 2015 and if so, required, what should be its composition?
Advise.
Answer
Constitution of Risk Management Committee: As per regulation 21 of LODR 2015, provision

relating to constitution of risk management committee is applicable to top 500 listed entities,
determined on the basis of market capitalisation, as at the end of the immediate previous financial
year. In the instant case, All-in-One Limited, is a large sized listed Indian Company with focus on
design and delivery of custom made IT applications for various business entities in India and
abroad. As per fact of the case it is a large sized listed Indian company, assuming that it is included
in top 500 listed entities, All – in – One Limited is required to constitute risk management
committee.
Composition of Risk Management Committee:
• The Board of Directors shall constitute a Risk Management Committee.

• The majority of members of Risk Management Committee shall consist of members of the Board
of Directors. However in case of a listed entity having outstanding superior rights equity shares,
atleast two thirds of the risk management committee shall comprise of independent directors.
• The Chairperson of the Risk Management Committee shall be a member of the Board of Directors
and senior executives of the listed entity may be members of the committee.
• The Board of Directors shall define the role and responsibility of the Risk Management Committee
and may delegate monitoring and reviewing of the risk management plan to the committee and
such other functions as it may deem fit.
• The provisions of these regulations shall be applicable for top 500 listed entities, determined on
the basis of Market capitalisation, as at the end of the immediate previous financial year.
These procedures shall be periodically reviewed to ensure that executive management controls
risk through means of a properly defined framework. A majority of this Committee will be the
391

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
members of the Board of Directors. Senior executives of the company may be also be members of
the Committee, but the Chairperson of the Committee shall be a member of the Board of
Directors.
4.RTP May 2018 Qn no.20 (C)

Key features of the Qualified and Independent Audit Committee set up under SEBI (Listing
Obligations and Disclosure Requirements) Regulations, 2015.
MTP Apr 18 Qn no.5(D) 4 Marks
Every listed entity shall constitute a qualified and independent audit committee in accordance
with the terms of reference.” State the main features of the Qualified and Independent Audit
Committee set up under SEBI (Listing Obligations and Disclosure Requirements) Regulations,
2015 .
MTP-Aug-18 Qn No 5(e) 4 Marks:
Every listed company shall constitute a qualified & Independent audit committee in
accordance with the terms of reference subject to a few conditions. Explain.
RTP May 2019 Qn no 20(c)

Key features of the Qualified and Independent Audit Committee set up under SEBI (Listing
ANSWER
The main features of a qualified and independent audit committee to be set up under SEBI
(Listing Obligations and Disclosure Requirements) Regulations, 2015 are as follows:
1. The audit committee shall have minimum three directors as members. Two- thirds of the
members of audit committee shall be independent directors, however in case of a listed entity
having outstanding Superior Rights equity shares the audit committee shall only comprise of
independent directors.
2. All members of audit committee shall be financially literate and at least one member shall have
accounting or related financial management expertise;
Explanation (i): The term “financially literate” means the ability to read and understand basic
financial statements i.e. balance sheet, profit and loss account, and statement of cash flows.
Explanation (ii): A member will be considered to have accounting or related financial management
expertise if he or she possesses experience in finance or accounting, or requisite professional
certification in accounting, or any other comparable experience or background which results in
the individual’s financial sophistication, including being or having been a chief executive officer,
chief financial officer or other senior officer with financial oversight responsibilities.
3. The Chairperson of the Audit Committee shall be present at Annual General Meeting to answer
shareholder queries;
392

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
4. The Company secretary shall act as the secretary to the committee.

5. The Audit Committee at its discretion shall invite the finance director or the head of the finance
function, head of internal audit and a representative of the statutory auditor and any other such
executives to be present at the meetings of the committee; provided that occasionally, the Audit
Committee may meet without the presence of any executives of the listed entity.;
Irregular Limited, a company incorporated in India has six members in its Audit Committee. Due
to recessionary conditions in India the revenue of the company is going down and there is slow
down in other activities of the company. Therefore, it was expected that there would not be
significant work for members of the Audit Committee. Considering the overall recession in the
company and the economy, the members of the Committee decided unanimously to meet once
in a year only on March 31, 2018. They reviewed monthly information system of the Company
and found no errors.
As an auditor of Irregular Limited would you consider the decision taken by the Audit Committee
is in line with the SEBI (Listing Obligations and Disclosure Requirements) Regulations, 2015?
ANSWER
One of the following additional requirement as stipulated under SEBI (Listing Obligations and Disclosure
Requirements) Regulations, 2015 (“LODR Regulations”) on which Section 177 of the Companies Act, 2013
(relating to audit committee) is silent is – The Audit Committee should meet at least four times in a year
and not more than one hundred and twenty days shall elapse between two meetings. The quorum shall be
either two members or one third of the members of the audit committee whichever is greater, but there
should be a minimum of two independent directors present.
Besides, there is a mandatory review requirement and to review only monthly information system
is not sufficient. Here the audit committee members reviewed only monthly information system of
the company and the same is not sufficient as per LODR Regulations.
The Audit Committee shall mandatorily review the following information as per LODR Regulations:
(i) Management discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations;
(ii) Statement of significant related party transactions (as defined by the Audit Committee), submitted by
management;
(iii) Management letters / letters of internal control weaknesses issued by the statutory auditors;
(iv) Internal audit reports relating to internal control weaknesses; and
(v) The appointment, removal and terms of remuneration of the Chief internal auditor shall be
subject to review by the Audit Committee;
(vi) Statement of deviations: (a) quarterly statement of deviations including report of monitoring agency if
applicable and (b) annual statement of funds utilized for purposes other than those stated in the offer
document/ prospectus/ notice.
393

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
Applying the above, the decision taken by the audit committee is not in line with the LODR Regulations.
RTP May 2020 Qn no 20(b) ,Nov 18 Qn no 5(d) 4 Marks

6. List few documents that require mandatory review by Audit Committee.
ANSWER
One of the following additional requirement as stipulated under SEBI (Listing Obligations and
Disclosure Requirements) Regulations, 2015 (“LODR Regulations”) on which Section 177 of the
Companies Act, 2013 (relating to audit committee) is silent is – The Audit Committee should meet
at least four times in a year and not more than one hundred and twenty days shall elapse between
two meetings. The quorum shall be either two members or one third of the members of the audit
committee whichever is greater, but there should be a minimum of two independent directors
present.
The Audit Committee shall mandatorily review the following information as per LODR
Regulations:
(ii) Statement of significant related party transactions (as defined by the Audit Committee),
submitted by management;
(iv) Internal audit reports relating to internal control weaknesses; and
(v) The appointment, removal and terms of remuneration of the Chief internal auditor shall be subject
to review by the Audit Committee;
(vi) Statement of deviations: (a) quarterly statement of deviations including report of monitoring
agency if applicable and (b) annual statement of funds utilized for purposes other than those stated
in the offer document/ prospectus/ notice.
Applying the above, the decision taken by the audit committee is not in line with the LODR
Regulations
7.May 2019 Qn no 3(a) 6 Marks

You have been appointed as an auditor of M/s Real Ltd. in which total number of directors in
the board is 9. As an auditor, state the points to be considered in verification of composition of
Board under Regulation 17 of The Securities and Exchange Board of India (Listing Obligations
and Disclosure Requirements) Regulations, 2015.
Answer
Verification regarding Composition of Board [Regulation 17]

(i) The auditor should ascertain whether, throughout the reporting period, the Board of Directors
394

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
comprises an optimum combination of executive and non-executive directors, with at least one
woman director and not less than 50% of the Board of Directors comprising non-executive
directors. It may be noted that the Board of directors of the top 500 listed entities shall have
at least one independent woman director (and the Board of directors of the top 1000 listed
entities shall have at least one independent woman director by April 1, 2020).
The top 500 and 1000 entities shall be determined on the basis of market capitalisation, as at
the end of the immediate previous financial year.
The auditor should also ensure that no listed entity shall appoint a person or continue the
directorship of any person as a non-executive director who has attained the age of seventy five
years unless a special resolution is passed to that effect, in which case the explanatory
statement annexed to the notice for such motion shall indicate the justification for appointing
such a person.
The directors of listed entities shall comply with the following conditions with respect to the
maximum number of directorships, including any alternate directorships that can be held by them
at any point of time -
(1) A person shall not be a director in more than eight listed entities (and in not more than seven
listed entities with effect from April 1, 2020).
It may be noted that a person shall not serve as an independent director in more than seven listed
entities.
(2) Notwithstanding the above, any person who is serving as a whole time director / managing
director in any listed entity shall serve as an independent director in not more than three listed
entities.
For the purpose of above-mentioned provision, the count for the number of listed entities on
which a person is a director / independent director shall be only those whose equity shares are
listed on a stock exchange.
The minutes of the Board of Directors’ meetings should be verified to ascertain whether a director
is an executive director or a non-executive director.
(ii) The auditor should also verify that where the Chairperson of the Board is a non-executive
director, at least one-third of the Board should comprise of independent directors and in case
the listed entity does not have a regular non-executive Chairperson, at least half of the Board
of Directors should comprise independent directors. Further, if the regular non-executive
Chairperson is a promoter of the listed entity or is related to any promoter or person occupying
management positions at the Board level or at one level below the Board, at least one-half of
the Board of the listed entity shall consist of independent directors.
In determining the number of requisite independent directors and/or non-executive directors,
the fraction, if any, in the number of one-half or one-third as the case may be, should be rounded
off. Since the terms in this clause refer to ‘not less than’ and ‘at least’, it would be appropriate to
compute the number by rounding off any fraction to the next integer. For example, in a Board
headed by a non-executive Chairman and comprising of six other directors (i.e., seven directors),
395

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
the independent directors should be three or more.

No listed entity shall appoint a person or continue the directorship of any person as a non-
executive director who has attained the age of seventy five years unless a special resolution is
passed to that effect, in which case the explanatory statement annexed to the notice for such
motion shall indicate the justification for appointing such a person.
(iii) The auditor should ensure that the board of directors of the top 1000 listed entities (and the
top 2000 listed entities with effect from April 1, 2020) shall comprise of not less than six
directors.
Explanation: The top 1000 and 2000 entities shall be determined on the basis of market
capitalisation as at the end of the immediate previous financial year.
(iv) With effect from April 1, 2020, the audit shall ensure that the Chairperson of the board of the top
500 listed entities is
(a) a non-executive director;
(b) not related to the Managing Director or the Chief Executive Officer as per the definition of the term
“relative” defined under the Companies Act, 2013.
It may be noted that this provision shall not be applicable to the listed entities which do not
have any identifiable promoters as per the shareholding pattern filed with stock exchanges.
It may also be noted that the top 500 entities shall be determined on the basis of market
capitalisation, as at the end of the immediate previous financial year.
(V) In case of listed company having outstanding SR equity shares, the auditor shall check that at
least half of the board of directors comprises of independent directors.
(VI) Annual disclosure submitted by the directors to the Board of Directors may be examined for
this purpose. If the Board of Directors has followed any particular procedure(s) to ascertain the
independence of directors, the auditor should examine the same. Effect of changes in the
composition of the Board and/or its Chairman and its impact on compliance throughout the
reporting period should also be examined.
(VII) An independent non-executive director, apart from receiving remuneration, should not have
had/ should not have any material pecuniary relationship with the listed entity, its holding,
subsidiary or associate company, or their promoters, or directors, during the two immediately
preceding financial years or during the current financial year. Also, such independent director,
either by himself or with any of his relatives should not be a material supplier, service provider
or customer or a lessor or lessee of the listed entity, and should not also be a substantial
shareholder of the listed entity. In determining ‘not a substantial shareholder’, he (together
with his relatives) should not own 2% or more of total voting power of the listed entity.
8.RTP Nov 2019 Qn no 18, MTP-Apr-19 Qn No 4(b) 5 Marks:

Comment on the following in the light of certificate of compliance of conditions of Corporate
396

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
Governance to be issued for a listed company where the Board consists of 10 directors including
a non-executive director as its chairman:
(i) There were 5 audit committee meetings held during the year as follows 01/04/2018,
01/06/2018, 01/09/2018, 03/01/2019, 25/03/2019.
(ii) There are 4 independent directors. One of them resigned on 25/05/2018. A new independent
director was appointed on 01/09/2018.
(iii) The Chairman of Audit Committee did not attend the Annual General meeting held on
14/09/2018.
(iv) The internal audit reports were obtained by Audit Committee on quarterly basis. Quarter 1
internal audit report commented on certain serious irregularities as regards electronic online
auction of scrap. The agenda of Audit Committee did not deliberate or take note of the issue.
(v) There is no woman director.
Compliance of conditions of Corporate Governance in case of Listed Company: As per Listing Obligation
and Disclosure Requirements Regulations 2015, depending upon the facts and circumstances, some
situations may require an adverse or qualified statement or a disclosure without necessarily making it a
subject matter of qualification in the Auditors’ Certificate, in respect of compliance of requirements of
corporate governance for example:
(i) The Audit Committee shall meet at least four times in a year and not more than one hundred and twenty
days shall lapse between two meetings. The number of days between the meetings held on 1.9.2018 and
3.01.2019 is more than 120 days. Hence it is a non-compliance and would require qualification in certificate
of corporate governance
(ii) Since the Chairman is the non-executive director, there should be 1/3rd of directors (rounded to next
integer) to be independent. In this case, 4 directors need to be independent. Any vacancy during shortfall
of independent directorship should be filled within next 3 months or before the start of next meeting,
whichever is later. In the instant case, since the independent director was appointed after lapse of 3
months (i.e. on 1.9.2018) and after next first meeting 1/6/2018, there is default which would require
qualification in certificate on corporate governance.
(iii) Chairman shall be present at Annual General Meeting to answer shareholder queries. In the given scenario,
Chairman of Audit Committee did not attend the Annual General Meeting held on 14/09/2018 which is
not in order/compliance.
(iv) The Audit Committee shall mandatorily review the Internal audit reports relating to internal control
weaknesses as per Part C (B) of Schedule II and the auditor should ascertain from the minutes book of the
Audit Committee and other sources like agenda papers, etc. whether the Audit Committee has reviewed
the above-mentioned information. In the given situation, the agenda of Audit Committee did not
deliberate or take note of serious irregularity mention in Internal Audit Report which is again not in
compliance of conditions of Corporate Governance and warrant audit qualification in certificate on
corporate governance.
(v) The auditor should ascertain whether, throughout the reporting period, the Board of Directors comprises
an optimum combination of executive and non-executive directors, with at least one-woman director.
Therefore, there should be at least one- woman director. In the given situation, there is no woman director
which is again not in compliance.
397

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
9. MTP-OCT-18 Qn No 5(d) 4 Marks:
Some situations may require an adverse or qualified statement or a disclosure without

necessarily making it a subject matter of qualification in the Auditors’ Certificate, in respect of
compliance of requirements of corporate governance. Give four examples of such situations.
Answer:
Adverse or Qualified Statement: Depending upon the facts and circumstances, some situations
may require an adverse or qualified statement or a disclosure without necessarily making it a
subject matter of qualification in the Auditors’ Certificate, in respect of compliance of
requirements of corporate governance for e.g.,
(i) The number of non-executive directors is less than 50% of the strength of Board of directors.
(ii) A qualified and independent audit committee is not set up.
(iii) The Chairman of the audit committee is not an independent director.
(iv) The Audit Committee does not meet four times a year.
(v) The necessary powers in terms of Part C of Schedule II have not been vested by the Board in the
Audit Committee.
(vi) The time gap between two Board meetings is more than one hundred and twenty days.
(vii) A director is a member of more than ten committees or acts as Chairman of more than five
committees across all companies in which he is a director.
(viii) The information of quarterly results is neither put on the listed entity’s website nor sent in a form
so as to enable the stock exchange on which the entity’s securities are listed to enable such stock
exchange to put it on its own website.
(ix) The power of share transfer is not delegated to an officer or a committee or to the registrar and
share transfer agents.

D Ltd., a company incorporated in India has six members in its Audit Committee. Due to
recessionary conditions in India, the revenue of the company is going down and there is
slowdown in other activities of the company. Therefore, it is expected that there would not be
significant work for members of the Audit Committee.
Considering the overall recession in the company and the economy, the members of the
Committee decided unanimously to meet only once at the year end. They reviewed monthly
information system of the Company and found no errors As an auditor of D Limited, would you
consider the decision taken by the Audit Committee to hold the meeting once in a year, in
complying with Listing Obligation and Disclosure Requirements (LODR)? Also state the quorum
requirements for such meetings.
Answer
398

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
One of the following additional requirement as stipulated under SEBI (Listing Obligations and
Disclosure Requirements) Regulations, 2015 (“LODR Regulations”) on which Section 177 of the
Companies Act, 2013 (relating to audit committee) is silent is : The Audit Committee should meet
at least four times in a year and not more than one hundred and twenty days shall elapse between
two meetings. The quorum shall be either two members or one third of the members of the audit
committee whichever is greater, but there should be a minimum of two independent directors
present.
(v) Management discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations;
(vi) Statement of significant related party transactions (as defined by the Audit Committee),
(vii) Management letters / letters of internal control weaknesses issued by the statutory auditors;
(viii) Internal audit reports relating to internal control weaknesses;
(ix) The appointment, removal and terms of remuneration of the Chief internal auditor shall be
subject to review by the Audit Committee; and
(x) Statement of deviations: (a) quarterly statement of deviations including report of monitoring
agency if applicable and (b) annual statement of funds utilized for purposes other than those
stated in the offer document/ prospectus/ notice.
In the instant case, due to recessionary conditions, slowdown in activities of the company and not
expecting the significant work for the members of the audit committee, D Ltd. decided unanimously
to meet only once at the year end. They also reviewed monthly information system of the company
and found no errors.
In view of above, decision taken by the audit committee to hold the meeting only once at the
year end is not correct as the Audit Committee should meet at least four times in a year and not
more than one hundred and twenty days shall elapse between two meetings.
11. (RTP- NOV 2020)
M/s FCA & Associates, Chartered Accountants is one of the leading auditing firms in Guwahati.
The firm received an assignment to examine the compliance conditions [as stated in SEBI (LODR)
Regulations] of corporate governance by ABC Ltd., a listed entity with no outstanding SR equity
shares. The firm had made the following observations:
Observation No. 1: Mr. Fine, one of the Director of the Company, also the Chairman of the
Stakeholder Relationship Committee, was acting as the audit committee Chairman in 4 other
listed companies as well & 1 private company, simultaneously.
Observation No. 2: The Nomination & Remuneration Committee consisted of 6 members, which
regularly met biannually.
399

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
Observation No. 3: The Risk Management Committee consisted of 9 directors, out of which, the
number of independent directors is the majority, but it was less than two thirds of the total
strength.
Which among the above three observations made by the auditor of ABC Ltd. should be reported
by M/s. FCA & Associates?
ANSWER
Observation No. 1 - Mr. Fine, one of the Director of the Company, also the Chairman of the Stakeholder
Relationship Committee, was acting as the Audit committee Chairman as well in 4 other listed companies
& 1 private Company, simultaneously: As per Regulation 26 of SEBI (LODR) Regulations, a Director cannot
be a Chairman in more than 5 committees across all listed entities. However, for the purpose of reckoning
the limit under this Regulation, chairmanship of committees in a private company shall be excluded. In this
case, since Mr. Fine is the Chairman of audit committee in ABC Ltd. and Chairman in 4 other listed
companies, there is no violation of the limit specified under the Regulation 26. Accordingly, this
observation need not be reported by the auditor.
Observation No. 2: The Nomination & Remuneration Committee consisted of 6 members, who regularly
met biannually: As per Regulation 19, Part D of Schedule II of SEBI (LODR) Regulations, every listed
company should have a Nomination & Remuneration Committee, which shall meet at least once in a year.
Since, in the given case the committee met biannually
(i.e. once in 2 years), the said observation needs to be reported by the auditor.
Observation No. 3: The Risk Management committee consisted of 9 directors, out of which the number
of independent directors is the majority, but it was less than two thirds of the total strength: As per
Regulation 21 of SEBI (LODR) Regulations, only in case of a listed entity having outstanding SR equity
shares, at least two thirds of Risk Management Committee shall comprise of independent directors. In the
given case, ABC Ltd. does not have outstanding SR equity shares. Accordingly, this observation need not
be reported by the auditor.
Thus, in the given scenario, only observation 2 will be reported
Study Material
12.State the main features of the Qualified and Independent Audit Committee set up SEBI (Listing
The main features of a qualified and independent audit committee to be set up under SEBI (Listing
Obligations and Disclosure Requirements) Regulations, 2015 are as follows:
(i) The audit committee shall have minimum three directors as members. Two-thirds of the members of
audit committee shall be independent directors, however, in case of a listed entity having outstanding
SR (Superior Rights) equity shares, the audit committee shall only comprise of independent directors;
(ii) All members of audit committee shall be financially literate and at least one member shall have
accounting or related financial management expertise;
Explanation (i): The term “financially literate” means the ability to read and understand basic financial
statements i.e. balance sheet, profit and loss account, and statement of cash flows.
Explanation (ii): A member will be considered to have accounting or related financial management expertise
if he or she possesses experience in finance or accounting, or requisite professional certification in
accounting, or any other comparable experience or background which results in the individual’s financial
400

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
sophistication, including being or having been a chief executive officer, chief financial officer or other senior
officer with financial oversight responsibilities.
(iii) The Chairperson of the Audit Committee shall be an independent director;
(iv) The Chairperson of the Audit Committee shall be present at Annual General Meeting to answer
shareholder queries;
(v) The Audit Committee at its discretion shall invite the finance director or the head of the finance
function, head of internal audit and a representative of the statutory auditor and any other such
executives to be present at the meetings of the committee; provided that occasionally, the Audit
Committee may meet without the presence of any executives of the listed entity; The Company
Secretary shall act as the secretary to the committee
13. Write short notes on the following:

(1) Content of Management Discussion and Analysis.
(2) Corporate Governance
Answer
Content of Management Discussion and Analysis: As part of the directors’ report or as an addition thereto,
a Management Discussion and Analysis report should form part of the Annual Report to the shareholders.
This Management Discussion & Analysis should include discussion on the following matters within the limits
set by the company’s competitive position-
(a) Industry structure and developments.
(b) Opportunities and Threats.
(c) Segment–wise or product-wise performance.
(d) Outlook.
(e) Risks and concerns.
(f) Internal control systems and their adequacy.
(g) Discussion on financial performance with respect to operational performance.
(h) Material developments in Human Resources/Industrial Relations front, including number of people
employed.
a. Details of significant changes (i.e. change of 25% or more as compared to the immediately previous
financial year) in key financial ratios, along with detailed explanations therefor, including:
i. Debtors Turnover
ii. Inventory Turnover
iii. Interest Coverage Ratio
iv. Current Ratio
v. Debt Equity Ratio
vi. Operating Profit Margin (%)
vii. Net Profit Margin (%) - or sector-specific equivalent ratios, as applicable.
401

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
b. Details of any change in Return on Net Worth as compared to the immediately previous financial year along
with a detailed explanation thereof.
(b) Corporate Governance: Corporate governance is the system by which companies are directed and
controlled by the management in the best interest of the shareholders and others ensuring greater
transparency and better and timely financial reporting. The Board of Directors are responsible
for governance of their companies. A number of reports and codes of corporate governance have been published
internationally.
SEBI on September 2, 2015, issued the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Listing Obligations and
Disclosure Requirements) Regulations, 2015 (“LODR
Regulations”), with the objective of streamlining and consolidating the provisions of various listing
agreements in operation for different segments of the capital markets, such as equity shares, preference
shares, debt instruments, units of mutual funds, Indian depository receipts, securitised debt instruments
and any other securities that the SEBI may specify.
The LODR Regulations are divided into two parts - the substantive provisions are incorporated in the main
body while the procedural requirements are incorporated in the form of schedules. The LODR Regulations
also capture the corporate governance principles found in Clause 49 of SEBI’s Model Listing Agreement. It
may be noted that the LODR Regulations deal with only post-listing requirements and exclude all pre- listing
requirements.
14. Dishonest Limited, a company incorporated in India has six members in its Audit Committee.
Due to recessionary conditions in India the revenue of the company is going down and there is
slow down in other activities of the company. Therefore, it was expected that there would not
be significant work for members of the Audit Committee. Considering the overall recession in
the company and the economy, the members of the Committee decided unanimously to meet
once in a year only on March 31, 2018.
They reviewed monthly information system of the Company and found no errors. As an auditor
of Dishonest Limited would you consider the decision taken by the Audit Committee is in line
with the SEBI (Listing Obligations and Disclosure Requirements) Regulations, 2015?
One of the following additional requirement as stipulated under SEBI (Listing Obligations and Disclosure
Requirements) Regulations, 2015 (“LODR Regulations”) on which Section 177 of the Companies Act, 2013
(relating to audit committee) is silent is – The Audit Committee should meet at least four times in a year and
not more than one hundred and twenty days shall elapse between two meetings. The quorum shall be either
two members or one third of the members of the audit committee, whichever is greater, but there should
be a minimum of two independent directors present.
Besides, there is a mandatory review requirement and to review only monthly information system is not
sufficient. Here the audit committee members reviewed only monthly information system of the company
and the same is not sufficient as per LODR Regulations.
(vi) Management discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations;
(vii) Statement of significant related party transactions (as defined by the Audit Committee),
402

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
(viii) Management letters / letters of internal control weaknesses issued by the statutory auditors;
(ix) Internal audit reports relating to internal control weaknesses;
(x) The appointment, removal and terms of remuneration of the Chief internal auditor shall be
subject to review by the Audit Committee; and
(xi) Statement of deviations: (a) quarterly statement of deviations including report of monitoring
agency if applicable and (b) annual statement of funds utilized for purposes other than those stated in the
offer document/ prospectus/ notice.
Applying the above, the decision taken by the audit committee is not in line with the LODR Regulations
15. XYZ Limited has conducted 4 meetings in 2019-20. i.e. June 15, 2019, October 18, 2019,
February 10, 2020 and June 10, 2020. Does it comply with provisions of conducting meeting?
ANSWER:
As per Listing Obligation and Disclosure Requirements Regulations 2015, depending upon the facts and
circumstances, some situations may require an adverse or qualified statement or a disclosure without
necessarily making it a subject matter of qualification in the Auditors’ Certificate, in respect of compliance
of requirements of corporate governance. The Audit Committee shall meet at least four times in a year and
not more than one hundred and twenty days shall lapse between two meetings. In the given case, XYZ
Limited has conducted 4 meetings in 2019-20. i.e. June 15, 2019, October 18, 2019, February 10, 2020 and
June 10, 2020. It does not comply with provisions because time gap between June 15 and October 18 is
more than 120 days i.e. 125 days.
Statutory auditor of ABC Limited has resigned on July 10, 2020. Whether he shall be liable for issuing
limited review report for quarter ended June 30, 2020.
All listed entities/material subsidiaries while appointing/re-appointing an auditor shall ensure compliance
withIf the auditor resigns within 45 days from the end of a quarter of a financial year, then the auditor
shall, before such resignation, issue the limited review/ audit report for such quarter. In the given situation,
statutory auditor of ABC Limited has resigned on July 10, 2020. he would be liable for issuing limited review
report for quarter ended June 30, 2020 because time gap between July 13, 2020 and June 30, 2020 is less
than 45 days.
16. PQR, auditor of XYZ Limited has signed limited review report of 2nd and 3rd quarter.
Whether auditor is liable to issue limited review report of 4th quarter before resignation?
ANSWER:
All listed entities/material subsidiaries while appointing/re-appointing an auditor shall ensure compliance
in case the auditor has signed the limited review/ audit report for the first three quarters of a financial
year, then the auditor shall, before such resignation, issue the limited review/ audit report for the last
quarter of such financial year as well as the audit report for such financial year. In the instant case, PQR,
auditor of XYZ Limited has signed limited review report of 2nd and 3rd quarter. Auditor is not liable to issue
limited review report of 4th quarter because he has not signed limited review report of first 3 quarters
17.The Board of Directors of PQR Ltd. have laid down the code of conduct for all Board members
and senior management. The auditor is provided with the annual compliance affirmations
received from the Board members and explained that since there has been no change in the
403

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
composition of the senior management, the previous year’s affirmations may be considered
valid. Is the contention of the Company valid?
ANSWER:
. Under Regulation 26(3) of LODR, all Board members and senior management personnel have to affirm
compliance with the code on an annual basis. The decision to consider the previous year’s affirmations from
the senior management personnel as valid is not in line with the LODR Regulations.
RST Ltd. has established a vigil mechanism to enable its directors and employees to report
genuine concerns and seek protection against victimization. The details of the mechanism are
available on the company intranet which is accessible by the directors and employees. Are the
measures taken by the Company in line with the LODR Regulations?
ANSWER:
Under Regulation 22 of the LODR, the vigil mechanism can be used by directors, employees and any other
person. To that effect, Regulation 46 of the LODR requires the details of establishment of such mechanism
to be disclosed by the Company on its website and in the Board Report. By only providing the details in the
intranet, the Company has failed to meet the LODR Regulations.
18.Genuine Ltd. has established the Internal Complaints Committee under the Sexual Harassment
of Women at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition and Redressal) Act, 2013 (‘POSH Act’). The
details (names, email addresses and contact numbers) of the Committee members are available
on the company intranet which is accessible by all employees. However, no disclosure regarding
number of complaints pertaining to sexual harassment of women at workplace is being made.
Are the measures taken by the Company adequate?
ANSWER:
As per Schedule V Disclosures in relation to the Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace (Prevention,
Prohibition and Redressal) Act, 2013, amongst other matters, following should be disclosed in the section
on Corporate Governance of the Annual Report:
• number of complaints filed during the financial year
• number of complaints disposed of during the financial year
• number of complaints pending as on end of the financial year .
The POSH Act offers protection to all women, be it employees or contract staff or any other women who are
associated with the Company in any other capacity (including service providers, vendors, professionals, etc.)
By only providing the details in the intranet, the Company has failed to meet the requirements under the
POSH Act. In view of above, Genuine Ltd. is required to make necessary disclosures in accordance with
Schedule V of SEBI (LODR) Regulation 2015.

A Review Report of an Auditor is negative in form in expression of conclusion- Explain.
ANSWER
404

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
Negative Review Report in expression of conclusion: According to Standards on Review Engagement (SREs)
review report is a limited assurance engagement. The practitioner provides a written report containing a
conclusion that conveys the assurance obtained about the subject matter information.
SAs, SREs and SAEs establish basic elements for assurance reports. In addition, the practitioner considers
other reporting responsibilities, including communicating with those charged with.
In a reasonable assurance engagement, the practitioner expresses the conclusion in the positive form, this
form of expression conveys “reasonable assurance”. However, in a limited assurance engagement, the
practitioner expresses the conclusion in the negative form, for example, “based on our work described in
this report, nothing has come to our attention that causes us to believe that internal control is not
effective, in all material respects, based on XYZ criteria”. This form of expression conveys a level of “limited
assurance” that is proportional to the level of the practitioner’s evidence-gathering procedures given the
characteristics of the subject matter and other engagement circumstances described in the assurance
report.
The format of Review report in SRE in conclusion caption of the report provides as follows- "nothing has
come to our attention that causes to believe that these financial statements do not give a true and fair
view of (Or presents fairly in all material respects) the financial position of the company and of its financial
performance and cash flows for the period then ended in accordance with the Accounting standards
referred to in Companies Act 2013 and other accounting principles generally accepted in India" .
Thus, in view of above it is clear that in a review report instead of positive form, the negative form of
expression is being used. Also it is to be noted that the Review report contains caption -conclusion and not
opinion.

20. The Audit Committee should consist of the following:
a) minimum of 3 directors with independent directors forming a majority.
b) minimum of 4 directors with only one independent director.
c) minimum 2 directors which are independent.
d) minimum 5 directors with 1 independent woman director
Answer: (a) minimum of 3 directors with independent directors forming a majority.
21. ABC Ltd is one of the top 1000 listed entities on the basis of market capitalisation. The Board of
Directors of ABC Ltd does not comprise of any women director. The Statutory Auditor who is certifying
Corporate Governance as per SEBI regulations, has to ascertain that –
a) the Board of directors will have at least 2 independent woman director.
b) the Board of directors will have at least 1 independent woman director.
c) the Board of directors will have at least 5 independent woman director.
d) None of the above
Answer: (b) the Board of directors will have at least 1 independent woman director.
405

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
22. (MTP NOV 2019)

The auditor should ensure that the board of directors of the top 100 listed entities shall comprise of –
e) not less than 7 directors.
f) not less than 4 directors.
g) not less than 6 directors.
h) not less than 2 directors
Answer: ( g) not less than 6 directors
23. Annual Remuneration payable to a single non-executive director of ABC Ltd exceeds 25% of the
total annual remuneration payable to all non-executive directors.
a) Approval of shareholders by special resolution shall be obtained every year.
b) Approval of shareholders in general meeting shall be obtained every year.
c) None of the above
d) Approval of Board of Directors.
Answer: ( c) None of the above
24. The Board of Directors of XYZ Ltd, one of the top 2000 listed entities meets 4 times a year. What
should be the quorum of the Board of Directors from 1st April 2020-
a) 1/3rd of its total strength or 3 directors, whichever is higher, including at least 1 independent director.
b) 1/3rd of its total strength or 4 directors, whichever is higher, including at least 1 independent director.
c) 1/3rd of its total strength or 3 directors, whichever is higher, including at least 2 independent director.
d) 1/3rd of its total strength or 3 directors, whichever is higher, including at least 1 non- executive
director.
Answer: (a) 1/3rd of its total strength or 3 directors, whichever is higher, including at least 1 independent
director.
25. BG Limited is a large-sized listed company. The Board of directors have constituted Nomination and
Remuneration committee comprising of non-executive and independent directors. The management
seeks your advice on the composition and role of the committee. Elucidate the composition and role of
Nomination and Remuneration committee as per SEBI (Listing Obligations and Disclosure Requirements)
Regulations, 2015. (past exam nov 2020)
(5 Marks)
ANSWER
Advice to the Management of BG Limited on the Composition of Nomination and Remuneration Committee
i. The Board of Directors of every listed public company shall constitute the Nomination and Remuneration
Committee which shall comprise of at least three directors, all of whom shall be non-executive directors
and at least half shall be independent directors,
406

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
ii. However, in case of a listed entity having outstanding SR equity shares, two thirds shall comprise of
iii. Chairperson of the committee shall be an independent director. It may be noted that the Chairperson of
the company (whether executive or nonexecutive) may be appointed as a member of the Nomination and
Remuneration Committee but shall not chair such committee.
Advice to the Management of BG Limited on the Role of Nomination and Remuneration Committee.
The role of such committee shall, inter-alia, include the following:
(i) Formulation of the criteria for determining qualifications, positive attributes and independence of a
director and recommend to the Board of Directors a policy, relating to the remuneration of the directors,
key managerial personnel and other employees;
(ii) Formulation of criteria for evaluation of performance of independent directors and the Board of
Directors;
(iii) Devising a policy on Board diversity;
(iv) Identifying persons who are qualified to become directors and who may be appointed in senior
management in accordance with the criteria laid down, and recommend to the Board their appointment
and removal;
(v) whether to extend or continue the term of appointment of the independent director, on the basis of the
report of performance evaluation of independent directors.
(vi) recommend to the board, all remuneration, in whatever form, payable to senior management.
26. (rtp- july 2021)
M/s. Suresh & Co., a partnership firm, has been appointed, for the 7th consecutive year, as the statutory
auditor of Alkis Ltd., an unlisted public company, for financial year 2020-21.
Mr. Suresh is the engagement partner for the audit assignment of Alkis Ltd. The engagement team,
before starting the assignment, was made to read the policies and procedures designed to achieve
desired quality control, with respect to the type of assignment being undertaken.
Mr. Suresh, referred the engagement letter, signed with the management initially and was considering
whether there was a requirement to send a new engagement letter, in light of following circumstances in
the Company during F.Y. 2020-21:
• Two senior whole time directors of the Company have retired out of total five directors.
• 40% stake in the Company was held by promoters, which was reduced to 5%, by selling shares to
general public.
• One more factory unit was set up in Gorakhpur, this year.
• Management has requested to cover 90% of the transactions with respect to each revenue line item,
this time, instead of 80% of the transactions, as was set out in the audit plan, considering the materiality
and other factors.
The following data is presented from the audited financial statements of Alkis Ltd., for the financial year
2019-2020:
407

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
(I) Paid up share capital - Rs. 8 crore;

(II) Turnover - Rs. 55 crore;
(III) Outstanding Borrowings - Rs. 14 crore;
(IV) Outstanding Public Deposits - Rs. 28 crore.
Mr. Suresh while preparing a report under section 143 of the Companies Act, 2013, made a statement
with respect to the remuneration paid by the Alkis Ltd. to one of its directors, Mr. Mahesh, was in excess
of the limit laid down under section 197 and also gave such other details as prescribed.
Mr. Suresh, for additional reporting purpose, while auditing with respect to compliance with
CARO, 2020, observed the following, relevant to Para 3(vii) of CARO, 2020: Mr. Suresh, referred
the engagement letter, signed with the management initially and was considering whether there was a
requirement to send a new engagement letter, in light of following circumstances in the Company during
F.Y. 2020-21:
• Two senior whole time directors of the Company have retired out of total five directors.
• 40% stake in the Company was held by promoters, which was reduced to 5%, by selling shares to
general public.
• One more factory unit was set up in Gorakhpur, this year.
• Management has requested to cover 90% of the transactions with respect to each revenue line item,
this time, instead of 80% of the transactions, as was set out in the audit plan, considering the materiality
and other factors.
The following data is presented from the audited financial statements of Alkis Ltd., for the financial year
2019-2020:
(I) Paid up share capital - Rs. 8 crore;
(II) Turnover - Rs. 55 crore;
(III) Outstanding Borrowings - Rs. 14 crore;
(IV) Outstanding Public Deposits - Rs. 28 crore.
Mr. Suresh while preparing a report under section 143 of the Companies Act, 2013, made a statement
with respect to the remuneration paid by the Alkis Ltd. to one of its directors, Mr. Mahesh, was in excess
of the limit laid down under section 197 and also gave such other details as prescribed.
Mr. Suresh, for additional reporting purpose, while auditing with respect to compliance with CARO,
2020, observed the following, relevant to Para 3(vii) of CARO, 2016:
Statutory Dues Undisputed Date Payable Date Paid

Amount (Rs. in
lakh)
Income Tax 2 25th September, 28 28th March,
Demand for A.Y. 2020 2021
2018-19
GST 1.5 3rd October, 2020 4th April, 2021
Customs Duty 0.80 20th September, 10th April, 2021
2020
408

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
Provident Fund 0.45 12th October, Not Paid till date

2020
Also, a representation was made to GST Department for waiving a penalty of Rs. 1 lakh for late payment
of GST demand.
The board of Alkis Ltd. declared interim dividend of Rs. 20 lakh on 20th May, 2021, to its 180
shareholders, out of surplus in the profit and loss account and such dividend amount was deposited in a
separate bank with a branch of SBI.
Dividend amounting to Rs. 1 lakh was not claimed by a shareholder, Mr. Rohit, till 19 th June, 2021, and so
the said amount of Rs. 1 lakh was transferred to Unpaid Dividend Account on 31st July, 2020.
Question No.: (1-5)
1. Which of the following option is correct with respect to Alkis Ltd.?
(a) Alkis Ltd. needs to form an Audit Committee. Further, provisions relating to internal audit as well as
rotation of auditors are applicable to Alkis Ltd.
(b) Alkis Ltd. need not to form an Audit Committee. Further, provisions relating to internal audit is not
applicable to Alkis Ltd. However, the provisions with respect to rotation of auditors are applicable to it.
(c) Alkis Ltd. need not to form an Audit Committee. Further, provisions relating to rotation of auditors is
not applicable to Alkis Ltd. However, the provisions with respect to internal audit are applicable to it.
(d) Alkis Ltd. needs to form an Audit Committee. Provisions relating to internal audit is applicable to Alkis
Ltd. However, the provisions with respect to rotation of auditors are not applicable to it.
ANSWER- C
2. Under which section of the auditor’s report, Mr. Suresh needs to report with respect to the excess
remuneration being paid to Mr. Mahesh?
(a) Other Matters Paragraph.
(b) Report on Other Legal and Regulatory Requirements.
(c) Basis for Qualified Opinion.
(d) Auditor’s Responsibilities for the Audit of the Financial Statements.
ANSWER- b
409

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
3. What total amount of statutory dues needs to be reported by Mr. Suresh as per Para 3 of CARO?
(a) Rs. 2.75 lakh.
(b) Rs. 0.80 lakh.
(c) Rs. 2.80 lakh.
(d) Rs. 2.30 lakh.
ANSWER- b
4. How much amount of interest Alkis Ltd. would be liable to pay with respect to unpaid dividend
amount?
(a) Rs. 575.
(b) Rs. 1,216.
(c) Rs. 1,726.
(d) Rs. 1,151.
ANSWER- d
5. By what date, the amount of interim dividend should have been deposited in the scheduled bank after
being declared and also by what date, the unpaid or unclaimed dividend amount should have been
transferred to Unpaid Dividend Account?
(a) 25th May, 2021 and 24th June, 2021, respectively.
(b) 25th May, 2021 and 26th June, 2021, respectively.
(c) 30th May, 2021 and 19th July, 2021, respectively.
(d) 27th May, 2021 and 26th June, 2021, respectively.

ANSWER- b
27. Mr. Ibrahim was appointed as statutory auditor of New Limited and Old Limited. Both the Companies
were having their base in Chennai they had recently listed their shares on the Stock Exchange. For the
financial year 2020-21, Mr. Ibrahim had signed limited review reports for each quarter, till the quarter
ended 31st December 2020 for both the companies. Owing to his personal commitments and increased
workload, he tendered his resignation to M/s New Limited on 30th January 2021 and asked the Company
to appoint another auditor to issue audit report for the remaining quarter and the FY 2020-21 as a
whole. But the management of the Company did not accept the same.
410

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
Mr. Ibrahim continued to as act as auditor for M/s Old limited. During the 1 st week of March 2021, Mrs.
W (wife of Mr. Ibrahim) had borrowed a sum of Rs. 6 lakh from the Company for her personal use.
Having come to know about this, Mr. Ibrahim immediately informed the management that he had been
disqualified to act as auditor and told them that he won ’t issue audit report for last quarter. But
management of the Company argued that it’s the legal responsibility of Mr. Ibrahim to do the same.
Whether contention of management of New Limited and Old Limited is justified in asking Mr. Ibrahim to
issue audit report for the last quarter and the FY 2020-21 as a whole, despite his resignation? Discuss.
(rtp- july 2021)
ANSWER
In the given scenario, Mr. Ibrahim was appointed as statutory auditor of two listed entities i.e., New
Limited and Old Limited. For the financial year 2020-21, Mr. Ibrahim had signed limited review reports for
first three quarter i.e., till the quarter ended 31st December 2020 for both the companies. Owing to his
personal commitments and increased workload, he resigned from New Limited and asked the Company to
appoint another auditor to issue audit report for the remaining quarter and audit report for the FY 2020-
21.
Further, Mr. Ibrahim immediately informed the management of Old Limited that he had been disqualified
to act as auditor and told them that he won’t issue audit report for last quarter as Mrs. W (wife of Mr.
Ibrahim) had borrowed a sum of Rs. 6 lakh from the Company for her personal use.
As per SEBI LODR Regulations, if the auditor has signed the limited review/ audit report for the first three
quarters of a financial year, then the auditor shall, before such resignation, issue the limited review/ audit
report for the last quarter of such financial year as well as the audit report for such financial year. This
provision will not apply if the auditor is disqualified due to Section 141 of the Companies Act, 2013.
Thus, in the given situation, in view of above conditions to be complied with upon resignation of
the statutory auditor of a listed entity/material subsidiary with respect to limited review / audit
report as per SEBI LODR Regulations, Mr. Ibrahim is required to issue the audit report for the last
quarter and audit report for the year 2020-21 for New Limited as he has issued audit report for
the first three quarters whereas Mr. Ibrahim is not required to issue the audit report for remaining
quarter and audit report for the year 2020-21 as a whole for Old Limited as he is disqualified under section
141 of Companies Act.
Accordingly, contention of Management of New Limited is correct and tenable for issuing the audit report
for remaining quarter and audit report for financial year 2020-21 however, contention of management of
Old Limited is not correct regarding the legal responsibility of Mr. Ibrahim to issue audit report for
remaining quarter and for the whole year.
28. As per Regulation 20 and Part D of Schedule II of SEBI (LODR) Regulations, 2015, who among the
following shall be appointed as Chairman of Stakeholder Relationship Committee? (mtp nov 20)
(a) Small Shareholder Director
(b) Whole time director
(c) Any of the Executive Director

411

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
(d) Any of the Non-Executive Director

ANSWER- d
29. (mtp nov 20)
Papa Limited is a listed nationalised bank whose face value per share is Rs. 100 each having its operation
across India. Papa Limited appointed Mr. Das, Mr. Pas and Mr. Tas as its central joint auditors for the year
2020-21. After making sure that all of them are qualified to be appointed as statutory auditor of the bank,
Papa Limited issued appointment letter as well as engagement letter to all of them. The engagement letter
contains the details on objective and scope of audit, responsibilities of auditor,
management and identification of framework applicable. It also contains the reference to expected form
and content of report from all three joint auditors. During the year Papa Limited has acquired another
bank called Baby Limited. While finalising the books of accounts, some adjustments were made to give the
effect of merger. These adjustments were related to determination of goodwill of Rs. 2 crores,
determination of amount of minority interest of Rs. 50 Lakh and some intra-group transaction adjustment
of Rs. 15 lac were also made. Another adjustment which was made was harmonization of accounting
policies of both Papa Limited and Baby Limited which was of 30 lac.
While planning the audit, all joint auditors mutually decided that responsibility of verification of cash book
will be entrusted with Mr. Pas. But Mr. Pas failed to detect the fraud committed by the cashier which he
could have detected if he had properly checked the cash book. This fraud was revealed in the special audit
which was conducted on the directions of RBI. Responsibility for verifying compliance with SLR requirement
was entrusted with Mr. Das. While performing audit on compliance with SLR requirements Mr. Das used 12
odd dates in different months of fiscal year. Mr. Das with his professional judgement used the below
mentioned days:
Month Day of Day

month
April 2nd Thursday
May 9th Saturday
June 5th Friday
July 31st Friday
August 31st Monday
September 1st Tuesday
October 30th Friday
November 1st Sunday
December 1st Tuesday
January 10th Sunday
February 8th Monday
March 7th Sunday
Mr. Tas was entrusted with responsibility for calculation of Demand and time liability. On 31st March total
liability stood at Rs. 200 Crores. It includes Margin held for funded facilities of Rs. 3 Crore, credit balance
for one branch of Rs. 4 crores, adverse balance of nostro Mirror account of Rs. 2 Crores and unadjusted
deposit for agency business of Rs. 6 Crore. Papa Limited has total 12 directors including 3 women
directors. Out of them, Mr. Right was non executive chairman as well as promoter of bank. Papa Limited
has a total of 5 independent directors in their board.
Wife of CA Das, was also a Chartered Accountant and was actively involved in purchase and sale of shares.
She purchased 100 shares of Papa Limited of Rs. 100 each for Rs. 15,00,000. All the required
412
communication were made among the joint auditors and significant matters were discussed with those

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
charged with governance. At the end, an unmodified report in accordance with SA 700 was issued which
was signed by all three joint auditors.
1. Which of the fallowing statement is true?
(a) For giving the effect of merger, permanent consolidation adjustment of 250 lac and current period
consolidation adjustment of 45 lac was made.
(b) For giving the effect of merger, permanent consolidation adjustment of 280 lac and current period
(c) For giving the effect of merger permanent consolidation adjustment of 295 lac.
(d) For giving the effect of merger, permanent consolidation adjustment of 265 lac and current period
ANSWER- a
2. While verifying the compliance of corporate governance, in accordance with Regulation 17 and 17A,
was there any non-compliance in composition of board?
(a) No, as in this scenario there should be at least 1/3 i.e.4 independent directors.
(b) Yes, as in this scenario there should be at least 1/ 2 i.e. 6 independent directors.
(c) No, as its upto the shareholder to decide the composition of board after complying with section
149(4) of companies act 2013.
(d) Yes, as in this scenario there should be at least 2/3 i.e. 8 independent directors.
ANSWER- b
3. List down all the months whose date has been selected inappropriately by CA Das for calculation of
SLR compliance?
(a) January, February and March.
(b) July, August and October
(c) June, July and October.

(d) May and November.
ANSWER- c
4. While calculating SLR compliance of Papa Limited, what will be value of demand and time liability as
on 31st March?
(a) 191 crores
(b) 200 crores.
(c) 197 crores.
(d) 185 crores.

413

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
ANSWER- a
5. Will CA Das be disqualified after his wife purchased 100 shares for Rs. 15,00,000?
(a) Mr. Das will be disqualified as an auditor of Papa Limited, as his relative owns shares of more than Rs.
100,000 market value.
(b) Mr. Das will be not disqualified as an auditor of Papa Limited, as his relative owns shares of less than
Rs. 20,00,000 market value.
(c) Mr. Das will be not disqualified as an auditor of Papa Limited, as his relative owns shares of less than
Rs. 100,000 face value.
(d) Mr. Das will be disqualified as an auditor of Papa Limited, as his relative owns shares in Papa limited
irrespective of amount of investment. (5 x 2 = 10 Marks)
ANSWER- c
30. (a) RAO & Co., a Chartered Accountant Firm, is appointed as the principal auditor of a listed company,
Triumph Ltd.
Figures of income and net-worth of five out of seven components of Triumph Ltd., which are its unlisted
subsidiaries, is tabulated below for the immediate preceding financial year along with the consolidated
amount
Particulars Consolidated Component Component Component Component Compon

‘A’ ‘B’ ‘C’ ‘D’ ent ‘E’
Income 300 35 10 70 65 20
Net Worth 800 40 20 140 180 50
The remaining two components i.e., Component ‘F’ & Component ‘G’ of Triumph Ltd. were unaudited.
According to Mr. RAO, the engagement partner, Component ‘F’ is material to the consolidated financial
statements whereas Component ‘G’ is not material to consolidated financial statements and this fact has
also been discussed in writing with those charged with governance of Triumph Ltd. and it will also form
part of report as a ‘Key audit matter’ in accordance with SA 701.
(i) Which of the components of Triumph Ltd. can be termed as “material subsidiary” and in the board of
which of the unlisted subsidiaries at least one independent director of Triumph Ltd. needs to be
appointed or would be appointed? (5 Marks)
(ii) What shall be the audit consideration in relation to reporting in case of unaudited components of
Triumph Ltd. by RAO & Co. and how RAO & Co. as a principal auditor shall report in case of Component
‘F’ & Component ‘G’, respectively? (4 Marks) (mtp – I -july 2021)
ANSWER
(i) As per Regulation 16(c) of the SEBI (LODR) Regulations, 2015, “material subsidiary” shall mean a
subsidiary, whose income or net worth exceeds ten percent of the consolidated income or net worth
respectively, of the listed entity and its subsidiaries in the immediately preceding accounting year.
[Explanation- The listed entity shall formulate a policy for determining ‘material’ subsidiary.]
Regulation 24(1) of the SEBI (LODR) Regulations, 2015, provides that at least one independent director on
the board of directors of the listed entity shall be a director on the board of directors of an unlisted
material subsidiary, whether incorporated in India or not.
414

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
[Explanation- For the purposes of Regulation 24(1), notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained in
regulation 16, the term “material subsidiary” shall mean a subsidiary, whose income or net worth exceeds
twenty percent of the consolidated income or net worth respectively, of the listed entity and its
subsidiaries in the immediately preceding accounting year]
On the basis of above provisions, following information is tabulated as below:
Particulars Share in Consolidated Share in Consolidated

Income Net Worth
Component ‘A’ 11.67% 5%
Component ‘B’ 3.33% 2.5%
Component ‘C’ 23.33% 17.5%
Component ‘D’ 21.67% 22.5%
Component ‘E’ 6.67% 6.25%
It can be observed that Component ‘A’, Component ‘C’ and Component ‘D’, respectively, can be termed as
“material subsidiary” as their shares in either consolidated Income or net worth exceeds 10%.
Further, at least one independent director from the board of directors of Triumph Ltd. shall be appointed
or would have been appointed on the board of Component ‘C’ and Component ‘D’, respectively, as their
shares in either consolidated income or net worth exceeds 20%.
(ii) Generally, the financial statements of all components included in consolidated financial statements
should be audited or subjected to audit procedures in the context of a multi-location group audit. Such
audits and audit procedures can be performed by the auditor reporting on the consolidated financial
statements or by the components’ auditor.
Where the financial statements of one or more components continue to remain unaudited, the auditor
reporting on the consolidated financial statements should consider unaudited components in evaluating a
possible modification to his report on the consolidated financial statements. The evaluation is necessary
because the auditor (or other auditors, as the case may be) has not been able to obtain sufficient
appropriate audit evidence in relation to such consolidated amounts/balances. In such cases, the auditor
should evaluate both qualitative and quantitative factors on the possible effect of such amounts remaining
unaudited when reporting on the consolidated financial statements using the guidance provided in SA 705,
“Modifications to the Opinion in the Independent Auditor’s Report”.
In the given situation, two out of seven components of Triumph Ltd. have remained unaudited where
Component ‘F’ is material and Component ‘G’ is not material to the consolidated financial statements.
Since Component ‘F’ is material, therefore, it may be assumed that reporting of Key Audit Matter in
accordance with SA 701 is being done for Component ‘F’ and not for Component ‘G’.
Thus, in case of Component ‘F’, the Principal Auditor needs to consider its impact on the auditor’s opinion
on the consolidated financial statements of the group, in terms of the principles laid down in SA 705,
Modifications to the Opinion in the Independent Auditor’s Report. Whereas in case of Component ‘G’, the
principal auditor should make appropriate reporting under the “Other Matters” paragraph, pursuant to SA
706, Emphasis of Matter Paragraphs and Other Matter Paragraphs, in the Independent Auditor’s Report
31. BN Limited is a listed entity having two subsidiaries namely BUS Limited and ROBUS Limited. Both
the subsidiaries are unlisted and are incorporated in Australia. The consolidated net worth of BN Limited
and its subsidiaries is Rs. 350 crore (including net worth of BUS Limited and ROBUS Limited Rs. 36 crore &
Rs. 80 crore respectively) in the immediately preceding year 2019-20. On observing this fact, your senior
manager advises you to inform the management of BN limited to make certain changes in the board of
415

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
directors of both the subsidiaries, in accordance with the LODR regulation 24(1). Comment. (5 Marks)
(mtp – II -july 2021)
ANSWER
As per SEBI - LODR Regulation 24(1), at least one independent director on the board of directors of the
listed entity shall be a director on the board of directors of the unlisted material subsidiary, whether
incorporated in India or not. For the purpose of Regulation 24(1), notwithstanding anything to the contrary
contained in
Regulation 16, the term ‘material subsidiary’ means a subsidiary, whose income or net worth exceeds 20%
of the consolidated income or net worth respectively, of the listed entity and its subsidiaries in the
immediately preceding accounting year.
In the given case, the fact that both the subsidiaries are unlisted and incorporated outside India is
irrelevant. From the above case we have the following details:
20% of consolidated net worth of BN Limited = 350*20% = Rs. 70 crore.

Net worth of BUS Limited = Rs. 36 crore.
Net worth of ROBUS Limited = Rs. 80 crore.
Accordingly, it is clear that out of the two subsidiaries, the net worth of only one subsidiary (ie. ROBUS
Limited) exceeds 20% of the consolidated net worth of BN Limited and all its subsidiaries. Therefore, the
change in the composition of board of directors needs to be made only for ROBUS Limited and not both the
subsidiaries.
Thus, contention of senior manager regarding change in composition of board of directors in BUS
Limited is not in order as per Regulation 24(1). However, change in composition of board of
director is required for ROBUS Limited.
Further, as per Regulation 24 (1) of LODR Regulation, 2015 one of the independent directors
present in the board of director of BN Limited should also be made as a director in the board of
directors of ROBUS Limited.
32. (RTP- NOV 2021)

Kayask Ltd. is a public company which got listed on BSE and NSE in the F.Y. 2015-16 and is
amongst the top 500 listed entities on the basis of market capitalization. JP Bhuj & Co., a CA
firm, has been appointed as its statutory auditor for the F.Y. 2020-21.
Mr. Pankaj Bhuj was assigned its audit as an engagement partner and he was verifying the
composition of the Board of Director because of some changes in the same. The present
composition of the Board of Kayask Ltd. is as follows: -
(1) There are 9 directors out of which there are 4 non-executive directors and 3 independent
directors. The board has only one woman director and she is an executive director.
(2) Mr. Madhusudan Mehra has been appointed as the non-executive chairperson of the Board.
He is brother in law of the Managing Director of Kayask Ltd.
Whether present composition of the board of Kayask Ltd. complies with the requirement of the
provisions of SEBI LODR Regulations?
ANSWER
As per Regulation 17 and 17A of the SEBI LODR Regulations, -

✓ The auditor should ascertain whether, throughout the reporting period, the Board of Directors
comprises an optimum combination of executive and non-executive directors, with at least one
416

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
woman director and not less than 50% of the Board of Directors comprising non-executive
directors.
It may be noted that the Board of directors of the top 1000 listed entities shall have at least one
independent woman director.
✓ The auditor should also verify that where the Chairperson of the Board is a non-executive
director, at least one-third of the Board should comprise of independent directors.
✓ The auditor shall ensure that the Chairperson of the board of the top 500 listed entities is - (a) a
non-executive director; (b) not related to the Managing Director or the Chief Executive Officer as
per the definition of the term “relative” defined under the Companies Act, 2013.
As per the term “relative” defined under the Companies Act, 2013 – Brother-in-law i.e. sister’s
husband is not included.
In the given case, Kayask Ltd. is a public company which got listed on BSE and NSE in the F.Y. 2015-
16 and is amongst the top 500 listed entities on the basis of market capitalization. The present
composition of the board of Kayask Ltd includes 9 directors out of which there are 4 non-executive
directors and 3 independent directors. The board has only one woman director and she is an
executive director. In addition, Chairperson of the Board Mr. Madhusudan Mehra is brother in law
of the Managing Director of Kayask Ltd. and has been appointed as the non-executive
Chairperson.
In view of Regulation 17 and 17A of the SEBI LODR Regulations, there should at least 5 non-
executive directors and 3 Independent directors as its Chairperson is a non-executive director.
Further as the company is amongst the top 500 listed entities, at least one independent woman
director should be there in its board.
Thus, it can be concluded that the present composition of the board of Kayask Ltd. does not comply
with the requirement of the provisions of SEBI LODR Regulations as the woman director should be
an independent director and there should be 5 non-executive directors
33. (MTP- NOV 2021)

Mr. DG, Partner in M/s. DG and Associates, as part of their audit presentation to the Audit Committee of
MABD Limited, a listed company, highlighted the following:
• Difficulties faced during the audit;
• Disagreements with the management;
• Management Letter Points;
• Draft Management Representation letter to be provided by the Company in connection with the audit.
Some of the Audit Committee members were not happy with the above presentation and asked Mr. DG to
take it back and submit directly to the Board. They believe that Audit Committee is not the forum for
discussing such problems and this has to be sorted out between auditors and the management. Please
comment on the above.
ANSWER
Mandatory Review Areas of Audit Committee: As per the Auditing Standards, the statutory auditor of the
Company is having an obligation to bring certain matters to the attention of those in charge of governance,
which inter alia includes aspects such as -
417

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
Difficulties faced by them during the audit

Disagreements with the management
Management Letter Points
Draft Management Representation letter to be provided by the Company in connection with the audit.
Further, the Audit Committee is also having an obligation to mandatorily review certain areas before
providing their recommendations/inputs to the board.
Given below are the areas required to be mandatorily reviewed by the AGM in the case of listed
companies.
The Audit Committee shall mandatorily review among other points the following information as per LODR
Regulations:
(ii) Statement of significant related party transactions (as defined by the Audit Committee), submitted by
management;
(iv) Internal audit reports relating to internal control weaknesses;
The auditor should further ascertain whether the Management Discussion and Analysis report includes
discussion on the matters stipulated. Where certain deficiencies or adverse findings are noted by the Audit
Committee, the auditor will be required to see that these have been suitably dealt with by the
management in the report on corporate governance.
In the instant case, Mr. DG, Partner in M/s DG and Associates highlighted the facts such as difficulties faced
during the audit, disagreements with the management, managements letters points and draft
management letters to be provided by the Company in connection with the audit.
However, some of the audit committee members were not happy and as according to them audit
committee is not the forum for discussing such problems.
Contention of those audit committee members regarding problems to be sorted out between auditors and
the management is not in order as Audit Committee is required to mandatorily review the same in
accordance with Schedule II of SEBI (Listing Obligations and Disclosure Requirements) Regulations, 2015
34 NOV2021 EXAM
CA Pradeep is appointed auditor of Delicious Foods Ltd. (DFL) a listed company to audit the financial
statements for the year ended 31st March 2021. Paid-up share capital of DFL is Rs. 5.97 Cr. While
auditing director's remuneration CA Pradeep observed that Mr. Shrinivas Gupta has been
appointed as an independent director. Mr. Srinivas Gupta is holding shares of Rs. 8,95,500 in DFL
and his wife is holding shares of Rs. 2,98,500 in the same company.
418

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
CA Pradeep raised an objection on the appointment of independent director, but other directors
explained that holding of shares by Mr. Srinivas is less than the prescribed limit hence, he is eligible
to be appointed as independent director.
How will CA Pradeep deal with this situation and how will he report this issue? (5 Marks)
ANSWER :
LODR Regulation 17 regarding Verification regarding Composition of Board of Directors of Listed

Entity: An independent non-executive director should not be a substantial shareholder of the listed
entity and in determining ‘not a substantial shareholder’; he (together with his relatives) should not
own 2% or more of total voting power of the listed entity.
In the given case of Delicious Foods Ltd. (DFL), Mr. Shrinivas Gupta along with his wife is substantial
shareholder of the DFL, Listed Company, because their holding in DFL is 2 % of the total voting power
of the DFL calculated as under:
Mr. Shrinivas Gupta’s holding in DFL = Rs. 8,95,500
His wife’s holding in DFL = Rs. 2,98,500 Combined holding of Mr. Shrinivas Gupta and his wife
= Rs. 11,94,000 Total Voting Power of DFL = Rs. 597,00,000
Percent calculation = 11,94,000 x100/59700000
= 2%
Hence objection raised by CA Pradeep on the appointment of independent director is valid and Mr.
Shrinivas is not eligible to be appointed as independent director of the company.
In this case CA Pradeep should specifically mention in his report about the disqualification of
appointment as independent director of Mr. Shrinivas. He should mention name of the disqualified
director, date of disqualification and reasons of disqualifications in his audit report.
35 MAY2022EXAM
Comment on the following in the light of certificate of compliance of conditions of Corporate

Governance to be issued under SEBI (LODR) Regulations 2015, for a Listed Company (one among
the top 1000 listed companies) where the Board consists of 20 directors with a Non-executive
director as its Chairman and further-
(i) One Non-executive Director has attained the age of 70 years;
(ii) One of the Directors is a Director in eight other listed entities;
(iii) The Managing Director is serving as Independent Director in four listed entities of which one
entity's equity shares are not listed on a Stock exchange;
419

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
(iv) The Non-executive Chairman is the promoter of the Listed Entity which has nine Independent
Directors;
(v) One Independent Director has been serving as Independent Director in eight listed entities of
which equity shares are listed on a Stock Exchange.
ANSWER
(a) (i) One non-executive director has attained the age of 70 years: The auditor should ensure
that no listed entity shall appoint a person or continue the directorship of any person as a non-
executive director who has attained the age of seventy-five years. In the given situation, there is no
violation of LODR 2015 for Non-executive director who has attained the age of 70 years.
(ii) One of the Directors is a Director in eight other Listed Entities: As per LODR 2015, a person
shall not be a director in more than seven listed entities. In the given situation, there is non-
compliance as one of the Directors is a Director in eight other listed entities which is exceeding the
prescribed limit of seven entities.
(iii) The Managing Director is serving as Independent Director in Four listed entities of which one
entity’s equity shares are not listed on a Stock Exchange: Any person who is serving as a whole-time
director / managing director in any listed entity shall serve as an independent director in not more
than three listed entities. For the purpose of above mentioned provision, the count for the number
of listed entities on which a person is a director / independent director shall be only those whose
equity shares are listed on a stock exchange. In the given situation, Managing Director has been
serving as Independent Director in four listed entities of which one entity’s equity shares are not
listed on a stock exchange. So it is not exceeding the prescribed limit of three entities, hence there
is no violation of LODR 2015.
(iv) The Non-executive Chairman is the Promoter of the Listed Entity which has nine Independent
Directors: The auditor should also verify that if the regular non- executive Chairperson is a promoter
of the listed entity or is related to any promoter or person occupying management positions at the
Board level or at one level below the Board, at least one-half of the Board of the listed entity shall
consist of independent directors. In the given situation, Board consist of 20 directors with a Non-
executive Director as its Chairman has 9 independent directors i.e., less than half of Board is not in
compliance with the requirement of LODR, 2015.
(v) One Independent Director has been serving as Independent Director in Eight Listed Entities of
which Equity Shares are listed on a Stock Exchange: A person shall not serve as an independent
director in more than seven listed entities in case its equity shares are listed on a Stock Exchange. It
may be noted that the count for the number of listed entities on which a person is a director /
independent director shall be only those whose equity shares are listed on a stock exchange.
420

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
In the given situation, there is non-compliance as one of the Independent Director has been serving
as Independent Director in eight listed entities which is exceeding the prescribed limit of seven
entities.
36 (OCT 2022 MTP)
KKML & Associates was appointed statutory auditor for FY 2021 -22 of AMPL Limited (a steel &
Iron manufacturing company and NSE-listed company) for the first time. CA. Kush was engagement
partner for this assignment. Last year, it was audited by Ananya & Company Chartered Accountants.
Ananya & Company charged Rs. 7,00,000 for the statutory audit for FY 2020-2021. Over and above
that, Ananya & Company raised bills for overtime and out-of-pocket expense of Rs. 1,50,000. AMPL
Limited paid Rs. 7,00,000 to Ananya & Company but raised a dispute over the calculation of
overtime. As per AMPL Limited, the overtime on account of additional work as recalculated along
with OPE should be Rs. 95,000/- and the same was paid on a day before proposing the appointment
of CA. Kush as a Statutory Auditor. This OPE was accounted only to the extent of Rs. 80,000 on a
provisional basis in books of accounts for FY 2020-21.
CA. Kush before accepting the appointment, communicated with Ananya & Company, as to why he
should not accept the appointment as a Statutory Auditor for AMPL Limited. Ananya & Company
replied on the same day stating the reason for not accepting the appointment as there were pending
audit fees of Rs. 55,000/- (1,50,000 – 95,000) for FY 2020-21. After analysing the whole situation
CA. Kush communicated with Ananya & Company that this was a case of disputed audit fees, and
he cannot decline acceptance of the appointment on this basis. Later, CA. Kush accepted the
appointment.
Moreover, while proposing the appointment of CA. Kush, AMPL Limited issued a general notice to
pass a resolution at AGM for the appointment of CA. Kush. The same was passed and a copy of the
resolution and the notice were served to Ananya & Company after the AGM. This resolution was
proposed by the Audit Committee consisting of 7 Directors i.e. Mr. Ram, Mr. Shyam, Mrs. Shweta,
Mrs. Komal, Mrs. Jaya, Mrs. Prabha and Mr. Anand. Out of these, Mr. Shyam, Mrs. Shweta
(Chairperson of the Audit Committee) and Mrs. Komal were not independent directors. There was
no change in this during the whole FY 2021 -22.
CA. Akash, the Engagement Quality Control Reviewer, insisted CA. Kush analyse whether the
opening balances reflect the application of appropriate accounting policies. CA. Kush contented that
he is not required to verify as he is already testing for closing balances which contain opening
balances and that will give comfort over the application of accounting policies.
During the year, Mr. Shyam entered into an arrangement with the company wherein the company
will transfer the residential flat (originally purchased by the company in his name) to Mr. Shyam for
Rs. 4 Crore (originally purchased at Rs. 2 Crore and having FMV Rs. 4 Crore). Instead of
consideration, the company will create a long- term loan due from Mr. Shyam in the books of
accounts at Rs. 3 Crore and for the rest (Rs. 1 Crore) of the amount, Mr. Shyam will provide Plant
421

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
and Machinery to the company. No reporting or further disclosures were made by the company for
this transaction as this was at an arm’s length price.
1. Ananya & Company raised the contention that the appointment of CA. Kush is inappropriate
as there were outstanding audit fees of Rs. 55,000 and he should not have accepted the
appointment as Statutory Auditor. Considering the above scenario kindly guide CA. Kush on whether
he should have declined the appointment on grounds of pending audit Fees
(a) As per section 141 of the Companies Act, 2013, if another auditor other than the retiring
auditor is getting appointed as Statutory Auditor in AGM then should not accept the appointment
till the time the previous auditor’s audit fees are paid in full.
(b) As per section 139 read with Rule 3, if another auditor other than the retiring auditor is getting
appointed as Statutory Auditor in AGM then he should not accept the appointment till if the
previous auditor’s audit fees are outstanding for a period of 180 days or more.
(c) CA. Kush can accept a position as auditor previously held by another chartered accountant or
a certified auditor i.e., Ananya & Company who has been issued a certificate under the Restricted
Certificate Rules, 1932 without first communicating with him in writing.
(d) CA. Kush can accept the appointment as statutory auditor as the pending fees are disputed
fees and this would not constitute valid professional reasons on account of which an audit should
not be accepted by the member to whom it is offered.
2. Ananya & Company contended that they were not given special notice and hence the
appointment of CA. Kush is invalid. Considering the above scenario kindly guide CA. Kush on what
course of action he should have adopted in the current case.
(a) Clause (9) of Part I of the First Schedule to Chartered Accountants Act, 1949 provides that a
member in practice shall be deemed to be guilty of professional misconduct if he accepts an
appointment as auditor of a Company without first ascertaining from it whether the requirements
of Sections 139 and 140 of the Companies Act, 2013 and hence CA. Kush is guilty of professional
misconduct and his appointment is invalid.
(b) Clause (8) of Part I of the First Schedule to Chartered Accountants Act, 1949 provides that a
member in practice shall be deemed to be guilty of professional misconduct if he accepts an
appointment as auditor of a Company without first ascertaining from it whether the requirements
of Sections 139 and 140 of the Companies Act, 2013 and hence CA. Kush is guilty of professional
misconduct and his appointment is invalid.
(c) As per section 140(4) of the Companies Act, 2013, the company is required to share the
general resolution and notice of appointment of another auditor once the resolution is passed in
AGM. Hence, CA. Kush’s appointment is valid and hence is not required to perform anything further.
422

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
(d) CA. Kush before getting appointed communicated with the previous auditor which was
sufficient and equivalent to special notice. Hence, the contention of Ananya & company is incorrect.
3. Whether contention of CA. Akash, the Engagement Quality Control Reviewer regarding
analysis of the opening balances is correct. Kindly guide CA. Kush with the correct course of action
as per SA 510.
(a) The auditor shall obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence about whether the accounting
policies reflected in the opening balances have been consistently applied in the current period’s
financial statements, and whether changes in the accounting policies have been properly accounted
for and adequately presented and disclosed in accordance with the applicable financial reporting
framework.
(b) The auditor shall obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence about whether the material
accounting policies reflected in the closing balances have been consistently applied in the current
period’s financial statements when there is a material change.
(c) If the auditor has identified misstatement in the drafting of accounting policies in the current
period, then he shall obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence about whether the accounting
policies reflected in the opening balances were appropriately drafted and applied.
(d) The auditor is not required to obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence about whether the
accounting policies reflected in the opening balances have been consistently applied in the current
period’s financial statements, and whether changes in the accounting policies have been properly
accounted for and adequately presented and disclosed in accordance with the applicable financial
reporting framework.
4. In the current case, Audit Committee of AMPL Limited is consisting of 7 Directors i.e. Mr.
Ram, Mr. Shyam, Mrs. Shweta, Mrs. Komal, Mrs. Jaya, Mrs. Prabha and Mr. Anand. Out of these,
Mr. Shyam, Mrs. Shweta (Chairperson of the Audit Committee) and Mrs. Komal were not
Chief Compliance Officer of the company raised an issue that the company has not complied with
SEBI LODR Regulations. He also, insisted CA. Kush focus on this while performing the audit. You are
required to verify the compliance with SEBI LODR Regulations based on the above-mentioned
scenario. Kindly select the appropriate option from below depicting the correct provision of SEBI
LODR regulation with respect to the Audit Committee:
(a) As per Regulation 17 of SEBI LODR Regulation, the audit committee shall have a minimum of
two directors as members. At least one-third of the members of the audit committee shall be
independent directors and the Chairperson of the audit committee shall be an independent
director. Thus, contention of Chief Compliance Officer is correct.
(b) As per Regulation 18 of SEBI LODR Regulation, the audit committee shall have a minimum of
five directors as members. At least one-third of the members of the audit committee shall be
423

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
independent directors and the chairperson of the audit committee can be a non-independent
director provided not more than one-third of directors shall be executive directors. Thus, contention
of Chief Compliance Officer is not correct.
(c) As per Regulation 19 of SEBI LODR Regulation, the audit committee shall have a minimum of
five directors as members. At least one-third of the members of the audit committee shall be non-
executive directors and the chairperson of the audit committee shall be an independent director. If
the chairperson is an executive director, then not more than one-third of directors shall be executive
directors. Thus, contention of Chief Compliance Officer is correct.
(d) As per Regulation 18 of SEBI LODR Regulation, the audit committee shall have a minimum of
three directors as members. At least two-thirds of the members of the audit committee shall be
independent directors and the Chairperson of the audit committee shall be an independent
director. Thus, contention of Chief Compliance Officer is correct.
5. CA. Kush was perplexed concerning reporting a transaction entered between Mr. Shyam and
the Company for the transfer of the Immovable Property. You are being the Engagement Quality
Control Reviewer, kindly guide CA. Kush concerning the appropriate reporting of the said
transaction as per CARO 2020.
(a) As per para 3(xv) of CARO 2020, Auditor is required to report whether the company has
entered into any non-cash transactions with directors or persons connected with him and if so,
whether the provisions of section 192 of the Companies Act have been complied with.
(b) As per para 3(xiv) of CARO 2020, Auditor is required to report whether the company has
entered into any non-cash transactions, other than being at arm’s length price, with directors or
persons connected with him and if so, whether the provisions of section 192 of Companies Act have
been complied with.
(c) As per para 3(ix) of CARO 2020, Auditor is required to report whether the company has raised
loans during the year on the pledge of securities held in its subsidiaries, joint ventures or associate
companies, if so, give details thereof and also report if the company has defaulted in repayment of
such loans raised.
(d). As per para 3(ix) of CARO 2020, Auditor is required to report whether the company has revalued
its Property, Plant and Equipment (including Right of Use assets) or intangible assets or both during
the year and, if so, whether the revaluation is based on the valuation by a Registered Valuer; specify
the amount of change, if the change is 10% or more in the aggregate of the net carrying value of
each class of Property, Plant and Equipment or intangible assets.
ANSWER :
1. D
2. A
3. A
424

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
4. D
5. A
37 (SEPT 2022 MTP)
Mr. Bharat was appointed as statutory auditor of N Limited and O Limited. Both the Companies
were having their base in Mumbai they had recently listed their shares on the Stock Exchange. For
the financial year 2021-22, Mr. Bharat had signed limited review reports for each quarter, till the
quarter ended 31st December 2021 for both the companies. Owing to his personal commitments
and increased workload, he tendered his resignation to N Limited on 30 th January 2022 and asked
the Company to appoint another auditor to issue audit report for the remaining quarter and the FY
2021-22 as a whole. But the management of the Company did not accept the same.
Mr. Bharat continued to as act as auditor for O limited. During the 1st week of March 2022, Mrs. D
(wife of Mr. Bharat) had borrowed a sum of Rs. 5.15 lakh from the Company for her personal use.
Having come to know about this, Mr. Bharat immediately informed the management that he had
been disqualified to act as auditor and told them that he won ’t issue audit report for last quarter.
But management of the Company argued that it’s the legal responsibility of Mr. Bharat to do the
same.
Whether contention of management of N Limited and O Limited is justified in asking Mr. Bharat to
issue audit report for the last quarter and the FY 2021-22 as a whole, despite his resignation? Please
comment on the above.
ANSWER :
In the given scenario, Mr. Bharat was appointed as statutory auditor of two listed entities i.e., N
Limited and O Limited. For the financial year 2021-22, Mr. Bharat had signed limited review reports
for first three quarter i.e., till the quarter ended 31st December 2021 for both the companies. Owing
to his personal commitments and increased workload, he resigned from N Limited and asked the
Company to appoint another auditor to issue audit report for the remaining quarter and audit report
for the FY 2021-22.
Further, Mr. Bharat immediately informed the management of O Limited that he had been
disqualified to act as auditor and told them that he won ’t issue audit report for last quarter as Mrs.
D (wife of Mr. Bharat) had borrowed a sum of Rs. 5.15 lakh from the Company for her personal use.
As per SEBI LODR Regulations, if the auditor has signed the limited review/ audit report for the first
three quarters of a financial year, then the auditor shall, before such resignation, issue the limited
review/ audit report for the last quarter of such financial year as well as the audit report for such
financial year. This provision will not apply if the auditor is disqualified due to Section 141 of the
Thus, in the given situation, in view of above conditions to be complied with upon resignation of the
statutory auditor of a listed entity/material subsidiary with respect to limited review / audit report
425

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
as per SEBI LODR Regulations, Mr. Bharat is required to issue the audit report for the last quarter
and audit report for the year 2021-22 for N Limited as he has issued audit report for the first three
quarters whereas Mr. Bharat is not required to issue the audit report for remaining quarter and
audit report for the year 2021-22 as a whole for O Limited as he is disqualified under section 141 of
the Companies Act, 2013.
Accordingly, contention of Management of N Limited is correct and tenable for issuing the audit
report for remaining quarter and audit report for financial year 2021-22 however, contention of
management of O Limited is not correct regarding the legal responsibility of Mr. Bharat to issue
audit report for remaining quarter and for the whole year.
38 (SEPT 2022 MTP)
The following inherent limitations in an audit affect the auditor’s ability to detect material
misstatements except:
(a) Test and sampling.
(b) Audit process permeated by judgement.
(c) Poor corporate governance.
(d) Audit evidence.
ANSWER : ( C )
39 (MARCH 2022 MTP)
Prabhu Ltd., a company incorporated in India and listed on a recognized Stock Exchange in India,
has entered into various related parties transactions during the financial year. You are required to
answer the following keeping in mind the Listing Obligations and Disclosure Requirements (LODR)
on Corporate Governance.
(i) Who should sign the report of material transactions with related parties? (1 Mark)
(ii) What type of transactions and policy are required to be disclosed in relation to related party
transactions? (2 Marks)
(iii) Whether disclosures of related party transactions on consolidated financial statements are
required to be made? If yes, what are the guidelines?
ANSWER :
An Indian company, Prabhu Ltd., listed on stock exchange entered into various related party
transactions.
426

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
(i) The report shall be signed either by the compliance officer or the chief executive officer of the
listed entity.
(ii) (a) The company shall disclose the policy on dealing with related party transactions on its
website and a web link thereto shall be provided in the Annual Report.
(b) The listed entity shall disclose the transactions with any person or entity belonging to the
promoter/ promoter group which hold(s) 10% or more shareholding in the listed entity, in the
format prescribed in the relevant accounting standards for annual results.
(iii) (a) Yes, disclosures of related party transactions on consolidated financial statements are
required to be made by the listed entity within 30 days from the date of publication of its standalone
and consolidated financial results for the half year.
(b) The listed entity shall disclose related party transactions on a consolidated basis, in the format
specified in the relevant accounting standards for annual results to the stock exchanges and publish
the same on its website. Provided that a ‘high value debt listed entity’ shall submit such disclosures
along with its standalone financial results for the half year
40 (MARCH 2022 MTP)
M/s Shiva & Associates have been appointed as statutory auditors of Kailash Ltd. which is the
company registered under Section 8 of the Companies Act 2013. During the course of audit, CA
Shiva noticed that the Board of Directors have held their meetings only twice, in the financial year
under audit. How should CA Shiva deal with the same in the compliance certificate to be issued by
him?
(a) CA Shiva should give an adverse statement stating that the meeting of board of directors were
held only twice as against the minimum requirement of 4 meetings of financial year.
(b) CA Shiva need not mention regarding the same in the compliance certificate as there is no
minimum requirement of meeting of board of directors in case of companies registered under
Section 8.
(c) Kailash Ltd. being a company registered under Section 8 of the Companies Act 2013 is exempt
from obtaining compliance certificate from the statutory auditors.
(d) Kailash Ltd. is correct in conducting two meeting of board of directors therefore, CA Shiva
should not give an adverse or qualified statement in this regard.
ANSWER : ( D )
41 (APRIL 2022 MTP)
Sambhav & Co., a Chartered Accountant Firm, is appointed as the principal auditor of a listed
company, Moksh Ltd.
427

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
Figures of income and net-worth of five out of seven components of Moksh Ltd., which are its
unlisted subsidiaries, is tabulated below for the immediate preceding financial year along with the
consolidated amount: (Rs. in crore)
Particulars Consolidated Component Component Component Component Component

‘A’ ‘B’ ‘C’ ‘D’ ‘E’
Income 600 70 20 140 130 40
Net Worth 1,600 80 40 280 360 100
The remaining two components i.e., Component ‘F’ & Component ‘G’ of Moksh Ltd. were unaudited.
According to Mr. Sambhav, the engagement partner, Component ‘F’ is material to the consolidated
financial statements whereas Component ‘G’ is not material to consolidated financial statements
and this fact has also been discussed in writing with those charged with governance of Moksh Ltd.
(i) Which of the components of Moksh Ltd. can be termed as “material subsidiary” and in the
Board of which of the unlisted subsidiaries at least one independent director of Moksh Ltd. needs
to be appointed or would be appointed? (4 Marks)
(ii) What shall be the audit consideration in relation to reporting in case of unaudited components
of Moksh Ltd. by Sambhav & Co. and how Sambhav & Co. as a principal auditor shall report in case
of Component ‘F’ & Component ‘G’, respectively?
ANSWER :
(i) As per Regulation 16(c) of the SEBI (LODR) Regulations, 2015, “material subsidiary” shall mean a
subsidiary, whose income or net worth exceeds ten percent of the consolidated income or net
worth respectively, of the listed entity and its subsidiaries in the immediately preceding accounting
year. [Explanation- The listed entity shall formulate a policy for determining ‘material’ subsidiary.]
Regulation 24(1) of the SEBI (LODR) Regulations, 2015, provides that at least one independent
director on the board of directors of the listed entity shall be a director on the board of directors of
an unlisted material subsidiary, whether incorporated in India or not.
[Explanation- For the purposes of Regulation 24(1), notwithstanding anything to the contrary
contained in regulation 16, the term “material subsidiary” shall mean a subsidiary, whose income
or net worth exceeds twenty percent of the consolidated income or net worth respectively, of the
listed entity and its subsidiaries in the immediately preceding accounting year]
On the basis of above provisions, following information is tabulated as below:

428

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
Particulars Share in Consolidated Income Share in Consolidated Net Worth

Component ‘A’ 11.67% 5%
Component ‘B’ 3.33% 2.5%
Component ‘C’ 23.33% 17.5%
Component ‘D’ 21.67% 22.5%
Component ‘E’ 6.67% 6.25%
It can be observed that Component ‘A’, Component ‘C’ and Component ‘D’, respectively, can be
termed as “material subsidiary” as their shares in either consolidated Income or net worth exceeds
10%.
Further, at least one independent director from the board of directors of Moksh Ltd. shall be
appointed or would have been appointed on the board of Component ‘C’ and Component ‘D’,
respectively, as their shares in either consolidated income or net worth exceeds 20 %.
(ii) Generally, the financial statements of all components included in consolidated financial
statements should be audited or subjected to audit procedures in the context of a multi - location
group audit. Such audits and audit procedures can be performed by the auditor reporting on the
consolidated financial statements or by the components’ auditor.
Where the financial statements of one or more components continue to remain unaudited, the
auditor reporting on the consolidated financial statements should consider unaudited components
in evaluating a possible modification to his report on the consolidated financial statements. The
evaluation is necessary because the auditor (or other auditors, as the case may be) has not been
able to obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence in relation to such consolidated
amounts/balances. In such cases, the auditor should evaluate both qualitative and quantitative
factors on the possible effect of such amounts remaining unaudited when reporting on the
consolidated financial statements using the guidance provided in SA 705, “Modifications to the
Opinion in the Independent Auditor’s Report”.
In the given situation, two out of seven components of Moksh Ltd. have remained unaudited where
Component ‘F’ is material and Component ‘G’ is not material to the consolidated financial
statements.
Thus, in case of Component ‘F’, the Principal Auditor needs to consider its impact on the auditor’s
opinion on the consolidated financial statements of the group, in terms of the principles laid down
in SA 705, Modifications to the Opinion in the Independent Auditor’s Report. Whereas in case of
Component ‘G’, the principal auditor should make appropriate reporting under the “Other Matters”
paragraph, pursuant to SA 706, Emphasis of Matter Paragraphs and Other Matter Paragraphs, in
the Independent Auditor’s Report.
42 (MAY 2022 RTP)
Aadi Nath & Associates have been appointed as Statutory Auditor of Shikhar Ltd. for the F.Y 2020-
21. Shikhar Ltd. enters into frequent business transactions with the entities belonging to promoter
429

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
and promoter group. The company is a listed entity and has to submit a compliance certificate to
the stock exchange. The auditors seek your guidance on the disclosure requirements in respect of
related party transactions as per Listing Obligations and Disclosure Requirements (LODR)
Regulations 2015 on Corporate Governance. Explain.
ANSWER :
Related Party Disclosure [Regulations 23, 27, 46 and Schedule V]: The listed entity shall submit a
quarterly compliance report on corporate governance in the format as specified by the Board from
time to time to the recognised stock exchange(s) within 21 days from the end of each quarter.
Details of all material transactions with related parties shall be disclosed therein. The report shall
be signed either by the compliance officer or the chief executive officer of the listed entity.
The company shall disclose the policy on dealing with related party transactions on its website and
a web link thereto shall be provided in the Annual Report.
The listed entity shall disclose the transactions with any person or entity belonging to the promoter/
promoter group which hold(s) 10% or more shareholding in the listed entity, in the format
prescribed in the relevant accounting standards for annual results.
The listed entity shall submit within 30 days from the date of publication of its standalone and
consolidated financial results for the half year, disclosures of related party transactions on a
consolidated basis, in the format specified in the relevant accounting standards for annual results
to the stock exchanges and publish the same on its website.
Provided that a ‘high value debt listed entity’ shall submit such disclosures along with its
standalone financial results for the half year.
430

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
1. (RTP MAY 2019)

IRC Ltd is in the business of construction and infrastructure. The company is listed in India having an
annual turnover of INR 2500 crores. The company has various projects offices/ operations in India and
outside India. The functional currency of the company and its project offices is INR. The company has
five joint ventures and various jointly controlled operations. The company has been audited by Luthra &
Associates, a firm of Chartered Accountants, since beginning. During the year ended 31 March 2018, new
auditors were appointed as the statutory auditors of the company for the audit of the financial statements
for the year ended 31 March 2018. New statutory auditors have raised various points related to the
consolidation procedures followed by the company. Management did not agree to the observations of
the auditors as they have been following this since many years now and there was no observation of
previous auditors in respect of the same. Auditors have highlighted a point that joint ventures have been
consolidated by the company in its standalone financial statements. However, management has an
argument that those are in the nature of its operations and hence to reflect the true and fair view it
would be appropriate to consolidate the same in the standalone financial statements.
Please advise as auditors how would you deal with this matter.
a. Since the matter is related to consolidation which is more relevant for consolidated financial statements,
hence no reporting in respect of this matter would be required in the auditors report for the year ended
31 March 2018.
b. Auditor should look at the materiality and conservatism principle. Company has included extra
information in the financials which can be considered by the auditors and basis that clean audit report
should be given.
c. Management should restate the financials to adjust the error related to consolidation of joint ventures
in standalone financial statements. Otherwise auditor may modify his opinion on current year's financial
431

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
statements considering the materiality.

d. As per the requirements of accounting standard, joint venture if consolidated in standalone financial
statements should not be consolidated again in the consolidated financial statements. Basis that this point
should be dropped by the auditor.
Answer: Option C
2.MTP Mar 2019 Qn no 13

Brown Ltd is a holding company with two subsidiaries Black Ltd and White Ltd. You have been
given the task of covering the valuation of non-current tangible assets in the consolidated
financial statements. You note that Black Ltd and Brown Ltd. adopt straight line method of
depreciation for its assets whereas White Ltd, follows written down method for calculating the
depreciation. Which of the following adjustment
would be considered as correct in respect of the consolidated financial statements preparation?

(a) White Ltd is required to depreciate the assets adopting straight line method of depreciation
which is the method adopted by the holding company.
(b) Brown Ltd is required to make suitable adjustments as to the depreciation charged byWhite Ltd,
at the time of consolidation.
(c) Brown Ltd and Black Ltd are required to depreciate the assets adopting written down value as to
facilitate the harmonization of accounting policies.
(d) No adjustment is required as there can be different methods of calculation of depreciation for its
assets for the group companies.
Answer: (d) No adjustment is required as there can be different methods of calculation of depreciation
for its assets for the group companies.
May 2018 -2(a) – 5Marks
3. As an Auditor give your comments for the following disclosures made by a Company which
adopted Ind AS for compilation of Financial Statements:
(i) In the Balance Sheet, the sub-head inventories contained an item "goods in transit
in which a consolidated amount aggregating the cost of raw materials in transit
and
loose tools billed on company but delivery not made to company had been
specified.
(ii) Provision for doubtful debts of trade debtors was grouped in, "Provisions" under current
liabilities.
(iii) In Statement of Profit and Loss, prior period income was shown under "Other Income".
(iv) Sale proceeds of scrap incidental to manufacture were included in "Other
Income".
432

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
(v) Payment towards a one time voluntary retirement scheme introduced

during the year
Answer
(i) Goods in Transits: As per Division II of Schedule III of the Companies Act, 2013, cost of raw
material in transit shall be disclosed as sub-head of raw material and loose tools billed on the
company would be shown as separate sub-head of Loose tools under heading of Inventories i.e.
part of Current Asset. Thus, disclosure of consolidated amount aggregating the cost of raw
material in transit and loose tools is not correct.
(ii) Provision for Doubtful Debts of Trade Debtors was grouped in “Provisions” under current
liabilities: The term ‘doubtful debts’ is an
(iii) adjustment to the carrying amounts of assets, hence no provision is created separately for it as
per Ind-AS 37 “Provisions, Contingent Liabilities and Contingent Assets”. Thus, provision should
be shown net in trade receivable.
(iv) In Statement of Profit and Loss, Prior Period Income was shown under Other Income: As per Ind-
AS 8 “Accounting Policies, Changes in Accounting Estimates and Errors”, Prior Period Income
should not be shown in statement of profit and loss. The entity shall adjust the opening balance
of each affected component of equity for the earliest prior period presented and the other
comparative amounts disclosed for each prior period presented as if the new accounting policy
had always been applied.
Sale Proceeds of Scrap incidental to manufacture were included in “Other
Income”: As per Ind-AS 2 “Inventories”, sale proceeds of scrap incidental to manufacture should be
deducted from the cost of the main product. Thus, disclosure of sale proceeds of scrap as other
income is not correct.
(v) Payment towards a one time VRS during the year included in Employee Benefit Expenses: As per
Ind-AS 19 “Employee Benefits”, if the termination benefits are expected to be settled wholly
before twelve months after the end of the annual reporting period in which the termination
benefit is recognized, the entity shall apply the requirements for short-term employee benefits,
in case it is not expected to be settled before twelve months the entity shall apply the
requirements for long term employee benefits. In the instant case, it should be shown as short
term employee benefits in place of Employee Benefit Expenses. Thus, treatment of such payment
as employee benefit expenses is not correct.
MAY 2018 3(a) 5 Marks

4. H Co. Ltd., is a holding company with two subsidiaries R Co. Ltd., and S Co. Ltd. The H Co. Ltd.,
adopts straight line method of depreciation for its assets whereas S Co. Ltd., follows written
down value or diminishing value method. Though R Co. Ltd., follows straight line method of
depreciation, it does not give effect to component accounting of depreciation in respect of high
value assets. While consolidating the financials of the R Co. Ltd., and S Co. Ltd., with those of H
Co. Ltd., determine the possible issues that you have to ensure for compliance in the light of
above facts.
433

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
ANSWER:
When the Component(s) Auditor Reports on Financial Statements under an Accounting
Framework is Different than that of the Parent: A component may alternatively prepare financial
statements on the basis of the parent’s accounting policies, as outlined in the group accounting
manual, to facilitate the preparation of the group’s consolidated financial statements. The group
accounting manual would normally contain all accounting policies, including relevant disclosure
requirements, which are consistent with the requirements of the financial reporting framework
under which the group’s consolidated financial statements are prepared. Thus, using group
accounting policies as the financial accounting framework for components to report under, the
principal/parent auditors should perform procedures necessary to determine compliance of the
group accounting policies with the GAAP applicable to the parent’s financial statements.
It may be noted that change in the selection of the method of depreciation is an accounting estimate
and not an accounting policy as per Ind-AS 8. Accordingly, the entity should select the method that
most closely reflects the expected pattern of consumption of the future economic benefits
embodied in the asset. That method should be applied consistently from period to period unless
there is a change in the expected pattern of consumption of those future economic benefits in
separate financial statements as well as consolidated financial statements.
Therefore, there can be different methods for calculation of depreciation for its assets, if their
expected pattern of consumption is different. The method once selected in the standalone
financial statements of the subsidiary should not be changed while preparing the consolidated
In the given case, assets of R Co. Ltd. (subsidiary company) is depreciated using straight line
method, assets of S Co. Ltd. (subsidiary company) are depreciated using written down value
method and assets of parent company (H Co. Ltd.) are depreciated using straight line method, is
in order. However, each part of an item of Property Plant and Equipment with a cost that is
significant in relation to the total cost of the item should be depreciated separately under
Component Method of Depreciation as per AS 10 on Property, Plant and Equipment. Thus, R Co.
Ltd., though adopting straight line method but does not giving effect to component accounting of
depreciation in respect of high value assets , is not in compliance with Ind AS 16/ Accounting
Standard 10 Property Plan and Equipment.
5.RTP May 2018 Qn no. 10, MTP Apr 18 Qn no.3(C) 5 Marks

You are appointed as an auditor of Nawab Limited, a listed company which is a main supplier to
the UK building and construction market. With a turnover of Rs. 2.9 billion, the company
operates through 11 business units and has nearly 1,80 branches across the countries .
As an auditor, how will you draft the report in case:
(a) When the Parent’s Auditor is also the Auditor of all its Components?
(b) When the Parent’s Auditor is not the Auditor of all its Components?
(c) When the Component(s) Auditor Reports on Financial Statements under an Accounting
Framework Different than that of the Parent?
434

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
(d) When the Component(s) Auditor Reports under an Auditing Framework Different than that of
the Parent?
(e) Where the financial statements of one or more components is not audited?
Answer
(a) When the Parent’s Auditor is also the Auditor of all its Components: While drafting the audit report,
the auditor should report whether principles and procedures for preparation and presentation of
consolidated financial statements as laid down in the relevant accounting standards have been followed.
In case of any departure or deviation, the auditor should make adequate disclosure in the audit report so
that users of the consolidated financial statements are aware of such deviation. Auditor should issue an
audit report expressing opinion whether the consolidated financial statements give a true and fair view of
the state of affairs of the Group as on balance sheet date and as to whether consolidated profit and loss
statement gives true and fair view of the results of consolidated profit or losses of the Group for the period
under audit. Where the consolidated financial statements also include a cash flow statement, the auditor
should also give his opinion on the true and fair view of the cash flows presented by the consolidated cash
flow statements.
(b) When the Parent’s Auditor is not the Auditor of all its Components: In a case where the parent’s auditor
is not the auditor of all the components included in the consolidated financial statements, the auditor of
the consolidated financial statements should also consider the requirement of SA 600 “Using the Work of
Another Auditor”.
As prescribed in SA 706 “Emphasis of Matter Paragraphs and Other Matter Paragraphs in the Independent
Auditor’s Report”, if the auditor considers it necessary to make reference to the audit of the other auditors,
the auditor’s report on the consolidated financial statements should disclose clearly the magnitude of the
portion of the financial statements audited by the other auditor(s). This may be done by stating aggregate
rupee amounts or percentages of total assets, revenues and cash flows of components included in the
consolidated financial statements not audited by the parent’s auditor. Total assets, revenues and cash
flows not audited by the parent’s auditor should be presented before giving effect to permanent and
current period consolidation adjustments. Reference in the report of the auditor on the consolidated
financial statements to the fact that part of the audit of the group was made by other auditor(s) is not to
be construed as a qualification of the opinion but rather as an indication of the divided responsibility
between the auditors of the parent and its subsidiaries.
When the Component(s) Auditor Reports on Financial Statements under an Accounting Framework
Different than that of the Parent: The parent may have components located in multiple geographies
outside India applying an accounting framework (GAAP) that is different than that of the parent in
preparing its financial statements. Foreign components prepare financial statements under different
financial reporting frameworks, which may be a well-known framework (such as US GAAP or IFRS) or the
local GAAP of the jurisdiction of the component. Local component auditors may be unable to report on
financial statements prepared using the parent’s GAAP because of their unfamiliarity with such GAAP.
When a component’s financial statements are prepared under an accounting framework that is different
than that of the framework used by the parent in preparing group’s consolidated financial statements, the
parent’s management perform a conversion of the components’ audited financial statements from the
framework used by the component to the framework under which the consolidated financial statements are
prepared. The conversion adjustments are audited by the principal auditor to ensure that the financial
information of the component(s) is suitable and appropriate for the purposes of consolidation.
A component may alternatively prepare financial statements on the basis of the parent’s accounting
435

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
policies, as outlined in the group accounting manual, to facilitate the preparation of the group’s
consolidated financial statements. The group accounting manual would normally contain all accounting
policies, including relevant disclosure requirements, which are consistent with the requirements of the
financial reporting framework under which the group’s consolidated financial statements are prepared.
The local component auditor can then audit and issue an audit report on the components financial
statements prepared in accordance with “group accounting policies”. When applying the approach of using
group accounting policies as the financial accounting framework for components to report under, the
principal/parent auditors should perform procedures necessary to determine compliance of the group
accounting policies with the GAAP applicable to the parent’s financial statements. This ensures that the
information prepared under the requirements of the group accounting policies will be directly usable and
relevant for the preparation of consolidated financial statements by the parent entity, eliminating the
need for auditing by the auditor, the differences between the basis used for the component’s financial
statements and that of the consolidated financial statements. The Principal auditor can then decide
whether or not to rely on the components’ audit report and make reference to it in the auditor’s report
on the consolidated financial statements.
(c) When the Component(s) Auditor Reports under an Auditing Framework Different than that of the
Parent: Normally, audits of financial statements, including consolidated financial statements, are
performed under auditing standards generally accepted in India (“Indian GAAS”). In order to maintain
consistency of the auditing framework and to enable the parent auditor to rely and refer to the other
auditor’s audit report in their audit report on the consolidated financial statements, the components’
financial statements should also be audited under a framework that corresponds to Indian GAAS.
(d) Components Not Audited: Generally, the financial statements of all components included in consolidated
financial statements should be audited or subjected to audit procedures in the context of a multi-location
group audit. Such audits and audit procedures can be performed by the auditor reporting on the
consolidated financial statements or by the components’ auditor.
Where the financial statements of one or more components continue to remain unaudited, the auditor
reporting on the consolidated financial statements should consider unaudited components in evaluating
a possible modification to his report on the consolidated financial statements. The evaluation is necessary
because the auditor (or other auditors, as the case may be) has not been able to obtain sufficient
appropriate audit evidence in relation to such consolidated amounts/balances.
In such cases, the auditor should evaluate both qualitative and quantitative factors on the possible effect
of such amounts remaining unaudited when reporting on the consolidated financial statements using the
guidance provided in SA 705, “Modifications to the Opinion in the Independent Auditor’s Report”.
6.MTP Mar 2018 Qn no.3(d) 5 Marks

Parent Ltd. acquired 51% shares of Child Ltd. during the year ending 31-3-2016. During the
financial year 2016-17 the 20% shares of Child Ltd. were sold by Parent Ltd. Parent Ltd. while
preparing the financial statements for the year ending 31-3-2016 and 31-3- 2017 did not consider
the financial statements of Child Ltd. for consolidation. Comment.
RTP Nov 18 Qn no 10, MTP-OCT-18 Qn No 3(d) 5 Marks:
Moon Ltd. acquired 51% shares of Star Ltd. during the year ending 31 -3-2017. During the
financial year 2017-18 the 20% shares of Star Ltd. were sold by Moon Ltd. Moon Ltd. while
preparing the financial statements for the year ending 31-3-2017 and 31-3-2018 did not
consider the financial statements of Star Ltd. for consolidation. As a statutory auditor how
would you deal with it?
436

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
Answer
Accounting Standard 21 “Consolidated Financial Statements”, states that a subsidiary should be excluded
from consolidation when control is intended to be temporary because the shares are acquired and held
exclusively with a view to its subsequent disposal in the near future.
Where an enterprise owns majority of voting power by virtue of ownership of the shares of another
enterprise and all the shares are acquired & held exclusively with a view to their subsequent disposal in
the near future, the control by the first mentioned enterprise would be considered temporary and the
investments in such subsidiaries should be accounted for in accordance with AS 13 “Accounting for
Investments”.
In the case of an entity which is excluded from consolidation on the ground that the relationship of parent
with the other entity as subsidiary is temporary, the auditor should verify that the intention of the parent, to
dispose the subsidiary, in the near future, existed at the time of acquisition of the subsidiary. The auditor
should also verify that the reasons for exclusion are given in the consolidated financial statements.
As per Ind AS 110, there is no such exemption for ‘temporary control’, or “for operation under severe long-
term funds transfer restrictions” and consolidation is mandatory for Ind AS compliant financial statement
in this case.
However, as per section 129(3) of the Companies Act, 2013 where a company having subsidiary, which is
not required to prepare consolidated financial statements under the applicable Accounting Standards, it
shall be sufficient if the company complies with the provisions on consolidated financial statements
provided in Schedule III to the Act.
Conclusion: In the given case, Parent Ltd. has acquired 51% shares of Child Ltd. during the year ending
31.03.2016 and sold 20% shares during the year 2016-17. Parent Ltd. did not consolidate the financial
statements of Child Ltd. for the year ending 31.03.2016 and 31.03.2017.
The intention of Parent Ltd. is quite clear that the control in Child Ltd. is temporary as the former company
disposed off the acquired shares in the next year of its purchase. Therefore, Parent Ltd. is not required to
prepare consolidated financial statement as per AS 21 however, for the compliance of provisions related
to consolidation of financial statements given under section 129(3) of the Companies Act, 2013, Parent
Ltd. is required to made disclosures in the financial statements as per the provisions provided in Schedule
III to the Companies Act’ 2013.
However, if the Parent Ltd. is required to prepare its financial statements under Ind AS, it shall have to
prepare Consolidated Financial Statements in accordance with Ind AS 110 as exemption for ‘temporary
control’, or “for operation under severe long-term funds transfer restrictions” is not available under Ind
AS 110. Paragraph 20 of Ind AS 110 states that “Consolidation of an investee shall begin from the date the
investor obtains control of the investee and cease when the investor loses control of the investee”.
7.MTP-Aug-18 Qn No 3(d) 5 Marks:
You are appointed as an auditor of Najib Limited, a listed company which is a main supplier to
the USA building and construction market. With a turnover of Rs. 1.9 billion, the company
operates through 11 business units and has nearly 1,70 branches across the countries.
As an auditor, how will you draft the report in case (I) When the Component(s) Auditor Reports
on Financial Statements under an Accounting Framework Different than that of the Parent?(II)
When the Component(s) Auditor Reports under an Auditing Framework Different than that of
the Parent?
437

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
Answer:
(I) When the Component(s) Auditor Reports on Financial Statements under an Accounting
Framework Different than that of the Parent: The parent may have components located in
multiple geographies outside India applying an accounting framework (GAAP) that is different
than that of the parent in preparing its financial statements. Foreign components prepare
financial statements under different financial reporting frameworks, which may be a well -
known framework (such as US GAAP or IFRS) or the local GAAP of the jurisdiction of the
component.
Local component auditors may be unable to report on financial statements prepared using the
parent’s GAAP because of their unfamiliarity with such GAAP.
When a component’s financial statements are prepared under an accounting framework that is
different than that of the framework used by the parent in preparing group’s consolidated
financial statements, the parent’s management perform a conversion of the components ‘audited
financial statements from the framework used by the component to the framework under which
the consolidated financial statements are prepared. The conversion adjustments are audited by the
principal auditor to ensure that the financial information of the component(s) is suitable and
appropriate for the purposes of consolidation.
A component may alternatively prepare financial statements on the basis of the parent’s
accounting policies, as outlined in the group accounting manual, to facilitate the preparation of
the group’s consolidated financial statements. The group accounting manual would normally
contain all accounting policies, including relevant disclosure requirements, which are consistent
with the requirements of the financial reporting framework under which the group’s consolidated
financial statements are prepared. The local component auditor can then audit and issue an audit
report on the components financial statements prepared in accordance with “group accounting
policies”.
When applying the approach of using group accounting policies as the financial accounting
framework for components to report under, the principal/parent auditors should perform
procedures necessary to determine compliance of the group accounting policies with the GAAP
applicable to the parent’s financial statements. This ensures that the information prepared under
the requirements of the group accounting policies will be directly usable and relevant for the
preparation of consolidated financial statements by the parent entity, eliminating the need for
auditing by the auditor, the differences between the basis used for the component’s financial
statements and that of the consolidated financial statements. The Principal auditor can then
decide whether or not to rely on the components’ audit report and make reference to it in the
auditor’s report on the consolidated financial statements.
(II) When the Component(s) Auditor Reports under an Auditing Framework Different than that
of the Parent: Normally, audits of financial statements, including consolidated financial
statements, are performed under auditing standards generally accepted in India (“Indian GAAS”).
In order to maintain consistency of the auditing framework and to enable the parent auditor to
rely and refer to the other auditor’s audit report in their audit report on the consolidated financial
statements, the components’ financial statements should also be audited under a framework that
corresponds to Indian GAAS.
438

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
8.Nov 18 Qn no 3(d) 5 Marks

H Limited is an Investment Company preparing its Financial Statements in accordance with Ind AS.
The Company obtains funds from various investors and commits its performance for fair return
and capital appreciation to its investors. During the year under audit, it had been observed that
the Company had invested 25% in S1 Ltd., 50% in S2 Ltd. and 60% in S3 Ltd. of the respective
share capitals of the Investee Companies. When checking the investment schedule of the
Company, an issue cropped as to whether there would arise any need to consolidate accounts
of any such investee companies with those of H Limited in accordance with section 129(3) of the
Companies Act, 2013 which contains no exclusion from consolidation. Analyse the issues involved
and give your views.
Answer
Consolidated Financial Statements: According to Section 129(3) of the Companies Act, 2013,
where a company has one or more subsidiaries, including associate company and joint venture, it
shall, in addition to its own financial statements prepare a consolidated financial statement of the
companyand of all the subsidiaries in the same form and manner as that of its own.
Further, as per Companies (Accounts) Rules, 2014, the consolidation of financial statements of the
company shall be made in accordance with the provisions of Schedule III to the Act and the
applicable accounting standards. However, a company which is not required to prepare
consolidated financial statements under the Accounting Standards, it shall be sufficient if the
company complies with provisions on consolidated financial statements provided in Schedule III of
the Act.
However, an investment entity need not present consolidated financial statements if it is required,
in accordance with Ind AS 110‘Consolidated Financial Statements’, to measure all of its
subsidiaries at fair value through profit or loss. A parent shall determine whether it is an
investment entity.(An investment entity is an entity that(a) obtains funds from one or more
investors for the purpose of providing those investor(s) with investment management services; (b)
commits to its investor(s) that its business purpose is to invest funds solely for returns from capital
appreciation, investment income, or both; and (c ) measures and evaluates the performance of
substantially all of its investments on a fair value basis.)
In the given case, H Limited is an investment company preparing its financial statements in
accordance with Ind AS and the company had invested 25% in SI Ltd., 50% in S2 Ltd. and 60% in S3
Ltd. of the respective share capitals of the investee companies. In view of provisions discussed in
Ind AS 110, the Company is not required to prepare consolidated financial statements however, for
the compliance of Companies (Accounts) Rules, 2014, it shall be sufficient if the company complies
with provisions on consolidated financial statements provided in Schedule III of the Act.
Thus, it can be concluded that ultimate authority on consolidation is AS / Ind AS as prescribed by
law and if they give some exemption it should be followed. If out of exemption some subsidiaries
are not consolidated then list should be disclosed in notes to accounts with reason.
9.RTP Nov 2019 Qn no 25(a)

Write a short note on the Auditor's objectives in an audit of consolidated financial statements
Answer
The auditor's objectives in an audit of consolidated financial statements are:
439

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
• to satisfy himself that the consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with the
requirements of applicable financial reporting framework;
• to enable himself to express an opinion on the true and fair view presented by the consolidated financial
statements;
• to enquire into the matters as specified in section 143(1) of the Companies Act, 2013; and.
• to report on the matters given in the clauses (a) to (i) of section 143(3) of the Companies Act, 2013, for
other matters under section 143(3)(j) read with rule 11 of the Companies (Audit and Auditors) Rules,
2014, to comment on the matters specified in sub-rule (a),(b) and (c)1 to the extent applicable;
• The auditor should also validate the requirement of preparation of CFS for the company as per applicable
financial reporting framework.

Give a check list of audit for checking the transactions of dematerialized securities in the conduct
of audit of Financial Statements of a Member of a Stock Exchange
ANSWER
Dematerialized Securities:
(i) On account of compulsory dematerialization of most of the securities listed on the Exchange, all
stock brokers are required to maintain two accounts with their Depository Participants (DP) for
handling the receipt and delivery of securities in demat. One account is ‘Beneficiary Account’ wherein the
demat securities belonging to the members’ for their own account are held and the other is ‘Pool Account’
wherein the demat securities of the clients are temporarily lodged for transfer to/from the Clients /
Clearing House in the Pay-in/Pay-out.
(ii) In case of sale of securities by clients, the clients transfer the same in the demat form to the member’s
Pool Account to the Clearing House on the Pay-in day. In case of purchase of securities by the Client, the
Clearing House transfers the securities to the Pool Accounts of the members and the members then
transfer the same to the accounts of individual clients.
(iii) The members are required to maintain a proper record of all shares received and delivered from their
Pool Account as well as preserve acknowledged copy of the delivery instructions given to their DP’s for
transferring the securities from the Pool Account to the Clients’ account after the Pay-out.
(iv) The auditor should verify whether the securities received by the member in the Pool Account are
regularly transferred to the buying clients’ Demat Accounts within 24 hours of declaration of Pay-out of the
relevant settlement of the Exchange. It may be noted that Sometimes, the clients instruct the brokers to
retain the shares in the Pool Account either because they have not opened a demat account or because
they intend to sell the shares they have bought earlier, in the subsequent settlement and thereby avoid
transaction charges.
(v) The auditor should check that the shares lying in the Pool Account have not been utilized by the
member to meet his own pay-in obligations or used for meeting auction obligations. If the auditor
discovers something like this then, he should further enquire into the matter. Such instances might indicate
the breach of fiduciary trust by the member of the stock exchange.
(vi) Depending upon the nature of the business carried on by the member, the auditor may apply such
procedural tests as he considers necessary on major items of income and expense such as, commission,
440

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
sub-brokerage, underwriting income, interest and dividends, advisory fees, interest, amounts payable
towards transactions charges and other charges to the Exchange or Clearing House and other income and
expenses.
(vii) The auditor should apply analytical procedures on the financial statements of the member. The auditor
should compare current operating results with those of the prior period to ascertain that the variations are
logical in the circumstances such as volume of business at the stock-exchanges, the brokerage concern’s
share of the market, changed business conditions such as volume of new securities issued, changes in the
character of the business of the brokerage concern, and trend prices of securities. A discussion of this
comparative data with the officials of the member may highlight areas where added audit emphasis may be
directed.
Study Material
11. R Ltd. owns 51% voting power in S Ltd. It however, holds and discloses all the shares as
"Stock-in-trade" in its accounts. The shares are held exclusively with a view to their subsequent
disposal in the near future. R Ltd. represents that while preparing Consolidated Financial
Statements, S Ltd. can be excluded from the consolidation. As a Statutory Auditor, how would
you deal?
Answer
Consolidation of Financial Statement: AS 21 “Consolidated Financial Statements”, states that a
subsidiary should be excluded from consolidation when:
(i) Control is intended to be temporary because the shares are acquired and held exclusively with
a view to its subsequent disposal in the near future or
(ii) Subsidiary operates under severe long- term restrictions which significantly impair its ability to
transfer funds to the parent.
Where an enterprise owns majority of voting power by virtue of ownership of the shares of
another enterprise and all the shares held as ‘stock-in-trade’ are acquired and held exclusively
with a view to their subsequent disposal in the near future, the control by the first mentioned
enterprise would be considered temporary and the investments in such subsidiaries should be
accounted for in accordance with AS 13 “Accounting for Investments”.
As per Ind AS 110, there is no such exemption for ‘temporary control’, or “for operation under
severe long-term funds transfer restrictions” and consolidation is mandatory for Ind AS
compliant financial statement in this case. Paragraph 20 of Ind AS 110 states that “Consolidation
of an investee shall begin from the date the investor obtains control of the investee and cease
when the investor loses control of the investee”.
However, as per Section 129(3) of the Companies Act, 2013 read with rule 6 of the Companies
(Accounts) Rules, 2014, where a company having subsidiary, which is not required to prepare
consolidated financial statements under the Accounting standards, it shall be sufficient if the
company complies with the provisions on consolidated financial statements provided in Schedule
III to the Act.
In the given case, R Ltd’s intention is to dispose off the shares in the near future as shares are
441

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
being held as stock in trade and it is quite clear that the control is temporary, Therefore, R Ltd. is
not required to prepare consolidated financial statement as per AS 21, however, for the
compliance of provisions related to consolidation of financial statements given under section
129(3) of the Companies Act, 2013 read with Companies (Accounts) Rules, 2014, R Ltd. is required
to make disclosures in the financial statements as per the provisions provided in Schedule III to
the Companies Act, 2013
However, if R Ltd. is required to prepare its financial statements under Ind AS, it shall have to
prepare Consolidated Financial Statements in accordance with Ind AS 110 as exemption for
‘temporary control’ is not available under Ind AS 110.
12. A Ltd. holds the ownership of 10% of voting power and control over the composition of Board of
Directors of B Ltd. While planning the statutory audit of A Ltd., what factors would be considered by
you as the statutory auditors of A Ltd for the audit of its consolidated financial statements prepared
under Ind AS?
Answer
10% Voting Power and Control over the composition of Board of Directors: In this case, A Ltd.
holds only 10 percent of the voting power but has control over the composition of the Board of
Directors of B Ltd.
In such a case, A Ltd shall be considered as a parent of B Ltd and, therefore, it would consolidate
B Ltd in its consolidated financial statements as a subsidiary.
The auditor should verify A Ltd’s management’s assessment of having control in B Ltd despite
having only 10% voting power as per the requirements of Ind AS 110. Auditor would need to verify
as to how A Ltd controls the composition of the Board of Directors or corresponding governing
body of B Ltd.
There can be various means by which such kind of control can be established. In this regard, the
auditor may verify the minutes of Board meetings, shareholder agreement entered into by the
parent, agreements with B Ltd to which the parent might have provided any technology or know
how, enforcement of statute, etc.
Further, the auditor should verify that the adjustments warranted by Ind AS 110 have been made
wherever required and have been properly authorised by the management of the parent. The
preparation of consolidated financial statements gives rise to permanent consolidation
adjustments and current period consolidation adjustments. The auditor should make plan, among
other things, for the understanding of accounting policies of the A Ltd and B Ltd and determining
and programming the nature, timing, and extent of the audit procedures to be performed etc.
Further, the duties of an auditor with regard to reporting of transactions with any other related
parties are given in SA 550 on Related Parties. As per SA 550 on, “Related Parties”, the auditor
should review information provided by the management of the entity identifying the names of all
442

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
known related parties. A person or other entity that has control or significant influence, directly
or indirectly through one or more intermediaries, over the reporting entity are considered as
Related Party. In forming an opinion on the financial statements, the auditor shall evaluate
whether the identified related party relationships and transactions have been appropriately
accounted for and disclosed in accordance with Ind AS 110 and Schedule III and whether the
effects of the related party relationships and transactions prevent the financial statements from
achieving true and fair presentation (for fair presentation frameworks) or cause the financial
statements to be misleading (for compliance frameworks).
13.Whether preparation of consolidated financial statements is mandatory? If yes, please elaborate on

the requirements under the statute.
ANSWER:
According to Section 129(3) of the Companies Act, 2013, where a company has one or more
subsidiaries, including associate company and joint venture, it shall, in addition to its own
financial statements prepare a consolidated financial statement of the company and of all the
subsidiaries in the same form and manner as that of its own.
Further, section 129(4) of the said Act, provides that the provisions applicable to the
preparation, adoption and audit of the financial statements of a holding company shall, mutatis
mutandis, also apply to its the consolidated financial statements.
The consolidated financial statements shall also be approved by the Board of Directors before
they are signed on behalf of the Board, along with its standalone financial statements and shall
also be laid before the annual general meeting of the company along with the laying of its
standalone financial statement.
The company shall also attach along with its financial statement, a separate statement
containing the salient features of the financial statement of its subsidiary(ies) in Form AOC-1.
According to the Companies (Accounts) Rules, 2014, the consolidation of financial statements of
the company shall be made in accordance with the provisions of Schedule III to the Act and the
applicable accounting standards. However, a company which is not required to prepare
consolidated financial statements under the Accounting Standards, it shall be sufficient if the
company complies with provisions of consolidated financial statements provided in Schedule III
of the Act [refer Appendix given at the end of Chapter 5 for Schedule III].
As per sub-section 6 of the section 129 of the Companies Act, 2013, the Central Government
may, on its own or on an application by a class or classes of companies, by notification, exempt
any class or classes of companies from complying with any of the requirements of section 129 or
the rules made thereunder, if it is considered necessary to grant such exemption in the public
interest and any such exemption may be granted either unconditionally or subject to such
conditions as may be specified in the notification. Thus, the companies having subsidiaries,
which have previously never prepared the consolidated financial statements, must prepare their
consolidated financial statements in adherence with this mandatory requirement. This will
provide the holding companies’ stakeholders more transparency about the companies’
businesses.
443

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
An investment entity need not present consolidated financial statements if it is required, in

accordance with paragraph 31 of Ind AS 110, to measure all of its subsidiaries at fair value
through profit or loss. A parent shall determine whether it is an investment enti ty.
14. Please elaborate on the situations wherein the requirement related to preparation of consolidated
financial statements may not apply.
ANSWER:
The requirement related to preparation of consolidated financial statements shall not apply to a company
if it meets the following conditions:
(i) it is a wholly-owned subsidiary, or is a partially-owned subsidiary of another company and all its other
members, including those not otherwise entitled to vote, having been
intimated in writing and for which the proof of delivery of such intimation is available with the company,
do not object to the company not presenting consolidated financial statements;
(ii) it is a company whose securities are not listed or are not in the process of listing on any stock exchange,
whether in India or outside India; and
(iii) its ultimate or any intermediate holding company files consolidated financial statements with the
Registrar which are in compliance with the applicable Accounting Standards.
15. While doing the audit of Consolidated Financial Statements, which current period consolidation
adjustments are to be taken into account?
ANSWER:
Current period consolidation adjustments primarily relate to elimination of intra-group transactions and
account balances including:
(a) intra-group interest paid and received, or management fees, etc.;
(b) unrealised intra-group profits on assets acquired/ transferred from/ to other subsidiaries;
(c) record deferred taxes on unrealised intercompany profits elimination in accordance with Ind AS 12;
(d) intra-group indebtedness;
(e) adjustments related to harmonising the different accounting policies being followed by the parent and
its components;
(f) adjustments to the financial statements (of the parent and the components being consolidated) for
recognized subsequent events or transactions that occur between the balance sheet date and the date of
the auditor’s report on the consolidated financial statements of the group.
(g) adjustments for the effects of significant transactions or other events that occur between the date of
the components balance sheet and not already recognised in its financial statements and the date of the
auditor’s report on the group’s consolidated financial statements when the financial statements of the
component to be used for consolidation are not drawn upto the same balance sheet date as that of the
parent;
(h) In case of a foreign component, adjustments to convert a component’s audited financial statements
prepared under the component’s local GAAP to the GAAP under which the consolidated financial
statements are prepared;
444

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
(i) determination of movement in equity attributable to the minorities interest/non-controlling interest

since the date of acquisition of the subsidiary. It should also be noted that under Ind AS, non-controlling
interest can also result in negative balance. Unlike earlier AS, as per paragraph 28 of Ind AS 27, if the net
worth of subsidiary is negative, non-controlling interest could have deficit balance;
(j) adjustments of deferred tax on account of temporary differences arising out of elimination of profit and
losses resulting from intragroup transactions and undistributed profits of the component in case of
consolidated financial statements prepared under Ind AS.
16.Write a short note on: (rtp- nov 2021)
(a) Responsibility of holding company for preparation of Consolidated Financial Statements.
ANSWER:
The responsibility for the preparation and presentation of consolidated financial statements, among other
things, is that of the management of the parent. This includes:
(a) identifying components, and including the financial information of the components to be included in the
consolidated financial statements;
(b) where appropriate, identifying reportable segments for segmental reporting;
(c) identifying related parties and related party transactions for reporting;
(d) obtaining accurate and complete financial information from components;
(e) making appropriate consolidation adjustments;
(f) harmonization of accounting policies and accounting framework; and
(g) GAAP conversion, where applicable.
Apart from the above, the parent ordinarily issues instructions to the management of the component
specifying the parent’s requirements relating to financial information of the components to be included in
the consolidated financial statements. The instructions ordinarily cover the accounting policies to be
applied, statutory and other disclosure requirements applicable to the parent, including the identification
of and reporting on reportable segments, and related parties and related party transactions, and a
reporting timetable.
(b) Permanent Consolidated Adjustments.
ANSWER:
Permanent consolidation adjustments are those adjustments that are made only on the first occasion or
subsequent occasions in which there is a change in the shareholding of a particular entity which is
consolidated. Permanent consolidation adjustments are:
445

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
The auditor should verify that the above calculations have been made appropriately.
• The auditor should pay particular attention to the determination of pre-acquisition reserves of the
components. Date(s) of investment in components assumes importance in this regard.
• The auditor should also examine whether the pre-acquisition reserves have been allocated appropriately
between the parent and the minority interests/ non-controlling interests of the subsidiary.
• The auditor should also verify the changes that might have taken place in these permanent consolidation
adjustments on account of subsequent acquisition of shares in the components, disposal of the
components in the subsequent years.
It may happen that while working out the permanent consolidation adjustments, in the case of one
subsidiary, goodwill arises and in the case of another subsidiary, capital reserve arises. The parent may
choose to net off these amounts to disclose a single amount in the consolidated balance sheet where
permitted by the applicable financial reporting framework. In such cases, the auditor should verify that the
gross amounts of goodwill and capital reserves arising on acquisition of various subsidiaries have been
disclosed in the notes to the consolidated financial statements to reflect the excess/shortage over the
parents’ portion of the subsidiary’s equity.
17. M Ltd. acquired 51 % shares of S Ltd. on 01-04-2019 and sold 25% of these shares during the
financial year 2019-20. M Ltd. did not prepare Consolidated Financial Statements for the
financial year 2019-20 on the plea that the control was only temporary. Do you agree with the
view of M Ltd.? Decide, assuming, that M Ltd. is required to prepare its financial statements
under Ind AS.
ANSWER:
Consolidation of Financial Statement: As per Ind AS 110, there is no such exemption for ‘temporary
control’, or “for operating under severe long-term funds transfer restrictions” and consolidation is
mandatory for Ind AS compliant financial statement in this case.
Ind AS 110 states that “Consolidation of an investee shall begin from the date the investor obtains control
of the investee and cease when the investor loses control of the investee”.
In the given case, M Ltd acquired 51% shares of S Ltd on 01.04.2019 and sold 25% shares during the year
ended 2019-20. M Ltd did not consolidate the financial statements of S Ltd for the year ended 31.03.2020
on the plea that control was only temporary. The intention of M Ltd. is quite clear that the control in S Ltd.
is temporary as the former company disposed off the acquired shares in the same year of its purchase.
446

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
However, even though the intention of M Ltd. is for temporary holding of shares in S Ltd. as per Ind AS, M
Ltd is required to prepare Consolidated Financial Statements in accordance with Ind AS 110 as exemption
for ‘temporary control’ is not available under Ind AS 110.
However, “Consolidation of an investee shall begin from the date the investor obtains control of the
investee and cease when the investor loses control of the investee”. Here, due to sale of investment in S
Ltd. up to 25%, M Ltd. loses control of S Ltd.
Accordingly, M Ltd., is required to prepare consolidated statement till the date of disposal of the 25%
shares to comply with the same.
18. BCO Private Limited is operating in India for the last 15 years. It has three group companies
– one subsidiary in India and the other two in Ireland and France. All these subsidiaries were
acquired one by one and investments were made in these companies gradually i.e. initially
control was not obtained and after investment for some period, control was obtained. The
statutory auditors have evaluated that all the group companies are significant for the purpose
of audit of consolidated financial statements.
During the year ended 31 March 2019, the audited financial statements of all the components
are available except for French company whose audit got delayed and would not get completed
before the release date of CFS of parent company.
For the purpose of consolidation, the parent company has provided the audited financial
statements of other components. Please suggest what can be the possible situation in respect
of financial statements of French company for the purpose of consolidation for the purpose of
audit of CFS.
(a) Since the audit of French company is in progress, its financial statements subject to audit can
be considered by auditor of parent company and audited signed financials can be given to
auditors even after release of audited CFS as this is matter of documentation only.
(b) The management should give management accounts to the auditors of CFS and auditor can
mention the same point in other matters paragraph in his audit report which is an acceptable
approach.
(c) Auditor should get the financial statements of French company excluded from CFS.
(d) If the auditor does not receive audited financial statements of French company, he should
modify his audit report.
Answer: (d) If the auditor does not receive audited financial statements of French company, he
should modify his audit report.
19. KB Ltd is engaged in the business of construction. It has multiple subsidiaries and associates
in India. The company acquired PPP Gmbh in Germany on 1 February 2019. The company also
obtained control in PPP Gmbh on the same date. Its investment in PPP Gmbh was of a huge
amount. The company has been preparing its CFS over the last few years and this has also
become a matter of concern for the company for the year ended 31 March 2019. The
447

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
management is of the view that consolidation of PPP Gmbh would not be required in CFS for
the year ended 31 March 2019 because this is the first year of acquisition. However, the
auditors have not been agreeing for the same. The timeline of submission of audited financial
statements is due in few months time.
In the meantime, the management moved on the consolidation of PPP Gmbh taking audited
financial statements of PPP Gmbh which are available in the GAAP of its local country and GAAP
conversion adjustments from its local GAAP to Indian GAAP have been made by the parent
company. GAAP conversion adjustments are significant at CFS level.
In the meantime, the management has also been consulting whether the consolidation would
be required or not also considering the fact that comparative figures in case of PPP Gmbh
would not be available.
Further the auditors have also raised observations regarding the GAAP conversion adjustments
over which management has a disagreement. As per the management the auditors are not
required to comment on GAAP adjustments because audited financial statements of PPP Gmbh
have been given to the auditors. Please help to resolve these matters.
a) Consolidation of PPP Gmbh should be done but GAAP conversion adjustments are not required
to be audited.
b) Consolidation of PPP Gmbh should not be done and accordingly, GAAP conversion adjustments
would not arise.
c) Consolidation of PPP Gmbh should be done and GAAP conversion adjustments are also required
to be audited.
d) Consolidation of PPP Gmbh is a choice of management as the accounting standard does not
mandate this. However, in case it is done then the GAAP conversion adjustments would be
required to be audited.
Answer: ( C) If the auditor does not receive audited financial statements of French company, he
should modify his audit report.
20.VDN Ltd is a medium-sized company engaged in the business of retail. It has two subsidiaries
and one joint venture. Both the subsidiaries are larger in size as compared to the parent
company. The accounting policies of the parent company, its subsidiaries and joint venture
were same. However, during the year ended 31 March 2019, one of its subsidiary, SMA Pvt Ltd
changed the method of depreciation of Property, plant and equipment (PPE) to written down
value method which is different from the method followed by the parent company i.e. Straight
line method. Further this subsidiary also changed the method of valuation from FIFO to
Weighted average method which has become different from parent as the parent follows FIFO
method.
These changes were made by the subsidiary because it reflected the better picture of its
standalone financial statements. Now for the purpose of CFS, the auditors have asked the
management of parent company to ensure that accounting policies of the group companies
448

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
should align with that of parent in line with the requirements of accounting standard.
But the management of parent and subsidiary company believe that out of three group
companies other than parent, only one group company requires this change for the purpose of
consolidation and the same should be ignored by the auditors. Please suggest.
a) The view of management is correct.
b) For CFS, method of depreciation of SMA Pvt Ltd may continue to be different, however, method
of valuation of inventory should be aligned with that of the parent.
c) For CFS, method of valuation of inventory of SMA Pvt Ltd may continue to be different,
however, method of depreciation should be aligned with that of the parent.
d) The auditor should get these changes made in the standalone financial statements of SMA Pvt
Ltd.
Answer: (b) For CFS, method of depreciation of SMA Pvt Ltd may continue to be different,
however, method of valuation of inventory should be aligned with that of the parent
21.AJ Private Ltd is engaged in the business of retail having annual turnover of Rs. 1,800 crores.
The company has a plan to get listed on Bombay Stock Exchange next year. The company has 3
associates, 4 subsidiaries, and 1 joint venture. The company prepares its consolidated financial
statements on a quarterly basis for the purpose for internal purposes. The quarterly financials
are reviewed by the statutory auditors of the company.
The group companies of the parent company have increased in terms of their size looking at
the total assets and revenue of the group.
For the purpose of audit of consolidated financial statements for the year ended 31 March 2019,
management has request the statutory auditors that it would be able to provide management
certified accounts of the joint venture as its audit would not get completed on time and even
without joint venture, the auditors would be able to cover 75% of the total assets of the group
at consolidated level. However, the statutory auditors are insisting that they need to cover at
least 80% of the total assets of the group at consolidated level as per the requirements of the
Auditing Standards and for that financials of the joint venture should also be audited. Please
advise.
a) Auditors should accept the management certified accounts of joint venture.
b) Auditors cannot accept management certified accounts of joint venture and should report the
matter to the Registrar of Companies.
c) Auditors cannot accept management certified accounts of joint venture and should report the
matter to the Securities and Exchange Board of India, considering the plan to get listed next
year.
d) Auditors should accept management certified accounts of joint venture provided the revenue
of the joint venture is less than 10% of the total revenue of the group.
449

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
Answer: (a) Auditors should accept the management certified accounts of joint venture
22.Advik Ltd is an unlisted public company. The company acquired few companies in the last 3-
4 years which have been assessed as its subsidiaries/ associates/ joint ventures (hereinafter
jointly called as ‘components’). The company prepares its condensed consolidated financial
statements every quarter to review the performance of the group. In the past years, the
company used to get the financials of its components reviewed/ audited on a quarterly basis.
AJ & Co LLP is the statutory auditor of parent company and KSH & Associates is the statutory
auditor of all the components. Quarterly condensed consolidated financial statements of the
group are reviewed by the statutory auditors as per the terms of the engagement letter.
AJ & Co LLP has communicated to Advik Ltd that in line with the requirements of the Companies
Act 2013, it would also be required to undertake audit/ limited review of all the components
which would be consolidated with those of Advik Ltd and for which KSH & Associates are the
statutory auditors currently.
Management is not agreeing with the same as they don’t want to change KSH & Associates as
auditors of the components and the requirement mentioned by AJ & Co LLP would lead to
duplication of work of auditors as well as the management. Please advise.
a) In an audit/review of consolidated financial statements (whether condensed or complete), the
principal auditor is required to perform various procedures in accordance with SA 600, Using
the work of another auditor and hence the requirement of auditor is valid.
b) In an audit/review of consolidated financial statements (whether condensed or complete), the
principal auditor is required to perform various procedures in accordance with the
requirements of the Companies Accounts and Audit Rules 2014 and hence the requirement of
auditor is valid
c) In an audit/review of consolidated financial statements (whether condensed or complete), the
principal auditor is not required to re-perform audit/ limited review of the components and
hence the requirement of auditor is not correct
d) Management and the auditor need to decide this mutually as this is based on the contractual
arrangement between them
Answer: ( c) In an audit/review of consolidated financial statements (whether condensed or
complete), the principal auditor is not required to re-perform audit/ limited review of the
components and hence the requirement of auditor is not correct.
23. CA. Vimal is the auditor of Excellent Ltd., a parent company which presents Consolidated Financial
Statements. The management of Excellent Ltd. has provided the list of the components included in the
Consolidated Financial Statements. As an auditor of Consolidated Financial Statements, CA Vimal has to
verify that all the components have been included in the Consolidated Financial Statements and review
the information provided by the management in identifying the components. (5 Marks) (past exam nov
2020)
ANSWER
450

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
i. review his working papers for the prior years for the known components;
ii. review the parent’s procedures for identification of various components;
iii. make inquiries of the management to identify any new components or any component which goes out
of consolidated financial statements;
iv. review the investments of parent as well as its components to determine the shareholding in other
entities;
v. review the joint ventures and joint arrangements as applicable;
vi. review the other arrangements entered into by the parent that have not been included in the
consolidated financial statements of the group;
vii. review the statutory records maintained by the parent, for example registers under section 186, 190 of
the Companies Act, 2013;
viii. Identify the changes in the shareholding that might have taken place during the reporting period.
A parent which presents consolidated financial statements is required to consolidate all its components in
the consolidated financial statements other than those for which exceptions have been provided in the
relevant accounting standards under the applicable financial reporting framework.
The auditor should obtain a listing of all the components included in the consolidated financial statements
and review the information provided by the management of the parent identifying the components. The
auditor should verify that all the components have been included in the consolidated financial statements
unless these components meet criterion for exclusion.
In the given case, Excellent Ltd has provided the list of components included in the consolidated financial
statements (CFSs). CA Vimal shall verify that all the components have been included in the CFSs.
24. LDH Ltd., a company incorporated in India and Listed on a recognized Stock Exchange in India has
entered into various related parties transactions during the financial year. You are required to answer
the following keeping in mind the Listing Obligations and Disclosure Requirements (LODR) on corporate
Governance.
(i) Who should sign the report of material transactions with related parties? (1 Mark)
(ii) What type of transactions and policy are required to be disclosed in relation to related party
transactions? (2 Marks)
(iii) Whether disclosures of related party transactions on consolidated financial statements are required
to be made? If yes, what are the guidelines? (2 Marks) (past exam jan 2021)
ANSWER
An Indian company, LDH Ltd., listed on stock exchange entered into various related party transactions.
(i) The report shall be signed either by the compliance officer or the chief executive officer of the listed
entity.
(ii) (a) The company shall disclose the policy on dealing with related party transactions on its website and a
web link thereto shall be provided in the Annual Report.
451

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
(b) The listed entity shall disclose the transactions with any person or entity belonging to the promoter/
promoter group which hold(s) 10% or more shareholding in the listed entity, in the format prescribed in the
relevant accounting standards for annual results.
(iii) (a) Yes, disclosures of related party transactions on consolidated financial statements are required to
be made by the listed entity within 30 days from the date of publication of its standalone and consolidated
financial results for the half year.
(b) The listed entity shall disclose related party transactions on a consolidated basis, in the format specified
in the relevant accounting standards for annual results to the stock exchanges and publish the same on its
website
25. JRS Limited holds the majority ownership of R Ltd. & K Ltd. S Ltd. is an intermediate
subsidiary of JRS Limited in Surat. The JRS Limited presents the consolidated financial
statements for audit purposes to MMT & Co. As a statutory auditor MMT & Co. obtain a listing
of all the components and verify that all the components included in financial statements unless
any component meet criterion for exclusion. Explain any two reasons which are considered by
MMT & Co. for exclusion of components from the consolidated financial statements and
reporting of reasons of exclusion thereof. (5 Marks) (past exam jan 2021)
ANSWER
Where a component is excluded from the consolidated financial statements, the auditor should examine
the reasons for exclusion and whether such exclusion is in conformity with the applicable financial
reporting framework.
(i) Under Companies (Accounting Standards) Rules, 2006, there could be two reasons for exclusion of
subsidiary, associate or jointly controlled entity- one, that the relationship of parent with the subsidiary,
associate or jointly controlled entity is intended to be temporary or the subsidiary, associate or joint
venture operates under
severe long-term restrictions which significantly impair its ability to transfer funds to the parent.
(ii) Similarly, under the Companies Act, 2013, intermediate subsidiary in India is not required to present
consolidated financial statements. Ind AS 110 also prescribes certain criteria where consolidated financial
statements are not required. In such cases, the auditor should satisfy himself that the exclusion made by
the management falls within these categories, example in the case of an entity which is excluded from
consolidation on the ground that the relationship of parent with the other entity as subsidiary, associate or
joint venture is temporary, the auditor should verify that the intention of the parent, to dispose off the
subsidiary, investment in associate or interest in jointly controlled entity, in the near future, existed at the
time of acquisition of the
subsidiary, making investment in associate or jointly controlled entity.
(iii) The auditor should also verify that the reasons for exclusion are given in the consolidated financial
statements. If an entity is excluded from the consolidated financial statements for reasons other than those
allowed by the applicable financial reporting framework, the auditor should consider its effect on the
auditor’s report to be issued.
26. Differences between Division II (Ind- AS- Other than NBFCs) and Division III (Ind- AS- NBFCs) of
Schedule III.
(rtp- july 2021)
452

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
ANSWER
Differences between Division II (Ind- AS- Other than NBFCs) and Division III (Ind- AS- NBFCs) of Schedule
III: The presentation requirements under Division III for NBFCs are similar to Division II (Non NBFC) to a
large extent except for the following:
(i) NBFCs have been allowed to present the items of the balance sheet in order of their liquidity which is
not allowed to companies required to follow Division II. Additionally, NBFCs are required to classify items of
the balance sheet into financial and non-financial whereas other companies are required to classify the
items into current and non-current.
(ii) An NBFC is required to separately disclose by way of a note any item of ‘other income’ or ‘other
expenditure’ which exceeds 1 per cent of the total income. Division II, on the other hand, requires
disclosure for any item of
income or expenditure which exceeds 1 per cent of the revenue from operations or Rs. 10 lakh, whichever
is higher.
(iii) NBFCs are required to separately disclose under ‘receivables’, the debts due from any Limited Liability
Partnership (LLP) in which its director is a partner or member.
(iv) NBFCs are also required to disclose items comprising ‘revenue from operations’ and ‘other
comprehensive income’ on the face of the Statement of profit and loss instead of showing those only as
part of the notes.
(v) Separate disclosure of trade receivable which have significant increase in credit risk & credit impaired.
(vi) The conditions or restrictions for distribution attached to statutory reserves have to be separately
disclose in the notes as stipulated by the relevant statute
27. As an Auditor give your comments for the following disclosures made by a Company which adopted
Ind AS for compilation of Financial Statements:
(i) In the Balance Sheet, the sub-head inventories contained an item "goods in transit" against which a
consolidated amount consisting of aggregate of the cost of raw materials in transit and loose tools which
are billed on company but delivery not been made to the company had been specified.
(ii) Provision for doubtful debts of trade debtors was grouped under, "Provisions" under current
liabilities.
(iii) Sale proceeds of scrap incidental to manufacture were included in "Other Income".
(mtp nov 20)
(6 Marks)
ANSWER
(i) Goods in Transits: As per Division II of Schedule III of the Companies Act, 2013, cost of raw material in
transit shall be disclosed as sub-head of raw material and loose tools billed on the company would be
shown as separate sub-head of Loose tools under heading of Inventories i.e. part of Current Asset. Thus,
disclosure of consolidated amount aggregating the cost of raw material in transit and loose tools is not
correct.
(ii) Provision for Doubtful Debts of Trade Debtors was grouped in “Provisions” under current liabilities:
The term ‘doubtful debts’ is an adjustment to the carrying amounts of assets, hence no provision is created
separately for it as per Ind-AS 37 “Provisions, Contingent Liabilities and Contingent Assets”. Thus, provision
should be shown as deduction from gross value of (net) trade receivable.
453

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
(iii) Sale Proceeds of Scrap incidental to manufacture were included in “Other Income”: As per Ind-AS 2
“Inventories”, sale proceeds of scrap incidental to manufacture should be deducted from the cost of the
main product. Thus, presentation of sale proceeds of scrap as other income is not correct. Alternatively,
sale of manufacturing scrap arising from operations for a manufacturing company could be treated as other
operating revenue since the same arises on account of the company’s main operating activity
28. B Limited controls entity C Limited (75%) and entity A Limited (an investment company). Entity B
Limited reduced the control of entity C Limited from 75% to 60%. With regard to that certain
adjustments were made to account for the change in the shareholding of entity C Limited which is
consolidated. These adjustments are known as: (mtp – I -july 2021)
(a) Memorandum adjustments.
(b) Current period consolidation adjustments.
(c) Permanent consolidation adjustments.
(d) Temporary period consolidation adjustments.

ANSWER- c
29. While examining the computation of Demand and Time liabilities which of the following is to be
included in liabilities: (mtp – II -july 2021)
(a) Part amounts of recoveries from the borrowers in respect of debts considered bad and doubtful of
recovery.
(b) Amounts received in Indian Currency against import bills and held in sundry deposits pending receipts
of final rates.
(c) Net credit balance in branch adjustment accounts including these relating to foreign branches.
(d) Margins held and kept in sundry deposits for funded facilities.
ANSWER- c
30. Atishaya Ltd. holds the ownership of 10% of voting power and control over the composition of Board
of Directors of Neenu Ltd. While planning the statutory audit of Atishaya Ltd., what factors would be
considered by you as the statutory auditors of Atishaya Ltd for the audit of its consolidated financial
statements prepared under Ind AS? (5 Marks) (mtp – II -july 2021)
ANSWER
10% Voting Power and Control over the composition of Board of Directors: In this case, Atishaya Ltd.
holds only 10 percent of the voting power but has control over the composition of the Board of Directors of
Neenu Ltd.
In such a case, Atishaya Ltd shall be considered as a parent of Neenu Ltd and, therefore, it would
consolidate Neenu Ltd in its consolidated financial statements as a subsidiary.
The auditor should verify Atishaya Ltd’s management’s assessment of having control in Neenu Ltd despite
having only 10% voting power as per the requirements of Ind AS 110. Auditor would need to verify as to
how Atishaya Ltd controls the composition of the Board of Directors or corresponding governing body of
Neenu Ltd.
454

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
There can be various means by which such kind of control can be established. In this regard, the auditor
may verify the minutes of Board meetings, shareholder agreement entered into by the parent, agreements
with Neenu Ltd to which the parent might have provided any technology or know how, enforcement of
statute, etc.
Further, the auditor should verify that the adjustments warranted by Ind AS 110 have b een made
wherever required and have been properly authorised by the management of the parent. The preparation
of consolidated financial statements gives rise to permanent consolidation adjustments and current period
consolidation adjustments. The auditor should make plan, among other things, for the understanding of
accounting policies of the Atishaya Ltd and Neenu Ltd and determining and programming the nature,
timing, and extent of the audit procedures to be performed etc.
Further, the duties of an auditor with regard to reporting of transactions with any other related parties are
given in SA 550 on Related Parties. As per SA 550 on, “Related Parties”, the auditor should review
information provided by the management of the entity identifying the names of all known related parties.
A person or other entity that has control or significant influence, directly or indirectly through one or more
intermediaries, over the reporting entity are considered as Related Party.
In forming an opinion on the financial statements, the auditor shall evaluate whether the identified related
party relationships and transactions have been appropriately accounted for and disclosed in accordance
with Ind AS 110 and Schedule III and whether the effects of the related party relationships and transactions
prevent the financial statements from achieving true and fair presentation (for fair presentation
frameworks) or cause the financial statements to be misleading (for compliance frameworks
31. (rtp- nov 2021)

Ulip Ltd. is a public company listed on the National Stock Exchange since the year, 2015, with
share capital of ₹ 150 crore.
SRS & Co. is being appointed as its statutory auditor for F.Y. 2020-21 and Mr. Raj is appointed as
the engagement partner, on behalf of the firm, to conduct the said audit assignment including
conducting of limited reviews and other statutory assignments.
Mr. Raj was conducting limited review for second quarter and during the same while adhering
to the responsibilities as conferred upon by SA 250, “Consideration of Laws and Regulations in
an Audit of Financial Statements”, he evaluated the implications of non-compliance in relation
to other aspects of the audit, including the auditor’s risk assessment and the reliability of
written representations and concluded that withdrawal from engagement was necessary in the
given circumstances, after seeking legal advice, even though the non-compliance was not
material to the financial statements but as the management or those charged with governance
refrained from taking the remedial action that he considered appropriate in the circumstances.
Such a withdrawal was not prohibited by any law or regulation.
Mr. Raj, on behalf of SRS & Co., brought to the notice of the Audit Committee of Ulip Ltd., all his
concerns with respect to the proposed resignation, along with relevant documents.
After issuing the necessary reports, as required in the circumstances, SRS & Co gave its
resignation letter to Ulip Ltd. at 1:00 p.m. on 20th November, 2021 vide its official email-id,
which contained the detailed reasons for such resignation.
Such a letter was forwarded to the stipulated authority by Ulip Ltd. at 4:00 p.m. on 21st
November, 2021 vide its official email-id.
SRS & Co. filed the statement with respect to its resignation as a statutory auditor in prescribed
form with Ulip Ltd. and the Registrar on 15th January, 2021, respectively, after receiving a notice
from MCA.
For the purpose of filling the casual vacancy in the office of auditor, the Audit Committee of Ulip
Ltd. gave recommendation of an audit firm for being appointed as the statutory auditor to
455

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
which the Board disagreed and it referred back the recommendation to the committee for
reconsideration citing reasons for such disagreement.
However, the Audit Committee, after considering the reasons given by the Board, decided not
to reconsider its original recommendation, so, the Board of Ulip Ltd. after recording the reasons
for its disagreement with the committee appointed Chavda & Co. as its new statutory auditor
on 15th December, 2021.
Such an appointment of Chavda & Co. was also approved by the members of Ulip Ltd. at a duly
convened general meeting on 3rd February, 2022.
Question No.: (6-10)
1. Whether the reasons for withdrawal from the engagement by SRS & Co. can be considered to
be justifiable in the light of the fact that the non-compliance was not material to the financial
statements?
(a) Yes, as such a withdrawal was not prohibited by any law or regulation.
(b) Yes, as the auditor had obtained legal advice for the same and also such a withdrawal was
not prohibited by any law or regulation.
(c) Yes, in exceptional cases, the auditor may consider for such withdrawal provided that such a
withdrawal is not prohibited by any law or regulation.
(d) Yes, as it does not matter whether non-compliance is material or not, management or those
charged with governance should not refrain from taking the remedial action
which the auditor has considered necessary, provided that such a withdrawal is not prohibited
by any law or regulation.
ANSWER- c
2. In continuation of Question no. 6, above, if it is assumed that the auditor was prohibited by
any law or regulation from such withdrawal from engagement, then how he would have
reported the non-compliance in the audit report?
(a) In the “Basis for Qualified Opinion” paragraph.
(b) In the Other Matter(s) paragraph.
(c) In the Emphasis of Matter(s) paragraph.
(d) In the “Basis for Disclaimer of Opinion” paragraph.
ANSWER- b
3. Ulip Ltd. was required to disclose to which authority, the detailed reasons for resignation of
the auditor and by what time limit as per LODR 2015?
(a) Such reasons were required to be disclosed to MCA till 1:00 p.m. – 21st November, 2021.
456

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
(b) Such reasons were required to be disclosed to NSE & SEBI till 1:00 p.m. – 23rd November,
2021.
(c) Such reasons were required to be disclosed to NSE till 1:00 p.m. – 21st November, 2021.
(d) Such reasons were required to be disclosed to the Registrar till 1:00 p.m. – 22nd November,
2021.
ANSWER- c
4. What could be the penalty specified under the Company Act, 2013 that could be levied upon
SRS & Co. for failure in filing the statement with respect to its resignation, within the prescribed
time limit, with Ulip Ltd. and the Registrar, respectively, if its remuneration was ₹ 40,000?
(a) ₹ 62,500.
(b) ₹ 50,000.
(c) ₹ 40,000.
(d) ₹ 52,500.
ANSWER- d
5. What was the last date available with board of Ulip Ltd. for filing the casual vacancy in the
office of the auditor and by what last date, the general meeting for approving the auditor as
appointed by the board should have been made in accordance with the provisions of the
Companies Act, 2013?
(a) 27th November, 2021 and 27th February, 2022.
(b) 20th December, 2021 and 15th February, 2022.
(c) 20th January, 2021 and 20th April, 2022.
(d) 20th December, 2021 and 15th March, 2022.
ANSWER- d
32. ( MTP- NOV 2021)
CA. V is the auditor of Superb Ltd., a parent company which presents Consolidated Financial Statements.
The management of Superb Ltd. has provided the list of the components included in the Consolidated
Financial Statements. As an auditor of Consolidated Financial Statements, CA V has to verify that all the
components have been included in the Consolidated Financial Statements and review the information
provided by the management in identifying the components. State the procedures to be followed by CA. V
in respect of completeness of this information.
ANSWER
457

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
A parent which presents consolidated financial statements is required to consolidate all its components in
the consolidated financial statements other than those for which exceptions have been provided in the
relevant accounting standards under the applicable financial reporting framework.
The auditor should obtain a listing of all the components included in the consolidated financial statements
and review the information provided by the management of the parent identifying the components. The
auditor should verify that all the components have been included in the consolidated financial statements
unless these components meet criterion for exclusion.
In the given case, Superb Ltd has provided the list of components included in the consolidated financial
statements (CFSs). CA V shall verify that all the components have been included in the CFSs.
Further, in respect of completeness of this information, CA V should perform the following procedures:
i. review his working papers for the prior years for the known components;
ii. review the parent’s procedures for identification of various components;
iii. make inquiries of the management to identify any new components or any component which goes out
of consolidated financial statements;
iv. review the investments of parent as well as its components to determine the shareholding in other
entities;
v. review the joint ventures and joint arrangements as applicable;
vi. review the other arrangements entered into by the parent that have not been included in the
consolidated financial statements of the group;
vii. review the statutory records maintained by the parent, for example registers under section
186, 190 of the Companies Act, 2013;
viii. Identify the changes in the shareholding that might have taken place during the reporting period.
33. ( MTP- NOV 2021)
The financial statements of Prabhu Ltd. as on March 31, 2020 are to be prepared under Division Il of
Schedule III to the Companies Act, 2013. Comment on the disclosure compliances for Prabhu Ltd. from the
following information in the financial statements which are required to be drawn up in compliance with Ind
AS.
(i) Property, Plant and Equipment include ₹ 2.50 crore for a boiler-plant under construction.
(ii) Cash and cash equivalents include ₹ 1.25 crore deposited with a nationalized bank on 31st March, 2020
for 18 months. It is shown under current assets.
(iii) Non-current assets include under caption "Biological assets other than bearer Plants" a sum of ₹ 1.50
crore being cost of cultivation for bringing to yield level, the cashewnut trees whose yield period, according
to estimate shall not be less than 10 years
ANSWER
458

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
(i) Disclosure of Boiler Plant under Construction: Boiler plant under construction should be shown under
the heading ‘Capital Work in Progress’ instead of Property Plan and Equipment. Thus, inclusion of value of
boiler plant under construction in Property Plan and Equipment is not in order.
(ii) Disclosure of Cash and Cash Equivalents deposited with Nationalised Bank: Bank deposits with more
than 12 months maturity shall be disclosed under 'Other financial assets'. Therefore, disclosure of deposits
rupees 1.25 crores in a nationalised bank for 18 months as Cash and Cash Equivalents is not in order as per
(iii) Disclosure of Cost of Cultivation for bringing to yield level the Cashewnut trees: Cost of 1.5 crore rupees
for Cultivation for bringing to yield level, the cashewnut trees whose yield period is more than one period
will form part of ‘Bearer Plant’. Hence it will not be considered as ‘Biological Assets other than bearer
plant’. Therefore, it should be shown under the heading ‘Property Plant and Equipment’ as Bearer Plant as
per Division II of Schedule III.
34. ( MTP- NOV 2021)
You are appointed as an auditor of NEMI Limited, a listed company which is a company providing
information technology service across the globe. NEMI limited was having turnover for the
financial year ended on 31 March 2021 ₹ 22 crore. The company operates through 15 business
units and has nearly 130 branches across the world. As an auditor, how will you draft the report in
case:
(I) When the Component(s) auditor reports on financial statements under an accounting
framework different than that of the Parent?
(II) When the Component(s) auditor reports under an auditing framework different than that of
the Parent?
ANSWER
(I). When the Component(s) Auditor Reports on Financial Statements under an Accounting
Framework Different than that of the Parent: The parent may have components located in
multiple geographies outside India applying an accounting framework (GAAP) that is different
than that of the parent in preparing its financial statements. Foreign components prepare financial
statements under different financial reporting frameworks, which may be a well-known
framework (such as US GAAP or IFRS) or the local GAAP of the jurisdiction of the component. Local
component auditors may be unable to report on financial statements prepared using the parent’s
GAAP because of their unfamiliarity with such GAAP.
When a component’s financial statements are prepared under an accounting framework that is
different than that of the framework used by the parent in preparing group’s consolidated
financial statements, the parent’s management perform a conversion of the components’ audited
financial statements from the framework used by the component to the framework under which
the consolidated financial statements are prepared. The conversion adjustments are audited by
the principal auditor to ensure that the financial information of the component(s) is suitable and
appropriate for the purposes of consolidation.
459

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
A component may alternatively prepare financial statements on the basis of the parent’s
accounting policies, as outlined in the group accounting manual, to facilitate the preparation of
the group’s consolidated financial statements. The group accounting manual would normally
contain all accounting policies, including relevant disclosure requirements, which are consistent
with the requirements of the financial reporting framework under which the group’s consolidated
financial statements are prepared. The local component auditor can then audit and issue an audit
report on the components financial statements prepared in accordance with “group accounting
policies”.
When applying the approach of using group accounting policies as the financial accounting
framework for components to report under, the principal/parent auditors should perform
procedures necessary to determine compliance of the group accounting policies with the GAAP
applicable to the parent’s financial statements. This ensures that the information prepared under
the requirements of the group accounting policies will be directly usable and relevant for the
preparation of consolidated financial statements by the parent entity, eliminating the need for
auditing by the auditor, the differences between the basis used for the component’s financial
statements and that of the consolidated financial statements. The Principal auditor can then
decide whether or not to rely on the components’ audit report and make reference to it in the
auditor’s report on the consolidated financial statements
(II) When the Component(s) Auditor Reports under an Auditing Framework Different than that
of the Parent: Normally, audits of financial statements, including consolidated financial
statements, are performed under auditing standards generally accepted in India (“Indian GAAS”).
In order to maintain consistency of the auditing framework and to enable the parent auditor to
rely and refer to the other auditor’s audit report in their audit report on the consolidated financial
statements, the components’ financial statements should also be audited under a framework that
corresponds to Indian GAAS.
35 (NOV21 EXAM)
M & B Investments Ltd. is a company having paid up share capital of Rs. 1 Crore, It has a subsidiary,
Investors Fund Management Ltd. Major business of M & B Investments Ltd. is to pool money from
investors on a collective basis and invest this money in various funds. This company pooled Rs. 10 Crore
from a number of clients, which represent the Company's shareholders.
While auditing books of accounts of M & B Investments Ltd. CA X observed that whole amount of Rs. 10
crore pooled has been invested in shares and debentures of various companies and profit earned due to
appreciation of the prices of these shares has been distributed to various shareholders of the company.
Now, CA X raised an issue while auditing financial statements of M & B Investments Ltd. whether the
consolidated financial statements are required as per Section 129(3) of the Companies Act, 2013 ?
Analyse the above issue and give your opinion. (5 Marks)

460

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
ANSWER :
According to Section 129(3) of the Companies Act, 2013, where a company has one or more subsidiaries,
including associate company and joint venture, it shall, in addition to its own financial statements prepare a
consolidated financial statement of the company and of all the subsidiaries in the same form and manner
as that of its own.
As per sub-section 6 of the section 129 of the Companies Act, 2013, the Central Government may, on its
own or on an application by a class or classes of companies, by notification, exempt any class or classes of
companies from complying with any of the requirements of section 129 or the rules made thereunder.
An investment entity is an entity that:
(a) obtains funds from one or more investors for the purpose of providing those investor(s) with
investment management services;
(b) commits to its investor(s) that its business purpose is to invest funds solely for returns from capital
appreciation, investment income, or both; and
(c) measures and evaluates the performance of substantially all of its investments on a fair value basis.
An investment entity need not present consolidated financial statements if it is required, in accordance
with paragraph 31 of Ind AS 110, to measure all of its subsidiaries at fair value through profit or loss. A
parent shall determine whether it is an investment entity.
However, as per paragraph 33 of Ind AS 110, parent of an investment entity shall consolidate all entities
that it controls, including those controlled through an investment entity subsidiary, unless the parent itself
is an investment entity.
Applying the above to the given case of M&B Investment Ltd, which fulfils all the conditions stated above, it
is an investment entity. By applying Para 31 and 33 of Ind AS 110, it can be concluded that M&B Investment
Ltd is not required to consolidate as per Section 129(3) of the compnies act ,2023.
36 (OCT 2022 MTP)
T Ltd. is holding 68% share of B Ltd, 51% share of C Ltd. RS & Co. Chartered Accountants are the statutory
auditors of T Ltd. MN & Co. Chartered Accountants are the statutory auditors of B Ltd. and C Ltd. MN & Co
have qualified the report of B Ltd. due to material discrepancies in standalone financial statement. While
framing the opinion on Consolidated Financial Statement of T Ltd., RS
& Co. (Principal Auditor) have ignored the qualification of B Ltd. considering it not material at Group Level.
Comment.
ANSWER :
In carrying out the audit of the standalone financial statements, the computation of materiality for the
purpose of issuing an opinion on the standalone financial statements of each component would be done
component-wise on a standalone basis. However, with regard to determination of materiality during the
audit of consolidated financial statements (CFS), the auditor should consider the following:
461

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
• The auditor is required to compute the materiality for the group as a whole. This materiality should
be used to assess the appropriateness of the consolidation adjustments (i.e. permanent consolidation
adjustments and current period consolidation adjustments)
• The parent auditor can also use the materiality computed on the group level to determine whether
the component's financial statements are material to the group to determine whether they should scope in
additional components, and consider using the work of other auditors as applicable.
• The principal auditor also computes materiality for each component and communicates to the
component auditor, if he believes is required for true and fair view on CFS.
• The principal auditor also obtains certain confirmations from component auditor like independence,
code of ethics, certain information required for consolidation and disclosure requirements etc.
However, while considering the observations (for instance modification and /or emphasis of matter in
accordance with SA 705/706) of the component auditor in his report on the standalone financial
statements, the principles of SA 600 needs to be considered., The parent auditor should comply with the
requirements of SA 600, “Using the Work of Another Auditor”. Therefore, the concept of materiality would
be considered while considering the observations of the component auditor.
Hence RS & Co. cannot ignore the qualification of B Ltd. while framing the opinion on consolidated financial
statements of T Ltd.
37 (OCT 2022 MTP)
The following table shows a summary of identified misstatements:
Profit & Loss Balance Sheet

` (in Lakh) ` (in Lakh)
1. Accumulated depreciation 20
Depreciation 20
Incorrectly calculated depreciation on a straight-line basis
2. Bad debt expense 45
Allowance for doubtful debt 45
Identified risk over bad debts based on ageing profile of the trade receivables balance
Overall materiality for this audit was calculated and agreed to be Rs. 50 lakh. Which of the following
scenarios would be the best approach to be taken by the audit team and most likely outcome?
(a) The audit team does not need to communicate this summary of identified misstatements to
management, as individually the misstatements are not material.
(b) The audit team should ask a member of the accounts team to make journal entries to correct the
misstatements identified immediately, without notifying senior management.
462

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
(c) The audit senior communicates all the identified misstatements to the appropriate level of
management of the entity on a timely manner. Management does not see that the accumulated
misstatements would lead to the financial statements being materially misstated and therefore, request
them to be uncorrected and noted in the written representation.
(d) The audit senior communicates all the identified misstatements to the appropriate level of
management of the entity on a timely manner. Then management can assess the findings and confirm they
are in agreement. Assuming management agrees, they will be requested to make the necessary
corrections.
ANSWER : (D )
38 (SEPT 2022 MTP)
Below is an extract from the list of supplier statements as at 31st March 2022 held by the Company and
corresponding payables ledger balances at the same date along with some commentary on the noted
differences:
Supplier Statement balance Payables ledger balance

`'000 `'000
Shubh Company 78 66
Labh Company 235 205
The difference in the balance of Shubh Company is due to an invoice which is under dispute due to
defective goods which were returned on 30th March 2022. Which of the following audit procedures should
be carried out to confirm the balance owing to Shubh Company?
(I) Review post year-end credit notes for evidence of acceptance of return.
(II) Inspect pre year-end goods returned note in respect of the items sent back to the supplier.
(III) Inspect post year-end cash book for evidence that the amount has been settled.
(a) 1, 2 and 3.
(b) 1 and 3 only.
(c) 1 and 2 only.
(d) 2 and 3 only.
ANSWER :( C )
39(APRIL 2022 MTP)

463

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
Dharam & Karam Company Ltd. had prepared its financial statements for the financial year 2021-22
which were approved by the Board of Directors of the company and thereafter they were signed by the
Chairperson of the company as authorized by the Board, as well as by its CEO, CFO and CS, respectively.
Also, its board report was signed by its Managing Director as well as by an Executive Director. You are
required to comment whether financial statements and the Board’s report of the company have been
signed by the persons mandatorily required to sign, as prescribed by the relevant Act.
ANSWER :
As per section 134 of the Companies Act, 2013, the financial statements, including consolidated financial
statements, if any, shall be approved by the Board of Directors before they are signed on behalf of the
Board by the Chairperson of the Company where he is authorized by the Board or by two directors out of
which one shall be Managing Director, if any, and the Chief Executive Officer, the Chief Financial Officer
and the Company Secretary of the Company, wherever they are appointed, or in the case of One Person
Company, only by one director, for submission to the auditor for his report thereon.
The Board’s report shall be signed by its chairperson of the company if he is authorised by the Board and
where he is not so authorised, shall be signed by at least two directors, one of whom shall be a Managing
Director.
Here, Dharam and Karam Company Ltd. had prepared its financial statements for the financial year 2021-22
which were approved by the Board of Directors of the company and thereafter they were signed by the
Chairperson of the company as authorised by the Board, as well as by its CEO, CFO and CS, respectively.
Also, its board report was signed by its Managing Director as well as by an Executive Director.
Hence, it can be said that the financial statements and the Board’s report of the Dharam and Karam
Company Ltd. have been signed are in accordance with section 134 of the Companies Act, 2013.
40 (APRIL 2022 MTP)
Rimmi Ltd. was set up initially as a private limited company. Subsequently, it got converted into a public
company. The company’s management has plans of expansion but the business was not growing in an
organic manner. Therefore, the management decided to acquire the competitors. During the financial year
ended 31st March, 2021, the company acquired two companies in India and France in September, 2020
and January, 2021 respectively. The company controls both of these companies as per the criteria laid
down in the Companies Act, 2013 as well as the applicable accounting standards.
The management started discussions with the auditors regarding the audit wherein it was also pointed out
by the auditors that the management should also prepare consolidated financial statements (CFS), if they
want. Management needs your advise on the same.
(a) Management must prepare the CFS as per the requirements of the Companies Act, 2013.
(b) Management has a choice not to prepare CFS but should go for that considering that its true
performance and financial position can then be demonstrated.
(c) Management could have prepared CFS if the acquired companies would have completed at least one
year post acquisition.
464

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
(d) Management must prepare CFS but it should include only the company acquired in India.
ANSWER : A
41(NOV 2022 RTP)
Jambu & Sudharma Investments Ltd. is a company having paid up share capital of Rs. 1 crore, it has a
subsidiary, Investors Fund Management Ltd. Major business of Jambu & Sudharma Investments Ltd. is to
pool money from investors on a collective basis and invest this money in various funds. This company
pooled Rs. 12 crore from a number of clients, which represent the Company's shareholders.
While auditing books of accounts of Jambu & Sudharma Investments Ltd. CA Vardhman observed that
whole amount of Rs. 12 crore pooled has been invested in shares and debentures of various companies
and profit earned due to appreciation of the prices of these shares has been distributed to various
shareholders of the company. Performance of all of its investments is measured on fair value basis.
Now, CA Vardhman raised an issue while auditing financial statements of Jambu & Sudharma Investments
Ltd. whether the consolidated financial statements are required as per Section 129(3) of the Companies
Act, 2013? Analyse the above issue and give your opinion.
ANSWER :
According to Section 129(3) of the Companies Act, 2013, where a company has one or more subsidiaries,
including associate company and joint venture, it shall, in addition to its own financial statements prepare a
consolidated financial statement of the company and of all the subsidiaries in the same form and manner
as that of its own.
As per sub-section 6 of the section 129 of the Companies Act, 2013, the Central Government may, on its
own or on an application by a class or classes of companies, by notification, exempt any class or classes of
companies from complying with any of the requirements of section 129 or the Rules made thereunder.
An investment entity is an entity that:
(a) obtains funds from one or more investors for the purpose of providing those investor(s) with
investment management services;
(b) commits to its investor(s) that its business purpose is to invest funds solely for returns from capital
appreciation, investment income, or both; and
(c) measures and evaluates the performance of substantially all of its investments on a fair value basis.
An investment entity need not present consolidated financial statements if it is required, in accordance
with paragraph 31 of Ind AS 110, to measure all of its subsidiaries at fair value through profit or loss. A
parent shall determine whether it is an investment entity.
However, as per paragraph 33 of Ind AS 110, parent of an investment entity shall consolidate all entities
that it controls, including those controlled through an investment entity subsidiary, unless the parent itself
is an investment entity.
465

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
Applying the above to the given case of Jambu & Sudharma Investments Ltd., which fulfils all the conditions
stated above, it is an investment entity. By applying Para 31 and 33 of Ind AS 110, it can be concluded that
Jambu & Sudharma Investments Ltd.is not required to consolidate as per Section 129 (3) of the Companies
Act, 2013
466

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s

The Advances Bank Ltd. has sanctioned overdraft limit of Rs. 44 crore to ASG Ltd. on the working
capital of the company as on 31st March 2015. As per bank norms the drawing power in the
overdraft account need to be reviewed on quarterly basis as per the audited stock statement of
the company. As a central statutory auditor for the year 2016-17, while verifying the advances for
the year ending 31st March 2017, you noticed that the bank has not obtained the stock statement
of ASG Ltd. for the two quarters ending 31 st December 2016 and 31st March 2017 and no
provision of NPA has been made for this account in the financial statements for the year 2016-
17. What will be your decision as a central statutory auditor?
a. Classify the borrower’s account as NPA as the borrower’s financial position cannot be
determined due to non-submission of stock statement.
b. Instruct the bank to obtain the audited stock statement for both the quarters and review the
credit limit accordingly.
c. As per bank norms the drawing power need to be determined on the basis of stock statement and
it was more than three months old as on 31st March 2017, so the outstanding in the account will
be deemed as irregular.
d. You should give a qualificatory note in the audit report as per SA700.
Answer: Option C
2.MTP Apr 2019 QN no
Your firm has been appointed statutory auditor by a Nationalised Bank for the year 2017-18. Your
senior advised you to check all the standard assets shown in the balance sheet as on 31 st March
2018. While verification you observed that one of the accounts was regularised on 28th March
2018, for which the interest and instalment amount was overdue from the quarter ending 30th
September 2017. The account was regularised after the repayment of overdue interest and
467

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
instalment amounts was done on 26 th March 2018. Only the last day of the financial year was
reckoned as the date of account becoming NPA by the Bank. As a statutory auditor will you agree
with the Bank’s policy?
(a) As the interest charged in the account was overdue for more than 90 days from the end of
quarter, it should be classified as NPA and should be considered as sub-standard asset for the
balance sheet as on 31st March 2018.
(b) As the overdue interest and instalment amount was paid before the balance sheet date there is
no reason to classify the account as NPA.
(c) The auditor should not agree with the Bank’s policy to regularise the account before balance
sheet date as overdue interest indicates more than normal risk attached to the business.
(d) Bank can regularise the account before balance sheet date but should ensure that the amount
has been paid through genuine resources and not by sanction of additional facilities, and the
account remains in order subsequently.
Answer: (d) Bank can regularise the account before balance sheet date but should ensure that
the amount has been paid through genuine resources and not by sanction of additional facilities,
and the account remains in order subsequently.
3.MTP Oct 2019 QN no 6 (1 Mark)

PFS Bank was engaged in the business of providing Portfolio Management Services to its
customers, for which it took prior approval from RBI. Your firm has been appointed as the
statutory auditors of the Bank’s financial statements for the year 2018-19. Your senior has
instructed you to verify the transactions of Portfolio Management Services (PMS). While
verifying the transactions you noticed that the bank has not prepared separate record for PMS
transactions from the Bank’s own investments. As a statutory auditor what will be your decision
for verification of PMS transactions?
(a) It is not necessary to maintain separate records for PMS clients from Bank’s own investments,
so the auditor can verify the PMS transactions as part of investment verification for Bank’s
financial statements and submit the audit report accordingly.
(b) As per RBI guidelines PMS investments need to be audited separately by the external auditors
and the auditors are required to give a certificate separately for the same. So, in the above case
the auditor should not verify the PMS transactions till the Bank segregates the transactions from
its own investments.
(c) The auditor can give a qualified opinion in his audit report on the financial statements of the Bank
and report the matter in special purpose certificate.
(d) Auditor should verify that PMS funds are not utilised for lending, inter-bank deposits or deposits
to corporate bodies and bills re-discounting only. So, whether the PMS transactions are recorded
separately or not will not matter for the auditor.
Answer: (b) As per RBI guidelines PMS investments need to be audited separately by the external auditors
and the auditors are required to give a certificate separately for the same. So, in the above case the auditor
should not verify the PMS transactions till the Bank segregates the transactions from its own investments.
468

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
4.MTP Oct 2019 QN no 10 (2 Marks)

The Chanakya Bank Ltd. was having 150 branches all over India by the year ending 31 st March,
2019. Ten branches of the bank were already covered for concurrent audit and the Bank’ s Audit
Committee decided to include the below mentioned branches for concurrent audit from the year
2019 -20.
1. Allahabad branch which started foreign exchange business from February 2019.
2. Rae Bareilly branch whose aggregate deposits were more than 35% of the aggregate deposits
of the bank.
Whether the decision of audit committee to include both the branches mentioned in above
paragraph for concurrent audit is as per RBI Guidelines?
(a) The decision of audit committee is valid as according to RBI Guidelines, both the branches fulfil
the criteria for compulsory concurrent audit.
(b) Allahabad branch falls under the compulsory audit criteria as per RBI Guidelines, however Rae
Bareilly branch whose aggregate deposits are less than 50% of the aggregate deposits of the Bank
is not required to be compulsorily covered for concurrent audit.
(c) Allahabad and Rae Bareilly branch are compulsorily not required to be covered under concurrent
audit as per RBI Guidelines.
(d) Allahabad branch has started foreign exchange business in February 2019 and as per RBI
Guidelines only the branches dealing in Foreign exchange business from more than three years
are covered under concurrent audit. Therefore, Allahabad branch is not covered under
compulsory concurrent audit criteria as per RBI Guidelines but the Rae Bareilly branch is covered
under compulsory concurrent audit criteria.
Answer: (b) Allahabad branch falls under the compulsory audit criteria as per RBI Guidelines, however Rae
Bareilly branch whose aggregate deposits are less than 50% of the aggregate deposits of the Bank is not
required to be compulsorily covered for concurrent audit.
5.May 2018 5(d) -4 Marks
In the course of audit of Skip Bank Ltd., you found that the Bank had sold certain of its non
performing assets. Draft the points of audit check that are very relevant to this area of checking.
Answer
Sale of Non-Performing Assets: In case of Sale of NPA by Bank, the auditor should examine :
• the policy laid down by the Board of Directors in this regard relating to procedures, valuation and
delegation of powers.
• that only such NPA has been sold which has remained NPA in the books of the bank for at least 2
years.
469

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
• the assets have been sold/ purchased “without recourse’ only.

• subsequent to the sale of the NPA, the bank does not assume any legal, operational or any other
type of risk relating to the sold NPAs.
• the NPA has been sold at cash basis only.
• the bank has not purchased an NPA which it had originally sold.
• that on the sale of the NPA, the same has been removed from the books of the account.
• that the short fall in the net book value has been charged to the profit and loss account.
• that where the sale is for a value higher than the NBV, no profit is recognised and the excess
provision has not been reversed but retained to meet the shortfall/ loss because sale of other non-
performing financial assets.
6.RTP May 2018 –Qn no.11

Advances generally constitute the major part of the assets of the bank. There are substantial number of
borrowers to whom variety of advances are granted. The audit of advances requires the major attention
from the auditors.
As an expert in bank audit, you are required to briefly discuss the area of focus and suggested audit
procedures regarding evaluation of internal controls over advances, substantive audit procedures and
recoverability of advances.
Answer
Audit Procedures -In carrying out audit of advances, the auditor is primarily concerned with obtaining
evidence about the following:
Area of Focus Suggested Audit Procedures
Evaluation of • Examine loan documentation;

Internal
• Examine the validity of the recorded amounts;
Controls over
Advances • Examine the existence, enforceability and valuation of the security;
• Ensure compliance with the terms of sanction and end use of funds.
• Ensure compliance with Loan Policy of Bank as well as RBI norms including
appropriate classification and provisioning
• Review the operation of the accounts;
•
Substantive Check that the advances represent amount due to the bank
Audit
Procedures Verify that the advances are disclosed, classified and described in accordance
with recognised accounting policies and practices and relevant statutory and
regulatory requirements.
Check that appropriate provisions towards advances have been made as per
the RBI norms, Accounting Standards and generally accepted accounting
practices.
470

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
Examine all large advances while other advances may be examined on a

sample basis
Verify completeness and accuracy of interest being charged
Ensure that there are no unrecorded advances
Check that the stated basis of valuation of advances is appropriate and
properly applied, and that the recoverability of advances is recognised in
their valuation
Check whether the amounts included in the balance sheet are outstanding as
on the date of balance sheet.
Verify completeness and accuracy of interest being charged.
Recoverability• Review periodic statements submitted by the borrowers indicating the

of Advances extent of compliance with terms and conditions.
• Review latest financial statements of borrowers.
• Review reports on inspection of security.
• Review Auditors’ reports in the case of borrowers enjoying aggregate credit
limits of Rupees 10 lakh or above for working capital from the banking system.
7. MTP Mar 2018 Qn no.6(d) 4 Marks, RTP Nov 2018 Qn no 11(b)

Your firm has been appointed as Central Statutory Auditors of a Nationalised Bank. The Bank
follows financial year as accounting year. The bank is a consortium member of Cash Credit
Facilities of Rs. 50 crores to X Ltd Bank's own share is Rs. 10 crores only. During the last two
quarters against a debit of Rs. 1.75 crores towards interest the credits in X Ltd's account are to
the tune of Rs. 1.25 crores only. Based on the certificate of lead bank, the bank has classified
the account of X Ltd as performing. Advise your views on the issue which were brought to your
notice by your Audit Manager.
Answer
The bank is a consortium member of cash credit facilities of Rs. 50 crores to X Ltd. Bank's own
share is Rs. 10 crores only. During the last two quarters against a debit of Rs. l.75 crores towards
interest, the credits in X Ltd's account are to the tune ofRs. 1.25 crores only. Sometimes, several
banks form a group (the 'consortium') under the leadership of a 'lead bank' to make advance to a
large customer on same conditions and security with proportionate rights. In such cases, each
bank may classify the advance given by it according to its own experience of recovery and other
factors. Since in the last two quarters, the amount remains outstanding and, thus, interest amount
should be reversed. This is despite the certificate of lead bank to classify that the account as
performing. Accordingly, the amount should be shown as non-performing asset.
8.MTP Apr 18 Qn no.6(d) 4 Marks, RTP May 2020

In course of audit of Fair Samaritan Bank as at 31st March, 18 you observed that in a particular
account there was no recovery in the past 18 months. The bank has not applied the NPA norms
as well as income recognition norms to this particular account. When queried the bank
471

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
management replied that this account was guaranteed by the central government and hence
these norms were not applicable. The bank has not invoked the guarantee. Advise. Would
your answer be different if the advance is guaranteed by a State Government?
RTP Nov 2019 Qn no 19(a),MTP Apr 2019 Qn no 3(c) 5 Marks
In course of audit of True Princi Bank as at 31st March, 2019, you observed that in a particular
account there was no recovery in the past 18 months. The bank has not applied the NPA norms
as well as income recognition norms to this particular account. When queried the bank
management replied that this account was guaranteed by the central government and hence
these norms were not applicable. The bank has not invoked the guarantee. Comment. Would
your answer be different if the advance is guaranteed by a State Government?
Answer
Government Guaranteed Advance: If a government guaranteed advance becomes NPA, then for
the purpose of income recognition, interest on such advance should not to be taken to income
unless interest is realized. However, for purpose of asset classification, credit facility backed by
Central Government Guarantee, though overdue, can be treated as NPA only when the Central
Government repudiates its guarantee, when invoked.
Since the bank has not revoked the guarantee, the question of repudiation does not arise. Hence
the bank is correct to the extent of not applying the NPA norms for provisioning purpose. But this
exemption is not available in respect of income recognition norms. Hence the income to the extent
not recovered should be reversed.
The situation would be different if the advance is guaranteed by State Government because this
exception is not applicable for State Government Guaranteed advances, where advance is to be
considered NPA if it remains overdue for more than 90 days.
In case the bank has not invoked the Central Government Guarantee though the amount is overdue
for long, the reasoning for the same should be taken and duly reported in LFAR.
9.MTP-Aug-18 Qn No 6(d) 4 Marks:
M/s. S Ltd. is a MSME unit. The company does multiple banking. The company is availing cash
credit limit from U Bank of Rs. 25 crores. The limit availed remained less than Rs. 5.00 crores
during all the days of F.Y. 2017-18. The company has not done any credit in cash credit account
during the year as it is operating current account in newly opened another bank branch
adjoining to company premises. The company is having sufficient security of stocks and
debtors and DP of Rs.25.00 crores remains all over the year. The company is availing term
loans from other bank branches. Now the Bank Manager is insisting to route the sale proceeds
through U Bank, otherwise cash credit limit and term loan accounts with other banks will be
treated as Non-Performing Accounts. Now company seeks your opinion.
Answer:
Classification of Account as NPA in case of Multiple Banking: If the account remains overdue for
more than 90 days, the account becomes Non-Performing Assets. The account will also be called
472

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
as overdue, if there are not sufficient credits in the cash credit account which even could not
serve the interest charged. In this case, there are no credits in accounts, it means interest has
not been served in the account. Thus, accounts become overdue after 90 days for non-credit of
amounts which could even serve the interest amount. Thus, cash credits will become as NPA if
no credits/sale proceeds are deposited in that account.
However, in multiple banking system, each bank is independent for classification of account as
NPA. If SBI declares the account as NPA due to non-serving of interest amount, other bank will be
free and will not classify the term loan accounts as NPA, if they are regular.
Your firm has been appointed as Central Statutory Auditors of a Nationalised Bank. The Bank
follows financial year as accounting year. State your views on the following issues which were
brought to your notice by your Audit Manager:
(a) The bank has recognised on accrual basis income from dividends on securities and Units of
Mutual Funds held by it as at the end of financial year. The dividends on securities and Units of
Mutual Funds were declared after the end of financial year.
It is not a prudent practice to treat dividend on shares of corporate bodies and units of mutual
funds as income unless these are actually received. Accordingly, income from dividend on shares
of corporate bodies and units of mutual funds should be booked on cash basis. In respect of
income from government securities and bonds and debentures of corporate bodies, where
interest rates on these instruments are pre-determined, income could be booked on accrual basis,
provided interest is serviced regularly and as such is not in arrears. It was further, however,
clarified that banks may book income on accrual basis on securities of corporate bodies/public
sector undertakings in respect of which the payment of interest and repayment of principal have
been guaranteed by the central government or a State government. Banks may book income from
dividend on shares of corporate bodies on accrual basis, provided dividend on the shares has been
declared by the corporate body in its annual general meeting and the owner's right to receive
payment is established. This is also in accordance with AS 9 as well. In the instant case, therefore,
the recognition of income by the bank on accrual basis is not in order.
11. Nov 18 Qn no 6(d) 4 Marks
You are the Concurrent Auditor of a Branch of Nationalized Bank which deals in foreign exchange
transactions. Give focus areas of your checking in this respect.
Answer
Focus Areas in case of Foreign Exchange Transactions:
• Check foreign bills negotiated under letters of credit.

• Check FCNR and other non-resident accounts whether the debits and credits are permissible under rules.
• Check whether inward/outward remittance have been properly accounted for.
• Examine extension and cancellation of forward contracts for purchase and sale of foreign currency. Ensure
that they are duly authorised and necessary charges have been recovered.
473

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
• Ensure that balances in Nostro accounts in different foreign currencies are within the limit as prescribed by
the bank.
• Ensure that the overbought/oversold position maintained in different currencies is reasonable considering
the foreign exchange operations.
• Ensure adherence to the guidelines issued by RBI/HO of the bank about dealing room operations.
• Ensure verification/reconciliation of Nostro and Vostro account transactions/ balances.

ABC Chartered Accountants have been appointed as concurrent auditors for the branches of
Effective Bank Ltd. for the year 2017-18. You are part of the audit team for Agra branch of the
bank and have been instructed by your senior to verify the advances of the audit period. You are
required to guide your assistant about the areas to be taken care while doing verification during
the concurrent audit.
Answer
Verification of Advances as a Concurrent Auditor:
(i) Ensure that loans and advances have been sanctioned properly in accordance with delegated authority.
(ii) Ensure that securities and documents have been received and properly charged/ registered.
(iii) Ensure that post disbursement supervision and follow-up is proper, such as receipt of stock statements,
instalments, renewal of limits, etc.
(iv) Verify whether there is any mis-utilisation of the loans and whether there are instances indicative of diversion
of funds.
(v) Check whether the letters of credit issued by the branch are within the delegated power and ensure that
they are for genuine trade transactions.
(vi) Check the bank guarantees issued, whether they have been properly worded and recorded in the register
of the bank. Whether they have been promptly renewed on the due dates.
(vii) Ensure proper follow-up of overdue bills of exchange.
(viii) Verify whether the classification of advances has been done as per RBI guidelines.
(ix) Verify whether the submission of claims to DICGC and ECGC is in time.
(x) Verify that instances of exceeding delegated powers have been promptly reported to controlling/Head
Office by the branch and have been got confirmed or ratified at the required level.
13.RTP May 2019 Qn no 1(b)
Write a short note on reversal of income under bank audit
Answer
Reversal of Income: If any advance, including bills purchased and discounted, becomes Non-
Performing Assets as at the close of any year, the entire interest accrued and credited to income
account in the past periods, should be reversed or provided for if the same is not realised. This will
apply to Government guaranteed accounts also.
474

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
In respect of NPAs, fees, commission and similar income that have accrued should cease to accrue
in the current period and should be reversed or provided for with respect to past periods, if
uncollected.
Further, in case of banks which have wrongly recognised income in the past should reverse the
interest if it was recognised as income during the current year or make a provision for an equivalent
amount if it was recognised as income in the previous year(s).
Banks, because of certain characteristics, are distinguished from other commercial enterprises
and hence it needs special audit consideration.
As an auditor of a bank, specify the various peculiarities which may necessitate special audit
consideration to be taken care by you.
Answer
Special audit considerations arise in the audit of banks because of:
(i) the particular nature of risks associated with the transactions undertaken;
(ii) the scale of banking operations and the resultant significant exposures which can arise within
short period of time;
(iii) the extensive dependence on IT to process transactions;
(iv) the effect of the statutory and regulatory requirements;
(i) the continuing development of new products and services and banking practices which may not
be matched by the concurrent development of accounting principles and auditing practices;
Evolution of technology and providing services through Net Banking and Mobiles has exposed
banks to huge operational and financial risk.
The auditor should consider the effect of the above factors in designing his audit approach. It is
imperative for Branch Auditor and Statutory Central auditor (SCAs) to have detailed knowledge of the
products offered and risks associated with them, and appropriately address them in their audit
plan to the extent they give rise to the risk of material misstatements in the financial statements.
In today’s environment, the banks use different applications to carry out different transactions
which may include data flow from one application to other application; the auditor while designing
his plans should also understand interface controls between the various applications.
15.RTP Nov 2019 Qn no 19(b)

While auditing FAIR Bank, you observed that a lump sum amount has been disclosed as
contingent liability collectively. You are, therefore, requested by the management to guide
them about the disclosure requirement of Contingent Liabilities for Banks.
Answer
Contingent Liabilities for Banks: The Third Schedule to the Banking Regulation Act, 1949, requires the
disclosure of the following as a footnote to the balance sheet-
475

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
(A) Contingent liabilities

(i) Claims against the bank not acknowledged as debts.
(ii) Liability for partly paid investments.
(iii) Liability on account of outstanding forward exchange contracts.
(iv) Guarantees given on behalf of constituents-
(1) In India.
(2) Outside India.
(v) Acceptances, endorsements and other obligations.
(vi) Other items for which the bank is contingently liable.
(B) Bills for collection.

You have been appointed as an auditor of LCO Bank, a nationalized bank. LCO Bank also deals in
providing credit card facilities to its account holder. The bank is aware of the fact that there
should be strict control over storage and issue of credit cards. How will you evaluate the Internal
Control System in the area of Credit Card operations of a Bank?
Answer
Evaluation of the Internal Control System in the area of Credit Card Operations of a bank:
(i) There should be effective screening of applications with reasonably good credit assessments.
(ii) There should be strict control over storage and issue of cards.
• There should be a system whereby a merchant confirms the status of unutilised limit of a credit-card
holder from the bank before accepting the settlement in case the amount to be settled exceeds a specified
percentage of the total limit of the card holder. There should be a system of prompt reporting by the
merchants of all settlements accepted by them through credit cards.
• Reimbursement to merchants should be made only after verification of the validity
of merchant’s acceptance of cards.
• All the reimbursement (gross of commission) should be immediately charged to
the customer’s account.
• There should be a system to ensure that statements are sent regularly and promptly to the customer.
• There should be a system to monitor and follow-up customers’ payments.
• Items overdue beyond a reasonable period should be identified and attended to carefully. Credit should
be stopped by informing the merchants through periodic bulletins, as early as possible, to avoid increased
losses.
• There should be a system of periodic review of credit card holders’ accounts. On this basis, the limits of
customers may be revised, if necessary. The review should also include determination of doubtful amounts
and the provisioning in respect thereof.
17.RTP May 2020 Qn no 14(a) (2)

The bank’s advance portfolio comprised of significant loans against Life Insurance Policies.
476

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
Write suitable audit program to verify these advances.

Answers:
The Audit Programme to Verify Advances against Life Insurance Policies is as under-
(i) The auditor should inspect the policies and see whether they are assigned to the bank and whether such
assignment has been registered with the insurer.
(ii) The auditor should also examine whether premium has been paid on the policies and whether they are in
force.
(iii) Certificate regarding surrender value obtained from the insurer should be examined.
(iv) The auditor should particularly see that if such surrender value is subject to payment of certain premium,
the amount of such premium has been deducted from the surrender value
18. (RTP- NOV 2020)

ABN Bank was engaged in the business of providing Portfolio Management Services to its
customers, for which it took prior approval from RBI. Your firm has been appointed as the
statutory auditors of the Bank’s financial statements for the year 2019-20. Your senior has
instructed you to verify the transactions of Portfolio Management Services (PMS). While
verifying the transactions you noticed that the bank has not maintained separate record for
PMS transactions from the Bank’s own investments. As a statutory auditor what methodology
will be adopted by you for verification of PMS transactions?
ANSWER
Separation of Investment Functions: The auditor needs to examine whether the bank, as required by the
RBI, is maintaining separate accounts for the investments made by it on their own Investment Account,
PMS clients’ account, and on behalf of other Constituents (including brokers). As per the RBI guidelines,
banks are required to get their investments under PMS separately audited by external auditors.
Thus, in the instant case, ABN Bank is required to prepare separate records for PMS and as per RBI
guidelines PMS investments need to be audited separately by the external auditors and the auditors are
required to give a certificate separately for the same.
So, in the above case the auditor should not verify the PMS transactions and advise the bank to segregate
the PMS transactions from its own investments and provide the certificate of external auditor as described
above. In case ABN Bank does not provide the same the auditor may report accordingly
Study Material
19.Your firm has been appointed as Central Statutory Auditors of a Nationalised Bank. The Bank follows
financial year as accounting year. State your views on the following issues which were brought to your
notice by your Audit Manager:
(a) The bank has recognised on accrual basis income from dividends on securities and Units of Mutual
Funds held by it as at the end of financial year. The dividends on securities and Units of Mutual Funds
were declared after the end of financial year.
(b) The bank is a consortium member of Cash Credit Facilities of Rs. 50 crores to X Ltd. Bank's own share
is Rs. 10 crores only. During the last two quarters against a debit of
Rs. 1.75 crores towards interest the credits in X Ltd's account are to the tune of
Rs. 1.25 crores only. Based on the certificate of lead bank, the bank has classified the account of X Ltd
477

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
as performing.
Answer
(a) It is not a prudent practice to treat dividend on shares of corporate bodies and units of mutual funds
as income unless these are actually received. Accordingly, income from dividend on shares of corporate
bodies and units of mutual funds should be booked on cash basis. In respect of income from government
securities and bonds and debentures of corporate bodies, where interest rates on these instruments are
pre-determined, income could be booked on accrual basis, provided interest is serviced regularly and as
such is not in arrears. It was further, however, clarified that banks may book income on accrual basis on
securities of corporate bodies/public sector undertakings in respect of which the payment of interest and
repayment of principal have been guaranteed by the central government or a State government. Banks
may book income from dividend on shares of corporate bodies on accrual basis, provided dividend on the
shares has been declared by the corporate body in its annual general meeting and the owner's right to
receive payment is established. This is also in accordance with AS 9 as well. In the instant case, therefore,
the recognition of income by the bank on accrual basis is not in order.
(b) The bank is a consortium member of cash credit facilities of Rs. 50 crores to X Ltd. Bank's own share is Rs.
10 crores only. During the last two quarters against a debit of 1.75 crores towards interest, the credits
in X Ltd's account are to the tune of 1.25 crores only. Sometimes, several banks form a group (the
'consortium') under the leadership of a 'lead bank' to make advance to a large customer on same
conditions and security with proportionate rights. In such cases, each bank may classify the advance given
by it according to its own experience of recovery and other factors. Since in the last two quarters, the
amount remains outstanding and, thus, interest amount should be reversed. This is despite the certificate
of lead bank to classify that the account as performing. Accordingly, the amount should be shown as non -
performing asset.
20. In course of audit of Good Samaritan Bank as at 31st March, 19 you observed the following:
a) In a particular account there was no recovery in the past 18 months. The bank has not applied the NPA
norms as well as income recognition norms to this particular account. When queried the bank
management replied that this account was guaranteed by the central government and hence these
norms were not applicable. The bank has not invoked the guarantee. Please respond. Would your
answer be different if the advance is guaranteed by a State Government?
b) The bank’s advance portfolio comprised of significant loans against Life Insurance Policies. Write
suitable audit program to verify these advances.
Answer
(a) Government Guaranteed Advance: If a government guaranteed advance becomes NPA, then for the
purpose of income recognition, interest on such advance should not to be taken to income unless interest
is realized. However, for purpose of asset classification, credit facility backed by Central Government
Guarantee, though overdue, can be treated as NPA only when the Central Government repudiates its
guarantee, when invoked.
Since the bank has not revoked the guarantee, the question of repudiation does not arise. Hence the bank
is correct to the extent of not applying the NPA norms for provisioning purpose. But this exemption is not
available in respect of income recognition norms. Hence the income to the extent not recovered should
be reversed.
The situation would be different if the advance is guaranteed by State Government because this exception
478

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
is not applicable for State Government Guaranteed advances, where advance is to be considered NPA if
it remains overdue for more than 90 days.
In case the bank has not invoked the Central Government Guarantee though the amount is overdue for
long, the reasoning for the same should be taken and duly reported in LFAR.
(b)The Audit Programme to Verify Advances against Life Insurance Policies is as under -
The auditor should inspect the policies and see whether they are assigned to the bank and whether such
assignment has been registered with the insurer
(i) The auditor should also examine whether premium has been paid on the policies and whether they are
in force.
(ii) Certificate regarding surrender value obtained from the insurer should be examined.
(iii) The auditor should particularly see that if such surrender value is subject to payment of certain
premium, the amount of such premium has been deducted from the surrender value.
21. As statutory central auditors of a Nationalized bank, what special points are to be borne in
mind in the audit of compliance with "Statutory Liquidity Ratio" (SLR) requirements?
ANSWER:
SLR is the requirement that every scheduled commercial bank in India is required to maintain in the form of
certain liquid assets such as gold, cash and government approved securities before providing credit to the
customers. The Reserve Bank of India requires statutory central auditors of banks to verify the compliance
with SLR requirements of 12 odd dates in different months of a fiscal year not being Fridays. The objective
of maintaining SLR is to have an amount in the form of liquid assets which can be used to handle a sudden
increase in demand for the amount from the depositors. The resultant report is to be sent to the top
management of the bank and to the Reserve Bank.

Compliance with CRR and SLR
requirements • Obtain an understanding of the relevant circulars/ instructions
of the RBI, particularly regarding composition of items of DTL.
• Request the branch auditors to send their weekly trial balance

as on Friday and these are consolidated at the head office. Based
on this consolidation, the DTL position is determined for every
reporting Friday. The statutory central auditor should request the
branch auditors to verify the correctness of the trial balances
relevant to the dates selected by him/her. The branch auditors
should also be specifically requested to examine the cash
balance at the branch on the selected dates.
• Examine, on a test basis, the consolidations regarding DTL

position prepared by the bank with reference to the related
returns received from branches. The auditor should examine
whether the valuation of securities done by the bank is in
accordance with the guidelines prescribed by the RBI.
479

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
• While examining the computation of DTL, specifically examine

that the following items have been excluded from liabilities- o
Part amounts of recoveries from the borrowers in respect of
debts considered bad and doubtful of recovery.
o Amounts received in Indian currency against import bills and
held in sundry deposits pending receipts of final rates.
o Un-adjusted deposits/balances lying in link branches for agency
business like dividend warrants, interest warrants, refund of
application money, etc., in respect of shares/debentures to the
extent of payment made by other branches but not adjusted by
the link branches.
o Margins held and kept in sundry deposits for funded facilities.
• Similarly, specifically examine that the following items have

been included in liabilities- o Net credit balance in branch
adjustment accounts including these relating to foreign branches.
o Interest on deposit as at the end of the first half year reversed
in the beginning of the next half-year.
o Borrowings from abroad by banks in India needs to be
considered as ‘liabilities to other’ and thus, needs to be
considered at gross level unlike ‘liabilities towards banking system
in India’, which are permitted to be netted off against ‘assets
towards banking system in India’. Thus, the adverse balances in
Nostro Mirror Account needs to be considered as ‘Liabilities to
other’.
o The reconciliation of Nostro accounts (with Nostro Mirror
Accounts) needs to be scrutinized carefully to analyze and
ascertain if any inwards remittances are received on behalf of the
customers / constituents of the bank and have remained
unaccounted and / or any other debit (inward) entries have
remained unaccounted and are pertaining to any liabilities for the
bank.
• Examine whether the consolidations prepared by the bank

include the relevant information in respect of all the branches.
• It may be noted that, even though interest accrues daily, it is

recorded in the books only at periodic intervals. Thus, examine
whether such interest accrued but not accounted for in books is
included in the computation of DTL.
• The auditor at the central level should apply the audit

procedures listed above to the overall consolidation prepared for
the bank as a whole. Where such procedure is followed, the
central auditor should adequately describe the same in the
report.
• While reporting on compliance with SLR requirements, the

auditor should specify the number of unaudited branches and
state that he/she has relied on the returns received from the
unaudited branches in forming an opinion. Recently, there has
480

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
been introduction of Automated Data Flow (ADF) for CRR & SLR
reporting and the auditors should develop necessary audit
procedures around this.
22.Explain the scope of concurrent audit of a bank with reference to Reserve Bank of India
guidelines.
The detailed scope of the concurrent audit should be clearly and uniformly determined for the Bank as a
whole by the Bank’s Inspector and Audit Department in consultation with the Bank’s Audit Committee of
the Board of Directors (ACB). In determining the scope, importance should be given to checking high-risk
transactions having large financial implications as opposed to transactions involving lesser amounts. The
detailed scope of the concurrent audit may be determined and approved by the ACB.
Further, the guidelines issued by the RBI cover all the key areas of activities of the branch which is under
concurrent audit. Most banks have prepared an Audit Manual for this purpose. Broadly stated, the following
areas are covered by these guidelines:
23. You have been appointed as Concurrent Auditor of a nationalized bank branch. The main business at
the branch is dealing in foreign exchange. Suggest the main areas of coverage with regard to foreign
exchange transactions of the said branch under concurrent audit.
ANSWER:
Foreign Exchange
• Check FCNR and other non-resident accounts whether the debits and credits
are permissible under rules.
• Examine extension and cancellation of forward contracts for purchase and sale
of foreign currency. Ensure that they are duly authorised and necessary charges
have been recovered.
• Ensure that balances in Nostro accounts in different foreign currencies are
within the limit as prescribed by the bank.
• Ensure that the overbought/oversold position maintained in different
currencies is reasonable, considering the foreign exchange operations.
481

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
24. ABC Bank had sanctioned credit limits of Rs.100 lakh to M/s Volkart Ltd on 1st September
2018. The renewal of limits was due on 1st September 2019. While doing the statutory branch
audit for the year ended 31st March 2020, you find that the renewal has not been done even
though 180 days are over. The bank says that the renewal process has been initiated on time
and most of the document are received. The account is operated regularly and is in order;
balance is maintained within drawing power. It also shows a letter from Volkart stating that due
to a sudden death of their auditor, a new auditor had to be appointed. Procedure for
appointment took some time and the new auditor was doing the audit all over again. The limit
was not renewed till 31/3/2020. However, the audited financials are received on 10th April 2020
and the renewal letter was issued immediately. Your assistant is insisting that the account must
be classified as NPA since the limit was not renewed as on 31/3/2020. What is your opinion?
ANSWER:
As per Guidelines of Reserve Bank of India the account should be classified as NPA if renewal is not done in
180 days. However, in the present case, operations in the account are excellent. The bank has shown a
letter from that company that due to certain reasons the audited financial statements are delayed. Further,
the limit has been renewed before signing the audit report.
Thus, even if the sanction was issued after the balance sheet date, it relates to the position as on the
balance sheet date. Therefore, it is an adjusting event under AS 4, Contingencies and Events Occurring
After the Balance Sheet Date. It is also a matter of substance over form.
The auditor would consider classifying the account as a standard asset.
25. You are auditing a small bank branch with staff strength of the manager, cashier and three
other staff S1 ,S2 and S3. Among allocation of work for other areas, S1 who is a peon also opens
all the mail and forwards it to the concerned person. He does not have a signature book so as to
check the signatures on important communications. S2 has possession of all bank forms (e.g.
Cheque books, demand draft/pay order books, travelers’ cheques, foreign currency cards etc.).
He maintains a record meticulously which you have test checked also. However, no one among
staff regularly checks that. You are informed that being a small branch with shortage of
manpower, it is not possible to always check the work and records. Give your comments.
ANSWER:
Banks are required to implement and maintain a system of internal controls for mitigating risks, maintain
good governance and to meet the regulatory requirements. Given below are examples of internal controls
that are violated in the given situation:
In the instant case, S1 who is a peon opens all the mail and forwards it to the concerned person. Further,
he does not have a signature book so as to check the signatures on important communications is not in
accordance with implementation and maintenance of general internal control. As the mail should be
482

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
opened by a responsible officer. Signatures on all the letters and advices received from other branches of
the bank or its correspondence should be checked by an officer with the signature book.
All bank forms (e.g. Cheque books, demand draft/pay order books, travelers’ cheques, foreign currency
cards etc.) should be kept in the possession of an officer, and another responsible officer should verify the
issuance and stock of such stationery. In the given case, S2 has possession of all bank forms (e.g. cheque
books, demand draft/pay order books, travelers’ cheques, foreign currency cards etc.). He maintains a
record meticulously which were also verified on test check basis.
Further, contention of bank that being a small branch with shortage of manpower they are not able to
check the work and records on regular basis, is not tenable as such lapses in internal control pose risk of
fraud.
The auditor should report the same in his report accordingly.
26. What are reporting requirements under Rule 11 of Companies (Audit and Auditors) Rules 2014.
ANSWER
The Ministry of Corporate Affairs has further to amended the Companies (Audit and Auditors) Rules, 2014,
through the Companies (Audit and Auditors) Amendment Rules, 2021 vide notification S.O. 206(E) dated
24th March, 2021.
As per reporting requirements cast through Rule 11 of the Companies (Audit and Auditors) Rules, 2014 the
auditor’s report shall also include their views and comments on the following matters, namely:
(1) whether the bank has disclosed the impact, if any, of pending litigations on its financial position in its
financial statement;
(2) whether the bank has made provision, as required under any law or accounting standards, for material
foreseeable losses, if any, on long term contracts including derivative contracts;
(3) whether there has been any delay in transferring amounts, required to be transferred, to the Investor
Education and Protection Fund by the bank.
(4)
(i) Whether the management has represented that, to the best of it’s knowledge and belief, other than
as disclosed in the notes to the accounts, no funds have been advanced or loaned or invested (either
from borrowed funds or share premium or any other sources or kind of funds) by the banks to or in any
other person(s) or entity(ies), including foreign entities (“Intermediaries”), with the understanding,
whether recorded in writing or otherwise, that the Intermediary shall, whether, directly or indirectly
lend or invest in other persons or entities identified in any manner whatsoever by or on behalf of the
bank (“Ultimate Beneficiaries”) or provide any guarantee, security or the like on behalf of the Ultimate
Beneficiaries;
(ii) Whether the management has represented, that, to the best of it’s knowledge and belief, other than
as disclosed in the notes to the accounts, no funds have been received by the bank from any person(s) or
entity(ies), including foreign entities (“Funding Parties”), with the understanding, whether recorded in
writing or otherwise, that the bank shall, whether, directly or indirectly, lend or invest in other persons
or entities identified in any manner whatsoever by or on behalf of the Funding Party (“Ultimate
Beneficiaries”) or provide any guarantee, security or the like on behalf of the Ultimate Beneficiaries; and
483

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
(iii) Based on such audit procedures that the auditor has considered reasonable and appropriate in the
circumstances, nothing has come to their notice that has caused them to believe that the
representations under sub-clause (i) and (ii) contain any material mis-statement.
(5) Whether the dividend declared or paid during the year by the bank is in compliance with section 123
of the Companies Act, 2013.
(6) [Whether the bank, in respect of financial years commencing on or after the 1st April, 2022,] has used
such accounting software for maintaining its books of account which has a feature of recording audit trail
(edit log) facility and the same has been operated throughout the year for all transactions recorded in the
software and the audit trail feature has not been tampered with and the audit trail has been preserved by
the company as per the statutory requirements for record retention.]

27. You are the internal auditor of FCD Bank Limited for the year 2018-19 and the bank maintains all the
data on computer. You are instructed by your senior to verify the loan against fixed deposits of the Navi
Mumbai branch. As per the scope of audit, you need to ensure that proper lien has been marked on all
the fixed deposits against which loan has been issued. Which of the following procedure you will follow
for the same:
(a) Ensure that all the fixed deposit receipts are attached along with the approved loan documents.
(b) Ensure that all the fixed deposit receipts, against which the loan has been sanctioned, are discharged
in favour of bank and check that the lien is marked in the computer software.
(c) Discuss the process followed for lien marking with the branch manager.
(d) Ensure that all the fixed deposit receipts, against which the loan has been sanctioned, are discharged
in favour of bank, check that the lien is marked in the computer software and the fixed deposit should
be kept separately with the branch manager.
Answer: (b) Ensure that all the fixed deposit receipts, against which the loan has been sanctioned, are
discharged in favour of bank and check that the lien is marked in the computer software
(MTP NOV 2019)

28. PFS Bank was engaged in the business of providing Portfolio Management Services to its customers,
for which it took prior approval from RBI. Your firm has been appointed as the statutory auditors of the
Bank’s financial statements for the year 2018-19. Your senior has instructed you to verify the
transactions of Portfolio Management Services (PMS). While verifying the transactions you noticed that
the bank has not prepared separate record for PMS transactions from the Bank’s own investments. As
a statutory auditor what will be your decision for verification of PMS transactions?
a) It is not necessary to maintain separate records for PMS clients from Bank’s own investments, so the
auditor can verify the PMS transactions as part of investment verification for Bank’s financial
statements and submit the audit report accordingly.
b) As per RBI guidelines PMS investments need to be audited separately by the external auditors and the
auditors are required to give a certificate separately for the same. So, in the above case the auditor
484

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
should not verify the PMS transactions till the Bank segregates the transactions from its own
investments.
c) The auditor can give a qualified opinion in his audit report on the financial statements of the Bank and
report the matter in special purpose certificate.
d) Auditor should verify that PMS funds are not utilised for lending, inter-bank deposits or deposits to
corporate bodies and bills re-discounting only. So, whether the PMS transactions are recorded
separately or not will not matter for the auditor.
Answer: (b) As per RBI guidelines PMS investments need to be audited separately by the external auditors
and the auditors are required to give a certificate separately for the same. So, in the above case the auditor
should not verify the PMS transactions till the Bank segregates the transactions from its own investments
29. Your firm has been appointed statutory auditor by a Nationalised Bank for the year 2018-19. Your
senior advised you to check all the standard assets shown in the balance sheet as on 31st March 2019.
While verification you observed that one of the accounts was regularised on 28th March 2019, for which
the interest and instalment amount was overdue from the quarter ending 30th September 2018.
The account was regularised after the repayment of overdue interest and instalment amounts was done
on 26th March 2019. Only the last day of the financial year was reckoned as the date of account becoming
NPA by the Bank.
As a statutory auditor will you agree with the Bank’s policy?
a) As the interest charged in the account was overdue for more than 90days from the end of quarter, it
should be classified as NPA and should be considered as sub- standard asset for the balance sheet as on
31st March 2019.
b) As the overdue interest and instalment amount was paid before the balance sheet date there is no
reason to classify the account as NPA.
c) The auditor should not agree with the Bank’s policy to regularise the account before balance sheet date
as overdue interest indicates more than normal risk attached to the business.
d) Bank can regularise the account before balance sheet date but should ensure that the amount has been
paid through genuine resources and not by sanction of additional facilities, and the account remains in
order subsequently
Answer: (d) Bank can regularise the account before balance sheet date but should ensure that the amount
has been paid through genuine resources and not by sanction of additional facilities, and the account
remains in order subsequently
30. SSP Bank was engaged in the business of providing Portfolio Management Services to its customers,
for which it took prior approval from RBI. Your firm has been appointed as the statutory auditors of the
Bank’s financial statements for the year 2019-20. Your senior has instructed you to verify the
transactions of Portfolio Management Services (PMS). While verifying the transactions you noticed that
the bank has not maintained separate record for PMS transactions from the Bank’s own investments. As
a statutory auditor what methodology will be adopted by you for verification of PMS transactions? (4
ANSWER
485

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
Separation of Investment Functions: The auditor needs to examine whether the bank, as
required by the RBI, is maintaining separate accounts for the investments made by it on their own
Investment Account, PMS clients’ account, and on behalf of other Constituents (including
brokers). As per the RBI guidelines, banks are required to get their investments under PMS
separately audited by external auditors.
Thus, in the instant case, SSP Bank is required to prepare separate records for PMS and as per
RBI guidelines PMS investments need to be audited separately by the external auditors and the
auditors are required to give a certificate separately for the same. So, in the above case the
auditor should not verify the PMS transactions and advise the bank to segregate the PMS
transactions from its own investments and provide the certificate of external auditor as described
above. In case SSP Bank does not provide the same the auditor may report accordingly
31. CA K have been doing audit of branch of LUD Bank Ltd. The principal business of the branch
is lending advances to large corporates. Since last one year, many large accounts have become
Non-Performing Asset (NPA) as per guidelines. The Management of the Bank decided to sell one
of the NPA account and consequently one NPA namely DEF Ltd. amounting to ~ 10.00 Crores
was sold to Asset Reconstruction Company. What audit points CA K should keep in mind while
doing audit of this transaction? (5 Marks) (past exam jan 2021)
ANSWER
CA K conducting audit of branch of LUD Bank Ltd. whose principal business is lending money to large
corporates. Many large accounts of this branch have turned NPA category and Management sold DEF Ltd.’s
NPA account amounting to Rs. 10 Crores to Asset Reconstruction Company.
CA K should proceed as under:
In case of Sale of NPA by Bank, the auditor should examine

(i) the policy laid down by the Board of Directors in this regard relating to procedures, valuation and
(ii) only such NPA has been sold which has remained NPA in the books of the bank for at least 2 years.
(iii) the assets have been sold “without recourse’ only.
(iv) subsequent to the sale of the NPA, the bank does not assume any legal, operational or any other type
of risk relating to the sold NPAs.
(v) the NPA has been sold at cash basis only.
(vi) on the sale of the NPA, the same has been removed from the books of the account.
(vii) the short fall in the net book value has been charged to the profit and loss account.
(viii) where the sale is for a value higher than the NBV, no profit is recognised and the excess provision has
not been reversed but retained to meet the shortfall/ loss because sale of other non-performing financial
assets.
32. You are auditing a small bank branch with staff strength of the manager, cashier and three other
staff Peter, Prem and Pran. Among allocation of work for other areas, Peter who is a peon also opens all
the mail and forwards it to the concerned person. He does not have a signature book so as to check the
signatures on important
486

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
communications. Prem has possession of all bank forms (e.g. Cheque books, demand draft/pay order
books, travelers’ cheques, foreign currency cards etc.). He maintains a record meticulously which you
have test checked also. However, no one among staff regularly checks that. You are informed that being
a small branch with shortage of manpower, it is not possible to always check the work and records. Give
your comments. (rtp- july 2021)
ANSWER
Banks are required to implement and maintain a system of internal controls for mitigating risks, maintain
good governance and to meet the regulatory requirements. Given below are examples of internal controls
that are violated in the given situation:
In the instant case, Peter who is a peon opens all the mail and forwards it to the concerned person.
Further, he does not have a signature book so as to check the signatures on important communications is
not in accordance with implementation and maintenance of general internal control.
As the mail should be opened by a responsible officer. Signatures on all the letters and advices received
from other branches of the bank or its correspondence should be checked by an officer with the signature
book.
All bank forms (e.g. Cheque books, demand draft/pay order books, travelers’ cheques, foreign currency
cards etc.) should be kept in the possession of an officer, and another responsible officer should verify the
issuance and stock of such stationery. In the given case, Prem has possession of all bank forms (e.g. cheque
books, demand draft/pay order books, travelers’ cheques, foreign currency cards etc.). He maintains a
record meticulously which were also verified on test check basis.
Further, contention of bank that being a small branch with shortage of manpower they are not able to
check the work and records on regular basis, is not tenable as such lapses in internal control pose risk of
fraud.
The auditor should report the same in his report accordingly
33. (a) You have been appointed as an auditor of LCO Bank, a nationalized bank. LCO Bank also deals in
providing credit card facilities to its account holders. The bank is aware of the fact that there should be
strict control over storage and issue of credit cards. As an auditor of the bank, how will you evaluate the
Internal Control System with respect to Credit Card operations maintained by the LCO Bank? (6 Marks)
(mtp nov 20)
ANSWER
The auditor should evaluate the Internal Control System in the area of Credit Card operations of a Bank in
following manner:
There should be effective screening of applications with reasonably good credit assessments.
There should be strict control over storage and issue of cards.
There should be a system whereby a merchant confirms the status of unutilised limit of a credit-card
holder from the bank before accepting the settlement, in case the amount to be settled exceeds a specified
percentage of the total limit of the card holder.
There should be a system of prompt reporting by the merchants of all settlements accepted by them
through credit cards.
Reimbursement to merchants should be made only after verification of the validity of merchant’s
acceptance of cards.
All the reimbursement (gross of commission) should be immediately charged to the customer’s account.
There should be a system to ensure that statements are sent regularly and promptly to the customer.
There should be a system to monitor and follow-up customers’ payments.
487

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
Payments overdue beyond a reasonable period should be identified and attended to carefully. For
defaulting customers, credit should be stopped by informing the merchants through periodic bulletins, as
early as possible, to avoid increased losses.
There should be a system of periodic review of credit card holders’ accounts. On this basis, the limits of
customers may be revised, if necessary. The review should also include determination of doubtful amounts
and the provisioning in respect thereof.
34. A bank has some non-interest-bearing staff advances. In the Balance Sheet these should be
presented under: (mtp – I -july 2021)
(a) ‘Term loans’ under ‘Advances’.
(b) ‘Cash Credits, Overdrafts and Loans Repayable on Demand’ under ‘Advances’.
(c) ‘Advances in India – Others’ under ‘Advances’ Schedule.
(d) ‘Others’ under ‘Other assets.
ANSWER- d
35. ( RTP- NOV 2021)

Gupta & Co. has been appointed as a statutory auditor of TCB Bank Ltd., a private sector bank,
registered with RBI. Mr. Kaival Gupta, the engagement partner, while performing the audit as
per the checklist, noted down the following points, which would be part of the audit queries, as
tabulated below:
Sr. No. Queries

1 Interest on State Government Guaranteed advance has
been taken to income even though such advance has
remained overdue for more than 90 days.
2 There is an account for which an ad hoc limit has not been
reviewed for 180 days from the date of such ad hoc
sanction and such account has been treated as a
performing asset in the books.
3 One of the NPAs was sold for a value higher than the net
book value. Profit was not recognized but the excess
provision in respect of the same has been reversed.
4 In case of one of the accounts, an additional temporary
limit has been sanctioned for 25% of the existing limit and
for 120 days tenure.
5 On verification of outstanding forward exchange
contracts, the ‘net position’ in respect of one of the
foreign currencies was not squared and was uncovered by
a substantial amount.
488

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
You are required to provide the reasons due to which such queries would have been raised by
Mr. Kaival and describe the actions that may be taken by the person responsible on behalf of
TCB Bank Ltd. for solving such queries.
ANSWER
Sr. No. Reason for such Query Action that may be taken in response
to the query
1 A State Government Guaranteed Interest income recognized on such
advance has to be treated as NPA even advance would be reversed and would
if it remains overdue for more than 90 be taken to income only when it is
days and in case of NPA, for the purpose realized.
of income recognition, interest on such
advance should not be taken to income
unless interest is realized.
2 Accounts for which an ad hoc limit has It’s treatment in the books would be
not been reviewed for 180 days from changed from performing asset to a
the date of such ad hoc sanction, should non-performing asset from the date
be considered as NPA. when such change in the treatment was
required.
3 In case of sale of NPA, where the sale is The entry for reversal of the excess
for a value higher than the NBV, the provision would be cancelled in the
auditor is required to ensure that no books and such excess provision would
profit is recognized, and the excess be retained to meet the shortfall/ loss
provision has not been reversed but that may arise because of the sale of
retained to meet the shortfall/ loss that other non-performing financial assets.
may arise because of the sale of other
non-performing financial assets.
4 Additional temporary limit may be The terms of additional temporary limit
sanctioned, for a maximum of 20% of in case of such account would be revised
the existing limit and 90 days maximum to 20% of the existing limit and for 90
tenure. days maximum tenure.
5 Net position in respect of each of the The net “position” of the branch in
foreign currencies should be generally relation to each foreign currency should
squared and should not be uncovered be squared off and get covered by a
by a substantial amount. substantial amount.
36. ( MTP- NOV 2021)
M/s Aadi & Co., Chartered Accountants, have been allotted the branch audit of a nationalized
bank for the year ended 31st March, 2021. You are part of audit team and have been instructed by
your partner to verify the following areas:
(i) Fulfilment of the criteria prescribed for NPA norms for government guaranteed advance.
(ii) Fulfilment of the criteria prescribed for NPA norms for the advances given for agricultural
purposes.
(iii) Drawing power calculation from stock statements in respect of working capital accounts.
489

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
(iv) Accounts where regular/ad hoc limits are not reviewed within 180 days from the due
date/date of ad hoc sanction.What may be your areas of concern as regards matters specified
above?
ANSWER

Government Guaranteed Advances
If government guaranteed advance becomes NPA, then for the purpose of income recognition,
interest on such advance should not to be taken to income unless interest is realized. However,
for purpose of asset classification, credit facility backed by Central Government Guarantee,
though overdue, can be treated as NPA only when the Central Government repudiates its
guarantee, when invoked. This exception is not applicable for State Government Guaranteed
advances, where advance is to be considered NPA if it remains overdue for more than 90 days.
In case the bank has not invoked the Central Government Guarantee though the amount is
overdue for long, the reasoning for the same should be taken and duly reported in LFAR.
Agricultural Advances
Ensure that NPA norms have been applied in accordance with the crop season determined by
the State Level Bankers’ Committee in each State. Depending upon the duration of crops – short
term/ long term - raised by an agriculturist, the NPA norms would also be made applicable to
agricultural term loans availed of by them. Also ensure that these norms are made applicable to all
direct agricultural advances listed in Master Circular on lending to priority sector.
In respect of agricultural loans, other than those specified in the circular, ensure that
identification of
NPAs has been done on the same basis as nonagricultura advances.
Drawing Power Calculation

Ensure that the drawing power is calculated as per the extant guidelines (i.e. the Credit Policy of
the Bank) formulated by the Board of Directors of the respective bank and agreed upon by the
concerned statutory auditors. Special consideration should be given to proper reporting of sundry
creditors for the purposes of calculating drawing power.
The stock audit should be carried out by the bank for all accounts having funded exposure of
more than stipulated limit. The report submitted by the stock auditors should be reviewed during
the course of the audit and special focus should be given to the comments made by the stock
auditors on valuation of security and calculation of drawing power. The drawing power needs to
be calculated carefully in case of working capital advances to companies engaged in construction
business. The valuation of work in progress should be ensured in consistent and proper manner. It
also needs to be ensured that mobilization advance being received by the contractors is reduced
while calculating drawing power.
Limits not reviewed

490

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
Accounts where regular/ad hoc limits are not reviewed within 180 days from the due date/date of
ad hoc sanction, should be considered as NPA. Auditors should also ensure that the ad hoc/short
reviews are not done on repetitive basis. In such cases, auditor can consider the classification of
account based on other parameters and functioning of the account.
37. ( MTP- NOV 2021)
Sheetal & Co LLP, a firm of Chartered Accountants, was appointed as auditor of an NBFC. The audit
work has been completed. The audit team which was involved in the fieldwork came across
various observations during the course of audit of this NBFC and have also limited understanding
about the exceptions which are required to be reported in the audit report. They would like to
understand in detail regarding the obligations on the part of an auditor in respect of exceptions in
his report so that they can conclude their work. Briefly explain.
ANSWER
Obligation of auditor to submit an exception report to the RBI:

(I) Where, in the case of a non-banking financial company, the statement regarding any of the
items referred to in paragraph 3 above, is unfavorable or qualified, or in the opinion of the auditor
the company has not complied with:
(a) the provisions of Chapter III B of RBI Act (Act 2 of 1934); or
(b) Non-Banking Financial Companies Acceptance of Public Deposits (Reserve Bank) Directions,
2016; or
(c) Non-Banking Financial Company – Non-Systemically Important Non-Deposit taking Company

(Reserve Bank) Directions, 2016 and Non-Banking Financial Company - Systemically Important
Non-Deposit taking Company and Deposit taking Company (Reserve Bank) Directions, 2016.
It shall be the obligation of the auditor to make a report containing the details of such
unfavourable or qualified statements and/or about the non-compliance, as the case may be, in
respect of the company to the concerned Regional Office of the Department of Non-Banking
Supervision of the RBI under whose jurisdiction the registered office of the company is located as
per first Schedule to the Non-Banking Financial Companies Acceptance of Public Deposits (Reserve
Bank) Directions, 2016.
(II) The duty of the Auditor under sub-paragraph (I) shall be to report only the contraventions of
the provisions of RBI Act, 1934, and Directions, Guidelines, instructions referred to in sub-
paragraph (1) and such report shall not contain any statement with respect to compliance of any
of those provisions.
38. ( MTP- NOV 2021)

491

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
You are auditing a small bank branch with staff strength of the manager, cashier and three other
staff P, Q and R. Among allocation of work for other areas, P who is a peon also opens all the mail
and forwards it to the concerned person. He does not have a signature book so as to check the
signatures on important communications. Q has possession of all bank forms (e.g. Cheque books,
demand draft/pay order books, travelers’ cheques, foreign currency cards etc.). He maintains a
record meticulously which you have test checked also. However, no one among staff regularly
checks that. You are informed that being a small branch with shortage of manpower, it is not
possible to always check the work and records. Give your comments.
ANSWER
Banks are required to implement and maintain a system of internal controls for mitigating risks,
maintain good governance and to meet the regulatory requirements. Given below are examples of
internal controls that are violated in the given situation:
In the instant case, P who is a peon opens all the mail and forwards it to the concerned person.
Further, he does not have a signature book so as to check the signatures on important
communications is not in accordance with implementation and maintenance of general internal
control. As the mail should be opened by a responsible officer. Signatures on all the letters and
advices received from other branches of the bank or its correspondence should be checked by an
officer with the signature book.
All bank forms (e.g. Cheque books, demand draft/pay order books, travelers’ cheques, foreign
currency cards etc.) should be kept in the possession of an officer, and another responsible officer
should verify the issuance and stock of such stationery. In the given case, Q has possession of all
bank forms (e.g. cheque books, demand draft/pay order books, travelers’ cheques, foreign
currency cards etc.). He maintains a record meticulously which were also verified on test check
basis.
Further, contention of bank that being a small branch with shortage of manpower they are not
able to check the work and records on regular basis, is not tenable as such lapses in internal
control pose risk of fraud.
The auditor should report the same in his report accordingly.
39(NOV 21 EXAM)
You have been appointed as Concurrent auditor of one of the branches of Coin Bank Ltd. This branch is
dealing mainly in foreign exchange. State the suggested audit procedures to be covered by you to check the
foreign exchange transactions of this branch while doing Concurrent audit. (5 Marks)
ANSWER :
Suggested audit procedure to be covered by the Concurrent Auditor to check the foreign exchange
transactions of one of the branches of Coin Bank Ltd is given hereunder:
• Check FCNR and other non-resident accounts whether the debits and credits are permissible under
rules.
492

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
• Examine extension and cancellation of forward contracts for purchase and sale of foreign currency.
Ensure that they are duly authorized and necessary charges have been recovered.
• Ensure that balances in Nostro accounts in different foreign currencies are within the limit as
prescribed by the bank.
• Ensure that the overbought/oversold position maintained in different currencies is reasonable,

considering the foreign exchange operations.
• Ensure adherence to the guidelines issued by RBI/HO of the bank about dealing room operations.
• Ensure verification/reconciliation of Nostro and Vostro account transactions/ balances.
40 MAY 2022 EXAM
Your firm has been appointed as Central Statutory Auditors of a Nationalised Bank for the financial year
2021-22. During the course of audit your audit team observed that a lump sum amount has been disclosed
as Contingent Liability collectively though the components are correctly identified. In respect of contingent
liabilities, the auditor is primarily, concerned with seeking reasonable assurance that all the contingent
liabilities are identified and properly valued and the audit firm intends to obtain a representation from the
'management. Highlight the points/checklists that are to be covered in the management representation
ANSWER :
Contingent Liabilities: In respect of contingent liabilities, the auditor is primarily concerned with seeking
reasonable assurance that all contingent liabilities are identified and properly valued. The auditor should
obtain representation from management that: -
(i) all off-balance sheet transactions have been accounted in the books of accounts as and when such
transaction has taken place;
(ii) all off balance sheet transactions have been entered into after following due procedure laid down;
(iii) all off balance sheet transactions are supported by the underlying documents;
(iv) all year end contingent liabilities have been disclosed;
(v) the disclosed contingent liabilities do not include any crystallised liabilities which are of the nature of
loss/ expense and which, therefore, require creation of a provision/adjustment in the financial statements;
(vi) the estimated amounts of financial effect of the contingent liabilities are based on the best estimates
in terms of Accounting Standard 29, including consideration of the possibility of any reimbursement;
(vii) in case of guarantees issued on behalf of the bank’s directors, the bank has taken appropriate steps
to ensure that adequate and effective arrangements have been made so that the commitments would be
met out of the party’s own resources and that the bank will not be called upon to grant any loan or
advances to meet the liability consequent upon the invocation of the said guarantee(s) and that no
violation of section 20 of the Banking Regulation Act, 1949 has arisen on account of such guarantee; and
493

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
(viii) such contingent liabilities which have not been disclosed on account of the fact that the possibility of
their outcome is remote include the management’s justification for reaching such a decision in respect of
those contingent liabilities.
Note: Students may be given due credit for any other relevant point quoted.
41 (OCT 2022 MTP)
You are part of engagement team conducting statutory audit of a branch of nationalized bank. During the
course of audit, it has come to your notice that there are large number o f cash credit accounts in the
branch. Many of the cash credit accounts are only partially utilized during substantial part of year.
However, in the month of March, the accounts are fully utilized. On further scrutiny, it is observed that
these account holders have made fixed deposits from these utilized amounts at the end of year. These
deposits have been liquidated in first week of April of next financial year.Comment upon how this situation
would be dealt by you as a statutory branch auditor?
ANSWER :
In the given case, many of the cash credit accounts in the branch of a nationalized bank are only partially
utilized during substantial part of year. However, in the month of March, the accounts are fully utilized. On
further scrutiny, it is observed that these account holders have made fixed deposits from these utilized
amounts at the end of year. These deposits have been liquidated in first week of April of next financial year.
This is an example of window dressing. The branch is resorting to window dressing by artificially boosting
its advances and deposits. Utilization of advances and placing of fixed deposits at end of year in branch and
again liquidation of deposits early next year indicate that branch is resort ing to window dressing to inflate
its advances as well as deposits artificially.
The auditor has to verify whether the unavailed portion of the credit facilities (overdraft, cash credit) are
used to boost the loans and deposits which might tantamount to window dressing.
The relevant regulatory guidelines also prohibit such type of practices and these might involve penal action
in terms of Banking Regulation Act, 1949.
The same needs to be suitably reported in audit report and commented in LFAR also. In appropriate cases,
making a suitable qualification in the main audit report has also to be considered
42 (OCT 2022 MTP)
Which of the following statements is correct regarding submission of Statutory branch audit report and
LFAR of branch signed by the branch Auditor CA. Mahaveer?
(a) Statutory branch audit report is to be submitted to Statutory Central auditors and LFAR is to be
submitted to head office of bank directly.
(b) Statutory branch audit report is to be submitted to Statutory Central auditors and LFAR is to be
submitted to RBI directly.
494

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
(c) Statutory branch audit report as well as LFAR are to be submitted to Statutory Central auditors.
(d) Statutory branch audit report as well as LFAR are to be submitted to head office directly as
appointment was made by Head office.
ANSWER : (C )
43 (SEPT 2022 MTP)
CA Ram have been doing audit of branch of RICH Bank Ltd. The principal business of the branch is lending
advances to large corporates. Since last one year, many large accounts have become Non-Performing Asset
(NPA) as per guidelines. The Management of the Bank decided to sell one of the NPA account and
consequently one NPA namely Shiva Ltd. amounting to Rs. 11.00 Crore was sold to Asset Reconstruction
Company. What audit points CA Ram should keep in mind while doing audit of this transaction?
ANSWER :
CA. Ram conducting audit of branch of RICH Bank Ltd. whose principal business is lending money to large
corporates. Many large accounts of this branch have turned NPA category and Management sold Shiva
Ltd.’s NPA account amounting to Rs. 11 Crore to Asset Reconstruction Company.
CA. Ram should proceed as under:
In case of Sale of NPA by Bank, the auditor should examine
(i) the policy laid down by the Board of Directors in this regard relating to procedures, valuation and
(ii) only such NPA has been sold which has remained NPA in the books of the bank for at least 2 years.
(iii) the assets have been sold “without recourse’ only.
(iv) subsequent to the sale of the NPA, the bank does not assume any legal, operational or any other
type of risk relating to the sold NPAs.
(v) the NPA has been sold at cash basis only.
(vi) on the sale of the NPA, the same has been removed from the books of the account.
(vii) the short fall in the net book value has been charged to the profit and loss account.
(viii) where the sale is for a value higher than the NBV, no profit is recognised and the excess provision
has not been reversed but retained to meet the shortfall/ loss because sale of other non-performing
financial assets.
44 (SEPT 2022 MTP)
A branch of ABC Bank was having three staff i.e., one cashier, one officer and one manager. The cashier
was responsible for the signing of cash slips, passing entries for cash withdrawals and providing cash to
customers. You as a Bank’s branch Auditor decided to verify the cash withdrawal transaction s and after
testing you decided to pass the control over the cash process. Also, there were no observations identified
495

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
during the testing. Moreover, as the process is present in the branch, work performed by the cashier is not
monitored on daily basis. However, on a quarterly basis, certain test checks are performed by an officer of
the branch. Internal Audit team reported the said controls over process as operating. You are required to
guide whether reporting of the said controls by Internal Audit Team is correct or not
(a) The controls over the cash process should be reported as operating because no issues were
identified during the testing of controls.
(b) The controls over the cash process should be reported operating as test checks are being performed
by officers on a quarterly basis.
(c) This control should be reported as non-operating because segregation of duties was not present with
respect to the processing of payment transactions by the cashier.
(d). This control should be reported as non-operating as the manager of the branch should have at least 2
officers for test checks of cash transactions and for cash process.
ANSWER : (C )
45 (SEPT 2022 MTP)
Which of the following statements is INCORRECT?
(a) Inoperative saving and current accounts are a fraud prone area.
(b) Debit balances in current account are reduced from aggregate demand deposits in balance sheet of a
bank.
(c) Interest accrued but not due on deposits is shown separately under head “Other Liabilities and
provisions.”
(d) FCNR deposits are in designated foreign currencies only.
ANSWER : (B )
46(APRIL 2022 MTP)
While examining the computation of Demand and Time liabilities which of the following i s to be included
in liabilities:
(a) Part amounts of recoveries from the borrowers in respect of debts considered bad and doubtful of
recovery.
(b) Amounts received in Indian Currency against import bills and held in sundry deposits pending
receipts of final rates.
(c) Net credit balance in branch adjustment accounts including these relating to foreign branches.
(d) Margins held and kept in sundry deposits for funded facilities.
ANSWER : C
47 (MAY 2022 RTP)

496

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
M/s JKL & Associates, Chartered Accountants were acting as the statutory auditors of M/s IBS Bank Limited.
During the statutory audit for the relevant financial year, the following observations were made:
• Interest income included the following:
- Rs. 5 lakh relating to a short-term crop loan where instalment was overdue for one crop season.
- Rs. 7 lakh relating to an advance (guaranteed equally by Government of India & Government of
Tamil Nadu) where the instalment was due for more than six months.
• A 25 month old NPA account worth Rs. 43 lakh (net book value) was sold to an asset reconstruction
company for Rs. 45 lakh. The profit from the above transaction was taken to the P&L account. The above
NPA was sold ‘without recourse’ and at cash basis. The auditors noticed a discrepancy in this transaction
and hence decided to report the same.
After completing the bank audit, JKL & Associates agreed to take up the following management
consultancy and other services for one of the start-up company based in Noida:
(i) Setting up executive incentive plan and wage incentive plan.
(ii) Price-fixation and other management decision making.
(iii) Conduct a periodical audit and advisor for tax matters.
Mr. K, one of the partners of the firm felt that providing the above services could result in professional
misconduct. Hence, he resigned from the partnership and became a sole practitioner. One of the clients of
JKL & associates came to know about the issue and they approached Mr. K to conduct the statutory audit
for the financial year. Mr. K took up the assignment without informing the previous firm. Annoyed by this,
Mr. J filed a complaint to ICAI regarding the act of Mr. K. After enquiry, it was decided that Mr. K was guilty
of professional misconduct.
After this incident, Mr. K also decided to file a complaint against Mr. J. When he was thinking about a
reason for the same, he remembered that Mr. J had entered into an agreement with two of his articled
clerks to pay stipend on an annual basis, while others were paid on monthly basis. Realising that this act is
in violation of Regulation 48 of the Act, he filed a complaint to ICAI. After enquiry, it was found that Mr. J
was guilty of professional misconduct.
On the basis of the abovementioned facts, you are required to choose the most appropriate answer for the
following MCQs:
QUESTIONS:
1 From the above facts and details, what is the correct amount of interest which the bank should
account in its financial statements?
(a) Nil.
(b) Rs. 8.5 lakh.
(c) Rs. 5 lakh.

497

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
(d) Rs. 3.5 lakh.
2 What could be the possible amount classified as NPA relating to the accounts with respect to
observation regarding the inclusion of interest income given below:
- Rs. 5 lakh relating to a short-term crop loan where instalment was overdue for one crop season.
- Rs. 7 lakh relating to an advance (guaranteed equally by Government of India & Government of
Tamil Nadu) where the instalment was due for more than six months.
(a) Rs. 12 lakh.
(b) Rs. 8.5 lakh.
(c) Rs. 7 lakh.
(d) Rs. 3.5 lakh.
3 In NPA, sale to asset reconstruction company, what discrepancy auditor might have noticed:
(a) The NPA had not completed 30 months.
(b) Sale was made ‘without recourse’.
(c) Sale was made for cash basis.
(d) The profit of Rs. 2 lakh was taken to P&L account.
4 Being guilty of professional misconduct, which of the following punishment Mr. K will be subject to:
(a) Removal of his name from members register for a period of 6 months.
(b) Impose a penalty of Rs. 1000.
(c) Removal of his name from members register up-to a period it thinks fit.
(d) Impose a penalty up-to Rs. 2 lakh.
5 Being guilty of professional misconduct, which among the following punishment Mr. J will be subject
to?
(a) Impose a penalty up-to Rs. 1 lakh.
(b) Remove his name from members register permanently.
(c) Impose a penalty up-to Rs. 3 lakh.
(d) Impose a penalty of Rs. 6 lakh.
ANSWER :
1. (c)
2. (d)
498

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
3. (d)
4. (b)
5. (b)
48(MAY 2022 RTP)
Mr. K is a practicing-chartered accountant and also member of CPA Ireland. He handles only GST related
work and tax audits for clients. Currently, he is having 19 companies for which he is handling the tax audit.
At the beginning of the current Financial Year, he was approached by 40 new clients for tax audit
assignments. He was reluctant to accept all the work as he feared breaching the permissible limit of
handling clients. After consulting several fr iends of his, he finally decided to accept the work of just 2 big
clients who approached him.
Mr. J, (K’s friend) a chartered accountant in practice and a member empanelled as insolvency professional
was acting as the statutory auditor for a listed entity. The audit for the current Financial Year was
completed but there was some difference of opinion between auditor and the management. As a result of
this, the company did not send the notice for AGM to Mr. J. When enquired, it was said that the company is
not obliged to send notices to the auditor and it’s the responsibility of the auditor to be aware of the AGM.
Having heard this, Mr. J went to his friend to clarify the above matter. As a result of this incident, the
management had not paid a part of the agreed audit fees to Mr. J. In retaliation, Mr. J took lien over few
documents pertaining to the company. Having come to know about this, Mr. K immediately informed his
friend that his act would lead to professional misconduct.
Mr. K & his friend Mr. J decided to start a partnership firm. They completed all formalities and went ahead
and printed their visiting card as follows:
M/s KJ & Associates M/s KJ & Associates
Mr. K, Chartered Accountant, Mr. J, Chartered Accountant,

CPA Ireland Insolvency Professional
Partner Partner
No.3, MMM Street, Delhi No.3, MMM Street, Delhi

Phone: 9xxxxxxxx0 Phone: 9xxxxxxxx0
The firm had also received the following assignments:
(i) Concurrent audit for T Bank Ltd.
(ii) Statutory audit for BBT Bank Ltd. (it is to be noted that the bank was not sponsored by T Bank)
(iii) Offer to act as settlor of ZZ Charitable Trust.
(iv) Internal audit of PF Trust of Government Company Ltd.
(v) Statutory Auditor of Government Company Ltd.

499

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
On the basis of the abovementioned facts, you are required to choose the most appropriate answer for the
following MCQs:
QUESTIONS:
1. In the given case scenario, has Mr. K breached the maximum limit of clients. If yes, can he be held
guilty of professional misconduct?
(a) Yes. The ceiling on number of tax audits which can be accepted by a chartered accountant is 20. In
this given case, Mr. K is already having 19 clients and has now accepted 2 more (19+2=21). Also, he shall be
held guilty of professional misconduct as per the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949.
(b) Yes. The ceiling on number of tax audits which can be accepted by a chartered accountant is 20. In
this given case, Mr. K is already having 19 clients and has now accepted 2 more (19+2=21). However, this
shall not be considered as guilty of professional misconduct as per the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949.
(c) No. In the above case, the maximum ceiling is 25 in number (as per the latest decision taken by the
ICAI council). The assignments (existing + new) handled by Mr. K is well below the prescribed limit and
hence there is no breach.
(d) No. In the above case, the maximum ceiling is 60 in number. The assignments (existing + new)
handled by Mr. K is well below the prescribed limit and hence there is no breach.
2. Assuming yourself to be Mr. K, what would be your advice to Mr. J on the above matter?
(a) The company has not followed the provisions of section 146 of Companies Act, 2013. All notices of,
and other communications relating to, any general meeting shall be forwarded to the auditor of the
company. Also, as per section 147, the company shall be punishable with fine which shall not be less than
Rs. 25,000/- but which may extend to Rs. 5 lakh.
(b) The company has not followed the provisions of section 146 of Companies Act, 2013. All notices of,
company. Also, as per section 147, the company shall be punishable with fine which shall not be less than
Rs. 10,000/- but which may extend to Rs. 1 lakh.
(c) The company has not followed the provisions of section 147 of Companies Act, 2013. All notices of,
company. However, the company shall not be punishable for this act.
(d) The argument of the management is right. The Companies Act, 2013 does not mandate that the
company shall send the notices for its general meetings to the auditor. It is the responsibility of the auditor
(in this case Mr. J) to attend the AGM irrespective of getting the notice for it or not. The auditor shall be
punishable under the provisions of the Act if he doesn’t not attend the AGM.
3. Will the retaliating act of Mr. J against the company make him guilty of professional misconduct?
(a) No. The above act will not lead to professional misconduct. However, under section 147 of the
Companies Act, 2013, Mr. J shall be punishable for exercising lien over the company’s documents.
500

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
(b) No. The Chartered Accountants Act, 1949 is silent about the above situation and hence it will not
lead to professional misconduct.
(c) Yes. As per the recent decision of Ethical Standards Board, a chartered accountant cannot exercise
lien over client documents/ records for non-payment of his fees.
(d) Yes. As per Clause 7 of Part I of Second Schedule of Chartered Accountants Act , 1949, the above act
of Mr. J will make him guilty of professional misconduct.
4. In the given case scenario, visiting cards printed by Mr. K & Mr. J, is there anything which may lead to
professional misconduct? If so, under what provisions?
(a) Mentioning ‘CPA Ireland’ & the term ‘Insolvency Professional’ by Mr. K & Mr. J respectively violates
the provisions of clause 7 of part I of First schedule of the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949. Hence, both of
them shall be held guilty of professional misconduct.
(b) There is no information contained in both the visiting cards, which leads to professional misconduct.
All details mentioned are abiding the provisions of clause 7 of part I of First schedule of the Chartered
Accountants Act, 1949.
(c) Mentioning ‘CPA Ireland’ by Mr. K violates the provisions of clause 6 & clause 7 of part I of First
schedule of the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949. Hence, Mr. K shall be held guilty of professional
misconduct. However, as far as Mr. J’s card is concerned, nothing mentioned in it is against the provision of
Chartered Accountants Act, 1949, so he shall not be held guilty of professional misconduct.
(d) Mentioning the term ‘Insolvency Professional’ by Mr. J violates the provisions of clause 7 of part I of
First schedule of the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949. Hence, he shall be held guilty of professional
misconduct. However, as far as Mr. K’s card is concerned, nothing mentioned in it is against the provision
of Chartered Accountants Act, 1949, so he shall not be held guilty of professional misconduct
5. The firm had received the following assignments:
(i) Concurrent audit for T Bank Ltd.
(ii) Statutory audit for BBT Bank Ltd. (it is to be noted that the bank was not sponsored by T Bank)
(iii) Offer to act as settlor of ZZ Charitable Trust.
(iv) Internal audit of PF Trust of Government Company Ltd.
(v) Statutory Auditor of Government Company Ltd.
Among the above assignments, which assignments can be accepted by the firm?
(a) Either (i) or (ii), (iii) & Either (iv) or (v)
(b) (i), (ii), (iii) & Either (iv) or (v)
(c) Either (i) or (ii) & Either (iv) or (v)
(d) (ii) only

501

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
ANSWER :
1. (d)
2. (a)
3. (c)
4. (b)
5. (b)
49(NOV 2022 RTP)
CA Prachi was conducting statutory audit of branch of a nationalized bank for the year 2021-22. While
reviewing operations and documents/papers of a borrower enjoying overdraft credit facilities of Rs. 50
crore (availed against security of stocks and book debts), following observations were jotted down by her: -
(i) The balance in overdraft credit facility as on 31st March,2022 was Rs. 55.65 crore. The balance in
account exceeded sanctioned limit during the whole month of March 2022.
(ii) As per terms of sanction letter, stock/book debt statements were required to be submitted monthly.
Latest available stock/book debt statement for the month of February, 2022 showed drawing power of Rs.
48.50 crore only. However, stock/book debt statements of previous months showed adequate drawing
power.
(iii) Stock audit of borrower was also conducted during the year by one of empanelled stock auditors of
the bank. Stock audit report dated 31st December,2021 placed on the record showed adequate drawing
power in the account. However, it has commented adversely on the declining turnover of borrower in year
2021 -22(till the date of stock audit report) as compared to proportionate turnover in preceding year.
(iv) The renewal of overdraft facilities was due on 20th October,2021. The account was short renewed by
competent authority for a period of 3 months pending submission of complete papers.
However, borrower has not submitted complete renewal papers till 31 st March,2022. There is a request
letter from borrower on record stating that valuation report of a property located at a faraway location was
taking time.
The branch has classified the account as ‘Standard Asset’. Considering above, CA Prachi is in dilemma
relating to proper classification of above advance. Guide her.
ANSWER :
The borrower was enjoying overdraft credit facilities of Rs. 50 crore against security of stocks and debts.
Further, though latest available stock statement for the month of February, 2022 showed inadequate
drawing power, there was adequate drawing power available throughout the year. Stock audit report
dated 31.12.2021 also reflected adequate drawing power. Hence, it shows that borrower had adequate
drawing power during the year. Further, comment on declining sales is of general informative value to
management for making credit decisions.
502

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
The fact of over drawings in account during the month of March, 2022 and inadequate drawing power in a
month are in nature of temporary deficiencies and do not require account to be classified as NPA in
accordance with asset classification and provisioning norms of RBI.
RBI instructions lay down that ordinarily credit limits need to be reviewed not later than three months from
the due date. As per Guidance note on Audit of Banks, in case of constraints such as non-availability of
financial statements and other data from the borrowers, the branch should furnish evidence to show that
renewal/ review of credit limits is underway and would be completed soon. In any case, delay beyond six
months is not considered desirable as a general discipline. Hence, an account where the credit limits have
not been reviewed/ renewed within 180 days from the due date will be treated as NPA.
It would be pertinent to note that the counting of 180 days would be required to be done from the date of
original due date for renewal and not from the date of expiry of short reviews / technical reviews. In the
instant case, the original date of renewal was 20th October, 2021 and period of 180 days has still not
expired as on balance sheet date.
Keeping in view all above factors, CA Prachi should accept classification of account as ‘Standard Asset’
made by branch.
503

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s

C Ltd. is a large company engaged in the business of insurance for the last 9 years. The company has
expanded its business considerably over the years and have set up various divisions across India.
The accounting and the operational systems of the company are centralized wherein the accounts
of all the divisions, trial balances and their balance sheets are prepared by the Head Office. AJ &
Co, a firm of Chartered Accountants, are the statutory auditors of this company and audit all the
divisions and the head office. The auditors have completed the audit of the financial statements
of the company for the year ended 31 March 2019 and the company’s financial statements are
approved.
Before the annual general meeting of the company, the company received a notice from the
Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority of India (IRDAI) which has asked the company
to respond within 7 days as to why this company breached the requirement of IRDAI guidelines
by having a single auditor for all the divisions and head office.
The management of the company has been doing this over the years and were never aware of this
requirement. To respond to this, the management has consulted many legal experts and also the
auditors.
They would also like to understand your views as to how to respond to IRDAI in this critical situation.
Please advise carefully.
There has been breach of IRDAI guidelines and accordingly the management should respond.
504

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
The management can request IRDAI to consider relaxation in respect of this provision for the
company for the current year as relaxation for the same is permissible.
The management should respond to IRDAI that this provision is applicable to a company only after
15 years of its existence and hence there is no breach of IRDAI guidelines.
The management should respond to IRDAI that this provision should have been ensured by the
auditors only. Hence, they should not be held liable for this breach of provision of the IRDAI
guidelines.
Answer: Option a
2. MTP Mar 2019 Qn no 6

Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Ltd. agreed to insure a large commercial client. Due to the size of
this client's operations, there is the potential that it could suffer a substantial loss. It would be
financially difficult for Bajaj Allianz to pay the entire claim itself. To spread this risk, Bajaj Allianz
contacted Bharti AXA General Insurance to request that it cover a portion of the risk. Bharti AXA
General Insurance agreed, but only on the condition that it receive a portion of the premium the
client has paid to Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Ltd. The term that best describes this scenario is
retention reinsurance.
loadings.
casualty insurance.
Answer: (b) reinsurance.
3.May -2018 4 (c) 4 Marks
You are the Auditor of Good Luck General Insurance Company. You want to ensure that there exists
good system that Effectively serves the requirements of true and fair accounting of claim-related
expenses and liabilities. Suggest how this can be ensured.
ANSWER
Claims Provisions -The auditor should obtain from the divisions/branches, the information for each class of
business, categorizing the claims value-wise before commencing verification of the claims provisions, so that
appropriate statistical sampling techniques may be applied, to ensure that representative volume of claims
is verified for each class of business. The auditor should determine the total number of documents to be
checked giving due importance to claim provisions of higher value.
The outstanding liability at the year-end is determined at the divisions/branches where the liability originates
for outstanding claims. Thereafter, based on the total consolidated figure for all the divisions/branches, the
Head Office considers a further provision in respect of outstanding claims. The auditor should satisfy himself
that the estimated liability provided for by the management is adequate with reference to the relevant claim
files/dockets, keeping in view the following:
505

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
(i) that provision has been made for all unsettled claims as at the year-end on the basis of claims
lodged/communicated by the parties against the company. The date of loss (and not the date of
communication thereof) is important for recording/ recognizing the claim as attributable to a particular
year.
(ii) Insurance companies normally have an ‘initial provision’ or ‘default provision’ based on a pre-determined
formula or on a primary assessment of the damage by a surveyor. The auditor would need to review the pre-
determined formula to ensure that initial reserving made is adequate.
In certain circumstances, the claims are incurred by the insurance company but are not reported at the balance
sheet date by the insured. Such claims are known as claims incurred but not reported (IBNR). The auditor
should check the records for subsequent periods to ascertain that adequate provision has been created for
such claims also.
(iii) that provision has been made for only such claims for which the company is legally liable, considering
particularly, (a) that the risk was covered by the policy, if in force, and the claims arose during the currency
of the policy; and (b) that claim did not arise during the period the company was not supposed to cover the
risk, e.g., where the premium was not paid or where cheques covering premium have been dishonoured
(refer section 64VB of the Insurance Act, 1938) or where a total loss under a policy has already been
met/settled.
(iv) that the provision made is normally not in excess of the amount insured except in some categories of
claims where matters may be sub-judice in legal proceedings which will determine the quantum of claim,
the amount of provision should also include survey fee and other direct expenses.
(v) that in determining the amount of provision, events after the balance sheet date have been considered,
e.g., (a) claims settled for a materially higher/lower amount in the post-audit period; (b) claims paid by other
insurance companies during the year under audit and communicated to company after the balance sheet
date where other companies are the leaders in co-insurance arrangements; and (c) further reports by
surveyors or assessors & (d), re-insurance cover available is considered.
(vi) that the claims status reports recommended to be prepared by the Divisional Manager on large claims
outstanding at the year-end have been reviewed with the contents of relevant files or dockets for
determining excess/short provisions. The said report should be complete as to material facts to enable the
auditor to take a fair view of the provision made.
(vii) that in determining the amount of provision, the ‘average clause’ has been applied in case of
under-insurance by parties.
(viii) that the provision made is net of payments made ‘on account’ to the parties wherever such
payments have been booked to claims.
(ix) that in case of co-insurance arrangements, the company has made provisions only in respect of its
own share of anticipated liability.
(x) that wherever an unduly long time has elapsed after the filing of the claim and there has been no
further communication and no litigation or arbitration dispute is involved, the reasons for carrying the
provision have been ascertained.
(xi) that wherever legal advice has been sought or the claim is under litigation, the provision is made
according to the legal advisor’s view and differences, if any, are explained.
(xii) that in the case of amounts purely in the nature of deposits with courts or other authorities, adequate
provision is made and deposits are stated separately as assets and provisions are not made net of such
deposits.
(xiii) that no contingent liability is carried in respect of any claim intimated in respect of policies issued.
(xiv) that the claims are provided for net of estimated salvage, wherever applicable.
506

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
(xv) that intimation of loss is received within a reasonable time and reasons for undue delay in
intimation are looked into.
(xvi) that provisions have been retained as at the yearend in respect of guarantees given by company to
various Courts for claims under litigation.
(xvii) that due provision has been made in respect of claims lodged at any office of the company other than
the one from where the policy was taken, e.g., a vehicle insured at Mumbai having met with an accident at
Chennai necessitating claim intimation at one of the offices of the company at Chennai.
In cases of material differences in the liability estimated by the management and that which ought to be
provided in the opinion of the auditor, the same must be brought out in the auditor’s report after
obtaining further information or explanation from the management. For determining the adequacy of the
provisions in respect of any category of business, the auditor may resort to the method of testing the actual
payments, wherever made, with the provisions made earlier for that category of business. Whether such
liability has been estimated in the past on a fair and realistic basis can, thus, be examined by looking into
current year’s payments against provisions of the earlier year.
Claims Paid - The auditor may determine the extent of checking of claims paid on the same line as suggested
for outstanding claims. Other aspects in respect of claims paid to be examined by the auditors are as follows:
(i) that in case of co-insurance arrangements, claims paid have been booked only in respect of company’s
share and the balance has been debited to other insurance companies;
(ii) that in case of claims paid on the basis of advices from other insurance companies (where the company
is not the leader in co-insurance arrangements), whether share of premium was also received by the
company. Such claims which have been communicated after the year- end for losses which occurred
prior to the year-end must be accounted for in the year of audit;
(iii) that the claims payments have been duly sanctioned by the authority concerned and the payments of
the amounts are duly acknowledged by the claimants;
(iv) that the salvage recovered has been duly accounted for in accordance with the procedure applicable to
the company and a letter of subrogation has been obtained in accordance with the laid down procedure;
(v) that the amounts of the nature of pure advances/deposits with Courts, etc., in matters under
litigation/arbitration have not been treated as claims paid but are held as assets till final disposal of
such claims. In such cases, full provision should be made for outstanding claims;
(vi) that payment made against claims partially settled have been duly vouched. In such cases, the
sanctioning authority should be the same as the one which has powers in respect of the total claimed
amount;
(vii) that in case of final settlement of claims, the claimant has given an unqualified discharge note, not
involving the company in any further liability in respect of the claim; and
(viii) that the figures of claims, wherever communicated for the year by the Division to the Head Office for
purposes of reinsurance claims, have been reconciled with the trial balance-figure.
(ix) that payments have been made within 30 days of the receipt of the last document received. In case,
there are delays, interest on such delays have to be paid as per IRDAI regulations.
(x) that the salvage recovered has been duly accounted for in accordance with the procedure applicable to
the company and a letter of subrogation has been obtained in accordance with the laid down procedure.
507

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
4.RTP May 2018 Qn No.12

(a) Mr. Bhavya is appointed as an auditor of General Insurance Company limited. State the
verification procedure to be followed by Mr. Bhavya in case of outstanding premium and agent’s
balances.
Answer
(a) General Insurance Company – Verification of Outstanding Premium and Agents’ Balances:
The following are the audit procedures to be followed for verification of outstanding premium
and agents’ balances:
(i) Scrutinise and review control account debit balances and their nature should be enquired into.
(ii) Examine inoperative balances and treatment given for old balances with reference to company
rules.
(iii) Enquire into the reasons for retaining the old balances.
(iv) Verify old debit balances which may require provision or adjustment. Notes of explanation may
be obtained from the management in this regard.
(v) Check age-wise, sector-wise analysis of outstanding premium.
(vi) Verify whether outstanding premiums have since been collected.

(vii) Check the availability of adequate bank guarantee or premium deposit for outstanding premium.
5.MTP-OCT-18 Qn No 4(c) 5 Marks:
High Life Insurance is into life insurance business and has established presence in this field
since last 25 years. Your firm, SR & Co. are appointed auditors of the High Life Insurance
company. While conducting its audit, you come across several important actuarial processes
being followed in accordance with general regulatory guidelines. You also understand &
realise that the actuarial department is calculating and modelling hub of the company. In the
above context explain the role of auditors.
RTP May 2018 Qn no 12

Briefly discuss the importance and role of auditor with respect to actuarial process for Life
Insurance business
(b) Importance of Actuarial Process and Role of Auditor in case of Life Insurance Business :
Importance of Actuarial Process: Actuaries in Life Insurance business have gained tremendous
importance. The role of Actuary in life insurance has shifted from supervising compliance to certify
whether products and financial reports are in accordance with the general regulatory guidelines.
The job of actuary or actuarial department in any Life Insurance Company involves, detailed analysis
508

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
of data to quantify risk. The actuarial department is calculating and modelling hub of the Company.
Within the department fundamentals of Insurance business is determined from pricing to policy
valuations techniques.
Role of Auditor: Auditors in the Audit report are required to certify, whether the actuarial
valuation of liabilities is duly certified by the appointed actuary, including to the effect that the
assumptions for such valuation are in accordance with the guidelines and norms, if any, issued by
the authority and/or the Actuarial Society of India in concurrence with the IRDA
Actuarial department broadly concentrates following key areas of Insurance business:
• Product Development/ Pricing and Experience analysis.
• Model Development.
• Statutory Valuations and reserving.
• Business Planning.
• Solvency management.
• Management reporting on various business valuations and profitability models of the Life
Insurance business.
Hence, Auditors generally rely on the Certificate issued by the Appointed Actuary, certifying the
Policy liabilities. However, Auditor may discuss with the Actuaries with respect to process
followed and assumptions made by him before certifying the Policy liabilities.
6.MTP Mar 2018 Qn 4(C) 4 Marks

As on 31st March 2017 while auditing Safe Insurance Ltd, you observed that a policy has been
issued on 25th March 2017 for fire risk favouring one of the leading corporate houses in the
country without the actual receipt of premium and it was reflected as premium receivable. The
company maintained that it is a usual practice in respect of big customers and the money was
collected later on. As an auditor discuss the steps to be taken while verifying the Premium of
Life Insurance Company
RTP Nov 18 QN no 12
Auditors should evaluate various sub-processes, employed by the Insurance Companies in
accounting of premiums like collection of premium from the policy holders, booking of
premium, banking, accounting and reconciliation of the same. In view of above, you are
required to briefly discuss some illustrative points, auditors are required to follow during the
Audit of Accounting of Premiums in case of Life Insurance Companies.
Answer
Collection of Premium:
• Check whether there is daily reconciliation process to reconcile the amounts collected, entered into the
system and deposited into the bank.
509

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
• Check that there is appropriate mechanism to ensure all the collections are deposited into the Bank on
timely basis.
Calculation of Premium:
• Check that Accounting system, employed by the Company, calculates premium amounts and its respective
due dates correctly.
• Check that system employed as such is equipped to calculate all types of premium modes correctly.
Recognition of Income:
• Check that premium is recognised only on the basis of ‘Issued Policies’ and not on underwriting dates.
• Check that there is inbuilt mechanism the system all the premium collected are correctly allocated all
various components of the Policies.
• Check that there is appropriate mechanism in place to conduct reconciliation on daily basis and
reconciling items, if any, are rectified/ followed up.
Accounting of ‘Advance Premium’:
• Check, whether system has capability to identify regular and advance premium.
• Check whether there is a process of applying advance premium to a contract when premium is due.
Reporting of Premium figures to IRDA/ Management:
• Check the methodology for generation of MIS from the system and there is no manual intervention.
• Check the procedure for Maker/ Checker before finalising the MIS.
• Check whether there is a reconciliation process between premium Income as per financials and as
reported.
Other Areas:
• Check whether there are appropriate SOPs developed by the Companies and are strictly followed by all
the departments/ branches of the Company.
• Ensure duly approved Delegation of Authority parameters matrix already in place for authorisation
limits.
• Premium recognition and refund of premium are independent processes with adequate segregation of
duties amongst the personnel.
• Check that the Company conducts premium reconciliation on daily basis.
• Check the robustness of interface between administration and accounting system.
7. MTP Apr 18 Qn no 4 (C) 4 Marks

Girnar is appointed as an auditor of National Insurance Company limited. State the verification
procedure to be followed by Mr. Girnar in case of Re-insurance outward.
Answer
Verification of Re-insurance Outward: The following steps may be taken by the auditor in the
verification of re-insurance outward:
510

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
(i) The auditor should verify that re-insurance underwriting returns received from the operating
units regarding premium, claims paid, outstanding claims tally with the audited figures of
premium, claims paid and outstanding claims.
(ii) The auditor should check whether the pattern of re-insurance underwriting for outward cessions
fits within the parameters and guidelines applicable to the relevant year.
(iii) The auditor should also check whether the cessions have been made as per the stipulation
applicable to various categories of risk.
(iv) The auditor should verify whether the cessions have been made as per the agreements entered
into with various companies.
(v) It should also be seen whether the outward remittances to foreign re-insurers have been done as
per the foreign exchange regulations.
(vi) It should also be seen whether the commission on cession has been calculated as per the terms
of the agreement with the re-insurers.
(vii) The auditor should verify the computation of profit commission for various automatic treaty
arrangements in the light of the periodical accounts rendered and in relation to outstanding loss
pertaining to the treaty.
(viii) The auditor should examine whether the cash loss recoveries have been claimed and accounted
on a regular basis.
(ix) The auditor should also verify whether the Claims Paid item appears in Outstanding Claims list by
error. This can be verified at least in respect of major claims.
(x) He should see whether provisioning for outstanding losses recoverable on cessions have been
confirmed by the re-insurers and in the case of major claims, documentary support should be
insisted and verified.
(xi) Accounting aspects of the re-insurance cession premium, commission receivable, paid claims
recovered, and outstanding losses recoverable on cessions have to be checked.
(xii) The auditor should check percentage pattern of gross to net premium, claims paid and outstanding
claims to ensure comparative justification.
(xiii) The auditor should also check that the re-insurers balance on cessions and whether the sub ledger
balances tallies with the general ledger balances.
(xiv) The auditor should review the individual accounts to find out whether any balance requires
provisioning / write off or write back.
(xv) He should verify whether the balances with re-insurers are supported by necessary confirmation
obtained from them.
(xvi) He should verify whether opening outstanding claims not paid during the year find place in the
closing outstanding claims vis-a-vis the reinsurance inwards outstanding losses recoverable on
cessions appears in both opening and closing list. If not, the reason for the same should be
analysed.
(xvii) Any major event after the Balance Sheet date which might have wider impact with reference to
subsequent changes regarding the claim recovery both paid and outstanding and also re -
insurance balances will need to be brought out suitably.
511

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
8. MTP-Aug-18 Qn No 4(C) 4 Marks:
While auditing Secure Insurance Ltd., you observed that the major proportion of expense of
the company is the remuneration/commission paid to its insurance agents. As the auditor of
the company, what audit procedure would you adopt for verification of such expense?
Nov 18 Qn no 4(c) 4 Marks

You have been appointed to carry out the audit of Sky Insurance Company Ltd. for the year
2017-18. In the course of your audit, you observed that the commission paid to agents constituted
a major expense in operating expenses of the Company. Enumerate the audit concerns that
address to the assertions required for the Auditor to ensure the continued existence of internal
control as well as fairness of the amounts in accounting of commission paid to agents.
Commission: The commission is the consideration payable for getting the insurance business. The
term ‘commission’ is used for the payment of consideration to get Direct business. Commission
received on amount of premium paid to a re-insurer is termed ‘Commission on reinsurance
accepted’ and is reduced from the amount of commission expenditure.
The internal control with regard to commission is aimed at ensuring that commission is paid in
accordance with the rules and regulations of the company and in accordance with the agreement
with the agent, commission is paid to the agent who brought the business and the legal
compliances, for example, tax deduction at sources, GST on reverse charge mechanism and
provisions of the Insurance Act, 1938 have been complied with.
Role of Auditor: The auditor should, inter alia, do the following for verification of commission:
• Ensure that commission is not paid in excess of the limits specified by IRDAI
• Ensure that commission is paid as per rates with the agent and rates filed with IRDAI
• Ensure that commission is paid to the agent/broker who has solicited the business
• Ensure that the agent is not blacklisted by IRDAI and is not terminated for fraud etc.
• Vouch disbursement entries with reference to the disbursement vouchers with copies of
commission bills and commission statements.
• Check whether the vouchers are authorized by the officers-in–charge as per rules in force and
income tax is deducted at source, as applicable.
• Test check correctness of amounts of commission allowed.
• Scrutinize agents’ ledger and the balances, examine accounts having debit balances, if any, and
obtain information on the same. Necessary rectification of accounts and other remedial actions
have to be considered.
• Check whether commission outgo for the period under audit been duly accounted.

512

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
As at 31st March 2018 while auditing Safe Insurance Ltd, you observed that a policy has been
issued on 25th March 2018 for fire risk favouring one of the leading corporate houses in the
country without the actual receipt of premium and it was reflected as premium receivable. The
company maintained that it is a usual practice in respect of big customers and the money was
collected on 5th April, 2018. You further noticed that there was a fire accident in the premises of
the insured on 31st March 2018 and a claim was lodged for the same. The insurance company
also made a provision for claim. Please advise.
Answer
Provision for Claim: No risk can be assumed by the insurer unless the premium is received.
According to section 64VB of the Insurance Act, 1938, no insurer should assume any risk in India in
respect of any insurance business on which premium is ordinarily payable in India unless and until
the premium payable is received or is guaranteed to be paid by such person in such manner and
within such time, as may be prescribed, or unless and until deposit of such amount, as may be
prescribed, is made in advance in the prescribed manner. The premium receipt of insurance
companies carrying on general insurance business normally arise out of three sources, viz.,
premium received from direct business, premium received from reinsurance business and the share
of co-insurance premium.
In view of the above, the insurance company is not liable to pay the claim and hence no provision
for claim is required.

You have been appointed as an auditor of ABC Insurance Co. Ltd. and found that M/s PQR Ltd. got
their Plant & Machinery insured on 01-10-2018 but the amount of premium has been paid by
them on 15-10-2018. In the meanwhile, on 10-10-2018 a fire has broken out in the factory and
the company filed a claim for damages of plant & machinery with the Insurance company. Advise
the insurance company in this regard.
Answer
No Risk Assumption without Premium: No risk can be assumed by the insurer unless the premium
is received. According to section 64VB of the Insurance Act, 1938, no insurer should assume any risk
in India in respect of any insurance business on which premium is ordinarily payable in India unless
and until the premium payable is received or is guaranteed to be paid by such person in such
manner and within such time, as may be prescribed, or unless and until deposit of such amount, as
may be prescribed, is made in advance in the prescribed manner. The premium receipt of
insurance companies carrying on general insurance business normally arise out of three sources,
viz., premium received from direct business, premium received from reinsurance business and the
share of co- insurance premium.
Therefore, in the instant case, PQR Ltd. signed the insurance documents on 01.10.2018 but did
not paid the premium. In case of non-payment of insurance premium if any accidental incident
occurs insurance company will have no liability to pay claim. In the given case, fire is occurred on
10th October, 2018 in factory and premium has been paid on 15 October 2018, the ABC Insurance
Company Ltd. will not be liable for claim for damages of plant and machinery.
513

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
11. RTP Nov 2019 Qn no 25(c)

Auditor’s considerations while reviewing of Investment Department of Life Insurance
Company.
Answer
Role of Auditor: The Auditor during his review of Investment Department of Life Insurance Company
should mainly consider the following:
❑ Review the Investment management structure to ensure adequate segregation of duties
between Investment Front office, Mid Office and Back office.
❑ Review of insurer’s Standard Operating Procedures which are prescribed by the
❑ IRDA Regulations and are required to cover the entire gamut of investment related processes and
policies.
❑ Review of insurer’s Investment policy.
❑ Review of functioning and scope and minutes of Investment Committee.
❑ Compliance of all Investment regulations, various other circulars specified by IRDA and other
regulations specified in the Insurance Act, 1938.
❑ Review of insurer’s Disaster Recovery, Backup and Contingency Plan.
❑ Review of access Controls, authorization process for Orders and Deal execution, etc.
❑ Review of insurer’s Cash Management System to track funds available for Investment
considering the settlement obligations and subscription and redemption of units, etc. The system
should be validated not to accept any commitment beyond availability of funds and restrict Short
Sales at the time of placing the order. Further insurer’s system should be able to determine the
amount of Investible surplus.
❑ Ensure that the system is be able to automatically monitor various Regulatory limits on Exposure
and Rating of debt instruments.
❑ Review of fund wise reconciliation with Investment Accounts, Bank, and Custodian records.
❑ Ensure that there is split between Shareholders’ and Policyholders’ funds, and earmarking of
securities between various funds namely Life (Participating & Non-Participating), Pension &
Group (Participating & Non-Participating) and Unit Linked Fund.
❑ Review the arrangements and reconciliations of holdings with the insurer’s custodian.
❑ Review and check insurer’s Investment Accounting and valuation policy and the controls
around this process.
❑ Insurer’s risk management policies and processes to manage investment risk such as Market
risk, Liquidity risk, Settlement risks, etc.
514

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
❑ Determine the extent of activities outsourced and the controls over such activities.
❑ Controls over NAV computation and declaration.
❑ Controls over various system interfaces such as Seamless integration of data, between front
office and back office, in the Investments accounting system.
❑ Flow of data from PMS to the Investment Accounting system.

❑ Controls around personal dealings, insider trading and front running.
12 RTP May 2020 Qn no 14(b)

Amrapali & Co., Chartered Accountants are the Auditors of Natural Care General Insurance
Company Limited. As on March 31, 2019 the Management made a provision for claims
outstanding. Enumerate the steps to be taken by the Auditor while verifying the "Claims
Provision".
Answer:
Verification of “Claims Provision” in the Case of a General Insurance Company: The outstanding liability
at the year-end is determined at the divisions/branches where the liability originates for outstanding
claims. Thereafter, based on the total consolidated figure for all the divisions/branches, the Head Office
considers a further provision in respect of outstanding claims. The auditor should satisfy himself that the
estimated liability provided for by the management is adequate with reference to the relevant claim
files/dockets, keeping in view the following:
(i) that provision has been made for all unsettled claims as at the year-end on the basis of claims
lodged/communicated by the parties against the company. The date of loss (and not the date of
communication thereof) is important for recording/ recognizing the claim as attributable to a particular
year.
(ii) that provision has been made for only such claims for which the company is legally liable, considering
particularly, (a) that the risk was covered by the policy, if in force, and the claims arose during the currency
of the policy; and (b) that claim did not arise during the period the company was not supposed to cover
the risk.
(iii) that the provision made is normally not in excess of the amount insured except in some categories of
claims where matters may be sub-judice in legal proceedings which will determine the quantum of claim,
the amount of provision should also include survey fee and other direct expenses.
(iv) that in determining the amount of provision, events after the balance sheet date have been considered.
(v) that the claims status reports recommended to be prepared by the Divisional Manager on large claims
outstanding at the year-end have been reviewed with the contents of relevant files or dockets for
determining excess/short provisions.
(vi) that in determining the amount of provision, the ‘average clause’ has been applied in case of under-
insurance by parties.
(vii) that the provision made is net of payments made ‘on account’ to the parties wherever such payments
have been booked to claims.
(viii) that in case of co-insurance arrangements, the company has made provisions only in respect of its own
515

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
share of anticipated liability.
(ix) that wherever an unduly long time has elapsed after the filing of the claim and there has been no further
communication and no litigation or arbitration dispute is involved, the reasons for carrying the provision
have been ascertained.
(x) that wherever legal advice has been sought or the claim is under litigation, the provisions is made
according to the legal advisor’s view and differences, if any, are explained.
(xi) that in the case of amounts purely in the nature of deposits with courts or other authorities, adequate
provision is made and deposits are stated separately as assets and provisions are not made net of such
deposits.
(xii) that no contingent liability is carried in respect of any claim intimated in respect of policies issued.
(xiii) that the claims are provided for net of estimated salvage, wherever applicable.
(xiv) that intimation of loss is received within a reasonable time and reasons for undue delay in intimation are
looked into.
(xv) that provisions have been retained as at the year-end in respect of guarantees given by company to various
Courts for claims under litigation.
(xvi) that due provision has been made in respect of claims lodged at any office of the company other than the
one from where the policy was taken, e.g., a vehicle insured at Mumbai having met with an accident at
Chennai necessitating claim intimation at one of the offices of the company at Chennai.
In cases of material differences in the liability estimated by the management and that which ought to be
provided in the opinion of the auditor, the same must be brought out in the auditor’s report after obtaining
further information or explanation from the management.
13. (RTP-NOV 2020)

M/s MPS & Associates, Chartered Accountants started the statutory audit of their client
Contingencies Ltd., a General Insurance company, which has a paid-up capital of Rs. 16,800/- lac.
During the course of the audit, it was found that the Company was not maintaining the required
solvency margin as per the provisions of Insurance Act, 1938. When the issue was escalated to
the management, they replied that solvency margin needs to be maintained as per limits
prescribed only on last day of the financial year. Comment whether reply of management is
tenable or not
ANSWER
Maintenance of Solvency Margin: Section 64VA of the Insurance Act, 1938 as amended by Insurance Laws
(Amendment) Act, 2015 requires every insurer and re-insurer to maintain an excess of the value of assets
over the amount of liabilities at all times which shall not be less than 50% of the amount of minimum
capital as stated under section 6 (requirement as to capital) of the Act and arrived at in the manner
specified by the regulations.
If, at any time, an insurer or re-insurer does not maintain the required control level of solvency margin, he
is required to submit a financial plan to the Authority indicating the plan of action to correct the deficiency.
If, on consideration of the plan, the Authority finds it inadequate, the insurer has to modify the financial
plan.
516

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
Sub-section (2) of section 64VA states that if an insurer or re-insurer fails to comply with the prescribed
requirement of maintaining excess of value of assets over amount of liabilities, it shall deemed to be
insolvent and may be wound up by the Court on an application made by the authority.
Therefore, in the said case Contingencies Ltd has not maintained the Solvency Margin throughout the year.
Accordingly, contention of Contingencies Ltd. that solvency margin is required to be maintained as per limits
prescribed only on last day of the financial year is not tenable.
Study Material
14. As at 31st March 2020 while auditing Safe Insurance Ltd, you observed that a policy has been
issued on 25th March 2020 for fire risk favouring one of the leading corporate houses in the country
without the actual receipt of premium and it was reflected as premium receivable. The company
maintained that it is a usual practice in respect of big customers and the money was collected on 5th
April, 2019. You further noticed that there was a fire accident in the premises of the insured on 31st
March 2019 and a claim was lodged for the same. The insurance company also made a provision for
claim. Please respond
Answer
Provision for Claim: No risk can be assumed by the insurer unless the premium is received. According to
section 64VB of the Insurance Act, 1938, no insurer should assume any risk in India in respect of any
insurance business on which premium is ordinarily payable in India unless and until the premium payable
is received or is guaranteed to be paid by such person in such manner and within such time, as may be
prescribed, or unless and until deposit of such amount, as may be prescribed, is made in advance in the
prescribed
manner. The premium receipt of insurance companies carrying on general insurance business normally
arise out of three sources, viz., premium received from direct business, premium received from
reinsurance business and the share of co-insurance premium.
In view of the above, the insurance company is not liable to pay the claim and hence no provision for claim
is required.
15. What are the steps to be taken while verifying the Premium of (a) General Insurance
Company; and (b) Life Insurance Company?
(i) Before commencing verification of premium income, the auditor should look into the internal
controls and compliance thereof as laid down for collection and recording of the premiums.
(ii) The auditor should broadly review the systems used by the company to collect money, underwrite
and issue the policy. Insurance companies use varied and complex IT systems for risk assessment, policy
issuance, premium receipting and accounting. Hence, it is essential for the auditor to understand the
overall system architecture and specifically the data flow from one system to the other.
(iii) The auditor should ascertain that all the cover notes (for motor business) relating to the risks
assumed have been serially numbered for each class of business. The auditor should also verify that
there is an adequate internal check on the issue of stationery comprising of cover notes, policy
documents, stamps, etc. The auditor may apply sampling techniques for verification of larger volume of
transactions.
517

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
(iv) The auditor should ensure that premium in respect of risks incepting during the relevant
accounting year has been accounted as premium income of that year on the basis of premium
revenue recognition. The auditor, as part of his audit procedures, should make an assessment of the
reasonability of the risk pattern established by the management. The auditor should also see whether
the premium received during the year but pertaining to risk commencing in the following year has
been accounted for under the head ‘Premium Received in Advance’ and has been disclosed
separately. Normally, such instances relate to the issue of cover notes and certificates at the end of
the accounting year relating to risks commencing in the next accounting period. Generally, there is a
column in the Premium Register called “Commencement of Risk”, indicating the date and time from
which the risk under the policy issued has commenced. The auditor should verify that policy
documents have not been issued, in case:
(a) premium had not been collected at all;
(b) premium had been collected but the relevant cheques have been dishonoured; (refer Cheque
Dishonoured Book);
(c) premium had not immediately been collected due to furnishing of a bank guarantee or cash
deposit but either the deposit or guarantee had fallen short or has expired or the premium had been
collected beyond the stipulated time limit (i.e., there is a shortfall in bank guarantee account or cash
deposit account of the insured);
(d) premium had not been collected due to risk cover being increased or where stipulated limits have
been exhausted in respect of open declaration policies (i.e., where premium has accrued but has not
been received); and
(e) instalments of premium have not been collected in time in respect of certain categories of policies,
e.g., marine-cum-erection policies where facility has been granted for premium being paid in
instalments (such facility is normally available
(vi) The auditor should verify the collections lodged by agents after the balance sheet date to
see whether any collection pertains to risk commencing for the year under audit. The auditor should
also check that the premium has been recorded originally at the gross figure, i.e., without providing
for unexpired risks and reinsurances.
(vii) In case of co-insurance business, where the company is not the leader, because of the non-
availability of the relevant information in many cases the premium is not booked even
though the risk has commenced during the relevant accounting year. The auditor should see that the
company’
s share of the premium has been accounted for on the basis of the
available information on nature of risk and the provisional premium charged by the leading insurer.
The auditor should examine the communications issued to the company by the leading insurers
advising them of the company’s share of premium income. Such communications should be seen
even in respect of the post -audit period. Where the company is the leader, the auditor should obtain
a reasonable assurance that only the company’s own share of premium has been shown as income
and accounts of the other
companies have been credited with their share of the premium collected.
(viii) The auditor should check whether Premium Registers have been maintained chronologically, for
each underwriting department, giving full particulars including service tax charged as per acceptance
advice on a day-to-day basis. The auditor should verify whether the figures of premium mentioned in
the register tally with those in General Ledger.
518

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
(xi) Where policies have been issued with a provision to collect premium periodically (i.e., under
instalment clause, special declaration policy or periodical declaration under open policies in marine
insurance), the auditor should check whether premium are collect ed as and when they become due.
(x) The auditor should verify whether instalments falling due on or before the balance sheet date,
whether received or not, have been accounted for as premium income as for the year under audit.
Also examine whether instalm
ents of premium falling due in the subsequent year have not been recognised in the accounts as
outstanding premium.
(xi) The auditor should verify the year end transactions to check that amounts receive
during the year in respect of risks commencing/ instalments falling due on or after th
first day of next financial year are not credited to premium account but credited to
Premium Received in Advance Account.
(xii) The auditor should verify the collections remitted by agents immediately after the
cut-off date to verify the risk assumed during the year under audit on those collections.
(xiii) The auditor should also check that in case of cancellation of policies/cover notes
issued, no risk has been assumed between the date of issue and subsequent
cancellation thereof.
(xiv) Where premium originally received has been refunded, the auditor should verify
whether the agency commission paid on such premium has been recovered.
(xv) The auditor should verify whether GST has been charged from the insured, at the
rates in force, on the total premium for all classes of business other than those
exempted under service tax laws. Check whether GST so collected is disclosed under
‘Current Liabilities’ to the extent not deposited in Government’s Account.
(xvi) In the case of co-insurance business, the auditor should verify whether GST at the
rates in force, based on the place of business and place of delivery on the whole
premium has been charged or collected from the insured by the company in case it is
the leader.
Check that GST/service tax so collected on premium charged from the insured by the
company have been regularly deposited in the Government’s Account.
(xvii) The auditor should also check that money collected by the agents from the
policyholders have been received by the company as quickly as possible.
(xviii) The auditor should also check whether the bank guarantees against which
policies are issued are valid and there is a tracking mechanism of the amounts of
policies issued against the guarantees.
16.Enumerate the steps to be taken by an auditor for the verification of Re-insurance outward by a
General Insurance Company.
519

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
The following steps may be taken by the auditor in the verification of re-insurance outward:
(i) The auditor should verify that re-insurance underwriting returns received from the operating units
regarding premium, claims paid, outstanding claims tally with the audited figures of premium, claims paid
and outstanding claims.
(ii) The auditor should check whether the pattern of re-insurance underwriting for outward cessions fits
within the parameters and guidelines applicable to the relevant year.
(iii) The auditor should also check whether the cessions have been made as per the stipulation applicable to
various categories of risk.
(iv) The auditor should verify whether the cessions have been made as per the agreements entered into
with various companies.
(v) It should also be seen whether the outward remittances to foreign re-insurers have been done as per
the foreign exchange regulations.
(vi) It should also be seen whether the commission on cession has been calculated as per the terms of the
agreement with the re-insurers.
(vii) The auditor should verify the computation of profit commission for various automatic treaty
arrangements in the light of the periodical accounts rendered and in relation to outstanding loss pertaining
to the treaty.
(viii) The auditor should examine whether the cash loss recoveries have been claimed and accounted on a
regular basis.
(ix) The auditor should also verify whether the Claims Paid item appears in Outstanding Claims list by error.
This can be verified at least in respect of major claims.
(x) He should see whether provisioning for outstanding losses recoverable on cessions have been
confirmed by the re-insurers and in the case of major claims, documentary support should be insisted and
verified.
(xi) Accounting aspects of the re-insurance cession premium, commission receivable, paid claims
recovered, and outstanding losses recoverable on cessions have to be checked.
(xii) The auditor should check percentage pattern of gross to net premium, claims paid and outstanding
claims to ensure comparative justification.
(xiii) The auditor should also check that the re-insurers balance on cessions and whether the sub ledger
balances tallies with the general ledger balances.
(xiv) The auditor should review the individual accounts to find out whether any balance requires
provisioning / write off or write back.
(xv) He should verify whether the balances with re-insurers are supported by necessary confirmation
obtained from them.
520

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
(xvi) He should verify whether opening outstanding claims not paid during the year find place in the closing
outstanding claims vis-a-vis the reinsurance inwards outstanding losses recoverable on cessions appears in
both opening and closing list. If not, the reason for the same should be analysed.
(xvii) Any major event after the Balance Sheet date which might have wider impact with reference to
subsequent changes regarding the claim recovery both paid and outstanding and also re-insurance
balances will need to be brought out suitably.
17 State the procedure for verification of Agents’ Balances in the course of audit of a General Insurance
Company.
ANSWER:
Outstanding Premium and Agents’ Balances: The following are the audit procedures to be followed for
verification of outstanding premium and agents’ balances:
(i) Inquire reasons for long outstanding credit balances in outstanding premium accounts and examine the
reasons for policies not being issued or the outstanding premium not adjusted against amounts due.
(ii) Scrutinise and review control account debit balances and their nature should be enquired into.
(iii) Examine inoperative balances and treatment given for old balances with reference to company rules.
(iv) Enquire into the reasons for retaining the old balances.
(v) Verify old debit balances which may require provision or adjustment. Notes of explanation may be
obtained from the management in this regard.
(vi) Check age-wise, sector-wise analysis of outstanding premium.
(vii) Verify whether outstanding premiums have since been collected.
(viii) Check the availability of adequate bank guarantee or premium deposit for outstanding premium.
18. ABC & Co., Chartered Accountants are the Auditors of Just Care Life Insurance Company
Limited. Enumerate the steps to be taken by the auditor while verifying the "Investment".
ANSWER:
The Auditor during his review of Investment Department should mainly consider the following:
--Review the Investment management structure to ensure adequate segregation of duties between
Investment Front office, Mid Office and Back office;
---Review of insurer’s Standard Operating Procedures which are prescribed by the IRDA Regulations and are
required to cover the entire gamut of investment related processes and policies;
---Review of insurer’s Investment policy;
---Review of functioning and scope and minutes of Investment Committee;
---Compliance of all Investment regulations, various other circulars specified by IRDAI and other regulations
specified in the Insurance Act, 1938;
---Review of insurer’s Disaster Recovery, Backup and Contingency Plan ;
---Review of access Controls, authorization process for Orders and Deal execution, etc.;
521

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
---Review of insurer’s Cash Management System to track funds available for Investment considering the
settlement obligations and subscription and redemption of units, etc. The system should be validated not
to accept any commitment beyond availability of funds and restrict Short Sales at the time of placing the
order. Further insurer’s system should be able to determine the amount of Investible surplus;
---Ensure that the system is be able to automatically monitor various Regulatory limits on Exposure and
Rating of debt instruments;
---Review of fund wise reconciliation with Investment Accounts, Bank, and Custodian records ;
---Ensure that there is split between Shareholders’ and Policyholders ’ funds, and earmarking of securities
between various funds namely Life (Participating & Non-Participating), Pension & Group (Participating &
Non-Participating) and Unit Linked Fund;
---Review the arrangements and reconciliations of holdings with the insurer ’s custodian;
---Review and check insurer’s Investment Accounting and valuation policy and the controls around this
process; insurer’s risk management policies and processes to manage investment risk such as M2Qarket
risk, Liquidity risk, Settlement risks, etc.;
---Determine the extent of activities outsourced and the controls over such activities;
---Controls over NAV computation and declaration;
---Controls over various system interfaces such as Seamless integration of data, between front office and
back office, in the Investments accounting system;
---Flow of data from PMS to the Investment Accounting system;

Controls around personal dealings, insider trading and front running.
19.Briefly explain the term policy lapse and revival in case of Life Insurance Company and role of
auditor in verifying the same.
ANSWER:
Policy Lapse and Revival: “Lapse” is the discontinuance of the policy owing to non-payment of premium
dues. The term “lapse” is not defined in the insurance legislation, except stating that “a policy which has
acquired a surrender value shall be kept alive to the extent of the paid-up sum assured” - vide section
113(2) of the Insurance Act,1938.
In order to keep a life insurance policy “in force” the policy holder is required to pay premiums when due
(either monthly/ quarterly/annual/bi-annual). If payment is missed, the insurer allows a period of 15/30
days from the premium due date for making the payment. This period is termed as “grace period”. If the
policy holder does not make the payment within the grace period, the policy gets “lapsed”. Thus, a
payment within the grace period is deemed to be a payment on the due date.
Lapsation affects all the stakeholders – the policy holder, agents and the insurer. A lapsed policy ceases to
provide insurance protection to the insured. It forfeits the benefits under the policy and cost of new policy
is higher. Agents do not get renewal premium commission if the policy is lapsed.
The terms and conditions of the policy stipulate, that where the premium is not paid within the grace
period, the policy lapses but may be revived during the life time of the life assured. Some insurers do not
allow revival, if the policy has remained in lapsed condition for more than five years. This is because of the
522

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
possibility that the arrears of premiums on such a policy would be too heavy and that it would be better to
take out a fresh policy.
The insurer should have taken persistent measures for monitoring receipt of renewal premium within the
due dates. In case of most of insurers, policy lapsation is tracked over the PMS, wherein premium due
dates are monitored by the system once initial data of the policy is entered in the system.
Role of Auditor: The primary objective of the audit is to check and confirm that due dates are recorded and
monitored properly and polices are marked as “lapsed” on non-receipt of renewal premium within due
dates/grace period. In case of revival request, whether adequate checks are in place for receipt of
outstanding amounts and adequate documents are obtained before reviving the policy.

You have been appointed to carry out the audit of Sky Insurance Company Ltd. for the year 2019-
20. In the course of your audit, you observed that the commission paid to agents constituted a
major expense in operating expenses of the Company. Enumerate the audit concerns that address
to the assertions required for the Auditor to ensure the continued existence of internal control as
well as fairness of the amounts in accounting of commission paid to agents.
ANSWER:
Role of Auditor: The auditor should, inter alia, do the following for verification of commission: Ensure
that commission/brokerage is not paid in excess of the limits specified by IRDAI
Ensure that commission/brokerage is paid as per rates with the agent and rates filed with IRDAI
Ensure that commission/brokerage is paid to the agent/broker who has solicited the business
Ensure that the agent/broker is not blacklisted by IRDAI and is not terminated for fraud etc.
Vouch disbursement entries with reference to the disbursement vouchers with copies of commission bills
and commission statements.
Check whether the vouchers are authorised by the officers-in–charge as per rules in force and income tax
is deducted at source, as applicable.
Test check correctness of amounts of commission allowed.
Scrutinise agents’ ledger and the balances, examine accounts having debit balances, if any, and obtain
information on the same. Necessary rectification of accounts and other remedial actions have to be
considered.
Check whether commission outgo for the period under audit been duly accounted.
21. Your audit assistant seeks your help in checking the claim liability of Bharat Insurance Co. Ltd. and
wants to know the registers and records which they should obtain and review in this regard.
ANSWER:
Claims: A demand for payment of policy benefit because of the occurrence of an insured event is known as
‘claim’. Claims in general insurance business are primarily in the nature of indemnity i.e. re-imbursing the
loss incurred to the policy holder. Cost of claims to the company includes all the expenses incurred in
settlement of claims. Internal controls are established over claims to ensure that only bonafide claims are
523

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
paid and that claims paid do not exceed the value of loss incurred and/r do not exceed the sum insured.
Cost of claims are properly recorded and disclosed in the financial statements.
The components of the cost of claims to an insurer comprise the claims under policies and claim settlement
costs. Claims under policies comprise the claims paid for losses incurred, and those estimated or
anticipated claims pending settlements under the policies. Settlement cost of claims includes surveyor fee,
legal expenses, etc. A liability for outstanding claims should be brought to account on the following:
The liability includes future payments in relation to unpaid reported claims and claims incurred but not
reported including inadequate reserves which would result in future cash or asset outgo for settling
liabilities against those claims. Change in estimated liability represents the difference between the
estimated liabilities for outstanding claims in respect of claims under policies, whether due or intimated at
the beginning and at the end of the financial period. The accounting estimate also includes claims cost
adjusted for salvage value if there is sufficient degree of certainty of its realisation.
Registers and Records -The following register and records are generally prepared in
respect of claims:
(i) Claims Intimation Register;
(ii) Claims Paid Register;
(iii) Claims Disbursement Bank Book;
(iv) Claims Dockets, normally containing the following records:
Claim intimation, claim form, particulars of policy, survey report, Photograph showing
damage, repairer’s bills, letter of subrogation, police report (in case of theft), fire
service report, claim settlement note, claim satisfaction note, salvage report, salvage
disposal note, claims discharge voucher, etc.;
(v) Report of quality assurance team; and
(vi) Salvage register.
22.As an auditor of Life Insurance Company, how will you verify the ‘Commission Payable’ to its Agents?
ANSWER:
Commission payable to Agent: Insurance business is generally solicited by the Insurance agents.
The remuneration of agent is paid by way of commission which is calculated by applying
percentage to premium collected by him. Agency commission contributes towards significant
portion of expenses incurred by the Insurance Commission. Commission is payable towards
generation of new business and towards settlement of renewal premium Role of Auditor: The
Auditor during his review of Commission paid to Agents should mainly consider the following:
Review the system established by the Insurer with respect to calculation of commission to eligible
agents accurately and processing the same in timely manner.
Review the commission payment system is in sync with the premium collection system.
Check whether commission paid is within the limit prescribed under Insurance Act.
Check whether commission is clawed-back on the cancelled policies.
Check the completeness of commission processing system.
23.What is the ‘Actuarial Process’ in Life Insurance Business and what is the role of Auditor with respect
524

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
to the same?
ANSWER:
Actuarial Process: Actuaries in Life Insurance business have gained tremendous importance. The role of
Actuary in life insurance has shifted from supervising compliance to certify whether products and financial
reports are in accordance with the general regulatory guidelines.
The job of actuary or actuarial department in any Life Insurance Company involves, detailed analysis of
data to quantify risk. The actuarial department is calculating and modelling hub of the Company. Within
the department fundamentals of Insurance business is determined from pricing to policy valuations
techniques.
Role of Auditor: Auditors in the Audit report are required to certify, whether the actuarial valuation of
liabilities is duly certified by the appointed actuary, including to the effect that the assumptions for such
valuation are in accordance with the guidelines and norms, if any, issued by the authority and/or the
Actuarial Society of India in concurrence with the IRDA.
Hence, Auditors generally rely on the Certificate issued by the Appointed Actuary, certifying the
Policy liabilities. However, Auditor may discuss with the Actuaries with respect to process followed
and assumptions made by him before certifying the Policy liabilities. Actuarial department broadly
concentrates following key areas of Insurance business:
• Product Development/ Pricing and Experience analysis.
• Model Development.
• Statutory Valuations and reserving.
• Business Planning.
• Solvency management.
• Management reporting on various business valuations and profitability models of the Life Insurance
business.

(mtp nov 2019)
24. KIC Ltd is a company engaged in the business of general insurance and has been in existence for over
15 years. The company has a subsidiary company, PIC Ltd, which is also engaged in the business of
insurance other than general insurance.
The previous statutory auditors of PIC Ltd have completed their tenure as an auditor and accordingly
have resigned and the management of PIC Ltd is looking for new statutory auditors.
KB & Associates, a firm of Chartered Accountants, have vast experience of audit of insurance companies
and would like to get appointed as auditor of PIC Ltd. KB & Associates is a large firm and have also
employed experts – engineers, valuers, lawyers for various client services. The firm is evaluating as to
what should be the criteria for get appointed as auditors of PIC Ltd because in the past they have audited
only the holding companies and considering a subsidiary company for the first time
In this context, please help the firm by answering which of the following options would be correct?
525

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
(a) The firm should be appointed by the Board of Directors of PIC Ltd and should ensure that they don’t
take up audit of more than 2 insurance companies.
(b) The firm should be appointed by the Comptroller and Auditor General of India and should ensure that
they don’t take up audit of more than 3 insurance companies.
(c) The firm cannot take audit of PIC Ltd because they have employed experts which is not permitted by
the IRDAI Guidelines.
(d) The firm can take up audit of PIC Ltd by ensuring that they are eligible to be appointed as per the
criteria laid down in the Companies Act 2013 for audit of subsidiary companies and they would need
to submit a certificate in this respect to the ICAI.
Answer: (b) The firm should be appointed by the Comptroller and Auditor General of India and should
ensure that they don’t take up audit of more than 3 insurance companies.
25. NIC Pvt Ltd is a large private company engaged in the business of insurance for the last 9 years. The
company has expanded its business considerably over the years and have set up various divisions across
India.
The accounting and the operational systems of the company are centralized wherein the accounts of all
the divisions, trial balances and their balance sheets are prepared by the Head Office. AJ & Co, a firm of
Chartered Accountants, are the statutory auditors of this company and audit all the divisions and the
head office. The auditors have completed the audit of the financial statements of the company for the
year ended 31 March 2019 and the company’s financial statements are approved.
Before the annual general meeting of the company, the company received a notice from the Insurance
Regulatory and Development Authority of India (IRDAI) which has asked the company to respond within
7 days as to why this company breached the requirement of IRDAI guidelines by having a single auditor
for all the divisions and head office.
The management of the company has been doing this over the years and were never aware of this
requirement. To respond to this, the management has consulted many legal experts and also the
auditors. They would also like to understand your views as to how to respond to IRDAI in this critical
situation. Please advise carefully.
a) There has been no breach of IRDAI guidelines and accordingly the management should respond.
b) The management should request IRDAI to consider relaxation in respect of this provision for the
company for the current year as the audit is completed and it would be practically very difficult to
complete the entire process within the required timelines.
c) The management should respond to IRDAI that this provision is applicable to a company only after 15
years of its existence and hence there is no breach of IRDAI guidelines.
d) The management should respond to IRDAI that this provision should have been ensured by the auditors
and hence they should be held liable for this breach of provision of the IRDAI guidelines.
Answer: ( a) There has been no breach of IRDAI guidelines and accordingly the management should
respond
26. BIC Ltd is an insurance company looking to expand their operations in the Northern India. The
company’s operations have been considerable in the Southern India and its head office is also based at
Chennai.
526
The company had strong processes and controls from its starting days and have appointed consultants

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
over the years to ensure their operative effectiveness at various points of time. Shivam Ltd exercises
significant influence over BIC Ltd and the financial statements of Shivam Ltd are prepared as per Ind AS
(Indian Accounting Standards) and audited by Shubham & Associates. Advik & Associates are the
statutory auditors of BIC Ltd. For the financial year ended 31 March 2019, BIC Ltd also requested
Advik & Associates to certify the Investment Risk Management Systems and Processes of BIC Ltd as per
discussions with Shivam Ltd.
Advik & Associates completed this task and also submitted the required certificate which the
management has submitted to the required authorities.
After submission, BIC Ltd received notice from the Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority of
India (IRDAI) that the company has not complied the provisions in respect of submission of certificate.
The company discussed this matter with Shivam Ltd and would also like to have your views on this.
a) BIC Ltd, being an associate of a company and because of the fact that Ind AS is applicable on Shivam Ltd,
should have appointed another firm of Chartered Accountants along with Advik & Associates for this
certification work.
b) BIC Ltd should have got this certification work done from their internal auditors as per the required
provisions of IRDAI.
c) BIC Ltd should not have got this certification work done from their statutory auditors.
d) The certification work should have been done by Shubham & Associates.
Answer: ( c) BIC Ltd should not have got this certification work done from their statutory auditors
27. An Indian insurance company in the name of Trust Life Limited was carrying on life insurance business
with paid-up capital of Rs. 250 crores. The Company appointed Mr. Vineet, as its statutory auditor for
the year 2018-19. The auditor verified the investments of the company in terms of title, acquisition or
disposal, safeguard etc. In the financial statements of the company the investments were classified in
terms of portfolio maintained with central, state or any other notified investment. The auditor
mentioned in the report that the company has complied with the guidelines of the IRDAI. The
shareholders raised an objection that the audit report is incomplete as the financial statements don’t
give the classification of investments as percentage of total investments in Housing Projects or
Infrastructural Projects as per IRDA (Investment) Regulations. Is it necessary for the auditor to verify
and give the details in audit report for investments made in Housing or Infrastructural Projects?
a) As per IRDA (Investment) Regulations if the auditor has classified the investments made by the company
on the basis of investments with central, state or any other notified investment, there is no need to
verify in terms of Housing or Infrastructural Projects.
b) The auditor has to verify only the valuation of investments and appropriateness of the method of
accounting policy followed.
c) The auditor is required to give classification of investments on the basis of investments in Housing
Projects or Infrastructural Projects as, according to IRDAI guidelines the insurance company carrying on
life insurance business shall invest a minimum of 5% of investment Assets in Housing Project.
d) The auditor is required to ensure compliance with the guidelines of IRDAI and accounting policy followed
for valuation of investments. As the auditor mentioned in the report that the company has complied
with the guidelines of the IRDAI it is complete and no other disclosure is required from the auditor.
527

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
Answer: (d) The auditor is required to ensure compliance with the guidelines of IRDAI and accounting policy
followed for valuation of investments. As the auditor mentioned in the report that the company has
complied with the guidelines of the IRDAI it is complete and no other disclosure is required from the
auditor.
28. KJLIC Ltd is a life insurance company. The company is based at Nagpur and has offices across Western
India.
KJ & Associates are the statutory auditors of this company. At the time of audit of this company, areas like
cash and bank, receipts and payment and fixed assets where the internal controls of the management are
similar to the ones adopted by other companies are dealt by the auditors as per the publications on the
Internal Control Questionnaire, published by the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India (ICAI). Since
various operational cycles are inter- linked, the internal controls operating within the systems of such
cycles are reviewed simultaneously by the auditors. The company avails services of an actuary for
computing various liabilities and provisions which are certified by the actuary.
During the audit of the financial statements for the financial year ended 31 March 2019, the auditors of
the company would like to have a discussion with the actuary who has given actuarial certificate on the
basis of which certain liabilities have been recorded in the financial statements, however, the actuary and
the management of the company are not comfortable with this and they have asked the auditor to
complete their work on the basis of certificate. Further the management also provides management
representation letter in respect of all of these points.
Please suggest if you were the auditors of this company, how would you have handled this matter?
a) The management is correct and as an auditor getting certificate would be a good audit evidence.
b) The management is not correct and the auditor may have discussions with the actuary.
c) The auditor is not correct because the IRDAI Guidelines require the actuary to maintain confidentiality
and by having such discussion it would be a non-compliance. Auditors should be aware of such legal
requirements.
d) The auditor is not correct because such requirements require approval of the Insurance Regulatory and
Development Authority of India (IRDA) and that would unnecessarily delay the completion of audit.
Answer: (b) The management is not correct and the auditor may have discussions with the actuary.
29. TNT Limited is engaged in the Life Insurance business. The company's operations have been
considerable in the Northern India and its Head Office is also based at New Delhi. TNT Ltd. while
preparing financial statements have classified administrative expenses under 14 heads as
mentioned in Schedule 3 forming part of financial statements given under schedule A to IRDA
Regulations, 2002. What is your responsibility as an auditor particularly in relation to
administrative/expenses of management? (4 Marks) (past exam jan 2021)
ANSWER
Operating Expenses related to Insurance Business (Expenses of Management):
(i) Any major expenses (Rs. 5 lacs or in excess of 1% of net premium, whichever is higher) are required to
be shown separately.
528

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
(ii) The auditor should ensure that these expenses are first aggregated and then apportioned to the
Revenue Account of each class of business on a reasonable and equitable basis.
(iii) The accounting policy should clearly indicate the basis of apportionment of these expenses to the
respective Revenue Accounts (i.e., Participating and Nonparticipating policies and in between Linked and
Non- Linked business) along with the certificate that all expenses of management, wherever incurred,
directly or
indirectly, read with the accounting policy, have been fully debited to the respective Revenue Account as
expenses.
(iv) Any expenses which are not covered under the 14 heads as mentioned in Schedule 3 are required to be
disclosed under the head ‘Others
30. Anant & Co. is the auditor of ST Insurance Company. The insurance company is also involved in re-
insurance business and necessary provision for re-insurance premium has been made in the books of
accounts. The insurance company is into a re-insurance whereby their contract relates to one particular
risk and is expressed in the re-insurance policy. Each transaction is negotiated individually, and each
party has a free choice i.e. for the insurance company to offer and the re-insurer to accept. What kind of
a re-insurance business is the insurance company into? (rtp- july 2021)
(a) Facultative Re-insurance.
(b) Stop loss treaty re-insurance.
(c) Auto-fac re-insurance.
(d) Proportional treaty re-insurance.

ANSWER- a
31. As at 31st March 2020 while auditing Universe Insurance Ltd, you observed that a policy has been
issued on 27th March 2020 for fire risk favouring one of the leading corporate houses in the country
without the actual receipt of premium and it was reflected as premium receivable. The Company
maintained that it is a usual practice in respect of big customers and the money was collected on 7th
April, 2020. You further noticed that there was a fire accident in the premises of the insured on 31st
March 2020 and a claim was lodged for the same. The insurance company also made a provision for
claim. Please respond. (rtp- july 2021)
ANSWER
No risk can be assumed by the insurer unless the premium is received. According to section 64VB of the
Insurance Act, 1938, no insurer should assume any risk in India in respect of any insurance business on
which premium is ordinarily payable in India unless and until the premium payable is received or is
guaranteed to be paid by such person in such manner and within such time, as may be prescribed, or
unless and until deposit of such amount, as may be prescribed, is made in advance in the prescribed
manner. The premium receipt of insurance companies carrying on general insurance business normally
arise out of three sources, viz., premium received from direct business, premium received from reinsurance
business and the share of co-insurance premium.
In view of the above, the insurance company is not liable to pay the claim and hence no provision for claim
is required.
529

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
32. You have been appointed to carry out the audit of Blue Insurance Company Ltd. for the year 2020-21.
In the course of your audit, you observed that the commission paid to agents constituted a major
expense in operating expenses of the Company. Enumerate the audit concerns that address to the
assertions required for the Auditor to ensure the continued existence of internal control as well as
fairness of the amounts in accounting of commission paid to agents. (4 Marks) (mtp – II -july 2021)
ANSWER
Commission: The commission is the consideration payable for getting the insurance business.
The term ‘commission’ is used for the payment of consideration to get Direct business.
Commission received on amount of premium paid to a re-insurer is termed ‘Commission on
reinsurance accepted’ and is reduced from the amount of commission expenditure. The internal control
with regard to commission is aimed at ensuring that commission is paid in accordance
with the rules and regulations of the company and in accordance with the agreement with th e
agent, commission is paid to the agent who brought the business and the legal compliances, for
example, tax deduction at sources, GST on reverse charge mechanism and provisions of the
Insurance Act, 1938 have been complied with.
Ensure that commission/brokerage is not paid in excess of the limits specified by IRDAI
Ensure that commission/brokerage is paid as per rates with the agent and rates filed with IRDAI
Ensure that commission/brokerage is paid to the agent/broker who has solicited the business
Ensure that the agent/broker is not blacklisted by IRDAI and is not terminated for fraud etc.
Vouch disbursement entries with reference to the disbursement vouchers with copies of commission
bills and commission statements.
Check whether the vouchers are authorised by the officers-in–charge as per rules in force and income
tax is deducted at source, as applicable.
Test check correctness of amounts of commission allowed.
Scrutinise agents’ ledger and the balances, examine accounts having debit balances, if any,
and obtain information on the same. Necessary rectification of accounts and other remedial ctions have to
be considered.
Check whether commission outgo for the period under audit been duly accounted
33. While auditing Innocent Insurance Ltd, you observed that a policy has been issued on 31st March,
2020 evening to LMN Company. LMN Company had signed all the papers and taken insurance policy
(value insured = Rs. 11 lac) for its new godown and premium for the same was paid through cheque
subject to realization. However, on the night of 31st March, a huge fire accident took place in LMN
Company and goods worth Rs. 15 lac were destroyed. Further, cheque was also dishonoured due to
insufficient fund. The Company informed the incident to Innocent Insurance Ltd and a claim was lodged
for the same. The insurance company also made a provision for claim. Advise the Innocent Insurance Ltd
in this regard. (4 Marks) (mtp nov 20)
530

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
ANSWER
Provision for Claim: No risk can be assumed by the insurer unless the premium is received. According to
section 64VB of the Insurance Act, 1938, no insurer should assume any risk in India in respect of any
insurance business on which premium is ordinarily payable in India unless and until the premium payable is
received or is guaranteed to be paid by such person in such manner and within such time, as may be
prescribed, or unless and until deposit of such amount, as may be prescribed, is made in advance in the
prescribed manner. Therefore, in the instant case, LMN Company signed the insurance documents on
31.03.2020 and paid the premium through cheque which later on dishonoured due to insufficiency of
funds. In such case insurance premium is not being received, thus, if any accidental incident occurs,
insurance company will have no liability to pay claim. In the given case, fire is occurred on 31st March night
and premium was not received, the Innocent Insurance Ltd. will not be liable for claim for damage of goods
amounting rupees 15 lac hence no provision for claim is required
34. R.O.K. & Co. and TNK & Co. were appointed as the joint statutory auditors at the AGM of Auspic
General Insurance Co. Ltd. Apart from the aforesaid audit, R.O.K. & Co. is also being appointed as a joint
statutory auditor of one another General Insurance Company and TNK & Co. is appointed as a joint
statutory auditor of Life Insurance Company. How many further audits can be accepted by R.O.K. & Co.
and TNK & Co., respectively, of either general or life insurance companies? (mtp – I -july 2021)
(4 Marks)
ANSWER
The appointment of statutory auditors in the General Insurance Corporation of India, and its subsidiaries
and the divisions as well as other public sector Insurance Companies is made by the Comptroller and
Auditor General of India, as in the case of other public sector undertakings. However, in the case of others,
auditor is appointed at the AGM after ensuring that the auditor satisfies the compliance requirements with
the relevant sections of the IRDAI Guidelines on Corporate Governance. These guidelines pose certain
restrictions on the number of insurance companies a statutory auditor can audit. Currently, an auditor can
conduct audit only for three insurance companies and not more than 2 life or 2 general. The Guidelines also
mandate a mandatory joint audit for all insurance companies.
In the given case, R.O.K. & Co. is joint statutory auditor of Auspic General Insurance Co. Ltd. And of one
another General Insurance Company. Accordingly, it can now, further, accept only one audit and that too
of a Life Insurance Company only.
Further, TNK & Co. is joint statutory auditor of Auspic General Insurance Co. Ltd. as well as of one Life
Insurance Company. Accordingly, it can now, further, accept only one audit of either a Life Insurance
Company or a General Insurance Company.
35. In course of audit of Decent Samaritan Bank as at 31st March, 20 you observed the following:
The bank’s advance portfolio comprised of significant loans against Life Insurance Policies. Write suitable
audit program to verify these advances. (6 Marks) (mtp – I -july 2021)
ANSWER
(ii) The Audit Programme to Verify Advances against Life Insurance Policies is as under-
531

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
(i) The auditor should inspect the policies and see whether they are assigned to the bank and whether such
assignment has been registered with the insurer.
(ii) The auditor should also examine whether premium has been paid on the policies and whether they are
in force.
(iii) Certificate regarding surrender value obtained from the insurer should be examined.
(iv) The auditor should particularly see that if such surrender value is subject to payment of certain
premium, the amount of such premium has been deducted from the surrender value.
36. (RTP- NOV 2021)

You have been appointed to carry out the audit of ‘The Blue Insurance Company Ltd.’ for the
year 2019-20. In the course of your audit, you observed that the commission paid to agents
constituted a major expense in operating expenses of the Company. Enumerate the audit
concerns that address to the assertions required for the Auditor to ensure the continued
existence of internal control as well as fairness of the amounts in accounting of commission paid
to agents
ANSWER
Commission/Brokerage: The commission is the consideration payable for getting the insurance business.
The term ‘commission’ is used for the payment of consideration to get Direct business. Commission
received on amount of premium paid to a re-insurer is termed ‘Commission on reinsurance accepted’ and
is reduced from the amount of commission expenditure. The internal control with regard to commission is
aimed at ensuring that commission is paid in accordance with the rules
and regulations of the company and in accordance with the agreement with the agent, commission is paid
to the agent who brought the business and the legal compliances, for example, tax deduction at sources,
GST on reverse charge mechanism and provisions of the Insurance Act, 1938 have been complied with.
It is a well-known fact that insurance business is solicited by insurance agents. The remuneration of an
agent is paid by way of commission which is calculated by applying a percentage to the premium collected
by him. Commission is payable to the agents for the business procured through them and is debited to
Commission on Direct Business Account. There is a separate head for commission on reinsurance accepted
which usually arise in case of Head Office. It may be noted that under section 40 of Insurance Act, 1938, no
commission can be paid to a person who is not an agent of the insurance company. Commission cannot be
paid in excess of the maximum rates of commission as framed by IRDAI. The rates of
commission/brokerage are agreed and documented with the agent and filed with IRDAI.
• Ensure that commission/brokerage is not paid in excess of the limits specified by IRDAI
• Ensure that commission/brokerage is paid as per rates with the agent and rates filed with IRDAI
• Ensure that commission/brokerage is paid to the agent/broker who has solicited the business
• Ensure that the agent/broker is not blacklisted by IRDAI and is not terminated for fraud etc.
532

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
• Vouch disbursement entries with reference to the disbursement vouchers with copies of commission bills
and commission statements.
• Check whether the vouchers are authorised by the officers-in–charge as per rules in force and income tax
is deducted at source, as applicable.
• Test check correctness of amounts of commission allowed.

• Scrutinise agents’ ledger and the balances, examine accounts having debit balances, if any, and obtain
information on the same. Necessary rectification of accounts and other remedial actions have to be
considered.
• Check whether commission outgo for the period under audit been duly accounted.

CAB Insurance Company Ltd. was incorporated on 01.07.2020. Company is mainly in the area of health
insurance and planning to expand in other fields of general insurance. You have been appointed as Chief
Financial Officer (CFO) of the Company. The company has made investment as per guidelines in real estate
investment property and Equity Securities and Derivatives. Guide CFO as to how the same should be
valued?
ANSWER
Valuation of Real estate investment property and Valuation of Equity Securities and Derivative
Instruments that are traded in markets -
In case of CAB Insurance Company Ltd dealing in Health Insurance and Planning to expand in other fields of
general insurance: Guidance to CFO for Valuation of Real estate investment property and Valuation of
Equity Securities and Derivative Instruments that are traded in markets.
Valuation of Real estate investment property – The value of investment property shall be determined at
historical cost, subject to revaluation at least once in every three years. The change in the carrying cost of
the investment property shall be taken to revaluation reserve.
• The insurer shall assess at each balance sheet date whether any impairment of the property has
occurred.
• Gains/losses arising due to changes in the carrying amount of real estate shall be taken to equity under
‘Revaluation Reserve’. The Profit on sale of investments or loss on sale of investments, as the case maybe
shall include any accumulated changes in the carrying amount previously recognized in equity under the
heading revaluation reserve in respect of particular property and being recycled to the relevant revenue
account or profit and loss account on sale of that property.
• The bases for revaluation shall be disclosed in the notes to accounts. The authority may issue directions
specifying the amount to be released from the revaluation reserve for declaring bonus to the policyholders.
For the removal of doubt, it is clarified that except for the amount that is released to policyholders as per
the authority’s direction, no other amount shall be distributed to shareholders out of revaluation reserve
account.
533

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
An impairment loss shall be recognized as an expense in the revenue/ Profit and loss account immediately,
unless the asset is carried at revalued amount. Any impairment loss of a revalued asset shall be treated as a
revaluation decrease of that asset and if the impairment loss exceeds the corresponding revaluation
reserve, such excess shall be recognized as expense in the Revenue/Profit and loss account.
Valuation of Equity Securities and Derivative Instruments that are traded in markets- Listed equity
securities and derivative instruments that are traded in active markets shall be measured at fair value on
the balance sheet date. For the purpose of calculation of fair value, the lowest of the last quoted closing
price at the stock exchanges where the securities are listed shall be taken.
• The insurer shall assess on each balance sheet date whether any impairment of listed equity security(ies)/
derivative(s) instruments has occurred.
• Unrealised gains/losses arising due to changes in the fair value of the listed equity shares and
the derivative instruments shall be taken to equity under the head ‘Fair value change account’.
The profit on sale of investments or loss on sale of investment as the case maybe shall include
accumulated changes in the fair value previously recognized under equity under the heading ‘Fair
value changes account’ in respect of a particular security and being recycled to the relevant
Revenue account or Profit and loss account on actual sale of that security.
• The Authority may issue directions specifying the amount to be released from the Fair Value Change
Account for declaring bonus to the policyholders. For the removal of doubt, it is clarified that except for the
amount that is released to policyholders as per the Authority’s prescription, no other amount shall be
distributed to shareholders out of Fair Value Change Account. Also, any debit balance in Fair Value Change
Account shall be reduced from profit/free reserves while declaring dividends.
The insurer shall assess, on each balance sheet date, whether any impairment has occurred. An impairment
loss shall be recognized as an expense in Revenue/Profit and Loss Account to the extent of the difference
between the re-measured fair value of the security/investment and its acquisition cost as reduced by any
previous impairment loss recognized as expense in Revenue/ Profit and Loss Account. Any reversal of
impairment loss earlier recognized in Revenue/Profit and Loss Account shall be recognized in
Revenue/Profit and Loss Account.
Unlisted and other than actively traded Equity Securities and Derivative Instruments – Unlisted equity
securities and derivative instruments and listed equity securities and derivative instruments that are not
regularly traded in active markets shall be measured at historical cost. Provision shall be made for
diminution value of such investments. The provision so made shall be reversed in subsequent periods if
estimates based on external evidence show an increase in the value of the investment over its’ carrying
amount. The increased carrying amount of the investment due to the reversal of the provision shall not
exceed the historical cost. For the purposes of this regulation, a security shall be considered as being not
actively traded, if as per guidelines governing mutual funds laid down from time to time by SEBI, such a
security is classified as "thinly traded".
37. ( MTP- NOV 2021)

As at 31st March 2021 while auditing Reliable Insurance Ltd, you observed that a policy has been issued on
25th March 2021 for fire risk favouring one of the leading corporate houses in the country without the
actual receipt of premium and it was reflected as premium receivable. The company maintained that it is a
usual practice in respect of big customers and the money was collected on 5th April, 2021. You further
noticed that there was a fire accident in the premises of the insured on 31st March 2021 and a claim was
lodged for the same. The insurance company also made a provision for claim. Comment.
ANSWER
534

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
Provision for Claim: No risk can be assumed by the insurer unless the premium is received.
According to section 64VB of the Insurance Act, 1938, no insurer should assume any risk in India
in respect of any insurance business on which premium is ordinarily payable in India unless and
until the premium payable is received or is guaranteed to be paid by such person in such manner and
within such time, as may be prescribed, or unless and until deposit of such amount, as may
be prescribed, is made in advance in the prescribed manner. The premium receipt of insurance
companies carrying on general insurance business normally arise out of three sources, viz.,
premium received from direct business, premium received from reinsurance business and the
share of co-insurance premium.
In view of the above, the insurance company is not liable to pay the claim and hence no provision
for claim is required.
38. ( MTP- NOV 2021)

M/s Rajul & Associates, Chartered Accountants started the statutory audit of their client Concession Ltd., a
General Insurance company, which has a paid-up capital of ₹ 18,600/- lac. During the course of the audit, it
was found that the Company was not maintaining the required solvency margin as per the provisions of
Insurance Act, 1938. When the issue was escalated to the management, they replied that solvency margin
needs to be maintained as per limits prescribed only on last day of the financial year. Comment whether
reply of management is tenable or not.
ANSWER
Maintenance of Solvency Margin: Section 64VA of the Insurance Act, 1938 as amended by Insurance Laws
(Amendment) Act, 2015 requires every insurer and re-insurer to maintain an excess of the value of assets
over the amount of liabilities at all times which shall not be less than 50% of the amount of minimum
capital as stated under section 6 (requirement as to capital) of the Act and arrived at in the manner
specified by the regulations.
If, at any time, an insurer or re-insurer does not maintain the required control level of solvency margin, he
is required to submit a financial plan to the Authority indicating the plan of action to correct the deficiency.
If, on consideration of the plan, the Authority finds it inadequate, the insurer has to modify the financial
plan.
Sub-section (2) of section 64VA states that if an insurer or re-insurer fails to comply with the prescribed
requirement of maintaining excess of value of assets over amount of liabilities, it shall deemed to be
insolvent and may be wound up by the Court on an application made by the authority.
Therefore, in the said case Concession Ltd has not maintained the Solvency Margin throughout the year.
Accordingly, contention of Concession Ltd. that solvency margin is required to be maintained as per limits
prescribed only on last day of the financial year is not tenable.
39 (NOV 21 EXAM)
CA M has been appointed as an auditor of Life Secure Insurance Ltd. He observed that few insurance
policies have been sold by the company in the last month of the financial year ending 31st March, 2021.
While recognizing income in the income statement of the company, it is the responsibility of CA M to make
an assessment of the reasonability of the risk pattern managed by the management.
Also, it is to be ensured by him that Life Secure Insurance Ltd. should not issue policies, if the risk is not
established before the closure of the F.Y.2020 -21.
Indicate the circumstances when the company should not issue the policy documents.
ANSWER :
535

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
The auditor, CA M appointed as an auditor of Life Secure Insurance Ltd. should ensure that policy
documents have not been issued, in case:
(i)Premium had not been collected at all;
(ii)Premium had been collected but the relevant cheques have been dishonoured; (refer Cheque
Dishonoured Book);
(iii)premium had not immediately been collected due to furnishing of a bank guarantee or cash deposit but
either the deposit or guarantee had fallen short or has expired or the premium had been collected beyond
the stipulated time limit (i.e., there is a shortfall in bank guarantee account or cash deposit account of the
insured);
(iv)premium had not been collected due to risk cover being increased or where stipulated limits have been
exhausted in respect of open declaration policies (i.e., where premium has accrued but has not been
received); and
(v)instalments of premium have not been collected in time in respect of certain categories of policies, e.g.,
marine-cum-erection policies where facility has been granted for premium being paid in instalments (such
facility is normally available subject to certain conditions, e.g., that the first equated instalment is more by
5 per cent of the total premium payable by instalments).
(vi)Premium collected but policies not issued for long periods of time.
(vii)Whether the premium received during the year but pertaining to risk commencing in the following year
has been accounted for under the head ‘Premium Received in Advance’ and has been disclosed separately
40 (MAY 2022 EXAM)
You have been appointed as an auditor of Safe Life Insurance Company Limited. During the course of audit
you come across several cases of lapsed policies. Management is flooded with complaints from Agents and
Life Assured regarding Policy lapses and Revival. The policy lapsation is tracked over the PMS software. You
are requested by the Management to explain in clear terms about Policy lapses and Revival. Also state your
role as an auditor in verifying the same. (5 Marks)
ANSWER:
Policy Lapse and Revival: “Lapse” is the discontinuance of the policy owing to non- payment of premium
dues. In order to keep a life insurance policy “in force” the policy holder is required to pay premiums when
due (either monthly/ quarterly/annual/bi-annual). If payment is missed, the insurer allows a period of
15/30 days from the premium due date for making the payment. This period is termed as “grace period”. If
the policy holder does not make the payment within the grace period, the policy gets “lapsed”. Thus, a
payment within the grace period is deemed to be a payment on the due date.
The terms and conditions of the policy stipulate that where the premium is not paid within the grace
period, the policy lapses but may be revived during the lifetime of the life assured. Some insurers do not
allow revival, if the policy has remained in lapsed condition for more than five years. This is because of the
possibility that the arrears of premiums on such a policy would be too heavy and that it would be better to
take out a fresh policy.
The insurer should have taken persistent measures for monitoring receipt of renewal premium within the
due dates. In case of most of insurers, policy lapsation is tracked over the PMS, wherein premium due
dates are monitored by the system once initial data of the policy is entered in the system.
Role of Auditor: The primary objective of the audit is to check and confirm that due dates are recorded and
536

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
monitored properly and polices are marked as “lapsed” on non-receipt of renewal premium within due
dates/grace period. In case of revival request, whether adequate checks are in place for receipt of
outstanding amounts and adequate documents are obtained before reviving the policy.
41 (OCT 2022 MTP)
CA Vardhman has been appointed as an auditor of Life Reliable Insurance Ltd. He observed that few
insurance policies have been sold by the company in the last month of the financial year ending 31st
March, 2022. While recognizing income in the income statement of the company, it is the responsibility of
CA Vardhman to make an assessment of the reasonability of the risk pattern managed by the management.
Also, it is to be ensured by him that Life Reliable Insurance Ltd. should not issue policies, if the risk is not
established before the closure of the F.Y. 2021-22.
Indicate the circumstances when the company should not issue the policy documents .
ANSWER :
The auditor should ensure that premium in respect of risks incepting during the relevant accounting year
has been accounted as premium income of that year on the basis of premium revenue recognition. The
auditor, as part of his audit procedures, should make an assessment of the reasonability of the risk pattern
established by the management. The auditor, CA Vardhman appointed as an auditor of Life Reliable
Insurance Ltd. should ensure that policy documents have not been issued, in case:
(i) Premium had not been collected at all;
(ii) Premium had been collected but the relevant cheques have been dishonoured; (refer Cheque
Dishonoured Book);
(iii) premium had not immediately been collected due to furnishing of a bank guarantee or cash deposit but
either the deposit or guarantee had fallen short or has expired or the premium had been collected beyond
the stipulated time limit (i.e., there is a shortfall in bank guarantee account or cash deposit account of the
insured);
(iv) premium had not been collected due to risk cover being increased or where stipulated limits have been
exhausted in respect of open declaration policies (i.e., where premium has accrued but has not been
received); and
(v) instalments of premium have not been collected in time in respect of certain categories of policies, e.g.,
marine-cum-erection policies where facility has been granted for premium being paid in instalments (such
facility is normally available subject to certain conditions, e.g., that the first equated instalment is more by
5 per cent of the total premium payable by instalments).
(vi) Premium collected but policies not issued for long periods of time.
(vii) Whether the premium received during the year but pertaining to risk commencing in the following
year has been accounted for under the head ‘Premium Received in Advance’ and has been disclosed
separately.
42 (SEPT 2022 MTP)

You are an auditor of Fair Insurance Company Ltd. which offers variety of risk management products to
business entities wishing to protect their business activities against losses due to various probable risks.
Fair Insurance Company Ltd. is in the process of offering to Guru Ltd., a multinational group having
537

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
worldwide market, “Trade Credit Insurance Policy” to cover domestic risk export risk and political risk. You
as an auditor of Insurance Company have been requested to ensure that all the requirements have been
met by Fair Insurance Company Ltd. before Trade Credit Insurance Product is offered to Guru Ltd. List down
those requirements.
ANSWER:
Basic Requirements of a Trade Credit Insurance Product: An insurer shall offer trade credit insurance
product only if all requirements mentioned below are met -
(i) Policyholder's loss is non-receipt of trade receivable arising out of a trade of goods or services.
(ii) Policyholder is a supplier of goods or services in consideration for a fair market value.
(iii) Policyholder's trade receivable does not arise out of factoring or reverse factoring arrangement or any
other similar arrangement.
(iv) Policyholder has a customer (i.e., Buyer) who is liable to pay a trade receivable to the policyholder in
return for the goods and services received by him from the policyholder, in accordance with a policy
document filed with the insurer.
(v) Policyholder undertakes to pay premium for the entire Policy Period.
(vi) Any other requirement that may be specified by the Authority from time to time.
43 (SEPT 2022 MTP)

Vishudh & Co. is the auditor of JIN Insurance Company. The insurance company is also involved in re-
insurance business and necessary provision for re-insurance premium has been made in the books of
accounts. The insurance company is into a re-insurance whereby their contract relates to one particular risk
and is expressed in the re-insurance policy. Each transaction is negotiated individually, and each party has a
free choice i.e. for the insurance company to offer and the re -insurer to accept. What kind of a re-
insurance business is the insurance company into?
(a)Facultative Re-insurance.
(b)Stop loss treaty re-insurance.
(c)Auto-fac re-insurance.
(d)Proportional treaty re-insurance.
ANSWER : ( A )
44 (MARCH 2022 MTP)
You have been appointed to carry out the audit of Blue Heaven Life Insurance Company Ltd. for the year
2021-22. During the course of audit, you observed that the commission payable to agents constituted a
major expense in operating expenses of the Company. Enumerate the audit concerns that address to the
assertions required for the Auditor to ensure the continued existence of internal control as well as fairness
of the amounts in accounting of commission payable to agents.
ANSWER :
Commission payable to Agents: Insurance business is generally solicited by the Insurance agents. The
remuneration of agent is paid by way of commission which is calculated by applying percentage to
538
premium collected by him. Agency commission contributes towards significant portion of expenses

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
incurred by the Insurance Commission. Commission is payable towards generation of new business and
towards settlement of renewal premium
Role of Auditor: The Auditor during his review of Commission paid to Agents should mainly consider the
following:
Review the system established by the Insurer with respect to calculation of commission to eligible agents
accurately and processing the same in timely manner.
Review the commission payment system is in sync with the premium collection system.
Check whether commission paid is within the limit prescribed under Insurance Act.
Check whether commission is clawed-back on the cancelled policies.
45(APRIL 2022 MTP)
You are an auditor of Great Insurance Company Ltd. which offers variety of risk management products to
business entities wishing to protect their business activities against losses due to various probable risks.
Great Insurance Company Ltd. is in the process of offering to Unique Ltd., a multinational group having
worldwide market, “Trade Credit Insurance Policy” to cover domestic risk, export risk and political risk. You
as an auditor of Insurance Company have been requested to ensure that all the requirements have been
met by Great Insurance Company Ltd. before Trade Credit Insurance Product is offered to Unique Ltd. List
down those requirements.
ANSWER :
Basic Requirements of a Trade Credit Insurance Product: An insurer shall offer trade credit insurance
product only if all requirements mentioned below are met -
(i)Policyholder's loss is non-receipt of trade receivable arising out of a trade of goods or services.
(ii)Policyholder is a supplier of goods or services in consideration for a fair market value.
(iii)Policyholder's trade receivable does not arise out of factoring or reverse factoring arrangement or
any other similar arrangement.
(iv)Policyholder has a customer (i.e. Buyer) who is liable to pay a trade receivable to the policyholder in
return for the goods and services received by him from the policyholder, in accordance with a policy
document filed with the insurer.
(v)Policyholder undertakes to pay premium for the entire Policy Period.
(vi)Any other requirement that may be specified by the Authority from time to time.
46( APRIL 2022 MTP)

The Splendid General Insurance Company has entered into reinsurance contract with Adi Reinsurance Co.
Ltd. against the risk of fire only. Adi Reinsurance Co. Ltd. is one of the largest reinsurers in India. Identify
the type of reinsurance contract between Splendid General Insurance Company and Adi Reinsurance Co.
Ltd.
(a)Treaty Reinsurance.
(b)Proportional Treaty Reinsurance.
(c)Non-Proportional Treaty Reinsurance.
539

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
(d)Facultative Reinsurance.
ANSWER : D
47 (MAY 2022 RTP)

ARHAM Limited is engaged in the business of Insurance for the last 27 years. KUSHAL & Co., a firm of
Chartered Accountants are the statutory auditors of this company and have been required to perform the
audit of all the divisions and head office for the financial year 2020-2021. At the planning state CA K,
Engagement Partner has identified outstanding premium and agents’ balances as a focus area. Guide CA K
by explaining key audit procedures to be performed for verification of outstanding premium and agent’s
balance.
ANSWER :
Outstanding Premium and Agents’ Balances: The following are the audit procedures to
be followed for verification of outstanding premium and agents’ balances:
(i)Inquire reasons for long outstanding credit balances in outstanding premium accounts and examine the
reasons for policies not being issued or the outstanding premium not adjusted against amounts due.
(ii)Scrutinise and review control account debit balances and their nature should be enquired into.
(iii)Examine inoperative balances and treatment given for old balances with reference to company rules.
(iv)Enquire into the reasons for retaining the old balances.
(v)Verify old debit balances which may require provision or adjustment. Notes of explanation may be
obtained from the management in this regard.
(vi)Check age-wise, sector-wise analysis of outstanding premium.
(vii)Verify whether outstanding premiums have since been collected.
(viii)Check the availability of an adequate bank guarantee or premium deposit for outstanding
premium.
48 (NOV 2022 RTP)

Write a short note on the following:
(a)Management audit questionnaire.
(b)Free look Cancellation (FRC)
(c)Services rendered by Forensic Auditors
ANSWER :
(a) A management audit questionnaire is an important tool for conducting a management audit. It is
through these questionnaires that the auditors make an inquiry into important facts by measuring current
performance. Such questionnaires aim at a comprehensive and constructive examination of an
organisation’s management and its assigned tasks. Overall it is concerned with the appraisal of
management actions in accomplishing the organisation’s objectives.
540

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
Management Audit
Questionnaire
Its primary objective is to highlight weaknesses and deficiencies of the organisation. It includes
a review of how well or badly the management functions of planning, organising, directing and
controlling are being performed. The questionnaire provides a means for evaluating an
organisation’s ongoing operations by examining its major functional areas. There are three
possible answers to the management audit questions:
Yes No Not applicable
It indicates that the specific It indicates

area, function or aspect unacceptable It indicates that the
under study is functioning in performance & should question doesnot
an acceptable manner. No be explained in writing. apply.
written application is needed
in that case.
Thus, management audit questionnaire for this part of the audit not only serves as
a management tool to analyse the current situation; more importantly, it enables
the management auditors to synthesis those elements that are causing
organisational difficulties and deficiencies.
(b) Free Look Cancellation (FLC) : As per clause 6(2) of IRDA (Protection of Policyholders Interest)
Regulations, 2002, “the insurer shall inform by the letter forwarding the policy that he has a period of 15
days from the date of receipt of the policy document to review the terms and conditions of the policy and
where the insured disagrees to any of those terms or conditions, he has the option to return the policy
stating the reasons for his objection, when he shall be entitled to a refund of the premium paid, subject
only to a deduction of a proportionate risk premium for the period on cover and the expenses incurred by
the insurer on medical examination of the proposer and stamp duty charges”.
Accordingly, FLC is an option provided to the policyholder wherein he has a period of 15 days from the date
of receipt of the policy document to review the Terms & Conditions of the policy and in case of
disagreement to any of the terms & conditions, he/ she has the option to return the policy stating the
reason for policy’s cancellation. FLC requests can be received through any mode –e-mail, fax and letters
depending on insurer’s policy. In case of written letters, the signature of the policy holder should be
matched with the original proposal form. FLC request is processed only when the policy holder is not
satisfied with the terms and conditions of the policy document and not for any other reasons. FLC refund is
paid either by cheque or in case the policy holder wants direct credit, then consent for direct credit along
with cancelled cheque for bank account details is submitted.
(c)Services rendered by Forensic Auditors are:
•Crafting questions to be posed
•Responding to questions posed
•Identifying documents to be requested and/or subpoenaed
•Identifying individuals to be most knowledgeable of facts
•Conducting research relevant to facts of the case
•Identifying and preserving key evidence
541

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
•Evaluating produced documentation and information for completeness

•Analysing produced records and other information for facts
•Identifying alternative means to obtain key facts and information
•Providing questions for deposition and cross examination of fact and expert witnesses
542

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTIONS

1. MTP Mar 2019 QN no 9 (1 Mark)
Deposit insurance facility of Deposit Insurance and Credit Guarantee Corporation (DICGC) is :
(a) Not available to depositors of NBFCs
(b) Available to depositors of NBFCs
(c) Available to depositors of Banks
(d) Not available to depositors of both NBFCs and banks
Answer: (a)Not available to depositors of NBFCs
2. MTP Oct 2019 QN no 5 (1 Mark)

CER Ltd is a non-banking financial company and has been operating for the last 10 years. The
company is duly registered as per the requirements of the Reserve Bank of India. The com
pany’s assets base has been very strong over the years due to its efficient management function.
The company is also planning to get listed for which required work is going on.
For the financial year ended 31 March 2019, the company has closed its books of accounts and
prepared the financial statements for the purpose of statutory audit in a timely manner.
The auditors of the company have started their fieldwork. It has been observed by the auditors
that the company’s various term loans which have been given to various parties have become
overdue in terms of instalment including interest for a period of 5 months.
As per the auditors these terms loans should be considered by the company for making
provision at the rate of 20% of total outstanding amount, however, the management has
considered a provision at the rate of 0.30%. Please advise the auditors and the management
regarding this matter considering that “Non-Banking Financial Company - Systemically Important
543

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
Non-Deposit taking Company and Deposit taking Company (Reserve Bank) Directions, 2016” are
applicable to this NBFC.
(a) Provision should be made at 10%.
(b) Provision should be made 0.30%
(c) Provision should be made at 20%.
(d) Provision should be made at 0.40%
Answer: a) Provision should be made at 10%.

Yuvraj Ltd. is a non-banking financial company other than Nidhi company and is covered under
“Master Direction - Non-Banking Financial Companies Auditor’s Report (Reserve Bank)
Directions, 2020”. The NBFC has been in existence for the last 11 years and its operations are
considerable in size having a net worth of Rs. 299 crores. The NBFC has new statutory auditors
for the financial year ended 31 March 2022. The audit report (including CARO) of the NBFC was
clean for the financial year ended 31 March 2021. The company had a planning discussion with
the auditors of the company for the financial year ended 31 March 2022 who raised a point
regarding the applicability of new set of accounting standards, Indian Accounting Standards (Ind
AS), on the NBFC for the financial year ended 31 March 2022 and have asked the management
to ensure that its financial statements should be according to that. This comes as a big surprise
to the management who had assessed that Ind AS would not be applicable to this NBFC because
of the fact that CARO is applicable on this NBFC. There is a big disconnect on this matter between
the auditor and the management. Please help by resolving this matter.
(A) Both the management and statutory auditors are not correct because Ind AS is not applicable
to any NBFC covered under “Master Direction - Non-Banking Financial Companies Auditor’s
Report (Reserve Bank) Directions, 2020”.
(B) Management is correct because Ind AS is only applicable to NBFC which are also a Nidhi
company. In this case, CARO being applicable Ind AS cannot apply to this NBFC.
(C) If the management does not agree with the view of statutory auditors then they should give
adverse opinion in their report and also report this to RBI.
(D) Ind AS would not be applicable for financial year ended 31 March 2022 and hence the view of
statutory auditors is not correct.
Answer: Option D - Ind AS would not be applicable for financial year ended 31 March 2022 and
hence the view of statutory auditors is not correct.
4. MTP Oct 2019 QN no 8 (1 Mark)

50:50 test determination is popularly used in
(a) Banking Company
(b) Insurance Company
(c) NBFC Company
(d) Stock Trading Company
544

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
Answer: Option (c) NBFC Company
RTP May 2018 Qn no.13
5.In the case of companies carrying on the business of a non-banking financial institution, the auditor
needs to report under CARO, 2020 whether the registration has been obtained under section 45-IA of
the Reserve Bank of India Act, 1934, if required.
You are required to state in brief the audit procedure to be followed while reporting under above
mentioned circumstances.
ANSWER
Reporting under CARO, 2020 for Registration under RBI Act, 1934: As per Clause (xvi) of
paragraph 3 of the CARO, 2020, the auditor is required to report whether the company is
required to be registered under section 45-IA of the Reserve Bank of India Act, 1934. If so,
whether the registration has been obtained.
Audit Procedures and Reporting-
(i) The auditor should examine the transactions of the company with relation to the activities
covered under the RBI Act and directions related to the Non-Banking Financial Companies.
(iv) Whether the company has obtained the registration as NBFC, if not, the reasons should be sought
from the management and documented.
(v) The auditor should report incorporating the following
• Whether the registration is required under section 45- IA of the RBI act,1934
• If so whether it has obtained the registration
• If the registration is not obtained, the reasons thereof.
RTP May 2019 Qn no 20(d)
6.Write short note on the Classification of Frauds by NBFC
Answer
Classification of Frauds by NBFC: In order to have uniformity in reporting, frauds have been
classified as under based mainly on the provisions of the Indian Penal Code:
(i) Misappropriation and criminal breach of trust.

(ii) Fraudulent encashment through forged instruments, manipulation of books of account or
through fictitious accounts and conversion of property.
(iii) Unauthorised credit facilities extended for reward or for illegal gratification.
545

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
(iv) Negligence and cash shortages.

(v) Cheating and forgery.
(vi) Irregularities in foreign exchange transactions.
(vii) Any other type of fraud not coming under the specific heads as above.
Cases of ‘negligence and cash shortages’ and ‘irregularities in foreign exchange transactions’
referred to in items (d) and (f) above are to be reported as fraud if the intention to cheat/ defraud is
suspected/ proved. However, the following cases where fraudulent intention is not suspected/
proved, at the time of detection, will be treated as fraud and reported accordingly:
(i) cases of cash shortages more than Rs.10,000/- and

(ii) cases of cash shortages more than Rs.5000/- if detected by management/ auditor/ inspecting
officer and not reported on the occurrence bythe persons handling cash.
NBFCs having overseas branches/offices should report all frauds perpetrated at such
branches/offices also to the Reserve Bank as per the prescribed format and procedures.

Aviral & Co LLP are the auditors of NBFC (Investment and Credit Company). In this context, please explain
what verification procedures should be performed in relation to audit of NBFC - Investment and Credit
Company (NBFC-ICC).

Shivam & Co LLP are the auditors of NBFC (Investment and Credit Company). Some of the team
members of the audit team who audited this NBFC have left the firm and the new team
members are in discussion with the previous team members who are still continuing with the
firm regarding the verification procedures to be performed. In this context, please explain what
verification procedures should be performed in relation to audit of NBFC - Investment and Credit
Company (NBFC-ICC).
Answer
Some points that may be covered in the audit of NBFC - Investment and Credit Company (NBFC-
ICC):
i. Physically verify all the shares and securities held by a NBFC. Where any security is lodged with an
institution or a bank, a certificate from the bank/institution to that effect must be verified.
ii. Verify whether the NBFC has not advanced any loans against the security of its own shares.
iii. Verify that dividend income wherever declared by a company, has been duly received by an NBFC
and interest wherever due [except in case of NPAs] has been duly accounted for. NBFC Prudential
Norms directions require dividend income on shares of companies and units of mutual funds to
be recognised on cash basis. However, the NBFC
has an option to account for dividend income on accrual basis, if the same has been declared by
the body corporate in its Annual General Meeting and its right to receive the payment has been
546

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
established. Income from bonds/debentures of corporate bodies is to be accounted on accrual

basis only if the interest rate on these instruments is predetermined and interest is serviced
regularly and not in arrears.
iv. Test check bills/contract notes received from brokers with reference to the prices vis- à-vis the
stock market quotations on the respective dates.
v. Verify the Board Minutes for purchase and sale of investments. Ascertain from the Board
resolution or obtain a management certificate to the effect that the investments so acquired are
current investments or Long Term Investments.
vi. Check whether the investments have been valued in accordance with the NBFC Prudential Norms
Directions and adequate provision for fall in the market value of securities, wherever applicable,
have been made there against, as required by the Directions.
vii. Obtain a list of subsidiary/group companies from the management and verify the investments
made in subsidiary/group companies during the year. Ascertain the basis for arriving at the price
paid for the acquisition of such shares.
viii. Check whether investments in unquoted debentures/bonds have not been treated as investments
but as term loans or other credit facilities for the purposes of income recognition and asset
classification.
ix. An auditor will have to ascertain whether the requirements of AS 13 “Accounting for Investments”
or other accounting standard, as applicable, (to the extent they are not inconsistent with the
Directions) have been duly complied with by the NBFC.
x. In respect of shares/securities held through a depository, obtain a confirmation from the
depository regarding the shares/securities held by it on behalf of the NBFC.
xi. Verify that securities of the same type or class are received back by the lender/paid by the
borrower at the end of the specified period together with all corporate benefits thereof (i.e.
dividends, rights, bonus, interest or any other rights or benefit accruing thereon).
xii. Verify charges received or paid in respect of securities lend/borrowed.
xiii. Obtain a confirmation from the approved intermediary regarding securities deposited
with/borrowed from it as at the year end.
xiv. An auditor should examine whether each loan or advance has been properly sanctioned. He
should verify the conditions attached to the sanction of each loan or advance i.e. limit on
borrowings, nature of security, interest, terms of repayment, etc.
xv. An auditor should verify the security obtained and the agreements entered into, if any, with the
concerned parties in respect of the advances given. He must ascertain the nature and value of
security and the net worth of the borrower/guarantor to determine the extent to which an advance
could be considered realisable.
xvi. Obtain balance confirmations from the concerned parties.
xvii. As regards bill discounting, verify that proper records/documents have been maintained for every
bill discounted/rediscounted by the NBFC. Test check some transactions with reference to the
documents maintained and ascertain whether the discounting charges, wherever, due, have been
547

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
duly accounted for by the NBFC.

xviii. Check whether the NBFC has not lent/invested in excess of the specified limits to any single
borrower or group of borrowers as per NBFC Prudential Norms Directions.
xix. An auditor should verify whether the NBFC has an adequate system of proper appraisal and follow
up of loans and advances. In addition, he may analyse the trend of its recovery performance to
ascertain that the NBFC does not have an unduly high level of NPAs.
xx. Check the classification of loans and advances (including bills purchased and discounted) made
by a NBFC into Standard Assets, Sub-Standard Assets, Doubtful Assets and Loss Assets and the
adequacy of provision for bad and doubtful debts as required by NBFC Prudential Norms
Directions.
(Note: The above checklist is not exhaustive. It is only illustrative. There could be various other
audit procedures which may be performed for audit of an NBFC.)
8. Nov 2019 Qn no 4(a) 5 Marks.RTP May 2020 Qn no 20(C)

Mr. G. has been appointed as an auditor of LMP Ltd., a NBFC company registered with RBI. Mr.
G is concerned about whether the format of financial statements prepared by LMP Ltd. is as per
notification issued by the Ministry of Corporate Affairs (MCA) dated October 11, 2018. The
notification prescribed the· format in Division III under Schedule III of the Companies Act, 2013
applicable to NBFCs complying with Ind-AS. Mr. G wants to know the differences in the
presentation requirements between Division II and Division III of Schedule III of the Companies
Act, 2013. Help Mr. G.
Differences between Division II (Ind- AS- Other than NBFCs) and Division III (Ind- AS- NBFCs) of
Schedule III –The Ministry of Corporate Affairs (MCA) vide notification dated October 11, 2018
introduced Division III under Schedule III of the Companies Act, 2013, wherein a format for
preparation of financial statements by NBFCs complying with Ind- AS has been prescribed.
The presentation requirements under Division III for NBFCs are similar to Division II (Non NBFC) to
a large extent except for the following:
• NBFCs have been allowed to present the items of the balance sheet in order of their liquidity
which is not allowed to companies required to follow Division II,Additionally, NBFCs are required
to classify items of the balance sheet into financial and non-financial whereas other companies
are required to classify the items into current and non-current.
• An NBFC is required to separately disclose by way of a note any item of ‘other income’ or ‘other
expenditure’ which exceeds 1 per cent of the total income . Division II, on the other hand,
requires disclosure for any item of income or expenditure which exceeds 1 per cent of the revenue
from operations or . 10 lakhs, whichever is higher.
• NBFCs are required to separately disclose under ‘receivables’, the debts due from any Limited
Liability Partnership (LLP) in which its director is a partner or member.
• NBFCs are also required to disclose items comprising ‘revenue from operations’ and ‘other
comprehensive income’ on the face of the Statement of profit and loss instead of as part of the
notes.
9.Shubham & Associates are going to start the audit of NBFCs. They have not performed much
548

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
work for the NBFCs in the past years. You are required to explain the requirements related to
registration and regulation of NBFCs which an auditor needs to keep in his mind while planning
the audit of NBFC which would help this firm .
Answer
An auditor should know following points regarding registration and regulation of NBFCs: Under
Section 45–IA of the RBI Act, 1934, no NBFC shall commence or carry on the business of a non-
banking financial institution without
• obtaining a certificate of registration issued by the RBI; and
• having a net owned fund (NOF) of Rs. 25 lakhs (₹ Two crore since April 1999) not exceeding two
hundred lakhs rupees, as the RBI may, by notification in the Official Gazette, specify.
(The RBI (Amendment) Act (1997) provided an entry point norm of Rs. 25 lakh as the minimum
NOF which was revised upwards to Rs. 2 crore for new NBFCs seeking grant of certificate of
registration (CoR) on or after 21 April 1999).
[Upper limit in relation to NOF requirement for commencing NBFC business has been increased
from Rs. 2 crores to Rs. 100 crores as per Finance (No.2) Bill 2019].
A company incorporated under the Companies Act and desirous of commencing business of non-
banking financial institution as defined under Section 45–IA of the RBI Act, 1934 can apply to the
RBI in prescribed form along with necessary documents for registration. The RBI issues CoR after
satisfying itself that the conditions as enumerated in Section 45-IA of the RBI Act, 1934 are
satisfied.
However, to obviate dual regulation, certain categories of NBFCs which are regulated by other
regulators are exempted from the requirement of registration with RBI viz. Venture Capital
Fund/Merchant Banking companies/Stock Broking Companies registered with SEBI, Insurance
Company holding a valid CoR issued by IRDA, Nidhi Companies as notified under Section 406 of
the Companies Act, 2013, Chit Companies as defined in clause (b) of Section 2 of the Chit Funds
Act, 1982 or Housing Finance Companies regulated by National Housing Bank.
The RBI has issued directions to NBFCs on acceptance of public deposits, prudential norms like
capital adequacy, income recognition, asset classification, provision for bad and doubtful debts,
risk exposure norms and other measures to monitor the financial solvency and reporting by
NBFCs.
Directions were also issued to auditors to report non-compliance with the RBI Act and regulations
to the Reserve Bank, Board of Directors and shareholders.
10.Define NBFC. Also give a brief description about types of NBFCs covering any five NBFCs
549

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
ANSWER:
Definition of NBFC:
45 I(f) of Reserve Bank of India (Amendment) Act, 1997 defines a
non-banking financial company as:
(i) A financial institution which is a company;
(ii) A non-banking institution which is a company a non-banking institution which is a company and which
has as its principal business the receiving of deposits, under any scheme or arrangement or in any other
manner, or lending in any manner;
(iii) Such other non-banking institution or class of such institutions, as the as the Bank may, with the previous
approval of the Central Government and by notification in the Official Gazette, specify;”
Types of NBFCs- Compliance and Regulatory Perspective:
In terms of the Section 45-I(f) read with Section 45-I (c) of the RBI Act, 1934, as amended in 1997, non-
banking financial company (NBFC) is a company registered under the Act, engaged in the business of loans
and advances, acquisition of shares/stocks/bonds/ debentures/ securities issued by Government or local
authority or other marketable securities of a like nature, leasing, hire-purchase, insurance business, chit
business but does not include any institution whose principal business is that of agriculture activity,
industrial activity, purchase or sale of any goods (other than securities) or providing any services and
sale/purchase/construction of immovable property.
A non-banking institution which is a company and has principal business of receiving deposits under any
scheme or arrangement in one lump sum or in installments by way of contributions or in any other manner,
is also a non-banking financial company (Residuary non-banking company).
11.Satyam Pvt Ltd is a company engaged in trading activities, it also has made investments in
shares of other Companies and advanced loans to group companies amounting to more than 50%
of its total assets. However, trading income constitutes majority of its total income. Whether the
Company is an NBFC?
ANSWER:
In order to identify a particular company as Non-Banking Financial Company (NBFC), it will consider both
assets and income pattern as evidenced from the last audited balance sheet of the company to decide its
principal business. The company will be treated as NBFC when a company's financial assets constitute more
than 50 per cent of the total assets (netted off by intangible assets) and income from financial assets
constitute more than 50 per cent of the gross income. A company which fulfils both these criteria shall
qualify as an NBFC and would require to be registered as NBFC by Reserve Bank of India.
In the given case, though Satyam Pvt Ltd is fulfilling the criteria on the asset side, but however is not fulfilling
the criteria on the income side, the company cannot be classified as a deemed NBFC.
12.You are appointed as the auditor of a NBFC registered with the RBI and which is accepting and
holding public deposits. You are considering your reporting requirement in addition to your report
made under Section 143 of the Companies Act, 2013 on the accounts of this NBFC as per the
prescribed Directions. Please explain what points are required to be known in respect of separate
report to be given by you to the Board of Directors of this NBFC.
550

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
ANSWER:
Material to be included in the Auditor’s report to the Board of Directors: The auditor’s report on
the accounts of a non-banking financial company shall include a statement on the following matters,
namely –
(A) In the case of all non-banking financial companies: I. Conducting Non-Banking Financial Activity
without a valid Certificate of Registration (CoR) granted by the RBI is an offence under chapter V of
the RBI Act, 1934. Therefore, if the company is engaged in the business of non-banking financial
institution as defined in section 45-I (a) of the RBI Act and meeting the Principal Business Criteria
(Financial asset/income pattern) as laid down vide the RBI’s press release dated April 08, 1999, and
directions issued by DNBR, auditor shall examine whether the company has obtained a Certificate
of Registration (CoR) from the RBI. II. In case of a company holding CoR issued by the RBI, whether
that company is entitled to continue to hold such CoR in terms of its Principal Business Criteria
(Financial asset/income pattern) as on March 31 of the applicable year. III. Whether the non-
banking financial company is meeting the required net owned fund requirement as laid down in
Master Direction - Non-Banking Financial Company – Non-Systemically Important Non-Deposit
taking Company (Reserve Bank) Directions, 2016 and Master Direction
- Non-Banking Financial Company - Systemically Important Non-Deposit taking Company and

Deposit taking Company (Reserve Bank) Directions, 2016. Note: Every non-banking financial
company shall submit a Certificate from its Statutory Auditor that it is engaged in the business of
non-banking financial institution requiring it to hold a Certificate of Registration under Section 45-
IA of the RBI Act and is eligible to hold it. A certificate from the Statutory Auditor in this regard with
reference to the position of the company as at end of the financial year ended March 31 may be
submitted to the Regional Office of the Department of Non-Banking Supervision under whose
jurisdiction the non-banking financial company is registered, within one month from the date of
finalization of the balance sheet and in any case not later than December 30th of that year. The
format of Statutory Auditor’s Certificate (SAC) to be submitted by NBFCs has been issued vide DNBS.
PPD.02/66.15.001/2016-17 Master Direction- Non-Banking Financial Company Returns (Reserve
(B) In the case of a non-banking financial companies accepting/holding public deposits
Apart from the matters enumerated in (A) above, the auditor shall include a statement on the
following matters, namely-
(i) Whether the public deposits accepted by the company together with other borrowings indicated
below viz.
(a) from public by issue of unsecured non-convertible debentures/bonds;

551

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
(b) from its shareholders (if it is a public limited company); and
(c) which are not excluded from the definition of ‘public deposit’ in the Non-Banking Financial
Companies Acceptance of Public Deposits (Reserve Bank) Directions, 2016, are within the limits
admissible to the company as per the provisions of the Non-Banking Financial Companies
Acceptance of Public Deposits (Reserve Bank) Directions, 2016;
(ii) Whether the public deposits held by the company in excess of the quantum of such deposits
permissible to it under the provisions of Non-Banking Financial Companies Acceptance of Public
Deposits (Reserve Bank) Directions, 2016 are regularised in the manner provided in the said
Directions;
(iii) Whether the non-banking financial company is accepting "public deposit” without minimum
investment grade credit rating from an approved credit rating agency as per the provisions of Non-
Banking Financial Companies Acceptance of Public Deposits (Reserve Bank) Directions, 2016;
(iv) Whether the capital adequacy ratio as disclosed in the return submitted to the Bank in terms of
the Non-Banking Financial Company - Systemically Important Non-Deposit taking Company and
Deposit taking Company (Reserve Bank) Directions, 2016 has been correctly determined and
whether such ratio is in compliance with the minimum CRAR prescribed therein;
(v) In respect of non-banking financial companies referred to in clause (iii) above,
(a) whether the credit rating, for each of the fixed deposits schemes that has been assigned by one
of the Credit Rating Agencies listed in Non-Banking Financial Companies Acceptance of Public
Deposits (Reserve Bank) Directions, 2016 is in force; and
(b) whether the aggregate amount of deposits outstanding as at any point during the year has
exceeded the limit specified by the such Credit Rating Agency;
(vi) Whether the company has violated any restriction on acceptance of public deposit as provided
in Non-Banking Financial Companies Acceptance of Public Deposits (Reserve Bank) Directions, 2016;
(vii) Whether the company has defaulted in paying to its depositors the interest and /or principal
amount of the deposits after such interest and/or principal became due;
(viii) Whether the company has complied with the prudential norms on income recognition,
accounting standards, asset classification, provisioning for bad and doubtful debts, and
concentration of credit/investments as specified in the Directions issued by the Bank in terms of the
Master Direction - Non-Banking Financial Company - Systemically Important Non-Deposit taking
Company and Deposit taking Company (Reserve Bank) Directions, 2016;
552

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
(ix) Whether the company has complied with the liquid assets requirement as prescribed by the
Bank in exercise of powers under section 45-IB of the RBI Act and whether the details of the
designated bank in which the approved securities are held is communicated to the office concerned
of the RBI in terms of NBS 3; Non-Banking Financial Company Returns (Reserve Bank) Directions,
2016;
(x) Whether the company has furnished to the RBI within the stipulated period the return on
deposits as specified in the NBS 1 to – Non- Banking Financial Company Returns (Reserve Bank)
Directions, 2016;
(xi) Whether the company has furnished to the RBI within the stipulated period the quarterly return
on prudential norms as specified in the Non-Banking Financial Company Returns (Reserve Bank)
Directions, 2016;
(xii) Whether, in the case of opening of new branches or offices to collect deposits or in the case of
closure of existing branches/offices or in the case of appointment of agent, the company has
complied with the requirements contained in the Non-Banking Financial Companies Acceptance of
Public Deposits (Reserve Bank) Directions, 2016.
(C) In the case of a non-banking financial company not accepting public deposits Apart from the
aspects enumerated in (A) above, the auditor shall include a statement on the following matters,
namely: - (i) Whether the Board of Directors has passed a resolution for non- acceptance of any
public deposits; (ii) Whether the company has accepted any public deposits during the relevant
period/year; (iii) Whether the company has complied with the prudential norms relating to income
recognition, accounting standards, asset classification and provisioning for bad and doubtful debts
as applicable to it in terms of Non- Banking Financial Company – Non-Systemically Important Non-
Deposit taking Company (Reserve Bank) Directions, 2016 and Non-Banking Financial Company -
Systemically Important Non-Deposit taking Company and Deposit taking Company (Reserve Bank)
Directions, 2016; (iv) In respect of Systemically Important Non-deposit taking NBFCs as defined in
Non-Banking Financial Company - Systemically Important Non-Deposit taking Company and Deposit
taking Company (Reserve Bank) Directions, 2016: (a) Whether the capital adequacy ratio as
disclosed in the return submitted to the RBI in form NBS - 7, has been correctly arrived at and
whether such ratio is in compliance with the minimum CRAR prescribed by the RBI; (b) Whether the
company has furnished to the RBI the annual statement of capital funds, risk assets/exposures and
risk asset ratio (NBS-7) within the stipulated period. (v) whether the non-banking financial company
has been correctly classified as NBFC Micro Finance Institutions (MFI) as defined in the Non-Banking
Financial Company – Non-Systemically Important Non-Deposit taking Company (Reserve Bank)
553

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
Directions, 2016 and Non-Banking Financial Company - Systemically Important Non-Deposit taking
Company and Deposit taking Company (Reserve Bank) Directions, 2016.
(D) In the case of a company engaged in the business of non-banking financial institution not
required to hold CoR subject to certain conditions
Apart from the matters enumerated in (A)(I) above where a company has obtained a specific advice
from the RBI that it is not required to hold CoR from the RBI, the auditor shall include a statement
that the company is complying with the conditions stipulated as advised by the RBI.
(4) Reasons to be stated for unfavourable or qualified statements: Where, in the auditor’s report,
the statement regarding any of the items referred to in paragraph 3 above is unfavourable or
qualified, the auditor’s report shall also state the reasons for such unfavourable or qualified
statement, as the case may be. Where the auditor is unable to express any opinion on any of the
items referred to in paragraph 3 above, his report shall indicate such fact together with reasons
therefor.
13.Kamna & Co LLP, a firm of Chartered Accountants, was appointed as auditor of an NBFC. The
audit work has been completed. The audit team which was involved in the fieldwork came across
understand in detail regarding the obligations on the part of an auditor in respect of exceptions
in his report so that they can conclude their work. Please explain.
ANSWER:
Obligation of auditor to submit an exception report to the RBI

(I) Where, in the case of a non-banking financial company, the statement regarding any of the items
referred to in paragraph 3 above, is unfavorable or qualified, or in the opinion of the auditor the
company has not complied with: (a) the provisions of Chapter III B of RBI Act (Act 2 of 1934); or (b)
Non-Banking Financial Companies Acceptance of Public Deposits (Reserve Bank) Directions, 2016;
or (c) Non-Banking Financial Company – Non-Systemically Important Non-Deposit taking Company
(Reserve Bank) Directions, 2016 and Non-Banking Financial Company –
Directions, 2016. It shall be the obligation of the auditor to make a report containing the details of
such unfavourable or qualified statements and/or about the non-compliance, as the case may be,
in respect of the company to the concerned Regional Office of the Department of Non-Banking
Supervision of the RBI under whose jurisdiction the registered office of the company is located as
per first Schedule to the Non-Banking Financial Companies Acceptance of Public Deposits (Reserve
554

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
(II) The duty of the Auditor under sub-paragraph (I) shall be to report only the contraventions of
the provisions of RBI Act, 1934, and Directions, Guidelines, instructions referred to in sub-paragraph
(1) and such report shall not contain any statement with respect to compliance of any of those
provisions.
14. Karma Pvt Ltd is a Non-Deposit Taking Non-Systemically Important NBFC registered with
Reserve Bank of India. The Statutory Auditor of the company is required to give a report to the
Board of Directors. What shall be the content of the Auditor’s Report to the Board.
ANSWER:
The statutory auditor of Karma Pvt Ltd, being a Non-Deposit Taking Non-Systemically Important NBFC is
required to submit separate report to the Board of Directors on the matters as specified as below:
I. Conducting Non-Banking Financial Activity without a valid Certificate of Registration (CoR) granted by the
RBI is an offence under chapter V of the RBI Act, 1934. Therefore, if the company is engaged in the business
of non-banking financial institution as defined in section 45-I (a) of the RBI Act and meeting the Principal
Business Criteria (Financial asset/income pattern) as laid down vide the RBI’s press release dated April 08,
1999, and directions issued by DNBR, auditor shall examine whether the company has obtained a
Certificate of Registration (CoR) from the RBI.
II. In case of a company holding CoR issued by the RBI, whether that company is entitled to continue to hold
such CoR in terms of its Principal Business Criteria (Financial asset/income pattern) as on March 31 of the
applicable year.
III. Whether the non-banking financial company is meeting the required net owned fund requirement as
laid down in Master Direction - Non-Banking Financial Company – Non-Systemically Important Non-Deposit
taking Company (Reserve Bank) Directions, 2016 and Master Direction - Non-Banking Financial Company -
Directions, 2016.
Apart from the aspects enumerated above, the auditor shall include a statement on the following matters,
namely: -
(i) Whether the Board of Directors has passed a resolution for non- acceptance of any public deposits;
(ii) Whether the company has accepted any public deposits during the relevant period/year;
(iii) Whether the company has complied with the prudential norms relating to income recognition,
accounting standards, asset classification and provisioning for bad and doubtful debts as applicable to it in
terms of Non-Banking Financial Company – Non-Systemically Important Non-Deposit taking Company
(Reserve Bank) Directions, 2016;
Where, in the auditor’s report, the statement regarding any of the items referred to matters specified above
is unfavourable or qualified, the auditor’s report shall also state the reasons for such unfavourable or
qualified statement, as the case may be. Where the auditor is unable to express any opinion on any of the
items referred above, his report shall indicate such fact together with reasons thereof.
555

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
15.Krishna Pvt Ltd is primarily into the business of selling computer parts. However, the company
is fulfilling the Principal Business Criteria as at the balance sheet date i.e. Financial Assets are
more than 50 % of total assets and Financial Income is more than 50% of Gross Income. What
shall be the obligation of the Statutory Auditor in such a scenario?
ANSWER:
In the given case, Krishna Pvt Ltd is fulfilling the Principal Business Criteria i.e. Financial Assets are more
than 50 % of total assets and Financial Income is more than 50 % of Gross Income. The company which
fulfils both these criteria shall qualify as an NBFC and hence is required to obtain Certificate of Registration
(CoR) with Reserve Bank of India. In such a scenario, the statutory auditor has an obligation to submit
exception report to the RBI on the following matters :
referred to in paragraph 3 of the Non-Banking Financial Companies Auditor’s Report (Reserve Bank)
Directions, 2016, is unfavourable or qualified, or in the opinion of the auditor the company has not
complied with:
(b) Non-Banking Financial Companies Acceptance of Public Deposits (Reserve Bank) Directions, 2016; or

(Reserve Bank) Directions, 2016 and Non-Banking Financial Company - Systemically Important Non-Deposit
taking Company and Deposit taking Company (Reserve Bank) Directions, 2016.
It shall be the obligation of the auditor to make a report containing the details of such unfavourable or
qualified statements and/or about the non-compliance, as the case may be, in respect of the company to
the concerned Regional Office of the Department of Non-Banking Supervision of the RBI under whose
jurisdiction the registered office of the company is located as per first Schedule to the Non-Banking
Financial Companies Acceptance of Public Deposits (Reserve Bank) Directions, 2016.
(II) The duty of the Auditor under sub-paragraph (I) shall be to report only the contraventions of the
provisions of RBI Act, 1934, and Directions, Guidelines, instructions referred to in sub-paragraph (1) and such
report shall not contain any statement with respect to compliance of any of those provisions.
16. Shivam & Co LLP are the auditors of NBFC (Investment and Credit Company). Some of the team
members of the audit team who audited this NBFC have left the firm and the new team members
are in discussion with the previous team members who are still continuing with the firm regarding
the verification procedures to be performed. In this context, please explain what verification
procedures should be performed in relation to audit of NBFC - Investment and Credit Company
(NBFC-ICC).
ANSWER
Some important points that may be covered in the audit of NBFCs, in addition to the audit points that may
be covered for companies in general, are given below:
556

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
(eg. NBFC - Investment and Credit Company (NBFC-ICC)
i. Physically verify all the shares and securities held by a NBFC. Where any security is lodged with an
ii. Verify whether the NBFC has not advanced any loans against the security of its own shares.
iii. Verify that dividend income wherever declared by a company, has been duly received by an NBFC and
interest wherever due [except in case of NPAs] has been duly accounted for. NBFC Prudential Norms
require dividend income on shares of companies and units of mutual funds to be recognised on cash basis.
However, the NBFC has an option to account for dividend income on accrual basis, if the same has been
declared by the body corporate in its Annual General Meeting and its right to receive the payment has
been established. Income from bonds/debentures of corporate bodies is to be accounted on accrual basis
only if the interest rate on these instruments is predetermined and interest is serviced regularly and not in
arrears.
iv. Test check bills/contract notes received from brokers with reference to the prices vis-à-vis the stock
market quotations on the respective dates.
v. Verify the Board Minutes for purchase and sale of investments. Ascertain from the Board resolution or
obtain a management certificate to the effect that the investments so acquired are current investments or
Long-Term Investments.
vi. Check whether the investments have been valued in accordance with the NBFC Prudential Norms and
adequate provision for fall in the market value of securities, wherever applicable, have been made there
against, as required by the Directions.
vii. Obtain a list of subsidiary/group companies from the management and verify the investments made in
subsidiary/group companies during the year. Ascertain the basis for arriving at the price paid for the
acquisition of such shares and whether the Valuation is as per Prudential norms.
viii. Check whether investments in unquoted debentures/bonds have not been treated as investments but
as term loans or other credit facilities for the purposes of income recognition and asset classification.
ix. An auditor will have to ascertain whether the requirements of AS 13 “Accounting for Investments” or
other accounting standard, as applicable, (to the extent they are not inconsistent with the Directions) have
been duly complied with by the NBFC.
x. In respect of shares/securities held through a depository, obtain a confirmation from the depository
regarding the shares/securities held by it on behalf of the NBFC.
xi. Verify that securities of the same type or class are received back by the lender/paid by the borrower at
the end of the specified period together with all corporate benefits thereof (i.e. dividends, rights, bonus,
interest or any other rights or benefit accruing thereon).
xii. Verify charges received or paid in respect of securities lend/borrowed.
xiii. Obtain a confirmation from the approved intermediary regarding securities deposited with/borrowed
from it as at the year end.
xiv. An auditor should examine whether each loan or advance has been properly sanctioned. He should
verify the conditions attached to the sanction of each loan or advance i.e. limit on borrowings, nature of
security, interest, terms of repayment, etc.
xv. An auditor should verify the security obtained and the agreements entered into, if any, with the
concerned parties in respect of the advances given. He must ascertain the nature and value of security and
the net worth of the borrower/guarantor to determine the extent to which an advance could be
considered realisable.
xvi. Obtain balance confirmations from the concerned parties.
xvii. As regards bill discounting, verify that proper records/documents have been maintained for every bill
discounted/rediscounted by the NBFC. Test check some transactions with reference to the documents
557

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
maintained and ascertain whether the discounting charges, wherever, due, have been duly accounted for
by the NBFC.
xviii. Check whether the NBFC has not lent/invested in excess of the specified limits to any single borrower
or group of borrowers as per NBFC Prudential Norms
xix. An auditor should verify whether the NBFC has an adequate system of proper appraisal and follow up
of loans and advances. In addition, he may analyse the trend of its recovery performance to ascertain that
the NBFC does not have an unduly high level of NPAs.
xx. Check the classification of loans and advances (including bills purchased and discounted) made by a
NBFC into Standard Assets, Sub-Standard Assets, Doubtful Assets and Loss Assets and the adequacy of
provision for bad and doubtful debts as required by NBFC Prudential Norms.
17. Mr. G. has been appointed as an auditor of LMP Ltd., a NBFC company registered with RBI.
Mr. G is concerned about whether the format of financial statements prepared by LMP Ltd. is as
per notification issued by the Ministry of Corporate Affairs (MCA) dated October 11, 2018. The
notification prescribed the· format in Division III under Schedule III of the Companies Act, 2013
applicable to NBFCs complying with Ind-AS. Mr. G wants to know the differences in the
presentation requirements between Division II and Division III of Schedule III of the Companies
Act, 2013. Help Mr. G.
ANSWER
The presentation requirements under Division III for NBFCs are similar to Division II (Non NBFC) to a large
extent except for the following:
(a)NBFCs have been allowed to present the items of the balance sheet in order of their liquidity which is not
allowed to companies required to follow Division II. (b)An NBFC is required to separately disclose by way of
a note any item of ‘other income’ or ‘other expenditure’ which exceeds 1 per cent of the total income.
Division II, on the other hand, requires disclosure for any item of income or expenditure which exceeds 1 per
cent of the revenue from operations or Rs. 10 lakhs, whichever is higher.(c)NBFCs are required to separately
disclose under ‘receivables’, the debts due from any Limited Liability Partnership (LLP) in which its director is
a partner or member.(d)NBFCs are also required to disclose items comprising ‘revenue from operations’ and
‘other comprehensive income’ on the face of the Statement of profit and loss instead of showing those only
as part of the notes.(e)Separate disclosure of trade receivable which have significant increase in credit risk
& credit impaired(f)The conditions or restrictions for distribution attached to statutory reserves have to
be separately disclose in the notes as stipulated by the relevant statute.
18. Abhimanyu Finance Ltd. is a Non Banking Finance Company and was in the business of
accepting public deposits and giving loans since 2015. The company was having net owned funds
of Rs. 1,50,00,000/-(one crore fifty lakhs) and was not having registration certificate from RBI and
applied for it on 30th March 2022. The company appointed Mr. Kabra as its statutory auditors for
the year 2021-22. Advise the auditor with reference to auditor procedures to be taken and
reporting requirements on the same in view of CARO 2020?
ANSWER
558

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
As per Clause (xvi) of Paragraph 3 of CARO 2020, the auditor is required to report that “whether the
company is required to be registered under section 45-IA of the Reserve Bank of India Act, 1934 and if so,
whether the registration has been obtained.”
The auditor is required to examine whether the company is engaged in the business which attract the
requirements of the registration. The registration is required where the financing activity is a principal
business of the company. The RBI restrict companies from carrying on the business of a non-banking
financial institution without obtaining the certificate of registration.
(i) The auditor should examine the transactions of the company with relation to the activities covered
under the RBI Act and directions related to the Non-Banking Financial Companies.
(ii) The financial statements should be examined to ascertain whether company’s financial assets constitute
more than 50 per cent of the total assets and income from financial assets constitute more than 50 per
cent of the gross income.
(iv) Whether the company has obtained the registration as NBFC, if not, the reasons should be sought from
the management and documented.
(1) Whether the registration is required under section 45-IA of the RBI Act, 1934.
(2) If so, whether it has obtained the registration.

(3) If the registration not obtained, reasons thereof
In the instant case Abhimanyu Finance Ltd. is a Non Banking Finance Company and was in the business of
accepting public deposits and giving loans since 2015. The company was having net owned funds of Rs.
1,50,00,000/-(one crore fifty lakhs) which is less in comparison to the prescribed limit i.e. 2 crore rupees and
was also not having registration certificate from RBI
(though applied for it on 30th March 2022). The auditor is required to report on the same as per Clause (xvi)
of Paragraph 3 of CARO 2020.
19. (RTP NOV 2018)
You are appointed as the auditor of a NBFC which is an Investment company registered with RBI. What
shall be the special points to be covered for the audit of NBFC in case of Investment companies?
ANSWER
Special points that may be covered in the audit of NBFCs in case of Investment Companies are given
below:
(i) Physically verify all the shares and securities held by a NBFC. Where any security is lodged with an
(ii) NBFC Prudential Norms stipulates that NBFCs should not lend more than 15% of its owned funds to any
single borrower and not more than 25% to any single group of borrower. The ceiling on investments in
559

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
shares by a NBFC in a single entity and the aggregate of investments in a single group of entities has been
fixed at 15% and 25% respectively. Moreover, a composite limit of credit to and investments in a single
entity/group of entities has been fixed at 25% and 40% respectively of the owned fund of the concerned
NBFC. Verify that the credit facilities extended and investments made by the concerned NBFC are in
accordance with the prescribed ceiling.
(iii) Verify whether the NBFC has not advanced any loans against the security of its own shares.
(iv) Verify that dividend income wherever declared by a company, has been duly received by a NBFC and
interest wherever due [except in case of NPAs] has been duly accounted for.
(v) Test check bills/contract notes received from brokers with reference to the prices vis-à-vis the stock
market quotations on the respective dates.
(vi) Verify the Board Minutes for purchase and sale of investments. Ascertain from the Board resolution or
obtain a management certificate to the effect that the investments so acquired are current investments or
Long Term Investments.
(vii) Check whether the investments have been valued in accordance with the NBFC Prudential
Norms Directions and adequate provision for fall in the market value of securities, wherever
applicable, have been made there against, as required by the Directions.
(viii) Obtain a list of subsidiary/group companies from the management and verify the investments made in
subsidiary/group companies during the year. Ascertain the basis for arriving at the price paid for the
acquisition of such shares.
(ix) Check whether investments in unquoted debentures/bonds have not been treated as investments but
as term loans or other credit facilities for the purposes of income recognition and asset classification.
(x) An auditor will have to ascertain whether the requirements of AS 13 “Accounting for Investments” (to
the extent they are not inconsistent with the Directions) have been duly complied with by the NBFC.
(xi) In respect of shares/securities held through a depository, obtain a confirmation from the depository
regarding the shares/securities held by it on behalf of the NBFC.
(xii) In the case of securities lent/borrowed under the Securities Lending Scheme of SEBI, verify the
agreement entered into with the approved intermediary (i.e. the person through whom the lender will
deposit and the borrower will borrow the securities for lending/borrowing) with regards to the period of
depositing/lending securities, fees for depositing/lending, collateral securities and provision for the return
including pre-mature return of the securities deposited/lent.
(xiii) Verify that securities of the same type or class are received back by the lender/paid by the borrower at
the end of the specified period together with all corporate benefits thereof (i.e. dividends, rights, bonus,
interest or any other rights or benefit accruing thereon.)
(xiv) Verify charges received or paid in respect of securities lent/borrowed.
(xv) Obtain a confirmation from the approved intermediary regarding securities deposited with/borrowed
from it as at the year end.
20. RCE Ltd was set up under the Companies Act 2013 and got itself registered as non-banking
financial company with the Reserve Bank of India, fulfilling the required criteria. During the
financial year ended 31 March 2019, the company’s operations have started. The company’s
total assets were rupees 298 crores out of which trade receivables, loans receivable in cash,
cash and bank balances comprised of rupees 199 crores. During the financial year ended 31
March 2019, the company’s operations generated total income of rupees 99.50 crores. The
management also did an assessment and observed that income from its financial assets was not
much during the year and amounted to only rupees 60 crores. The management is looking at
various alternatives to improve its operations, if required, to generate better income in the
coming years. Further, the company during the year also accepted and gave demand deposits
which have been very efficient for the company. Management has a plan to significantly
560

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
increase these deposits in the next 2 years as that would help in the overall functioning of the
company.
In the context of the above, please answer which of the following options would be correct.
(a) The company does not meet the criteria of financial assets and hence would not be considered
as NBFC. Further, it cannot accept and give demand deposits and the same thing should be
reported by the statutory auditors of the company.
(b) The company does not meet the criteria of income and hence would not be considered as
NBFC. Further, it cannot accept and give demand deposits and the same thing should be
reported by the statutory auditors of the company.
(c) The company meets the criteria of financial assets and income. An NBFC can only accept
demand deposits but cannot give demand deposits. Hence in this case, the statutory auditors
should report regarding the same.
(d) The company meets the criteria of financial assets and income. An NBFC can only give demand
deposits but it cannot accept demand deposits. Hence in this case, the statutory auditors should
report regarding this matter.
Answer: (d) The company meets the criteria of financial assets and income. An NBFC can only give
demand deposits but it cannot accept demand deposits. Hence in this case, the statutory auditors
should report regarding this matter.
21. CER Ltd is a non-banking financial company and has been operating for the last 10 years.
The company is duly registered as per the requirements of the Reserve Bank of India. The
company’s assets base has been very strong over the years due to its efficient management
function. The company is also planning to get listed for which required work is going on.
For the financial year ended 31 March 2019, the company has closed its books of accounts and
prepared the financial statements for the purpose of statutory audit in a timely manner. The
auditors of the company have started their fieldwork. It has been observed by the auditors that
the company’s various term loans which have been given to various parties have become
overdue in terms of instalment including interest for a period of 5 months.
As per the auditors these terms loans should be considered by the company for making
provision at the rate of 20% of total outstanding amount, however, the management has
considered a provision at the rate of 0.30%. Please advise the auditors and the management
regarding this matter considering that “Non-Banking Financial Company - Systemically
Important Non-Deposit taking Company and Deposit taking Company (Reserve Bank)
Directions, 2016” are applicable to this NBFC.
a) Provision should be made at 10%.
b) Provision should be made 0.30%
c) Provision should be made at 20%.

561

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
d) Provision should be made at 0.40%
Answer: (a) Provision should be made at 10%.
22.CRE Ltd is a non-banking financial company and registered with the Reserve Bank of India
as per the requirements of Section 45-IA of the Reserve Bank of India Act, 1934. The company
was established with a net owned fund of Rs. 2 crores. The company’s management had a great
focus on the internal controls and processes. To make them robust, in the initial years of set
up of the company, the management involved consultants who helped the management in
setting up those processes and controls.
The company’s operations have grown considerably over the years and their assets base is huge.
The management has in-house function which reviews these processes regularly and any
improvements required are actioned upon in no time.
With this kind of set up, the management was assured of the functioning of the NBFC as per
right principles, however, despite this during the year ended 31 March 2019, the management
came across instance of fraudulent encashment through forged instruments and fictitious
accounts involving an amount of Rs. 5 lakhs. Though the amount was not significant but still the
management discussed the same with the statutory auditors for their knowledge.
The statutory auditors after discussion told the management that the management needs to
report this matter to RBI with which the management is not comfortable considering the
amount involved in this matter and the size of the company.
a) Management need not report this matter considering the nature of fraud.
b) Management need not report this matter considering the amount involved.
c) Management should report this matter to RBI.
d) Management should not report this to RBI, however, it will be their responsibility to report this
matter to SEBI.
Answer: (C) Management should report this matter to RBI
23. NBB Ltd is a non-banking financial company on which provisions of “Non-Banking Financial
Companies Acceptance of Public Deposits (Reserve Bank) Directions, 2016” are applicable. The
company has been accepting as well as holding the public deposits. During the financial year
ended 31 March 2017, the company obtained specified credit rating for its fixed deposits from
CRISIL.
However, during the financial year ended 31 March 2018, the company obtained minimum
investment grade for its fixed deposits from ICRA Ltd. During the financial year ended 31 March
2019, no such grade/ rating was obtained. The reports of the statutory auditors for the past
562

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
years have always been clean.
The statutory auditors of NBB Ltd have completed their audit for the financial year ended 31
March 2019 as well and finalizing their audit report. The auditors discussed with the
management that for the financial year ended 31 March 2019, they would have to include
matter regarding acceptance of public deposits by the company without obtained required
specified credit rating during the year ended 31 March 2019.
The auditors further explained that even during the year ended 31 March 2018, instead of
specified credit rating, the management obtained minimum investment grade which was
ignored by them but it cannot continue for 2 years.
The management is of the view that this requirement was fulfilled as the same was obtained
in the previous year and for one year if that is not taken then it should be fine. Please advise
how to deal with this matter.
a) It would have been fine if the rating was obtained in the financial year ended 31 March 2018
instead of minimum investment grade. Hence the auditor should report this matter.
b) It does not make any difference whether rating or grade was obtained. Moreover the same
should have been obtained in the current year also and hence the auditor should report this
matter.
c) It does not make any difference whether rating or grade was obtained. And hence management
is correct that only upto last year it was obtained and hence no reporting is required by the
the auditor on this matter.
d) If the rating was not obtained in the previous year, it requires that NBFC obtains rating in the
current year twice i.e. every half year. Accordingly, it should be reported by the auditor.
Answer: (b) It does not make any difference whether rating or grade was obtained. Moreover the
same should have been obtained in the current year also and hence the auditor should report
this matter.
24. Kshitij Ltd is a non-banking financial company other than Nidhi company and is covered
under “Master Direction - Non-Banking Financial Companies Auditor’s Report (Reserve Bank)
Directions, 2016”. The NBFC has been in existence for the last 11 years and its operations are
considerable in size having a net worth of Rs. 299 crores.
The NBFC has new statutory auditors for the financial year ended 31 March 2019. The audit
report (including CARO) of the NBFC was clean for the financial year ended 31 March 2018.
The company had a planning discussion with the auditors of the company for the financial year
ended 31 March 2019 who raised a point regarding the applicability of new set of accounting
standards, Indian Accounting Standards (Ind AS), on the NBFC for the financial year ended 31
March 2019 and have asked the management to ensure that its financial statements should be
563

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
according to that. This comes as a big surprise to the management who had assessed that Ind
AS would not be applicable to this NBFC because of the fact that CARO is applicable on this
NBFC. There is a big disconnect on this matter between the auditor and the management. Please
help by resolving this matter.
a) Both the management and statutory auditors are not correct because Ind AS is not applicable
to any NBFC covered under “Master Direction - Non-Banking Financial Companies Auditor’s
Report (Reserve Bank) Directions, 2016”.
b) Management is correct because Ind AS is only applicable to NBFC which are also a Nidhi
company. In this case, CARO being applicable, Ind AS cannot apply to this NBFC.
c) If the management does not agree with the view of statutory auditors then they should give
adverse opinion in their report and also report this to RBI.
d) Ind AS would not be applicable for financial year ended 31 March 2019 and hence the view of
statutory auditors is not correct
Answer: (d) Ind AS would not be applicable for financial year ended 31 March 2019 and hence
the view of statutory auditors is not correct
25. Mr. Shripal has been appointed as an auditor of ASG Ltd., a NBFC company registered with RBI. Mr.
Shripal is concerned about whether the format of financial statements prepared by ASG Ltd. is as per
notification issued by the Ministry of Corporate Affairs (MCA) dated October 11, 2018. The notification
prescribed the· format in Division III under Schedule III of the Companies Act, 2013 applicable to NBFCs
complying with Ind-AS. Mr. Shripal wants to know the differences in the presentation requirements
between Division II and Division III of Schedule III of the Companies Act, 2013. Help Mr. Shripal. (6 Marks)
ANSWER
Differences between Division II (Ind- AS- Other than NBFCs) and Division III (Ind- AS- NBFCs) of Schedule III:
The presentation requirements under Division III for NBFCs are similar to Division II (Non NBFC) to a large
extent except for the following:
(i) NBFCs have been allowed to present the items of the balance sheet in order of their liquidity which is
not allowed to companies required to follow Division II. Additionally, NBFCs are required to classify items of
the balance sheet into financial and non-financial whereas other companies are required to classify the
items into current and non-current.
(ii) An NBFC is required to separately disclose by way of a note any item of ‘other income’ or ‘other
expenditure’ which exceeds 1 per cent of the total income. Division II, on the other hand, requires
disclosure for any item of income or expenditure which exceeds 1 per cent of the revenue from operations
or Rs.10 lakhs, whichever is higher.
(iii) NBFCs are required to separately disclose under ‘receivables’, the debts due from any Limited Liability
Partnership (LLP) in which its director is a partner or member.
564

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
(iv) NBFCs are also required to disclose items comprising ‘revenue from operations’ and ‘other
comprehensive income’ on the face of the Statement of profit and loss instead of showing those only as
part of the notes.
(v) Separate disclosure of trade receivable which have significant increase in credit risk & credit impaired
(vi) The conditions or restrictions for distribution attached to statutory reserves have to be separately
disclose in the notes as stipulated by the relevant statute.
26. In the course of statutory Branch audit of KS Bank Ltd, you observe that some borrower accounts
have been regularised before Balance sheet date by payment of overdue amount. Narrate the audit
procedures to be carried out with special focus on the Classification of advances and Provisioning for
Non-Performing assets of the Branch. (5 Marks) (past exam nov 2020)
ANSWER
The Audit procedures that need to be carried out with special focus on classification of advances and
provisioning for NPAs of KS Bank Ltd, in which the auditor has observed that some borrower accounts
have been regularized before balance sheet date by payment of overdue amount shall be carried out as
under :
(i) As per the Reserve Bank guidelines, if an account has been regularised before the balance sheet date by
payment of overdue amount through genuine sources, the account need not be treated as NPA.
(ii) Where subsequent to repayment by the borrower (which makes the account regular), the branch has
provided further funds to the borrower (including by way of subscription to its debentures or in other
accounts of the borrower), the auditor should carefully assess whether the repayment was out of genuine
sources or not.
(iii) Where the account indicates inherent weakness based in the data available, the account shall be
deemed as a NPA.
Classification and Provision
a. Examine whether the classification made by the branch is appropriate. Particularly, examine the
classification of advances where there are threats to recovery.
b. Examine whether the secured and the unsecured portions of advances have been segregated correctly
and provisions have been calculated properly.
c. It is to be ensured that the classification is made as per the position as on date and hence classification of
all standard accounts be reviewed as on balance sheet date.
d. The date of NPA is significant to determine the classification and hence specific care be taken in this
regard.
e. NPA should be recognized only based on concept of Past Due/ Overdue concept, and not based on the
Balance Sheet date
565

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
27. CA Nadar is conducting the statutory audit of RHL Ltd., a non-banking financial company. It has
branches in various parts of India. The company with a focus on housing finance, has outstanding non
convertible debentures worth Rs. 150 Crores. The company reportedly missed interest payments of INR
15 Crores on its debts because of inadequate liquidity. As a result, RHL Ltd. faced a series of downgrades
by rating agencies on its debts over the past two months. Rating was cut to D from A4 implying that the
company was in default or expected to be in default soon. What aspects CA Nadar should look into in
relation to the activity of mobilization of public deposits (particularly in relation to downgrading of credit
facilities) by RHL Ltd? (5 Marks) (past exam nov 2020)
ANSWER
CA Nadar has to ascertain whether the company has complied with the following aspects in relation to
the activity of mobilization of public deposits:-
i. The ceiling on quantum of public deposits has been linked to its credit rating as given by an approved
credit rating agency. In the event of a upgrading/downgrading of credit rating, the auditor should bear in
mind that the NBFC will have to increase/reduce its public deposits in accordance with the revised credit
rating
assigned to it within a specified time frame and should ensure that the NBF Chas informed about the same
to the RBI inwriting.
ii. In the event of downgrading of credit rating below the minimum specified investment grade, a non-
banking financial company, being an investment and credit company or a factor, shall regularise the excess
deposit as provided hereunder:
a. with immediate effect, stop accepting fresh public deposits and renewing existing deposits;
b. all existing deposits shall run off to maturity; and
c. report the position within 15 working days, to the concerned Regional Office of the RBI where the NBFC
is registered.
d. No matured public deposit shall be renewed without the express and voluntary consent of the depositor.
28. During the audit of AMC Finance Ltd, an NBFC, the auditor found that a fraud was committed by its
employees amounting to Rs. 107.80 lac. The management of the company took severe action against the
employees and the auditors took all necessary steps to report the fraud. Which among the following
steps auditor should take, with respect to the fraud committed by the employees of the NBFC? (mtp
nov 20)
(a) Report in prescribed form should be sent to Central Fraud Monitoring Cell of RBI withing 3 weeks
from date of detection of fraud.
(b) Report in prescribed form should be sent to Regional Office of Dept. of Non-banking supervision of
RBI withing 3 weeks from date of detection of fraud.
(c) Report the matter in prescribed form to the Central government within 21 days from date of
detection of fraud.
(d) Report the matter to the promoters of the company, within 15 days from date of detection of fraud.
566

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
ANSWER- a
29 (NOV 21 EXAM)
ABC Ltd. is a company registered under the Companies Act, 2013. The company is engaged in the
business of loans and advances, acquisition of shares / stocks / bonds / debentures/securities issued by
Government or local authorities. For the year ended 31st March, 2021 following are some extracts
from the financial statements:
(i) Paid-up share capital Rs. 40.53 Cr.
(ii) Non-Current Assets - Loans & AdvancesRs. 55.90 Cr.
(iii) Current Assets - Loans and advances Rs. 344.47 Cr.
(iv) Total assets of the company Rs. 530 Cr.
(v) Intangible assets Rs. 3 Cr.
(vi) Profit for the Year Rs. 7.25 Cr.
(vii) Income from interest and dividends Rs. 52 Cr.
(viii) Gross income Rs. 102.57 Cr.
Directors intend to apply for registration as Non-Banking Financial Company (NBFC) under Section 45-IA
of the Reserve Bank of India (Amendment) Act, 1997. Advise
ANSWER :
In order to identify a particular company as Non-Banking Financial Company (NBFC), it will consider both
assets and income pattern as evidenced from the last audited balance sheet of the company to decide its
principal business. The company will be treated as NBFC when a company's
(i) Financial assets constitute more than 50 per cent of the total assets (netted off by intangible
assets) and
(ii) Income from financial assets constitute more than 50 per cent of the gross income.
A company which fulfils both these criteria shall qualify as an NBFC and would require to be registered as
NBFC by RBI.
In the given case of ABC Ltd, its Financial Assets are =Rs. 55.90 + Rs. 344.47= Rs. 400.37 Cr Total Assets
(netted off by intangible assets) = Rs. 527 Cr
Income from financial assets = Rs. 52 Cr
Gross Income = Rs. 102.57 Cr

567

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
From the above, it is clear that ABC Ltd.’s financial assets constitute more than 50 per cent of the total
assets (netted off by intangible assets) and income from financial assets constitutes more than 50 per
cent of the gross income. Hence, ABC Ltd. fulfills both these criteria to qualify as an NBFC.
Thus ABC Ltd. can apply for registration under Section 45-IA of Reserve Bank of India (Amendment) Act,
1997 in prescribed form along with the necessary documents.
30 (OCT 2022 MTP)

GYAN & Co. is the statutory auditor of KUNTHU NBFC Ltd. While planning the audit procedures to
be done during the audit of entity, there was a difference of opinion between CA. Matigyan and his
partner CA. Shrutgyan. CA. Shrutgyan is of the opinion that evaluation of internal control system
and verification of registration with RBI should not be the part of audit procedure, as it is the part
of internal audit only. Is the contention of CA. Shrutgyan correct? Also state what broad areas should
mandatorily become part of the audit procedure of GYAN & Co. for conducting the audit of KUNTHU
NBFC Ltd.?
ANSWER :
Following are broad areas that should be mandatorily part of the audit procedure for
conducting the audit of NBFC:
(1)Ascertaining the Business of the Company - The first step in carrying out the audit of a NBFC is to
scan through the Memorandum and Articles of Association of the company, so as to acquaint
oneself with the type of business that the company is engaged into.
The task of ascertaining the principal business activity of any NBFC is of paramount importance since
the very classification of a company as a NBFC and its further classification would all depend upon
its principal business activity. Based on the classification of a company, it will be required to comply
with the provisions relating to limits on acceptance of public deposits as contained in the NBFC
Public Deposit Directions.
(2)Evaluation of Internal Control System - An auditor should gain an understanding of the
accounting system and related internal controls adopted by the NBFC to determine the nature,
timing and extent of his audit procedures. An auditor should also ascertain whether the internal
controls put in place by the NBFC are adequate and are being effectively followed.
In particular, an auditor should review the effectiveness of the system of recovery prevalent at the
NBFC. He should ascertain whether the NBFC has an effective system of periodical review of
advances in place which would facilitate effective monitoring and follow up. The absence of a
periodical review system could result in non-detection of sticky advances at their very inception
which may ultimately result in the NBFC having an alarmingly high level of NPAs.
(3)Registration with the RBI - Section 45-IA of the RBI Act, 1934, has made it incumbent on the part
of all NBFCs to comply with registration requirements and have minimum net owned funds. An
auditor should obtain a copy of the certificate of registration granted by the RBI or in case the
certificate of registration has not been granted, a copy of the application form filed with the RBI for
registration. It may particularly be noted that NBFCs incorporated af ter 9th January, 1997 are not
entitled to commence business without first obtaining a registration certificate from the RBI. An
auditor should, therefore, verify whether the dual conditions relating to registration with the RBI
and maintenance of minimum net owned funds have been duly complied with by the concerned
NBFC. The auditor should ascertain whether investment in prescribed liquid assets have been made
568

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
and whether quarterly returns as mentioned above have been regularly filed with the RBI by the
concerned NBFC.
(4)The auditors must ascertain whether the company properly classified as per the requirements of
various regulations. In case, the NBFC has not been classified by the RBI, the classification of a
company will have to be determined after a careful consideration of various factors such as
particulars of earlier registration granted, if any, particulars furnished in the application form for
registration, company’s Memorandum of Association and its financial results.
(5)NBFC Prudential Norms Directions - Check compliance with prudential norms encompassing
income recognition, income from investments, accounting standards, accounting for investments,
asset classification, provisioning for bad and doubtful debts, capital adequacy norms, prohibition on
granting of loans by a NBFC against its own shares, prohibition on loans and investments for failure
to repay public deposits and norms for concentration of credit/investments.
In the given situation, GYAN & Co., is the statutory auditor of KUNTHU NBFC Ltd. While planning the
audit procedures to be done during the audit of entity, there was difference of opinion between
Matigyan and his partner Shrutgyan regarding evaluation of internal control and verification of
registration with RBI.
As discussed above NBFCs are not entitled to commence business without first obtaining a
registration certificate from the RBI. An auditor should, therefore, verify whether the dual
conditions relating to registration with the RBI and maintenance of minimum net owned funds have
been duly complied with by the concerned NBFC. Further, auditor should gain an understanding of
the accounting system and related internal controls adopted by the NBFC to determine the nature,
controls put in place by the NBFC are adequate and are being effectively followed.
Accordingly, contention of Mr. Shrutgyan regarding evaluation of internal control system and
verification of registration with RBI should not be part of the audit procedure as it is part of internal
audits only, is not correct.
31 (OCT 2022 MTP)

50:50 test determination is popularly used in :
(a)Banking Company.
(b)Insurance Company.
(c)NBFC Company.
(d)Stock Trading Company.
ANSWER : (C )
32(SEPT 2022 MTP)

Shreyansh & Co LLP, a firm of Chartered Accountants, was appointed as auditor of an NBFC. The
audit work has been completed. The audit team which was involved in the fieldwork came across
understand in detail regarding the obligations on the part of an auditor in respect of exceptions in
569

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
his report so that they can conclude their work. Briefly explain.
ANSWER:
Obligation of auditor to submit an exception report to the RBI:
referred to in paragraph 3 above, is unfavorable or qualified, or in the opinion of the auditor the
company has not complied with:
(b) Non-Banking Financial Companies Acceptance of Public Deposits (Reserve Bank)
Directions, 2016; or
(Reserve Bank) Directions, 2016 and Non-Banking Financial Company - Systemically Important Non-
Deposit taking Company and Deposit taking Company (Reserve Bank) Directions, 2016.
It shall be the obligation of the auditor to make a report containing the details of such unfavourable
or qualified statements and/or about the non-compliance, as the case may be, in respect of the
company to the concerned Regional Office of the Department of Non-Banking Supervision of the
RBI under whose jurisdiction the registered office of the company is located as per first Schedule to
the Non-Banking Financial Companies Acceptance of Public Deposits (Reserve Bank) Directions,
2016.
(II) The duty of the Auditor under sub-paragraph (I) shall be to report only the contraventions of the
provisions of RBI Act, 1934, and Directions, Guidelines, instructions referred to in sub- paragraph
(1) and such report shall not contain any statement with respect to compliance of any of those
provisions.
33(MARCH 2022 MTP)
CA Sheetal is conducting the statutory audit of Kunthu Ltd., a non-banking financial company. It has
branches in various parts of India. The company with a focus on housing finance, has outstanding
non-convertible debentures worth Rs. 170 crore. The company reportedly missed interest payments
of Rs. 17 crore on its debts because of inadequate liquidity. As a result, Kunthu Ltd. faced a series
of downgrades by rating agencies on its debts over the past two months. Rating was cut to D from
A4 implying that the company was in default or expected to be in default soon. What aspects CA
Sheetal should look into in relation to the activity of mobilization of public deposits (particularly in
relation to downgrading of credit facilities) by Kunthu Ltd?
ANSWER :
CA Sheetal has to ascertain whether the company has complied with the following aspects in
relation to the activity of mobilization of public deposits:-
i.The ceiling on quantum of public deposits has been linked to its credit rating as given by an
approved credit rating agency. In the event of a upgrading/downgrading of credit rating, the auditor
should bear in mind that the NBFC will have to increase/reduce its public deposits in accordance
with the revised credit rating assigned to it within a specified time frame and should ensure that
the NBFC has informed about the same to the RBI inwriting.
ii.In the event of downgrading of credit rating below the minimum specified investment grade, a
non-banking financial company, being an investment and credit company or a factor, shall regularise
570

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
the excess deposit as provided hereunder:

a.with immediate effect, stop accepting fresh public deposits and renewing existing deposits;
b.all existing deposits shall run off to maturity; and
c.report the position within 15 working days, to the concerned Regional Office of the RBI where the
NBFC is registered.
d.No matured public deposit shall be renewed without the express and voluntary consent of the
depositor.
34 (MARCH 2022 MTP)
M/s Vardhman and Associates have been appointed as the statutory auditors of a NBFC ( UVW Ltd.)
for the financial year 2021-22. The company is required to comply with the Indian Accounting
Standards. During the course of audit CA Vardhman found that the company has classified its Assets
and Liabilities as financial and non-financial instead of current and non-current. What should CA
Vardhman advice the management of NBFC UVW Ltd. in this regard?
(a)The management of NBFC UVW Ltd. is correct in classifying the Balance Sheet items as financial
and non-financial as per requirement of Division III of Schedule III of Companies Act 2013.
(b)The management of NBFC UVW Ltd. is not correct in this regard and should classify the Balance
Sheet items as current and non-current as is required by all other companies as per the requirement
of the Division III under Schedule III of the Companies Act 2013.
(c)The management of NBFC UVW Ltd is right in this regard as the NBFC has the option to classify
the balance sheet items either as current and non-current or as financial and non- financial.
(d)The management of NBFC UVW Ltd. should classify the Balance Sheet items as current and non-
current as per the requirement of Division II of Schedule III of the Companies Act 2013 applicable in
case of NBFC.
ANSWER : ( A )
35(APRIL 2022 MTP)

OM & Co. is the statutory auditor of OTAPS NBFC Ltd. While planning the audit procedures to be
done during the audit of entity, there was a difference of opinion between Mr. O and his partner
Mr. M. Mr. O is of the opinion that evaluation of internal control system and verification of
registration with RBI should not be the part of audit procedure, as it is the part of interna l audit
only. Briefly state what broad areas should mandatorily become part of the audit procedure of OM
& Co. for conducting the audit of OTAPS NBFC Ltd.? Also comment whether contention of Mr. O is
correct? (6 Marks)
ANSWER :
(a)Following are broad areas that should be mandatorily part of the audit procedure for conducting
the audit of NBFC:
(1) Ascertaining the Business of the Company - The first step in carrying out the audit of a NBFC is
to scan through the Memorandum and Articles of Association of the company, so as to acquaint
oneself with the type of business that the company is engaged into. The task of ascertaining the
principal business activity of any NBFC is of paramount importance since the very classification of a
571

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
company as a NBFC and its further classification would all depend upon its principal business
activity. Based on the classification of a company, it wi ll be required to comply with the provisions
relating to limits on acceptance of public deposits as contained in the NBFC Public Deposit
Directions.
(2)Evaluation of Internal Control System - An auditor should gain an understanding of the
accounting system and related internal controls adopted by the NBFC to determine the nature,
controls put in place by the NBFC are adequate and are being effectively followed. In particular, an
auditor should review the effectiveness of the system of recovery prevalent at the NBFC. He should
ascertain whether the NBFC has an effective system of periodical review of advances in place which
would facilitate effective monitoring and follow up. The absence of a periodical review system could
result in non-detection of sticky advances at their very inception which may ultimately result in the
NBFC having an alarmingly high level of NPAs.
(3)Registration with the RBI - Section 45-IA of the RBI Act, 1934, has made it incumbent on the part
of all NBFCs to comply with registration requirements and have minimum net owned funds. An
auditor should obtain a copy of the certificate of registration granted by the RBI or in case the
certificate of registration has not been granted, a copy of the application form filed with the RBI for
registration. It may particularly be noted that NBFCs incorporated after 9th January, 1997 are not
entitled to commence business without first obtaining a regist ration certificate from the RBI. An
auditor should, therefore, verify whether the dual conditions relating to registration with the RBI
and maintenance of minimum net owned funds have been duly complied with by the concerned
NBFC. The auditor should ascertain whether investment in prescribed liquid assets have been made
and whether quarterly returns as mentioned above have been regularly filed with the RBI by the
concerned NBFC.
(4)The auditors must ascertain whether the company properly classified as per the requirements of
various regulations. In case, the NBFC has not been classified by the RBI, the classification of a
company will have to be determined after a careful consideration of various factors such as
particulars of earlier registration granted, if any, particulars furnished in the application form for
registration, company’s Memorandum of Association and its financial results.
(5)NBFC Prudential Norms Directions - Check compliance with prudential norms encompassing
income recognition, income from investments, accounting standards, accounting for investments,
asset classification, provisioning for bad and doubtful debts, capital adequacy norms, prohibition on
granting of loans by a NBFC against its own shares, prohibition on loans and investments for failure
to repay public deposits and norms for concentration of credit/investments.
In the given situation, OM & Co., is the statutory auditor of OTAPS NBFC Ltd. While planning the
audit procedures to be done during the audit of entity, there was difference of opinion between O
and his partner M regarding evaluation of internal control and verification of registration with RBI.
As discussed above NBFCs are not entitled to commence business without first obtaining a
registration certificate from the RBI. An auditor should, therefore, verify whether the dual
conditions relating to registration with the RBI and maintenance of minimum net owned funds have
been duly complied with by the concerned NBFC. Further, auditor should gain an understanding of
the accounting system and related internal controls adopted by the NBFC to determine the nature,
controls put in place by the NBFC are adequate and are being effectively followed. Accordingly,
572

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
contention of Mr. O regarding evaluation of internal control system and verification of registration
with RBI should not be part of the audit procedure as it is part of internal audits only, is not correct.
36(APRIL 2022 MTP)

Your firm has been appointed as Central Statutory Auditors of a Nationalised Bank. The Bank follows
financial year as accounting year. Your Audit Manager informed that the bank has recognised on
accrual basis income from dividends on securities and Units of Mutual Funds held by it as at the end
of financial year. The dividends on securities and Units of Mutual Funds were declared after the end
of financial year. Comment.
ANSWER :
Banks may book income from dividend on shares of corporate bodies on accrual basis, provided
dividend on the shares has been declared by the corporate body in its annual general meeting and
the owner's right to receive payment is established. This is also in accordance with AS 9. In this case
the dividends have been declared after the financial year end. Therefore, the re cognition of income
by the bank on accrual basis is not in order.
In respect of income from government securities and bonds and debentures of corporate bodies,
where interest rates on these instruments are pre-determined, income could be booked on accrual
basis, provided interest is serviced regularly and as such is not in arrears. It was further, however,
clarified that banks may book income on accrual basis on securities of corporate bodies/public
sector undertakings in respect of which the payment of interest and repayment of principal have
been guaranteed by the Central Government or a State Government.
37(APRIL 2022 MTP)

HF Limited – ND, a Non-Banking financial company which is exclusively into housing finance business
completed one month of operations. They approached their auditor M/s UVW & Co. Chartered
Accountants to know about the process to apply for certificate of registration under section 45 IA
of RBI Act. After calculating the net owned funds (which stood at Rs. 249 lakh) and considering other
details, the company was told that they need not apply for the certificate.
After the completion of the financial year, UVW & Co. started the statutory audit and tax audit for
HF limited. During the course of the audit, the management disagreed on the following matters:
(I)The company had revalued a particular class of its asset (no intangible asset was revalued). The
carrying value before revaluation was Rs. 77 lakh and the value post revaluation was Rs. 84.70 lakh.
The auditors wanted to mention the same along with the amount of change in CARO.
(II)It was found that an amount of Rs. 5 lakh had been written off as bad debts. The complete
amount was not admissible as per the Income tax Act and hence the auditor decided to mention
about the same under clause 19 of the tax audit report and disallow the inadmissible amount.
MC Limited approached UVW & Co. for providing few management and consultancy services for
their company. The offers given by the company was:
(i)Inventory management, material handling & storage
(ii)Personnel recruitment and selection
(iii)Tax representation and advice concerning tax matters
573

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
Mr. U, the senior partner of the firm was not consulted while deciding to respond to the above
offers made by MC Limited. Hence, he resigned from the partnership and went into practice as a
sole proprietor. Since Mr. U was having an interest in the field of merchant banking, he applied and
obtained a registration as category IV merchant banker under SEBI’s Rules and Regulations. Upon
obtaining the same, he was approached by HF limited, who wanted to go for a capital issue. Mr. U
accepted the offer. The offer document and advertisements regarding the capital issue prominently
displayed the name and address of Mr. U, un der the caption ‘Advisor to the Issue’. It was later
found that Mr. U was guilty of professional misconduct because of the above incident.
1.Why the auditor advised HF Limited – ND, a Non-Banking financial company not to apply for
certificate under section 45 IA ?
(a)Since the company is Non-Deposit taking NBFC, there is no need to apply for certificate of
registration.
(b)The company needs to completed one year of operations before applying for the certificate.
(c)Net owned funds are below the stipulated limit of Rs. 250 lakh, hence the company need not
apply for certificate.
(d)The company falls under exempt category as notified by RBI.
2.Is the auditor’s decision to report issue I given in the situation correct? What is the reason?
(a)Yes. Since the revaluation of asset has brought a change of 10% in the carrying amount, the same
shall be reported in CARO, including the amount.
(b)No. The reporting requirement under CARO relates to physical verification of assets, record
maintenance, etc. only. It does not require the details of revaluation to be provided.
(c)No. Since no intangible asset is revalued, the above matter need not be reported.
(d)No. Since the revaluation of asset has not reduced the carrying value, the same need not be
reported.
3.Assuming yourself to be a part of the management, how would you respond to point II relating
to reporting of written off Bad debts in Tax Audit Report ?
(a)Completely agree with the above matter as told by the auditor.
(b)Disagree to the point, since the above details need not be reported under clause 19 of Form 3CD.
(c)Disagree to the point, since the above details need not be reported under clause 19 of Form 3CD,
but under clause 25 of Form 3CD.
(d)Partially agree with respect to reporting the same, but not with respect to the amount being
disallowed by the auditor.
4.Assuming all responsibilities & protocols being fulfilled properly, from the above case scenario,
what can you infer about the appointment of M/s UVW & Co. as auditors for HF limited?
(a)They were appointed by Shareholders.
(b)They were appointed by Empanelment Committee.
(c)They were appointed by Board of Directors.
574

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
(d)They were re-appointed as auditors.

5.In the above case of Mr. U, which act of his could have led to professional misconduct?
(a)Obtaining registration as category IV merchant banker.
(b)Allowing the caption ‘Advisor to the Issue’ in the offer document and advertisement.
(c)Accepting the offer of HF limited without communicating the same to their auditors.
(d)Allowing his name and address to be displayed prominently in the offer document and
advertisement.
ANSWER :
1. (d)
2. (a)
3. (b)
4. (c)
5. (d)
38(NOV 2022 RTP)

CA Z is appointed as a Statutory Auditor of JB Finance Limited (a Non- Banking Financial Company
covered under Non-Banking Financial Company — Systematically important Non-Deposit taking
Company and Deposit taking Company (Reserve Bank) Directions, 2016) for the year 2021-22.
Following information is available with CA Z with respect to JB Finance Limited as at 31st March,
2022:
Particulars ` (in Lakh)
Standard Assets 700.00
Sub-standard Assets 200.00
Doubtful Assets (Secured and up-to one year) 10.00
Doubtful Assets (Secured and more than three years) 50.00
What will be the total provision required to be made in the books of JB Finance Limited for the year
ended 31 March, 2022 for the above stated Assets?
(a)Rs. 49.8 Lakh
(b)Rs. 47 Lakh
(c)Rs. 34.8 Lakh
(d)Rs. 52.8 Lakh
ANSWER : A
39 (NOV 2022 RTP)
Sudarshan Ltd. is a company registered under the Companies Act, 2013. The company is engaged in
the business of loans and advances, acquisition of shares / stocks / bonds / debentures/securities
issued by Government or local authorities. For the year ended 31st March, 2022 following are
some extracts from the financial statements:
575

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
(i) Paid-up share capital ` 40.53 Cr.

(ii) Non-Current Assets - Loans & Advances ` 75.50 Cr.
(iii) Current Assets - Loans and advances ` 294.33 Cr.
(iv) Total assets of the company ` 618.55 Cr.
(v) Intangible assets ` 6.35 Cr.
(vi) Profit for the Year ` 8.15 Cr.
(vii) Income from interest and dividends ` 62.31 Cr.
(viii) Gross income ` 111.23 Cr.
Directors intend to apply for registration as Non-Banking Financial Company (NBFC) under Section
45-IA of the Reserve Bank of India (Amendment) Act, 1997. Advise.
ANSWER :
In order to identify a particular company as Non-Banking Financial Company (NBFC), it will consider
both assets and income pattern as evidenced from the last audited balance sheet of the company
to decide its principal business. The company will be treated as NBFC when a company's
(i)Financial assets constitute more than 50 per cent of the total assets (netted off by intangible
assets) and
(ii)Income from financial assets constitute more than 50 per cent of the gross income.
A company which fulfils both these criteria shall qualify as an NBFC and would require to be
registered as NBFC by RBI.
In the given case, applying the Criteria (i) Financial assets constitute more than 50 per cent of the
total assets (netted off by intangible assets),
A.Financial Assets of Sudarshan Ltd. are =
Non-Current Assets - Loans & Advances ` 75.50 Cr.
Add: Current Assets - Loans and advances ` 294.33 Cr.
Total Financial Assets ` 369.83 Cr.
B.Total Assets (netted off by intangible assets) of Sudarshan Ltd. are=

Total assets of the company ` 618.55 Cr.
Less: Intangible assets ` 6.35 Cr.
Total Assets (netted off by intangible assets) ` 612.20 Cr.
In view of above, Financial assets of Sudarshan Ltd. constitute more than 50 per cent of the total
assets (netted off by intangible assets).
Applying the Criteria (ii) Income from financial assets constitute more than 50 per cent of the gross
income.
Income from financial assets = Rs. 62.31 Cr
Gross Income = Rs. 111.23 Cr
From the above, it is clear that Sudarshan Ltd.’s financial assets constitute more than 50 per cent of
the total assets (netted off by intangible assets) and income from financial assets constitutes more
576

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
than 50 per cent of the gross income. Hence, Sudarshan Ltd. fulfills both these criteria to qualify as
an NBFC.
Thus Sudarshan Ltd. can apply for registration under Section 45-IA of Reserve Bank of India
(Amendment) Act, 1997 in prescribed form along with the necessary documents.
577

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
1. MTP Mar 2019 Qn no 4 (1 Mark)

Following are the registered persons under GST Act, 2017. Which one of the registered person
is required to get his accounts audited and also furnish a copy of audited annual accounts and a
reconciliation statement, duly certified in FORM GSTR –9C?
a) Mr. A is an advocate whose turnover for the financial year ended 31 March 2018 was Rs.1.25
crores.
b) Mr. B is a labour contractor managing construction services and his turnover for 31 March 2018
was Rs.3.95 crores.
c) Dr. C is a pediatric surgeon who has newly set up his practice in Pune. He paid an amount of
Rs.10.5 lakhs as taxes in the current year.
d) Mr. D who is an architect has paid taxes of Rs.22.5 lakhs in the current year.
Answer: (b) Mr. B is a labour contractor managing construction services and his turnover for 31
March 2018 was Rs.3.95 crores.
2. MTP Mar 2019 Qn no 5 (1 Mark)

As an auditor appointed under section 44AB of the Income Tax Act, 1961, under which clause of
Form 3CD, you will report for amounts deemed to be profits and gains under section 32AC, 33AB
or 33ABA or 33AC
(a) clause 24
(b) clause 40
(c) clauses 31
578

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
(d) clause 23
Answer:(a)clause 24
3. MTP Apr 2019 QN no 3 (1 Mark)
MNC Ltd., India is subsidiary of MNC Inc, US. LLP & Associates has been appointed by MNC Ltd.
for audit of statutory financial statements. MNP & Associates has been appointed as the
auditors of the Reporting package of MNC Ltd. prepared for the year ended 31 March which is
required for consolidation purposes. MNP & Associates are also the tax auditors of MNC Ltd.
What should be format for reporting of MNP & Associates on Form 3CD of MNC Ltd.?
(a) MNC Ltd. should report as per the internal formats of the firm.
(b) MNC Ltd. should report as per the formats issued as per ICDS (Income Computation and
Disclosure Standards).
(c) MNC Ltd. should report as per Form 3CB.
(d) MNC Ltd. should report as per Form 3 CA.
Answer: Option (d) MNC Ltd. should report as per Form 3 CA
AJ & Co LLP is a firm of Chartered Accountants. The firm has 10 Partners. The firm has a good
portfolio of clients for statutory audits but the same clients had some other firms as their tax
auditors. In the current year (FY 2018-19), many existing clients for whom AJ & Co LLP happens
to be the statutory auditor have requested the firm to carry out their tax audits as well. The firm
is expecting the no of tax audits to increase significantly this year. One of the partners of the firm
has also raised a point that the firm can accepts tax audits upto a maximum limit. However, other
partners are of the strong view that limits on audits is applicable in case of statutory audits and
not for tax audits.
This needs to be decided as soon as possible so that the appointment formalities can also be
completed.
You are requested to advise the firm in this matter.
a) There is no limit on no of tax audits in case of LLP.
b) All the partners of the firm can collectively sign 450 tax audit reports.
c) All the partners of the firm can collectively sign 600 tax audit reports.
d) All the partners of the firm can collectively sign 450 tax audit reports. However, one partner can
individually sign maximum 60 tax audit reports.
579

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
Answer : Option C
5. RTP Nov 2019 QN no 8

AOP Pvt. Ltd. is currently engaged in closing its books of accounts for the financial year ended
31 March 2019. The company has always been a compliance-savvy and has also engaged
consultants for the same. The business of the company has been stable over the years and
profitability has been good over the last 3 years.
The company got registered for GST on time. Since registration the company has been filing
statement of returns in GSTR 3B. However, Annual Return in GSTR 9 has not been filed by the
company.
Proper Officer issued a notice for failure to file Annual Return within 15 days. Even then, no
Annual Return was filed by the company within the time permitted. Please advise.
(a) In such a case, the company becomes a ‘non-filer’.
(b) In such a case, the company would remain fully compliant.
(c) The Proper Officer would be required to discuss this matter with the GST auditors of the
company.
(d) GST auditor may resign in this situation.

Answer: Option a In such a case, the company becomes a ‘non-filer’.
6. MTP Oct 2019 QN no 4 1 Mark
Rajeev Ltd is a listed company having business of production of motion pictures. For the year
ended 31 March 2018, the company wanted to appoint GST auditor. For the purpose, somebody
who is familiar with the business of the company/industry was to be preferred for appointment
i.e. who would have worked with the company in the past to avoid efforts/ duplication in terms
of providing the information to get the GST audit completed. The company had following options
for the same. Please advise.
(a) Internal auditors can be appointed for this work.
(b) Both statutory and internal auditors can be jointly appointed for this work.
(c) Internal auditors along with the tax consultants of the company can be appointed for this work.
(d) Statutory auditors can be appointed for this work.

Answer: (d) Statutory auditors can be appointed for this work.
7.May 2018 – 2 (b) 5 Marks

580

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
ABC Ltd., is consistently following Accounting Standards as required under section 133 of the
Companies Act, 2013. During your tax audit under section 44AB of the Income Tax Act, 1961,
the Board of Directors informed you that profits of the Company is properly arrived at and
the Accounting Standards applicable to it have been followed consistently and as such, there
need not be any adjustments to be made as per Income Computation and Disclosure Standards
notified under section 145 of Income Tax Act, 1961. Based on the requirements of Law in this
regard, examine the validity of the stand of Management in this regard.
ANSWER
Income Computation and Disclosure Standards (ICDS): Section 145 of the Income Tax Act, 1961
deals with the Method of Accounting: Under section 145(1), income chargeable under the heads
“Profits and gains of business or profession” or “Income from other sources” shall be computed
in accordance with either the cash or mercantile system of accounting regularly employed by the
assessee.
Further, Section 145(2) empowers the Central Government to notify in the Official Gazette from
time to time, income computation and disclosure standards to be followed by any class of assessee
or in respect of any class of income.
Accordingly, the Central Government has, in exercise of the powers conferred under section
145(2), notified ten income computation and disclosure standards (ICDSs) to be followed by all
assesses (other than an individual or a HUF who is not required to get his accounts of one previous
year audited in accordance with the provisions of section 44AB), following the mercantile system
of accounting, for the purposes of computation of income chargeable to income-tax under the
head “Profit and gains of business or profession” or “Income from other sources”. from the A.Y.
2017-18.
In the instant case, ABC Ltd. is consistently following Accounting Standards in compliance with
section 133 of the Companies Act, 2013 but not complying with the provisions of Income
Computation and Disclosure Standards notified under section 145 of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
Contention of the management that they are following Accounting Standards and need not to
make any adjustments as per ICDS, is not correct. Thus, ABC Ltd. is required to adjust the profits
in compliance with ICDS.
8.MTP-Mar-19 Qn No 5(c) 6 Marks:, RTP May 2018 Qn no 14(a)
Concession Ltd. is engaged in the business of manufacturing of threads. The company recorded
the turnover of Rs. 1.13 crore during the financial year 2017-18 before adjusting the following:
Discount allowed in the Sales Invoice Rs. 8,20,000
Cash discount (other than allowed in

Cash memo/ sales invoice) Rs. 9,20,000
Trade discount Rs. 2,90,000
Commission on Sales Rs. 6,00,000
581

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
Sales Return (F.Y. 2016-17) Rs. 1,60,000

Sale of Investment Rs. 6,60,000
You are required to ascertain the effective turnover to be considered for the prescribed limit of
tax audit under the relevant Act and guide the company whether the provisions relating to tax
audit applies.
Answer
The provisions relating to tax audit under section 44AB of the Income Tax Act, 1961 applies to
every person carrying on business, if his total sales, turnover or gross receipts in business exceed
the prescribed limit of Rs. 1 crore and to a person carrying on a profession, if his gross receipts
from profession exceed the prescribed limit ofRs. 50 lakhs in any previous year.
However, the term "sales", "turnover" or "gross receipts" are not defined in the Act, and therefore
the meaning of the aforesaid terms has to be considered for the applicability of the section.
Some of the points for merit consideration in this regard as discussed in the Guidance Note issued
by the Institute are given below-
• Discount allowed in the sales invoice will reduce the sale price and, therefore, the same can be
deducted from the turnover.
• Cash discount otherwise than that allowed in a cash memo/sales invoice is in the nature of a
financing charge and is not related to turnover. Therefore, should not be deducted from the
turnover.
• Turnover discount is normally allowed to a customer if the sales made to him exceed a particular
quantity. As per trade practice, it is in the nature of
trade discount and should be deducted from the figure.

• Special rebate allowed to a customer can be deducted from the sales if it is in the nature of trade
discount. If it is in the nature of commission on sales, the same cannot be deducted from the
figure of turnover.
• Price of goods returned should be deducted from the turnover even if the returns are from the
sales made in the earlier year/s.
• Sale proceeds of any shares, securities, debentures, etc., held as investment will not form part of
turnover. However, if the shares, securities, debentures etc., are held as stock-in-trade, the sale
proceeds thereof will form part of turnover.
In the given case, Concession Ltd. is engaged in manufacturing business. Therefore, the tax audit
would be applicable if the turnover exceeds Rs. 1 crore during the financial year 2017-18. The
calculation of effective turnover for the prescribed limit purpose, in accordance with
abovementioned conditions, is given below:
Particluars Rs.
Recorded turnover during the year Rs. 1,13,00,000
Less: (i)Discount allowed in the Sales (Rs. 8,20,000)
Invoice
(ii)Trade discount (Rs. 2,90,000)
(iii)Sales Return (Rs. 1,60,000)
Effective turnover Rs. 1,00,30,000
582

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
Conclusion: The effective turnover of Concession Ltd. is rupees one crore and thirty thousand only
which is over and above the prescribed limit for tax audit under section 44AB of the Income Tax Act,
1961. Thus, the provisions related to tax audit are applicable to the company and is therefore liable
for tax audit
9.MTP Mar 2018 2(b) 5 Marks

Mr. A engaged in business as a sole proprietor presented the following information to you for the FY 21-
22 Turnover made during the year Rs. 1124 lacs. Goods returned in respect of sales made during FY 20-
21 is Rs. 20 lacs not included in the above. Cash discount allowed to his customers Rs. 1 lac for prompt
payment. Special rebate allowed to customer in the nature of trade discount Rs. 5 lacs. Kindly advise
him whether he has to get his accounts audited u/s 44AB of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
Answer
Turnover limit for the purpose of Tax Audit: The following points merit consideration as stated in
the Guidance note on Tax Audit issued by the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India-
a. Price of goods returned should be deducted from the figure of turnover even if the return are from
the sales made in the earlier years.
b. Cash discount otherwise than that allowed in a cash memo/sales invoice is in the nature of a
financing charge and is not related to turnover. The same should not be deducted from the figure
of turnover.
c. Special rebate allowed to a customer can be deducted from the sales if it is in the nature of trade
discount.
Applying the above stated points to the given problem,
1. Total Turnover 1124 Lacs
2. Less: (i) Goods Returned 20 Lacs
(ii) Special rebate allowed to customer in the nature of trade discount would be deducted 5 Lacs
Balance 1099 Lacs
As the limit for tax audit is Rs.one crore, therefore, he would not be required to get his accounts
audited under section 44AB of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
10. MTP Apr 2018 Qn no.2(b)

ABC Pvt. Ltd. and XYZ Pvt. Ltd. are the companies in which public are not substantially
interested. During the previous year 2017-18, ABC Pvt. Ltd. received some property, being
shares of XYZ Pvt. Ltd., the details of which are provided below:
No. of Shares: 1,000
Aggregate fair market value of shares: Rs. 75,000
Consideration value: Nil

The management of the company contends that the shares need not to be furnished in Form No.
3CD. As the tax auditor of ABC Pvt. Ltd., how would you deal with the matter?
583

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
Reporting for Receipt of Shares, the Aggregate Fair Market Value of Which Exceeds Rs.
50,000: In this case, ABC Pvt. Ltd. is a company, other than a company in which the public are
substantially interested. During the previous year 2017-18, the company received property, being
shares, for no consideration, the aggregate fair market value of which i s Rs. 75,000.
Provisions and Explanations: A tax auditor has to furnish the details of shares received during the
previous year, under clause 28 of Form 3CD, in case, the assessee has received any property, being
share of a company not being a company in which public are substantially interested, without
consideration or for inadequate consideration as referred to in section 56(2)(viia) of the Income
Tax Act, 1961.
Section 56(2)(viia) provides that where a firm or a company not being a company in which the
public are substantially interested, receives, in any previous year any property being shares of a
company not being a company in which the public is substantially interested,
(x) without consideration, the aggregate fair market value of which exceeds Rs. 50,000, the whole of
the aggregate fair market value of such property;
(xi) for a consideration which is less than the aggregate fair market value of the property by an amount
exceeding Rs. 50,000, the aggregate fair market value of such property as exceeds such
consideration, shall be chargeable to income-tax under the head “Income from other sources”.
The fair market value of shares means the value as determined in accordance with the method
prescribed in Income Tax Rules, 1962.
Conclusion: As per the facts of the case, provisions and explanations given above, the income
generated by ABC Pvt. Ltd., being whole of the aggregate fair market
value of shares received (i.e. Rs. 75,000), is chargeable to income-tax under the head “Income
from other sources” as per section 56(2)(viia) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. Therefore, the tax
auditor of ABC Pvt. Ltd. is required to furnish the details of such shares received under clause 28 of
Form 3CD. The contention of the management of the company, for not reporting such receipt of
shares, is not acceptable.
11. RTP Nov 18 Qn no.14(a)

You are doing the tax audit of a Limited Company. After submission of Tax Audit Report,
management notices that there was apparent mistake of law and due to this mistake, revised
the final accounts. As a tax auditor, company seeks your opinion whether the tax audit can also
be revised or not.
RTP Nov 2019 Qn no 25(D)
State whether a Tax audit report can be revised and if so state those circumstances
ANSWER
Revision of Tax Audit Report:

584

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
Section 44AB lays obligation on certain persons mentioned thereunder carrying on business or profession,
to get their accounts audited before the “specified date” by a Chartered Accountant, if their turnover
exceeds the stipulated threshold or in cases where they are eligible to declare income on presumptive
basis, if they claim that their income is lower than the income so computed.
These persons have to furnish by the specified date, a report of the audit in the prescribed form. For this
purpose, the CBDT has prescribed under Rule 6G, Forms 3CA/ 3CB and Form 3CD.
The CBDT has, vide this notification, amended Rule 6G to provide that the audit report furnished may be
revised by the person by getting revised report of audit from a chartered accountant, duly signed and verified
by such chartered accountant, if there is payment by such person after furnishing of report which
necessitates recalculation of disallowance under section 40 or section 43B. The said revised audit report has
to be furnished before the end of the relevant assessment year for which the report pertains
AB Ltd. is a company in which public are not substantially interested. During the previous year
2017-18, the company issued shares to residents of India and provides you the following data
related to such issue:
No. of shares issued 1,00,000

Face Value Rs. 10 per share
Fair Market Value (FMV) Rs. 60 per share

Consideration received Rs. 80 per share
The management of the company contends that, it is a normal issue of shares, thus, needs not
to be reported. As the tax auditor of AB Ltd., how would you deal with the matter in your tax
audit report?
Answer:
Reporting for issue of shares for value exceeding fair market value: In this case, AB Ltd. is a
company, other than a company in which the public are substantially interested. During the
previous year 2017-18, it receives consideration for issue of shares (i.e. Rs. 80 per share) which
exceeds the face value (i.e. Rs. 10 per share) and fair market value of the shares (i.e.
Rs. 60 per share).
A tax auditor has to furnish the details of shares issued during the previous year, under clause 29
of Form 3CD, in case, the assessee received any consideration for issue of shares which exceeds
the fair market value of the shares as referred to in section 56(2)(viib) of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
Section 56(2)(viib) provides that where a company, not being a company in which the public are
substantially interested, receives, in any previous year, from any person being a resident, any
consideration for issue of shares that exceeds the face value of such shares, the aggregate
consideration received for such shares as exceeds the fair market value of the shares shall be
chargeable to income-tax under the head “Income from other sources”.
Since section 56(2)(viib) is applicable to companies in which public is not substantially interested,
reporting under this clause is to be done only for corporate assessees. The auditor should obtain
585
from the auditee, a list containing the details of shares issued, if any, by him to any person being

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
a resident and verify the same from the books of accounts and other relevant documents.
As per the facts of the case, provisions and explanations given above, the income generated by
AB Ltd., due to differences in consideration received and fair market value of shares issued, is
chargeable to income-tax under the head “Income from other sources” as per section 56(2)(viib)
of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
Therefore, the tax auditor of AB Ltd. is required to furnish the details of shares issued under clause
29 of Form 3CD. The contention of the management of the company, behind non-reporting, that
it is a normal issue of shares, is not acceptable.
14.Nov 18 Qn no 2(b)
While doing Tax Audit, under section 44AB of the. Income Tax Act, 1961, of the accounts of
Glue Private Limited for the Assessment Year 2018-19, it was found that during the Financial Year
2017-18, Glue Private Limited had received 9,000 shares, the market value of which was Rs.
90,000 on the date of transfer, at a price of Rs. 45,000 from Stick Private Limited. The
Management of Glue Private Limited maintained that the transaction was as per the terms of
negotiations and there would be no cause for the Auditor to bring this matter in his Tax Audit
Report –
Comment.
Answer
Reporting for Receipt of Shares, the Aggregate Fair Market Value of Which Exceeds Rs. 50,000:
In this case, Glue Private Ltd. is a company, other than a company in which the public are
substantially interested. During the previous year 2017-18, the company received property,
being shares, for rupees 45000 as consideration, the fair market value of which is Rs. 90,000.
A tax auditor has to furnish the details of shares received during the previous year, under clause 28
of Form 3CD, in case, the assessee has received any property, being share of a company not
being a company in which public are substantially interested, without consideration or for
inadequate consideration as referred to in section 56(2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
Section 56(2) provides that where a firm or a company not being a company in which the public
are substantially interested, receives, in any previous year any property being shares of a company
not being a company in which the public is substantially interested,
(i) without consideration, the aggregate fair market value of which exceeds Rs. 50,000, the whole of
the aggregate fair market value of such property;
(ii) for a consideration which is less than the aggregate fair market value of the property by an amount
exceeding Rs. 50,000, the aggregate fair market value of such property as exceeds such
consideration,
shall be chargeable to income-tax under the head “Income from other sources”.
As per the facts of the case, provisions and explanations given above, the income generated by
Glue Private Ltd., is rupees 45,000 i.e. in excess of fair market value of shares received (i.e. Rs.
90,000), is lesser than rupees 50,000 as per section 56(2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. Therefore,
the tax auditor of Glue Private Ltd. is not required to furnish the details of such shares received
under clause 28 of Form 3CD. The contention of the management of the company, for not
reporting such receipt of shares, is in order.
586

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s

(i) While conducting the tax audit of A & Co. you observed that it made an escalation claim
to one of its customers but which was not accounted as income. What is your reporting
responsibility.
(ii) While writing the audit program for tax audit in respect of A Ltd., you wish to include possible
instances of capital receipt if not credited to Profit & Loss Account which needs to be reported
under clause 16(e) of form 3CD. Please elucidate possible instances.
Answer:
(i)Clause 16(c) of Form 3CD: A tax auditor has to report under clause 16(c) of Form 3CD on
any escalation claim accepted during the previous year and not credited to the profit and loss
account under clause 16(c) of Form 3CD.
The escalation claim accepted during the year would normally mean “accepted during the relevant
previous year”. If such amount are not credited to Profit and Loss Account the fact should be
reported. The system of accounting followed in respect of this particular item may also be brought
out in appropriate cases. If the assessee is following cash basis of accounting with reference to this
item, it should be clearly brought out since acceptance of claims during the relevant previous year
without actual receipt has no significance in cases where cash method of accounting is followed.
Escalation claims should normally arise pursuant to a contract (including contracts entered into
in earlier years), if so permitted by the contract. Only those claims to which the other party has
signified unconditional acceptance could constitute accepted claims. Mere making claims by the
assessee or claims under negotiations cannot constitute accepted claims. After ascertaining the
relevant factors as outlined above, a decision whether to report or not, can be taken.
(ii) The following is an illustrative list of capital receipts which, if not credited to the profit and loss
account, are to be stated under clause 16(e) of Form 3CD-
Capital subsidy received in the form of Government grants, which are in the nature of
promoters’ contribution i.e., they are given with reference to the total investment of the
undertaking or by way of contribution to its total capital outlay. For e.g., Capital Investment Subsidy
Scheme.
(b) Government grant in relation to a specific fixed asset where such grant is shown as a deduction
from the gross value of the asset by the concern in arriving at its book value.
(c) Compensation for surrendering certain rights.
(d) Profit on sale of fixed assets/investments to the extent not credited to the profit and loss account.
In the course of your tax audit assignment u/s 44AB of the Income Tax Act, 1961 of Dream Bank
Ltd., you have instructed your assistant to find out receipt of capital nature which might not
have been credited to Profit & Loss Account and needs to be reported in Para 16(e) of Form
3CD. Your audit assistant seeks your guidance in reporting the same. Specify any four
illustrative examples of such receipt.
587

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
Capital Receipts which, if not credited to the profit and loss account, are to be stated under
clause 16(e) of Form 3CD:
(a) Guidance for reporting capital receipts: Capital receipts are not generally credited to profit and
loss account hence the auditor should take enough care to check out any transaction generating
the capital receipts by –
• Enquiring whether the assessee is in receipt of any amount of capital nature during the previous
year.
• Going through the financial statements, in particular reserve account, to ascertain whether the
assessee has received any such receipts and credited them directly to reserve account.
• If the assesse has received any amount of capital nature during the year under audit, then enquiring
whether the assessee has credited such receipts to profit and loss account. State the fact and the
amount involved.
• Checking that any such receipts is accounted for in terms of method of accounting followed by the
assessee.
(b) Illustrative examples of capital receipts: The following is an illustrative list of capital receipts
which, if not credited to the profit and loss account, are to be stated under clause 16(e) of Form
3CD-
(i) Capital subsidy received in the form of Government grants, which are in the nature of promoters’
contribution i.e., they are given with reference to the total investment of the undertaking or by way
of contribution to its total capital outlay. For e.g., Capital Investment Subsidy Scheme.
(ii) Government grant in relation to a specific fixed asset where such grant is shown as a deduction
from the gross value of the asset by the concern in arriving at its book value.
(iii) Compensation for surrendering certain rights.
(iv) Profit on sale of fixed assets/investments to the extent not credited to the profit and loss account.
17. RTP Nov 2019 Qn no20, MTP Oct 2019 Qn no 3(b) 6 Marks
You are doing Tax Audit of Private Limited Company for the financial year ending 31st March,
2019. During audit, you notice that the company is not regular in deposit of VAT/GST and there
remains pendency every year. The details of VAT/GST payable are:
(i) GST payable as on 31/03/2018 of FY 2017-18 was Rs. 200 Lakh and out of which Rs.100 Lakh was
paid on 15/09/2018 and Rs.50 Lakh on 30/03/2019 and balance of Rs.50 Lakh paid on
16/09/2019.
(ii) GST payable of current financial year 2018-19 was Rs.100 lakh and out of this, RS. 40 Lakh was
paid on 25/05/2018 and balance of Rs.60 Lakh remained unpaid till the due date of return.
The date of Tax Audit report and due date of return was 30 th September.
Now as a Tax Auditor, how/where the said transaction will be reflected in Tax Audit Report under
Section 43B(a)?
Answer
Reporting in Tax Audit Report: Any amount of GST/Tax payable on the last day of previous year
(opening balance) as well as on the last day of current year has to be reported in Tax Audit Report
588

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
under clause 26(A) and 26(B) in reference of section43B.

Clause 26 (A) dealt GST/VAT payable on the pre-existed of the first day of the previous year but
was not allowed in the assessment of any preceding previous year and was either paid {clause
26(A) (a)}/ or/ and/ not paid during the previous year {clause 26(A)(b)}
The details will be as under in regard to opening balances:
Liability Pre-existed on the previous year.
Sr. Section Nature of Outstanding Amount Amount Amount

No. Liability Opening paid/set- written unpaid at
balance not off during the back to the end
allowed in year P&L Of the
previous year Account year
01 43B(a) VAT/GST 100 lakh 50 lakh 0 50 lakh
It has been assumed that 50 lakh was allowed in last year as it was paid before the due date of
return.
Liability incurred during the previous year
Sr. Section Nature of Amount Amount Amount

No. Liability incurred in paid/set-off unpaid on
previous year before the the due of
but remaining due date of filing of
outstanding on filing return/date
last day of return/date upto which
previous year. upto which reported in
reported in the tax audit
the tax audit report,
report, whichever is
whichever is earlier
earlier
01 43B(a) VAT/GST 100 lakh 40 lakh 60 akh
18. Nov 2019 Qn no 4(c) 4 Marks

Mr. PK is conducting the Tax audit under section 44 AB of the Income Tax Act, 1961 of MG Ltd.
for the year ended 31st March 2019. There is a difference of opinion between Mr. PK and the
Management in respect of certain information to be furnished in Form No. 3CD. As a tax auditor,
Mr. PK has to report whether the statement of particulars in Form 3CD are true and correct and
the same is to be annexed to the report in Form No. 3CA. Advise on the matters to be considered
by Mr. PK while furnishing the particulars in Form No. 3CD.
Answer
(a) The statement of particulars given in Form No. 3CD as annexure to the audit report contains forty-
589

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
one clauses. The tax auditor has to report whether the particulars are true and correct. This Form
is a statement of particulars required to be furnished under section 44AB. The same is to be
annexed to the reports in Forms No. 3CA and 3CB in respect of a person who carries on business
or profession and whose accounts have been audited under any other law and in respect of person
who carries on business or profession b ut who is not required by or under any other law to get
his accounts audited respectively.
While furnishing the particulars in Form No. 3CD it would be advisable for the tax auditor to
consider the following:
(i) If a particular item of income/expenditure is covered in more than one of the specified clauses in
the statement of particulars, care should be taken to make a suitable cross reference to such
items at the appropriate places.
(ii) If there is any difference in the opinion of the tax auditor and that of the assessee in respect of
any information furnished in Form No. 3CD, the tax auditor should state both the view points and
also the relevant information in order to enable the tax authority to take a decision in the matter.
(iii) If any particular clause in Form No. 3CD is not applicable, he should state that the same is not
applicable.
(iv) In computing the allowance or disallowance, he should keep in view the law applicable in the
relevant year, even though the form of audit report may not have been amended to bring it in
conformity with the amended law.
(iii) In case the prescribed particulars are given in part or piecemeal to the tax auditor or relevant form
is incomplete and the assessee does not give the information against all or any of the clauses,
the auditor should not withhold the entire audit report. In such a case, he can qualify his report
on matters in respect of which information is not furnished to him. In the absence of relevant
information, the tax auditor would have no option but to state in his report that the relevant
information has not been furnished by the assessee.
(iv) The information in Form No. 3CD should be based on the books of accounts, records, documents,
information and explanations made available to the tax auditor for his examination.
(v) In case the auditor relies on a judicial pronouncement, he may mention the fact as his
observations in clause (3) of Form No. 3CA or clause (5) provided in Form No. 3CB, as the case may
be.
19. RTP May 2020 Qn no 15(a)

ABC Printing Press, a proprietary concern, made a turnover of above Rs. 11.03 crore for the year
ended 31.03.2022. The Management explained its auditor Mr. Z, that it undertakes different job
work orders from various customers. The raw materials required for each job are dissimilar. It
purchases the raw materials as per specification/ requirements of each customer and there is
hardly any balance of raw materials remaining in the stock except pending work-in-progress at
the year end. Because of variety and complexity of materials, it is impossible to maintain a
stock- register. Give your comments.
Answer
Non-maintenance of stock register: The explanation of the entity for the use of varieties of raw
materials for different jobs undertaken may be valid. But the auditor needs to verify the specified
590

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
job-orders received and the different raw materials purchased for each job separately. The use of
different papers (quality, quantity and size) ink, colour etc. may be examined. If possible, the
auditor may also enquire with the other similar printers in the locality to ensure the prevailing
custom. At the same time, he has to report and certify under clause 35(b) and clause 11(b) of Form
3CD read with the Rule 6G(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961,
about the details of stock and account books (including stock register) maintained. He must verify
the closing stock of raw materials, work-in-progress and finished goods of the concern, at least on
the date of its balance sheet. In case the said details are not properly maintained, he has to
specifically mention the same with reasons for non-maintenance of stock register by the entity.
20. (RTP-NOV 2020)
M/s PQRS & Associates is appointed for conducting tax audit as per Income Tax Act, 1961 of
QW Ltd., a cotton textile company. The Company had incurred Rs. 6 lac towards
advertisement expenditure on a brochure/ pamphlet published by a political party in Pune.
Advise the auditor whether such expenditure should be included in the tax audit report or
not.
ANSWER
Expenses on Advertisement in the Media of a Political Party: In the given situation, M/s PQRS &
Associates is appointed for conducting tax audit as per Income Tax Act, 1961 of QW Ltd., a cotton textile
company. The Company had incurred Rs. 6 lac towards advertisement expenditure on a brochure/
pamphlet published by a political party.
As per Clause 21(a) of Form 3CD, the auditor is required to furnish the details of amounts debited to the
Profit and Loss Account, being in the nature of advertisement expenditure in any souvenir, brochure, tract,
pamphlet or the like published by a political party in his tax audit report.
Therefore, advertisement expenditure of Rs. 6 lac on brochure/pamphlet published by a political party
shall be reported in the tax audit report as per Clause 21 (a) of Form 3CD
Study Material
ILLUSTRATIONS
21. V Pvt Ltd is engaged in the business of providing corporate/professional training programs. It
has an annual turnover of INR 69 crores. The company is subject to tax audit for which the work
has been started by the tax auditor. For the financial year ending 31 March 2021, the company
applied for GST registration for 2 new locations for which registration certificates have not yet
been received by the company. However, the registration number is available on the portal of
relevant authority which can be verified by checking the details of the company. In this case
what should be the audit procedures to verify this registration number?
Solution: The tax auditor should verify the registration number for the locations for which registration
certificates have not been received from online portal of the relevant authority. The auditor should also
ensure that the details furnished while checking the registration number pertains to the company only. If
the company has filed any returns for these locations, the auditor should enquire for the same from the
management and should check those returns to verify the correctness of the registration numbers. In
591

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
addition, the auditor should also obtain specific representation in respect of this point from the
management.
22. Ploy Ltd., engaged in the leasing of goods carriage, appointed you as the tax auditor for the financial
year 2020-21. How would you deal with the following payments to Mr. X, Mr. Y and Mr. Z (engaged in
leasing of goods carriage) relating to the leasing transactions in your tax audit report:
(i) Payments of 6 invoices of Rs. 5,000 each made in cash to Mr. X on 4th July, 2020.
(ii) Payments of 2 invoices of Rs. 18,000 each made in cash to Mr. Y on 5th July, 2020 and 6th July, 2020
respectively.
(iii) Payment of Rs. 40,000 made in cash to Mr. Z on 7th July, 2020 against an invoice for expenses
booked in 2019-20. ( MTP- NOV 2021)
Solution
Reporting of Payments Exceeding Rs. 35,000 in Cash: Disallowance under section 40A(3) of the Income
Tax Act, 1961 is attracted if the assessee incurs any expenses in respect of which payment or aggregate of
payments made to a person in a day, otherwise than by an account payee cheque drawn on bank or
account payee draft, exceeds Rs. 10,000. However, in case of payment made for plying, hiring or leasing of
goods carriage, limit is Rs. 35,000 instead of Rs. 10,000.
Further, as per section 40A(3A) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, where an allowance has been made in the
assessment for any year in respect of any liability incurred by the assessee for any expenditure and
subsequently during any previous year the assessee makes payment in respect thereof, otherwise than by
an account payee cheque drawn on a bank or account payee bank draft, the payment so made shall be
deemed to be the profits and gains of business or profession and accordingly chargeable to income-tax as
income of the subsequent year if the payments made to a person in a day, exceeds Rs. 10,000 (Rs. 35,000
in case of plying, hiring or leasing of goods carriages).
However, exemption is provided under Rule 6DD having regard to nature and extent of banking facilities
available and other relevant factors.
Subsequently, under clause 21(d)(A) and 21(d)(B) of Form 3CD, the tax auditor has to scrutinize on the
basis of the examination of books of account and other relevant documents/evidence, whether the
expenditure covered under section 40A(3) and 40A(3A) respectively read with rule 6DD were made by
account payee cheque drawn on a bank or account payee bank draft. If not, the same has to be reported
under abovementioned clauses.
Therefore, as per the provisions and explanations discussed above, the given cases are dealt as under-
i Payments of 6 invoices of Rs. 5,000 each aggregating Rs. 30,000 made in cash on 4th July, 2020 need
not be reported as the aggregate of payments do not exceed Rs. 35,000.
ii (Payments of 2 invoices of Rs. 18,000 each made in cash on 5th July, 2020 and 6th July, 2020
respectively aggregating Rs. 36,000 need not be reported as the payment do not exceed Rs. 35,000 in a
day.
592

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
iii Payment of Rs. 40,000 made in cash against an invoice for expenses booked in 2019-20 is likely to be
deemed to be the profits and gains of business or profession under section 40A(3A) of the Income Tax Act,
1961. Thus, the details of such amount needs to be furnished under clause 21(d)(B) of Form 3CD.
23. GTA issued a consignment note on 1-Jan-2020. The consignment note charges GST @ 12%.
The consignor has booked the GTA. The recipient has paid the freight to GTA on ‘to collect’
basis. Would this turnover be mentioned in S. No. 7D?
Solution :
The consignment note contains GST @ 12%, so reverse charge does not attract as per Notification No. 13/
2017- CT (R) w.e.f. 22-Aug-2017. Hence, tax has to be paid by GTA under forward charge, and this
transaction should not be entered in S. No. 7D.
24. GTA issued a consignment note on 1-Jan-2020. The consignment note does not charge GST.
The consignor has booked the GTA. The recipient has paid the freight to GTA on ‘to collect’
basis. Would this turnover be mentioned in S. No. 7D?
Solution :
Since consignment note does not contain GST @ 12%, reverse charge provisions would apply. Tax is to be
paid by the person liable to pay freight, that is, the recipient and not the GTA under forward charge.
Because of this, while preparing GSTR-9C of the GTA, the impugned transaction has to be entered in S. No.
7D. But while preparing GSTR-9C of the recipient this transaction will not be entered in this S. No.
25.Advocate Mr. X, has provided legal services and charged GST of Rs. 18 on his invoice of Rs.
100. The advocate’s client has paid Rs. 118 to the advocate. The advocate has remitted Rs. 18
to Government and is of the opinion that the aforesaid transaction should not be reduced in S.
No. 7D. Is the stand taken by the advocate correct?
Solution :
Supplies made by a registered person, where the recipient is liable to pay tax under reverse charge, are to
be declared in S. No. 7D. Legal services provided by the advocate to his client are liable for reverse charge
(assuming all other conditions in reverse charge notification stands satisfied). Hence, the impugned
transaction should be declared in S. No. 7D. GST wrongly collected and paid by the advocate under forward
charge will not change the fact that the aforesaid service is liable to reverse charge and, hence, merits
insertion in S. No. 7D.
26. The ITC as booked in purchase account is as follows: (a) ITC on purchase of raw material: Rs.
1,50,000 (Purchase value: 20,00,000) (b) ITC on purchase of consumable: Rs. 60,000(Purchase
value: 4,00,000) (c) ITC on purchase of food items for staff: Rs. 12,000 (Purchase value: 120,000)
ITC availed by the registered person from the Purchase account: Rs. 2,22,000
Ans.
The reporting of the following transactions shall be made in this column: ➢ Value of purchases: 25,20,000
➢ Amount of total ITC: 2,22,000 Amount of eligible ITC: Rs. 2,10,000
QUESTIONS
27.Mr. A engaged in business as a sole proprietor presented the following information to you
for the FY 2021-22. Turnover made during the year Rs. 1124 lacs. Goods returned in respect of
sales made during FY 2020-21 is Rs. 20 lacs not included in the above. Cash discount allowed to
593

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
his customers Rs. 1 lac for prompt payment. Special rebate allowed to customer in the nature
of trade discount Rs. 5 lacs. Kindly advise him whether he has to get his accounts audited u/s
44AB of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
Answer
Turnover limit for the purpose of Tax Audit: The following points merit consideration as stated in the
Guidance note on Tax Audit issued by the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India-
(i) Price of goods returned should be deducted from the figure of turnover even if the return are from
the sales made in the earlier years.
(ii) Cash discount otherwise than that allowed in a cash memo/sales invoice is in the nature of a
financing charge and is not related to turnover. The same should not be deducted from the figure of
turnover.
(iii) Special rebate allowed to a customer can be deducted from the sales if it is in the nature of trade
discount.
Applying the above stated points to the given problem,
1. Total Turnover 1124 Lacs
2. Less – (i) Goods Returned 20 Lacs
(ii) Special rebate allowed to customer in the nature
of trade discount would be deducted 5 Lacs
Balance 1099 Lacs
As the limit for tax audit is Rs. one crore, he would not be required to get his accounts audited under section
44AB of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
28.Comment with respect to computation of total sales, turnover or gross receipts in business
exceeding the prescribed limit under Section 44 AB of Income Tax Act, 1961.
(i) Discount allowed in the sales invoice
(ii) Cash discount
(iii) Price of goods returned related to earlier year
(iv) Sale proceeds of fixed assets.
Answer
Computation of Sales, Turnover or Gross Receipts: In the context of section 44AB of the Income Tax Act,
1961, following considerations are required with regard to computation of sales, turnover or gross receipts
in business exceeding the prescribed limit under section 44AB of the Income Tax Act, 1961-
(i) Discount allowed in the sales invoice will reduce the sale price and, therefore, the same can be deducted
from the turnover.
(ii) Cash discount otherwise than that allowed in a cash memo/sales invoice is in the nature of a financing
charge and is not related to turnover. Therefore, should not be deducted from the turnover.
(iii) Price of goods returned should be deducted from the turnover even if the returns are from the sales
594

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
made in the earlier year/s.
Sale proceeds of fixed assets would not form part of turnover since these are not held for resale.
29. Write a short note on - Method of accounting in Form No. 3CD of Tax Audit.
Answer
Method of accounting in Form No. 3CD of Tax Audit: Clause 13 of Form No. 3CD of the tax audit
requires to state method of accounting employed in the previous year. It also requires to state
the change in method of accounting vis-à-vis the preceding year. If so, details of change and the
effect on the profit or loss are to be stated. Also details of deviation thereof if any, from
accounting standards prescribed under section 145 and the effect there of on the profit or loss
are stated. Section 145 provide that method of accounting be either cash or mercantile. Hybrid
system is not permitted
30. ABC Printing Press, a proprietary concern, made a turnover of above Rs. 11.03 crore for the
year ended 31.03.2019. The Management explained its auditor Mr. Z, that it undertakes
different job work orders from various customers. The raw materials required for each job are
dissimilar. It purchases the raw materials as per specification/ requirements of each customer
and there is hardly any balance of raw materials remaining in the stock except pending work-
in-progress at the year end. Because of variety and complexity of materials, it is impossible to
maintain a stock-register. Give your comments.
Answer
The explanation of the entity for the use of varieties of raw materials for different jobs
undertaken may be valid. But the auditor needs to verify the specified job-orders received and
the different raw materials purchased for each job separately.
The use of different papers (quality, quantity and size) ink, colour etc. may be examined. If
possible, the auditor may also enquire with the other similar printers in the locality to ensure the
prevailing custom.
At the same time, he has to report and certify under clause 35(b) and clause 11(b) of Form 3CD
read with the Rule 6G(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, about the details of stock and account books
(including stock register) maintained. He must verify the closing stock of raw materials, work-in-
progress and finished goods of the concern, at least on the date of its balance sheet. In case the
said details are not properly maintained, he has to specifically mention the same with reasons for
non-maintenance of stock register by the entity.
31. A Co-operative Society having receipts above Rs. 1 crore gets its accounts audited by a
person eligible to do audit under Co-operative Societies Act, 1912, who is not a Chartered
Accountant. State with reasons whether such audit report can be furnished as tax audit report
under Section 44AB of the Income-tax Act, 1961?
Answer
595

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
Furnishing Audit Report of a Co-operative Society: As per Section 44AB read with Explanation to
Section 288(2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, “accountant” means a chartered accountant within
the meaning of the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949, and includes, in relation to any State, any
person who by virtue of the provisions of section 141 of the Companies Act, 2013, is entitled to
be appointed to act as an auditor of companies registered in that State.
Accordingly, the person who is not a Chartered Accountant as mentioned in the question, though
is eligible to act as auditor of Cooperative Society under the Cooperative Society Act, 1912, but is
not eligible to carry out tax audit under Section 44AB of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
Hence, such audit report cannot be furnished as tax audit report under Section 44AB of the
Income-tax Act, 1961.
An auditor should conduct routine checking during the course of audit of a public trust, in the
following manner:
(i) Check the books of account and other records having regard to the system of accounting and
internal control;
(ii) Vouch the transactions of the trust to satisfy that:
• the transaction falls within the ambit of the trust the transaction is properly authorized
by the trustees or other delegated authority as may be permissible in law;
• all incomes due to the trust have been properly accounted for on the basis of the
system of accounting followed by the trust;
• all expenses and outgoings appertaining to the trust have been recorded on the basis
of the system of accounting followed by the trust;
• amounts shown as applied towards the object of the trust are covered by the objects
of trust as specified in the document governing the trust.
(iii) Obtain trial balance on the closing date duly certified by the trustee;
(iv) Obtain Balance Sheet and Profit & Loss Account of the trust authenticated by the trustees and
check the same with the trial balance with which they should agree.
32. State whether a Tax audit report can be revised and if so state those circumstances
Answer
Section 44AB lays obligation on certain persons mentioned thereunder carrying on business or profession,
to get their accounts audited before the “specified date” by a Chartered Accountant, if their turnover
exceeds the stipulated threshold or in cases where they are eligible to declare income on presumptive
basis, if they claim that their income is lower than the income so computed.
These persons have to furnish by the specified date, a report of the audit in the prescribed form. For this
purpose, the CBDT has prescribed under Rule 6G, Forms 3CA/ 3CB and Form 3CD.
The CBDT has, vide this notification, amended Rule 6G to provide that the audit report furnished may be
revised by the person by getting revised report of audit from a chartered accountant, duly signed and
596

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
verified by such chartered accountant, if there is payment by such person after furnishing of report which
necessitates recalculation of disallowance under section 40 or section 43B. The said revised audit report
has to be furnished before the end of the relevant assessment year for which the report pertains.
33. Draft an audit programme for conducting the audit of a Public Trust registered under section 12A of
the Income-tax Act, 1961.
ANSWER:
An auditor should conduct routine checking during the course of audit of a public trust, in the following
manner:
(i) Check the books of account and other records having regard to the system of accounting and internal
control;
(ii) Vouch the transactions of the trust to ensure that:

• the transaction falls within the ambit of the trust;
• the transaction is properly authorized by the trustees or other delegated authority as may be permissible
in law;
• all incomes due to the trust have been properly accounted for on the basis of the system of accounting
followed by the trust;
• all expenses and outgoings appertaining to the trust have been recorded on the basis of the system of
accounting followed by the trust;
• amounts shown as applied towards the object of the trust are covered by the objects of trust as specified
in the document governing the trust.
(iii) Obtain trial balance on the closing date duly certified by the trustee;
(iv) Obtain Balance Sheet and Profit & Loss Account of the trust authenticated by the trustees and check the
same with the trial balance with which they should agree.
34 Mr. PK would be conducting the Tax audit under section 44 AB of the Income Tax Act, 1961 of MG Ltd.
for the year ending 31st March 2021. There is a difference of opinion between Mr. PK and the Management
in respect of certain information to be furnished in Form No. 3CD. As a tax auditor, Mr. PK has to report
whether the statement of particulars in Form 3CD are true and correct and the same is to be annexed to
the report in Form No. 3CA.
Advise on the matters to be considered by Mr. PK while furnishing the particulars in Form No. 3CD.
ANSWER:
i. If a particular item of income/expenditure is covered in more than one of the specified clauses in the
statement of particulars, care should be taken to make a suitable cross reference to such items at the
appropriate places.
ii. If there is any difference in the opinion of the tax auditor and that of the assessee in respect of any
information furnished in Form No. 3CD, the tax auditor should state both the view points and also the
relevant information in order to enable the tax authority to take a decision in the matter.
iii. If any particular clause in Form No. 3CD is not applicable, he should state that the same is not applicable.
597

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
iv. In computing the allowance or disallowance, he should keep in view the law applicable in the relevant
year, even though the form of audit report may not have been amended to bring it in conformity with the
amended law.
v. In case the prescribed particulars are given in part or piecemeal to the tax auditor or relevant form is
incomplete and the assessee does not give the information against all or any of the clauses, the auditor
should not withhold the entire audit report. In such a case, he can qualify his report on matters in respect of
which information is not furnished to him. In the absence of relevant information, the tax auditor would have
no option but to state in his report that the relevant information has not been furnished by the assessee.
vi. The information in Form No. 3CD should be based on the books of accounts, records, documents,
information and explanations made available to the tax auditor for his examination.
vii. In case the auditor relies on a judicial pronouncement, he may mention the fact as his observations in
clause (3) of Form No. 3CA or clause (5) provided in Form No. 3CB, as the case may be.
35. A is the proprietor of a firm M/s ABC & Co. The firm is expecting a turnover of Rs. 1025 lakhs during
the financial year ending 31/03/2022. The firm sold land and building during the year for a consideration
of Rs. 15 lakhs, whose value for stamp duty purposes was Rs. 16 lakhs. As’ the Tax Auditor of the said
firm, is the above required to be reported? If yes, how will you report the same?
ANSWER:
Reporting Requirement Under Clause (17) & (29B) of Form 3CD: As per Clause 17 of Form 3CD,
the tax auditor is required to furnish detailed information in case if any land or building or both is transferred
during the previous year for a consideration less than value adopted or assessed or assessable by any
authority of a State Government referred to in section 43CA or 50C, as under:
Details of property Consideration Value adopted or Whether provisions of

received or accrued assessed or assessable second proviso to
subsection (1) of
section 43CA or fourth
proviso to clause (x) of
sub-section (2) of
section 56 applicable?
[Yes/No] .’’;
The auditor should obtain a list of all properties transferred by the assessee during the previous year. He
may also verify the same from the statement of profit and loss or balance sheet, as the
case may be. Further, the auditor has to furnish the amount of consideration received or accrued, during
the relevant previous year of audit, in respect of land/building transferred during the year as disclosed in
the books of account of the assessee.
For reporting the value adopted or assessed or assessable, the auditor should obtain from the assessee a
copy of the registered sale deed in case, the property is registered. In case the property is not registered,
the auditor may verify relevant documents from relevant authorities or obtain third party expert like
lawyer, solicitor representation to satisfy the compliance of section 43CA / section 50C of the Act. In
exceptional cases where the auditor is not able to obtain relevant documents, he may state the same
through an observation in his report 3CA/CB.
598

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
In addition, as per clause 29(B) (w.e.f. assessment year 2019-20), in case of an immovable property, where
the stamp duty value exceeds the consideration by less than the higher of (i) rupees 50,000 or (ii) 5% of the
consideration, the difference is not chargeable to tax. Therefore, for any immovable property, where the
stamp duty value is up to 105% of the sale consideration, no addition can be made under section 56(2)(x).
In the given case, M/s. ABC & Co., has sold land and building during the year for a consideration of rupees 15
lakhs which is less than stamp duty value i.e. rupees 16 lakhs.
Hence, tax auditor is required to report on the same under Clause 17 and clause 29(B) of Form 3CD.
36. How will you verify the income & expenditure of earlier years credited/debited in the current
year for reporting under clause 27(b) of Form 3CD while carrying out Tax Audit u/s 44AB of the
Income Tax Act, 1961?
ANSWER:
• Particulars of income or expenditure of prior period credited or debited to the profit and loss account.
It may be noted that information under this clause would be relevant only in those cases where the
assessee follows mercantile system of accounting.
Under cash system of accounting, expenses debited/ income credited to the profit and loss account would
be current year’s expenses/income even though they may relate to earlier years.
The tax auditor should maintain the following information in his working papers file for the purpose of
reporting in the format provided in the e-filing utility:
37. Write a short note on differences in Audit by Tax Authorities and the Special Audit?
ANSWER:
There are differences in Audit by Tax Authorities and the Special Audit. Such differences can be analysed as
under-
(1) The audit by tax authorities is conducted by the revenue officers whereas special audit is conducted by
the CA/ Cost Accountants on the penal of the department.
(2) The audit by tax authorities is conducted by the revenue officers either the taxpayer’s office or at their
own office whereas special audit is conducted by the CA/ Cost Accountants at the taxpayer’s office.
(3) The audit by tax authorities can be invoked in a routine manner by the revenue officers whereas special
audit is invoked with the prior approval of the Commissioner if the nature of business of the auditee is
found to be complex.
(4) The audit by tax authorities is to be completed within 3 months which is further extendable by another
6 months, whereas special audit is to be completed within 90 days which is further extendable by another
90 days.
38. Jain Ltd is a medium sized company having operations in Ghaziabad and Lucknow. The
corporate office of the company is based at Delhi. During the year due to certain migration in
the ERP package of the company, the financial statements were finalized very l ate but were
filed with the regulatory authorities on time as per the requirements of the statute. For the
financial year ended 31 March 2018, the due date of filing income tax return of the company
was 31 October 2018 and tax audit was also applicable to the company.
Since the company was facing internal disturbances, its tax audit could not get completed on
599

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
time and the company decided to submit its income tax return on time and form 3CD and tax
audit report later on (i.e. after the due date of filing income tax return once that is properly
audited).
Please suggest which of the following would be correct in this case.
(a) Company is doing right by filing income tax return on time without tax audit
report.
(b) Company’s move is not right. Income tax return should be filed along with
tax audit report.
(c) Company is doing the right thing by filing income tax return on time. In the
given situation, the company may choose not to file tax audit report for the current year.
(d) Company should take written advise from a tax consultant about this and
should attach that along with income tax return if tax audit report is not being filed.
Answer : (b) Company’s move is not right. Income tax return should be filed along with tax audit
report.
39. Nisha Ltd is engaged in the business of trading of chemicals. Nisha Ltd is a small size company
but on the basis of turnover criteria, tax audit becomes applicable to the company. The
company has been filing its income tax returns on time in the previous years and understands
that the objective of the tax audit is to ensure that proper books of accounts are maintained by
the assesses. Considering the fact that company is also required to get its accounts audited as
per the requirements of the Companies Act 2013, it would like to avail exemption from tax
audit. If that is not possible then the company would go for tax audit report from an accountant
who is cost effective. In this context, please suggest which of the following should be correct.
a) Company can avail tax audit exemption in the given situation.
b) Company cannot avail tax audit exemption but it may be exempt from submitting the tax audit
report from a Chartered Accountant.
c) Company can avail tax audit exemption, however, the statutory auditor in that case would be
required to cover the same in his statutory audit report.
d) Company cannot avail tax audit exemption and would need to get this done from a Chartered
Accountant.
Answer: (d) Company cannot avail tax audit exemption and would need to get this done from a
Chartered Accountant.
40. RJ & Associates have been the statutory auditors of SH & Co, a partnership firm, for many
years. Tax audit of SH & Co was performed by KJ & Associates. During the year ended 31 March
2018, KJ & Associates resigned as tax auditors of SH & Co due to their personal reasons. SH &
Co appointed RJ & Associates as its tax auditor for the year ended 31 March 2018. The
engagement letter of RJ & Associates as statutory auditors of SH & Co was already signed and
600

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
RJ & Associates moved ahead without signing another engagement letter for tax audit since
most of the terms related to engagement were covered in the engagement letter of statutory
audit except additional scope and fee which was principally agreed between both the parties.
Please suggest which of the following is correct in the given situation.
a) RJ & Associates need not sign another engagement letter for tax audit.
b) RJ & Associates need to sign another engagement letter for tax audit.
c) RJ & Associates need not sign another engagement letter for tax audit. However, they should
ensure that the same thing is covered in the engagement letter for next year
i.e. year ending 31 March 2019.
d) RJ & Associates need not sign another engagement letter for tax audit if the fee for tax
audit is within the range of 5-10% of statutory audit fee.
Answer : (b) RJ & Associates need to sign another engagement letter for tax audit
41. ABC & Co LLP is a firm of Chartered Accountants having 5 partners. The firm specializes in
taxation work and also has large no of statutory audits and tax audits of corporate entities and
non-corporate entities. During the financial year ended 31 March 2018, the firm has received
various requests for new tax audits. On the basis of limit assigned in respect of tax audit
assignments by a Chartered Accountant/ firm of Chartered Accountants, please suggest which
of the following would be correct.
a) Firm can accept 300 tax audits assignments (in total) to be signed by its 5 partners.
b) Firm can accept 300 tax audits of corporate entities and 300 tax audits of non- corporate entities
to be signed by its 5 partners.
c) Firm can accept 300 tax audits of corporate entities, 300 tax audits of non-corporate entities
and more by outsourcing the same to Chartered Accountants outside the firm, however, all
these will be signed by its 5 partners.
d) Since the firm specializes in taxation work, it cannot accept 300 tax audit assignments.
Answer: (a) Firm can accept 300 tax audits assignments (in total) to be signed by its 5 partners.
42. AOP Pvt Ltd is currently engaged in closing its books of accounts for the financial year ended
31 March 2019. The company has always been a compliance-savvy and has also engaged
consultants for the same. The business of the company has been stable over the years and
profitability has been good over the last 3 years.
The company got registered for GST on time. Since registration the company has been filing
statement of returns GSTR 3B. However, Annual Return in GSTR 9 has not been filed by the
company.
Proper Officer issued a notice for failure to file Annual Return within 15 days. Even then, no
Annual Return was filed by the company within the time permitted. Please advise
601

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
a) In such a case, the company becomes a ‘non-filer’.

b) In such a case, the company would remain fully compliant.
c) The Proper Officer would be required to discuss this matter with the GST auditors of the
company.
d) GST auditor may resign in this situation.
Answer: (a) In such a case, the company becomes a ‘non-filer’
43. Rajeev Ltd is a listed company having business of production of motion pictures. For the
year ended 31 March 2018, the company wanted to appoint GST auditor. For the purpose,
somebody who is familiar with the business of the company/industry was to be preferred for
appointment i.e. who would have worked with the company in the past to avoid efforts/
duplication in terms of providing the information to get the GST audit completed. The company
had following options for the same. Please advise.
a) Internal auditors can be appointed for this work.
b) Both statutory and internal auditors can be jointly appointed for this work.
c) Internal auditors along with the tax consultants of the company can be appointed for this work.
d) Statutory auditors can be appointed for this work.
Answer: (d) Statutory auditors can be appointed for this work.
44. M/s. NKB Ltd. is engaged in the manufacturing of textile products having an annual capacity
of producing 1,00,000 units of garments. NKB Ltd. is covered under the provisions of Goods and
Service Tax Act with an applicable rate of 12%. During the financial year 2019-2020, NKB Ltd.
received a demand notice of Rs. 15.00 Lacs pertaining to the F.Y 2013-14 when the provisions of
Central Excise Act were applicable. NKB Ltd. deposited the demand amount after discussing
with its legal department. Are you, as a tax auditor of NKB Ltd., required to report the same? (4
ANSWER
NKB Ltd. Is a manufacturer of textile products and is covered under GST Act. During financial year 2019-
2020 NKB has received a demand notice of 15 lakhs which pertains to financial year 2013-2014 when the
Central Excise Act was prevalent. As a tax auditor of NKB Ltd., reporting would be under Clause 41 which is
given hereunder:
“Please furnish the details of demand raised or refund issued during the previous year under any tax laws
other than Income Tax Act, 1961 and Wealth tax Act, 1957 along with details of relevant proceedings. “
It may be noted that even though the demand/refund order is issued during the previous year, it may
pertain to a period other than the relevant previous year. In such cases also, reporting has to be done
under this clause. If there is any adjustment of refund against any demand, the auditor shall also report the
same under this clause.
602

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
In this case, liability is of excise duty i.e. under Central Excise Act, other than Income Tax Act and Wealth
Tax Act, thus this clause gets attracted and the reporting has to be done as per format
45. Arihant Pvt Ltd is engaged in the business of providing corporate/professional training programs. It
has an annual turnover of INR 74 crore. The Company is subject to tax audit for which the work has been
started by the tax auditor. For the financial year ending 31 March 2021, the Company applied for GST
registration for 5 new locations for which registration certificates have not yet been received by the
Company. However, the registration number is available on the portal of relevant authority which can be
verified by checking the details of the Company. In this case what should be the audit procedures to
verify this registration number? (rtp- july 2021)
ANSWER
Clause (4) (Details as to Indirect Tax Registration) of Part A of Form No. 3CD generally requires the auditor
to ensure whether the assessee is liable to pay indirect tax like excise duty, service tax, sales tax, goods and
service tax, custom duty, etc. If yes, please furnish the registration number or GST number or any other
identification number allotted for the same. Thus, the auditor is primarily required to furnish the details of
registration numbers as provided to him by the assessee. The reporting is required to be done in the
manner or format specified by the e-filing utility in this context.
In the given situation, Arihant Pvt Ltd is engaged in the business of providing corporate/professional
training programs. The Company is subject to tax audit. For the financial year ending 31 March 2021, the
Company applied for GST registration for 5 new locations for which registration certificates have not yet
been received by the Company. However, the registration number is available on the portal of relevant
authority.
In the instant case, the tax auditor of Arihant Private Limited should verify the registration number for the
locations for which registration certificates have not been received from online portal of the relevant
authority.
The auditor should also ensure that the details furnished while checking the registration number pertains
to the company only. If the company has filed any returns for these locations, the auditor should enquire
for the same from the management and should check those returns to verify the correctness of the
registration numbers. In addition, the auditor should also obtain specific representation in respect of this
point from the management
47. Mr. KTK, was an employee of Youths Ltd, a company engaged in the business of electronics goods;
who retired from his service on 30th September,2018. As he is an electronic Engineer by profession, on
27th October,2018 he started a retail business dealing in Electronic items under the name KTK Traders, a
proprietary concern, in his hometown. Mr. KTK provides you the following information regarding the
turnover of his proprietary concern for the financial year ended 31st March,2020 (mtp nov 20)
Date Particulars Amount

From 1.4.2019 to 31.3.2020 Gross Turnover 1.25 crore
25-05-2019 Less: Goods returned (sales made during the 0.08 crore
financial year 2018-2019)
12-11-2019 Less: Cash discount allowed 0.05 crore
603

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
30-12-2019 Less: Goods returned (sales made on 10-12- 0.11 crore

2019)
15-02-2020 Less: Discount allowed in the sales invoice 0.03 crore
31-03-2020 Less: Commission on sales 0.01 crore
Net Sales 0.97 crore
As per section 44AB of the Income tax Act,1961,every person carrying on business shall, if his total sales,
turnover or gross receipts, as the case may be, in business exceed or exceeds one crore rupees in any
previous year, get his accounts audited by an accountant before the specified date.
Considering the above, which of the following shall be considered as a reason for applicability or non-
applicability of tax audit under section 44AB of the Income Tax Act,1961.
(a) Tax audit under section 44AB of the Income Tax Act,1961 shall be applicable as it is having an
effective turnover of Rs. 1.25 crore, which is more than the limit prescribed.
(b) Tax audit under section 44AB of the Income Tax Act,1961 shall be applicable as it is having an
effective turnover of Rs. 1.03 crore, which is more than the limit prescribed.
(c) Tax audit under section 44AB of the Income Tax Act,1961 shall not be applicable as it is having an
effective turnover of Rs. 0.97 crore, which is less than the limit prescribed.
(d) Tax audit under section 44AB of the Income Tax Act,1961 shall not be applicable as it is having an
effective turnover of Rs. 0.98 crore, which is less than the limit prescribed.
ANSWER- b
48. For the year ending 31st March 2021, SabkaVikas & Sons has made a claim for refund of custom duty
for Rs. 2 crore but such refund was as admitted as due by authority in April 2021. SabkaVikas & Sons
neither credited the claim in Profit and Loss account nor reported the same in clause 16 of Form 3CD. Can
you please guide the auditor of SabkaVikas & Sons for reporting of refund of custom duty in accordance
with clause 16 of Form 3CD? (mtp – I -july 2021)
(a) Refund of custom duty to the extent of Rs. 2 crore should be reported in clause 16 as the same is
admitted by the custom authorities.
(b) Refund of custom duty to the extent of Rs. 2 crore need not be reported in clause 16 as it is admitted
by custom authorities in the next financial year.
(c) No disclosure is required as refund of custom duties is not covered under clause 16.
(d) Auditor should take a written representation from the management stating that refund of custom
duty of Rs. 2 crore will be credited to profit and loss account for the financial year ending 31st March
2022 and thus, no reporting is required.
ANSWER- b
49. Mr. Abhinandan engaged in business as a sole proprietor presented the following information to you
for the FY 2021-22. Turnover expected to be made during the year Rs. 1124 lacs. Goods returned in
604

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
respect of sales made during FY 2020-21 is Rs. 20 lacs not included in the above. Cash discount allowed to
his customers Rs. 1 lac for prompt payment. Special rebate allowed to customer in the nature of trade
discount Rs. 5 lacs. Further, the aggregate of all amounts received including amount received for sales,
turnover or gross receipts during the previous year, in cash, does not exceed five per cent of the said
amount and aggregate of all payments made including amount incurred for expenditure, in cash, during
the previous year does not exceed five per cent of the said payment. Kindly advise him whether he has
to get his accounts audited u/s 44AB of the Income Tax Act, 1961. (4 Marks) (mtp – I -july 2021)
ANSWER
Turnover limit for the purpose of Tax Audit: The following points merit consideration as stated in the
Guidance note on Tax Audit issued by the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India-
(i) Price of goods returned should be deducted from the figure of turnover even if the return are from the
sales made in the earlier years.
charge and is not related to turnover. The same should not be deducted from the figure of turnover.
(iii) Special rebate allowed to a customer can be deducted from the sales if it is in the nature of trade
discount.
Applying the above stated points to the given problem, 1. 1124 Lac
Total Turnover
2. Less – (i) Goods Returned 20 Lac
(ii) Special rebate allowed to customer in the nature of 5 Lac
trade discount would be deducted
Balance 1099 Lac
50. (RTP- NOV 2021)

UT & Co. is a Chartered Accountant Firm, that provides consultancy services. Recently, it got
queries from different clients with respect to applicability of tax audit provisions to their
businesses.
In response to such queries, UT & Co., asked from them details such as turnover, total receipts
and total payments made during the year respectively along with mode of receipt/payment,
whether filing return of Income under normal tax provisions or presumptive tax provisions such
as section 44AD, 44AE, etc.
So, in the trailing mail, UT & Co., got the aforesaid details from different clients, which it classified
into following categories for ease of framing an opinion, as follows:
Client Sr Turnover % of Cash % of Cash Remarks

. No. (₹ in Receipts in Payments in
crore) Total Receipts Total
Payments
1 4.5 5% 5% Has been filing return as per the regular
provisions of income tax.
2 1.8 7% 4% Has declared business income as per presumptive
taxation under section 44AD of the Income-tax
Act, 1961.
605

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s

taxation under section 44AD of the Income-tax
Act, 1961 during last 2 previous years but during
current previous year has declared income lower
than as per section 44AD and the total income is
less than basic exemption limit.
taxation under section 44AE of the Income-tax
Act, 1961 during last 4 previous years but during
current previous year has declared income lower
than as per section 44AE and the total income is
less than basic exemption limit.
On behalf of UT & Co., please provide your opinion, along with reasons, as a consultant in case of
aforesaid clients that whether tax audit is applicable to them or not?
ANSWER
Applicability of Tax Audit:
Client Opinion (Tax Reason
Sr. Audit applicable
No. or not)
1 No As the turnover is upto ₹ 5 crore, Cash Receipts and Cash
Payments are upto 5% of total receipts & total payments,
respectively, and has been filing return as per the regular
provisions of income tax, so tax audit is not applicable.
2 No Even though turnover exceeds ₹ 1 crore and Cash Receipts are
greater than 5% of Total Receipts but as the business income has
been declared as per presumptive taxation under section 44AD of
the Income-tax Act, 1961, so tax audit is not applicable.
3 No Even though business income as per presumptive taxation under
section 44AD of the Income-tax Act, 1961 has been declared
during last 2 previous years but has not been declared during the
current previous year but as the total income is less than basic
exemption limit, so tax audit is not applicable.
4 Yes Has been declaring total income as per presumptive taxation
under section 44AE of the Income-tax Act, 1961 during last 4
previous years but during current previous year has declared
income lower than as per section 44AE, so tax audit is applicable.
51. ( MTP- NOV 2021)

Mr. Manipal, a practicing Chartered Accountant has signed the Tax Audit Reports u/s 44AB of the Income tax
Act, 1961 for the financial year 2019-20 that are filed online using Digital Signature and without generating
UDIN on the ground that there is no field for mentioning UDIN on digitally signed online reports. Is the
contention of Mr. Manipal valid? Give your comments with reference to the Chartered Accountants Act,
1949 and schedules thereto.
ANSWER
Non Generation of UDIN: Whereas, to curb the malpractice of false/certification/attestation by the
unauthorized persons and to eradicate the practice of bogus certificates and to save various regulators,
606
banks, stakeholders etc. from being misled, the Council of the Institute decided to implement an innovative

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
concept to generate Unique Document Identification Number (UDIN) mandatorily for all kinds of the
certificates/GST and tax audit reports and other attest function in phased manner, for which members of
the ICAI were notified through the various announcements published on the website of ICAI at the relevant
times.
In exercise of the powers conferred on it under clause 1 of Part II of the Second Schedule to the Chartered
Accountants Act,1949, the Council of the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India issued the following
guidelines for information of public and necessary compliance by members of the Institute-A member of
the Institute in practice shall generate Unique Document Identification Number
(UDIN) for all kinds of the certification, GST and Tax Audit Reports and other Audit, Ass urance and
Attestation functions undertaken/signed by him which are made mandatory from the following dates
through announcements published on the website of the ICAI –
For all Certificates w.e.f. 1st February,2019.

For all Tax Audit Reports w.e.f. 1st April, 2019.
For all other Audit, Assurance and Attestation functions, w.e.f. 1st July, 2019.
Conclusion: UDIN will be applicable to Tax Audit Reports signed by Mr. Manipal for the financial year 2019-
20 that are filed online using Digital Signature. In case where there is no field for mentioning UDIN on
digitally signed online reports, UDIN has to be generated and communicated to “Management” or “Those
Charged with Governance” for disseminating it to the stakeholders from their end.
Hence he will be held guilty under Clause 1 of Part II of the Second Schedule to the Chartered Accountants
Act,1949.
52. ( MTP- NOV 2021)
Excellent Ltd. is engaged in the business of manufacturing of threads. The company is expecting to record
turnover of ₹ 8.13 crores during the financial year 2020-21 before adjusting the following:
Discount allowed in the Sales Invoice ₹ 8,20,000
Cash discount (other than allowed in
Cash memo/ sales invoice) ₹ 9,20,000
Trade discount ₹ 2,90,000
Commission on Sales ₹ 6,00,000
Sales Return (F.Y. 2018-19) ₹ 1,60,000
Sale of Investment ₹ 6,60,000
You are required to ascertain the effective turnover to be considered for the prescribed limit of tax audit
under the relevant Act and guide the company whether the provisions relating to tax audit applies.
ANSWER
The provisions relating to tax audit under section 44AB of the Income Tax Act, 1961 applies to every person
carrying on business, if his total sales, turnover or gross receipts in business exceed the prescribed limit of ₹
1 crore (Provided that in the case of a person whose aggregate of all amounts received including amount
received for sales, turnover or gross receipts during the previous year, in cash, does not exceed five per
cent of the said amount and aggregate of all payments made including amount incurred for expenditure, in
cash, during the previous year does not exceed five per cent of the said payment, the limit of one crore
rupees shall change to five crore rupees) and to a person carrying on a profession, if his gross receipts from
profession exceed the prescribed limit of ₹ 50 lakh in any previous year. However, the term "sales",
"turnover" or "gross receipts" are not defined in the Act, and therefore the meaning of the aforesaid terms
has to be considered for the applicability of the section.
607

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
Some of the points for merit consideration in this regard as discussed in the Guidance Note issued by the
Institute are given below-
(i) Discount allowed in the sales invoice will reduce the sale price and, therefore, the same can be deducted
from the turnover.
charge and is not related to turnover. Therefore, should not be deducted from the turnover.
(iii) Turnover discount is normally allowed to a customer if the sales made to him exceed a particular
quantity. As per trade practice, it is in the nature of trade discount and should be deducted from the figure.
(iv) Special rebate allowed to a customer can be deducted from the sales if it is in the nature of trade
discount. If it is in the nature of commission on sales, the same cannot be deducted from the figure of
turnover.
(v) Price of goods returned should be deducted from the turnover even if the returns are from the sales
made in the earlier year/s.
(vi) Sale proceeds of any shares, securities, debentures, etc., held as investment will not form part of
turnover. However, if the shares, securities, debentures etc., are held as stock-in-trade, the sale proceeds
thereof will form part of turnover.
In the given case, Excellent Ltd. is engaged in manufacturing business. Therefore, the tax audit would be
applicable if the turnover exceeds ₹ 5 crore during the financial year 2020-21. The calculation of effective
turnover for the prescribed limit purpose, in accordance with abovementioned conditions, is given below:
Expected turnover during the year ₹ 8,13,00,000

Less: (i) Discount allowed in the Sales Invoice (₹ 8,20,000)
(ii) Trade discount (₹ 2,90,000)
(iii) Sales Return (₹ 1,60,000)
Effective turnover ₹ 8,00,30,000
Conclusion: The expected effective turnover of Excellent Ltd. is Rupees Eight Crore and Thirty Thousand only
which is over and above the prescribed limit for tax audit under section 44AB of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
Thus, the provisions related to tax audit would be applicable to the company and would therefore be liable
for tax audit.
53NOV 2021 EXAM
CA Nitesh, while carrying out the Tax audit of PQR Ltd. observed that PQR Ltd. has entered into specified
financial transactions covered under Section 285BA of the Income tax Act, 1961. PQR Ltd. has furnished
statement of the specified financial transaction in Form No. 61 & Form No. 61A.
Guide CA Nitesh with reporting requirements under clause 42 of Form 3CD?
The management contends that tax auditor need not report, if the transactions are not covered in the ambit
of Section 269ST. Comment.
ANSWER :
Clause 42 has been introduced where the tax auditor has to report that whether the taxpayer is required to
furnish a statement of the specified financial transaction (in Form No.61 or Form No. 61A or Form No. 61B).
With respect to Form 61, the tax auditor should verify whether the taxpayer has entered into any transaction
where the other party was required to quote PAN. He should verify whether the taxpayer has obtained
declaration in Form No. 60 where the other party has not furnished his PAN. Wherever the taxpayer has
608

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
received declarations in Form No. 60, the auditor should verify if the taxpayer has filed Form No. 61 including
therein all the necessary particulars.
With respect to Form 61A, the tax auditor should ascertain whether the taxpayer is required to report any
transactions under Section 285BA read with Rule 114E. It may be noted that specified transactions under
Section 285BA include the issue of bonds, issue of shares, buy-back of shares by a listed company, etc. These
transactions may not happen every year and hence special attention should be given in the year when a
company taxpayer issues any security or a listed company undertakes buyback of shares.
While verifying the same, the tax auditor should ensure that the provisions of Rule 114E(3) have been
properly considered and applied.
Failure to do so may result in a certain transaction not being reported. It may be noted that the payment
may be received for various transactions and on different dates, and hence these may not be covered under
Section 269ST but will have to be reported under Section 285BA.
Keeping in view above provisions, contention of the management that tax auditor need not report is
incorrect and hence tax auditor will have to report under Section 285BA.
He would be required to report under clause 42 of Form 3CD as under:
S. Income Tax Type of Due date Date of Whether the form If not please
No. Department Form for furnishing, contains furnish list of
Reporting furnishing if furnished information about the details/
entity all details/ transactions
Identification transactions which are not
No. which are required reported
to be reported
54 (MAY 2022 EXAM)

M/s PQR Auto, a partnership firm, is engaged in manufacture of automobile spare parts having factory at
Surat. CA S was appointed as the Tax Auditor of M/s PQR Auto for the Assessment Year 2022-2023. While
carrying out the Tax Audit under section 44AB of the Income-tax Act, 1961. CA S observed following:
(i) Interest of Rs. 50,000 paid to Vendor X who was registered under MSME Act, 2006.
(ii) Interest payment Rs. 10,000 was incurred in relation to earning exempt interest income
from Tax Relief bonds.
(iii) Sum of Rs. 1,00,000 was received from Mr. X, for sale of one plant and machinery. But due
to non-compliance of one of the conditions as specified in the contract with Mr. X, M/s. PQR Auto forfeited
Rs. 1,00,000 during AY 2022-23 as per forfeiture clause mentioned in the contract.
Guide CA S in reporting the above transactions under the relevant clauses in Form No. 3CD. (5 Marks)
ANSWER :
(i) As per Clause 22 of Form 3CD of the Income-tax Act, 1961, the tax auditor is required to state the amount
of interest inadmissible under section 23 of the Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Development Act,
2006. Section 23 of the MSME Act lays down that an interest payable or paid by the buyer, in accordance
with the provisions of this Act, shall not be allowed as a deduction for the purposes of the computation of
income under the Income-tax Act,1961.
Accordingly, the CA. S is required to report the payment of interest of Rs. 50,000 to Vendor X who was
registered under MSME Act, 2006 under clause 22 of Form 3CD of the Income-tax Act, 1961.
(ii)As per Clause 21(h) of Form 3CD of the Income-tax Act, 1961, the tax auditor is required to report about
the amount of deduction inadmissible in terms of section 14A Income-tax Act, 1961, in respect of the
609

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
expenditure incurred in relation to income which does not form part of the total income.
Therefore, CA. S, the auditor is required to scrutinize expense accounts particularly interest account to check
whether there is included any expense which is relatable to exempt income. He is also required to note down
the amount and mention against the clause.
Thus, in the given situation, CA. S is required to report the same as per clause 21 (h) of Form 3CD of the
Income-tax Act, 1961.
(iii)As per Clause 29(A) of Form 3CD of the Income-tax Act, 1961 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, the auditor is
required to report,
(a)whether any amount is to be included as income chargeable under the head ‘income from other sources’
as referred to in clause (ix) of sub section (2) of section 56 the Income-tax Act, 1961.
(b)If yes, to provide the nature of income and amount thereof.
The auditor is also required to obtain a certificate from the assessee regarding all such advances received
towards transfer of capital assets which have forfeited during the year and examine whether any amount of
such advances has been written back during the year and examine the basis of such write back to determine
whether such write back was on account of an act of forfeiture. Further, the auditor is also required to verify
the terms of contract to check the conditions to forfeit of such advance and such conditions have occurred,
then should verify whether the amount has been actually forfeited.
Thus, same is required to be reported under clause 29(A) of Form 3CD of the Income-tax Act, 1961.
55 (MAY 2022 EXAM)
CA K, a Practising Chartered Accountant, was appointed as Authorized Representative by GKR Limited to
appear before National e-assessment centre in the matter of its Faceless Income-tax proceedings for the
Assessment year 2020-21. While preparing a reply in response to the notice for the Scrutiny Assessment, CA
K observed that there were certain trade payables and loan creditors which were not in existence but was
fabricated by the management of GKR Limited. Though CA K knew these accounts were fabricated, he still
submitted those false accounts to the National faceless e-assessment centre. What are the liabilities of CA K
under the Income-tax Act, 1961?
ANSWER :
False Declaration as Authorized Representative: In connection with proceedings under the Income-
tax Act 1961, a Chartered Accountant often acts as the authorized representative of his clients and
attends before an Income-tax Authority or the appellate tribunal.
Any person who acts or induces, in any manner another person to make and deliver to the Income-
tax Authorities a false account, statement, or declaration, relating to any income chargeable to tax
which he knows to be false or does not believe to be true will be liable under section 278 of the
Income-tax Act 1961.
Further, in case of submission of any information which is false and which the Chartered Accountant
either knows or believes to be false or untrue, he would be liable to rigorous imprisonment which
may extend to seven years (in other cases two years) and/or to a fine.
In the instant case, Mr. K, a chartered accountant was appointed as authorize representative by
GKR Limited to appear before National E-Assessment Centre in the matter of its faceless Income-
tax proceeding. While preparing a reply in response to the notice for the scrutiny assessment, CA.
K, submitted false accounts to the National Faceless E-Assessment Centre, knowingly that certain
trade payables and loan creditors accounts were not in existence and were fabricated by
Management.
610

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
In view of above, CA. K would be liable under section 278 of the Income-tax Act, 1961.
56 (OCT 2022 MTP)

Gautam Ltd. is engaged in the manufacturing of textile products having an annual capacity of
producing 2,30,000 units of garments. Gautam Ltd. is covered under the provisions of Goods and
Service Tax Law with an applicable rate of 12%. During the financial year 2021-2022, Gautam Ltd.
received a demand notice of Rs. 17.00 Lacs pertaining to the F.Y 2015-16 when the provisions of
Central Excise Act were applicable. Gautam Ltd. deposited the demand amount after discussing with
its legal department. Comment whether a tax auditor of Gautam Ltd.is required to report the same.
ANSWER :
Gautam Ltd. is a manufacturer of textile products and is covered under GST Law. During financial
year 2021-2022 Gautam Ltd. has received a demand notice of 17 lakh which pertains to financial
year 2015-2016 when the Central Excise Act was prevalent.
As a tax auditor of Gautam Ltd., reporting would be under Clause 41 which is given hereunder:
“Please furnish the details of demand raised or refund issued during the previous year under any
tax laws other than Income Tax Act, 1961 and Wealth tax Act, 1957 along with details of relevant
proceedings. “
It may be noted that even though the demand/refund order is issued during the previous year, it
may pertain to a period other than the relevant previous year. In such cases also, reporting has to
be done under this clause. If there is any adjustment of refund against any demand, the auditor
shall also report the same under this clause.
In this case, liability is of excise duty i.e. under Central Excise Act, other than Income Tax Act and
Wealth Tax Act, thus this clause gets attracted and the reporting has to be done as per format:
S No. Name of Demand/ Date of Financial year Amount of Adjustment of Remarks
the Refund demand to which the demand/raised refund
Applicable Order raised/refund demand/refund /refund issued against
Act no., if any issued relates demand, if
any
57 (SEPT 2022 MTP)

While conducting the tax audit of Rajul Ltd. you observed that company has timely filed ETDS return
for TDS deducted on salary undersection 192 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 in form 24Q in respect of
fourth quarter period from 1st January 2022 to 31st March 2022. The company has not furnished
list of details which are not reported in the statement of tax deducted at source under the pretext
that TDS statements are furnished within the prescribed time. As a Tax Auditor of Rajul Ltd. how
you would deal and report?
ANSWER:
As per Clause 34 (b) of the Form 3CD, the auditor has to report whether the assessee is required to
furnish the statement of tax deducted or tax collected. If yes, please furnish the details:
611

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
Tax Type of Due date Date of Whether the If not, please

deduction Form for furnishing, statement of tax furnish list of
and furnishing if furnished deducted or details/transa
collection collected contains ctions which
Account information about are not
Number all transactions reported
(TAN) which are required
to be reported
Accordingly, clause 34 (b) requires, a list of details/transactions which are not reported in the
statement of tax deducted at source and statement of tax collected at source are required to be
furnished. The reporting requirement is notwithstanding the fact that the assessee has furnished
the statements of tax deducted at source and tax collected at source within the prescribed time.
In the given situation, Rajul Ltd., has timely filed ETDS return for TDS deducted on Salary under
section 192 of the Income Tax Act in Form 24Q in respect of 4th quarter. The company has not
furnished list of details which are not reported in the statement of tax deducted at source under
the pretext that TDS Statements are furnished within the prescribed time. Therefore, in view of
above, Rajul Ltd. is required to furnish list of details which are not reported in the statement of tax
deducted at source.
58 ( SEPT 2022 MTP)
Mr. Paras has been appointed statutory auditor under Companies Act, 2013 of DEMA Limited., a
company engaged in manufacturing of range of products. DEMA Limited was also listed on NSE.
Besides, he was also appointed to conduct audit u/s 44AB of Income Tax Act. Mr. Chandra, relative
of Mr. Paras was involved in the business of trading stocks listed on NSE. During the year FY 21 -22
Mr. Chandra performed the following trades.
Name of Stock Date of Transaction Purchase / Quantity FV per Share Market
Sale Value per
Share
DEMA Limited 1-4-2021 Purchase 10 10 3500
DMEA Limited 1-4-2021 Purchase 90 10 3300
DEMA Limited 30-04-2021 Sale 50 10 3600
DEMA Limited 30-06-2021 Sale 30 10 3750
Thereafter no transaction in the shares of DEMA limited was performed by Mr. Chandra during the
year.
Moreover, Mr. Paras identified a fraud related to misappropriation of cash amounting to Rs. 3 Crore
in the books of the company. In this fraud, Procurement Manager and Payment Managers were
together involved. As per provision of Section 143(12) Mr. Paras, reported fraud to Audit Committee
within 7 days from date of identification and asked audit committee to submit their response. Audit
Committee did not respond as they wanted to investigate further on this.
In the absence of any reply, audit committee and, understanding the nature of issue, Mr. Paras did
612

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
not report this issue to anyone as it could impact negatively to the image of the company. Further,
Mr. Paras made necessary change in their audit procedures to extent their coverage of Procurement
and Payments area. After performing additional procedures over Procurement and Payment
business process, Mr. Paras identified that the internal controls over the said area are significantly
deficient. Mr. Paras did not communicate this finding with those Charged with Governance as he
already reported about the fraud and the Audit Committee was investigating the same.
Mr. Paras also identified that the internal audit function reports directly to the management and
they do not have any direct communication with those charged with governance or an of ficer
with the appropriate authority. Also, all the findings of internal audit function are first reported to
the management and then the management decides what to report to those charged with
governance from the findings of internal audit function.
At the end, Mr. Paras issued a qualified opinion, and, in his report, he mentioned the following
paragraph
under the head “Basis of Qualified Opinion”:
“a.Company has not disclosed the impact of pending litigations on its financial position in its
financial statement. The impact assessed for the pending litigation is Rs. 4.5 Crore (Best Estimate).
b.During the audit, a fraud related to misappropriation of cash amounting to Rs. 3 Crore was
identified in the books of the company.
c.Company has not made any provision, as required under any law or accounting standards, for
material foreseeable losses on long term contracts including derivative contracts. During the year,
as per assessment performed by an expert, the amount of provision for material foreseeable loss
on long term contracts was estimated at Rs. 7 Crore for which no provision was made.”
No other reference or reporting was made of these qualifications in audit report.
1. Kindly guide whether Mr. Paras is eligible to be appointed as a Tax Auditor of DEMA Limited u/s
288 of the Income Tax Act, by selecting the appropriate option from below:
(a)As per 288(2)(viii)(a) of Income Tax Act read with Section 141(3) of Companies Act, relative of Mr.
Paras is holding securities of market value of Rs. 1,00,000 or more and hence Mr. Paras is not eligible
to be appointed as Tax Auditor.
(b)As per 288(2)(viii)(a) of Income Tax Act read with Section 141(3) of Companies Act, relative of
Mr. Paras is not holding securities of face value having Rs. 1,00,000 or more and hence Mr. Paras is
eligible to be appointed as Tax Auditor.
(c)As per Section 288(2)(viii)(b) relative of Mr. Paras is indebted to the company or its subsidiary or
its holding or associate company or a subsidiary of such holding company and hence Mr. Paras is
not eligible to get appointed as a Tax Auditor.
(d)Relative of Mr. Paras is the person who is competent to verify the return under section 139 in
accordance with the provisions of section 140 and hence Mr. Paras is eligible to get appointed as a
Tax Auditor.
2. With respect to the qualifications (a) and (c) specified in the Audit Report, kindly guide with
respect to the additional reporting requirement of these matters in audit report.
613

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
(a)As per the Companies (Auditor's Report) Order, 2020, Auditor is required to report these matters
under reporting done for Para 3(ix) of the Order.
(b)As per section 143(3)(j) read with Rule 11(a) & 11(b) of The Companies (Audit and Auditors) Rules,
2014, Auditor is required to report or give reference of these matters.
(c)Company is not required to report these matters anywhere else except for qualification under
the head “Basis for Qualification”
(d)Company should report this matter under the head “Management Responsibilities”.
3. With respect to identification of Fraud in the books of account of the company, Kindly guide Mr.
Paras with respect to the appropriate reporting requirements under section 143(12) of Companies
Act.
(a) Mr. Paras should have reported the matter to Audit Committee within 2 days of identification of
the fraud. However, Mr. Paras is valid in not reporting this issue further as it could negatively to the
image of company.
(b)Mr. Paras should have reported the matter to Audit Committee and Board of Directors within 7
days of identification of the fraud. Hence, Mr. Paras did not report to Board of Director which is
inappropriate.
(c)Mr. Paras should have reported the matter to Audit Committee within 2 days of identification of
the fraud. Over and above Mr. Paras should have reported this matter to the Central Government
as per prescribed rules.
(d)Mr. Paras should not have reported this matter to Audit Committee. Mr. Paras should have
reported matter first to central government within 2 days of identification of fraud.
4. With respect to the reporting of significant deficiencies to those charged with governance, kindly
guide Mr. Paras with respect to appropriate provisions in this regard.
(a)As per SA 315, the engagement partner shall determine which matters are to be communicated
to management and those charged with governance involved in the discussion.
(b)As per SA 265, the auditor shall communicate in writing significant deficiencies in internal control
identified during the audit to those charged with governance on a timely basis.
(c)As per SA 315, the auditor should understand the communications between management and
those charged with governance before communicating anything to those charged with governance.
(d)As per SA 450, the auditor shall communicate on a timely basis critical misstatements
accumulated during the audit with the appropriate level of management, unless they are already
communicated with management earlier in any form.
5. The external audit team decided to rely on and to use the work of internal audit function in the
areas where more judgment was involved or where the risk of material misstatement was assessed
at a higher level. Based on the above information, kindly guide the audit team regarding use of the
work of internal audit function as per SA 610 by selecting the appropriate option from below:
(a)The external auditor shall not use the work of an internal audit function if the external auditor
determines that the internal audit function’s organizational status and the relevant policies and
procedures do not adequately support the objectivity of the internal auditors.
(b)The external auditors shall not use the work of an internal audit function if the external auditor
614

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
determines that the internal audit function’s organizational structure and relevant policies and
procedures do adequately support the objectivity of internal auditors.
(c)The external auditor shall use the work of the internal audit function if the external auditor
determines that the internal audit function applies a systematic and discipline approach including
quality control while discharging their duties.
(d)The external auditor shall not use the work of the internal audit function is the external auditor
determines that the internal audit function does not lack sufficient competence to discharge their
duties.
ANSWER :
1.B
2.B
3.C
4.B
5.A
59 (MARCH 2022 MTP)
Mr. Yuvi is a contractor dealing in food catering, flower decorating and light decorating
activities. He has received contract in respect of food catering and flower decorating from one
NGO for holding Annual Talent evening event to celebrate completion of 25 years of their
establishment. For the said event Mr. Yuvi has received in cash Rs. 1,75,000 for food catering
and Rs. 1,35,000 for flower decoration. As a tax auditor how would you deal and report on
the above? (5 Marks)
ANSWER :
Section 269ST provides that no person shall receive sum of Rs. 2 lakh or more a) in aggregate
from a person in a day; or b) in respect of a single transaction; or c) in respect of transactions
relating to one event or occasion from a person otherwise than by an account payee cheque
or an account payee demand draft or by use of electronic clearing system through a bank
account.
Further, the tax auditor has the responsibility to verify the compliance with the provisions of
269T of the Income Tax Act.
Furthermore, the tax auditor is required to report under Clause 31 (ba) particulars of each
receipt in an amount exceeding the limit specified in section 269ST, in aggregate from a
person in a day or in respect of a single transaction or in respect of transactions relating to
one event or occasion from a person, during the previous year, where such receipt is
otherwise than by a cheque or bank draft or use of electronic clearing system through a bank
account:-
(i)Name, address and Permanent Account Number (if available with the assessee) of the
payer;
(ii)Nature of transaction;
(iii)Amount of receipt (in Rs.);
615

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
(iv)Date of receipt;
In the present case, Mr. Yuvi, contractor dealing in food catering, flower decorating and light
decorating activities, received in cash Rs. 1,75,000 for food catering and Rs. 1,35,000 for
flower decoration from one NGO for holding one event, by way of cash which is exceeding
prescribed amount of Rs. 2,00,000. Thus, tax auditor is required to report the same in
compliance with Clause 31 (ba) of Form 3CD.
60 (MARCH 2022 MTP)
M/s. ASH Brothers is a partnership firm engaged in the business of selling old vehicles. Mr. A,
Mr. S and Mr. H are the three partners of the firm. In the month of January 2021, Mr. H’s son
(a minor) was admitted for the benefit of partnership who attained majority in April 2022, but
no change was made in the Partner’s share during the year. Whether the tax auditor is
required to mention the details of Mr. H’s son admitted to the partnership during the year, as
per clause 9 of Form3CD of the Income Tax?
(a)Since the minor has not attained majority during the audit period, no details need to
mention in Form 3CD.
(b)The auditor is not required to give details of minor admitted to partnership as there was
no change in the Partner’s Share during the year.
(c)Any change in the Partners since the last date of the preceding year has to be mentioned
under clause 9(b) of Form 3CD.
(d)As the father of minor is his guardian till he attains majority and Mr. H was already partner
in the firm, there is no need to mention the details of minor in Form 3CD.
ANSWER: ( C )
61(APRIL 2022 MTP)

While conducting the tax audit of RRR Ltd. you observed that company has timely filed ETDS
return for TDS deducted on salary under section 192 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 in form 24Q
in respect of fourth quarter period from 1st January 2021 to 31st March 2021. The company
has not furnished list of details which are not reported in the statement of tax deducted at
source under the pretext that TDS statements are furnished within the prescribed time. As a
Tax Auditor of RRR Ltd. how you would deal and report?
ANSWER :
As per Clause 34 (b) of the Form 3CD, the auditor has to report whether the assessee is
required to furnish the statement of tax deducted or tax collected. If yes, please furnish the
details:
616

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
Tax Type Due date Date of Whether the If not,

deduction of for furnishing, statement of tax please
and Form furnishing if furnished deducted or furnish list
collection collected contains of
Account information about details/trans
Number all transactions actions
(TAN) which are required which are
to be reported not reported
Accordingly, clause 34 (b) requires, a list of details/transactions which are not reported in the
statement of tax deducted at source and statement of tax collected at source are required to
be furnished. The reporting requirement is notwithstanding the fact that the assessee has
furnished the statements of tax deducted at source and tax collected at source within the
prescribed time.
In the given situation, RRR Ltd., has timely filed ETDS return for TDS deducted on Salary unde
section 192 of the Income Tax Act in Form 24Q in respect of 4th quarter. The company has
not furnished list of details which are not reported in the statement of tax deducted at source
under the pretext that TDS Statements are furnished within the prescribed time. Therefore,
in view of above, RRR Ltd. is required to furnish list of details which are not reported in the
statement of tax deducted at source.
62 (APRIL 2022 MTP)

Gamma Private Ltd. duly appoints CA Palak as the tax auditors of their Company and the appointed
Tax-auditor chalks out a detailed Audit Programme to be assigned to her audit engagement team
to carry out the tax audit efficiently & effectively. Which of the following situations wouldn’t
warrant an alteration in the Audit Programme during the course of Audit by the Tax Auditor of
Gamma Private Limited during the next Financial Year ?
(a)Significant changes in Procedures and Personnel of the Company subsequent to audit
Procedures.
(b)A Substantial increase in the volume of turnover as against the anticipated results of the
Company.
(c)An extraordinary increase in the amount of Book Debts as compared to that in the First Year.
(d)A New Contract received by Gamma Ltd. form a Foreign Client during the course of the audit.
ANSWER : D
63(MAY 2022 RTP)

CA Sumati has been appointed as a tax auditor under section 44 AB of the Income-tax Act, 1961, of
M/s Pal & Company, a partnership firm, following cash basis of accounting. CA Sumati made the
qualification that ICDS were not followed by the entity while maintaining books of accounts.
Whether qualification made by CA Sumati is correct? Explain the provisions of the applicability of
ICDS with reference to Sec 145(2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
ANSWER :
617

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
Section 145(2) empowers the Central Government to notify in the Official Gazette from time to
time, income computation and disclosure standards are to be followed by any class of assessees or
in respect of any class of income.
Accordingly, the Central Government had, in the exercise of the powers conferred under section
145(2), notified ten income computation and disclosure standards (ICDSs) to be followed by all
assesses (other than an individual or a HUF who is not required to get his accounts of one previous
year audited in accordance with the provisions of section 44AB), following the mercantile system of
accounting, for the purposes of computation of income chargeable to income-tax under the head
“Profit and gains of business or profession” or “ Income from other sources”. from the A.Y. 2017-
18.
All the notified ICDSs are applicable for computation of income chargeable under the head “Profits
and gains of business or profession” or “Income from other sources” and not for the purpose of
maintenance of books of accounts. In the case of conflict between the
provisions of the Income‐tax Act, 1961 and the notified ICDSs, the provisions of the Act
shall prevail to that extent.
In the given situation, Sumati has been appointed as a tax auditor of M/s Pal & Company, a
partnership firm, following the cash basis of accounting. CA Sumati made the qualification that ICDS
were not followed by the entity while maintaining books of accounts. In view of the above
provisions, it is clear the ICDS is applicable on a mercantile system of accounting, and it is only for
the purpose of computation of income chargeable to income tax under the head “Profits and Gains
of business or profession” or “Income from other sources” and not for the maintenance of books of
accounts. Thus, qualification made by CA. Sumati is not correct.
64(NOV 2022 RTP)

Billimoria & Billimoria, a partnership firm, is engaged in providing engineering consultancy services
to insurance corporates in automobile sector. The firm conducts risk inspection of vehicles and
submit their reports to insurance companies. Both the partners are Chartered Engineers. The Firm
is one of your regular tax audit clients. The following information is culled out from the account
books of the company for financial year 2021 -22 by the firm:
Particulars Rupees in Crore
Turnover 8.50
Receipt on account of sales/debtors 6.00
Cash receipt from debtors 0.10
Expenditure during year 7.00
Cash expenditure 0.21
Cash loan repayment 0.05
The partner of said firm informs you that due to changes in income-tax laws, their firm is not liable
for audit under section 44 AB of Income tax Act (commonly called as tax audit). How would you deal
with the matter? Is contention of partner in accordance with law?
ANSWER :
618

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
Section 44 AB(a) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 prescribes that a person carrying on business shall get
his accounts audited if his total sales, turnover or gross receipts exceed
Rs. 1 crore in any previous year. However, this limit was enhanced to Rs. 10 crore in the following
case where: -
(a)aggregate of all amounts received including amount received for sales, turnover or gross receipts
during the previous year, in cash, does not exceed five per cent of the said amount; and
(b)aggregate of all payments made including amount incurred for expenditure, in cash, during the
previous year does not exceed five per cent of the said payment.
However, section 44 AB(b) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 states that in case of profession, every
person shall get his accounts audited, if his gross receipts in profession exceed Rs. 50 lakh. The
above said firm is engaged in providing engineering consultancy services to insurance corporates.
Hence, the benefit of enhanced threshold limit is not available to persons engaged in professional
activities.
The information regarding cash receipt and payment although falling within 5% of total
receipts/payments is not relevant in the instant case.
Hence, contention of partner is not correct, and firm is required to get its accounts audited under
income tax law.
619

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s

1. MTP Mar 2019 Qn no 8
In Case of PSU, Direct Reporting Engagement does not include
(a) Performance audits
(b) compliance audits
(c) Financial audits
(d) Comprehensive Audit
Answer: (c)Financial audits
MTP Apr 2019 QN no 4
2. A Public Limited Company is having its Head Office at Mumbai and the employees from various
branch offices used to visit Mumbai for official meetings. So, the company decided to construct
guest house for their employees staying in Mumbai, as the stay in hotel was very expensive. The
management took all sanctions to construct the building and the expenditure was incurred in
conformity with the rules and regulations. The building was ready for use by the year 2015 on
which a total expenditure of Rs. 5 crores was done, but it was not used by the employees and they
continued to stay in hotel. From the financial 2015-16 onwards the expenses were booked in
company’s profit and loss account for the upkeep and maintenance of the building and the hotel
charges paid for the stay of employees.
The company was having a separate internal audit department but one of the director demanded
propriety audit to ensure compliance with section 186 of the Companies Act, 2013 and ensure
that the transactions represented by books are prejudicial to the interests of the company. Do you
think that there is any need for propriety audit?
620

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
(a) Propriety audit is not required when the company is already having a separate internal audit
department and these areas can be covered in the scope of internal auditors.
(b) The director has no right to demand propriety audit, as in the case of Public Limited Company
only Government is authorised to decide on whether a propriety audit is required or not.
(c) Propriety audit is concerned with the scrutiny of executive decisions and actions affecting the
company’s financial and profit & loss situation. So, in the above case it is required as huge expense
has been done on construction of building and even then it was not used, which had a major
impact on company’s profit and loss statement.
(d) There is no need of propriety audit as the management took all sanctions to construct the
building and the expenditure was incurred in conformity with the rules and regulations.
Answer: (c) Propriety audit is concerned with the scrutiny of executive decisions and actions
affecting the company’s financial and profit & loss situation. So, in the above case it is required as
huge expense has been done on construction of building and even then it was not used, which had
a major impact on company’s profit and loss statement.
RTP May 2018 Qn no.16
3.Being an expert in the field of government audit, you are required to briefly explain the
powers of Comptroller and Auditor General of India with respect to supplementary audit and
test audit as stated under section 143(6) and 143(7) of the Companies Act, 2013.
ANSWER
Powers of Comptroller and Auditor-General of India
Supplementary audit under section 143(6)(a) of the Companies Act, 2013:
The Comptroller and Auditor-General of India shall within 60 days from the date of receipt of
the audit report have a right to conduct a supplementary audit of the financial statement of the
company by such person or persons as he may authorize in this behalf; and for the purposes of
such audit, require information or additional information to be furnished to any person or
persons, so authorised, on such matters, by such person or persons, and in such form, as the
Comptroller and Auditor-General of India may direct.
Comment upon or supplement such Audit Report under section 143(6)(b) of the Companies Act,
2013: Any comments given by the Comptroller and Auditor-General of India upon, or supplement
to, the audit report shall be sent by the company to every person entitled to copies of audited
financial statements under sub-section (1) of section 136 of the said Act i.e. every member of the
company, to every trustee for the debenture-holder of any debentures issued by the company,
and to all persons other than such member or trustee, being the person so entitled and also be
placed before the annual general meeting of the company at the same time and in the same
manner as the audit report.
Test audit under section 143(7) of the Companies Act, 2013: Without prejudice to the provisions
621
relating to audit and auditor, the Comptroller and Auditor-General of India may, in case of any

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
company covered under sub-section (5) or sub-section (7) of section 139 of the said Act, if he
considers necessary, by an order, cause test audit to be conducted of the accounts of such
company and the provisions of section 19A of the Comptroller and Auditor-General's (Duties,
Powers and Conditions of Service) Act, 1971, shall apply to the report of such test audit.
4.MTP Mar 18 Qn no.4(e) 4 Marks

ABG & Co., a Chartered Accountant firm has been appointed by C & AG for performance audit of a Sugar
Industry. List out the factors to be considered generally by ABG & Co., while planning a performance
audit of Sugar Industry?
Answer
Factors to be considered while planning the Performance Audit: While planning a performance
audit of Sugar Industry, the auditors should take care of certain factors which are listed below:
(i) to consider significance and the needs of potential users of the audit report.
(ii) to obtain an understanding of the program to be audited.
(iii) to consider legal and regulatory requirements.
(iv) to consider management controls.
(v) to identify criteria needed to evaluate matters subject to audit.
(vi) to identify significant findings and recommendations from previous audits that could affect the
current audit objectives. Auditors should determine if management has corrected the conditions
causing those findings and implemented those recommendations.
(vii) to identify potential sources of data that could be used as audit evidence and consider the validity
and reliability of these data, including data collected by the audited entity, data generated by
the auditors, or data provided by third parties.
(viii) to consider whether the work of other auditors and experts may be used to satisfy some of the
auditors' objectives.
(ix) to provide sufficient staff and other resources to do the audit.
(x) to prepare a written audit plan.
5.MTP APR 2018 Qnn 4(E) 4 Marks, (RTP MAY 2019)

The areas covered in comprehensive audit vary from enterprise to enterprise depending on the nature of
the enterprise, its objectives and operations.’ You are required to list down some of the broad areas to be
examined in comprehensive audit.
RTP May 2019 Qn no 20(b)
Write short note on the areas covered under Comprehensive audit
ANSWER
Areas to be Examined: The areas covered in comprehensive audit will naturally vary from
enterprise to enterprise depending on the nature of the enterprise, its objectives and operations.
Some of the broad areas are listed below-
622

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
 Comparison of overall capital cost of the project with the approved planned costs.
 Production or operational outputs vis-à-vis under-utilisation of the installed capacity.
 Systems of project formulation and implementation.
 Planned rate of return.
 Cost control measures.
 Research and development programmes.
 System of repairs and maintenance.
 Adequate purchase policies.
 Effective and economical procedures.
 Project planning.
 Undue waste, unproductive time for men and machines, wasteful utilisation or even non-
utilisation of resources.
6.RTP Nov 18 Qn no.16 RTP May 2020 Qn 16 (b)

“A performance audit is an objective and systematic examination of evidence for the purpose
of providing an independent assessment of the performance of a government organization,
program, activity, or function in order to provide information to improve public accountability
and facilitate decision-making by parties with responsibility to oversee or initiate corrective
action.” Briefly discuss the issues addressed by Performance Audits conducted in accordance
with the guidelines issued by C&AG.
Answer
According to the guidelines issued by the C&AG, Performance Audits usually address the issues of:
(i) Economy- It is minimising the cost of resources used for an activity, having regard to appropriate quantity,
quality and at the best price.
Judging economy implies forming an opinion on the resources (e.g. human, financial and material)
deployed. This requires assessing whether the given resources have been used economically and
acquired in due time, in appropriate quantity and quality at the best price.
(ii) Efficiency- It is the input-output ratio. In the case of public spending, efficiency is achieved when the output
is maximised at the minimum of inputs, or input is minimised for any given quantity and quality of output.
Auditing efficiency embraces aspects such as whether:
(a) sound procurement practices are followed;
(b) resources are properly protected and maintained;
(c) human, financial and other resources are efficiently used;
(d) optimum amount of resources (staff, equipment, and facilities) are used in producing or delivering the
appropriate quantity and quality of goods or services in a timely manner
(e) public sector programmes, entities and activities are efficiently managed, regulated, organised and
executed;
623

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
(f) efficient operating procedures are used; and

(g) the objectives of public sector programmes are met cost-effectively.
(iii) Effectiveness- It is the extent to which objectives are achieved and the relationship between the
intended impact and the actual impact of an activity.
In auditing effectiveness, performance audit may, for instance:
(a) assess whether the objectives of and the means provided (legal, financial, etc.) for a new or ongoing public
sector programme are proper, consistent, suitable or relevant to the policy;
(b) determine the extent to which a program achieves a desired level of program results;
(c) assess and establish with evidence whether the observed direct or indirect social and economic impacts
of a policy are due to the policy or to other causes;
(d) identify factors inhibiting satisfactory performance or goal-fulfilment;
(e) assess whether the programme complements, duplicates, overlaps or counteracts other related
programmes;
(f) assess the effectiveness of the program and/or of individual program components;
(g) determine whether management has considered alternatives for carrying out the program that might
yield desired results more effectively or at a lower cost;
(h) assess the adequacy of the management control system for measuring, monitoring and reporting a
programme's effectiveness;
(i) assess compliance with laws and regulations applicable to the program; and
(j) identify ways of making programmes work more effectively.
7. MTP-OCT-18 Qn No 4(e) 5 Marks:
The Comptroller & Auditor General of India plays a key role in the functioning of the financial
committees of Parliament and the State Legislatures. He has come to be recognised as a
'friend, philosopher and guide' of the Committees. In view of above, you are required to list
down any four role.
Answer:
C&AG's Role – The Comptroller & Auditor General of India plays a key role in the functioning of
the financial committees of Parliament and the State Legislatures. He has come to be recognised
as a 'friend, philosopher and guide' of the Committees.
• His Reports generally form the basis of the Committees' working, although they are not precluded
from examining issues not brought out in his Reports;
• He scrutinises the notes which the Ministries submit to the Committees and helps the Committees
to check the correctness of submissions to the Committees and facts and figures in their draft
reports;
• The Financial Committees present their Report to the Parliament/ State Legislature with their
observations and recommendations.
The various Ministries / Department of the Government are required to inform the Committees of
624

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
the action taken by them on the recommendations of the Committees (which are generally
accepted) and the Committees present Action Taken Reports to Parliament / Legislature ;
(iv) In respect of those Audit Reports, which could not be discussed in detail by the Committees,
written answers are obtained from the Department / Ministry concerned and are sometimes
incorporated in the Reports presented to the Parliament / State Legislature.
This ensures that the Audit Reports are not taken lightly by the Government, even if the entire
report is not deliberated upon by the Committee.
8.NOV 18 Qn no 4(e) 4 Marks, RTP MAY 2020

Sunlight Limited is a public sector undertaking engaged in production of electricity from solar
power. It had commissioned a new project near Goa with a new technology for a cost of Rs. 5,750
crore. The project had seen delay in commencement and cost overrun. State the matters that
a Comprehensive Audit by C&AG may cover in reporting on the performance and efficiency of
this project.
Answer
Matters covered in Reporting in case of Comprehensive Audit are: To facilitate a proper
consideration, the reports of the C&AG on the audit of PSUs are presented to the Parliament in
several parts consisting of results of comprehensive appraisals of selected undertakings conducted
by the Audit Board etc. Some of the issues examined in comprehensive audit are:
(i) How does the overall capital cost of the project compare with the approved planned costs? Were
there any substantial increases and, if so, what are these and whether there is evidence of
extravagance or unnecessary expenditure?
(ii) Have the accepted production or operational outputs been achieved? Has there been under-
utilization of installed capacity or shortfall in performance and, if so, what has caused it?
(iii) Has the planned rate of return been achieved?
(iv) Are the systems of project formulation and execution sound? Are there inadequacies? What has
been the effect on the gestation period and capital cost?
(v) Are cost control measures adequate and are there inefficiencies, wastages in raw materials
consumption, etc.?
(vi) Are the purchase policies adequate? Or have they led to piling up of inventory resulting in
redundancy in stores and spares?
(vii) Does the enterprise have research and development programmes ? What has been the
performance in adopting new processes, technologies, improving profits and in reducing costs
through technological progress?
(viii) If the enterprise has an adequate system of repairs and maintenance?
(xi) Are procedures effective and economical?
(x)Is there any poor or insufficient or inefficient project planning?
9.May 2019 Qn no 4(C) 5 Marks

625

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
On receipt of statutory audit report on 30-03-2018 of M/s Sunlight Ltd., a government company,
C&AG on 25-05-2018 appointed M/s Veeru & Associates to conduct supplementary audit u/s
143(6)(a) of the Companies Act, 2013. They submitted their report to C&AG as per their scope of
work. The Company held its AGM on 01-09-2018 but directors did not think it necessary to
discuss supplementary auditor's report and comment of the C&AG. Is the approach of the
directors of Sunlight Ltd. correct? Guide the company with the provisions related to
supplementary audit.
Answer
The Comptroller and Auditor-General of India shall within 60 days from the date of receipt of the audit
report have a right to,
(i) conduct a supplementary audit under section 143(6)(a), of the financial statement of the
companyby such person or persons as he may authorize in this behalf; and for the purposes of such
audit, require information or additional information to be furnished to any person or persons, so
authorised, on such matters, by such person or persons, and in such form, as the Comptroller and
Auditor-General of India may direct; and
(ii) comment upon or supplement such audit report under section 143(6)(b): It may be noted that
any comments given by the Comptroller and Auditor-General of India upon, or supplement to, the
audit report shall be sent by the company to every person entitled to copies of audited financial
statements under sub-section (1) of section 136 i.e. every member of the company, to every trustee
for the debenture-holder of any debentures issued by the company, and to all persons other than
such member or trustee, being the person so entitled and also be placed before the annual general
meeting of the company at the same time and in the same manner as the audit report.
In view of above provisions, the approach of directors of Sunlight Ltd. is not correct. They are
required to mandatory send the Supplementary Audit Report and comments of C&AG to every
member of the company etc. as prescribed and also be placed before the annual general meeting
of the company in the same manner as in case of audit report. Since in the given case neither the
report has been distributed nor discussed in the Annual General Meeting, the directors of the
company will be liable for contravention of aforesaid sections.
10. MTP-Aug-18 Qn No 4(e) 4 Marks:, (MTP- NOV 2019)
“The C&AG may direct the appointed auditor the manner in which the accounts of the
Government company are required to be audited and thereupon the auditor so appointed shall
submit a copy of the audit report to the Comptroller and Auditor-General of India.” What are
the relevant sections of the Companies Act, 2013 and steps involved in auditor of Government
Companies?
MTP-OCT-18 Qn No 3(c) 4 Marks:, Nov 2019 Qn no 6(a) 4 Marks
"The C & AG may direct the appointed auditor about the manner in which the accounts of the
Government company are required to be audited and thereupon the auditor so appointed shall
submit a copy of the audit report to the Comptroller and Auditor-General of India”. What are
the relevant sections of the Companies Act, 2013 and steps involved in the audit of
Government Companies?
626

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
The following steps are involved in the audit of government companies:

❑ Appointment of Auditors under Section 139(5) and 139(7) read with section 143(5) of the Companies
Act, 2013 - Statutory auditors of Government Companies are appointed or re-appointed by the C&AG.
There is thus, a departure from the practice in vogue in the case of private sector companies where
appointment or reappointment of the auditors and their remuneration are decided by the members at
the annual general meetings. In the case of government companies, though the appointment of statutory
auditors is done by the C&AG, the remuneration is left to the individual companies to decide based on
certain guidelines given by the C&AG in this regard.
❑ The C&AG may direct the appointed auditor on the manner in which the accounts of the Government
company are required to be audited and the auditor so appointed has to submit a copy of the audit
report to the Comptroller and Auditor-General of
India. The report, among other things, includes the directions, if any, issued by the C&AG, the action taken
thereon and its impact on the accounts and financial statement of the company.
The report under section 143(5) is in addition to the reports issued by the Statutory Auditors under various
other clauses of section 143.
❑ Supplementary audit under section 143(6)(a) of the Companies Act, 2013 -The Comptroller and Auditor-
General of India shall within 60 days from the date of receipt of the audit report have a right to conduct a
supplementary audit of the financial statements of the government company by such person or persons as
he may authorize in this behalf and for the purposes of such audit, require information or additional
information to be furnished to any person or persons, so authorised, on such matters, by such person or
persons, and in such form, as the C&AG may direct.
❑ Comment upon or supplement such Audit Report under section 143(6)(b) of the Companies Act, 2013 -
Any comments given by the C&AG upon, or in supplement to, the audit report issued by the statutory
auditors shall be sent by the company to every person entitled to copies of audited financial statements
under sub- section (1) of section 136 of the said Act i.e. every member of the company, to every trustee
for the debenture-holder of any debentures issued by the company, and to all persons other than such
member or trustee, being the person so entitled and also be placed before the annual general meeting of
the company at the same time and in the same manner as the audit report.
❑ Test audit under section 143(7) of the Companies Act, 2013 -Without prejudice to the provisions relating
to audit and auditor, the C&AG may, in case of any company covered under sub-section (5) or sub-section
(7) of section 139 of the said Act, if he considers necessary, by an order, cause test audit to be conducted
of the accounts of such company and the provisions of section 19A of the Comptroller and Auditor-
General's (Duties, Powers and Conditions of Service) Act, 1971, shall apply to the report of such test
audit.
The Comptroller and Auditor General assists the legislature in reviewing the performance of
public undertakings. He conducts an efficiency-cum-performance audit other than the field
which has already been covered either by the internal audit of the individual concerns or by the
professional auditors. He locates the area of weakness for managements’ information. Explain
stating clearly the issues examined in comprehensive audit.
RTP May 2020 Qn no 16(b)

XYZ & Co., a CA. firm was appointed by C&AG to conduct comprehensive audit of ABC Public
627

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
undertaking. C&AG advised to cover areas such as investment decisions, project formulation,
organisational effectiveness, capacity utilisation, management of equipment, plant and
machinery, production performance, use of materials, productivity of labour, idle capacity, costs
and prices, materials management, sales and credit control, budgetary and internal control
systems, etc. Discuss stating the issues examined in comprehensive audit.
Answer:
Issues examined in Comprehensive Audit: Some of the issues examined in comprehensive audit are-
(i) How does the overall capital cost of the project compare with the approved planned costs? Were there
any substantial increases and, if so, what are these and whether there is evidence of extravagance or
unnecessary expenditure?
(ii) Have the accepted production or operational outputs been achieved? Has there been under utilisation of
installed capacity or shortfall in performance and, if so, what has caused it?
(iv) Are the systems of project formulation and execution sound? Are there inadequacies? What has been
the effect on the gestation period and capital cost?
(v) Are cost control measures adequate and are there inefficiencies, wastages in raw materials consumption,
etc.?
(vi) Are the purchase policies adequate? Or have they led to piling up of inventory resulting in redundancy in
stores and spares?
(vii) Does the enterprise have research and development programmes? What has been the performance in
adopting new processes, technologies, improving profits and in reducing costs through technological
progress?
(ix) Are procedures effective and economical?
(x) Is there any poor or insufficient or inefficient project planning?
The efficiency and effectiveness audit of public enterprises is conducted on the basis of certain
standards and criteria. Profit is not the key criterion on performance; management’s performance
in the economical and efficient use of public funds and in the achievement of objectives is more
relevant. Public enterprises have been set up with certain socio-economic purposes and for
fulfillment of certain objectives. The objectives vary from enterprise to enterprise. Audit appraisal
analyses the performance of an enterprise to bring out the extent to which the objectives for which
the enterprise was set up have been served.
12.RTP May 2020 Qn no 16 (b)

A performance audit is an objective and systematic examination of evidence for the purpose of
providing an independent assessment of the performance of a government organization,
action.” Briefly discuss the issues addressed by Performance Audits conducted in accordance
with the guidelines issued by C&AG.
Answer:
628

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
According to the guidelines issued by the C&AG, Performance Audits usually address the issues
of:
(i) Economy - It is minimising the cost of resources used for an activity, having regard to appropriate
quantity, quality and at the best price.
Judging economy implies forming an opinion on the resources (e.g. human, financial and material)
deployed. This requires assessing whether the given resources have been used economically and
acquired in due time, in appropriate quantity and quality at the best price.
Study Material
ILLUSTRATIONS
13. The Managing Director of X Ltd is concerned about high employee attrition rate in his
company. As the internal auditor of the company he requests you to analyze the causes for the
same. What factors would you consider in such analysis?
Solution
The factors responsible for high employee attrition rate are as under:
(i) Job Stress & work life imbalance;
(ii) Wrong policies of the Management;
(iii) Unbearable behaviour of Senior Staff;
(iv) Safety factors;
(v) Limited opportunities for promotion;
(vi) Low monetary benefits;
(vii) Lack of labour welfare schemes;
(viii) Whether the organization has properly qualified and experienced personnel for the various levels of
works?
(ix) Is the number of people employed at various work centres excessive or inadequate?
(x) Does the organization provide facilities for staff training so that employees and workers keep themselves
abreast of current techniques and practices?
14. XYZ, a manufacturing unit does not accept the recommendations for improvements made by
the Operational Auditor. Suggest an alternative way to tackle hostile management.
Solution
Alternative Way to Tackle the Hostile Management: While conducting the operational audit the
629

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
auditor has to come across many irregularities and areas where improvement can be made and
therefore he gives his suggestions and recommendations.
QUESTIONS
15.What are the principles involved regarding “Propriety audit’ in the case of Public Sector
Undertaking?
Answer
1. Companies Act, lays down special provisions regarding audit of accounts of public sector undertakings
registered as Government Companies. Section 143 of the Companies Act, 2013 empowers C&AG to
conduct supplementary or test audit. Audit of public enterprises in India is not restricted to financial
and compliance audit; it extends also to efficiency, economy and effectiveness with which these operate
and fulfill their objectives and goals. Another aspect of audit relates to questions of propriety; this audit
is directed towards an examination of management decisions in sales, purchases, contracts, etc. to see
whether these have been taken in the best interests of the undertaking and conform to accepted
principles of financial propriety. Propriety audit stands for verification of transactions on the tests of
public interest, commonly accepted customs and standards of conduct. On an analysis, these tests boil
down to tests of economy, efficiency and faithfulness. Instead of too much dependence on documents,
vouchers and evidence, it shifts the emphasis to the substance of transactions and looks into the
appropriateness thereof on a consideration of financial prudence, public interest and prevention of
wasteful expenditure. Thus, propriety audit is concerned with scrutiny of executive actions and decisions
bearing on financial and profit and loss situation of the company, with special regard to public interest
and commonly accepted customs and standards of conduct.
It is also seen whether every officer has exercised the same vigilance in respect of expenditure incurred
from public money, as a person of ordinary prudence would exercise in respect of expenditure of his own
money under similar circumstances. Some general principles have been laid down in the Audit Code, which
have for long been recognised as standards of financial propriety. Audit against propriety seeks to ensure
that expenditure conforms to these principles which have been stated as follows:
(i) The expenditure should not be prima facie more than the occasion demands. Every public officer is
expected to exercise the same vigilance in respect of expenditure incurred from public moneys as a
person of ordinary prudence would exercise in respect of expenditure of his own money.
(ii) No authority should exercise its powers of sanctioning expenditure to pass an order which will be
directly or indirectly to its own advantage.
(iii) Public moneys should not be utilised for the benefit of a particular person or section of the community.
(iv) Apart from the agreed remuneration or reward, no other avenue is kept open to indirectly benefit the
management personnel, employees and others.
It may be stated that it is the responsibility of the executive departments to enforce economy in public
expenditure. The aim of propriety audit is to bring to the notice of the proper authorities of wastefulness
in public administration and cases of improper; avoidable and in fructuous expenditure.
16. Write a short explanatory note on –

630
(a) Areas of propriety audit under Section 143(1) of the Companies Act, 2013.

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
(b) Role of C&AG in the Audit of a Government company.

Answer
Areas of Propriety Audit under Section 143(1): Section 143(1) of the Companies Act, 2013 requires
the auditor to make an enquiry into certain specific areas. In some of the areas, the auditor has
to examine the same from propriety angle as to -
i. whether loans and advances made by the company on the basis of security have been properly
secured and whether the terms on which they have been made are prejudicial to the interests of
the company or its members;
ii. whether transactions of the company which are represented merely by book entries are
prejudicial to the interests of the company; Again, considering the propriety element,
rationalizing the proper disclosure of loans and advance given by company is made;
iii. where the company not being an investment company or a banking company, whether so much
of the assets of the company as consist of shares, debentures and other securities have been sold
at a price less than that at which they were purchased by the company;
iv. whether loans and advances made by the company have been shown as deposits;
v. whether personal expenses have been charged to revenue account;
vi. where it is stated in the books and documents of the company that any shares have been allotted
for cash, whether cash has actually been received in respect of such allotment, and if no cash has
actually been so received, whether the position as stated in the account books and the balance
sheet is correct, regular and not misleading.
A control has been set up to verify the receipt of cash in case of allotment of shares for cash.
Further, if cash is not received, the books of accounts and statement of affairs shows the true
picture.
(b) Role of C&AG in the Audit of a Government company: Role of C&AG is prescribed under sub
section (5), (6) and (7) of section 143 of the Companies Act, 2013.
In the case of a Government company, the comptroller and Auditor-General of India shall appoint
the auditor under sub-section (5) or sub-section (7) of section 139 i.e. appointment of First Auditor
or Subsequent Auditor and direct such auditor the manner in which the accounts of the Government
company are required to be audited and thereupon the auditor so appointed shall submit a copy of
the audit report to the Comptroller and Auditor-General of India which, among other things, include
the directions, if any, issued by the Comptroller and Auditor-General of India, the action taken
thereon and its impact on the accounts and financial statement of the company.
The Comptroller and Auditor-General of India shall within sixty days from the date of receipt of the
audit report have a right to:
(i) conduct a supplementary audit of the financial statement of the company by such person or
persons as he may authorize in this behalf; and for the purposes of such audit, require information
or additional information to be furnished to any person or persons, so authorised, on such
matters, by such person or persons, and in such form, as the Comptroller and Auditor-General of
India may direct; and
631

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
(ii) comment upon or supplement such audit report.

It may be noted that any comments given by the Comptroller and Auditor-General of India upon, or
supplement to, the audit report shall be sent by the company to every person entitled to copies of
audited financial statements under sub-section (1) of section 136 i.e. every member of the company, to
every trustee for the debenture-holder of any debentures issued by the company, and to all persons other than
such member or trustee, being the person so entitled and also be placed before the annual general meeting of
the company at the same time and in the same manner as the audit report.
Test Audit: Further, without prejudice to the provisions relating to audit and auditor, the
Comptroller and Auditor- General of India may, in case of any company covered under sub-section
(5) or sub-section (7) of section 139, if he considers necessary, by an order, cause test audit to be
conducted of the accounts of such company and the provisions of section 19A of the Comptroller
and Auditor-General's (Duties, Powers and Conditions of Service) Act, 1971, shall apply to the report
of such test audit.
17.Ceta Ltd. is a company in which 54% of the paid up share capital is held by Rajasthan
Government. The company is engaged in the business of providing consultancy services in
relation to construction projects. The audit of the financial statements of Ceta Ltd. for the
financial year ended 31 March 2020 got completed with lot of intervention of Comptroller &
Auditor General of India, wherein C&AG was giving directions to the auditors on the manner in
which audit should be conducted in respect of certain areas. Further, it also received comments
from C&AG on the audit report of the auditors. Ceta Ltd is seeking advice to go against C&AG so
that they can avoid unnecessary interference of C&AG. You are required to advise Ceta Ltd. with
respect to role of C&AG in the audit of a Government company.
ANSWER:
The following steps are involved in the audit of government companies: (a) Appointment of
Auditors under Section 139(5) and 139(7) read with section 143(5) of the Companies Act, 2013 -
Statutory auditors of Government Companies are appointed or re-appointed by the C&AG. There
is thus, a departure from the practice in vogue in the case of private sector companies where
appointment or re-appointment of the auditors and their remuneration are decided by the
members at the annual general meetings. In the case of government companies, though the
appointment of statutory auditors is done by the C&AG, the remuneration is left to the individual
companies to decide based on certain guidelines given by the C&AG in this regard. The C&AG may
direct the appointed auditor on the manner in which the accounts of the Government company
are required to be audited and the auditor so appointed has to submit a copy of the audit report
to the Comptroller and Auditor-General of India.
The report, among other things, includes the directions, if any, issued by the C&AG, the action
taken thereon and its impact on the accounts and financial statement of the company. The report
under section 143(5) is in addition to the reports issued by the Statutory Auditors under various
other clauses of section 143. (b)
Supplementary audit under section 143(6)(a) of the Companies Act, 2013 - The Comptroller and
632

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
Auditor-General of India shall within 60 days from the date of receipt of the audit report have a
right to conduct a supplementary audit of the financial statement s of the government company
by such person or persons as he may authorize in this behalf and for the purposes of such audit,
require information or additional information to be furnished to such form, as the C&AG may
direct. (c)
Comment upon or supplement such Audit Report under section 143(6)(b) of the Companies Act,
2013 - Any comments given by the C&AG upon, or in supplement to, the audit report issued by the
statutory auditors shall be sent by the company to every person entitled to copies of audited
financial statements under sub-section (1) of section 136 of the said Act i.e. every member of the
company, to every trustee for the debenture-holder of any debentures issued by the company,
and to all persons other than such member or trustee, being the person so entitled and also be
placed before the annual general meeting of the company at the same time and in the same
manner as the audit report.
(d) Test audit under section 143(7) of the Companies Act, 2013 - Without prejudice to the
provisions relating to audit and auditor, the C&AG may, in case of any company covered under
sub-section (5) or sub-section (7) of section 139 of the said Act, if he considers necessary, by an
order, cause test audit to be conducted of the accounts of such company and the provisions of
section 19A of the Comptroller and Auditor-General's (Duties, Powers and Conditions of Service)
Act, 1971, shall apply to the report of such test audit.
18. BT Ltd , a company wholly owned by central government was disinvested during the
previous year, resulting in 40% of the shares being held by public. The shares were also listed on
the BSE. Since the shares were listed, all the listing requirements were applicable, including
publication of quarterly results, submission of information to the BSE etc. Sam, the FM of the
company is of the opinion that now the company is subject to stringent control by BSE and the
markets, therefore the auditing requirements of a limited company in private sector under the
Companies Act 2013 would be applicable to the company and the C&AG will not have any role
to play. Comment.
ANSWER:
Section 2(45) of the Companies Act, 2013, defines a “Government Company” as a company in
which not less than 51% of the total voting power is held by the Central Government or by any
State Government or Governments or partly by the Central Government and partly by one or
more State Governments, and includes a company which is a subsidiary company of such a
Government company. The auditors of these government companies are firms of Chartered
Accountants, appointed by the Comptroller & Auditor General, who gives the auditor directions
on the manner in which the audit should be conducted by them. The listing of company’s shares
on a stock exchange is irrelevant for this purpose and hence Sam’s opinion is not correct.
19.You have been appointed as auditor of a AKY Ltd. After having determined the audit
objectives, now you have been requested to draft audit criteria. What are the sources that you
will use while doing the task?
633

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
ANSWER:
Determining Audit Criteria - Audit criteria are the standards used to determine whether a
program meets or exceeds expectations. It provides a context for understanding the results of the
audit. Audit criteria are reasonable and attainable standards of performance against which
economy, efficiency and effectiveness of programmes and activities can be assessed.
(v) new or established scientific knowledge and other reliable information. (vi) general
management and subject matter literature and research papers.
20. ABG & Co., a Chartered Accountant firm has been appointed by C & AG for performance audit
of a Sugar Industry. What factors should be considered by ABG & Co., while planning a
performance audit of Sugar Industry?
ANSWER
The following steps are suggested to the auditors for planning while conducting the performance audit: (A)
Understanding the Entity/Programme - It is the starting point for planning individual performance audit.
(B) Defining the Objectives and the Scope of Audit - The audit objectives should be defined in a succinct
manner as they will impact the nature of the audit, govern its conduct and affect audit conclusions. Setting
audit objectives ensures good quality performance audits. It facilitates clarity, demonstrates consistent
quality of audit and serves as a measure of quality assurance of the audit.
Defining the scope constricts the audit to significant issues that relate to the audit objectives. It mainly
focuses the extent, timing and nature of the audit.
(C) Determining Audit Criteria - Audit criteria are the standards used to determine whether a program
meets or exceeds expectations. It provides a context for understanding the results of the audit. Audit
criteria are reasonable and attainable standards of performance against which economy, efficiency and
effectiveness of programmes and activities can be assessed.
v) new or established scientific knowledge and other reliable information. (vi) general management and
subject matter literature and research papers. (D) Deciding Audit Approach - There is no uniform audit
approach prescribed that can be applicable to all types of subjects of performance audits. Selection of
approach also determine methods and means used for conducting the audit.
(E) Developing Audit Questions - Subsequent to designing of audit objectives and determination of audit
634

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
criteria, the audit team is required to prepare a list of questions to which they would seek answers. The
questions should be framed in comprehensive manner involving detailed hierarchy of questions.
(F) Assessing Audit Team Skills and whether Outside Expertise required - It is essential that the
performance auditors possess special aptitude and knowledge. The Auditing Standards of C&AG of India
provide that the audit institution should develop and train the auditors to enable them to perform their
tasks effectively & efficiently and should prepare manuals & other written guidance notes & instructions
concerning conduct of audits.
Given the diverse range of subjects of performance auditing, the audit team needs to develop sound
understanding of the programme or entity proposed to be audited.
The audit team needs to decide at the planning stage on which aspect expertise is required. Though, the
Accountant General may use the work of an expert, he retains full responsibility for the expression of
opinion in the auditor’s report.
(G) Preparing Audit Design Matrix (ADM) - Having determined the audit objective, audit criteria, audit
approach, data collection etc., audit team should prepare an Audit Design Matrix. It is a structured and
highly focused approach to designing a performance audit study.
The ADM highlights the data collection and analysis method as well as the type and sources of evidence
required to support audit opinion/findings
H) Establishing Time Table and Resources - It is significant to determine the timetable and desirable
resources. Selection of appropriate audit team is the most vital component in planning an audit.
Considerations for selection of an appropriate audit team should be recorded along with the proposed
timelines for various activities to be undertaken as a part of audit process. The progress should also be
monitored against these timelines. The Accountant General would be liable for ensuring that the
performance audit is completed on time. The variations between the required and actual time spent should
be compared and approved from the competent authority.
The team should build time for translation, approval and possible delays in their own schedule in order to
meet the targets.
(I) Intimation of Audit Programme to Audit Entities - Audited entities must be intimated about the intention
of taking up planned performance audit with the scope and extent of audit
21. Sunlight Limited is a public sector undertaking engaged in production of electricity from solar
power. It had commissioned a new project near Goa with a new technology for a cost of Rs. 5,750
crore. The project had seen delay in commencement and cost overrun. State the matters that a
Comprehensive Audit by C&AG may cover in reporting on the performance and efficiency of this
project
( MTP- NOV 2021)
ANSWER
Some of the issues examined in comprehensive audit are:
(a) How does the overall capital cost of the project compare with the approved planned costs? Were there
635

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
(b) Have the planned production or operational outputs been achieved? Has there been under-utilisation of
installed capacity or shortfall in performance and, if so, what has caused it?
(c) Has the planned rate of return been achieved?
(d) Are the systems of project formulation and execution sound? Are there inadequacies? What has been
(e) Are cost control measures adequate and are there inefficiencies, wastages in raw materials
consumption, etc.?
(f) Are the purchase policies adequate? Or have they led to piling up of inventory resulting in redundancy in
stores and spares?
(g) Does the enterprise have research and development programmes? What has been the performance in
progress?
(h) If the enterprise has an adequate system of repairs and maintenance?
(i) Are procedures effective and economical?
(j) Is there any poor or insufficient or inefficient project planning?
22. “A performance audit is an objective and systematic examination of evidence for the purpose
of providing an independent assessment of the performance of a government organization,
action.” Briefly discuss the issues addressed by Performance Audits conducted in accordance with
the guidelines issued by C&AG.
ANSWER
According to the guidelines issued by the C&AG, Performance Audits usually address the issues of
(i) Economy- It is minimising the cost of resources used for an activity, having regard to appropriate quantity,
quality and at the best price
(ii) Efficiency- It is the input-output ratio. In the case of public spending, efficiency is achieved when the
output is maximised at the minimum of inputs, or input is minimised for any given quantity and quality of
output. Auditing efficiency embraces aspects such as whether: (a) sound procurement practices are
followed; (b) resources are properly protected and maintained;
(c) human, financial and other resources are efficiently used;
(d) optimum amount of resources (staff, equipment, and facilities) are used in producing or delivering the
appropriate quantity and quality of goods or services in a timely manner;
636

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
(e) public sector programmes, entities and activities are efficiently managed, regulated, organised and
executed;
(f) efficient operating procedures are used; and
(g) the objectives of public sector programmes are met cost-effectively.
(iii) Effectiveness- It is the extent to which objectives are achieved and the relationship between the
intended impact and the actual impact of an activity.
In auditing effectiveness, performance audit may, for instance:
(a) assess whether the objectives of and the means provided (legal, financial, etc.) for a new or ongoing
public sector programme are proper, consistent, suitable or relevant to the policy;
(b) determine the extent to which a program achieves a desired level of program results;
(c) assess and establish with evidence whether the observed direct or indirect social and economic impacts
of a policy are due to implementation of the policy or to other causes;
(d) identify factors inhibiting satisfactory performance or goal-fulfilment;
(e) assess whether the programme complements, duplicates, overlaps or counteracts other related
programmes;
(f) assess the effectiveness of the program and/or of individual program components;
(g) determine whether management has considered alternatives for carrying out the program that might
yield desired results more effectively or at a lower cost;
(h) assess the adequacy of the management control system for measuring, monitoring and reporting a
programme's effectiveness;
(i) assess compliance with laws and regulations applicable to the program; and
(j) identify ways of making programmes work more effectively.

23. Setir Ltd is a company in which 59% of the paid up share capital is held by Punjab Government.
The company is engaged in the business of providing consultancy services in relation to
construction projects.
The Punjab Government is also planning to induct funds in the company in future, if required.
Nocri Ltd is a company controlled by Setir Ltd. The business of Nocri Ltd is construction and has
an annual turnover of INR 2500 crores approx.
The audit of the financial statements of Nocri Ltd for the financial year ended 31 March 2019 got
completed but Nocri Ltd observed that during the course of audit, there was lot of intervention
of Comptroller & Auditor General of India, wherein C&AG was giving directions to the auditors
on the manner in which audit should be conducted in respect of certain areas.
637

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
Further, it also received comments from C&AG on the audit report of the auditors. Nocri Ltd is
seeking legal opinion to go against C&AG so that they can avoid unnecessary interference of C&AG
and is also looking to have new auditors appointed by Nocri Ltd with whom they will have an
engagement letter with the terms that those auditors don’t accept any interference of C&AG
which the existing auditors have not been able to avoid.
In this context, please advise which of the following should be correct?
(a) The stand of the existing auditors should have been better i.e. not to accept any
interference of C&AG.
(b) Management could have planned the audit work better by including the same terms in
engagement letter with existing auditors instead of appointing another auditors.
(c) C&AG involvement could have been accepted if this was the audit of Setir Ltd but not
in case of Nokri Ltd and hence Nokri Ltd should also reach out to its parent company to
get this resolved.
(d) Stand of Nokri Ltd is wrong as the C&AG may get involved in the audit of Nokri Ltd.
Answer: (d) Stand of Nokri Ltd is wrong as the C&AG may get involved in the audit of Nokri Ltd.
24. CGN Ltd is a large company engaged in the business of oil exploration in India. The Tamil Nadu
Government and the Central Government hold 37% and 20% respectively of the paid up share
capital of this company.
The C&AG appointed the statutory auditors of this company as per requirements of the
Companies Act 2013. The company had a concern regarding this appointment because company
wanted to appoint another auditors as per their assessment, however, considering the legal
hassles which would have got involved, the company decided to go ahead with this.
The audit of the financial statement for the year ended 31 March 2019 got completed by the
auditors appointed by the C&AG. Subsequent to this, the C&AG also issued an order to conduct
test audit of the accounts of the company which was objected by the management of the
company.
The management objected saying that the complete set of financial statements have been
audited by auditors appointed by the C&AG and hence this order is not acceptable because this
would lead to duplication of work.
Moreover, the management has also written to the C&AG that for the next financial year, the
existing auditors should either resign so that the management may bring in their own auditors or
the C&AG should have faith in the work of the auditors appointed by them. Please suggest how
to resolve this matter.
a) The management’s stand is not correct. The C&AG may order test audit as per the requirements
of the Companies Act 2013.
b) The management’s stand is not correct. The C&AG may order test audit as per the requirements
of the Indian Penal Code.
638

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
c) The management is correct and in this situation they get the right to appoint another auditor
considering the fact that the C&AG has lost faith in the work of auditors appointed by them.
d) Such type of matters should be taken to arbitration as per the requirements of the Arbitration
Act.
Answer: (a) The management’s stand is not correct. The C&AG may order test audit as per the
requirements of the Companies Act 2013
25. NOP Ltd is a joint venture of Central Government and a private company and is engaged in
the business of distribution of electricity in Chennai. The Central Government holds 51% shares
of the company.
The company is acknowledged for its consumer-friendly practices. Initially it was completely
owned by the Government and was running into significant losses but after the joint venture, the
aggregate technical and commercial losses of the company showed a record decline.
The operations of the company have improved significantly as claimed by the management of
the company.
The C&AG wants to conduct the performance audit of one of the departments of the company
through a subordinate office of Indian Audit and Accounts Department.
For this purpose, the audit programme has also been finalized and the Accountant General has
intimated the company that the audit would start within a day’s time. The company is concerned
because the programme which has been received from the Accountant General is quite detailed
and would involve significant time. Further the management of the company is quite surprised as
to why this audit should be conducted as this is not a company subject to such types of audits as
per law.
The management of the company would like to have your inputs in respect of this matter. Please
guide.
a) The notice for such type of audit should give reasonable time to the management to prepare
themselves. Further it should not be a detailed audit requiring significant time of the company.
b) The C&AG may conduct such type of audits in respect of NOP Ltd which would get covered in this
criteria, however, the notice for conducting such type of audit should give reasonable time to the
management to prepare themselves
c) In case of a joint venture such type of audit cannot be performed as per the Companies Act 2013.
The company should write to the Registrar of Companies in respect of this matter and till that
time no audit can be started.
d) In case of a joint venture such type of audit cannot be performed as per the Companies Act 2013.
Further wherever this is applicable that is only for a small period of time. The company should
write to the Ministry of Corporate Affairs in respect of this matter.
Answer: (b) The C&AG may conduct such type of audits in respect of NOP Ltd which would get
639
covered in this criteria, however, the notice for conducting such type of audit should give reasonable

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
time to the management to prepare themselves
26. AJ Petroleum & Refining Ltd is a Maharatna Central Public Sector Undertaking (PSU) in India
having its registered office in Uttranchal.
It is engaged in the business of oil refining, pipeline transportation & marketing, exploration &
production of crude oil & gas, petrochemicals, gas marketing and other downstream operations.
The PSU has global aspirations for which its management is working on various plans/
programmes so that the same can be achieved in future. It is also planning to pursue diverse
business interests by setting up of various joint ventures with reputed business partners from
India and abroad to explore global opportunities.
Considering these objectives and other factors, the C&AG directed the performance audit in
respect of its certain activities/ functions which has been in progress. Before starting the audit,
the detailed scope and composition of audit team was shared with the management of the
company and tentative timelines were also given with which the management was fine. However,
during the course of the audit the audit team changed its audit programme to achieve the desired
objectives which was approved by the competent authority, however, the management was not
happy with those changes.
The management wants the audit team to conclude the audit with the same scope as this is a
special type of audit wherein such flexibility cannot be accepted as that would defeat the purpose
of the law. However, the audit team has a different view. Please guide.
a) Changes in audit programme in such type of audits are not acceptable as specified by the
Companies Audit and Auditors Rules 2014.
b) Changes in audit programme in such type of audits are not acceptable as specified by the
Companies Audit and Auditors Rules 2014 and the Ministry of Law.
c) Changes in audit programme in such type of audits can be accepted provided those are discussed
with the management and approved by the Competent Authority.
d) The C&AG should get involved in this matter after taking permission from the Central Government
and would require to change the audit team if the scope requires any changes as the same should
have been properly assessed by the audit team before commencing the audit.
Answer: ( c) Changes in audit programme in such type of audits can be accepted provided those are
discussed with the management and approved by the Competent Authority
27. In Case of PSU, Direct Reporting Engagement does not include

a) Performance audits
640

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
b) Compliance audits
c) Financial audits
d) Comprehensive Audit
Answer: ( c) Financial audits
28. In Case of PSU, Direct Reporting Engagement does not include (mtp – II -july 2021)
(a) Performance audits.
(b) Compliance audits.
(c) Financial audits.
(d) Comprehensive Audit. (10 x 1 = 10 Marks)
ANSWER- c
29. The Comptroller and Auditor General of India has appointed a chartered accountant firm to conduct
the comprehensive audit of Metro Company Limited (a listed government company) which is handling
the Metro project of the metropolitan city for the period ending 31-03-2020. The work to be conducted
under Project A handled by the Metro Company Limited was of laying down railway line of 124
kilometres. [The chartered accountant firm reviewed the internal audit report and observed the
shortcoming reported about the
performance of Project A regarding the understatement of the Current liabilities and Capital work in
progress by ~ 84.68 crore.] Explain some of the matters to be undertaken by the chartered accountant
firm while conducting the comprehensive audit of Metro Company Limited. (5 Marks) (past exam jan
2021)
ANSWER
A CA Firm has been appointed to conduct comprehensive audit of Metro Company Limited, which is a listed
Govt Company handling the Metro project. CA firm has observed the shortcomings as stated in internal
audit report regarding understatement of Current liabilities and CWIP by Rs. 84.68 crore.
Matters to be undertaken by the CA Firm while conducting the comprehensive audit of Metro Company
Limited are:
(ii) Have the accepted production or operational outputs been achieved? Has there been under-utilisation
of installed capacity or shortfall in performance and, if so, what has caused it?

641

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
(iv) Are the systems of project formulation and execution sound? Are there inadequacies? What has been
consumption, etc.?
(vi) Are the purchase policies adequate? Or have they led to piling up of inventory resulting in redundancy
in stores and spares?
(vii) Does the enterprise have research and development programmes? What has been the performance in
progress?
30. (a) Solar Limited is a public sector undertaking engaged in production of electricity from solar power.
It has started a new project near Puducherry with a new technology for a cost of Rs. 9,750 crore. Though
there is delay in commencement of project and accordingly, there has been overrun in the cost. State the
matters C&AG while conducting Comprehensive Audit may cover in reporting on the performance and
efficiency of this project. (4 Marks) (mtp nov 20)
ANSWER
The areas covered in comprehensive audit naturally vary from enterprise to enterprise depending on the
nature of the enterprise, its objectives and operations. However, in general, the covered areas are those of
investment decisions, project formulation, organisational effectiveness, capacity utilisation, management
of equipment, plant and machinery, production performance, use of materials, productivity of labour, idle
capacity, costs and prices, materials management, sales and credit control, budgetary and internal control
systems, etc.
(ii) Have the accepted production or operational outputs been achieved? Has there been under-utilisation
of installed capacity or shortfall in performance and, if so, what has caused it?
(iii) Are the systems of project formulation and execution sound? Are there inadequacies? What has been
(iv) Are cost control measures adequate and are there inefficiencies, wastages in raw materials
consumption, etc.?
(v) Are the purchase policies adequate? Or have they led to piling up of inventory resulting in redundancy
642


for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
(vi) Does the enterprise have research and development programmes? What has been the performance in
progress?
(vii) Are procedures effective and economical?
(viii) Is there any poor or insufficient or inefficient project planning?
31. (a) Sunshine Limited is a public sector undertaking engaged in production of electricity from solar
power. It had commissioned a new project near Puducherry with a new technology for a cost of Rs. 4,926
crore. The project had seen delay in commencement and cost overrun. State the matters that a
Comprehensive Audit by C&AG may cover in reporting on the performance and efficiency of this project.
(5 Marks) (mtp – II -july 2021)
ANSWER
Matters covered in Reporting in case of Comprehensive Audit are: To facilitate a proper consideration, the
reports of the C&AG on the audit of PSUs are presented to the Parliament in several parts consisting of
results of comprehensive appraisals of selected undertakings conducted by the Audit Board etc. Some of
the issues examined in comprehensive audit are:
(ii) Have the accepted production or operational outputs been achieved? Has there been under - utilization
of installed capacity or shortfall in performance and, if so, what ha s caused it?
(iv) Are the systems of project formulation and execution sound? Are there inadequacies? What has been
consumption, etc.?
(vi) Are the purchase policies adequate? Or have they led to piling up of inventory resulting in redundancy
(vii) Does the enterprise have research and development programmes ? What has been the performance in
progress?
(xi) Are procedures effective and economical?

643

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
32. In course of audit of Decent Samaritan Bank as at 31st March, 20 you observed the following:
(i) In a particular account there was no recovery in the past 18 months. The bank has not applied the NPA
norms as well as income recognition norms to this particular account. When queried the bank
management replied that this account was guaranteed by the Central Government and hence these
norms were not applicable.
The bank has not invoked the guarantee. Please respond. Would your answer be different if the advance
is guaranteed by a State Government? (mtp – I -july 2021)
ANSWER
i) Government Guaranteed Advance: If a government guaranteed advance becomes NPA, then for the
purpose of income recognition, interest on such advance should not to be taken to income unless interest
is realized. However, for purpose of asset classification, credit facility backed by Central Government
Guarantee, though overdue, can be treated as NPA only when the Central Government repudiates its
guarantee, when invoked.
Since the bank has not invoked the guarantee, the question of repudiation does not arise. Hence the bank
is correct to the extent of not applying the NPA norms for provisioning purpose. But this exemption is not
available in respect of income recognition norms. Hence the income to the extent not recovered should be
reversed.
The situation would be different if the advance is guaranteed by State Government because this exception
is not applicable for State Government Guaranteed advances, where advance is to be considered NPA if it
remains overdue for more than 90 days.
In case the bank has not invoked the Central Government Guarantee though the amount is overdue for
long, the reasoning for the same should be taken and duly reported in LFAR.
33 (NOV2021 EXAM)
The reports of the Comptroller and Auditor General of India on the audit of PSUs are presented to the
Parliament and to various state legislatures to facilitate a proper consideration. Enumerate the contents of
Audit Report presented by C & AG. (5 Marks)
ANSWER :
(a) To facilitate a proper consideration, the reports of the C&AG on the audit of PSUs are
presented to the Parliament in several parts consisting of the following:
(i) Introduction containing a general review of the working results of Government companies,
deemed Government companies and corporations;
(ii) Results of comprehensive appraisals of selected undertakings conducted by the Audit Board;
(iii) Resume of the company auditors’ reports submitted by them under the directions issued by
the C&AG and that of comments on the accounts of the Government companies; and
(iv) Significant results of audit of the undertakings not taken up for appraisal by the Audit Board.
For certain specified states, the C&AG submits a separate audit report (commercial) to the
legislature, while for other States/Union Territories with legislature, there is a commercial chapter
in the main audit report. The State audit reports, contains both the results of audit appraisal of
performance of selected companies/corporations as well as important individual instances of
644

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
financial irregularities, wasteful expenditure, system deficiencies noticed by the statutory

auditors, and a general review of the working results of Government companies and corporations.
34 (OCT 2022 MTP)

You have been given an assignment of audit of IT department of a PSU. A checklist was handed over
to you which contained many questions such as,
• Are separate user-names and passwords assigned to individual users?
• Are periodical changes of passwords ensured?
• Are external (offsite) data backups maintained at a place outside the premises?
The type of audit being conducted is likely to be:
(a) Comprehensive audit.
(b) Propriety audit.
(c) Compliance audit.
(d) Financial audit.
ANSWER :(A)
35 (SEPT 2022 MTP)

Shravasti Limited is a public sector undertaking engaged in production of electricity from solar
power. It had commissioned a new project near Mumbai with a new technology for a cost of
Rs. 9,580 crore. The project had seen delay in commencement and cost overrun. State the matters
that a Comprehensive Audit by C&AG may cover in reporting on the performance and efficiency of
this project.
ANSWER :
The areas covered in comprehensive audit naturally vary from enterprise to enterprise depending
on the nature of the enterprise, its objectives and operations. However, in general, the covered
areas are those of investment decisions, project formulation, organisational effectiveness,
capacity utilisation, management of equipment, plant and machinery, production performance,
use of materials, productivity of labour, idle capacity, costs and prices, materials management,
sales and credit control, budgetary and internal control systems, etc..
(i) How does the overall capital cost of the project compare with the approved planned costs?
Were there any substantial increases and, if so, what are these and whether there is evidence of
(ii) Have the planned production or operational outputs been achieved? Has there been under-
utilisation of installed capacity or shortfall in performance and, if so, what has caused it?
(iv) Are the systems of project formulation and execution sound? Are there inadequacies? What
has been the effect on the gestation period and capital cost?
645

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
consumption, etc.?
(vii) Does the enterprise have research and development programmes? What has been the
36 (MARCH 2022 MTP)

Bahubali & Co., a CA. firm was appointed by C&AG to conduct comprehensive audit of Brahmi
Ltd., a public sector undertaking. C&AG advised Bahubali & Co. to cover areas such as investment
decisions, project formulation, organisational effectiveness, capacity utilisation, management of
equipment, plant and machinery, production performance, use of materials, productivity of
labour, idle capacity, costs and prices, materials management, sales and credit control, budgetary
and internal control systems, etc. Discuss stating the issues examined in comprehensive audit.
ANSWER :
Issues examined in Comprehensive Audit: Some of the issues examined in comprehensive audit are-
(ii) Have the accepted production or operational outputs been achieved? Has there been under
consumption, etc.?
646

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
37(APRIL 2022 MTP)

The Comptroller and Auditor General of India has appointed a chartered accountant firm to
conduct the comprehensive audit of Tram Company Limited (a listed government company)
which is handling the Metro project of the metropolitan city for the period ending 31-03-2021.
The work to be conducted under Project ‘D’ handled by the Tram Company Limited was of laying
down railway line of 124 kilometers. [The chartered accountant firm reviewed the internal audit
report and observed the shortcoming reported about the performance of Project ‘D’ regarding the
understatement of the Current liabilities and Capital work in progress by Rs. 95.39 crore.] Explain
some of the matters to be undertaken by the chartered accountant firm while conducting the
comprehensive audit of Tram Company Limited.
ANSWER :
A CA Firm has been appointed to conduct comprehensive audit of Tram Company Limited, which is
a listed Govt Company handling the Metro project. CA firm has observed the shortcomings as stated
in internal audit report regarding understatement of Current lia bilities and CWIP by Rs. 95.39 crore.
Matters to be undertaken by the CA Firm while conducting the comprehensive audit of Tram
Company Limited are:
(ii) Have the accepted production or operational outputs been achieved? Has there been under-
consumption, etc.?
38(MAY 2022 RTP)

The objectives of audit in connection with a State Electricity Distribution Company were to ascertain
whether the:
(i) total cost of providing electricity is being recovered by timely submissions to the State
Electricity Regulatory Commission;
647

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
(ii) tariff orders, sales circulars and sales instructions were issued timely, without any ambiguity.
They were implemented in time;
(iii) metering, billing and collection was managed efficiently and effectively;
(iv) monitoring and internal controls were efficient.
What kind of audit is referred in the above scenario? Also briefly discuss the steps suggested
to the auditors for planning such an audit.
ANSWER:
In the given scenario, in view of the objectives discussed, performance audit is being referred.
The following steps are suggested to the auditors for planning while conducting the performance
audit:
(A) Understanding the Entity/Programme - It is the starting point for planning individual
performance audit.
The auditor may use the following sources for understanding the entity:
(i) Documents of the entity: Documents on administration and functions of the entity, policy
files, annual reports, budget documents, accounts, minutes of meetings, information on the
website, internal audit reports, electronic databases and MIS reports, RTI material etc.
(ii) Legislative documents: Legislation, parliamentary questions and debates, reports of the Public
Accounts Committee, the Committee on Public Undertakings, the Estimates Committee, and letters
from Members of Parliament.
(iii) Policy documents: Documents of Planning Commission, Ministry of Finance etc.
(iv) Academic or special research: Independent evaluations on the entity, academic research and
similar work done by other governments and other SAIs.
(v) Past audits: Past financial and performance audits of the entity provide a major source of
information and understanding.
(vi) Media coverage: Print and electronic media - their systematic documentation on regular basis
in a transparent manner.
(vii) Special focus groups: Audit Advisory Committee concerns, annual and special reports of
World Bank, Reserve Bank of India, reports by special interest groups, NGOs, etc.
(B) Defining the Objectives and the Scope of Audit - The audit objectives should be defined in a
succinct manner as they will impact the nature of the audit, govern its conduct and affect audit
conclusions. Setting audit objectives ensures good quality performance audits. It facilitates clarity,
demonstrates the consistent quality of audit and serves as a measure of quality assurance of the
audit.
Defining the scope constricts the audit to significant issues that relate to the audit objectives. It
mainly focuses on the extent, timing and nature of the audit.
(C) Determining Audit Criteria - Audit criteria are the standards used to determine whether a
program meets or exceeds expectations. It provides a context for understanding the results of the
audit. Audit criteria are reasonable and attainable standards of performance against which
economy, efficiency and effectiveness of programmes and activities can be assessed.
648

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s

(ii) policies, standards, directives, and guidelines.
(v) new or established scientific knowledge and other reliable information.
(vi) general management and subject matter literature and research papers.
(D) Deciding Audit Approach - There is no uniform audit approach prescribed that can be
applicable to all types of subjects of performance audits. The selection of approach also determines
methods and means used for conducting the audit.
Some of the methods which could be used in conducting performance audits include:
(i) Analysis of procedures: It involves review of the systems in place for planning, conducting,
checking and monitoring the activity. This would consist of examination of documents such as
financial reports, budgets, programme guidelines, procedure manuals, etc.
(ii) Case studies: A case study is a descriptive analysis of an entity, scheme or programme. It
involves analysis of a particular issue within the context of the whole area under review.
(iii) Use of existing data: The audit staff should investigate the data held by entity management
and by other relevant sources. Audit conclusions based on testing of available data for correctness
and completeness enhances the assurance level.
(iv) Surveys: Survey is a method of collecting information from members of a population to assess
the interrelation of events and conditions. Surveys on predetermined parameters can supplement
the audit findings and conclusions adding value to the performance audits.
(v) Analysis of results: It requires the auditor to carry out actual output-input analysis to
determine the efficiency of the programme.
(vi) Quantitative analysis: It involves an examination of available data relating to financials like
earnings, revenue, or data relating to programme implementation like details of beneficiaries etc.
However, it may not be possible for the auditor to work with complete data due to its high
volume. In such cases, sampling techniques are required to be used.
(E) Developing Audit Questions - Subsequent to designing of audit objectives and determination
of audit criteria, the audit team is required to prepare a list of questions to which they would seek
answers. The questions should be framed in a comprehensive manner involving a detailed hierarchy
of questions.
(F) Assessing Audit Team Skills and whether Outside Expertise required - It is essential that the
performance auditors possess special aptitude and knowledge. The Auditing Standards of C&AG of
India provide that the audit institution should develop and train the auditors to enable them to
perform their tasks effectively & efficiently and should prepare manuals & other written guidance
notes & instructions concerning the conduct of audits.
Given the diverse range of subjects of performance auditing, the audit team needs to develop a
sound understanding of the programme or entity proposed to be audited.
The audit team needs to decide at the planning stage on which aspect of expertise is required.
Though the Accountant General may use the work of an expert, he retains full responsibility for the
649

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
expression of opinion in the auditor’s report.

(G) Preparing Audit Design Matrix (ADM) - Having determined the audit objective, audit criteria,
audit approach, data collection etc., the audit team should prepare an Audit Design Matrix. It is a
structured and highly focused approach to designing a performance audit study.
The ADM highlights the data collection and analysis method as well as the type and sources of
evidence required to support audit opinion/findings.
A specimen of ADM is given as under:
Audit Audit Questions Audit Evidence Data Collection and
Objective Criteria Analysis Method
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5)
An ADM is prepared on the basis of information and knowledge obtained during the planning stage.
A well-designed ADM leads to effective audits thus providing the highest assurances to the auditing
entities. It is desirable to prepare ADM for each of the audit objectives.
(H) Establishing Time-Table and Resources - It is significant to determine the timetable and
desirable resources. Selection of an appropriate audit team is the most vital component in planning
an audit. Considerations for the selection of an appropriate audit team should be recorded along
with the proposed timelines for various activities to be undertaken as a part of the audit process.
The progress should also be monitored against these timelines. The Accountant General would be
liable for ensuring that the performance audit is completed on time. The variations between the
required and actual time spent should be compared and approved from the competent authority.
The team should build time for translation, approval and possible delays in their own schedule in
order to meet the targets.
(I) Intimation of Audit Programme to Audit Entities - Audited entities must be intimated about
the intention of taking up planned performance audit with the scope and extent of audit including
the constitution of an audit team and the tentative time schedule, well before the commencement
of Audit. Acknowledgement of this may be requested and placed on record.
It may be required to refine an audit's objectives as the audit progresses for gathering the requisite
information to fulfil the audit. The reasons for such changes in the objectives should also be
recorded and approved by the competent authority.
The audit programme should be flexible and reviewed from time to time as it is not possible to
anticipate all the contingencies at the early stage.
The Accountant General should share all significant refinements in the approach and additional
tests and findings, concurrently with other audit teams when different persons conduct the
audit at different locations. The system of sharing of the significant field audit experience should
be documented and reviewed.
39(NOV 2022 RTP)

With respect to audit of public sector undertaking, which among the below is related to propriety
audit?
650

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
(a) This audit is carried out by assessing whether activities, financial transactions and information
comply in all material aspects, with the regulatory and other authorities which govern the audited
entity.
(b) This auditing focuses on the areas in which it can add value which have the greatest potential
for development. It provides constructive incentives for the responsible parties to take appropriate
action.
(c) It is an audit under which the C&AG does not really cover again the field which has already
been covered. He conducts an appraisal or an efficiency cum performance audit.
(d) It stands for verification of transactions on the tests of public interest, commonly accepted
customs and standards of conduct. This audit is directed towards an examination of managements
decisions in sales, purchases, contracts, etc.
ANSWER : D
40NOV 2022 RTP

Comptroller & Auditor General appointed Sambhav & Associates, a chartered accountant firm, to
conduct Performance audit of MAP Ltd., a public sector undertaking of Government of India. The
firm conducted the audit with a view to check all the expenses of the unit are in conformity with
the public interest and publicly accepted customs. The audit report submitted by audit firm was
rejected by C&AG. Give your opinion on the action of C&AG.
ANSWER :
In the given scenario, C&AG appointed Sambhav & Associates, a chartered accountant firm, to
conduct Performance Audit of MAP Ltd., a PSU of Government of India. The firm conducted audit
with a view to check all the expenses of the unit are in conformity to the public interest and publicly
accepted customs which is not Performance Audit.
A performance audit is an objective and systematic examination of evidence for the purpose of
providing an independent assessment of the performance of a government organization, program,
activity, or function in order to provide information to improve public accountability and facilitate
decision-making by parties with responsibility to oversee or initiate corrective action.
Performance audit in PSUs is conducted by the C&AG (Supreme Audit Institutions) through various
subordinate offices of Indian Audit and Accounts Department (IAAD). In conducting performance
audit, the subordinate offices are guided by manual and auditing standards prescribed by C&AG.
Therefore, the objectives of performance auditing are evaluation of economy, efficiency, and
effectiveness of policy, programmes, organization and management. It also promotes
accountability by assisting those charged with governance and oversight responsibilities to improve
performance; and transparency by affording taxpayers, those targeted by government policies and
other stakeholders an insight into the management and outcomes of different government
activities.
Performance auditing focuses on areas in which it can add value which have the greatest potential
for development. It provides constructive incentives for the responsible parties to take appropriate
action.
Regulations on Audit and Accounts issued by C&AG lay down that the responsibility for the
651

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
development of measurable objectives and performance indicators as also the systems of

measurement rests with the Government departments or Heads of entities. They are also required
to define intermediate and final outputs and outcomes in measurable and monitorable terms,
standardise the unit cost of delivery and benchmark quality of outputs and outcomes.
Thus, rejection of audit report (submitted by audit firm) by C&AG is in order as audit with a view
to mere check all the expenses of the unit are in conformity to the public in terest and publicly
accepted customs done by audit firm is not performance audit in all aspects.
652

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
RTP Nov 2019 QN no 5

1. Kshitij and a group of persons subscribed to the shares of JNN Ltd. JNN Ltd. had issued a
prospectus for issuance of shares against which these persons had subscribed the shares.It was
later on found that some information as included in the prospectus was misleading. These
persons filed a case against the company covering all the parties who were responsible for the
prospectus on the ground that the information contained in the prospectus was misleading and
they suffered losses by relying on that information.
The company consulted this matter with its legal consultants in respect of the course of action to
be taken and also consulted that if the outcome of the case goes against the company then which
all parties may be held liable and what could be the other consequences.
The prospectus included auditor’s report who had also given his clearance. Some of the experts
were also involved in respect of the information on which the litigation was filed.
Subsequently, it was proved that the contention of Kshitij and those persons was correct. It
was held that the directors, promoters of the company and the experts involved would be
liable to pay compensation to all these persons who had sustained losses or any damage.
The auditors of the company were also asked to make good the losses but they refused with an
argument that it is limited to directors, promoters and experts.
In this context, please suggest which of the following statement is correct.
(a) The argument of the auditors is valid. As per the final outcome of the litigation the auditors
were not held liable. However, on moral grounds the auditors should contribute towards the
losses suffered by any person.
(b) The argument of the auditors is valid. Since the final outcome of the litigation did not held them
liable, they cannot be asked to contribute towards the losses suffered by any person.
(c) The argument of the auditors is not valid. The final outcome of the litigation covers the experts
and hence the auditors also get covered to contribute towards the losses suffered by the
persons.
(d) The outcome of the litigation seems to be completely wrong. The directors and experts were
653

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
held liable but along with that the statutory auditors, internal auditors, tax auditors, Company
Secretary, tax consultants and the legal advisors should also have been held liable. Further the
promoters cannot be held liable in such matters.
Answer: Option C
May 2018 5(b) -4 Marks

2.The Auditor of M/s Quick Limited succumbed to the pressure of the management in
certifying the financials with an over stated figure of turnover by not adhering to the cut-off
principles of the time scale for the transactions of the year. On taking cognizance of this act of
the auditor, the Tribunal under the Companies Act, 2013 initiated the proceedings against
him. Briefly list the powers of the Tribunal in this respect including those relating to making
orders against the Auditor found to be guilty
MTP Apr 18 Qn no.6(B) 4 Marks
Elucidate the power of Tribunal to change the auditor of a company if found acted in a fraudulent
manner as provided under sub-section (5) of section 140 of the Companies Act, 2013.
MTP-OCT-19 Qn No 5(b) 5 Marks:
Vivan Ltd is a company engaged in the business of software development. It is one of the largest
companies in this sector with a turnover of INR 25,000 crores. The operations of the company
are increasing constantly, however, the focus of the management is more on cost cutting in the
coming years to improve its profitability. In respect of the financial statements of the company
which are used by various stakeholders, some fraud was observed in respect of assets
reported therein due to which those stakeholders suffered damages.
As a result, those stakeholders applied to Tribunal for change of auditor on the basis that
auditor is colluded in the fraud.
Elucidate the power of Tribunal to change the auditor of a company if found acting in a
fraudulent manner as provided under sub-section (5) of section 140 of the Companies Act, 2013.

Anvisha Ltd. is a company engaged in the business of software development. It is one of the
largest companies in this sector with a turnover of Rs. 25,000 crores. The operations of the
company are increasing constantly, however, the focus of the management is more on cost
cutting in the coming years to improve its profitability. In respect of the financial statements
of the company which are used by various stakeholders, some fraud was observed in respect
of assets reported therein due to which those stakeholders suffered damages. As a result,
those stakeholders applied to Tribunal for change of auditor on the basis that auditor is
colluded in the fraud.
Elucidate the power of tribunal to change the auditor of a company if found acted in a fraudulent
manner as provided under sub-section (5) of section 140 of the Companies Act, 2013.
654

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
Answer
Power of Tribunal in case Auditor acted in a Fraudulent Manner: As per sub-section (5) of the
section 140 of the Companies Act, 2013, the Tribunal either suo motu or on an application made
to it by the Central Government or by any person concerned, if it is satisfied that the auditor of a
company has, whether directly or indirectly, acted in a fraudulent manner or abetted or colluded
in any fraud by, or in relation to, the company or its directors or officers, it may, by order, direct
the company to change its auditors.
However, if the application is made by the Central Government and the Tribunal is satisfied that any
change of the auditor is required, it shall within fifteen days of receipt of such application, make an
order that he shall not function as an auditor and the Central Government may appoint another
auditor in his place.
It may be noted that an auditor, whether individual or firm, against whom final order has been
passed by the Tribunal under this section shall not be eligible to be appointed as an auditor of any
company for a period of five years from the date of passing of the order and the auditor shall also
be liable for action under section 447 of the said Act.
It is hereby clarified that in the case of a firm, the liability shall be of the firm and that of every
partner or partners who acted in a fraudulent manner or abetted or colluded in any fraud by, or in
relation to, the company or its director or officers.
3.RTP May 2018 Qn no. 9
In assessment procedure of M/s Cloud Ltd., Income Tax Officer observed some irregularities.
Therefore, he started investigation of Books of Accounts audited and signed by Mr. Old, a
practicing Chartered Accountant. While going through books he found that M/s Cloud Ltd. used
to maintain two sets of Books of Accounts, one is the official set and other is covering all the
transactions. Income Tax Department filed a complaint with the Institute of Chartered
Accountants of India saying Mr. Old had negligently performed his duties. Comment.
Answer
Liability of Auditor: “It is the auditor’s responsibility to audit the statement of accounts and
prepare tax returns on the basis of books of accounts produced before him. Also if he is satisfied
with the books and documents produced to him, he can give his opinion on the basis of those
documents only by exercising requisite skill and care and observing the laid down audit
procedure.
In the instant case, Income tax Officer observed some irregularities during the assessment
proceeding of M/s Cloud Ltd. Therefore, he started investigation of books of accounts audited
and signed by Mr. Old, a practicing Chartered Accountant. While going through the books, he
found that M/s Cloud Ltd. Used to maintain two sets of Books of Accounts, one is the official set
and other is covering all the transactions. Income Tax Department filed a complaint with the ICAI
saying Mr. Old had negligently performed his duties.
Mr. Old, the auditor was not under a duty to prepare books of accounts of assessee and he
should, of course, neither suggest nor assist in the preparations of false accounts. He is
655

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
responsible for the books produced before him for audit. He completed his audit work with official
set of books only.
In this situation, as Mr. Old, performed the auditing with due skill and diligence; and, therefore, no
question of negligence arises. It is the duty of the Department to himself investigate the truth and
correctness of the accounts of the assessee.
4. MTP Mar 18 Qn no.6(b) 4 Marks

Mr. Fresh, a newly qualified chartered accountant, wants to start practice and he requires your advice,
among other things, on criminal liabilities of an auditor under the Companies Act, 2013. You are
required to briefly explain the same to Mr. Fresh.
The circumstances in which an auditor can be prosecuted under the Companies Act, and the
penalties to which he may be subjected are briefly stated below:
(i) Criminal liability for Misstatement in Prospectus - As per Section 34 of the Companies Act, 2013,
where a prospectus issued, circulated or distributed includes any statement which is untrue or
misleading in form or context in which it is included or where any inclusion or omission of any
matter is likely to mislead, every person who authorises the issue of such prospectus shall be liable
under section 447.
This section shall not apply to a person if he proves that such statement or omission was
immaterial or that he had reasonable grounds to believe, and did up to the time of issue of the
prospectus believe, that the statement was true or the inclusion or omission was necessary.
(ii) Punishment for false statement - According to Section 448 of the Companies Act, 2013 if in any
return, report, certificate, financial statement, prospectus, statement or other document
required by, or for, the purposes of any of the provisions of this Act or the rules made thereunder,
any person makes a
statement —
(a) which is false in any material particulars, knowing it to be false; or
(b) which omits any material fact, knowing it to be material, he shall be liable under section 447.
Punishment for Fraud- As per Section 447 of the Companies Act, 2013, without prejudice to any
liability including repayment of any debt under this Act or any other law for the time being in
force, any person who is found to be guilty of fraud, shall be punishable with imprisonment for
a term which shall not be less than six months but which may extend to ten years and shall also
be liable to fine which shall not be less than the amount involved in the fraud, but which may
extend to three times the amount involved in the fraud.
It may be noted that where the fraud in question involves public interest, the term of
imprisonment shall not be less than three years.
It may also be noted that when the fraud where the fraud involved is less than ten lakh rupees or
1% of the turnover of the company, whichever is lower and doesn’t involve public interest, any
person guilty of fraud shall be punishable with imprisonment for a term which may extend to 5
Years or with a fine which may extend to Rs. 50,00,000 or both.
656

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
5.MTP-Aug-18 Qn No 6(b) 4 Marks:
Mr. Ram, a Chartered Accountant has appeared before the Income Tax Authorities as the
authorized representative of his client and delivers to the Income Tax Authorities a false
declaration. Discuss briefly the liabilities of Mr. Ram under Income Tax Act, 1961.
Answer:
False Declaration as Authorized Representative: In connection with proceedings under the

Income Tax Act 1961, a Chartered Accountant often acts as the authorised representative of his
clients and attends before an Income Tax Authority or the appellate tribunal.
Any person who acts or induces, in any manner another person to make and deliver to the Income
Tax Authorities a false account, statement, or declaration, relating to any income chargeable to
tax which he knows to be false or does not believe to be true will be liable under section 278 of
the Income Tax Act 1961. Further, in case of submission of any information which is false and which
the Chartered Accountant either knows or believes to be false or untrue, he would be liable to
rigorous imprisonment which may extend to seven years (in other cases two years) and/or to a
fine. In the instant case, Mr. Ram, a chartered accountant has appeared before the Income Tax
Authorities as the authorized representative of his client and delivered a false declaration, thus,
he would be liable under section 278 of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
Indicate the precise nature of auditor's liability in the following situations and support your
views with authority, if a misstatement had occurred in the prospectus issued by the
company.
Answer:
Under section 35 of the Companies Act, 2013 -
Where a person has subscribed for securities of a company acting on any statement included, or
the inclusion or omission of any matter, in the prospectus which is misleading and has sustained any
loss or damage as a consequence thereof, the company and every person who—
(a) is a director of the company at the time of the issue of the prospectus;
(b) has authorized himself to be named and is named in the prospectus as a director of the company,
or has agreed to become such director, either immediately or after an interval of time;
(c) is a promoter of the company;
(d) has authorised the issue of the prospectus; and
(e) is an expert referred to in sub-section (5) of section 26,
shall, without prejudice to any punishment to which any person may be liable under section 36, be
liable to pay compensation to every person who has sustained such loss or damage.
(2) No person shall be liable under sub-section (1), if he proves—
657

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
(a) that, having consented to become a director of the company, he withdrew his consent before the
issue of the prospectus, and that it was issued without his authority or consent, or
(b) that the prospectus was issued without his knowledge or consent, and that on becoming aware
of its issue, he forthwith gave a reasonable public notice that it was issued without his knowledge
or consent.
(c) that, as regards every misleading statement purported to be made by an expert or contained in what
purports to be a copy of or an extract from a report or valuation of an expert, it was a correct and fair
representation of the statement, or a correct copy of, or a correct and fair extract from, the report or
valuation; and he had reasonable ground to believe and did up to the time of the issue of the prospectus
believe, that the person making the statement was competent to make it and that the said person had
given the consent required by sub-section (5) of section 26 to the issue of the prospectus and had not
withdrawn that consent before delivery of a copy of the prospectus for registration or, to the defendant's
knowledge, before allotment thereunder.
(3) Notwithstanding anything contained in this section, where it is proved that a prospectus has been
issued with intent to defraud the applicants for the securities of a company or any other person
or for any fraudulent purpose, every person referred to in subsection ( 1) shall be personally
responsible, without any limitation of liability, for all or any of the losses or damages that may
have been incurred by any person who subscribed to the securities on the basis of such prospectus.
It may be noted that the term “expert” as defined in Section 2(38) of the Companies Act, 2013
includes an engineer, a valuer, a chartered accountant, a company secretary, a cost accountant and
any other person who has the power or authority to issue a certificate in pursuance of any law for
the time being in force. Also that under Section 26 of the Act a statement may be considered to be
untrue, not only because it is so but also if it is misleading in the form and context in which it is
included.
The liability would arise if the written consent of the auditor to the issue of the prospectus, including
the report purporting to have been made by him as an “expert” has been obtained.
Criminal liability for Misstatement in Prospectus

The circumstances in which an auditor can be prosecuted under the Companies Act, and the
penalties to which he may be subjected are briefly stated below:
Criminal liability for Misstatement in Prospectus - As per Section 34 of the Companies Act, 2013,
where a prospectus issued, circulated or distributed includes any statement which is untrue or
misleading in form or context in which it is included or where any inclusion or omission of any
matter is likely to mislead, every person who authorises the issue of such prospectus shall be
liable under section 447.
This section shall not apply to a person if he proves that such statement or omission was
immaterial or that he had reasonable grounds to believe, and did up to the time of issue of the
prospectus believe, that the statement was true or the inclusion or omission was necessary.
658

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
Punishment for false statement - According to Section 448 of the Companies Act, 2013 if in any
return, report, certificate, financial statement, prospectus, statement or other document
required by, or for, the purposes of any of the provisions of this Act or the rules made thereunder,
any person makes a statement —
which is false in any material particulars, knowing it to be
e; or
which omits any material fact, knowing it to be material,
he shall be liable under section 447
Punishment for Fraud- As per Section 447 of the Companies Act, 2013, without prejudice to any
liability including repayment of any debt under this Act or any other law for the time being in
force, any person who is found to be guilty of fraud [involving an amount of at least ten lakh rupees
or one per cent. of the turnover of the company, whichever is lower] shall be punishable with
imprisonment for a term which shall not be less than six months but which may extend to ten
years and shall also be liable to fine which shall not be less than the amount involved in the fraud,
but which may extend to three times the amount involved in the fraud: It may be noted that
where the fraud in question involves public interest, the term of imprisonment shall not be less
than three years. It may also be noted that where the fraud involves an amount
less than ten lakh rupees or one per cent. of the turnover of the company, whichever is lower,
and does not involve public interest, any person guilty of such fraud shall be punishable with
imprisonment for a term which may extend to five years or with fine which may extend to fifty
lakh rupees or with both.].
Under section 448, an auditor is liable for criminal prosecution, if he, in any return, certificate,
balance sheet, prospectus, statement or other document required by or for the purpose of the
Act, makes a statement (a) which is false in any material particular knowing it to be false; or (b)
which omits any material fact knowing it to be material. If convicted, he can be punished with
imprisonment and also with fine as provided under section 447 of the said Act.
7.Nov 2018 Question no 6(b) 4 Marks

What are the liabilities of a Chartered Accountant under Income Tax Act, 1961 for furnishing an
incorrect statement in any report or certificate required to be submitted by him under the Act?
Answer
Liability of an Auditor under Income Tax Act: Liabilities of a Chartered Accountant under the
Income Tax Act of 1961 for furnishing an incorrect statement in any report or certificate required
to be submitted by him under the Act are as below:
Under Section 278: “If a person abets or induces in any manner another person to make and deliver
an account or a statement or declaration relating to any income [or any fringe benefits] chargeable
659

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
to tax which is false and which he either knows to be false or does not believe to be true or to
commit an offence under sub-section (1) of section 276C, he shall be punishable,-
Section 278 of the Income Tax Act, 1961:
• in a case where the amount of tax, penalty or interest which would have been evaded, if the
declaration, account or statement had been accepted as true, or which is willfully attempted to be
evaded, exceeds [twenty five] hundred thousand rupees, with rigorous imprisonment for a term
which shall not be less than six months but which may extend to seven years and with fine;
• in any other case, with rigorous imprisonment for a term which shall not be less than three months
but which may extend to [two] yeas and with fine
Under Rule 12A of the Income Tax Rules: Under this rule a Chartered Accountant who as an
authorised representative has prepared the return filed by the assessee, has to furnish to the
Assessing Officer, the particulars of accounts, statements and other documents supplied to him by
the assessee for the preparation of the return.
Where the Chartered Accountant has conducted an examination of such records, he has also to
submit a report on the scope and results of such examination. The report to be submitted will be a
statement within the meaning of Section 277 of the Income Tax Act. Thus, if this report contains
any information which is false and which the Chartered Accountant either knows or believes to be
false or untrue, he would be liable to rigorous imprisonment which may extend to seven years and
to a fine.
Under Section 271J of the Income Tax Act: As per new section inserted by the Finance Act, 2017 if
an accountant or a merchant banker or a registered valuer, furnishes incorrect information in a
report or certificate under any provisions of the Act or the rules made there under, the Assessing
Officer or the Commissioner (Appeals) may direct him to pay a sum of ten thousand rupees for
each such report or certificate by way of penalty. [ section 271J]

Indicate the precise nature of auditor's liability in the following situations and support your views
with authority, if any:
(I) Certain weaknesses in the internal control procedure in the payment of wages in a
large construction company were noticed by the statutory auditor who in turn brought
the same to the knowledge of the Managing Director of the company. In the
subsequent year huge defalcation came to the notice of the management. The origin
of the same was traced to the earlier year. The management wants to sue the auditor
for negligence and also plans to file a complaint with the Institute.
(II) Based upon the legal opinion of a leading advocate, X Ltd. made a provision of Rs. 3.5
crores towards Income Tax liability. The assessing authority has worked out the liability
at Rs. 5 crores. It is observed that the opinion of the advocate was inconsistent with
legal position with regard to certain revenue items.
ANSWER
(I) In the given case, certain weaknesses in the internal control procedure in the payment of wages
in a large construction company were noticed by the statutory auditor and brought the same to
the knowledge of the Managing Director of the company. In the subsequent year, a huge
660

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
defalcation took place, the ramification of which stretched to the earlier year. The management
of the company desires to sue the statutory auditor for negligence. The precise nature of
auditor's liability in the case can be ascertained on the basis of the under noted considerations:
(a) Whether the defalcation emanated from the weaknesses noticed by the statutory auditor, the information
regarding which was passed on to the management; and
(b) Whether the statutory auditor properly and adequately extended the audit programme of the previous year
having regard to the weaknesses noticed.
SA 265 on “Communicating Deficiencies in Internal Control to Those Charged with Governance and
Management” clearly mentions that, “The auditor shall determine whether, on the basis of the
audit work performed, the auditor has identified one or more deficiencies in internal control.
If the auditor has identified one or more deficiencies in internal control, the auditor shall
determine, on the basis of the audit work performed, whether, individually or in combination, they
constitute significant deficiencies. The auditor shall communicate in writing significant deficiencies
in internal control identified during the audit to those charged with governance on a timely basis.
The auditor shall also communicate to management at an appropriate level of responsibility on a
timely basis”. The fact, however, remains that, weaknesses in the design of the internal control
system and non-compliance with identified control procedures increase the risk of fraud or error. If
circumstances indicate the possible existence of fraud or error, the auditor should consider the
potential effect of the suspected fraud or error on the financial information. If the auditor believes
the suspected fraud or error could have a material effect on the financial information, he should
perform such modified or additional procedures as he determines to be appropriate. Thus,
normally speaking, as long as the auditor took due care in performing the audit work, he cannot be
held liable. The fact that the matter was brought to the notice of the managing director may be a
good defence for the auditor as well. According to the judgement of the classic case. In re Kingston
Cotton Mills Ltd., (1896) it is the duty of the auditor to probe into the depth only when his suspicion
is aroused. The statutory auditor, by bringing the weakness to the notice of the managing director
had alerted the management which is judicially held to be primarily responsible for protection of
the assets of the company and can put forth this as defence against any claim arising subsequent
to passing of the information to the management. In a similar case S.P. Catterson & Sons Ltd. (81
Acct. L. R.68), the auditor was acquitted of the charge.
(II) SA 500 on "Audit Evidence" discusses the auditor's responsibility in relation to and the
procedures the auditor should consider in, using the work of an expert as audit evidence. During
the audit, the auditor may seek to obtain, in conjunction with the client or independently, audit
evidence in the form of reports, opinions, valuations and statements of an expert, e.g., legal
opinions concerning interpretations of agreements, statutes, regulations, notifications,
circulars, etc. Before relying on advocate's opinion, the auditor should have seen that opinion
given by the management’s expert is prima facie dependable. The question states very clearly
that the opinion of the advocate was inconsistent with legal position with regard to certain items.
It is, perhaps, quite possible that auditor did not seek reasonable assurance as to the
appropriateness of the source data, assumptions and methods used by the expert properly.
In fact, SA 500 makes it incumbent upon the part of the auditor to resolve the inconsistency by
discussion with the management and the expert. In case, the expert's' work does not support the
related representation in the financial information the inconsistency in legal opinions could have
been detected by the auditor if he had gone through the same.
661

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
This seems apparent having regard to wide difference in the liability worked out by the assessing
authority. Under the circumstance, the auditor should have rejected the opinion and insisted upon
making proper provision.
Study Material
9.Indicate the precise nature of auditor's liability in the following situations and support your
views with authority, if any:
(i) Certain weaknesses in the internal control procedure in the payment of wages in a
large construction company were noticed by the statutory auditor who in turn brought the same
to the knowledge of the Managing Director of the company. In the subsequent year huge
defalcation came to the notice of the management. The origin of the same was traced to the
earlier year. The management wants to sue the auditor for negligence and also plans to file a
complaint with the Institute.
(ii) Based upon the legal opinion of a leading advocate, X Ltd. made a provision of
Rs. 3 crores towards Income Tax liability. The assessing authority has worked out the liability at
Rs. 5 crores. It is observed that the opinion of the advocate was inconsistent with legal position
with regard to certain revenue items.
Answer
(i)In the given case, certain weaknesses in the internal control procedure in the payment of wages
in a large construction company were noticed by the statutory auditor and brought the same to the
knowledge of the Managing Director of the company. In the subsequent year, a huge defalcation
took place, the ramification of which stretched to the earlier year. The management of the company
desires to sue the statutory auditor for negligence. The precise nature of auditor's liability in the
case can be ascertained on the basis of the under noted considerations:
(a) Whether the defalcation emanated from the weaknesses
noticed by the statutory auditor, the information regarding which was passed on to the
management; and
(b) Whether the statutory auditor properly and adequately
extended the audit programme of the previous year having regard to the weaknesses noticed.
SA 265 on “Communicating Deficiencies in Internal Control to Those Charged with Governance and
Management” clearly mentions that, “The auditor shall determine whether, on the basis of the audit
work performed, the auditor has identified one or more deficiencies in internal control. If the
auditor has identified one or more deficiencies in internal control, the auditor shall determine, on
the basis of the audit work performed, whether, individually or in combination, they constitute
significant deficiencies. The auditor shall communicate in writing significant deficiencies in internal
control identified during the audit to those charged with governance on a timely basis.
The auditor shall also communicate to management at an appropriate level of responsibility on a
timely basis”. The fact, however, remains that, weaknesses in the design of the internal control
system and non-compliance with identified control procedures increase the risk of fraud or error. If
circumstances indicate the possible existence of fraud or error, the auditor should consider the
662

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
potential effect of the suspected fraud or error on the financial information. If the auditor believes
the suspected fraud or error could have a material effect on the financial information, he should
perform such modified or additional procedures as he determines to be appropriate. Thus,
normally speaking, as long as the auditor took due care in performing the audit work, he cannot
be held liable. The fact that the matter was brought to the notice of the managing director may be
a good defence for the auditor as well. According to the judgement of the classic case in re Kingston
Cotton Mills Ltd., (1896) it is the duty of the auditor to probe into the depth only when his suspicion
is aroused. The statutory auditor, by bringing the weakness to the notice of the managing director
had alerted the management which is judicially held to be primarily responsible for protection of
the assets of the company and can put forth this as defence against any claim arising subsequent
to passing of the information to the management. In a similar case S.P. Catterson & Sons Ltd. (81
Acct. L. R.68), the auditor was acquitted of the charge.
(ii)SA 500 on "Audit Evidence" discusses the auditor's responsibility in relation to and the
procedures the auditor should consider in, using the work of an expert as audit evidence. During
the audit, the auditor may seek to obtain, in conjunction with the client or independently, audit
evidence in the form of reports, opinions, valuations and statements of an expert, e.g., legal
opinions concerning interpretations of agreements, statutes, regulations, notifications, circulars,
etc. Before relying on advocate's opinion, the auditor should have seen that opinion given by the
expert is prima facie dependable. The question states very clearly that the opinion of the advocate
was inconsistent with legal position with regard to certain items. It is, perhaps, quite possible that
auditor did not seek reasonable assurance as to the appropriateness of the source data,
assumptions and methods used by the expert properly.
In fact, SA 500 makes it incumbent upon the part of the auditor to resolve the inconsistency by
discussion with the management and the expert. In case, the experts' work does not support the
related representation in the financial information the inconsistency in legal opinions could have
been detected by the auditor if he had gone through the same. This seems apparent having regard
to wide difference in the liability worked out by the assessing authority. Under the circumstance,
the auditor should have rejected the opinion and insisted upon making proper provision .
10.Write a short note on - Auditor’s liability in case of unlawful acts or defaults by clients.
Answer
Auditor's liability in case of unlawful Acts or defaults by clients: The auditor's basic responsibility is
to report whether in his opinion the accounts show a true and fair view and in discharging his
responsibility he has to see as to how the particular situations affected his position. The general
thinking with regard to unlawful acts or defaults by clients appears to be that the auditor should
not 'aid or abet' but he is apparently not under any legal obligation to disclose the offence. A
professional accountant would himself be guilty of a criminal offence if he advises his client to
commit any criminal offence or helps or encourages in planning or execution of the same or
conceals or destroys evidence to obstruct the course of public justice or positively assists his client
in evading prosecution. A professional accountant in his capacity as auditor, accountant, or tax
representative has access to a variety of information concerning his clients. On some occasions, he
663

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
mayacquire knowledge that his client has been guilty of some unlawful act, default, fraud, or other
criminal offence. The duty of the professional accountant in such a case would depend upon the
actual circumstances of the situation. Due consideration should be given to the exact nature of
services that a professional accountant is rendering to his client, i.e. is he representing the client
in income-tax proceedings or is he acting in the capacity of an auditor or an accountant or a
consultant.
The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India has considered the role of chartered accountants in
relation to taxation frauds by an assessee and has made the following major recommendations:
(i) A professional accountant should keep in mind the provisions of Section 126 of the Evidence Act
whereby a barrister, an attorney, a pleader or a Vakil is barred from disclosing any communication
made to him in the course of and for the purpose of his employment.
(ii) If the fraud relates to past years when the accountant did not represent the client, the client
should be advised to make a disclosure. The accountant should also be careful that the past fraud
does not in any way affect the current tax matters.
(iii) In case of fraud relating to accounts examined and reported upon by the professional accountant
himself, he should advise the client to make a complete disclosure. In case the client refuses to
do so, the accountant should inform him that he is entitled to dissociate himself from the case
and that he would make a report to the authorities that the accounts prepared or examined by
him are unreliable on account of certain information obtained later. In making such a report, the
contents of the information as such should not be communicated unless the client consents in
writing.
(iv) In case of suppression in current accounts, the client should be asked to make a full disclosure. If
he refuses to do so, the accountant should make a complete reservation in his report and should
not associate himself with the return.
However, it can be argued that the auditor has a professional obligation to ensure that the client
is fully aware of the seriousness of the offence and to seriously consider full disclosure of the
matter.
It has been clearly established in various case laws that the auditor is expected to know the
contents of documents and records and ascertain whether the affairs of the client are being
conducted in an unlawful manner. It is in the course of the work, he comes across any unlawful
acts, it is his duty to bring it to the notice of the client as also to make a disclosure in his report
in appropriate cases. In this regard, one has to bear in mind the consequence of the act in relation
to the professional code to which an auditor is subjected. Under the code, an auditor cannot
disclose confidential information unless permitted by the client or unless required by law. Each
case has to be judged on its circumstances. However, in every case he has to assess the
implications of the unlawful act or default on the true and fair character of the accounting
statements.
The question of liability of an auditor for unlawful acts or defaults by clients should be considered
in the light of the broad parameters given above. However, it appears that if an auditor was aware
of any unlawful act having been committed by client in respect of accounts audited by him and
664

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
the unlawfulness was not rectified by proper disclosure or any other appropriate means, the auditor
owes a duty to make a suitable report. If he does not, he may be held liable, if the true and fair
character of the accounts has been vitiated.
11.Explain briefly duties and responsibilities of an auditor in case of material misstatement

resulting from Management Fraud.
Answer
Duties & Responsibilities of an Auditor in case of Material Misstatement resulting from
Management Fraud: Misstatement in the financial statements can arise from fraud or error. The
term fraud refers to an ‘Intentional Act’ by one or more individuals among management, those
charged with governance. The auditor is concerned with fraudulent acts that cause a material
misstatement in the financial statements.
As per SA 240 on “The Auditor’s Responsibilities Relating to Fraud in an Audit of Financial
Statements”, fraud can be committed by management overriding controls using such techniques as
engaging in complex transactions that are structured to misrepresent the financial position or
financial performance of the entity.
Fraud involving one or more members of management or those charged with the governance is
referred to as “management fraud”. The primary responsibility for the prevention and detection of
fraud rests with those charged with the governance and the management of the entity.
Further, an auditor conducting an audit in accordance with SAs is responsible for obtaining
reasonable assurance that the financial statements taken as a whole are free from material
misstatement, whether caused by fraud or error. Owing to the inherent limitations of an audit,
there is an unavoidable risk that some material misstatements of the financial statements may not
be detected, even though the audit is properly planned and performed in accordance with the
SAs.
The risk of the auditor not detecting a material misstatement resulting from management fraud is
greater than for employee fraud, because management is frequently in a position to directly or
indirectly manipulate accounting records, present fraudulent financial information or override
control procedures designed to prevent similar frauds by other employees
Auditor’s opinion on the financial statements is based on the concept of obtaining reasonable
assurance, hence in an audit, the auditor does not guarantee that material misstatements will be
detected.
course of the performance of his duties as auditor, has reason to believe that an offence of fraud
involving such amount(s) as may be prescribed, is being or has been committed in the co. by its
officers or employees, the auditor shall report the matter to the Central Government (in case
amount of fraud is Rs. 1 crore or above)or Audit Committee or Board in other cases (in case the
amount of fraud involved is less than Rs. 1 crore) within such time and in such manner as may be
prescribed.
665

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
i. Determine the professional and legal responsibilities applicable in the circumstances, including
ii. Consider whether it is appropriate to withdraw from the engagement, where withdrawal from
iii. If the auditor withdraws:
(1) Discuss with the appropriate level of management and those charged with
governance, the auditor’s withdrawal from the engagement and the reasons for the withdrawal;
and
(2) Determine whether there is a professional or legal requirement to report to the
person or persons who made the audit appointment or, in some cases, to regulatory authorities,
the auditor’s withdrawal from the engagement and the reasons for the withdrawal.
12. In assessment procedure of M/s Cloud Ltd., Income Tax Officer observed some irregularities.
Therefore, he started investigation of Books of Accounts audited and signed by Mr. Old, a
practicing Chartered Accountant. While going through books he found that M/s Cloud Ltd. used
to maintain two sets of Books of Accounts, one is the official set and other is covering all the
transactions. Income Tax Department filed a complaint with the Institute of Chartered
Accountants of India saying Mr. Old had negligently performed his duties. Comment.
Answer
Liability of Auditor: “It is the auditor’s responsibility to audit the statement of accounts and prepare tax
returns on the basis of books of accounts produced before him. Also if he is satisfied with the books and
documents produced to him, he can give his opinion on the basis of those documents only by exercising
requisite skill and care and observing the laid down audit procedure.
In the instant case, Income tax Officer observed some irregularities during the assessment proceeding of
M/s Cloud Ltd. Therefore, he started investigation of books of accounts audited and signed by Mr. Old, a
practicing Chartered Accountant. While going through the books, he found that M/s Cloud Ltd. Used to
maintain two sets of Books of Accounts, one is the official set and other is covering all the transactions.
Income Tax Department filed a complaint with the ICAI saying Mr. Old had negligently performed his
duties.
Mr. Old, the auditor was not under a duty to prepare books of accounts of assessee and he should, of course,
neither suggest nor assist in the preparations of false accounts. He is responsible for the books produced
before him for audit. He completed his audit work with official set of books only.
In this situation, as Mr. Old, performed the auditing with due skill and diligence; and, therefore, no question
666

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
of negligence arises. It is the duty of the Department to himself investigate the truth and correctness of the
accounts of the assessee.
13. On the advice of Management of Quick Ltd., the auditor of the Company overlooked and did
not report on shifting of certain current year's sales transactions to the next year. The National
Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) wants to take action against the auditor. Describe the powers of
the NCLT under Section 140(5) of the Companies Act, 2013 for such action and consequences for
the auditor.
ANSWER:
False Declaration as Authorized Representative: In connection with proceedings under the Income
Tax Act 1961, a Chartered Accountant often acts as the authorised representative of his clients
and attends before an Income Tax Authority or the appellate tribunal.
the Income Tax Act 1961.
Further, in case of submission of any information which is false and which the Chartered
Accountant either knows or believes to be false or untrue, he would be liable to rigorous
imprisonment which may extend to seven years (in other cases two years) and/or to a fine. SIn the
instant case, Mr. Prince, a chartered accountant has appeared before the Income Tax Authorities
as the authorized representative of his client and delivered a false declaration, thus, he would be
liable under section 278 of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
14. State the nature of liability as provided in the Companies Act, 2013 for an auditor for not
appropriately dealing with a misstatement appearing in audited financial statements or a false
statement in Audit Report.
ANSWER:
Nature of Liability as per the Companies Act, 2013: Under section 448 of the Companies Act,
2013, an auditor is liable for criminal prosecution, if he, in any return, report, certificate, financial
statement, prospectus, statement or other document required by, or for, the purposes of any of
the provisions of this Act or the rules made thereunder, makes a statement (a) which is false in
any material particular knowing it to be false; or (b) which omits any material fact knowing it to be
material.
If convicted, he can be punished with imprisonment and also with fine as provided under section
447 of the said Act. (Refer Para 5 for section 447)
Thus, in view of above, an auditor will be held liable for criminal prosecution for not appropriately
dealing with a misstatement appearing in audited financial statements or a false statement in Audit
Report assuming that it was known to auditor.
15. CA Prince, a Chartered Accountant has appeared before the Income Tax Authorities as the
authorized representative of his client and delivers to the Income Tax Authorities a false
declaration. What are the liabilities of CA. Prince under Income Tax Act, 1961?
ANSWER:
667

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
False Declaration as Authorized Representative: In connection with proceedings under the Income
Tax Act 1961, a Chartered Accountant often acts as the authorised representative of his clients
and attends before an Income Tax Authority or the appellate tribunal.
the Income Tax Act 1961.
Further, in case of submission of any information which is false and which the Chartered
Accountant either knows or believes to be false or untrue, he would be liable to rigorous
imprisonment which may extend to seven years (in other cases two years) and/or to a fine.
In the instant case, Mr. Prince, a chartered accountant has appeared before the Income Tax
Authorities as the authorized representative of his client and delivered a false declaration, thus, he
would be liable under section 278 of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
16. Mr. Fresh, a newly qualified chartered accountant, wants to start practice and he requires
your advice, among other things, on criminal liabilities of an auditor under the Companies Act,
2013. Kindly guide him.
ANSWER
The circumstances in which an auditor can be prosecuted under the Companies Act, and the penalties to
which he may be subjected are briefly stated below:
(i) Criminal liability for Misstatement in Prospectus - As per Section 34 of the Companies Act,
2013, where a prospectus issued, circulated or distributed includes any statement which is untrue
or misleading in form or context in which it is included or where any inclusion or omission of any
matter is likely to mislead, every person who authorises the issue of such prospectus shall be liable under
section 447.
This section shall not apply to a person if he proves that such statement or omission was immaterial or that
he had reasonable grounds to believe, and did up to the time of issue of the prospectus believe, that the
statement was true or the inclusion or omission was necessary.
(ii) Punishment for false statement - According to Section 448 of the Companies Act, 2013 if in any return,
report, certificate, financial statement, prospectus, statement or other document required by, or for, the
purposes of any of the provisions of this Act or the rules made thereunder, any person makes a statement
(a) which is false in any material particulars, knowing it to be false; or
(b) which omits any material fact, knowing it to be material
he shall be liable under section 447.
Punishment for Fraud- As per Section 447 of the Companies Act, 2013, without prejudice to any liability
including repayment of any debt under this Act or any other law for the time being in force, any person
who is found to be guilty of fraud [involving an amount of at least ten lakh rupees or one percent of the
turnover of the company, whichever is lower] shall be punishable with imprisonment for a term which shall
not be less than six months but which may extend to ten years and shall also be liable to fine which shall
not be less than the amount involved in the fraud, but which may extend to three times the amount
involved in the fraud:
It may be noted that where the fraud in question involves public interest, the term of imprisonment shall
not be less than three years.
It may also be noted that where the fraud involves an amount less than ten lakh rupees or one percent of
668

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
the turnover of the company, whichever is lower, and does not involve public interest, any person guilty of
such fraud shall be punishable with imprisonment for a term which may extend to five years or with fine
which may extend to fifty lakh rupees or with both.]

The Auditor of M/s Quick Limited succumbed to the pressure of the management in Certifying the
Financials with an over stated figure of turnover by not adhering to the cut-off principles of the
time scale for the transactions of the year. On taking cognizance of this act of the Auditor, the
Tribunal under the Companies Act, 2013 initiated the proceedings against him. Briefly list the
powers of the Tribunal in this respect including those relating to making orders against the
Auditor found to be guilty.
ANSWER
False Declaration as Authorized Representative: In connection with proceedings under the Income Tax Act
1961, a Chartered Accountant often acts as the authorised representative of his clients and attends before
an Income Tax Authority or the appellate tribunal.
Any person who acts or induces, in any manner another person to make and deliver to the Income Tax
Authorities a false account, statement, or declaration, relating to any income chargeable to tax which he
knows to be false or does not believe to be true will be liable under section 278 of the Income Tax Act
1961.
Further, in case of submission of any information which is false and which the Chartered Accountant either
knows or believes to be false or untrue, he would be liable to rigorous imprisonment which may extend to
seven years (in other cases two years) and/or to a fine.
In the instant case, Mr. Prince, a chartered accountant has appeared before the Income Tax Authorities as
the authorized representative of his client and delivered a false declaration, thus, he would be liable under
section 278 of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
18. OPE Ltd issued a prospectus in respect of an IPO which had the auditor’s report on the financial
statements for the year ended 31 March 2019. The issue was fully subscribed.
During this year, there was an abnormal rise in the profits of the company for which it was found
later on that it was because of manipulated sales in which there was participation of Whole-time
director and other top officials of the company. On discovery of this fact, the company offered to
refund all moneys to the subscribers of the shares and sued the auditors for the damages
alleging that the auditors failed to examine and ascertain any satisfactory explanation for steep
increase in the rate of profits and related accounts.
The company emphasized that the auditor should have proceeded with suspicion and should
not have followed selected verification. The auditors were able to prove that they found internal
controls to be satisfactory and did not find any circumstance to arouse suspicion.
The company was not able to prove that auditors were negligent in performance of their duties.
Please suggest your views on this.
(a) The stand of the company was correct in this case. Considering the nature of the work,
669

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
the Auditors should have proceeded with suspicion and should not have followed selected
verification.
(b) The approach of the auditors look reasonable in this case. The auditors found internal
controls to be satisfactory and also did not find any circumstance to arouse suspicion and hence
they performed their procedures on the basis of selected verification.
(c) In the given case, the auditors should have involved various experts along with them
to help them on their audit procedures. Prospectus is one area wherein management involves
various experts and hence the auditors should also have done that. In the given case, by not
involving the experts the auditors did not perform their job in a professional manner. If they had
involved experts like forensic experts etc, the manipulation could have been detected. Hence the
auditors should be held liable.
(d) In case of such type of engagements, the focus is always on the management controls.
If the controls are found to be effective then an auditor can never be held liable in respect of any
deficiency or misstatement or fraud.
Answer: (b) The approach of the auditors look reasonable in this case. The auditors found internal
controls to be satisfactory and also did not find any circumstance to arouse suspicion and hence
they performed their procedures on the basis of selected verification
19. Kshitij and a group of persons subscribed to the shares of JNN Ltd. JNN Ltd had issued a
prospectus for issuance of shares against which these persons had subscribed the shares.
It was later on found that some information as included in the prospectus was misleading. These
persons filed a case against the company covering all the parties who were responsible for the
prospectus on the ground that the information contained in the prospectus was misleading and
they suffered losses by relying on that information.
The company consulted this matter with its legal consultants in respect of the course of action
to be taken and also consulted that if the outcome of the case goes against the company then
which all parties may be held liable and what could be the other consequences.
The prospectus included auditor’s report who had also given his clearance. Some of the experts
were also involved in respect of the information on which the litigation was filed.
Subsequently, it was proved that the contention of Kshitij and those persons was correct. It was
held that the directors, promoters of the company and the experts involved would be liable to
pay compensation to all these persons who had sustained losses or any damage.
The auditors of the company were also asked to make good the losses but they refused with an
argument that it is limited to directors, promoters and experts.
In this context, please suggest which of the following statement is correct.
a) The argument of the auditors is valid. As per the final outcome of the litigation the auditors were
not held liable. However, on moral grounds the auditors should contribute towards the losses
suffered by any person.
670

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
b) The argument of the auditors is valid. Since the final outcome of the litigation did not held them
liable, they cannot be asked to contribute towards the losses suffered by any person.
c) The argument of the auditors is not valid. The final outcome of the litigation covers the experts
and hence the auditors also get covered to contribute towards the losses suffered by the persons.
d) The outcome of the litigation seems to be completely wrong. The directors and experts were
held liable but along with that the statutory auditors, internal auditors, tax auditors, Company
Secretary, tax consultants and the legal advisors should also have been held liable. Further the
promoters cannot be held liable in such matters.
Answer: ( c) The argument of the auditors is not valid. The final outcome of the litigation covers
the experts and hence the auditors also get covered to contribute towards the losses suffered by
the persons.
20. JK Ltd is a company engaged in the business of software development. It is one of the largest
companies in this sector with a turnover of INR 25,000 crores. The operations of the company are
increasing constantly, however, the focus of the management is more on cost cutting in the
coming years to improve its profitability.
In respect of the financial statements of the company which are used by various stakeholders,
some deficiencies were observed in respect of assets reported therein due to which those
stakeholders suffered damages. As a result, those stakeholders went for a civil action against the
company including all the parties who had the responsibility in respect of those financial
statements.
The statutory auditors of the company were also roped in. The statutory auditors went against
this civil action and were able to prove that there was no professional negligence on their part.
It was decided that the loss was occasioned through the negligence of directors and the fault of
the auditor in failing to verify the asset was considered to be only technical.
On the basis of above mentioned facts, what should be the correct option out of the following?
a) A penalty should be levied on the auditors but that should not be equivalent to the damages
suffered by the stakeholders. The damages would be required to be made good by the directors
of the company.
b) Both the auditors and the directors should be held liable in respect of the deficiencies identified.
Both of them should compensate these stakeholders in respect of the damages and a further
penalty of INR 10 lakhs would be imposed on them.
c) Auditors and directors should be held liable in this case. Further because the fault of directors is
bigger, they would be subject to a penalty of INR 10 crores or losses suffered by the stakeholders,
whichever is higher.
d) Since the fault of the auditor is limited to technical in nature, he cannot be held liable for any
penalty or damages. However, he would not be allowed to work for this company and any other
company in similar industry for a period of next 5 years as per the requirements of the
671

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
Companies Act 2013.

Answer : (a) A penalty should be levied on the auditors but that should not be equivalent to the
damages suffered by the stakeholders. The damages would be required to be made good by the
directors of the company
21. KKR Ltd is a medium-sized company engaged in the business of e-commerce. The company’s
operations have remained stable over the years and its profitability has been going down. The
company also ventured into different markets over the last few years but that has not helped
much in terms of growth of business or increasing the profitability. The company’s immediate
plan is to expand its operations with focus on increasing the profitability.
The company was looking for funds to achieve this objective and issued a prospectus to the public
to subscribe to its shares.
The financial statements of the company for the year ended 31 March 2018 included in the
prospectus showed a very different picture of the company particularly in respect of its profits.
It was later on found that some of the information contained in the prospectus was misstated
i.e. it was untrue and misleading to attract the public to subscribe the shares of the company.
Legal action was taken by the stakeholders against the company including its auditors and the
company’s management/ directors were confident that they would not be required to face any
action considering the fact that the financial statements were duly audited by a reputed firm of
Chartered Accountants. If at all any problem arises, it would be the responsibility of the auditors.
Please advise whether anyone can be held liable in this matter or not. If yes, what action can be
taken against him/them? If no, what should be the corrective action?
a) The understanding of the directors is correct and the auditors should be held liable under section
447 of the Companies Act.
b) The understanding of the directors is wrong. They would be held liable under section447 of the
Companies Act and not the auditors because responsibility for the prospectus lies with the
management.
c) This may lead to criminal liability wherein every person who authorises the issue of such
prospectus shall be liable under section 447 of the Companies Act.
d) This may lead to civil liability wherein every person who authorises the issue of such prospectus
shall be liable under section 447 of the Companies Act.
Answer: ( c) This may lead to criminal liability wherein every person who authorises the issue of
such prospectus shall be liable under section 447 of the Companies Act.
22. Vimal Kumar, a Chartered Accountant by profession, has been into practice for the over 6
years. He developed a specialization in respect of matters related to Income Tax and hence got
various clients to whom he was advising.
672

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
Other than the taxation work, Vimal was also good in accounting matters but he could not
develop his business/ clientele the accounting services over the period.
He used to represent his clients in respect of income tax returns.
For one of his clients, he, as an authorised representative, prepared the return of income and
furnished the same and other required documents (the particulars of accounts, statements and
other documents supplied to him by the assessee for the preparation of the return) to the
Assessing Officer. He had also conducted an examination of those records and submitted a report
on the scope and results of his examination.
The assesse in this case was a very old client of Vimal and also used to pay him very good
remuneration. In order to provide some benefits to the assesse, Vimal provided certain
information to the assessing officer which was found to be false later on.
In the given case, which of the following options should apply?
a) Since Vimal only acted as a representative of the assesse, he cannot be held liable. The assesse
is the primary person responsible and accordingly the assessee would be liable to rigorous
imprisonment which may extend to seven years and to a fine.
b) The given matter does not only relate to submission of the return of income but also covers an
examination of those records and a report on the scope and results of examination by a
Chartered Accountant. Because of the professional responsibilities placed on a CA, it becomes
his duty to carry out all the tasks in an objective manner free from any bias. Hence Vimal would
be liable to a penalty of Rs. seven crores and imprisonment of seven years.
c) Vimal would be liable to rigorous imprisonment which may extend to seven years and to a fine.
d) Vimal and his assessee would be liable to a penalty which may extend to Rs. 1 crore. Further
because of the fact that the particulars submitted with the assessing officer belong to the
assesse, hence the assesse would also be liable to imprisonment for three years under the
Indian Penal Code.
Answer : ( c) Vimal would be liable to rigorous imprisonment which may extend to seven years
and to a fine.
23. ( MTP- NOV 2021)

As a part of the listing process, M/s FRAD Limited had prepared and issued its prospectus to the public. The
top executives thought that a pending litigation against the company (which would cause a cash outflow of
₹ 1 crore) may affect the demand for share application. Due to this, they had omitted the fact, for the well-
being of the company. Mr. K, who was well aware of this matter, had authorized himself to be named in
the prospectus as a director. However, Mr. K was little reluctant, so he informed and agreed that he shall
become such director after an interval of some time. Unfortunately, after few days, this matter got leaked
and several subscribers sustained huge loss. Mr. K is now defending himself stating that he is currently not
holding the director post hence no action can be taken against him. Analyse
ANSWER
673

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
Damages for negligence: Civil liability for mis-statement in prospectus under section 35 of the
Companies Act, 2013, includes where a person has subscribed for securities of a company acting on any
statement included, or the inclusion or omission of any matter, in the prospectus which is misleading and
has sustained any loss or damage as a consequence thereof, the company and every person who has
authorized himself to be named and is named in the prospectus as a director of the company or has agreed
to become such director either immediately or after an interval of time; shall, without prejudice to any
punishment to which any person may be liable under section 36, be liable to pay compensation to every
person who has sustained such loss or damage.
Further. As per Section 447 of the Companies Act, 2013, without prejudice to any liability including
repayment of any debt under this Act or any other law for the time being in force, any person who is found
to be guilty of fraud [involving an amount of at least ten lakh rupees or one percent of the turnover of the
company, whichever is lower] shall be punishable with imprisonment for a term which shall not be less
than six months but which may extend to ten years and shall also be liable to fine which shall not be less
than the amount involved in the fraud, but which may extend to three times the amount involved in the
fraud. It may be noted that where the fraud in question involves public interest, the term of imprisonment
shall not be less than three years.
Hence, in this case, Mr. K is liable for punishment even though he is currently not a director in the company
as per section 35 of the Companies Act, 2013. He shall be liable to punishment as per section 447 discussed
above as he was aware of the litigation against the company which may cause outflow of Rs. 1 crore which
may affect the demand for share application and had also authorized himself to be named in the
prospectus as director.
24(SEPT2022 MTP)
In assessment procedure of M/s Dim Ltd., Income Tax Officer observed some irregularities.
Therefore, he started investigation of Books of Accounts audited and signed by Mr. O, a practicing
Chartered Accountant. While going through books he found that M/s Dim Ltd. used to maintain two
sets of Books of Accounts, one is the official set and other is covering all the transactions. Income
Tax Department filed a complaint with the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India saying Mr. O
had negligently performed his duties. Comment.
ANSWER:
Liability of Auditor: “It is the auditor’s responsibility to audit the statement of accounts and prepare
tax returns on the basis of books of accounts produced before him. Also if he is satisfied with the
books and documents produced to him, he can give his opinion on the basis of those documents
only by exercising requisite skill and care and observing the laid down audit procedure.
In the instant case, Income tax Officer observed some irregularities during the assessment
proceeding of M/s Dim Ltd. Therefore, he started investigation of books of accounts audited and
signed by Mr. O, a practicing Chartered Accountant. While going through the books, he found that
M/s Dim Ltd. Used to maintain two sets of Books of Accounts, one is the official set and ot her is
covering all the transactions. Income Tax Department filed a complaint with the ICAI saying Mr. O
had negligently performed his duties.
Mr. O, the auditor was not under a duty to prepare books of accounts of assessee and he should, of
course, neither suggest nor assist in the preparations of false accounts. He is responsible for the
books produced before him for audit. He completed his audit work with official set of books only.
674

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
In this situation, as Mr. O, performed the auditing with due skill and diligence; and, therefore, no
question of negligence arises. It is the duty of the Department to himself investigate the truth and
correctness of the accounts of the assessee.
675

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
1. Prakash Limited has around 25 branch offices and all the branch offices were on company’s
own land and building. Company has the Policy that all the original title deeds for land and
building owned by the company will be kept in the custody of authorised official at company’s
head office and a certified copy of the same is kept with the respective branch for verification.
You have been appointed as the internal auditor for the branches of the company and during the
course of audit you observed that the original title deeds of some of the branch office are kept
in the branch under the custody of branch officials itself. What action will you take in such case?
(a) It is not a material discrepancy, so the auditor is not required to take any action in such case.
(b) The auditor should inform the internal auditor of the Head Office for the compliance of the
same.
(c) The auditor should ask the branch office/official to send original title deed to the authorised
official at Head Office of the company immediately and submit the Internal Audit Report once
the confirmation received from Head office of company.
(d) As an internal auditor, report the matter in the Internal Audit Report and check for the
compliance of the same in the next audit period.
Answer: (d) As an internal auditor, report the matter in the Internal Audit Report and check for
the compliance of the same in the next audit period.

2. Management of HFC Ltd. noticed a sudden increase in expense under the head “wages &
676

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
salaries” for the year 2015-16 and 2016-17. The management felt a need to get the management
audit done in order to identify the reason for the sudden increase. Mr. Arsh Gupta, Chartered
Accountant was appointed as management auditor by the company on 15th April 2017. What
areas do you think the auditor need to verify for the purpose?
(a) Check the payroll sheet prepared as per approved pay and allowances; verify the overtime
sanctioned and authorised; and verify the payment process followed by the company for the
payment of wages & salaries to employees.
(b) Overtime authorised and the payment done to employees are the main areas need to be
(c) Auditor should first understand the HR Policy of the company. Then verify all the authorised
vouchers for overtime payments done during the year; verify the payroll preparation and
reconcile the gross pay in terms of increments/ promotions & resignations; verify the
appointments made during the year as per HR Policy and payments made to agencies providing
contractual staff.
(d) Auditor need to verify the new appointments i.e. of company’s payroll or outsourced staff and
theovertime allowance paid to employees.
Answer :(c) Auditor should first understand the HR Policy of the company. Then verify all the
authorised vouchers for overtime payments done during the year; verify the payroll preparation
and reconcile the gross pay in terms of increments/ promotions & resignations; verify the
appointments made during the year as per HR Policy and payments made to agencies providing
contractual staff.
MTP Mar 2019 QN no 14 (2 Marks)

3. An educational institute was collecting fees from their students by cash/ cheque / draft and
through net banking. Institute follows the policy to account for the fees received in the year of
receipt only and for the cheques or drafts received but not deposited in bank or credited in bank
account, should be shown in reconciliation statement. The internal auditor of branches noticed
that at some branches only the fees received up to 25th March are accounted for in the same
year and the receipts after that date are carried forward to be accounted for in the next financial
year.
The fees collected in these branches between 25th to 31st March amounted to Rs. 15 lakhs for
the year 2017-18 and the collection for the financial year ended 31st March 2018 amounted to
Rs. 115 crores. The auditor was of the view that it will not give a true and fair view on institute’s
revenue for the year. What do you think should be the next step of the auditor?
(a) The branches have accounted for those receipts in the next financial year so the auditor can
ignore the observation.
(b) Auditor should report the matter in Executive Summary paragraph and highlight it as significant
internal control lapse.
(c) Internal auditor can discuss the matter with the management to take a strict action against the
branches not following institute’s policy.
677

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
(d) Auditor should get the accounts modified and report the matter in action taken report.
Answer:(d) Auditor should get the accounts modified and report the matter in action taken report.

4. AFM coaching institute was accepting fees from its students in cash or cheque or online
transfer for an amount up to Rs.10000/-, and if the amount of fees is above Rs.10000/- by cheque
or online transfer only. In the year 2017 the institute’s total fees collection was of Rs.82 crores.
Your firm has been appointed the internal auditor by the Institute and during the verification of
vouchers for fee receipts you noticed that cash receipts of approximately Rs.5 lakhs were directly
credited in bank account instead of routing through cash account. Management explained that
since the deposit slips used for fees received in cash or cheque are same, the accountant has
erroneously shown them in the bank account but he has always tallied the cash at day end and
those cash receipts were deposited in the bank account same day. Whether the auditor will
consider the discrepancy as material for audit report?
(a) The auditor should disclose the fact with his comment in the audit report as it is material for
giving a true and fair view on financial statements.
(b) It is not a material discrepancy as the total receipts amount will remain the same and the fees
collected in cash are deposited in bank account only.
(c) The auditor should verify that whether such cash receipts reflects in bank statement on the same
day and cash ledger reconciles with the cash book on the respective dates or not. If it is followed
then auditor can include the matter in observation paragraph with his comments else disclose
the matter as major internal control lapse.
(d) Auditor can ask the management to give a representation letter in writing.
Answer: (c) The auditor should verify that whether such cash receipts reflects in bank statement
on the same day and cash ledger reconciles with the cash book on the respective dates or not. If it
is followed then auditor can include the matter in observation paragraph with his comments else
disclose the matter as major internal control lapse.
MTP Apr 2019 QN no 18 (2 Marks)

5. Rajaram is appointed as internal auditor for a finance company with 15 branches across the
states. He needs to conduct a branch visit in the coming week. Based on management inputs and
past year audit reports, he has shortlisted four branches.
Rajaram is not able to decide which branch visit he should prioritize as an internal auditor. Based
on the branch information given below, which branch should Rajaram visit first?
a. Sonpur – 15 people; two instances of fraud in the last year; regional manager present in the
branch for supervision
b. Chandpur – 12 people; no fraud, no visit by internal auditor in last two years due to set processes
c. Rampur – 18 people; no fraud, 6 of 20 employees are new joiners in the last 6 months; newly
opened branch
678

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
d. Laxmanpur–10 people; 1 fraud in the last year, all 10 are long term employees of the company;
no audit visit in the last year
Answer: Option (d) Laxmanpur–10 people; 1 fraud in the last year, all 10 are long term employees
of the company; no audit visit in the last year
MTP Oct 2019 QN no 14 (2 Marks)

6. Employees of LIG Ltd. have to travel frequently for business purposes, so the company entered
into a contract with a Simon Travels Ltd. for managing booking, cancellation and other services
required by their employees. As per contract terms, Simon travels has to raise its monthly bills
for the tickets booked or cancelled during the period and the same are paid by LIG Ltd. within 15
days of the bill date. The bills raised by Simon travels were of huge amount, so the management
of LIG Ltd. decided to get an audit conducted of the process followed for booking/ cancellation
of tickets and verify the accuracy of bills raised by the travel agency. Which audit do you feel the
management should opt for?
(a) Internal audit, as it relates to examine the operational efficiency of the organisation.
(b) Management audit, as it is an audit desired by the management.
(c) Performance audit so as to assess the performance of the Simon travels appointed by the
organisation.
(d) Operational audit, as it is the audit for the management and involves verifying the effectiveness,
efficiency and economy of operations done by the Simon travels for the organisation.
Answer: (d) Operational audit, as it is the audit for the management and involves verifying the
effectiveness, efficiency and economy of operations done by the Simon travels for the organisation.
7.The Operational Audit is carried out effectively when the Operational Auditor responds with
positive traits in a scenario which is blended with behavioural issues. Explain few positive traits
that help to conclude an Operational Audit,a success. May 2018 6(e) 4 Marks
Answer
(a) Positive Traits that help to conclude an Operation Audit A success: The operational auditor
should possess some very essential personal qualities to be effective in his work:
In areas beyond accounting and finance, his knowledge ordinarily would be rathe r scanty and this
is a reason which should make him even more inquisitive.
He should ask the who, why, how of everything. He should try to visualise whether simpler
alternative means are available to do a particular work.
He should try to see everything as to whether that properly fits in the business frame and
organisational policy. He should be persistent and should possess an attitude of scepticism.
He should not give up or feel satisfied easily. He should imbibe a constructive approach rather than
a fault-finding approach and should give a feeling that his efforts are to help attaining an improved
operation and not merely fault finding.
679

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
If the auditor succeeds in giving a feeling of help and assistance through constructive criticism, he
will be able to obtain co-operation of the persons who are involved in the operations. This will itself
be a tremendous achievement of the operational auditor. He should try to develop a team
comprised of people of different backgrounds. Involvement of technical people in operational
auditing is generally helpful.

(a) Mr. Anand is appointed as statutory auditor of Xerox Ltd. Xerox Ltd is required to appoint
internal auditor as per statutory provisions given in the Companies Act, 2013 and appointed Mr.
Bhanu as its internal auditor. The external auditor Mr. Anand asked internal auditor to provide
direct assistance to him regarding evaluating significant accounting estimates by the
management and assessing the risk of material misstatements.
Discuss whether Mr. Anand, statutory auditor, can ask direct assistance from Mr. Bhanu,
internal auditor as stated above in view of auditing standards.
(b) DLF Ltd., a manufacturing unit does not accept the recommendations for improvements
made by the Operational Auditor. Suggest an alternative way to tackle the hostile management.
Direct Assistance from Internal Auditor: As per SA 610 “Using the Work of Internal Auditor”, the external
auditor shall not use internal auditors to provide direct assistance to perform procedures that Involve
making significant judgments in the audit. Since the external auditor has sole responsibility for the audit
opinion expressed, the external auditor needs to make the significant judgments in the audit engagement.
• Assessing the risks of material misstatement;

• Evaluating the sufficiency of tests performed;
• Evaluating the appropriateness of management’s use of the going concern assumption;
• Evaluating significant accounting estimates; and
• Evaluating the adequacy of disclosures in the financial statements, and other matters affecting the
auditor’s report.
In view of above, Mr. Anand cannot ask direct assistance from internal auditors regarding evaluating
significant accounting estimates and assessing the risk of material misstatements.
(b) While conducting the operational audit the auditor has to come across many irregularities and areas
where improvement can be made and therefore he gives his suggestions and recommendations.
These suggestions and recommendations for improvements may not be accepted by the hostile managers
and in effect there may be cold war between the operational auditor and the managers. This would defeat
the very purpose of the operational audit.
The Participative Approach comes to the help of the auditor. In this approach the auditor discusses the
ideas for improvements with those managers that have to implement them and make them feel that they
have participated in the recommendations made for improvements. By soliciting the views of the operating
personnel, the operational audit becomes co-operative enterprise.
680

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
This participative approach encourages the auditee to develop a friendly attitude towards the auditors and
look forward to their guidance in a more receptive fashion. When participative method is adopted then the
resistance to change becomes minimal, feelings of hostility disappear and gives room for feelings of mutual
trust. Team spirit is developed. The auditors and the auditee together try to achieve the common goal. The
proposed recommendations are discussed with the auditee and modifications as may be agreed upon are
incorporated in the operational audit report. With this attitude of the auditor it becomes absolutely easy to
implement the proposed suggestions as the auditee themselves take initiative for implementing and the
auditor do not have to force any change on the auditee.
Hence, Operational Auditor of DLF manufacturing unit should adopt above mentioned participative
approach to tackle the hostile management of DLF
9.MTP Mar 2018 5(b) 4 Marks
Mr. 'P' have been appointed as operational auditor of M/s Books & Magazine Ltd. and observed
a totaling error in invoice of Rs. 1,000. He has not taken care of the same saying that this is out
of scope of his work. Comment.
Scope of Operational Audit: Operational auditing is a systematic process involving logical,
structured and organized series of procedures. It concentrates on effectiveness, efficiency and
economy of operations and therefore it is future oriented. It does not end with the reporting of
the findings but also recommends the steps for improvement in future.
The main objective of operational auditing is to verify the fulfilment of plans and sound business
requirements as also to focus on objectives and their achievement objectives; the operational
auditor should not only have a proper business sense, he should also be equipped with a
thorough knowledge of policies, procedures, systems and controls, he should be intimately
familiar with the business, its nature and problems, and prospects and its environment.
Above all, his mind should be open and active so as to be able to perceive problems and prospects,
and grasp technical matters.
In carrying out his work probably at every step he will have to exercise judgement to evaluate
evidence in connection with the situations and issues; he will have to get the assistance of norms
and standards in every operating field to be able to objectively judge a situation. The norms and
standards should be such as are generally acceptable or developed by the company itself.
To a traditional internal auditor, a loss of Rs. 1,000 caused by a wrong totaling of invoice is
important and this is that he looks for. But for an auditor engaged in th e review of operations,
carrying out of a proper maintenance programme of the machines is of greater importance
because considerable production loss due to machine breaks down can thus be prevented. In both
the cases, the auditor’s objective is to see that the business and its profitability do not suffer from
avoidable loss, but, nevertheless, there is a distinct difference in approach. But it should not be
assumed, that, since an operational auditor is concerned with the audit of operations and review
of operating conditions, he is not concerned with the financial aspects of transaction and controls.
Hence, contention of operational auditor that totaling error in invoice of Rs. 1,000 is out of
scope is not correct as operational audit is being carried out to ensure that all the management
functions like planning, organizing, staffing, directing and controlling are working effectively
681

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
and efficiently. Such kind of error is very much in scope because such an existence of error
indicates that control system (c ontrolling function) is not sound.
10.MTP Mar 18 Qn no.5(e) 4 Marks
New Life Hospital is a multi-speciality hospital which has been facing a lot of pilferage and troubles
regarding their inventory maintenance and control. On investigation into the matter it was found that
the person in charge of inventory inflow and outflow from the store house is also responsible for
purchases and maintaining inventory records. According to you, which basis system of control has
been violated? Also advise the other general conditions pertaining to such system which needs to be
maintained and checked by the management.
Answer
Basic system of Control: Internal Checks and Internal Audit are important constituents of
Accounting Controls. Internal check system implies organization of the overall system of book-
keeping and arrangement of Staff duties in such a way that no one person can carry through a
transaction and record every aspect thereof. In the given case of New Life Hospital, the person-
in-charge of inventory inflow and outflow from the store house is also responsible for purchases
and maintaining inventory records. Thus, one of the basic system of control i.e. internal check
which includes segregation of duties or maker and checker has been violated where transaction
processing are allocated to different persons in such a manner that no one person can carry
through the completion of a transaction from start to finish or the work of one person is made
complimentary to the work of another person.
The general condition pertaining to the internal check system may be summarized as under-
(i) No single person should have complete control over any important aspect of the business
accounts.
of cash.
682

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
11.MTP Apr 18 Qn no 2(d) 5 Marks
As an internal auditor for a large manufacturing concern, you are asked to verify whether
there are adequate records for identification and value of Plant and Machinery, tools and dies
and whether any of these items have become obsolescent and not in use. Draft a suitable
audit programme for the above.
ANSWER
The Internal Audit Programme in connection with Plant and Machinery and Tools and dies may be on the
following lines:
(i) Internal Control Aspects: The following may be incorporated in the audit programme to check the
internal control aspects-
(a) Maintaining separate register for hired assets, leased asset and jointly owned assets.
(b) Maintaining register of fixed asset and reconciling to physical inspection of fixed asset and to nominal
ledger.
(c) All movements of assets are accurately recorded.
(d) Authorisation be obtained for –
(1) a declaring a fixed asset scrapped.
(2) selling a fixed asset.
(e) Check whether additions to fixed asset register are verified and checked by authorised person.
(f) Proper recording of all additions and disposal.
(g) Examining procedure for the purchase of new fixed assets, including written authority, work order,
voucher and other relevant evidence.
(h) Regular review of adequate security arrangements.
(i) Periodic inspection of assets is done or not.
(j) Regular review of insurance cover requirements over fixed assets.
Assets Register: To review the registers and records of plant, machinery, etc. showing clearly the date of
purchase of assets, cost price, location, depreciation charged, etc.
(ii) Cost Report and Journal Register: To review the cost relating to each plant and machinery and to verify
items which have been capitalised.
(iii) Code Register: To see that each item of plant and machinery has been given a distinct code number to
facilitate identification and verify the maintenance of Code Register.
(iv) Physical Verification: To see physical verification has been conducted at frequent intervals.
(v) Movement Register: To verify (a) whether Movement Register for movable equipments and
(b) log books in case of vehicles, etc. are being maintained properly.
(vi) Assets Disposal Register: To review whether assets have been disposed off after proper technical and
financial advice and sales/disposal/retirement, etc. of these assets are governed by authorisation, sales
memos or other appropriate documents.
683

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
(vii) Spare Parts Register: To examine the maintenance of a separate register of tools, spare parts for each
plant and machinery.
(viii) Review of Maintenance: To scrutinise the programme for an actual periodical servicing and overhauling
of machines and to examine the extent of utilisation of maintenance department services.
(ix) Review of Obsolescence: To scrutinise whether expert’s opinion have been obtained from time to time to
ensure purchase of technically most useful efficient and advanced machinery after a thorough study.
(x) Review of R&D: To review R&D activity and ascertain the extent of its relevance to the operations of the
organisation, maintenance of machinery efficiency and prevention of early obsolescence.
12.MTP Apr 18 Qn no.5(b) 4 Marks
Munch Ltd. is a public company having Rs. 40 lacs paid up capital in previous financial year which
raised to Rs. 60 lacs in current financial year under audit. The company had turnover of previous
three consecutive financial years being Rs. 49 crores, Rs. 145 crores and Rs. 150 crores. During
the previous year, Munch Ltd. borrowed a loan from a public financial insti tution of Rs. 110
crores but squared up Rs. 20 crores by the year end. The company does not have any internal
audit system. In view of the management, internal audit system is not mandatory.
You are required to state the provisions related to applicability of internal audit as per the
Companies Act, 2013 and comment upon the contention of the management of the company
ANSWER
Applicability of Provisions of Internal Audit: As per section 138 of the Companies Act, 2013,
following class of companies (prescribed in Rule 13 of Companies (Accounts) Rules, 2014) shall
be required to appoint an internal auditor or a firm of internal auditors, namely:-
(A) every listed company;
(B) every unlisted public company having-
(1) paid up share capital of fifty crore rupees or more during the preceding financial year; or
(2) turnover of two hundred crore rupees or more during the preceding financial year; or
(3) outstanding loans or borrowings from banks or public financial institutions exceeding one hundred
crore rupees or more at any point of time during the preceding financial year; or
(4) outstanding deposits of twenty five crore rupees or more at any point of time during the preceding
financial year; and
(C) every private company having-
crore rupees or more at any point of time during the preceding financial year.
In the given case, Munch Ltd. is a public company. The company borrowed a loan from a public
financial institution of Rs. 110 crores during the previous year. At the year end, the loan
outstanding after being squared up is Rs. 90 crores (Rs. 110 crores - Rs. 20 crores) which is less
than the minimum prescribed limit of Rs. 100 crores for applicability of internal audit. Although,
the outstanding loan at previous year end is Rs. 90, it was Rs. 110 crores at some point of time
which is the requirement of the section (refer Rule 13(B)(3) as mentioned above).
684

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
Hence, Munch Ltd. has the statutory liability to appoint an Internal Auditor and mandatorily conduct
internal audit. Consequently, the contention of the management of the company is not tenable.
13.MTP Apr 18 Qn no 5(E) 4 Marks
Yex Ltd. has five entertainment centers to provide facilities for public especially for childr en
and youngsters at 5 different locations in the peripheral of 200 kms. Collections are made in
cash. Specify the adequate control system towards collection of money.
Answer
Control System over Selling and Collection of Tickets: In order to achieve proper internal control
over the sale of tickets and its collection by the Yex Co. Ltd., following system should be adopted
-
(i) Printing of tickets: Serially numbered pre-printed tickets should be used and designed in such a
way that any type of ticket used cannot be duplicated by others in order to avoid forgery. Serial
numbers should not be repeated during a reasonable period, say a month or year depending on
the turnover. The separate series of the serial should be used for such denomination.
(ii) Ticket sales: The sale of tickets should take place from the Central ticket office at each of the 5
centres, preferably through machines. There should be proper control over the keys of the
machines.
(iii) Daily cash reconciliation: Cash collection at each office and machine should be reconciled with
the number of tickets sold. Serial number of tickets for each entertainment activity/denomination
will facilitate the reconciliation.
(iv) Daily banking: Each day’s collection should be deposited in the bank on next working day of the
bank. Till that time, the cash should be in the custody of properly authorized person preferably in
joint custody for which the daily cash in hand report should be signed by the authorized persons.
(v) Entrance ticket: Entrance tickets should be cancelled at the entrance gate when public enters the
centre.
(vi) Advance booking: If advance booking of facility is made available, the system should ensure that
all advance booked tickets are paid for.
(vii) Discounts and free pass: The discount policy of the Y Co. Ltd. should be such that the concessional
rates, say, for group booking should be properly authorized and signed forms for such
authorization should be preserved.
(viii) Surprise checks: Internal audit system should carry out periodic surprise checks for cash counts,
daily banking, reconciliation and stock of unsold tickets etc.
BSF Limited is engaged in the business of trading leather goods. You are the internal auditor
of the company for the year 2018-19. In order to review internal controls of the Sales
Department of the company, you visited the Department and noticed the work division as
follows:
685

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
(3) One more officer was there to handle customer/ debtor accounts and issue of receipts.
As an internal auditor, you are required to briefly discuss the general condition pertaining to the
internal check system prevalent in internal control system. Do you think that there was proper
division of work in BSF Limited? If not, why?
Answer:
The general condition pertaining to the internal check system may be summarized as under:
(i) no single person should have complete control over any important aspect of the business
accounts.
of cash.
In the given scenario, Company has not done proper division of work as: (i) the receipts of cash
should not be handled by the official handling sales ledger and (ii)delivery challans should be
verified by an authorised official other than the officer handling despatch of goods.
Many modern enterprises have become huge and sophisticated. This has resulted in decentralisation of
their activities and different type of audits. You are required to explain the difference to the
management:
(a) Internal & Operational Audit.
(b) Management Audit & Operational Audit.
(c) Financial Audit & Operational Audit.
Difference between Internal & Operational Audit: There probably may not be much of difference
686

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
in viewing operational audit as a review and appraisal of operations of an organisation carried on

by a competent independent person. Auditing whether carried on by an internal staff or by an
external person, should necessarily be an independent activity to maintain its objectivity and
usefulness.
The difference in the approach of both these audits is illustrated below:
1. Perception - Traditionally, internal auditors have been engaged in a sort of protective function,
deriving their authority from the management. They view and examine internal controls in the
financial and accounting areas to ensure that possibilities of loss, wastage and fraud are not
there; they check the accounting books and records to see, whether the internal checks are
properly working and the resulting accounting data are reliable.
For example - when the auditor looks into the vouchers to see whether they corroborate the
entries in the cash book or physically examines the cash in hand he is doing his traditional
protective function. The moment be concerns himself to see whether customers’ complaints are
duly attended to or whether cash balance is excessive to the need, he comes to the operational
field.
Also he will review the operational control on cash to determine whether maximum possible
protection has been given to cash.
Similarly, in the audit of stocks, he would be interested in such matters as reorder policy,
obsolescence policy and the overall inventory management policy. In pure administrative areas
on stock, he will see whether adequate security and insurance arrangements exist for protection
of stocks.
2. Issues - The basic difference that exists in conceptualisation of the technique of operational
auditing is in the auditor’s role in recommending corrections or in installing systems and controls.
According to Lindberg and Cohn, such a situation would be in conflict with the role of operational
auditor. In this connection, the views of the Institute of Internal Auditors, in the context of internal
audit are relevant. According to that Institute, “the internal auditor should be free to review and
appraise policies, plans, procedures and records; but his review and appraisal does not in any way
relieve other persons in the organisation of the responsibilities assigned to them.
However, a further distinction should be observed between traditional internal auditing and
operational auditing - this lies in the attitude and approach to the whole auditing proposition. Every
aspect of operational auditing programme should be geared to management policies, management
objectives and management goals.
3. Objectives - The main objective of operational auditing is to verify the fulfilment of plans and
sound business requirements as also to focus on objectives and their achievement objectives; the
operational auditor should not only have a proper business sense, he should also be equipped
with a thorough knowledge of policies, procedures, systems and controls, he should be intimately
familiar with the business, its nature and problems and prospects and its environment.
Above all, his mind should be open and active so as to be able to perceive problems and prospects
and grasp technical matters. In carrying out his work probably at every step he will have to exercise
judgement to evaluate evidence in connection with the situations and issues. The norms and
standards should be such as are generally acceptable or developed by the company itself.
Performance yardsticks can be found in the management objectives, goals and plans, budgets,
687

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
records of past performance, policies and procedures. Industry standards can be obtained from the
statistics provided by industry, associations and government sources. It should be appreciated that
the standards may be relative depending upon the situation and circumstances; the operational
auditor may have to apply them with suitable adjustments.
For Example: The standards relating to objectives for a government company are quite different
from those of a private sector company. Similarly standards of performance of a well equipped
company which also adequately looks after the well-being of employees may be significantly
different from a company which offers scanty welfare facilities or is ill-equipped.
Today, however, the concept of modern internal auditing suggests that there is no difference in
internal and operational auditing. In fact, the scope of internal auditing is broad enough to
embrace the areas covered by operational auditing as well. The modern internal auditing performs
both protective as well as constructive functions.
Difference between Management Audit & Operational Audit
Management audit is concerned with the “Quality of managing”, whereas operational audit focuses on the
“Quality of operations”.
 Management audit is the “Audit of management” while operational audit is the“Audit for the
management”.
 The basic difference between the two audits, then, is not in method, but in the level of appraisal.
In management audit, the auditor is to make his tests to the level of top management, its
formulation of objectives, plans and policies and its decision making. It is not that he just verifies
the operations of control and procedures and fulfilment of plans in conformity with the
prescribed policies.
(c) Differences between Financial and Operational Auditing - The major differences between
financial and operational auditing can be described as follows:
• Purpose - The financial auditing is basically concerned with the opinion that whether the historical
information recorded is correct or not, whereas the operational auditing emphasizes on
effectiveness and efficiency of operations for future performance.
• Area - Financial audits are restricted to the matters directly affecting the appropriateness of the
presented financial statements but the operational auditing covers all the activities that are
related to efficiency and effectiveness of operations directed towards accomplishment of
objectives of organization.
• Reporting -The financial audit report is sent to all stock holders, bankers and other persons having
stake in the Organisation. However the operational audit report is primarily for the management.
• End Task - The financial audit has reporting the findings to the persons getting the report as its
end objective, however, the operational auditing is not limited to reporting only but includes
suggestions for improvement also.
16.MTP-OCT-18 Qn No 5(b) (1)4 Marks:

XYZ Yarns Ltd. is a manufacturing company engaged in manufacturing of different types of
yarns. Its annual turnover is Rs. 100 Crores and net profit Rs. 10 crores. It has two
manufacturing units. Company is facing difficulties in maintaining adequate system of internal
688

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
control. Company wants to appoint Internal Auditor who would help in the above task and
also various other functions including compliance. In view of above, you are required to
explain the main responsibility of Internal Auditors.
Answer:
Main responsibility of internal auditor must be :
• to maintain adequate system of internal control by a continuous examination of accounting

procedures, receipts and disbursements and to provide adequate safeguards against
misappropriation of assets.
• to operate independently of the accounting staff and must not in any way divest himself of any
of the responsibilities placed upon him.
• Not to involve himself in the performance of executive functions in order that his objective outlook
does not get obscured by the creation of vested interest.
• to observe facts and situations and bring them to notice of authorities who would otherwise never
know them; also, they critically appraise various policies of the management and draw its attention
to any deficiencies, wherever these require to be corrected.
• to associate closely with management and his knowledge must be kept up to date by his being
kept informed about all important occurrences and events affecting the business, as well as the
changes that are made in business policies. He must enjoy an independent status.
In addition, the Audit Committee of the company or the Board shall, in consultation with the Internal
Auditor, formulate the scope, functioning, periodicity and methodology for conducting the internal
audit. It may also be noted that the Central Government may, by rules, prescribe the manner and
the intervals in which the internal audit shall be conducted and reported to the Board.
17.Nov 18 Qn no 3(b) 5 Marks

The Board of Directors of XYZ Ltd. is concerned with decreasing operating efficiency in material
consumption. As an Auditor entrusted with investigating the causes for this poor state, what may
be the areas of your focus in this respect.
Answer
Decreasing Operating Efficiency in Material Consumption: It is the input-output ratio. In the case of public
spending, efficiency is achieved when the output is maximized at the minimum of inputs, or input is
minimized for any given quantity and quality of output.
• The auditor should make an analytical procedure to compare the material consumption with output for the
current year as well as previous years.
• The internal control system should be studied.
• The auditor should have discussions/ inquiry with different personnel of the company including production
personnel.
• The production process, scheduling, machine usage, material mix should be studied.
• A reconciliation of variation as to various causes – Price, quantity efficiency are to be analyzed.
• The budget, standard coasting and other MIS reports should be called for and studied.
689

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
• Internal audit report should be thoroughly studied and whether any pilferage, fraud etc. were noticed.
These are to be looked into.
• The key material should be picked up for detailed study of their ordering, receipts, issue, normal loss yield
percentage etc.
18.Nov 18 Qn no5(b)
Internal auditor makes an appraisal of organization structure to ensure that it is in harmony with
the objectives of the entity, besides checking of financial transactions and operational activities
of the entity- Elaborate.
Answer
Review of the Organisation Structure - The internal auditor should conduct an appraisal of the
organisation structure to ascertain whether it is in harmony with the objectives of the enterprise
and whether the assignment of responsibilities is in consonance therewith. For this purpose:
➢ He should review the manner in which the activities of the enterprise are grouped for managerial
control. It is also important to review whether responsibility and authority are in harmony with the
grouping pattern.
➢ The internal auditor should examine the organization chart to find out whether the structure is
simple and economical and that no function enjoys an undue dominance over the others.
➢ He should particularly see that the responsibilities of managerial staff at headquarters do not
overlap with those of chief executives at operating units. He should examine whether there is a
satisfactory balance between authority and responsibility of important executives.
➢ The internal auditor should examine the reasonableness of the span of control of each executive
(the number of sub-ordinates that an executive controls). He should examine whether there is a
unity of command i.e., whether each person reports only to one superior.
➢ Where dual responsibilities cannot be avoided, the primary one should be specified and the
specific responsibility to each senior fixed. This must be made known to all concerned.
➢ Finally, he should evaluate the process of managerial development in the enterprise. This is a vital
aspect in a fast growing enterprise.
19.Nov 18 Qn no 5(e) 4 Marks
In the use of standardized Internal Control Questionnaire (ICQ), certain basic assumptions about
elements of a good internal control system are taken into account. List down few such
assumptions.
Answer
Basic Assumption about Elements of Good Control in Standardized Internal Control
Questionnaire: In the use of standardized internal control questionnaire, certain basic assumptions
about elements of good control are taken into account. These are -
(i) Certain procedures in general used by most business concerns are essential in achieving reliable
internal control. This is a time-tested assumption. Deposit into bank of the entire receipts of a day
690

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
or daily balancing of the cash book and ledgers or periodic reconciliation with the control accounts
are examples of widely used practices which are considered good internal control practices.
Besides, basic operations giving rise to these practices exist in all businesses irrespective of their
nature.
(ii) Organisations are such that permit an extensive division of duties and responsibilities. The larger
the organisation, the greater is the scope of such division.
(iii) Employees concerned with accounting function are not assigned any custodial function.
(iv) No single person is thrust with the responsibility of completing a transaction all by himself.
(v) There should always be evidence to identify the person who has done the work whether involving
authorisation, implementation or checking.
(vi) The work performed by each one is expected to come under review of another in the usual course
of routine.
(vii) There is proper documentation and recording of the transactions.
20.RTP May2019 Qn no 22(a)

Employees of GIG Ltd. have to travel frequently for business purposes, so the company entered
into a contract with a Simony Travels Ltd. for managing booking, cancellation and other services
required by their employees. As per contract terms, Simony travels has to raise its monthly bills
for the tickets booked or cancelled during the period and the same are paid by GIG Ltd. within 15
days of the bill date.
The bills raised by Simony travels were of huge amount, so the management of GIG Ltd. decided
to get an audit conducted of the process followed for booking/ cancellation of tickets and verify
the accuracy of bills raised by the travel agency. Which audit do you feel the management should
opt for? Also briefly discuss the qualities the auditor should possess for such audit.
Answer
Operational audit, (functional audit) as it is the audit for the management and involves verifying the
effectiveness, efficiency and economy of operations done by the Simony travels for the organisation.
The operational auditor should possess some very essential personal qualities to be effective in his work:
1. In areas beyond accounting and finance, his knowledge ordinarily would be rather scanty and this is a reason
which should make him even more inquisitive.
2. He should ask the who, why, how of everything. He should try to visualise whether simpler alternative
means are available to do a particular work.
3. He should try to see everything as to whether that properly fits in the business frame and organisational
policy. He should be persistent and should possess an attitude of skepticism.
4. He should not give up or feel satisfied easily. He should imbibe a constructive approach rather than a fault-
finding approach and should give a feeling that his efforts are to help attaining an improved operation and
not merely fault finding.
5. If the auditor succeeds in giving a feeling of help and assistance through constructive criticism, he will be
able to obtain co-operation of the persons who are involved in the operations. This will itself be a
tremendous achievement of the operational auditor. He should try to develop a team comprised of people
691

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
of different backgrounds. Involvement of technical people in operational auditing is generally helpful.

(a) Perfect Steel Ltd. has reported a higher turnover of Rs. 560 crores in the year 2018-19 as
compared to earlier years but its sales return has also increased to 10% from only 4% upto the
last year. The management is concerned about the high sales returns and feels a need to get the
operational audit done for sales and production department of the company. The company is
also having an internal audit system in the company. Elaborate the possible reason/s, why
management is getting operational audit done when internal audit has already been done for
both the departments by stating the shortcomings of conventional information sources.
(b) You are also required to discuss the difference in the approach of both of these audits.
Answer
Why Operational Audit?: The need for operational auditing has arisen due to the inadequacy of
traditional sources of information for an effective management of the company where the
management is at a distance from actual operations due to layers of delegation of responsibility,
separating it from actualities in the organisation.
Operational audit is considered as a specialised management information tool to fill the void that
conventional information sources fail to fill. Conventional sources of management information
are departmental managers, routine performance report, internal audit reports, and periodic
special investigation and survey. These conventional sources fail to provide information for the
best direction of the departments all of whose activities do not come under direct observation of
managers. The shortcomings of these sources can be stated as under:
• Executives and managers are too preoccupied with implementation of plans and achieving of
targets. They are left with very little time to collect information and locate problems. They may
come across problems that have come to surface but they are hardly aware of problems that are
brewing and potential.
• Managers or their aides are generally relied upon for transmitting information than for booking
for information or for analysing situations.
• The information that is transmitted by managers is not necessarily objective - often it may be
biased for various reasons.
• Conventional internal audit reports are often routine and mechanical in character and have a
definite leaning towards accounting and financial information. They are also historical in nature.
• Other performance reports contained in the annual audited accounts and the routine reports
prepared by the operating departments have their own limitations. The annual audited accounts
are good as far as an overall evaluation is concerned in monetary terms.
Example:
Sales may be shown at a higher monetary value compared to the previous year and this may
apparently suggest that the functioning of the sales department is satisfactory. But this may have
been caused by a number of factors inspite of a really bad performance on the sales front. This fact
may not be readily known unless one cares to analyse the sales data by reference to notes and
explanations to the accounts and other related accounting data. Even a study of this nature may
692

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
not fully reveal the weakness. It is quite possible that the established market for sales has been lost
partly while some fortuitous sales have compensated the loss
Example:
The routine weekly production report may include production ‘that is subsequently rejected by the
quality control staff, or to avoid showing a bad production performance; even the partly produced
goods may also be included. Remember, all this can happen inspite of specific management
instructions about the basis on which the production report is to be made out.
Another important point may be noticed in the matter of routine departmental reports. The busy
management people, who can afford time only to glance over the performance reports, cannot
be expected to make an integrated reading of several reports or to undertake an analysis of such
reports. What they need is reliable, unmanipulated and objective report which they would like to
look into to understand the situation.
• Operations of controls in a satisfactory manner cannot be relied upon to bring to light the
environmental conditions. Controls are specific and their satisfactory operation is related to the
specific situation under control. Also monitoring of the breakdown or non-operation of controls
is a periodic phenomenon.
• Surveys and special investigations, no doubt, are very useful but these are at the best occasional
in character. Also, they are costly, time consuming and keep the departmental key personnel busy
during the period they are on. These are basically an attempt to carry out a post-mortem rather
than to enlighten the management about the ways on improvement or for better performance or
to give a signal for dangers and disasters to come.
(B) The difference in the approach of both of these audits is illustrated below:
1. Perception - Traditionally, internal auditors have been engaged in a sort of protective function,
deriving their authority from the management. They view and examine internal controls in the in
the financial and accounting areas to ensure that possibilities of loss, wastage and fraud are not there;
they check the accounting books and records to see, whether the internal checks are properly working and
the resulting accounting data are reliable.
For example - when the auditor looks into the vouchers to see whether they corroborate the
entries in the cash book or physically examines the cash in hand he is doing his traditional
protective function. The moment be concerns himself to see whether customers’ complaints are
duly attended to or whether cash balance is excessive to the need, he comes to the operational
field.
Also, he will review the operational control on cash to determine whether maximum possible
protection has been given to cash. Similarly, in the audit of stocks, he would be interested in such
matters as reorder policy, obsolescence policy and the overall inventory management policy. In
pure administrative areas on stock, he will see whether adequate security and insurance
arrangements exist for protection of stocks.
2. Issues - The basic difference that exists in conceptualisation of the technique of operational
auditing is in the auditor’s role in recommending corrections or in installing systems and controls.
According to Lindberg and Cohn, such a situation would be in conflict with the role of operational
auditor. In this connection, the views of the Institute of Internal Auditors, in the context of internal
audit are relevant. According to that Institute, “the internal auditor should be free to review and
appraise policies, plans, procedures and records; but his review and appraisal does not in any way
relieve other persons in the organisation of the responsibilities assigned to them.
693

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
However, a further distinction should be observed between traditional internal auditing and
operational auditing - this lies in the attitude and approach to the whole auditing proposition. Every
aspect of operational auditing programme should be geared to management policies, management
objectives and management goals.
3. Objectives – The main objective of operational auditing is to verify the fulfilment of plans and
sound business requirements as also to focus on objectives and their achievement objectives;
the operational auditor should not only have a proper business sense, he should also be
equipped with a thorough knowledge of policies, procedures, systems and controls, he should
be intimately familiar with the business, its nature and problems and prospects and its
environment.
Above all, his mind should be open and active so as to be able to perceive problems and
prospects and grasp technical matters. In carrying out his work probably at every step he will have
to exercise judgement to evaluate evidence in connection with the situations and issues. The
norms and standards should be such as are generally acceptable or developed by the company
itself.
Performance yardsticks can be found in the management objectives, goals and plans, budgets,
records of past performance, policies and procedures. Industry standards can be obtained from the
statistics provided by industry, associations and government sources.
It should be appreciated that the standards may be relative depending upon the situation and
circumstances; the operational auditor may have to apply them with suitable adjustments.
For example - The standards relating to objectives for a government company are quite
different from those of a private sector company. Similarly, standards of performance of a well
equipped company which also adequately looks after the well-being of employees may be
significantly different from a company which offers scanty welfare facilities or is ill-equipped.
Today, however, the concept of modern internal auditing suggests that there is no
difference in internal and operational auditing. In fact, the scope of internal auditing is broad
enough to embrace the areas covered by operational auditing as well. The modern internal
auditing performs both protective as well as constructive functions
22. (RTP MAY 2019)

Employees of GIG Ltd. have to travel frequently for business purposes, so the company entered into a
contract with a Simony Travels Ltd. for managing booking, cancellation and other services required by their
employees. As per contract terms, Simony travels has to raise its monthly bills for the tickets booked or
cancelled during the period and the same are paid by GIG Ltd. within 15 days of the bill date. The bills
raised by Simony travels were of huge amount, so the management of GIG Ltd. decided to get an audit
conducted of the process followed for booking/ cancellation of tickets and verify the accuracy of bills raised
by the travel agency. Which audit do you feel the management should opt for? Also briefly discuss the
qualities the auditor should possess for such audit
ANSWER
effectiveness, efficiency and economy of operations done by the Simony travels for the organisation
1. In areas beyond accounting and finance, his knowledge ordinarily would be rather scanty and this is a
reason which should make him even more inquisitive.
694

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
4. He should not give up or feel satisfied easily. He should imbibe a constructive approach rather than a
fault-finding approach and should give a feeling that his efforts are to help attaining an improved operation
and not merely fault finding.
able to obtain co-operation of the persons who are involved in the operations. This will itself be a tremendous
achievement of the operational auditor. He should try to develop a team comprised of people of different
backgrounds. Involvement of technical people in operational auditing is generally helpful
Study Material
23.State the important aspects to be considered by the External auditor in the evaluation of
Internal Audit Function.
Answer
Evaluation of Internal Audit Functions by External Auditor: The external auditor’s general evaluation of
the internal audit function will assist him in determining the extent to which he can place reliance upon
the work of the internal auditor. The external auditor should document his evaluation and conclusions in
this respect. The important aspects to be considered in this context are:
(a) Organisational Status - Whether internal audit is undertaken by an outside agency or by an internal
audit department within the entity itself, the internal auditor reports to the management. In an ideal
situation his reports to the highest level of management and is free of any other operating responsibility.
Any constraints or restrictions placed upon his work by management should be carefully evaluated. In
particular, the internal auditor should be free to communicate fully with the external auditor.
(b) Scope of Function - The external auditor should ascertain the nature and depth of coverage of the
assignment which the internal auditor discharges for management. He should also ascertain to what
extent the management considers, and where appropriate, acts upon internal audit recommendations.
(c) Technical Competence - The external auditor should ascertain that internal audit work is performed by
persons having adequate technical training and proficiency. This may be accomplished by reviewing the
experience and professional qualifications of the persons undertaking the internal audit work.
(d) Due Professional Care - The external auditor should ascertain whether internal audit work appears to be
properly planned, supervised, reviewed and documented. An example of the exercise of due professional
care by the internal auditor is the existence of adequate audit manuals, audit programmes and working
papers
24. AB Pvt. Ltd. company having outstanding loans or borrowings from banks exceeding one
hundred crore rupees wants to appoint internal auditor. Please guide him for applicability of
the same and who can be appointed as internal auditor and what work would be reviewed by
695

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
him.
Answer
Applicability of Internal Audit: Section 138 of the Companies Act, 2013 states that every private limited
company is required to conduct internal audit if its outstanding loans or borrowings from banks or public
financial institutions exceeding one hundred crore rupees or more at any point of time during the
preceding financial year.
In view of above provisions, AB Pvt. Ltd. is under compulsion to conduct internal audit as its loans or
borrowings are falling under the prescribed limit.
Who can be appointed as Internal Auditor- The internal auditor shall either be a chartered accountant or a
cost accountant, whether engaged in practice or not, or such other professional as may be decided by the
Board to conduct internal audit of the functions and activities of the companies.
The internal auditor may or may not be an employee of the company.
25.Write a short note on Summary Written Report. (rtp- nov 2021)

ANSWER:
Summary written reports - These summary reports are also referred to as ‘flash’ reports’. In a number of
companies, the practice has developed of issuing an annual (or sometimes more frequent) report
summarising the various individual reports issued and describing the range of their content. These summary
reports in some cases are primarily for audit committees of Boards of Directors, but in other cases for higher
level management. They are especially useful to top level managers who do not actively review the individual
reports. They are also useful to the general auditor in seeing his total reporting effort with more perspective
and on an integrated basis.
26.The main objective of operational auditing is to verify the fulfillment of plans, and sound
business requirements while in financial auditing, the concentration is more in the financial and
accounting areas to ensure that possibilities of loss, wastage and fraud are minimized or removed.
Analyze and Explain stating clearly major differences between Financial and Operational Auditing.
ANSWER:
The purpose of systems and procedures is to help management in the planning and accomplishment of
organisational goals, in communicating their requirements, and in assisting the personnel in carrying out
the requirements. The review of systems and procedures is to improve the methods, to get away from the
old ways and traditional routines and to reduce the cost in completing and processing the paperwork -
eliminating waste, duplication and inefficiencies. In reviewing any system or procedure, the management
auditor must concern himself with its purpose as well as its design and then he must decide on its merits as
the best serving the interests of the enterprise. In the study of the systems and procedural functions, the
auditor should ask himself:
1. Is the function properly located in the organisation?

2. Do the staff personnel have the necessary training and experience to perform the work?
3. Has a definite programme been established and has been taken for its attentive accomplishment?
696

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
4. Is productivity satisfactory?
The evaluation of a system or a procedure actually includes three separate considerations. First, is the
system or procedure meeting all of the current requirements? Second, is it operating effectively? And third,
what is the degree of effectiveness? To determine whether the system or procedure is meeting current
requirements, the following among other things should be considered:
1. Is the system or procedure designed to promote the achievement of the company’s objectives, and is it
accomplished effectively?
2. Does the system or procedure operate within the framework of the organisational structure?
3. Does the system or procedure adequately provide methods of control in order to obtain maximum
performance with the least expenditure of time and effort?
4. Do the routines designated in the system or procedures indicate performance in a logical sequence?
5. Does the system or procedure provide the means for effective coordination between one department
and another?
6. Have all required functions been established?
7. Has the necessary authority been designated to carry out responsibilities?
8. Can any changes be made to improve effectiveness?

The important thing is to make sure that the system or procedure is designed to meet the desired results.
27. Mr. A is appointed as a statutory auditor of XYZ Ltd. XYZ Ltd is required to appoint an
internal auditor as per statutory provisions given in the Companies Act, 2013 and appointed Mr.
B as its internal auditor. The external auditor Mr. A asked internal auditor to provide direct
assistance to him regarding evaluating significant accounting estimates by the management and
assessing the risk of material misstatements.
(a) Discuss whether Mr. A, statutory auditor, can ask direct assistance from Mr. B, internal auditor
as stated above in view of auditing standards.
ANSWER:
(a) Direct Assistance from Internal Auditor: As per SA 610 “Using the Work of Internal Auditor”, the
external auditor shall not use internal auditors to provide direct assistance to perform procedures that
Involve making significant judgments in the audit.
Since the external auditor has sole responsibility for the audit opinion expressed, the external auditor
needs to make the significant judgments in the audit engagement.
Assessing the risks of material misstatement;
Evaluating the sufficiency of tests performed;
697

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
Evaluating the appropriateness of management’s use of the going concern assumption;

Evaluating significant accounting estimates; and
Evaluating the adequacy of disclosures in the financial statements, and other matters affecting the
auditor’s report.
In view of above, Mr. A cannot ask direct assistance from internal auditors regarding evaluating significant
accounting estimates and assessing the risk of material misstatements.
(b) Will your answer be different if Mr. A asks direct assistance from Mr. B, internal auditor with
respect to external confirmation requests and evaluation of the results of external confirmation
procedures?
ANSWER:
(b) Direct Assistance from Internal Auditor in case of External Confirmation Procedures: SA 610 “Using the
Work of Internal Auditor”, provide relevant guidance in determining the nature and extent of work that
may be assigned to internal auditors.
In determining the nature of work that may be assigned to internal auditors, the external auditor is careful
to limit such work to those areas that would be appropriate to be assigned.
Further, in accordance with SA 505, “External Confirmation” the external auditor is required to maintain
control over external confirmation requests and evaluate the results
of external confirmation procedures, it would not be appropriate to assign these responsibilities to internal
auditors. However, internal auditors may assist in assembling information necessary for the external auditor
to resolve exceptions in confirmation responses.
28. M/s ABC & Co., Chartered Accountants have been approached by PQR Ltd., a company
engaged in iron and steel manufacturing industry. The company has been facing following
operational issues:
(a) Penal interest for delayed payments to the overseas vendors despite having enough cash
flows; and
(b) Despite having regular production and enough inventory, delays in shipping the final goods
to the customers leading to its deteriorating vendor rating.
As a partner of M/s ABC & Co., through detailed discussion with the Senior Manager of PQR
Ltd., you have concluded that all these delays are because of long decision-making cycles in the
company. As a consultant to the Company, would you recommend Management Audit or
Operational Audit?
ANSWER:
A comparison between the Management Audit & the Operational Audit is as follows:
Management audit is concerned with the “Quality of managing”, whereas operational audit
focuses on the “Quality of operations”. Management audit is the “Audit of management” while the
operational audit is the “Audit for the management”. The focus of Management Audit is on “Quality of
Decision Making” rather than the effectiveness or efficiency of operations.
698

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
The basic difference between the two audits, then, is not in method, but in the level of appraisal. In a
management audit, the auditor is to make his tests to the level of top management, its formulation of
objectives, plans and policies and its decision making. It is not that he just verifies the operations of control
and procedures and fulfillment of plans in conformity with the prescribed policies.
Since, the delays in payments and consequent penal interest payments and the delays in shipping and the
consequent deteriorating vendor ratings are happening because of the delays in decision-making process
of the management. Therefore, it appears that this is not just an internal control or operational issue but
an issue of management process.
Therefore, management audit would be recommended in this case.
29. The PQR Ltd. has come across many instances where it could buy products at lesser cost
than the actual procurement price it paid. The management believes that the adequate
purchase policy is in place including the requirements of three quotations from registered
vendors, appropriate vendor vetting and rating mechanism, however, the on-ground
implementation of the purchase policy might be defective. Further, it has observed that there
might be some employees involved in choosing the higher cost vendors as well. The company
approaches you to advise the type of audit it should get done: Management or Operational.
Please advise through a comparison between both the audits.
ANSWER:
Since it is not the Management’s Decisions that are creating the operational bottlenecks. The Purchase Policy
and Procedure seem to be in place, the missing part is the operational implementation by the process
employees. Therefore, the Operational Audit is recommended in this case.
30. The Marketing Department of XYZ Ltd. has been consistently showing a lower performance
whereas the cost of the department is increasing in spurts over the years. The management
believes that since the marketing department is under a regular radar of the CFO, an audit might
result in the employee hostility. Also, an operational audit of Marketing Department was done
two years back however, the recommendations of the previous audit were not followed by the
concerned employees. Please advise the management if another audit is the solution and
whether only one-time operational audit is enough? Further, advise on the ways to deal with the
employee hostility.
ANSWER:
The Operational Audit is not one-time activity. It should be viewed as a continuous improvement cycle:
The continuous improvement cycle of Operational Audit can be depicted through Plan, Do, Check and Act
diagram.
All the significant operations must be subjected to the scrutiny of operational audit, at least, once in three
years. Therefore, the operational audit should be done in the current scenario.
However, to deal with the employee hostility the participative approach of the audit should be adopted:
In this approach the auditor discusses the ideas for improvements with those managers that have
to implement them and make them feel that they have participated in the recommendations made
699

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
for improvements. By soliciting the views of the operating personnel, the operational audit becomes a co-
operative enterprise.
look forward to their guidance in a more receptive fashion. When the participative method is adopted then
the resistance to change becomes minimal, feelings of hostility disappear and gives room for feelings of
mutual trust. Team spirit is developed. The auditors and the auditee together try to achieve the common
goal. The proposed recommendations are discussed with the auditee and modifications as may be agreed
upon are incorporated in the operational audit report. With this attitude of the auditor, it becomes absolutely
easy to implement the proposed suggestions as the auditee themselves take initiative for implementing and
the auditor does not have to force any change on the auditee.

31. The Board of Directors of Young Ltd., a listed company, appointed Mr. Old, a Cost Accountant (not
in practice), to conduct internal audit of the functions and activities of the company. The job of Mr. Old
would be of an independent management function, involving a continuous and critical appraisal of the
functioning of the company with a view to suggest improvements thereto and add value to and
strengthen the overall governance mechanism of the company, including the entity’s strategic risk
management and internal control system.
However, some of the officers of the company are against the appointment of a Cost Accountant who
is not in practice as an internal auditor. State whether those officers are correct or not in their view
point by referring the provisions of the Companies Act, 2013?
(a) The view point of the officers are correct because as per section 138 of the Companies Act, 2013,
the internal auditor shall be a chartered accountant.
(b) The view point of the officers are correct because as per section 138 of the Companies Act, 2013,
the internal auditor shall a cost accountant in practice.
(c) The view point of the officers are correct because as per section 138 of the Companies Act, 2013,
the internal auditor shall be an employee of the company.
(d) The view point of the officers are not correct because as per section 138 of the Companies Act,
2013, the internal auditor shall either be a chartered accountant or a cost accountant (whether
engaged in practice or not), or such other professional as may be decided by the Board.
Answer: (d)
The view point of the officers are not correct because as per section 138 of the Companies Act, 2013,
the internal auditor shall either be a chartered accountant or a cost accountant (whether engaged in
practice or not), or such other professional as may be decided by the Board
32. Employees of GIG Ltd. have to travel frequently for business purposes, so the company entered into
a contract with a Simony Travels Ltd. for managing booking, cancellation and other services required by
their employees. As per contract terms, Simony travels has to raise its monthly bills for the tickets
booked or cancelled during the period and the same are paid by GIG Ltd. within 15 days of the bill date.
The bills raised by Simony travels were of huge amount, so the management of GIG Ltd. decided to get
700

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
an audit conducted of the process followed for booking/ cancellation of tickets and verify the accuracy of
bills raised by the travel agency.
Which audit do you feel the management should opt for?
a) Internal audit, as it relates to examine the operational efficiency of the organisation.
b) Management audit, as it is an audit desired by the management.
c) Performance audit so as to assess the performance of the Simony travels appointed by the organisation.
d) Operational audit, as it is the audit for the management and involves verifying the effectiveness,
efficiency and economy of operations done by the Simony travels for the organisation
Answer: (d) Operational audit, as it is the audit for the management and involves verifying the
effectiveness, efficiency and economy of operations done by the Simony travels for the organisation
33. As auditor of ZED Ltd., you would like to limit your examination of account balance tests. What are
the control objectives you would like the accounting control system to achieve to suit your purpose?
(4 Marks) (mtp – I -july 2021)
ANSWER
Basic Accounting Control Objectives: The basic accounting control objectives which are sought to be
achieved by any accounting control system are -
(i) Whether all transactions are recorded;
(ii) Whether recorded transactions are real;
(iii) Whether all recorded transactions are properly valued;
(iv) Whether all transactions are recorded timely;
(v) Whether all transactions are properly posted;
(vi) Whether all transactions are properly classified and disclosed;
(vii) Whether all transactions are properly summarized.
34. The management auditor has to analyse the nature and causes of behavioural problems in the
discharge of the review function and to arrive at possible solutions to overcome these problems. As a
management auditor of Real Limited, how will you demonstrate in arriving at a solution to behavioural
problems and create an atmosphere of trust and friendliness, so that audit reports will be understood in
their proper perspective? (5 Marks) (past exam nov 2020)
ANSWER
The auditors, if they were to adopt the role of accuser or secret agency of the management to try upon the
happenings of the auditee division, they would be unwelcome. Relations between the auditor and the
auditee may improve if the auditor acts and is perceived as a professional advisor and consultant.
701

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
Management auditor of Real Limited shall demonstrate, in arriving at a solution, behavioral problems in the
discharge of the review function.
In this case, there is a need to demonstrate to the extent possible that:
1. the audit is part of an overall programme mandated by higher- level authority to meet higher-level
organizational needs for both protection and maximum constructive benefit.
2. the objective of the review is to provide maximum service in all feasible managerial dimensions.
3. the review will be conducted with minimum interference with regular operations of the operating
personnel.
4. the responsible officers will be kept fully informed and have an opportunity to review findings and
recommendations before any audit report is formally released.
It is essential to create an atmosphere of trust and friendliness so that audit reports will be understood in
their proper perspective.
1. Constructive criticism - It is essential that the auditor should concentrate only on constructive criticism.
He should also make obvious in his report the value of his comments in tangible terms. Only then would
suggestions carry weight with the auditees and they will feel convinced that the auditor has been objective
in his remarks in the report.
2. Reporting methods - To achieve this objective, the auditor has to make a concerted effort to convey
effectively his role by adopting a friendly but firm tone in his report. It is always possible to disagree
without being disagreeable, to criticize without being critical. The reports should concentrate on areas
which need improvement rather than listing inefficiencies and deficiencies in performance of the auditee.
3. Participative approach - It is well established that auditor’s reports have better acceptability if the
improvements suggested are discussed with those who have to implement them and made to feel that
they have participated in the recommendations made for improvements. On the other hand, it has been
observed that either oral or written appreciation of the auditee’s achievements not only encourages the
auditees to develop a friendly attitude towards the auditors but look forward to their guidance in a more
receptive fashion.
The participative approach to the internal audit process has proved to be success. Feelings of hostility
disappear giving room to feelings of mutual trust. Team spirit is developed. Proposed recommendations
are discussed with the auditee and such modifications as may be mutually agreed upon are incorporated.
35. CA. Dev, a recently qualified practicing Chartered Accountant got his first internal audit assignment of
a large manufacturing concern Growth Limited. As an internal auditor for Growth Limited, CA. Dev is
required to verify whether there are adequate records for identification and value of Plant and
Machinery, tools and dies and whether any of these items have become obsolescent and not in use.
Draft a suitable audit programme for the above. (rtp- july 2021)
ANSWER
The Internal Audit Programme in connection with Plant and Machinery and Tools and dies may be on the
following lines:
(i) Internal Control Aspects: The following may be incorporated in the audit programme to check the
internal control aspects-
702
(a) Maintaining separate register for hired assets, leased asset and jointly owned assets.

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
(b) Maintaining register of fixed asset and reconciling to physical inspection of fixed asset and to nominal
ledger.
(c) All movements of assets are accurately recorded.
(d) Authorisation be obtained for –
(1) a declaring a fixed asset scrapped.
(2) selling a fixed asset.
(e) Check whether additions to fixed asset register are verified and checked by authorised person.
(f) Proper recording of all additions and disposal.
(g) Examining procedure for the purchase of new fixed assets, including written authority, work order,
voucher
and other relevant evidence.
(h) Regular review of adequate security arrangements.
(i) Periodic inspection of assets is done or not.
(j) Regular review of insurance cover requirements over fixed assets.
(ii) Assets Register: To review the registers and records of plant, machinery, etc. showing clearly the date of
purchase of assets, cost price, location, depreciation charged, etc.
(iii) Cost Report and Journal Register: To review the cost relating to each plant and machinery and to verify
items which have been capitalised.
(iv) Code Register: To see that each item of plant and machinery has been given a distinct code number to
facilitate identification and verify the maintenance of Code Register.
(v) Physical Verification: To see physical verification has been conducted at frequent intervals.
(vi) Movement Register: To verify (a) whether Movement Register for movable equipments and (b) log
books in case of vehicles, etc. are being maintained properly.
(vii) Assets Disposal Register: To review whether assets have been disposed off after proper technical and
financial advice and sales/disposal/retirement, etc. of these assets are governed by authorisation, sales
memos or other appropriate documents.
(viii) Spare Parts Register: To examine the maintenance of a separate register of tools, spare parts for each
plant and machinery.
(ix) Review of Maintenance: To scrutinise the programme for an actual periodical servicing and overhauling
of machines and to examine the extent of utilisation of maintenance department services.
(x) Review of Obsolescence: To scrutinise whether expert’s opinion have been obtained from time to time
to ensure purchase of technically most useful efficient and advanced machinery after a thorough study.
703

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
(xi) Review of R&D: To review R&D activity and ascertain the extent of its relevance to the operations of
the organisation, maintenance of machinery efficiency and prevention of early obsolescence.
36. M/s Raka & Co., Chartered Accountants have been approached by Abhinandan Ltd., a company
engaged in iron and steel manufacturing industry. The Company has been facing following operational
issues:
(a) Penal interest for delayed payments to the overseas vendors despite having enough cash flows; and
(b) Despite having regular production and enough inventory, delays in shipping the final goods to the
customers leading to its deteriorating vendor rating.
As a partner of M/s Raka & Co., through detailed discussion with the Senior Manager of Abhinandan Ltd.,
you have concluded that all these delays are because of long decision-making cycles in the Company. As
a consultant to the Company, would you recommend Management Audit or Operational Audit? (rtp- july
2021)
ANSWER
“Quality of operations”.
Management audit is the “Audit of management” while the operational audit is the “Audit for the
management”. The focus of Management Audit is on “Quality of Decision Making” rather than the
effectiveness or efficiency of operations.
The basic difference between the two audits, then, is not in method, but in the level of appraisal.
In a management audit, the auditor is to make his tests to the level of top management, its
formulation of objectives, plans and policies and its decision making. It is not that he just verifies the
operations of control and procedures and fulfilment of plans in conformity with the prescribed policies.
Since, the delays in payments and consequent penal interest payments and the delays in shipping and the
consequent deteriorating vendor ratings are happening because of the delays in decision-making process
of the management of Abhinandan Ltd. Therefore, it appears that this is not just an internal control or
operational issue but an issue of management process.
Therefore, Management Audit would be recommended in this case
37. You are the audit manager of Ranker & Co are responsible for the audit work to be managed for the
fixed assets of the company. Ranker & Co has 5 properties amounting to Rs.11.5 crore. One of the
important tasks ahead for you is to confirm the ownership of these properties.
Which of the following would provide the most persuasive evidence of the ownership?
(a) To conduct a physical inspection of all the properties located at different areas.
(b) To ask the management registration documents of these properties and inspect and verify them.
(c) To check whether all the properties are recorded properly in the fixed asset register and depreciation
has been calculated correctly.
(d) Enquire with the management if these properties are insured and review the insurance
documentation.
704

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
ANSWER- b
38. The management of Amazon, a manufacturing unit does not accept the recommendations for
improvements made by the Operational Auditor. Suggest an alternative way to tackle the hostile
management. (4 Marks) (mtp nov 20)
ANSWER
Alternative Way to Tackle the Hostile Management: While conducting the operational audit the auditor
has to come across many irregularities and areas where improvement can be made and therefore, he gives
his suggestions and recommendations.
These suggestions and recommendations for improvements may not be accepted by the hostile managers
and in effect there may be cold war between the operational auditor and the managers. This would defeat
the very purpose of the operational audit.
The Participative Approach comes to the help of the auditor. In this approach the auditor discusses the
ideas for improvements with those managers that have to implement them and make them feel that they
have participated in the recommendations made for improvements. By soliciting the views of the operating
personnel, the operational audit becomes a co-operative enterprise.
goal.
The proposed recommendations are discussed with the auditee and modifications as may be agreed upon
are incorporated in the operational audit report. With this attitude of the auditor it becomes absolutely
easy to implement the proposed suggestions as the auditee themselves take initiative for implementing
and the auditor does not have to force any change on the auditee.
Hence, the Operational Auditor of Amazon Manufacturing Unit should adopt the above-mentioned
participative approach to tackle the hostile management of Amazon
39. The firm from which you are pursuing your articleship training is the internal auditor of ABC Ltd.
While conducting the audit of the medical expense reimbursements of the company employees, you
come across some bills which are clearly not medical in nature, and some others which have been
overwritten. During the discussions, the accountant points out that the employee is a functional head
who enjoys a significantly higher medical expense reimbursement limit, and that you should ignore those
bills as the amount is not material. You will: (mtp – I -july 2021)
(a) Accept the explanation and the bills.
(b) Recommend that the claim should be reduced, and clear guidelines should be issued to all employees
on the matter, with a provision for disciplinary action.
(c) Recommend that the employee be asked to submit fresh bills to avail the tax benefit.
(d) Recommend that the employee be taxed on the aggregate amount of the suspect bills.
ANSWER- b
40. The Marketing Department of ISHITA Ltd. has been consistently showing a lower performance
whereas the cost of the department is increasing in spurts over the years. The management believes that
since the marketing department is under a regular radar of the CFO, an audit might result in the
employee hostility. Also, an operational audit of Marketing Department was done two years back
however, the recommendations of the previous audit were not followed by the concerned employees.
705

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
Please advise the management if another audit is the solution and whether only one-time operational
audit is enough? Further, advise on the ways to deal with the employee hostility. (5 Marks) (mtp – I -july
2021)
ANSWER
years. Therefore, the operational audit should be done in the current scenario. However, to deal with the
employee hostility the participative approach of the audit should be adopted.
In this approach the auditor discusses the ideas for improvements with those managers that have to
implement them and make them feel that they have participated in the recommendations made for
improvements. By soliciting the views of the operating personnel, the operational audit becomes a co-
mutual trust.
Team spirit is developed. The auditors and the auditee together try to achieve the common goal. The
proposed recommendations are discussed with the auditee and modifications as may be agreed upon are
incorporated in the operational audit report. With this attitude of the auditor, it becomes absolutely easy
to implement the proposed suggestions as the auditee themselves take initiative for implementing and the
auditor does not have to force any change on the auditee.

One of the objectives of Internal control relating to accounting system is that all transactions are promptly
recorded in an appropriate manner to permit the preparation of financial information and to maintain
accountability of assets. To achieve this objective, certain matters should be ensured by accounting
controls. List down matters to be ensured by accounting controls.
ANSWER
Matters to be ensured by accounting controls -
Basic Accounting Control Objectives: The basic accounting control objectives which are sought to be
achieved by any accounting control system are -
(i) Transactions are executed in accordance with management’s general or specific authorisation;
(ii) Transactions and other events are real & promptly/timely recorded at correct amounts;
(iii) Transactions should be classified in appropriate accounts and in the appropriate period to which it
relates;
(iv) Transactions are properly posted.
(v) Transactions should be recorded in a manner so as to facilitate preparation of financial statements in

accordance with applicable accounting standards, other accounting policies and practices and relevant
statutory requirements;
706

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
(vi) Transactions are properly disclosed.
(vii) Recording of transactions should facilitate maintaining accountability for assets;
(vii) Assets and records are required to be protected from unauthorized access, use or disposition;
(ix) Records of assets, such as sufficient description of the assets (to facilitate identification, its location
should also be maintained, so that the assets could be physically verified periodically.
(x) Transactions are properly summarized.
42. ( MTP-NOV 2021)
Manidhari Ltd. has come across many instances where it could buy products at lesser cost than the actual
procurement price it paid. The management believes that the adequate purchase policy is in place
including the requirements of three quotations from registered vendors, appropriate vendor vetting and
rating mechanism, however, the on-ground implementation of the purchase policy might be defective.
Further, it has observed that there might be some employees involved in choosing the higher cost vendors
as well. The company approaches you to advise the type of audit it should get done: Management or
Operational. Please advise through a comparison between both the audits.
ANSWER
“Quality of operations”. Management audit is the “Audit of management” while the operational audit is
the “Audit for the management”. The focus of Management Audit is on “Quality of Decision Making” rather
than the effectiveness or efficiency of operations.
The basic difference between the two audits, then, is not in method, but in the level of appraisal.
In a management audit, the auditor is to make his tests to the level of top management, its formulation of
objectives, plans and policies and its decision making. It is not that he just verifies the operations of control
and procedures and fulfilment of plans in conformity with the prescribed policies.
Since it is not the Management’s Decisions that are creating the operational bottlenecks. The Purchase
Policy and Procedure seem to be in place, the missing part is the operational implementation by the
process employees. Therefore, the Operational Audit is recommended in this case.
43. ( MTP-NOV 2021)
Employees of MIG Ltd. have to travel frequently for business purposes, so the company entered into a
contract with a Chinmay Travels Ltd. for managing booking, cancellation and other services required by
their employees. As per contract terms, Chinmay travels has to raise its monthly bills for the tickets booked
or cancelled during the period and the same are paid by MIG Ltd. within 15 days of the bill date. The bills
raised by Chinmay travels were of huge amount, so the management of MIG Ltd. decided to get an audit
707

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
qualities the auditor should possess for such audit.
ANSWER
effectiveness, efficiency and economy of operations done by the Chinmay travels for the organisation.
1. In areas beyond accounting and finance, his knowledge ordinarily would be rather scanty, and this is a
reason which should make him even more inquisitive.
able to obtain co-operation of the persons who are involved in the operations. This will itself be a
44 (MAY 2022 EXAM)
XYZ Limited is manufacturer of soaps and cosmetics having business operations in Delhi. XYZ Limited is
planning to expand its operations across India. Before expansion, the top management of XYZ Limited is
willing to· appoint CA T for conducting Management Audit of XYZ Limited. However, the top management
of XYZ Limited is afraid that Management Audit may lead to the breeding of antagonism on the part of the
Company. The top management of XYZ Limited approached CA T and requested to explain them the causes
of antagonism. Help CA T.
ANSWER :
CA. T as the management auditor, is expected to evaluate the effectiveness of controls, the auditees might
fear that the management audit report may create their incompetent impression on the top management
of XYZ Limited. Therefore, the management audit may lead to the breeding of antagonism on the part of
the auditees. Causes of antagonism are as under:
i. Fear of criticism stemming from adverse audit findings.
ii. Fear of changes in day-today working habits because of changes resulting from audit
recommendations.
708
iii. Punitive action by superiors prompted by reported deficiencies.


for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
iv. Insensitive audit practices - reports which are overly critical, reports which focus on deficiencies only,
the air of mystery cloaking some audits, and the perception that auditors gain personally from reporting
deficiencies.
v. Hostile audit style - a cold and distant aspect is a lack of understanding of the auditee’s problems, an
absence of empathy, an air of smugness or superiority, an excessive concentration on insignificant errors, a
prosecutional tone when asking questions, and a greater concern with parading defects than helping
constructively to improve conditions.
45 (OCT 2022 MTP)
ABC Pvt Ltd was involved in the business of manufacturing pipes and holdings. For financial year 2020-21
the company had the following turnover from its various segments and product:
Segment Name Turnover Profit

Steel / Iron Pipe Manufacturing 140 Crore 10 Crore
Holdings and Civil Structure Accessories 25 Crore 50 Lakh
PVC / Yellow Pipe Manufacturing 65 Crore 8 Crore
During Financial Year 2021-22, the company’s performance was considerably lower compared to FY 2020-
21 due to competition and high prices. Turnover and Profit of the company for FY 2021-22 is given
hereunder:
Segment Name Turnover Profit

Steel / Iron Pipe Manufacturing 60 Crore 2 Crore
Holdings and Civil Structure Accessories 15 Crore 35 Lakh
PVC / Yellow Pipe Manufacturing 35 Crore 3 Crore
The company was fully financed through its own capital during both years. Kindly assess whether the
company was required to appoint internal auditor as per section 138 read with Rule 13 of the Companies
(Accounts) Rules, 2014 for FY 2021-22.
ANSWER :
As per section 138 of the Companies Act, 2013, such class or classes of companies as may be prescribed
shall be required to appoint an internal auditor, who shall either be a chartered accountant or a cost
accountant, or such other professional as may be decided by the Board to conduct an internal audit of the
functions and activities of the company.
As per Rule 13 of the Companies (Accounts) Rules, 2014, the following class of companies shall be required
to appoint an internal auditor which may be either an individual or a partnership firm or a body corporate,
namely:
• every listed company.
• every unlisted public company having-

709

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
o paid up share capital of fifty crore rupees or more during the preceding financial year; or
o turnover of two hundred crore rupees or more during the preceding financial year; or
o outstanding loans or borrowings from banks or public financial institutions exceeding one hundred
o outstanding deposits of twenty-five crore rupees or more at any point of time during the preceding
financial year; and
• every private company having-
o turnover of two hundred crore rupees or more during the preceding financial year; or
o outstanding loans or borrowings from banks or public financial institutions exceeding one hundred
crore rupees or more at any point time during the preceding financial year:
In the current scenario, the company is a private limited company with having turnover of ₹ 230 Crore in FY
2020-21 and ₹ 110 Crore in FY 2021-22. As per Rule 13, every private company with a turnover of two
hundred crore rupees or more during the preceding financial year must appoint an internal auditor who
may be either an individual, a partnership firm or a body corporate. Hence, ABC Pvt Ltd is required to
appoint Internal Audit for FY 2021 -22.
46 (OCT 2022MTP)
Employees of SIDHA Ltd. have to travel frequently for business purposes, so the company entered into a
contract with SIDHACHAL Travels Ltd. for managing booking, cancellation and other services required by
their employees. As per contract terms, SIDHACHAL travels has to raise its monthly bills for the tickets
booked or cancelled during the period and the same are paid by SIDHA Ltd. within 18 days of the bill date.
The bills raised by SIDHACHAL travels were of huge amount, so the management of SIDHA Ltd. decided to
get an audit conducted of the process followed for booking/ cancellation of tickets and verify the accuracy
of bills raised by the travel agency. Which audit do you feel the management should opt for?
(a) Internal audit, as it relates to examining the operational efficiency of the organisation.
(c) Performance audit, so as to assess the performance of the SIDHACHAL travels appointed by the
organisation.
efficiency and economy of operations done by the SIDHACHAL travels for the organisation.
ANSWER : ( D )
47(SEPT 2022 MTP)
Employees of BIG Ltd. have to travel frequently for business purposes, so the company entered into a
contract with a Chinmay Travels Ltd. for managing booking, cancellation and other services required by
their employees. As per contract terms, Chinmay travels has to raise its monthly bills for the tickets booked
710
or cancelled during the period and the same are paid by BIG Ltd. within 15 days of the bill date. The bills

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
raised by Chinmay travels were of huge amount, so the management of BIG Ltd. decided to get an audit
qualities the auditor should possess for such audit.
ANSWER :
effectiveness, efficiency and economy of operations done by the Chinmay travels for the organisation.
1. In areas beyond accounting and finance, his knowledge ordinarily would be rather scanty, and this is
a reason which should make him even more inquisitive.
2. He should ask the who, why, how of everything. He should try to visualise whether simpler
alternative means are available to do a particular work.
3. He should try to see everything as to whether that properly fits in the business frame and
organisational policy. He should be persistent and should possess an attitude of skepticism.
5. If the auditor succeeds in giving a feeling of help and assistance through constructive criticism, he
will be able to obtain co-operation of the persons who are involved in the operations. This will itself be a
48(MARCH 2022MTP)
Moksh Ltd. is a manufacturing company and started its business in the year 2000. The net profit after tax of
the company was 15% up to the financial year 2019-20, but for the financial year 2020- 21 and 2021-22 the
company’s profit declined even when there was increase in the sales and production of goods by the
company. So, the management of AS Ltd. felt a need to get the management audit conducted with the
objective of detecting and overcoming current managerial deficiencies. Briefly discuss the steps to prepare
the management audit report.(5 Marks)
ANSWER :
Steps to Prepare the Management Audit Report:
Planning the Audit Report - Before starting the report, the auditor should ask himself, “What do I want to
tell the reader about this audit?” The answer will enable him to communicate effectively.
Supporting information - The management auditor should supplement his report with appropriate audit
evidence which sufficiently and convincingly supports the conclusions.
711

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
Preparing draft report - Before writing the final report, the auditor should prepare a draft report. This
would help him in finding out the most effective manner of presenting his report. It would also indicate
whether there is any superfluous information or a gap in reasoning.
Writing and issuing the final report - The final report should be written only when the auditor is completely
satisfied with the draft report. The head of the management auditing department may review and approve
the final report. Before issuing the final report, the auditor should discuss conclusions and
recommendations at appropriate levels of management. The report should be duly signed and dated.
Follow-up of the audit report - The management auditor should review whether follow-up action is taken
by management on the basis of his report. If no action is taken within a reasonable time, he should draw
management’s attention to it.
Action / Response of Management on Audit Report: Where management has not acted upon his
suggestions or not implemented his recommendations, the auditor should ascertain the reasons thereof. In
cases where he finds that non-implementation is due to a gap in communication, he should initiate further
discussions to bridge such gaps. The actions and responses to the Management Audit Report reflect
management’s attitude to the audit. In any case, the auditor to retain the usefulness of the audit function
should ascertain from the management, preferably in writing, the reasons for non- implementation. It is
possible that because of change in circumstances, the audit observation did not require any action on the
part of the management. The auditor should satisfy himself on the appropriateness of such reasons as well
to close the issue.
49(MARCH 2022 MTP)
Employees of Star Ltd. have to travel frequently for business purposes, so the company entered into a
contract with a Sudarshan Travels Ltd. for managing booking, cancellation and other services required by
their employees. As per contract terms, Sudarshan travels has to raise its monthly bills for the tickets
booked or cancelled during the period and the same are paid by Star Ltd. within 15 days of the bill date.
The bills raised by Sudarshan travels were of huge amount, so the management of Star Ltd. decided to get
an audit conducted of the process followed for booking/ cancellation of tickets and verify the accuracy of
bills raised by the travel agency. Which audit do you feel the management should opt for?
(a) Internal audit, as it relates to examine the operational efficiency of the organisation.
(c) Performance audit so as to assess the performance of the Sudarshan travels appointed by the
organisation.
efficiency and economy of operations done by the Sudarshan travels for the organisation
ANSWER : ( D )
50(APRIL 2022 MTP)
The Marketing Department of Charitra Ltd. has been consistently showing a lower performance whereas
the cost of the department is increasing in spurts over the years. The management believes that since the
712

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
marketing department is under a regular radar of the CFO, an audit might result in the employee hostility.
Also, an operational audit of Marketing Department was done two years back however, the
recommendations of the previous audit were not followed by the concerned employees. Please advise the
management if another audit is the solution and whether only one-time operational audit is enough?
Further, advise on the ways to deal with the employee hostility. (4 Marks)
ANSWER :
The continuous improvement cycle of Operational Audit can be depicted through
Plan, Do, Check and Act diagram.
years. Therefore, the operational audit should be done in the current scenario. However, to deal with the
employee hostility the participative approach of the audit should be adopted:
In this approach the auditor discusses the ideas for improvements with those managers that have to
implement them and make them feel that they have participated in the recommendations made for
improvements. By soliciting the views of the operating personnel, the operational audit becomes a co-
goal. The proposed recommendations are discussed with the auditee and modifications as may be agreed
upon are incorporated in the operational audit report. With this attitude of the auditor, it becomes
absolutely easy to implement the proposed suggestions as the auditee themselves take initiative for
implementing and the auditor does not have to force any change on the auditee.
51(MAY 2022 RTP)
One of the independent directors sought information regarding the appointment of internal auditors for
following Group Companies in accordance with the Companies Act, 2013 of which certain Financial
Information are given below:
713
Figures are in Rs. crore and correspond to the previous year.


for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
Name Nature Equity Share Turnover Loan from Public

Capital Bank and PFI Deposits
AADI Ltd. Listed 100 190 50 24
AJIT Ltd. Unlisted Public 60 190 50 24
NEMI Ltd. Unlisted Private 60 190 50 -
You are required to evaluate the requirements of the Companies Act, 2013 regarding the appointment of
internal Auditors for the Group Companies. Discuss.
ANSWER :
Applicability of Provisions of Internal Audit: As per section 138 of the Companies Act, 2013, following class
of companies (prescribed in Rule 13 of Companies (Accounts) Rules, 2014) shall be required to appoint an
internal auditor or a firm of internal auditors, namely:-
(A) every listed company;
(B) every unlisted public company having-
(1) paid up share capital of fifty crore rupees or more during the preceding financial year; or
(4) outstanding deposits of twenty five crore rupees or more at any point of time during the preceding
financial year; and
(C) every private company having-
(2) outstanding loans or borrowings from banks or public financial institutions
exceeding one hundred crore rupees or more at any point of time during the preceding financial year.
In the given case, AADI Ltd. is a listed company. As per section 138 of the Companies Act, 2013, every listed
company is required to appoint an internal auditor or a firm of internal auditors. Thus, in view of the above,
AADI Ltd. is required to appoint an internal auditor.
Further, AJIT Ltd. is unlisted public company. The company is having Rs. 60 crore as equity share capital
which is exceeding the prescribed limit of rupees fifty crore as per section 138. Thus, AJIT Ltd. is required to
appoint an internal auditor as per section 138 of the Companies Act, 2013.
NEMI Ltd. is unlisted private company and having Rs. 60 crore as equity share capital,
Rs. 190 crore as turnover and Rs. 50 crore loan from Bank and PFI. In view of provisions of section 138 of
the Companies Act, 2013 discussed above, all the limits are below the prescribed limit for a private
company. Therefore, NEMI Ltd. is not required to appoint an internal auditor.
714

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
It can be concluded that AADI Ltd. and AJIT Ltd. is required to appoint the internal auditor as per the
provisions of the Companies Act, 2013 whereas NEMI Ltd. is not required to do the same.
715

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
DUE DILIGENCE
MTP Apr 2019 Qn no 15 2 Marks
1.Yellow Steels Ltd. was engaged in the business of manufacturing and selling steel products. The
company was having sales offices at different locations in and outside India. The company decided to
have a sales office at Kanpur on their own land. A Managing Committee of some officers from the
companywas formed in order to get a building constructed at land in Kanpur. Budget of Rs.35 crores
was approved bythe company for the same and it was proposed to complete the construction within
two years. Rs. 32 crores were already released by the companywithin a year of start of the project and
the managing committee raised a demand for Rs. 5 crores for further payments to vendors. The
management of Yellow Steels wants to get the verification done of all the expenses incurred on site
and identify the reasons for increase in construction cost. Which of the following will suffice the
purpose of management?
a) The management should go for operational audit, as it will evaluate the effectiveness, efficiency
and economy of operations done at the construction site.
b) The management should get a Forensic Audit done in order to rule out any possibility of fraud or
any other financial crime.
c) A Financial Due Diligence is required to be done as no fraud has been reported and the management
just want to analyse the books of accounts and other financial matters pertaining to financial matters
at site.
716

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
d) A management audit should be done to ensure that the increase in cost of construction is not due
to any discrepancies in the formulation of objectives, plans and policies of the top management.
Answer:C A Financial Due Diligence is required to be done as no fraud has been reported and the
management just want to analyse the books of accounts and other financial matters pertaining to
financial matters at site.
2.MAY 2018 3(d) 5 Marks, (RTP NOV 2020) ( MTP- NOV 2021)
KDK Bank Ltd., received an application from a pharmaceutical company for take over of their
outstanding term loans secured on its assets, availed from and outstanding with a nationalised
bank. KDK Bank Ltd., requires you to make a due diligence audit in the areas of assets of
pharmaceutical company especially with reference to valuation aspect of assets. State what may
be your areas of analysis in order to ensure that the assets are not stated at overvalued amounts.
ANSWER
Over-Valued Assets: In case of due diligence exercise, the area of analysis in order to ensure that
the assets are not stated at over-valued amounts are:
• Uncollected/uncollectable receivables.
• Obsolete, slow non-moving inventories or inventories valued above NRV; huge inventories of
packing materials etc. with name of company.
• Underused or obsolete Plant and Machinery and their spares; asset values which have been impaired
due to sudden fall in market value etc.
• Assets carried at much more than current market value due to capitalization of expenditure/foreign
exchange fluctuation, or capitalization of expenditure mainly in the nature of revenue.
• Litigated assets and property.
• Investments carried at cost though realizable value is much lower.
• Investments carrying a very low rate of income / return.
• Infructuous project expenditure/deferred revenue expenditure etc.
• Group Company balances not reconciled.
• Intangibles having no reliasable value
A German Company engaged in the business of manufacturing and distribution of industrial gases,
is interested in acquiring a listed Indian Company having a market share of more than 65% of the
industrial gas business in India, request you to conduct a “Due Diligence” of this Indian Company
and submit your Report. As due Diligence Auditor, discuss the key areas you will cover in your
717
review.

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
Answer:
Due Diligence – Key Areas: The German company engaged in the business of manufacturing and
distribution of industrial gases wishing to acquire a listed Indian company has commissioned the Due
Diligence Audit to assess the strengths and weaknesses of this company. It is quite important for the
acquirer to assess the proposal from different angles and specifically as per terms of the assignment
and also see whether proposed merger would create operational synergies. On the other hand,
financial due diligence review would be performed after the commercial valuation.
Accordingly, while a preliminary review might be performed during initial stages of the restructuring
exercise and may in fact, be performed simultaneously with the commercial evaluation, at a later
stage, financial due diligence may be performed on the books of account and other information
directly pertaining to the financial matters of the entity.
In addition, a legal due diligence may be required where legal aspects of functioning of the entities
are reviewed; for example, the lega l aspects of property owned by the entity or compliance with
various statutory requirements under various laws. Like other due diligence exercises, environmental
and personnel due diligence are also carried out in order to establish whether various propositions
with regard to environment and personnel of the enterprise under review are appropriate. In any
case, it is quite important to look behind the veil of initial information provided by the company and
to assess the benefits and costs of the proposed acquisition/merger by inquiring into all relevant
aspects of the past, present and future of the business to be acquired. Some of the significant key
areas which shall be covered under the review are as under.
(1) Historical Background: The accountant should begin the financial due diligence review by looking
into the history of the company and the background of the promoters. The details of how the
company was set up and who were the original promoters have to be gone into, before verification
of financial data in detail. An eye into the history of the company may reveal its turning points,
survival strategies adopted from time to time, the market share enjoyed by and changes therein,
product life cycle and adequacy of resources. It could also help the accountant in determining
whether, in the past, any regulatory requirements have had an impact on the business of the said
company. This could, inter alia, include the nature of business(es), location of production facilities,
warehouses, offices, products or services and markets.
(2) Significant Accounting Policies: The accountant should study the accounting policies being followed
by the target and ascertain whether any accounting policy is inappropriate.The accountant should
also see the effects of the recent changes in the accounting policies. The
target might have changed its accounting policies in the recent past keeping in view its intention of
offering itself for sale.
The overall scope has to be based on the accounting policies adopted by the management. The
accountant has to look at the main effect of accounting policies on the overall profitability and their
correctness. It is reiterated that the accountant should mainly look at all material changes in Accounting
Policies in the period subjected to review very carefully.
The accountant's report should include a summary of significant accounting policies used by the target,
that changes that have been made to the accounting policies in the recent past, the areas in which
accounting policies followed by the target are different from those adopted by the acquiring
718
enterprise, the effect of such differences.

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
(3) Review of Financial Statements: An evaluation of the profit reported by the company would be
largely based upon its operating results. Any extraordinary item of income or expense that might have
affected the operating results would require close examination. It is advisable to compare the actual
figures with the budgeted figures for the period under review and those of the previous accounting
period. It is important that the trading results for the past four to five years are compared and the
trend of normal operating profit arrived at. The normal operating profits should further be
benchmarked against other similar companies. Besides the above, and based on the trend of
operating results, the accountant has to advise the acquiring enterprise, through due diligence
report, on the indicative valuation of the business.
The exercise to evaluate the balance sheet of the company has to take into consideration the basis
upon which assets have been valued and liabilities have been recognised. The net worth of the
business has to be arrived at by taking into account the impact of over/under valuation of assets and
liabilities.
(4) Taxation - Tax due diligence is a separate due diligence exercise but since it is an integral component
of the financial status of a company, it is generally included in the financial due diligence. It is
important to check if the company is regular in paying various taxes to the Government. The
accountant has to also look at the tax effects of the merger or acquisition.
(5) Cash Flow: A review of historical cash flows and their pattern would reflect the cash generating
abilities of the target company and should highlight the major trends. It is important to know if the
company is able to meet its cash requirements through internal accruals or does it have to seek
external help from time to time. It is necessary to check that:
(a) Is the company able to honour its commitments to its trade payables, to the banks, to government
and other stakeholders
(b) How well is the company able to turn its trade receivables and inventories
(c) How well does it deploy its funds
(d) Are there any funds lying idle or is the company able to reap maximum benefits out of the available
funds?
(6) Financial Projections: The accountant should obtain from the target company the projections for
the next five years with detailed assumptions and workings. He should ask the target to give
projections on optimistic, pessimistic and most likely bases.
Management and Employees - In most of the companies which are available for take over the problem
of excess work force is often witnessed. It is important to work out how much of the labour force has
to be retained. It is also important to judge the job profile of the administrative and managerial staff
to gauge which of these match the requirements of the new incumbents. Due to complex set of labour
laws applicable to them, companies often have to face protracted litigation from its workforce and it
is important to gauge the likely impact of such litigation. The aspects whether all employee benefits
like PF, Gratuity, ESI and superannuation have been properly paid/funded. The pay packages of the key
employees will be thoroughly reviewed since this can be a crucial factor in future employee costs.
(7) Statutory Compliance: During a due diligence this is one aspect that has to be investigated in detail.
It is important therefore, to make a list of laws that are applicable to the entity as well as to make
719
a checklist of compliance required from the company under those laws. If the company has not been

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
regular in its legal compliance it could lead to punitive charges under the law. These may have to be
quantified and factored into the financial results of the company.
4.MTP-Mar 2019 Qn No 5(b) 4 Marks:
A Ltd who is one of the leading manufacturer of kids clothing is interested to acquire B Ltd. B Ltd
is currently a manufacturer of women’ clothing. As a professional consultant in due diligence and
valuation, A Ltd entrusted you to value B Ltd. The valuation of B Ltd is dependent on future
maintainable sales. Discuss the factors you would consider in assessing the future maintainable
turnover of B Ltd?
Answer:
In assessing the turnover which the business would be able to maintain in the future, the following
factors should be taken into account:
(i) Trend: Whether in the past, sales have been increasing consistently or they have been fluctuating. A
proper study of this phenomenon should be made.
(ii) Marketability: Is it possible to extend the sales into new markets or that these have been fully
exploited? Product wise estimation should be made.
(iii) Political and economic considerations: Are the policies pursued by the Government likely to promote
the extension of the market for goods to other countries? Whether the sales in the home market are
likely to increase or decrease as a result of various emerging economic trends?
(iv) Competition: What is the likely effect on the business if other manufacturers enter the same field or
if products which would sell in competition are placed on the market at cheaper price? Is the demand
for competing products increasing? Is the company’s share in the total trade constant or has it been
fluctuating?

5. ZARI & Associates is a partnership firm and has been in existence for the last 15 years. The firm is
engaged in consultancy business related to various areas and has built a good name for itself over the
period.
Some of the clients of the firm are very old who have been continuing since its existence. The business
of the firm has gone through various phases some of them were very bad. But currently the business
is going very well and the firm is looking to expand its operations into different geographies. For this,
the firm’s management decided that some of its senior partners will move to new offices and new
partners would be inducted.
A team of new partners is in discussion with the senior old partners regarding their joining the firm.
The new partners would be interested to know whether the terms offered to them are reasonable
having regard to the nature of the business, profit records, capital distribution, personal capacity of
720
the existing partners, socio-economic setting etc. and whether they would be able to derive

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
continuing benefits in the shape of return of capital to be contributed and remuneration of services
to be offered. In addition, they also want to ascertain whether the capital to be contributed by them
would be safe and applied usefully or not.
For this purpose, an investigation of the business of the firm was set up on behalf of these new
partners.
At the time of scrutiny of the record of profitability of the firm’s business, the investigating acc ountant
picked up records of last 4-5 years wherein he observed 2 years which were unusual because the
profits during those 2 years were highly erratic and fluctuating. The investigating accountant,
therefore, went into the profits of last 7-8 years to iron out the fluctuation. He also examined the
provisions of the partnership deed particularly the composition of partners, their capital contribution,
drawing rights, retirement benefits and goodwill. He also asked for details of jobs/ contracts in hand
and the range of current clientele of the firm for his examination. Some of these procedures of the
investigating accountant were not found appropriate by the senior partners of the firm and they
advised the investigating accountant not to go beyond his scope. In the given situation, which of the
following is correct:
a. The investigating accountant should not have asked for the records of the profits of last 7 -8 years
as that would be too much of the information for his review. Also the details of jobs/ contracts in
hand and the range of current clientele of the firm are confidential and hence does not get covered
in his scope.
b. After finding 2 years which were unusual because the profits during those 2 years were highly
erratic and fluctuating, the investigating accountant should have reported the matter to the new
partners instead of asking for more details related to the profits of last 7-8 years. Also he is not
required to examine the provisions of the partnership deed as these details would have already
been discussed with the new partners and they would have checked that.
c. The procedures of the investigating accountant looks completely reasonable considering his scope
of work. Further, no changes are required in his work approach.
d. At the outset, it can be said that investigation in the given case was not required. However, even if
the new partners decided to carry out the investigation it should have been limited to mainly inquiry
procedures by the investigating accountant. The investigating accountant could have also reviewed
the manner of computation of goodwill which doesn’t seem to have been performed on the basis
of the above mentioned facts.
Answer: (c) The procedures of the investigating accountant looks completely reasonable considering his scope
of work. Further, no changes are required in his work approach.
MTP Mar 2018 3(b) 5 Marks RTP May 2020 Qn no 18
6. A nationalised bank received an application from an export company seeking sanction of a term
loan to expand the existing sea food processing plant. In this connection, the General Manager, who
is in charge of Advances, approaches you to conduct a thorough investigation of this limited
company and submit a confidential report based on which he will decide whether to sanction this
721
loan or not. Decide the points you will cover in your investigation before submitting your report to
the General Manager.

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
AMSWER
Steps involved in the verification of assets and liabilities included in the Balance Sheet of the borrower
company which has been furnished to the Bank - The investigating accountant should prepare schedules of
assets and liabilities of the borrower and include in the particulars stated below:
(a) Fixed assets - A full description of each asset its gross value, the rate at which depreciation has been charged
and the total depreciation written off. In case the rate at which depreciation has been adjusted is inadequate,
the fact should be stated. In case any asset is encumbered, the amount of the charge and its nature should be
disclosed. In case an asset has been revalued recently, the amount by which the value of the asset has been
decreased or increased on revaluation should be stated along with the date of revaluation. If considered
necessary, he may also comment on the revaluation and its basis.
(b) Inventory - The value of different types of inventories held (raw materials, work-in-progress and finished
goods) and the basis on which these have been valued.
Details as regards the nature and composition of finished goods should be disclosed. Slow-moving or obsolete
items should be separately stated along with the amounts of allowances, if any, made in their valuation. For
assessing redundancy, the changes that have occurred in important items of inventory subsequent to the date
of the Balance Sheet, either due to conversion into finished goods or sale, should be considered.
If any inventory has been pledged as a security for a loan the amount of loan should be disclosed.
(c) Trade Receivables, including bills receivable - Their composition should be disclosed to indicate the nature of
different types of debts that are outstanding for recovery; also whether the debts were being collected within the
period of credit as well as the fact whether any debts are considered bad or doubtful and the provision if any, that
has been made against them.
(d) Investments - The schedule of investments should be prepared. It should disclose the date of purchase, cost
and the nominal and market value of each investment. If any investment is pledged as security for a loan, full
particulars of the loan should be given.
(e) Secured and Unsecured Loans - Debentures and other secured loans should be included together in a
separate schedule. Against the debentures and each secured loan, the amounts outstanding for payments along
with due dates of payment should be shown. In case any debentures have been issued as a collateral security,
the fact should be stated. Particulars of assets pledged or those on which a charge has been created for re-
payment of a liability should be disclosed. Details of loans proposed to be obtained from Promoters/ Directors/
Related Parties should be stated separately. In case any unsecured loan is to be repaid prior to repayment of
Bank loan, its terms and conditions should be verified.
(f) Provision of Taxation - The previous year’s up to which taxes have been assessed or assessment order
received should be ascertained. If provision for taxes not assessed appears to be inadequate, the fact should be
stated along with the extent of the shortfall.
(g) Other Liabilities - It should be stated whether all the liabilities, actual and contingent, are correctly disclosed.
Also, an analysis according to ages of trade payables should be given to show that the company has been
meeting its obligations in time and has not been depending on trade credit for its working capital requirements.
(h) Insurance - A schedule of insurance policies giving details of risks covered, the date of payment of last
premiums and their value should be attached as an annexure to the statements of assets, together with a report
as to whether or not the insurance-cover appears to be adequate, having regard to the value of assets.
(i) Contingent Liabilities - By making direct enquiries from the borrower company, from members of its staff,
722
perusal of the files of parties to whom any loan has been advanced for example, those of machinery suppliers and

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
the legal adviser. The investigating accountant should ascertain particulars of any contingent liabilities which have
not been disclosed. In case, there are any, these should be included in a schedule and attached to the report.
RTP Nov 18 Qn no 18
A nationalised bank received an application from an export company seeking sanction of a term
loan to expand the existing sea food processing plant. In this connection, the General Manager, who
is in charge of Advances, approaches you to conduct a thorough investigation of this limited company
and submit a confidential report based on which he will decide whether to sanction this loan or not.
List out the points you will cover in your investigation before submitting your report to the General
Manager.
ANSWER
Investigation on Behalf of the Bank for Advances: A bank is primarily interested in knowing the
purpose for which a loan is required, the sources from which it would be repaid and the security that
would be available to it, if the borrower fails to pay back the loan. On these considerations, the
investigating accountant, in the course of his enquiry, should attempt to collect information on
the under mentioned points:
(i) The purpose for which the loan is required and the manner in which the borrower proposes to invest
the amount of the loan.
(ii) The schedule of repayment of loan submitted by the borrower, particularly the assumptions made
therein as regards amounts of profits that will be earned in cash and the amount of cash that would
be available for the repayment of loan to confirm that they are reasonable and valid in the
circumstances of the case. Institutional lenders now-a-days rely more for payment of loans on the
reliability of annual profits and loss on the values of assets mortgaged to them.
(iii) The financial standing and reputation for business integrity enjoyed by directors and officers of the
company.
(iv) Whether the company is authorised by the Memorandum or the Articles of As- sociation to borrow
money for the purpose for which the loan will be used.
(v) The history of growth and development of the company and its performance during the past 5 years.
(vi) How the economic position of the company would be affected by economic, political and social
changes that are likely to take place during the period of loan.
To investigate the profitability of the business for judging the accuracy of the schedule of repayment
furnished by the borrower, as well as the value of the security in the form of assets of the business
already possessed and those which will be created out of the loan, the investigating accountant
should take the under - mentioned steps:
(a) Prepare a condensed income statement from the Statement of Profit and Loss for the previous five
years, showing separately therein various items of income and expenses, the amounts of gross and
net profits earned and taxes paid annually during each of the five years. The amount of maintainable
profits determined on the basis of foregoing statement should be increased by the amount by which
these would increase on the investment of borrowed funds.
723
(b) Compute the under-mentioned ratios separately and then include them in the statement to show

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
the trend as well as changes that have taken place in the financial position of the company:
(i) Sales to Average Inventories held.
(ii) Sales to Fixed Assets.
(iii) Equity to Fixed Assets.
(iv) Current Assets to Current Liabilities.
(v) Quick Assets (the current assets that are readily realisable) to Quick Liabilities.
(vi) Equity to Long Term Loans.
(vii) Sales to Book Debts.
(viii) Return on Capital Employed.
(c) Enter in a separate part of the statement the break-up of annual sales product- wise to show their
trend.
Steps involved in the verification of assets and liabilities included in the Balance Sheet of the
borrower company which has been furnished to the Bank- The investigating accountant should
prepare schedules of assets and liabilities of the borrower and include in the particulars stated below:
(1) Fixed assets - A full description of each item, its gross value, the rate at which depreciation has been
charged and the total depreciation written off. In case the rate at which depreciation has been
adjusted is inadequate, the fact should be stated. In case any asset is encumbered, the amount of
the charge and its nature should be disclosed. In case an asset has been revalued recently, the
amount by which the value of the asset has been decreased or increased on revaluation should be
stated along with the date of revaluation. If considered necessary, he may also comment on the
revaluation and its basis.
(2) Inventory - The value of different types of inventories held (raw materials, work-in-progress and
finished goods) and the basis on which these have been valued.
Details as regards the nature and composition of finished goods should be disclosed. Slow-moving
or obsolete items should be separately stated along with the amounts of allowances, if any, made
in their valuation. For assessing redundancy, the changes that have occurred in important items of
inventory subsequent to the date of the Balance Sheet, either due to conversion into finished goods
or sale, should be considered.
(3) Trade Receivables, including bills receivable - Their composition should be disclosed to indicate the
nature of different types of debts that are outstanding for recovery; also whether the debts were
being collected within the period of credit as well as the fact whether any debts are considered bad
or doubtful and the provision if any, that has been made against them.
Further, the total amount outstanding at the close of the period should be segregated as follows:
(i) debts due in respect of which the period of credit has not expired;
(ii) debts due within six months; and
(iii) debts due but not recovered for over six months.
724
If any debts are due from directors or other officers or employees of the company, the particulars

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
thereof should be stated. Amounts due from subsidiary and affiliated concerns, as well as those
considered abnormal should be disclosed. The recoveries out of various debts subsequent to the
date of the Balance sheet should be stated.
(4) Investments - The schedule of investments should be prepared. It should disclose the date of
purchase, cost and the nominal and market value of each investment. If any investment is pledged
as security for a loan, full particulars of the loan should be given.
(5) Secured Loans - Debentures and other loans should be included together in a separate schedule.
Against the debentures and each secured loan, the amounts outstanding for payments along with
due dates of payment should be shown. In case any debentures have been issued as a collateral
security, the fact should be stated. Particulars of assets pledged or those on which a charge has been
created for re-payment of a liability should be disclosed.
(6) Provision of Taxation - The previous years up to which taxes have been assessed should be
ascertained. If provision for taxes not assessed appears in be inadequate, the fact should be stated
along with the extent of the shortfall.
(7) Other Liabilities - It should be stated whether all the liabilities, actual and contingent, are correctly
disclosed. Also, an analysis according to ages of trade payables should be given to show that the
company has been meeting its obligations in time and has not been depending on trade credit for its
working capital requirements.
(8) Insurance - A schedule of insurance policies giving details of risks covered, the date of payment of
last premiums and their value should be attached as an annexure to the statements of assets,
together with a report as to whether or not the insurance-cover appears to be adequate, having
regard to the value of assets.
(9) Contingent Liabilities - By making direct enquiries from the borrower company, from members of
its staff, perusal of the files of parties to whom any loan has been advanced those of machinery
suppliers and the legal adviser, for example, the investigating accountant should ascertain
particulars of any contingent liabilities which have not been disclosed. In case, there are any, these
should be included in a schedule and attached to the report. .Finally, the investigating accountant
should ascertain whether any application for loan to another bank or any other party has been
made. If so, the result thereof should be examined.
7.MTP Apr 2018 Qn no.3(b) 5 Marks

Dalal, Banerji and Mallick are partners in a firm sharing profits and losses in the ratio 2:2:1. The partners
have agreed to take Mr. Mistri as a partner with effect from 1st April, 2018 as 1/4 th partner. What are the
important steps involved while conducting investigation on behalf of Mr. Mistri, the incoming partner?
Steps involved while conducting investigation on behalf of an incoming partner: The general
approach of the investigating accountant in this type of investigation would be more or less similar,
irrespective of the nature of business of the firm-manufacturing, trading or rendering a service.
Primarily, an incoming partner would be interested to know whether the terms offered to him are
reasonable having regard to the nature of the business, profit records, capital distribution, personal
capability of the existing partners, socio-economic setting, etc., and whether he would be capable of
725
deriving continuing benefit in the shape of return on capital to be contributed and remuneration for
services to be rendered, which can be justified by the overall economic conditions prevailing and other

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
considerations considering his own personality and achievements. In addition, he would be interested
to ascertain whether the capital to be contributed by him would be safe and applied usefully.
Broadly, the steps involved are the following:
(a) Ascertainment of the history of the inception and growth of the firm.
(b) Study of the provisions of the deed of partnership, particularly for composition of partners, their
capital contribution, drawing rights, retirement benefits, job allocation, financial management,
goodwill, etc.
(c) Scrutiny of the record of profitability of the firm’s business over a suitable number of years, with
usual adjustments that are necessary in ascertaining the true record of business profits. Particular
attention should, however, be paid to the nature of partners’ remuneration, which may be excessive
or inadequate in relation to the nature and profitability of the business, qualification and expertise
of the partners and such other factors as may be relevant.
(d) Examination of the asset and liability position to determine the tangible asset backing for the
partner’s investment, appraisal of the value of intangibles like goodwill, know how, patents, etc.
impending liabilities including contingent liabilities and those for pending tax assessment. In case
of firms rendering services, the question of tangible asset backing usually is not important, provided
the firm’s profit record, business coverage and standing of the partners are of the acceptable order.
(e) Position of orders at hand and the range and quality of clientele should be thoroughly examined,
which the firm is presently operating.
(f) Position and terms of loan finance would call for careful scrutiny to assess its usefulness and
implication for the overall financial position; reason for its absence should be studied.
(g) It would be interesting to study the composition and quality of key personnel employed by the firm
and any likelihood of their leaving the organisation in the near future.
(h) Various important contractual and legal obligations should be ascertained and their nature studied.
It may be the case that the firm has standing agreement with the employees as regards salary and
wages, bonus, gratuity and other incidental benefits. Full import of such standing agreements would
be gauged before a final decision is reached.
(i) Reasons for the offer of admission to a new partner should be ascertained and it should be
determined whether the same synchronises with the retirement of any senior partner whose
association may have had considerable bearing on the firm’s success.
(j) Appraisal of the record of capital employed and the rate of return. It is necessary to have a
comparison with alternative business avenues for investments and evaluation of possible results on
a changed capital and organisation structure, if any, envisaged along with the admission of the
partner.
(k) It would be useful to have a first hand knowledge about the specialisation, if any, attained by the
firm in any of its activities.
(l) Manner of computation of goodwill on admission as also on retirement, if any, should be
ascertained.
(m) Whether any special clause exists in the deed of partnership to allow admission in future of a new
partner, who may be specified, on concessional terms.
726

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
(n) Whether the incomplete contracts which will be transferred to the reconstituted firm will be a
liability or a loss.
It would always be worthwhile to remember that, in a partnership, personal considerations count
predominantly over other considerations and assessment of standing of the firm, standing and reliability
of other partners, their personal reputation and the goodwill enjoyed by the products/services are
important.
On the basis of the broad frame of considerations as given above, the investigating accountant should
devise his own considerations in each case which may be quite diverse. Additional considerations may
come up in the case of service-rendering firms where profit and business record, goodwill of the firm
and of individual partners would assume greater significance.
Again, in the case of industrial firms, the network of customers, their scatter, size, etc., would be relevant
for consideration.

Mr Sharma is reviewing the anti-fraud controls for a construction company. The company has
witnessed a few frauds in the past mainly in the nature of material stolen from the sites and fake
expense vouchers.
Mr. Sharma is evaluating options for verifying the process to reveal fraud and the corrective action to
be taken in such cases. As an expert, you are required to brief Mr. Sharma about the inventory fraud
and verification procedure with respect to defalcation of inventory?
Answer
(i) Employees may simply remove goods from the premises.
(ii) Theft of goods may be concealed by writing them off as damaged goods, etc.
(iii) Inventory records may be manipulated by employees who have committed theft so that book
Verification Procedure for Defalcation of inventory - It may be of trading stock, raw materials,
manufacturing stores, tools or of other similar items (readily) capable of conversion into cash. The loss
may be the result of a theft by an employee once or repeatedly over a long period, when the same have
not been detected. Such thefts usually are possible through collusion among a number of persons.
Therefore, for their detection, the entire system of receipts, storage and despatch of all goods, etc.
should be reviewed to localise the weakness in the system.
The determination of factors which have been responsible for the theft and the establishment of guilt
would be difficult in the absence of:
The first step in such an investigation is to establish the different items of inventory defalcated and their
727
quantities by checking physically the quantities in inventory held and those shown by the Inventory Book.

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
Afterwards, all the receipts and issues of inventory recorded in the Inventory Book should be verified
by reference to entries in the Goods Inward and Outward Registers and the documentary evidence as
regards purchases and sales. This would reveal the particulars of inventory not received but paid for
as well as that issued but not charged to customers. Further, entries in respect of returns, both inward
and outward, recorded in the financial books should be checked with corresponding entries in the
Inventory Book. Also, the totals of the Inventory.
Book should be checked. Finally, the shortages observed on physical verification of inventory should be
reconciled with the discrepancies observed on checking the books in the manner mentioned above. In
the case of an industrial concern, issue of raw materials, stores and tools to the factory and receipts of
manufactured goods in the godown also should be verified with relative source documents.
Defalcations of inventory, sometimes, also are committed by the management, by diverting a part of
production and the consequent shortages in production being adjusted by inflating the wastage in
production; similar defalcations of inventories and stores are covered up by inflating quantities issued
for production. For detecting such shortages, the investigating accountant should take assistance of an
engineer. For that he will be more conversant with factors which are responsible for shortage in
production and thus will be able to correctly determine the extent to which the shortage in production
has been inflated. In this regard, guidance can also be taken from past records showing the extent of
wastage in production in the past. Similarly, he would be able to better judge whether the material
issued for production was excessive and, if so to what extent. The per hour capacity of the machine and
the time that it took to complete one cycle of production, also would show whether the issues have been
larger than those required.

(a) General objective of an audit is to find out whether the financial statements show true and fair
view. On the other hand, investigation implies systematic, critical and special examination of the
records of a business for a specific purpose.
In view of the above, you are required to brief out the difference between Audit and Investigation.
Answer
Etymologically, auditing and investigation are largely overlapping concepts because auditing is
nothing but an investigation used in a broad sense. Both auditing and investigation are fact finding
techniques but their basic nature and objectives differ as regards scope, frequency, basis, thrust, depth
and conclusiveness. Audit and investigation differ in objectives and in their nature. Auditing is general
while investigation is specific.
Basis of Difference Investigation Audit

(i) OAn investigation aims at establishing a fact The main objective of an audit is to
bjor a happening or at assessing a verify whether the financial statements
ecparticular situation. display a true and fair view of the state of affair
ti and the working results of an entity.
v
e
728

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
(ii) ScThe scope of investigation may be governed bThe scope of audit is wide and in case o
ostatute or it may be non- statutory. statutory audit the scope of work is
p determined by the provisions of relevant
e law.
(iii) PThe work is not limited by rigid time frame. It

The audit is carried on either quarterly,
ermay cover several years, as the outcome of half- yearly or yearly.
iothe same is not certain.
di
ci
ty
(iv) Nature Requires a detailed study and examination oInvolves tests checking or sample technique to
facts and figures. draw evidences for forming a judgement and
expression of opinion.
(v) Inherent No inherent limitation owing to its nature of Audit suffers from inherent limitation.
Limitations engagement.
(vi) Evidence It seeks conclusive evidence. Audit is mainly concerned with prima-
facie evidence.
(vii) Observance ofIt is analytical in nature and requires a Is governed by compliance with
Accounting thorough mind capable of observing, generally accepted accounting principles,
Principles collecting and evaluating facts. audit procedures and disclosure
requirements.
(viii) Reporting The outcome is reported to the person(s) onThe outcome is reported to the owners
whose behalf investigation is carried out. of the business entity.
10.Nov 2019 Qn no 6(C) 4 Marks, MTP Oct 2019 Qn no 6(a) 5 Marks
MF. Ltd., engaged in the manufacturing of various products in its factory, is concerned with
shortage in production and there arose suspicion of inventory fraud. You are appointed by MF Ltd.
To evaluate the options for verifying the process to reveal fraud and the corrective action to be
taken.
As an investigating accountant what will be your areas of verification and the procedure to be
followed for verification of defalcation of inventory?
Answer
729

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
❑ Employees may simply remove goods from the premises.

❑ Theft of goods may be concealed by writing them off as damaged goods, etc.
❑ Inventory records may be manipulated by employees who have committed theft so that book
Verification Procedure for Defalcation of inventory - Such thefts usually are possible through collusion
among a number of persons. Therefore, for their detection, the entire system of receipts, storage and
despatch of all goods, etc. should be reviewed to localise the weakness in the system.
The determination of factors which have been responsible for the theft and the establishment of guilt
would be difficult in the absence of:
The step in such an investigation is to establish the different items of inventory defalcated and their
quantities by checking physically the quantities in inventory he ld and those shown by the Inventory
Book.
Defalcations of inventory, sometimes, also are committed by the management, by diverting a part of
production and the consequent shortages in production being adjusted by inflating the wastage in
production; similar defalcations of inventories and stores are covered up by inflating quantities issued
for production. For detecting such shortages, the investigating accountant should take assistance of
an engineer. For that he will be more conversant with factors which are responsible for shortage in
production and thus will be able to correctly determine the extent to which the shortage in production
has been inflated.
In this regard, guidance can also be taken from past records showing the extent of wastage in
production in the past. Similarly, he would be able to better judge whether the material issued for
production was excessive and, if so to what extent.
The per hour capacity of the machine and the time that it took to complete one cycle of production,
also would show whether the issues have been larger than those required.
11. Explain how a Forensic Audit differs from an Assurance Engagement.

Answer
Difference between Forensic Audit and Assurance Engagement:
Sr. Particulars Assurance Engagement Forensic Audit
No.
1. Objectives Express an opinion as to Whether fraud has taken
‘True & Fair presentation place in books
2. Techniques Substantive & Compliance. Sample Investigative, substantive
based or in depth checking
3. Period Normally for a particulars accounting No such limitations
period.
730

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
4. Verification of stock, Relies on the management Independent / verification

Estimation realisable value of certificate/Management Representation of suspected/selected
assets, provisions, liability etc. items where
misappropriation in
suspected
5. Off balance sheet items (like Used to vouch the arithmetic accuracy & Regulatory & propriety of
contracts etc.) compliance with procedures. these
transactions/contracts are
examined.
6. Adverse findings if any Negative opinion or qualified opinion Legal determination of
expressed with/without fraud impact and
quantification identification of
perpetrators depending on
scope.
ABC Ltd. is a listed company having turnover of Rs. 50 crores & plans expansion by installation of new
machines at new building-having total additional project cost of Rs. 20 crore.
Rupees (In crore) Purpose
10.0 - for Building
8.5 - for Machinery
1.5 - for Working Capital
20 Crore
Project gets implemented in 2017-18 and one of the accountants points out to Managing Director
that something wrong has happened in the purchase of building material.
On hearing this, the management is planning to appoint Forensic Auditor. Advise management
that how is a forensic accounting analysis is different from an audit.
Difference between a forensic accounting analysis and an audit: The general public believes that a financial
auditor would detect a fraud if one were being perpetrated during the financial auditor's audit. The truth,
however, is that the procedures for financial audits are designed to detect material misstatements, not
immaterial frauds. While it is true that many of the financial statements and frauds could have, perhaps should
have, been detected by financial auditors, the vast majority of frauds could not be detected with the use of
financial audits. Reasons include the dependence of financial auditors on a sample and the auditors' reliance
on examining the audit trail versus examining the events' and activities behind the documents. The latter is
simply resource prohibitive in terms of costs and time.
731

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
There are some basic differences today between the procedures of forensic auditors and those of financial
auditors. In comparison, forensic accounting and audit differ in specific ways, as shown below:
Forensic Accounting Audit

*In response to an event *Mandatory
*Financial investigation *Measures compliance with reporting

standards
*Finding used as evidence in court or to
resolve disputes Obtain reasonable assurance that financial
statements are free of material
misstatement In practice, there are
difference in mind set between forensic
accounting and audit:
"Investigative mentality" vs. "professional
scepticism". A forensic accountant will
often require more extensive
corroboration.
A forensic accountant may focus more on
seemingly immaterial transactions.
A forensic accountant will often look for indications of fraud that are not subject to the scope of a
financial statement audit.
Particulars Other Audits Forensic Audit
Objectives Express an opinion as to ‘True & Fair’ Whether fraud has taken
presentation place in books
Techniques Substantive & Compliance. Sample Investigative,
based substantiv
e or in depth checking
Period Normally for a particulars accounting No such limitations
period.
Verification of stock, Relies on the management Independent/verification
Estimation realizable value certificate/Management of suspected/selected
of assets, provisions, Representation items where
liability etc. misappropriation in
suspected
Off balance sheet items Used to vouch the arithmetic accuracy Regulatory & propriety
(like contracts etc.) & compliance with procedures. of these
transactions/contracts
are examined.
Adverse findings if any Negative opinion or qualified opinion Legal determination of
expressed with/without quantification fraud impact and
identification of
perpetrators depending
on scope.
732

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
13.MTP-Aug-18 Qn No 3(b) 5 Marks:
PQR Ltd. is a listed company having turnover of Rs. 50 crores & plans expansion by installation of
new machines at new building-having total additional project cost of Rs. 20 crores.
Rupees (In crore) Purpose

10.0 - for Building
8.5 - for Machinery
1.5 - for Working Capital
20 Crore
Project gets implemented in 2017-18 and one of the accountants points out to Managing Director that
something wrong has happened in the purchase of building material.
On hearing this, the management is planning to appoint Forensic Auditor. Advise the Forensic Auditor
about the steps to be undertaken in case of forensic audit process.
Answer:
Each Forensic Accounting assignment is unique. Accordingly, the actual approach adopted, and the
procedures performed will be specific to it. However, in general, many Forensic Accounting
assignments will include the steps detailed below.
Step 1. Initialization
It is vital to clarify and remove all doubts as to the real motive, purpose and utility of the assignment.
It is helpful to meet the client to obtain an understanding of the important facts, players and issues at
hand. A conflict check should be carried out as soon as the relevant parties are established. It is often
useful to carry out a preliminary investigation prior to the development of a detailed plan of action.
This will allow subsequent planning to be based upon a more complete understanding of the issues.
Step 2. Develop Plan
This plan will take into account the knowledge gained by meeting with the client and carrying out the
initial investigation and will set out the objectives to be achieved and the methodology to be utilized
to accomplish them.
Step 3. Obtain Relevant Evidence
Depending on the nature of the case, this may involve locating documents, economic information,
assets, a person or company, another expert or proof of the occurrence of an event. In order to gather
detailed evidence, the investigator must understand the specific type of fraud that has been carried
out, and how the fraud has been committed. The evidence should be sufficient to ultimately prove the
identity of the fraudster(s), the mechanics of the fraud scheme, and the amount of financial loss
suffered. It is important that the investigating team is skilled in collecting evidence that can be used in
a court case, and in keeping a clear chain of custody until the evidence is presented in court. If any
evidence is inconclusive or there are gaps in the chain of custody, then the evidence may be challenged
in court, or even become inadmissible. Investigators must be alert to documents being falsified,
damaged or destroyed by the suspect(s).
733
Step 4. Perform the analysis


for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
The actual analysis performed will be dependent upon the nature of the assignment and may involve:
• calculating economic damages;
• summarizing a large number of transactions;
• performing a tracing of assets;
• performing present value calculations utilizing appropriate discount rates;
• performing a regression or sensitivity analysis;
• utilizing a computerized application such as a spread sheet, data base or computer model; and
• utilizing charts and graphics to explain the analysis.
Step 5. Reporting
Issuing an audit report is the final step of a fraud audit. Auditors will include information detailing the
fraudulent activity, if any has been found. The client will expect a report containing the findings of the
investigation, including a summary of evidence and a conclusion as to the amount of loss suffered as a
result of the fraud. The report may include sections on the nature of the assignment, scope of the
investigation, approach utilized, limitations of scope and findings and/or opinions. The report will
include schedules and graphics necessary to properly support and explain the findings.
The report will also discuss how the fraudster set up the fraud scheme, and which controls, if any, were
circumvented. It is also likely that the investigative team will recommend improvements to controls
within the organization to prevent any similar frauds occurring in the future.
The forensic auditor should have active listening skills which will enable him to summarize the facts in
the report. It should be kept in mind that the report should be based on the facts assimilated during the
process and not on the opinion of the person writing the report.
Step 6. Court proceedings
The investigation is likely to lead to legal proceedings against the suspect, and members of the
investigative team will probably be involved in any resultant court case. The evidence gathered during
the investigation will need to be presented at court, and team members may be called to court to
describe the evidence they have gathered and to explain how the suspect was identified
14.May 2019 Qn no 5(C)5 Marks
You have been appointed as a forensic accountant in M/s Secure Ltd. to carryout various analysis as
a part of your assignment to arrive at a particular result. Specify the various analysis which might
have to be carried out by you to arrive at your result.
Answer
Perform the Analysis: The actual analysis performed will be dependent upon the nature of the assignment and
may involve:
1. calculating economic damages;
2. summarizing a large number of transactions;
734
3. performing a tracing of assets;

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
4. performing present value calculations utilizing appropriate discount rates;

5. performing a regression or sensitivity analysis;
utilizing a computerized application such as a spread sheet, data base or computer model; and
6. utilizing charts and graphics to explain the analysis.
(B) (RTP NOV 2019)

15. Beta Ltd. is anticipating taking over a manufacturing concern and appoints you for due diligence
review. While reviewing, it requests you to look specifically for any hidden liabilities and overvalued
assets. State in brief the major areas you would examine for hidden liabilities and overvalued
assets.
Major areas to examine in course of Due Diligence Review: 'Due Diligence' is a term that is often heard
in the corporate world these days in relation to corporate restructuring. The purpose of due diligence
is to assist the purchaser or the investor in finding out all he can, reasonably about the business he is
acquiring or investing in prior to completion of the transaction including its critical success factors as
well as its strength and weaknesses.
Due diligence is an all pervasive exercise to review all important aspects like financial, legal, commercial,
etc. before taking any final decision in the matter. As far as any hidden liabilities or overvalued assets
are concerned, this shall form part of such a review of Financial Statements. Normally, cases of hidden
liabilities and overvalued assets are not apparent from books of accounts and financial statements.
Review of financial statements does not involve examination from the view point of extraordinary items,
analysis of significant deviations, etc.
However, in order to investigate hidden liabilities, the auditor should pay his attention to the following
areas:
 The company may not show any show cause notices which have not matured into demands, as
contingent liabilities. These may be material and important.
 The company may have given “Letters of Comfort” to banks and Financial Institutions. Since these
are not “guarantees”, these may not be disclosed in the Balance sheet of the target company.
 The Company may have sold some subsidiaries/businesses and may have agreed to take over and
indemnify all liabilities and contingent liabilities of the same prior to the date of transfer. These may
not be reflected in the books of accounts of the company.
 Product and other liability claims; warranty liabilities; product returns/discounts; liquidated
damages for late deliveries etc. and all litigation.
 Tax liabilities under direct and indirect taxes.
 Long pending sales tax assessments.
 Pending final assessments of customs duty where provisional assessment only has been
completed.
 Agreement to buy back shares sold at a stated price.
 Future lease liabilities.
735
 Environmental problems/claims/third party claims.

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
 Unfunded gratuity/superannuation/leave salary liabilities; incorrect gratuity valuations.

 Huge labour claims under negotiation when the labour wage agreement has already expired.
Regularly Overvalued Assets:
The auditor shall have to specifically examine the following areas:

 Uncollected/uncollectable receivables.
 Obsolete, slow non-moving inventories or inventories valued above NRV; huge inventories of
packing materials etc. with name of company.
 Underused or obsolete Plant and Machinery and their spares; asset values which have been
impaired due to sudden fall in market value etc.
 Assets carried at much more than current market value due to capitalization of expenditure/foreign
exchange fluctuation, or capitalization of expenditure mainly in the nature of revenue.
 Litigated assets and property.
 Investments carried at cost though realizable value is much lower.
 Investments carrying a very low rate of income / return.
 Infructuous project expenditure/deferred revenue expenditure etc.
 Group Company balances under reconciliation etc.

 Intangibles of no value.
Study Material
16. J Ltd. is interested in acquiring S Ltd. The valuation of S Ltd. is dependent on future maintainable
sales. As the person entrusted to value S Ltd., what factors would you consider in assessing the future
maintainable turnover?
Answer
In assessing the turnover which the business would be able to maintain in the future, the following factors
should be taken into account:
(i) Trend: Whether in the past, sales have been increasing consistently or they have been fluctuating. A proper
study of this phenomenon should be made.
(ii) Marketability: Is it possible to extend the sales into new markets or that these have been fully exploited?
Product wise estimation should be made.
(iii) Political and economic considerations: Are the policies pursued by the Government likely to promote the
extension of the market for goods to other countries? Whether the sales in the home market are likely to
increase or decrease as a result of various emerging economic trends?
Competition: What is the likely effect on the business if other manufacturers enter the same field or if products
which would sell in competition are placed on the market at cheaper price? Is the demand for competing
products increasing? Is the company’s share in the total trade constant or has it been fluctuating?
736

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s

17. IMIR Inc is a major technology, engineering, manufacturing and financial services conglomerate, with
global operations having its registered office in US. The Company’s manufacturing footprint extends across
eight countries in addition to US. It has several international offices and a supply chain that extends around the
globe.
HIN Private Limited is a medium-sized Fast Moving Electrical Goods (FMEG) company and is also involved in
power distribution equipment manufacturing. This company is based in India and enjoys a good market share
in a wide spectrum of products like Industrial & Domestic Circuit Protection Devices, Cables & Wires, Fans,
Commercial and Industrial Applications.
IMIR Inc (Acquirer) is currently in talks to acquire HIN Pvt Ltd (Target). The initial price has been agreed for
the acquisition of business based on net worth and profitability of the target company with an assumption
that all contingent liabilities of the target impacting its future business have been considered. The acquirer
appointed a firm to carry out the financial due diligence review of the target company and advised that the
firm should strictly work as per the scope.
The firm during the course of its review found some showcause notices (which have not matured into
demands) being issued against the target company. The firm also found that there could be a potential high
value labour claim which may arise out of the negotiation which was ongoing between the target company
and the labour union and the labour wage agreement was already expired.
The firm discussed all these matters with the management of the target company. The target company
confirmed that these matters are under discussion and was confident that these matters would not result into
any liability and hence it did not consider the same in the initial price. The firm after its discussion with the
target reported these matters to the acquirer.
In the given situation, please suggest which one of the following should be correct?
(a) In the given case, the initial price between the target and the acquirer is already set which includes the
impact of contingent liabilities. Hence the above mentioned matters relating to showcause notice and
labour claim should be ignored by the firm.
(b) In the given case, the initial price between the target and the acquirer is already set which includes the
impact of contingent liabilities. However, since these matters have not been considered by the target
company in the initial price, it would be appropriate to consider the impact of matter related to labour
claim as that may result in liability in future but the matter related to showcause notice should be ignored
by the firm.
(c) In the given case, the firm has gone beyond its scope of financial due diligence review. Financial due
diligence review covers review of trading
results, assets and liabilities and accounting policies and practices of the target company. The
management of the target company should talk to acquirer so that the acquirer can ask the firm to limit
its work as per the scope agreed.
(d) In the given case, even though the initial price between the target and the acquirer is already set but still
the firm needs to look at any hidden liabilities which may arise in the two cases – show cause notices and
labour claim. Accordingly, the firm has done the right thing by reporting these matters to the acquirer.
737
Answer: (b) In the given case, the initial price between the target and the acquirer is already set which includes
the impact of contingent liabilities. However, since these matters have not been considered by the target

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
company in the initial price, it would be appropriate to consider the impact of matter related to labour claim as
that may result in liability in future but the matter related to showcause notice should be ignored by the firm
18. FTA Renewables S.p.A, is based in Europe and has operations in renewable energy. The company’s
operations are spread out in many countries. The company is also looking for various acquisitions.
VAS Private Limited is a company based in Pune having operations into solar energy. The company’s
management projected that its operations should increase significantly and it should become one of the
largest companies in the sector in the next five years on the basis of the management plan. However, due to
some unforeseen circumstances, the promoters of the company are looking to sell their business.
FTA Renewables S.p.A (acquirer) is interested in acquisition of VAS Private Ltd (target) and has started the
discussions with the target company for the same.
The due diligence of the target company is in process and the reviewer has come up with following observations
so far:
(i) The target company has certain balances with its related companies which are under reconciliation for
long time.
(ii) The target company had certain demands in respect of taxation matters on which the court has given
a stay.
(iii) The target company has some assets which are carried in its books at more than their current market
value due to capitalization of foreign exchange loss as the same was permitted in Indian GAAP.
(iv) The target company had two properties which were under litigation.
(v) The target company had given guarantees which were not appearing the financial statements.
Reviewer needs your advise that which of the above mentioned observations should be reported by him to
the acquirer?
(a) i, ii, iv and v.
(b) ii, iii, iv and v.
(c) i, ii, iii, iv and v.
(d) i, iii, iv and v.
Answer: (b) ii, iii, iv and v
19. ARA & Associates is a partnership firm and has been in existence for the last 15 years. The firm is engaged
in consultancy business related to various areas and has built a good name for itself over the period.
Some of the clients of the firm are very old who have been continuing since its existence. The business of the
firm has gone through various phases some of them were very bad. But currently the business is going very
well and the firm is looking to expand its operations into different geographies. For this, the firm’s
management decided that some of its senior partners will move to new offices and new partners would be
inducted.
738
A team of new partners is in discussion with the senior old partners regarding their joining the firm.

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
The new partners would be interested to know whether the terms offered to them are reasonable having
regard to the nature of the business, profit records, capital distribution, personal capacity of the existing
partners, socio-economic setting etc. and whether they would be able to derive continuing benefits in the
shape of return of capital to be contributed and remuneration of services to be offered. In addition, they also
want to ascertain whether the capital to be contributed by them would be safe and applied usefully or not.
For this purpose, an investigation of the business of the firm was set up on behalf of these new partners.
At the time of scrutiny of the record of profitability of the firm’s business, the investigating accountant picked
up records of last 4-5 years wherein he observed 2 years which were unusual because the profits during those
2 years were highly erratic and fluctuating. The investigating accountant, therefore, went into the profits of
last 7-8 years to iron out the fluctuation. He also examined the provisions of the partnership deed particularly
the composition of partners, their capital contribution, drawing rights, retirement benefits and goodwill. He
also asked for details of jobs/ contracts in hand and the range of current clientele of the firm for his
examination. Some of these procedures of the investigating accountant were not found appropriate by the
senior partners of the firm and they advised the investigating accountant not to go beyond his scope.
Please advise which of the above mentioned procedures of investigating accountant is/are not appropriate
and what improvements/ changes are required in his approach.
a) The investigating accountant should not have asked for the records of the profits of last 7-8 years as that
would be too much of the information for his review. Also the details of jobs/ contracts in hand and the
range of current clientele of the firm are confidential and hence does not get covered in his scope.
b) After finding 2 years which were unusual because the profits during those 2 years were highly erratic and
fluctuating, the investigating accountant should have reported the matter to the new partners instead of
asking for more details related to the profits of last 7-8 years. Also he is not required to examine the
provisions of the partnership deed as these details would have already been discussed with the new
partners and they would have checked that.
c) The procedures of the investigating accountant looks completely reasonable considering his scope of work.
Further, no changes are required in his work approach.
d) At the outset, it can be said that investigation in the given case was not required. However, even if the new
partners decided to carry out the investigation it should have been limited to mainly inquiry procedures by
the investigating accountant. The investigating accountant could have also reviewed the manner of
computation of goodwill which doesn’t seem to have been performed on the basis of the above mentioned
facts.
Answer: ( c) The procedures of the investigating accountant looks completely reasonable considering his
scope of work. Further, no changes are required in his work approach.
20. CA Robo has been appointed as Forensic Auditor by BMY Bank Limited for one of its borrowal accounts
WRONG Ltd. CA Robo started the audit by first reviewing the transactions of the borrower in Bank statement
as per Bank records to identify any hidden patterns in that information. She had to review huge volume of
data, as the number of transactions per day were in hundreds and the data was to be reviewed for the last
three years. So, she was stuck up as to how to proceed further to identify any hidden patterns in information,
if any. Guide CA Robo, suggesting which technique to be used for identifying any hidden patterns in the
information. (4 Marks) (past exam nov 2020)( SEPT 2022 MTP)
739
ANSWER

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
Data Mining Techniques:

i. Data mining techniqueis a set of assisted techniques designed to automatically mine large volumes of data for
new, hidden or unexpected information or patterns.
ii. It discovers the usual knowledge or patterns in data, without a predefined idea or hypothesis about what the
pattern may be, i.e. without any prior knowledge of fraud.
iii. It explains various affinities, association, trends and variations in the form of conditional logic.
iv. Data mining techniques are categorized in three ways: Discovery, Predictive modeling and Deviation and Link
analysis.
In the given case of BMY Bank Ltd., CA Robo appointed as forensic auditor for its borrower, WRONG Ltd, shall
use above stated data mining techniques to identify any hidden patterns of information.
21. A European company engaged in the business of manufacturing and distribution of industrial gases, is
interested in acquiring a listed Indian Company having a market share of 51% and assets over Rs. 1000
Crores. It requests you to conduct "Due Diligence" of assets of this Indian Company to find out, if any of the
assets is overvalued. List down the areas of due diligence exercise to find out overvalued assets. (5 Marks)
ANSWER
A European company which is manufacturing and distributing industrial gases is looking forward to acquire an
Indian company having 51% market share and assets beyond Rs. 1000 crores. Areas to be covered as a part of
due diligence exercise to find out over valued assets would be as under:
1. Uncollected/uncollectable receivables.
2. Obsolete, slow non-moving inventories or inventories valued above NRV; huge inventories of packing
materials etc. with name of company
3. Underused or obsolete Plant and Machinery and their spares; asset values which have been impaired due to
sudden fall in market value etc.
4. Assets carried at much more than current market value due to capitalization of expenditure/foreign exchange
fluctuation, or capitalization of expenditure mainly in the nature of revenue.
5. Litigated assets and property.
6. Investments carried at cost though realizable value is much lower.
7. Investments carrying a very low rate of income / return.
8. Infructuous project expenditure/deferred revenue expenditure etc.
9. Group Company balances under reconciliation etc.
10. Intangibles of no value

740

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
22. CA S has been appointed as peer reviewer of Shivam & Co. LLP. Shivam & Co. LLP submitted a list
of its assurance and due diligence services for the peer review. CA S is in the process of deciding as to
how many assurance services should be reviewed. Guide CA S in deciding the number of assurance
services engagement to be reviewed. (5 Marks) (past exam jan 2021)
ANSWER
In the given case, CA S appointed as peer reviewer of Shivam & Co. LLP, is in the process of deciding as to how
many assurance services need to be reviewed. The number of assurance service engagements to be reviewed
shall depend upon:
(i) Standard of quality controls generally prevailing;
(ii) The size and nature of assurance service engagements undertaken by the Practice Unit.
(iii) The methodology generally adopted by the Practice Unit in providing assurance services.
(iv) The number of partners / members involved in assurance service engagements in the Practice Unit;
(v) The number of locations / branch offices of the practice Unit;
(vi) The Fees charged / received / service tax paid by the Practice unit.
23. Important issues to be kept in mind by the investigator while preparing his report. (rtp- july 2021)
ANSWER
The important issues to be kept in mind by the investigator while preparing his report are as follows:
(i) The report should not contain anything which is not relevant either to highlight the nature of the investigation
or the final outcome thereof
(ii) Every word or expression used should be properly considered so that the possibility of arriving at a different
meaning or interpretation other than the one intended by the investigator can be minimized.
(iii) Relevant facts and conclusions should be properly linked with evidence.
(iv) Bases and assumptions made should be explicitly stated. Reasonableness of the bases and assumptions
made should be well examined and care should be taken to see that none of the bases and assumptions can be
considered to be in conflict with the objective of the investigation. For example, in an investigation into over-
stocking of raw materials, inventories and spares etc. it should not be assumed that the ordering levels indicated
on bin cards provide fair guidance about acquisition of further materials. Also, since investigation is a fact-
finding assignment, assumptions should be made only when it is unavoidably necessary.
(v) The report should clearly spell out the nature and objective of the assignment accepted its scope and
limitations, if any.
(vi) The report should be made in paragraph form with headings for the paragraphs. Any detailed data and
figures supporting any finding may be given in Annexures.
(vii) The report should also state restrictions or limitations, if any, imposed on the instructions given by the
741
client. Preferably the reasons for placing such restrictions and their impact on the final result should also be
stated.

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
(viii) The opinion of the investigator should appear in the final paragraph of the report
24. Technology based /Digital Forensics Techniques. (rtp- july 2021)

ANSWER
Technology based/Digital Forensics Techniques: Every transaction leaves a digital footprint in today's
computer-driven society. Close scrutiny of relevant emails, accounting records, phone logs and target company
hard drives is a requisite facet of any modern forensic audit. Before taking steps such as obtaining data from
email etc. the forensic auditor should take appropriate legal advice so that it doesn’t amount to invasion of
privacy. Digital investigations can become quite complex and require support from trained digital investigators.
However, many open-source digital forensics tools are now available to assist in this phase of the investigation
• Cross Drive Analysis • EnCase

• Live Analysis • MD5
• Deleted Files • Tracking Log Files
• Stochastic Forensics • PC System Log
• Steganography • Free Log Tools
25. A nationalized bank received an application from a Limited company seeking sanction of a term loan to
expand its existing business. In this connection, the Loan Manager of the Bank approaches you to conduct a
thorough investigation of the items of the Balance Sheet of this Limited company and submit a confidential
report based on which he will decide whether to sanction this loan or not. List out the major steps an
investigating accountant would keep in mind while verifying assets and liabilities included in the Balance
Sheet of the borrower company which has been furnished to the Bank. (5 Marks) (mtp nov 20)
ANSWER
Steps involved in the verification of assets and liabilities included in the Balance Sheet of the borrower company
which has been furnished to the Bank - The investigating accountant should prepare schedules of assets and
liabilities of the borrower and include in the particulars stated below:
(i) Fixed assets - A full description of each item, its gross value, the rate at which depreciation has been charged
and the total depreciation written off. In case the rate at which depreciation has been adjusted is inadequate,
the fact should be stated. In case any asset is encumbered, the amount of the charge and its nature should be
disclosed. In case an asset has been revalued recently, the amount by which the value of the asset has been
decreased or increased on revaluation should be stated along with the date of revaluation. If considered
necessary, he may also comment on the revaluation and its basis.
(ii) Inventory - The value of different types of inventories held (raw materials, work-in-progress and finished
goods) and the basis on which these have been valued.
Details as regards the nature and composition of finished goods should be disclosed. Slow-moving or obsolete
items should be separately stated along with the amounts of allowances, if any, made in their valuation. For
assessing redundancy, the changes that have occurred in important items of inventory subsequent to the date
of the Balance Sheet, either due to conversion into finished goods or sale, should be considered.
742

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
(iii) Trade Receivables, including bills receivable - Their composition should be disclosed to indicate the nature
of different types of debts that are outstanding for recovery; also whether the debts were being collected within
the period of credit as well as the fact whether any debts are considered bad or doubtful and the provision if
any, that has been made against them
Further, the total amount outstanding at the close of the period should be segregated as follows:
(i) debts due in respect of which the period of credit has not expired;
(ii) debts due within six months; and
(iii) debts due but not recovered for over six months.
If any debts are due from directors or other officers or employees of the company, the particulars thereof
should be stated. Amounts due from subsidiary and affiliated concerns, as well as those considered abnormal
should be disclosed. The recoveries out of various debts subsequent to the date of the Balance sheet should be
stated.
(iv) Investments - The schedule of investments should be prepared. It should disclose the date of purchase, cost
and the nominal and market value of each investment. If any investment is pledged as security for a loan, full
particulars of the loan should be given.
(v) Secured Loans - Debentures and other loans should be included together in a separate schedule. Against the
debentures and each secured loan, the amounts outstanding for payments along with due dates of payment
should be shown. In case any debentures have been issued as a collateral security, the fact should be stated.
Particulars of assets pledged or those on which a charge has been created for re-payment of a liability should be
disclosed.
(vi) Provision of Taxation - The previous years up to which taxes have been assessed should be ascertained. If
provision for taxes not assessed appears in be inadequate, the fact should be stated along with the extent of the
shortfall.
(vii) Other Liabilities - It should be stated whether all the liabilities, actual and contingent, are correctly
disclosed. Also, an analysis according to ages of trade payables should be given to show that the company has
been meeting its obligations in time and has not been depending on trade credit for its working capital
requirements.
(viii) Insurance - A schedule of insurance policies giving details of risks covered, the date of payment of last
premiums and their value should be attached as an annexure to the statements of assets, together with a report
as to whether or not the insurance-cover appears to be adequate, having regard to the value of assets.
(ix) Contingent Liabilities - By making direct enquiries from the borrower company, from members of its staff,
perusal of the files of parties to whom any loan has been advanced those of machinery suppliers and the legal
adviser, for example, the investigating accountant should ascertain particulars of any contingent liabilities which
have not been disclosed. In case, there are any, these should be included in a schedule and attached to the
report.
Finally, the investigating accountant should ascertain whether any application for loan to another bank or any
other party has been made. If so, the result thereof should be examined.
26. LMN Ltd. entered into a deal with SP Ltd. for buying its business of manufacturing wooden products/
goods. LMN Ltd. has appointed your firm for conducting due diligence review and they want to know the cash
743

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
generating abilities of SP Ltd. What points will you check in order to ensure that the manufacturing unit of SP
Ltd. will be able to meet the cash requirements internally? (mtp – I -july 2021)
(5 Marks)
ANSWER
In order to ensure that the manufacturing unit of SP Ltd. will be able to meet the cash requirements internally,
one is required to verify:
(i) Is the company able to honour its commitments to its trade payables, to the banks, to the government and
other stakeholders?
(ii) How well is the company able to convert its trade receivables and inventories?
(iii) How well the Company deploys its funds?
(iv) Are there any funds lying idle or is the company able to reap maximum benefits out of the available funds?
(v) What is the investment pattern of the company and are they easily realizable?
27. (RTP- NOV 2021)

Example of Headings of a Due Diligence Report
ANSWER
Example of Headings of a Due Diligence Report
Executive Summary
Introduction
Background of Target company
Objective of due diligence
Terms of reference and scope of verification
Brief history of the company
Share holding pattern
Observations on the review
Assessment of management structure
Assessment of financial liabilities
Assessment of valuation of assets
Comments on properties, terms of leases, lien and encumbrances.
Assessment of operating results
Assessment of taxation and statutory liabilities
Assessment of possible liabilities on account of litigation and legal proceedings against the company
Assessment of net worth
744

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
Interlocking investments and financial obligations with group / associates companies, amounts
receivables subject to litigation, any other likely liability which is not provided for in the books of
account
SWOT Analysis
Comments on future projections
Status of charges, liens, mortgages, assets and properties of the company
Suggestion on ways and means including affidavits, indemnities, to be executed to cover unforeseen
and undetected contingent liabilities
Suggestions on various aspects to be taken care of before and after the proposed merger/acquisition.
28. ( STUDY MAT)

Sri Rajan is above 80 years old and wishes to sell his proprietary business of manufacture of specialty
chemicals. Ceta Ltd. wants to buy the business and appoints you to carry out a due diligence audit to
decide whether it would be worthwhile to acquire the business.
What procedures you would adopt before you could render any advice to Ceta Ltd.?
ANSWER
following objectives for individual areas of the verification:
Brief description of the history of business
The background and standing of promoters
Accounting policies and practices followed by the organization
Management information systems
Details of management structure
Trading results both past and the recent past
Assets and liabilities as per latest balance sheet
Current status of Income tax assessments including appeals pending against tax liabilities assessed by
tax authority.
Cash flow patterns
Brief description of commercial and/or other activities carried out by the organization
The projection of future profitability
29. ( STUDY MAT)

“Due diligence is different from audit” – Explain the difference between due diligence and audit.
ANSWER
It needs be underlined that due diligence is different from audit. Audit is an independent examination
and evaluation of the financial statements on an organization with a view to express an opinion thereon.
Whereas, due diligence refers to an examination of a potential investment to confirms all material facts
of the prospective business opportunity. It involves review of financial and non-financial records as
deemed relevant and material. Simply put, due diligence aims to take the care that a reasonable person
should take before entering into an agreement or a transaction with another party.
745

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
30. ( STUDY MAT)

PB Ltd. entered into a deal with SV Ltd. for buying its business of manufacturing wooden products/
goods. PB Ltd. has appointed your firm for conducting due diligence review and they want to know the
cash generating abilities of SV Ltd. What points will you check in order to ensure that the manufacturing
unit of SV Ltd. will be able to meet the cash requirements internally?
ANSWER
In order to ensure that the manufacturing unit of SV Ltd. will be able to meet the cash requirements
internally, one is required to verify:
(a) Is the company able to honor its commitments to its trade payables, to the banks, to the
government and other stakeholders?
(b) How well is the company able to convert its trade receivables and inventories?
(c) How well the Company deploys its funds?
(d) Are there any funds lying idle or is the company able to reap maximum benefits out of the available
funds?
(e) What is the investment pattern of the company and are they easily realizable?
31. ( STUDY MAT)

In a Public Limited Company, it is suspected by the Management that there has been embezzlement in
supplier's ledger. As an auditor of the Company, you have been asked to investigate the matter. What
are the major areas that you would verify in this regard?
ANSWER
Frauds through suppliers’ ledger -
(i) Adjusting fictitious or duplicate invoices as purchases in the accounts of suppliers and subsequently
misappropriating the amounts when payments are made to the suppliers in respect of these invoices.
(ii) Suppressing the Credit Notes issued by suppliers and withdrawing the corresponding amounts not
claimed by them.
(iii) Withdrawing amounts unclaimed by suppliers, for one reason or another by showing that the same
have been paid to them.
(iv) Accepting purchase invoices at prices considerably higher than their market prices and collecting
the excess amount, paid in cash, from the suppliers.
Verification of balances in suppliers’ ledger - The Purchase Journal should be vouched by reference to
entries in the Goods Inward Book and the suppliers’ invoices to confirm that amounts credited to the
accounts of suppliers were in respect of goods, which were duly received and the suppliers’ accounts
had been credited correctly. All the suppliers should be requested to furnish statements of their accounts
to see whether or not any balance is outstanding or due so as to confirm that allowances and rebates
given by them have been correctly adjusted and were duly authorized by the authorized person/ officer.
Examine the system of internal control in relation to purchase orders issued and identify possibilities of
collusion with suppliers.
746

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
32. ( STUDY MAT)

XYZ Ltd. has bought a land in Nagpur for setting up a manufacturing unit in the year 2018 at a price of
Rs. 10 crores. In the year 2019, one of the directors of company raised suspicion on the price and
transactions related to purchase of land. Therefore, an investigation was ordered by the management
and PV Associates were appointed to investigate the matter and submit their report accordingly. PV
Associates were of the view that they need to take an expert’s opinion on the price of land. Whether PV
Associates is authorized to take assistance of expert? If yes, what is the process they need to follow?
ANSWER
If PV Associates feels the necessity of obtaining views and opinions of experts in various fields to
properly conduct the investigation, they are allowed to do so.
It would be therefore, proper for the investigator to get the written general consent of his client, to refer
special matters for views of different experts at the beginning of investigation and he should settle the
question of costs for obtaining the views and other related implications.
33. ( STUDY MAT)

Briefly mention the forensic audit techniques
ANSWER
Some of the techniques that a forensic auditor may use are listed below:
(I) General Audit Techniques:
• Testing defenses: A good initial forensic audit technique is to attempt to circumvent these defenses
yourself. The weaknesses you find within the organizations control will most probably guide you down
the sea path taken by suspected perpetrators. This technique requires you to attempt to put yourself
in the shoes and think like your suspect.
(II) Statistical & Mathematical Techniques:
• Trend Analysis: Businesses have cycles and seasons much akin to nature itself. An expense or event
within a business that would be analogous to a snowy day in the middle of summer is worth
investigating. Careful review of your subject organization's historical norms is necessary in order for
you to be able to discern the outlier event should it arise within your investigation.
• Ratio Analysis: Another useful fraud detection technique is the calculation of data analysis ratios for
key numeric fields. Like financial ratios that give indications of the financial health of a company, data
analysis ratios report on the fraud health by identifying possible symptoms of fraud.
(III) Technology based /Digital Forensics Techniques: Every transaction leaves a digital footprint in
today's computer-driven society. Close scrutiny of relevant emails, accounting records, phone logs and
target company hard drives is a requisite facet of any modern forensic audit. Before taking steps such as
obtaining data from email etc. the forensic auditor should take appropriate legal advice so that it doesn’t
amount to invasion of privacy. Digital investigations can become quite complex and require support from
747
trained digital investigators. However, many open-source digital forensics tools are now available to

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
assist you in this phase of the investigation.
(IV) Computer Assisted Auditing Techniques (CAATs): Changing patterns of businesses, regulatory
framework, scarcity of resources at auditors’ disposal on one side and the ever-increasing mountainous
data on other hand is making audit a complex process. Use of CAATs is, thus, indispensable to the
Auditors and forensic auditors. Computer-assisted audit techniques (CAATs) or computer-assisted audit
tools and techniques (CAATs) are computer programs that the auditors use as part of the audit
procedures to process data of audit significance contained in a client’s information systems, without
depending on him.
(V) Generalised Audit Software (GAS): Generalized Audit Software (GAS) is a class of CAATs that allows
auditors to undertake data extraction, querying, manipulation, summarization and analytical tasks. GAS
focuses on the fully exploiting the data available in the entity’s application systems in the pursuit of
audit objectives. GAS support auditors by allowing them to examine the entity’s data easily, flexibly,
independently and interactively in data-based auditing.
Using GAS, an auditor can formulate a range of alternative hypotheses for a particular potential
misstatement in the subject matter and then test those hypotheses immediately. “What if” scenarios
can be developed with the results and the auditors can examine the generated report rapidly.
Currently, the latest versions of GAS include the Audit Command Language (ACL), Interactive Data
Extraction and Analysis (IDEA) and Panaudit.
(VI) Common Software Tool (CST): Due to shortcomings of GASs, CSTs have become popular over a
period. Spreadsheets (like MS Excel, Lotus, etc.), RDBMS (like MS Access, etc.) and Report writers (like
Crystal reports, etc.) are few examples of CSTs. Their widespread acceptability is due to its instant
availability and lower costs. While spreadsheets may be extremely easy to use due to its simplicity and
versatility, other CSTs may need some practice.
Whether one uses GAS or CST, it is imperative that the auditor is aware about the manner and
processes that have led to the data generation, the control environment revolving around the data and
the source from where the data samples are imported into the GAS/CST.
(VII) Data Mining Techniques: It is a set of assisted techniques designed to automatically mine large
volumes of data for new, hidden or unexpected information or patterns.
Data mining techniques are categorized in three ways: Discovery, Predictive modeling and Deviation and
Link analysis. It discovers the usual knowledge or patterns in data, without a predefined idea or
hypothesis about what the pattern may be, i.e. without any prior knowledge of fraud. It explains various
affinities, association, trends and variations in the form of conditional logic.
34. ( STUDY MAT)

What are the areas where the services of forensic accountants/ auditors are generally required?
ANSWER
Services rendered by Forensic Auditors
• Crafting questions to be posed
748
• Responding to questions posed

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
• Identifying documents to be requested and/or subpoenaed

• Identifying individuals to be most knowledgeable of facts
• Conducting research relevant to facts of the case
• Identifying and preserving key evidence
• Evaluating produced documentation and information for completeness
• Analysing produced records and other information for facts
• Identifying alternative means to obtain key facts and information
• Providing questions for deposition and cross examination of fact and expert witnesses
35. ( STUDY MAT)

What do you understand by the word “Forensic” and why the need for forensic audit arises?
ANSWER
“Forensic” means “suitable for use in the court of law”. Bologna said that it is the application of
financial skills and investigative mentality to unresolved issues, conducted within the context of
the rules of evidence. As an emerging discipline, it encompasses financial expertise, fraud
knowledge and a sound knowledge and understanding of business reality and the working of legal
system.
A Forensic Auditor is often involved in:
• Fraud Detection: Investigating and analyzing financial evidence, detecting financial frauds and tracing
misappropriated funds
• Computer Forensics:Developing computerized applications to assist in the recovery, analysis and
presentation of financial evidence;Comp
• Fraud Prevention: Either reviewing internal controls to verify their adequacy or providing consultation
in the development and implementation of an internal control framework aligned to an organization's
risk profile
• Providing Expert Testimony: Assisting in legal proceedings, including testifying in court as an expert
witness and preparing visual aids to support trial evidence. uter Forensics:
In order to properly perform these services a Forensic Auditor must be familiar with legal concepts and
procedures and have expertise in the use of IT tools and techniques that facilitate data recovery and
analysis. In addition, a Forensic Auditor must be able to identify substance over form when dealing with
an issue.
36. ( STUDY MAT)

BR Construction was into the business of building roads and other infrastructure facilities for government
contracts. Mr. Tiwari, one of the senior official, was looking after the procurement of cement required
at the construction sites. There was a substantial increase in the price of cement bags bought as
compared to those bought prior to the appointment of Mr. Tiwari. The management of the company
decides to get a forensic audit done for the transactions handled by Mr. Tiwari. What points should be
kept in mind by the management while appointing a forensic auditor?
749
ANSWER

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
While appointing a forensic auditor, the Management of BR Construction must initially consider
whether the firm has the necessary skills and experience to accept the work.
A Forensic Auditor is often retained to analyze, interpret, summarize and present complex financial
and business-related issues in a manner which is both understandable and properly supported.
Forensic Accountants are trained to look beyond the numbers and deal with the business reality of the
situation.
A Forensic Auditor must initially consider whether his/her firm has the necessary skills and experience
to accept the work. Forensic audits are highly specialized, and the work requires detailed knowledge of
fraud investigation techniques and the legal framework. Forensic auditor needs to have an
understanding on various frauds that can be carried off and how evidence need to be collected.
Forensic Auditors can be engaged in public practice or employed by insurance companies, banks, police
forces, government agencies and other organizations.
Skills - Forensic Auditor should possess
• Auditing standards, procedures and related
methodologies
• Accounting & Business reporting systems
• Information Technology
• Data Analytics
• Criminology
• Legal Framework
• Litigation processes & procedures
• Investigative Techniques
• Evidence gathering
• Network of professional contacts in related fields' viz.
enforcement, regulatory bodies, law, industry, peers etc.

M/s GSB Limited is into the business of construction for the past 25 years. Management of the Company
came to know that building material sent to construction sites are of substandard quality whereas the
payment released by the accounts department of the Company are on the higher side. Forensic Auditor
was asked to carry out detailed investigation. Forensic auditor completed his investigation and now
preparing his report. What are the broad areas of information that needs to be incorporated in the report
of forensic auditor?
ANSWER
Broad areas of information to be incorporated in the report of Forensic auditor -

Issuing an audit report is the final step of a fraud audit. Auditors will include information detailing the
fraudulent activity, if any has been found. The client will expect a report containing the findings of the
investigation, including a summary of evidence, a conclusion as to the amount of loss suffered as a
result of the fraud and to identify those involved in fraud.
750

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
The report may include sections on the nature of the assignment, scope of the investigation, approach
utilized, limitations of scope and findings and/or opinions. The report will include schedules and
graphics necessary to properly support and explain the findings.
circumvented. It is also likely that the investigative team will recommend improvements to controls
within the organization to prevent any similar frauds occurring in the future.
The forensic auditor should have active listening skills which will enable him to summarize the facts in
the report. It should be kept in mind that the report should be based on the facts assimilated during the
process and not on the opinion of the person writing the report.
38 NOV 21 EXAM
ACT Silk Industries is a leading textile manufacturing listed company. In the course of evidence collection and
analysis, it was observed that the company is involved in siphoning of funds through payments to shell
companies. Hence, SEBI appointed B & S Associates, Chartered Accountants, as forensic auditors of the
company.
Enumerate in brief the steps to be taken by B & S Associates in forensic audit process.
ANSWER:
Each Forensic accounting assignment is unique. Accordingly, the actual approach adopted and the procedures
performed will be specific to it. Steps to be taken by B &S Associates, as Forensic auditors of the company are:
Step 1. Initialization
It is vital to clarify and remove all doubts as to the real motive, purpose and utility of the assignment. It is helpful
to meet the client to obtain an understanding of the important facts, players and issues at hand. A conflict check
should be carried out as soon as the relevant parties are established. It is often useful to carry out a preliminary
investigation prior to the development of a detailed plan of action. This will allow subsequent planning to be based
upon a more complete understanding of the issues.
Step 2. Develop Plan
This plan will take into account the knowledge gained by meeting with the client and carrying out the initial
investigation and will set out the objectives to be achieved and the methodology to be utilized to accomplish
them.
Step 3. Obtain Relevant Evidence
Depending on the nature of the case, this may involve locating documents, economic information, assets, a person
or company, another expert or proof of the occurrence of an event. In order to gather detailed evidence, the
investigator must understand the specific type of fraud that has been carried out, and how the fraud has been
committed. The evidence should be sufficient to ultimately prove the identity of the fraudster(s), the mechanics
of the fraud scheme, and the amount of financial loss suffered. It is important that the investigating team is skilled
in collecting evidence that can be used in a court case within the stipulated time period, and in keeping a clear
chain of custody until the evidence is presented in court. If any evidence is inconclusive or there are gaps in the
chain of custody, then the evidence may be challenged in court, or even become inadmissible. Investigators must
be alert to documents being falsified, damaged or destroyed by the suspect(s).
Step 4. Perform the analysis
•calculating economic damages;
•summarizing a large number of transactions;
751

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
•performing a tracing of assets;

•performing present value calculations utilizing appropriate discount rates;
•performing a regression or sensitivity analysis;
•utilizing a computerized application such as a spread sheet, data base or computer model; and
•Utilizing charts and graphics to explain the analysis.
Step 5. Reporting
Issuing an audit report is the final step of a fraud audit. Auditors will include information detailing the fraudulent
activity, if any has been found. The client will expect a report containing the findings of the investigation, including
a summary of evidence, a conclusion as to the amount of loss suffered as a result of the fraud and to identify those
involved in fraud. The report may include sections on the nature of the assignment, scope of the investigation,
approach utilized, limitations of scope and findings and/or opinions. The report will include schedules and graphics
necessary to properly support and explain the findings.
circumvented. It is also likely that the investigative team will recommend improvements to controls within the
organization to prevent any similar frauds occurring in the future.
The forensic auditor should have active listening skills which will enable him to summarize the facts in the report.
It should be kept in mind that the report should be based on the facts assimilated during the process and not on
the opinion of the person writing the report.
Step 6. Court proceedings
The investigation is likely to lead to legal proceedings against the suspect, and members of the investigative team
will probably be involved in any resultant court case. The evidence gathered during the investigation will need to
be presented at court, and team members may be called to court to describe the evidence they have gathered
and to explain how the suspect was identified.
39 (MAY 2022 EXAM)

TQR Limited is engaged in the business of garment manufacturing having registered office at Mumbai and
branches across India. Mr. Shyam, one of the senior Managers was involved in creating false documents and
legitimate documents were altered to support fictitious transactions. Consequently, the management appointed
you to get forensic audit done based on the digital foot-print of transactions handled by Mr. Shyam. The use of
sound techniques will enable to discover the defalcations on a timely basis. As a forensic auditor how will you deal
and suggest Technology based/Digital forensic techniques.
ANSWER :
Technology based /Digital Forensics Techniques: Every transaction leaves a digital footprint in today's computer-
driven society. Close scrutiny of relevant emails, accounting records, phone logs and target company hard drives
is a requisite facet of any modern forensic audit.
Before taking steps such as obtaining data from email etc. the forensic auditor should take
appropriate legal advice so that it doesn’t amount to invasion of privacy.
Digital investigations can become quite complex and require support from trained digital investigators.
Many open-source digital forensics tools are now available to assist you in this phase of the investigation.
752
(i)Cross Drive Analysis (ii) Live Analysis (iii) Deleted Files

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
(iv)Stochastic Forensics (v) Steganography (vi) EnCase

(vii)MD5 (viii) Tracking Log Files (ix) PC System Log
(x)Free Log Tools
40 (OCT 2022 MTP)

An American company engaged in the business of manufacturing and distribution of industrial gases, is interested
in acquiring a listed Indian Company having a market share of 51% and assets over Rs. 1000 Crore. It requests you
to conduct "Due Diligence" of assets of this listed Indian Company to find out, if any of the assets is overvalued.
List down the areas of due diligence exercise to find out overvalued assets.
ANSWER :
An American company which is manufacturing and distributing industrial gases is looking forward to acquire an
Indian company having 51% market share and assets beyond Rs. 1000 crores. Areas to be covered as a part of due
diligence exercise to find out over valued assets would be as under:
1.Uncollected/uncollectable receivables.
2.Obsolete, slow non-moving inventories or inventories valued above NRV; huge inventories of packing materials
etc. with name of company.
3.Underused or obsolete Plant and Machinery and their spares; asset values which have been impaired due to
4.Assets carried at much more than current market value due to capitalization of expenditure/foreign exchange
5.Litigated assets and property.
6.Investments carried at cost though realizable value is much lower.
7.Investments carrying a very low rate of income / return.
8.Infructuous project expenditure/deferred revenue expenditure etc.
9.Group Company balances under reconciliation etc.
10.Intangibles of no value.
41(OCT 2022 MTP)

JIN Ltd. which is based in Mumbai, is in the business of manufacturing leather products since 1995 and wants to
acquire OM Leathers Private Limited, which is based in Pune and engaged in the business of selling leather
products manufactured by different companies. Before acquisition JIN Ltd. wants to get a due diligence review to
be done of OM Leathers. JIN Ltd. appointed S & S Associates for conducting overall due diligence of OM Leathers.
During review, the accountant asked OM Leathers to provide financial projections of the company for next five
years, but OM leathers refused to provide the same and claimed that financial projections are not part of due
diligence review.
Whether the objection raised by the management of OM Leathers is correct? Give reason.
(a)The objection raised by OM Leathers is correct, as due diligence doesn’t include review of financial
projections.
(b)The objection raised by OM Leathers is not correct, as due diligence refers to an examination of a potential
753
investment to confirm all material facts of the prospective business which a company wants to acquire and

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
financial projection is a part of same.

(c)The objection raised by OM Leathers is correct, as reviewer cannot comment on financial projections in
his report.
(d)The objection raised by OM Leathers is not correct, as the target company cannot refuse in providing any
information required by the reviewer.
ANSWER : (B)
42 (SEPT 2022 MTP)

ABC & Co were appointed to conduct a forensic audit of XYZ Limited. After successfully conducting the forensic
audit, ABC & Co prepared its report for the appointing authority. A copy of the report was also shared with the
Board of Directors of the company. In the report, Forensic Auditors enumerated the findings of the investigation,
including a summary of the evidence, a conclusion as to the amount of loss suffered as a result of the fraud and
identification of those involved in fraud. The report also cover ed sections on the nature of the assignment, scope
of the investigation, approach utilized, limitations of scope and opinions. Upon receiving the report, the Board of
Directors raised objections as to how forensic auditors can mention the names of those who are involved in fraud.
You as a Forensic Expert guide whether is it appropriate to mention the details of the person who are involved in
fraud in the final report.
(a) Report can include a section to identify those involved in fraud. This is recommendatory and in line with the
appropriate practice of reporting.
(b) Report should not contain such details till the time it is proved in a court of law.
(c) Report can include a section to identify those involved in fraud but subject to prior approval of the Board of
Directors of the company.
(d) Report should not include a section to identify those involved in fraud as it is not permitted under SA 700.
ANSWER : ( A )
43(MARCH 2022MTP)
HSDC Bank Ltd., received an application from a pharmaceutical company for take over of their outstanding term
loans secured on its assets, availed from and outstanding with a nationalised bank. HSDC Bank Ltd., requires
you to make a due diligence audit in the areas of assets of pharmaceutical company especially with reference
to valuation aspect of assets. State what may be your areas of analysis in order to ensure that the assets are
not stated at overvalued amounts.
ANSWER :
Over-Valued Assets: In case of due diligence exercise, the area of analysis in order to ensure that the assets are
not stated at over-valued amounts are:
•Uncollected/uncollectable receivables.
•Obsolete, slow non-moving inventories or inventories valued above NRV; huge inventories of packing materials
etc. with name of company.
•Underused or obsolete Plant and Machinery and their spares; asset values which have been impaired due to
•Assets carried at much more than current market value due to capitalization of expenditure/foreign exchange
754

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
•Litigated assets and property.

•Investments carried at cost though realizable value is much lower.
•Investments carrying a very low rate of income / return.
•Infructuous project expenditure/deferred revenue expenditure etc.
•Group Company balances not reconciled.
•Intangibles having no relisable value.
44 (MARCH 2022 MTP)

CA Rajul has been appointed as Forensic Auditor by BMY Bank Limited for one of its borrowal accounts AMISS Ltd.
CA Rajul started the audit by first reviewing the transactions of the borrower in Bank statement as per Bank
records to identify any hidden patterns in that information. She had to review huge volume of data, as the number
of transactions per day were in hundreds and the data was to be reviewed for the last three years. So, she was
stuck up as to how to proceed further to identify any hidden patterns in information, if any. Guide CA Rajul,
suggesting which technique to be used for identifying any hidden patterns in the information.
ANSWER :
Data Mining Techniques:
i.Data mining technique is a set of assisted techniques designed to automatically mine large volumes of data for
new, hidden or unexpected information or patterns.
ii.It discovers the usual knowledge or patterns in data, without a predefined idea or hypothesis about what the
pattern may be, i.e. without any prior knowledge of fraud.
iii.It explains various affinities, association, trends and variations in the form of conditional logic.
iv.Data mining techniques are categorized in three ways: Discovery, Predictive modeling and Deviation and Link
analysis.
In the given case of BMY Bank Ltd., CA Rajul appointed as forensic auditor for its borrower, AMISS Ltd, shall use
above stated data mining techniques to identify any hidden patterns of information.
45(APRIL2022 MTP)
BR Construction was into the business of building roads and other infrastructure facilities for government
contracts. Mr. Tiwari, one of the senior official, was looking after the procurement of cement required at the
construction sites. There was a substantial increase in the price of cement bags bought as compared to those
bought prior to the appointment of Mr. Tiwari. The management of the company decides to get a forensic audit
done for the transactions handled by Mr. Tiwari. What points should be kept in mind by the management while
appointing a forensic auditor?
ANSWER :
A Forensic Auditor is often retained to analyze, interpret, summarize and present complex financial and business-
related issues in a manner which is both understandable and properly supported. Forensic Accountants are trained
to look beyond the numbers and deal with the business reality of the situation. Forensic auditor needs to have an
understanding on various frauds that can be carried off and how evidence need to be collected.
While appointing a forensic auditor, the Management of BR Construction must initially consider whether the firm
has the necessary skills and experience to accept the work. In view of above, Management of BR Construction
755
should ensure that the forensic auditor should necessarily possess the following characteristics and skills:

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
➢Crafting questions to be posed.

➢Responding to questions posed.
➢Identifying documents to be requested and/or subpoenaed.
➢Identifying individuals to be most knowledgeable of facts.
➢Conducting research relevant to facts of the case.
➢Identifying and preserving key evidence.
➢Evaluating produced documentation and information for completeness.
➢Analysing produced records and other information for facts.
➢Identifying alternative means to obtain key facts and information.
➢Providing questions for deposition and cross examination of fact and expert witnesses.
46(APRIL 2022 MTP)

Bhagwan & Co. has received an order in writing from the Central Government, in respect of one of its clients, to
carry out an investigation under section 210 of the Companies Act 2013. During the course of carrying out
investigation as above, Bhagwan & Co. requires certain evidence from a place outside India in order to establish
the correctness of an investment in the shares of a company outside India. What should be the procedure of
Bhagwan & Co. to seek evidence from outside India for the investigation?
(a)Seeking evidence from outside India for investment in shares outside India is outside the scope of investigation.
(b)An application is to be made to the competent court in India by the inspector and such court may issue a letter
of request to a court or an authority in such country for seeking evidence.
(c)The evidence can be sought by electronic mail by writing to the concerned authorities of the entity outside
India.
(d)Powers of seeking evidence outside India is available only to an investigator under section 212 - Serious Fraud
Investigation.
ANSWER : ( B )
47(MAY 2022 RTP)

Which among the following are the skills to be possessed by M/s ABC & Associates as forensic auditors?
(a)Criminology and evidence gathering.
(b)Confidence and curiosity.
(c)Discretion and creativity.
(d)Inquisitiveness and persistence.
ANSWER : A
48 (MAY 2022 RTP)

Shipra recently qualified as a Chartered Accountant and started her own practice. One of her friends told her that
756
Forensic Audit is a new area and has a lot of potential in terms of professional opportunities and remuneration.

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
Seema said that there is nothing new in this as ultimately forensic audit is also like other audits. Do you agree with
the views of Seema? Support your answer with relevant explanation.
ANSWER :
A forensic accountant will often look for indications of fraud that are not subject to the scope of a financial
statement audit. Forensic Accounting has an Investigative mentality" however auditing is done with "professional
scepticism". A forensic accountant will often require more extensive corroboration. A forensic accountant may
focus more on seemingly immaterial transactions. Therefore, the contention of Seema is not correct that
ultimately forensic audit is also like other audits.
Difference between forensic audit and other audits
Sr. Particulars Other Audits Forensic Audit
No.
1. Objectives Express an opinion as to Whether fraud has actually
‘True & Fair’ taken place in books.
presentation.
2. Techniques Substantive & Investigative, substantive or
Compliance. Sample in-depth checking.
based.
3. Period Normally for a particular No such limitations.
accounting period.
4. Verification of Relies on the Independent/verification of
stock, Estimation of management suspected/selected items
the realisable value
of assets, certificate/Management where misappropriation is

provisions, liability Representation. suspected.
etc.
5. Off balance sheet Used to vouch the Regulatory & propriety of
items (like contracts arithmetic accuracy & these transactions/contracts
etc.) compliance with are examined.
procedures.
6. Adverse findings if Negative opinion or Legal determination of fraud
any qualified opinion impact and identification of
expressed with/without perpetrators depending on
quantification. scope.
757

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s

(RTP NOV 2019) (MTP NOV 2019)
1. Shivam & Co LLP is a large firm of Chartered Accountants based out of Delhi-NCR. During the financial year
ended 31 March 2019, the firm Shivam & Co LLP got an intimation for the peer review on 1 July 2018. The
process of peer review got started and completed on 15 September 2018 which included the on-site review
from 1 August 2018 to 16 August 2018.
Shivam & Co LLP objected to the time taken by the Peer Reviewer on-site, however, as per Peer Reviewer,
the entire review process got completed within 90 days from the date of notifying the firm about its selection
for review.
a) The time for complete review should be completed within 120 days.
b) The time for on-site review should not have extended beyond 10 working days.
c) The time for complete review should be completed within 60 days.
d)The time for on-site review should not have extended beyond 7 working days.
Answer: Option D
2. An audit firm is the subject of the Peer review, please indicate the maximum number of years in
the review cycle:
(a) 1 year
(b) 2 years
(c) 3 years
(d) 5 years
Answer: c) 3 years
758

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
MTP Oct 2019 Qn no 2 (1 Mark)

3. Rana & Co LLP is a large firm of Chartered Accountants based out of Delhi-NCR. During the financial
year ended 31 March 2019, the firm Rana & Co LLP got an intimation for the peer review on 1 July. The
entire peer review process including on-site review got completed. The peer reviewer did not share
any of his observations with Rana & Co LLP as draft and final report was submitted to the firm.
(e) Peer reviewer need not share any draft report with the firm if there are no observations.
(f) Even the final report is not required to be submitted to the firm.
(g) Peer reviewer needs to share draft report with the firm before finalisation.
(h) There are no reports in case of peer review. On completion, a certificate to that effect is issued.
Answer: Option (g) Peer reviewer needs to share draft report with the firm before finalisation.
RTP May 2018 Qn no.20 (a), RTP May 2019 Qn no 25(a)
4. Technical, ethical and professional standards as per statement on peer review
Answer
Technical, Ethical and Professional Standards as per Statement on Peer Review: As per the
Statement, Technical, Professional and Ethical Standards means-
1. Accounting Standards issued by ICAI and /or prescribed and notified by the Central Government of
India;
2. Standards issued by the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India including-
(i) Engagement standards
(ii) Statements
(iii) Guidance notes
(iv) Standards on Internal Audit

(v) Statements on Quality Control
(vi) Notifications / Directions / Announcements / Guidelines / Pronouncements/ Professional standards
issued from time to time by the Council or any of its committees.
3. Framework for the Preparation and presentation of financial statements, framework of statements
and Standard on Auditing, Standard on Assurance Engagements, Standards on Quality Control and
Guidance Notes on related services issued, from time to time, by the Institute of Chartered
Accountants of India and framework for assurance engagements;
4. Provisions of the various relevant statutes and / or regulations which are applicable in the context
of the specific engagements being reviewed including instructions, guidelines, notifications,
directions issued by regulatory bodies as covered in the scope of assurance engagements.
May 2018 -4(e) 4 Marks
759
5. The elements of skill, experience and independence of reviewers are ensured before initiating
them in Peer Review process. In the above light, state few eligibility criteria fixed for a person to be

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
empanelled and also tor being appointed as a Peer Reviewer.

ANSWER:
Eligibility to be a Reviewer :
(i) A Peer Reviewer shall: -

(a) Be a member with at least 10 years of experience in practice.
(b) Is in Practice as per the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949.

(c) Should have undergone the requisite training as prescribed by the Board.
(d) Should furnish a declaration as prescribed by the Board, at the time of acceptance of Peer Review
appointment.
(e) Should have signed the Declaration of Confidentiality as prescribed by the Board.
(f) Should have conducted audit of Level I Entities for at least 7 years to be eligible for conducting Peer
Review of Level I Entities as referred to in Para II of this Statement.
(ii) For being a Reviewer a member should not have: -
(a) Disciplinary action / proceedings pending against him
(b) been found guilty by the Council or the Disciplinary Board or Committee at any time.
(c) been convicted by a Competent Court whether within or outside India, of an offence involving moral
turpitude and punishable with transportation or imprisonment.
(d) any Obligation or conflict of interest in the Practice Unit or its Partners / Personnel.
(iii) A Reviewer shall not accept any professional assignment from the Practice Unit for a period two years
from the date of appointment.
MTP-Mar 2019 Qn No 4(c) 5 Marks:

6. Ayush, a practicing Chartered Accountant is appointed to conduct the peer review of another practicing
unit. What are the areas excluded from the scope of peer reviewer?
Answer:
Areas excluded from scope of Peer Reviewer are:
(i) Management Consultancy Engagements;

(ii) Representation before various Authorities;
(iii) Engagements to prepare tax returns or advising clients in taxation matters;
(iv) Engagements for the compilation of financial statements;
(v) Engagements solely to assist the client in preparing, compiling or collating information other than financial
statements;
(vi) Testifying as an expert witness;
760
(vii) Providing expert opinion on points of principle, such as Accounting Standards or the applicability of certain
laws, on the basis of facts provided by the client; and

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
(viii) Engagement for Due diligence.
RTP Nov 18 Qn no 20(C)

7. Write short note on the stepwise approach of the peer reviewer.
Answer
Stepwise Approach of the Peer Reviewer: The stepwise approach which may be adopted by the
reviewer is discussed below-
(iii) The reviewer should gain an understanding of the engagement letter since an assurance engagement
or for that matter any other kind of engagement should begin with an engagement letter. This
understanding would help him in planning the review of documentation.
(iv) The number of assurance engagements to be selected requires the exercise of judgement by the
reviewer based on the evaluation of replies given in the questionnaire and the size of the practice
unit.
(v) The practice unit may have policies and procedures for accepting a particular engagement. The
reviewer should, wherever possible, examine that the policies and procedures for acceptance of
audit have been complied with and necessary documentation with regard to the same exists.
(vi) The reviewer may follow a combination of compliance procedures and substantive procedures
throughout the peer review process.
(vii) Finally, the reviewer while evaluating records may consider the following:
➢ determine that any significant issues, matters, problems that arose during the course of the
engagement have been appropriately considered, resolved and documented;
➢ determine that adequate audit evidence or other relevant evidence in relation to the engagement is
obtained to support the reasonableness of the conclusions drawn; and
➢ determine that significant decisions relating to the engagement, use of professional judgement,
resolution of significant matters have been properly documented.
Nov 2018 Qn no 6(e) 4 Marks

8. What are the objectives of Peer Review?
Answer
Objectives of Peer Review: The main objective of Peer Review is to ensure that in carrying out the
assurance service assignments, the members of the Institute-
(1) comply with Technical, Professional and Ethical Standards as applicable including other regulatory
requirements thereto and
(2) have in place proper systems including documentation thereof, to amply demonstrate the quality of
the assurance services.
Thus, the primary objective of peer review is not to find out deficiencies but to improve the quality of
services rendered by members of the profession. The Statement of Peer Review also makes it clear that
761
the peer review, "does not seek to redefine the scope and authority of the Technical Standards specified

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
by the Council but seeks to enforce them within the parameters prescribed by the Technical Standards".
The peer review is directed towards maintenance as well as enhancement of quality of assurance
services and to provide guidance to members to improve their performance and adherence to various
statutory and other regulatory requirements. Such an objective of the peer review process makes it
amply clear that the reviewer is not going to sit on the judgment of the practice unit while rendering
assurance services but to evaluate the procedure followed by the practice unit in rendering such a
service.
Accordingly, where a practice unit is not following technical standards, the reviewers are expected to
recommend measures to improve the procedures. To elaborate further, the key objective of peer review
exercise is not to identify isolated cases of engagement failure, but to identify weaknesses that are
pervasive and chronic in nature. The conclusion, therefore, is that the peer review seeks to identify and
address patterns of non-compliance with quality control standards.
Nov 18 Qn no 6(e) 4 Marks

9. What are the inherent limitations of Peer Review?
Answer
Inherent Limitations of Peer Review: The reviewer conducts the review in accordance with the
Statement on Peer Review. The review would not necessarily disclose all weaknesses in compliance of
technical standards and maintenance of quality of assurance services since it would be based on
selective tests. As there are inherent limitations in the effectiveness of any system of quality control
which happens to be subject-matter of review, departure from the system may occur and may not be
detected.
MTP-OCT-18 Qn No 6(E) 4 Marks:
10. Arpit, a practicing Chartered Accountant is appointed to conduct the peer review of another
practicing unit. What areas Arpit should review in the assessment of independence of the
practicing unit?
MTP-OCT-19 Qn No 6(c)(2) 4 Marks:
Aarav, a practicing Chartered Accountant is appointed to conduct the peer review of another
practicing unit. What areas A should review in the assessment of independence of the practicing
unit?
Answer:
Review in the Assessment of Independence of the Practicing Unit – The reviewer should carry out
the compliance review of the five general controls, i.e., independence, maintenance of professional skills
and standards, outside consultation, staff supervision and development and office administration and
evaluate the degree of reliance to be placed upon them. The degree of reliance will, ultimately, affect
762
the attestation service engagements to be reviewed.

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
Aarav, a practicing Chartered Accountant should review following controls in respect of assessment of
independence of the practicing unit:
(i) Does the practice unit have a policy to ensure independence, objectivity and integrity, on the part of
partners and staff? Who is responsible for this policy?
(ii) Does the practice unit communicate these policies and the expected standards of professional
behaviour to all staff?
(iii) Does the practice unit monitor compliance with policies and procedures relating to independence?
(iv) Does the practice unit periodically review the practice unit's association with clients to ensure
objectivity and independence?

11. Scope of peer review.
Answer:
Scope of Peer Review: The Statement on Peer Review lays down the scope of review to be conducted
as under:
The Peer Review process shall apply to all the assurance services provided by a Practice Unit.
1. Once a Practice Unit is selected for Review, its assurance engagement records pertaining to the Peer
Review Period shall be subjected to Review.
2. The Review shall cover:
(i) Compliance with Technical, Professional and Ethical Standards:
(ii) Quality of reporting.
(iii) Systems and procedures for carrying out assurance services.
(iv) Training programmes for staff (including articled and audit assistants) concerned with assurance
functions, including availability of appropriate infrastructure.
(v) Compliance with directions and/or guidelines issued by the Council to the
Members, including Fees to be charged, Number of audits undertaken, register for Assurance
Engagements conducted during the year and such other related records.
(vi) Compliance with directions and/or guidelines issued by the Council in relation to article assistants
and/or audit assistants, including attendance register, work diaries, stipend payments, and such
other related records.
RTP May 2018 Qn no.20(b)

12. Write short note on the Various Stages involved in the Conduct of the Quality Review Assignments
Answer
763
Various Stages involved in the Conduct of the Quality Review Assignments are:

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
• Selection of Audit Firm and Technical Reviewer to conduct Quality Review and sending Offer Letter
of Engagement to the Technical Reviewer.
• Technical Reviewer to convey his acceptance of Letter of Engagement by sending necessary
declarations for meeting eligibility conditions and furnishing statement of confidentiality by the
Technical Reviewer and his assistant/s, if any.
• Intimation to the Audit Firm about the proposed Quality Review and acceptance of the assignment
by the Technical Reviewer. Also marking a copy of the intimation to the Technical Reviewer.
• Technical Reviewer to send the specified Quality Review Program General Questionnaire to the Audit
firm for filling-up and call for additional information from the Audit Firm, if required.
• Technical Reviewer to carry out the Quality Review by visiting the office of the Audit Firm by fixing
the date as per mutual consent.
• Technical Reviewer to send the preliminary report to Audit firm.
• Audit firm to submit representation on the preliminary report to the Technical Reviewer.
• Technical Reviewer to submit final report alongwith a copy of Annual report of the company/entity
for the year, to the Board in the specified format, on their (individual) letterhead, duly signed and
dated within 45 days from the date of acceptance of the assignment.
• Technical Reviewer should also send a copy of their final report to the Statutory Auditor/Audit firm,
requesting the firm to send their submissions thereon to the
• Board within 7 days of receipt of the final report with a copy to Technical Reviewer. Upon receipt of
their final submission, Technical Reviewer shall submit within next 7 days a summary of their findings,
reply of the audit firm thereon alongwith their final comments in the specified format.
• Quality Review Group to consider the report of the Technical Reviewer and responses of the Audit
firm and make recommendations to Quality Review Board.
• Quality Review Board to consider the report of the Quality Review Group and decide the final course
of action.
MTP Mar 18 Qn no.6(e) 5 Marks

13. List out the consequences if the Quality review board notices major non-compliances with the
requirements of the Standards on quality control or standards on auditing or accounting standards?
Answer
Consequence in case QRB notices non-compliance of Standards:
• Referring the case to the Director (Discipline) of the Institute for necessary action under the Chartered
Accountants Act, 1949;
• Informing the details of the non-compliance to the regulatory bod(y)/ies relevant to the enterprise;
• Intimating the concerned auditor as to the findings of the Report as well as action initiated under (a) and/or
(b) above;
764
• Consider the matter complete and inform the audit firm/auditor accordingly.

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
MTP Apr 18 Qn no.6(d) 4 Marks

14. Reviewers, based on the conclusions drawn from the quality review, shall issue a preliminary
report and subsequently the final report. As a quality reviewer briefly discuss the basic elements of
Quality Review Report.
Basic Elements of the Reviewer's Report in case of Quality Review: The quality review report should
contain elements relating to audit quality of companies and elements relating to quality control
framework adopted by the audit firm in conducting audit which are given below:
A. Elements relating to audit quality of companies:

• A reference to the description of the scope of the review and the period of review of audit firm
conducted alongwith existence of limitation(s), if any, on the review conducted with reference to
the scope as envisaged.
• A statement indicating the instances of lack of compliance with technical standards and other
professional and ethical standards.
• A statement indicating the instances of lack of compliance with relevant laws and regulations.
B. Elements relating to quality control framework adopted by the audit firm in conducting audit:
• An indication of whether the firm has implemented a system of quality control with reference to the
quality control standards.
• A statement indicating that the system of quality control is the responsibility of the reviewed firm.
• An opinion on whether the reviewed firm's system of quality control has been designed to meet the
requirements of the quality control standards for attestation services and whether it was complied
with during the period reviewed to provide the reviewer with reasonable assurance of complying
with technical standards in all material respects.
• Where the reviewer concludes that a modification in the report is necessary, a description of the
reasons for modification. The report of the reviewer should also contain the suggestions.
• A reference to the preliminary report.
• An attachment which describes the quality review conducted including an overview and information
on planning and performing the review.
Further, the Quality Review Report should be issued on the reviewer's (individual) letterhead and
signed by the reviewer. The report should be addressed to the Board and should be dated as of the
date of the conclusion of the review.
MTP-Aug-18 Qn No 6(e) 4 Marks:
15. Reviewers, based on the conclusions drawn from the review, shall issue a preliminary report
and subsequently the final report. A clean report indicates that the reviewer is of the opinion that
the affairs are being conducted in a manner that ensures the quality of services rendered.
765
However, a reviewer may qualify the report due to one or more reasons. In view of above Give

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
example of some of the situations when Reviewer of Quality Review Board may qualify the
report.
Answer:
Reviewers, based on the conclusions drawn from the review, shall issue a preliminary report and
subsequently the final report. A clean report indicates that the reviewer is of the opinion that the
affairs are being conducted in a manner that ensures the quality of services rendered. However, a
reviewer may qualify the report due to one or more of the following:
 non-compliance with technical standards;

 non-compliance with relevant laws and regulations;
 quality control system design deficiency;
 non-compliance with quality control policies and procedures; or
 non-existence of adequate training programmes for staff.
RTP Nov 18 Qn no 20(b)

16. Write short note on Objective of Quality Review
Answer
Objectives of Quality Review: Quality review is directed towards evaluation of audit quality and adherence to
various statutory and other regulatory requirements. They are designed to identify and address weaknesses
and deficiencies related to how the audits were performed by the audit firms. To achieve that goal, quality
reviews included reviews of certain aspects of selected statutory audits performed by the firm and reviews of
other matters related to the firm’s quality control system.
In the course of reviewing aspects of selected audits, a review may identify ways in which a particular audit is
deficient, including failures by the firm to identify, or to address appropriately, aspects in which an entity’s
financial statements do not present fairly the financial position or the results of operations in conformity with the
applicable Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) and other technical standards. It is not the purpose
of a review, however, to review all of a firm’s audits or to identify every aspect in which a reviewed audit is
deficient. Accordingly, a review should not be understood to provide any assurance that the firm’s audits, or its
clients’ financial statements or reporting thereon, are free of any deficiencies.
RTP Nov 2019 Qn no 25(e)

17. Scope of the Quality review.
Answer
The scope of the quality review includes:
❑ Examining whether the Engagement Partner has ensured compliance with the applicable technical
standards in India and other applicable professional and ethical standards and requirements.
❑ Examining whether the Engagement Partner has ensured compliance with the relevant laws and
766
regulations.

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
❑ Examining whether the Audit firm has implemented a system of quality control as envisaged in line
with the Standard on Quality Control (SQC) 1, Quality Control for Firms that Perform Audits and
Reviews of Historical Financial Information, and Other Assurance and Related Services Engagements.
Study Material
18. A, a practicing Chartered Accountant is appointed to conduct the peer review of another
practicing unit. What areas A should review in the assessment of independence of the practicing
unit?
Answer
Review in the Assessment of Independence of the Practicing Unit – The reviewer should carry out the
compliance review of the five general controls, i.e., independence, maintenance of professional skills and
standards, outside consultation, staff supervision and development and office administration and evaluate
the degree of reliance to be placed upon them. The degree of reliance will, ultimately, affect the attestation
service engagements to be reviewed.
A, a practicing Chartered Accountant should review following controls in respect of assessment of independence
of the practicing unit:
(i) Does the practice unit have a policy to ensure independence, objectivity and integrity, on the part of
partners and staff? Who is responsible for this policy?
(ii) Does the practice unit communicate these policies and the expected standards of professional behaviour
to all staff?
(iv) Does the practice unit periodically review the practice unit's association with clients to ensure
objectivity and independence?
19. What are the reporting responsibilities of the technical reviewer while carrying out a Quality
review assignment?
The Technical Reviewers expresses an opinion on whether the system of quality control for the attestation
services of the firm under review has been designed so as to carry out professional attestation services
assignments in a manner that ensures compliance with the applicable Technical standards and maintenance of
the quality of attestation service work they perform. The Technical Reviewer’s review would not necessarily
disclose all weaknesses in the quality of attestation work or all instances of lack of compliance with applicable
Technical Standards. As there are inherent limitations in the effectiveness of any system of quality control,
departure from the system may occur and not be detected. Also, projection of any evaluation of system of
quality control to future periods is subject to the risk that the system of quality controls may become
inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies and procedures
may deteriorate. In the process, the Technical Reviewers also identified what they considered to be deficiencies
and any defects in, or criticisms of the firm’s quality control system.
767
20. Give examples of areas on which the reviewer may qualify the report?

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
ANSWER:
The reviewer, based on the conclusions drawn from the review, shall issue a preliminary report and
subsequently the final report. The final report shall be issued in the format as may be specified by the Board
from time to time. A clean report indicates that the TR is of the opinion that the statutory audit is being
conducted in a manner that ensures the quality of audit services rendered. However, a reviewer may qualify
the report due to one or more of the following:
non-compliance with technical standards and other relevant guidance;
non-compliance with relevant laws and regulations as required under applicable auditing standard;
quality control system design deficiency; or
non-compliance with quality control policies and procedures.
21. What are the consequences if the Quality review board notices major non-compliances with the
requirements of the Standards on quality control or standards on auditing or accounting standards?
ANSWER:
(a) Make recommendations to the Council of ICAI u/s 28B(a) of Chartered Accountants Act, 1949 for
referring the case to the Director (Discipline) of the Institute for consideration and necessary action
under the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949.
(b) Issue advisory and guidance to the AFUR u/s 28B(c) of Chartered Accountants Act, 1949 for
improvement in the quality of services and adherence to various statutory and other regulatory
requirements. A copy of such advisory may also be sent to the ICAI for information.
(c) Inform the details of the non-compliance to the regulatory bod(y)/ies relevant to the entity as may
be decided by the Board.
(d) Intimate the AFUR as to the findings of the Report as well as action initiated as above.
(e) In case of review arising out of a reference received from a regulatory body, inform the results of
review and the details of action taken to the concerned regulatory body.
(f) Consider the matter complete and inform the AFUR accordingly.
22. Briefly discuss the various stages involved in the conduct of the quality review assignments.
ANSWER:
The following table describes the various stages generally involved in the conduct of the quality review
assignments:
QRB selects Audit Firm and the audit file for review and identifies TR to conduct Quality
Review.
768
QRB sends Offer Letter of Engagement to TR.


for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
TR conveys his acceptance of Letter of Engagement to QRB by sending necessary

declarations for meeting eligibility conditions and furnishing statement of confidentiality by
himself and his assistant/s, if any.
QRB intimates AFUR about the proposed Quality Review. QRB also sends a copy of this
intimation letter to TR and provides them contact details of each other for further
communication.
TR sends the specified Quality Review Questionnaire to the AFUR for filling-up. He also calls
for additional information from the AFUR, if required
TR & his team carry out the Quality Review by starting their off-site review by making proper
planning for the review and then on-site visiting the office of the AFUR by fixing the date as
per mutual consent ensuring that review exercise gets completed within specified time
frame.
On completion of on-site review, TR to send the preliminary report to AFUR. TR shall send a
copy of preliminary report to QRB as well.
AFUR to submit representation on the preliminary report to the TR and TR to immediately

send the reply of the AFUR to QRB.
TR to submit final report along with a copy of Annual report of the entity for the year under
review, to the QRB in the specified format, on his (individual) letterhead, duly signed and
dated within specified time frame or as extended by the QRB. In addition, he shall also send
a copy of the final report to the AFUR, requesting them to send their final reply thereon to
the QRB within 7 days of receipt of the final report. AFUR shall also send a copy of their final
reply to TR.
AFUR to submit to QRB their reply on the final report and feedback, in prescribed format,
regarding their experience of the quality review.
Upon receipt of the final reply from the AFUR, TR shall submit to QRB within next 7 days a
summary of his findings, in the specified format, containing his findings, technical
requirements, final reply of the AFUR and his final comments thereon.
QRG to consider the report of the TR and responses of AFUR and make recommendations to
QRB. QRG may also call for additional details/information/explanations, if required, from
TR/AFUR or issue such directions to TR, as it may deem appropriate, enabling it to assess the
quality of audit and reporting by the AFUR.
QRB to consider report and recommendations of QRG and decide further course of action.
769

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
23.What are the important areas for evaluation while conducting quality reviews in terms of SQC -1
Standard on Quality Control?
ANSWER:
(1) Whether the audit firm establishes and implements policies and procedure on all the element of
system of quality control
(2) Whether the engagement quality control reviewer review at an appropriate time for the planning of
an audit, significant audit judgement, and expressions of an audit opinion. (3) Whether the audit firm
assigns as the person responsible for the monitoring of the system of quality control a person with
appropriate experience for the role, vest the assigned person with sufficient and appropriate authority.
(4) Whether the audit firm obtain, at least annually, a confirmation letter concerning compliance with
policies and procedure for the maintenance of independence from all person required to maintain
independence. (5) Whether the audit firm perform the independence confirmation procedure set forth
in its internal rules before acceptance and continuance of an audit engagement, and when issuing the
auditor’s report appropriately confirms that there was no change in the status of independence.
(6) Whether the audit firm develop and provides education/ training program that fully take into account
the knowledge, experience, competence and capabilities of the professional staff.
24.Evaluating the professional judgment exercised by the auditor is one of the important aspects
under Quality review, please explain the situation with reference to applicable SA.
ANSWER:
As per the QRB, the term “Technical Standards” in the context of the Chartered Accountants
(Procedures of Meetings of Quality Review Board, and Terms and Conditions of Service and
Allowances of the Chairperson and Members of the Board) Rules, 2006 includes:
Preface to the Statements of Accounting Standards;

Preface to the Standards on Quality Control, Auditing, Review, Other Assurance and Related
Services;
The Accounting Standards notified under section 133 of the Companies Act, 2013; The Accounting
Standards issued by the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India; The Framework for the
Preparation and Presentation of Financial Statements issued by the Institute of Chartered Accountants
of India;
The applicable Quality Control and Standards on Auditing issued by the Institute of Chartered
Accountants of India and those notified under the relevant statute; The Statements on Auditing
issued by the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India; The Notifications/Directions/Guidelines
issued by the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India including those of a self-regulatory nature;
770

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
Other relevant legal and regulatory requirements.

“Other Relevant Guidance” include:-
• The Guidance Notes on accounting and auditing matters issued by the Institute of Chartered
Accountants of India;
• The Code of Ethics issued by the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India.
25.What are the objectives of the Quality review?

ANSWER:
Quality review is directed towards evaluation of audit quality and adherence to various statutory and
other regulatory requirements. They are designed to identify and address weaknesses and deficiencies
related to how the audits were performed by the audit firms. To achieve that goal, quality reviews
included reviews of certain aspects of selected statutory audits performed by the firm and reviews of
other matters related to the firm’s quality control system.
In the course of reviewing aspects of selected audits, a review may identify ways in which a particular
audit is deficient, including failures by the firm to identify, or to address appropriately, aspects in which
an entity’s financial statements do not present fairly the financial position or the results of operations
in conformity with the applicable Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) and other technical
standards. It is not the purpose of a review, however, to review all of a firm’s audits or to identify
every aspect in which a reviewed audit is deficient. Accordingly, a review should not be understood to
provide any assurance that the firm’s audits, or its clients’ financial statements or reporting thereon,
are free of any deficiencies.
The scope & objective of the quality review includes:

(a) Examining whether the Statutory Auditor has ensured compliance with the applicable technical
standards in India and other applicable professional and ethical standards and other relevant
guidance.
(b) Examining whether the Statutory Auditor has ensured compliance with the relevant laws and
regulations as required under applicable auditing standard.
(c) Examining whether the Audit firm under review (AFUR) has implemented a system of quality control
with reference to the applicable quality control standards. (d) Examining whether there is no material
misstatement of assets and liabilities as at the reporting date in respect to the selected entity.

26. ICAI is responsible for monitoring the quality of the work of it’s members for performing audits of
financial statements?
(a) Yes - for all audits of financial statements
(b) Yes - for all audits except those of listed entities
(c) No, responsibility for quality assurance for all audits rests with another body
(d) Yes - for all audits except those of unlisted entities
771
Answer: (a) Yes - for all audits of financial statements


for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
27. What types of engagements are not included in the scope of the quality assurance review program?
a) Financial statement audit - listed entities (minimum requirement)
b) Financial statement audit - audit of other than listed entities
c) Other services (e.g., review, compilation)
d) Insolvency
Answer: d)Insolvency
RTP Nov 2020 Q no 20

28. Write a short note on the following:
(a) Selection of sample by the reviewer in case of peer review.
(b) Classification of frauds by NBFC.
(c) General steps in the conduct of risk based audit.
(d) Contents of an audit plan.

Answer
(a) Selection of Sample by the Reviewer in case of Peer Review:

(i) The Reviewer shall within 15 days of receiving the information from the Practice
Unit select a sample of the assurance services that he would like to Review and intimate the same to
the Practice Unit.
(ii) The Reviewer may also seek further / additional clarification from the Practice Unit on the
information furnished / not furnished.
(iii) The Reviewer shall plan for an on–site Review visit or initial meeting in consultation with the
Practice Unit. The Reviewer shall give the Practice Unit at least fifteen days’ time to keep ready the
necessary records of the selected assurance services.
(iv) The Reviewer and Practice Unit shall mutually cooperate and ensure that the entire Review process
is completed within 90 days from the date of notifying the Practice Unit about its selection for Review.
(b)Classification of Frauds by NBFC: In order to have uniformity in reporting, frauds have been
classified as under based mainly on the provisions of the Indian Penal Code:
(i) Misappropriation and criminal breach of trust.
(ii) Fraudulent encashment through forged instruments, manipulation of books of account or through
fictitious accounts and conversion of property.
(iii) Unauthorised credit facilities extended for reward or for illegal gratification.
(iv) Negligence and cash shortages.

772
(v) Cheating and forgery.


for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
(vi) Irregularities in foreign exchange transactions.
(vii) Any other type of fraud not coming under the specific heads as above.
Cases of ‘negligence and cash shortages’ and ‘irregularities in foreign exchange transactions’ referred
to in items (d) and (f) above are to be reported as fraud if the intention to cheat/ defraud is suspected/
proved. However, the following cases where fraudulent intention is not suspected/ proved, at the time
of detection, will be treated as fraud and reported accordingly:
(I) cases of cash shortages more than Rs. 10,000/- and
(II) cases of cash shortages more than Rs. 5000/- if detected by management/ auditor/ inspecting
officer and not reported on the occurrence by the persons handling cash.
(c) General Steps in the Conduct of Risk Base Audit: RBA consists of four main phases starting with the
identification and prioritization of risks, to the determination of residual risk, reduction of residual risk
to acceptable level and the reporting to auditee of audit results. These are achieved through the
following:
Step 1 Understand auditee operations to identify and prioritize risks: Understanding auditee
operations involves processes for reviewing and understanding the audited organization’s risk
management processes for its
strategies, framework of operations, operational performance and information process framework, in
order to identify and prioritize the error and fraud risks that impact the audit of financial statements.
The environment in which the auditee operates, the information required to monitor changes in the
environment, and the process or activities integral to the audited entity’s success in meeting its
objectives are the key factors to an understanding of agency risks. Likewise, a performance review of
the audited entity’s delivery of service by comparing expectations against actual results may also aid in
understanding agency operations.
Step 2 Assess auditee management strategies and controls to determine residual audit risk:
Assessment of management risk strategies and controls is the determination as to how controls within
the auditee are designed. The role of internal audit in promoting a sound accounting system and
internal control is recognized, thus the SAI should evaluate the effectiveness of internal audit to
determine the extent to which reliance can be placed upon it in the conduct of substantive tests.
Step 3 Manage residual risk to reduce it to acceptable level: Management of residual risk requires the
design and execution of a risk reduction approach that is efficient and effective to bring down residual
audit risk to an acceptable level. This includes the design and execution of necessary audit procedures
and substantive testing to obtain evidence in support of transactions and balances. More resources
should be allocated to areas of high audit risks, which were earlier known through the analytical
procedures undertaken.
Step 4 Inform auditee of audit results through appropriate report: The results of audit shall be
communicated by the auditor to the audited entity. The auditor must immediately communicate to the
auditee reportable conditions that have been observed even before completion of the audit, such as
773
weaknesses in the int ernal control system, deficiencies in the design and operation of internal controls

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
that affect the organization’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data d)Contents
of an Audit Plan: The auditor shall develop an audit plan that shall include a description of-
i. The nature, timing and extent of planned risk assessment procedures, as determined under SA 315
“Identifying and Assessing the Risks of Material Misstatement through Understanding the Entity and Its
Environment”.
ii. The nature, timing and extent of planned further audit procedures at the assertion level, as
determined under SA 330 “The Auditor’s Responses to Assessed Risks”.
iii. Other planned audit procedures that are required to be carried out so that the engagement
complies with SAs.
The audit plan is more detailed than the overall audit strategy that includes the nature, timing and
extent of audit procedures to be performed by engagement team members.
Planning for these audit procedures takes place over the course of the audit as the audit plan for the
engagement develops. For example, planning of the auditor's risk assessment procedures occurs early
in the audit process. However, planning the nature, timing and extent of specific further audit
procedures depends on the outcome of those risk assessment procedures. In addition, the auditor may
begin the execution of further audit procedures for some classes of transactions, account balances and
disclosures before planning all remaining further audit procedures
28. Write a short note on the following: (rtp- july 2021)
(a) Technical, Ethical and Professional Standards as per Statement on Peer Review.
ANSWER
As per the Statement on Peer Review, Technical, Professional and Ethical Standards means:
(i) Accounting Standards issued by ICAI that are applicable for entities other than companies under the
Companies Act, 2013;
(ii) Accounting Standards prescribed under section 133 of the Companies Act; 2013 by the Central Government
based on the recommendation of ICAI and in consultation with the National Financial Reporting Authority
(NFRA) and notified as Accounting Standards Rules 2006, as amended from to time;
(iii) Indian Accounting Standards prescribed under section 133 of the Companies Act 2013 by the Central
Government based on the recommendation of ICAI and in consultation with NFRA and notified as Companies
(Indian Accounting Standards) Rules, 2015, as amended from time to time;
(iv) Standards
Standards issued by the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India

774
including-

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
(a) Engagement standards
(b) Statements
(c) Guidance notes
(d) Standards on Internal Audit.
(e) Guidelines/ Notifications / Directions / Announcements /

Pronouncements / Professional Standards issued from time to
time by the Council or any of its Committees
(v) Framework for the preparation and presentation of financial statements, Preface to the Standards on Quality
Control, Auditing, Review, Other Assurance and Related Services and Framework for Assurance engagements;
(vi) Provisions of the relevant statutes and / or rules or regulations which are applicable in the context of the
specific engagements being reviewed including instructions, guidelines, notifications, directions issued by
regulatory bodies as covered in the scope of assurance engagements.
29. MMH & Co, is a large firm of Chartered Accountants having 10 partners and 7 branches across India. The
firm had undertaken Statutory Audit of the branches of some insurance companies and public sector banks.
They were also the Central Statutory Auditors of a major Private Sector Bank in South India. On 1st
September,2019, the firm got an intimation from Peer Review Board (‘Board’) regarding the peer review of
the firm. The Board recommended some names of reviewers. The practice unit, MMH & Co(‘Firm’), selected
CA. R and intimated the name to the Board. CA. R along with his qualified assistant did an on-site review. The
Firm was not happy with the preliminary report issued by the reviewer arguing that the findings of the
reviewer were baseless. The managing Partner of the firm wrote a letter to the Peer review Board doubting
the eligibility of the reviewer.
In this backdrop, you are required to advise on the following matter. (mtp nov 20)
(a) A Peer Reviewer shall be a Chartered Accountant having at least 15 years of experience in practice and
should have conducted audit of Level I entities for at least 7 years.
(b) A Peer Reviewer shall be a Chartered Accountant having at least 10 years of experience in practice and
should have conducted audit of Level I entities for at least 7 years.
(c) A Peer Reviewer shall be a Chartered Accountant having at least 15 years of experience in practice and
should have conducted audit of Level II entities for at least 7 years.
(d) A Peer Reviewer shall be a Chartered Accountant having at least 10 years of experience in practice and
should have conducted audit of Level II entities for at least 7 years
ANSWER- b
30. ABC & Co LLP is a large firm of Chartered Accountants based out of Chennai. ABC & Co. LLP is
subject to peer review which was last conducted 3 years back. For the peer review of the financial
775
year ended 31 March 2020, the firm got an intimation on 31 May 2020. The process of peer review
got started and was completed on 29 September 2020. In view of peer reviewer, the systems and

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
procedures of ABC & Co. LLP are deficient / non-compliant. The peer reviewer did not share any of
his observations with ABC & Co LLP as draft and final report was submitted to the Board. Comment.
(4 Marks) (mtp nov 20)
ANSWER
Peer Review Report of Reviewer: After completing the on-site Review, the Peer Reviewer, before making his
Report to the Board, shall communicate his findings in the Preliminary Report to the Practice Unit if in his
opinion, the systems and procedures are deficient or non-compliant with reference to any matter that has been
noticed by him or if there are other matters where he wants to seek clarification.
The Practice Unit shall within 15 days after the date of receipt of the findings, make any submissions or
representations, in writing to the Reviewer. (i.e. Response to the Preliminary Report).
At the end of an on-site Review if the Reviewer is satisfied with the reply received from the Practice Unit, he
shall submit a Peer Review Report to the Board along with his initial findings, response by the Practice Unit and
the manner in which the responses have been dealt with. A copy of the report shall also be forwarded to the
Practice Unit.
In case the Reviewer is of the opinion that the response by the Practice Unit is not satisfactory, the Reviewer
shall accordingly submit a modified Report to the Board incorporating his reasons for the same. The Reviewer
shall also submit initial findings (i.e. Preliminary Report), response by the Practice Unit (Response to
Preliminary Report) and the manner in which the responses have been dealt with. A copy of the report shall also
be forwarded to the Practice Unit.
In case of a modified report, The Board shall order for a “Follow On” Review after a period of one year from the
date of issue of report as mentioned above. If the Board so decides, the period of one year may be reduced but
shall not be less than six months from the date of issue of the report.
In the instant case, in view of peer reviewer systems and procedures in ABC & Co. LLP are deficient, therefore,
peer reviewer should not submit the report directly to the Board. Thus, contention of ABC & Co. LLP is correct
31. CA. Sudarshan, appointed as a Peer Reviewer for M/s. Preet Associates, has asked for all the management
consultancy engagements and engagements solely to assist the client in preparing, compiling or collating
information other than financial statements carried out by M/s. Preet Associates for peer review during the
period considered for peer review purposes by the board. Peer Reviewer CA. Sudarshan has also sent out a
mail to Peer Review Board regarding his selection. Mr. Preet, the managing partner of the firm seeks your
advise on this matter. (mtp – I -july 2021)
(4 Marks)
ANSWER
Selection of Assurance Service Engagements for Review: The Statement on Peer Review defines the scope of
peer review which revolves around compliance with technical, ethical and professional standards; quality of
reporting; office systems and procedures with regard to compliance of assurance engagements; and, training
programmes for staff including articled and audit assistants involved in assurance engagements. The entire peer
review process is directed at the assurance services.
Assurance Services means assurance engagements services as specified in the “Framework for Assurance
Engagements” issued by the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India and as may be amended from time to
time. Assurance engagements does not include management consultancy engagements or engagements solely
to assist the client in preparing, compiling or collating information other than financial statements. In the given
situation, CA. Sudarshan is appointed as a peer reviewer for M/s Preet Associates, has asked for all management
consultancy engagements and engagements solely to assist the client in preparing, compiling or collating
776
information other than financial statements carried out by M/s Preet Associates for her peer review. In view of

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
above, Peer Review of management consultancy engagements and engagements solely to assist the client in
preparing, compiling or collating information other than financial statements at the time of execution step by
CA. Sudarshan is not correct as management consultancy engagements and engagements solely to assist the
client in preparing, compiling or collating information other than financial statements are not covered in the
scope of Assurance engagement and Peer Review is directed at assurance engagement only.
32. Briefly explain the difference between Peer Review and Quality Review. (4 Marks) (mtp – II -july
2021)
ANSWER
Difference Between Peer Review and Quality Review: Peer review is a review of the systems and procedures of
an audit firm. Although sample audit files are inspected by the peer reviewer, it is done for the purpose of
testing the effectiveness of the systems and procedures. The intention is to not to find faults but to help the firm
develop effective systems. It is a kind of mentoring process. Peer review is a part of the activities of ICAI aimed
at improving the quality of service.
In contrast, a quality review is supposed to act as a deterrent. Quality Review Board (QRB) is constituted by the
Central Government and is independent of ICAI. As per Section 28A of the Chartered Accountant’s Act, the
Central Government has the authority to constitute a Quality Review Board. QRB carries out supervisory and
disciplinary functions. A quality review normally pertains to one particular audit conducted by an audit firm. The
main objective quality review is to find errors or inadequacies, if any, committed by the auditor while conducting
the audit. Serious errors detected in quality review lead to disciplinary action against the member.
33. (RTP- NOV 2021)

(a) Roshan, a practicing Chartered Accountant is appointed to conduct the peer review of another
practicing unit. What areas Roshan should review in the assessment of independence of the
practicing unit?
(b) You are required to classify the following practice units into Level I entity or Level II entity for the
purpose of peer review along with providing the reason for such classification, assuming the services
have been undertaken in the period under review by such CA firms:
Name of the Firm Data of assurance services provided by such

firms
MT & Co. Conducted statutory audit of a private company
which is an associate of a company, the net
worth of which is ₹ 300 crore.
GBL & Co. Conducted statutory audit of a Mutual Fund
Company.
IML & Associates Conducted statutory audit of a company
registered under Section 8 of the Companies Act,
2013 but is not covered as a public interested
entity. However, it has raised a contribution of ₹
60 crore.
BTS & Co. Conducted statutory audit of an unlisted public
company having net worth of ₹ 4 crore and
turnover of ₹ 55 crore. The net worth of its
parent company is ₹ 325 crore.
777

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
TJK & Associates Conducted statutory audit of LLP which has

raised has a loan of ₹ 35 crore from a bank and a
loan of ₹ 10 crore from an NBFC, respectively.
(c) Evaluating the professional judgment exercised by the auditor is one of the important aspects
under Quality review, please explain the situation with reference to applicable SA.
ANSWER
(a) Review in the Assessment of Independence of the Practicing Unit – The reviewer should carry out the
compliance review of the five general controls, i.e., independence, maintenance of professional skills and
standards, outside consultation, staff supervision and development and office administration and evaluate the
degree of reliance to be placed upon them. The degree of reliance will, ultimately, affect the attestation service
engagements to be reviewed.
Independence is the main quality expected of an auditor. That is the very basis for the existence of the
profession of auditing. Independence is a condition of mind as well a personal character of a person. It is difficult
to define but very easy to perceive. Guidance Note on Independence of Auditors clarifies that independence is
of two types, viz. independence of mind and independence of appearance. The Guidance Note further states
that there are certain threats to independence which are classified as self interest threats, self review threats,
advocacy threats, familiarity threats and intimidation threats.
The responsibility of the Peer Reviewer, therefore, is to ascertain the existence of independence and the
absence of threats to independence.
The reviewer should, therefore, check the following aspects in respect of assessment of independence of the
practicing unit:
(i) Does the practice unit have a policy to ensure independence, objectivity and integrity, on the part of partners
and staff? Who is responsible for this policy?
(ii) Does the practice unit communicate these policies and the expected standards of professional behaviour to
all staff?
(iv) Does the practice unit periodically review the practice unit's association with clients to ensure objectivity
and independence?
(v) How does the practice unit deal with the threats to independence ?
(b) Classification of Entity as per Statement of Peer Review
Name of Entity Type of Entity Reason for such classification based on the Statement of Peer
Review
MT & Co. Level I entity A Practice Unit which has undertaken Statutory Audit of a company
which is an associate of an entity having net worth of more than ₹
250 Crores at any time during the period under Review, shall be
treated as a Level I entity.
GBL & Co. Level I entity A Practice Unit which has undertaken Statutory Audit of a mutual
fund shall be treated as a Level I entity.
IML & Associates Level I entity A Practice Unit which has undertaken Statutory Audit of an Entity
which has raised donations and / or contributions over ₹ 50 crore
during the period under Review, shall be treated as a Level I entity.
BTS & Co. Level I entity A Practice Unit which has undertaken Statutory Audit of a company
which is a subsidiary of an entity having net worth of more than ₹
250 Crores at any time during the period under Review, shall be
778
treated as a Level I entity.

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
TJK & Associates Level II entity A Practice Unit which has undertaken Statutory Audit of an entity
which has raised funds from public or banks or financial institutions
of more than ₹ 25 crore but less than ₹ 50 crore during the period
under Review, shall be treated as a Level II entity.
Evaluating the professional judgment exercised by the auditor: It is also important for the Technical Reviewer
(hereinafter referred as TR) to understand that “professional judgment”, as defined in SA 200, “Overall
Objectives of the Independent Auditor and the Conduct of an Audit in Accordance with Standards on Auditing” is
an integral concept in the context of an audit and application of SAs in real life audit scenarios. SA 200 defines
professional judgment as “the application of relevant training, knowledge and experience, within the context
provided by auditing, accounting and ethical standards, in making informed decisions about the course of action
that is appropriate in the circumstances of the audit engagement.”
The concept of “professional judgment” underscores the fact that Standards, particularly, Standards on Auditing
are written to lay down the fundamental principles that would apply to an audit situation. Hence, no Standard
can have straight jacketed application/solutions for all audit scenarios. Above all, the Standards on Auditing
issued by the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India are principle based rather than rule based. Hence,
almost all the SAs envisage exercise of professional judgment by the auditor in their application in real life audit
scenarios.
The TR would need to appreciate that the exercise of professional judgment in any particular case is based on
the facts and circumstances that are known to the auditor as at the time of exercising that professional
judgment. Normally, exercise of professional judgement by an auditor is preceded by consultation on the
relevant matters both within the engagement team and between the engagement team and others at the
appropriate level within or outside the firm.
In evaluating the professional judgment exercised by the auditor, the TR should consider the following factors:
• whether the judgment reached reflects a due consideration and application of the relevant auditing and
accounting principles; and
• whether the judgment is appropriate in the light of, and consistent with, the facts and circumstances that were
known to the auditor up to the date of the auditor’s report. Hence, the TR and the QR Team should not, under
any circumstance, use “hindsight” (i.e. perception or retrospection) in their evaluation of exercise of
professional judgment by the auditor.
Since the auditor needs to exercise professional judgment throughout the audit, the latter also needs to be
appropriately documented. Hence, the TR can expect to find such audit documentation as a part of the audit
engagement file. It is important to note that professional judgment cannot be used by an auditor as a
justification for decisions that are not otherwise supported by the facts and circumstances of the engagement or
sufficient appropriate audit evidence
34. ( MTP- NOV 2021)
The elements of skill, experience and independence of reviewers are ensured before initiating them in
Peer Review process. In the above light, state few eligibility criteria fixed for a person to be empanelled
and also for being appointed as a Peer Reviewer.
ANSWER
Eligibility to be a Reviewer:
779
1. A Peer Reviewer shall: -

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
(a) Shall be a member in practice with at least 10 years of experience for Level I entities and 7 years of
experience for Level II entities.
(b) In case a member has moved from industry to practice and is currently in practice he should have at
least 15 years of experience in industry and at least 5 years’ experience in practice for Level I entities
and an experience of at least 10 years in industry and at least 3 years’ experience in practice, for Level
II entities.
(c) Should have undergone the requisite training and cleared the requisite test for Peer Review as
prescribed by the Board.
(d) Should have conducted audit of Level I Entities for at least 7 years or got his entity audited for at
least 7 years which should be a Level I entity to be eligible for conducting Peer Review of Level I
Entities.
2. A member on being appointed as a Reviewer shall be required to -

(a) furnish a declaration as prescribed by the Board, at the time of acceptance of Peer Review
appointment.
(b) sign a Declaration of Confidentiality as per Annexure A to this Statement.
3. A member shall not be eligible for being appointed as a Reviewer, if -

(i) any disciplinary action / proceeding is pending against him
(ii) he has been found guilty of professional or other misconduct by the Council or the Board of
Discipline or the Disciplinary Committee at any time
(iii) he has been convicted by a competent court whether within or outside India, of an offence
involving moral turpitude and punishable with imprisonment
(iv) he or his partners or personnel has any obligation or conflict of interest in the Practice Unit.
4. A Reviewer shall not accept any professional assignment from the Practice Unit for a period
two years from the date of appointment. Further, he should not have accepted any professional
assignment from the Practice Unit for a period of two years before the date of appointment as
reviewer of that Practice Unit
35. ( MTP- NOV 2021)
You are required to classify the following practice units into Level I entity or Level II entity for the purpose of
peer review along with providing the reason for such classification, assuming the services have been undertaken
in the period under review by such CA firms:
780
Name of the Firm Data of assurance services provided by such firms

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
Abhinanadan & Co. Conducted statutory audit of a private company which is an associate of a company,
the net worth of which is ₹ 279 crore.
Sambhav & Co. Conducted statutory audit of a mutual fund company and of a branch of a regional
rural bank, respectively.
Kunthu & Associates Conducted statutory audit of LLP which has raised has a loan of ₹ 29 crore from a
bank and a loan of ₹ 18 crore from an NBFC, respectively.
Dharam & Co. Conducted statutory audit of an unlisted public company having net worth of ₹ 3.79
crore and turnover of ₹ 63 crore. The net worth of its parent company is ₹ 295 crore.
ANSWER
Classification of Entity as per Statement of Peer Review
Name of Entity Type of Entity Reason for such classification based on the Statement of Peer
Review
Abhinanadan & Co. Level I entity A Practice Unit which has undertaken Statutory Audit of a
company which is an associate of an entity having net worth of
more than ₹ 250 Crores at any time during the period under
Review, shall be treated as a Level I entity.
Sambhav & Co. Level I entity A Practice Unit which has undertaken Statutory Audit of a mutual
fund shall be treated as a Level I entity.
Kunthu & Level II entity A Practice Unit which has undertaken Statutory Audit of an
Associates entity which has raised funds from public or banks or financial
institutions of more than ₹ 25 crore but less than ₹ 50 crore
during the period under Review, shall be treated as a Level II
entity.
Dharam & Co. Level I entity A Practice Unit which has undertaken Statutory Audit of a
company which is a subsidiary of an entity having net worth of
more than ₹ 250 Crores at any time during the period under
Review, shall be treated as a Level I entity.
36(NOV21 EXAM)
CA Manoj has been appointed as Peer Reviewer of M/s UV Associates, a Chartered Accountant firm
consisting of 18 partners. As a Practicing unit what are the obligations that are to be complied by
M/s UV associates in addition to furnishing the questionnaire, statements and such other particulars
as the Board may deem fit? (4 Marks)
ANSWER :
M/s UV Associates-Practice Unit, in addition to the prescribed information to be furnished including

the questionnaire, statements and such other particulars as the Board may deem fit, shall comply
with the following:
(i) Produce to the Reviewer or allow access to, any record, document or prescribed register
781
maintained by the Practice Unit or any other record or document which is of a class or description
so specified, and which is in the possession or under the control of the Practice Unit.

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
(ii) Provide to the Reviewer such explanation or further particulars/ information in respect of
anything produced in compliance with a requirement under sub clause (1) above, as the Reviewer
shall specify.
(iii) Provide to the Reviewer all assistance in connection with Peer Review.
(iv) Where any information or matter relevant to a Practice Unit is recorded otherwise than in a
legible form, the Practice Unit shall provide and present to the Reviewer a reproduction of any such
information or matter, or of the relevant part of it in a legible form, with a translation in English or
Hindi, if the matter is in any other language, and if such translation is requested for by the
Reviewer. The Practice Unit shall be responsible and accountable for the accuracy and truthfulness
of the translation so provided.
37 (MAY 2022 EXAM)
In exercise of the powers conferred by clauses (f) and (g) of Sub-section (2) of Section 29A read with
Section 28C and Sub-section (1) of Section 28D of the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949 (38 of 1949),
the Central Government has made 'Chartered Accountants (Procedures of Meetings of Quality
Review Board, and Terms and Conditions of Service and Allowances of the Chairperson and
Members of the Board) Rules, 2006’. Elucidate the powers of Quality Review Board in discharging its
functions. How the Quality Review Board would proceed in case it does not receive the information
called for by it from any Company? (5 Marks)
ANSWER :
Powers of Quality Review Board : The Government of India has, in exercise of the powers conferred
by clauses (f) and (g) of Sub-section (2) of Section 29A read with Section 28C and Sub-section (1) of
Section 28D of the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949 (38 of 1949), the Central Government has
made ‘Chartered Accountants (Procedures of Meetings of Quality Review Board, and Terms and
Conditions of Service and Allowances of the Chairperson and Members of the Board) Rules, 2006’.
To facilitate the discharge of its functions, Rule 6 of aforesaid rules provides:
i. on its own or through any specialized arrangement set up under the Institute, evaluate and
review the quality of work and services provided by the members of the Institute in such manner as
it may decide;
ii. lay down the procedure of evaluation criteria to evaluate various services being provided by
the members of the Institute and to select, in such manner and form as it may decide, the
individuals and firms rendering such services for review;
iii. call for information from the Institute, the Council or its Committees, Members, Clients of
members or other persons or organizations, in such form and manner as it may decide, and may
also give a hearing to them;
782

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
iv. invite experts to provide expert/technical advice or opinion or analysis on any matter or
issue which the Board may feel relevant for the purpose of assessing the quality of work and
services offered by the members of the Institute;
v. make recommendations to the Council to guide the members of the Institute to improve
their professional competence and qualifications, quality of work and services offered and
adherence to various statutory and other regulatory requirements and other matters related
thereto.
In case, the Board does not receive the information called for by it from any company registered
under the Companies Act, 2013, the Board may request the Central Government in the Ministry of
Corporate Affairs for assistance in obtaining the information.
38 (OCT 2022 MTP)
CA. Vimal wants to apply in the empanelment of peer reviewer. He was into employment till 2012
since then he shifted from industry and started his own practice. Below is his experience and
employment record from 1995 to 2012.
Name of Company Designation From To Date

Date
Parshav Ltd Project Implementation Manager 1-4-1995 31-3-1998
Suparshava Ltd Financial Reporting Senior Manager 1-4-1998 31-3-2007
(Assisting in Audits)
Parasnath Ltd Project & Improvement Director 1-4-2007 31-3-2012
Own Practice – Sole Audit & Taxation 1-4-2012 31-3-2022
Prop
Kindly assess whether CA. Vimal can apply and is qualified to get admitted in the empanelment of
Peer Reviewer.
ANSWER :
(c) As per Peer Review Statement,
(a) Shall be a member in practice with at least 7 years of audit experience.
(b) In case a member has moved from industry to practice and is currently in practice he should
have at least 10 years of audit experience in industry and at least 3 years audit experience in
practice.
(c) Should have undergone the requisite training and cleared the requisite test for Peer Review
783
as prescribed by the Board.

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
2 A member on being appointed as a Reviewer shall be required to furnish-
(a) a declaration as prescribed by the Board, at the time of Empanelment as a Peer

Reviewer.
(b) a Declaration of Confidentiality as per Annexure A to this Statement while giving consent for
appointment as a Peer Reviewer.
3. A member shall not be eligible for being appointed as a Reviewer of a Practice Unit, if -
(i) any disciplinary action / proceeding is pending against him;
Discipline or the Disciplinary Committee at any time
involving moral turpitude and punishable with imprisonment,
(iv) he or his partners have any obligation or conflict of interest in the Practice Unit.
(v) He has undergone training/articleship under any of the partner of Practice Unit.
4. A Reviewer shall not accept any professional assignment from the Practice Unit for a period
of next two years from the date of appointment. Further, he should not have accepted any
professional assignment from the Practice Unit for a period of two years before the date of
appointment as reviewer of that Practice Unit.
In the current scenario, CA. Vimal was in employment for a period from 1 -4-95 to 31-3-12 i.e., 17
years. Out of which, he was having audit experience for 9 years. However, he is in practice since 10
years i.e. 2012 to 2022. Hence, he will be eligible for Peer Reviewer by virtue of the condition
stipulating that a Peer Reviewer shall be a member in practice with at least 7 years of audit
experience.
39(SEPT 2022 MTP)
Evaluating the professional judgment exercised by the auditor is one of the important aspects under
Quality review, please explain the situation with reference to applicable SA.
ANSWER :
Evaluating the professional judgment exercised by the auditor: It is also important for the Technical
Reviewer (hereinafter referred as TR) to understand that “professional judgment”, as defined in SA
200, “Overall Objectives of the Independent Auditor and the Conduct of an Audit in Accordance
with Standards on Auditing” is an integral concept in the context of an audit and application o f SAs
in real life audit scenarios. SA 200 defines professional judgment as “the application of relevant
784
training, knowledge and experience, within the context provided by auditing, accounting and ethical

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
standards, in making informed decisions about the course of action that is appropriate in the
circumstances of the audit engagement.”
The concept of “professional judgment” underscores the fact that Standards, particularly, Standards
on Auditing are written to lay down the fundamental principles that would apply to an audit
situation. Hence, no Standard can have straight jacketed application/solutions for all audit
scenarios. Above all, the Standards on Auditing issued by the Institute of Chartered Accountants of
India are principle based rather than rule based. Hence, almost all the SAs envisage exercise of
professional judgment by the auditor in their application in real life audit scenarios.
The TR would need to appreciate that the exercise of professional judgment in any particular case is
based on the facts and circumstances that are known to the auditor as at the time of exercising that
professional judgment. Normally, exercise of professional judgement by an auditor is preceded by
consultation on the relevant matters both within the engagement team and between the
engagement team and others at the appropriate level within or outside the firm.
In evaluating the professional judgment exercised by the auditor, the TR should consider the
following factors:
• whether the judgment reached reflects a due consideration and application of the relevant
auditing and accounting principles; and
• whether the judgment is appropriate in the light of, and consistent with, the facts and
circumstances that were known to the auditor up to the date of the auditor’s report. Hence, the TR
and the QR Team should not, under any circumstance, use “hindsight” (i.e. perception or
retrospection) in their evaluation of exercise of professional judgment by the auditor.
Since the auditor needs to exercise professional judgment throughout the audit, the latter also
needs to be appropriately documented. Hence, the TR can expect to find such audit documentation
as a part of the audit engagement file. It is important to note that professional judgment cannot be
used by an auditor as a justification for decisions that are not otherwise supported by the facts and
circumstances of the engagement or sufficient appropriate audit evidence.
40 (MARCH 2022MTP)
While assigning the quality review work to the respective Technical Reviewers, in order to ensure
independence and avoid conflict of interest, certain eligibility conditions were specified for carrying
out the specified quality review assignment to the Technical Reviewers who were required to
submit a declaration of eligibility before starting the assignment. In view of above, briefly discuss
those eligibility conditions prescribed for Technical Reviewer.
ANSWER :
785

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
(c) While assigning the quality review work to the respective Technical Reviewers, in order to
ensure independence and avoid conflict of interest, the following eligibility conditions were
specified for carrying out the specified quality review assignment to the Technical Reviewers who
were required to submit a declaration of eligibility before starting the assignment.
For being a technical reviewer (TR):
• He should not have disciplinary proceeding under the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949
pending against him/her or any disciplinary action under the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949
/ penal action under any other law taken/pending against him during last three financial years
and/or thereafter.
• He or his/her firm or any of the network firms or any of the partners of the firm or that of
the network firms should not have been the statutory auditor of the company, as specified, or h ave
rendered any other services to the said entity during last three financial years and /or thereafter.
• He or his/her firm or any of the network firms or any of the partners of the firm or that of
the network firms should not have had any association with the specified AFUR, during the last
three financial years and /or thereafter.
• He should comply with all the eligibility conditions laid down for appointment as an auditor
of a company u/s 141(3) of the Companies Act, 2013 which apply mutatis mutandis in respect of the
review of the quality of statutory audit of the entity, as specified, so far as applicable.
• He does not belong to the city/region of head office of the AFUR.
41(APRIL 2022 MTP)
CA. Sita, appointed as a Peer Reviewer for M/s. Ram Associates, has asked for all the compilation
and the Due Diligence engagements carried out by M/s. Ram Associates for her peer review during
the period considered for peer review purposes by the board. She has also sent out a mail to Peer
Review Board regarding her selection. Mr. Ram, the managing partner of the firm seeks your advice
on this matter.
ANSWER :
Selection of Assurance Service Engagements for Review: The Statement on Peer Review defines the
scope of peer review which revolves around compliance with technical, ethical and professional
standards; quality of reporting; office systems and procedures with regard to compliance of
assurance engagements; and, training programmes for staff including articled and audit assistants
involved in assurance engagements. The entire peer review process is directed at the assurance
services.
786

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
Assurance Services means assurance engagements services as specified in the “Framework for
Assurance Engagements” issued by the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India and as may be
amended from time to time. Assurance engagements does not include engagements for the
compilation of financial statements or engagements solely to assist the client in preparing,
compiling or collating information other than financial statements; or engagement for Due
diligence.
In the given situation, CA. Sita is appointed as a peer reviewer for M/s Ram Associates, has asked for
all the compilations and the due diligence engagements carried out by M/s Ram Associates for her
peer review. In view of above, Peer Review of compilation and due diligence at the time of
execution step by CA. Sita is not correct as due diligence and compilation engagements are not
covered in the scope of Assurance engagement and Peer Review is directed at assurance
engagement only.
42 (MAY 2022 RTP)
As per the Quality Review Board, the term technical standards in the context of Chartered
Accountants Rules 2006, includes which among the following?
(a) ICDS notified under Income Tax Act, 1961.
(b) Accounting standards notified under Companies Act, 2013.
(c) Guidance notes on accounting and auditing matters issued by C&AG.
(d) Notifications/ Directions issued on accounting and auditing matters issued by RBI/ SEBI/
other regulatory bodies.
ANSWER : B
43(MAY 2022 RTP)
Write a short note on the following:
(a) Eligibility to be a Reviewer in case of Peer Review.
(b) Reporting in case the parent company’s auditor is not the auditor of all its
components.
(c) Relationship between the overall audit strategy and the audit plan.
ANSWER ;
(a) Eligibility to be a Reviewer

787

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
(a) Shall be a member in practice with at least 7 years of audit experience.
(b) In case a member has moved from industry to practice and is currently in practice he should
have at least 10 years of audit experience in the industry and at least 3 years of audit experience in
practice.
(c) Should have undergone the requisite training and cleared the requisite test for Peer Review
as prescribed by the Board.
2. A member on being appointed as a Reviewer shall be required to furnish-
(a) a declaration as prescribed by the Board, at the time of Empanelment as a Peer Reviewer.
(b) a Declaration of Confidentiality as per Annexure A to this Statement while giving consent for
appointment as a Peer Reviewer.
3 A member shall not be eligible for being appointed as a Reviewer of a Practice Unit, if -
(i) any disciplinary action/proceeding is pending against him,
Discipline or the Disciplinary Committee at any time,
involving moral turpitude and punishable with imprisonment,
(iv) he or his partners have any obligation or conflict of interest in the Practice Unit.
(v) He has undergone training/articleship under any of the partner of the Practice Unit.
4. A Reviewer shall not accept any professional assignment from the Practice Uni t for a period of
the next two years from the date of appointment. Further, he should not have accepted any
professional assignment from the Practice Unit for a period of two years before the date of
appointment as a reviewer of that Practice Unit.
(b) Reporting in case the Parent Company’s Auditor is not the Auditor of all its Components: In a
case where the parent’s auditor is not the auditor of all the components included in the
consolidated financial statements, the auditor of the consolidated financial statements should also
consider the requirement of SA 600.
As prescribed in SA 706, if the auditor considers it necessary to make reference to
the audit of the other auditors, the auditor’s report on the consolidated financial statements should
disclose clearly the magnitude of the portion of the financial statements audited by the other
auditor(s).
788

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
This may be done by stating aggregate rupee amounts or percentages of total assets, revenues and
cash flows of components included in the consolidated financial statements not audited by the
parent’s auditor.
Total assets, revenues and cash flows not audited by the parent’s auditor should be presented
before giving effect to permanent and current period consolidation adjustments.
Reference in the report of the auditor on the consolidated financial statements to the fact that part
of the audit of the group was made by other auditor(s) is not to be construed as a qualification of
the opinion but rather as an indication of the divided responsibility between the auditors of the
parent and its subsidiaries.
(c) Relationship between the Overall Audit Strategy and the Audit Plan: The audit strategy is
prepared before the audit plan. The audit plan is more detailed than the overall audit strategy.
Audit strategy and audit plan are inter-related because a change in one would result into a change
in the other. The audit strategy provides the guidelines for developing the audit plan. It establishes
the scope and conduct of the audit procedures and thereby, works as a basis for developing a
detailed audit plan. Detailed audit plan would include the nature, timing and extent of the audit
procedures so as to obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence.
The overall audit strategy & Audit plan should take into consideration the element of materiality
and its relationship with Risks & procedures to be adopted. It is summarized as under: -
High Materiality Detailed Procedures High Risks

Low Materiality Test Checks Low Risks
44(NOV 2022 RTP)
In case of peer review, which among the following the review shall covered?
(a) Compliance with legal regulations governing the firm
(b) Check whether the qualification of the articled assistants and other staffs are sufficient to be
employed
(c) Compliance with tax regulations of the firm, which includes filing IT return of the firm,
payment of tax, etc.
(d) Training program for staff concerned with assurance function, including availability of
infrastructure
ANSWER : D
45(NOV 2022 RTP)

789

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
(a) Evaluating the professional judgment exercised by the auditor is one of the important aspect
under Quality Review, please explain the situation with reference to applicable Standard on
Auditing.
(b) Prabhu & Co LLP is a large firm of Chartered Accountants based out of Mumbai. Prabhu & Co.
LLP is subject to peer review which was last conducted 3 years back. For the peer review of the
financial year ended 31st March 2021, the firm got an intimation on 29th May 2021. The process of
peer review got started and was completed on 27th September 2021. In view of peer reviewer,
the systems and procedures of Prabhu & Co. LLP are deficient / non-compliant. The peer reviewer
did not share any of his observations with Prabhu & Co LLP as draft and final report was submitted
to the Board. Comment.
ANSWER :
(a) Evaluating the professional judgment exercised by the auditor: It is also important for the
Technical Reviewer (hereinafter referred as TR) to understand that “professional judgment”, as
defined in SA 200, “Overall Objectives of the Independent Auditor and the Conduct of an Audit in
Accordance with Standards on Auditing” is an integral concept in the context of an audit and
application of SAs in real li fe audit scenarios. SA 200 defines professional judgment as “the
application of relevant training, knowledge and experience, within the context provided by auditing,
accounting and ethical standards, in making informed decisions about the course of action that is
appropriate in the circumstances of the audit engagement.”
The concept of “professional judgment” underscores the fact that Standards, particularly, Standards
on Auditing are written to lay down the fundamental principles that would apply to an audit
situation. Hence, no Standard can have straight jacketed application/solutions for all audit
scenarios. Above all, the Standards on Auditing issued by the Institute of Chartered Accountants of
India are principle based rather than rule based. Hence, almost all the SAs envisage exercise of
professional judgment by the auditor in their application in real life audit scenarios.
The TR would need to appreciate that the exercise of professional judgment in any particular case is
based on the facts and circumstances that are known to the auditor as at the time of ex ercising that
professional judgment. Normally, exercise of professional judgement by an auditor is preceded by
consultation on the relevant matters both within the engagement team and between the
engagement team and others at the appropriate level within or outside the firm.
In evaluating the professional judgment exercised by the auditor, the TR should consider the
following factors:
• whether the judgment reached reflects a due consideration and application of the relevant
auditing and accounting principles; and
• whether the judgment is appropriate in the light of, and consistent with, the facts and
790
circumstances that were known to the auditor up to the date of the auditor’s report. Hence, the TR

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
and the QR Team should not, under any circumstance, use “hindsight” (i.e. perception or
retrospection) in their evaluation of exercise of professional judgment by the auditor.
Since the auditor needs to exercise professional judgment throughout the audit, the latter also
needs to be appropriately documented. Hence, the TR can expect to find such audit documentation
as a part of the audit engagement file. It is important to note that professional judgment cannot be
used by an auditor as a justification for decisions that are not otherwise supported by the facts and
circumstances of the engagement or sufficient appropriate audit evidence.
(b) Peer Review Report of Reviewer: After completing the on-site Review, the Peer Reviewer, before
making his Report to the Board, shall communicate his findings in the Preliminary Report to the
Practice Unit if in his opinion, the systems and procedures are deficient or non -compliant with
reference to any matter that has been noticed by him or if there are other matters where he wants
to seek clarification.
The Practice Unit shall within 5 days after the date of receipt of the findings, make any submissions
or representations, in writing to the Reviewer. (i.e. Response to the Preliminary Report).
At the end of an on-site Review if the Reviewer is satisfied with the reply received from the Practice
Unit, he shall submit a Peer Review Report to the Board along with his initial findings, response by
the Practice Unit and the manner in which the responses have been dealt with. A copy of the report
shall also be forwarded to the Practice Unit.
In case the Reviewer is of the opinion that the response by the Practice Unit is not satisfactory, the
Reviewer shall accordingly submit a modified Report to the Board incorporating his reasons for the
same. The Reviewer shall also submit initial findings (i.e. Preliminary Report), response by the
Practice Unit (Response to Preliminary Report) and the manner in which the responses have been
dealt with. A copy of the report shall also be forwarded to the Practice Unit.
In case of a modified report, The Board shall order for a “Follow On” Review after a period of one
year from the date of issue of report as mentioned above. If the Board so decides, the period of one
year may be reduced but shall not be less than six months from the date of issue of the report.
In the instant case, in view of Peer Reviewer systems and procedures in Prabhu & Co. LLP are
deficient, therefore, Peer Reviewer should not submit the report directly to the Board. Thus,
contention of Prabhu & Co. LLP is correct.
791

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
Multiple Choice questions
MTP Mar 2019 QN no 16
1. BVM & Associates is an audit firm that employs large number of audit assistants. CA Mahesh, a
partner pays extreme attention to briefing the audit assistants every day while the audit is
continuing. All audit assistants are required to document their notes in the daily briefing and
accordingly conduct the audit. CA Mahesh has made it very clear that any assistant who does not
document the notes taken and the steps taken accordingly will be reprimanded as it will mean that
the assistants are not creating their audit programmes on the job. The practice deployed by CA
Mahesh can be termed as?
(a) Unacceptable as CA Mahesh being the auditor should be providing the audit programme and he
cannot expect the team to take daily notes instead of performing the audit.
(b) Appropriate and in line with SA 230 as the audit programme must be prepared on the basis of
documentation of auditor’s briefing notes.
(c) Acceptable but incomplete as CA Mahesh has not given any audit programme to the audit assistants
to follow.
792
(d) Inappropriate as CA Mahesh should not only provide the audit programme but also make sure that
audit programme is formally approved by all partners of the firm.

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
Answer(c) Acceptable but incomplete as CA Mahesh has not given any audit programme to the audit
assistants to follow.

2. Prabhakar & Associates were the statutory auditors of Inverto & Co for last 2 years. In the current
year, one of the partners Mr. Anant Prabhakar, a qualified chartered accountant from ICAI also
got qualified as a chartered management accountant from a foreign accountancy body CIMA. The
management of Inverto & Co were glad to hear this and offered Mr. Anant to handle the
management services of the company from this year. Is he allowed take up this assignment for
Inverto & Co as per the Chartered Accountants Act 1949 and Schedules thereunder?
(a) Yes, being a qualified management accountant within their group, Prabhakar & Associates should
take this assignment.
(b) Yes, Mr. Anant can cover the management services and another auditor from the firm can cover
the statutory audit of Inverto & Co.
(c) No, the management services cannot be provided by the firm, who currently is the statutory
auditor of Inverto & Co.
(d) No, Mr. Anant is newly qualified management accountant who does not have enough experience,
hence should not take up the management services assignment.
Answer: (c) No, the management services cannot be provided by the firm, who currently is the
statutory auditor of Inverto & Co.
MTP Oct 2019 Qn no 1 (1 Mark)

3. CA Ram is practicing in the field of financial management planning for over 12 years. He has gained
expertise in this domain over others. Mr. Ratan, a student of Chartered Accountancy course, is very
much impressed with the knowledge of CA. Ram. He approached CA. Ram to take guidance on some
topics of financial management subject related to his course. CA. Ram, on request, decided to spare
some time and started providing private tutorship to Mr. Ratan along with some other aspirants for
4 days in a week and for 3 hours in a day. However, he forgot to take specific permission for such
private tutorship from the Council. Later on, he came to know that the Council has passed a Resolution
under Regulation 190A granting general permission (for private tutorship, and part-time tutorship
under Coaching organization of the Institute) and specific permission (for part-time or full time
tutorship under any educational institution other than Coaching organization of the Institute). Such
general and specific permission granted is subject to the condition that the direct teaching hours
devoted to such activities taken together should _______________ in order to be able to undertake
attest functions.
(i) not exceed 25 hours a week
793
(j) not exceed 21 hours a week

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
(k) not exceed 25 hours a month

(l) not exceed 21 hours a month
Answer: (i) not exceed 25 hours a week
Clause 1 of Part 1 First Schedule

4.May 2019 Qn no 6(C)5 Marks

CA Sant, a newly qualified professional with certificate of practice, approached CA Pant, the auditor
of his father's company M/s Max Ltd., to allow him to have some practical and professional knowledge
and experience in his firm before he can set up his own professional practice. CA Pant allowed him
to sit in his office for 6 month and allotted a small chamber with other office infrastructure facility.
In the course of his association with CA Pant' s office, he used to provide tax consultancy
independently to the client of the firm and also filed few IT and GST return and represented himself
before various tax authorities on behalf of the firm although no documents were signed by him. During
his association in CA Pant's office, he did not get any salary or share of profit or commission but only
re-imbursement of usual expenses like conveyance, telephone etc. was made to him. After the end of
the agreed period, he was given a lump sum amount of Rs. 3,00,000 by CA Pant for his association
out of gratitude.
Examine the case in the light of code of professional misconduct.
Answer
Clause (1) of Part I of the First Schedule to the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949 states that a chartered
accountant in practice shall be deemed to be guilty of professional misconduct if he allows any person
to practice in his name as a chartered accountant unless such person is also a chartered accountant in
practice and is in partnership with or employed by him.
The above clause is intended to safeguard the public against unqualified accountant practicing under
the cover of qualified accountants. It ensures that the work of the accountant will be carried out by a
Chartered Accountant who may be his partner, or his employee and would work under his control and
supervision.
In the instant case, CA Pant allowed CA Sant (who is a newly qualified CA professional with COP) to sit
in his office for 6 months, and allowed him to provide tax consultancy independently to his firm’s clients,
filing of some IT and GST Returns. He also allowed him to appear before various tax authorities on
behalf of his firm. CA Sant was only reimbursed with his usual expenses and was not paid any salary or
share of profit for the same. However, after the end of agreed period he was given a lump-sums of
rupees 3,00,000 for his association out of gratitude.
Thus, in the present case CA. Pant will be held guilty of professional misconduct as per Clause (1) of Part
I of First Schedule to the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949 as he allowed CA Sant to practice in his name
as Chartered accountant and CA Sant is neither in partnership nor in employment with CA. Pant.
794

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
4A (MARCH 2022MTP)
CA Bahu, a newly qualified professional with certificate of practice, approached CA Subahu, the auditor
of his father's company Apex Ltd., to allow him to have some practical and professional knowledge and
experience in his firm before he can set up his own professional practice. CA Subahu allowed him to sit
in his office for 6 month and allotted a small chamber with other office infrastructure facility. In the
course of his association with CA Subahu' s office, he used to provide tax consultancy independently to
the client of the firm and also filed few IT and GST return and represented himself before various tax
authorities on behalf of the firm although no documents were signed by him. During his association in
CA Subahu's office, he did not get any salary or share of profit or commission but only re-imbursement
of usual expenses like conveyance, telephone etc. was made to him. After the end of the agreed period,
he was given a lump sum amount of Rs. 2,50,000 by CA Subahu for his association out of gratitude. Give
your comments with reference to the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949 and Schedules thereto.
ANSWER :
Clause (1) of Part I of the First Schedule to the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949 states that a chartered
accountant in practice shall be deemed to be guilty of professional misconduct if he allows any person
to practice in his name as a chartered accountant unless such person is also a chartered accountant in
practice and is in partnership with or employed by him.
The above clause is intended to safeguard the public against unqualified accountant practicing under the
cover of qualified accountants. It ensures that the work of the accountant will be carried out by a
Chartered Accountant who may be his partner, or his employee and would work under his control and
supervision.
In the instant case, CA Subahu allowed CA Bahu (who is a newly qualified CA professional with COP) to
sit in his office for 6 months, and allowed him to provide tax consultancy independently to his firm’s
clients, filing of some IT and GST Returns. He also allowed him to appear before various tax authorities
on behalf of his firm. CA Bahu was only reimbursed with his usual expenses and was not paid any salary
or share of profit for the same. However, after the end of agreed period he was given a lump-sums of
Rs. 2,50,000 for his association out of gratitude.
Thus, in the present case CA. Subahu will be held guilty of professional misconduct as per Clause
(1) of Part I of First Schedule to the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949 as he allowed CA Bahu to practice
in his name as Chartered accountant and CA Bahu is neither in partnership nor in employment with
CA. Subahu.

MTP-OCT-19 Qn No 4(c) 4 Marks:
5.Mr. Avin, a practicing Chartered Accountant gave 50% of the audit fees received by him to a non-
Chartered Accountant, Mr. Lucky, under the nomenclature of office allowance and such an
arrangement continued for a number of years. Comment with reference to the Chartered
Accountants Act, 1949, and Schedules thereto.
795
Or

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
Study Material
Mr. K, a practicing Chartered Accountant gave 50% of the audit fees received by him to a non-
Chartered Accountant, Mr. L, under the nomenclature of office allowance and such an arrangement
continued for a number of years.
Answer:
Sharing of Audit Fees with Non-Member: As per Clause (2) of Part I of First Schedule to the Chartered
Accountants Act, 1949 a member shall be held guilty if a Chartered Accountant in practice pays or allows or
agrees to pay or allow, directly or indirectly, any share, commission
or brokerage in the fees or profits of his professional business, to any person other than a member of the
Institute or a partner or a retired partner or the legal representative of a deceased partner, or a member of
any other professional body or with such other persons having such qualification as may be prescribed, for the
purpose of rendering such professional services from time to time in or outside India.
In the instant case, Mr. Avin, a practising Chartered Accountant gave 50% of the audit fees received by him to a
non-Chartered Accountant, Mr. Lucky, under the nomenclature of office allowance and such an arrangement
continued for a number of years. In this case, it is not the nomenclature to a transaction that is material but it is
the substance of the transaction, which has to be looked into.
The Chartered Accountant had shared his profits and, therefore, Mr. Avin will be held guilty of professional
misconduct under the Clause (2) of Part I of First Schedule to the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949.
6.MTP Mar 2018 2(a) 5 Marks
Ms. Preeti is a practicing Chartered Accountant. Mr. Preet is a practicing Advocate representing
matters in the court of law. Ms. Preeti and Mr. Preet decided to help each other in the matters
involving their professional expertise. Accordingly, Ms. Preeti recommends Mr. Preet in all tax
litigation matters in the court of law and Mr. Preet consults Ms. Preeti in all matters related to
finance and other related matters, which comes to him in arguing various cases in the court of law.
Consequently, they started sharing some part in the profits of their professional work. Comment
on above with reference to the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949, and Schedules thereto
Answer
Sharing and Accepting of Part of Profits with an Advocate: According to Clause(2) of Part I of the
First Schedule to the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949, a Chartered Accountant in practice is
deemed to be guilty of professional misconduct if he pays or allows or agrees to pay or allow, directly
or indirectly, any share, commission or brokerage in the fees or profits of his professional business, to
any person other than a member of the Institute, for the purpose of rendering such professional
services from time to time in or outside India.
Furthermore, Clause (3) of Part I of the First Schedule to the said Act states that a Chartered Accountant
in practice is deemed to be guilty of professional misconduct if he accepts any part of the profits of
the professional work of a person who is not a member of the Institute.
796
However, a practicing member of the Institute can share fees or profits arising out of his professional

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
business with such members of other professional bodies or with such other persons having such
qualifications as prescribed by the Council under Regulation 53-A of the Chartered Accountants
Regulations, 1988. Under the said regulation, the member of “Bar Council of India” is included.
Therefore, Mr. Preet, an advocate, a member of Bar Council, is allowed to share part of profits of his
professional work with Ms. Preeti. Hence, Ms. Preeti, a practicing Chartered Accountant, will not be
held guilty under any of the abovementioned clauses for paying and accepting part of profits from
Mr. Preet.
7. Mr. X who passed his CA examination of ICAI on 18th July, 2020 and started his practice from
August 15, 2017. On 16th August 2017, one female candidate approached him for articleship. In
addition to monthly stipend, Mr. X also offered her 1 % profits of his CA firm. She agreed to take
both 1 % profits of the CA firm and stipend as per the rate prescribed by the ICAI. The Institute of
Chartered Accountants of India sent a letter to Mr. X objecting the payment of 1 % profits. Mr. X
replies to the ICAI stating that he is paying 1 % profits of his firm over and above the stipend to
help the articled clerk as the financial position of the articled clerk is very weak. Is Mr. X Liable to
professional misconduct?
Answer
Sharing Fees with an Articled Clerk: As per Clause (2) of Part I of First Schedule to the Chartered
Accountants Act 1949, a Chartered Accountant in practice shall be deemed to be guilty of professional
misconduct if he pays or allows or agrees to pay or allow, directly or indirectly, any share, commission
or brokerage in the fees or profits of his professional business, to any person other than a member of
the Institute or a partner or a retired partner or the legal representative of a deceased partner, or a
member of any other professional body or with such other persons having such qualification as may
be prescribed, for the purpose of rendering such professional services from time to time in or outside
India.
In view of the above, the objections of the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India, as given in the
case, are correct and reply of Mr. X, stating that he is paying 1 % profits of his firm over and above the
stipend to help the articled clerk as the position of the articled clerk is weak is not tenable.
Hence, Mr. X is guilty of professional misconduct in terms of Clause (2) of Part I of First Schedule to the
Chartered Accountants Act 1949
8.Mr. Qureshi, Chartered Accountant, in practice died in a road accident. His widow proposes to sell
the practice of her husband to Mr. Pardeshi, Chartered Accountant, for Rs. 5 lakhs. The price also
includes right to use the firm name - Qureshi and Associates. Can widow of Qureshi sell the practice
and can Mr. Pardeshi continue to practice in that name as a proprietor?
Solution
Sale of Goodwill: With reference to Clause (2) of Part I to the First Schedule to Chartered Accountants’ Act, 1949,
the Council of the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India considered whether the goodwill of a proprietary
797
concern of chartered accountant can be sold to another member who is otherwise eligible, after the death of the
proprietor.

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
It lays down that the sale is permitted subject to certain conditions discussed in the above flowchart. It further
resolved that the legal heir of the deceased member has to obtain the permission of the Council within a year of
the death of the proprietor concerned.
Conclusion: Thus, in a given case, the widow of Mr. Qureshi, who has proposed to sell the practice for Rs. 5 lakhs
is in effect proposing the sale of goodwill. Thus, the act of Mrs. Qureshi is permissible and Mr. Pardeshi can
continue to practice in that name as a proprietor.
8A(MAY 2022 EXAM)
CA Ravi, a practising Chartered Accountant, was proprietor of M/s Ravi & Associates. CA Ravi died on
15th September, 2020 due to cardiac arrest. Only family member left behind CA Ravi was his wife,
Roohi. On 30th September, 2021, Roohi sold the practice of her husband to CA Balwan for Rs. 25 Lacs
along with right to use the firm name i.e., M/s. Ravi & Associates and requested the Institute to
consider the effect of such sale. Give your comments on the following issues with reference to the
Chartered Accountants Act, 1949 and Schedules thereto:
(i) Whether Roohi can sell the practice to CA Balwan?
(ii) Can CA Balwan continue to practice as proprietor in name of M/s Ravi & Associates?
ANSWER :
(c) Sale of Goodwill: With reference to Clause (2) of Part I to the First Schedule to Chartered
Accountants’ Act, 1949, the Council of the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India considered
whether the goodwill of a proprietary concern of chartered accountant can be sold to another member
who is otherwise eligible, after the death of the proprietor.
It is being resolved that the legal heir of the deceased member has to obtain the permission of the
Council within a year of the death of the proprietor concerned.
It further lays down that the sale is permitted subject to certain conditions like such a sale is
completed/effected in all respects and the Institute’s permission to practice in deceased’s proprietary
firm name is sought within a year of the death of such proprietor concerned. In respect of these cases,
the name of the proprietary firm concerned would be kept in abeyance (i.e. not removed on receipt
of information about the death of the proprietor as is being done at present) only upto a period of one
year from the death of proprietor concerned as aforesaid.
In the given case, Mrs. Roohi, widow of Mr. Ravi, proprietor of M/s. Ravi & Associates, has sold the
practice along with right to use the firm name after one year of his death for Rs. 25 lakhs. This sale is
in effect the sale of goodwill.
From the discussion given above it can be concluded that:
(i) Mrs. Roohi cannot sell the practice of CA. Balwan with right to use the firm name.
(ii) CA Balwan cannot continue to practice in the name of the firm M/s. Ravi & Associates as a
proprietor because the name of the firm M/s. Ravi & Associates would be kept in abeyance only up to
a period of one year from the death of the proprietor.
798
8B (OCT 2022 MTP)

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
CA. Vasu started his practice from August 15, 2021. On 16th August 2021, one female candidate
approached him for articleship. In addition to monthly stipend, CA. Vasu also offered her 2 % profits
of his CA firm. She agreed to take both 2 % profits of the CA firm and stipend as per the rate prescribed
by the ICAI. The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India sent a letter to CA. Vasu objecting the
payment of 2 % profits. CA. Vasu replies to the ICAI stating that he is paying 2 % profits of his firm over
and above the stipend to help the articled clerk as the financial position of the articled clerk is very
weak. Is CA. Vasu liable to professional misconduct? Comment with reference to the Chartered
ANSWER :
Sharing Fees with an Articled Clerk: As per Clause (2) of Part I of First Schedule to the Chartered
Accountants Act 1949, a Chartered Accountant in practice shall be deemed to be guilty of professional
misconduct if he pays or allows or agrees to pay or allow, directly or indirectly, any share, commission
or brokerage in the fees or profits of his professional business, to any person other than a member of
the Institute or a partner or a retired partner or the legal representative of a deceased partner, or a
member of any other professional body or with such other persons having such qualification as may
be prescribed, for the purpose of rendering such professional services from time to time in or outside
India.
In view of the above, the objections of the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India, as given in the
case, are correct and reply of CA. Vasu, stating that he is paying 2% profits of his firm over and above
the stipend to help the articled clerk as the position of the articled clerk is weak, is not ten able.
Hence, CA. Vasu is guilty of professional misconduct in terms of Clause (2) of Part I of First Schedule to
the Chartered Accountants Act 1949.

9.(RTP NOV 2018)
Mr. P, a Chartered Accountant in practice entered into a partnership with Mr. L, an advocate for
sharing of fees for work sent by one to the other. However, due to some disputes, the partnership
was dissolved after 1 month without any fees having been received.
Partnership with an Advocate: As per Clause (4) of Part I of the First Schedule to the Chartered
Accountants Act, 1949, a chartered accountant will be guilty of professional misconduct if he enters
into partnership with any person other than a chartered accountant in practice or a person resident
without India who but for his residence abroad would be entitled to be registered as a member under
Clause (v) of Sub-section (1) of Section 4 or whose qualification are recognized by the Central
Government or the Council for the purpose of permitting such partnership.
However, Regulation 53B of the Chartered Accountants Regulations, 1988 permits a Chartered
Accountant in practice to enter into partnership with other prescribed Professionals which includes an
Advocate, a member of Bar Council of India. In the instant case, Mr. P, a chartered accountant, has
entered into partnership with Mr. L, an advocate.
799
Thus, he would not be guilty of professional misconduct as per Clause (4) of Part I of First Schedule read

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
with Regulation 53B

10.Mr. S, a Chartered Accountant published a book and gave his personal details as the author. These details
also mentioned his professional experience and his present association as partner with M/s RST, a firm.
Soliciting Professional Work: Clause (6) of Part I of the First Schedule to the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949
refers to professional misconduct of a member in practice if he solicits client or professional work either directly
or indirectly, by circular, advertisement, personal communication or interview or by any other means. Therefore,
members should not adopt any indirect methods to advertise their professional practice with a view to gain
publicity and thereby solicit clients or professional work. Such a restraint must be practiced so that members
may maintain their independence of judgement and may be able to command the respect of their prospective
clients. While elaborating forms of soliciting work, the Council has specified that a member is not permitted to
indicate in a book or an article, published by him, his association with any firm of chartered accountants. In this
case, Mr. S, a Chartered Accountant published the book and mentioned his professional experience and his
association as a partner with M/s RST, a firm of chartered accountants.
Conclusion: Mr. S being a chartered accountant in practice has committed the professional misconduct by
mentioning that at present he is a partner in M/s. RST, a chartered accountants firm.
MTP-Aug-18 Qn No 4(a) 4 Marks:
11.M/s LMN, a firm of Chartered Accountants responded to a tender from a State Government for
computerization of land revenue records. For this purpose, the firm also paid Rs. 50,000 as earnest
deposit as part of the terms of the tender. Comment with reference to the Chartered Accountants
Act, 1949.
Answer:
Responding to Tenders: Clause (6) of Part I of the First Schedule to the Chartered Accountants Act,
1949 lays down guidelines for responding to tenders, etc. As per the guidelines if a matter relates to
any services other than audit, members can respond to any tender. Further, in respect of a non-
exclusive area, members are permitted to pay reasonable amount towards earnest money/security
deposits.
In the instance case, since computerization of land revenue records does not fall within exclusive areas
for chartered accountants, M/s LMN can respond to tender as well as deposit Rs. 50,000 as earnest
deposit and shall not have committed any professional misconduct.
MTP-OCT-19 Qn No 2(c) 5 Marks:
12. Mr. Rival, a Chartered Accountant in practice, delivered a speech in the national
conference organized by the Ministry of Textiles. While addressing the audience, he informed
that he is a management expert and his firm provides services of taxation and audit at reasonable
rates. He also requested the audience to approach his firm of chartered accountants for these
services and at the request of audience he also distributed his business cards and telephone
800

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
number of his firm to those in the audience. Comment with reference to the Chartered Accountants
Act, 1949, and Schedules thereto.
Answer:
Using Designation Other Than a CA and Providing Details of Services Offered: Clause (6) of
Part I of the First Schedule to the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949 states that a Chartered Accountant
in practice shall be deemed to be guilty of misconduct if he solicits clients or professional work
either directly or indirectly by a circular, advertisement, personal communication or interview or by
any other means. Such a restraint has been put so that the members maintain their independence of
judgment and may be able to command respect from their prospective clients. Section 7 of the
Chartered Accountants Act, 1949 read with Clause (7) of Part I of the First Schedule to the said Act
prohibits advertising of professional attainments or services of a member. It also restrains a member
from using any designation or expression other than that of a chartered accountant in documents
through which the professional attainments of the member would come to the
notice of the public. Under the clause, use of any designation or expression other than chartered
accountant for a chartered accountant in practice, on professional documents, visiting cards, etc.
amounts to a misconduct unless it be a degree of a university or a title indicating membership of any
other professional body recognised by the Central Government or the Council.
Member may appear on television and films and agree to broadcast in the Radio or give lectures at
forums and may give their names and describe themselves as Chartered Accountants. Special
qualifications or specialized knowledge directly relevant to the subject matter of the programme may
also be given but no reference should be made, in the case of practicing member to the name and
address or services of his firm. What he may say or write must not be promotional of his or his firm but
must be an objective professional view of the topic under consideration.
Thus, it is improper to use designation "Management Expert" since neither it is a degree of a University
established by law in India or recognised by the Central Government nor it is a recognised professional
membership by the Central Government or the Council.
Therefore, he is deemed to be guilty of professional misconduct under both Clause (6) and Clause (7)
as he has used the designation “Management Expert” in his speech and also he has made reference
to the services provided by his firm of Chartered Accountants at reasonable rates. Distribution of
cards to audience is also a misconduct in terms of Clause (6).
MTP Mar 2018 3(a) 5 Marks
13.A special notice has been issued for a resolution at 3rd annual general meeting of Fiddle Ltd. providing
expressly that CA. Smart shall not be re-appointed as an auditor of the company. Consequently, CA. Smart
submitted a representation in writing to the company as provided under section 140(4)(iii) of the Companies
Act, 2013. In the representation, CA. Smart incorporated his independent working as a professional
throughout the term of office and also indicated his willingness to continue as an auditor if reappointed by
the shareholders of the Company. Advise on above with reference to the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949,
and Schedules thereto.
801
Answer

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
Soliciting Clients: As per Clause (6) of Part I of First Schedule to the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949,
a Chartered Accountant in practice is deemed to be guilty of professional misconduct if he solicits
clients or professional work either directly or indirectly by circular, advertisement, personal
communication or interview or by any other means except applying or requesting for or inviting or
securing professional work from another chartered accountant in practice and respondin g to tenders.
Further, section 140(4)(iii) of the Companies Act, 2013, provides a right, to the retiring auditor, to
make representation in writing to the company. The retiring auditor has the right for his
representation to be circulated among the members of the company and to be read out at the
meeting. However, the content of letter should be set out in a dignified manner how he has been
acting independently and conscientiously through the term of his office and may, in addition, indicate,
if he so
chooses, his willingness to continue as auditor, if re- appointed by the shareholders.
Thus, the incorporation as an independent professional, made by CA. Smart, while submitting
representation under section 140(4)(iii) of the Companies Act, 2013 and indication of willingness to
continue as an auditor if reappointed by shareholders, does not leads to solicitation.
Therefore, CA. Smart will not be held guilty for professional misconduct under Clause (6) of Part I of
First Schedule to the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949.
RTP May 2018 Qn no 19(a)
14. Comment on the following with reference to the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949 and schedules
thereto:
Mr. Brilliant, a chartered accountant in practice, created his own website in attractive format and
highlighted the contents in blue colour. He also circulated the information contained in the website
through E-mail to acknowledge public at large about his expertise. However, due to shortage of time,
he could not intimate his website address to the Institute.
Answer:
Circulating Information Contained in Own Website: As per clause (6) of Part I of the First Schedule
to the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949, a Chartered Accountant in practice is deemed to be guilty of
professional misconduct if he solicits clients or professional work either directly or indirectly by
circular, advertisement, personal communication or interview or by any other means.
However, the guidelines approved by the Council of the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India
permit creation of own website by a chartered accountant in his or his firm name and no standard
format or restriction on colours is there. The chartered accountant or firm, as per the guidelines,
should ensure that none of the information contained in the website be circulated on their own or
through E-mail or by any other mode except on a specific “Pull” request.
Further, members are not required to intimate the Website address to the Institute. Members are only
required to comply with the Website Guidelines issued by the Institute in this regard.
In the given case, Mr. Brilliant has circulated the information contained in the website through E-mail to
public at large. Therefore, he is guilty of professional misconduct under clause (6) of Part I of the First
802
Schedule to the said Act. However, there is no such misconduct for not intimating website address to

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
the Institute.
CA. Raj is a leading income tax practitioner and consultant for derivative products. He resides in
Bangalore near to the XYZ commodity stock exchange and does trading in commodity derivatives.
Every day, he invests nearly 50% of his time to settle the commodity transactions, though he has not
taken any permission for this. Is CA. Raj liable for professional misconduct
Nov 18 Qn no 3(a) 5 Marks

15. During the opening ceremony of a new branch office of CA. Young, his friend CA. Old introduced to CA.
Young, his friend and client Mr. Rich, the owner of an Export House whose accounts had been audited by CA.
Old for more than 15 Years. After few days, Mr. Rich approached CA. Young and offered a certification work
which hitherto had been done by CA. Old. CA. Young undertook the work for a fee which was not less than
fee charged by CA. Old in earlier period. Comment whether CA. Young had done any professional misconduct.
Answer
Acceptance of original professional work by a member emanating from the client Introduced to him
by another member: As per Clause (6) of Part I of the First Schedule to the Chartered Accountants Act,
1949, a Chartered Accountant in practice shall be deemed to be guilty of misconduct if he solicits clients
or professional work either directly or indirectly by a circular, advertisement, personal communication
or interview or by any other means.
Further, some forms of the soliciting work which the Council has prohibited include that a member
should not accept the original professional work emanating from a client introduced to him by another
member. If any professional work of such client comes to him directly, it should be his duty to ask the
client that he should come through the other member dealing generally with his original work.
In the given case, CA Old introduced his friend CA. Young to his friend and client Mr. Rich, the owner of
an Export House whose accounts has been audited by CA. Old for more than 15 years. After a few day
Mr. Rich approached CA. Young and offered a certification work which hitherto had been done by CA.
Old. Fees charged by CA. Young is also not less than fee charged by CA. Old.
In view of above decision CA Young should ask the client to come through CA Old. However, CA Young
undertook the work without informing CA. Old. Thus, CA. Young is held guilty under Clause (6) of Part
I of the First Schedule to the Chartered Accountants Act,1949.
MTP-Apr-19 Qn No 3(a) 5 Marks:

16.A special notice has been issued for a resolution at 2nd annual general meeting of Fiddle Ltd.
providing expressly that CA. Smart shall not be re-appointed as an auditor of the company.
Consequently, CA. Smart submitted a representation in writing to the company as provided under
section 140(4)(iii) of the Companies Act, 2013. In the representation, CA. Smart incorporated his
independent working as a professional throughout the term of office and also indicated his
willingness to continue as an auditor if reappointed by the shareholders of the Company. Comment
with reference to the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949 and Regulations there to.
803
Answer:

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
Soliciting Clients: As per Clause (6) of Part I of First Schedule to the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949, a
Chartered Accountant in practice is deemed to be guilty of professional misconduct if he solicits
securing professional work from another chartered accountant in practice and responding to
tenders.
Further, section 140(4)(iii) of the Companies Act, 2013, provides a right, to the retiring auditor, to make
representation in writing to the company. The retiring auditor has the right for his representation to be
circulated among the members of the company and to be read out at the meeting. However, the
content of letter should be set out in a dignified manner how he has been acting independently and
conscientiously through the term of his office and may, in addition, indicate, if he so chooses, his
willingness to continue as auditor, if re-appointed by the shareholders.
Thus, the incorporation as an independent professional, made by CA. Smart, while submitting
representation under section 140(4)(iii) of the Companies Act, 2013 and indication of willingness to
continue as an auditor if reappointed by shareholders, does not leads to solicitation.
Therefore, CA. Smart will not be held guilty for professional misconduct under Clause (6) of Part I of

17.Mr Bold, a chartered accountant in practice, created his own website in attractive format and
highlighted the contents in blue colour. He also circulated the information contained in the website
through E-mail to acknowledge public at large about his expertise. However, due to shortage of time,
he could not intimate his website address to the Institute.
(a) Circulating Information Contained in Own Website: As per Clause (6) of Part I of the First Schedule
to the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949, a Chartered Accountant in practice is deemed to be guilty of
professional misconduct if he solicits clients or professional work either directly or indirectly by circular,
advertisement, personal communication or interview or by any other means.
However, the guidelines approved by the Council of the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India
permit creation of own website by a chartered accountant in his or his firm name and no standard
format or restriction on colours is there. The chartered accountant or firm, as per the guidelines, should
ensure that none of the information contained in the website be circulated on their own or through E-
mail or by any other mode except on a specific “Pull” request.
Further, members are not required to intimate the Website address to the Institute. Members are only
required to comply with the Website Guidelines issued by the Institute in this regard.
In the given case, Mr. Bold has circulated the information contained in the website through E-mail to
public at large. Therefore, he is guilty of professional misconduct under Clause (6) of Part I of the First
Schedule to the said Act. However, there is no such misconduct for not intimating website address to
the Institute.
Nov 2019 Qn no 2(C) 4 Marks

804

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
18.Comment with reference to the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949 and schedules thereto: A
special notice has been issued for a resolution at 3rd annual general meeting of LED Ltd., providing
expressly that CA. Anoop shall not be re-appointed as an auditor of the· company. Consequently,
CA. Anoop submitted a representation in writing to the company with a request to circulate to the
members. In the detailed representation, CA. Anoop included the contributions made by him in
strengthening the control procedures of the company during his association with the company and
also indicated his willingness to continue as an auditor if reappointed by the shareholders of the
company.
Answer
Soliciting Clients: As per Clause (6) of Part I of First Schedule to the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949,
a Chartered Accountant in practice is deemed to be guilty of professional misconduct if he solicits
securing professional work from another chartered accountant in practice and responding to tenders.
Further, section 140(4)(iii) of the Companies Act, 2013, provides a right, to the retiring auditor, to
make representation in writing to the company. The retiring auditor has the right for his representation
to be circulated among the members of the company and to be read out at the meeting. However, the
content of letter should be set out in a dignified manner how he has been acting independently and
conscientiously through the term of his office and may, in addition, indicate, if he so chooses, his
willingness to continue as auditor, if re- appointed by the shareholders.
The proposition of the auditor to highlight contributions made by him in strengthening the control
procedures in the representation should not be included in such representations because the
representation letter should not be prepared in a manner so as to seek publicity.
Thus, highlighting contributions made by him in strengthening the control procedures, while submitting
representation U/S 140(4)(iii) of the Companies Act 2013, would amount to canvassing or soliciting for
his continuance as auditor.
Therefore, CA. Anoop will be held guilty for professional misconduct under Clause (6) of Part I of First
Schedule to the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949.
RTP May 2020

19. OPAQ & Associates, a firm of Chartered Accountants responded to a tender issued exclusively
for Chartered Accountants by an organisation in the area of tax audit. However no minimum fee was
prescribed in the tender document.
Answer:
Responding to Tenders: Clause (6) of Part I of the First Schedule to the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949 lays
down guidelines for responding to tenders, etc. It states that a member may respond to tenders or enquiries
issued by various users of professional services or organizations from time to time and secure professional work
as a consequence.
805
However, a member of the Institute in practice shall not respond to any tender issued by an

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
organization or user of professional services in areas of services which are exclusively reserved for
Chartered Accountants, such as audit and attestation services. Though, such restriction shall not be
applicable where minimum fee of the assignment is prescribed in the tender document itself or where
the areas are open to other professionals along with the Chartered Accountants.
In the instant case, OPAQ & Associates responded to a tender of tax audit which is exclusively reserved
for Chartered Accountants even though no minimum fee was prescribed in the tender document.
Therefore, OPAQ & Associates shall be held guilty of professional conduct for responding to such
tender in view of above-mentioned guideline.
20.(RTP MAY 2020)

ABZ & Co., a firm of Chartered Accountants, develops a website “abz.com”. The colour chosen for
the website was a very bright green and the web-site was to run on a “push” technology where the
names of the partners of the firm and the major clients were to be displayed on the web-site without
any disclosure obligation from any regulator.
Posting of Particulars on Website: The Council of the Institute had approved posting of particulars on
website by Chartered Accountants in practice under Clause (6) of Part I of First Schedule to the
Chartered Accountants Act, 1949 subject to the prescribed guidelines. The relevant guidelines in the
context of the website hosted by ABZ & Co. are:
 No restriction on the colours used in the website;
 The websites are run on a “pull” technology and not a “push” technology
 Names of clients and fees charged not to be given.
However, disclosure of names of clients and/or fees charged, on the website is permissible only where
it is required by a regulator, whether or not constituted under a statute, in India or outside India,
provided that such disclosure is only to the extent of requirement of the regulator. Where such
disclosure of names of clients and/or fees charged is made on the website, the member/ firm shall
ensure that it is mentioned on the website [in italics], below such disclosure itself, that “This
disclosure is in terms of the requirement of [name of the regulator] having
jurisdiction in [name of the country/area where such regulator has jurisdiction] vide [Rule/ Directive etc.
under which the disclosure is required by the Regulator].
In view of the above, ABZ & Co. would have no restriction on the colours used in the website but failed
to satisfy the other two guidelines. Thus, the firm would be liable for professional misconduct since it
would amount to soliciting work by advertisement.
21. (RTP-NOV 2020)

Comment on the following with reference to the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949 and schedules thereto:
(a) CA. Srishti and CA. Mishti are two partners of the CA firm ‘Srishti Mishti & Associates’. Being very pious, CA.
Srishti organised a religious ceremony at her home for which she instructed her printing agent to add her
designation “Chartered Accountant” with her name in the invitation cards. Later on, the invitations were
distributed to all the relatives, close friends and clients of both the partners
806

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
(b) Ms. Preeto, a CA, had an account with a bank. The normal balance in this account remained at a level
below Rs. 5,000. The bank inadvertently credited this account with a cheque of Rs. 2,70,000 belonging to
another account holder. When CA. Preeto came to know about this she withdrew the amount of Rs. 2,75,000
and closed the bank account. After 1 year the bank noticed the mistake and claimed Rs. 2,75,000 with
interest. CA. Preeto contested this claim. Can the bank approach the Institute of Chartered Accountants of
India for disciplinary action against CA. Preeto?
(c) CA. Moni is practicing since 2009 in the field of company audit. Due to her good practical knowledge, she
was offered editorship of a ‘Company Audit’ Journal which she accepted. However, she did not take any
permission from the Council regarding such editorship
ANSWER
a) Printing of Designation “Chartered Accountant” on Invitations for Religious Ceremony: As per Clause (6) of
Part I of the First Schedule to the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949, a Chartered Accountant in practice shall be
deemed to be guilty of professional misconduct if he solicits clients or professional work either directly or
indirectly by circular, advertisement, personal communication or interview or by any other means.
However, the Council of the ICAI is of the view that the designation “Chartered Accountant” as well as the name
of the firm may be used in greeting cards, invitations for marriages, religious ceremonies and any other specified
matters, provided that such greeting cards or invitations etc. are sent only to clients, relatives and close friends
of the members concerned.
In the given case, CA. Srishti has instructed to write designation “Chartered Accountant” on invitation cards for a
religious ceremony and distributed the same to all the relatives, close friends and clients of both the partners.
In this context, it may be noted that the Council has allowed using designation “Chartered Accountant” in
invitations for religious ceremony, provided these are sent to clients, relatives and close friends of the members
concerned only.
Therefore, CA. Srishti would be held guilty of professional misconduct under the said clause for sending such
invitations to the relatives, close friends and clients of CA. Mishti as well.
(b) Disrepute to the Profession: As per Clause 2 of Part IV of First Schedule of the Chartered Accountant Act,
1949, a Chartered Accountant will be deemed to be guilty of other misconduct if he in the opinion of the Council
brings disrepute to the profession or the Institute as a result of his action whether or not related to his
professional work.
In the instant case, CA. Preeto, a CA, had an account with a bank from which she withdrew the amount of Rs.
2,75,000 and closed the account. This amount of Rs. 2,75,000 was pertaining to Rs. 5,000 minimum balance
and Rs. 2,70,000 belonging to other account holder and inadvertently credited to his account by the bank. The
said act of CA. Preeto to withdraw the money which does not belongs to her will bring disrepute to the
profession. Hence under this clause the bank can file a suitable complaint under Clause 2 of Part IV of First
Schedule of the Chartered Accountant Act, 1949 with the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India.
(c) Permission from the Council: As per Clause (11) of Part I of First Schedule to the Chartered Accountants Act,
1949, a Chartered Accountant in practice will be deemed to be guilty of professional misconduct if he engages in
any business or occupation other than the profession of Chartered Accountant unless permitted by the Council
so to engage.
However, the Council has granted general permission to the members to engage in certain specific occupation.
In respect of all other occupations specific permission of the Institute is necessary.
In the instant case, CA. Moni accepted editorship of a journal for which she did not take any permission from the
Council. In this context, it may be noted that the editorship of professional journals is covered under the general
permission and specific permission is not required.
Therefore, CA. Moni shall not be held guilty of professional misconduct in terms of Clause (11) of Part I of First
807
Schedule to the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949.

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
Study Material
22 .M/s XYZ, a firm in practice, develops a website “xyz.com”. The colour chosen for the website
was a very bright green and the web-site was to run on a “push” technology where the names of the
partners of the firm and the major clients were to be displayed on the web-site without any
disclosure obligation from any regulator.
Answer
Posting of Particulars on Website: The Council of the Institute had approved posting of particulars on website
by Chartered Accountants in practice under Clause (6) of Part I of First Schedule to the Chartered Accountants
Act, 1949 subject to the prescribed guidelines. The relevant guidelines in the context of the website hosted by
M/s XYZ are:
 No restriction on the colours used in the website;
 The websites are run on a “pull” technology and not a “push” technology;
 Names of clients and fees charged not to be given.
However, disclosure of names of clients and/or fees charged, on the website is permissible only where it is
required by a regulator, whether or not constituted under a statute, in India or outside India, provided that
such disclosure is only to the extent of requirement of the regulator. Where such disclosure of names of clients
and/or fees charged is made on the website, the member/ firm shall ensure that it is mentioned on the website
[in italics], below such disclosure itself, that “This disclosure is in terms of the requirement of [name of the
regulator] having jurisdiction in [name of the country/area where such regulator has jurisdiction] vide [Rule/
Directive etc. under which the disclosure is required by the Regulator].
In view of the above, M/s XYZ would have no restriction on the colours used in the website but failed to satisfy
the other two guidelines. Thus, the firm would be liable for professional misconduct since it would amo unt to
soliciting work by advertisement.
23. A partner of a firm of chartered accountants during a T.V. interview handed over a bio-data of
his firm to the chairperson. Such bio-data detailed the standing of the international firm with which
the firm was associated. It also detailed the achievements of the concerned partner and his
recognition as an expert in the field of taxation in the country. The chairperson read out the said
bio-data during the interview. Discuss whether this action by the Chartered Accountant would
amount to misconduct or not.
Answer
Clause (6) of Part I of the First Schedule to the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949 prohibits solicitation of client
or professional work either directly or indirectly by circular, advertisement, personal communication or
interview or by any other means since it shall constitute professional misconduct. The bio-data was handed
over to the chairperson during the T.V. interview by the Chartered Accountant which included details about
the firm and the achievements of the partner as an expert in the field of taxation.
808
The chairperson simply read out the same in detail about association with the international firm as also the

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
achievements of the partner and his recognition as an expert in the field of taxation. Such an act would
definitely lead to the promotion of the firms’ name and publicity thereof as well as of the partner and as such
the handing over of bio-data cannot be approved. The partner would be held guilty of professional miscount
under Clause (6) of Part I of the First Schedule to the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949
24. An advertisement was published in a Newspaper containing the photograph of Mr. X, a member
of the institute wherein he was congratulated on the occasion of the opening ceremony of his office.
Answer
Publishing an Advertisement Containing Photograph: As per Clause (6) of Part I of the First Schedule to the
Chartered Accountants Act, 1949, a Chartered Accountant in practice shall be deemed to be guilty of
misconduct if he solicits clients or professional work either directly or indirectly by a circular, advertisement,
personal communication or interview or by any other means
In the given case, Mr. X published an advertisement in a Newspaper containing his photograph on the occasion
of the opening ceremony of his office. On this context, it may be noted that the advertisement which had been
put in by the member is quite prominent. If soliciting of work is allowed, the independence and forthrightness
of a Chartered Accountant in the discharge of duties cannot be maintained.
The above therefore amounts to soliciting professional work by advertisement directly or indirectly. Mr. X
would be therefore held guilty under Clause (6) of Part I of the First Schedule to the Chartered Accountants
Act, 1949
25. Mr. X, a Chartered Accountant and the proprietor of X & Co., wrote several letters to the
Assistant Registrar of Co-operative Societies stating that though his firm was on the panel of
auditors, no audit work was allotted to the firm and further requested him to look into the matter .
Answer
Soliciting Professional Work: As per Clause (6) of Part I of the First Schedule to the Chartered Accountants
Act, 1949, a Chartered Accountant in practice shall be deemed to be guilty of misconduct if he solicits clients
or professional work either directly or indirectly by a circular, advertisement, personal communication or
interview or by any other means. In the given case, Mr. X, a Chartered Accountant and proprietor of M/s X and
Co., wrote several letters to the Assistant Registrar of Co-operative Societies, requesting for allotment of audit
work. In similar cases, it was held that the Chartered Accountant would be guilty of professional misconduct
under Clause (6) of Part I of the First Schedule to the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949. The writing of
continuous letter to ascertain the reasons for not getting the work is quite alright but in case such either
amount to request for allowing the work then Mr. X will be liable for professional misconduct.
Consequently, Mr. X would therefore be held guilty under Clause (6) of Part I of the First Schedule to the
Chartered Accountants Act, 1949.
26.(mtp nov 2019)

Mr. Nigal, a Chartered Accountant in practice, delivered a speech in the national conference
organized by the Ministry of Textiles. While delivering the speech, he told to the audience that he
809
is a management expert and his firm provides services of taxation and audit at reasonable rates.

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
He also requested the audience to approach his firm of chartered accountants for these services
and at the request of audience he also distributed his business cards and telephone number of his
firm to those in the audience. Comment
Answer
Using Designation Other Than a CA and Providing Details of Services Offered: Clause (6) of Part I of the First
Schedule to the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949 states that a Chartered Accountant in practice shall be
deemed to be guilty of misconduct if he solicits clients or professional work either directly or indirectly by a
circular, advertisement, personal communication or interview or by any other means. Such a restraint has
been put so that the members maintain their independence of judgment and may be able to command respect
from their prospective clients.
Section 7 of the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949 read with Clause (7) of Part I of the First Schedule to the said
Act prohibits advertising of professional attainments or services of a member. It also restrains a member from
using any designation or expression other than that of a chartered accountant in documents through which
the professional attainments of the member would come to the notice of the public. Under the clause, use of
any designation or expression other than chartered accountant for a chartered accountant in practice, on
professional documents, visiting cards, etc. amounts to a misconduct unless it be a degree of a university or
a title indicating membership of any other professional body recognised by the Central Government or the
Council.
Member may appear on television and films and agree to broadcast in the Radio or give lectures at forums
and may give their names and describe themselves as Chartered Accountants. Special qualifications or
specialized knowledge directly relevant to the subject matter of the programme may also be given but no
reference should be made, in the case of practicing member to the name and address or services of his firm.
What he may say or write must not be promotional of his or his firm but must be an objective professional
view of the topic under consideration.
established by law in India or recognised by the Central Government nor it is a recognised professional
membership by the Central Government or the Council. Therefore, he is deemed to be guilty of professional
misconduct under both Clause (6) and Clause (7) as he has used the designation “Management Expert” in his
speech and also he has made reference to the services provided by his firm of Chartered Accountants at
reasonable rates. Distribution of cards to audience is also a misconduct in terms of Clause (6).
RTP Nov’2020 Q No 1 Part A

Integrated Case Scenario
27. YS & Associates, a firm of Chartered Accountants, having CA. Y and CA. S as partners, is based at
Mumbai. YS & Associates get their website developed as www.ysassociates.com from KPY Ltd. The
colour of their website was very bright and attractive to run on a “push” technology. Names of the
partners of the firm and the major clients were also displayed on the web-site without any disclosure
obligation from any regulator.
CA. Y, accepted his appointment as tax auditor of a firm under Section 44AB, of the Income-tax Act,
and commenced the tax audit within two days of appointment since the client was in a hurry to file
810
Return of Income before the due date. After commencing the audit, CA. Y realised his mistake of

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
accepting this tax audit without sending any communication to the previous tax auditor. In order to
rectify his mistake, before signing the tax audit report, he sent a registered post to the previous
auditor and obtained the postal acknowledgement.
CA. S, provides management consultancy and other services to his clients. During 2019, looking to
the growing needs of his clients to invest in the stock markets, he also advised them on Portfolio
Management Services whereby he managed portfolios of
some of his clie nts. Looking at his expertise in financial management, Mr. Tarak, a student of
Chartered Accountancy course, is very much impressed with his knowledge. He approached CA. S to
take guidance on some topics of financial management subject related to his course. CA. S, on
request, decided to spare some time and started providing classes to Mr. Tarak along with some
other aspirants for 3 days in a week and for 1 hours in a day. However, he has not taken any specific
permission for such private tutorship from the Council.
YS & Associates is appointed to conduct statutory audit of XYZ Ltd. XYZ Ltd is required to appoint
internal auditor as per statutory provisions given in the Companies Act, 2013 and appointed CA. IA as
its internal auditor. YS & Associates asked Mr. IA to provide direct assistance to him regarding
evaluating significant accounting estimates by the management and assessing the risk of material
misstatements. He also seeks his direct assistance in assembling the information necessary to
resolve exceptions in confirmation responses with respect to external confirmation requests and
evaluation of the results of external confirmation procedures.
XYZ Ltd is seeking advice of YS & Associates to appoint CA. IA for conducting GST Audit.
Question No.: (1-5)
1. YS & Associates sought direct assistance from CA. IA, internal auditor as stated in the above
scenario. Advise as to whether he is permitted to do so in accordance with relevant Standards on
Auditing.
(a) YS & Associates cannot ask CA. IA for direct assistance regarding evaluating significant accounting
estimates and assessing the risk of material misstatements. However, CA. IA may assist YS &
Associates in assembling information necessary to resolve exceptions in confirmation responses as
per SA 610.
(b) CA. IA cannot assist YS & Associates in assembling information necessary to resolve exceptions in
confirmation responses. However, YS & Associates can ask Mr. IA for direct assistance regarding
evaluating significant accounting estimates and assessing the risk of material misstatements as per
SA 610.
(c) YS & Associates cannot ask CA. IA for direct assistance regarding evaluating significant accounting
estimates and assessing the risk of material misstatements and in assembling the information
necessary to resolve exceptions in confirmation responses as per SA 610.
811

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
(d) YS & Associates can ask CA. IA for direct assistance regarding evaluating significant accounting
estimates and assessing the risk of material misstatements and in assembling the information
necessary to resolve exceptions in confirmation responses as per SA 610.
Answer: (a) YS & Associates cannot ask CA. IA for direct assistance regarding evaluating significant
accounting estimates and assessing the risk of material misstatements. However, CA. IA may assist
YS & Associates in assembling information necessary to resolve exceptions in confirmation responses
as per SA 610.
2. Whether CA S is guilty of professional misconduct in providing private tutorship to Mr. Tarak along
with some other aspirants for 3 days in a week and for 1 hours in a day in the absence of specific
approval.
(a) CA. S is not guilty of professional misconduct as he is teaching within prescribed hours i.e. not
exceeding 25 hours a month as per Regulation 192A
(b) CA. S is not guilty of professional misconduct as he is teaching within prescribed hours i.e. not
exceeding 25 hours a month as per Regulation 190A
(c) CA. S is guilty of professional misconduct as he has not obtained specific permission for the same.
(d) CA. S is not guilty of professional misconduct as he is teaching within prescribed hours i.e. not
exceeding 25 hours a week as per Regulation 190A
Answer: d) CA. S is not guilty of professional misconduct as he is teaching within prescribed hours i.e.
not exceeding 25 hours a week as per Regulation 190A
3. Before signing the tax audit report, CA. Y sent a registered post to the previous auditor and
obtained the postal acknowledgement. Will CA. Y be held guilty of professional misconduct under
the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949?
(a) As per Clause (8) of Part I of First Schedule to the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949 CA. Y will not
be held guilty of professional misconduct as he communicated with the previous tax auditor before
signing the audit report.
(b) As per Clause (8) of Part I of First Schedule to the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949, CA. Y will not
be held guilty of professional misconduct since the requirement for communicating with the
previous auditor being a chartered accountant in practice would apply to statutory audit only.
(c) As per Clause (8) of Part I of First Schedule to the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949, CA. Y will be
held guilty of professional misconduct since he has accepted the tax audit, without first
812
communicating with the previous auditor in writing.

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
(d) As per Clause (8) of Part I of Second Schedule to the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949, CA. Y will
be held guilty of professional misconduct since he has accepted the tax audit, without first
Answer: c) As per Clause (8) of Part I of First Schedule to the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949, CA. Y
will be held guilty of professional misconduct since he has accepted the tax audit, without 540 first
4. In view of YS & Associates, whether CA. IA is eligible to undertake Goods and Service Tax (GST)
Audit of XYZ Ltd simultaneously?
(a) CA. IA is internal auditor of XYZ Ltd and therefore, is eligible to undertake Goods and Service Tax
(GST) Audit of XYZ Ltd simultaneously
(b) CA. IA is internal auditor of XYZ Ltd and therefore, not eligible to undertake Goods and Service
Tax (GST) Audit of XYZ Ltd simultaneously
(c) Being Internal Auditor CA. IA is appropriate person to carry out Goods and Service Tax (GST) Audit
of XYZ Ltd
(d) None of the above
Answer: b) CA. IA is internal auditor of XYZ Ltd and therefore, not eligible to undertake Goods and
Service Tax (GST) Audit of XYZ Ltd simultaneously
5. Whether, website designed for www.ysassociates.com is in compliance with the guidelines given
in Clause (6) of Part I of First Schedule to the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949:
(a) Yes, website can have names of partners and major clients along with its fess.
(b) Yes, as the websites can be designed on a “push” technology.
(c) Yes, as there is no restriction on the colours used in the website.
(d) No, as names of the partners of the firm and the major clients were displayed without any
Answer: d) No, as names of the partners of the firm and the major clients were displayed without any
27A(MAY 2022 EXAM)
Mr. Sirish, a Chartered Accountant in practice, delivered a speech in the national conference
organized by the Ministry of Information Technology. While delivering the speech, he told the
813
audience that he is a Cybersecurity Expert and his firm provides services of cloud accounting, IT
governance, risk compliance and information security at reasonable rates. He also requested the

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
audience to approach his firm of chartered accountants for these services and at the request of the
audience he also distributed his business cards and telephone number of his firm to those in the
audience.
Comment in the light of professional Code of Ethics.
ANSWER:
Using Designation Other Than a CA and Providing Details of Services Offered: Clause (6) of Part I of
the First Schedule to the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949 states that a Chartered Accountant in
practice shall be deemed to be guilty of misconduct if he solicits clients or professional work either
directly or indirectly by a circular, advertisement, personal communication or interview or by any
other means. Such a restraint has been put so that the members maintain their independence of
judgment and may be able to command respect from their prospective clients.
Section 7 of the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949 read with Clause (7) of Part I of the First Schedule
to the said Act prohibits advertising of professional attainments or services of a member. It also
restrains a member from using any designation or expression other than that of a chartered
accountant in documents through which the professional attainments of the member would come to
the notice of the public. Under the clause, use of any designation or expression other than chartered
other professional body recognised by the Central Government or the Council.
In view of above, it is improper to use designation "Cybersecurity Expert" since neither it is a degree
of a University established by law in India or recognised by the Central Government nor it is a
recognised professional membership by the Central Government or the Council. Therefore, he is
deemed to be guilty of professional misconduct under both Clause (6) and Clause (7) as he has used
the designation “Cybersecurity Expert” in his speech and also he has made reference to the services
provided by his firm of Chartered Accountants at reasonable rates. Distribution of cards to audience
is also misconduct in terms of Clause (6).
27B (OCT 2022 MTP)
CA Praful has recently qualified and has obtained certificate of practice. In the initial years, it is taking
time to set up his clientele base. He is also conducting audit of few entities. Simultaneously, he plans
to provide coaching to CA students online taking advantage of his fresh reservoir of knowledge.
Therefore, he advertises his classes on various social media platforms. Comment with reference to
the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949, and Schedules thereto.
ANSWER :
Regulation 190A of Chartered Accountants Regulations, 1988 provides that a chartered accountant
in practice shall not engage in any business or occupation other than the profession of accountancy
except with the permission granted in accordance with a resolution of the Council.
The Council has passed a resolution under Regulation 190A granting general permission for private
814
tutorship and part time tutorship under coaching organization of the Institute. Such gener al

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
permission is subject to the condition that direct teaching hours devoted to such activities taken
together should not exceed 25 hours a week in order to be able to perform attest functions.
However, Clause 6 of Part I of the First Schedule to the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949 states that
Chartered Accountant in practice shall be deemed to be guilty of professional misconduct, if he solicits
communication or interview or by any other means;
Further, an advertisement of online coaching activities through social media platforms amounts to
indirect solicitation as well as solicitation by another means and is, therefore, violative of Clause 6 of
Part I of the First Schedule to Chartered Accountants Act, 1949.
Therefore, although a member in practice can engage in private tutorship subject to Council
Guidelines but he cannot advertise by any means for coaching activities as it amounts to indirect
solicitation of clients and professional work.
In the given case, CA Praful is providing coaching to CA students online and also advertising his classes
on various social media platforms. In view of above, CA. Praful is guilty of professional misconduct
under Clause (6) of Part I of First Schedule to the Chartered Accountants Act 1949 for advertising his
classes on various social media platforms.
27C (MAY 2022 RTP)

Mr. Avi, a newly qualified Chartered Accountant, started his practice and sought clients through
telephone calls from his family and friends, almost all of them employed in one or the other retail
trade business. One of his friends Mr. Ravi gave him an idea to start online services and give stock
certifications to traders with Cash Credit Limits in Banks. Mr. Avi started a website with colourful
catchy designs and shared the website address on his all social media posts and stories and tagged
40 traders of his local community with the caption “Simple Online Stock Certification Services”.
Besides, Mr. Avi entered into an agreement with a Digital Marketer to give him 8% commission on
each service procured through him. Discuss if the actions of Mr. Avi are valid in th e light of the
Professional Ethics and various pronouncements and guidelines issued by ICAI.
ANSWER :
As per Clause (6) of Part I of the First Schedule of the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949, a Chartered
Accountant in practice is deemed to be guilty of professional misconduct if he solicits clients or
professional work either directly or indirectly by circular, advertisement, personal communication or
interview or by any other means.
Mr. Avi is wrong in seeking clients through family and friends. Creating a website is not a non-
compliance provided it is in line with the guidelines issued by the Institute in this regard. One of the
guidelines is that the website should not be in push mode. Further, mentioning of clients’ names is
also prohibited as per the guidelines.
In the given situation, Mr. Avi shared the website address on his all social media posts and stories and
815
tagged 40 traders of his local community with the caption “Simple Online Stock Certification Services”

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
mentioning his current clients as well. This is in complete contravention of the guidelines on the
website issued by the ICAI.
Thus, CA, Avi would be held guilty of professional misconduct under clause 6 of Part 1 of First Schedule
of the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949.

RTP Nov 2019 Qn no 19, (rtp nov 2018)
28. A Chartered Accountant in practice, empanelled as IP (Insolvency Professional) has mentioned
the same on his visiting cards, letter heads and other communications also. Mr. A, who is residing in
his neighbourhood has filed a complaint for professional misconduct against the said member for
such mention of insolvency professional on circulations.
Answer
As per the Clause 7 of Part 1 of the First Schedule, if any Chartered Accountant advertises his professional
attainments or services, or uses any designation or expressions other than the Chartered Accountant on
professional documents, visiting cards, letter heads or sign boards unless it be a degree of a University
established by law in India or recognised by the Central Government or a title indicating membership of the ICAI
of any other institution that has been recognized by the Central Government or may be recognized by the
council, will be guilty of professional misconduct.
Here A Chartered Accountant empanelled as IP (Insolvency Professional) can mention 'Insolvency
Professional' on his visiting cards, Letter heads and other communication, as this is a title recognised
by the Central Government in terms of Clause-7 of Part-1 of First Schedule to the Chartered
Accountants Act, 1949. Thus, complaint of neighbour is not enforceable/valid.
29. RTP May 2019 Qn no 24/ MTP-Aug-18 Qn No 5(a) 4 Marks:

Mr. M, a Chartered Accountant in practice, has printed visiting cards which besides other details
also carries a Quick Response (QR) code. The visiting card as well the QR code contains his name,
office and residential address, contact details, e-mail id and name of the firm's website. Comment
with reference to the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949 and schedules thereto.
Answer
Printing of QR Code on Visiting Cards: As per Clause (7) of Part I of First Schedule to the Chartered
Accountants Act, 1949, a Chartered Accountant in practice is deemed to be guilty of professional
misconduct if he advertises his professional attainments or services.
Ethical Standards Board has also clarified that a member in practice is allowed to print Quick Response
Code (QR Code) on the visiting Card, provided that the Code does not contain information that is not
otherwise permissible to be printed on a visiting Card.
In the given case, Mr. M has printed visiting cards which carries Quick Response Code (QR Code) besides
other details. The visiting card as well as the QR Code contains his name, office and residential address,
contact details, e-mail id and name of the firm’s website which are otherwise allowed to be printed
on the visiting cards of a Chartered Accountant in practice.
816
Thus, Mr. M is not guilty under Clause (7) of Part I of First Schedule to the Chartered Accountants Act,

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
1949.
30.MTP-Aug-18 Qn No 3(a) 5 Marks:
A practicing Chartered Accountant uses a visiting card in which he designates himself, besides as
Chartered Accountant, as
(i) Tax Consultant

(ii) Cost Accountant.
Advise on above with reference to the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949, and Schedules thereto.
Answer:
1. Tax Consultant: Section 7 of the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949 read with Clause (7) of Part I of the
First Schedule to the said Act prohibits advertising of professional attainments or services of a member.
It also restrains a member from using any designation or expression other than that of a chartered
accountant in documents through which the professional attainments of the member would come to
the notice of the public. Under the clause, use of any designation or expression other than chartered
other professional body recognized by the Central Government or the Council. Thus, it is improper to
use designation "Tax Consultant" since neither it is a degree of a University established by law in India
or recognized by the Central Government nor it is a recognized professional membership by the Central
Government or the Council.
(ii) Cost Accountant: As stated in the preceding paragraph, this would also constitute misconduct
under section 7 of the Act read with Clause (7) of Part I of the First Schedule to the Chartered
Accountants Act, 1949. A chartered accountant in practice cannot use any other designation than that
of a chartered accountant. Nevertheless, a member in practice may use any other letters or
descriptions indicating membership of accountancy bodies which have been approved by the Council.
Thus, it is improper for a chartered accountant to state in his documents that he is a “Cost Accountant”.
However as per the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949, the Council has resolved that the members are
permitted to use letters indicating membership of the Institute of Cost and Works Accountants but not
the designation "Cost Accountant".
Study Material
31.A practising Chartered Accountant uses a visiting card in which he designates himself, besides as
Chartered Accountant, Cost Accountant.
Answer
Cost Accountant: As stated in the case study given in clause 7 with reference to tax consultant, this
would also constitute misconduct under section 7 of the Act read with Clause(7) of Part I of the First
Schedule to the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949. A chartered accountant in practice cannot use any
817
other designation than that of a chartered accountant. Nevertheless, a member in practice may use

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
any other letters or descriptions indicating membership of accountancy bodies which have been
approved by the Council. Thus, it is improper for a chartered accountant to state in his documents that
he is a “Cost Accountant”. However as per the
Chartered Accountants Act, 1949, the Council has resolved that the members are permitted to use
letters indicating membership of the Institute of Cost and Works Accountants but not the designation
"Cost Accountant".
31A(MARCH 2022 MTP)

CA. Vardhman, a Chartered Accountant in practice, empanelled as an Insolvency Professional (IP) has
mentioned the same on his visiting cards, letter heads and other communications also. Mr. Tapas
residing in his neighbourhood, has filed a complaint for professional misconduct against the said
member for such mention of IP. You are required to examine the same with reference to the Chartered
Accountants Act, 1949 and Schedules thereto. (4 Marks)
ANSWER :
Using Designation of Insolvency Professional: As per Clause (7) of Part I of First Schedule to the
Chartered Accountants Act, 1949, a CA in practice is deemed to be guilty of professional misconduct if
he (i) advertises his professional attainments or services or (ii) uses any designation or expressions
other than ‘Chartered Accountant” on professional documents, visiting cards, letter heads or sign
boards unless it be a degree of a university established by law in India or recognized by the Central
Government or a title indicating membership of the ICAI or of any other institution that has been
recognized by the Central Government or may be recognized by the council.
In the given situation, CA. Vardhman is a Chartered Accountant in practice. He is also empanelled as
an Insolvency Professional (IP), accordingly, has mentioned the same on his visiting cards, letter heads
and other communications also. As per Clause (7) of Part I of First Schedule to the Chartered
Accountants Act, 1949, a Chartered Accountant empaneled as IP (Insolvency Professional) can mention
“Insolvency Professional” on his visiting cards, let ter heads and other communication, as this is a title
recognised by the Central Government in terms of Clause 7 of Part 1 of First Schedule to the Chartered
Accountants Act, 1949. Thus, complaint of neighbor Mr. Tapas is not enforceable/ valid.

32.MTP-Mar 2019 Qn No 3(a) 5 Marks:
CA. T, in practice, was appointed to carry out internal audit of a stock broker, listed with BSE.
However, he failed to intimate his appointment to the statutory auditors of the company. The
statutory auditor feels this is violation of professional ethics. Comment with reference to the
Chartered Accountants Act, 1949, and Schedules thereto.
Answer:
818

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
As per Clause (8) of Part I of First Schedule to the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949, a chartered accountant in
practice is deemed to be guilty of professional misconduct, if he accepts a position as auditor previously held
by another chartered accountant or a certified auditor who has been Issued certificate under the Restricted
Certificate Rules, 1932 without first communicating with him in writing.
This clause is applicable in situation of replacing of one auditor by another auditor. Internal auditor and statutory
audition are parallel positions and not replacement positions. The management generally appoints the internal
auditor whereas the statutory auditor will be appointed by the shareholders in the AGM. In this situation, there is
no need for communication by one to other.
In view of above the contention of the statutory auditor is unacceptable and there is no question of
communicating in writing by Mr. T.
33.CA Raja was appointed as the Auditor of Castle Ltd. for the year 2019-20. Since he declined to accept
the appointment, the Board of Directors appointed CA Rani as the auditor in the place of CA Raja,
which was also accepted by CA Rani.
Board can appoint the auditor in the case of casual vacancy under section 139(8) of the Companies
Act, 2013. The non-acceptance of appointment by CA. Raja does not constitute a casual vacancy to be
filled by the Board. In this case, it will be deemed that no auditor was appointed in the AGM.
Further, as per Section 139(10) of the Companies Act, 2013 when at any annual general meeting, no auditor is
appointed or re-appointed, the existing auditor shall continue to be the auditor of the company. The appointment
of the auditor by the Board is defective in law.
Clause (9) of Part I of First Schedule to the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949 states that a chartered accountant is
deemed to be guilty of professional misconduct if he accepts an appointment as auditor of a company without
first ascertaining from it whether the requirements of section 225 of the Companies Act, 1956 (now Section 139,
140 and 142 read with Section 141 of the Companies Act, 2013), in respect of such appointment have been fully
complied with.
Conclusion: Hence, CA. Rani is guilty of professional misconduct since she accepted the appointment without
verification of statutory requirements.
34. Mrs. X is a Director of ABC Pvt. Ltd. During the year 2020-21, the company appointed CA Mr. Y,
Mrs. X's spouse, as its statutory auditor. Mr. Y used to deliver audit report without any comments or
disclosures, thereupon.
As per Section 141(3)(f) of the Companies Act, 2013, a person shall not be eligible for appointment as
an auditor of a company whose relative is a director or is in the employment of the company as a
director or key managerial personnel. The definition of ‘Relative’ includes husband and wife.
Clause (9) of Part I of the First Schedule to the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949, provides that a member in
practice shall be deemed to be guilty of professional misconduct if he accepts an appointment as auditor of a
company without first ascertaining from it whether the requirements of Section 225 of the Companies Act, 1956
(now Section 139, 140 and 142 read with Section 141 of the Companies Act, 2013), in respect of such appointment
have been duly complied with.
In this case Mrs. X is a Director of ABC Pvt. Ltd. and the company has appointed Mr. Y, Chartered Accountant, Mrs.
X's spouse, as its statutory auditor. Mr. Y should not accept the appointment as statutory auditor of the company,
where his wife Mrs. X is a director. This is contravention of section 141 of the Companies Act, 2013.
Conclusion: Therefore, Mr. Y is liable for misconduct under the said clause since he accepted the appointment
without first verifying the compliance of statutory requirements.
819

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s

Q 34A (NOV 21 EXAM)
CA Mehta was appointed as the Auditor of CS Ltd. for the year 2020 -21 in the place of retiring auditor CA Gupta.
CA Mehta accepted the appointment after obtaining a certificate from the management that the provisions of
the Sections 139 and 140 of the Companies Act, 2013 have been complied with.
Comment with reference to the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949 and schedules thereto.
ANSWER :
In the given case, CA Mehta accepted the appointment in place of retiring auditor after obtaining a certificate
from the management that the provisions of the Sections 139 and 140 of the Companies Act, 2013 have been
complied with.
Clause (9) of Part I of the First Schedule to Chartered Accountants Act, 1949 provides that a member in practice
shall be deemed to be guilty of professional misconduct if he accepts an appointment as auditor of a Company
without first ascertaining from it whether the requirements of Sections 139 and 140 of the Companies Act, 2013,
in respect of such appointment have been duly complied with.
Under this clause it is obligatory on the incoming auditor to ascertain from the Company that the appropriate
procedure in the matter of his appointment has been duly complied with so that no shareholder or retiring
auditor may, at a later date, challenge the validity of such appointment.
Under Clause (9) of Part I of the First Schedule to the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949, the incoming auditor has
to ascertain whether the Company has complied with the provisions of the above sections. The word "ascertain”
means “to find out for certain”. This would mean that the incoming auditor should find out for certain as to
whether the Company has complied with the provisions of Sections 139 and, 140 of the Companies Act, 2013. In
this respect, it would not be sufficient for the incoming auditor to accept a certificate from the management of
the Company that the provisions of the above sections have been complied with. It is necessary for the incoming
auditor to verify the relevant records of the Company and ascertain as to whether the Company has, in fact,
complied with the provisions of the above sections. If the Company is not willing to allow the incoming auditor
to verify the relevant records in order to enable him to ascertain as to whether the provisions of the above
sections have been complied with, the incoming auditor should not accept the audit assignment.
Applying the above clause to the given case, the Company is not willing to allow the incoming auditor to verify
the relevant records in order to enable him to ascertain as to whether the provisions of the above sections have
been complied with, the incoming auditor, CA Mehta should not have accepted the audit assignment. But on the
other hand, CA Mehta accepted the appointment in place of retiring auditor after obtaining a certificate from
the management which is not enough and hence CA Mehta is deemed to be guilty of professional misconduct.

35.MTP Mar 2018 Qn no.4(a) 4 Marks
Alora Pvt. Ltd. approached CA. Neha, a practicing Chartered Accountant since 1998, for recovery of
debts amounting Rs. 20 crore. CA Neha accepted the work and requested to charge fees @ 1.5% of
the debt recovered. Later on, she raised a bill for debts recovered and charged Rs. 27 lacs for
recovering 90% of the debts. Comment with reference to the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949.
Answer
Charging of Fees based on Percentage: Clause (10) of Part I to First Schedule to the Chartered
Accountants Act, 1949 prohibits a Chartered Accountant in practice to charge, to offer, to accept or
820
accept fees which are based on a percentage of profits or which are contingent upon the findings or

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
results of such work done by him.

However, this restriction is not applicable where such payment is permitted by the Chartered
Accountants Act, 1949. The Council of the Institute has framed Regulation 192 which exempts debt
recovery services where fees may be based on a percentage of the debt recovered.
In the given case, CA. Neha has charged fees based on percentage of the debt recovered (which is
exempted under Regulation 192). Hence, CA. Neha will not be held guilty for professional misconduct.
36 .RTP May 2020 Qn no 19 (b)
Agarwal Pvt Ltd. approached CA. Prem, a Chartered Accountant in practice, for debt recovery
services. CA Prem accepted the work and insisted for fees to be based on 2% of the debt recovered.
Answer:
Charging of Fees based on Percentage: Clause (10) of Part I to First Schedule to the Chartered
Accountants Act, 1949 prohibits a Chartered Accountant in practice to charge, to offer, to accept or
accept fees which are based on a percentage of profits or which are contingent upon the findings or
results of such work done by him.
However, this restriction is not applicable where such payment is permitted by the Chartered
Accountants Act, 1949. The Council of the Institute has framed Regulation 192 which exempts debt
recovery services where fees may be based on a percentage of the debt recovered.
In the given case, CA. Prem has insisted for fees to be based on percentage of the debt recovered (which
is exempted under Regulation 192). Hence, CA. Prem will not be held guilty for professional misconduct.

37.RTP May 2018 Qn no 19(b)
CA. Raj is a leading income tax practitioner and consultant for derivative products. He resides in
Bangalore near to the XYZ commodity stock exchange and does trading in commodity derivatives.
Every day, he invests nearly 50% of his time to settle the commodity transactions, though he has not
taken any permission for this. Is CA. Raj liable for professional misconduct?
Answer
Engaging into a Business: As per clause (11) of Part I of First Schedule to the Chartered Accountants
Act, 1949, a Chartered Accountant in practice is deemed to be guilty of professional misconduct if he
engages in any business or occupation other than the profession of Chartered Accountant unless
permitted by the Council so to engage.
However, the Council has granted general permission to the members to engage in certain
specific occupation. In respect of all other occupations specific permission of the Institute is necessary.
In this case, CA. Raj is engaged in the occupation of trading in commodity derivatives which is not
covered under the general permission.
Hence, specific permission of the Institute has to be obtained otherwise he will be deemed to be
guilty of professional misconduct under clause (11) of Part I of First Schedule of Chartered Accountants
Act, 1949.
821

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
38. MTP Mar 18 Qn no.5(a) 4 Marks

CA. Aman, a practicing Chartered Accountant, took over as the executive chairman of Signora IT Ltd. on
01.04.2016. However, realizing about obtaining prior approval from the Council of the ICAI for engaging into
other business, he applied to the Council for permission within 10 days. Comment with reference to the
Answer
Specific Permission to be Obtained: As per Clause (11) of Part I of First Schedule to the Chartered
Accountants Act, 1949, a Chartered Accountant in practice will be deemed to be guilty of professional
misconduct if he engages in any business or occupation other than the profession of Chartered
Accountant unless permitted by the Council so to engage.
In the instant case, CA. Aman took over as the executive chairman on 01.04.2016 and applied for
permission later. Based on the given facts, he was engaged in other occupation, after 01.04.2016 and
before the application for approval, without the permission of the Council. Therefore, CA. Aman is
guilty of professional misconduct in terms of Clause (11) of Part I of First Schedule to the Chartered
39.MTP Apr 18 Qn no 3(A) 5 Marks

CA Raman is practicing in the field of financial management planning for over 12 years. He has gained
expertise in this domain over others.
Mr. Ratan, a student of Chartered Accountancy course, is very much impressed with the knowledge
of CA. Raman. He approached CA. Raman to take guidance on some topics of financial management
subject related to his course. CA. Raman, on request, decided to spare some time and started providing
private tutorship to Mr. Ratan along with some other aspirants for 3 hours in a week. However, he
forgot to take specific permission for such private tutorship from the Council. Comment on above with
reference to the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949, and Schedules thereto.
ANSWER
Permission for Providing Private Tutorship: As per Clause (11) of Part I of the First Schedule to the
Chartered Accountants Act, 1949, a Chartered Accountant in practice shall be deemed to be guilty of
professional misconduct if he engages in any
business or occupation other than the profession of chartered accountant unless permitted by the
Council so to engage.
Further, regulation 190A of the Chartered Accountants Regulation, 1988 provides that a Chartered
Accountant in practice shall not engage in any other business or occupation other than the profession
of accountancy except with the permission granted in accordance with a re solution of the Council.
Such general and specific permission granted is subject to the condition that the direct teaching hours
devoted to such activities taken together should not exceed 25 hours a week in order to be able to
undertake attest functions.
According to the same there is no specific permission from the council would be necessary in the case
of private tutorship.
822
In the given case, CA. Raman has started providing private tutorship to Mr. Ratan along with some other
aspirants 3 hours in a week, without obtaining specific or prior approval of the Council.

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
On this context, it may be noted that the Council has provided general permission for providing such
private tutorship subject to the condition that the direct teaching hours devoted to such activities
taken together should not exceed 25 hours a week. Therefore, CA. Raman would not be held guilty of
professional misconduct under Clause (11) of Part I of the First Schedule to the Chartered Accountants
Act, 1949.
40.A chartered accountant holding certificate of practice and having four articled clerks registered under him
accepts appointment as a full-time lecturer in a college. Also, he becomes a partner with his brother in a
business. Examine his conduct in the light of Chartered Accountants Act, 1949 and the regulations thereunder.
Clause (11) of Part I of the First Schedule to the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949 debars a chartered
accountant in practice from engaging in any business or occupation other than the profession of
chartered accountancy unless permitted by the Council of the Institute so to engage. This clause, in
effect, has empowered the Council of the Institute to permit chartered accountants in practice to engage
in any other business or occupation considered fit and proper. Accordingly, the Council had formulated
Regulations 190A and 191 to the Chartered Accountants Regulations, 1988 to provide a basis for
considering applications of chartered accountants seeking permission to engage in other business or
occupation. A member can accept full- time lecturer-ship in a college only after obtaining the specific
and prior approval of the Council as also becoming a partner in a business with his brother would require
specific permission.
Conclusion: Thus, the chartered accountant is liable for professional misconduct since he failed to obtain specific
and prior approval of the Council in each case.
41.Mr. A, a practicing Chartered Accountant, took over as the executive chairman of Software
Company on 1.4.2019. On 10.4.2019 he applied to the Council for permission.
Specific Permission to be Obtained: As per Clause (11) of Part I of First Schedule to the Chartered Accountants
Act, 1949, a Chartered Accountant in practice will be deemed to be guilty of professional misconduct if he
engages in any business or occupation other than the profession of Chartered Accountant unless permitted by
the Council so to engage.
In the instant case, Mr. A took over as the executive chairman on 01.04.2019 and applied for permission on
10.04.2019. On the basis of these facts, he was engaged in other occupation between the period 01.04.2019 and
10.04.2019, without the permission of the Council. Conclusion: Therefore, Mr. A is guilty of professional
misconduct in terms of Clause (11) of Part I of First Schedule to the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949.
41A (SEPT2022 MTP)
CA. Bahubali is Special Executive Magistrate. He also took over as the executive chairman of Software Company
on 1.4.2022. He is also a leading income tax practitioner and consultant for derivative products. He resides in
Chennai near to the ION commodity stock exchange and does trading in commodity derivatives. Every day, he
invests nearly 36% of his time to settle the commodity transactions. He has not taken any permission for
becoming Special Executive Magistrate. However, he has got special permission of Council of ICAI for becoming
executive chairman and for trading in commodity derivatives. Is CA. Bahubali liable for professional misconduct?
Comment with reference to the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949, and Schedules thereto.
ANSWER :
Engaging into a Business: As per Clause (11) of Part I of First Schedule of Chartered Accountants Act, 1949, a
Chartered Accountant in practice is deemed to be guilty of professional misconduct if he engages in any business
or occupation other than the profession of Chartered Accountant unless permitted by the Council so to engage.
823

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s

In this case, C.A. Bahubali is Special Executive Magistrate, engaged in the occupation of trading in commodity
derivatives and also took over as the Executive Chairman on 01.04.2022.
In this context, it may be noted that the Special Executive Magistrate which is generally permitted for Members
of the Institute in practice, further specific permission is required for holding the position of Executive Chairman
and getting engaged in the occupation of trading in commodity derivatives.
In the given situation, C.A. Bahubali is acting as Special Executive Magistrate which is generally permitted for
Members of the Institute in practice. Further, He is engaged in the occupation of trading in commodity
derivatives which is not covered under the general permission. He also took over as the Executive Chairman for
which specific permission is required. CA. Bahubali got the permission for the same from the Council of ICAI.
Conclusion: Hence, CA. Bahubali is not guilty for acting as Special Executive Magistrate as it is covered under the
general permission. He is also not guilty for holding the position of Executive Chairman and getting engaged in
the occupation of trading in commodity derivatives after getting specific permission of the Institute.

MTP Apr 18 QN no.2(a) 5 Marks
42. Mr. 'A' is a practicing Chartered Accountant working as proprietor of M/s A & Co. He went abroad
for 3 months. He delegated the authority to Mr. 'Y' a Chartered Accountant his employee for taking
care of routine matters of his office. During his absence Mr. 'Y' has conducted the under mentioned
jobs in the name of M/s A & Co.
(i) He issued the audit queries to client which were raised during the course o f audit.
(ii) He attended the Income Tax proceedings for a client as authorized representative before Income
Tax Authorities.
Comment on eligibility of Mr. 'Y' for conducting such jobs in name of M/s A & Co. and liability of
Mr. 'A' under the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949.
Answer
Delegation of Authority to the Employee: As per Clause (12) of Part I of the First Schedule of the
Chartered Accountants Act, 1949, a Chartered Accountant in practice is deemed to be guilty of
professional misconduct “if he allows a person not being a member of the Institute in practice or a
member not being his partner to sign on his behalf or on behalf of his firm, any balance sheet, profit
and loss account, report or financial statements”.
In this case CA. ‘A’ proprietor of M/s A & Co., went to abroad and delegated the authority to another
Chartered Accountant Mr. Y, his employee, for taking care of routine matters of his office who is a
member of the Institute of Chartered Accountants but not his partner.
The Council has clarified that the power to sign routine documents on which a professional opinion or
authentication is not required to be expressed may be delegated and such delegation will not attract
provisions of this clause 12 for example issue of audit queries during the course of audit, asking for
information or issue of questionnaire, attending to routing matters in tax practice, subject to provisions
of Section 288 of Income Tax Act etc.
824
(i) In the given case, Mr. ‘Y’, a chartered accountant being employee of M/s A & Co. has issued audit

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
queries which were raised during the course of audit. Here “Y” is right in issuing the query, since the
same falls under routine work which can be delegated by the auditor. Therefore, there is no
misconduct in this case as per Clause (12) of Part I of First schedule to the Act.
(ii) In this instance, Mr. “Y”, CA employee of the audit firm M/s A & Co. has attended the Income tax
proceedings for a client as authorized representative before Income Tax Authorities. Since the council
has allowed the delegation of such work, the chartered accountant employee can attend to routine
matter in tax practice as decided by the council, subject to provisions of Section 288 of the Income Tax
Act.
Therefore, there is no misconduct in this case as per Clause (12) of Part I of First schedule to the Act.
43.Nov 2019 Qn no 5(A) 5 Marks

Mr. 'K’, a practicing Chartered Accountant is the proprietor of M/s K & Co. since 1995. He went abroad
in the month of December 2018. He delegated the authority to Mr. ‘Y’ a Chartered Accountant, his
employee for taking care of the important matters of his office. During his absence Mr. 'Y' has
conducted the undermentioned jobs in the name of M/s K & Co.
(i) He issued Net worth certificate to a client for furnishing to a Bank.
(ii) He attended the GST proceedings for a client as authorized representative before GST
Authorities.
Please comment on eligibility of Mr. 'Y' for conducting such jobs in name of M/s K & Co. and liability
of Mr. 'K’ under the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949
Answer
Delegation of Authority to the Employee: As per Clause (12) of Part I of the First Schedule of the
In this case CA. ‘K’ proprietor of M/s K & Co., went abroad and delegated the authority to another
Chartered Accountant Mr. Y, his employee, for taking care of the important matters of his office who
is not a partner but a member of the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India.
provisions of this clause like issue of audit queries during the course of audit, asking for information or
issue of questionnaire, attending to routing matters in tax practice, subject to provisions of Section
288 of Income Tax Act etc.
In the given case, Mr. ‘Y’, a chartered accountant being employee of M/s K & Co. has issued net worth
certificate for furnishing to a bank. Since the issuance of net worth certificate to a client by Mr. “Y”
being an employee of M/s K& Co. (an audit firm), is not a routine work and it is outside his authorities.
Thus, CA. ‘K’ is guilty of professional misconduct under Clause (12) of Part I of First Schedule of the
825
Further, Mr. “Y”, CA employee of the audit firm M/s K& Co. has attended the GST proceedings for a

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
client as authorized representative before GST Authorities. Since the council has allowed the
delegation of such work, the chartered accountant employee can attend to routine matter in tax
practice as decided by the council.
Therefore, there is no misconduct in this case as per Clause (12) of Part I of First schedule to the Act.
Study Material
44. Mr. 'A' is a practicing Chartered Accountant working as proprietor of M/s A & Co. He went
abroad for 3 months. He delegated the authority to Mr. 'Y' a Chartered Accountant his employee
for taking care of routine matters of his office. During his absence Mr. 'Y' has conducted the under
mentioned jobs in the name of M/s A & Co.
(i) He issued the audit queries to client which were raised during the course of audit.
(ii) He issued production certificate to a client under GST Act, 1944.
(iii) He attended the Income Tax proceedings for a client as authorized representative before
Income Tax Authorities.
Please comment on eligibility of Mr. 'Y' for conducting such jobs in name of M/s A & Co. and liability
of Mr. 'A' under the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949
Answer
Delegation of Authority to the Employee: As per Clause (12) of Part I of the First Schedule of the Chartered
misconduct “if he allows a person not being a member of the Institute in practice or a member not
being his partner to sign on his behalf or on behalf of his firm, any balance sheet, profit and loss
account, report or financial statements”.
Chartered Accountant Mr. Y, his employee, for taking care of routine matters of his office who is not a
partner but a member of the Institute of Chartered Accountants
provisions of this clause like issue of audit queries during the course of audit, asking for information
or issue of questionnaire, attending to routing matters in tax practice, subject to provisions of Section
288 of Income Tax Act etc.
(i) In the given case, Mr. ‘Y’, a chartered accountant being employee of M/s A & Co. has issued audit queries
which were raised during the course of audit. Here “Y” is right in issuing the query, since the same falls
under routine work which can be delegated by the auditor. Therefore, there is no misconduct in this case as
per Clause (12) of Part I of First schedule to the Act.
(ii) Further, issuance of production certificate to a client under GST Act, 1944 by Mr. “Y” being an employee of
M/s A & Co. (an audit firm), is not a routine work and it is outside his authorities. Thus, CA. ‘A’ is guilty of
professional misconduct under Clause (12) of Part I of First Schedule of the Chartered Accountants Act,
826
1949.

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
(iii) In this instance, Mr. “Y”, CA employee of the audit firm M/s A & Co. has attended the Income tax proceedings
for a client as authorized representative before Income Tax Authorities. Since the council has allowed the
delegation of such work, the chartered accountant employee can attend to routine matter in tax practice
as decided by the council, subject to provisions of Section 288 of the Income Tax Act. Therefore, there is
no misconduct in this case as per Clause (12) of Part I of First schedule to the Act.
45. CA. Smart, a practicing Chartered Accountant was on Europe tour between 15-9-20 and 25-9-20. On 18-9-20
a message was received from one of his clients requesting for a stock certificate to be produced to the bank on
or before 20-9-20. Due to urgency, CA. Smart directed his assistant, who is also a Chartered Accountant, to sign
and issue the stock certificate after due verification, on his behalf.
Allowing a Member Not Being a Partner to Sign Certificate: As per Clause (12) of Part I of the First Schedule to
the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949, a Chartered Accountant in practice is deemed to be guilty of professional
misconduct “if he allows a person not being a member of the Institute in practice or a member not being his
partner to sign on his behalf or on behalf of his firm, any balance sheet, profit and loss account, report or financial
statements”.
In this case, CA. Smart allowed his assistant who is not a partner but a member of the Institute of Chartered
Accountants of India to sign stock certificate on his behalf and thereby commits misconduct.
Conclusion: Thus, CA. Smart is guilty of professional misconduct under Clause (12) of Part I of First Schedule to
the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949.
Clause 2 of Part II First Schedule
46. Nov 2019 Qn no 6(B) 5 Marks

Mr. 'C', a Chartered Accountant employed as Senior executive in charge of Tax in a company, and
not holding certificate of practice recommends a particular lawyer to his employer in respect of a
case. The lawyer, out of the professional fee received from the employer of Mr. 'C' paid a particular
sum as referral fee to Mr. 'C'. Comment with reference to the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949 and
schedules thereto. (5 Marks)
Answer
Referral Fee from Lawyer: According to Clause (2) of Part II of First Schedule of the Chartered
Accountant Act, 1949, a member of the Institute(other than a member in practice) shall be guilty of
professional misconduct, if he being an employee of any company, firm or person accepts or agrees to
accept any part of fee, profits or gains from a lawyer, a chartered accountant or broker engaged by
such company, firm or person or agent or customer of such company, firm or person by way of
commission or gratification.
In the present case, Mr. C who beside holding a certificate of practice, is also an employee and by
referring a lawyer to the company in respect of a case, he receives a particular sum as referral fee from
the lawyer out of his professional fee.
Conclusion: Therefore, Mr. C is guilty of professional misconduct by virtue of Clause (2) of Part II of First
schedule
827

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
47.Mr. 'C', a Chartered Accountant holds a certificate of practice while in employment also,
recommends a particular lawyer to his employer in respect of a case. The lawyer, out of the
professional fee received from employer paid a particular sum as referral fee to Mr. 'C'.
Referral Fee from Lawyer: According to Clause (2) of Part II of First Schedule of the Chartered Accountant Act,
1949, a member of the Institute(other than a member in practice) shall be guilty of professional misconduct, if he
being an employee of any company, firm or person accepts or agrees to accept any part of fee, profits or gains
from a lawyer, a chartered accountant or broker engaged by such company, firm or person or agent or customer
of such company, firm or person by way of commission or gratification.
In the present case, Mr. C who beside holding a certificate of practice, is also an employee and by referring a
lawyer to the company in respect of a case, he receives a particular sum as referral fee from the lawyer out of his
professional fee.
Conclusion: Therefore, Mr. C is guilty of professional misconduct by virtue of Clause (2) of Part II of First schedule.
Clause 2 of Part III First Schedule

Nov 18 Qn no 5(a) 4 Marks
48.XYZ Associates, a Chartered Accountants Firm is having a relationship with a multinational
accounting firm in India. The ICAI required that all firms having networking relationship with any other
entity need to furnish information online within the stipulated time. XYZ Associates failed to respond.
Comment on this with reference to Professional misconduct, if any.
Answer:
Failed to Supply Information Called For: As per Clause (2) of Part III of the First Schedule to the
Chartered Accountants Act, 1949, a member, whether in practice or not, will be deemed to be guilty
of professional misconduct if he does not supply the information called for, or does not comply with
the requirements asked for, by the Institute, Council or any of its Committees, Director (Discipline), Board
of Discipline, Disciplinary Committee, Quality Review Board or the Appellate authority.
Thus, in the given case, Mr. XYZ Associates, a chartered accountant firm is failed to furnish the
information of its relationship with multi-national accounting firm in India. The ICAI required this
information to be submitted online within the stipulated time. XYZ Associates failed to respond and
submit the required information. Therefore, XYZ
Associates is held guilty of professional misconduct as per Clause (2) of Part III of the First Schedule to
the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949.
49.Mr. 'G', while applying for a certificate of practice, did not fill in the columns which solicit information about
his engagement in other occupation or business, while he was indeed engaged in a business.
Disclosure of Information: As per Clause (2) of Part III of First Schedule to the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949 a
member shall be held guilty if a Chartered Accountant, in practice or not, does not supply the information called
for, or does not comply with the requirements asked for, by the Institute, Council or any of its Committees,
Director (Discipline), Board of Discipline, Disciplinary Committee, Quality Review Board or the Appellate Authority;
In the given case, Mr. “G”, a Chartered Accountant while applying for a certificate of practice, did not fill in the
columns which solicit information about his engagement in other occupation or business, while he was indeed
828
engaged in a business. Details of engagement in business need to be disclosed while applying for the certificate
of practice as it was the information called for in the application, by the Institute.

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
Conclusion: Thus, Mr. G will be held guilty for professional misconduct under the Clause (2) of Part III of First
Schedule of the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949.
50. Mr. X, a Chartered Accountant, employed as a paid Assistant with a Chartered Accountant firm, leaves the
services of the firm on 31st December, 2019. Despite many reminders from ICAI he fails to reply regarding the
date of leaving the services of the firm.
Failed to Supply Information Called For: As per Clause (2) of Part III of the First Schedule to the Chartered
Accountants Act, 1949, a member, whether in practice or not, will be deemed to be guilty of professional
misconduct if he does not supply the information called for, or does not comply with the requirements asked for,
by the Institute, Council or any of its Committees, Director (Discipline), Board of Discipline, Disciplinary Committee,
Quality Review Board or the Appellate authority.
Conclusion: Thus, in the given case, Mr. X has failed to reply to the letters of the Institute asking him to confirm
the date of leaving the service as a paid assistant. Therefore, he is held guilty of professional misconduct as per
Clause (2) of Part III of the First Schedule to the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949.
50A(MARCH 2022 MTP)
Mr. Shanti, a Chartered Accountant, employed as a paid Assistant with a Chartered Accountant firm,
leaves the services of the firm on 31st December, 2020. Despite many reminders from ICAI he fails to
reply regarding the date of leaving the services of the firm. Comment with reference to the Chartered
ANSWER :
Failed to Supply Information Called For: As per Clause (2) of Part III of the First Schedule to the Chartered
Accountants Act, 1949, a member, whether in practice or not, will be deemed to be guilty of professional
misconduct if he does not supply the information called for, or does not comply with the requirements
asked for, by the Institute, Council or any of its Committees, Director (Discipline), Board of Discipline,
Disciplinary Committee, Quality Review Board or the Appellate authority.
Thus, in the given case, Mr. Shanti has failed to reply to the letters of the Institute asking him to confirm
the date of leaving the service as a paid assistant. Therefore, he is held guilty of professional misconduct
as per Clause (2) of Part III of the First Schedule to the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949.
Clause 2 of Part IV First Schedule

51.MTP-Mar2019 Qn No 2(a) 4 Marks:
YKS & Co., a proprietary firm of Chartered Accountants was appointed as concurrent auditor of a
bank. YKS used his influence for getting some cheques purchased and thereafter failed to repay
the loan/overdraft. Comment with reference to the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949, and
Schedules thereto.
Answer:
This is a case which is covered under the expression in other misconduct of the Chartered
Accountants Act, 1949. As per Clause (2) of Part IV of First Schedule to the Chartered Accountants Act,
829
1949, a member of the Institute, whether in practice or not, shall be deemed to be guilty of other

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
misconduct, if he, in the opinion of the Council, brings disrepute to the profession or the Institute as a
result of his action whether or not related to his professional work. Here the Chartered Accountant is
expected to maintain the highest standards of integrity even in his personal affairs and any deviation
from these standards calls for disciplinary action.
In the present case, YKS & Co, being a concurrent auditor used his position to obtain the funds and
failed to repay the same to the bank. This brings disrepute to the profession of a Chartered Accountant.
This act of YKS & Co is not pardonable.
Conclusion: Therefore, YKS & Co will be held guilty of other misconduct under Clause (2) of Part IV of
CA. X, a practicing Chartered Accountant, failed to return the books of account and other
documents of ABC Ltd. despite many reminders from the company. The company had settled
his entire fees dues also. Comment with reference to the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949.
Answer:
Bringing Disrepute to the Profession: A member is liable to disciplinary action under section 21 of
the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949, if he is found guilty of any professional or “Other Misconduct”.
As per Clause (2) of Part IV of the First Schedule to the said Act, a member of the Institute, whether in
practice or not, shall be deemed to be guilty of other misconduct, if he , in the opinion of the Council,
brings disrepute to the profession or the Institute as a result of his action whether or not related to
his professional work.
A member may be found guilty of “Other Misconduct” as per Clause (2) under the aforesaid provisions
rendering himself unfit to be member if he retains the books of account and documents of the client
and fails to return these to the client on request without a reasonable cause.
In the given case, CA. X failed to return the books of accounts and other documents of his client without
any reasonable cause, therefore, he would be guilty of other misconduct under the aforesaid
provisions.
Clause 1 of Part I of Second schedule

53.May 2018 4(a) 4 Marks
Mr. B, a Chartered Accountant in practice was invited to deliver a seminar on GST which was
attended by professionals as well as by representatives of various Industries. One section of
audience raised a particular issue unique to the industry to which it pertains. Mr. B enthusiastically
explained the issue and elaborated how
he actually solved this, for his client facing the same issue with worked out examples from the
computer storage device using the actual data of one of his clients with full identification of client
details being displayed to the group for the sake giving clarity on a topic in a real life situation.
830
Comment his acts in the light of Code of Conduct

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
ANSWER
Disclosure of Information to third Party: Clause (1) of Part I of the Second Schedule to the Chartered
Accountants Act, 1949 states that a chartered accountant in practice shall be deemed to be guilty of
professional misconduct if he discloses information acquired in the course of his professional
engagement to any person other than his client, without the consent of the client or otherwise than
as required by law for the time being in force.
SA 200 on " Overall Objectives of the Independent Auditor and the Conduct of an Audit in Accordance
with Standards on Auditing" also reiterates that, "the auditor should respect the confidentiality of
information acquired during his work and should not disclose any such information to a third party
without specific authority or unless there is a legal or professional duty to disclose".
In the instant case, Mr. B is a Chartered Accountant in practice and he was invited to deliver a seminar
on GST which was attended by professional as well as by representatives of various industries. During
his session, a query was raised on particular issue and Mr. B used the actual data of one of his clients
with full identification of client details displayed to explain and elaborate such query. Applying the
above provision, the auditor cannot disclose the information in his possession without specific
permission of the client. Thus, CA. B will be liable for professional misconduct under clause 1 of Part I
of the Second Schedule to the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949.
Study Material
54. XYZ Co. Ltd. has applied to a bank for loan facilities. The bank on studying the financial
statements of the company notices that you are the auditor and requests you to call at the bank for
a discussion. In the course of discussions, the bank asks for your opinion regarding the company and
also asks for detailed information regarding a few items in the financial statements. The information
is available in your working paper file. What should be your response and why?
Clause (1) of Part I of the Second Schedule to the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949 states that a
chartered accountant in practice shall be deemed to be guilty of professional misconduct if he discloses
information acquired in the course of his professional engagement to any person other than his client,
without the consent of the client or otherwise than as required by law for the time being in force. SA
200 on " Overall Objectives of the Independent Auditor and the Conduct of an Audit in Accordance
with Standards on Auditing" also reiterates that, "the auditor should respect the confidentiality of
information acquired in the course of his work and
should not disclose any such information to a third party without specific authority or unless there is
a legal or professional duty to disclose". In the instant case, the bank has asked the auditor for detailed
information regarding few items in the financial statements available in his working papers. Having
regard to the position stated earlier, the auditor cannot disclose the information in his possession
without specific permission of the client. As far as working papers are concerned, working papers a re
the property of the auditor.
The auditor may at his discretion, make portions of or extracts from his working papers available to
his client". Thus, there is no requirement compelling the auditor to divulge information obtained in
831
the course of audit and included in the working papers to any outside agency except as and when

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
required by any law
54A(APRIL 2022 MTP)

Mr. Shreyansh, a Chartered Accountant in practice was invited to deliver a seminar on Amendments
in Schedule III and CARO 2020 which was attended by professionals as well as by representatives of
various Industries. One section of audience raised a particular issue unique to the industry to which it
pertains. Mr. Shreyansh enthusiastically explained the issue and elaborated how he solved this, for his
client facing the same issue with worked out examples from the computer storage device using the
actual data of one of his clients with full identification of client details being displayed to the group for
the sake giving clarity on a topic in a real-life situation. Comment with reference to the Chartered
ANSWER :
Disclosure of Information to third Party: Clause (1) of Part I of the Second Schedule to the Chartered
Accountants Act, 1949 states that a chartered accountant in practice shall be deemed to be guilty of
professional misconduct if he discloses information acquired in the course of his professional
engagement to any person other than his client, without the consent of the client or otherwise than
as required by law for the time being in force.
SA 200 on " Overall Objectives of the Independent Auditor and the Conduct of an Audit in
Accordance with Standards on Auditing" also reiterates that, "the auditor should respect the
confidentiality of information acquired during his work and should not disclose any such information
to a third party without specific authority or unless there is a legal or professional duty to disclose".
In the instant case, Mr. Shreyansh is a Chartered Accountant in practice and he was invited to deliver
a seminar on Amendments in Schedule III and CARO 2020 which was attended by professional as well
as by representatives of various industries. During his session, a query was raised on particular issue
and Mr. Shreyansh used the actual data of one of his clients with full identification of client details
displayed to explain and elaborate such query. Applying the above provision, the auditor cannot
disclose the information in his possession without specific permission of the client.
Thus, CA. Shreyansh will be liable for professional misconduct under clause 1 of Part I of the
Second Schedule to the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949.

55. (MTP-NOV 2018)
Mr. Mohan is a practising Chartered Accountant. He issued a certificate of consumption which did
not reflect the correct factual position of the consumption of raw material by the concerned entity.
It is found that the certificate is given on the basis of data appearing in the minutes of meeting of
the Board of Directors. Comment on above with reference to the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949,
and Schedules thereto.
832

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
Answer:
According to Clause (2) of Part I of Second Schedule to the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949 a
chartered accountant is held guilty of professional misconduct if he certifies or submits a report of an
examination of financial statements unless the examination of such statements and the related
records has been made by him or by a partner or employee in his firm or any other chartered
accountant in practice.
Mr. Mohan has issued a certificate of consumption which does not reflect the correct factual position
of the consumption of raw material by the concerned entity. He has failed in his duty of examining the
record. He has relied on the minutes of Board of director’s meeting which is not proper evidence to
show the consumption of raw material. The relevant record of production and stock register should
have been scrutinized thoroughly and properly.
Clause (7) of Part I of Second Schedule to the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949 also applies to this
case which states that a Chartered Accountant in practice shall be deemed to be guilty of professional
misconduct, if he does not exercise due diligence or is grossly negligent in the conduct of his
professional duties.
Mr. Mohan will be held guilty of Professional Misconduct under Clause (2) of Part I of Second Schedule
to the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949.
56. Mr. Parekh, a Chartered Accountant was invited by the Chamber of Commerce to present a paper in a
symposium on the issues facing Indian Leather Industry. During the course of his presentation he shared some
of the vital information of his client’s business under the impression that it will help the Nation to compete with
other countries at international level.
Disclosure of Client’s Information:
ANSWER
Clause (1) of Part I of the Second Schedule to the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949 deals with the professional
misconduct relating to the disclosure of information by a chartered accountant in practice relating to the business
of his clients to any person other than his client without the consent of his client or otherwise than as required by
any law for the time being in force would amount to breach of conduct. The Code of Ethics further clarifies that
such a duty continues even after completion of the assignment. The Chartered Accountant may however, disclose
the information in case it is required as a part of performance of his professional duties. In the given case, Mr.
Parekh has disclosed vital information of his client’s business without the consent of the client under the
impression that it will help the nation to compete with other countries at International level.
Conclusion: Thus, it is a professional misconduct covered by Clause (1) of Part I of Second Schedule to the
57.(MTP-NOV 2018)
Mr. A, a Chartered Accountant was the auditor of 'A Limited'. During the financial year 2019-20, the investment
appeared in the Balance Sheet of the company of Rs. 10 lakhs and was the same amount as in the last year.
Later on, it was found that the company's investments were only Rs. 25,000, but the value of investments was
inflated for the purpose of obtaining higher amount of Bank loan.
Grossly Negligent in Conduct of Duties: As per Part I of Second Schedule to the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949,
a Chartered Accountant in practice shall be deemed to be guilty of professional misconduct, if he, certifies or
833
submits in his name or in the name of his firm, a report of an examination of financial statements unless the
examination of such statements and the related records has been made by him or by a partner or an employee in

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
his firm or by another chartered accountant in practice, under Clause (2); does not exercise due diligence, or is
grossly negligent in the conduct of his professional duties, under Clause (7); or fails to obtain sufficient information
which is necessary for expression of an opinion or its exceptions are sufficiently material to negate the expression
of an opinion, under Clause (8).
The primary duty of physical verification and valuation of investments is of the management. However, the
auditor’s duty is also to verify the physical existence and valuation of investments placed, at least on the last day
of the accounting year. The auditor should verify the documentary evidence for the cost/value and physical
existence of the investments at the end of the year. He should not blindly rely upon the Management’s
representation.
In the instant case, such non-verification happened for two years. It also appears that auditors failed to confirm
the value of investments from any proper source. In case auditor has simply relied on the management’s
representation, the auditor has failed to perform his duty.
Conclusion: Accordingly, Mr. A, will be held liable for professional misconduct under Clauses (2), (7) and (8) of Part
I of the Second Schedule to the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949.

58 .Lily, a chartered accountant prepares and certifies projected financial statements of his client
Amazon Ltd. Amazon Ltd. forwarded the same to their banks to secure some loans and bank, on
that basis sanctioned a loan. Comment with reference to the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949, and
Schedules thereto.
Answer:
Certification of Projected Financial Forecast: Under Clause (3) of Part I of Second Schedule to the
Chartered Accountants Act, 1949, a chartered accountant in practice is deemed to be guilty of
professional misconduct if he permits his name or the name of his firm to be used in connection with
an estimate of earnings contingent upon future transactions in a manner which may lead to the
belief that he vouches for the accuracy of the forecast.
Further, SAE 3400 “The Examination of Prospective Financial Information”, provides that the
management is responsible for the preparation and presentation of the prospective financial
information, including the identification and disclosure of the sources of information, the basis of
forecasts and the underlying assumptions. The auditor may be asked to examine and report on the
prospective financial information to enhance its credibility, whether it is intended for use by third
parties or for internal purposes.
Thus, while making report on projection, the auditor need to mention that his responsibility is to
examine the evidence supporting the assumptions and other information in the prospective financial
information, his responsibility does not include verification of the accuracy of the projections,
therefore, he does not vouch for the accuracy of the same.
In the instant case, Mr. Lily, a chartered accountant, has prepared and certified a projected financial
forecast of his client Amazon Ltd. which was forwarded to the client’s bank to secure some loans and
based on which the bank sanctioned a loan to the client is not in order.
Thus, Mr. Lily will be held guilty of misconduct in view of above.
834

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s

58A(NOV 2021 EXAM)
Comment with reference to the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949 and schedules thereto:
CA D, a practicing Chartered Accountant, was appointed as a simplicitor Director in a Pvt. Ltd.
company on 01-01-2020. After serving 18 months, Mr. D resigned as the Director. He accepted the
appointment as the Statutory Auditor of the company with effect from 01-10-2021.
Is CA D right in accepting the audit? (4 Marks
ANSWER :
As per Clause (4) of Part I of the Second Schedule of the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949, a
Chartered Accountant in practice is deemed to be guilty of professional misconduct if he expresses
his opinion on financial statements of any business or enterprise in which he, his firm, or a partner in
his firm has a substantial interest.
Section 141 of the Companies Act, 2013 specifically prohibits a member from auditing the accounts
of a company in which he is an officer or employee. Although the provisions of the aforesaid section
are not specifically applicable in the context of audits performed under other statutes, e.g. tax audit,
yet the underlying principle of independence of mind is equally applicable in those situations also.
Therefore, the Council’s views are clarified in the following situations.
As per the clarifications issued by the Council, a member shall not accept the assignment of audit of
a Company for a period of two years from the date of completion of his tenure as Director, or
resignation as Director of the said Company.
In the instant case, Mr. D, a practicing CA, is appointed as a Director Simplicitor in Pvt. Ltd. Company.
Mr. D resigned as the Director and after 18 months of resignation accepted the Statutory Auditor
position of the Company. In view of above provisions Mr. D cannot accept the Directorship of the
company as tenure of two years after his resignation is yet to be completed.
Thus, CA, D would be held guilty of professional misconduct under clause 4 of Part 1 of Second
Schedule of the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949.
58B (NOV 2022 RTP)

CA Dev started practice in Punjab in the year 2019. CA Dev issued ‘Turnover Certificate’ for M/s.
ASAUS Traders to be forwarded to the Bank for the purpose of availing cash credit facility and
machinery term loan. Brother of CA Dev was proprietor of M/s. ASAUS Traders.
ANSWER :
As per Clause (4) of Part I of Second Schedule to the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949, a Chartered
Accountant in practice is deemed to be guilty if he expresses his opinion on financial statements of
any business or enterprise in which he, his firm, or a partner in his firm has a substantial interest.
Further, it is not permissible for a member to undertake the assignment of certification, wherein the
client is relative of the member. The “relative" for this purpose would refer to the definition
mentioned in Accounting Standard (AS) - 18.
In the given situation, CA Dev started practice in Punjab in the year 2019. CA Dev issued Turnover
835
certificate for M/s. ASAUS Traders to be forwarded to the Bank for the purpose of obtaining Loan.

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
Brother of CA Dev is proprietor of M/s. ASAUS Traders. Brother is very well covered in the
definition of relative mentioned in Accounting Standard (AS)-18.
Hence, CA Dev is guilty of professional misconduct.

59. Nov 2018 Qn no 4(a) 4 Marks
D, a Chartered Accountant in practice was appointed by Realty Limited to represent its cases before
GST Authorities under a duly executed power of representation. In the course of proceedings he
submitted certain statements-written as well as oral-which later found to be false and materially
misleading. Comment this in the light of Professional Code.
Answer
Submitting Information as Authorized Representative: As per Clause (5) of Part I of Second Schedule
to the Chartered Accountant Act, 1949, if a member in practice fails to disclose a material fact known
to him which is not disclosed in a financial statement, but disclosure of which is necessary to make the
financial statement not misleading, where he is concerned with that financial statement in a
professional capacity, he will be held guilty under Clause (5). As per Clause (6) of Part I of Second
Schedule if he fails to report a material misstatement known to him to appear in a financial statement
with which he is concerned in a professional capacity, he will be held guilty under Clause (6).
In given case, the Chartered Accountant had submitted the statements before the GST authorities. These
statements are based on the data provided by the management of the company. Although the
statements prepared were based on incorrect facts and misleading, the Chartered Accountant had only
submitted them acting on the instructions of his client as his authorized representative.
Hence Mr. D would not be held liable for professional misconduct.
MTP-Apr-19 Qn No 2(a) 4 Marks:

60. In the course of his audit assignment in M/s Bailey Ltd., CA Soft came to know that the company,due to
financial crunch and unable to meet employees salary, has taken a loan of Rs. 50 lacs from Employees Gratuity
Fund. The said loan was not reflected in the books of account of the company and the auditor ignored this
transaction in his report. Comment with reference to the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949 and Regulations
there to.
Answer:
Failure to Disclose Material Facts: As per Clause (5) of Part I of Second Schedule to the Chartered
Accountants Act, 1949, a chartered Accountant in practice will be held liable for misconduct if he fails to
disclose a material fact known to him, which is not disclosed in the financial statements but disclosure of which
is necessary to make the financial statements not misleading. In this case, CA. Soft has come across information
that a loan of Rs. 50 lakhs has been taken by the company from Gratuity Fund. This is contravention of Rules
and the said loan has not been reflected in the books of account.
Further, this material fact has also to be disclosed in the financial statements. The very fact that CA. Soft has
failed to disclose this fact in his report, he would be guilty for professional misconduct under Clause (5) of Part I
of Second Schedule to the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949.
836

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
61.Mr. Joe, a Chartered Accountant during the course of audit of M/s XYZ Ltd. came to know that the
company has taken a loan of Rs. 10 lakhs from Employees Provident Fund. The said loan was not
reflected in the books of account. However, the auditor ignored this information in his report.
Failure to Disclose Material Facts: As per Clause (5) of Part I of Second Schedule to the Chartered Accountants
Act, 1949, a chartered Accountant in practice will be held liable for misconduct if he fails to disclose a material
fact known to him, which is not disclosed in the financial statements but disclosure of which is necessary to
make the financial statements not misleading. In this case, Mr. Joe has come across information that a loan of
Rs. 10 lakhs has been taken by the company from Employees Provident Fund. This is contravention of Rules and
the said loan has not been reflected in the books of accounts. Further, this material fact has also to be disclosed
in the financial statements. The very fact that Mr. Joe has failed to disclose this fact in his report, he is attracted
by the provisions of professional misconduct under Clause (5) of Part I of Second Schedule to the Chartered
62.A practicing Chartered Accountant was appointed to represent a company before the tax
authorities. He submitted on behalf of his clients certain information and explanations to the
authorities, which were found to be false and misleading.
Submitting Information as Authorised Representative:
As per Clause (5) of Part I of Second Schedule to the Chartered Accountant Act, 1949, if a member in practice
fails to disclose a material fact known to him which is not disclosed in a financial statement, but disclosure of
which is necessary to make the financial statement not misleading, where he is concerned with that financial
statement in a professional capacity, he will be held guilty under Clause (5). As per Clause (6) of Part I of Second
Schedule if he fails to report a material misstatement known to him to appear in a financial statement with
which he is concerned in a professional capacity, he will be held guilty under Clause (6).
In given case, the Chartered Accountant had submitted the statements before the taxation authorities. These
statements are based on the data provided by the management of the company. Although the statements
prepared were based on incorrect facts and misleading, the Chartered Accountant had only submitted them
acting on the instructions of his client as his authorized representative.
Conclusion: Hence the Chartered Accountant would not be held liable for professional misconduct .
Clause 7 of Part I Second Schedule

MTP-OCT-18 Qn No 2(a) 5 Marks:
63. Mr. Anil, a Chartered Accountant was the auditor of 'A Limited'. During the financial year
2015-16, the investment appeared in the Balance Sheet of the company of Rs. 10 lakhs and was
the same amount as in the last year. Later on, it was found that the company's investments were
only Rs. 25,000, but the value of investments was inflated for the purpose of obtaining higher
amount of Bank loan.
Answer:
Grossly Negligent in Conduct of Duties: As per Part I of Second Schedule to the Chartered
Accountants Act, 1949, a Chartered Accountant in practice shall be deemed to be guilty of
professional misconduct, if he, certifies or submits in his name or in the name of his firm, a report of
an examination of financial statements unless the examination of such statements and the related
records has been made by him or by a partner or an employee in his firm or by another chartered
837
accountant in practice, under Clause (2); does not exercise due diligence, or is gross negligent in the

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
conduct of his professional duties, under Clause (7); or fails to obtain sufficient information which is
necessary for expression of an opinion or its exceptions are sufficiently material to negate the
expression of an opinion, under Clause (8).
The primary duty of physical verification and valuation of investments is of the management. However,
the auditor’s duty is also to verify the physical existence and valuation of investments placed, at least on
the last day of the accounting year. The auditor should verify the documentary evidence for the
cost/value and physical existence of the investments at the end of the year. He should not blindly rely
upon the Management’s representation.
In the instant case, such non-verification happened for two years. It also appears that auditors failed
to confirm the value of investments from any proper source. In case auditor has simply relied on the
management’s representation, the auditor has failed to perform his duty.
Accordingly, Mr. Anil, will be held liable for professional misconduct under Clauses (2), (7) and (8) of
Part I of the Second Schedule to the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949.
64.RTP Nov 2018 Qn no.19

Mr. D, a practicing Chartered Accountant, did not complete his work relating to the audit of the
accounts of a company and had not submitted his audit report in due time to enable the company
to comply with the statutory requirements.
ANSWER
Not Exercising Due Diligence: According to Clause (7) of Part I of Second Schedule of Chartered
misconduct if he does not exercise due diligence or is grossly negligent in the conduct of his
It is a vital clause which unusually gets attracted whenever it is necessary to judge whether the
accountant has honestly and reasonably discharged his duties. The expression negligence covers a wide
field and extends from the frontiers of fraud to collateral minor negligence.
Where a Chartered Accountant had not completed his work relating to the audit of the accounts a
company and had not submitted his audit report in due time to enable the company to comply with the
statutory requirement in this regard. He was guilty of professional misconduct under Clause (7).
Since Mr. D has not completed his audit work in time and consequently could not submit audit report in
due time and consequently, company could not comply with the statutory requirements, therefore, the
auditor is guilty of professional misconduct under Clause (7) of Part I of the Second Schedule to the
Chartered Accountants Act, 1949
65.CA Chiranjiv who conducted ABC audit of a Haryana daily ‘New Era’ certified the circulation figures
based on Management Information System Report (M.I.S Report) without examining the books of
Account.
According to Clause (7) of Part I of Second Schedule of Chartered Accountants Act, 1949, a Chartered Accountant
in practice is deemed to be guilty of professional misconduct if he “does not exercise due diligence or is grossly
838
negligent in the conduct of his professional duties”.

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
In the instant case, CA Chiranjiv did not exercise due diligence and is grossly negligent in the conduct of his
professional duties since he certified the circulation figures without examining the books of accounts.
To ascertain the number of paid copies verification of remittances from the agents, credit allowed to the agents
for unsold copies returned, examination of books of account is essential. Further certification of circulation figures
based on statistical information without cross verification with financial records amounts to gross negligence and
failure to exercise due diligence.
Conclusion: Hence, CA Chiranjiv is guilty of professional misconduct as per Clause (7) of Part I of Second Schedule
of Chartered Accountants Act, 1949.
66. Z, a practicing Chartered Accountant issued a certificate of circulation of a periodical without going
into the most elementary details of how the circulation of a periodical was being maintained i.e. by
not looking into the financial records, bank statements or bank pass books, by not examining evidence
of actual payment of printer’s bills and by not caring to ascertain how many copies were sold and paid
for.
Failure to Obtain Information: Clause (8) of Part I of Second Schedule to the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949
states that if a Chartered Accountant in practice fails to obtain sufficient information to warrant the expression of
an opinion or his exceptions are sufficient material to negate the expression of an opinion, the chartered
accountant shall be deemed to be guilty of a professional misconduct.
In the instant case Mr. Z, a practicing Chartered Accountant issued a certificate of circulation of a periodical
without going into the most elementary details of how the circulation of a periodical was being maintained i.e.,
by not looking into the financial records, bank statements or bank pass books, by not examining evidence of actual
payment of printer’s bills and by not caring to ascertain how many copies were sold and paid for.
The chartered accountant should not express his opinion before obtaining the required data and information. As
an auditor, Mr. Z ought to have verified the basic records to ensure the correctness of circulation figures.
Conclusion: Thus, in the present case Mr. Z will be held guilty of professional misconduct as per Clause (8) of Part
I of Second Schedule to the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949.
Q 66A (NOV 2021 EXAM)

The Cashier of a company committed a fraud and absconded with the proceeds thereof. The Chief Accountant of
the company also did not know when the fraud had occurred. In the course of the audit, the auditor failed to
discover the fraud. After the audit was completed, however, the fraud was discovered by the Chief Accountant.
Investigation made at that time indicates that the auditor did not exercise proper skill and care and performed his
work in a desultory and haphazard manner. With this background, the Directors of the company intend to file
disciplinary proceedings against the auditor. Comment with reference to the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949
and schedules thereto.
ANSWER :
In the given case, in the course of audit, auditor failed to discover the fraud. It is clearly given that investigation
indicated that the auditor did not exercise reasonable skill and care and performed his work in a casual and
unmethodical manner.
According to Clause (7) of Part I of Second Schedule of Chartered Accountants Act, 1949, a Chartered Accountant
in practice is deemed to be guilty of professional misconduct if he “does not exercise due diligence or is grossly
negligent in the conduct of his professional duties”.
As per SA 240, "The auditor's responsibilities relating to fraud in an audit of financial statements", it can be
839
concluded that the auditor did not plan and perform the audit with an attitude of professional skepticism. Thus,
having regard to this and a fraud has actually taken place during the year, committed by the absconding cashier,

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
it is reasonable to think that prima facie there is a case against the auditor for gross negligence.
From the facts given in the case and by applying Clause (7) and SA 240, it is clear that the auditor is guilty of
professional misconduct and the directors can file disciplinary proceedings against the auditor.
66B (NOV 2022 RTP)

Aagam Private Limited requested CA Sheetal, a practicing Chartered Accountant, to digitally sign the form related
to resignation of Mr. Rohit, one of the Director of Aagam Private Limited, along with the copy of Resignation Letter
to be uploaded on the website of Registrar of Companies. The signature of Mr. Rohit was simply copied and pasted
by another Director of Aagam Private Limited. CA Sheetal, without verifying the genuineness of the resignation
letter, digitally signed the form and the said form was uploaded on the website of Registrar of Companies.
ANSWER:
As per Clause (7) of Part I of Second Schedule to the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949, a Chartered Accountant in
practice is deemed to be guilty if he does not exercise due diligence or is grossly negligent in the conduct of this
In the given case, Aagam Private Limited requested CA Sheetal, a practicing chartered accountant, to digitally sign
the form related to resignation of Mr. Rohit, one of the Director of Aagam Private Limited, along with the copy of
Resignation Letter to be uploaded on the website of Registrar of Companies. The signature of Mr. Rohit was simply
copied and pasted by another Director of Aagam Private Limited.
CA Sheetal, without verifying the genuineness of the Resignation Letter, digitally signed the Form and the said
form was uploaded on the website of Registrar of Companies.
Due to forged resignation letter, the resignation of Mr. Rohit from directorship of the Aagam Private Limited had
been occurred. It was noted that CA Sheetal had not taken any step to verify forged signature on resignation letter
which anyone would have taken in normal circumstances.
Consequently, CA. Sheetal would be held liable for professional misconduct as per Clause (7) of Part I of Second
Schedule to the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949 .

66AB(OCT 2022 MTP)
CA. Prakash, a practicing Chartered Accountant issued a certificate of circulation of a periodical without going into
the most elementary details of how the circulation of a periodical was being maintained i.e., by not looking into
the financial records, bank statements or bank pass books, by not examining evidence of actual payment of
printer’s bills and by not caring to ascertain how ma ny copies were sold and paid for. Is CA. Prakash liable to
professional misconduct? Comment with reference to the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949, and Schedules
thereto.
ANSWER :
Failure to Obtain Information: Clause (8) of Part I of Second Schedule to the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949
states that if a Chartered Accountant in practice fails to obtain sufficient information to warrant the expression of
an opinion or his exceptions are sufficient material to negate the expression of an opinion, the chartered
accountant shall be deemed to be guilty of a professional misconduct.
In the instant case Mr. Prakash, a practicing Chartered Accountant issued a certificate of circulation of a periodical
without going into the most elementary details of how the circulation of a periodical was being maintained i.e.,
840
by not looking into the financial records, bank statements or bank pass books, by not examining evidence of actual
payment of printer’s bills and by not caring to ascertain how many copies were sold and paid for.

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
The chartered accountant should not express his opinion before obtaining the required data and information. As
an auditor, Mr. Prakash ought to have verified the basic records to ensure the correctness of circulation figures.
Conclusion: Thus, in the present case CA. Prakash will be held guilty of professional misconduct as per Clause (8)
of Part I of Second Schedule to the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949.
66B MAY 2022 EXAM

CA K qualified as Chartered Accountant and started practice as proprietor in the name of M/s K & Associates in
the year 2015-16. LST Limited, a listed entity, appointed M/s K & Associates as Statutory Auditor for the year
ended 31st March, 2022. CA K signed the balance sheet of LST Limited for the year ended 31st March, 2022 on
14th May, 2022. M/s K & Associates never subjected themselves to the Peer Review process of the Institute since
its inception of practice. Comment with reference to the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949 and Schedules thereto.
ANSWER :
Clause (9) of Part I of the Second Schedule to the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949 states that a Chartered
Accountant in practice shall be deemed to be guilty of misconduct if he fails to invite attention to any material
departure from the generally accepted procedure of audit applicable to the circumstances.
This clause implies that the audit should be performed in accordance with “generally accepted procedure of audit
applicable to the circumstances” and if for any reason the auditor has not been able to perform the audit in
accordance with such procedure, his report should draw attention to the material departures from such
procedures. What constitutes “generally accepted audit procedure” would depend upon the facts and
circumstances of each case, but guidance is available in general terms from the various pronouncements of the
Institute is issued by way of Engagement and Quality Control Standards, Statements, General Clarifications,
Guidance Notes Technical Guides, Practice Manuals, Studies and Other Papers.
Audit of Listed Companies: Pursuant to SEBI Notification, statutory audit of listed companies under the Companies
Act, 2013 shall be done by only those auditors who have subjected themselves to the Peer Review process of the
Institute, and hold a valid certificate issued by the Peer Review Board of the ICAI.
In the given case of M/s. K & Associates, who is appointed auditor of a listed entity LST Limited for the year ended
31.03.2022, CA K, the proprietor signed the balance sheet on 14.05.2022 but never subjected the firm to the Peer
Review process of the Institute. CA K would be held guilty of professional misconduct under clause (9) of Part I of
Second Schedule of the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949. Also, CA K did not comply with the SEBI Notification
which was required to be complied with.
Alternative Solution
Clause (1) of Part II of the Second Schedule to the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949 states that a chartered
accountant in practice shall be deemed to be guilty of misconduct if he contravenes any of the provisions of this
Act or the regulations made thereunder or any guidelines issued by the Council. It requires every member of the
institute to act within the framework of the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949 and the regulations and guidelines
made by Council thereunder.
The Statement on Peer Review shall be deemed to be a guideline of the Council under Clause (1) of Part II of
Second Schedule to the Act and it is obligatory for the Practice Unit to comply with the provisions contained in
this Statement.
As per the Statement every Practice Unit including its branches who has conducted Statutory Audit of Enterprises
841
whose equity or debt securities are listed in India or abroad as defined under SEBI(LODR) regulations, 2015, will

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
be subject to Peer Review in accordance with this statement.

Audit of Listed Companies: Pursuant to SEBI Notification, Statutory Audit of Listed Companies under the
Companies Act, 2013 shall be done by only those auditors who have subjected themselves to the Peer Review
process of the Institute, and hold a valid certificate issued by the Peer Review Board of the ICAI.
In the given case of M/s K & Associates, who is appointed auditor of a listed entity LST Limited for the year ended
31.03.2022, Mr K, the proprietor signed the Balance sheet on 14.05.2022 but never subjected the firm to the Peer
Review process of the Institute. Hence, CA K would be held guilty of professional misconduct under clause (1) of
Part II of Second Schedule of the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949.

MAY 2018 3(c) -5 Marks
67. A film artist who was going abroad for long shooting, deposited a sum of Rs. 20 lakhs with his
tax consultant Mr. G, a practising Chartered Accountant for payment of Goods and Service Tax
monthly when they were due, Mr. G duly remitted all but one instalments. He utilised the amount
of instalment which he did not pay, to remit his own advance income tax. However, while filing
return of GST of the film artist, he duly remitted on her behalf the tax payable with interest due for
late payment of GST out of money lying with him. He also bore for himself the interest due to short
fall in remittance of tax of his client. Comment on the above in the light of Code of Conduct.
ANSWER
Money of Clients to be Deposited in Separate Bank Account: Clause (10) of Part I of Second Schedule
states that a Chartered Accountant shall be deemed to be guilty of professional misconduct if “he fails
to keep money of his clients in separate banking account or to use such money for the purpose for which
they are intended”.
In the instant case, CA. G received sum of rupees 20 lakh from his client who is a film artist for monthly
installment payment of Goods and Service Tax. This money should have been deposited in a separate
bank account. CA. G utilized the amount of last installment for his own advance tax payment, though he
paid the same along with interest and bore the interest due to short fall in remittance of tax of his client.
As per fact of the case CA. G has failed to keep the sum of rupees 20 lakh received on behalf of his client
in a separate Bank Account and utilized the same for his own advance tax payment amounts to
professional misconduct under Clause (10) of Part I of Second Schedule.
68. A charitable institution entrusted Rs. 10 lakhs with its auditors M/s Ram and Co., a Chartered
Accountant firm, to invest in a specified securities. The auditors pending investment of the money,
deposited it in their Savings bank account and no investment was made in the next three months
Failure to Keep Money in Separate Bank Account:
If a Chartered Accountant in practice fails to keep moneys of his clients in a separate bank account or
fails to use such moneys for purposes for which they are intended then his action would amount to
professional misconduct under Clause (10) of Part I of Second Schedule to the Chartered Accountants Act,
1949. In the course of his engagement as a professional accountant, a member may be entrusted with moneys
belonging to his client. If he should receive such funds, it would be his duty to deposit them in a separate banking
842

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
account, and to utilise such funds only in accordance with the instructions of the client or for the purposes
intended by the client.
Conclusion: In the given case by depositing the client’s money by M/s Ram and Co., a firm of Chartered
Accountants, in their own savings bank account, the auditors have committed a professional misconduct. Hence
in the given case, M/s Ram & Co. will be held guilty of professional misconduct.
68A(APRIL 2022 MTP)

Sanyam, a chartered accountant in practice is owner of three agriculture lands. He lost his father due to Covid
Pandemic. After death of his father, he started carrying out agricultural activities. His neighbour Raja who is a
farmer, filed a complaint against him to ICAI that being a member he is carrying out agricultural activities,
therefore, he is liable for misconduct. You are required to examine the same with reference to the Chartered
Accountants Act, 1949 and Schedules thereto.
ANSWER :
Engaging into Agricultural Activity: As per Clause (11) of Part I of First Schedule of Chartered Accountants
Act, 1949, a Chartered Accountant in practice is deemed to be guilty of professional misconduct if he
engages in any business or occupation other than the profession of Chartered Accountant unless
permitted by the Council so to engage.
However, the Council has granted general permission to the members to engage in certain specific
occupation. In respect of all other occupations specific permission of the Institute is necessary.
In this case, CA. Sanyam is owner of 3 agriculture lands, and he is carrying out agricultural activities which
is covered under the general permission.
Therefore, CA Sanyam is not guilty of professional misconduct under Clause (11) of Part I of First Schedule
of Chartered Accountants Act, 1949 and complain of neighbor to the Institute is not correct.
Clause 1 of Part II Second Schedule

A Chartered Accountant in practice certified in requisite Form that an articled assistant was undergoing
training with him, whereas, he was also employed in a company between 9:30 a.m. and 5:30 p.m. on a
monthly salary of Rs. 18,000 and attended the office of the Chartered Accountant thereafter until 7 p.m. The
Chartered Accountant pleaded that the articled assistant was on audit of the company. Comment with
reference to the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949, and Schedules thereto.
Answer:
Failure to Observe Regulations: As per Clause (1) of Part II of Second Schedule to the Chartered Accountants
Act, 1949, a member shall be held guilty of professional misconduct if he contravenes any of the provisions of
the Act or the regulations made thereunder or any guidelines issued by the Council. The chartered accountant,
as per Regulations also, is expected to impart proper practical training.
In the instant case, the articled assistant is not attending office on timely basis and the explanation of the
Chartered Accountant that the articled assistant was on audit of the company cannot be accepted particularly
in view of the fact that articled assistant is getting monthly salary from that company. Under the circumstances,
the Chartered Accountant would be held guilty of professional misconduct in regard to the discharge of his
843
professional duties as per Clause (1) of Part II of Second Schedule to the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949.

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
A Chartered Accountant in practice certified in requisite Form that an articled assistant was
undergoing training with him, whereas, he was also employed in a company between 10 a.m. and
6 p.m. on a monthly salary of Rs. 17,000 and attended the office of the Chartered Accountant
thereafter until 7 p.m. The Chartered Accountant pleaded that the articled assistant was on audit
of the company. Comment with reference to the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949.
Answer:
Failure to Observe Regulations: As per Clause (1) of Part II of Second Schedule to the Chartered
Accountants Act, 1949, a member shall be held guilty of professional misconduct if he contravenes
any of the provisions of the Act or the regulations made thereunder or any guidelines issued by the
Council. The chartered accountant, as per Regulations also, is expected to impart proper practical
training.
In the instant case, the articled assistant is not attending office on timely basis and the explanation of
the Chartered Accountant that the articled assistant was on audit of the company cannot be accepted
particularly in view of the fact that articled assistant is getting monthly salary from that company. Under
the circumstances, the Chartered Accountant would be held guilty of professional misconduct in regard
to the discharge of his professional duties.
71. RTP May 2019 Qn no 24 (b)

The manager of ZedEx (P) Ltd. approached CA. Vineet in the need of a certificate in respect of a
consumption statement of raw material. Without having certificate of practice (CoP), CA. Vineet
issued the certificate to the manager of the company, acting as a CA in practice and applied for the
CoP to the Institute on very next day to avoid any dispute.
Answer
Issuing Certificate without having Certificate of Practice: As per Clause (1) of Part II of Second
Schedule to the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949, a member of the Institute, whether in practice or
not, shall be deemed to be guilty of professional misconduct, if he contravenes any of the provisions
of this Act or the regulations made thereunder or any guidelines issued by the Council.
This clause requires every member of the Institute to act within the framework of the Chartered
Accountants Act and the Regulations made thereunder. Any violation either of the Act or the
Regulations by a member would amount to misconduct.
In the given case, CA. Vineet has issued a certificate in respect of a consumption statement of
raw material to the manager of ZedEx (P) Ltd., as a Chartered Accountant in practice when he had not
even applied for the CoP to the Institute, thereby contravening the provisions of section 6 of the
Therefore, CA. Vineet will be held guilty of professional misconduct in terms of clause(1) of Part
II of Second Schedule to the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949 for contravention of provisions of this Act.
844

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
Clause 3 of Part II Second Schedule

72. MTP Apr 18 Qn no 4(a) 4 Marks,RTP May 2020 Qn no 19(d)
Mr. P and Mr. Q are running a firm of Chartered Accountants in the name of M/s
PQ & Co. On 23.05.2017, they included the name of Mr. R, a practicing Chartered Accountant, without
his knowledge, as a partner while submitting an application for empanelment as auditor for Public
Sector Bank branches to the Institute. However, they added Mr. R as a partner to their firm offering a
share of 21% of the profits, on 25.05.2017. Comment with reference to the Chartered Accountants
Act, 1949.
Answer
Submitting Wrong Information to the Institute: As per Clause (3) of Part II of the Second Schedule to
the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949, a member of the Institute, whether in practice or not, shall be
deemed to be guilty of professional misconduct if he includes in any information, statement, return or
form to be submitted to the Institute, Council or any of its committees, Director (Discipline), Board of
Discipline, Disciplinary Committee, Quality Review Board or the Appellate Authority any particulars
knowing them to be false.
In the instant case, Mr. P and Mr. Q, partners of M/s PQ & Co., included the name of Mr. R, another
Chartered Accountant, as partner in their firm, without his knowledge, in their application for
empanelment as auditor of branches of Public Sector Banks submitted to the Institute. However, such
a member was not a partner of the said firm as on the date of application submitt ed. Here, Mr. P and
Mr. Q have submitted wrong information to the Institute.
Therefore, Mr. P and Mr. Q, both, would be held guilty of professional misconduct under Clause (3) of
Part II of the Second Schedule to the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949.
Miscellaneous
73. MAY 2018-2(d) 5 Marks
M & Co., a sole proprietary Chartered Accountant firm in practice with an office in a busy belt of a
city, had great difficulty in regularly attending to the consultancy needs of his clients who are
mostly located in an industrial cluster in a nearby outskirt which is situated at a distance of 26 kms
from the office of the firm. To mitigate the difficulty and to have ease of business, a facilitation
centre was opened in the industrial cluster. The proprietor managed, both the office and the
facilitation centre, by himself. No intimation was made to the Institute of Chartered Accountants of
India. Examine whether there, is any professional misconduct in this respect
Answer
Maintenance of Branch Office in the Same City: As per section 27 of the Chartered Accountants Act,
1949 if a chartered accountant in practice has more than one office in India, each one of these offices
845
should be in the separate charge of a member of the Institute. However, a member can be in charge

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
of two offices if the second office is located in the same premises or in the same city, in which the first
office is located; or the second office is located within a distance of 50 Kilometres from the municipal
limits of a city, in which the first office is located.Further a member having two offices of the type
referred to above, shall have to declare which of the two offices is his main office, which would
constitute his professional address.
In the given case, M & Co., a sole proprietary Chartered Accountant firm in practice with an office in
a busy belt of a city and had great difficulty in regularly attending to the consultancy needs of his clients.
Therefore, a facilitation centre was opened in the industrial cluster and the proprietor is managing
both the office and facilitation centre.
Though distance between his office and facilitation centre i.e. sort of second office is within prescribed
range i.e. 50 kilometres but M& Co., will be liable for misconduct as prescribed intimation about
facilitation centre and main office should be sent to the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India.
74.Write a short note on Other Misconduct.

ANSWER:
Other misconduct has been defined in part IV of the First Schedule and part III of the Second Schedule. These
provisions empower the Council to inquire into any misconduct of a member even it does not arise out of his
professional work. This is considered necessary because a chartered accountant is expected to maintain the
highest standards of integrity even in his personal affairs and any deviation from these standards, even in his
non-professional work, would expose him to disciplinary action. Other misconduct would also relate to
conviction by a competent court for an offence involving moral turpitude punishable with transportation or
imprisonment to an offence not of a technical nature committed by the member in his professional capacity.
[See section 8(v) of the Act].
75.May 2018 5(a) 4 Marks
Mr. Dice, a practising Chartered Accountant was ordered to surrender his Certificate of Practice and
he was suspended for one year on certain professional misconduct against him. During the period of
suspension, Mr. Dice, designating himself as GST Consultant, did the work of filing GST returns and
made appearance as a consultant before various related authorities. He contended that there is
nothing wrong in it as he, like any other GST consultant, could take such work and his engagement
as such in no way violates the order of suspension inflicted on him. Is he right in his contention?
Answer
Filing of GST Returns and Appearance as GST Consultant: A chartered accountant not holding
certificate of practice cannot take up any other work in the capacity of Chartered Accountant in
practice because it would amount to violation of the relevant provisions of the Chartered Accountants
Act, 1949.
In case a member is suspended and is not holding Certificate of Practice, he cannot in any other
capacity take up any practice separable from his capacity to practices as a member of the Institute.
This is because once a member becomes a member of the Institute, he is bound by the provisions of
846
the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949 and its Regulations.

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
In case he files GST returns and appears as a consultant before various related authorities in his
capacity as a chartered accountant and a member of the Institute , having bound himself by the said
Act and its Regulations made thereunder, he cannot then set the Regulations at naught by contending
that even though he continues to be a member and has been punished by suspension, he would be
entitled to practice in some other capacity. But if he is doing so in any other capacity such as GST
Consultant wherein his capacity is not chartered accountant in practice, he will not be held guilty for
misconduct.
In the instant case, Mr. Dice was a practicing chartered accountant and he was ordered to surrender
his certificate of practice and was suspended for one year. Mr. Dice is doing the work of filing GST
returns and has appeared as a consultant before various related authorities as GST Consultant which
is not in capacity of a practicing chartered accountant rather in capacity of authorized representative.
Any person who has been authorized to act as a GST Practitioner on behalf of the concerned registered
person can become authorized representative. Thus, Mr. Dice would not be allowed to represent as a
Chartered Accountant before various related authorities for the period he remains suspended.
Accordingly, in the present case he is guilty of professional misconduct.
76.RTP May 2018 Qn No.19(D)
CA. Elegant is in practice for two years and runs his proprietorship firm in the name of “Elegant &
Co.”. He maintains notes in his mobile in which he writes the fees received from various clients.
Based on his record, he prepares and files his income tax return.
Answer
Maintenance of Books of Account by a CA in Practice: Chapter V of the Council General Guidelines,

2008 specifies that a member of the Institute in practice or the firm of Chartered Accountants of which
he is a partner, shall maintain and keep in respect of his/its professional practice, proper books of
accounts including the following-
(i) a Cash Book
(ii) a Ledger
Thus, a Chartered Accountant in practice is required to maintain proper books of accounts.
In the instant case, CA. Elegant does not maintain proper books of accounts and writes the fees
received from various clients in notes in his mobile. Notes maintained by him in mobile cannot be
treated as books of accounts.
Hence, CA. Elegant, being a practicing Chartered Accountant will be held guilty of misconduct for
violation of Council General Guidelines, 2008.
MTP Apr 18 Qn no.5(a) 4 Marks

77. MNC Pvt. Ltd. appointed CA. Moksh for some professional assignments like company’s ROC work,
preparation of minutes, statutory register etc. For this, CA. Moksh charged his fees depending on the
complexity and the time spent by him on each assignment.
Later on, MNC Pvt. Ltd. filed a complaint against CA. Moksh to the Institute of Chartered Accountants
of India (ICAI) that he has charged excessive fees for the assignments comparative to the scale of fees
847
recommended by the Board as well as duly considered by the Council of ICAI. Comment with reference

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
to the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949.

ANSWER
Charging Excess Fees: The prescribed scale of fees for the professional assignments done by the
chartered accountants is recommendatory in nature. Charging an excessive fee for a professional
assignment does not constitute any misconduct in the context of the provisions of the Chartered
Accountants Act, 1949 and regulation made thereunder since the matter of fixation of actual fee charged
in individual cases depends upon the mutual agreement and understanding between the member and
the client.
In the given case, CA. Moksh has charged excess fees compared to the scale of fees recommended by
the Board as well as duly considered by the Council of ICAI. In this context, it may be noted that the
scale of fees is the minimum prescribed scale of fees.
From the above facts and provisions, it may be concluded that CA. Moksh is not liable for any
misconduct under the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949. Therefore, the contention of MNC Pvt. Ltd. is
not tenable.

Mr. X, a Chartered Accountant in Practice filed his income tax return for the Assessment Year 2018-
19 under section 44ADA of the Income Tax Act, 1961, declaring his income on presumptive basis. In a
disciplinary proceeding against him for an alleged misuse of funds of his clients, it was asked that he
should submit his books of accounts for the financial year ended on 31/03/2018. Mr. X refused to
submit books of accounts on the ground that he had not maintained any books and even for income
tax purposes, he submitted his Return of Income on a presumptive basis. Is he right in putting such
a defence? Analyse the issues in the light of Professional Code, if any
Answer
Maintenance of Books of Account: As per the Council General Guidelines 2008, under Chapter 5 on
maintenance of books of accounts, it is specified that if a chartered accountant in practice or the firm
of Chartered Accountants of which he is a partner fails to maintain and keep in respect of his/its
professional practice, proper books of account including the Cash Book and Ledger, he is deemed to be
guilty of professional misconduct.
Accordingly, it does not matter that as per section 44ADA of the Income Tax Act Mr. X declared his
income on presumptive basis. Here, it may be noted that though 44ADA of the Income Tax Act exempt
the requirement of books and accounts but as per Council
General Guidelines a chartered accountant in practice is required to maintain and keep proper books of
accounts including cash book and ledger. Hence, Mr. X is guilty of professional misconduct.
79.MTP-OCT-18 Qn No 6(a) 3 Marks:, (MTP-NOV 2019)
M/s LMN, a firm of Chartered Accountants having 5 partners accepts an audit assignment of a newly
formed private limited company for audit fees of Rs. 5,000. Comment with reference to the Chartered
848

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
Answer:
Minimum Audit Fee: Prescribed minimum audit fee is recommendatory, not mandatory in nature.
Therefore, acceptance of audit assignment by M/s LMN, a firm of Chartered Accountants having 5
partners of a newly formed private limited company for audit fees of Rs. 5,000 is not violation of
any provisions. Therefore, M/s LMN will not be held liable for guilty of misconduct.
80. May 2019 Qn no 3(C) 4 Marks
CA Natraj, in practice, accepted an assignment as·advisor and consultant to the public issue of shares
by his client M/s Super Ltd.
Besides helping the company as an advisor, he also underwrote the public issue of the company to
the extent of 25% at a commission of 1%. Remaining shares were underwritten by banks and other
financial institutions at the same rate of commission. He contends that above assignments are part
of management consultancy work permitted by the council of the Institute. Do you agree with the
view of CA Natraj? Decide in the light of applicable code of conduct.
Answer
Assignment as Advisor and Consultant: The Council of the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India
(ICAI) pursuant to Section 2(2)(iv) of the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949 has passed a resolution
permitting “Management Consultancy and other Services” by a Chartered Accountant in practice. A
clause of the aforesaid resolution allows Chartered Accountants in practice to act as advisor or
consultant to an issue of securities including such matters as drafting of prospectus, filing of documents
with SEBI, preparation of publicity budgets, advice regarding selection of brokers, etc. It is, however,
specifically stated that Chartered Accountants in practice are not permitted to undertake the activities
of broking, underwriting and portfolio management services.
In the instant case, CA Natraj accepted an assignement as advisor and consultant to the public issue of
shares by his client M/s Super Ltd. In addition, he also underworte the public issue of the company to
the extent of 25% at a commission of 1%. Contention of CA. Natraj that advisor, consultant and
underwriting work is part of management consultancy work and permitted by the council is not correct
as Chartered Accountants in practice are not permitted to undertake the activities of broking,
underwriting and portfolio management services.
Conclusion: In view of this, CA. Natraj would be guilty of misconduct under the Chartered Accountants
Act, 1949
81.P, a Chartered Accountant in practice provides management consultancy and other services to his
clients. During 2020, looking to the growing needs of his clients to invest in the stock markets, he
also advised them on Portfolio Management Services whereby he managed portfolios of some of his
clients. Is P guilty of professional misconduct?
ANSWER:
Advising on Portfolio Management Services: The Council of the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India
849
(ICAI) pursuant to Section 2(2)(iv) of the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949 has passed a resolution permitting
“Management Consultancy and other Services” by a Chartered Accountant in practice. A clause of the aforesaid

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
resolution allows Chartered Accountants in practice to act as advisor or consultant to an issue of securities
including such matters as drafting of prospectus, filing of documents with SEBI, preparation of publicity budgets,
advice regarding selection of brokers, etc. It is, however, specifically stated that Chartered Accountants in
practice are not permitted to undertake the activities of broking, underwriting and portfolio management
services. Thus, a chartered accountant in practice is not permitted to manage portfolios of his clients.
82.RTP Nov 2018 Qn no.19
CA Kumar who is contesting Central Council Elections of Institute, engages his Articled Assistant for
his election campaigning promising him that he will come in contact with influential people which
will help to enhance his career after completion of his training period
Answer:
Other Misconduct: CA Kumar has engaged his Articled Assistant for his own election campaigning
for the central Council elections of ICAI.
This aspect is covered under ‘Other Misconduct’ which has been defined in Part IV of the First Schedule
and Part III of the Second Schedule. These provisions empower the Council even if it does not arise out
of his professional work This is considered necessary because a Chartered Accountant is expected to
maintain the highest standards of integrity even in his personal affairs and any deviation from these
standards, even in his non-professional work, would expose him to disciplinary action.
Thus, when a Chartered Accountant uses the services of his Articled Assistant for purposes other than
professional practice, he is found guilty under ‘Other Misconduct’.
Hence, CA Kumar is guilty of 'Other Misconduct'.
Comment on the following with reference to the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949 and schedules
thereto:
(a) WCP & Co LLP are the internal auditors of DEF Ltd. WCP & Co LLP also agreed to undertake Goods
and Service Tax (GST) Audit of DEF Ltd simultaneously.
Answer:
The Council of the Institute, while considering the issue whether an internal auditor of an entity can
also undertake GST Audit of the same entity as required under the Central Goods and Service Act, 2017,
decided, that internal auditor of an assessee, whether working with the organization or independently
practising Chartered Accountant being an individual chartered accountant or a firm of chartered
accountants, cannot be appointed as his Tax auditor (under the Income Tax Act, 1961). Upon
consideration, the Council decided that based on the conflict in roles as statutory and internal auditor
simultaneously, the bar on internal auditor of an entity to accept tax audit (under Income Tax Act,
1961) will also be applicable to GST Audit (under the Central Goods and Service Act, 2017). Accordingly,
an Internal Auditor of an entity cannot undertake GST Audit of the same entity.
In the instant case, WCP & Co LLP are the internal auditors of DEF Ltd. and it also agreed to undertake
850
Goods and Service Tax (GST) Audit of DEF Ltd simultaneously. WCP & Co LLP will be held guilty for

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
misconduct.

Comment on the following with reference to the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949 and schedules
thereto:
(a) Mr. 'A' is a practicing Chartered Accountant working as proprietor of M/s A & Co. He went abroad
for 3 months. He delegated the authority to Mr. 'Y' a Chartered Accountant, his employee, for
taking care of routine matters of his office. During his absence, Mr. 'Y' has conducted the under
mentioned jobs in the name of M/s A & Co.:
(i) He issued the audit queries to client which were raised during the course of audit.
(ii) He attended the Income Tax proceedings for a client as authorized representative before Income
Tax Authorities.
Please comment on eligibility of Mr. 'Y' for conducting such jobs in name of M/s A & Co. and liability
of Mr. 'A' under the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949.
(b) M/s Amudhan & Co., a firm of Chartered Accountants, received Rs. 2.8 lakhs in January, 2019 on
behalf of one of their clients, who has gone abroad and deposited the amount in their Bank
account, so that they can return the money to the client in July, 2019, when he is due to return to
India.
(c) CA Raman who is contesting Regional Council Elections of Institute, engages his Articled Assistant
for his election campaigning promising him that he will come in contact with influential people
which will help to enhance his career after completion of his training period.
(d) Mr. Anil, a practicing Chartered Accountant, did not complete his work relating to the audit of the
accounts of a company and had not submitted his audit report in due time to enable the company
to comply with the statutory requirements.
Answer
(a) Delegation of Authority to the Employee: As per Clause (12) of Part I of the First Schedule of the
Chartered Accountant Mr. Y, his employee, for taking care of routine matters of his office who is not a
partner but a member of the Institute of Chartered Accountants
provisions of this clause like issue of audit queries during the course of audit, asking for information or
issue of questionnaire, attending to routing matters in tax practice, subject to provisions of Section 288
of Income Tax Act etc.
• In the given case, Mr. ‘Y’, a chartered accountant being employee of M/s A & Co. has issued audit
851
queries which were raised during the course of audit. Here “Y” is right in issuing the query, since the

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
same falls under routine work which can be delegated by the auditor. Therefore, there is no
misconduct in this case as per Clause (12) of Part I of First schedule to the Act.
• In this instance, Mr. “Y”, CA employee of the audit firm M/s A & Co. has attended the Income tax
proceedings for a client as authorized representative before Income Tax Authorities. Since the
council has allowed the delegation of such work, the chartered accountant employee can attend to
routine matter in tax practice as decided by the council, subject to provisions of Section 288 of the
Income Tax Act. Therefore, there is no misconduct in this case as per Clause
(12) of Part I of First schedule to the Act.
(b) Money of Clients to be Deposited in Separate Bank Account: Clause (10) of Part I of Second
Schedule states that a Chartered Accountant shall be deemed to be guilty of professional misconduct
if “he fails to keep money of his clients in separate banking account or to use such money for the
purpose for which they are intended”.
In the given case, M/s Amudhan & Co. received the money in January, 2019 which is to be paid only in
July 2019, hence, it should be deposited in a separate bank account. Since in this case M/s Amudhan
& Co. has failed to keep the sum of Rs. 2.8 lakhs received on behalf of their client in a separate Bank
Account, it amounts to professional misconduct under Clause (10) of Part I of Second Schedule.
(c) Other Misconduct: CA Raman has engaged his Articled Assistant for his own election campaigning
for the Regional Council elections of ICAI.
This aspect is covered under ‘Other Misconduct’ which has been defined in Part IV of the First Schedule
and Part III of the Second Schedule. These provisions empower the Council even if it does not arise out
of his professional work. This is considered necessary because a Chartered Accountant is expected to
maintain the highest standards of integrity even in his personal affairs and any deviation from these
standards, even in his non-professional work, would expose him to disciplinary action.
Thus, when a Chartered Accountant uses the services of his Articled Assistant for purposes other than
professional practice, he is found guilty under ‘Other Misconduct’.
Hence, CA Raman is guilty of 'Other Misconduct'.
(d) Not Exercising Due Diligence: According to Clause (7) of Part I of Second Schedule of Chartered
misconduct if he does not exercise due diligence or is grossly negligent in the conduct of his
It is a vital clause which unusually gets attracted whenever it is necessary to judge whether the
accountant has honestly and reasonably discharged his duties. The expression negligence covers a wide
field and extends from the frontiers of fraud to collateral minor negligence.
Where a Chartered Accountant had not completed his work relating to the audit of the accounts a
company and had not submitted his audit report in due time to enable the company to comply with the
statutory requirement in this regard, he was guilty of professional misconduct under Clause (7).
Since, Mr. Anil has not completed his audit work in time and consequently could not submit audit report
in due time and consequently, company could not comply with the statutory requirements, the auditor
is guilty of professional misconduct under Clause(7) of Part I of the Second Schedule to the Chartered
852

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
85.Mr. A, a newly qualified Chartered Accountant, started his practice and sought clients through
telephone calls from his family and friends, almost all of them employed in one or the other retail
trade business. One of his friends Mr. X gave him an idea to start online services and give stock
certifications to traders with Cash Credit Limits in Banks. Mr. A started a website with colorful catchy
designs and shared the website address on his all social media posts and stories and tagged 30
traders of his local community with the caption “Easy Online Stock Certification Services”. Besides,
Mr. A entered in an agreement with a Digital Marketer to give him 5% commission on each service
procured through him. Discuss if the actions of Mr. A are valid in the light of the Professional Ethics
and various pronouncements and guidelines issued by ICAI.
ANSWER:
As per Clause (6) of Part I of the First Schedule of the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949, a Chartered Accountant
in practice is deemed to be guilty of professional misconduct if he solicits clients or professional work either
directly or indirectly by circular, advertisement, personal communication or interview or by any other means.
Mr. A is wrong in seeking clients through family and friends. Creating a website is not a non-compliance
provided it is in line with the guidelines issued by the Institute in this regard. One of the guidelines is that the
website should not be in push mode. Further, mentioning of clients’ names is also prohibited as per the
guidelines.
In the given situation, Mr. A shared the website address on his all social media posts and stories and tagged 30
traders of his local community with the caption “Easy Online Stock Certification Services” mentioning his current
clients as well. This is in complete contravention of the guidelines on website issued by the ICAI. Thus, CA, A
would be held guilty of professional misconduct under clause 6 of Part 1 of First Schedule of the Chartered
86. Mr. D, a practicing CA, is appointed as a Director Simplicitor in XYZ Pvt. Ltd. After one year of
appointment, Mr. D resigned as the Director and accepted the Statutory Auditor position of the
company. Is Mr. D right in accepting the auditor position?
ANSWER:
As per Clause (4) of Part I of the Second Schedule of the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949, a Chartered
Accountant in practice is deemed to be guilty of professional misconduct if he expresses his opinion on financial
statements of any business or enterprise in which he, his firm, or a partner in his firm has a substantial interest.
Section 141 of the Companies Act, 2013 specifically prohibits a member from auditing the accounts of a
company in which he is an officer or employee. Although the provisions of the aforesaid section are not
specifically applicable in the context of audits performed under other statutes, e.g. tax audit, yet the underlying
principle of independence of mind is equally applicable in those situations also. Therefore, the Council’s views
are clarified in the following situations.
As per the clarifications issued by the Council, a member shall not accept the assignment of audit of a Company
for a period of two years from the date of completion of his tenure as Director, or resignation as Director of the
said Company.
In the instant case, Mr. D, a practicing CA, is appointed as a Director Simplicitor in XYZ Pvt. Ltd. After one year of
appointment, Mr. D resigned as the Director and accepted the Statutory Auditor position of the company. In
view of above provisions Mr. D cannot accept the Directorship of the company until the completion of two years
after his resignation.
Thus, CA, D would be held guilty of professional misconduct under clause 4 of Part 1 of Second
853
Schedule of the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949. As per Clause (4) of Part I of the Second Schedule of the

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
Chartered Accountants Act, 1949, a Chartered Accountant in practice is deemed to be guilty of professional
misconduct if he expresses his opinion on financial statements of any business or enterprise in which he, his
firm, or a partner in his firm has a substantial interest.
principle of independence of mind is equally applicable in those situations also. Therefore, the Council’s views
are clarified in the following situations.
said Company.
In the instant case, Mr. D, a practicing CA, is appointed as a Director Simplicitor in XYZ Pvt. Ltd. After one year of
appointment, Mr. D resigned as the Director and accepted the Statutory Auditor position of the company. In
view of above provisions Mr. D cannot accept the Directorship of the company until the completion of two years
after his resignation.
Thus, CA, D would be held guilty of professional misconduct under clause 4 of Part 1 of Second Schedule of the
87.Mr. F, a Chartered Accountant, gave advisory services to PQR Pvt. Ltd. Further, he gave them GST
consultancy and helped in ERP set up. Later, the company turned out to be a part of a group of
companies involved in money laundering. Mr. F was asked to provide details of the companies. Mr. F
refused on the grounds that he gave only consultancy services to the company and wasn’t supposed
to keep any information about the company. Is Mr. F right as per the guidelines issued by the ICAI?
ANSWER:
The financial services industry globally is required to obtain information of their clients and comply
with Know Your Client Norms (KYC norms). Keeping in mind the highest standards of Chartered
Accountancy profession in India, the Council of ICAI issued such norms to be observed by the members
of the profession who are in practice. In the given situation, CA. F, gave GST consultancy and helped in
ERP set up along with advisory services to PQR Pvt. Ltd. Mr. F was asked to provide details of the
companies as the company, turned out to be a part of a group of companies, involved in money
laundering. Contention of Mr. F that he gave only consultancy services to the company and wasn’t
supposed to keep any information about the company is not valid as Mr. F should have kept following
information in compliance with KYC Norms which are mandatory in nature and shall apply in all
assignments pertaining to attestation functions. In the given case of PQR Pvt. Ltd., a Corporate Entity,
Mr. F should have kept following information:
A. General Information
Name and Address of the Entity
Business Description
Name of the Parent Company in case of Subsidiary
Copy of last Audited Financial Statement
854

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
B. Engagement Information
Type of Engagement
C. Regulatory Information
Company PAN No.
Company Identification No.
Directors’ Names & Addresses
Directors’ Identification No.
88. Mr. S, the auditor of ABC Pvt. Ltd. has delegated following works to his articles and staff:
i Issue of audit queries during the course of audit.
ii Issue of memorandum of cash verification and other physical verification.
iii Letter forwarding draft observations/financial statements.
iv Issuing acknowledgements for records produced.
v Signing financial statements of the company.
Is this correct as per the Professional Ethics and ICAI’s guidelines and pronouncements?
ANSWER:
in practice is deemed to be guilty of professional misconduct if he allows a person not being a member of the
institute in practice or a member not being his partner to sign on his behalf or on behalf of his firm, any balance
sheet, profit and loss account, report or financial statements. The Council has clarified that the power to sign
routine documents on which a professional opinion or authentication is not required to be expressed may be
delegated in the following instances and such delegation will not attract provisions of this clause:
(i) Issue of audit queries during the course of audit.
(ii) Asking for information or issue of questionnaire.
(iii) Letter forwarding draft observations/financial statements.
(iv) Initiating and stamping of vouchers and of schedules prepared for the purpose of audit.
(v) Acknowledging and carrying on routine correspondence with clients.
(vi) Issue of memorandum of cash verification and other physical verification or recording the results thereof in
the books of the clients.
(vii) Issuing acknowledgements for records produced. Raising of bills and issuing acknowledgements for money
receipts.
855
(ix) Attending to routine matters in tax practice, subject to provisions of Section 288 of Income Tax Act.

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
(x) Any other matter incidental to the office administration and routine work involved in practice of
accountancy.
In the instant case, Mr. S, the auditor of ABC Pvt. Ltd. has delegated certain task to his articles and staff such as
issue of audit queries during the course of audit, issue of memorandum of cash verification and other physical
verification, letter forwarding draft observations/financial statements, issuing acknowledgements for records
produced and signing financial statements of the company.
Therefore, Mr. S is correct in allowing first four tasks i.e. issue of audit queries during the course of audit, issue
of memorandum of cash verification and other physical verification, letter forwarding draft
observations/financial statements, issuing acknowledgements for records produced to his staff and articles.
However, if the person signing the financial statements on his behalf is not a member of the institute in practice
or a member not being his partner to sign on his behalf or on behalf of his firm, Mr. S is wrong in delegating
signing of financial statements to his staff.
Conclusion: In view of this, S would be guilty of professional misconduct for allowing the person signing the
financial statements on his behalf to his articles and staff under Clause 12 of Part 1 of First Schedule of the
89. AJ & Co LLP is a firm of Chartered Accountants. The firm has 10 Partners. The firm has a good
portfolio of clients for statutory audits, but the same clients had some other firms as their tax
auditors. In the current year (FY 2019-20), many existing clients for whom AJ & Co LLP happens to be
the statutory auditor have requested the firm to carry out their tax audits as well. The firm is
expecting the no of tax audits to increase significantly this year. One of the partners of the firm has
also raised a point that the firm can accepts tax audits upto a maximum limit. However, other
partners are of the strong view that limits on audits is applicable in case of statutory audits and not
for tax audits. This needs to be decided as soon as possible so that the appointment formalities can
also be completed.
You are requested to advise the firm in this matter.
(a) There is no limit on no of tax audits in case of LLP.
(b) All the partners of the firm can collectively sign 450 tax audit reports.
(c) All the partners of the firm can collectively sign 600 tax audit reports.
(d) All the partners of the firm can collectively sign 450 tax audit reports. However, one partner can
individually sign maximum 60 tax audit reports.
Answer: ( c) All the partners of the firm can collectively sign 600 tax audit reports
90. CA. D, a chartered accountant in practice availed of a loan against his personal investments from
a bank. He issued 2 cheques towards repayment of the said loan as per the instalments due. However,
both the cheques were returned back by the bank with the remarks "Insufficient funds". As per
Chartered Accountants Act, 1949, under which clause CA D is liable for misconduct .
a) Clause (6) of Part I of the First Schedule to the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949
856
b) Clause (4) of Part I of the Second Schedule to the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
c) Clause (12) of Part I of the First Schedule to the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949
d) Clause (2) of Part IV of the First Schedule to the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949
Answer: d) Clause (2) of Part IV of the First Schedule to the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949
91. CA. Intelligent, a Chartered Accountant in practice, provides part-time tutorship under the
coaching organization of the Institute. On 30th June, 2019, he was awarded ‘Best Faculty of the year’
as gratitude from the Institute. Later on, CA. Intelligent posted his framed photograph on his website
wherein he was receiving the said award from the Institute. As per Chartered Accountants Act, 1949,
under which clause Intelligent is liable for misconduct .
a) Clause (6) of Part I of the First Schedule to the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949
c) Clause (7) of Part I of the First Schedule to the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949
d) Clause (8) of Part I of the Second Schedule to the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949
Answer : a) Clause (6) of Part I of the First Schedule to the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949
92. Mr. Hopeful, an aspiring student of ICAI, approached Mr. Witty, a practicing Chartered
Accountant, for the purpose of articleship. Mr. Witty, the principal, offered him stipend at the rate of
Rs. 2,000 per month to be paid every sixth month along with interest at the rate of 10% per annum
compounded monthly to compensate such late payment on plea that cycle of professional receipts
from clients is six months. Mr. Hopeful agreed for such late payment in the hope of getting extra
stipend in the form of interest. Mr. Witty, however, used to disburse salary to all of his employees
on time. As per Chartered Accountants Act, 1949, under which clause Mr. Witty is liable for
misconduct.
a) Clause (1) of Part II of the Second Schedule to the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949
c) Mr. Witty is paying interest thus he is not liable for misconduct
d) Clause (10) of Part I of the Second Schedule to the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949
Answer: a) Clause (1) of Part II of the Second Schedule to the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949
93. CA Ram is practicing in the field of financial management planning for over 12 years.
He has gained expertise in this domain over others. Mr. Ratan, a student of Chartered Accountancy
course, is very much impressed with the knowledge of CA. Ram. He approached CA. Ram to take
guidance on some topics of financial management subject related to his course.
CA. Ram, on request, decided to spare some time and started providing private tutorship to Mr. Ratan
along with some other aspirants for 3 days in a week and for 2 hours in a day. However, he forgot to
857
take specific permission for such private tutorship from the Council.

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
Later on, he came to know that the Council has passed a Resolution under Regulation 190A granting
general permission (for private tutorship, and part-time tutorship under Coaching organization of the
Institute) and specific permission (for part-time or full time tutorship under any educational institution
other than Coaching organization of the Institute).
Such general and specific permission granted is subject to the condition that the direct teaching hours
devoted to such activities taken together should ________________________ in order
to be able to undertake attest functions.
a) not exceed 25 hours a week

b) not exceed 21 hours a week
c) not exceed 25 hours a month
d) not exceed 21 hours a month
Answer: a) not exceed 25 hours a week
94. Comment with reference to the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949 and schedules thereto:
CA Dice had signed the Balance sheet of QR Ltd. for the year ended 31st March, 2019 which failed to give
disclosure of the charge created for Rs. 4.35 crores against the Corporate Guarantee given in favour of a
Group Company. The Balance Sheet size of the company filed with the Registrar of Companies was Rs. 26.12
crores. (4 Marks) (past exam nov 2020)
ANSWER
Failure to Disclose Material Facts: As per Clause (5) of Part I of Second Schedule to the Chartered Accountants
Act, 1949, a chartered Accountant in practice will be held liable for misconduct if he fails to disclose a material
fact known to him which is not disclosed in a financial statement, but disclosure of which is necessary in making
such financial statement not misleading where he is concerned with that financial statement in a professional
capacity. It may be observed that this clause refers to failure to disclose a material fact, which is known to him,
in a financial statement reported on by the auditor. It is obvious, that before a member could be held guilty of
misconduct, materiality has to be established. The determination of materiality has been provided in SA 320,
“Materiality in Planning and Performing an Audit”.
Financial reporting frameworks often discuss the concept of materiality in the context of the preparation and
presentation of financial statements. Although financial reporting frameworks may discuss materiality in
different terms, they generally explain, among other points, that Judgments about materiality are made in the
light of surrounding circumstances, and are affected by the size or nature of a misstatement, or a combination of
both.
In this case, CA Dice has signed a Balance Sheet which failed to give disclosure of Rs. 4.35 crores (considered
material fact applying above SA 320 principle) against the corporate guarantee given in favour of a Group
Company. Size of Balance Sheet of QR Ltd is Rs. 26.12 crore.
This material fact has to be disclosed in the financial statements. Keeping in view the above, he is attracted by the
858
provisions of professional misconduct under Clause (5) of Part I of Second Schedule to the Chartered Accountants

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
Act, 1949.
95. Mr. Kushal, a practicing Chartered Accountant has signed the GST Audit Reports, Tax Audit Reports u/s
44AB of the Income tax Act, 1961 for the financial year 2019-20 that are filed online using Digital Signature
and without generating UDIN on the ground that there is no field for mentioning UDIN on digitally signed
online reports. Is the contention of Mr. Kushal valid? Give your comments with reference to the Chartered
Accountants Act, 1949 and schedules thereto. (4 Marks) (past exam nov 2020)
ANSWER
Non Generation of UDIN: Whereas, to curb the malpractice of false/certification/attestation by the

unauthorized persons and to eradicate the practice of bogus certificates and to save various regulators, banks,
stakeholders etc. from being misled, the Council of the Institute decided to implement an innovative concept to
generate Unique Document Identification Number (UDIN) mandatorily for all kinds of the certificates/GST and
tax audit reports and other attest function in phased manner, for which members of the ICAI were notified
through the various announcements published on the website of ICAI at the relevant times.
In exercise of the powers conferred on it under clause 1 of Part II of the Second Schedule to the Chartered
Accountants Act,1949, the Council of the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India issued the following
guidelines for information of public and necessary compliance by members of the Institute-
A member of the Institute in practice shall generate Unique Document Identification Number (UDIN) for all kinds
of the certification, GST and Tax Audit Reports and other Audit, Assurance and Attestation functions
undertaken/signed by him which are made mandatory from the following dates through announcements
published on the website of the ICAI-
• For all Certificates w.e.f. 1st February,2019
For all GST and Tax Audit Reports w.e.f. 1st April, 2019.
• For all other Audit, Assurance and Attestation functions, w.e.f. 1st July, 2019.
Conclusion: UDIN will be applicable to GST & Tax Audit Reports signed by Mr. Kushal for the financial year 2019-
20 that are filed online using Digital Signature. In case where there is no field for mentioning UDOIN on digitally
signed online reports, UDION has to be generated and communicated to “Management” or “Those Charged with
Governance” for disseminating it to the stakeholders from their end.
Hence he will be held guilty under Clause 1 of Part II of the Second Schedule to the Chartered Accountants
Act,1949.
Alternative Answer
According to Clause (9) of Part I of Second Schedule to the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949, a Chartered
Accountant in practice shall be deemed to be guilty of professional misconduct if he fails to invite attention to
any material departure from the generally accepted procedure of audit applicable to the circumstances.
This clause implies that the audit should be performed in accordance with “generally accepted procedure of
audit applicable to the circumstances” and if for any reason the auditor has not been able to perform the audit
in accordance with such procedure, his report should draw attention to the material departures from such
procedures. What constitutes “generally accepted audit procedure” would depend upon the facts and
circumstances of each case, but guidance is available in general terms from the various pronouncements of the
Institute is issued by way of statements and Guidance Notes and SAs to members.
A member of the Institute in practice shall generate Unique Document Identification Number (UDIN) for all kinds
859
of the certification, GST and Tax Audit Reports and other Audit, Assurance and Attestation functions
undertaken/signed by him.

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
In the given case, Mr. Kushal has signed the GST Audit Reports, Tax Audit Reports under section 44AB of the
Income Tax Act, 1961 for the F.Y.2019-20 and also has filed online using Digital Signature without generating
UDIN on the ground that there is no field for mentioning UDIN on digitally signed online reports. Applying the
above clause, UDIN provision etc. to the given case, Mr. Kushal would be held guilty of professional misconduct.
96. Comment with reference to the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949 and schedules thereto: Mr.
Vineet, a chartered accountant in practice, created his own website in attractive format and
highlighted the contents in purple colour. The website also displayed the nature of assignments
handled along with the names of clients without such requirement from any of the regulator. He also
circulated the information contained in the website through e-mail to acknowledge public at large about his
expertise. However, he did not intimate his website address to the Institute. (4 Marks) (past exam nov
2020)
ANSWER
Circulating Information Contained in Own Website: As per Clause (6) of Part I of the First Schedule to the
Chartered Accountants Act, 1949, a Chartered Accountant in practice is deemed to be guilty of professional
misconduct if he solicits clients or professional work either directly or indirectly by circular, advertisement,
personal communication or interview or by any other means.
1. However, the guidelines approved by the Council of the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India permit
creation of own website by a chartered accountant in his or his firm name and no standard format or restriction
on colours is there. Hence there is no misconduct as per Clause (6) of Part I of the First Schedule to the
2. The chartered accountant or firm, as per the guidelines, should ensure that none of the information contained
in the website be circulated on their own or through E-mail or by any other mode except on a specific “Pull”
request. Mr. Vineet has circulated the information contained in the website through e-mail to public at large.
Therefore, he is guilty of professional misconduct under Clause (6) of Part I of the First Schedule to the said Act.
3. Nature of assignments handled (to be displayable only on specific “pull” request). Names of clients and fee
charged cannot be given without such requirement from any of the regulator. Mr. Vineet has displayed the nature
of assignments handled along with the name of clients without such requirement from the regulator. Therefore,
he is guilty of professional misconduct under Clause (6) of Part I of the First Schedule to the said Act
97. Nam & Co., conducted Stock Audit of DEF Ltd. as per instructions issued by HEG Bank. However
instead of visiting the site where the stock was lying, the firm relied on the Management Information
Systems report along with inspections reports and photographs of Stock taken by the employees of
DEF Ltd. The photographs were also carrying the date and time printed on them. Comment with
reference to the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949 and its schedules thereto. (4 Marks) (past exam jan
2021)
ANSWER
According to Clause (7) of Part I of Second Schedule to the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949, a Chartered
Accountant in practice is deemed to be guilty of professional misconduct if he “does not exercise due diligence
or is grossly negligent in the conduct of his professional duties”.
It is a vital clause which usually gets attracted whenever it is necessary to judge whether the accountant has
honestly and reasonably discharged his duties. The expression negligence covers a wide field and extends from
the frontiers of fraud to col lateral minor negligence.
In the instant case, CA. Nam &Co. did not exercise due diligence and is grossly negligent in the conduct of his
860
professional duties since it did not visit the site where the stock was lying and instead the firm relied on the MIS

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
report along with inspection reports and photographs of stock taken by the employees of DEF Ltd, which is
incorrect.
To conduct stock audit, ascertainment of existence and physical condition of stocks, cross tallying the stock with
Stock statement submitted by bank borrower, correct classification of stocks for valuation purpose etc. is
essential. Further submitting stock audit report without physically verifying the stock amounts to gross
negligence.
From the above, it can be concluded that Nam & Co. is guilty of professional misconduct under Clause (7) of Part
I of Second Schedule to the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949.
98. CA N was appointed as an auditor of JAL Ltd. The company has branches all over the state of Haryana. CA
N, in consultation with management, decided to Visit 6 out of 10 branches. Management decided to pay him
advance of Rs. 2.00 Lacs against the estimated expenses of Rs. 2.50 Lacs on visits to be conducted as a part
of services rendered. As agreed, Rs. 2.00 Lacs was transferred in his bank account from which he met all the
expenses. Comment with reference to Chartered Accountants Act, 1949 whether the action of CA N of
receiving the advance money in his saving accounts and not keeping it in separate bank account is valid. (4
ANSWER
As per Clause (10) of Part I of Second Schedule to the Chartered Accountant Act,
1949, a Chartered Accountant in practice will be deemed to be guilty of professional misconduct if he fails to
keep moneys of his client other than the fees or remuneration or money meant to be expended in a separate
banking account or to use such moneys for purposes for which they are intended within a reasonable time.
In the course of his engagement as a professional accountant, a member may be entrusted with moneys
belonging to his client. If he should receive such funds, it would be his duty to deposit them in a separate
banking account, and to utilize such funds only in accordance with the instructions of the client or for the
purposes intended by the client.
In this connection the Council has considered some practical difficulties of the members and the following
suggestion, among other suggestions, has been made to remove these difficulties:
“An advance received by a Chartered Accountant against services to be rendered does not fall under Clause (10)
of Part I of the Second Schedule”
In the given case, CA N was given an advance of Rs. 2 Lakhs against the estimated expenses of Rs. 2.50 Lakhs on
visits to be conducted as a part of services rendered. Applying the above, it can be concluded that CA N is not
guilty of professional misconduct under Chartered Accountants Act, 1949
99. CA AB, a practicing chartered accountant, is a promoter director of ABG Pvt. Ltd. and moreover
he is also a sleeping partner in his family business of garments manufacturing firm. Is CA. AB liable
for professional misconduct as per Chartered Accountant Act 1949? (4 Marks) (past exam jan 2021)
ANSWER
Clause (11) of Part I of the First Schedule to the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949
debars a chartered accountant in practice from engaging in any busines s or occupation other than the
profession of chartered accountancy unless permitted by the Council of the Institute so to engage.
Promoter/Promoter Director - There is no bar for a member to be a promoter / signatory to the Memorandum
and Articles of Association of any company. There is also no bar for such a promoter / signatory to be a Director
Simplicitor of that company irrespective of whether the object of the company include areas which fall within
861
the scope of the profession of chartered accounts. Therefore, members are not required to obtain specific

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
permission of the Council in such cases.
Sleeping partner in the family business-

Prior Approval - Members of the Institute in practice may engage in the following category, among other points,
of business or occupations, after obtaining the specific and prior approval of the Council in case of: Interest in
family business concerns (including such interest devolving on the members as a result of inheritance /
succession / partition of the family business) or concerns in which interest has been acquired as a result of
relationships and in the management of which no active part is taken.
In the given case, CA AB is a promoter director of ABG Pvt Ltd and also he is a sleeping partner in his family
business of garments manufacturing firm. Applying the above to the given case, it can be concluded that-CA AB:
As Promoter Director- Not guilty of professional misconduct under Chartered Accountants Act, 1949
As Sleeping Partner- guilty of professional misconduct under Chartered Accountants Act, 1949 as he did not
obtain prior approval of the Council.
100. Comment on the following with reference to the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949 and schedules
thereto:
C.A. Ajitnath is Special Executive Magistrate. He also took over as the Executive Chairman of Software
Company on 1.4.2020. He is also a leading income tax practitioner and consultant for derivative products. He
resides in Chennai near to the ION commodity stock exchange and does trading in commodity derivatives.
Every day, he invests nearly 40% of his time to settle the commodity transactions. He has not taken any
permission for becoming Special Executive Magistrate. However, he has got special permission of Council of
ICAI for becoming Executive Chairman. Is C.A. Ajitnath liable for professional misconduct? (rtp- july 2021)
ANSWER
In this case, C.A. Ajitnath is Special Executive Magistrate, engaged in the occupation of trading in commodity
In the given situation, C.A. Ajitnath is acting as Special Executive Magistrate which is generally permitted for
which specific permission is required. CA. Ajitnath got the permission for the same from the Council of ICAI.
Conclusion: Hence, CA. Ajitnath is not guilty for acting as Special Executive Magistrate as it is covered under the
general permission. He is also not guilty for holding the position of Executive Chairman after getting specific
permission of the Institute.
However, he is guilty of professional misconduct under Clause (11) of Part I of First Schedule of Chartered
Accountants Act, 1949 for getting engaged in the occupation of trading in commodity derivatives which is not
covered under the general permission
862

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
101. CA. Sambhav, the auditor of Mahvir Pvt. Ltd. has delegated following works to his articles and
staff:
❖ Raising of bills and issuing acknowledgements for money receipts.
❖ Initiating and stamping of vouchers and of schedules prepared for the purpose of audit.
❖ Issuing acknowledgements for records produced.
❖ Signing financial statements of the company.
Is this correct as per the Professional Ethics and ICAI’s guidelines and pronouncements? (rtp- july
2021)
ANSWER
in practice is deemed to be guilty of professional misconduct if he allows a person not being a member of the
institute in practice or a member not being his partner to sign on his behalf or on behalf of his firm, any balance
sheet, profit and loss account, report or financial statements.
authentication is not required to be expressed may be delegated in the following instances and such delegation
will not attract provisions of this clause:
receipts.
(ix) Attending to routine matters in tax practice, subject to provisions of Section 288 of Income Tax Act.
(x) Any other matter incidental to the office administration and routine work involved in practice of
accountancy.
In the instant case, CA. Sambhav, the auditor of Mahvir Pvt. Ltd. has delegated certain task to his articles and
staff such as raising of bills and issuing acknowledgements for money receipts, initiating and stamping of
vouchers and of schedules prepared for the purpose of audit and issuing acknowledgements for records
produced and signing financial statements of the company.
Therefore, CA. Sambhav is correct in allowing first three tasks i.e., raising of bills and issuing acknowledgements
863
for money receipts, initiating and stamping of vouchers and of schedules prepared for the purpose of audit.

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
or a member not being his partner to sign on his behalf or on behalf of his firm, CA. Sambhav is not right in
delegating signing of financial statements to his staff.
Conclusion: In view of this, CA. Sambhav would be guilty of professional misconduct for allowing the person
signing the financial statements on his behalf to his articles and staff under Clause 12 of Part 1 of First Schedule
of the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949.
102. Letter head of CA. Panaj, a Practicing Chartered Accountant, is reproduced below: (mtp nov 20)
As per Chartered Accountants Act, 1949 you are required to choose the appropriate answer :
(a) As per clause 7 of Part I of First Schedule to the Chartered Accountants Act,1949 he shall not use the
designation ‘Member of the Parliament’ in addition to that of a ‘Chartered Accountant’
(b) He shall not use the designation ‘LLB’ in addition to that of a ‘Chartered Accountant’ as he has not enrolled
as an Advocate as per clause 7 of Part I of First Schedule to the Chartered Accountants Act,1949.
(c) He can use designations such as Member of Parliament, Member of the Legislative Assembly in addition to
that of a ‘Chartered Accountant’ as these are specifically allowed as per clause 7 of Part I of First Schedule to
the Chartered Accountants Act,1949.
(d) As per clause 7 of Part I of First Schedule to the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949 he can designate himself
as ‘Chartered Accountant and Company Secretary’ as he is a member of the Institute of Company Secretaries
of India also.
ANSWER- a
103. In accordance with provisions of Companies Act, 2013 with respect to investigation into the affairs of a
company, who can be appointed as an inspector? (mtp nov 20)
I. Raj & Associates, a firm

II. CA Rahul
III. Mihim Pvt. Ltd, a body corporate
IV. ABC & Partners LLP, a body corporate
(a) I, III & IV
(b) I only
(c) III & IV
(d) II only
864
ANSWER- d

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
104. Mr. Aniket, a Chartered Accountant was the auditor of 'Alpha Limited' for the year 2018-19 and 2019-20.
During the financial year, the investment appeared in the Balance Sheet of the company amounting Rs. 11 lac
and was the same amount as in the last year 2018-19. Later on, it was found that the company's investments
were only for Rs. 45,000, however, the value of investments was inflated for the purpose of obtaining higher
amount of Bank loan. Comment with reference to the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949, and Schedules
thereto. (5 Marks) (mtp nov 20)
ANSWER
Gross Negligence in Conduct of Duties: As per Part I of Second Schedule to the Chartered Accountants Act,
1949, a Chartered Accountant in practice shall be deemed to be guilty of professional misconduct, if he, certifies
or submits in his name or in the name of his firm, a report of an examination of financial statements unless the
examination of such statements and the related records has been made by him or by a partner or an employee
in his firm or by another chartered accountant in practice, under Clause (2); does not exercise due diligence, or is
grossly negligent in the conduct of his professional duties, under Clause (7); or fails to obtain sufficient
information which is necessary for expression of an opinion or its exceptions are sufficiently material to negate
the expression of an opinion, under Clause (8).
The primary duty of physical verification and valuation of investments is of the management. However, the
auditor’s duty is also to verify the physical existence and valuation of investments placed, at least on the last day
of the accounting year. The auditor should verify the documentary evidence for the cost/value and physical
existence of the investments at the end of the year. He should not blindly rely upon the Management’s
representation.
In the instant case, such non-verification happened for two years. It also appears that auditors failed to confirm
the value of investments from any proper source. In case auditor has simply relied on the management’s
representation, the auditor has failed to perform his duty.
Conclusion: Accordingly, Mr. Aniket, will be held liable for professional misconduct under Clauses (2), (7) and (8)
of Part I of the Second Schedule to the Chartered Accountants Act, 194
105. Mr. Dhruv, a practicing Chartered Accountant, did not complete his work relating to the audit of the
accounts of a company and had not submitted his audit report in due time to enable the company to comply
with the statutory requirements. Comment with reference to the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949, and
Schedules thereto. (4 Marks) (mtp nov 20)
ANSWER
Not Exercising Due Diligence: According to Clause (7) of Part I of Second Schedule of Chartered Accountants Act,
1949, a Chartered Accountant in practice is deemed to be guilty of professional misconduct if he does not
exercise due diligence or is grossly negligent in the conduct of his professional duties.
It is a vital clause which unusually gets attracted whenever it is necessary to judge whether the accountant has
honestly and reasonably discharged his duties. The expression negligence covers a wide field and extends from
the frontiers of fraud to collateral minor negligence.
Where a Chartered Accountant had not completed his work relating to the audit of the accounts a company and
had not submitted his audit report in due time to enable the company to comply with the statutory requirement
in this regard, he would be held guilty of professional misconduct under Clause (7).
Since Mr. Dhruv has not completed his audit work in time and consequently could not submit audit report in due
time and consequently, company could not comply with the statutory requirements, therefore, the auditor is
guilty of professional misconduct under Clause (7) of Part I of the Second Schedule to the Chartered Accountants
865
Act, 1949.

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
106. Mr. Chintamani, a Chartered Accountant in practice has been elected as the treasurer the Regional
Council of the ICAI. The Regional Council had organized an international tour through a tour operator during
the year for its members. During the audit of the Regional Council, it was found that Mr. Chintamani had
received a personal benefit of Rs. 40,000 from the tour operator. Comment with reference to the Chartered
Accountants Act, 1949, and Schedules thereto. (4 Marks) (mtp nov 20)
ANSWER
Section 21 of the Chartered A ccountants Act, 1949 provides that a member is liable for disciplinary action if he
is guilty of any professional or “Other Misconduct.” Other misconduct has been defined in part IV of the First
Schedule and part III of the Second Schedule. These provisions empower the Council to inquire into any
misconduct of a member even it does not arise out of his professional work. This is considered necessary
because a chartered accountant is expected to maintain the highest standards of integrity even in his personal
affairs and any deviation from these standards, even in his non-professional work, would expose him to
disciplinary action. The Council has also laid down that among other things “misappropriation by an office-
bearer of a Regional Council of the Institute of a large amount and utilization thereof for his personal use” would
amount to “other misconduct”.
In the instant case, receipt of personal benefit of Rs. 40,000 from the tour operator by Mr. Chintamani for
organising an international tour as treasurer of a Regional Council of the Institute would amount to other
misconduct as per section 21. Therefore, Mr. Chintamani would be held guilty for other misconduct
107. CA Dharma has established another branch in the same city. Branch was inaugurated on 3rd October
2020 and on 4th October 2020, friends of CA Dharma gave an article on the front page of local newspaper
congratulating CA Dharma on opening of another branch which also includes half page photograph of CA
Dharma with his consent. In your opinion was the news in newspaper a misconduct on the part of CA Dharma
and what actions can be taken against him? (mtp – I -july 2021)
(a) Yes, it is a misconduct under clause 8 of Part I of Second Schedule and he can be reprimanded, his name
can be removed from the register of members for 3 years and fine upto Rs. 5,00,000.
(b) Yes, it is a misconduct under under clause 5 Part I of First Schedule and he can be reprimanded, his name
can be removed from the register of members for 3 months and fine upto Rs. 1,00,000.
(c) Yes, it is a misconduct under clause 7 of Part I of First Schedule and he can be reprimanded, his name can
be removed from the register of members for 3 months and fine upto Rs. 1,00,000.
(d) Yes, it is a misconduct under clause 8 of Part I of Second Schedule and he can be reprimanded, his name
can be removed from the register of members permanently and fine upto Rs. 5,00,000.
ANSWER- c
108. (a) J.A.C.K. & Co., a Chartered Accountant firm was appointed as the statutory auditor of Falcon Ltd. after
ensuring the compliance with relevant provisions of the Companies Act, 2013. Mr. Jay was the engagement
partner for the aforesaid audit and prior to commencement of the audit, Mr. Jay had called for a meeting of
the engagement team in order to direct them and assign them their responsibilities. At the end of meeting,
866
Mr. Jay assigned review responsibilities to two of the engagement team members who were the most
experienced amongst all, for reviewing the work performed by the less experienced team members. While

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
reviewing the work performed by the less experienced members of the engagement team, what shall be the
considerations of the reviewers? (mtp – I -july 2021)
(5 Marks)
ANSWER
As per SQC 1, “Quality Control for Firms that Perform Audits and Reviews of Historical Financial Information,
and Other Assurance and Related Services Engagements”, review responsibilities are determined on the basis
that more experienced team members, including the engagement partner, review work performed by less
experienced team members.
In the given situation, Mr. Jay, engagement partner assigned review responsibilities to two of the engagement
team members who were the most experienced team members.
While reviewing the work performed by less experienced members of the engagement team, both the more
experienced Reviewers should consider whether
requirements.
(ii) Significant matters have been raised for further consideration.
(iii) Appropriate consultations have taken place and the resulting conclusions have been documented and
implemented.
(iv) There is a need to revise the nature, timing and extent of work performed.
(v) The work performed supports the conclusions reached and is appropriately documented.
(vii) The objectives of the engagement procedures have been achieved
109. M/s SS limited is a partly owned subsidiary of M/s HH limited. For the upcoming financial year, M/s DD
& Co., Chartered Accountants, were appointed as the statutory auditors of SS limited. The CEO of the holding
company was impressed with the knowledge and experience of Mr. D, one of the partners of the firm and
hence, he offered Mr. D to take up the position of Director (not MD/ whole-time director) of HH limited. At
the same time, Mr. D’s friend approaches him with an assignment to act as a Recovery Consultant for a bank.
Mr. D is now confused whether to accept or reject the offers. He approaches you and seeks your advice on the
same. Advise what Mr. D about what he can do with the offers with reference to the Chartered Accountants
Act, 1949 and Schedules thereto. (5 Marks) (mtp – I -july 2021)
ANSWER
As per Clause (11) of Part I of First Schedule of Chartered Accountants Act, 1949, a Chartered Accountant in
practice is deemed to be guilty of professional misconduct if he engages in any business or occupation other
than the profession of Chartered Accountant unless permitted by the Council so to engage.
Provided nothing contained herein shall disentitle a chartered accountant from being a director of a company
(not being MD or whole-time director) unless he or his partners is interested in such company as auditor.
The Ethical Standards Board (ESB) noted that Public conscience is expected to be ahead of law. Members,
therefore, are expected to interpret the requirement as regards independence much more strictly than what the
law requires and should not place themselves in positions which would either compromise or jeopardise their
867
independence. In the view of the above, the Board, via a clarification, decided that the auditor of a Subsidiary
company cannot be a Director of its Holding company, as it will affect the independence of the auditor.

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
In respect of all other occupations specific permission of the Institute is necessary. ‘acting as Recovery
Consultant in the banking sector’ is covered under general permission.
In the given situation, M/s SS limited is a partly owned subsidiary of M/s HH limited. For the upcoming financial
year, M/s DD & Co., Chartered Accountants, were appointed as the statutory auditors of SS limited. The CEO of
the holding company was impressed with the knowledge and experience of Mr. D, one of the partners of the
firm and hence, he offered Mr. D to take up the position of Director (not MD/ whole-time director) of HH
limited. Further, Mr. D’s friend approached him for an assignment for acting as a Recovery Consultant for a
bank.
Therefore, in view of above in the given case, Mr. D should not accept the offer to be appointed as director of
HH Limited.However, he can accept the assignment offered by his friend and can act as a recovery consultant for
a bank
110. A letter is sent by Mr. Raja, a Chartered Accountant in practice, to the Ministry of Finance inquiring
whether a panel of auditors is being maintained by the Ministry and if so to include his name in the panel. He
also enclosed his CV. Comment on the above with reference to the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949 and
Schedules thereto. (4 Marks) (mtp – I -july 2021)
ANSWER
Making Roving Inquiries: Clause (6) of Part I of the First Schedule to the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949 states
that a Chartered Accountant in practice shall be deemed to be guilty of misconduct if he solicits clients or
professional work either directly or indirectly by a circular, advertisement, personal communication or interview
or by any other means. Such a restraint has been put so that the members maintain their independence of
judgement and may be able to command respect from their prospective clients.
In case of making an application for the empanelment for the allotment of audit and other professional work,
the Council has opined that, “where the existence of such a panel is within the knowledge of the member, he is
free to write to the concerned organization with a request to place his name on the panel. However, it would
not be proper for the member to make roving inquiries by applying to any such organization for having his name
included in any such panel.”
Accordingly, Mr. Raja is guilty of misconduct in terms of the above provision as he has solicited professional
work from the Finance Ministry, by inquiring about the maintenance of the panel
111. Mr. Z, a newly qualified chartered accountant started his practice in February 2018 by setting up an
office in the hill station Kodaikanal. Initially, since he was getting very less assignments, he decided to set up a
temporary office in the nearby city Marudai, situated at about 100 kms from the main office. As planned, he
took an office space on rent for the months of April, May & June. During these months, his regular office was
not closed and Mr. Z was in-charge for both the offices. Mrs. A, another newly qualified chartered accountant
who is also in practice in Marudai came to know about the new office of Mr. Z. Thinking that he could be a
potential competitor, she informed the institute stating that Mr. Z had violated the provisions of the
Chartered Accountant Act. As a member of the Board of Discipline of ICAI, you are requested to analyse this
complaint. (mtp – I -july 2021)
ANSWER
868

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
As per section 27 of Chartered Accountants Act 1949, if a Chartered Accountant in practice or a Firm of
Chartered Accountants has more than one office in India, each one of such offices should be in the separate
charge of a member of the Institute. Failure on the part of a member or a firm to have a member in charge of its
branch and a separate member in case of each of the branches, where there is more than one, would constitute
professional misconduct. This condition applies to any additional office situated at a place beyond 50 kms from
the municipal limits in which any office is situated.
However, exemption has been given to members in practicing in hill areas subject to certain conditions such as:
− Such member/ firm be allowed to open temporary offices in a city in the plains for a limited period not
exceeding 3 months in a year.
− The regular office need not be closed during this period and all correspondence can
continue to be made at the regular office.
− The name board of the firm in temporary office should not be displayed at times other than the period such
office is permitted to function.
− The temporary office should not be mentioned in letter head, visiting card, any other documents as a place of
business of the member/ firm.
− Before commencement of every winter, it shall be obligatory on the member/firm to inform the Institute that
he/it is opening the temporary office from a particular date and after the office is closed at the expiry of the
period of permission, an intimation to that effect should also be sent to the office of the Institute by registered
post.
In the given case, Mr. Z has set up his regular office in the hill area of Kodaikanal, he decided to set up a
temporary office in the nearby city Marudai, situated at about 100 kms from the main office. As planned, he
took an office space on rent for the months of April, May & June. During these months, his regular office was not
closed. Further he was in-charge for both the offices. In view of abovementioned criteria’s, he is eligible to avail
the benefits of the above exemptions. Also, it is given that the temporary office was open in Madurai for only 3
months and not beyond that. The fact that Mr. Z is in-charge for both the offices, the temporary office being set-
up in the plains which is 100 kms away and the regular office kept open during the 3 months does not constitute
any violation of the provisions of the Chartered Accountant Act. Assuming Mr. Z has informed the Institute
regarding such temporary office in the prescribed manner.
Therefore, in the given case, no penal action needs to be taken on the basis of complaint registered by Mrs. A, as
Mr. Z is not guilty of professional misconduct
112. KB Associates a chartered accountant firm has been appointed as an auditor of the company for the
financial year 2020-21. It consists of two partners CA K & CA B. CA K is brother of the father of the finance
director of the company. CA B is an old friend of the finance director of the company.
What kind of ethical threat is associated with appointment of KB Associates as an auditor of ABC LTD.? (mtp –
II -july 2021)
(a) Self Interest Threat.
(b) Advocacy Threat.
(c) Familiarity Threat.
(d) Self-Review Threat.

ANSWER- c
869

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
113. Mr. R, (friend of Mr. P) a CA in practice invited Mr. P to set up a ‘Network Firm’ along with 2 more
friends. All the four auditors agreed to the same and decided to start a network firm by the name M/s RP &
Co. However, one of the auditors suggested that they cannot use the term ‘& Co.’ and it needs to be changed.
But Mr. R informed that there is no such Regulation regarding the firm’s name. Which among the name shall
be suitable to the newly started ‘Network Firm’, in accordance with the provisions of Chartered Accountant
Act and Regulation? (mtp – II -july 2021)
(a) RP and Co.
(b) RP & Associates.
(c) RP and Networks.
(d) RP & Affiliates.

ANSWER- d
114. Mr. Sudhir, a Chartered Accountant in practice, delivered a speech in the national conference organized
by the Ministry of Textiles. While delivering the speech, he told to the audience that he is a management
expert and his firm provides services of taxation and audit at reasonable rates. He also requested the
audience to approach his firm of chartered accountants for these services and at the request of audience he
also distributed his business cards and telephone number of his firm to those in the audience. Comment with
reference to the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949, and Schedules thereto. (5 Marks) (mtp – II -july 2021)
ANSWER
Using Designation Other Than a CA and Providing Details of Services Offered:

Clause (6) of Part I of the First Schedule to the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949 states that a Chartered
Accountant in practice shall be deemed to be guilty of misconduct if he solicits client s or professional work
either directly or indirectly by a circular, advertisement, personal communication or interview or by any other
means. Such a restraint has been put so that the members maintain their independence of judgment and may
be able to command respect from their prospective clients.
Section 7 of the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949 read with Clause (7) of Part I of the First Schedule to the said
Act prohibits advertising of professional attainments or services of a member. It also restrains a member from
using any designation or expression other than that of a chartered accountant in documents through which the
professional attainments of the member would come to the notice of the public. Under the clause, use of any
designation or expression other than chartered accountant for a chartered accountant in practice, on
professional documents, visiting cards, etc. amounts to a misconduct unless it be a degree of a university or a
title indicating membership of any other professional body recognised by the Central Government
or the Council.
Member may appear on television and films and agree to broadcast in the Radio or give lectures at forums and
may give their names and describe themselves as Chartered Accountants. Special qualifications or specialized
knowledge directly relevant to the subject matter of the programme may also be given but no reference should
be made, in the case of practicing member to the name and address or services of his firm. What he may say or
write must not be promotional of his or his firm but must be an objective professional view of the topic under
consideration.
870
established by law in India or recognised by the Cent ral Government nor it is a recognised professional
membership by the Central Government or the Council. Therefore, CA.

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
Sudhir is deemed to be guilty of professional misconduct under both Clause (6) and Clause (7) as he has used the
designation “Management Expert” in his speech and also he has made reference to the services provided by his
firm of Chartered Accountants at reasonable rates. Distribution of cards to audience is also a misconduct in
terms of Clause (6).
115. Mr. Dhawal, a practicing CA, is appointed as a Director Simplicitor in Gautam Pvt. Ltd. After three year of
appointment, Mr. Dhawal resigned as the Director and accepted the Statutory Auditor position of the
Company. Is Mr. Dhawal right in accepting the auditor position? Comment with reference to the Chartered
Accountants Act, 1949, and Schedules thereto. (4 Marks) (mtp – II -july 2021)
ANSWER
As per Clause (4) of Part I of the Second Schedule of the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949, a Chartered
Accountant in practice is deemed to be guilty of professional misconduct if he expresses his opinion on financial
statements of any business or enterprise in which he, his firm, or a partner in his firm has a substantial interest.
principle of independence of mind is equally applicable in those situations also.
Therefore, the Council’s views are clarified in the following situations.

said Company. In the instant case, Mr. Dhawal, a practicing CA, is appointed as a Director Simplicitor in Gautam
Pvt. Ltd. After three year of appointment, Mr. Dhawal resigned as the Director and accepted the Statutory
Auditor position of the Company. In view of above provisions Mr. Dhawal can accept the Directorship of the
company as tenure of two years after his resignation is completed. Thus, CA, Dhawal would not be held guilty of
professional misconduct under clause 4 of Part 1 of Second Schedule of the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949
116. CA. Rani is practicing since 2007 in the field of tax audit. Due to her good practical knowledge, she was
offered editorship of a ‘Tax Audit’ Journal which she accepted. However, she did not take any permission from
the Council regarding such editorship. Comment with reference to the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949, and
Schedules thereto. (4 Marks) (mtp – II -july 2021)
ANSWER
Permission from the Council: As per Clause (11) of Part I of First Schedule to the Chartered Accountants Act,
1949, a Chartered Accountant in practice will be deemed to be guilty of professional misconduct if he engages in
any business or occupation other than the profession of Chartered Accountant unless permitted by the Council
so to engage. However, the Council has granted general permission to the members to engage in certain
specific occupation. In respect of all other occupations specific permission of the Institute is necessary.
In the instant case, CA. Rani accepted editorship of a journal for which she did not take any permission from the
Council. In this context, it may be noted that the editorship of professional journals is covered under the general
permission and specific permission is not required.
Therefore, CA. Rani shall not be held guilty of professional misconduct in terms of Clause (11) of Part I of First
Schedule to the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949
871

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
117. (RTP- NOV 2021)

The Director (Discipline) of the ICAI received information of alleged misconduct against Mr.
Jayprakash, the proprietor of JP & Associates, as follows:-
(i) Audit of a college was accepted by JP & Associates in which Mr. Jayprakash is working as a part-
time lecturer and also, he had not taken permission of the ICAI for working as a part-time lecturer in
the college.
(ii) An event relating to Corporate Social Responsibility was sponsored by JP & Associates, whereby
in the sponsorship banner, name of Mr. Jayprakash as ‘CA Jayprakash, Proprietor, JP & Associates’
was mentioned.
On the basis of above information and along with certain evidence against Mr. Jayprakash, he was
found guilty and so he was reprimanded and a fine of ₹ 1 lakh was imposed by an order passed
against him dated 12th July, 2020.
Against the said order, Mr. Jayprakash preferred an appeal with the Appellate Authority on 17th
August, 2020 by submitting a statement of appeal along with the application form of appeal. During
such appellate proceedings, it was discovered that the said statement of appeal contained some
facts which were false to which Mr. Jayprakash admitted it to be false and apologized for it.
(a) Mr. Jayprakash has violated which of the provisions of the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949?
ANSWER
(a) Mr. Jayprakash has violated following provisions of the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949: (i) As per Clause (4)
of Part I of the Second Schedule to the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949, a Chartered Accountant in practice
shall be deemed to be guilty of professional misconduct, if he expresses his opinion on financial statements of
any business or enterprise in which he, his firm, or a partner in his firm has a substantial interest. In this
connection, as per the decision of the Council of the ICAI, a Chartered Accountant should not by himself or in his
firm name accept the audit of a college, if he is working as a part-time lecturer in the college. Thus, by accepting
audit of a college in which he is working as a part-time lecturer, Mr. Jayprakash has violated the restriction
imposed under Clause (4) of Part I of the Second Schedule to the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949. (ii) As per
Clause (11) of Part I of the First Schedule to the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949, a Chartered Accountant in
practice shall be deemed to be guilty of professional misconduct, if he engages in any business or occupation
other than the profession of chartered accountant unless permitted by the Council so to engage. Members of
the Institute in practice may engage in a part-time or full-time tutorship under any educational institution other
than the coaching organization of the Institute, after obtaining the specific and prior approval of the Council in
each case. Mr. Jayprakash had not taken permission of the ICAI for working as a part-time lecturer in the college
and so has violated the restriction imposed under Clause (11) of Part I of the First Schedule to the Chartered
Accountants Act, 1949. (iii) As per Clause (6) of Part I of the First Schedule to the Chartered Accountants Act,
1949, a Chartered Accountant in practice shall be deemed to be guilty of professional misconduct, if he solicits
clients or professional work either directly or indirectly by circular, advertisement, personal communication or
In this connection, members sponsoring activities relating to Corporate Social Responsibility may mention their
individual name with the prefix “CA”. However, mentioning a firm’s name or CA Logo is not permitted. An event
872
relating to Corporate Social Responsibility was sponsored by JP & Associates, whereby in the sponsorship

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
banner, name of Mr. Jayprakash as ‘CA Jayprakash, Proprietor, JP & Associates’ was mentioned. Thus, firm’s
name was mentioned which is not allowed and thus, Mr. Jayprakash has violated the restriction imposed under
Clause (6) of Part I of the First Schedule to the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949. (iv) As per Clause (3) of Part II
of the Second Schedule to the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949, a member of the ICAI shall be deemed to be
guilty of professional misconduct, if he includes in any information, statement, return or form to be submitted
to the Institute, Council or any of its Committees, Director (Discipline), Board of Discipline, Disciplinary
Committee, Quality Review Board or the Appellate Authority, any particulars knowing them to be false. Mr.
Jayprakash in the statement of appeal submitted with the Appellate Authority mentioned some facts knowing
them to be false and thus, he has violated the restriction imposed under Clause (3) of Part II of the Second
Schedule to the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949. (b) As Mr. Jayprakash has been alleged of misconduct falling
in First as well as Second Schedule, so the matter would be placed before the Disciplinary Committee. The
maximum punishment which could have been imposed on him by the said authority would be:- (i) reprimanding
the member. (ii) removing name of the member permanently or for any duration, it thinks fit. (iii) imposing fine
upto ₹ 5,00,000.
118. ( STUDY MAT)
Mr. G, a Chartered Accountant in practice as a sole proprietor has an office in Mumbai near Church Gate. Due to
increase in professional work, he opens another office in a suburb of Mumbai which is approximately 80
kilometers away from the municipal limits of the city. For running the new office, he employs three retired
Income-tax Officers. Is Mr. G guilty of professional misconduct?
ANSWER
In terms of section 27 of the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949, if a chartered accountant in practice has more
than one office in India, each one of these offices should be in the separate charge of a member of the Institute.
There is however an exemption for the above if the second office is located in the same premises, in which the
first office is located; or the second office is located in the same city, in which the first office is located; or the
second office is located within a distance of 50 kms from the municipal limits of a city, in which the first office is
located. Since the second office is situated beyond 50 kms of municipal limits of Mumbai city, he would be liable
for committing a professional misconduct
119. (JULY 2021 PAPER)
M/s. SR & Associates is one of the three firms shortlisted by ARG Cooperative Bank for assignment of
Statutory Audit for the F.Y 2020-2021. Bank mailed the list of branches to the audit firms along with
the maximum fee per branch and asked them to submit the quotations. SR & Associates responded to
the bank and submitted their quotation. Comment with reference to the provisions of the Chartered
Accountants Act, 1949 and schedules thereto.
ANSWER
Provisions of the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949 and Schedules thereto -

As per Clause (6) of Part I of First Schedule to the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949, a Chartered
Accountant in practice will be deemed to be guilty of professional misconduct if he Solicits clients or
873

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
professional work either directly or indirectly by circular, advertisement, personal communication or

Provided that nothing herein contained shall be construed as preventing or prohibiting -
(i) Any Chartered Accountant from applying or requesting for or inviting or securing professional work
from another chartered accountant in practice; or
(ii) A member from responding to tenders or enquiries issued by various users of professional services
or organizations from time to time and securing professional work as a consequence.
However, as per the guideline issued by the Council of the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India,
a member of the Institute in practice shall not respond to any tender issued by an organization or user
of professional services in areas of services which are exclusively reserved for chartered accountants,
such as audit and attestation services.
However, such restriction shall not be applicable where minimum fee of the assignment is prescribed
in the tender document itself or where the areas are open to other professionals along with the
Chartered Accountants.
In the given case of ARG Cooperative Bank, Bank mailed the list of branches to the audit firms along
with maximum fees per branch, in response to which SR & Associates responded and submitted their
quotation.
Keeping in view the facts, clause 6 and guideline issued by the council, it can be concluded that SR &
Associates is guilty of Professional misconduct.
Vineet & Associates have been offered Statutory Audit of TLP Ltd. As a part of ethical requirements of
the Institute of Chartered Accountants, CA V, partner of the firm, communicated with the previous
auditor enquiring as to whether any professional reason exists for which he should not accept the audit
assignment. Previous auditor informed that he issued a qualified report, so management is changing
the auditor. Comment with reference to the provisions of the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949 and
schedules thereto as to whether Vineet & Associates can accept the audit.
ANSWER

Accountant in practice will be deemed to be guilty of professional misconduct if he accepts a position
as auditor previously held by another chartered accountant or a certified auditor who has been issued
certificate under the Restricted Certificate Rules, 1932 without first communicating with him in writing.
The professional reasons for not accepting an audit would be:
(a) Non-compliance of the provisions of Sections 139 and 140 of the Companies Act, 2013 as
mentioned in Clause (9) of the Part - I of First Schedule to The Chartered Accountants Act, 1949; and
(b) Non-payment of undisputed Audit Fees by auditees other than in case of Sick Units for carrying out
the Statutory Audit under the Companies Act, 2013 or various other statutes; and
874
(c) Issuance of a qualified report.

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
There is no rule, written or unwritten, which would prevent an auditor from accepting the
appointment offered to him under the circumstance of Issuance of qualified report. However, before
accepting the audit, he should ascertain the full facts of the case. For nothing will bring the profession
to disrepute so much as the knowledge amongst the public that if an auditor is found to be
“inconvenient” by the client, he could readily be replaced by another who would not displease the
client and this point cannot be too over-emphasised. From the above it can be concluded that Vineet &
Associates may accept the audit of TLP Ltd if CA V is satisfied that the attitude of the retiring auditor
was not proper and justified. If, on the other hand, CA V feels that the retiring auditor had qualified the
report for good and valid reasons, he should refuse to accept the audit of TLP Ltd.
CA R, a Chartered Accountant in practice is specializing in the field of Information Systems Audit. He is

considered to be one of the experts of this field because of his command over the subject. HKC
Limited, a Company engaged in rendering management consultancy offered him to appoint as its
managing director. CA R accepted the position of managing director without obtaining prior permission
from the Institute. One of his friends, CA S informed him that now he cannot retain full time certificate
of practice, thus cannot do attest function and train articled assistants. Comment with reference to the
provisions of the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949 and schedules thereto.
ANSWER

Accountant in practice will be deemed to be guilty of professional misconduct if he engages in any
business or occupation other than the profession of Chartered Accountant unless permitted by the
Council so to engage.
The Council decided to allow members in practice to hold the office of Managing Director, Whole-time
Director or Manager of a body corporate within the meaning of the Companies Act, 2013 provided that
the body corporate is engaged exclusively in rendering Management Consultancy and Other Services
permitted by the Council in pursuant to Section 2(2)(iv) of the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949 and
complies with the conditions(s) as specified by the Council from time to time in this regard. The name
of the Management Consultancy Company is required to be approved by the Institute and such
Company has to be registered with the Institute.
The members can retain full time Certificate of Practice besides being the Managing Director, Whole-
time Director or Manager of such Management Consultancy Company. There will be no restriction on
the quantum of the equity holding of the members, either individually and/ or along with the relatives,
in such Company. Such members shall be regarded as being in full- time practice and therefore can
continue to do attest function either in individual capacity or in Proprietorship/Partnership firm in
which capacity they practice and wherein they are also entitled to train articled/audit assistants.
Thus, the action of CA R is valid.
875

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
122. ( MTP- NOV 2021 PAPER)
Mr. Sheetal, a Chartered Accountant during the course of audit of SS Ltd. came to know that the
company has taken a loan of ₹ 12 lakh from Employees Provident Fund. The said loan was not reflected
in the books of account. However, the auditor ignored this information in his report. Comment with
reference to the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949, and Schedules thereto
ANSWER
Failure to Disclose Material Facts: As per Clause (5) of Part I of Second Schedule to the
Chartered Accountants Act, 1949, a chartered Accountant in practice will be held liable for
misconduct if he fails to disclose a material fact known to him, which is not disclosed in the
financial statements but disclosure of which is necessary to make the financial statements not
misleading. In this case, Mr. Sheetal has come across information that a loan of ₹ 12 lakhs has
been taken by the company from Employees Provident Fund. This is contravention of Rules and
the said loan has not been reflected in the books of accounts. Further, this material fact has also
to be disclosed in the financial statements. The very fact that Mr. Sheetal has failed to disclose
this fact in his report, he is attracted by the provisions of professional misconduct under Clause
(5) of Part I of Second Schedule to the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949.
CA. Intelligent, a practicing Chartered Accountant was on Europe tour between 15-09-20 and 25-09-20.
On 18-09-20 a message was received from one of his clients requesting for a stock certificate to be
produced to the bank on or before 20-09-20. Due to urgency, CA. Intelligent directed his assistant, who
is also a Chartered Accountant, to sign and issue the stock certificate after due verification, on his
behalf. Comment with reference to the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949, and Schedules thereto.
ANSWER
Allowing a Member Not Being a Partner to Sign Certificate: As per Clause (12) of Part I of the
First Schedule to the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949, a Chartered Accountant in practice is
deemed to be guilty of professional misconduct “if he allows a person not being a member of the
Institute in practice or a member not being his partner to sign on his behalf or on behalf of his
firm, any balance sheet, profit and loss account, report or financial statements”.
In this case, CA. Intelligent allowed his assistant who is not a partner but a member of the
Institute of Chartered Accountants of India to sign stock certificate on his behalf and thereby
commits misconduct.
Conclusion: Thus, CA. Intelligent is guilty of professional misconduct under Clause (12) of Part I
of First Schedule to the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949.
876

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
C.A. Bahubali is Special Executive Magistrate. He also took over as the executive chairman of Software Company
on 1.4.2021. He is also a leading income tax practitioner and consultant for derivative products. He resides in
Chennai near to the ION commodity stock exchange and does trading in commodity derivatives. Every day, he
invests nearly 38% of his time to settle the commodity transactions. He has not taken any permission for
becoming Special Executive Magistrate. However, he has got special permission of Council of ICAI for becoming
executive chairman and for trading in commodity derivatives. Is C.A. Bahubali liable for professional
misconduct? Comment with reference to the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949, and Schedules thereto.
ANSWER
However, the Council has granted general permission to the members to engage in certain specific
occupation. In respect of all other occupations specific permission of the Institute is necessary. In this
case, C.A. Bahubali is Special Executive Magistrate, engaged in the occupation of trading in commodity
In the given situation, C.A. Bahubali is acting as Special Executive Magistrate which is generally permitted for
which specific permission is required. CA. Bahubali got the permission for the same from the Council of ICAI.
Conclusion: Hence, CA. Bahubali is not guilty for acting as Special Executive Magistrate as it is covered under the
general permission. He is also not guilty for holding the position of Executive Chairman after getting specific
permission of the Institute.
However, he is guilty of professional misconduct under Clause (11) of Part I of First Schedule of Chartered
Accountants Act, 1949 for getting engaged in the occupation of trading in commodity derivatives which is not
covered under the general permission.
CA. Paras, the auditor of Vardhman Pvt. Ltd. has delegated following works to his articles and staff:
❖ Asking for information or issue of questionnaire.
❖ Letter forwarding draft observations/financial statements.
❖ Issue of memorandum of cash verification and other physical verification or recording the results
thereof in the books of the clients.
❖ Signing financial statements of the company.
Is this correct as per the Professional Ethics and ICAI’s guidelines and pronouncements
ANSWER
877

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
As per Clause (12) of Part I of the First Schedule of the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949, a Chartered
Accountant in practice is deemed to be guilty of professional misconduct if he allows a person not being a
member of the institute in practice or a member not being his partner to sign on his behalf or on behalf of his
firm, any balance sheet, profit and loss account, report or financial statements.
authentication is not required to be expressed may be delegated in the following instances and such delegation
will not attract provisions of this clause:
receipts.
(viii) Attending to routine matters in tax practice, subject to provisions of Section 288 of Income Tax Act.
(ix) Any other matter incidental to the office administration and routine work involved in practice of
accountancy.
In the instant case, CA. Paras, the auditor of Vardhman Pvt. Ltd. has delegated certain task to his articles and
staff such asking for information or issue of questionnaire, letter forwarding draft observations/financial
statements, issue of memorandum of cash verification and other physical verification or recording the results
thereof in the books of the clients and signing financial statements of the company.
Therefore, CA. Paras is correct in allowing first three tasks i.e. asking for information or issue of questionnaire,
letter forwarding draft observations/financial statements and issue of memorandum of cash verification and
other physical verification or recording the results thereof in the books of the clients.
or a member not being his partner to sign on his behalf or on behalf of his firm, CA. Paras is not right in
delegating signing of financial statements to his staff.
Conclusion: In view of this, CA. Paras would be guilty of professional misconduct for allowing the person signing
the financial statements on his behalf to his articles and staff under Clause 12 of Part 1 of First Schedule of the
Mr. Gautam & Mr. Mahaveer, partners of a Chartered Accountant Firm, one in-charge of Head Office
and another in-charge of Branch at a distance of 80 km. from the municipal limits, puts up a name-
878

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
board of the firm in both premises and also in their respective residences. Comment with reference to
ANSWER
Putting Name Board of the Firm at Residence: The council of the Institute has decided that with regard
to the use of the name-board, there will be no bar to the putting up of a name-board in the place of
residence of a member with the designation of chartered accountant, provided, it is a name-plate or
board of an individual member and not of the firm.
In the given case, partners Mr. Gautam and Mr. Mahaveer, put up a name board of the firm in both
offices but also in their respective residences.
Conclusion: Thus, Mr. Gautam and Mr. Mahaveer are guilty of misconduct. Distance given in the
question is not relevant for deciding.
127(SEPT2022 MTP)
AJ & Associates and PK & Co., chartered accountant firms have joined the Network firm A to Z &
Affiliates registered with Institute. AJ & Associates was statutory auditor of B Ltd. for last 10 years. Due
to rotation of auditor as per section 139 (2) of Companies Act, 2013, B Ltd. retires AJ & Associates and
appoints PK & Co., as auditor for the year 2020 -21. Comment as per Chartered Accountant Act, 1949 -
Guidelines for Networking.
ANSWER :
As per Council General Guidelines, 2008, Chapter XV, Guidelines for Networking, once the relationship of
network arises, it will be necessary for such a network to comply with all applicable ethical requirements
prescribed by the Institute from time to time in general and the following requirements in particular in those
cases where rotation of firms is prescribed by any regulatory authority, no member firm of the network can
accept appointment as an auditor in place of any member firm of the network which is retiring.
In the given situation, AJ & Associates was statutory auditor of B Ltd. For last 10 years and due to rotation of
auditor as per section 139(2) of the Companies Act, 2013 B Ltd., retires AJ & Associates and appoints PK & Co. as
auditor for the year 2020-21.
It may be considered that AJ & Associates and PK & Co., chartered accountant firms have joined the network
firm namely A to Z & Affiliates registered with Institute. In view of above Guidelines for Networking PK & Co., is
disqualified for appointment as an auditor of B Ltd.
128 (SEPT2022 MTP)
Mr. Gautam & Mr. Mahaveer, partners of a Chartered Accountant Firm, one in-charge of Head Office
and another in-charge of Branch at a distance of 80 km. from the municipal limits, puts up a name-
board of the firm in both premises and also in their respective residences. Comment with reference to
ANSWER :
879

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
Putting Name Board of the Firm at Residence: The Council of the Institute has decided that with regard
to the use of the name-board, there will be no bar to the putting up of a name-board in the place of
residence of a member with the designation of chartered accountant, provided, it is a name-plate or
board of an individual member and not of the firm.
In the given case, partners Mr. Gautam and Mr. Mahaveer, put up a name board of the firm in both
offices but not in their respective residences.
Conclusion: Thus, Mr. Gautam and Mr. Mahaveer are guilty of misconduct. Distance given in the
question is not relevant for deciding.
129 (MARCH 2022 MTP)
M/s Head Limited, had recently issued right shares for all the existing shareholders. The total proceeds
collected amounted to Rs. 200 crore, out of which 50 % was planned to be used for construction of a
new factory next to the existing one and the balance was to be used for working capital purpose.
However, due to the Covid-19 pandemic, the proposed factory work was affected and hence the
company decided to park 9% of the specific fund in a debt mutual fund instead of keeping it idle.
Similarly, the company decided to park 11% of the working capital fund in government securities.
M/s Legs Limited, an unlisted associate entity of Head Limited had similarly raised funds through
qualified institutional placement & used the funds fully for the specified purpose. The auditor of the
Legs Limited (Mr. G, partner of M/s GK & Associates) and the auditor of Head Limited (Mr. Q, partner
of M/s CYQ & Associates) suggested that they shall mandatorily disclose the details of utilization of
funds, as per SEBI LODR Regulation 32.
However, Mr. C, one of the partners of M/s CYQ & Associates argued that there is no need to report
the above matter under SEBI LODR Regulations, but the same shall be reported under CARO 2020. Mr.
Q argued that the matter need not be reported under CARO 2020. This argument had spoiled the
relationship between the two partners, as a result of which, Mr. C decided to quit from the partnership
and started his own practice.
Mr. C then decided to induct Mr. J, a newly qualified Chartered Accountant as a partner in his firm.
After this, the firm got an audit assignment from M/s Bank Limited. Mr. C consulted with his partner
whether to accept the offer. Mr. J told that he has a loan (amounting to 75% of FD) against fixed
deposit (of Rs.6.8 lakh) in the said bank and feared that they cannot accept the offer. However, Mr. C
told that since the loan is against fixed deposit there is no problem in taking up the offer, but he didn’t
want to force Mr. J in giving his acceptance. Therefore, the offer was dropped.
Few months later, Mr. C passed away and the whole firm was managed by his partner Mr. J. The legal
representative of Mr. C (Mrs. C) quoted the partnership agreement clause regarding the right of legal
880
representative of the deceased partner to receive share of profit from the firm and requested for such

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
share of profit. However, Mr. J informed that there is no such provision as per the Chartered
Accountants Act and denied to share any profits/ revenue from the firm. Agitated by the decision of
Mr. J, Mrs. C filed a complaint with the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India against Mr. J.
1. Is the advice of Mr. Q correct in case of Head Limited? If yes what are the details which need to be
disclosed by the company?
(a)Yes. The company shall indicate the deviations in use of proceeds and category wise variation
between projected utilization and actual utilization.
(b)No. There is no need to indicate the statement since such deviations were due to Covid-19
pandemic.
(c)Yes. The company shall indicate the deviations in use of proceeds in form of an explanatory
statement.
(d)Yes. The company shall indicate the % of deviation if such deviation is more than 10% of the total
funds allotted for the specified purpose. Hence, the company shall indicate only the deviation in
utilization funds allocated for working capital purpose.
2.In case if Head Limited is to report the deviation in use of funds, at what interval should it report the
same?
(a)Disclose it every year in its Annual Report
(b)Biannual reporting
(c)Every quarter
(d)Monthly reporting, till the funds are fully utilised.
3.Assuming yourself as the auditor of Head Limited, what would be your stand on reporting the
deviation in utilization of funds under CARO 2020?
(a)There is no need to report the matter under CARO, since such deviations were due to Covid -19
pandemic.
(b)The matter should be reported under CARO, under clause (xi)(a)
(c)The matter should be reported under CARO, under clause (x)
(d)The matter should be reported under CARO, under clause (xvi)(b)

881

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
4.In the above case, is the act of Mr. J to deny share of profits to legal representative of Mr. C right?
What is the relevant provision of the Chartered Accountants Act which you need to refer in this case?
(a)Mr. J has no right to deny the share of profit since it is given in the partnership agreement. The
relevant provision to be considered here is Clause 2 of Part I of First Schedule of Chartered
Accountants Act.
(b)Mr. J has all right to deny the share of profit since it shall lead to professional misconduct. The
relevant provision to be considered here is clause 2 of Part I of First Schedule of Chartered Accountants
Act.
(c)Mr. J has no right to deny the share of profit since it is given in the partnership agreement. The
relevant provision to be considered here is Clause 4 of Part I of First Schedule of Chartered
Accountants Act.
(d)Mr. J is correct in denying the share of profit. Though the same is mentioned in the agreement, it is
against the provisions of Chartered Accountants Act. The relevant provision to be considered here is
Clause 1 of Part II of Second Schedule.
5.Had the firm accepted the audit assignment of Bank Limited, would it have led to invalid
appointment as per the Companies Act, 2013? If yes, under what provision?
(a)No. As explained by Mr. C, since the loan was against a fixed deposit (loan against a collateral)
appoint of the firm would not be void had they accepted the offer.
(b)Yes. The acceptance of the offer would have led to invalid appointment of the firm as per the
section 141(3)(d)(ii) of the Companies Act, 2013.
(c)Yes. The acceptance of the offer would have led to invalid appointment of the firm as per the section
141(3)(d)(iii) of the Companies Act, 2013.
(d)Yes. The acceptance of the offer would have led to professional to invalid appointment of the firm
as per the section 141(3)(c)(ii) of the Companies Act, 2013.
ANSWER :
1. (a)
2. (c)
3. (c)
4. (a)
5. (b)
882
130 ( MARCH 2022MTP)

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
M/s Audit & Co. were appointed as internal auditors of M/s Manufacturing Limited, whose shares were
held by Mr. F, Mrs. F, Mr. S & Ms. D in equal proportion.
CA Senior and his articled assistant Mr. Junior were a part of the team which was looking after the
above assignment. As a part of the work, Mr. Junior was required to take care of the P2P internal
controls established to ensure the three-way match is properly functioning. Being new to internal
audit, he asked from help from a fellow team member regarding the above matter.
After completion of the audit, the firm submitted its report directly to the Board of Directors of the
company. A copy of the same was also sent to the company’s statutory auditors. The report had clearly
mentioned that the existing internal audit system in the company was not commensurate with its size
and nature of business.
Following this, the company offered the assignment of Tax Audit to M/s Audit & Co. itself. All the
partners were happy to accept the offer, except CA New, an ex-articled assistant and newly inducted
partner of the firm. He was of the opinion that if the above offer was accepted, it would lead to
professional misconduct under the Chartered Accountants Act. However, despite his advice, the firm
went on to accept the offer.
After the above incident, CA New resigned from the firm and started his own practice as a sole
proprietor. Few days after the resignation of CA New, the following things happened:
(i)M/s Audit & Co. had advertised the changes in partnership of the firm, by limiting the ad to a bare
statement of facts and consideration given to the appropriateness of the area of distribution of the
magazine.
(ii)CA New issued a classified advertisement in the newsletter of the Institute, for seeking partnership.
The ad contained his name, phone number and addresses of Social Networking sites.
1.Assuming yourself to be a fellow team member of Mr. Junior, explain him what is a three-way match
internal control involved in P2P process.
(a)Matching of Purchase order, Sales order & Invoice raised to ensure all ordered quantity of intended
goods have been invoiced and proper control over quantity of inventory is maintained.
(b)Matching of Sales order, Goods delivery note & invoice to ensure all ordered quantity of intended
goods have been delivered and invoiced accordingly.
(c)Matching of Sales order, Invoice & Payment receipt details to ensure all ordered quantity of
intended goods have been invoiced and payment for the same is received.
883

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
(d)Matching of Purchase order, Goods receipt note & invoice to ensure all ordered quantity of
intended goods have been received and invoiced accordingly.
2.Assuming yourself to be the statutory auditors of the company, would you need to mention about
the details in the internal audit under CARO 2020? If yes, under what clause should it be mentioned?
(a)The above matter should be reported under clause (xiv) of CARO 2020
(b)The above matter need not be reported under CARO, but it shall be reported under Emphasis of
Matter Paragraph as per SA 706.
(c)The above matter should be reported under clause (xviii) of CARO 2020
(d)The above matter should be reported under clause (xv) of CARO 2020
3.From the above information that M/s Manufacturing Limited appointed an internal auditor, what
could you infer about their Paid-up share capital, outstanding deposit & turnover?
(a)Paid up share capital of ≥ 40 crore Outstanding deposits > 20 crore; Turnover ≥ 190 crore
(b)Paid up share capital of ≥ 25 crore Outstanding deposits ≥ 25 crore; Turnover ≥ 100 crore
(c)Paid up share capital of ≥ 50 crore Outstanding deposits ≥ 25 crore; Turnover ≥ 200 crore
(d)Paid up share capital of ≥ 45 crore Outstanding deposits ≥ 15 crore; Turnover > 100 crore
4.Will accepting the Tax Audit offer lead to professional misconduct? If yes, as per which clause?
(a)No. There will be no professional misconduct on the firm, if it accepts the offer.
(b)Yes. By accepting the offer, the firm will be guilty of professional misconduct as per clause 4 of Part I
of Second Schedule read along with Council Guidelines.
(c)Yes. By accepting the offer, the firm will be guilty of professional misconduct as per clause 12 of Part
I of First Schedule.
(d)Yes. By accepting the offer, the firm will be guilty of professional misconduct as per clause 2 of Part I
of Second Schedule read along with Council guidelines.
5.Comment on following incidents (i) & (ii) discussed in the scenario from the perspective of
Professional Ethics as per the Chartered Accountants Act.
(i)M/s Audit & Co. had advertised the changes in partnership of the firm, by limiting the ad to a bare
statement of facts and consideration given to the appropriateness of the area of distribution of the
magazine.
(ii)CA New issued a classified advertisement in the newsletter of the Institute, for seeking partnership.
884
The ad contained his name, phone number and addresses of Social Networking sites.

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
(a)Incident (ii) makes CA New guilty of professional misconduct, since he is advertising for seeking
partnership.
(b)Neither of the incidents violate any provisions of Chartered Accountants Act. Hence, there is no
professional misconduct.
(c)Incident (i) makes M/s Audit & Co. firm guilty of professional misconduct, as the advertisement is
published in newspaper other than that issued by the Institute.
(d)Incident (ii) makes CA New guilty of professional misconduct, since he has provided the addresses of
his social networking sites.
ANSWER :
1. (d)
2. (a)
3. (c)
4. (b)
5. (b)
131 (APRIL 2022 MTP)
Shripal Company got a show cause notice from State Pollution Control Board for the contravention of
the provisions of Hazardous and waste Management Rule. As per SA 250, the auditor shall perform the
audit procedures to help identify instances of non-compliance with other laws and regulations that
may have a material effect on the financial statements. As the audit team of the company became
aware of information concerning an instance of non-compliance with law, what would NOT be the
audit procedure to be performed?
(a)Understand the nature of the act and circumstances in which it has occurred and obtain further
information to evaluate the possible effect on the financial statement.
(b)Discuss the matter with management and if they do not provide sufficient information; and if the
effect of non-compliance seems to be material, legal advice may be obtained.
(c)Monitoring legal requirement and compliance with code of conduct and ensuring that operating
procedures are designed to assist in the prevention of non-compliance with law and regulation and
report accordingly.
(d)Evaluate the implication of non-compliance in relation to other aspects of audit including risk
assessment and reliability of written representation and take appropriate action.
885
ANSWER : ( C )

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
132(APRIL 2022 MTP)
While preparing the financial statement for the year ended on 31 March 2022, ABC Limited, a listed
entity, provided the below information:
Excerpt of Standalone Balance sheet of ABC Ltd as of 31 March 2022 (in Rs. Lakhs)
Particulars Note No As on As on
31.03.2022 31.03.2021
Equity and Liabilities
Current liabilities
(a) Financial Liabilities
(ii) Trade Payables: - 10
(A) total outstanding dues of micro enterprises and 300
small enterprises; and
(B) total outstanding dues of creditors other than 210
micro enterprises and small enterprises.
(iii) Other financial liabilities (other than those specified in
item (c)
Note 10: Ageing of Trade Payables
Particulars Ageing of Trade Payables (` in Lakhs)

Ageing Less than 3-5 More than Total Non- MSME Total
3 Year Years 5 Years MSME Trade Trade Trade
Payables Payables Payables
Undisputed 100 50 30 180 160 340
Disputed 10 20 0 30 40 70
Total 110 70 30 210 200 410
Additional Information:
1.Mr. A while performing the statutory audit of ABC Ltd identified that the total trade payables
reported in the Balance Sheet as of 31 March 2022 and the amount reported in Note 10: Ageing of
Trade Payables are different. Upon inquiry, management informed that the difference between both
amounts is the Intercompany Trade Payables which is eliminated as part of consolidation Adjustment.
Hence, there was no requirement to show intercompany Trade Payables in the ageing schedule. Mr. A
accepted the explanation and did not perform any further procedures to validate the explanation.
2.When Audit Committee inquired with Mr. A as to how they have verified and validated the
segregation of the trade payables, Mr. A replied that they purely relied upon the management
representation as there was no alternate procedure available to gather sufficient and appropriate audit
evidence to validate the said information. Moreover, they informed the management that they have
886
not qualified their audit opinion as they have relied in true faith upon management representation.

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
3.While performing the audit procedure to validate the Trade Payables ageing, Mr. A identified that
management has calculated the due date of trade payables from the end of 180 days from the date of
transaction. Mr. A found it appropriate based on the conservative approach.
4.Mr. A did not qualify his audit opinion on the financial statement prepared for the period ending on
31 March 2022 on any grounds. Also, Mr. A specified that :
“The financial statements for the year ended on 31 March 2022 give a true and fair view of the state of
affairs of the company, comply with the accounting standards notified under section 133 and are in the
form provided for the company in Schedule III of the Act”
5. While preparing the audit report Mr. A, provided the following information in Key Audit Matters.
Key Audit Matters How our audit addressed KAM
While auditing the Trade Payables, the auditor We have relied upon the assessment
identified that the trade payables balance includes performed by the management with
` 100 lakh payable to the intercompany which is respect to the litigation and disputed Trade
aged more than 3 years. Payables Balance.
Upon Inquiry with management, it was identified the Moreover, the amount is not material and
same amount is not paid on account of a dispute hence no further procedure other than
with respect to commercial terms. obtaining management representation was
performed on the said balance.
However, no such amount was outstanding as
receivable in the accounts statement shared by
Intercompany. The amount was already written off
by such an Intercompany in past years.
6. Other than the disputed trade payables disclosed, there were claims against the company
which were not yet acknowledged as debt. The aggregate amount and exposure for such claims
were Rs. 25 Lakh. As per an expert hired by the management, no amount is required to be
provided in books of accounts as in all the claims there are high chances that the decision will be in
favour of the company.
7. Following were the materiality levels decided by the auditor for the current period’s audit :
• Overall Materiality: Rs. 50 Lakh;
• Performance Materiality:Rs. 5 Lakh;
• Materiality for Aggregate Uncorrected Misstatement: Rs. 1 Lakh.
1. In the given situation whether Mr. A will be held guilty of professional Misconduct.
(a) Yes, Mr. A, is guilty of professional misconduct under Clause 7 of Part I of First Schedule.
(b) Yes, Mr. A, is guilty of professional misconduct under Clause 7 & 8 of Part I of First
Schedule.
(c) Yes, Mr. A, is guilty of professional misconduct under Clause 7 & 8 of Part I of the Second
887
Schedule.

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
(d) No, Mr. A is not guilty of professional misconduct as he has performed all the audit
procedures appropriately.
2. Whether Financial statements given in the scenario are in confirmation with the
requirements of Division II of Schedule III?
(a) Yes, the financial statements are in confirmation with requirements mentioned in Division II
of Schedule III
(b) No, management should have eliminated the Intercompany Trade Payables balance from
the amount disclosed in the Standalone Balance Sheet. This will bring Note 10: Ageing Schedule
and Standalone Balance Sheet in alignment.
(c) No, Management should not have disclosed the disputed trade payables less than 3 years
as these trade payables are still under the period of limitation as per Limitation Act and they
should not be disclosed in Financial Statement.
(d) No, management should have added the Intercompany Trade Payables balance to the
ageing schedule. This will bring Note 10: Ageing Schedule and Standalone Balance Sheet in
alignment.
3. In continuation to MCQ no 12, what is an appropriate way to report the above-mentioned
issues?
(a) Mr. A should have expressed a modified opinion if he was not able to gather appropriate &
sufficient audit evidence to validate the disputed trade payables. Moreover, he should have
modified or issued an adverse opinion as Financial Statements were not in confirmation with
requirements of Division II of Schedule III.
(b) Mr. A should have expressed an unmodified opinion if he was not able to gather
appropriate & sufficient audit evidence to validate the intercompany trade payables. Moreover, he
should have been unmodified as Financial Statements were not in confirmation with requirements
of Division II of Schedule III.
(c) Mr. A should have expressed an unmodified opinion as per SA 700, as he was able to obtain
all the explanation and information required and sought by him. Moreover, he should have
modified it as the Cash Flow Statement was not in confirmation with the requirements of
(d) Mr. A should have reported matters related to Trade Payables Ageing as a qualification in
Key Audit Matters, as he was not able to obtain all the explanation and information required and
sought by him.
4. Whether the reporting performed by Mr. A related to intercompany trade payables under
the paragraph/section of Key Audit Matter in the audit report appropriate? Select from the below
option to support your answer.
(a) Mr. A should have expressed an unmodified opinion if he was not able to gather
appropriate & sufficient audit evidence to validate the disputed intercompany trade payables. As
per SA 701, those matters that, in the auditor’s professional judgment, were of most significance
in the audit of the financial statements of the current period are Key Audit Matters. The auditor
shall not communicate a matter in the Key Audit Matters section of the auditor’s report when the
888

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
auditor would be required to modify the opinion in accordance with SA 705 (Revised) as a result of
t he matter.
(b) Mr. A should have expressed a modified opinion if he was not able to gather appropriate &
sufficient audit evidence to validate the disputed intercompany trade payables. As per SA 701,
those matters that, in the auditor’s professional judgment, were of most significance in the audit
of the financial statements of the current period are Key Audit Matters. The auditor shall not
communicate a matter in the Key Audit Matters section of the auditor’s report when the auditor
would be required to modify the opinion in accordance with SA 705 (Revised) as a result of the
matter.
(c) Mr. A should have expressed an unmodified opinion if he was not able to gather
appropriate & sufficient audit evidence to validate the disputed intercompany trade payables. As
per SA 701, the auditor shall report the matter in Key Audit Matters in the auditor’s report when
the auditor concludes that, based on the audit evidence obtained, the financial statements as a
whole are not free from material misstatement or the auditor is unable to obtain sufficient
appropriate audit evidence to conclude that the financial statements as a whole are free from
material misstatement.
(d) The auditor shall express an adverse opinion and report the said matter in Key Audit Matter
Para when the auditor, having obtained sufficient appropriate audit evidence, concludes that
misstatements, individually or in the aggregate, are both material and pervasive to the financial
statements. In the current case, the auditor has appropriately disclosed the said matter in Key
Audit Matter Paragraph.
5. As per the expert appointed by the Auditor, the exposure for the company can be Rs. 20
lacs as in past in similar cases, the judgement was delivered against the company. However, the
management of ABC Limited was of the view that when management has already hired an expert,
then there is no need to hire another expert by the auditor. Seeking your advice, kindly guide the
auditor by selecting the below option, and what next steps should perform.
(a) The auditor shall design and perform audit procedures in order to identify litigation and
claims involving the entity which may give rise to a risk of material misstatement. Also, if expertise
in a field other than accounting or auditing is necessary to obtain sufficient appropriate audit
evidence, the auditor shall determine whether to use the work of an auditor’s expert. Hence
auditor can appoint his expert to validate the assumption and estimate performed by the
management’s expert.
(b) The auditor shall rely upon the work performed by the management’s expert. Management
expert will be equivalent to the auditor’s expert and hence no other expert is required to be
appointed.
(c) The auditor shall not rely upon the management’s expert unless he evaluates the adequacy
of the expert’s work for the auditor’s purposes, including the relevance and reasonableness of that
expert’s findings or conclusions, and their consistency with other audit evidence. Although in the
current case, there is no consonance between the management’s expert’s findings and other audit
evidence, the auditor is still required to rely upon the findings of the management’s expert.
889

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
(d) The auditor shall rely upon the management’s expert without evaluating the adequacy of
the expert’s work for the auditor’s purposes, including the relevance and reasonableness of that
expert’s findings or conclusions, and their consistency with other audit evidence. Hence auditor is
required to rely upon the findings of management’s expert in the current case.
ANSWER :
1. (c)
2. (d)
3. (a)
4. (b)
5. (a)
133 (MAY 2022 RTP)

CA Sheetal is contesting Central Council Elections of Institute, engages his Articled Assistant for his
election campaigning promising him that he will come in contact with influential people which will
help to enhance his career after completion of his training period. Comment on the action of CA.
Sheetal with reference to the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949 and Schedules thereto.
ANSWER :
Other Misconduct: CA Sheetal has engaged his Articled Assistant for his election campaigning for
the Central Council elections of ICAI.
This aspect is covered under ‘Other Misconduct’ which has been defined in Part IV of the First
Schedule and Part III of the Second Schedule. These provisions empower the Council even if it does
not arise out of his professional work. This is considered necessary because a Chartered
Accountant is expected to maintain the highest standards of integrity even in his personal affairs
and any deviation from these standards, even in his non-professional work, would expose him to
disciplinary action.
Thus, when a Chartered Accountant uses the services of his Articled Assistant for purposes other
than professional practice, he is found guilty under ‘Other Misconduct’.
Hence, CA Sheetal is guilty of 'Other Misconduct'.
134(MAY 2022 RTP)

Mr. B one of the partners of the firm is facing a dilemma as to whether the firm BMY LLP should
accept the appointment as Statutory Auditors of M/s Foam Limited wherein Mr. B had sent a
communication in writing addressed to the outgoing auditor Mr. Dalai under certificate of posting
and the outgoing auditor has sent an acknowledgement vide their official email, but this email
address of the outgoing auditor is not registered with the Institute of Chartered Accountants of
India. Mr. B is of the opinion that this is not positive evidence of delivery and violates the
provisions of Code of Ethics if the firm accepts the audit assignment.
With respect to the dilemma being faced by Mr. B, partner of the firm regarding acknowledgment
of the communication from the retiring auditor's vide their official email is not positive evidence of
890
delivery?

for free resources
CA Ravi Agarwal’s
(a) The dilemma of Mr. B is correct as it is not positive evidence of delivery.

(b) The dilemma of Mr. B is not correct as it is positive evidence of delivery as the same is
received from the official email of the outgoing auditor, as per the Code of Ethics.
(c) The dilemma of Mr. B is not correct as statutory auditors are not required to
communicate with the retiring or outgoing auditors in this case.
(d) The dilemma of Mr. B is correct as the email address of the outgoing auditor from which
acknowledgement has come is not registered with the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India
ANSWER : B
891

for free resources

Audit

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Audit

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Audit

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

AUDIT

PAPER – 3: ADVANCED AUDITING AND PROFESSIONAL ETHICS

+91-8334866117 or visit http://www.caraviagarwal.com| Join our Telegram Channel https://t.me/caraviagarwaloriginal

+91-8334866117 or visit http://www.caraviagarwal.com| Join our Telegram Channel https://t.me/caraviagarwaloriginal

SA 200 – Overall Objectives of the Independent Auditor and the

1. ( JULY 2021 PAPER)

+91-8334866117 or visit http://www.caraviagarwal.com| Join our Telegram Channel https://t.me/caraviagarwaloriginal

(i) Fraud, particularly fraud involving senior management or collusion.

2. ( MTP- NOV 2021)

+91-8334866117 or visit http://www.caraviagarwal.com| Join our Telegram Channel https://t.me/caraviagarwaloriginal

(iii) Change in Circumstances - Another factor contributing towards variation in planning

2A (APRIL 2022 MTP)

responsibly in the engagement letter, as produced below:-

Accordance with Standards on Auditing”, the auditor is required:-

+91-8334866117 or visit http://www.caraviagarwal.com| Join our Telegram Channel https://t.me/caraviagarwaloriginal

• The nature of financial reporting;

• The nature of audit procedures; and

SA 210 – Agreeing to the terms of audit engagement

+91-8334866117 or visit http://www.caraviagarwal.com| Join our Telegram Channel https://t.me/caraviagarwaloriginal

to obtain audit evidence.

4. MTP-Apr-19 Qn No 5(a) 4 Marks:

+91-8334866117 or visit http://www.caraviagarwal.com| Join our Telegram Channel https://t.me/caraviagarwaloriginal

5. May 2019 Qn no 2(c) 5 Marks

A professional accountant in public practice is always subject to various threats in compliance

Engagement-specific safeguards in the work environment may include:

6.(RTP Nov’2020 Q No 13(a))

+91-8334866117 or visit http://www.caraviagarwal.com| Join our Telegram Channel https://t.me/caraviagarwaloriginal

(ii) The responsibilities of the auditor;

(iii) The responsibilities of management;

7. ( MTP- NOV 2021)

+91-8334866117 or visit http://www.caraviagarwal.com| Join our Telegram Channel https://t.me/caraviagarwaloriginal

7A(SEPT 2022 MTP)

(ii) The responsibilities of the auditor;

(iii) The responsibilities of management;

SA 220 - Quality Control for an Audit of Financial Statements

+91-8334866117 or visit http://www.caraviagarwal.com| Join our Telegram Channel https://t.me/caraviagarwaloriginal

9. MTP Oct 2019 Qn no 19 (2 Marks)

10. RTP Nov 2019 Qn no 7 and Study Material

+91-8334866117 or visit http://www.caraviagarwal.com| Join our Telegram Channel https://t.me/caraviagarwaloriginal

11. MTP Mar 2019 Qn no 18 (2 Marks)

+91-8334866117 or visit http://www.caraviagarwal.com| Join our Telegram Channel https://t.me/caraviagarwaloriginal

+91-8334866117 or visit http://www.caraviagarwal.com| Join our Telegram Channel https://t.me/caraviagarwaloriginal

13.MTP-OCT-18 Qn No 1(a) 5 Marks:

+91-8334866117 or visit http://www.caraviagarwal.com| Join our Telegram Channel https://t.me/caraviagarwaloriginal

14. RTP May 2019 Qn no 11(C), MTP-OCT-19 Qn No 6(c) 4 Marks:

15. (PAST EXAM MAY 2018)

+91-8334866117 or visit http://www.caraviagarwal.com| Join our Telegram Channel https://t.me/caraviagarwaloriginal

(i) Self-interest threat from self-review threat in an Assurance Engagement

(ii) Reasonable Assurance Engagement from Limited Assurance Engagement

Circumstances that may create self-interest threats

Examples of circumstances that may create self-review threats

(ii) Reasonable Assurance Engagement and Limited Assurance Engagement :

Limited Assurance Reasonable Assurance

+91-8334866117 or visit http://www.caraviagarwal.com| Join our Telegram Channel https://t.me/caraviagarwaloriginal

2 In obtaining an understanding of the In obtaining an understanding of the

15A(OCT 2022 MTP)

+91-8334866117 or visit http://www.caraviagarwal.com| Join our Telegram Channel https://t.me/caraviagarwaloriginal

15B (MAY 2022 RTP)