LARSEN & TOUBRO LIMITED

THERMAL POWER PLANT CONSTRUCTION

Ref: PM 01 A Rev 03
HIRA REGISTER

Name of the Job Site: 2x600MW ITPCL Power Project,Cuddalore Date: 14/05/13
HIRA No: L&T /ESP/001 Assessment
Team: EV/SKR/KCD
Name of the Main Activity Pre- Assembly of Hopper
Risk Additional Residual Risk
considering Control After applying
existing Measures to Additional Action By
R control bring Risk to Control
/ measures ALARP Level Measures
N (A-Elimination, Safe work
Sl. R Existing Control Measures B-Substitution, method

Probability Rating
Probability Rating
Sub Activity Hazard Risk

Impact Rating

Impact Rating
No / (As per company defined procedure) C- (Give only

Risk Level

Risk Level
E Engineering, the Doc no)
/ D-Signage
L /Warning/
Administrative,
E- PPEs
usage )

 Stacking below 01 meter height

 Injury to person  Sufficiently prevent from falling or slippage
Material  Property  No lateral pulling or dragging EXECUTION
 1 Stacking R Improper Stacking damage  Area barricaded & illuminated, Signage 2 1 L  A,B,C,D,E 1 1 L
hopper plate  Stacking as per the priority SWM 1&2
 Sharp edge covered
 Use of PPEs

R
Severity of Aspect (Impact)
: Routine
Value Description NR: Non Routine
Massive effect

5
E : Emergency
1. Persistent severe environmental damage or severe nuisance extending over a large area
2. Hi terms of commercial or recreational use or natural conservation
3. A major economic loss for the company
L : Legal Requirement
4. Constant and or highly exceeding statutory or prescribed limits
Major effect
RISK ASSESSMENT MATRIX
1. Severe environmental damage.
4 2. The company is required to take extensive measures to restore polluted or damaged ICONSEQUENCE
MPACT
environment to its original state.
3. Exceeding statutory or prescribed limits. 1 2 3 4 5

Localised effect
1. Limited loss of discharges to known toxicity 1

3 2. Repeated exceed of statutory or prescribed limit

P
3. Affecting neighbourhood R
4. Spontaneous recovery of limited damage within one year O
2 LOW RISK
B
Minor effect A

2
1. Contamination damage sufficiently to attack the environment B 3 MEDIUM RISK
2. Single exceed of statutory or prescribed criterion I
L
3. Single complaint. No permanent effect on environment I
Slight effect T
4 HIGH RISK
1. Local environmental damage. Y
1
2. Within the fence and within systems. 5
3. Negligible financial consequences.
 LARSEN & TOUBRO LIMITED
THERMAL POWER PLANT CONSTRUCTION
Ref: PM 01 A Rev 03
HIRA REGISTER
 Property EXECUTION
damage  Area permit
 Electrocution  Operator is trained & holding valid license &
 Injury to person fit for the job
 Fall of material  Path is free from any obstacles
R SWM 08
 Imbalance  Hit to nearby  Marching path is identified
Crane objects  Escorts is available
2 Movement  Improper 2 3 M A,B,C,D,E 1 1 L
approach escorting/  Toppling  Boom is in down position
Signaling  Hook is in locked position & no oscillation
 Reverse horn is working
 Availability of bunting pole to caution from
Overhead power cables
 Power cut off during movement

 Falling of  Injury to  Use of PPE

person person
 Before lifting, the load will be checked to
 Failure of  Damage to ensure that it is secure
lifting tools & equipment A,B,C,D,E
tackles  Signal man in place
Hopper plate  Toppling of
R  Falling of crane  SWL of tools & tackles be ensured for the SWM 01&02
3 Loading load lifting with competent person certification
/Unloading equipment 3 2 M
2 2 L EXECUTION /
 Unbalancing  Using Tag line
P&M
of cranes  Lifting of load as per load
 Chart specification

------------------------------ ---------------------------
HSEM
CM/SECTION HEAD

R
Severity of Aspect (Impact)
: Routine
Value Description NR: Non Routine
Massive effect

5
E : Emergency
1. Persistent severe environmental damage or severe nuisance extending over a large area
2. Hi terms of commercial or recreational use or natural conservation
3. A major economic loss for the company
L : Legal Requirement
4. Constant and or highly exceeding statutory or prescribed limits
Major effect
RISK ASSESSMENT MATRIX
1. Severe environmental damage.
4 2. The company is required to take extensive measures to restore polluted or damaged ICONSEQUENCE
MPACT
environment to its original state.
3. Exceeding statutory or prescribed limits. 1 2 3 4 5

Localised effect
1. Limited loss of discharges to known toxicity 1

3 2. Repeated exceed of statutory or prescribed limit

P
3. Affecting neighbourhood R
4. Spontaneous recovery of limited damage within one year O
2 LOW RISK
B
Minor effect A

2
1. Contamination damage sufficiently to attack the environment B 3 MEDIUM RISK
2. Single exceed of statutory or prescribed criterion I
L
3. Single complaint. No permanent effect on environment I
Slight effect T
4 HIGH RISK
1. Local environmental damage. Y
1
2. Within the fence and within systems. 5
3. Negligible financial consequences.
 LARSEN & TOUBRO LIMITED
THERMAL POWER PLANT CONSTRUCTION
Ref: PM 01 A Rev 03
HIRA REGISTER

Name of the Job Site: 2x600MW ITPCL Power Project, Cuddalore Date: 14/05/13
HIRA No: L&T /ESP/001 Assessment
Team: EV/SKR/KCD
Name of the Main Activity ERECTION OF HOPPER & STRUCTURE
Additional Residual Risk
Risk
Control After applying
considering
Measures to Additional
R existing control
bring Risk to Control
/ measures Safe work
ALARP Level Measures
N Existing Control Measures method
Sl. (A-Elimination,
Sub Activity R Hazard Risk (As per company defined Action By

Impact Rating

Impact Rating
No B-Substitution, (Give only
/ procedure)

Probability

Probability
Risk Level

Risk Level
C-Engineering, the Doc no)

Rating

Rating
E
D-Signage
/L
/Warning/
Administrative,
E- PPEs usage )
 Electrocution
 Damage of  Signal man in place
underground  If soil load bearing capacity is
pipe lines SWM - 08
less, Sal wood sleepers or  Clearance for
R  Over head power
 Toppling of metal plates will be used while underground SWM-09 EXECUTION
lines
POSITIONING crane handling crawler-mounted services. / P&M
 Underground cranes
 1 OF CRAWLER services  Outriggers will be fully extended
3 3 M  Avoiding of 2 2 L
CRANE shortcuts
 Unstable/soft during lifting operation and the
ground base of the hydraulic jacks
packed with sleepers if the load
bearing capacity of the ground
is not adequate

R
Severity of Aspect (Impact)
: Routine
Value Description NR: Non Routine
Massive effect

5
E : Emergency
1. Persistent severe environmental damage or severe nuisance extending over a large area
2. Hi terms of commercial or recreational use or natural conservation
3. A major economic loss for the company
L : Legal Requirement
4. Constant and or highly exceeding statutory or prescribed limits
Major effect
RISK ASSESSMENT MATRIX
1. Severe environmental damage.
4 2. The company is required to take extensive measures to restore polluted or damaged ICONSEQUENCE
MPACT
environment to its original state.
3. Exceeding statutory or prescribed limits. 1 2 3 4 5

Localised effect
1. Limited loss of discharges to known toxicity 1

3 2. Repeated exceed of statutory or prescribed limit

P
3. Affecting neighbourhood R
4. Spontaneous recovery of limited damage within one year O
2 LOW RISK
B
Minor effect A

2
1. Contamination damage sufficiently to attack the environment B 3 MEDIUM RISK
2. Single exceed of statutory or prescribed criterion I
L
3. Single complaint. No permanent effect on environment I
Slight effect T
4 HIGH RISK
1. Local environmental damage. Y
1
2. Within the fence and within systems. 5
3. Negligible financial consequences.
 LARSEN & TOUBRO LIMITED
THERMAL POWER PLANT CONSTRUCTION
Ref: PM 01 A Rev 03
HIRA REGISTER
 Injury to person
 Falling of person  Use of PPE  Keeping the
 Damage to Trailer in
 Failure of lifting equipment  Before lifting, the load will be stable
tools & tackles checked to ensure that it is
 Toppling of position
 Falling of secure
crane  Avoiding
UNLOADING OF R equipment  Signal man in place unwanted
STRUCTURAL &  Unbalancing of  SWL of tools & tackles be 3 2 M person near SWM-08 &
 2 HOPPER EXECUTION /
cranes ensured for the load lifting with by the activity SWM-09
FROM TRAILOR P&M
competent person certification 2 2 L
BY CRANE
 Using Tag line
 Lifting of load as per load
 Chart specification

 Injury to person
 Toppling of  Use of PPE
 Falling of loose crane
 Crushing of  Before lifting, the load will be  Cleaning of
materials checked to ensure that it is
fingers and leg equipment
 Failure of lifting secure before lifting
tools & tackles
ERECTION OF R  Unbalancing of  Signal man in place 3 2 M  Barricading SWM-08 &
of crane SWM-09 EXECUTION
STRUCTURAL & cranes  SWL of tools & tackles be
3 HOPPER BY  Injury during ensured for the load lifting with
swing area 2 2 L / P&M
 Avoiding
CRANE positioning competent person certification
unwanted
 Using Tag line person near
 Lifting of load as per load chart by the activity
specification
 Engaging Skilled workmen

4 Alignment of R  Falling of  Injury to person  Adequate access A,B,C,D,E 3 1 L

Columns after person  Property  Access to be checked and
box formation  Falling of Damage maintained clear.

R
Severity of Aspect (Impact)
: Routine
Value Description NR: Non Routine
Massive effect

5
E : Emergency
1. Persistent severe environmental damage or severe nuisance extending over a large area
2. Hi terms of commercial or recreational use or natural conservation
3. A major economic loss for the company
L : Legal Requirement
4. Constant and or highly exceeding statutory or prescribed limits
Major effect
RISK ASSESSMENT MATRIX
1. Severe environmental damage.
4 2. The company is required to take extensive measures to restore polluted or damaged ICONSEQUENCE
MPACT
environment to its original state.
3. Exceeding statutory or prescribed limits. 1 2 3 4 5

Localised effect
1. Limited loss of discharges to known toxicity 1

3 2. Repeated exceed of statutory or prescribed limit

P
3. Affecting neighbourhood R
4. Spontaneous recovery of limited damage within one year O
2 LOW RISK
B
Minor effect A

2
1. Contamination damage sufficiently to attack the environment B 3 MEDIUM RISK
2. Single exceed of statutory or prescribed criterion I
L
3. Single complaint. No permanent effect on environment I
Slight effect T
4 HIGH RISK
1. Local environmental damage. Y
1
2. Within the fence and within systems. 5
3. Negligible financial consequences.
 LARSEN & TOUBRO LIMITED
THERMAL POWER PLANT CONSTRUCTION
Ref: PM 01 A Rev 03
HIRA REGISTER
 Ensuring Skilled workmen for
material the activity 3 2 M SWM- EXECUTION
 Area barricading 11,12,13
 Use of PPE
 Use of fall arrester
 Preparatory talk before starting
the work
 Use Hook chook

 Injury to person  Holding of

 Material scaffold
damage material till
erection
 Use of Fall
R 3 2 M arrester SWM-05 EXECUTION
 Collapse of
scaffolding  Scaffold erection to be done  Ensure entire
under supervision of Certified scaffold joints
 Falling of are ok &
scaffold inspector
material scaffold is
 Erection of scaffolds as per the
 5 SCAFFOLDING locked with 1 2 L
standard dimension
firm
 Area barricading structure.
 Use of PPE  Imparting
 Use of tag refresher
training for
the
workmen
on
continuous
basis 
Fixing of ladder  Slippage of  Fall of material
6 & platform
 Work permit A,B,C,D,E 2 1 L
material
R
Severity of Aspect (Impact)
: Routine
Value Description NR: Non Routine
Massive effect

5
E : Emergency
1. Persistent severe environmental damage or severe nuisance extending over a large area
2. Hi terms of commercial or recreational use or natural conservation
3. A major economic loss for the company
L : Legal Requirement
4. Constant and or highly exceeding statutory or prescribed limits
Major effect
RISK ASSESSMENT MATRIX
1. Severe environmental damage.
4 2. The company is required to take extensive measures to restore polluted or damaged ICONSEQUENCE
MPACT
environment to its original state.
3. Exceeding statutory or prescribed limits. 1 2 3 4 5

Localised effect
1. Limited loss of discharges to known toxicity 1

3 2. Repeated exceed of statutory or prescribed limit

P
3. Affecting neighbourhood R
4. Spontaneous recovery of limited damage within one year O
2 LOW RISK
B
Minor effect A

2
1. Contamination damage sufficiently to attack the environment B 3 MEDIUM RISK
2. Single exceed of statutory or prescribed criterion I
L
3. Single complaint. No permanent effect on environment I
Slight effect T
4 HIGH RISK
1. Local environmental damage. Y
1
2. Within the fence and within systems. 5
3. Negligible financial consequences.
 LARSEN & TOUBRO LIMITED
THERMAL POWER PLANT CONSTRUCTION
Ref: PM 01 A Rev 03
HIRA REGISTER
 Fall of person  Use of PPE
 Injury to person  Adequate access & fall
 Property damage protection EXECUTION
 Tilting  Area to be barricaded 2 3 M
 Bulge  Proper holding till fit up work SWM
 Sharp edges  Proper locking for incomplete 03,04,05&06
work
 Floor opening
 Hard barricading around the
 Improper locking
gap / opening between two
grating
 Heavy load not kept for
preventing from bulging
 Avoid overlapping
R  Fall of material  Work permit
 Fall of person  Use of PPE
 Slippage of  Injury to person  Adequate access & fall
material  Property damage protection EXECUTION
Fixing of lifeline  Tilting  Proper holding till fit up work 2 3 M SWM 10,11
7 & safety nets  Stack by the  Proper locking for incomplete A,B,C,D,E 2 1 L
safety net work
 Improper tying  Hard barricading around the
gap / opening between two
grating
 Avoid overlapping /Gap

8 Handling of R  A,B,C,D,E  1 1  L 
Grouting  Chemical  Ill health  Use of Nose mask, Rubber
 Suspending  Injury to hand gloves
particles person  Coverall
 Work area barricading
 Life line
R
Severity of Aspect (Impact)
: Routine
Value Description NR: Non Routine
Massive effect

5
E : Emergency
1. Persistent severe environmental damage or severe nuisance extending over a large area
2. Hi terms of commercial or recreational use or natural conservation
3. A major economic loss for the company
L : Legal Requirement
4. Constant and or highly exceeding statutory or prescribed limits
Major effect
RISK ASSESSMENT MATRIX
1. Severe environmental damage.
4 2. The company is required to take extensive measures to restore polluted or damaged ICONSEQUENCE
MPACT
environment to its original state.
3. Exceeding statutory or prescribed limits. 1 2 3 4 5

Localised effect
1. Limited loss of discharges to known toxicity 1

3 2. Repeated exceed of statutory or prescribed limit

P
3. Affecting neighbourhood R
4. Spontaneous recovery of limited damage within one year O
2 LOW RISK
B
Minor effect A

2
1. Contamination damage sufficiently to attack the environment B 3 MEDIUM RISK
2. Single exceed of statutory or prescribed criterion I
L
3. Single complaint. No permanent effect on environment I
Slight effect T
4 HIGH RISK
1. Local environmental damage. Y
1
2. Within the fence and within systems. 5
3. Negligible financial consequences.
 LARSEN & TOUBRO LIMITED
THERMAL POWER PLANT CONSTRUCTION
Ref: PM 01 A Rev 03
HIRA REGISTER
 Use of PPE
3 2 M
EXECUTION
SWM-14
R  Injury to person  Use of PPE ERECTION
 A,B,C,D,E. SWM
 Crushing of  Safe access 11,16 INCHARGE
 Falling of loose
fingers and leg  Providing of life line with fall
materials
 Property damage. arrester
 Falling of person
  Usage of right tool for the job.
Removal of from height
9 ladder & platform  Safe handling of removed
 Failure of lifting
packing material. 3 2 M 3 1 L
tools & tackles
 Disposal of unwanted packing
materials from the workplace.
 Firefighting arrangement

_________________________ ____________________________________
Section Head HSEM

R
Severity of Aspect (Impact)
: Routine
Value Description NR: Non Routine
Massive effect

5
E : Emergency
1. Persistent severe environmental damage or severe nuisance extending over a large area
2. Hi terms of commercial or recreational use or natural conservation
3. A major economic loss for the company
L : Legal Requirement
4. Constant and or highly exceeding statutory or prescribed limits
Major effect
RISK ASSESSMENT MATRIX
1. Severe environmental damage.
4 2. The company is required to take extensive measures to restore polluted or damaged ICONSEQUENCE
MPACT
environment to its original state.
3. Exceeding statutory or prescribed limits. 1 2 3 4 5

Localised effect
1. Limited loss of discharges to known toxicity 1

3 2. Repeated exceed of statutory or prescribed limit

P
3. Affecting neighbourhood R
4. Spontaneous recovery of limited damage within one year O
2 LOW RISK
B
Minor effect A

2
1. Contamination damage sufficiently to attack the environment B 3 MEDIUM RISK
2. Single exceed of statutory or prescribed criterion I
L
3. Single complaint. No permanent effect on environment I
Slight effect T
4 HIGH RISK
1. Local environmental damage. Y
1
2. Within the fence and within systems. 5
3. Negligible financial consequences.
 LARSEN & TOUBRO LIMITED
THERMAL POWER PLANT CONSTRUCTION
Ref: PM 01 A Rev 03
HIRA REGISTER

Name of the Job Site: 2x600MW ITPCL Power Project ,Cuddalore Date: 14/05/13
HIRA No: L&T/ESP/001 Assessment Team:
EV/SKR/KCD
Name of the Main Activity Casing Pre assembly & Erection
Residual
Risk
Additional Control Risk After
considering
Measures to bring Risk applying
existing Action By
R/ to ALARP Level Additional Safe work
control
NR Existing Control Measures (A-Elimination, Control method
Sl. measures
Sub Activity /E Hazard Risk (As per company defined B-Substitution, Measures (Give only
No
/ procedure) C-Engineering, the Doc

Probability

Probability
Risk Level

Risk Level
L D-Signage /Warning/ no)

Impact

Impact
Rating

Rating
Administrative,
E- PPEs usage )

 Injury to  Stacking of plates below

person 1meter
 Improper  Property  Wooden sleepers to be
 Slip protection STORES/
stacking damage provide.
R  Imparting refresher SWM 10 EXECUTION
Stacking Of  Dumping  Stacking evenly
 1 2 2 L training for the 1  2  L ENGINEER
Casing Plates of metal
 Sharp edges covered workmen on
scrap
 Barricaded the area continuous basis 
 Use of PPEs
 Training to workmen
 2  Shifting Of  Improper  Falling  Area cordoned off  Use of additional 1  1 L 
R
Severity of Aspect (Impact)
: Routine
Value Description NR: Non Routine
Massive effect

5
E : Emergency
1. Persistent severe environmental damage or severe nuisance extending over a large area
2. Hi terms of commercial or recreational use or natural conservation
3. A major economic loss for the company
L : Legal Requirement
4. Constant and or highly exceeding statutory or prescribed limits
Major effect
RISK ASSESSMENT MATRIX
1. Severe environmental damage.
4 2. The company is required to take extensive measures to restore polluted or damaged ICONSEQUENCE
MPACT
environment to its original state.
3. Exceeding statutory or prescribed limits. 1 2 3 4 5

Localised effect
1. Limited loss of discharges to known toxicity 1

3 2. Repeated exceed of statutory or prescribed limit

P
3. Affecting neighbourhood R
4. Spontaneous recovery of limited damage within one year O
2 LOW RISK
B
Minor effect A

2
1. Contamination damage sufficiently to attack the environment B 3 MEDIUM RISK
2. Single exceed of statutory or prescribed criterion I
L
3. Single complaint. No permanent effect on environment I
Slight effect T
4 HIGH RISK
1. Local environmental damage. Y
1
2. Within the fence and within systems. 5
3. Negligible financial consequences.
 LARSEN & TOUBRO LIMITED
THERMAL POWER PLANT CONSTRUCTION
Ref: PM 01 A Rev 03
HIRA REGISTER
tying of of  Ensure Tying of pipes SWM 12
plates material correctly
slings
 Failure of  Fall of  Use of certified inspected tool
lifting person & tackles,  Inspection of Lifting
tools & tools & tackles.
 Injury to  Ensure fitness certificate of
Plates At R tackles person, 3 2 M  Gathering of minimum EXECUTION
lifting equipment
Different  Malfunctio  Property persons ENGINEER /
 Authorized operator & signal P&M
Location ning of  Very slow movement
damage man,
lifting of load shifting
equipmen  Use of guide rope
 Desired elevation to
t  Adequate access & fall
be marked
 Dislocatio protection
n of load  Use of PPEs
 Electric  Ensure proper earthing of
al welding M/C & job  Ensure work area, job

Electrical shock  Functioning of ELCB. & welding torch are

UV rays  Eye dry
 Use of welding face shield
Fire injury  Ensure welder is not
 Fit Up &  Use of fire blanket SWM 02

Welding  Burn wearing wet clothing  
4 Welding Of fumes& injury  Barricading the area & his body is dry 1 L 
1
Joints water  Work area free from
R  Ill 3 2 M  Make welding booth EXECUTION
logging health combustible material with proper ventilation ENGINEER /
 Horse  Fire Extinguisher stand by  Keep Power cut off P&M
play  Use of PPE switch near to job.

5  Grinding Of  Electrical  Ensure no joints in power  Use minimum length 1 1  L 

Joints  Fire  Electric cable Functioning of ELCB of power cable as per
al  Condition of grinding m/c requirement
 Breaking
of wheel shock  Work area free from  Power cut off switch

R
Severity of Aspect (Impact)
: Routine
Value Description NR: Non Routine
Massive effect

5
E : Emergency
1. Persistent severe environmental damage or severe nuisance extending over a large area
2. Hi terms of commercial or recreational use or natural conservation
3. A major economic loss for the company
L : Legal Requirement
4. Constant and or highly exceeding statutory or prescribed limits
Major effect
RISK ASSESSMENT MATRIX
1. Severe environmental damage.
4 2. The company is required to take extensive measures to restore polluted or damaged ICONSEQUENCE
MPACT
environment to its original state.
3. Exceeding statutory or prescribed limits. 1 2 3 4 5

Localised effect
1. Limited loss of discharges to known toxicity 1

3 2. Repeated exceed of statutory or prescribed limit

P
3. Affecting neighbourhood R
4. Spontaneous recovery of limited damage within one year O
2 LOW RISK
B
Minor effect A

2
1. Contamination damage sufficiently to attack the environment B 3 MEDIUM RISK
2. Single exceed of statutory or prescribed criterion I
L
3. Single complaint. No permanent effect on environment I
Slight effect T
4 HIGH RISK
1. Local environmental damage. Y
1
2. Within the fence and within systems. 5
3. Negligible financial consequences.
 LARSEN & TOUBRO LIMITED
THERMAL POWER PLANT CONSTRUCTION
Ref: PM 01 A Rev 03
HIRA REGISTER
 Burn SWM 03
injury to be kept near to job
combustible material
R  Cut Replacement of wheel
 Use of spatter arrester
injury under supervision of
 Use of grinder face shield & 3 2 M expert EXECUTION
 noise  Tempo
PPE ENGINEER /
rary  Always use clear P&M
hearing  Regular inspection of grinding scratch less face
loss m/c.  shield.

 Burn  Inspection of gas

Injury hoses & leak test to
 Propert  Handling of gas cylinder in be carried out
y trolley intermittently during
damag  Use of fire blanket job
 Fire e  Use of flash back arrester  Monitor the pressure
3 3 M of gas cylinder EXECUTION
 Explosion  Eye  Work area free from
6 Gas Cutting R  Health injury combustible material  Replace the torch 1 1 L SWM 04 ENGINEER
 Heat nozzle as soon as
 Area barricading
stroke carbon deposition
 Fire extinguisher stand by starts.
 Heat
 Use of PPE  Imparting refresher
cramps
 Regular inspection. training for the
 Fatigue workmen on
continuous basis 
 Over  Signal man in place
 7 Positioning Of  Electr 3 3 M  Clearance for 2 2 L
Crawler Crane head ocutio  If soil load bearing capacity is underground services.
power n less, Sal wood sleepers or metal  Avoiding of shortcuts
lines plates will be used while handling SWM - 08
 Dama crawler-mounted cranes
R  Undergro ge of  Outriggers will be fully extended SWM-09 EXECUTION
und under
services during lifting operation and the / P&M

R
Severity of Aspect (Impact)
: Routine
Value Description NR: Non Routine
Massive effect

5
E : Emergency
1. Persistent severe environmental damage or severe nuisance extending over a large area
2. Hi terms of commercial or recreational use or natural conservation
3. A major economic loss for the company
L : Legal Requirement
4. Constant and or highly exceeding statutory or prescribed limits
Major effect
RISK ASSESSMENT MATRIX
1. Severe environmental damage.
4 2. The company is required to take extensive measures to restore polluted or damaged ICONSEQUENCE
MPACT
environment to its original state.
3. Exceeding statutory or prescribed limits. 1 2 3 4 5

Localised effect
1. Limited loss of discharges to known toxicity 1

3 2. Repeated exceed of statutory or prescribed limit

P
3. Affecting neighbourhood R
4. Spontaneous recovery of limited damage within one year O
2 LOW RISK
B
Minor effect A

2
1. Contamination damage sufficiently to attack the environment B 3 MEDIUM RISK
2. Single exceed of statutory or prescribed criterion I
L
3. Single complaint. No permanent effect on environment I
Slight effect T
4 HIGH RISK
1. Local environmental damage. Y
1
2. Within the fence and within systems. 5
3. Negligible financial consequences.
 LARSEN & TOUBRO LIMITED
THERMAL POWER PLANT CONSTRUCTION
Ref: PM 01 A Rev 03
HIRA REGISTER
groun
d pipe base of the hydraulic jacks
 Unstable/ lines packed with sleepers if the load
soft
 Toppli bearing capacity of the ground is
ground
ng of not adequate
crane
 Falling of  Injury
person to
 Failure of perso
n  Use of PPE
lifting
 Keeping the Trailer in
tools &  Dama  Before lifting, the load will be
checked to ensure that it is stable position
R tackles ge to
equip secure  Avoiding unwanted
 Falling of 3 2 M SWM-08 &
ment  Signal man in place person near by the EXECUTION /
equipmen SWM-09
Unloading Of t  Toppli  SWL of tools & tackles be
activity P&M
 8 Casing From ng of ensured for the load lifting with
Trailer By Crane  Unbalanci
ng of crane competent person certification 2 2 L
cranes  Using Tag line
 Lifting of load as per load
 Chart specification

9 Erection Of  Falling of  Injury  Use of PPE  Cleaning of equipment 2 2 L

Casing Plate loose to before lifting
Crane materials perso  Before lifting, the load will be  Barricading of crane
 Failure of n checked to ensure that it is swing area
lifting  Toppli secure  Avoiding unwanted
tools & ng of  Signal man in place person near by the
R tackles crane  SWL of tools & tackles be 3 2 M activity SWM-08 &
 Unbalanci  Crushi SWM-09 EXECUTION
ensured for the load lifting with
ng of ng of competent person certification
/ P&M
cranes finger

R
Severity of Aspect (Impact)
: Routine
Value Description NR: Non Routine
Massive effect

5
E : Emergency
1. Persistent severe environmental damage or severe nuisance extending over a large area
2. Hi terms of commercial or recreational use or natural conservation
3. A major economic loss for the company
L : Legal Requirement
4. Constant and or highly exceeding statutory or prescribed limits
Major effect
RISK ASSESSMENT MATRIX
1. Severe environmental damage.
4 2. The company is required to take extensive measures to restore polluted or damaged ICONSEQUENCE
MPACT
environment to its original state.
3. Exceeding statutory or prescribed limits. 1 2 3 4 5

Localised effect
1. Limited loss of discharges to known toxicity 1

3 2. Repeated exceed of statutory or prescribed limit

P
3. Affecting neighbourhood R
4. Spontaneous recovery of limited damage within one year O
2 LOW RISK
B
Minor effect A

2
1. Contamination damage sufficiently to attack the environment B 3 MEDIUM RISK
2. Single exceed of statutory or prescribed criterion I
L
3. Single complaint. No permanent effect on environment I
Slight effect T
4 HIGH RISK
1. Local environmental damage. Y
1
2. Within the fence and within systems. 5
3. Negligible financial consequences.
 LARSEN & TOUBRO LIMITED
THERMAL POWER PLANT CONSTRUCTION
Ref: PM 01 A Rev 03
HIRA REGISTER
 Injury s and
during leg
positionin  Using Tag line
g  Lifting of load as per load chart
specification
 Engaging Skilled workmen

R  Ensure adequate illumination

 Area is cordoned off &
barricaded
 Ensure adequate access & fall
arrester
 Use of PPEs
 Injury SWM EXECUTION
to  Ensure chain pulley block is 8,9,10,11&
person fastened & shifted safely 15
 Slippage 3 2 M
 Propert  Ensure holding sling is tie on
 Loose y strong & firm support
Lifting & fixing of
materials damag  Ensure holding sling is not tie up
connecting beams
10 & bracings  Fall of e to any Equipment or machinery A,B,C,D,E 2 1 L
person  Ensure packing is used where
 Fall of sharp edges are there
material  Ensure sling is fully inserted
inside THORT of holding hook &
latch is perfectly locked.
 Ensure there is no obstacles for
chain pulley block
 Ensure no one is passing below
the tie up activity
 Ensure capacity is adequate as
per load to be lifted

11 Scaffolding  Collapse  Injury  Scaffold erection to be done  Holding of scaffold 1 2 L

of to under supervision of Certified material till erection
R
Severity of Aspect (Impact)
: Routine
Value Description NR: Non Routine
Massive effect

5
E : Emergency
1. Persistent severe environmental damage or severe nuisance extending over a large area
2. Hi terms of commercial or recreational use or natural conservation
3. A major economic loss for the company
L : Legal Requirement
4. Constant and or highly exceeding statutory or prescribed limits
Major effect
RISK ASSESSMENT MATRIX
1. Severe environmental damage.
4 2. The company is required to take extensive measures to restore polluted or damaged ICONSEQUENCE
MPACT
environment to its original state.
3. Exceeding statutory or prescribed limits. 1 2 3 4 5

Localised effect
1. Limited loss of discharges to known toxicity 1

3 2. Repeated exceed of statutory or prescribed limit

P
3. Affecting neighbourhood R
4. Spontaneous recovery of limited damage within one year O
2 LOW RISK
B
Minor effect A

2
1. Contamination damage sufficiently to attack the environment B 3 MEDIUM RISK
2. Single exceed of statutory or prescribed criterion I
L
3. Single complaint. No permanent effect on environment I
Slight effect T
4 HIGH RISK
1. Local environmental damage. Y
1
2. Within the fence and within systems. 5
3. Negligible financial consequences.
 LARSEN & TOUBRO LIMITED
THERMAL POWER PLANT CONSTRUCTION
Ref: PM 01 A Rev 03
HIRA REGISTER
scaffoldin perso  Use of Fall arrester
g n
scaffold inspector  Ensure entire scaffold
 Falling of  Materi joints are ok & scaffold
material al  Erection of scaffolds as per the
R standard dimension 3 2 M is locked with firm SWM-05 EXECUTION
dama structure.
ge  Area barricading
 Imparting refresher
 Use of PPE
training for the
 Use of tag workmen on
continuous basis 

 Fall of  Work permit

 Slippage of material  Use of PPE
material  Fall of  Adequate access & fall
 Tilting person protection EXECUTION
 Bulge  Injury to  Area to be barricaded
person 2 3 M
Fixing of ladder &  Sharp  Proper holding till fit up work
platform  Property SWM
12 edges  Proper locking for incomplete A,B,C,D,E 2 1 L 03,04,05&0
damage
 Floor work 6
opening  Hard barricading around the gap /
 Improper opening between two grating
locking  Heavy load not kept for
preventing from bulging
 Avoid overlapping
13 Fixing of lifeline & R  Slippage of  Fall of  Work permit A,B,C,D,E 2 1 L
safety nets material material  Use of PPE
 Tilting  Fall of  Adequate access & fall
 Stack by person protection EXECUTION
the safety  Injury to  Proper holding till fit up work
net person 2 3 M SWM 10,11
 Proper locking for incomplete
 Improper  Property work
tying damage

R
Severity of Aspect (Impact)
: Routine
Value Description NR: Non Routine
Massive effect

5
E : Emergency
1. Persistent severe environmental damage or severe nuisance extending over a large area
2. Hi terms of commercial or recreational use or natural conservation
3. A major economic loss for the company
L : Legal Requirement
4. Constant and or highly exceeding statutory or prescribed limits
Major effect
RISK ASSESSMENT MATRIX
1. Severe environmental damage.
4 2. The company is required to take extensive measures to restore polluted or damaged ICONSEQUENCE
MPACT
environment to its original state.
3. Exceeding statutory or prescribed limits. 1 2 3 4 5

Localised effect
1. Limited loss of discharges to known toxicity 1

3 2. Repeated exceed of statutory or prescribed limit

P
3. Affecting neighbourhood R
4. Spontaneous recovery of limited damage within one year O
2 LOW RISK
B
Minor effect A

2
1. Contamination damage sufficiently to attack the environment B 3 MEDIUM RISK
2. Single exceed of statutory or prescribed criterion I
L
3. Single complaint. No permanent effect on environment I
Slight effect T
4 HIGH RISK
1. Local environmental damage. Y
1
2. Within the fence and within systems. 5
3. Negligible financial consequences.
 LARSEN & TOUBRO LIMITED
THERMAL POWER PLANT CONSTRUCTION
Ref: PM 01 A Rev 03
HIRA REGISTER
 Hard barricading around the gap /
opening between two grating
 Avoid overlapping /Gap


_________________________ ____________________________________
Section Head HSEM

R
Severity of Aspect (Impact)
: Routine
Value Description NR: Non Routine
Massive effect

5
E : Emergency
1. Persistent severe environmental damage or severe nuisance extending over a large area
2. Hi terms of commercial or recreational use or natural conservation
3. A major economic loss for the company
L : Legal Requirement
4. Constant and or highly exceeding statutory or prescribed limits
Major effect
RISK ASSESSMENT MATRIX
1. Severe environmental damage.
4 2. The company is required to take extensive measures to restore polluted or damaged ICONSEQUENCE
MPACT
environment to its original state.
3. Exceeding statutory or prescribed limits. 1 2 3 4 5

Localised effect
1. Limited loss of discharges to known toxicity 1

3 2. Repeated exceed of statutory or prescribed limit

P
3. Affecting neighbourhood R
4. Spontaneous recovery of limited damage within one year O
2 LOW RISK
B
Minor effect A

2
1. Contamination damage sufficiently to attack the environment B 3 MEDIUM RISK
2. Single exceed of statutory or prescribed criterion I
L
3. Single complaint. No permanent effect on environment I
Slight effect T
4 HIGH RISK
1. Local environmental damage. Y
1
2. Within the fence and within systems. 5
3. Negligible financial consequences.
 LARSEN & TOUBRO LIMITED
THERMAL POWER PLANT CONSTRUCTION
Ref: PM 01 A Rev 03
HIRA REGISTER

Name of the Job Site: 2x600MW ITPCL Power Project ,Cuddalore Date: 14/05/13
HIRA No: L&T/ESP/001 Assessment Team:
EV/SKR/KCD
Name of the Main Activity Emitting Frame Pre assembly & Erection
Residual
Risk
Additional Control Risk After
considering
Measures to bring Risk applying
existing Action By
R/ to ALARP Level Additional Safe work
control
NR Existing Control Measures (A-Elimination, Control method
Sl. measures
Sub Activity /E Hazard Risk (As per company defined B-Substitution, Measures (Give only
No
/ procedure) C-Engineering, the Doc

Probability

Probability
Risk Level

Risk Level
L D-Signage /Warning/ no)

Impact

Impact
Rating

Rating
Administrative,
E- PPEs usage )

 1 Stacking Of  Improper  Injury to  Stacking of plates below 2 2 L  Slip protection 1  2  L

Frame Materials stacking person 1meter  Imparting refresher
 Dumping  Property  Wooden sleepers to be training for the STORES/
of metal damage provide. workmen on
R scrap continuous basis  SWM 10 EXECUTION
 Stacking evenly ENGINEER
 Sharp edges covered
 Barricaded the area
 Use of PPEs

R
Severity of Aspect (Impact)
: Routine
Value Description NR: Non Routine
Massive effect

5
E : Emergency
1. Persistent severe environmental damage or severe nuisance extending over a large area
2. Hi terms of commercial or recreational use or natural conservation
3. A major economic loss for the company
L : Legal Requirement
4. Constant and or highly exceeding statutory or prescribed limits
Major effect
RISK ASSESSMENT MATRIX
1. Severe environmental damage.
4 2. The company is required to take extensive measures to restore polluted or damaged ICONSEQUENCE
MPACT
environment to its original state.
3. Exceeding statutory or prescribed limits. 1 2 3 4 5

Localised effect
1. Limited loss of discharges to known toxicity 1

3 2. Repeated exceed of statutory or prescribed limit

P
3. Affecting neighbourhood R
4. Spontaneous recovery of limited damage within one year O
2 LOW RISK
B
Minor effect A

2
1. Contamination damage sufficiently to attack the environment B 3 MEDIUM RISK
2. Single exceed of statutory or prescribed criterion I
L
3. Single complaint. No permanent effect on environment I
Slight effect T
4 HIGH RISK
1. Local environmental damage. Y
1
2. Within the fence and within systems. 5
3. Negligible financial consequences.
 LARSEN & TOUBRO LIMITED
THERMAL POWER PLANT CONSTRUCTION
Ref: PM 01 A Rev 03
HIRA REGISTER
 Training to workmen
 Improper  Falling  Area cordoned off
tying of of  Ensure Tying of pipes SWM 12
plates material correctly  Use of additional
 Fall of slings
 Failure of  Use of certified inspected tool
lifting person & tackles,  Inspection of Lifting
tools &  Injury to tools & tackles.
 Ensure fitness certificate of
 Shifting Of R tackles person, 3 2 M  Gathering of minimum EXECUTION
 2 lifting equipment 1  1 L 
Frame Materials  Malfunctio  Property persons ENGINEER /
 Authorized operator & signal P&M
ning of damage  Very slow movement
man,
lifting of load shifting
equipmen  Use of guide rope
 Desired elevation to
t  Adequate access & fall be marked
 Dislocatio protection
n of load  Use of PPEs
 Electric  Ensure proper earthing of
al welding M/C & job  Ensure work area, job

Electrical shock  Functioning of ELCB. & welding torch are

UV rays  Eye dry
 Use of welding face shield
Fire injury  Ensure welder is not
 Fit Up &  Use of fire blanket SWM 02

Welding  Burn wearing wet clothing  
4 Welding Of fumes& injury  Barricading the area & his body is dry 1 L 
1
Joints water  Work area free from
R  Ill 3 2 M  Make welding booth EXECUTION
logging health combustible material with proper ventilation ENGINEER /
 Horse  Fire Extinguisher stand by  Keep Power cut off P&M
play  Use of PPE switch near to job.

5  Grinding Of  Electrical  Ensure no joints in power  Use minimum length 1 1  L 

Joints of power cable as per
R
Severity of Aspect (Impact)
: Routine
Value Description NR: Non Routine
Massive effect

5
E : Emergency
1. Persistent severe environmental damage or severe nuisance extending over a large area
2. Hi terms of commercial or recreational use or natural conservation
3. A major economic loss for the company
L : Legal Requirement
4. Constant and or highly exceeding statutory or prescribed limits
Major effect
RISK ASSESSMENT MATRIX
1. Severe environmental damage.
4 2. The company is required to take extensive measures to restore polluted or damaged ICONSEQUENCE
MPACT
environment to its original state.
3. Exceeding statutory or prescribed limits. 1 2 3 4 5

Localised effect
1. Limited loss of discharges to known toxicity 1

3 2. Repeated exceed of statutory or prescribed limit

P
3. Affecting neighbourhood R
4. Spontaneous recovery of limited damage within one year O
2 LOW RISK
B
Minor effect A

2
1. Contamination damage sufficiently to attack the environment B 3 MEDIUM RISK
2. Single exceed of statutory or prescribed criterion I
L
3. Single complaint. No permanent effect on environment I
Slight effect T
4 HIGH RISK
1. Local environmental damage. Y
1
2. Within the fence and within systems. 5
3. Negligible financial consequences.
 LARSEN & TOUBRO LIMITED
THERMAL POWER PLANT CONSTRUCTION
Ref: PM 01 A Rev 03
HIRA REGISTER
 Electric
al cable Functioning of ELCB
shock requirement
 Condition of grinding m/c SWM 03
 Burn  Power cut off switch
 Fire injury  Work area free from to be kept near to job
R  Breaking combustible material Replacement of wheel
 Cut
 Use of spatter arrester 3 2 M under supervision of EXECUTION
of wheel injury
expert ENGINEER /
 noise  Tempo  Use of grinder face shield &
PPE  Always use clear P&M
rary
scratch less face
hearing  Regular inspection of grinding
shield.
loss m/c. 

 Burn  Inspection of gas

Injury hoses & leak test to
 Propert  Handling of gas cylinder in be carried out
y trolley intermittently during
damag  Use of fire blanket job
 Fire e  Use of flash back arrester  Monitor the pressure
 Eye 3 3 M of gas cylinder EXECUTION
 Explosion  Work area free from
6 Gas Cutting R  Health injury combustible material  Replace the torch 1 1 L SWM 04 ENGINEER
 Heat nozzle as soon as
 Area barricading
stroke carbon deposition
 Fire extinguisher stand by starts.
 Heat
 Use of PPE  Imparting refresher
cramps
 Regular inspection. training for the
 Fatigue workmen on
continuous basis 
 7 Emitting plate  Material  Dam  Signal man in place 3 3 M Imparting refresher 2 2 L
Erection Using  Use of alternate communication training for the
Falldown aged System.
Tower Crane tools workmen on

R
Severity of Aspect (Impact)
: Routine
Value Description NR: Non Routine
Massive effect

5
E : Emergency
1. Persistent severe environmental damage or severe nuisance extending over a large area
2. Hi terms of commercial or recreational use or natural conservation
3. A major economic loss for the company
L : Legal Requirement
4. Constant and or highly exceeding statutory or prescribed limits
Major effect
RISK ASSESSMENT MATRIX
1. Severe environmental damage.
4 2. The company is required to take extensive measures to restore polluted or damaged ICONSEQUENCE
MPACT
environment to its original state.
3. Exceeding statutory or prescribed limits. 1 2 3 4 5

Localised effect
1. Limited loss of discharges to known toxicity 1

3 2. Repeated exceed of statutory or prescribed limit

P
3. Affecting neighbourhood R
4. Spontaneous recovery of limited damage within one year O
2 LOW RISK
B
Minor effect A

2
1. Contamination damage sufficiently to attack the environment B 3 MEDIUM RISK
2. Single exceed of statutory or prescribed criterion I
L
3. Single complaint. No permanent effect on environment I
Slight effect T
4 HIGH RISK
1. Local environmental damage. Y
1
2. Within the fence and within systems. 5
3. Negligible financial consequences.
 LARSEN & TOUBRO LIMITED
THERMAL POWER PLANT CONSTRUCTION
Ref: PM 01 A Rev 03
HIRA REGISTER
 Failure &tack SWM - 08
R of Hook les SWM-09 EXECUTION
assembl  TPI  All Tool& tackles to be certified by / P&M
y not the Competent person continuous basis 
 Failure done  Periodic Inspection to be
of conducted

Cummun
ication

_________________________ ____________________________________
Section Head HSEM

Name of the Job Site: 2x600MW ITPCL Power Project ,Cuddalore Date: 14/05/13

R
Severity of Aspect (Impact)
: Routine
Value Description NR: Non Routine
Massive effect

5
E : Emergency
1. Persistent severe environmental damage or severe nuisance extending over a large area
2. Hi terms of commercial or recreational use or natural conservation
3. A major economic loss for the company
L : Legal Requirement
4. Constant and or highly exceeding statutory or prescribed limits
Major effect
RISK ASSESSMENT MATRIX
1. Severe environmental damage.
4 2. The company is required to take extensive measures to restore polluted or damaged ICONSEQUENCE
MPACT
environment to its original state.
3. Exceeding statutory or prescribed limits. 1 2 3 4 5

Localised effect
1. Limited loss of discharges to known toxicity 1

3 2. Repeated exceed of statutory or prescribed limit

P
3. Affecting neighbourhood R
4. Spontaneous recovery of limited damage within one year O
2 LOW RISK
B
Minor effect A

2
1. Contamination damage sufficiently to attack the environment B 3 MEDIUM RISK
2. Single exceed of statutory or prescribed criterion I
L
3. Single complaint. No permanent effect on environment I
Slight effect T
4 HIGH RISK
1. Local environmental damage. Y
1
2. Within the fence and within systems. 5
3. Negligible financial consequences.
 LARSEN & TOUBRO LIMITED
THERMAL POWER PLANT CONSTRUCTION
Ref: PM 01 A Rev 03
HIRA REGISTER
HIRA No: L&T/ESP/001 Assessment Team:
EV/SKR/KCD
Name of the Main Activity Electrode Shifting & Erection
Residual
Risk
Additional Control Risk After
considering
Measures to bring Risk applying
existing Action By
R/ to ALARP Level Additional Safe work
control
NR Existing Control Measures (A-Elimination, Control method
Sl. measures
Sub Activity /E Hazard Risk (As per company defined B-Substitution, Measures (Give only
No
/ procedure) C-Engineering, the Doc

Probability

Probability
Risk Level

Risk Level
L D-Signage /Warning/ no)

Impact

Impact
Rating

Rating
Administrative,
E- PPEs usage )

 Improper  Falling  Area cordoned off

tying of of  Ensure Tying of pipes SWM 12
plates material correctly  Use of additional
 Fall of slings
 Failure of  Use of certified inspected tool
lifting person & tackles,  Inspection of Lifting
tools &  Injury to tools & tackles.
 Shifting Of  Ensure fitness certificate of
R tackles person, 3 2 M  Gathering of minimum EXECUTION
 2 Electrode lifting equipment 1  1 L 
 Malfunctio  Property persons ENGINEER /
Materials  Authorized operator & signal
ning of damage  Very slow movement P&M
man,
lifting of load shifting
equipmen  Use of guide rope
 Desired elevation to
t  Adequate access & fall be marked
 Dislocatio protection
n of load  Use of PPEs
Electrode  Signal man in place Imparting refresher
 7  Material  Dam 3 3 M 2 2 L
R
Severity of Aspect (Impact)
: Routine
Value Description NR: Non Routine
Massive effect

5
E : Emergency
1. Persistent severe environmental damage or severe nuisance extending over a large area
2. Hi terms of commercial or recreational use or natural conservation
3. A major economic loss for the company
L : Legal Requirement
4. Constant and or highly exceeding statutory or prescribed limits
Major effect
RISK ASSESSMENT MATRIX
1. Severe environmental damage.
4 2. The company is required to take extensive measures to restore polluted or damaged ICONSEQUENCE
MPACT
environment to its original state.
3. Exceeding statutory or prescribed limits. 1 2 3 4 5

Localised effect
1. Limited loss of discharges to known toxicity 1

3 2. Repeated exceed of statutory or prescribed limit

P
3. Affecting neighbourhood R
4. Spontaneous recovery of limited damage within one year O
2 LOW RISK
B
Minor effect A

2
1. Contamination damage sufficiently to attack the environment B 3 MEDIUM RISK
2. Single exceed of statutory or prescribed criterion I
L
3. Single complaint. No permanent effect on environment I
Slight effect T
4 HIGH RISK
1. Local environmental damage. Y
1
2. Within the fence and within systems. 5
3. Negligible financial consequences.
 LARSEN & TOUBRO LIMITED
THERMAL POWER PLANT CONSTRUCTION
Ref: PM 01 A Rev 03
HIRA REGISTER
Falldown aged
 Failure tools SWM - 08
of Hook &tack  Use of alternate communication
R training for the SWM-09 EXECUTION
assembl les System.
Erection Using  All Tool& tackles to be certified by workmen on / P&M
Tower Crane
y  TPI the Competent person continuous basis 
 Failure not  Periodic Inspection to be
of done conducted
Cummun 
ication
R  Shar Imparting refresher Execution
Material  Cut training for the
p  Use Hand gloves SWM-18
8 handling(Electrod Injury 3 2 M workmen on 2 1 L
Edge 
e) –Manually continuous basis 

_________________________ ____________________________________
Section Head HSEM

Name of the Job Site: 2x600MW ITPCL Power Project, Cuddalore Date: 14/05/13
HIRA No: L&T /ESP/001 Assessment EV/SKR/KCD

R
Severity of Aspect (Impact)
: Routine
Value Description NR: Non Routine
Massive effect

5
E : Emergency
1. Persistent severe environmental damage or severe nuisance extending over a large area
2. Hi terms of commercial or recreational use or natural conservation
3. A major economic loss for the company
L : Legal Requirement
4. Constant and or highly exceeding statutory or prescribed limits
Major effect
RISK ASSESSMENT MATRIX
1. Severe environmental damage.
4 2. The company is required to take extensive measures to restore polluted or damaged ICONSEQUENCE
MPACT
environment to its original state.
3. Exceeding statutory or prescribed limits. 1 2 3 4 5

Localised effect
1. Limited loss of discharges to known toxicity 1

3 2. Repeated exceed of statutory or prescribed limit

P
3. Affecting neighbourhood R
4. Spontaneous recovery of limited damage within one year O
2 LOW RISK
B
Minor effect A

2
1. Contamination damage sufficiently to attack the environment B 3 MEDIUM RISK
2. Single exceed of statutory or prescribed criterion I
L
3. Single complaint. No permanent effect on environment I
Slight effect T
4 HIGH RISK
1. Local environmental damage. Y
1
2. Within the fence and within systems. 5
3. Negligible financial consequences.
 LARSEN & TOUBRO LIMITED
THERMAL POWER PLANT CONSTRUCTION
Ref: PM 01 A Rev 03
HIRA REGISTER
Name of the Main Activity INLET & OUT LET FUNNEL PRE ASSEMBLY & ERECTION Team:

Additional Residual Risk

Risk
Control After applying
considering
Measures to Additional
R existing control
bring Risk to Control
/ measures Safe work
ALARP Level Measures
N Existing Control Measures method
Sl. (A-Elimination,
Sub Activity R Hazard Risk (As per company defined Action By

Impact Rating

Impact Rating
No B-Substitution, (Give only
/ procedure)

Probability

Probability
Risk Level

Risk Level
C-Engineering, the Doc no)

Rating

Rating
E
D-Signage
/L
/Warning/
Administrative,
E- PPEs usage )
 Injury to person
 Falling of person  Use of PPE  Keeping the
 Damage to Trailer in
 Failure of lifting equipment  Before lifting, the load will be stable
tools & tackles checked to ensure that it is
 Toppling of position
 Falling of secure
crane  Avoiding
R equipment  Signal man in place
Unloading Of unwanted
Materials  Unbalancing of  SWL of tools & tackles be 3 2 M person near SWM-08 &
 2 EXECUTION /
From Trailer By cranes ensured for the load lifting with by the activity SWM-09
P&M
Crane. competent person certification 2 2 L
 Using Tag line
 Lifting of load as per load
 Chart specification

R
Severity of Aspect (Impact)
: Routine
Value Description NR: Non Routine
Massive effect

5
E : Emergency
1. Persistent severe environmental damage or severe nuisance extending over a large area
2. Hi terms of commercial or recreational use or natural conservation
3. A major economic loss for the company
L : Legal Requirement
4. Constant and or highly exceeding statutory or prescribed limits
Major effect
RISK ASSESSMENT MATRIX
1. Severe environmental damage.
4 2. The company is required to take extensive measures to restore polluted or damaged ICONSEQUENCE
MPACT
environment to its original state.
3. Exceeding statutory or prescribed limits. 1 2 3 4 5

Localised effect
1. Limited loss of discharges to known toxicity 1

3 2. Repeated exceed of statutory or prescribed limit

P
3. Affecting neighbourhood R
4. Spontaneous recovery of limited damage within one year O
2 LOW RISK
B
Minor effect A

2
1. Contamination damage sufficiently to attack the environment B 3 MEDIUM RISK
2. Single exceed of statutory or prescribed criterion I
L
3. Single complaint. No permanent effect on environment I
Slight effect T
4 HIGH RISK
1. Local environmental damage. Y
1
2. Within the fence and within systems. 5
3. Negligible financial consequences.
 LARSEN & TOUBRO LIMITED
THERMAL POWER PLANT CONSTRUCTION
Ref: PM 01 A Rev 03
HIRA REGISTER
 Injury to person
 Toppling of  Use of PPE
 Falling of loose crane
 Crushing of  Before lifting, the load will be  Cleaning of
materials checked to ensure that it is
fingers and leg equipment
 Failure of lifting secure before lifting
tools & tackles
R  Unbalancing of  Signal man in place 3 2 M  Barricading SWM-08 &
Erection Of Inlet of crane SWM-09 EXECUTION
cranes  SWL of tools & tackles be
3 & Out Let By
 Injury during ensured for the load lifting with
swing area 2 2 L / P&M
Crane  Avoiding
positioning competent person certification
unwanted
 Using Tag line person near
 Lifting of load as per load chart by the activity
specification
 Engaging Skilled workmen

4  Fit Up &  Electrical  Electrical shock  Ensure proper earthing of  Ensure work  1 1 L 
Welding Of  UV rays  Eye injury welding M/C & job area, job &
Joints  Functioning of ELCB. welding
 Fire  Burn injury torch are dry
 Welding  Ill health  Use of welding face shield
 Ensure
fumes& water  Use of fire blanket welder is not SWM 02
logging  Barricading the area wearing wet
 Horse play  Work area free from clothing &
R 3 2 M EXECUTION
combustible material his body is
ENGINEER /
dry
 Fire Extinguisher stand by P&M
 Make
 Use of PPE
welding
booth with
proper
ventilation
 Keep Power
cut off switch

R
Severity of Aspect (Impact)
: Routine
Value Description NR: Non Routine
Massive effect

5
E : Emergency
1. Persistent severe environmental damage or severe nuisance extending over a large area
2. Hi terms of commercial or recreational use or natural conservation
3. A major economic loss for the company
L : Legal Requirement
4. Constant and or highly exceeding statutory or prescribed limits
Major effect
RISK ASSESSMENT MATRIX
1. Severe environmental damage.
4 2. The company is required to take extensive measures to restore polluted or damaged ICONSEQUENCE
MPACT
environment to its original state.
3. Exceeding statutory or prescribed limits. 1 2 3 4 5

Localised effect
1. Limited loss of discharges to known toxicity 1

3 2. Repeated exceed of statutory or prescribed limit

P
3. Affecting neighbourhood R
4. Spontaneous recovery of limited damage within one year O
2 LOW RISK
B
Minor effect A

2
1. Contamination damage sufficiently to attack the environment B 3 MEDIUM RISK
2. Single exceed of statutory or prescribed criterion I
L
3. Single complaint. No permanent effect on environment I
Slight effect T
4 HIGH RISK
1. Local environmental damage. Y
1
2. Within the fence and within systems. 5
3. Negligible financial consequences.
 LARSEN & TOUBRO LIMITED
THERMAL POWER PLANT CONSTRUCTION
Ref: PM 01 A Rev 03
HIRA REGISTER
near to job.
 Use
 Electrical shock minimum
length of
 Burn injury power cable
 Cut injury  Ensure no joints in power as per SWM 03
 Temporary cable Functioning of ELCB requirement
R  Electrical hearing loss  Condition of grinding m/c  Power cut
 Work area free from off switch to
 Fire 3 2 M EXECUTION
combustible material be kept near
 Grinding Of ENGINEER /
5  Breaking of to job 1 1  L 
Joints  Use of spatter arrester P&M
wheel Replacemen
 Use of grinder face shield & t of wheel
 noise
PPE under
 Regular inspection of supervision
grinding m/c.  of expert
 Always use
clear scratch
less face
shield.
6 Gas Cutting  Fire  Burn Injury  Handling of gas cylinder in  Inspection of 1 1 L
 Explosion  Property trolley gas hoses &
damage  Use of fire blanket leak test to
 Health be carried
 Eye injury  Use of flash back arrester out
 Heat stroke  Work area free from intermittently
 Heat cramps combustible material during job
3 3 M EXECUTION
 Fatigue  Area barricading  Monitor the ENGINEER
R SWM 04
 Fire extinguisher stand by pressure of
gas cylinder
 Use of PPE

R
Severity of Aspect (Impact)
: Routine
Value Description NR: Non Routine
Massive effect

5
E : Emergency
1. Persistent severe environmental damage or severe nuisance extending over a large area
2. Hi terms of commercial or recreational use or natural conservation
3. A major economic loss for the company
L : Legal Requirement
4. Constant and or highly exceeding statutory or prescribed limits
Major effect
RISK ASSESSMENT MATRIX
1. Severe environmental damage.
4 2. The company is required to take extensive measures to restore polluted or damaged ICONSEQUENCE
MPACT
environment to its original state.
3. Exceeding statutory or prescribed limits. 1 2 3 4 5

Localised effect
1. Limited loss of discharges to known toxicity 1

3 2. Repeated exceed of statutory or prescribed limit

P
3. Affecting neighbourhood R
4. Spontaneous recovery of limited damage within one year O
2 LOW RISK
B
Minor effect A

2
1. Contamination damage sufficiently to attack the environment B 3 MEDIUM RISK
2. Single exceed of statutory or prescribed criterion I
L
3. Single complaint. No permanent effect on environment I
Slight effect T
4 HIGH RISK
1. Local environmental damage. Y
1
2. Within the fence and within systems. 5
3. Negligible financial consequences.
 LARSEN & TOUBRO LIMITED
THERMAL POWER PLANT CONSTRUCTION
Ref: PM 01 A Rev 03
HIRA REGISTER
 Replace the
torch nozzle
as soon as
carbon
deposition
starts.
 Regular inspection.  Imparting
refresher
training for
the workmen
on
continuous
basis 
 Fall of material  Work permit
 Fall of person  Use of PPE
 Injury to person  Adequate access & fall
 Slippage of protection
material  Property damage EXECUTION
 Area to be barricaded 2 3 M
 Tilting
Fixing of ladder  Proper holding till fit up work SWM
 Bulge
6 & platform  Proper locking for incomplete A,B,C,D,E 2 1 L 03,04,05&06
 Sharp edges work
 Floor opening  Hard barricading around the
 Improper locking gap / opening between two
grating
 Heavy load not kept for
preventing from bulging
 Avoid overlapping
7 Fixing of lifeline R  Slippage of  Fall of material  Work permit A,B,C,D,E 2 1 L
& safety nets material  Fall of person  Use of PPE
 Tilting  Injury to person  Adequate access & fall

R
Severity of Aspect (Impact)
: Routine
Value Description NR: Non Routine
Massive effect

5
E : Emergency
1. Persistent severe environmental damage or severe nuisance extending over a large area
2. Hi terms of commercial or recreational use or natural conservation
3. A major economic loss for the company
L : Legal Requirement
4. Constant and or highly exceeding statutory or prescribed limits
Major effect
RISK ASSESSMENT MATRIX
1. Severe environmental damage.
4 2. The company is required to take extensive measures to restore polluted or damaged ICONSEQUENCE
MPACT
environment to its original state.
3. Exceeding statutory or prescribed limits. 1 2 3 4 5

Localised effect
1. Limited loss of discharges to known toxicity 1

3 2. Repeated exceed of statutory or prescribed limit

P
3. Affecting neighbourhood R
4. Spontaneous recovery of limited damage within one year O
2 LOW RISK
B
Minor effect A

2
1. Contamination damage sufficiently to attack the environment B 3 MEDIUM RISK
2. Single exceed of statutory or prescribed criterion I
L
3. Single complaint. No permanent effect on environment I
Slight effect T
4 HIGH RISK
1. Local environmental damage. Y
1
2. Within the fence and within systems. 5
3. Negligible financial consequences.
 LARSEN & TOUBRO LIMITED
THERMAL POWER PLANT CONSTRUCTION
Ref: PM 01 A Rev 03
HIRA REGISTER
 Property damage protection EXECUTION
 Proper holding till fit up work 2 3 M SWM 10,11
 Stack by the  Proper locking for incomplete
safety net work
 Improper tying  Hard barricading around the
gap / opening between two
grating
 Avoid overlapping /Gap

R  Injury to person  Use of PPE ERECTION
 A,B,C,D,E. SWM
 Crushing of  Safe access 11,16 INCHARGE
 Falling of loose
fingers and leg  Providing of life line with fall
materials
 Property damage. arrester
 Falling of person
  Usage of right tool for the job.
Removal of from height
9 ladder & platform  Safe handling of removed
 Failure of lifting
packing material. 3 2 M 3 1 L
tools & tackles
 Disposal of unwanted packing
materials from the workplace.
 Firefighting arrangement

10 Entry into  Lack of Oxygen  Work Permit Standby 1 1 L

Confined Space  Poisonous Gases  Flammability & Oxygen level ventilation
checking. system
 Proper ventilation arrangement is Continuous
done. monitoring of
Oxygen level
 Proper housekeeping ensured.
Suffocation Short period
 Exhaust fan ensured. inside & more
N Ill health 2 2 L

R
Severity of Aspect (Impact)
: Routine
Value Description NR: Non Routine
Massive effect

5
E : Emergency
1. Persistent severe environmental damage or severe nuisance extending over a large area
2. Hi terms of commercial or recreational use or natural conservation
3. A major economic loss for the company
L : Legal Requirement
4. Constant and or highly exceeding statutory or prescribed limits
Major effect
RISK ASSESSMENT MATRIX
1. Severe environmental damage.
4 2. The company is required to take extensive measures to restore polluted or damaged ICONSEQUENCE
MPACT
environment to its original state.
3. Exceeding statutory or prescribed limits. 1 2 3 4 5

Localised effect
1. Limited loss of discharges to known toxicity 1

3 2. Repeated exceed of statutory or prescribed limit

P
3. Affecting neighbourhood R
4. Spontaneous recovery of limited damage within one year O
2 LOW RISK
B
Minor effect A

2
1. Contamination damage sufficiently to attack the environment B 3 MEDIUM RISK
2. Single exceed of statutory or prescribed criterion I
L
3. Single complaint. No permanent effect on environment I
Slight effect T
4 HIGH RISK
1. Local environmental damage. Y
1
2. Within the fence and within systems. 5
3. Negligible financial consequences.
 LARSEN & TOUBRO LIMITED
THERMAL POWER PLANT CONSTRUCTION
Ref: PM 01 A Rev 03
HIRA REGISTER
R  Use PPEs SMW-19 EXECUTION
 24 Volt lamp
 Attendant with IN OUT register
 Communication system
recess time
 Provision of life line
 Attendant Standby
 Emergency vehicle standby
 Use PPEs
 Training

_________________________ ____________________________________
Section Head HSEM

R
Severity of Aspect (Impact)
: Routine
Value Description NR: Non Routine
Massive effect

5
E : Emergency
1. Persistent severe environmental damage or severe nuisance extending over a large area
2. Hi terms of commercial or recreational use or natural conservation
3. A major economic loss for the company
L : Legal Requirement
4. Constant and or highly exceeding statutory or prescribed limits
Major effect
RISK ASSESSMENT MATRIX
1. Severe environmental damage.
4 2. The company is required to take extensive measures to restore polluted or damaged ICONSEQUENCE
MPACT
environment to its original state.
3. Exceeding statutory or prescribed limits. 1 2 3 4 5

Localised effect
1. Limited loss of discharges to known toxicity 1

3 2. Repeated exceed of statutory or prescribed limit

P
3. Affecting neighbourhood R
4. Spontaneous recovery of limited damage within one year O
2 LOW RISK
B
Minor effect A

2
1. Contamination damage sufficiently to attack the environment B 3 MEDIUM RISK
2. Single exceed of statutory or prescribed criterion I
L
3. Single complaint. No permanent effect on environment I
Slight effect T
4 HIGH RISK
1. Local environmental damage. Y
1
2. Within the fence and within systems. 5
3. Negligible financial consequences.