COMPANY OVERVIEW

Supplier Name:
Supplier Address:
City, State, Zip Code:
Manufacturing DUNS#:

TIME IN YEARS
TITLE NAME PHONE NO. POSITION AT COMPANY
CEO/President
Quality Control Manager
Plant Manager
Production Control
Process Engineer
Product Engineer
Sales
Other

1. Are you ISO9001:2000 Certified? Yes No If Yes, Send Copy of Certificate.

If No, Planned Date? Registrar?
2. Are you ISO/TS16949:2002 Certified? Yes No If Yes, Send Copy of Certificate.
If No, Planned Date? Registrar?
3. What is the facility size? Number of employees? Average seniority?
4. Percent Employee turnover? Management Hourly
5. Union Representation? Yes No If yes, name and expiration date?
6. Your current plant utilization? % Impact of Delphi quoted business on your plant?
7. How many shifts/day does your plant normally work? Days per week?
8. How long have you been in the business you are quoting on?
9. What type of products do you manufacture?

10. Do you currently manufacture parts for the auto industry? Yes No

11. What are the typical tolerances with which you work?
12. What are the typical materials you utilize?

CURRENT CUSTOMERS % PPM CURRENT CUSTOMERS % PPM

NOTE: - % = PERCENT OF TOTAL VOLUME PPM = (RETURN + SCRAPPED + SORTS + REWORKS) X 1,000,000 / RECEIPTS

13. Standard Lead-time to PPAP parts? Weeks

 Potential Supplier Assessment Results

Element
Status
Element
10

Score
A Business Planning and Management Review Audit Trail
5.1 Management Commitment 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PASS
5.2 Customer Focus 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PASS
5.3 Quality Policy 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PASS
5.4 Quality Objectives 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PASS
6.1 Provision of Resources 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PASS
5.6 Management Review 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PASS
8.2 Monitoring and Measurement 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PASS
B Process Monitoring and Improvement Audit Trail
8.1 Measurement, Analysis and Improvement - General 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PASS
4.1 Quality Management System - General 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PASS
8.2 Requirements
Monitoring and Measurement 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PASS
8.4 Analysis of Data 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PASS
8.5 Improvement 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PASS
C New Product Development Audit Trail
7.2 Customer-related Processes 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PASS
7.1 Planning of Product Realization 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PASS
7.3 Design and Development 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PASS
8.1 Measurement, Analysis and Improvement - General 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PASS
D Provision Audit Trail
7.5 Production and Service Provision 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PASS
8.2 Monitoring and Measurement 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PASS
8.3 Control of Nonconforming Product 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PASS
7.4 Purchasing 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PASS
7.6 Control of Measuring and Monitoring Devices 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PASS
E Administration and Resources
5.5 Responsibility, Authority and Communication 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PASS
4.2 Documentation Requirements 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PASS
6.2 Human Resources 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PASS
6.3 Infrastructure 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PASS
6.4 Work Environment 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PASS
7.5 Production and Service Provision 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PASS
F Statistical Techniques
8.1 Measurement, Analysis and Improvement - General 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PASS
8.5 Improvement 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PASS
Total Score: PASS

10
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
 COMPANY OVERVIEW

Supplier Name:
Supplier Address:
City, State, Zip Code:
Manufacturing DUNS#:

TIME IN YEARS
TITLE NAME PHONE NO. POSITION AT COMPANY
CEO/President
Quality Control Manager
Plant Manager
Production Control
Process Engineer
Product Engineer
Sales
Other

1. Are you ISO-9001:2000 Certified? Yes No If Yes, Send Copy of Certificate.

If No, Planned Date? Registrar?
2. Are you ISO/TS16949:2002 Certified? Yes No If Yes, Send Copy of Certificate.
If No, Planned Date? Registrar?
3. What is the facility size? Number of employees? Average seniority?
4. Percent Employee turnover? Management Hourly
5. Union Representation? Yes No If yes, name and expiration date?
6. Your current plant utilization? % Impact of Delphi quoted business on your plant?
7. How many shifts/day does your plant normally work? Days per week?
8. How long have you been in the business you are quoting on?
9. What type of products do you manufacture?

10. Do you currently manufacture parts for the auto industry? Yes No

11. What are the typical tolerances with which you work?
12. What are the typical materials you utilize?

CURRENT CUSTOMERS % PPM CURRENT CUSTOMERS % PPM

NOTE: - % = PERCENT OF TOTAL VOLUME PPM = (RETURN + SCRAPPED + SORTS + REWORKS) X 1,000,000 / RECEIPTS

13. Standard Lead-time to PPAP parts? Weeks

 Potential Supplier Assessment Results

Element
Status
Element
10

Score
A Business Planning and Management Review Audit Trail
5.1 Management Commitment 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PASS
5.4 Quality Objectives 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PASS
5.6 Management Review 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PASS
8.2 Monitoring and Measurement 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PASS
B Process Monitoring and Improvement Audit Trail
8.2 Monitoring and Measurement 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PASS
8.4 Analysis of Data 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PASS
8.5 Improvement 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PASS
C New Product Development Audit Trail
7.2 Customer-related Processes 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PASS
7.1 Planning of Product Realization 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PASS
7.3 Design and Development 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PASS
D Provision Audit Trail
7.5 Production and Service Provision 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PASS
8.2 Monitoring and Measurement 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PASS
8.3 Control of Nonconforming Product 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PASS
7.4 Purchasing 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PASS
7.6 Control of Measuring and Monitoring Devices 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PASS
E Administration and Resources
5.5 Responsibility, Authority and Communication 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PASS
4.2 Documentation Requirements 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PASS
6.2 Human Resources 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PASS
6.3 Infrastructure 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PASS
6.4 Work Environment 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PASS
7.5 Production and Service Provision 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PASS
F Statistical Techniques
8.1 Measurement, Analysis and Improvement - General 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PASS
8.5 Improvement 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PASS
Total Score: PASS

10
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
 COMPANY OVERVIEW

Supplier Name:
Supplier Address:
City, State, Zip Code:
Manufacturing DUNS#:

TIME IN YEARS
TITLE NAME PHONE NO. POSITION AT COMPANY
CEO/President
Quality Control Manager
Plant Manager
Production Control
Process Engineer
Product Engineer
Sales
Other

1. Are you ISO-9001:2000 Certified? Yes No If Yes, Send Copy of Certificate.

If No, Planned Date? Registrar?
2. Are you ISO/TS16949:2002 Certified? Yes No If Yes, Send Copy of Certificate.
If No, Planned Date? Registrar?
3. What is the facility size? Number of employees? Average seniority?
4. Percent Employee turnover? Management Hourly
5. Union Representation? Yes No If yes, name and expiration date?
6. Your current plant utilization? % Impact of Delphi quoted business on your plant?
7. How many shifts/day does your plant normally work? Days per week?
8. How long have you been in the business you are quoting on?
9. What type of products do you manufacture?

10. Do you currently manufacture parts for the auto industry? Yes No

11. What are the typical tolerances with which you work?
12. What are the typical materials you utilize?

CURRENT CUSTOMERS % PPM CURRENT CUSTOMERS % PPM

NOTE: - % = PERCENT OF TOTAL VOLUME PPM = (RETURN + SCRAPPED + SORTS + REWORKS) X 1,000,000 / RECEIPTS

13. Standard Lead-time to PPAP parts? Weeks

 Potential Supplier Assessment Results

Element
Status
Element
10

Score
A Business Planning and Management Review Audit Trail
5.1 Management Commitment 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PASS
5.2 Customer Focus 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PASS
5.3 Quality Policy 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PASS
5.4 Quality Objectives 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PASS
6.1 Provision of Resources 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PASS
5.6 Management Review 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PASS
8.2 Monitoring and Measurement 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PASS
B Process Monitoring and Improvement Audit Trail
8.1 Measurement, Analysis and Improvement - General 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PASS
4.1 Quality Management System - General 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PASS
8.2 Requirements
Monitoring and Measurement 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PASS
8.4 Analysis of Data 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PASS
8.5 Improvement 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PASS
C New Product Development Audit Trail
7.2 Customer-related Processes 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PASS
7.1 Planning of Product Realization 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PASS
7.3 Design and Development 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PASS
8.1 Measurement, Analysis and Improvement - General 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PASS
D Provision Audit Trail
7.5 Production and Service Provision 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PASS
8.2 Monitoring and Measurement 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PASS
8.3 Control of Nonconforming Product 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PASS
7.4 Purchasing 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PASS
7.6 Control of Measuring and Monitoring Devices 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PASS
E Administration and Resources
5.5 Responsibility, Authority and Communication 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PASS
4.2 Documentation Requirements 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PASS
6.2 Human Resources 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PASS
6.3 Infrastructure 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PASS
6.4 Work Environment 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PASS
Total Score: PASS

10
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
DELPHI

Manufacturing Capability Assessment

COVER SHEET
Supplier: PT. INFINEON TECHNOLOGIES BATAM

Facility Address: Jl. BERINGIN LOT 317

BATAM INDUSTRIAL PARK
BATAM - INDONESIA

Supplier DUNS#: Audit Date:

Reason for Audit: INITIAL FOLLOW-UP OTHER

Audit Results: GREEN Over All Percent: 100%

Follow-up Required: YES NO Follow-up Date:

Comments: DSO-28-17 - DSO-20-12

Delphi Auditors Supplier/Site Management Acknowlegment

CEO/President

QC Manager

Plant Manager

Production Control

Process Engineer

Product Engineer

Sales

Other
 DELPHI

SUPPLIER/SITE OVERVIEW

Supplier Name:
Supplier Address:
City, State, Zip Code:
Manufacturing DUNS#:

TIME IN YEARS
TITLE NAME PHONE NO. POSITION AT COMPANY
CEO/President
Quality Control Manager
Plant Manager
Production Control
Process Engineer
Product Engineer
Sales
Other

1. Are you ISO9001:2000 Certified? Yes No If Yes, Send Copy of Certificate.

If No, Planned Date? Registrar?
2. Are you ISO/TS16949:2002 Certified? Yes No If Yes, Send Copy of Certificate.
If No, Planned Date? Registrar?
3. What is the facility size? Number of employees? Average seniority?
4. Percent Employee turnover? Management Hourly
5. Union Representation? Yes No If yes, name and expiration date?
6. Your current plant utilization? % Impact of Delphi quoted business on your plant?
7. How many shifts/day does your plant normally work? Days per week?
8. How long have you been in the business you are quoting on?
9. What type of products do you manufacture?

10. Do you currently manufacture parts for the auto industry? Yes No

11. What are the typical tolerances with which you work?
12. What are the typical materials you utilize?

CURRENT CUSTOMERS % PPM CURRENT CUSTOMERS % PPM

NOTE: - % = PERCENT OF TOTAL VOLUME PPM = (RETURN + SCRAPPED + SORTS + REWORKS) X 1,000,000 / RECEIPTS

13. Standard Lead-time to PPAP parts? Weeks

 Delphi Supplier Manufacturing Capability Assessment

A. Management AUDIT WORKSHEET

Score G/
QUESTION: Suggested Evidence Checklist 0-4, Y/ OBSERVATIONS
* = N/A R

Is management frequently on the manufacturing floor and Manufacturing floor feedback, Improvement
goals, objectives posted in department,
1 participates in daily performance reviews where key quality goals, continuous improvement
* G
information is communicated? messages/awareness on floor

Is top management (I.e. Quality Manager, Logistics Manager, Questions answered during discussions,
Plant Manager, etc.) aware of the current performance to evidence provided. Documentation of data,
2 * G
Delphi and is trend analysis for FTQ, customer complaints review dates, meeting minutes, actions as a
reviewed for appropriate actions? result of data & impact on performance

Does management ensure that an enterprise wide proactive Evidence of plan provided by plant
3 containment plan exists and is being implemented when leadership, and history of implementation and * G
needed? actions/results

Documented evidence of new programs and

Is management aware of programs currently in the Early EPC's in place. Auditor should have
4 * G
Production Containment process? knowledge of launches. Responses from
mgt.

Are team meetings conducted weekly, at a minimum, where

Meeting minutes/team reporting, auditor's
5 issues that can or have impacted the quality of products sent to knowledge of issues * G
Delphi are addressed?

Does evidence exist that management practices layered audits Audit checklists / records of audits(&
6 to insure continued compliance to the common business frequency), who was involved, actions / * G
systems and process controls at their facility? follow up to closure

Do business objectives, strategic plans, business quality Documentation defining connectivity.

Business performance translated into
7 improvement goals and organizatonal structure support each improvement goals Review of organizational
* G
other? chart for suffificient/key positions

Sub-tier management-Does a formal sub-tier suppliers Documentation and evidence of sub-tier

management process exist, do the quality reqmts line up with management, requirements and evidence of
8 the process for validating new suppliers and
* G
Delph's expectations, and is the process that they have for
validating new suppliers/parts effective? addressing quality concerns

B. Design Control AUDIT WORKSHEET

Score G/
QUESTION: Suggested Evidence Checklist 0-4, Y/ OBSERVATIONS
* = N/A R
Do all the following exist or are provided, if not waived by the
customer: ( Appropriate resources/facilities available to use
computer aided design, engineering and analysis. Technical
leadership provided for subcontracted CAD/CAE work. Review of resources, responsibilities, skill
1 CAD/CAE systems capable of two way interface with customer set, workload and facilities/CAD/CAE * G
systems.)? systems suitability

Are there records of formal documented design reviews by the

Design plan with appropriate documentation
2 appropriate functions conducted at applicable stages per the and evidence related to design reviews
* G
design plan?

When required by the customer, is there a comprehensive

New program launch requirement document,
3 prototype process? prototype process review
* G

For new program launches, does a comprehensive Early

New product launch list and document that
4 Production Containment plan exist? addresses EPC, review of actual EPC * G
process

Is a copy of all applicable specifications(example SAE, ISO,

Ask supplier to show you the specs that they
5 etc.) on hand and current? have on hand and consider to be current
* G

Is there documentation verifying the material they are buying is

right, when a supplier is allowed to utilize a different sub- Comparison to original spec vs. supplier
6 specification and buy material different than on original spec, ? specification, verification documentation/ * G
procedure, customer approval for sub-specs

If design responsible, and has had previous design

responsibility for similar products, is there warranty Look for detailed component drawings.
7 performance data available for these products that Warranty data on previous supplier design * G
responsible products
demonstrate process capability?

Is there capability to do validation testing that is required, and

Tour their validation and test facilities.
8 ability to do "stack-up" testing? Certifications.
* G

Is there evidence that they are able to achieve tolerances for

Look at the drawings and have them show
9 similar products that they are quoting? actual data demonstrating their capability.
* G

Is the performance testing (that considers and includes as

appropriate - life, durability, reliability) tracked for timely Evidence of performance testing document
10 completion and conformance? and process, contents and status/date of * G
current product performance testing plan

04/11/2023 10
 Delphi Supplier Manufacturing Capability Assessment

C . Change Control(Design & Process) AUDIT WORKSHEET

Score G/
QUESTION: Suggested Evidence Checklist 0-4, Y/ OBSERVATIONS
* = N/A R

Supplier documentation of changes

Are change requests processed correctly through the Supplier
1 completed and in process. Supplier review on * G
Portal? Supplier Portal of changes

Supplier has copy of document or can access

Does supplier understand Delphi Change Control process and on line. Questions asked during discussion,
2 4 G
requirements? evidence change control is discussed.
evidence from above.

Does supplier understand the consequences of an un-

3 Same as above * G
authorized change to supplier & Delphi?
Review of PFMEA and Process Control
Is there any evidence of a change implemented by supplier Documents, prints, etc for differences that
4 that would be categorized as unauthorized and not yet known might be characterized as a change that 4 G
by Delphi? required approval. Added lines or sites,
material changes.

D. Material & Logistics AUDIT WORKSHEET

Score G/
QUESTION: Suggested Evidence Checklist 0-4, Y/ OBSERVATIONS
* = N/A R
Are part storage areas at each operation labeled to show part Review of areas, Label with part numbers at
1 4 G
numbers stored at that location? each storage location

Part container dates at each operation show

2 Is First In/First Out maintained at each operation? oldest material being used first, compare to 4 G
what is being used

Are Min/Max quantities displayed at each operation's part Min/Max inventory label at each operation's
3 storage location 4 G
storage location?
Operators not over producing, evidence of
Are operators working ahead? (staging parts in a manner that
4 defects on parts due to staging. Operators not 4 G
could result in the creation of defects) at station

Is there proper lot traceability/identification of all material?(in- Evidence of traceability/identification for all
5 4 G
process, final labeling, pkg. and shipping) material at various stages

Traceability and identification method and

Can the parts run since the last good check be traced to the
6 consistency. Recent problem evidence of 4 G
producing shift and operation to prevent reoccurrence? how well this was done

Are only materials(standard packs) needed to complete the Compare what should be and what is at each
7 4 G
work order available at the station? work station(standard pack)

Audit appearance of parts, packaging,

Does packaging protect parts in storage and in transit to the susceptibility to damage protection provided,
8 4 G
customer ? past defects(do not include transportation
carrier caused)

Are proper storage areas available/in use, to prevent damage Humidity / temp. appropriate (part reqmts),
9 or deterioration of product quality pending use or delivery to overstacking. foreign material in packaging, 4 G
customer? appearance of packaging(damaged, wet, etc.)

Staging / cleaning returnables with / without

Are returnable containers handled properly to prevent quality
10 parts , prodecure of care by management / 4 G
issues? workers, shipments -condition of returnables

Look at certification procedure and WI's,

Is there an adequate certification/verification of all incoming
11 records of incoming part or certification 4 G
material, including raw materials? checks
Is all incoming material traceable through the process back to
12 See how done with actual part 4 G
the incoming certifications?
Material shelf life reqmts, compliance,
13 Is "shelf life" of material controlled? outdated material in storage areas
4 G

Is there an acceptable level of knowledge of scheduling Review schedule and shipping performance,
14 4 G
product ? Delivery problem cases

When necessary, does the ability exist to export parts out side
15 Review product export documents, process * G
of their country?

04/11/2023 11
 Delphi Supplier Manufacturing Capability Assessment

E. Quality System-Process Control Plan AUDIT WORKSHEET

Score G/
QUESTION: Suggested Evidence Checklist 0-4, Y/ OBSERVATIONS
* = N/A R

Review process control documents for

current or similar products requiring these
1 type of tolerances. Look for evidence of 4 G
For customer required tolerances, is supplier capable of process stability and capability over time.
producing a new product to those tolerances?(MSA, Stability,
Capability)

Review drawings for reqmts, review process

control documents, review reject/return parts
2 Is the ability to meet special drawing reqmts/specs relationship to spec reqmts, FTQ fallout,
4 G
demonstrated, including any standard bill of process or best QCOS(quality contol operating standards)
practice that may exist for this technology?
Easily accessible to appropriate operators and others as Do operators know where control plan is
3 4 G
needed? kept? Is it on or close to the line?

Does the production process control plan agree with the actual Control Plan and Operator Instructions, PFD
4 to actual process layout and controls
4 G
process, and is it being followed?

Do control plans cover three phases,( prototype, pre-launch Review of control plans and customer
5 4 G
and production), as required by the customer? requirement.

Follow process to verify controls and

Are all controls working properly, and is process monitoring
6 monitoring actions and documentation of 4 G
being done properly and on an established basis? timing

Are control plans reviewed and updated as appropriate when Review of control plan change process, latest
update, change types, records of conditions
7 any of the following occurs? (product or process changes, described and reference to control plan
4 G
processes are found to be unstable or non-capable, inspection method,
frequency, etc. is revised) updates

For current production product, does the manufacturing

location maintain or exceed the process capability/design Compare PPAP requirements, current
reqmts. performance as approved by PPAP? process performance, measurement and
controls, implementation and adherence to
8 the CP, PFD, measurement technique, 4 G
sampling plans, and reaction plans when
acceptance criteria is not met, Design reqmts
to current process controls set

Does the statistical data make sense (Reasonable control Review of statistical data, print requirements,
limits, normal variation, common cause vs. special cause)? to charts and graphs. Are controls set
9 correctly? Does the person preparing and 4 G
analyzing understand statistical process
control?

E.2 Quality System-Process Control Plan continued AUDIT WORKSHEET

Is the method acceptable for determining what is critical and
quality control critical in their process? Documentation, procedure, etc.. That would
describe this, questioning how decisions were
10 made, observation of process versus what is 4 G
noted as critical, customer print requirements,
KPC's

Are significant process events recorded, on the control charts? Process variation that exceeds control limits,
or shift to the edge of the limits suddenly and
11 continue that path, are there notes for cause
4 G
and correction?

On control plan or work instructions and

If applicable, is proper first part and last part inspection
12 evidence that is being performed on all shifts 4 G
performed? & results
If a sample part is selected for verification , did it meet
13 Part measured with production gages 4 G
specifications as required by the control plan?
Control Chart content, location and last
Are KPC's statistically tracked at the operation(s) that produce
14 update. Is information readily available? 4 G
them? How current is it?

Does an effective internal proactive containment process exist Evidence of plan provided by plant
to continually proactively protect the customer? (For events leadership, and history of implementation and
15 4 G
such as after a shutdown, change in work force, increase in actions/results when events listed in question
FTQ rejects, etc.) occur

Documented evidence of new programs and

For new program launch is there an Early Production
16 EPC's in place. On line review of plan. 4 G
Containment in place, and if so, is it being followed? Auditor knowledge of new programs

Are any issues from the Early Production Containment Plan Review of documentation related to EPC,
issues, actions and if customer was notified
17 being documented and addressed to protect the customer, and as appropriate, customer awareness of
4 G
if necessary, notification of customer regarding defects found? issues

What is the documented process for FTQ,

18 Is there an effective FTQ measurement process? method, scoring
* G

Are appropriate alarm limits established for FTQ, and is there FTQ Charting with Alarm limits & Control
Plan indicating FTQ Charting, comparison of
19 a reaction plan on the Control Plan that is documented and control plan, part prints to alarm limits,
* G
utilized? reaction plan & utilization evidence

04/11/2023 12
 Delphi Supplier Manufacturing Capability Assessment

E.3 Quality System-Process Control Plan continued AUDIT WORKSHEET

Procedure or WI's, and logs of data analysis

and actions/results. Do they process quickly,
20 Are appropriate actions taken for end of line fallout? analyze for root cause and take appropriate
4 G
actions? FTQ improvement.

Excessive foreign material (I.e. dust, outside

sources, material residue, human hair, food,
Are all short term and long term (inherent) sources of foreign etc) If clean room is required, is it maintained
21 material, that could affect the quality of the part, being correctly? Particle/FM continuous 4 G
effectively addressed? Short term and long term? improvement plan, action item dates(placed
on plan, and complete dates current) Team
awareness of plan

Review of control plan and PFMEA for

Is foreign material sufficiently considered in Control Plan and containment consideration. Based on part
22 PFMEA that includes specific root causes as they are type, is containment control effective enough 4 G
identified? to prevent latent type defects. Does and/or a
Contamination Team exist?

Are all processes operated within adequate environmental Part type and environmental requirements,
23 4 G
controls? audit documentation, controls in place

Is Work In Process minimized? (If operations are not

24 Material is not be stored between operations 4 G
bottlenecks, is one piece flow being utilized)

Is rework/sorting and any outside the normal process flow Review of actual rework, sort and any other
additional processing, documented sufficiently, as part of the areas out side of normal process and their
reference on control plan. This includes
25 PFD, PFMEA and Control Plan,(as a Hidden Factory, with processing within the supplier's walls, and
4 G
reintroduction into the Value Stream identified) to prevent any material sent outside for processing and
defects from occurring due to additional processing? returned to supplier for final process steps.

Are there communications concerning expectations, and Does supplier provide customer requirements
and procedures to their suppliers, how
26 processes with sub tier suppliers concerning PPAP reqmts., monitored. Performance of sub tier suppliers 4 G
structured problem solving? related to defects

How would you rate the overall accuracy and completeness of Objective view based on responses to
27 4 G
the Control Plan? questions and observations

F. Quality System-PFMEA AUDIT WORKSHEET

Score G/
QUESTION: Suggested Evidence Checklist 0-4, Y/ OBSERVATIONS
* = N/A R

Is the PFMEA being updated to include findings from FTQ as

1 Updated PFMEA 4 G
well as customer complaints?

Is PFMEA and Control Plan understood to be living documents Review of PFMEA and control plan revision
2 dates 4 G
& updated timely & appropriately?

Is there a responsible person identified to ensure that the PFD, Review of name identified on documents and
response to question by management and
3 PFMEA and Control Plan documents are updated when associated documentation that supports.
4 G
appropriate? Update dates and reason on documents

Are High RPN potential failure modes, as identified in PFMEA, Comparison of high RPN to control plan and
error proofing. Compare rating used to Delphi
4 utilizing Delphi's rating system, addressed through error- standards the supplier using the Delphi rating
4 G
proofing and documented in control plan? for Severity, Occurrence and Detection?

Do the PFMEA, Control Plan, & Process Flow correlate, and PFMEA
Control Plan
5 does the PFD incorporate all internal & external processes PFD comparison, PFD walk the value stream
4 G
related to the product? of product

Are management Line Side Reviews performed to verify

Documentation of activity, who, dates,
6 process and process documents for accuracy and actions, responsible person for follow up
4 G
completeness?

7 Is planning process consistent with elements of APQP? Comparison of plan to elements of APQP * G

Review of PFMEA content and entire process

8 Does PFMEA include all processes from receiving to shipping? of supplier, including outside the main line or 4 G
the facility sub-processing

How would you rate the PFMEA overall accuracy and Objective view based on responses to
9 completeness, including the correct use of Delphi's Severity questions and observations. Comment on 4 G
ratings? good area and opportunities for improvement

04/11/2023 13
 Delphi Supplier Manufacturing Capability Assessment

G. Quality System-Error Proofing AUDIT WORKSHEET

Score G/
QUESTION: Suggested Evidence Checklist 0-4, Y/ OBSERVATIONS
* = N/A R

For automatic inspection stations or vision systems, does a Evidence of plan and compliance for all
1 inspection/vision stations
4 G
verification/calibration plan exist and is it being followed?

Error detection is present and protection

Does the criteria for deciding when and what type of adequate to not pass to next station,
management and operation understanding of
error proofing solution is implemented make sense?
2 why EP is in place. Question person or team 4 G
(based on non-capable process, high RPN, customer responsible for error proofing. How long has it
complaints, etc.) been since EP was reviewed or upgraded,
does it make sense?

Evidence of procedure on line and in work

Are procedures clear, used correctly & test parts available to instructions, does operator understand and
3 4 G
check and verify functioning of error-proofing? perform checks without problems. Evidence
of compliance & understanding on all shifts.

Is error-proofing adequate and implemented/ working Documented daily audit of error proofing,
4 station to station and end of line FTQ fallout
4 G
according to the PFMEA and process control plan?

Are the error proofing devices re-verified following PM, etc, and List of errorproofing devices for station and
5 is frequency of the error proofing verification identified in the PM records and re-verification logs, operator 4 G
work instruction? WI's

FTQ details for each station showing what

Does the machine logic prevent non-conforming parts from was found at previous station that should
6 4 G
being passed to subsequent operations? have been stopped, test parts passing or
failing machine logic

Does work area have sufficient lighting and environmental Can operators see to do their jobs properly,
7 controls such has temperature, humidity and venting for the are the correct environmental controls in 4 G
type of process to prevent errors/defects from occurring? place based on part type?

H. Quality System-Gages & Calibration AUDIT WORKSHEET

Score G/
QUESTION: Suggested Evidence Checklist 0-4, Y/ OBSERVATIONS
* = N/A R

Does a calibration control system exist for all gages(including Record of gage calibration, complete and
1 4 G
manual gages)? current

2 Are all gages labeled with calibration status? Labels on all gages with date calibrated 4 G

Are required gages available at point of use and properly List of gages required in area, and R&R
3 4 G
calibrated? records, appropriate current dates

Are attribute gages & variable gages used when

Record of KPC checks and process variation.
4 necessary/appropriate(I.e. KPC's) for tracking common cause Gages in area.
4 G
variation?
Calibration Sticker on the gage within
Are Product Measurement Systems calibrated & work
5 documented timing, knowledge of person 4 G
instructions to utilize the gage present? performing calibration

How would you rate the overall accuracy and completeness of

the process for calibration of inspection, measuring and test
equipment include the following? (Type of equipment?, Unique
Review of calibration inspection and
6 identification?, Location?, Frequency of checks? measuring log completeness for all required 4 G
Check method?, Acceptance criteria?,CA's 4.11.2c) tools and test equipment, and detail

Are all measuring and test equipment preserved/stored in such Review of storage area, and documented
a way that the accuracy for fitness is maintained? (4.11.2.h) procedure for handling and storage,
7 documentation records of equipment
4 G
performance checks

Do gages have adequate repeatability and discrimination

8 (Gage R & R)? Gage R&R documentation and results 4 G

Is measurement system analyzed through time to determine if Documentation shows records of measuring
still appropriate, and actions taken when it found not to be? results records and actions taken if
9 measurement system found to not be
4 G
appropriate

04/11/2023 14
 Delphi Supplier Manufacturing Capability Assessment

I. Quality System-Labeling AUDIT WORKSHEET

Score G/
QUESTION:
Suggested Evidence Checklist 0-4, Y/ OBSERVATIONS
* = N/A R

Final Labels being applied to the product

1 Is labeling a part of the natural production process flow? within the work cell
4 G

Work Instructions indicating Instructions for

Is there a control to allow only properly labeled product and/or
2 product movement that include steps for 4 G
containers moved from the work cell? Label verification

Is the printer for label creation located in the work cell, and No evidence of label bulk storage or pre-
3 4 G
printed on demand and applied immediately after printing? printed labels

Assessment of area and potential for mix up.

4 Does layout prevent mixing of parts and labels? Past label issues and actions 4 G

Is the labeling process electronically error-proofed to protect

Verification of the electronic system to verify
5 the customer?(Barcode quality, cross reference and verification Labels prior to shipment
4 G
of part number, qty and sequence)

6 Is labeling a part of the Control Plan, PFD, and PFMEA? Quality Documents and content for labeling 4 G

Labels on all material is formatted and sized

7 Is supplier meeting all Delphi label requirements? correctly to Delphi specs. Scanner used to 4 G
scan material

J. Rework/Sort AUDIT WORKSHEET

Score G/
QUESTION: Suggested Evidence Checklist 0-4, Y/ OBSERVATIONS
* = N/A R

Are rework and scrap materials marked/stored in clearly

defined areas, & containers properly sized and identified for Part labels identifying rework and defined
1 4 G
visual control(clearly identified as containing material that is not storage of rework
part of the normal process flow)?

Is use of the rework or scrap containers understood and Appearance / content of containers,
2 responses from people queried
4 G
documented for the operator?

Are the rules/procedures for rework and reverification of parts Approved rework procedures, evidence of
3 through normal process clear and followed(& approved by the customer awareness and approval, 4 G
customer if required), when rework is needed? observation of rework process

Is good and reject material clearly identified?

Is there adequate identification and segregation of good and Is there evidence of good material in reject
4 reject materials to ensure they are not reintroduced into the bin and visa versa due to layout or 4 G
normal process flow and shipped to the customer? closeness? History of rejected material being
sent to Delphi

Are improvement plans in place to support scrap and rework Review of scrap and rework improvement
plan. Documented daily actions are taken.
analysis (FTQ findings), & does the supplier take actions,
5 Customer was notified when appropriate that 4 G
when necessary, to protect the customer from increased material should be segregated until supplier
possible escapes? can sort, etc…

Documentation of how incoming and on line

Is product revision level verified as current before introducing
6 material revision level is checked and 4 G
into production? managed.

04/11/2023 15
 Delphi Supplier Manufacturing Capability Assessment

K. Machine/Tooling AUDIT WORKSHEET

Score G/
QUESTION: Suggested Evidence Checklist 0-4, Y/ OBSERVATIONS
* = N/A R

1 Do maintenance checklists exist for machinery and tooling? Maintenance checklist at operation 4 G

Do maintenance trouble log exists and posted at the

2 At machinery, an up to date trouble log 4 G
machinery?

During review are machines running, logs of

3 Are machines running without trouble? down time
4 G

Are machine control characteristics tracked/controlled at each Control Chart or out of control signal (Audible
4 4 G
machine? or Visual), tracking/adjustment documentation

Is there an preventive maintenance process in place, and are PM process documentation, Records of PM
5 4 G
results of PM recorded and complete? and content, date

Work Instructions for part specific

6 Do documented set-up/changeover WI's exist? changeovers/set-up, up to date
4 G

L. 5-S (Workplace Organization) AUDIT WORKSHEET

Score G/
QUESTION: Suggested Evidence Checklist 0-4, Y/ OBSERVATIONS
* = N/A R

Are only items that are part of the process in the work areas No excess equipment/tools or parts present
1 4 G
(Sort)? in work area

Are things set in order with visual controls present(Set in Floor markings and signs identifying
2 4 G
Order)? everything in the work area

Only debris from the past 24 hours of

3 Are areas cleaned regularly(Shine)? production appears present in the work area
4 G

Housekeeping tasks are defined in the work

4 Is housekeeping identified in work standards (standardized)? instructions
4 G

Does management understand the importance of and audit Audit checklists and records of audits,
5 management review or walk around 4 G
housekeeping and workplace organization(Sustain)?

M. Standardized Work at each operation AUDIT WORKSHEET

Score G/
QUESTION: Suggested Evidence Checklist 0-4, Y/ OBSERVATIONS
* = N/A R
Are work instructions available for the following:
(1) Start/Stop, 2) Run: (Standardized method of performing
Required work instructions posted in
1 work), 3) Setup/Changeover; appropriate areas 4 G
4) Control & Gaging: (Control checks for ‘important’ product
and process characteristics))?

Are operator instructions/visual controls available and adhered Required work instructions posted in
2 to at each work station? appropriate areas and observation of 4 G
compliance. Responses of operators.

Documents: Part name/number; Print

level/date; Tools, gages, other equipment?
Do process monitoring and operator instructions Special Characteristics,Customer/supplier
designated, SPC requirements?, Standards:
include/reference all appropriate information? Operation
3 Engineering and manufacturing?, 4 G
name and number keyed to PFD? Instructions:Inspections, test, Reaction plan,
Visual aids, Tool change intervals and set-
up, Material identification and disposition?
Revision date and approvals? (4.9.1; 4.9.4)

Is each operation diagramed showing the operator's path and Diagram showing each element, order of
4 4 G
work order? element and operator's path
Is each operation audited to see that standardized work is Audit sheets with authorized personnel sign-
5 4 G
followed? offs of each review
Posting of part numbers used at each
6 Is the Bill of Material posted at each job? operation
4 G

Posting within each department with operator

7 Is operator certification posted for each operation? names that are certified for each operation 4 G

Are most current boundary samples present for each part

family produced with a label(that includes customer sign-off Agreed upon completed component boundary
8 * G
and date), and do operators know where the boundary samples
samples are located and their purpose?

Job element within standard identifying

9 Are successive checks identified in work elements? inspection of previous operation's work
4 G

Process Control Plan, alarm procedure, Work

Do operators have a standardized plan to guide them from the Instructions, Pictures. Instructions that
10 last bad part to the first good part, after a problem identification include how to stop process, trace last good 4 G
and/or correction? part, segregate non-conforming parts, identify
who can correct problem.

04/11/2023 16
 Delphi Supplier Manufacturing Capability Assessment

N. Training AUDIT WORKSHEET

Score G/
QUESTION: Suggested Evidence Checklist 0-4, Y/ OBSERVATIONS
* = N/A R

Does training plan follow the company's strategic plan, and are
Answers provided by people asked,
1 employees familiar with training plan and its tie to the company Company strategic plan and training
4 G
strategic plan?

Does training plan address need for additional training for

2 product/process changes/improvements, transfers, new hires, Content and detail of training plan 4 G
absences, etc.?

Date of last update, content of training,

Are there controls in place to ensure training plans are process or procedure that identifies person
3 periodically evaluated for effectiveness(tangible results) and responsible(or training department exists and 4 G
employee training status? person assigned) Results of training(FTQ,
customer complaint improvement)

Training records with appropriate classes

identified for all appropriate employees for
Are employee training records maintained that show who has
4 classes such as:all operator req'd training, 5- 4 G
attended appropriate quality/problem solving classes? Why, Problem Solver, Supplier Portal, Error
Proofing, Look Across, PFMEA, Lean, etc.)

How often and when is training discussed? Is

Is there an active approach to ensure employees are trained in training on employee development plans?
5 4 G
these areas as appropriate? Are employees assessed periodically? Part of
strategic plan?

Review of actual 5-Why responses, # of

Are structured problem solving training process and tools rejected responses of supplier, questions and
6 4 G
understood? (Problem definition tree, 5-Why, Look Across) answered provided by people responsible.
Evidence of tools on training records

O. Problem Response System & Reqmts. AUDIT WORKSHEET

Score G/
QUESTION: Suggested Evidence Checklist 0-4, Y/ OBSERVATIONS
* = N/A R

Does supplier have an ID and track Covisint problem solver Record on problem cases issued with dates
1 problem cases, on time responsiveness and first time o.k. responded, chart of responsiveness. Name of 4 G
responses? person(s) with ID, evidence of last log in

Is there a plan and responsible person assigned to correct poor Record of person responsible & the actions
2 taken based on data, performance 4 G
5-Whys or late responses? improvement trends

Do the appropriate supplier personnel understand 5-Why and Last 6 months closed problem cases.
3 the other required problem solver response fields and Supplier understands based on discussions, 4 G
attachments? training records for problem solver and 5-Why

Answers to questions asked of management,

4 Is supplier Scorecard understood and utilized? on line evidence provided by supplier
* G

Has the supplier updated their Supplier Profile for required

Answers to questions asked of management,
5 information(including ISO/TS status or plan), and is it up to on line evidence provided by supplier
4 G
date?

Evidence of team involvement in past and

6 Is a team approach for structured problem solving used? current problem resolution
4 G

04/11/2023 17
Supplier: Duns Code: Date:
Location: SQE/Team Auditors:
Part Desc. Plant / Quality Mgr.:
Delphi Supplier - Manufacturing Capability Assessment
A. Management F. Quality System-PFMEA L. Workplace Organization 5S
* Floor presence 4 Updated with FTQ and customer data 4 Only valid items in process workplace(sort)
* Management awareness of issues 4 Frequency of review & update 4 Order, visual controls
* Proactive containment in place 4 Responsibility for updates 4 Clean(shine)
* Awareness of Early Production Containment Programs 4 High RPN addressed & documented, Delphi rating 4 Standardized housekeeping
* Team meetings with pertinent Delphi information shared 4 Do PFD, PFMEA, PCP correlate 4 Audting performed(sustain)
* Layered audits conducted 4 Mgt Line Side Reviews 20 Total Potential 20 100%
* Business objectives & strategic plans * Planning process & APQP M. Standardized Work
* Sub-tier supplier management 4 All processes included-from receiving to shipping 4 WI's available,Start,Stop,Run, Set-up,Gaging
0 Total Potential 0 0% 4 Overall accuracy & completeness 4 WI's available work station,visual aids
B. Design Control 32 Total Potential 32 100% 4 WI's & process control content
* Computer aided design equipment G. Quality System-Error Proofing 4 Diagram of work stations
* Evidence of formal design reviews 4 Verification/calibration of inspection 4 Operation audited for standardization
* Prototype program 4 Error Proofing exist and adequate 4 BOM at each work station
* Early Production Containment Plan 4 Procedures for EP checks 4 Operator certification posted
* Applicable specs available 4 EP implementation match PFMEA & PCP * Boundary samples
* Sub-specification & control 4 EP device verification - PM & frequency 4 Successive checks
* Other design responsible quality data 4 Machine logic working properly 4 Last bad part to first good part
* Validation testing/stack up 4 Work area lighting and environmental controls 36 Total Potential 36 100%
* Holding of tolerances 28 Total Potential 28 100% N. Training
* Tracking of performance testing H. Quality System-Gages & Calibration 4 Familiarity with training plan/follow strategic plan
0 Total Potential 0 0% 4 Calibration control system 4 Addresses changes in process or people
C. Change Control 4 Labeling of gages 4 Periodically evaluated
* Change request management 4 Availability of gages 4 Records maintained
4 Understanding of change control 4 Usage of variable gages when needed 4 Active approach to training
* Consequences unapproved changes 4 Product measurement systems calibrated 4 Level of understanding of quality tools
4 Current possible unauthorized changes 4 Calibration plan accuracy and completeness 24 Total Potential 24 100%
8 Total Potential 8 100% 4 Handling, preservation and storage O. Problem Response System & Reqmts
D. Material & Logistics 4 Repeatability and discrimination 4 Tracking of responses on Covisint & ID
4 Part storage areas 4 MSA analyzed through time 4 5-Why & management awareness
4 First in First out 36 Total Potential 36 100% 4 5-Why & Covisint Problem Solver knowledge
4 Min/Max maintained I. Quality System-Labeling * Scorecard awareness and utilization
4 Staging of material 4 Part of actual process flow 4 Supplier Profile updated
4 Lot traceability/ID 4 Proper labeling and material movement 4 Team approach for problem solving
4 Tracing of parts since last good check 4 Printer available and on demand 20 Total Potential 20 100%
4 Standard packs 4 Mixing of parts and labels
4 Packaging protect product 4 Electronic error proofing of label process
4 Material storage areas 4 Part of PFD, PFMEA & PCP
4 Returnable containers 4 Meets all Delphi label reqmts
4 Certification of incoming material 28 Total Potential 28 100%
4 Material traceability to incoming certs J. Rework/Sort
4 Life of material control 4 Storage method for scrap & rework
4 Scheduling material and product 4 Container usage and understanding
* Exporting of material 4 Rules & procedures understood
56 Total Potential 56 100% 4 Proper ID and segregation
E. Quality System-Process Control Plan 4 Improvement plans and actions taken % Pts Summary R Y G Over All
4 Ability to meet customer required tolerances 4 Revision level verification 0% 0 Management 0 0 0 RED
4 Ability to meet special reqmts 24 Total Potential 24 100% 0% 0 Design Control 0 0 0 RED
4 Accessible Control Plan K. Machine Tooling 100% 8 Change Control 0 0 2 GREEN
4 Agree with actual process 4 Maintenance checklist exists machinery and tooling 100% 56 Material & Logistics 0 0 14 GREEN
4 Cover three phases if required 4 Maintenance troubleshooting documentation 100% 100 Quality System-Process Control Plan 0 0 25 GREEN
4 Controls in place & working 4 Machines current running condition 100% 32 Quality System-PFMEA 0 0 8 GREEN
4 Reviewed & updated as appropriate 4 Machine control Characteristics 100% 28 Quality System-Error Proofing 0 0 7 GREEN
4 Process capability performance 4 PM records 100% 36 Quality System-Gages & Calibration 0 0 9 GREEN
4 Statistical data makes sense 4 Set-up/changeover WI exist 100% 28 Quality System-Labeling 0 0 7 GREEN
4 Critcal controls method 24 Total Potential 24 100% 100% 24 Rework/Sort 0 0 6 GREEN
4 Significant events recorded 100% 24 Machine Tooling 0 0 6 GREEN
4 1st part inspection 100% 20 Workplace Organization 0 0 5 GREEN
4 Selected part meet specification 100% 36 Standardized Work 0 0 9 GREEN
4 KPC tracked, available, current 100% 24 Training 0 0 6 GREEN
4 Proactive containment understanding & presence 100% 20 Problem Response System & Reqmts 0 0 5 GREEN
4 Early Production Cont. followed 100% 436 Overall 0 0 109 GREEN
4 Early production issues addressed
* FTQ method Summary Scoring:
* Alarms & reaction plans Green 90%
4 Actions for end of line fallout Yellow 70-89%
4 Foreign matl sources & actions Red <69%
4 Foreign matl in PCP & PFMEA
4 Environmental controls
4 WIP management
4 Rework/sorting part of PFD, PCP, PFMEA
4 Expectations of sub tier suppliers, PPAP
4 Overall accuracy & completeness
100 Total Potential 100 100%

Pts Element Scoring

Element is not in place & no evidence of plans to implement

0

Element is not in place but a plan to implement exists

1

2 Element is in place but it is not being followed

Element in place but not followed at each job or all the time
3
Element is in place and it is being followed
4
 Supplier/Site Name: Date of Assessment: AQE/SQE/Other Competencies
Action
Items
List

Progress(NS-not
Category Comments/Action Taken(Prior to implementing a started,IP-in
/Line Ref Target Completion change, a Change Request must be submitted to Delphi process, C-
# Item Requiring Action Responsible Person Date Date via Supplier Portal for all applicable changes) complete)

04/11/2023 19
 Supplier/Site Name: Date of Assessment: AQE/SQE/Other Competencies
Action
Items
List

Progress(NS-not
Category Comments/Action Taken(Prior to implementing a started,IP-in
/Line Ref Target Completion change, a Change Request must be submitted to Delphi process, C-
# Item Requiring Action Responsible Person Date Date via Supplier Portal for all applicable changes) complete)

04/11/2023 20
 Supplier/Site Name: Date of Assessment: AQE/SQE/Other Competencies
Action
Items
List

Progress(NS-not
Category Comments/Action Taken(Prior to implementing a started,IP-in
/Line Ref Target Completion change, a Change Request must be submitted to Delphi process, C-
# Item Requiring Action Responsible Person Date Date via Supplier Portal for all applicable changes) complete)

04/11/2023 21
 Supplier/Site Name: Date of Assessment: AQE/SQE/Other Competencies
Action
Items
List

Progress(NS-not
Category Comments/Action Taken(Prior to implementing a started,IP-in
/Line Ref Target Completion change, a Change Request must be submitted to Delphi process, C-
# Item Requiring Action Responsible Person Date Date via Supplier Portal for all applicable changes) complete)

04/11/2023 22
 Delphi Supplier Manufacturing Capability Assessment
1 Procedure to use computer to fill out forms
Check List Details Sheet & Scoring
Use blank checklist - fill in score and comments. For your convenience, a " * " has been filled in each input cell that turns the cell a
light gray until evaluated. This will prevent auditor from having to fill in something for every question that is not used asked due to
applicability or choice for audit. All questions may not be appropriate depending on the audit timing(i.e. AQPQ vs. Post Production or
audit or re-audit of a section or sections), and type of assessment being performed

For not applicable questions, Leave " * " in the cell for "N/A", otherwise formula will show the line item Red if left blank.

More formula explanation: Reason for " * " , "N/A" in the question response column: This character is being filled in so that the user
will not have fill to in "N/A" and uses a single key stroke for questions they decide can be omitted for a particular assessment
purpose. The question with the "N/A" will show green but the overall summary will be accurate. A question can not be left blank,
something must be in the cell for formula to work.

The " * " from the detail sheet carries over to the summary sheet and leaves a small character in the cell to know status

Fill in checklist on computer, this will automatically fill in and calculate the summary sheet,
Use correct scoring of 0 to 4 for each question, see definition for scores on summary sheet or comment box for category. If a value
outside of 0 to 4 is filled in the cell remains gray in color.

If the entire section is " * " , then the summary will show "Red" for Over All.

Action Items List

Supplier should fill in Action Item List (sheet 3) or use Step Down Chart process, based on findings from assessment. (Format is
copied from Step Down Chart Action Items Page)
APQP may also add to Open Items List that are reviewed during Program Reviews
Track Action Item List with supplier for closure. Supplier is responsible for providing regular status updates.

Suggested / Optional Actions: AQE/SQE and DGSM discretion after reviewing all relevant
2 information and circumstances.
RED Categories or Overall Score:
Evidence of noncompliance is to be filled in on Red or Yellow rankings.

APQP -
Soucing decisions and Risk Assessment impacts or recommend through proper channels that we Do not Source to Supplier
PPAP not approved
Ask for Assistance From Other DGSM Personnel For Workshops/Training

Production:
Red results may require immediate actions such as: notifying appropriate Delphi personnel, containment, short term corrective actions
to protect nonconforming products from being manufactured or shipped.

The supplier's management shall be made aware of serious concerns to obtain their commitment and priority of additional actions,
resources and promise dates and tracked via the action item list.

SPDP tools and processes including Controlled Shipping, work shop results, Quality Focus Supplier process, through New Business
Hold may be implemented

Recommend having supplier initiate Step Down Charts to communicate over all commitment and tracking improvements. If not
already, may recommend for QFS process depending on current performance.

YELLOW
APQP &Categories or Overall
Post Production Score:
- Same Options as Above Depending on the Severity and Quantity of Yellow Categories or If Overall Score is
Yellow
Evidence of noncompliance is to be filled in on Red or Yellow rankings.

GREEN Overall Score:

Document any actions required on Action Item List and follow up to resolution