The Efficacy of Apivar® and Bayvarol® and CheckMite+® in The Control of Varroa Destructor in Iran (2009)

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 1

The Efficacy of Apivar® and Bayvarol® and CheckMite+® in the control of Varroa destructor in

Iran (2009)

Page 1 of 5

The Efficacy of Apivar® and Bayvarol® and CheckMite+® in the


Control of Varroa destructor in Iran

By Reza Phone :+98 281


International Counsellor for
SHAHROUZI Fax: :+98 281
3687061
Agriculture &
Apiculture Mobile :+98 912
2227144
Qazvin-Iran.P.O.Box [email protected]
5819733
34185-451
Introduction

Varroa destructor was first found in Iran in the 1980s and for three decades
beekeepers
Iranian have had to deal with this mite. Various treatments were evaluated
pyrethroids (Apistan®, Bayvarol®) became the most popular. However, in 1996
and
problems worsened when Apistan resistant populations of varroa emerged. The
their
reasons for the resistance development are the
main
following:
• Since 1989, Apistan has been the principal treatment used in Iran.
• Fluvalinate is liposoluble, so residues are left in beeswax combs and
progressively as the wax is reused for comb
accumulate
• Thefoundation.
wax of continuously used comb contains only small amounts of the
compound.
active
• Wooden frames impregnated with klartan (phytosanitary formulation)
•are
Theused.
new use of used strips that only contain a small dose of the active
preparation.
The parasitic mite Varroa destructor is well known to beekeepers because in
countries it is the most common cause of death of Apis mellifera colonies. It
many
found
was firstin the 1980s, and we have been faced with this problem for three
decades.
Methods of controlling the mite have been investigated and several products
approved
are now for use. A recent difficulty in Iran as well as in other countries has
development
been the of resistance in varroa to pyrethroids (Apistan®, Bayvarol®).This
has led
high mortality
to a of colonies worldwide, and we have therefore investigated
control
various products
new on
sale.
Recently, use has been made of Thymol, which is the active component of
ApiLifeVar and Thymovar as well as Apiguard. In 2000 and 2002, I tested
Apiguard,
Iran and 2008
Apiguard in in Afghanistan, also studied many publications from around the
Thymol
world. has the advantage of being a natural substance, and one with a low
humans.
toxicity toAlso Varroa destructor has not been reported as resistant to it.
However,
use of Apiguard
the has the following
disadvantages:
• Colonies must be given a double dose, and the treatment repeated in the
autumn. Mites that survive the first treatment reproduce during the bees’
season. So it is necessary to use another acaricide (according to
active
R. Shahrouzi
J.P.Faucon and
• When
2002).colonies infested with Varroa destructor were treated only with
Apiguard,
they showed abnormally high winter losses, with clear evidence of mites
(Jean.P.Faucon, Reza Shahrouzi
• A 2003).
strong odour is apparent during the three days following treatment,
disturbs the colony and stimulates the bees to clean
which
• For twohive.
their applications the treatment takes 14 -16 weeks, which is
the
inconvenient for
beekeeper.

Page 2 of 5
Page 1 / 5

View in full screen / Voir en plein écran (https://docs.google.com/viewer?


url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.apiservices.biz%2Fdocuments%2Farticles-en%2Fefficacy_of_bayvarol.pdf&hl=en)

You might also like