2009 - IPEC Excipient Information Package
2009 - IPEC Excipient Information Package
2009 - IPEC Excipient Information Package
EXCIPIENT INFORMATION
PACKAGE (EIP):
TEMPLATE AND USER GUIDE
2009
FOREWORD
Regulatory
Authorities
This document offers best practice and guidance in the establishment of an excipient
information package. The excipient supplier may be a manufacturer or a distributor (or both).
The Guide highlights the factors to consider when preparing such a package.
This guideline is the result of the hard work and substantial resources, of IPEC member
companies. IPEC greatly appreciates the many hours the following individuals devoted to
develop this guide and the generous support of their employers for providing the necessary
time and resources.
IPEC-AMERICAS
• Alexa Smith, Colorcon
• Priscilla Zawislak, Hercules Incorporated
• Craig Scott, JRS Pharma LP
• Laura Horne, Mutchler, Inc.
• David B. Klug, sanofi-aventis
• Maria Guazzaroni Jacobs, Pfizer
• Londa Ritchey, Wyeth
• Chris Armstrong, Evonik
• Judy Emmert, Abbott
• Ann Van Meter, Dow
• Cindy Libonati, Purdue Pharma L.P.
IPEC EUROPE
• Iain Moore, Croda
• Kevin McGlue, Colorcon Limited
• Carl Mroz, Colorcon Limited
• Rebecca Roberts, Colorcon Limited
In order to use an excipient, users need to obtain a significant amount of data about the
excipient manufacturer, distributor, where applicable, and the excipient itself. Many users
have resorted to sending questionnaires and surveys to obtain this information using their
own individual formats. Often these surveys and questionnaires address essentially the same
quality and regulatory concerns. It is also difficult in some cases, due to the phrasing of
specific questions, to interpret the intent of the question.
While excipient suppliers want to provide information to the user as quickly as possible,
many excipient suppliers receive such a large volume of questionnaires and surveys from
their customers that they are unable, due to resource constraints, to individually complete
each customer’s specific form. Further, because these surveys and questionnaires vary to
some degree in the specific questions asked, if a change in the information occurs, it is
virtually impossible for the excipient supplier to determine which completed surveys and
questionnaires are affected by the change. Significant time and resources are spent, both by
the user and supplier, to send, complete, return, review and track these non-standardized
questionnaires and surveys.
This guide was developed in order to address these issues. It defines the Standardized
Excipient Information Package that comprises:
The primary goal of the template is to provide standards for the exchange of data between
excipient suppliers and users that will simplify this process. By responding to surveys,
questionnaires and other requests for information in this format, excipient suppliers can
respond in a timely and efficient manner to all requests as well as ensure that consistent
information is provided. Excipient users will be able to anticipate the type and format of the
standard data that they receive from excipient suppliers. This will assist both users and
suppliers in the task of information management. In the future, electronic transmission of this
data for direct download may be possible. Additionally, this standardization will facilitate any
necessary change notifications pertaining to previously supplied information further
strengthening the excipient suppliers’ change notification program.
The Excipient Information Package (EIP) is set up much like a Material Safety Data Sheet
(MSDS) with designated sections to include specified data. Each section covers specific
topics. The minimum topics that should be covered in each section are defined, however,
additional related information can also be provided at the discretion of the excipient supplier.
If particular topics are not applicable to a particular excipient or site, it should be so indicated
in the document. Where information is considered confidential, the document should reflect
how the excipient user can obtain this information. For example, the document may state that
the information may only be obtained under a confidentiality agreement.
These documents should be version controlled by the excipient supplier. Suppliers should
have a process in association with their management of change policy for updating EIP
documents in a timely manner including updates to company and product information and
EIP template revisions. The current version of the EIP template can be found on the IPEC
website.
The documents do not require signatures, however they must be an official company
document.
The EIP documents are intended for individuals experienced and competent in the area of
evaluating excipient suppliers and should not be viewed as a replacement for audits. While
the documents are intended to form a complete package of information, each document
within the EIP was designed to also be functional as a stand-alone document and therefore,
some basic information may be common among the documents.
The following sections are expected to be included in the document unless otherwise
specified.
Section 6 – Revisions
This section provides information related to version control for the document. The
document should have a date and a version number. This section should also describe
the changes made since the last revision.
Version 1 May 2009
Copyright © 2009 The International Pharmaceutical Excipients Council
Page 7 of 24
Section 7 - Contact Information
This section explains how the user should contact the supplier to get additional
information, if needed, regarding the topics provided in this document.
The Site Quality Overview is a tool to assist in evaluating the manufacturing practices
and quality systems of suppliers, as well as a reference to inform users of the systems in
place to assure appropriate GMP requirements. The “Joint IPEC-PQG Good
Manufacturing Practice Guide for Pharmaceutical Excipients 2006" was used as the
basis to construct this document and should serve as the primary source for evaluating
responses provided by the supplier. Users of this document should be familiar with the
introduction, definitions, and general guidance that are contained within the IPEC-PQG
GMP Guide, and should refer to the guide if further details are needed.
The following sections are expected to be included in the document unless otherwise
specified.
Section 5 – Revisions
This section provides information related to version control for the document. The
document should have a date and a version number. This section should also describe
the changes made since the last revision.
The Site And Supply Chain Security Overview is designed to provide users with
information concerning the supplier's plans to ensure the protection of the product and
the continuity of supply. It is intended to provide a high level overview of these plans
while preserving confidential information.
The following sections are expected to be included in the document unless otherwise
specified.
Section 6 – Revisions
This section provides information related to version control for the document.
The document should have a date and a version number. This section should
also describe the changes made since the last revision.
Product name/code
Scope of document
Other general product information (optional)
Sites of manufacturing, processing, packaging, product release and other related sites such as
warehousing, terminals, contract labs, etc.
Exclusive distribution channels (if applicable)
GMP or GDP compliance statement, as applicable
Multi purpose/dedicated equipment
CAS number
Origin information (synthetic, animal, vegetable, mineral, product of biotechnology, product
of fermentation, etc.)
Synonyms (including INCI name if applicable) (Optional)
Morphological form (Optional)
Brief description of manufacture (blend, reaction, continuous / batch process etc.)
Mixed excipient ingredient statement
Country of origin for ingredients used in mixed excipients (optional)
See User’s Guide for other optional information to include in this section
Scope
− Site Name(s)
− Address(es)
− Excipients covered by this document (optional)
Corporate ownership (if different from site identified in Scope)
Customer audit policy (optional)
Site Details
− General Site Information (e.g. size, history, number of employees, shift
operations, site plan, union workforce (optional), etc)
− Site activities conducted (e.g. blending, packaging, testing, R&D)
− Primary applications of products produced at this site (pharmaceutical, food,
cosmetic, etc)
− Facility production of antibiotics, steroids, or hormone products
− Organizational chart (including responsibility for product release)
− Use scope and control of sub-contractors, if applicable
Include as applicable:
ISO registration number and registrar certificates
GMP Inspections by Competent Authorities (Regulatory Agencies) including outcome
General GMP statements
Other certifications or external audit programs
Site compliance with the IPEC-PQG GMP Guide 2006 (if another level of GMP are
used please specify). Parenthetical references are from the IPEC-PQG Good
Manufacturing Practices Guide for Pharmaceutical Excipients 2006.
Section 1 - Scope
Site Name(s)
Address(es)
Excipients covered by this document (optional)
Corporate ownership (if different from site identified in Scope)
Controls to assure the integrity and security of the product in transit from manufacturer to end
user. The following are suggested areas that may be discussed where applicable:
− Evaluation of carriers
− Tamper evident packaging
− Environmental control (if appropriate)
− Qualification of distributors
− Qualification of forwarders/brokers
− Qualification of intermediate storage locations
− Repacking/relabelling activities
Tamper evidence
Registrations with the FDA under the BioTerrorism Act, if applicable
C-TPAT or AEO Participation, if applicable
Approved distributors and how material pedigree is assured (where applicable) (Optional)