Correctional Counseling

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 6

1

Correctional Counseling

Student’s Name

Institution

Tutor

Course

Date
2

Correctional Counseling

The Facets of Behavior Modification

Behavior modification seems to be a sort of therapy dependent on operant conditioning

concepts. It's a framework that enables parents to employ reinforcement and punishment to

modify their children's behavior. Kids learn to form their personal behavioral choices

grounded on the understanding that good conduct results in positive consequences, while bad

behavior results in negative consequences. This strategy encourages children to make their own

decisions in order to avoid unpleasant consequences. Simply said, parents may use negative

and positive consequences to influence a child's behavior. The principle behind behavior

modification seems to be that good conduct should result in positive consequences, whereas poor

behavior should result in negative consequences. To shape and promote habits, behavior

modification employs four main components: positive and negative punishment, as well

as positive and negative reinforcement.

Discipline

Positive and negative punishment are two types of discipline tactics. Positive punishment

entails the addition of a consequence, whereas negative punishment entails the removal of

something.

Positive Punishment

Punishment is often used to put a halt to bad behavior. Though it may appear perplexing

to reference to discipline as "affirmative," the concept positive within operant conditioning refers

to the act of adding. As a result, a positive punishment entails tying a result to the conduct that

will discourage the youngster from imitating it. Positive therefore in this concept denotes the
3

addition of something. A positive punishment denotes when a penalty is added to help reduce

harmful behaviors.

Negative Punishment

Negative punishment entails the removal of something. Privileges are taken away, and

favorable attention is taken away as a negative punishment. Negative punishment can include

things like aggressively dismissing a temper tantrum, putting a kid in time-out ensuring they do

not get any positive regard, or removing a child's technology rights.

Reinforcement

Reinforcement seems to be a method of encouraging or discouraging certain behaviors.

Reinforcement, like discipline, may be good or negative.

Positive Reinforcement

When a youngster is given anything, they enjoy in order to promote good conduct, this is

known as positive reinforcement. Positive reinforcement seems to be a fairly effective

disciplinary method in most cases. Positive reinforcement can take the form of praise, a graded

reward structure, or a token exchange.

Negative Reinforcement

When a youngster is encouraged to improve their conduct since it will result in the

removal of something unpleasant, this is known as aversive stimuli. When a youngster quits

doing something because their parents scream at them, they are attempting to eliminate the

negative reinforcer. Negative reinforcement becomes less efficient than positive encouragement

with children, thus it has to be used cautiously.

The most critical part of behavioral change and the essential to lasting success is

consistency. When a youngster is praised or rewarded for making good decisions, such decisions
4

become habitual. The applause and incentive can be progressively tapered away over time, while

the good choices remain. To be successful, negative consequences should be constant. When

negative effects are inconsistent, youngsters learn that they may get away with making poor

decisions on occasion and are thus more prone to engage in risky conduct.

Compare and Contrast Operant and Classical Conditioning

Both classical as well as operant conditioning entail creating associations between

behavior and occurrences in an organism's settings and are guided by a number of general

principles of correlation - for instance, it is simpler to link stimuli that are comparable to each

other and happen at comparable times.

Classical conditioning entails linking an instinctive reaction to a stimulus, whereas

operant conditioning entails linking a chosen activity to a consequence. The learner gets

additionally compensated with rewards throughout operant conditioning, whereas classical

conditioning does not. Also keep in mind that classical conditioning needs the person to be

inactive and undertake some type of action to be punished or rewarded, but operant conditioning

demands the person to actively engage and conduct some course of behavior in order to be

punished or rewarded. The target must first exhibit a conduct that may be awarded or penalized

for operant conditioning to function. On the other side, classical conditioning entails creating a

link with a previously occurring event.

The method by which a conditioned response is learned differs between operant

and classical conditioning. Whenever a conditioned stimulus is coupled with an unconditioned

stimulus, this is known as classical learning. In contrast to classical learning, operant

conditioning entails utilizing reward to encourage or discourage a certain behavior. The reaction

or conduct is spontaneous in classical conditioning. The action is deliberate in operant


5

conditioning. An initially neutral stimulus gets matched with an automatic reaction in classical

conditioning. A response is linked with a response in operant conditioning. A stimulus comes

even before reaction in classical conditioning. In operant, a conduct is compensated initially,

then it will be rewarded or punished again.

In behavior therapy, both operant and classical conditioning are significant. Both types of

conditioning are instances of behaviorism, so it's intriguing to understand how these notions are

used.
6

References

You might also like