People v. Monallo PDF
People v. Monallo PDF
People v. Monallo PDF
SYNOPSIS
Appellant was found guilty by the trial court of the crime of rape for
sexually abusing Rozaldiza Nabor. He was sentenced to suffer the penalty of
reclusion perpetua. Hence, this appeal.
In affirming the conviction of appellant, the Supreme Court ruled that
when a rape victim's testimony is straightforward and candid, unshaken by
rigid cross-examination and unflawed by inconsistencies or contradictions in its
material points, the same must be given full faith and credit. The credibility of a
rape victim is augmented when she has no motive to testify against the
appellant or where there is absolutely no evidence which even remotely
suggest that she could have been actuated by such motive. The victim's
testimony was buttressed by the medico-legal findings. The fresh lacerations in
the victim's hymen are the best physical evidence of her defloration. The
presence of motile sperm cells in the victim's violated organ affirms her charge
more than words and anger alone could prove. Her contusion on the right cheek
and hematoma on the right thigh are ample proof of struggle and resistance
against rape. The physical evidence showing the use of brutal force on the
victim when she was sexually assaulted certainly speaks louder than words.
Moreover, it is highly inconceivable for a young barrio lass, inexperienced with
the ways of the world, to fabricate a charge of defloration, undergo a medical
examination of her private parts, subject herself to public trial and tarnish her
family's honor and reputation unless she was motivated by a potent desire to
seek justice for the wrong committed against her.
SYLLABUS
DECISION
CALLEJO, SR., J : p
Spouses Romeo Nabor and Liliosa Napay and their nine-year old 1
daughter Rosaldiza Nabor tenanted and lived in a coconut plantation located in
Barangay Salugan, Camalig, Albay. Rosaldiza helped in the household chores by
washing the family's dirty laundry every Saturday at the barangay reservoir.
The route to the reservoir was uninhabited. Going there was quite a long trek. It
usually took Rosaldiza fifteen minutes to negotiate the grassy path from the
reservoir to their house.
In the early morning of March 30, 1992, Liliosa left their house for the
market. Rosaldiza went to the reservoir to wash her clothes bringing with her a
pail and a basin. She wore a t-shirt and a pair of short pants. After washing her
clothes, Rosaldiza took a quick bath. 4 At around 11:00 a.m., Rosaldiza, who
was drenched all over, left the reservoir and trekked the same route in going
home. On her way, Alex suddenly appeared from the bushes and grabbed
Rosaldiza from behind. Alex was completely naked. He covered her mouth and
poked a knife on her neck. Rosaldiza dropped the basin and the pail she was
carrying and fought with Alex to extricate herself from his clutches. However,
he was too strong for her. Alex dragged her to a grassy portion, pulled her
down and pinned her to the ground. 5 She cried and shouted for help, at the
same time, resisting Alex's advances. However, when Alex boxed Rosaldiza on
her thighs and on her abdomen, she lost consciousness. When she regained
consciousness, Rosaldiza noticed that she was completely naked. She felt weak
and tired. Her private parts and body ached all over. She noticed semen in her
vagina. 6 Fearing for her life and completely devastated, she cried bitterly. Alex
dressed up and warned her not to tell her parents, brothers and sisters of the
incident, otherwise, he would kill them all. Rosaldiza put on her clothes and ran
home. By then, Liliosa was already in the house. Rosaldiza related to her
mother what happened to her. 7 Stunned by the revelation of her daughter,
CD Technologies Asia, Inc. © 2021 cdasiaonline.com
Liliosa accompanied Rosaldiza to the house of the barangay captain, but the
latter was out of the house. The distraught Liliosa and Rosaldiza proceeded to
the house of barangay kagawad Elesio Obal to whom they related that Alex
raped Rosaldiza. Liliosa, Rosaldiza and Elesio boarded a tricycle and went to the
Camalig Police Station 8 where Liliosa and Rosaldiza had the incident reported
in the police blotter. 9 The trio then proceeded to the Rural Health Unit of
Camalig where Dr. Ma. Crispa Loria-Florece, the Municipal Health Officer,
conducted a physical, pelvic and smear examinations of Rosaldiza. Dr. Loria-
Florece signed and issued a medico-legal certificate 10 which reads:
*Physical findings:
-CONTUSION — right cheek
-Adnexa (-)
-W/ bloody & whitish stick mucous per examining Finger
On April 27, 1992, an Information was filed with the Regional Trial Court of
Legaspi City, charging Alex with rape, the accusatory portion of which reads:
That on the 30th day of March 1992, at more or less 11:00
o'clock A.M. at Barangay Salugan, Camalig, Albay, the accused with
lewd design, armed with a knife, by means of violence and
intimidation, poked the victim Rosaldiza Nabor y Nebres with said knife
and when the victim resisted, slapped her rendering her unconscious,
and while in that stae (sic) accused have carnal knowledge with
Rozaldiza N. Nabor, to the latter's damage and prejudice.
CONTRARY TO LAW. 11
Teresita Manallo testified that when she visited her husband, Alex, in his
cell after his arrest, he confided to her that he already admitted the charge.
She likewise testified that Alex instructed her to talk to Liliosa and ask her
forgiveness and if possible to settle the matter with the Nabors. She claimed
that on her way out of the municipal jail she chanced upon the Nabors and
relayed to them the instructions of Alex. However, the Nabors rejected the offer
of settlement. Liliosa was resolute in filing a case against Alex.
On April 25, 2000, the trial court rendered its decision 18 finding Alex
guilty as charged, the dispositive portion of the decision reads:
WHEREFORE, premises considered, the accused Alex Manallo is
hereby found guilty beyond reasonable doubt of the crime of rape by
using force and intimidation as defined and penalized under Art. 335
(1) of the Revised Penal Code and he is hereby sentenced to suffer the
penalty of imprisonment of Reclusion Perpetua , to pay complainant
P75,000.00 as indemnity, P50,000.00 as moral damages and the costs.
SO ORDERED. 19
The trial court considered appellant's flight from the scene of the crime,
his having jumped bail and for eluding arrest for six long years as evidence of
his guilt for the crime charged:
. . . Besides, the flight of the accused in jumping bail and going
CD Technologies Asia, Inc. © 2021 cdasiaonline.com
into hiding for (6) years is evidence of his guilt. He would not have fled
if his story is true. The court noted that during the years that the
accused was in hiding, the complainant was relentless in her efforts to
locate the accused so that he may be arrested. Complainant's
demeanor in court showed insincerity. 23
PROS. DE MESA:
Q Ms. Witness, are you the same Rosaldiza Nabor, the private
complainant in this case?
A Yes, sir.
Q Where were you on March 30, 1992 particularly in the morning of
11:00 o'clock more or less?
A I was on my way home coming from the water reservoir of our
place where I washed our clothes, when suddenly a man who
came from nowhere poked a knife on me.
Despite the threats of appellant to kill her and her family, Rosaldiza
spontaneously reported to her mother the bestial assault on her by appellant.
As disclosed by the records, Rosaldiza constantly cried during her testimony.
Her tears add poignancy and credibility to the rape charge with the verity born
out of human nature and experience. 25
On review, the Court finds that the testimony of Rosaldiza bears the
hallmarks of truth. It is consistent on material points. The rule is that when a
rape victim's testimony is straightforward and candid, unshaken by rigid cross-
examination and unflawed by inconsistencies or contradictions in its material
points, the same must be given full faith and credit. It is a well-entrenched
jurisprudential rule that the credibility of a rape victim is augmented when she
has no motive to testify against the appellant or where there is absolutely no
evidence which even remotely suggest that she could have been actuated by
such motive. 26
Rosaldiza's testimony is buttressed by the medico-legal findings of Dr.
Florece. The fresh lacerations in Rosaldiza's hymen are the telling and
irrefutable, the best physical evidence of her defloration. The presence of
motile sperm cells in the victim's violated organ affirms her charge more than
words and anger alone could prove. 27 Her contusion on the right cheek and
hematoma on the right thigh are ample proof of struggle and resistance against
rape. These physical evidence showing the use of brutal force on the victim
when she was sexually assaulted certainly speak louder than words. 28 In
countless cases, we have taken judicial notice of the fact that it is highly
inconceivable for a young barrio lass, inexperienced with the ways of the world,
to fabricate a charge of defloration, undergo a medical examination of her
private parts, subject herself to public trial and tarnish her family's honor and
reputation unless she was motivated by a potent desire to seek justice for the
wrong committed against her. 29
The Court has taken judicial cognizance of the fact that in rural areas in
this country, young girls, by custom and tradition, act with circumspection and
prudence, and that great caution is observed so that their reputation remains
untainted. 35 Even assuming arguendo that the offended party was a girl of
loose morals, as claimed by the appellant, it is settled that moral character is
immaterial in the prosecution and conviction for rape for even prostitutes can
be rape victims. 36
The case for the prosecution was even fortified by no less than the
evidence of the appellant. His wife Teresita testified that he instructed her to
plead for Rosaldiza's forgiveness and for the settlement of the case, and in
obedience to said instruction, Teresita did relay Alex's plea for forgiveness and
for an amicable settlement to Liliosa, the mother of the victim but that Liliosa
turned down appellant's plea:
ATTY. MUÑOS:
Q And so when your mother-in-law came back from the municipal
jail telling you that you'll be the one to go there because she
cannot stand her son being beaten by the policeman, what did
you do?
A Yes, Sir.
Q And what did he tell you?
CD Technologies Asia, Inc. © 2021 cdasiaonline.com
A Alex Manallo informed me that he already admitted the act, and
instructed me to ask forgiveness from the mother for me, or if
not to settle the matter, sir.
A Yes, Sir.
Q Did you ask him something more?
Wait.
Q All right, when your husband told you that you ask forgiveness
from the mother for me, who is that mother, who is that person
referred to as the mother that you are supposed to ask
forgiveness for your husband?
The Court cannot write finis to this case without making of record its
concern and displeasure at the egregious procedural lapse of the trial court in
granting bail to appellant. It bears stressing that he was charged with rape
punishable by reclusion perpetua to death. Section 5, Rule 114 of the 1985
Rules of Criminal Procedure reads:
SEC. 5. Burden of proof in Bail application. — At the hearing
of an application for admission to bail filed by any person who is in
custody for the commission of an offense punishable by reclusion
perpetua to death, the prosecution has the burden of showing that
evidence of guilt is strong. The evidence presented during the bail
hearings shall be considered automatically reproduced at the trial, but
upon motion of either party, the court may recall any witness for
additional examination unless the witness is dead, outside of the
Philippines or otherwise unable to testify. (7a) 43
The trial court was mandated, in resolving a motion or petition for bail, to
do the following:
The presiding judge of the trial court thus exposed his gross ignorance of
the law. As a consequence, the appellant jumped bail and managed to elude
arrest for six years, to the prejudice of the administration of justice.
Costs de oficio.
SO ORDERED.
CD Technologies Asia, Inc. © 2021 cdasiaonline.com
Bellosillo, Mendoza, Quisumbing, and Austria-Martinez, JJ., concur.
Footnotes
5. id., p. 20.
6. id., p. 20.
7. TSN, 6 July 1998, pp. 4–5.
8. TSN, 30 September 1998, pp. 5–6.
9. Exhibit "C."
10. Records, p. 4.
11. id., p. 12.
12. id., pp. 14–15.
13. id., p. 16.
14. id., p. 17.
15. id., p. 42.
16. id., p. 139.
17. TSN, 13 July 1999. pp. 3–6.
18. Records, pp. 308–312. Penned by Judge Vladimir B. Brusola.
43. Supra.
44. Tabao vs. Judge Espina, 309 SCRA 273, 289 (1999).
45. 311 SCRA 99 (1999).