Fiona Cristy Lao Essay Answer Style
Fiona Cristy Lao Essay Answer Style
Fiona Cristy Lao Essay Answer Style
July 8, 2018
Good day!
Lately, I have received a number of messages, not only from my friends but the
public as well, asking me how I crafted my answers in the Bar Examinations.
We have to understand that the most distinguished constraint we tackle in the Bar
is TIME.
I will try to dissect to you the paragraphs that consist my entire answer (an answer
that saves time and covers all the bases, so to speak).
If my memory serves me well, I think the question was: can cruelty be appreciated
as an aggravating circumstance? You can imagine that the examiner presented the
facts in such a way that would confuse the examinees. But if you know how to spot
MATERIAL FACTS, then answering essays will be a breeze.
The first par. contains your categorical answer: NO, cruelty cannot be appreciated
as an aggravating circumstance;
Then move to the next part which starts with, "because," followed by your
FACTUAL reason. Remember, not legal reason but factual.
If you can see, the MATERIAL FACT in that problem was "Jose's body was
dumped at the meat grinder when he was already dead." This is material because
cruelty can only be appreciated as an aggravating circumstance when there is
evidence that he was still alive when it was inflicted upon him. This material fact is
your FACTUAL REASON.
Second Paragraph. This is your LEGAL REASON. This is where you lay down the
legal reason for your categorical answer. This is the part where you demonstrate to
the examiner that you know the law and jurisprudence that govern the case at hand.
Third Paragraph. The first part is where you summarize why the facts come or do
not come within the contemplation of the law. Begin with "in this case," followed
by your analysis of the facts and the applicable law. Lastly, form your conclusion.
Start with, "hence" or "therefore."
The advantage of this structure is that it addresses the constraint posed above - it
saves your time.
But more importantly it gives the examiner a quick view of the accuracy of your
answer. It already gives him/her a concise idea of your answer which will entice
him to read it further.
When I took the Bar, I always kept it in mind that the examiner would be checking
thousands of notebooks and that he/she would not put more effort in appreciating
my answers than that he/she would make for the answers of other Barristers.
Don't try to impress the examiner with verbal gymnastics. Impress him/her with
accurate legal and jurisprudential bases. And yes, that's correct. Cite cases if you
have to. In Mercantile Law and Labor Law, I cited cases the titles of which I was
sure of. Don't hesistate if you are certain. I obtained higher scores than what I
expected in both subjects. (Please don't state the G.R. No.)