Enable Your Growth Strategy Blog
Enable Your Growth Strategy Blog
Enable Your Growth Strategy Blog
Senior executives know that, beyond mergers and acquisitions, a company’s growth is driven
one deal at a time through the effective sales and negotiations of their direct and indirect
salespeople.
That’s why American corporations spend $7.2 billion (1) every year on sales processes, account
management skills, negotiation, and opportunity management training. That’s an average of
$347,000 per company, according to Selling Power. But beyond proprietary (and perhaps
biased) consulting reports and high-level academic papers on change, there’s little information
available on whether those that invest money are achieving a return on their investment that’s
at least equal to—if not better than—their cost of capital.
(1) Journal of Personal Selling
When we started researching the ROI challenge, we found that others were asking at the same
question and uncovered the following which begins to paint the picture.
• Inconsistent usage: “...more than half of firms report investing $1500 to $7500 annually
per sales rep in training...only a quarter of reps consistently use their company’s accepted
methodology more than half the time, only 10% resolutely (greater than 90% of the time).”
(2)
(2) CSO Insights “Sales 2.0 Whitepaper"
• Minimal Adoption: “Eighty-seven percent of training is lost within one month.” (3)
(3) Sales Executive Council of the Corporate Executive Board
• Missing connection to value drivers: “Financial and human resources are precious and
constrained assets. We frequently see companies with a slew of goals that have no clear
connection to real value drivers, and that diffuse or dilute those assets. Organizations use
up valuable resources with only modest connection to the highest impact execution
priorities.” (4)
(4) Axiom Consulting Partners, Winning Axiom #2
Do any of these challenges ring true? Have you been wondering or been frustrated with the
ability to implement sales training programs and get them to “stick?" We were too, so we
underwent an exhaustive search to determine: what drives implementation and adoption?
In partnership with Selling Power Magazine, The Professional Society for Sales and Marketing
Training, and The Standard Register Corporation we reached out to 30,000 executives to get
this question answered. We found 150 companies who felt they had “deeply embedded the
sales training into the DNA of their organization.” Of those responses the ratio of end user to
sales training consultants was about 2-1. Once we had survey results tabulated, we executed
one-on-one interviews and focus groups with respondents to get a better sense of the data.
What emerged from this work was the top three drivers of implementation and adoption:
Clearly the lead issue was #1, linking a training initiative to execution of corporate strategy. If
#1 is achieved, numbers 2 and 3 follow. Here are some quotes from the focus groups to better
defined what #1 looks like:
For us, the next logical step of this work was a bit harder. In it we had to ask, how does one
connect a corporate strategy to a training initiative? The short answer is:
Those who matter need to define their own needs and make the decision on the best way to
execute… prior to a decision.
While this takes a little more work, it ultimately leads to a much higher probability of adoption
and ROI. We’ve spent the last few years adding rigor to this upfront work to understand the
needs of stakeholders and then help them make the highest value decision on a sales
enablement initiative that drives growth.
3. Decide
• Present options for available alternatives to help improve on reported desired outcomes
• Pro Tip: Look for highest probability of success at lowest risk
4. Implement
• Measure leading and lagging
• Implement operational cadence/coaching
• Report, report, report! (celebrate)
When you would like a more in depth look at a sales enablement diagnostic, please click here.
SUMMARY
In our interview with Dave Stein (CEO of ES Research Group) on this subject, Dave states:
“In many companies, the sales team is last in line with respect to the adoption and
institutionalization of not only effective measurement mechanisms, but basic process as well.
Standards and methods are employed by every other department within a company.
Manufacturing has just-in-time, lean and the Toyota Production System (TPS). Finance has
GAAP. And the list goes on. Sales has a lot of catching up to do to be depended on as a critical
enabler of corporate growth strategies.”
• Sales training, because of its potential use as a growth engine, must be thought about—
and measured—differently than other types of training.
• All sales training is not created equal, and given the demands on managers and
salespeople, only those training initiatives that can be directly tied to a corporate growth
strategy should be chosen for complete implementation.
• For those initiatives chosen for world class implementation, there are three imperatives:
3. field sales management formally measures those who report to them and are, in
turn, measured by those to whom they report
• Finally, because neither aggregating sales stories nor measuring lagging indicators alone
provide meaningful data, key leading and lagging indicators must be agreed upon before,
and measured after, implementation of the initiative in order to determine both its
success as an enabler of corporate growth and its real ROI.
If you would like to discuss getting more ROI from your sales training initiatives, send me an
email to schedule a time to connect: [email protected]