Task 2
Task 2
Task 2
1.0 Introduction…………………………………………………....………………………..3
2.0 Turbine Types and Selection………………………………………………..………….4
2.1 Kaplan Turbine……………………………………………………………….5-7
3.0 Alternative Turbine Types…………………………………………………………..8-10
3.1 Francis Turbine……………………………………………………………….8-9
3.2 Cross Flow Turbine…………………………………………………………9-10
3.3 Propeller Turbine……………………………………………………………...10
List of Figures
Figure 1: Hydropower Plant Structure...…………………………….…………………...……3
Figure 2: Trash-rack cleaning machine……………………………………………………......3
Figure 3: Turbine selection chart, head vs discharge.……………….………………….……..4
Figure 4: Kaplan turbine components………………….……………………………………...5
Figure 5: 8600kw Kaplan Turbine Generator and description……………………………..….6
Figure 6: 750KW Brushless Excitation Hydroelectric Axial Flow
Generator Kaplan Water Turbine and description……………………………..……………...6
Figure 7: Ossberger Kaplan Turbine (trash rack cleaner)..……………………………………7
Figure 8: Turbine efficiency curve relying on discharge rate…………………………………8
Figure 9: 15KW Hydroelectric Vertical Francis Turbine Generator………………………….8
Figure 10: Low head cross flow turbine for bulb tubular generator power plant and details…9
Figure 11: The original OSSBERGER cross flow turbine and short details….……………...10
Figure 12: The horizontal and vertical inflow………………………………………………..10
Figure 13: Hydraulic Propeller Turbine 100KW Kaplan Turbine Generator for Low Head
HPP…………………………………………………………………………….……………..10
List of Tables
Table 1: Characteristics of various turbine types and their heads ………………………….......4
Table 2: Ossberger Kaplan Turbine Specifications……………………………………………7
Table 3: 15KW Hydroelectric Vertical Francis Turbine Generator Specs……………………..9
Bibliography………………………………………………………………...……………….11
2|Page
1.0 Introduction
Hydropower plants generate electricity by capturing the energy of falling water from dam. Since dam
is at a greater height, it has a high potential energy. The kinetic energy of falling water is converted
into mechanical energy by a turbine. The mechanical energy from the turbine is then converted into
electrical energy by a generator [1].
The use of optimal trash rack cleaning machines reduces the loss of performance in hydroelectric
power plants caused by floating debris. Trash-racks are fitted in hydroelectric power plants' intake
security to avoid large debris from entering and detrimental turbine parts, causing serious problems to
power plant operation [2]. In a simply put, it acts as a filter for the turbines which can be seen in
figure 1.
3|Page
2.0 Turbine Types and Selection
Turbines are divided into two types based on their water energy functionality: Impulse and Reaction.
4|Page
2.1 Kaplan Turbine
As shown in Table 1 and Figure 1 (where we have drawn lines as per the given requirement
and the lines intersect in ‘Axial’), the most suitable turbine to utilize as per our requirement
would be the Kaplan turbine. Due to the variable geometry of wicket gate and turbine blades,
it has high efficiency ranges from 90% to 93% [7] [8, p.2].
It has high discharge since its utilization concentrates on locations with low heads ranging from
1.5 to 15 meters [3, p.2] and high flow rates up to 30𝑚3 /𝑠. Power outputs for these systems
would vary from 75 kW to 1 MW [4]. They are costly, but last for decades.
Kaplan Turbine has adjustable blades (no. of blades are 3 to 5). The runner wear can be reduced by
optimising the geometries, by reducing the relative velocity based on the hydraulic design and also
by reducing the flow variation and is prone to cavitation. However, [5] provide techniques to be
followed for reaction turbines cavitation to be completely diminished:
5|Page
Option A:
Option B:
6|Page
Option C: The ‘Selected’ turbine as per our requirements.
Figure 7: Ossberger Kaplan Turbine (trash rack cleaner). Adapted from [3, p.3].
We could pick out any of these constructions as Alternative designs for Kaplan turbine since they
all meet the discharge and head requirements.
7|Page
3.0 Alternative Turbine Types
Figure 8: Turbine efficiency curve relying on discharge rate. Adapted from [7]
This graph shows that the maximum efficiency of the Propeller and Kaplan turbines is relatively better
than that of the Crossflow turbine in which these three constitute low heads. Francis turbine would also
be convenient since it’s low to medium head (all heads based on in table 1). Hence, these are to be used
as an alternative turbines to attain the requirement.
We can’t use high head turbines (like Pelton and Turgo) based on our requirement since the fluid
velocity will increase as it passes over the impeller blade. It will result in huge losses for two primary
reasons: friction loss and blade stall loss. The efficiency will plummet dramatically.
8|Page
Table 3: 15KW Hydroelectric Vertical Francis Turbine Generator Specs.
Figure 10: Low head cross flow turbine for bulb tubular generator power plant and
details. Adapted from [15]
9|Page
• Option B:
Figure 11: The original OSSBERGER cross flow turbine and short details. Adapted from [16]
Figure 12: The horizontal and vertical inflow. Adapted from [16]
Figure 13: Hydraulic Propeller Turbine 100KW Kaplan Turbine Generator for Low Head
HPP. Adapted from [17]
10 | P a g e
Bibliography
[1] "How Hydropower Works | Wisconsin Valley Improvement Company", Wvic.com. [Online]. Available:
http://www.wvic.com/content/how_hydropower_works.cfm#:~:text=Hydropower%20plants%20capture%20the
%20energy,the%20turbine%20into%20electrical%20energy. [Accessed: 27- May- 2022].
[2] I. Lučin, Z. Čarija, L. Grbčić and L. Kranjčević, "Assessment of head loss coefficients for water turbine
intake trash-racks by numerical modeling", Journal of Advanced Research, vol. 21, pp. 109-119, 2019.
Available:
https://reader.elsevier.com/reader/sd/pii/S2090123219301687?token=58DD9B50AD9335072610EB73F6E063
D4077AA687E29261E21ED14A45C713519519B37196E58162E77D0D4274F0A93BC1&originRegion=eu-
west-1&originCreation=20220527145857. [Accessed 27 May 2022].
[4] "Kaplan Turbines - Renewables First", Renewables First - The Hydro and Wind Company. [Online].
Available: https://www.renewablesfirst.co.uk/hydropower/hydropower-learning-centre/kaplan-turbines/.
[Accessed: 27- May- 2022].
https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/57a08b3bed915d3cfd000bfa/TI_UP_HD_Oct2009_Micro_Hydro
_Low_Head_Turbines.pdf
[7] M. Taih and R. Azeez, "Hydro Power", Energy Conservation, 2012. Available:
https://www.intechopen.com/chapters/40550. [Accessed 28 May 2022].
[11] "Hydropower Plant - Types, Components, Turbines and Working", ELECTRICAL TECHNOLOGY, 2021.
[Online]. Available: https://www.electricaltechnology.org/2021/07/hydropower-plant.html. [Accessed: 02- Jun-
2022].
[14] "750KW Brushless Excitation Hydroelectric Axial Flow Generator Kaplan Water
Turbine", https://www.fstgenerator.com/. [Online]. Available: https://www.fstgenerator.com/750kw-kaplan-
turbine-product/. [Accessed: 02- Jun- 2022].
[15] "[Hot Item] Low Head Cross Flow Turbine for Bulb Tubular Generator Power Plant", Made-in-China.com.
[Online]. Available: https://m.made-in-china.com/product/Low-Head-Cross-Flow-Turbine-for-Bulb-Tubular-
Generator-Power-Plant-908507545.html. [Accessed: 02- Jun- 2022].
[17] "Hydraulic Propeller Turbine 100KW Kaplan Turbine Generator for Low Head
HPP", https://www.fstgenerator.com/, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://www.fstgenerator.com/kaplan-turbine-
100kw-product/. [Accessed: 02- Jun- 2022].
11 | P a g e