Exposing Feminism
Exposing Feminism
Exposing Feminism
Language manipulation
September 15, 2008 in history
Political thought can be influenced by intentional
language manipulation.
You might think that I sound a little like a conspiracy
theorist! How on earth could anyone influence your politics
with language? Allow me to explain with a small thought
experiment.
Imagine a jungle spider.
What springs to mind? Something large, perhaps
terrifying? Parhaps something that spins a huge web.
Now imagine a rainforest spider.
Did you imagine this spider to be any different? Perhaps
smaller, more colourful, and less imposing?
Can you name the difference between a jungle and a
rainforest?
Within the last few decades, environmentalism has become a
key political issue. The jungle can be a scary place. Wouldn’t
you rather save the rainforest?
Perhaps you think that ‘those in charge’ are unconcerned
with intentional use of words and phrasing to influence
political thought. Who do you think of when you hear the
phrase ‘The Princess Of Wales’ ? Why do we have
a ‘War On Terror’ and not a ‘War Of Terror’ ?
Feminism also adopts strange tactics when explaining
foundational concepts. Have you ever heard of reverse
sexism? If you think about this phrase for a moment, you
may notice that it sounds a little awkward – as if someone
had designed it.
The idea behind the phrase ‘reverse sexism’ is that it
represents sexism directed at men, whilst intimating that this
is unusual.
What was wrong with the word we had already, just
plain ‘sexism’ ?
This language manipulation is used frequently by feminists ,
for example in the formation of organisations like Men Can
Stop Rape (intimation: ‘only men rape’ ).
Have you ever stopped to ask yourself the real difference
between ‘positive discrimination’ and ‘sexual discrimination’
? The former is policy, yet the latter illegal. However,
they amount to the same thing – favouring one sex over
another!
Here are a few more examples. Have you ever noticed that
the severe, clunky sounding non-gender specific
word Homemaker has superceded the now archaic
term Housewife ?
Why do we hear of ‘deadbeat’ dads – but not moms ?
Why do we now hear of ‘single’ rather
than ‘unmarried’ mothers ?
Why do we have ‘family courts’ and not ‘divorce courts’ ?
Why do we now hear of ‘single parent families’ rather
than ‘broken homes’ ?
Why do the BBC, who are legally required to be impartial,
self-justify their heterosexual gynocentric bias in
discusssion of domestic abuse ?
Why is it that the English ‘Minister For Equality’ favours
legislation that promotes inequality HYPERLINK
"http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/7474801.stm" ?
What do these words and phrases have in common? Each
one is fundamentallyanti-male and anti-nuclear family ,
and widely used by feminist approved media and
government. This is clearly no coincidence.
Feminism purports to concern itself only with equality
– but in reality propagates mistrust, tension and
hatred between the sexes