Additive Aravinth
Additive Aravinth
Additive Aravinth
REPORT ON:
Experiment A: Printing a humidity sensor
Experiment B: Calibration of humidity sensor
1
CONTENTS
1.0 INTRODUCTION……………………………………………………………….….3
2.0 EXERCISE A- PRINTING A HUMIDITY SENSOR………………………….…4
2.1 AIM…………………………………………………………………….……4
2.2 PROCEDURE………………………………………………….………….4
2.3 OBSERVATIONS…………………………………………………………5
2.4 DISCUSSIONS…………………………………………………………..10
3.0 EXERCISE B- CALIBERATION OF HUMIDITY SENSOR…………………..11
3.1 AIM……………………………………………………………………......11
3.2 PROCEDURE…………………………………………………………....11
3.3 OBSERVATIONS………………………………………………………..12
3.4 DISCUSSIONS…………………………………………………………..15
2
1.0 INTRODUCTION
Water exists in the atmosphere in the form of liquid and gas. When water is in
gaseous state it is known as water vapor. So, the amount of water vapor that are present in
the air is known as humidity. Therefore, humidity sensor is a device which can detect and
measures water vapor present in the air. Hygrometer is a device which is used to measure
the amount of water vapour or the humidity in the air. There are various types of humidity
sensos like Resistive humidity sensor, Thermal humidity sensor and Capacitive Humidity
sensor. For our exercise, we are using an electronic absorption hygrometer along with
Capacitive humidity sensor. This humidity sensors measure the humidity through electrical
capacitance.
3
2.0 EXERCISE A- PRINTING A HUMIDITY SENSOR
2.1 AIM
To print the humidity sensors in the laboratory using screen printer and to analyse
the printed sensor by means of electrical characterization.
MATERIALS USED
4
2.3 OBSERVATION
PAPER 1
Short name- CG
Paper Type-Coated – Glossy
Manufacturer-DuPont
Material name-5028
Conductive filler-Silver (Ag)
Nom. Sheet Resistance* Rs-12 mΩ/sq./mil
w
R s= R
l
Rs – Sheet Resistance
w- width = 1cm=0.01m
l – Length in meter
R- Resistance in Ω
w.t
ρ= l
R
ρ- Resistivity in Ωm
t - layer thickness in µm = 32.4 µm
5
Resistance R vs length Sheet Resistance RS vs length
Sheet Resistance RS
Resistance, R in Ω
0.5 9.000
0.45 8.000
0.4 7.000
0.35 6.000
0.3 5.000
0.25 4.000
0.2
0.15 3.000
0.1 2.000
0.05 1.000
0 0.000
0.02 0.03 0.04 0.05 0.06 0.07 0.08 0.09 0.1 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.05 0.06 0.07 0.08 0.09 0.1
Sheet Resistance Rs in Ω
0.050
0.250
0.040
0.200
0.030
0.150
0.100 0.020
0.050 0.010
0.000 0.000
Average Standard Deviation Average Standard Deviation
PAPER 2
Short name- CG
6
Paper Type-Coated – Glossy
Manufacturer-Acheston
Material name- 965SS (electrodag)
Conductive filler- Carbon (C)
Nom. Sheet Resistance* Rs- 60 Ω/sq./mil
w
R s= R
l
Rs – Sheet Resistance
w- width = 1cm=0.01m
l – Length in meter
R- Resistance in Ω
7
Resistance, R vs length l Sheet Resistance, Rs vs length l
1200 160.000
1000 140.000
Sheet Resistance, Rs
Resistance, R in Ω
120.000
800 100.000
600 80.000
400 60.000
40.000
200
20.000
0 0.000
0.03 0.04 0.05 0.06 0.07 0.08 0.09 0.1 0.03 0.04 0.05 0.06 0.07 0.08 0.09 0.1
length (m) length (m)
Corelation of Resistance R
Corelation of Sheet Resistance Rs
900.000
140.000
800.000
700.000 120.000
Sheet Resistance Rs
Resistance R in Ω
600.000 100.000
500.000 80.000
400.000
60.000
300.000
200.000 40.000
100.000 20.000
0.000 0.000
Average Standard Deviation Average Standard Deviation
PAPER 3
Short name- UM
Paper Type-Uncoated – Machine finish
Manufacturer-Acheston
Material name- 965SS (electrodag)
Conductive filler- Carbon (C)
Nom. Sheet Resistance* Rs- 60 Ω/sq./mil
w
R s= R
l
Rs – Sheet Resistance
w- width = 1cm=0.01m
8
l – Length in meter
R- Resistance in Ω
Resistance, R vs length l
1600 Sheet Resistance, Rs vs length l
1400 250.00
Resistance, R in Ω
1200
Sheet Resistance, Rs
1000 200.00
800
150.00
600
400 100.00
200
50.00
0
0.02 0.03 0.04 0.05 0.06 0.07 0.08 0.09
0.00
length (m) 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.05 0.06 0.07 0.08 0.09
length (m)
9
Corelation of Resistance R Corelation of Sheet Resistance Rs
1200.00 250.00
1000.00
200.00
Sheet Resistance Rs
Resistance R in Ω
800.00
150.00
600.00
100.00
400.00
50.00
200.00
0.00
0.00 Average Standard Deviation
Average Standard Deviation
2.4 DISCUSSION
1. If printed on the Coated-Glossy substrate with Silver (Ag)-5028 it will have lowest
resistance values
2. It is clear from the above graph of Resistance vs length, that if length increases, then
resistance also increases. It clearly shows, resistance is in direct proportion to length.
3. Higher the thread diameter of the mesh, higher the layer thickness can be achieved
10
3.1 AIM
The aim of this exercise is to calibrate the humidity sensor printed in the Exercise A
with the assistance of Arduino software.
MATERIALS USED
3.2 PROCEDURE
1. Now the humidity sensor that was printed during the Exercise A is cut out from the
substrate paper.
2. Since the printed sensor is a passive type sensor, it cannot be directly connected to
an instrument to obtain the required output data.
3. Hence, we use Arduino hardware to convert the parameter variations of the printed
sensor into voltage/current signal variations which can then become a readable
format.
4. Now, the printed sensor is connected to Arduino by means of snap connectors (push
button type) which is attached to the sensor by riveting tool.
5. The above setup is now connected to a laptop by means of a USB cable.
6. Now calibration is done by measuring the capacitance in the ambient air through
Arduino in laptop and humidity by means of commercial hygrometer. These values
are recorded as a reference.
7. The entire setup of hygrometer, Arduino and the printed sensor is now transferred to
a box, which contains a water container.
8. The water in the container will evaporate and thus will increase the humidity within
the box and, now the capacitance and the relative humidity are measured and noted
down with a defined time interval.
9. The entire setup of printed sensor along with Arduino is now taken to room and then
the capacitance is measured for a specific duration with time interval of 30 minutes
and it is shown in the table 5.
10. The relative humidity is the noted from the calibration table 4 itself.
11. Also, graph is drawn between relative humidity and the corresponding time of the day
11
3.3 OBSERVATIONS
Calibration graph
90
80
70
RELATIVE HUMIDITY (%)
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
10 10.5 11.6 12.8 15.4 20 24 29-45.2 46-58 59-70
12
(Pico Farad) (%)
7:30 pm (T1) 11.7 66
8:00 pm (T2) 11.25 60
8:30 pm (T3) 12.08 70
9:00 pm (T4) 12.06 70
9:30 pm (T5) 12.06 70
10:00 pm (T6) 14.88 72
10:30 pm (T7) 15.41 74
11:00 pm (T8) 15.31 74
11:30 pm (T9) 15.46 74
12:00 pm(T10) 15.45 74
12:30 pm (T11) 15.48 74
13:00 pm (T12) 15.38 74
70
60
RELATIVE HUMIDITY (%)
50
40
30
20
10
0
(T1) (T2) (T3) (T4) (T5) (T6) (T7) (T8) (T9) (T10) (T11) (T12)
TIME
13
TIME HUMIDITY from from Website (°C) HUMIDITY (%)
Website (%) (Room and and
website values)
7:20 PM 64 18.8 2
7:50 PM 68 17.7 8
8:20 PM 68 17.7 2
8:50 PM 72 17.2 2
9:20 PM 72 17.2 2
9:50 PM 77 17.2 5
10:20 PM 77 17.2 3
10:50 PM 77 17.2 3
11:20 PM 77 17.2 3
11:50 PM 77 17.2 3
12:20 AM 77 17.2 3
12:50 AM 82 16.1 3
1:20 AM 77 17.2 2
Date: 18/08/2021
Assumed Room Temperature: 17 °C
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
7:20 PM
7:50 PM
8:20 PM
8:50 PM
10:50 PM
11:20 PM
12:20 AM
12:50 AM
9:20 PM
9:50 PM
10:20 PM
11:50 PM
1:20 AM
Time
14
( T17.67T
+243.5 )
Absolute humidity = 6.112∗ⅇ ∗RH∗2.1674
( 273 ⋅15+T )
RH – Relative humidity
T- Temperature in °C
Let’s take T- Temperature in °C = 19 °C
Relative Humidity at 10.20 PM = 77%
Absolute Humidity = 11.3 g/m3
3.4 DISCUSSIONS
1. From the above graph, it is clearly evident that capacitance and Relative humidity are
directly proportional.
2. With the help of Arduino chipset and software, the capacitance is measured using the
printed humidity sensor. The recorded capacitance is then used to find the corresponding
Relative Humidity by referring to the calibration table.
4.Gradual increase in capacitance and relative humidity was observed when the setup was
placed in the box containing a container of water, whereas in room condition it is almost
constant
15