Science Research Writing For Native and Non-Native Speakers of English (Second Edition)
Science Research Writing For Native and Non-Native Speakers of English (Second Edition)
Science Research Writing For Native and Non-Native Speakers of English (Second Edition)
For photocopying of material in this volume, please pay a copying fee through the Copyright Clearance
Center, Inc., 222 Rosewood Drive, Danvers, MA 01923, USA. In this case permission to photocopy
is not required from the publisher.
Printed in Singapore
Acknowledgements
v v
vii v
result, titles have become more important, and parts of the research article,
particularly the Abstract or Summary, are developing in ways that enable
them to be read as independent, standalone documents.
w viii
All of these changes are having a profound effect on research writing,
with impacts on both the structure and the content of the traditional research
article. The form of the research article is in transition, changing to satisfy
the fast-moving needs of the research community. The function and content
of the Abstract is changing, the location of the Methods section is shifting,
the IMRD (Introduction, Methods, Results, Discussion) structure is loosening,
and markers of significance such as Research in Context panels, one-page
summaries and lists of Highlights are sometimes included, particularly in the
online version of the research article. To participate successfully in the current
research environment, researchers need to be aware of — and respond to —
these changes and developments in science research writing. They also need
to be prepared for those that are coming. This has resulted in two key changes
in the Second Edition of this book.
The first change reflects the fact that science communication platforms are
in transition. In the First Edition, research articles in high-impact journals
across a wide range of disciplines were analysed to generate what was then
a set of fairly stable writing models for each section of the research article.
Those writing models have been significantly updated in this Second Edition
to reflect current patterns and trends in research writing, but they can
no longer be seen as stable representations. Researchers now need to
develop the ability to update their writing models alongside the next
round of changes and developments in science communication. Given the
fast-moving nature of the changes outlined above, the Second Edition aims
to develop writing strategies that are future-proof and which represent a
lifelong tool, irrespective of upcoming changes and developments in science
communication.
The Second Edition develops these strategies by encouraging writers
to use a reverse-engineering approach to writing. Most reading involves
passively approaching a text as a source of information. By contrast, reverse
engineering a text requires an active reading strategy that involves learning
to step back from the information itself and become aware of how that
information is delivered. Once developed, reverse engineering can be used
by STEMM research writers as a starting point to generate all text types in
ix v
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mona_Lisa
w x
does not guarantee a successful text, and that the reverse is also true: a text
may be well-written and therefore communicate successfully and accurately
despite some language errors. I have therefore shifted the focus of the book
to language and writing issues that are common to both native and non-native
STEMM researchers, and particularly to those issues which have an impact
on meaning and readability.
Since the First Edition was published in 2009, Science Research Writing
has been translated into Chinese, Japanese and Korean, and is used around
the world at universities and research institutes, by instructors teaching
English for Academic Purposes (EAP) and English for Specific Academic
Purposes (ESAP) to STEMM researchers and students, as well as by STEMM
researchers who are native speakers of English. These users of the book have
contributed to many of the changes in the Second Edition, including the
addition of a Checklist and Tips chapter that summarises the writing issues
dealt with in other Units.
xi v
Introduction
Writing for a reader: wrapping information in a narrative
xiii v
IDENTIFYING GENRE
AND READERSHIP CHOOSING THE NUMBER,
DIVIDING INTO ORDER AND POSITION
SUBSECTIONS OF GRAPHICS
Introduction
you begin planning your text, reverse engineer a current example of the
relevant genre as a model.
Who might read this? Where do I pitch the information level of my text?
What can I assume that all potential readers know? How quickly can I move
into scientific detail? Is the readership of this text likely to become more
interdisciplinary in the future?
DIVIDING INTO SUBSECTIONS Are there standard subsections for this type
of text in this field? How many subsections are normal in my target articles?
What is the average length of these subsections? Does my work fit neatly
and logically into these subsections? If not, is the way I have divided my text
into subsections more appropriate?
CHOOSING THE NUMBER, ORDER AND POSITION OF GRAPHICS (i.e. figures,
tables, images) Do I have a good reason for including each graphic? What is
the most logical order of my graphics? Where is each one most useful to the
reader? Position each graphic within the surrounding text so that it doesn’t
interrupt the narrative flow of the text but rather comes at a natural point within
the narrative, i.e. exactly when the reader becomes aware of wanting to see it.
PLANNING THE FUNCTION AND ORDER OF PARAGRAPHS Do all my paragraphs
have an identifiable function? Is that function clear to the reader? Is the order
of paragraphs logical?
PLANNING THE FUNCTION AND ORDER OF SENTENCES WITHIN PARAGRAPHS
Do all my sentences have an identifiable function? Is that function clear to
the reader, or will they wonder why I have included it here? Does each
sentence fit with the overall function of the paragraph? Does each sentence
follow logically from the next?
w xvi
Introduction
To answer questions of this type, users of this book are shown how to develop
a reverse-engineering approach. They are guided towards deconstructing
successful current research writing in their own field to create models for
their own writing. I have used this reverse-engineering approach at Imperial
College London and other universities around the world, analysing thousands
of recently-published research articles in a range of STEMM disciplines to
construct and validate the basic models, the grammar, and the language lists
in the book. The Centre for Academic English at Imperial College London uses
the approach to teach STEMM writing to early-stage researchers, as well as
training more experienced research writers to develop and apply it. A key
advantage of the reverse-engineering approach is that it responds well to
the fast-changing nature of research writing: once the strategy becomes
familiar, writers can adjust and update their models alongside the next round
of changes in science writing and publication platforms.
The aim of this book is to provide a quick, do-it-yourself guide for writing
science research for publication. The reverse-engineering approach can be
understood quickly, used independently, and tailored to the needs of all
STEMM research disciplines and all STEMM texts, including grant proposals,
conference abstracts and industry reports. The approach is descriptive rather
than prescriptive. Instead of offering advice or telling writers what to do and
what not to do, the aim is to begin by generating a highly accurate description
of the type of writing each individual writer wants to produce. Accurate
descriptions alone, however, do not generate written text — describing
something is not the same as being able to do it, so in addition to a description
of what to do, the key contribution of this approach is that it then helps the
writer to discover how to do it, and to apply that knowledge.
xvii v
The last step in the process: Continually reinforce, adjust and develop
1–3 above via reading in the field is essential. Science research writing
is not a static genre; it is in transition, and successful writers need to be
willing and able to upgrade as the genre develops. The key to success is
to refer to a set of target research articles (or review articles, conference
abstracts etc.), update that set constantly and update the models
accordingly.
The models, grammar/language and vocabulary presented in each
chapter are the result of analysing over 2,500 recently-published research
articles in a range of STEMM disciplines in order to generate a toolkit that is
reliable and has high face validity.
Key messages:
· THE CONTENT OF SCIENCE RESEARCH SHOULD BE ACCESSIBLE TO ALL
READERS.
· THE READER NEEDS TO BE SHOWN THE FUNCTION OF DATA OR
INFORMATION, NOT JUST PRESENTED WITH IT.
· THE AIM IS NOT SIMPLY TO MAKE IT POSSIBLE FOR THE READER TO
UNDERSTAND; THE AIM IS TO MAKE IT IMPOSSIBLE FOR THE READER
NOT TO UNDERSTAND.
· EVIDENCE-BASED GUIDANCE CAN BE OBTAINED BY STUDYING THE
STRUCTURE AND LANGUAGE OF SUCCESSFULLY-PUBLISHED PAPERS.
w xviii
Introduction
sometimes to a total stop. In the current global context, research needs to
be published quickly. This book is designed to speed up this ‘lab-to-journal’
process by providing the information, vocabulary and skills you need so that
you can write quickly, confidently and independently.
As a science researcher, you read and understand highly complex material
in your field with little effort. However, you may find it harder to produce
well-written texts at that level, or you may feel that your writing does not
represent the content or impact of your work effectively. In this book you
will learn to use your existing reading ability and the material you read to
develop the relevant writing skills. You don’t need to learn much more than
you already know; you just need to make that knowledge active, rather than
passive. Science writing is easier than it looks.
Why not simply use proof-readers, or (in the case of non-native researchers)
translation software?
Turning to proof-readers or translators for help resolves some language
errors, but may not resolve writing issues. They may not notice some errors,
because a sentence which is grammatically correct will still be wrong if it
does not mean what the writer intended. The wrong verb tense, for
example, may make a finding (X occurred) look like a known and accepted
truth (X occurs). In addition, a proof-reader or translator may not check
whether your writing fits conventional patterns in your field. For example,
you may have forgotten to justify your choice of method or explain how
xix v
w xx
Introduction
1. Science writing does not need to be stylish or elegant; its primary aim
is to communicate clearly and accurately. Using elegant English may
actually make your research article less accessible, or even less accurate.
For example, using a thesaurus to avoid repetition is counter-productive;
a framework should not suddenly become a methodology, an approach
or a model without warning. Repeating the same word creates an echo
which enables the reader to recognise and track concepts through the
paper, and ensures that the concepts themselves remain stable and
consistent.
2. Good organisation and good writing can compensate for language
errors, but error-free language does not compensate for poor
organisation or poor writing. A text in perfectly grammatical English will
be ineffective and even unintelligible if the information is jumbled or
presented incoherently.
xxi v
w xxii
Introduction
sections at the end of each Unit; this book is intended to be a fast and easily-
accessible guide rather than a language textbook. Where grammar issues
are discussed, the aim is not to identify rules for ‘correct’ grammar, but rather
to avoid ambiguity.
At this stage in Unit 1, you will have a robust generic model of an
Introduction, a list of useful words, phrases and sentence patterns for each
part of the Introduction model, and a language/writing skills guide that
responds to FAQs about grammar and writing skills in the Introduction. If you
do the tasks in the unit, you will be able to put the model, vocabulary and
language/writing skills together to write an Introduction. At the end of Unit 1
you write a simple Introduction using what you have learned and compare
it with a sample answer in the Key. This pattern is repeated in Unit 2.
In Units 3, 4, 5 and 6 you are encouraged to reverse engineer your own
target research articles to create the models, and then check and adjust them
against the generic, universal models presented in each Unit. The tasks
throughout the book are designed to help you develop reverse engineering
to the point where it becomes an automatic adjunct to your reading strategies.
If you read the book without completing the exercises and tasks, you will
have an intellectual understanding of what to do but you may find it hard to
put it into practice. Knowing what to do is not the same as knowing how to
do it. At the moment, you may be focusing very strongly on the information
content of research articles, and you may not be paying much attention to
the way that the content is delivered. However, once you become aware of
the structure and language used to deliver the content, this creates a ‘learning
circle’ in which your research reading actively and continually informs your
research writing.
xxiii v
w xxiv
Contents
Acknowledgements v
Preface to the Second Edition vii
Introduction xiii
Unit 1: How to Write the Introduction 1
1.1. The Structure and Content of the Introduction 3
1.2. Building a Model 4
1.3. Testing and Adjusting the Model 18
1.4. Useful Words and Phrases 45
1.5. Language and Writing Skills 53
1.6. Writing the Introduction 69
Unit 2: How to Write about Methods 73
2.1. The Structure and Content of the Methods Section 75
2.2. Building a Model 77
2.3. Testing and Adjusting the Model 89
2.4. Useful Words and Phrases 99
2.5. Language and Writing Skills 113
2.6. Writing a Methods Section 127
Unit 3: How to Write about Results 139
3.1. The Structure and Content of the Results 141
3.2. Building a Model 142
3.3. Testing and Adjusting the Model 157
xxv v
3.5. Language and Writing Skills: The Certainty Continuum 183
Unit 4: How to Write the Discussion 189
4.1. How to Write the Discussion 191
4.2. Building Your Own Model
192
4.3. Testing and Adjusting the Basic Generic Model 209
4.4. Useful Words and Phrases 221
4.5. Language and Writing Skills: Modal Verbs 229
4.6. Summary Discussion Exercise 242
Unit 5: How to Write the Conclusion 243
5.1. Building a Model 246
5.2. Testing and Adjusting the Model 257
5.3. Useful Words and Phrases 258
5.4. Language and Writing Skills 259
Unit 6: Writing the Abstract 263
6.1. Guidelines for the Abstract 266
6.2. Types of Abstract 269
6.3. A Generic Abstract Model 286
6.4. Language 290
6.5. Summary Abstract Exercise 297
Unit 7: Writing the Title 299
7.1. Check Average Length 304
7.2. Using Acronyms 305
7.3. Compare the Title Keywords to the Keyword List 306
7.4. Check the Grammar of the Title 307
7.5. Map and Model the Structural Content of the Titles
in Target Articles 309
7.6. Check that Expectations that the Title Suggests
Are Fulfilled in the Paper 310
w xxvi
Contents
8.2. Creating Sentences 318
8.3. Grammar and Vocabulary 321
8.4. General 329
Sources and Credits 331
Appendix A: Prefixes Used in Science Writing 337
Appendix B: Research Verbs 341
Writing Skills Index 345
Language Index 347
xxvii v
UNIT 1
How to Write the Introduction
TITLE
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
CONCLUSION*
Fig. 1.1 The shape of a research article
*Some journals call this section CONCLUSION and others call it CONCLUSIONS but this does not seem
to reflect the number of conclusions that are drawn.
w 2
Notice that the Introduction narrows towards the central report section,
and the Discussion widens after it. This represents the way information is
ordered in the Introduction and the Discussion: in the Introduction you start
out by being fairly general and gradually narrow your focus towards your
own study, and the opposite is true in the Discussion.
3 v
The structure of the Introduction is similar in most research fields, and the
content links directly to the structure. This Unit will show you how to build
and use an Introduction model that answers the following three questions:
How do writers normally start an Introduction?
What is normally included in an Introduction, and in what order?
How do writers normally end an Introduction?
Introduction
1 Biomass-derived polylactide (PLA) has received much attention in
recent years due to its biodegradable1 and biocompatible2 properties.
2 Biomass-derived PLA is produced from renewable feedstocks such as
w 4
corn and sugar cane. 3 It has outstanding molding properties for use
in biomedical applications such as scaffolds for tissue engineering3,4.
4 However, its weakness under impact has significantly limited its use.
5 Biomedical applications require materials with the lowest
possible toxicity so although metals such as aluminium have been used
to strengthen PLA for industrial applications5,6, these are not appropriate
for biomedical use7. 6 One way to strengthen polymers for biomedical
applications is to incorporate a layer of keratin, a material that occurs
naturally in the mammalian anatomy, and there has been extensive
research regarding keratin-PLA composites8,9,10. 7 For example, Penney
et al. (2012) showed that incorporation of keratin fillers in the PLA
matrix could be achieved using blending techniques8. 8 However,
although the effect of keratin on the mechanical properties of copolymer
systems was demonstrated over two years ago 9, keratin adds
considerably to the weight of the composite, and little attention has
been paid to the selection of an alternative biocompatible material.
9 The present paper presents a set of criteria for selecting such a
component. 10 On the basis of these criteria it then describes the
preparation of a biomass-derived polymer blend using chitin, a long-
chain polymer found in many places throughout the natural world.
11 This combination formed a novel lightweight copolymer in which
the incorporation of PI significantly increased resistance to impact while
retaining the biocompatible features of keratin.
5 v
1.2.2 Key
In Sentence 1 Biomass-derived polylactide (PLA) has received much
attention in recent years due to its biodegradable1 and biocompatible2
properties. the writer establishes the importance of this research topic.
If you wrote the writer introduces the study for Sentence 1, that won’t help
when you come to write your own research paper, because it doesn’t tell
you how to ‘introduce’ the study. You may have started previous Introductions
by describing the specific problem you are trying to solve, or the method you
plan to use, but when you look at published work in your field you will see
that this is not how most research papers begin, and therefore it may not be
the best way for you to begin. Many research articles begin by establishing
how or why the topic is useful or important, so in your target articles you will
often find something in the first sentence like much study in recent years or
a major role or widely-used.
w 6
Sentence 2 is in the Present Simple tense, which is the verb tense used for
accepted/established facts. Research papers often begin, either in the first
sentence or the first paragraph, with accepted or established facts. This
ensures that all readers have the appropriate background information to
process the rest of the paper.
7 v
your Introduction in the same way as other authors who have successfully
submitted their work on similar topics to that journal.
What if there are several background facts I want to start with, not just
one? How do I know which one to begin with?
The shape of the Introduction in Fig. 1.1 starts wide and gradually narrows. This
means that you start with a fairly general item of information, one that many
of your readers already know. This represents a ‘meeting place’ fact from which
all readers can start together, after which you can move on to more specific
information. Always show your readers the general picture before you proceed
to the details: show them the wall before you start to talk about the bricks!
w 8
There are citation references in Sentence 3 — does that mean that this is
part of a review of the research in this area?
No, a short review of previous and current research and knowledge usually
comes later in the Introduction, and is more likely to focus on the methods
or results of individual studies. This is simply a citation reference for the
background facts.
9 v
from renewable feedstocks such as corn and sugar cane or the Past Simple
tense: Lawrence et al. (2000) found that biomass-derived PLA can be obtained
from renewable feedstocks such as corn and sugar cane. However, once that
research finding becomes well established, such statements start to appear in
the Present Simple tense, with the citation attached: Biomass-derived PLA is
produced from renewable feedstocks such as corn and sugar cane (Lawrence
et al., 2000), and eventually the citation simply drops off and the information
becomes part of the accepted factual background to the topic: Biomass-derived
PLA is produced from renewable feedstocks such as corn and sugar cane.
The only way to get this right is to check current usage in your field.
A journal article from five years ago may use a verb tense that is now no longer
appropriate, so using that tense implies that you are not up to date with
developments in your field. Search engines such as Google Scholar are a good
resource for this. If most researchers in your field currently use the Present
Simple tense when they state a particular fact, follow their lead if you also state
that fact. If most are still including a citation reference, follow their lead. It is
exciting to realise that once your status as a published researcher is established
in your field, you will have earned the right to make such decisions yourself.
Notice that the writer is still not describing the specific problem which their
own research paper will deal with; s/he is referring to the current focus of
the field, i.e. the problem of weakness under impact. This is presented as a
problem which many researchers in this field are interested in, and which
leads to the specific problem that this paper will deal with.
w 10
11 v
· General-to-specific
Writers frequently start with general research in the field, possibly a review
article, and gradually move to research that is closer to the problem or
gap dealt with in the present study. This is the most common pattern.
· Different approaches/theories/models
In some papers, studies are grouped according to the approach or
method they used. Grouping similar studies together helps you avoid the
‘tennis match’ effect where you go backwards and forwards beginning
each sentence with However or On the other hand.
w 12
· Chronological order
This may be appropriate, for example, if the development of your field is
related to political decisions and laws such as those relating to pollution
or fracking.
To link the studies and contributions, consider words or phrases such as:
13 v
This is where you begin to move towards your own paper or study, and the
specific problem you will deal with. This is normally done either by identifying
a gap in the existing knowledge or by indicating that there is a problem in
previous research. It is conventional to introduce it with a signal such as
However or Although, and these words have an ‘instant recognition’ feature
that alerts the reader to the gap. Note that in professional writing it is unusual
to put the gap or problem in the form of a question; it is normally stated as
a prediction, suggestion or hypothesis.
Don’t be shy about pointing out the problems in previous research. In
the first place it may be necessary to identify those problems in order to
explain why you have done your study. In the second place, the language
used here is usually respectful and impersonal, and therefore not offensive.
The reader may need more background information at this stage; for
example, details of the properties of the material which you are investigating,
or a description of the specific part of the device which you plan to improve.
Research writing requires a surprising amount of background information,
and it is better to offer slightly too much than too little.
At this stage you move directly to your own paper or study. You can describe
it, say what its purpose or focus is, give its structure or a combination of these.
w 14
15 v
We can streamline these so that our Introduction model has FOUR basic
components. It’s not necessary to use everything when you write an
Introduction; the model should be considered as a flexible menu.
w 16
When you have looked at many Introductions, you will notice that:
17 v
Introduction
General anesthesia is a drug-induced reversible coma commonly
initiated by administering a large dose of a fast-acting drug to induce
unconsciousness within seconds (1). This state can be maintained as
long as needed to execute surgical and many nonsurgical procedures.
One of the most widely used anesthetics is propofol, an i.v. drug that
enhances GABAergic inhibitory input to neurons (2–4), with effects in
cortex, thalamus, brainstem, and spinal cord (5–7). Despite the
understanding of propofol’s molecular actions, it is not clear how these
effects at molecular targets affect single neurons and larger-scale neural
circuits to produce unconsciousness.
The effects on macroscopic dynamics are noticeable in the EEG,
which contains several stereotyped patterns during maintenance of
propofol general anesthesia. These patterns include increased delta
(0.5–4 Hz) power (8, 9); increased gamma (25–40 Hz) power (9); an
alpha (~10 Hz) rhythm (10–12) that is coherent across frontal cortex;
and burst suppression, an alternation between bursts of high-voltage
activity and periods of flat EEG lasting for several seconds (13, 14). In
addition, slow oscillations (<1 Hz) have been well characterized in
deeply anesthetized animals and are associated with an alternation of
the neuronal membrane potential between UP (depolarized) and
DOWN (hyperpolarized) states (8, 15).
Although these patterns are observed consistently, it is unclear
how they are functionally related to unconsciousness under general
w 18
19 v
Introduction
w 20
21 v
Introduction
w 22
23 v
w 24
Introduction
Introduction
Support Vector Machines (SVMs) are among the most popular general purpose
learning methods in use today. SVM learning amounts to learning a linear
predictor, with regularization (corresponding to a “large margin”) ensuring
good generalization even in very high dimensions. This predictor need not be
linear in the input representation: it is possible to learn a linear predictor in
25 v
w 26
algorithms on a GPU are different than those for a serial implementation, and
arrive at an implementation specifically designed for graphics hardware. As
with many previous approaches, we assume that the dataset fits in memory,
and focus mostly on the Gaussian kernel, although our implementation can
handle any kernel function which can be written in the form K(x, y) = f (||x||,
||y||, 〈x, y〉) (see Section 5.2), and our ideas apply even more broadly to any
kernel which is an aggregation of element-wise operations.
One particularly significant drawback of other GPU SVM solvers is their
lack of support for sparse datasets. On the CPU, taking advantage of sparsity
is a simple matter, and sparse datasets are encountered frequently enough
that many widely-used SVM solvers treat all input vectors as sparse, by default
[9, 4, 1]. On the GPU, however, maximum performance is only achieved if
memory accesses follow certain fairly restrictive patterns, which are difficult
to ensure with sparse data. In contrast to other GPU SVM solvers, our
implementation does take advantage of sparsity in the training set through a
novel “sparsity clustering” approach (Section 5.3).
Overall, our implementation is orders of magnitudes faster than existing
CPU implementations, and several times faster on sparse datasets than prior
GPU implementations of SVM training.
Introduction
Human pluripotent stem (hPS) cells (embryonic stem cells and induced
pluripotent stem cells) are promising sources of specialized cells because of
two intrinsic properties: they can self-renew indefinitely and differentiate
into diverse cell types (1). To selectively guide hPS cell differentiation, precise
control cellular microenvironment is needed (2, 3). Considerable effort has
been devoted to identify soluble factors that promote differentiation.
Additionally, there is interest in developing matrices to support cells during
differentiation (4), yet much less is known about how signals from the matrix
influence cell fate.
27 v
Matrigel is the most widely used substratum for hPS cell propagation
(5) and differentiation (6–12); it is derived from mouse sarcoma cells, and
although its principal components are laminin, collagen, and entactin,
Matrigel consists of up to 1,800 different proteins — including encapsulated
growth factors — whose levels vary significantly from batch to batch (13).
Accordingly, the contributions of Matrigel-delivered signals to specific
phenotypic outcomes — self-renewal or differentiation — are difficult to
characterize or control. Elucidating the effects of insoluble signals requires
defined substrata. Such defined substrata have been developed for the long-
term culture of undifferentiated hPS cells in defined media. A number of
surfaces have been described including recombinant proteins (14–16), fully
synthetic polymers (17–19), and peptide-modified surfaces (20–23). Surfaces
that present bioactive peptides have the advantage that they can be
programmed to interact with specific cell-surface macromolecules such as
the glycosaminoglycans (GAGs) and integrins.
Defined surfaces can be exploited for differentiation via two distinct
mechanisms. First, surfaces can be tailored to present ligands that promote
adhesion of specific cell populations during differentiation (24). Second,
surfaces can be devised to specifically activate (or mitigate) signal transduction
pathways. Here, we use a modular approach to exploit the aforementioned
modes to control hPS cell differentiation to each of the primary germ layers.
Our results reveal the advantages of defined surfaces for decoding the influence
of insoluble signals on cell fate.
Introduction
w 28
such as aerospace, nuclear, and oil and gas, among others. Successful SHM
systems can be considered as those which combine good sensitivity to defects,
preferably with the capability of localization and identification, with a low
sensor density.
Nondestructive evaluation (NDE) systems based on ultrasonic guided
waves generated by deployable arrays of transducers have been applied to the
inspection of pipeline, rail, and relatively simple platelike structures [8–14].
These systems take advantage of the fact that certain guided-wave modes are
able to propagate through several meters of the structure, often across various
structural features, from a single excitation point. Recently, focus has shifted
to the development of SHM systems based on guided waves, where a small
number of permanently attached transduction units would allow good coverage
and real-time, on-demand inspection of complex structures [15–18].
So far, effective commercial applications of systems based on guided
waves [9, 10, 13, 14] have been achieved only when processing of recorded
time-traces allows straightforward identification of individual reflections, which
can then be attributed either to benign structural features (e.g., stiffeners,
welds, and supports) or to defects. Simple pulse-echo or pitch-catch signals
from complex undamaged structures will usually consist of a large number of
interfering reflections that cannot be identified; these unwanted reflections
are a source of coherent noise, which is highly detrimental because it can mask
reflections from defects in the structure. In these cases, it is necessary to use
a benchmark or baseline signal [15, 16, 18], taken at initial stages of operation
of the structure, when the possibility of the presence of defects due to
fabrication processes has been eliminated by inspection through conventional
NDE techniques (NDT). Because the baseline contains information on the
interaction of the reflections from benign structural features in the absence
of critical defects, subtraction of a current signal from such a baseline will
eliminate the coherent noise to a certain degree; if cancellation of coherent
noise is sufficiently good, the remaining level of residual will contain only
changes in the signals caused by features that were not present initially, such
as defects [18]. The quality of the baseline subtraction therefore controls the
sensitivity of the system to defects.
29 v
Introduction
w 30
31 v
Introduction
w 32
For this reason, triboemission has been the focus of significant research efforts
for over half a century [10].
The first significant triboemission measurements were made by Nakayama
et al. [11] during scratch tests by a diamond tip. To achieve this, they used a
low-voltage-biased collector positioned close to the contact that registered
bursts of the electrical current due to the emission of negatively and positively
charged particles, while photon emission was measured using a photomultiplier
[12]. Their results showed that insulator materials produced significantly higher
levels of emission when scratched than metals. Kim et al. [13] investigated the
emission of electrons using channel electron multipliers (CEMs) and photons
using photomultipliers, during abrasion of MgO samples under vacuum. They
also measured the kinetic energy of the electrons using a retarding grid. In
these studies, photon emission was attributed mainly to deformation and
electrons emission to fracture. Molina et al. investigated the triboemission of
negatively charged particles under vacuum for a wide range of materials
(alumina, sapphire, silicon nitride and semiconductors) using a CEM in pulse-
counting mode [14–16]. The results from Nakayama et al. and Molina et al.
suggested that triboemission is related to material hardness [14, 17]. Emission
is also correlated strongly with the wear of the surface, highlighted by the
observation that repeated scratches along a single track result in a decrease
of emission with time, due to decreasing wear [14].
From these investigations, it is generally concluded that triboemission of
electrons is related to surface fracture during sliding contact. More specifically,
Dickinson et al. [18] put forward a charge separation model, as shown in Fig.
1. Here, an imbalance of charge is created between opposite faces of a crack
as it opens. Due to the small width of the crack, this electric field has a large
gradient, which encourages electrons to leave the negatively charged crack
face. Due to thermal vibrations, a portion of these electrons do not reach the
opposing face and are instead emitted into the surrounding environment. This
model, however, does not explain why the energy of the tribo-emitted electrons
can be lower than the work function of the sample [14]. To account for these
low-energy electrons, Dickinson et al. [18] suggested that the work function
of the surface could be locally decreased by small defects in the highly strained
areas.
33 v
w 34
Key to EXERCISE 2b
1 The oxidative corrosion of carbide inclusions at the surface of uranium
metal during exposure to water vapourd
Introduction
Introduction
Support Vector Machines (SVMs) are among the most popular general purpose
learning methods in use today. SVM learning amounts to learning a linear
predictor, with regularization (corresponding to a “large margin”) ensuring
good generalization even in very high dimensions. This predictor need not be
linear in the input representation: it is possible to learn a linear predictor in
35 v
w 36
algorithms on a GPU are different than those for a serial implementation, and
arrive at an implementation specifically designed for graphics hardware. As with
many previous approaches, we assume that the dataset fits in memory, and
focus mostly on the Gaussian kernel, although our implementation can handle
any kernel function which can be written in the form K(x, y) = f (||x||, ||y||,
〈x, y〉) (see Section 5.2), and our ideas apply even more broadly to any kernel
which is an aggregation of element-wise operations.
One particularly significant drawback of other GPU SVM solvers is their
lack of support for sparse datasets. On the CPU, taking advantage of sparsity
is a simple matter, and sparse datasets are encountered frequently enough
that many widely-used SVM solvers treat all input vectors as sparse, by default
[9, 4, 1]. On the GPU, however, maximum performance is only achieved if
memory accesses follow certain fairly restrictive patterns, which are difficult
to ensure with sparse data. In contrast to other GPU SVM solvers, our
implementation does take advantage of sparsity in the training set through a
novel “sparsity clustering” approach (Section 5.3).
Overall, our implementation is orders of magnitudes faster than existing
CPU implementations, and several times faster on sparse datasets than prior
GPU implementations of SVM training.
Introduction
Human pluripotent stem (hPS) cells (embryonic stem cells and induced
pluripotent stem cells) are promising sources of specialized cells because of two
intrinsic properties: they can self-renew indefinitely and differentiate into diverse
cell types (1). To selectively guide hPS cell differentiation, precise control cellular
microenvironment is needed (2, 3). Considerable effort has been devoted to
identify soluble factors that promote differentiation. Additionally, there is interest
in developing matrices to support cells during differentiation (4), yet much less
is known about how signals from the matrix influence cell fate.
37 v
Matrigel is the most widely used substratum for hPS cell propagation (5)
and differentiation (6–12); it is derived from mouse sarcoma cells, and although
its principal components are laminin, collagen, and entactin, Matrigel consists
of up to 1,800 different proteins — including encapsulated growth factors —
whose levels vary significantly from batch to batch (13). Accordingly, the
contributions of Matrigel-delivered signals to specific phenotypic outcomes —
self-renewal or differentiation — are difficult to characterize or control.
Elucidating the effects of insoluble signals requires defined substrata. Such
defined substrata have been developed for the long-term culture of
undifferentiated hPS cells in defined media. A number of surfaces have been
described including recombinant proteins (14–16), fully synthetic polymers
(17–19), and peptide-modified surfaces (20–23). Surfaces that present bioactive
peptides have the advantage that they can be programmed to interact with
specific cell-surface macromolecules such as the glycosaminoglycans (GAGs)
and integrins.
Defined surfaces can be exploited for differentiation via two distinct
mechanisms. First, surfaces can be tailored to present ligands that promote
adhesion of specific cell populations during differentiation (24). Second, surfaces
can be devised to specifically activate (or mitigate) signal transduction pathways.
Here, we use a modular approach to exploit the aforementioned modes to control
hPS cell differentiation to each of the primary germ layers. Our results reveal the
advantages of defined surfaces for decoding the influence of insoluble signals on
cell fate.
Introduction
w 38
industries such as aerospace, nuclear, and oil and gas, among others. Successful
SHM systems can be considered as those which combine good sensitivity to
defects, preferably with the capability of localization and identification, with
a low sensor density.
Nondestructive evaluation (NDE) systems based on ultrasonic guided
waves generated by deployable arrays of transducers have been applied to the
inspection of pipeline, rail, and relatively simple platelike structures [8–14].
These systems take advantage of the fact that certain guided-wave modes are
able to propagate through several meters of the structure, often across various
structural features, from a single excitation point. Recently, focus has shifted
to the development of SHM systems based on guided waves, where a small
number of permanently attached transduction units would allow good coverage
and real-time, on-demand inspection of complex structures [15–18].
So far, effective commercial applications of systems based on guided
waves [9, 10, 13, 14] have been achieved only when processing of recorded
time-traces allows straightforward identification of individual reflections, which
can then be attributed either to benign structural features (e.g., stiffeners,
welds, and supports) or to defects. Simple pulse-echo or pitch-catch signals
from complex undamaged structures will usually consist of a large number of
interfering reflections that cannot be identified; these unwanted reflections
are a source of coherent noise, which is highly detrimental because it can mask
reflections from defects in the structure. In these cases, it is necessary to use
a benchmark or baseline signal [15, 16, 18], taken at initial stages of operation
of the structure, when the possibility of the presence of defects due to
fabrication processes has been eliminated by inspection through conventional
NDE techniques (NDT). Because the baseline contains information on the
interaction of the reflections from benign structural features in the absence
of critical defects, subtraction of a current signal from such a baseline will
eliminate the coherent noise to a certain degree; if cancellation of coherent
noise is sufficiently good, the remaining level of residual will contain only
changes in the signals caused by features that were not present initially, such
as defects [18]. The quality of the baseline subtraction therefore controls the
sensitivity of the system to defects.
39 v
Introduction
w 40
41 v
Introduction
w 42
For this reason, triboemission has been the focus of significant research efforts
for over half a century [10].
The first significant triboemission measurements were made by Nakayama
et al. [11] during scratch tests by a diamond tip. To achieve this, they used a
low-voltagebiased collector positioned close to the contact that registered
bursts of the electrical current due to the emission of negatively and positively
charged particles, while photon emission was measured using a photomultiplier
[12]. Their results showed that insulator materials produced significantly higher
levels of emission when scratched than metals. Kim et al. [13] investigated the
emission of electrons using channel electron multipliers (CEMs) and photons
using photomultipliers, during abrasion of MgO samples under vacuum. They
also measured the kinetic energy of the electrons using a retarding grid. In
these studies, photon emission was attributed mainly to deformation and
electrons emission to fracture. Molina et al. investigated the triboemission of
negatively charged particles under vacuum for a wide range of materials
(alumina, sapphire, silicon nitride and semiconductors) using a CEM in pulse-
counting mode [14–16]. The results from Nakayama et al. and Molina et al.
suggested that triboemission is related to material hardness [14, 17]. Emission
is also correlated strongly with the wear of the surface, highlighted by the
observation that repeated scratches along a single track result in a decrease
of emission with time, due to decreasing wear [14].
From these investigations, it is generally concluded that triboemission
of electrons is related to surface fracture during sliding contact. More
specifically, Dickinson et al. [18] put forward a charge separation model, as
shown in Fig. 1. Here, an imbalance of charge is created between opposite
faces of a crack as it opens. Due to the small width of the crack, this electric
field has a large gradient, which encourages electrons to leave the negatively
charged crack face. Due to thermal vibrations, a portion of these electrons
do not reach the opposing face and are instead emitted into the surrounding
environment. This model, however, does not explain why the energy of the
tribo-emitted electrons can be lower than the work function of the sample
[14]. To account for these low-energy electrons, Dickinson et al. [18] suggested
that the work function of the surface could be locally decreased by small
defects in the highly strained areas.
43 v
w 44
1 ESTABLISHING SIGNIFICANCE
Look for words and phrases such as widespread and much research in recent
years.
3 GAP/PROBLEM/PREDICTION
Look for ways to say exactly how previous and/or current research is not yet
complete, or has not addressed the problem your paper deals with, for
example inefficient, unclear, few studies have focused on…
45 v
w 46
Here are some first sentences taken from research article Introductions:
· The status and function of the port has evolved rapidly in recent years.
· Since the discovery of the first isolated graphene layer, many chemical
approaches have been developed.
· The increasing pressure to eliminate lead has stimulated great interest
in the search for lead-free solders.
· Fourier transforms are widely used in image processing to characterise
textures in images.
· The vanadium redox flow battery (VRFB) is an emerging energy storage
technology.
· Steady-state multiphase upscaling has become increasingly popular
because it is fast, robust and computationally cheap.
· The optic thalamus has been the subject of numerous investigations.
· Malaria affects as many as 216 million people annually, with 445,000
deaths occurring primarily in children under 5 years old.*
· Control of serum phosphorus levels is a central goal in the management
of patients with chronic renal failure.
· Heat transfer phenomena play an important role in welding.
*Note that such numbers may change over time, so consider including a date
(e.g. in 2019).
47 v
3 GAP
Group 1: PROBLEM/CRITICISM
49 v
· The fact that these galaxies are so massive may make them ideal
candidates for protocluster searches.
· Little attention has been paid to the selection of an alternative
biocompatible material.
· How propofol acts on neural circuits to produce unconsciousness
remains unclear.
· The main drawback of this approach is that it is unable to provide
quantitative information.
· Little is known about these early differentiating cells and it is not
clear whether this initial Oct4 expressing population differ from
undifferentiated hESCs.
· One of the limitations of electron triboemission experiments to date is
that they provide only ensemble average values.
· This shortcoming is responsible for our lack of understanding of
triboemission processes.
· However, the search for a stable oral prostaglandin preparation has
been largely unsuccessful.
· The high absorbance makes this an impractical option.
· An alternative approach is necessary.
· Determining the function of these proteins remains a challenge.
w 50
This section deals with four topics that are important in the Introduction and
elsewhere:
VERB TENSE CHOICES
LINKING SENTENCES TOGETHER
PASSIVE/ACTIVE CHOICES
PARAGRAPHING
The Past Simple just describes what the authors found in their study; the
findings are linked to that study and are not presented as permanent truths.
By contrast, choosing the Present Simple reflects a belief that the findings
are strong and reliable enough to constitute a permanent truth.
Note, however, that as we saw in Section 1.2.2, many background facts
presented in the Present Simple began their life as research findings stated
53 v
in the Past Simple, and graduated to Present tense status as they became
established and accepted. This means that a journal article from five years
ago may use a verb tense that is no longer appropriate, and using that tense
now would give the impression that you are not up to date with developments
in your field. When you are writing about previous research and contributions,
check which verb tense is currently being used for that particular finding
or fact. Search engines such as Google Scholar are a good resource for this,
but make sure you search only recent research.
In these sentences:
(a) Past Simple I lived in Tokyo for five years …but I don’t live there
anymore.
(b) Present Perfect I have lived in Tokyo for five …and I still live there
years now.
the difference between (a) and (b) is the ‘time’ of the event, i.e. whether or
not the writer is still living in Tokyo. In these sentences, however:
the difference is more complex, and more important for you as a STEMM
research writer. In (c) and (d), the ‘time’ of the event isn’t the key difference;
it’s possible that both (c) and (d) happened last month, this morning, or one
nanosecond ago. The event in (d) is in the Present Perfect tense because it
w 54
is more relevant to the situation now than the event in (c). Why is this idea
of current relevance important when you write an Introduction? Look at this
sentence from the Introduction in Section 1.2.1:
In this sentence, the writer changes from the Past Simple (was demonstrated)
to the Present Perfect (has been paid) in order to communicate that the
latter refers to a current gap in the research. The choice of Present Perfect
therefore implies that this research article will now pay attention to the
selection of an appropriate biocompatible material.
Compare this with the following sentence, in which the writer does not
change tense, but continues in the Past Simple:
In the Past Simple, the sentence means that little attention was paid THEN,
i.e. two years ago. Perhaps attention has been paid to this problem since
then, or perhaps the problem has since been solved. Tense changes are always
meaningful, and they always signal a change in the function of the information,
so don’t choose or change tense randomly.
Check this information about tenses by looking at the way the Past Simple
and Present Perfect are used in the Introductions of your target articles. Look
in particular at the way the Past Simple tense and the Present Perfect tense
are used to describe previous research and the contributions of previous
research.
55 v
w 56
A second way is to use a pro-form (This method, These systems) to glue the
sentences together:
Note that when you use pro-forms, it is easier for the reader if you repeat
exactly the same noun as you used the first time. If you have described
something as a device, the pro-form you use to refer to it next time should
be this device, not this technique or this method.
57 v
You can begin sentences with It, They, These or This, but it may be difficult
for the reader to work out what these words refer to. Look at these examples:
A third way is not to finish the sentence at all, but to join it to the next
sentence with a semicolon. Joining sentences with a semicolon works well
when there are two consecutive sentences that are very closely related,
particularly if one of them is short. Using a semicolon to join sentences in
this way feels like a long comma rather than a full stop.
w 58
CAUSE
The experiment was unsuccessful ________ the measuring instruments were
inaccurate.
The experiment was unsuccessful ________ the inaccuracy of the measuring
instruments.
59 v
RESULT
The measuring instruments were calibrated accurately, ________ the
experiment was successful.
CONTRAST/DIFFERENCE
British students are all vegetarians, __________ Norwegian students eat
meat every day.
· on the contrary and conversely don’t fit into this category because
they don’t just communicate difference; they communicate the fact
that exactly the opposite is true. You can’t use them in the sentence
above because vegetarians and meat eaters aren’t opposites, they’re
just different. However, you could use them in the following sentence:
Some experiments used uncalibrated instruments and succeeded;
conversely, other experiments used carefully calibrated instruments
and failed.
· Also, remember that while often means at that/the same time, so if there’s
any possibility of confusion, choose a different signal, such as whereas.
UNEXPECTEDNESS
A _______ it was difficult, a solution was quickly found.
B _______ the difficulty, a solution was quickly found.
C It was difficult; ________ a solution was quickly found.
w 60
A B C
although despite nevertheless
even though in spite of however
though regardless of yet
notwithstanding but
nonetheless
even so
ADDITION/LISTING
We used a batch processing system because it was more effective.
___________ it was significantly less expensive.
in addition also
moreover secondly (etc.)
furthermore in the second place (etc.)
what is more,
Note that besides has more or less the same meaning as the items in the list
above, but it’s more powerful and is therefore better in persuasive contexts.
TRANSITION
The drug is extremely effective and easy to administer. ________ cost, it is
approximately the same price per dose as existing drugs.
It’s not necessary (and it looks formulaic) to start every sentence with a signal.
Signals are emphatic, and starting each sentence with one creates a jerky, over-
emphatic text. To ensure that the information in your text is logical and easy to
61 v
follow, consider using repetition linkage instead of a signal. This means repeating
words across sentences, and particularly at the start of a sentence, to ensure
that the reader is carried carefully from one item of information to the next.
Checking that sentences and information are explicitly linked is a valuable
self-editing tool, as it forces you to examine the relationships between your
sentences. Good linkage helps to create flow.
In the Introduction to Rapid fragmentation of neuronal networks at the
onset of propofol-induced unconsciousness below, sentence-to-sentence
linkage is in bold type, and repetition linkage is in italics. It’s surprising how
much linkage and repetition there is in the text — and how easy it is to read
and understand as a result. After you have looked at this example, check the
way sentence linkage and repetition linkage operate in the Introductions of
your target articles and the other Introductions in this Unit.
w 62
63 v
w 64
objective, but this is changing in some fields and in some journals. The passive
is still common, particularly in descriptions of methods or experimental
procedures, but many interdisciplinary or free-flowing research areas are
more flexible and tolerant.
With regard to communicative accuracy, if you use the active, it is
important to keep the referent of we/our consistent. This is because there
is a risk that the referent of we/our may become unstable and even change
from one sentence to the next. This can have an impact on the ownership
of the sentence content. In one sentence we/our may refer to ‘me and the
other authors of this paper’ (we investigated), in another it may refer to ‘me,
the other authors of this paper and everyone in my research field, possibly
even you (the reader) too (our knowledge/when we consider), and in another
sentence it may refer to ‘me, the other authors of this paper, everyone in my
research field, possibly even you…and my grandmother’, i.e. people in general
(we know). If you are using we/our to refer to people in general, it may be
clearer to use a construction with It (It is known/thought that…).
A third option is to rewrite the sentence using a non-human grammatical
subject (The present paper describes an algorithm for clustering sequences
into index classes/This study presents a set of criteria for selecting such a
component/Section 2 reviews existing methods).
1.5.4 Paragraphing
Why is good paragraphing important?
Paragraphs are powerful non-verbal text elements that provide a visual and
intellectual separation between ideas and concepts. A good paragraph generally
has a single unifying function, for example, summarising the implications of the
results or explaining why a particular technique was used. Every sentence and
indeed every part of every sentence should be relevant to the central function
of the paragraph and drive that function forward; ‘loose’ or irrelevant items
interrupt the narrative and cause confusion. If the function of the paragraph is
clear to the writer, it will be easier to make it clear to the reader.
Good paragraphing is key to text planning, and good text planning is
essential for fast, effective text production. Getting lost in the middle of a
paragraph and not knowing how to end it or where to go next is stressful
and time-consuming for the writer. The result is often an interruption in the
65 v
flow of information, and both reader and writer may find it hard to pick up
the narrative again. Good paragraphing is a key component of the narrative
scaffold that enables readers to process information and, equally importantly,
helps writers to create that information.
w 66
mentioned you concentrate and read carefully — but you don’t bother to
read the details about the other suspects. This enables you to read faster by
giving you the confidence to ignore things which you know are not relevant.
How does skimming work? And what is the connection between skimming
and good paragraphing?
Skimming focuses your attention on the first line or sentence of each
paragraph. These sentences provide a simple, basic ‘map’ of the topics
covered in the text, the order in which they are presented and the general
direction of the text; in other words, what the text is about and where it is
going. Skimming generally follows the following pattern:
67 v
w 68
In this Unit you have seen that conventional science writing patterns are easy
to identify and that they generate text that is readable and effective. In this
section you will write an Introduction by bringing together everything in this
Unit: the model, the language and writing skills, and the vocabulary.
Write the Introduction for your research article. The title of your paper is
A cover for the single-person pedal-powered vehicle, and you should write
an Introduction of approximately 250–350 words. Follow the model as closely
as possible; make sure your Introduction contains the four main components
of the model and use the vocabulary in this Unit for each component. You can
lie as much as you like, and of course you will have to create fake research
references.
69 v
1.6.2 Key
A cover for the single-person pedal-powered vehicle
Introduction
Urban air pollution has become a central issue in transport policy
decision-making. Air quality in city centres is linked to the level of vehicle
emissions2, and urban transport policy in the UK aims to reduce the
use of private cars in city centres by 25% within the next ten years3. As
a result, much research has focused on developing environmentally-
friendly commuter vehicles such as the Single-Person Pedal-Powered
Vehicle (SPPPV). However, although there has been an increase in the
sale of SPPPVs, safety and comfort issues need to be addressed if the
number of users is to increase to a level at which a significant effect on
environmental pollution can be achieved.
Researchers have studied and improved many safety aspects of
the SPPPV. In 1999, Wang et al. responded to the need for increased
safety by designing an SPPPV surrounded by a ‘cage’ of safety bars4,
and in 2002 Martinez introduced a reinforced polymer screen which
could be fitted to the safety bars to protect the cyclist’s head in the
event of a collision5. The issue of comfort has also been addressed by
many design teams; in 2008 Kohl et al. introduced an SPPPV with a
built-in rain/sun umbrella, which could be opened at the touch of a
button6, and more recently, Martinez7 added a mesh filter which can
be placed over the entire cage to reduce the risk of environmental
pollution. However, it has been suggested that both the shape of the
umbrella and the weight of the mesh filter negatively affect aerodynamic
efficiency (Zhang et al., 2019).
In this study, we model the aerodynamic effect of these safety and
comfort features and use the data thus obtained to propose a new
design which balances design parameters with optimum aerodynamic
performance.
w 70
71 v
UNIT 2
How to Write about Methods
TITLE
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
CONCLUSION*
*Some journals call this section CONCLUSION and others call it CONCLUSIONS but this does not seem
to reflect the number of conclusions that are drawn.
w 74
The Methods section has a more flexible structure and content than the
Introduction, and its title reflects the many different activities involved in
scientific research. In some journals it is called Methods; in others it may be
called Materials and methods, Experimental, Test methods, Simulations,
Model, Experimental design, Experimental work, Experimental techniques,
or Methodology. It may even have a specific title such as Calibration or
Model-controlled test, but for simplicity, it will be referred to here as the
Methods section.
As discussed previously, the rate at which science research is produced
and the way it is communicated affect the structure and the content of
research papers. The number of papers published in peer-reviewed journals
is increasing, and so is publication using channels such as conference
proceedings, open archives and home pages. The total volume of science
research published every year and accessible on the internet is estimated to
be doubling every ten years; some estimate that approximately 3 million
scientific papers are now published every year. This has a huge impact on
the way that scientists read and access information, and this impact is evident
in the way that the Methods are communicated.
Scientists aim to ‘move rapidly through the literature to assess and exploit
content with as little actual reading as possible’4. This has generated an
information-surfing approach in which readers often move directly from the
Title/Abstract to the Results or even straight to the Conclusion, bypassing
the Methods section unless it is the section they are interested in, or is very
short. This reading strategy, together with manuscript length restrictions in
print journals, is changing the way many Methods sections are communicated.
A long detailed or technical description of the method may not appear in the
main manuscript of the paper but rather via an online link to supplementary
materials.
This does not mean that the writer can ignore the reader’s need for
information about the method in the rest of the paper. The readers’
acceptance of those results and conclusions is linked to their acceptance of
the method. If there is little or no information about the method in the rest
of the paper, this may affect the overall credibility of the study, particularly
if the amount of supplementary material discourages reading. The reader
needs sufficient information about the method for the results and conclusions
75 v
w 76
Method
1 The current investigation involved collecting and analysing groundwater
samples from six wells in the Mahomet Aquifer region to determine levels
77 v
w 78
2.2.2 Key
In Sentence 1 The current investigation involved collecting and
analysing groundwater samples from six wells in the Mahomet Aquifer
region to determine levels of dissolved CO2. the writer provides an
overview of the method, including the aim of the investigation (to
determine levels of dissolved CO2) and the source of the sample (six
wells in the Mahomet Aquifer region).
If you just wrote that the writer introduces the method here, that won’t help
you when you come to write your own research article, because it doesn’t
tell you how to ‘introduce’ the method.
79 v
Do I need to state the reasons for the choices I made? Isn’t it obvious?
In Sentence 2, the writer justifies the choice of location via factual information
and reference to previous studies. Your reasons are obvious to you, but they
are not always obvious to readers. If you don’t provide justification for your
choices, the reader may wonder why you did things in a particular way, or
why you used a particular procedure. This has a negative effect: if you don’t
explain why you made certain choices then readers may not accept your
method, and this will eventually affect the way they evaluate your study.
w 80
w 82
In this sentence, the writer uses tightly to demonstrate that the work
was carried out carefully. Your aim is not only to report your work and
communicate your conclusions, it is also to encourage your reader to accept
those conclusions. To this end, it is important to present yourself as a
competent and careful researcher whose conclusions are therefore likely to
be reliable.
Note the language used to demonstrate that the authors were competent
and careful. They could simply have written: Samples were shipped to two
laboratories at Imperial College London, but including the words directly and
separate communicates that they were careful and that the study is,
therefore, reliable.
Why provide citation references for existing methods, especially if they are
well known?
In most cases, part of your own method comes from, or is based on, a
method developed by another researcher. If that part of the method is
well known and the appropriate citation reference is provided, you don’t
need to describe it in full but you may still need to provide an appropriate
reference. You will find vocabulary and sentence patterns for this in
Section 2.4.2, Option 1 (page 109).
Check current usage in your field by inputting the method into a
search engine such as Google Scholar. As a method becomes more and
more established, the citation occurs less frequently, and the method
eventually becomes part of the background information as described in
Section 1.2.2 (pages 9–10). Once that has happened, a citation reference
becomes unnecessary.
83 v
But if that part of my method is available in the literature and I also include
the citation reference, why should I describe that part of the method at all?
Why can’t readers just find the reference and read it for themselves?
Readers do not have time to waste and it is unprofessional to require them
to look up a reference if the information is necessary to understand the paper
they are reading. Writers therefore often describe the procedures, equipment
or materials that they used even if they are well known and/or identical to
those in existing methods. This can be done in the following way: The assay
was carried out as in [1]. Briefly, samples were…, followed by a basic
description.
It is common to describe existing or standard methods in the Present
Simple: “...dissolved organic carbon was measured using a revised version
of the method established by the Illinois Sustainable Technology Center [12].
This method uses a carbon analyser with a detection limit of 0.050 mg L−1,
which ensured…”.
Note that in this case, the method used by the writer is not identical to
the cited method (using a revised version of the method established by the
Illinois Sustainable Technology Center). Comparisons between your materials
and methods and those of other researchers in the same field are an
important topic for the Methods section. Your method may be identical to
others you mention (Option 1 on page 109), similar (Option 2), or significantly
different. When yours is significantly different to existing methods, the
difference may represent the key contribution of your study (Option 3).
These comparisons form part of a central feature of all STEMM research
writing: mapping a study onto existing literature and knowledge in order to
identify its contribution. The literature in the field is a thread that runs through
a research article from beginning to end. Starting in the Introduction by
setting out the research background to the study, the thread is picked up in
the Methods and Results sections by comparing your methods and results
with others, and eventually, in the Discussion/Conclusion section, by
identifying the contribution your study has made to the existing knowledge
and literature on the topic.
Remember that citation references do not automatically go at the end
of a sentence (see page 11). In the Methods section, you need to be
particularly careful about the location of your citation references or you may
w 84
accidentally credit someone with work they have not done — perhaps even
with your own work. This is a surprisingly common error.
In Sentence 9 All filters used were glass or stainless steel, and although
two samples were at risk of CFC contamination as a result of brief contact
with plastic and other anthropogenic materials at the source location,
variation among samples was negligible. the writer mentions a possible
difficulty or problem in the method.
Why would I mention problems in the method? Won’t it make me look bad?
When you look at your first set of results, you may realise that you could
have achieved better results by adjusting your simulation parameters or
changing the experimental conditions. Should you delay writing the paper
while you repeat the work and improve your method? What happens if you
learn more next time too; should you delay again while you repeat the work
again? And again? In this scenario, you may never actually write it up. Science
does not truly exist until it is published8, and delaying publication until the
project is perfect is neither realistic nor advisable. You need to stop at a
certain point and write the paper, including your subsequent awareness of
potential limitations or difficulties.
There are two good reasons for mentioning problems or limitations. First,
it is common to end a research article with suggestions for future work, and
these are often linked to problems or limitations that were noted in the study
being reported. These suggestions encourage other researchers to respond
85 v
and their work places your study in the continuum of research on the topic.
However, it is not a good idea to mention those problems or limitations for
the first time right at the end of the research article, as this may affect the
reader’s confidence in your work. It is more effective to mention them first
where they occur — in this case, in the Methods section — and then refer to
them again at the end of the article. It’s easy to imagine what kind of sentence
might occur at the end of the paper we are looking at: Future studies should
further reduce the risk of CFC contamination by removing plastic and other
anthropogenic materials from the source location prior to collecting samples.
The second reason is that if you don’t mention difficulties or problems
that occurred, it appears as though you are unaware of them. This gives a poor
impression of your competence. If you ignore or try to hide imperfections (such
as a data set which was too small, or equipment that was not ideal), the reader
may doubt your legitimacy as a researcher. By contrast, mentioning them
demonstrates a high level of self-awareness, thereby enhancing the reliability
of the study.
But how can I talk about problems in my work without looking like a
failure?
Conventionally, writers use language that minimises the problem and its effects,
minimises your responsibility, maximises the good aspects and/or suggests a
solution. In the example above, the writer acknowledged that there was a
problem and minimised it (brief contact/negligible). You can find examples of
the language to refer to problems and difficulties in a conventional, professional
way in the language list on pages 111–112.
w 86
We can streamline these so that our Methods model has SIX basic
components. Unlike the Introduction model, in which most of the
components are likely to be used, in the Methods section the model should
be considered as a ‘menu’: select the items which are appropriate to your
research topic and which reflect the norms in the journal you are submitting
to. If you did not encounter any problems or issues, for example, you won’t
use the sixth component. In some cases, the Methods section also includes
graphics such as figures, maps, photographs or tables, so this has been added
to the model.
87 v
w 88
89 v
The MC code system PENELOPE 2003 (Salvat et al. 2003) and the main
program PENCYL were used to calculate the absorbed dose in the detector
and surrounding water phantom. In order to minimize the time of the
simulations, the geometry of the diamond layer and electrodes was simplified
by adopting an infinite-slab geometry […] Since the present study focuses
on the metal/diamond/metal interface phenomena, the housing of the
detector was regarded as water equivalent and thus replaced by water. The
influence of metallic electrodes of different thicknesses on the absorbed dose
to the diamond was investigated. Electrodes made of silver were simulated
first. Silver is a common material because it has a high electrical conductivity,
forms ohmic contact with diamond and the technology of its thermal
deposition as well as contacting the detector with silver epoxy glue is well
established. […]
A careful selection of simulation parameters was needed in order to
preserve accuracy while completing the calculations within reasonable CPU
w 90
2. Methodology
91 v
w 92
2.2. Measurement
For each air rate, 5 min of conditioning was allowed, before 5 min of on-line
data collection. The height of the overflowing froth above the lip of the cell
was measured via an on-line laser (0D1300, supplied by ifm electronic) and
the data recorded through LabVIEW [24]. The velocity of the overflowing froth
was measured using a camcorder (Panasonic Video NVGS37) through
FrothTracker, a block-matching image analysis program developed in-house.
The output values were then used to calculate air recovery using Eq. (1).
In order to sample the concentrate, a scoop was fitted to the lip of the
flotation cell for 20 s at the end of each measurement period. The sample
was weighed, and the mass of the solid and liquid phases determined by
decanting the liquid into a measuring cylinder. The sample was then returned
to the launder. Only one sample was taken for each air rate tested, as removing
too much of the concentrate leads to a destabilisation of the experimental
system.
Methods
93 v
Maximum allowable ATT was defined as the amount of ATT calculated for
maximum isometric contractions of the quadriceps (i.e., maximum isometric
knee extension) in the intact knee (23). Maximum allowable ATT was used
as the upper limit of knee instability because some researchers have shown
that ACLd subjects often perform activities with ATT levels above those
observed in the healthy knee (10, 32). Thus, maximum allowable ATT
represents the limit of ATT that a healthy knee might comfortably achieve (33).
Maximum allowable ATT was calculated with the lower extremity model (see
below) by simulating a seated maximum isometric knee extension. In these
simulations, the model knee was placed at joint angles corresponding to
those found in walking, the quadriceps muscles were maximally activated,
and a constraint was applied at the level of the ankle to prevent the knee
from extending (23).
A 3D model of the body was used to determine lower limb muscle forces
during normal walking. The skeleton was modeled as a 10-segment, 23-df
articulated chain. Each hip was represented as a 3-df ideal ball-and-socket
joint, each knee as a 1-df hinge joint, each ankle as a 2-df universal joint, and
each metatarsal joint as a 1-df hinge (1). The model was actuated by 54
musculotendinous units, each unit represented as a three-element muscle
in series with tendon. The dynamic optimization problem was to find the
muscle excitation histories, muscle forces, and body motions subject to
minimum metabolic energy consumed per unit of distance moved. The joint
angles, ground reaction forces, and muscle activation patterns obtained from
the simulation were similar to the same measures obtained from healthy
subjects who walked at their preferred speeds (1, 2). Details concerning the
walking model and dynamic optimization solution obtained for normal gait
are reported by Anderson and Pandy (1, 2).
Anterior tibial translation of the intact and ACLd knee was calculated
using another model of the lower limb that included a detailed 3D model of
the knee (the lower-limb model). Five segments were used to represent the
lower limb in this model: thigh, shank, patella, hindfoot, and toes. These
segments were connected together by five joints: hip, tibiofemoral joint,
patellofemoral joint, ankle, and metatarsal joint (Fig. 1). The hip, ankle, and
metatarsal joints were represented in exactly the same way as in the walking
model. At the knee, six generalized coordinates described the movements of
w 94
the tibia relative to the femur, and another six coordinates described the
movements of the patella relative to the femur. A complete description of the
model can be found in Shelburne et al. (24).
The geometry of the distal femur, proximal tibia, and patella was based
on parasagittal sections of the bones obtained from 23 cadaveric knees. The
contacting surfaces of the femur and tibia were modeled as deformable (19).
The model of patellofemoral mechanics was based on the assumptions that
the patellar tendon was inextensible and that interpenetration between the
facets of the patella and the patellar surfaces of the femur can be neglected.
The geometry of the cruciate and collateral ligaments, posterior capsule, and
anterolateral structures of the knee was modeled using 13 elastic elements
(Fig. 1B). Thirteen muscles were represented in the lower-limb model (Fig. 1A).
The paths of all muscles, except vasti, hamstrings, and gastrocnemius, were
identical with those incorporated in the walking model. Whereas vasti,
hamstrings, and gastrocnemius were each represented as one muscle in the
walking model, the separate portions of each of these muscles were included
in the lower-limb model (18, 19).
The relative positions of the femur, tibia, and patella in the intact knee
were found by assuming the lower limb was in static equilibrium at each instant
during the simulated gait cycle; thus, the inertial contributions of the shank,
patella, hindfoot, and toe segments were neglected in these calculations.
Specifically, muscle forces, ground reaction forces, joint angles of the hip, ankle,
and metatarsals, and the flexion-extension angle of the knee obtained from
the walking simulation were used as inputs to the model. The unknown
translations and rotations of the bones at the knee were found by performing
a forward integration of the equations of motion at each time step of the
walking simulation until the accelerations and velocities of all the joints
approached zero (24). These calculations were repeated with the ACL removed
from the model to estimate the amount of ATT during ACLd gait (25).
Four simulations of ACL-deficient walking were performed. The model
of the lower limb was used for these calculations. In each simulation a static
equilibrium problem was solved at 23 points of the gait cycle (as described
above for the intact and ACL-deficient knee) subject to the following
conditions. In the first two simulations, quadriceps force was decreased to
determine whether this change alone could reduce ATT in the ACLd knee first
95 v
to the amount calculated for the intact knee (intact ATT; simulation 1), and
second, to the amount calculated for maximum isometric knee extension
(maximum allowable ATT; simulation 2). In each of these simulations,
quadriceps force was decreased by decreasing the force in each of the three
vasti (medialis, intermedius, and lateralis) as a percentage of its peak isometric
strength. The forces in all three muscles were decreased by the same
percentage each time. The output of simulations 1 and 2 were a decrease in
quadriceps force and the resultant change in extensor moment. In the next
two simulations, hamstrings force was increased to determine whether this
change alone could restore ATT in the ACLd knee first to the amount calculated
for the intact knee (simulation 3), and second, to the amount calculated for
maximum isometric knee extension (simulation 4). In each of these
simulations, hamstrings force was increased by increasing the force in each
of three hamstrings (biceps femoris long head, semimembranosus, and
semitendinosus) as a percentage of its peak isometric strength. The forces in
all three muscles were increased by the same percentage each time.
Experimental evidence suggests that a hamstrings facilitation strategy is
characterized by increased activity of both the medial and lateral hamstring
muscles (14). […]
2. Method
After acquisition the images were filtered using a non-local means edge
preserving filter [30,31]. They were then corrected for any beam hardening
or softening artefacts created during image reconstruction by modelling these
w 96
97 v
EXERCISE 3 Analyse and model the Methods sections in your target research
articles. Instead of reading for content, pay attention to how that content is
delivered. You will start to see the scaffold that holds the information, and
this will develop into a lifelong reading and writing tool that updates
automatically every time you read a review article or a research paper.
w 98
99 v
The list will also keep the flow of writing moving. Underneath each
list there are examples of how the words and phrases are used in
sentences, so look at the sentence examples as well as the list when you
are feeling stuck and can’t think of what to write or how to continue.
w 100
· The source light is polarised horizontally and the sample beam can be
scanned laterally.
· The microtubules that were embedded in collagen gel were oriented
perpendicular to the direction of the magnetic field.
· Measuring stations were spaced 20 cm apart, starting 2 cm downstream
of the pipe entrance.
· A scanner was mounted on top of a metal structure, while pots were
placed underneath, over a cart moving at constant speed in the
direction perpendicular to the line of acquisition.
In which sentence/s below was the table placed closest to the wall?
The table was placed against the wall.
The table was placed alongside the wall.
The table was placed beside the wall.
The table was placed flush with the wall.
The table was placed in contact with the wall.
The table was placed next to the wall.
The table was placed right against the wall.
In which sentence/s below was the clock positioned closest to the door?
The clock was positioned just above the door.
The clock was positioned slightly above the door.
The clock was positioned immediately above the door.
The clock was positioned directly above the door.
The clock was positioned right above the door.
LANGUAGE TO PROVIDE SPECIFIC AND PRECISE DETAILS OF MATERIALS
AND METHODS
(i) VERBS
Verbs in the Methods section fall into three categories. The first contains
general academic research verbs such as attempt, consider, conduct,
determine, investigate, report, verify. These can be found in Appendix B:
Research Verbs. The second category contains verbs which are highly specific
to a particular discipline, for example anneal, clone, dissect, ionise, infuse.
These are not included in the list because they are not useful in other
w 102
disciplines. The list below contains examples of the third category: technical
verbs used in a wide range of disciplines to specify what was done or used.
103 v
(ii) SEQUENCE LANGUAGE
w 104
as another ended, i.e. that the two events interfaced. Items in this group
are sometimes used to communicate a possible causal relationship or a
correlation between the events:
The temperature dropped sharply when we reduced the pressure.
Group 7 marks the end of a sequence:
At the end there was a noticeable drop in temperature.
Group 8 refers to events that occurred after you finished your experiment/
simulation or after you finished observing the results:
At the end there was a noticeable drop in temperature but it was decided
afterwards to omit this from the input data.
KEY
Group 1: before the beginning
beforehand formerly originally prior to
earlier in advance previously initially
105 v
Group 3: steps/order
after followed by next secondly (etc.)
afterwards following previously subsequently
earlier formerly prior to then
JUSTIFY CHOICES
This includes phrases that introduce the reasons for the methodological or
procedural choices you made, such as in order to, and a list of ‘happy’ words
and verbs that communicate the advantage/s of those choices.
w 106
Most of the items in the box below are in adverb form (accurately), but they
can also occur in adjective form (accurate).
Option 2: The material/method you used is similar to the one you cite.
109 v
w 110
111 v
w 112
This section deals with three language areas which are important in the
Methods section:
OWNERSHIP: VERB TENSE AND THE AGENTLESS PASSIVE
PREPOSITIONS
USING A AND THE
113 v
w 114
•
modified) as you can Figure as your own work: The
see in Fig. 1, and it was experimental setup used here is shown in
collected/ modified by Fig. 3.
me. Move to the active: We collect/modify X.
•
5 X was (collected/ •
Move to the active: We collect/modify X.
modified) by me, but Add words or phrases such as here/in
•
in my field/this journal this work/in our model.
the Present Simple Use a ‘dummy’ subject such as This
•
tense is used. equation/The model.
2.5.2 Prepositions
Prepositions have an impact on meaning. Evidence of something is a measurable
sign that it is there or that it exists, whereas evidence for something is a sign
that it might be there, or that it might exist. Some verbs depend entirely on
the preposition for their meaning: X was substituted for Y means that X replaced
Y, whereas X was substituted with Y means that Y replaced X.
Even if English is your first language, you are writing for a global audience,
some of whom may have difficulty understanding preposition meanings, so
it pays to be careful. Here are FIVE useful strategies for improving your
preposition use:
115 v
normal. The specularly reflected beam was absorbed onto a black card,
and the scattered light was collected at normal incidence to the sample
using an X10 microscope objective. (8)
The solutions were placed in the refluxing bath immediately after
•
mixing, and the temperature of the bath was increased to 70°C in 15
min and kept there for 2 h. The solutions were then aged for 24 h at
room temperature, before being diluted with an equal volume of EtOH
and stirred for 10 min, to give the solution used for spin coating. (11)
The film is placed in a sealed chamber on the sample stage of the
•
ellipsometer; first dry N2 gas is passed through the chamber to
empty the pores, and after N2 has been bubbled through, the liquid
adsorbate is passed over the sample to fill the pores. By assuming that
all the accessible pores are completely empty or filled with adsorbate,
the pore volume and index of the solid skeleton can be determined.
Measurement of nf for both the dry and saturated films allows both
vp and ns to be determined with the assumption that np has the same
value as that of the bulk adsorbate in the saturated case, and of air
(np = 1) in the dry case. (15)
The IR camera that we used in the setup is a Raytheon Radiance HS,
•
and operates in the 3–5 µm spectral region. It is sensitive (with a 1 ms
integration time) to surface temperature changes of ~0.03°C, and can be
operated at full frame rates of 140 Hz with that sensitivity. We have also
observed the effects reported here with a microbolometer focal plane
array camera, operating in the long wavelength of the IR. (11)
Hexagonally packed intermediate (HPI) layer from Deinococcus
•
radiodurans, a kind gift of Dr. W. Baumeister, was extracted from whole
cells (strain SARK) with lithium dodecyl sulfate, and purified on a Percoll
density gradient. A stock solution (1 mg/ml protein) was stored in
distilled water at 4°C. Porin OmpF trimers from E. coli strain BZ 1 10/
PMY222 (Hoenger et al., 1993) solubilized in octyl-polyoxyethylene were
mixed with solubilised dimyristoyl phosphatidylcholine (Sigma Chemical
Co., St. Louis, MO) at a ratio (w/w) of 0.2 and a protein concentration
of 1 mg/ml. 1,2-Dipalmitoyl-phosphatidylethanolamine (DPPE) from
Sigma was solubilized in chloroform:hexane (1:1) to a concentration of
1 mg/ml. The resulting solution was diluted in buffer solution (150 mM
KCl, 10 mM Tris, pH 8.4) to a concentration of 100 µg/ml. (20)
w 116
117 v
Here are some examples of verb + preposition clusters. Add to this list
by mining your target articles.
3 Consider replacing prepositions with words that make the meaning clear
This is particularly important at the start of a sentence, because as noted
earlier (Section 1.5.2), the way that a sentence starts is central to its success.
Instead of:
From this estimation, we ranked the search results obtained and then
classified them according to size.
Consider writing:
Using this estimation, we ranked the search results and then classified
them according to size.
w 118
was analysed USING a computing cluster was generated USING clinical covariates
was assessed USING an Instron 4507 was improved USING a shielding gas mix
was calculated USING another was modeled USING 13 elastic elements
was carried out USING a Ministat 251 was mounted USING adhesive tape
was computed USING a flow algorithm was optimised USING Bayesian criteria
was conducted USING an optical microscope was performed USING an X-ray diffractometer
was controlled USING an automatic system was performed USING a mapping algorithm
was designed USING an eArray platform was quantified USING the phase-locking factor
was developed USING a laser was removed USING a grinder
was evaluated USING an analog scale was reported USING the HGVS nomenclature
was evaporated USING a rotary evaporator was selected USING a filter
was extracted USING a reagent solution was solved USING the penalty method
was filtered USING a Butterworth filter was sonicated USING a Branson Sonificator
119 v
w 120
121 v
So when you use a noun like industry, stop and think — do you mean industry
in general (uncountable) or particular industries (countable)? In addition,
materials such as concrete and steel, which are normally considered uncountable,
can be used countably when they are used by those who are experts in that
material:
We have developed steels containing only elements that produce
certain radioactive isotopes.
Here is a list of uncountable nouns that are useful in a STEMM context. Try
and identify those which can also form plurals, and then check your answers
in the Key.
w 122
KEY
Nouns which CANNOT be used countably, i.e. do not have a plural form, are
in bold type. To use these nouns in the plural, add another noun: items of
equipment/methods of transport/types of evidence.
123 v
a book clearly refers to a specific book, in fact the aim of the sentence is to
specify or identify that book. So if the general/specific criterion doesn’t help
you to select a/an or the, how do you choose?
Using a/an
(i) Use a/an when you mention a singular countable noun for the first
time:
I bought a cheese sandwich and an apple. The sandwich was OK but
the apple had a little worm in it.
Although both sentences refer to the same (specific) cheese sandwich
and apple, the first uses a and the second uses the. This is because the
first time the writer mentions the cheese sandwich or the apple, only s/
he knows about them — but the second time, both the writer and the
reader share that knowledge. The switch to the is therefore not grammar-
based; it is context-based and reflects the fact that knowledge is shared
by both reader and writer. This concept of shared knowledge is highly
relevant to research writing.
(ii) Use a/an when it doesn’t matter, or you don’t know, or the reader
doesn’t know which thing/person you mean:
Bring me a pen please. (It doesn’t matter which pen)
She works in a bank. (I/you don’t know which bank)
The subject spoke to an interviewer. (I know which one but you don’t)
(iii) Use a/an to make a general statement about a countable noun in the
singular:
A semiconductor can conduct electricity under certain conditions.
Using Ø
(i) Use Ø to make a general statement about a countable noun in the
plural:
Ø Semiconductors can conduct electricity under certain conditions.
(ii) Use Ø to make a general statement about an uncountable noun:
Ø Pollution is generally the result of human activity.
(iii) Use Ø when you mention a plural countable noun for the first time:
We conducted Ø DNA arrays on Ø silicon chips.
(iv) Use Ø for a fully uncountable noun, or a noun in its uncountable
meaning:
These acids may undergo Ø oxidation.
w 124
Using the
(i) Use the when there is really only one possibility:
The opening was located in the centre of each mesh.
We report the discovery of the smallest possible carbon nanotube.
(ii) Use the when it is definitely known to the reader:
They arranged to meet in the café. (The café where they usually meet)
Did she get the job? (The job we both know she wanted)
The cheese sandwich was very good. (The cheese sandwich I mentioned
earlier)
(iii) Use the when it is obvious to the reader, even if the thing or person
has not been mentioned:
I bought a new computer but the keyboard was faulty.
This is where the concept of shared knowledge becomes important.
As soon as computer is mentioned, the reader and writer can be safely
assumed to ‘share’ keyboard. Accurately and sensitively determining what
you can safely assume to be shared knowledge is central to the success of
your text.
125 v
w 126
This Unit presents a generic model of the Methods section and the language
that is conventionally used to generate a readable, effective text. In this task,
you will write a Methods section by bringing together everything in this Unit:
the model, the language and writing skills, and the vocabulary.
Introduction
127 v
Now write the Methods section. If you get stuck and don’t know what to
write next, use the model and the language list to help you move forward. Don’t
look at the sample answer in the Key below until you have finished writing.
2.6.2 Key
Note which part of the model is represented in each sentence.
Method
w 128
129 v
Experimental
w 130
acceptable level for a screen printing ink. 11 In formulating the ink, two
conditions were sought: high total solid content and high nanoparticle content.
The order of addition was important to ensure that the nanoparticles were
fully incorporated and homogenised, and the large differences in particle size
between the different components helped to maintain an appropriate viscosity
at high solid loadings.
The inks were screen printed onto 200 µm thick yttria-stabilised zirconia
(YSZ) electrolytes. In the case of fuel cells, the procedure differed slightly between
cells with different sintering temperatures for the anode, as shown schematically
in Fig. 1. In the cells with scaffolds sintered at 1300 °C, one side was printed
with the scaffold ink, while the other was printed with a thin layer of a CGO ink
(this is to prevent reactions between the cathode material and the YSZ
electrolyte). The printed pellets were then heat-treated at 1300 °C for one hour,
with a 1 °C min−1 ramp rate during heating and cooling. The LSCF-CGO cathode
(ink purchased from Fuel Cell Materials, Columbus, OH, USA) was then screen-
printed, and the cell heat-treated at 1100 °C for three hours with a 5 °C min−1
ramp rate during heating and cooling. The process for the cells with scaffolds
heat-treated at 1000 °C was identical except the order of printing and sintering
was a protective CGO layer first, followed by cathode and finally by the CGO
scaffold. Cells with one, two or three layers of CGO scaffold were produced. The
scaffold was dried in an oven at ~80 °C in between each printing cycle.
Next, the CGO scaffolds were impregnated with a nickel salt, again shown
schematically in Fig. 1. The impregnation solution was prepared from 0.125 g
of nickel nitrate hexahydrate in 200 µL of absolute ethanol. The solution was
dropped onto the scaffold using a 1–20 µL pipette, with the volumes used
determined empirically by visually observing whether the drop spread beyond
the edge of the scaffold. If it did, then the volume of the following impregnation
was reduced. The first volume used was determined by dropping pure ethanol
onto the scaffold. In between each impregnation, the pellets were placed into
a furnace directly at 500 °C for 5 min. This cycle was then repeated ten times.
After the final impregnation, the pellets were placed into this furnace, and the
temperature was increased to 800 °C at 5 °C min−1 and held for eight hours
before cooling at 5 °C min−1. The NiO loading was determined by weighing.
Four symmetrical cells were produced: a single layer cell heat-treated at
1300 °C; a single layer cell heat-treated at 1000 °C; a double layer cell heat-treated
131 v
at 1000 °C and a triple layer cell heat-treated at 1000 °C. In addition, four button
cells for fuel cell testing were produced from single and double layer CGO scaffolds
heat-treated at 1000 °C, and the same heat-treated at 1300 °C.
The scaffolds were studied by Ultra Small Angle X-ray Scattering (USAXS)
to obtain information about the pore structure, while the in situ measurements
allowed us to monitor the development of the microstructure with
temperature.25 For the USAXS measurements, single layered samples were
printed onto MgO substrates (used instead of YSZ as it is less absorbing of
X-rays) for analysis by USAXS, and heat-treated at either 1000 or 1300 °C. These
samples were compared to a scaffold made from a “control” ink in which the
nanoparticle component was replaced by extra commercial CGO. One sample
printed on MgO was heat-treated in situ. The USAXS data were taken at sector
15, Advanced Photon Source, Argonne National Laboratory. Briefly, small angle
scattering intensities around the direct beam was measured using channel cut
Si crystal monochrometers in a Bonse–Hart configuration. The X-ray energy
was 16.8 keV and the beam size was 1.5 × 0.4 mm. The sample was mounted
in a LinkAm heater for the in situ USAXS measurements. The USAXS intensity
is plotted as a function of the scattering vector q = 4 sin(θ)/λ where λ is the
X-ray wavelength and θ is the scattering angle. The USAXS spectra can be viewed
as the autocorrelation of the electron density fluctuations inside the sample,
resulting from contrast between the pores and the powders. The USAXS is
normally plotted in a log–log plot, and at low q Guinier approximation is valid
so the USAXS intensity shows an inflection proportional to –exp(q2Rg2/3) where
Rg is the radius of gyration. At higher q values, the USAXS intensity follows a
power law slope with an exponent of −3, as expected from Porod’s law from
slit-smeared USAXS. Our USAXS could not resolve the Guinier inflection from
the large pores made by polymer microbeads, so we used a combination of a
powder law slope and a log-normal size distribution of spherical pores to model
the USAXS intensity for non-linear least squares fitting.
The scaffolds and impregnated anodes were imaged by FEG-SEM (LEO
Gemini 1525).
Electrochemical measurements were carried out with an Autolab PGSTAT.
Symmetrical cell tests were carried out under humidified hydrogen in nitrogen,
while fuel cell tests were carried out under humidified hydrogen in nitrogen
and humidified syngas in nitrogen (15% H2, 25% CO, 60% N2). The exact syngas
w 132
composition with a high content of nitrogen was chosen so that some of the
nitrogen can be replaced with other components (e.g. CO2, larger quantities of
steam, tars or H2S) in later studies. For the syngas tests the cells were put under
load in 50% H 2 in N 2 before switching to syngas and carrying out the
measurements. This avoids the carbon deposition caused by direct exposure
to syngas at OCV. In all cases the same procedure for reducing the anode was
employed; the cells were heated under dry nitrogen to 765 °C at 5 °C min−1
before switching to humidified 10% hydrogen in nitrogen for one hour before
cooling to the operating temperature. In all cases in this report, the humidification
was carried out at 20 °C, giving a humidity of 2.3%, while the gas compositions
given refer to the gas compositions prior to humidification. […]
Key to EXERCISE 5
Nanoparticle scaffolds for syngas-fed solid oxide fuel cellsn
Experimental
133 v
w 134
dropped onto the scaffold using a 1–20 µL pipette, with the volumes used
determined empirically by visually observing whether the drop spread beyond
the edge of the scaffold. If it did, then the volume of the following impregnation
was reduced. The first volume used was determined by dropping pure ethanol
onto the scaffold. In between each impregnation, the pellets were placed into
a furnace directly at 500 °C for 5 min. This cycle was then repeated ten times.
After the final impregnation, the pellets were placed into this furnace, and the
temperature was increased to 800 °C at 5 °C min−1 and held for eight hours
before cooling at 5 °C min–1. The NiO loading was determined by weighing.
Four symmetrical cells were produced: a single layer cell heat-treated at
1300 °C; a single layer cell heat-treated at 1000 °C; a double layer cell heat-
treated at 1000 °C and a triple layer cell heat-treated at 1000 °C. In addition,
four button cells for fuel cell testing were produced from single and double
layer CGO scaffolds heat-treated at 1000 °C, and the same heat-treated at
1300 °C.
The scaffolds were studied by Ultra Small Angle X-ray Scattering (USAXS)
to obtain information about the pore structure, while the in situ measurements
allowed us to monitor the development of the microstructure with
temperature.25 For the USAXS measurements, single layered samples were
printed onto MgO substrates (used instead of YSZ as it is less absorbing of X-rays)
for analysis by USAXS, and heat-treated at either 1000 or 1300 °C. These samples
were compared to a scaffold made from a “control” ink in which the nanoparticle
component was replaced by extra commercial CGO. One sample printed on
MgO was heat-treated in situ. The USAXS data were taken at sector 15, Advanced
Photon Source, Argonne National Laboratory. Briefly, small angle scattering
intensities around the direct beam was measured using channel cut Si crystal
monochrometers in a Bonse–Hart configuration. The X-ray energy was 16.8 keV
and the beam size was 1.5 × 0.4 mm. The sample was mounted in a LinkAm
heater for the in situ USAXS measurements. The USAXS intensity is plotted as
a function of the scattering vector q = 4 sin(θ)/λ where λ is the X-ray wavelength
and θ is the scattering angle. The USAXS spectra can be viewed as the
autocorrelation of the electron density fluctuations inside the sample, resulting
from contrast between the pores and the powders. The USAXS is normally
plotted in a log–log plot, and at low q Guinier approximation is valid so the
USAXS intensity shows an inflection proportional to –exp(q2Rg2/3) where Rg is
135 v
the radius of gyration. At higher q values, the USAXS intensity follows a power
law slope with an exponent of −3, as expected from Porod’s law from slit-
smeared USAXS. Our USAXS could not resolve the Guinier inflection from the
large pores made by polymer microbeads, so we used a combination of a powder
law slope and a log-normal size distribution of spherical pores to model the
USAXS intensity for non-linear least squares fitting.
The scaffolds and impregnated anodes were imaged by FEG-SEM (LEO
Gemini 1525).
Electrochemical measurements were carried out with an Autolab PGSTAT.
Symmetrical cell tests were carried out under humidified hydrogen in nitrogen,
while fuel cell tests were carried out under humidified hydrogen in nitrogen
and humidified syngas in nitrogen (15% H2, 25% CO, 60% N2). The exact syngas
composition with a high content of nitrogen was chosen so that some of the
nitrogen can be replaced with other components (e.g. CO2, larger quantities of
steam, tars or H2S) in later studies. For the syngas tests the cells were put under
load in 50% H 2 in N 2 before switching to syngas and carrying out the
measurements. This avoids the carbon deposition caused by direct exposure to
syngas at OCV. In all cases the same procedure for reducing the anode was
employed; the cells were heated under dry nitrogen to 765 °C at 5 °C min−1
before switching to humidified 10% hydrogen in nitrogen for one hour before
cooling to the operating temperature. In all cases in this report, the humidification
was carried out at 20 °C, giving a humidity of 2.3%, while the gas compositions
given refer to the gas compositions prior to humidification. […]
w 136
· Remember that your familiarity with the topic may mean that you are not
aware of the reader’s need for introductory or background information.
The amount of background factual information depends on the current
level of readers’ knowledge, so check this against recent papers dealing
with similar topics in similar journals. If a wider readership will access the
study via the internet, adjust the amount of introductory or background
information accordingly.
· Make sure the reader knows exactly WHY you did what you did at each
stage. This creates a narrative that reads coherently and supports your
integrity as a researcher.
· The extent of comparison with existing/current methods and the verb
tense that describes these methods depends on the current level of
readers’ knowledge, so check this against recent papers dealing with
similar topics in similar journals.
· Check every single sentence to ensure that the verb tense is
communicating the correct meaning.
· Make sure you have separated your own work from that of other
researchers and from established knowledge. Your contribution may be
obvious to you, but it’s not obvious to every reader. Use the Agentless
Passive table in Section 2.5.1 to check that you have avoided any
potential ambiguity.
137 v
UNIT 3
How to Write about Results
TITLE
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
CONCLUSION*
*Some journals call this section CONCLUSION and others call it CONCLUSIONS but this does not seem
to reflect the number of conclusions that are drawn.
w 140
The table below shows four common options for the final sections of the
research article.
Your target articles will help you decide between these options, but if
your target journal has a flexible structure, aspects of your study may also
guide your decision. If your preliminary results influence later ones, you may
prefer a combined Results and Discussion section in which you present and
discuss preliminary results before presenting and discussing the later ones.
Similarly, if your results respond to multiple hypotheses/predictions, it may
be easier for the reader to see the results and discussion for each hypothesis
together, with appropriate subtitles. If you intend to discuss the results as a
whole, you may decide to present all the results together in the Results section,
and then move onto a Discussion section. Ultimately, the aim is to make this
section as easy as possible for the reader to negotiate, to demonstrate the
relationship between the results and the aim/s of the study, and to lay a clear
path to the Conclusion.
In this book, the Results section will be treated separately from the
Discussion section, and the Discussion section will be treated separately from
the Conclusion. This is to ensure that you can train yourself to recognise —
and therefore create — the components that are characteristic of each
section, whether you keep them separate or combine them.
N.B. In some cases, depending on the journal, the topic, or the type of
study, the Results section may be called Data Analysis or Case Study. As
always, the golden rule is to use your target research articles as a guide.
141 v
The advice given to writers about what should and should not be in the
Results section often conflicts with what is successfully published. For
example, you may be advised to avoid any interpretation of your data in the
Results section. You may be advised to use only the past tense, or to avoid
repetitive paragraph structures. You may be told that the Results section
should only deal with what the results are, and that the Discussion section
should only deal with what the results mean. However, when we examine
and describe successfully-published research articles, we see that authors
do not always — or even often — follow such advice.
A reverse-engineering, descriptive approach based on current published
research will generate a more reliable picture of the Results section than a
prescriptive approach that tells you what you should or shouldn’t do. One
reason for this is that the structure and content of the Results section is
changing to reflect the way that readers read, and particularly the way they
use the internet as a resource. The current trend towards placing the Methods
section in Supplementary Materials is also influencing the content of the
Results section, since this means that the Results section will need to include
information about the method to make the results intelligible. Prescriptive
advice may therefore quickly become out of date. By contrast, the descriptive
approach makes it easy to update and adapt your writing models as they
change over time — and they will.
Developing the reverse-engineering approach for yourself will mean that
you can use it for any type of text, now and in the future. In this Unit you are
therefore encouraged to take control of the analysis and modelling for yourself
and build your own model of the Results section, using your target research
articles as the primary source. The aim is to generate a model for the Results
section in current research articles in your own field, and to ensure that
you develop the competence to update and adapt it confidently.
w 142
simply provide good, clear graphics with good, clear titles and perhaps a note
underneath each one? Almost all STEMM research articles currently include
a written Results section, so clearly some functions of the Results section,
for example explaining the results, cannot be achieved without narrative text.
With this in mind, start by writing a brief description of the function of
each sentence in the Results section of at least TWO of your target articles to
generate a broad list of potential components. Then write a brief description
of the function of each sentence in the simplified Results section below, and
compare your list with this description. Some components in your list will be
similar to the sentence descriptions on page 154; others will be specific to the
research you are doing, the current conventions of your field, or the type of
article you are writing. Integrate the two lists to generate a robust set of model
components for the Results section in research articles in your own current
research area which you can adapt or update as your research develops.
Results
1 Data obtained in previous cycling safety studies1,5,7 used fixed monitors
positioned at high-emission locations to measure weekday concentrations
of black carbon (BC) and nitrogen dioxide (NO2). 2 Those studies found
no significant difference in BC and NO2 emissions between cycle lanes
shared with buses and cycle lanes separated from vehicle traffic. 3 In
our study, BC and NO2 concentrations were measured using a PEMS-43,
a portable emissions measurement system developed by Noxious et
al.7. 4 The PEMS-43 was fixed to a bicycle and recorded the emissions
hourly along each route type.
5 Figure 1 shows the BC and NO2 concentrations measured hourly
on each route type from 6.00 a.m. to 10.00 a.m. 6 In line with results
from previous studies, the BC and NO2 concentrations were broadly
similar for both route types over this 4-hour period. 7 However, the data
obtained by PEMS-43 for journeys later in the day were significantly
different. 8 We recorded a striking reduction in the NO2 concentrations
along bike paths separated from vehicle traffic, beginning shortly after
143 v
10.00 a.m. (Figure 2). 9 As can be seen, by 2.00 p.m. the NO2 levels had
fallen by as much as 33%, and this low level was maintained even during
the 5.00 p.m. to 7.00 p.m. peak traffic density period. 10 These results
suggest that NO2 levels along bike paths separated from vehicle traffic
may not match those of BC at all times throughout the day.
11 The presence of vegetation is known to slightly alter BC and NO2
concentrations at different times of day11,18, and the effect of this along
the two routes was not investigated. 12 Nevertheless, the data obtained
here suggest that using a portable emissions measurement system to
measure BC and NO2 exposures hourly may provide more accurate
information for traffic management strategies than traditional on-site
measurement.
3.2.2 Key
In Sentences 1 and 2 Data obtained in previous cycling safety studies1,5,7
used fixed monitors positioned at high-emission locations to measure
weekday concentrations of black carbon (BC) and nitrogen dioxide (NO2).
Those studies found no significant difference in BC and NO2 emissions
between cycle lanes shared with buses and cycle lanes separated from
vehicle traffic. the writer repeats/revisits the methods and findings
of studies mentioned earlier in the article.
145 v
w 146
comes before and after the graphic. Think about why the writer put the
graphics in that order, and how you, the reader, responds to them at those
locations, in that order, and framed by that narrative text. You may be
impatient to present your most important and exciting results, but it may be
more effective to start with the graphics and narrative that underlie or lead
to the more important ones so that the reader can ‘discover’ the important
ones with you.
Sometimes a graphic that summarises the data or findings is presented
at the start of the Results section before any text, particularly if the data is
visually very clear and unambiguous. However, if the visual representation
of the data in your figures, tables and photographs can be interpreted in
more than one way, it may be better to comment on that data before inviting
the reader to take a look. If you don’t, the reader might interpret it differently
from you. This will affect their response to the next graphic or set of results,
and ultimately to your conclusions.
147 v
how your results have advanced or modified knowledge in your field, and
enables the reader to position your study on the research map. This mapping
of your study is developed in the Discussion, but in order to do it effectively,
you need to first set your results against existing results.
Many types of comparisons can be found in the Results section. In
addition to comparing your results with those in the literature, you may
want to compare your own results with your predictions, or compare your
modelled/simulated results with your experimental results. The language
used to communicate the level of similarity or difference in these comparisons
can be central to the success of the article, and a wide range of options can
be found on pages 179–180.
Why do I have to use evaluative language — why not simply describe what
is in the graphic?
The most important reason for using language in the Results section rather
than relying only on graphics is that results do not speak for themselves. You
are not simply writing up your results, you are writing a guide to the results
that should lead logically and naturally towards the conclusions you will
draw.
The language that you use to describe your results and the comments
you make on your results influence the way readers perceive them. For
example, look at the two curves in the figure below:
If you write As can be seen in Fig. 3.1, the two curves are very similar,
the reader will focus on the similarity between the curves. However, if you
write As can be seen in Fig. 3.1, the two curves are significantly different, the
reader will notice the difference between them.
w 148
Your description of the results supports the alignment between the aim
of the study, the results themselves, and your conclusions. If you do not
comment on your results so that the reader can share your understanding
of them, the reader may interpret them differently from you and the
conclusions you eventually draw will not seem either logical or natural to the
reader; in fact, they may seem surprising or inappropriate. For example, if
you just write: As can be seen in Fig. 1, the effect occurred in 23% of cases,
you may be basing your conclusions on a belief that 23% of cases is a high
proportion, but without any evaluative language to ‘fix’ the value of the
number, the reader may independently decide that 23% of cases is low. This
will have a damaging effect on the rest of your paper, and particularly on the
Conclusion.
Although results are sometimes described objectively (i.e. numerically
or using non-evaluative language), if you simply describe what is in the
graphic, you have not added anything to what the reader can already see,
so why bother? You are a legitimate member of your research community,
and you are entitled to — and should — present your understanding of the
results you have obtained. Your readers do not have to agree with you but
they need to know where you are going with the results, otherwise the gap
between your results and the conclusions you draw from them will be too
wide to negotiate. Results are therefore usually presented including some
evaluative language.
Evaluative language may occur together with the relevant number/
quantity (only 23 ml), or it may replace the number/quantity (in many cases).
The language you choose guides the reader towards your own interpretation
of the data, so if the effect you were looking for occurred in 23% of cases,
you can choose to communicate this as a strong result (in as many as 23%
of cases) or a weak result (in only 23% of cases). Interestingly, researchers
often deny that writers do this in their own field — until the evaluative
language in their target articles is pointed out to them. A list of evaluative
language commonly used to describe and comment on results can be found
on pages 171–179. After you look at the list, start underlining or highlighting
examples when you see them in your target articles. This will give you a clear
indication of what, when, how, and how much evaluative language to include
in your own papers.
149 v
In Sentence 9 As can be seen, by 2.00 p.m. the NO2 levels had fallen by
as much as 33%, and this low level was maintained even during the
5.00 p.m. to 7.00 p.m. peak traffic density period. the writer selects a
specific result to present in more detail, and comments on it (as much
as, even).
w 150
How do I decide which results to present in detail? Why not describe all of
them in detail?
Remember that your job is to provide a guide to the results, not simply a
description of the results. If you present all your results in detail they will all
seem to be equally important. This is unlikely to be the case: you know that
some of your results are key results, that others are less important, and that
even within the set of key results, some are more significant than others.
Your sentences are, in the end, just black lines on a white page — the reader
cannot hear your voice and so cannot hear you emphasising the importance
of a particular result. You cannot print it in red and, as we have seen, you
cannot even use an exclamation mark. It’s your responsibility to select the
important results and focus on them in more detail so that your reader can
share your perception of what is important. You can also make this clear
by beginning sentences with language like It is important to note that…/
Importantly,/It is significant that…
It is interesting that the best results are often described in such a way
as to give the impression that they are typical results — look out for that in
the papers you read. Writers may make a general statement about the results
followed by a phrase like for example and the ‘best’ result: The SFS results
are generally in very good agreement with their FE counterparts; for example,
at midspan the values are almost identical.
151 v
In Sentence 10 These results suggest that NO2 levels along bike paths
separated from vehicle traffic may not match those of BC at all times
throughout the day. the writer mentions a possible implication of the
results.
w 152
Shouldn’t the implications and applications of the Results wait until the
Discussion?
The implications are a central topic in the Discussion, but almost all writers
give some indication of what their results imply within the Results section.
Once the results have been presented, the focus of the paper begins to open
out and face away from the central reporting section and towards the
Discussion/Conclusion, so it is common to see verbs like suggest or indicate
at this point. This helps the reader to see where the paper is going, and opens
the path into the Discussion section.
Mentioning the applications helps the reader to link the results of the
study to the aims or applications mentioned in the Introduction or Abstract.
The writer can create this link by using language that echoes those aims or
applications. For example, if the aim stated in the Introduction was to improve
the accuracy of something, using the phrase more accurate to describe the
results will help the reader to see the link clearly. These words and phrases
are often very positive; see the lists of ‘happy words’ J on pages 51, 107,
175, 225 and 294 for some examples.
153 v
w 154
Notes:
w 156
Results
Regional Chemical Diversity. Canopy chemical traits varied widely
among the thousands of trees surveyed along the Andes–Amazon
elevation gradient (Table 1 and Table S3). Foliar N, P, and lignin spanned
an order of magnitude in value, whereas Ca and phenols varied by two
orders of magnitude. Community-scale variation in many chemical traits
tracked changes in elevation (Fig. S1) and at times, was closely related
to climate (Table S4). Intercomparison of elevational trends in canopy
chemistry was made possible by applying a gradient normalization
procedure to the data, which shows the percentage increase or decrease
in a community’s average trait value relative to the gradient mean
(SI Methods). By doing this normalization, elevational trends among all
forests were found to differ from observed trends among high-fertility
sites alone, revealing the central role of soils in determining community
level canopy chemistry in the region (Fig. 1). Most notably, foliar P and
Ca concentrations on higher-fertility lowland sites were two times that
measured on lower-fertility lowland sites, and soluble C concentrations
were elevated in higher-fertility areas (Table 2). In contrast, total C,
phenols, and lignin were suppressed in the higher-fertility sites.
We also discovered elevation-dependent tradeoffs in canopy foliar
C allocation throughout the region. Up the elevation gradient, cellulose
and lignin decreased 100% relative to their region-wide mean. Soluble
C increased by almost 150% with elevation (Fig. 1), and this change
157 v
w 158
Results
159 v
moment was predicted when ATT in the ACLd knee was restricted to the maximum
allowable limit (Fig. 3B, gray dashed line).
The simulation results showed that it was possible to reduce ATT exactly
to the level calculated for the intact knee merely by increasing the magnitude
of hamstrings force (Fig. 4A). As expected, the increase in hamstrings force
needed to bring ATT in the ACLd knee to the maximum allowable level was
less than that needed to bring ATT to the intact level (Fig. 4A, compare gray
dashed and solid lines). An increase in hamstrings force led to a decrease in
the knee extensor moment, but this effect was noticeably less than that
obtained when quadriceps force was reduced (compare gray lines in Fig. 3B
and 4B). […]
Results
Similar to the cells in the ICM, undifferentiated hESCs express embryonic cell
specific surface antigens, including stage-specific embryonic antigens (SSEA) 3
and 4, Tra-1-60 and Tra-1-81 [17], which were first identified in human
embryonic carcinomas. However, unlike mESCs, they do not express SSEA1.
Although the functional significance of these antigens is as yet unclear, they
are routinely used as markers for hESCs. Therefore, we anticipated that studying
the dynamic changes of these cell surface markers in neural differentiation
could potentially enable us to capture and isolate the early differentiating
populations which could be used for further analysis.
We focused our study on Tra-1-81, SSEA4 and SSEA1, given that SSEA3
expression is not necessarily required for a pluripotent state [18], and the high
similarity between Tra-1-60 and Tra-1-81 [19]. Our results showed that, in
self-renewal culture conditions, H1 hESCs express high levels of SSEA4 and
TRA-1-81, but not SSEA1 (Figure 1A, top). After differentiation to neural
w 160
161 v
w 162
TR2/S4+ cells generate both neural and non-neural lineage cell types
163 v
and is widely used to examine the differentiation potential of cells in vitro [23].
The TR2/S4+ cell aggregates were able to expand in culture and displayed
structures similar to embryoid bodies (EBs) after 7 days of differentiation in
suspension (Figure 5A). These EBlike aggregates were then dissociated and
plated onto adherent culture dishes for further differentiation. After another
7 days, cells with various morphologies were visible (Figure 5B) and were
analysed for gene expression by qRT-PCR and immunocytochemistry. Real-time
RT-PCR showed upregulation of markers of the three germ layers: neuroectoderm
(Pax6, Sox1 and Sox2), mesoderm (goosecoid (GSC) and Meox1) and endoderm
(albumin (ALB) and GATA6) (Figure 5C), while pluripotent markers, Oct4 and
Nanog were downregulated. Immunocytochemistry further confirmed that
the differentiated cells contained progeny from the three germ layers: AFP,
HNF4a and GATA6 for endoderm, muscle actin for mesoderm, nestin and Pax6
for neuroectoderm (Figure 5D). These results demonstrate that TR2/S4+ cells
are also capable of differentiating into cells of non-neural lineages.
w 164
Comparison of TR2/S4+ cells with cells of early embryoid bodies and definitive
endoderm differentiation
Since TR2/S4+ cells are able to generate cells in addition to the neural lineage,
it raises the question of whether these cells are equivalent to those of early
EBs. To answer this question, we compared our global gene expression data of
early neural differentiation (N1), which resembled the TR2/S4+ cells (over 85%
cells are TR2/S4+) [22], with the published microarray data from 16-day EBs of
the same hESC line, H1 [26]. Interestingly, gene ontology analysis revealed that
the genes significantly upregulated during EB differentiation have considerable
functions during neural differentiation and development (Table 1) and, as a
result, shared >60% of the functions in biological processes with those genes
upregulated in TR2/S4+ cells. This becomes more evident when the top 15
functions in the biological process of the gene-ontology list are compared
between the two cell-populations as over 70% of them appeared in both lists
(Table 1). Similarly, the downregulated genes in both cell populations also shared
>60% of gene ontology functions. Therefore, global gene expression analysis
does provide certain support for the similar phenotype and differentiation
observed between TR2/S4+ cells and the early EBs (EBs in suspension).
Since cells in the early neural differentiation and early EB formation share
a similar gene expression pattern and phenotype, we asked whether early
mesendoderm differentiation would also generate this population. To address
165 v
4. Results
w 166
of these 45 different material conditions (i.e. in total 135 tensile tests and
hardness measurements) are shown as an overview in Fig. 2 in terms of the
yield strength (YS) (Fig. 2a), ultimate tensile strength (UTS) (Fig. 2b), total
elongation (TE) (Fig. 2c) and hardness (Fig. 2d). The results are plotted according
to the systematically varied Al content (Table 1) and colour coded according
to the individual ageing conditions. Pronounced effects associated with the
changes in chemical composition and ageing parameters on the mechanical
behaviour of the materials can be clearly distinguished. For the reference
material (no Al addition, i.e. Fe–30Mn–1.2C) the best mechanical behaviour
was observed for the as-homogenised, non-aged state. This alloy was
characterised by a YS of 360 MPa, strong work hardening (UTS = 830MPa) and
high ductility (TE = 77%). Ageing of the Fe–30Mn–1.2C alloy showed that the
YS was virtually unchanged and the hardness slightly increased. However,
ageing greatly reduces both the UTS and TE. This embrittlement becomes most
apparent for long ageing times (24 h) and higher temperatures (>500°C). For
the alloy Fe–30Mn–1.2C–8Al, i.e. the material with the highest Al concentration,
the opposite trend applied. Without ageing the mechanical data are similar
to those of the Al-free alloy, with only a slight change in YS (increase), UTS and
TE (decrease). Ageing treatments for 1 h, however, led to a simultaneous
improvement in YS, UTS and hardness (increasing with temperature) and to
only a slight drop in TE. Ageing of alloy Fe–30Mn–1.2C–8Al for 24 h further
increased YS, UTS and hardness to values almost twice as high as in the as-
homogenized state, but also drastically reduced the ductility. The mechanical
data for the alloys with intermediate Al contents appear as the superimposition
of the two different behaviours described above: as a general rule, the values
obtained for the alloys with 2, 4 and 6 wt.% Al lie between the respective data
from alloys without and with 8 wt.% Al. The alloys with Al additions of 4 and
6 wt.% especially are only very weakly affected by the applied ageing
treatments in terms of their mechanical data compared with the alloys Fe–
30Mn–1.2C (weakening /embrittlement) and Fe–30Mn–1.2C–8Al
(strengthening). […]
167 v
side, respectively. In the as-homogenized state the three alloys exhibit almost
identical austenitic microstructures with an average grain size of about 80 lm,
few twins (increasing with higher Al content) and no apparent micro-
segregations. After ageing, however, pronounced differences between the three
alloys could be observed. Coarse particles with a diameter of ~10 µm appear
at the grain boundaries of the Al-free alloy (Fe–30Mn–1.2C), most probably
consisting of a pearlitic ferrite/(Fe,Mn)3C microstructure. The addition of Al to
the alloy Fe–30Mn–1.2C–4Al apparently constrained the formation of those
phases during ageing, as the number density and size of the particles was now
significantly lower than in the Al-free material and only thin films appeared on
the grain boundaries of the alloy with 4 wt.% Al. A further increase in Al content
(alloy Fe–30Mn–1.2C–8Al) resulted in the complete absence of grain boundary
particles during ageing, but a large number of unevenly distributed small
particles appeared within the grains, giving them a darker contrast.
w 168
169 v
w 170
w 172
The amount that remained in the pipe was even higher/even lower than
predicted.
Group 4 contains words/phrases which communicate that the size/quantity
is similar or close to another:
Almost half of the residue remained in the pipe.
Group 5 is useful when you do not want to interpret the size/quantity:
Some of the residue remained in the pipe.
Look at the list below, and place each word/phrase in the correct group.
(Those marked with an asterisk [*] appear in two groups.)
KEY
Group 1: words/phrases which ‘increase’ the size/quantity
173 v
Group 5: words/phrases which you can use when you do not want to interpret
the size/quantity
w 174
1. If she always goes to the Library on Monday mornings you will find
her there today.
2. If she generally goes to the Library on Monday mornings you expect to
find her there today and you will be surprised if she is not there.
3. If she often goes to the Library on Monday mornings there is a good
chance that you may find her there today.
4. If she goes to the Library more often than not on Mondays, you should
start by looking for her there, but she may not be there today.
5. If she goes to the Library as often as not on Monday mornings you
may find her there today — or you may not. It’s impossible to predict
because the chances are equal; she goes there as often as she doesn’t
go there.
6. If she sometimes goes to the Library on Monday mornings perhaps
she will be there today, but you won’t be surprised if she isn’t there.
175 v
7. If she occasionally goes to the Library on Monday mornings she might
be there today but it’s unlikely.
8. If she rarely goes to the Library on Monday mornings she probably
won’t be there today, so don’t bother to look for her there.
9. If she hardly ever goes to the library on Monday mornings she is not
expected to be there today, and you would be surprised to find her
there.
10. If she never goes to the Library on Monday mornings she won’t be
there today.
The list below shows the ten levels in decreasing order of frequency.
However, note that statements about frequency tend to be subjective: saying
that something occurred frequently may refer to how often it was expected
to occur. For example, if previous research indicated that a particular result
was unlikely to occur but in your study it occurred on 22% of occasions, you
may present that as a frequent occurrence. On the other hand, if previous
research indicated that something is very likely to occur but in your study it
occurred on only 22% of occasions, you may present that as a rare occurrence.
1 each/every time
without exception
on each/every occasion
always
invariably
2 habitually
as a rule
generally
normally
usually
3 regularly
repeatedly
frequently
often
commonly
w 176
When you look at your target articles, you will notice that it is harder to
find examples of the language used to provide an objective description of
the results than it is to find examples of the language used to provide a
subjective description of the results. When objective language does occur,
a subjective ‘add-on’ is often provided. For example, slightly lower or much
lower is found more often than lower on its own. This is probably because,
as mentioned earlier, an objective description of the results does not tell
readers anything they don’t already know from looking at the graphic.
If you are having difficulty seeing the difference between objective
and subjective language, remember that saying that one level or quantity is
higher than another is an objective truth; saying that it is high is a subjective
evaluation.
177 v
w 178
· The amount of dye adsorbed on gold was even higher than that on the
silver particles.
· Breaks in nanotubes were rarely observed following specimen cutting.
COMPARISON WITH RESULTS IN OTHER RESEARCH/MODELLED RESULTS/
PREDICTED RESULTS
as expected, Verbs
better than accord with
broadly similar to align with
comparable to compare well with
comparatively (low/high etc.) confirm
consistent with contradict
contrary to correlate with
(effectively) the same as corroborate
(essentially) identical deviate from
in accordance with differ
in (good) agreement with disprove
in contradiction to mirror
in contrast to prove
in line with refute
much the same as reinforce
not dissimilar resemble
not unlike substantiate
relative to support
similar validate
unlike verify
well known
Note: The verb tense may change as time passes and knowledge and information
develop. This means that a sentence like X has been found to occur4 in a paper from
five years ago may now be written as X occurs4 or even simply X occurs.
179 v
Adding risk-reducing phrases such as appear to, seem to, tend to can be
used to communicate the level of certainty the writer wants to express (see
IMPLICATIONS AND EXPLANATIONS OF RESULTS on page 182, Section 3.5
THE CERTAINTY CONTINUUM, and Section 4.5 MODAL VERBS).
Here are some examples of how these are used:
w 180
181 v
w 182
In some cases, the position of the cause and the effect are fixed by the
verb. For example, in X produced Y, X is the cause and Y is the effect; in X
originated in Y, X is the effect and Y is the cause. In other cases, such as X is
linked to Y, the writer may simply want to indicate that X and Y are connected
in some way. These verbs (linked to, connected to, related to) do not specify
which is the cause and which is the effect — nor do they even mean that the
connection between the two is necessarily a cause-effect relationship.
Articles and prepositions also affect the meaning of cause/effect
statements. For example:
the Past Simple was related to simply describes what the authors found in
their study; the findings are linked to that study and are not presented as
generally-accepted or established truths. By contrast, choosing the Present
Simple is related to reflects a belief that the findings are reliable enough to
constitute a permanent truth.
w 184
Here are some examples from Results sections in recent published research
to show how language is used to communicate different levels of confidence
and certainty:
185 v
· Remember that data and results do not speak for themselves. Present
the results within a narrative that leads the reader logically and naturally
towards the interpretations and conclusions you want to draw and that
you want your reader to share.
· Check the amount of commenting/evaluative language in the Results
sections of your target articles.
· Decide where your results and the implications of your results fit on the
certainty continuum, and choose language that represents that location.
187 v
UNIT 4
How to Write the Discussion
TITLE
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
CONCLUSION*
*Some journals call this section CONCLUSION and others call it CONCLUSIONS but this does not seem
to reflect the number of conclusions that are drawn.
w 190
As stated on page 141, the Results section will be treated separately from the
Discussion section, and the Discussion section will be treated separately from
the Conclusion. This is to ensure that you can train yourself to recognise — and
therefore create — the components that are characteristic of each section,
whether you keep them separate or combine them.
· Has the study obtained identical or similar results to other studies but
uses a modified or new method that is better than existing methods? In
that case, the main contribution may be the method.
· Has the study obtained better (e.g. more accurate) results than
other studies? In that case, the main contribution may be the results
themselves.
· Is the study a game-changer, i.e. is it setting a new direction for research/
invalidating previous work? In that case, the main contribution of the
study may be its impact on the literature/research world.
· Has the study identified or created new or extended applications? In
that case, the main contribution may be its impact on industry/the real
world.
191 v
w 192
Block 2 presents a research map that identifies key studies and contributions.
In the Discussion the current study is positioned in relation to that research
map.
Block 1 provides an interface between the outside world and the research
article that prepares the reader to ‘cross the border’ into the article by
establishing that the topic is significant, providing background information
and/or identifying the current focus of research. The end of the Discussion
creates a similar interface, preparing the reader to exit the article and carry
the key message to the outside world and/or the research world.
The diagram below shows how the Introduction and the Discussion mirror
each other:
THE FIELD/TOPIC
EXISTING
RESEARCH/KNOWLEDGE
GAP
YOUR PAPER/STUDY
193 v
articles. To create this list, write a brief description of the function of each
sentence in the Discussion section of at least TWO target articles. When you
have finished, read the analysis of the simplified Discussion section below, and
then compare your list with the generic model on page 208. Some components
in your list will be similar to those in the generic model; others will be specific
to the research topic you are dealing with, the current conventions of your
field, or the type of article you are writing. Integrate your list with the generic
list to produce a robust set of model components for the Discussion section in
your current research area, and adapt or update this as necessary.
Discussion
1 To our knowledge, the study reported here is the largest study of
patients who have survived the viral disease V2D, and provides a key
contribution to the understanding of post-V2D health issues following
infection. 2 Our study is the first to record a wide range of post-V2D
complications, and provides clear evidence that survivors who
experience a given symptom during V2D infection often present with a
closely-related symptom within 300 days following infection. 3 This was
particularly true in relation to some specific complications, such as
hearing loss (Fig. 1). 4 A key finding was that some post-V2D health
issues appear to be age-related: infants below the age of 2 experienced
post-V2D cardiac complications far less frequently than adults
irrespective of the severity of such complications during the acute stage
(Figs. 2a and 2b). 5 This has clear implications for post-V2D-related
public health management, and suggests that when resources are
limited, cardiac screening priority could be given to adults.
6 Some questions remain; for example, anecdotal evidence
collected from patients during the study period suggested that there
was a positive correlation between viral load at the acute stage and
the severity of post-V2D health issues. 7 However, this was not addressed
formally during the study. 8 Although many studies have quantified
viral load during acute V2D17,22,27,33, a direct comparison with the
w 194
4.2.2 Key
In Sentence 1 To our knowledge, the study reported here is the largest
study of patients who have survived the viral disease V2D, and provides
a key contribution to the understanding of post-V2D health issues
following infection. the writer explicitly identifies the contribution of
the study in relation to the existing literature and knowledge.
Doesn’t ‘to our knowledge’ sound a bit weak? Aren’t I supposed to know
whether it is the largest study or not?
In Sentence 1, the writer includes the phrase to our knowledge in case a study
has been overlooked accidentally. Even after every effort has been made to
search all relevant journals, it is difficult to be absolutely sure that no-one has
ever done a particular type of study until now. Immediately before submission
you should check current research as thoroughly as possible, using a wide
range of keywords. The information you get from the internet will only be as
good as your skill in looking for it, and it is unprofessional to make a mistake
in a sentence like this. Research develops and is published at a very fast rate,
and during the time it takes to submit to your target journal/receive peer
review/redraft and resubmit, it is possible that similar research may have been
published. If that is the case, don’t panic. It may only be necessary to review
and clarify the similarities and differences between your study and others in
order to separate and identify the contribution yours makes to the topic.
195 v
As discussed in the Preface, most readers don’t read the entire research article
linearly from beginning to end. Many only read the Title, Abstract and
Discussion/Conclusion, and these need to be viable as standalone, independent
communications. In addition, even if the reader has read the entire article up
to this point, it should not be assumed that they have read it with the same
focus and concentration as the writer, or that they remember everything they
have read. For these reasons, writers often re-position or reboot the reader
at the start of the Discussion section by restating relevant aspects of the study.
If I decide to ‘reboot’ the reader, how do I choose which part/s of the article
to revisit?
The success of the Discussion relies on a controlling narrative that clearly
identifies the primary value of the study, and that takes the reader logically
and effectively to the Conclusion. That narrative begins with the first sentence
of the Discussion, so thinking about the main achievement or contribution of
your study (see Section 4.1.1) may help you decide what to focus on first. For
example, if the main contribution of your study is the change or modification
you have made to an existing method, you might begin by revisiting the
difficulties associated with that existing method, or by revisiting the key features
and comparative advantages of your new method. If the main achievement
of your study is that your results are more accurate than existing results, or
reveal new information, you may begin by revisiting your results. If the main
contribution of your study is that it provides a strong response to the gap or
problem identified in the Introduction, you may begin by revisiting that gap.
Using similar sentences to those in the section you have chosen to revisit
will provide an echo for the reader and will help them recall or find that
section. As always, reverse engineer by looking at how writers in your target
journals start the Discussion section.
197 v
w 198
Discussion
IBS is a multifactorial disease, frequently associated with psychological
distress and characterized by altered gastrointestinal motor function,
viscerosensitivity, and, more recently, low-grade inflammation and
impaired intestinal barrier function. Noteworthy, a positive correlation
between increased intestinal permeability and visceral pain has been
shown in IBS patients (2). Since stressful life events contribute to the
IBS symptom exacerbation, the most commonly animal models
reproducing “IBS-like” symptoms result from the use of central nervous
system-directed stressors (33). In this study, WAS was used as a reliable
model of chronic psychological stress. We first demonstrated that a
4-day WAS induced intestinal epithelial barrier impairment, consistent
with the literature (2, 4, 45). In particular, for WAS, colonic permeability
increase was shown to occur from the third day of a 5-day stress
application (40). […] information regarding the effects of chronic stress
on mucus barrier, a major actor ensuring intestinal barrier integrity,
remains scarce in IBS-like models. Regarding this concern, Söderholm
et al. (45) reported that a 10-day WAS decreased the number of
mucus-containing goblet cells in the ileum and colon and increased
bacterial adhesion. A reduction in the goblet cell number was also
depicted in the duodenum of maternally deprived rats (15). In contrast,
O’Malley et al. (34) reported an increased colonic mucus secretion
and number of goblet cells in maternally deprived rats.
[…] Larsson et al. (29) depicted in active phase UC patients an
altered Muc2 O-glycosylation profile, which was correlated with
inflammation severity. Such profile was characterized by changes in
the rate of glycanic structures and decreased overall sulfation (29).
More recently, the same group showed that mucus of patients with
active UC was penetrable ex vivo to 2-μm-sized fluorescent beads (24),
suggesting that biochemical changes in mucins impact mucus
“penetrability,” resulting in a loss of barrier integrity. In this framework,
199 v
w 200
201 v
I’ve been told that the Discussion section shouldn’t repeat the results. Should
I mention the results at all? And if so, how do I mention them without
repeating them?
There is considerable overlap between the Results and Discussion sections.
For example, as we saw in Unit 3, in the Results section most writers include
a comment about what the results suggest or imply although in theory, this
belongs in the Discussion. Equally, it is difficult, if not impossible, to develop
the implications in the Discussion without referring to or repeating key results,
since they provide the evidence that underpins and validates those
implications. However, repeating or even re-wording key results is not
sufficient; the Discussion should move on from the Results. The aim of
research is not simply to obtain and describe results; it is to make sense of
w 202
203 v
Why are Sentences 3 and 4 in the Past Simple tense? Is that related to the
level of certainty?
As stated above, the writer chooses a verb tense that reflects the appropriate
level of confidence or certainty.
How do the verb tenses in these sentences affect the reader’s response?
A key finding was that some post-V2D health issues appeared to be age-
•
related…
A key finding was that some post-V2D health issues appear to be age-
•
related…
A key finding is that some post-V2D health issues appear to be age-
•
related…
It’s a good idea to highlight the verbs in the Discussion sections of your
target articles and consider how the tense affects your response as a reader.
Does the verb tense seem to ‘match’ the power of the results?
w 204
205 v
Another possible reason for mentioning a limitation for the first time in
the Discussion is if you are finding it difficult to commit to your conclusions
because of the need for further work. This is a limitation that can be
mentioned in the Discussion and linked to an invitation to the research
community to continue and make further progress.
Why should I try to fix the direction of future work — why not let researchers
decide for themselves?
Good studies are rarely an end in themselves; in most cases, they open up
forward directions for research. Inviting the research community to follow
your work in a specific way has many advantages. First, it provides researchers
with a rational, defined project, which is more attractive than a vague
suggestion and therefore more likely to be carried out. Second, it encourages
a line of direct continuity from your research. Studies that follow from your
own will cite your paper, which enhances the status of your study. In addition,
a study which responds to difficulties or limitations that you encountered
may provide you with useful data for your current and future work. The
obvious question at this point therefore is: where should the research go
next?
w 206
207 v
REVISIT GAP/AIM/METHOD
w 208
5. Discussion
5.1 Microstructure and mechanical properties of the 30Mn–1.2C–xAl
steels
The novel bulk RAP approach introduced in this work provides, for
the first time, a systematic evaluation of the compositional and thermo-
mechanical trends associated with a change in the Al content of a group
of Triplex steels with high Mn and C concentrations. We observed that
without the addition of Al to the 30Mn–1.2C steels the most favourable
mechanical properties were obtained for the as-homogenised state
(Figs. 2 and 3a). The observed properties are in reasonable agreement
with data reported for Mn–C alloyed TWIP steels of a similar chemical
composition [27, 28]. The observed embrittlement during ageing can
be related to the formation of the coarse, pearlitic particles on the
grain boundaries [27] (Fig. 5a).
High amounts of Al ( ~8 wt.%), on the other hand, result in
pronounced strengthening during ageing, depending on the time and
temperature (Figs. 2 and 3c), and no coarse particles could be observed
in this case (Fig. 5c). In the light of previous results this typical
precipitation hardening behaviour, which allows tuning of the strength
and ductility, can be explained by the formation and growth of j carbides
during ageing [17, 18, 21]. Due to their reportedly small size, which is
of the order of several nanometres, the j carbides could not be reliably
detected or identified in the high throughput RAP OM observations
209 v
w 210
of the verb tense. Underline the identifiers of the model in the second half
of the Discussion, and then underline the identifiers of the model for the
whole of the second Discussion.
Notice how the way the sentences start reveals the narrative scaffold
containing the information.
fi
decrease in the volume of heterotopic bone formed, compared to animals with
functional TRPV1. The suppression, rather than complete ablation, suggests
that other TRPV family members present on sensory neurons may also
contribute to the induction of HO. Although we do not rule out alterations in
other peripheral nerve signaling to the central nervous system in these animals,
both substance P and CGRP were found to be signi cantly decreased in the
fi
TRPV1 mice. We still observed a trend towards an increase in substance P and
CGRP upon addition of the AdBMP2 transduced cells. However, this was not
above the normal background levels observed in wild type mice, nor was it
statistically signi cant for CGRP, and the induction was over three folds lower
fi
for SP, so it is unclear whether this contributes to HO. The result that BMP2
does not induce SP or CGRP in TRPV1 mice is not surprising, as it has been
previously shown that TRPV1 induces SP in response to capsaicin [Theriault
et al., 1979] and that TRPV1 also controls heat- and acid-induced CGRP release
from sensory nerves [Kichko and Reeh, 2009]. In addition, previous studies
have revealed decreased injury-induced neuropeptide release in TRPV1 mice
[Wang and Wang, 2005]. While TRPV1 is unquestionably involved in pain and
neuroin ammation, TRPV has also been found to be involved in diabetes
fl
[Razavi et al., 2006] and obesity [Motter and Ahern, 2008]. Whether this is
by the same mechanism proposed here, or by alternative mechanisms, remains
undetermined. Consequently, deletion of TRPV1 could have additional
pleiotropic effects. TRPV1 mice receiving Adempty transduced cells did not
produce heterotopic bone, which is in line with our previous ndings that
fi
Adempty transduced cells have not produced HO in any animal model we have
tested [Olmsted-Davis et al., 2002].
w 212
fi
the number of mast cells after induction of HO and found a signi cant elevation
fi
in this population within 48 h, when compared to tissues receiving the control
cells. We observed an upward trend in the number of mast cells on all days.
However, perhaps due to the immune response evoked to clear the injected
cells, there was also an increase in mast cell numbers in the control tissues,
leading to a signi cant difference only on day 2. Further, we observed the mast
fi
cells, within the rst 48 h, associating with the nerves and within the nerves,
fi
as compared to control tissues where the mast cells were usually located
randomly throughout the tissues. It is intriguing that we observed the most
signi cant difference at these early stages, since this appears to parallel our
fi
ndings for the release of SP and CGRP within the tissues, suggesting mast
fi
cells may be recruited after release of these factors.
[…]
We next looked at whether the nerve remodeling was releasing cells that
were essential to bone formation. As noted above, it has been previously
demonstrated that precursors in peripheral nerves are the origin of skin
melanoctyes. Therefore, mast cell degranulation, and subsequent nerve
remodeling, was blocked using cromolyn, and we observed a signi cant
fi
decrease in HO. We next analyzed the nerves from these animals and found
an increase in cells expressing markers of early stem cells (nanog and Klf4).
These primitive markers were sporadic in the nerves of untreated animals, but
completely covered the nerve in the cromolyn treated animals. This not only
suggests that the early tissue changes lead to expansion of these cells, but also
213 v
that the pool size of these cells within the nerve of untreated animals is
extremely low, due to concomitant and rapid migration and differentiation.
However, blockade of these latter steps with cromolyn leads to accumulation
of these cells expressing primitive markers within the nerve. We note here,
however, that the mechanisms of cromolyn action are incompletely understood.
Although cromolyn is widely characterized as a ‘‘mast cell-stabilizer’’ (i.e., an
agent that blocks the release of mast cell mediators following appropriate
activation of the cell) that can suppress mouse mast cell function in vivo, its
molecular targets are neither fully de ned nor restricted to mast cells [Galli
fi
et al., 2008]. Moreover, while the mechanism of action of cromolyn mainly
involves mast cell degranulation [Cox, 1967], other mechanisms, such as
inhibition of neutrophils and eosinophil induced chemotaxis [Bruijnzeel et al.,
1990], have also been described.
To our surprise, we observed osterix positive cells on the nerve as early
as day 2, in the presence of cromolyn. There were also cells that expressed
primitive stem cell factors, which appeared to simultaneously express osterix,
suggesting that these cells are osteoblast precursors. The majority of osterix
positive expression was associated with the nerve. We also observed Klf-4+ and
nanog+ cells that were not associated with osterix, suggesting that these cells
may have other potentials. Besides osteoblasts, another possible fate of these
cells may be brown adipocytes, which we have shown previously to be critical
for reduction of the oxygen tension in the microenvironment for cartilage
formation [Olmsted-Davis et al., 2007] and for secreting VEGF for vessel
formation [Dilling et al., 2010]. It has recently been noted that the Misty mouse
phenotype [Sviderskaya et al., 1998], which is de cient in brown fat, is caused
fi
by a mutation in dock 7 [Blasius et al., 2009], a neuronal factor that regulates
Schwann cell migration and neuronal polarity. It is intriguing to speculate that
brown fat progenitors may also reside in peripheral nerves, particularly since
TRPV1 responds to heat [Szallasi et al., 2007]. Additionally, it is interesting that
the mutation in a single neuronal protein, dock7, not only dramatically increases
HO in the Misty mouse [Olmsted-Davis et al., 2007], but also causes severe
osteoporosis in the skeletal bone (Rosen C., unpublished). Further, we previously
demonstrated the rapid formation of new vessels early after BMP2 induction
[Dilling et al., 2010], suggesting that several types of tissues are being assembled
simultaneously during this period. Osterix has previously been suggested to
w 214
times, in vessel-like structures that co-aligned with early endothelial markers,
such as k 1, which we have previously identi ed as characteristic of this early
fl
fi
vasculogenesis [Dilling et al., 2010]. This notion supports the work of Lounev
et al. [2009], suggesting that osteoblast progenitors reside within the newly
forming vessels, have a Tie 2 marker, and are not derived from marrow [Kaplan
et al., 2007]. Other investigators have also provided evidence for this concept
of osteoblast progenitors being associated with the vasculature [Kolf et al.,
2007; Medici et al., 2010].
This study is the rst step in identifying a potential direct role for the
fi
peripheral nervous system in the induction of heterotopic ossi cation. The data
fi
suggest that early neuroin ammation, elicited in the presence of BMP2, may
fl
be capable of expanding a population of cells within the nerve, which can
migrate and potentially contribute to a number of structures, rapidly assembling
to produce HO. Suppression of these steps signi cantly decreases HO formation.
fi
Although it is unclear what effects this may have on the adjacent skeletal bone,
the data suggest that there is direct communication with the hypothalamus,
which could, in part, signal to impact bone remodeling. Understanding these
earliest steps of HO will, for the rst time, provide us novel targets for
fi
therapeutic intervention, which may ultimately lead to effective treatments.
Finally, it is conceivable that such a mechanism could play a role in many other
disease states, including neuro bromatosis and vascular calci cation.
fi
fi
2 Supervised learning in spiking neural networks with FORCE trainings
Discussion
We have shown that FORCE training can take initially chaotic networks of spiking
neurons and use them to mimic the natural tasks and functions demonstrated
by populations of neurons. For example, these networks were trained to learn
215 v
fi
network of Izhikevich neurons that could discriminate its inputs. Extending the
notion of an oscillator even further allowed us to store a complicated sequence
in the form of the notes of a song, reproduce the singing behavior of songbirds,
and encode and replay a movie scene. These tasks are aided by the inclusion
of a high-dimensional temporal signal (HDTS) that discretizes time by
segregating the neurons into assemblies.
FORCE training is reminiscent of how songbirds learn their stereotypical
learned songs35,46. Juvenile songbirds are typically presented with a species
speci c song or repertoire of songs from their parents or other members of
fi
their species. These birds internalize the original template song and
subsequently use it as an error signal for their own vocalization35–37,39,46–49.
Our model reproduced the singing behavior of songbirds with FORCE training
as the error correction mechanism. Both the spiking statistics of area RA and
the song spectrogram were accurately reproduced after FORCE training.
Furthermore, we demonstrated that altering the balance between excitation
and inhibition post training degrades the singing behavior post-training. A
shift to excess excitation alters the spectrogram in a highly non-linear way
while a shift to excess inhibition reduces the amplitude of all frequencies.
Inspired by the clock-like input pattern that songbirds use for learning and
replay35,36 we used a similar HDTS to encode a longer and more complex
sequence of notes in addition to a scene from a movie. We found that these
signals made FORCE training faster and the subsequent replay more accurate.
Furthermore, by manipulating the HDTS frequency we found that we could
speed up or reverse movie replay in a robust fashion. We found that compressing
replay resulted in higher frequency oscillations in the mean population activity.
Attenuating the HDTS decreased replay performance while transitioning the
mean activity from a 4–8Hz oscillation to a slower (≈2Hz) oscillation. Finally,
replay of the movie was robust to lesioning neurons in the replay network.
w 216
While our episodic memory network was not associated with any
particular hippocampal region, it is tempting to conjecture on how our results
might be interpreted within the context of the hippocampal literature. In
particular, we found that the HDTS conferred a slow oscillation in the mean
population activity reminiscent of the slow theta oscillations observed in the
hippocampus. The theta oscillation is strongly associated to memory; however,
its computational role is not fully understood, with many theories proposed50–53.
For example, the theta oscillation has been proposed to serve as a clock for
memory formation50,54.
Here, we show a concrete example that natural stimuli that serve as proxies
for memories can be bound to an underlying oscillation in a population of
neurons. The oscillation forces the neurons to re in discrete temporal
fi
assemblies. The oscillation (via the HDTS) can be sped up, or even reversed
resulting in an identical manipulation of the memory. Additionally, we found
that reducing the HDTS input severely disrupted replay and the underlying
mean population oscillation. This mirrors experimental results that showed
that theta power was predictive of correct replay55. Furthermore, blocking the
HDTS prevents learning and prevents accurate replay with networks trained
with an HDTS present. Blocking the hippocampal theta oscillation
pharmacologically56 or optogenetically57 has also been found to disrupt learning.
The role of the HDTS is reminiscent of the recent discovery of time cells,
which also serve to partition themselves across a time interval in episodic
memory tasks58–60. How time cells are formed is ongoing research however they
are dependent on the medial septum, and thus the hippocampal theta
oscillation61. Time cells have been found in CA158, CA362 and temporally selective
cells occur in the entorhinal cortex63.
In a broader context, FORCE trained networks could be used in the future
to elucidate hippocampal functions. For example, future FORCE trained
networks can make use of biological constraints such as Dale’s law in an effort
to reproduce veri ed spike distributions for different neuron types with regards
fi
to the phase of the theta oscillation64. These networks can also be explicitly
constructed to represent the different components of the well studied
hippocampal circuit.
FORCE training is a powerful tool that allows one to use any suf ciently
fi
complicated dynamical system as a basis for universal computation. The primary
217 v
w 218
219 v
performance over a region. Both sets of solutions yield different insights into
the structure, dynamics, and functions of spiking neural networks. For example,
brain scale functional models can be constructed with NEF networks8. Spike-
based coding networks demonstrate how higher order error scaling is possible
by utilizing spiking sparsely and ef ciently through balanced network solutions.
fi
While the NEF and spike based coding approaches provide immediate weight
matrix solutions, both techniques are dif cult to generalize to other types of
fi
networks or other types of tasks. Both the NEF and spike based coding
approaches require a system of closed form differential equations to determine
the static weight matrix that yields the target dynamics.
In summary, we showed that FORCE can be used to train spiking neural
networks to reproduce complex spatio-temporal dynamics. This method could
be used in the future to mechanically link neural activity to the complex
behaviors of animals.
w 220
This section lists words and phrases for the Discussion section from analysis of
over 2,500 published research articles in different disciplines. The list only includes
words and phrases which appear frequently and are therefore considered normal
and acceptable by writers and editors. The list will also keep the flow of writing
moving. Underneath each list there are examples of how the words and phrases
are used in sentences, so look at the list and the sentence examples when you
are feeling stuck and can’t think of what to write or how to continue.
Language suggestions for many of the components of the Discussion
have appeared in previous Units. For example:
1 MAP TO LITERATURE/KNOWLEDGE
2 REFINE/EXPLORE IMPLICATIONS
221 v
3 ACHIEVEMENT/CONTRIBUTION TO LITERATURE/KNOWLEDGE
4 CURRENT AND FUTURE WORK
5 APPLICATIONS/USE/APPLICABILITY/IMPLEMENTATION
Look through the Discussion sections in this unit and in your target research
articles. Underline or highlight words or phrases that you think could be used
in these five areas, and compare your suggestions with the lists in Section 4.4.2.
w 222
2 REFINE/EXPLORE IMPLICATIONS
A full list of language to communicate implications can be found on page 182
IMPLICATIONS AND EXPLANATIONS OF RESULTS. The list reflects the fact
that in the Discussion the implications are sometimes expressed in a more
223 v
3 ACHIEVEMENT/CONTRIBUTION
It is essential to communicate the value of your study explicitly, and a
range of options is given in (i) Positive language (‘happy’ words). In some
cases, the achievement or contribution is extremely exciting or highly
significant. Science writing does not generally permit the use of the
exclamation mark (!), but there are many acceptable ways of communicating
that ‘wow!’ feeling, and these are listed in (ii) !-substitutes (‘very happy’
words).
w 224
225 v
· We describe not only neutral but also ionized systems with unprecedented
accuracy.
· The system described here enables fast and easy analysis of LRRC8
proteins.
· The study provides a first step towards a better representation of
southern African dust sources in dust emission models.
· We achieved outstanding performance compared to similar catalysts
reported in the literature.
· The rapid, easy-to-perform mRNA-based method presented here is a
robust approach to detect rare coding.
· The system described here provides novel means to systematically
study this in diseased tissues.
· A straightforward analysis procedure is presented which enables accurate
prediction.
· The model is thus both realistic and flexible, taking advantage of both
types of computational phantoms.
· The analytical method described here removes the need for difficult
and time consuming pre treatment.
‐
‐
4 CURRENT AND FUTURE WORK
w 226
5 APPLICATIONS/USE/APPLICABILITY/IMPLEMENTATION
227 v
w 228
Section 4.5 deals only with modal verb usage that is relevant for STEMM research
writing or formal academic writing. Modal verb usage in informal or spoken
communication, such as the use of may for permission, is not included.
To find out how reliable your current use of modal verbs is, match the
modal verbs in Column A to their meanings in Column B. Most modal verbs
can be used to communicate more than one meaning, so fill in the blank
spaces with as many options as you can.
COLUMN A COLUMN B
The model is able to predict a wide range of experimental
data.
= The model ___________ predict a wide range of
experimental data.
It is possible that these interactions are the same for each
1 should species.
= These interactions ___________ be the same for each
2 must species.
The ratio is expected to remain constant if the expansion is
3 can
uniform.
= The ratio ___________ remain constant if the expansion
4 may
is uniform.
229 v
It is obvious that this is the result of direct collision between the electron
and the nucleus.
This must be the result of direct collision between the electron and the
nucleus.
It is advisable to centrifuge the tubes before the experiment.
The tubes should be centrifuged before the experiment.
It is necessary to centrifuge the tubes before the experiment.
The tubes must/need to/have to be centrifuged before the experiment.
w 230
If you write:
The drop in pressure may have been caused by a crack in the pipe.
you are offering a possible cause for the drop in pressure; perhaps it was
caused by a crack in the pipe — and perhaps not.
If you write:
The drop in pressure must have been caused by a crack in the pipe.
you are saying that you are certain that the drop in pressure was caused by
a crack in the pipe, but you do not have evidence to prove it, perhaps because
evidence is impossible to obtain, or because it is so obvious that you don’t
need to provide evidence.
231 v
Being certain that something is true and knowing that it is true are not the
same. For example, we do not look at a clock and say I’m certain it is ten o’clock
or It must be ten o’clock; we simply say it is ten o’clock. Interestingly, we only
say It must be ten o’clock if we cannot see a clock — in other words, when we
lack empirical evidence. Although must seems to give the verb more power, it
also communicates an absence of proof because when we say we are ‘sure’
that something is true, we are also involuntarily communicating that we don’t
actually know that it is true.
The grammar and usage of modal verbs is complex and does not follow
regular grammar rules. For example, most modal verbs have more than one
meaning: should can mean either ‘advisable’ or ‘likely’. In addition some
modal verbs change their meaning in the negative: He must go home and He
has to go home both mean that it is essential or necessary that he goes home.
However, He must not go home means that it is essential that he does not
go home, whereas He does not have to go home means that it is not essential
that he does go home.
An analysis of current research writing suggests that using alternative
structures, e.g. it is possible rather than it may, is becoming increasingly
common, perhaps because of these complexities and the risk of communicating
the wrong message. Therefore, in the examples below alternative structures
with the same or similar meaning are given where possible.
1 ABLE
w 232
· If you’re not sure whether to use can or be able to, use be able to — it’s
safer and less likely to be misinterpreted.
· If you need the future tense, use will be able to: The model will
eventually be able to predict a wide range of experimental data.
· could means possible as well as able, so consider whether using could
makes the meaning ambiguous.
· could also refers to conditional/hypothetical ability: If there was a 100%
uptake of the vaccine, this could (would be able to) prevent infection.
· be capable of is an alternative to can/could in some contexts.
2 POSSIBLE/OPTIONAL
233 v
w 234
235 v
Past SHOULD Our data suggest that the decrease should have
Simple HAVE occurred during the first year.
= Our data suggest that the decrease was expected
to occur during the first year.
Past SHOULD Our data suggest that corrosion should not have
Simple NOT occurred for at least two years.
negative HAVE = Our data suggest that corrosion was not expected
to occur for at least two years.
4 OBVIOUS/IMPOSSIBLE
w 236
5 ADVISABLE/RECOMMENDED
237 v
· should have often refers to something that didn’t happen, and should
not have often refers to something that did happen.
· ought to is the same as should, but it is becoming less common in
science writing, so examples have not been given.
We see from the above that should has two completely different meanings.
It can be used to communicate that something is EXPECTED/LIKELY/PROBABLE
and it can also be used to communicate that something is ADVISABLE/
RECOMMENDED. Here are some examples of each — can you separate them
into EXPECTED/LIKELY/PROBABLE and ADVISABLE/RECOMMENDED?
6 NECESSARY/ESSENTIAL
239 v
4.5.3 Key
1. This software can distinguish between different viruses.
2. The fall in pressure may have been/might have been/could have been
due to a gas leak.
3. The equipment must be disconnected during repairs.
4. This material should remain stable if it is kept below 30°C.
5. The contamination cannot have been/could not have been caused by
the presence of salt.
w 240
6. Children cannot use symbols to represent objects until the age of
18 months.
7. Using a rubber seal may not/might not prevent contamination.
8. Antioxidant compounds should not be used.
9. This material should not decompose if it is kept below 30°C.
10. The bicarbonate must have been produced by the mineralization of
carbon.
11. We realised later that the composite need not have been/did not
have to be/did not need to be exposed to heat.
12. If we had extended the time period, we could have produced more
crystals.
241 v
w 242
UNIT 5
How to Write the Conclusion
TITLE
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
CONCLUSION*
*Some journals call this section CONCLUSION and others call it CONCLUSIONS but this does not seem
to reflect the number of conclusions that are drawn.
w 244
In some journals, the Conclusion section occurs as the last one or two
paragraphs of the Discussion; in most it is a separate section. At the beginning
of Unit 3, four structural options were set out for the way research articles
are subdivided. The following table provides details of typical Conclusion
sections for each of these four scenarios:
245 v
List the sentence functions in the six Conclusion sections below using the
reverse-engineering approach in Units 1-4, and then compare your list with the
GENERIC CONCLUSIONS MODEL in Section 5.2. In the first two examples, clues
to the sentence functions in the Conclusion have been highlighted in bold. In
some cases, the verb is highlighted simply to draw attention to the verb tense.
Each Conclusion section is preceded by the Abstract of that paper and,
where relevant, the Synopsis or Highlights, to help you see how these differ
from the Conclusion section, and to emphasise that the Abstract should not
be used as the primary source material for the Conclusion.
Synopsis
w 246
Abstract
247 v
markers and targets for potential diagnosis and treatment of human diseases.
We also show that the fluorescent probes are capable of monitoring H2O2-
mediated PTP inactivation, which should facilitate the study of regulated H2O2
production as a new tier of control over tyrosine phosphorylation-dependent
signal transduction. The ability to profile the entire PTP family on the basis of
changes in their activity is expected to yield new functional insights into
pathways regulated by PTPs and contribute to the discovery of PTPs as novel
therapeutic targets.
Conclusions
w 248
Abstract
Conclusion
The rate order of the water oxidation reaction has been investigated on
hematite photoanodes by photoinduced absorption of accumulated holes
and photocurrent densities recorded simultaneously. A transition from first
order to third order in photogenerated holes has been identified when a
sufficient density of holes is accumulated at the semiconductor-electrolyte
249 v
interface to oxidize two nearest neighbor surface metal atoms. This transition
was con rmed by agreement between three di erent analyses. The third
fi
ff
order reaction is rationalized by considering the rate-limiting formation of an
intermediate, which requires the incorporation of three holes. It is argued
that* this rate law is consistent with reaction mechanisms based on recent
observations of intermediates involving oxygen−oxygen bond formation during
the oxygen evolution reaction on other metal oxide surfaces.
This study clearly demonstrates the ability of a metal oxide semiconductor
surface, such as hematite, to drive a multihole reaction, but also highlights the
modest catalytic properties of this surface. Our ndings will help to tailor the
fi
design of metal oxide anodes and photoanodes for water oxidation with regards
to achieving high localized hole concentration, and the need for cocatalysts to
enhance function. Further work is currently in progress with di erent materials
ff
and overlayers to determine their function and abilities to catalyze this complex
but fascinating reaction.
*It’s likely that the authors are referring to themselves, i.e. We argue that, but the
sentence could mean It is argued by others that…
Abstract
w 250
paper eleven new concrete mixes are evaluated to study five plastic material
compositions, three groups of particle sizes, three different aspect ratios, and
two chemical treatments and establish an appropriate choice of material to
act as partial replacement for sand.
The results show that replacing 10% sand by volume with recycled plastic
is a viable proposition that has the potential to save 820 million tonnes of sand
every year. Through suitable mix design the structural performance of concrete
with plastic waste can be maintained. This preliminary work was supported
through funding from the British Council under the UKIERI (United Kingdom
India Educational Research Initiative) programme for the project ‘Development
of structural concrete with the help of plastic waste as partial replacement for
sand’.
Conclusions
This paper has demonstrated the potential for using recycled waste plastic in
structural concrete mixes. At a replacement ratio of 10% by volume, this has
the potential to save 820 millions tonnes of sand every year from being used
in concrete mixes [1]. This is equivalent to approximately 5% of total global
annual sand consumption. A further benefit is to add value to waste plastic,
helping to reduce the volumes sent to landfill in some countries. A reduction
in sand demand from the construction industry would further support efforts
to limit the effects of sand dredging in countries such as India and China, where
significant sand volumes are extracted every year.
It is generally seen that substituting plastic into a concrete mix causes a
decrease in compressive and tensile strength due to the poor bond between
the plastic and surrounding matrix. Since failure in concrete propagates in
tension, the poor bond around plastic particles leads to a reduced compressive
and tensile strength. The use of a graded PET plastic matched to the size of the
sand particles it replaces, and at a replacement of 10% by volume, gave the
most promising overall performance. This material is furthermore cost effective
to produce and comes widely available as a waste material in many markets.
This paper has shown that simply shredding a PET material is sufficient
processing to provide a viable alternative to sand.
Testing different forms of plastic has demonstrated that the most efficient
plastic aggregate used in a concrete mix should have a rough surface, be
251 v
Abstract
The reaction between uranium and water vapour has been well investigated,
however discrepancies exist between the described kinetic laws, pressure
dependence of the reaction rate constant and activation energies. Here this
problem is looked at by examining the influence of impurities in the form of
carbide inclusions on the reaction. Samples of uranium containing 600 ppm
carbon were analysed during and after exposure to water vapour at 19 mbar
pressure, in an environmental scanning electron microscope (ESEM) system.
After water exposure, samples were analysed using secondary ion mass
spectrometry (SIMS), focused ion beam (FIB) imaging and sectioning and
transmission electron microscopy (TEM) with X-ray diffraction (micro-XRD).
The results of the current study indicate that carbide particles on the surface
of uranium readily react with water vapour to form voluminous UO3·xH2O
growths at rates significantly faster than that of the metal. The observation
may also have implications for previous experimental studies of uranium–water
interactions, where the presence of differing levels of undetected carbide may
partly account for the discrepancies observed between datasets.
Highlights
High resolution imagery (FIB, SEM and SIMS) of carbide inclusions in uranium
metal. ► Real time images following the reaction of the carbide inclusions
with water vapour. ► Shown preferential consumption of carbide over that
of the bulk metal. ► Quantity of impurities in the metal therefore seriously
influence reaction rate. ► Metal purity must be considered when storing
uranium in air or moist conditions.
w 252
Conclusions
water) mixture at temperatures from 298.15 K to 448.15 Kw
Abstract
253 v
(1.5 to 18.0) MPa, and the results are compared with the available literature
data. Vapor–liquid–liquid and liquid–liquid equilibrium points were also measured
at T = 298.15 K. Standard uncertainties were 0.04 K for temperature, 0.04% of
reading for pressure, and typically 3 × 10−4 and 8 × 10−4 for the mole fractions in
liquid and vapor phases respectively. The results have been correlated by means
of an asymmetric approach based on the Peng–Robinson equation of state, for
the vapor phase, and an extended form of Henry’s law incorporating the NRTL
solution model, for the aqueous liquid-phase. The ability of the Krichevsky–
Kasarnovsky (KK) approach to correlate the data has also been evaluated.
Graphical abstract
Highlights
w 254
Conclusions
The phase behavior of (CO2 + H2O) was measured at temperature from 298.15
K to 448.15 K, and at pressures up to 18 MPa. The experimental results are
compared comprehensively with literature data and found to agree with those
literature sources identified in earlier reviews as being of the highest reliability.
Our results fill key gaps in terms of accurate and high-quality data at high
temperature and pressure, and pave the way for measurements on (CO2 +
brine) systems. The results are modeled accurately with a γ−ϕ approach
incorporating the Peng–Robinson EoS with the classical mixing rules for the
vapor phase, and an extended form of Henry’s law with the NRTL solution
model and a Poynting correction for the liquid phase. The Krichevsky–
Kasarnovsky (KK) (simplified γ−ϕ approach) was also studied as well as the
empirical correlation of Duan et al. Both were found to have significant
deficiencies for this system.
Abstract
Aim: Olfactory sensation is highly functional early in human neonatal life, with
studies suggesting that odours can influence behaviour and infant–mother
bonding. Due to its good spatial properties, blood oxygen level–dependent
(BOLD) contrast functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) has the potential
to rapidly advance our understanding of the neural activity which underlies
the development of olfactory perception in this key period. We aimed to design
an ‘olfactometer’ specifically for use with neonatal subjects for fMRI studies
of odour perception.
Methods: We describe a fully automated and programmable, fMRI compatible
system capable of presenting odorant liquids. To prevent contamination of the
system and minimize between-subject infective risk, the majority of the
olfactometer is constructed from single-use, readily available clinical
equipment. The system was used to present the odour of infant formula milk
255 v
Key notes
Conclusions
w 256
In the Conclusion sections in this Unit, how many examples did you find of
sentences, parts of sentences, or language that communicate or recall the
components in the Conclusions model below?
Map components 1–11 onto the Conclusion sections of your target articles
to see where they are similar to or different from the six Conclusion sections
in this Unit. Your analysis should consider the order in which the components
typically occur, and what proportion of the Conclusion section deals with
each component.
257 v
259 v
The Past Simple tense is less common, but is sometimes used to repeat key
aspects of the method or key results:
w 260
If you and your colleagues understand what you have written, it may not
seem necessary to make things clearer — you may even feel that it appears
condescending or patronising. However, sentences with a non-human
grammatical subject and a verb in the Present Simple tense, such as:
Kinetic analyses suggest that these probes are active site directed
and inactivate a broad range of PTPs in a time- and concentration-
dependent fashion. Direct in-gel fluorescence scanning indicates
that the fluorescent probes form a covalent adduct with the PTPs.
contain nothing to tell the reader that these are in fact conclusions from this
study. The sentences could easily be presenting relevant background
information or the gap/aim/need for the study, both of which sometimes
occur in the Conclusion (see Section 5.2). Readers do not read forensically;
they read fast, and a fast reading of such sentences risks loss of ownership
at this critical point.
In the Conclusion sections above, writers can avoid ambiguity by using
one or more of the following:
· the Past Simple or Present Perfect
· the active rather than the passive
· a human grammatical subject
· explicit sentence start-up or language that explicitly refers to the paper
or study
261 v
w 262
UNIT 6
Writing the Abstract
TITLE
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
METHOD
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
CONCLUSION*
*Some journals call this section CONCLUSION and others call it CONCLUSIONS but this does not seem
to reflect the number of conclusions that are drawn.
w 264
The Abstract is a high-stakes document: many more people will read the
Abstract — or briefly look at it — than the whole paper. A good Abstract
enhances the visibility of the study, whereas a poor Abstract may result in
the study being overlooked.
Abstract writing has changed significantly in recent years and is continuing
to evolve alongside developments and changes in research communication.
Internet reading means that the Abstract is no longer designed to be read
as a prelude or an adjunct to the research article; it is typically read in isolation
and has to function as a standalone, independent text that will be accessed
by readers who are reading it for a wide range of reasons. Some readers
simply want to know what is currently going on in a given research area and
may not be interested in technical details; others may be experts in the field
who want to know details but are only interested in studies which are directly
relevant to their own project. Readers may have just one specific reason for
reading an Abstract, for example, they may only want to check that their own
current or planned project has not already been covered by another research
group. Another possibility is that the reader may only want to know the
applications of the study; for example, in medicine, treatment decisions are
sometimes made on the basis of the Abstract alone.
Over 3 million research articles are published annually, creating an
environment in which studies compete for attention online as readers scroll
through titles and Abstracts. However, writing guidelines are sometimes
inconsistent or confusing, for example, the suggestion that the Abstract
should ‘include all relevant information while being concise’. In other cases,
the advice is too vague; a recommendation to write ‘clearly’ or ‘coherently’
needs to be backed up with practical details of how to do so. Writers always
understand what they have written and therefore believe it to be clear, but
a very high level of clarity and coherence are required by the reader who is
looking at several Abstracts in quick succession.
265 v
1. If the Abstract is written too early there is a risk that it will not be
consistent with the content of the paper or contain information that is not
in the final version of the paper. Papers are often changed or updated just
before submission, so if the Abstract has already been written it should
be reviewed, and if necessary, modified or refocused before submission.
2. The content, style and length of the Abstract depend on where you plan
to submit it, and that decision may be taken late in the writing process.
Last-minute cutting and pasting to rejig an Abstract so that it conforms
to a fresh set of submission guidelines risks loss of coherence.
3. The Abstract derives from the paper, not the other away around,
therefore it does not require ‘creation’ as such; it requires careful
267 v
w 268
1. Simple/Standard Abstracts
2. Structured Abstracts, which have headings such as Background/Aims/
Method/Results etc.
3. Abstracts that exist alongside a Significance Statement or a list of
Highlights
4. Graphical Abstracts
6.2.1 Simple/Standard Abstracts
Using the reverse-engineering technique demonstrated in the previous Units,
create a model based on the sentence functions in the ten SIMPLE/STANDARD
ABSTRACTS below. In these Abstracts, identifiers of the model are in bold.
When you have finished, underline or highlight the model identifiers in the
STRUCTURED ABSTRACTS in Section 6.2.2 to support your model, and then
check and adjust it against the generic model in Section 6.3.
Abstract
This paper presents the implementation of the first fully integrated pulse
oximeter front-end with a power consumption lower than 1 mW. This is enabled
by system- and block-level noise optimisation, also detailed in the manuscript.
The proposed design features an analogue feedback loop that enables fast
and accurate regulation of the detected photocurrent level and a serial-to-
parallel interface allowing for extensive programmability of several operation
parameters. The front-end was fabricated in the AMS 0.35 μm technology and
occupies an occupies an area of 1.35 mm2. Extensive measured results, both
electrical and physiological from human subjects are reported, demonstrating
an estimated SNR of 39 dB and ability to detect 2% changes in SpO2, similar
to commercial pulse oximeters. This is despite the constrained power
consumption which amounts to 0.31 mW for the LEDs and 0.53 mW for the
269 v
rest of the front-end from a 3.3 V supply. Statistical results from 20 chips verify
good matching across the Red and Infrared channels of the front-end and the
accurate operation of the proposed analogue feedback loop.
Abstract
w 270
Abstract
Abstract
271 v
vivo examples to illustrate the method’s clinical relevance, and finite element
simulations to assess its accuracy. Quantitative and qualitative comparisons
are made with leading single- and multi-level alternatives. In the in vivo
examples, the hybrid method produces fewer obvious peak-hopping errors,
and in simulation, the hybrid method is found to reduce displacement
estimation errors by 5 to 50%. With typical clinical data, the hybrid method
can generate more than 25 strain images per second on commercial hardware;
this is comparable with the alternative approaches considered in this paper.
Abstract
w 272
‐
substituted bioactive glassesdd
Abstract
Bioactive glasses are known to stimulate bone healing, and the incorporation
of strontium has the potential to increase their potency. In this study, calcium
oxide in the 45S5 bioactive glass composition was partially (50%, Sr50) or fully
(100%, Sr100) substituted with strontium oxide on a molar basis. The effects
of the substitution on bioactive glass properties were studied, including density,
solubility, and in vitro cytotoxicity. Stimulation of osteogenic differentiation
was investigated using mesenchymal stromal cells obtained from rat bone
marrow. Strontium substitution resulted in altered physical properties including
increased solubility. Statistically significant reductions in cell viability were
observed with the addition of bioactive glass powders to culture medium.
Specifically, addition of ≥ 13.3 mg/ml of 45S5 bioactive glass or Sr50,
or ≥ 6.7 mg/ml of Sr100, resulted in significant inhibition. Real‐time PCR
analyses detected the upregulation of genes associated with osteoblastic
differentiation in the presence of all bioactive glass compositions. Some genes,
including Alpl and Bglap, were further stimulated in the presence of Sr50 and
Sr100. It was concluded that strontium‐substituted bioactive glasses promoted
osteogenesis in a differentiating bone cell culture model and, therefore, have
considerable potential for use as improved bioactive glasses for bone tissue
regeneration.
Abstract
273 v
Abstract
w 274
that the model accurately predicts the measured voltage of a single charge/
discharge cycle with an average error of 1.83%, and estimates the capacity loss
of a 45 cycle experiment with an average error of 4.2%.
Abstract
275 v
Abstract
Abstract
Objective
Inferring the times of sequences of action potentials (APs) (spike trains) from
neurophysiological data is a key problem in computational neuroscience. The
detection of APs from two-photon imaging of calcium signals offers certain
advantages over traditional electrophysiological approaches, as up to thousands
of spatially and immunohistochemically defined neurons can be recorded
simultaneously. However, due to noise, dye buffering and the limited sampling
rates in common microscopy configurations, accurate detection of APs from
calcium time series has proved to be a difficult problem.
w 276
Approach
Here we introduce a novel approach to the problem making use of finite rate
of innovation (FRI) theory (Vetterli et al 2002 IEEE Trans. Signal Process: 50
1417–28). For calcium transients well fit by a single exponential, the problem
is reduced to reconstructing a stream of decaying exponentials. Signals made
of a combination of exponentially decaying functions with different onset times
are a subclass of FRI signals, for which much theory has recently been developed
by the signal processing community.
Main results
We demonstrate for the first time the use of FRI theory to retrieve the timing of APs
from calcium transient time series. The final algorithm is fast, non-iterative and
parallelizable. Spike inference can be performed in real-time for a population of
neurons and does not require any training phase or learning to initialize parameters.
Significance
The algorithm has been tested with both real data (obtained by simultaneous
electrophysiology and multiphoton imaging of calcium signals in cerebellar
Purkinje cell dendrites), and surrogate data, and outperforms several recently
proposed methods for spike train inference from calcium imaging data.
Abstract
Background
The continued spectre of resistance to existing anti-malarials necessitates the
pursuit of novel targets and mechanisms of action for drug development. One
class of promising targets consists of the 80S ribosome and its associated
components comprising the parasite translational apparatus. Development of
translation-targeting therapeutics requires a greater understanding of protein
synthesis and its regulation in the malaria parasite. Research in this area has
been limited by the lack of appropriate experimental methods, particularly a
direct measure of parasite translation.
277 v
Methods
An in vitro method directly measuring translation in whole-cell extracts from
the malaria parasite Plasmodium falciparum, the PfIVT assay, and a historically-
utilized indirect measure of translation, S35-radiolabel incorporation, were
compared utilizing a large panel of known translation inhibitors as well as
anti-malarial drugs.
Results
Here, an extensive pharmacologic assessment of the PfIVT assay is presented,
using a wide range of known inhibitors demonstrating its utility for studying
activity of both ribosomal and non-ribosomal elements directly involved in
translation. Further, the superiority of this assay over a historically utilized
indirect measure of translation, S35-radiolabel incorporation, is demonstrated.
Additionally, the PfIVT assay is utilized to investigate a panel of clinically
approved anti-malarial drugs, many with unknown or unclear mechanisms of
action, and show that none inhibit translation, reaffirming Plasmodium
translation to be a viable alternative drug target. Within this set, mefloquine
is unambiguously found to lack translation inhibition activity, despite having
been recently mischaracterized as a ribosomal inhibitor.
Conclusions
This work exploits a direct and reproducible assay for measuring P. falciparum
translation, demonstrating its value in the continued study of protein synthesis
in malaria and its inhibition as a drug target.
Note that the Significance Statement and the Highlights do not always appear
in the PDF of the paper, so they should be considered as adjuncts to the
Abstract rather than as supplements. Using your reverse-engineering
technique, describe the sentence functions in the Significance Statements
and Highlights. Model identifiers are in bold.
w 278
Abstract
The reaction between uranium and water vapour has been well investigated,
however discrepancies exist between the described kinetic laws, pressure
dependence of the reaction rate constant and activation energies. Here this
problem is looked at by examining the influence of impurities in the form of
carbide inclusions on the reaction. Samples of uranium containing 600 ppm
carbon were analysed during and after exposure to water vapour at 19 mbar
pressure, in an environmental scanning electron microscope (ESEM) system.
After water exposure, samples were analysed using secondary ion mass
spectrometry (SIMS), focused ion beam (FIB) imaging and sectioning and
transmission electron microscopy (TEM) with X-ray diffraction (micro-XRD).
The results of the current study indicate that carbide particles on the surface
of uranium readily react with water vapour to form voluminous UO3·xH2O
growths at rates significantly faster than that of the metal. The observation
may also have implications for previous experimental studies of uranium-
water interactions, where the presence of differing levels of undetected carbide
may partly account for the discrepancies observed between datasets.
Highlights
► High resolution imagery (FIB, SEM and SIMS) of carbide inclusions in uranium
metal. ► Real time images following the reaction of the carbide inclusions
with water vapour. ► Shown preferential consumption of carbide over that
of the bulk metal. ► Quantity of impurities in the metal therefore seriously
influence reaction rate. ► Metal purity must be considered when storing
uranium in air or moist conditions.
279 v
Significance
Canopy trees are keystone organisms that create habitat for an enormous
array of flora and fauna and dominate carbon storage in tropical forests.
Determining the functional diversity of tree canopies is, therefore, critical to
understanding how tropical forests are assembled and predicting ecosystem
responses to environmental change. Across the megadiverse Andes-to-Amazon
corridor of Peru, we discovered a large-scale nested pattern of canopy chemical
assembly among thousands of trees. This nested geographic and phylogenetic
pattern within and among forest communities provides a different perspective
on current and future alterations to the functioning of western Amazonian
forests resulting from land use and climate change.
Abstract
w 280
Significance
Solid particles can replace surfactants to stabilize emulsions and foams. The
attachment of particles onto drops and bubbles is typically considered to be
irreversible because of a large energy barrier for particle detachment — millions
of times the thermal energy for microparticles. Here we demonstrate a method
to promote the detachment of microparticles from bubbles using ultrasound.
We identified conditions for complete particle removal and recovery in under
a millisecond. Our method is programmable in time, and does not require any
physicochemical modification of the fluids or the interface. This work addresses
the emerging need for methods to recover interfacial particles from emulsions
and foams in applications ranging from controlled release to interfacial catalysis
and gas storage.
Abstract
281 v
‐
give readers an immediate understanding of the take home message of the
‐
paper. The GA should use colour judiciously, and grab attention visually by
minimising clutter and unnecessary elements. In some cases the image is
reproduced from the paper; in others it is specifically designed as a GA.
The GA communicates the main point right at the start. This improves
the reader’s understanding and acceptance of the message; furthermore,
providing a clear and memorable image enhances retention of that message
even after the reader moves on to another article. Note that some GAs also
include a short text.
Using your reverse-engineering technique, build a model for the GAs
below and compare it with the generic model in Section 6.3. Model identifiers
are in bold.
w 282
Abstract
Abstract
283 v
Highlights
Abstract
w 284
Graphical abstract
285 v
Now compare and adjust your model according to the generic model below.
Note the number of potential locations for ‘happy words’ J that communicate
the value of the study quickly and unmistakably.
w 286
Can I include citations in the Abstract, for example to support the background?
Research background may be appropriate to identify the problem or challenge,
but it is rare to include actual citations in the Abstract. However, if your article
follows directly from an existing published paper or is a major advance or
contradiction relating to a specific work or theory, cite the relevant paper.
287 v
Note: Adding language to numbers (e.g. only 38% or as high as 38%) ensures that the
numbers will not be misinterpreted at this crucial stage.
w 288
How can I make the Abstract flow, given the word limit?
The Abstract has to operate within a fixed number of words, and this sometimes
means including valuable data or information at the expense of narrative
flow. However, the more the narrative ‘wrap’ is reduced, the less coherent
that data or information becomes.
To make the Abstract flow given the word limit while retaining as much
information as possible:
289 v
6.4. Language
All the language you need for the Abstract can be found in the previous Units.
However, because the Abstract needs to be understood very quickly by a
wide range of readers, it tends to contain simple, conventional language, and
the selection below reflects this. Add to the list from your target article
Abstracts.
THE CHALLENGE/PROBLEM
(an) alternative approach inaccurate
(a) key problem inadequate
a need for inconvenient
challenge limited
complicated little (work)
critical not able to
debate previously
desirable problem
difficulty require
disadvantage risk
drawback time-consuming
essential unsuccessful
expensive until now
impractical
291 v
METHOD/MATERIALS
w 292
RESULTS
293 v
ACHIEVEMENT/VALUE/CONTRIBUTION
Most Abstracts contain at least one sentence that makes the achievement/
value/contribution of the study clear. Here are some examples from the first
five of the Abstracts; continue by identifying sentences with similar functions
in the rest of the Abstracts and those in your target articles.
IMPLICATIONS
appear to potentially
indicate that seem to
may/might/could suggest that
possible we conclude that
APPLICATIONS
apply potential
employ relevant for/in
enable suitable for/in
implement use
wide range of
295 v
w 296
Analyse the Abstracts of your target articles to determine all of the following:
UNIT 7
Writing the Title
TITLE*
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
CONCLUSION†
*For simplicity, all titles have been standardised with respect to capitalisation.
†
Some journals call this section CONCLUSION and others call it CONCLUSIONS but this does not seem
to reflect the number of conclusions that are drawn.
w 300
advice means that writers sometimes simply submit the article with the
original working title and hope for the best, but in the competitive global
research context this is not a good strategy.
w 302
303 v
w 304
It is tempting to use acronyms to reduce the size of the title, but the decision
to use an acronym should not be taken lightly. While you are doing your
research, you spend most of your time with colleagues who share your
knowledge of the concepts and terminology associated with the study, to
the point where much of your communication relies on this implicit shared
understanding. By the time you write the title of your paper, you have used
a shared set of acronyms with colleagues so frequently that the full form
seems redundant. This tends to blind you to the reality that those reading
your work may not know exactly what your acronym refers to — they may
simply find the use of the acronym in the title off-putting and scroll down to
the next article.
In addition, although including acronyms in the title is acceptable in highly
specific research microcommunities, these acronyms will be completely
impenetrable to outsiders, and the outsiders of today may well be the
interdisciplinary readers of tomorrow. For example, the potential future readers
of a research article on using machine learning to identify malaria vaccine
candidates may eventually include a wide range of stakeholders and audiences
such as cancer researchers, public health policy makers, clinicians and investors
in pharmaceuticals, so the decision of whether to use an acronym in the title
depends on correctly gauging the level of knowledge shared by both current
and future readers.
305 v
Keywords are marketing tools, and journals often request a short keyword
list that will be displayed on the front page of the article. The list generally
contains words or short phrases that enhance the indexing — and therefore
the discoverability — of your article. The keyword list is a valuable complement
to the title, so creating one which simply repeats the keywords in the title is
not a productive strategy.
Comparing the keyword list with the keywords in the title is highly
informative. In some cases, the keyword list is more general than the keywords
in the title, signalling that the readership could extend more broadly than
the title suggests. For example, an article with the title: A framework for
reviewing the trade-offs between renewable energy, food, feed and wood
production at a local level has a keyword list that includes Ecosystem and
Landscape to attract the widest possible audience. In other cases, the title
itself may focus on the wider impact and contribution of the study, and
keywords that are highly technical are used to attract specialist researchers
in the field. For example, an article with the title: Large igneous provinces
and organic carbon burial: controls on global temperature and continental
weathering during the Early Cretaceous has a keyword list that includes
Belemnites; Oceanic Anoxic Events; Late Aptian cold snap.
Another useful function of the keyword list is that diverting items to the
keyword list can thin out an overcrowded title. Including all potential
keywords in the title for the sake of search engine optimisation may overload
the title with nouns. This tends to scatter the key message, as readers cannot
decide where the central focus lies. For example, a title such as Simultaneous
voltage and calcium mapping of genetically purified human induced
pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiac myocyte monolayers does not make it
easy for readers to quickly identify the central focus of the study while title-
scrolling.
w 306
It may sound obvious, but the title must make sense to the reader. The more
nouns and compound nouns there are in the title, the harder it is to convey
a clear message. Compound nouns are particularly problematic. They are
attractive because they compress meaning and can give the impression of
‘ownership’ of a new or modified concept, but as they become longer, the
overall grammar of the title and the relationships between each of the
nouns becomes harder to control. The noun on the right-hand side of a
compound noun is the only ‘real’ noun grammatically; nouns to the left of
it have the same function as adjectives in that they modify that noun. As
the compound noun becomes longer, the relationship between those nouns
becomes harder to unravel:
307 v
w 308
The title should attract readers and encourage them to read your article, but
it should not overstate or exaggerate the achievement of the study. The
expectations set up by the title must be met in the paper itself. Given the
need to publish research reasonably fast, it’s acceptable to use modal verbs
(may/might/could) in some cases to suggest the direction of research or the
eventual potential contribution: Diminished circadian rhythms in hippocampal
microglia may contribute to age-related neuroinflammatory sensitization.
Look at the titles of your target research articles and predict what you expect
to understand or gain from the article. Then check the Conclusion. How
correct was your prediction?
Now evaluate the titles below using the following criteria:
· Does the title predict the focus and content of the article?
· How many nouns are there in each title?
· Is the title easy for all targeted readers to understand?
· Is the title grammatically ambiguous?
· Is the contribution or potential application of the study clear from the
title?
311 v
UNIT 8
Checklist and Tips
Almost all of the items in this checklist are discussed in detail elsewhere in
the book and can be found by using the Writing Skills Index on page 345.
The checklist deals with common writing issues and errors, and aligns
with the following principles:
· The aim of writing is not to make it possible for the reader to understand
what you have written. The aim is to make it impossible for the reader
not to understand.
· Data and information alone have no intrinsic or obvious function for
the reader without a narrative.
· Knowing WHAT to write is not the same as knowing HOW to write it.
· The fact that you and your colleagues understand what you have
written makes it harder for you to see potential ambiguities.
· Good organisation and good writing can compensate for language
errors, but error-free language does not compensate for poor
organisation or poor writing.
· Everything in the text, whether it is a research article, conference
abstract, thesis or other text type, should be consistent with and lead
towards the destination point — the ‘magnetic south’.
w 314
Planning
Results and data do not speak for themselves and the achievement,
contribution and impact of the study are not always obvious to the
reader.
315 v
Check that the way you have divided the text into subsections is helpful to
the reader and that the subtitles accurately represent the content of the
subsection. Use the keywords in the subtitle as early as possible in the
subsection, and lead from those keywords.
Ordering information
Make sure that all potential readers know what the information is doing, not
just what it is saying. Is its function to introduce a description of a problem/
solution? Is it an example of something positive — or something negative?
Consider the magnetic south, i.e. where your text is going, and show the
reader the direction of travel by commenting on data and information rather
than just stating it. For example, don’t just provide data in ‘naked numbers’;
add evaluative comments such as only 43% or as high as 43% to show what
the data means in the context of the study.
Relevance: Make sure the reader knows why you are writing
each sentence
The fact that you know why the sentence is relevant does not ensure that
the reader knows. Consider a potential ‘so what?’ question in the reader’s
mind at the end of a sentence. These questions can be resolved by adding
phrases such as ‘suggesting that.../which means that...’.
w 316
Assumptions
Paragraphing
Plan the function of each paragraph and order the paragraphs logically before
you start writing.
317 v
Sentence start-up
The reading speed of the eye should correlate reasonably well with the
processing speed of the brain. If the reader frequently needs to re-read over-
long and over-dense sentences, this will slow them down. Consecutive long
sentences are particularly problematic.
w 318
Signals such as moreover and therefore are not just glue to join ideas or
sentences together; they are emphatic, and have specific and restricted
meanings. The wrong signalling connector means that the reader sets off
in the wrong direction and the text becomes unintelligible.
319 v
w 320
Verb tense
· Agentless passives (was done, was studied without ‘by X’) do not make
it clear who actually ‘did’ the verb. Identify the agent by using words or
phrases like here/in that study/in our model/in their approach.
· Placing a passive verb at the end of a long sentence requires the reader
to wait until the end of the sentence to discover what happened.
Error example: Images and patient data from seventeen patients
who were suspected of having PH and who had also undergone
cardiac MRI and right-sided heart catheterization between 2002 and
2008 were retrospectively reviewed.
· The impersonal use of we/us/our can refer to ‘everyone in my field’ or
even ‘everyone in the world’. This can cause ambiguity if you also use
we/us/our in other sentences to refer to yourselves as authors. Instead
of We can now design proteins with many functions to refer to ‘everyone
in my field’, consider It is now possible to design proteins with new
functions.
· Own your own work and contribution. Sentences with non-human
grammatical subjects may risk your work being interpreted as common
knowledge or other researchers’ contributions. In the sentence
Theoretical modelling suggests formation of these bonds can be strongly
reduced by coating the receptors on the nanoparticles it is not clear
whether or not it was the writers who carried out the modelling.
321 v
· Watch out for errors that are invisible, i.e. when both a and the are
grammatically correct but the choice will affect the meaning.
Example: The cords should be connected to φ /the two outlets.
· Use the to communicate shared knowledge.
· Check for uncountable nouns that you are using countably, e.g. steel,
environment, technology and therefore which potentially need an article.
Prepositions
Prepositions can change the meaning: evidence of vs. evidence for; improved
up to 3 times vs. improved by up to 3 times.
Subject-verb agreement
Adverb location
Some adverbs such as just, only, simply change the meaning or focus of the
information depending on their location. In the table below, match sentences
1–6 with their meanings to see how this works.
323 v
-ing ambiguity
· -ing forms are inherently ambiguous in that they exhibit no verb tense or
singular/plural marker. In the following sentence it is not clear whether
the deposits or the processes are doing the producing. It is also not clear
what exactly is doing the encapsulating.
Error example: MTCs are deposits resulting from creep, slide,
slump and flow processes producing a variety of rheological units
w 324
A by [verb]ing
B as a result of [verb]ing
C on the basis of [verb]ing
D when [verb]ing
E thereby [verb]ing
F therefore verbing
G which is/are capable of [verb]ing
H which/that [verb]
I if we/it/they [verb]
J because it/they [verb]
325 v
Vocabulary accuracy
Terminology should be used consistently. A tool should not become a strategy
and then a device and then an approach and then a methodology and then
a framework and then a technique.
· The thesaurus is not your friend, and it is the global writer and reader’s
enemy. No two words have exactly the same meaning in every context
so there is no such thing as a perfect synonym. This means that the word
you choose as an alternate may have a broader scope than the original
word or it may be more negative/positive/neutral than the original word.
A non-native writer risks choosing a thesaurus option whose meaning is
so distant from the original word that the reader does not recognise it as
an alternate. noticeable is not the same as conspicuous. famous is not the
same as well-known. Don’t be afraid to repeat the same word or phrase
if that makes reading easier.
Example: Most studies have focused on a deep steady state of
general anesthesia and have not used a systematic behavioral
measure to track the transition into unconsciousness. This steady-
state approach cannot distinguish between patterns that are
characteristic of a deeply anesthetized brain and patterns that arise
at the onset of unconsciousness. Unconsciousness can occur in
tens of seconds, but many neurophysiological features continue to
fluctuate for minutes after induction.
· Use Google Scholar to check whether your use of technical terms or
phrases is accurate and current. First put the term into Google Scholar
in quotation marks (“) to check where, when and how many times that
w 326
exact phrase appears in the literature; then enter the same term again
without quotation marks and compare the two sets of data.
· New terminology is created very quickly in science, and the term you
have been using may have been superseded or steamrollered by an
influential research group who are naming it differently. Keep checking.
· comprise/consist of/be made up of/be composed of are followed by a list
or description of all the components, whereas include is followed by a
list or description of a selection of the components.
· respectively means in the same order as just mentioned: T helper and T
suppressor cells are restricted by the A and E molecules respectively.
· Joining two or more words with a hyphen makes them act as a single
concept to describe the noun that follows them. Thus, We used five
centimetre-wide layers means that we used five layers, each of which
was one centimetre wide, whereas We used five-centimetre wide layers
means that each layer we used was five centimetres wide.
· Make sure you know the difference between the following pairs:
alternately and alternately = one after the other or in sequence
alternatively alternatively = on the other hand, instead or as an
alternative
beside and besides beside = next/close to
besides = apart from/in addition to
criterion and criteria criterion is the singular form
criteria is the plural form
different and various different = not the same
various = a range of
e.g. and i.e. e.g. = for example
i.e. = in other words
effective and effective = it works
efficient efficient = it works well
phenomenon and phenomenon is the singular form
phenomena phenomena is the plural form
to adapt and to to adapt = to modify/adjust
adopt to adopt = to choose to use/follow
327 v
w 328
8.4. General
Use language that accurately communicates how committed you are to your
interpretation of your results and their implications. You can choose language
that tells the reader that you are certain or you can choose language that
tells the reader you are merely speculating; what is essential is that the
language you choose follows logically from the results or achievements of
the study.
Citations
· If your tic is overusing pairs of dashes, note that the meaning of a pair
of dashes is not obvious, particularly to international readers. Consider
translating what you mean by the dash pairs into language.
329 v
w 330
The author wishes to acknowledge and thank the following. Note that because
extracts from published papers are presented as examples of good writing,
graphics are not generally included. For simplicity, all titles have been
standardised with respect to capitalisation.
331 v
Index of Extracts
a. Lewis, L.D. et al. (2012). Rapid fragmentation of neuronal networks at the
onset of propofol-induced unconsciousness. Proceedings of the National
Academy of Sciences of the United States of America Vol. 109, No. 49: E3377–
E3386.
b. Burrows, P.E. et al. (1995). Organic vapor phase deposition: a new method for
the growth of organic thin films with large optical non-linearities. Journal of
Crystal Growth Vol. 156, Issues 1–2: 91–98.
c. Noisa, P. et al. (2012). Identification and characterisation of the early
differentiating cells in neural differentiation of human embryonic stem cells.
PLoS ONE Vol. 7, Issue 5: e37129.
d. Scott, T.B. et al. (2011). The oxidative corrosion of carbide inclusions at
the surface of uranium metal during exposure to water vapour. Journal of
Hazardous Materials Vol. 195: 115–123.
e. Cotter, A., Srebro, N. and Keshet, J.A. (2011). A GPU-tailored approach for
training kernelized SVMs. KDD’11: Proceedings of the 17th ACM SIGKKD
International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, San
Diego, California, USA, August 2011: 805–813.
f. Wrighton, P.J. et al. (2014). Signals from the surface modulate differentiation
of human pluripotent stem cells through glycosaminoglycans and integrins.
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of
America Vol. 111, No. 51: 18126–18131.
g. Clarke, T. et al. (2009). Evaluation of the damage detection capability of a
sparse-array guided-wave SHM system applied to a complex structure under
varying thermal conditions. IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics,
and Frequency Control Vol. 56, Issue 12: 2666–2678.
h. Zhang, P. et al. (2010). Silica encapsulated heterostructure catalyst of Pt
nanoclusters on hematite nanocubes: synthesis and reactivity. Journal of
Materials Chemistry Vol. 20, Issue 10: 2013–2017.
i. Le Rouzic, J. and Reddyhoff, T. (2014). Spatially resolved triboemission
measurements. Tribology Letters Vol. 55, Issue 2: 245–252.
j. Górka, B. et al. (2006). Influence of electrodes on the photon energy deposition
in CVD-diamond dosimeters studied with the Monte Carlo code PENELOPE.
Physics in Medicine & Biology Vol. 51, No. 15: 3607–3623.
w 332
k. Norori-McCormac, A. et al. (2017). The effect of particle size distribution on froth
stability in flotation. Separation and Purification Technology Vol. 184: 240–247.
l. Shelburne, K.B., Torry, M. and Pandy, M.G. (2005). Effect of muscle
compensation on knee instability during ACL-deficient gait. Medicine and
Science in Sports & Exercise Vol. 37, Issue 4: 642–648.
m. Andrew, M., Bijeljic, B. and Blunt, M.J. (2014). Pore-scale contact angle
measurements at reservoir conditions using X-ray microtomography. Advances
in Water Resources Vol. 68, pp 24–31.
n. Boldrin, P. et al. (2015). Nanoparticle scaffolds for syngas-fed solid oxide fuel
cells. Journal of Materials Chemistry A Vol. 3, Issue 6: 3011–3018.
o. Asner, G.P. et al. (2014). Amazonian functional diversity from forest canopy
chemical assembly. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the
United States of America Vol. 111, No. 15: 5604–5609.
p. Springer, H. and Raab, D. (2012). Rapid alloy prototyping: compositional and
thermo-mechanical high throughput bulk combinatorial design of structural
materials based on the example of 30Mn–1.2C–xAl triplex steels. Acta
Materialia Vol. 60, Issue 12: 4950–4959.
q. Da Silva, S. et al. (2014). Stress disrupts intestinal mucus barrier in rats via
mucin O-glycosylation shift: prevention by a probiotic treatment. American Journal
of Physiology-Gastrointestinal and Liver Physiology Vol. 307, Issue 4: G420–G429.
r. Salisbury, E. et al. (2011). Sensory nerve induced inflammation contributes to
heterotopic ossification. Journal of Cellular Biochemistry Vol. 112, Issue 10:
2748–2758.
s. Nicola, W., and Clopath, C. (2017). Supervised learning in spiking neural networks
with FORCE training. Nature Communications 8, Article Number 2208.
t. Kumar, S. et al. (2006). Global analysis of protein tyrosine phosphatase activity
with ultra-sensitive fluorescent probes. Journal of Proteome Research Vol. 5,
Issue 8: 1898–1905.
u. Le Formal, F. et al. (2015). Rate law analysis of water oxidation on a hematite
surface. Journal of the American Society Vol. 137, Issue 20: 6629–6637.
v. Thorneycroft, J. et al. (2018). Performance of structural concrete with recycled
plastic waste as a partial replacement for sand. Construction and Building
Materials Vol. 161: 63–69.
w. Hou, S.-X., Maitland, G.C. and Trusler, J.P.M. (2013). Measurement and
modeling of the phase behavior of the (carbon dioxide + water) mixture at
333 v
w 334
335 v
337 v
w 338
339 v
341 v
w 342
Research Verbs
343 v
345 v
Language Index
347 v
Language Index
349 v
fragile 49 imperfection/s 181
frequent/ly 46, 108, 176, 290 importance 46
freshly 108 important 46, 68, 107, 172, 225
from time to time 177 impossible 111, 180, 235–237
fruitful 226 impractical 111, 80, 291
fully 51, 108 improved 294
fundamental 46, 290 in accordance with 109, 179, 222
fundamentally 222 in addition 61, 327
furthermore 61 in advance 105
gap 49 in agreement with 222
generally 172, 176, 290 in an attempt to 107
gently 108 in conflict with 222
global 46 in contradiction to 179
goal 51, 68 in contrast 60, 179, 222
gradual 172 in due course 106, 227
great potential 46 in essence 110
greater (than) 173 in fact 329
growth in popularity 46 in future 227
in general 172
habitually 176
in good agreement (with) 222
hard to 49, 111, 180
in line with 110, 179, 222
hardly 173, 174
in order to 68, 107
hardly ever 176, 177
in part 182
hence 60
in principle 110, 172
higher 171–174
in progress 181, 226
highest 171
in some cases 173, 174
holds promise 226
in spite of 61
however 49, 60, 61, 110
in the beginning 105
ideal 50, 111, 181 in the end 105, 106
identical 108, 109, 171, 179, in the main 172
222, 293 in the meantime 105, 106
immaterial 111, 180 in the second place (etc.) 61
immediately 102, 105, 106, 108 in view of (the fact that) 59
imperceptible 173, 174 in/from fig. 1 (it can be seen that) 170
w 350
Language Index
351 v
w 352
Language Index
353 v
w 354
Language Index
355 v
unstudied 50 weak/ly 172
unsuccessful 49, 291 weakness 49
unsuitable 49 well (over/under) 173, 174
unsupported 49 well-documented 46
until 105, 106, 291 well-known 46
unusual 172, 225 what is more, 61
unworkable 111, 181 when 59, 105, 106, 325
upwards of 173 whereas 60, 110
urgent 50, 226 while 60, 106
useful 46, 49, 107, 175, 225, wide range of 46, 295
226 wide/ly 46
usually 176 widespread 46
valid 225 with regard to 61, 68
valuable 225 with respect to 61
variety of 46 with some adjustments 110
versatile 225 with some alterations 110
very 173, 174 with some changes 110
viable 175, 225, 227 with the aim of 107
vigorously 108 without exception 176
virtually 109, 172, 173, 174 worldwide 46, 290
visible 170 worthwhile 46, 226
vital 46, 225 yet 61
w 356