Explosive
Explosive
Explosive
ENGINEERING DESIGN
HANDBOOK
REDSTONE SCIENTIFIC ll#ORMATION CENTER
5 0510 01030180 9
EXPLOSIVES SERIES
PROPERTIES OF EXPLOSIVES
OF MILITARY INTEREST
Page
Torpex 359
l,3,5-Triamino-2,4, 6-Trinitrobenzene (TATNB) 364
Triethylene Glycol Diniträte (TEGN) Liquid 367
Trimonite 370
2,2,2-Trinitroethyl-4,4, 4-Trinitrobutyrate (TNETB) 373
Trinitro Triazodibcnzcnc 378
Tripentaerythritol Octaniträte (TPEON) 381
Tri tonal. 80/20 386
Veltex No . 448 391
I V
AMCP 706-177
PREFACE
The Engineering Design Handbook Series of the Army Materiel Command is a coordinated
series of handbooks containing basic information and fundamental data useful in the design
and development of Army materiel and systems. The handbooks are authoritative reference
books of practical information and quantitative facts helpful in the design and development
of Anny materiel SO that it will meet the tactical and technical needs of the Armed Forces.
AMCP 706-177, Properties of Explosives of Military Interest, is one of a series on
Explosives. One hundred and ten explosive compounds or mixtures are listed herein, alpha-
betically, with their properties, including composition variations. These explosives were
selected because of their current or probable application to military use.
The tabulated data reflect the results of tests, and were first compiled for publica-
tion at Picatinny Arsenal, Dover, Nw Jersey, by W. R. Tomlinson, Jr. These data were
later revised by Oliver E. Sheffield, also of Picatinny Arsenal, for the Engineering Hand-
book Office of Duke University, prime contractor to the Anny Materiel Command.
The Handbooks are readily available to all elements of AMC, including personnel and
contractors having a need and/or requirement. The Anny Materiel Command policy is to re-
lease these Engineering Design Handbooks to other DOD activities and their contractors
and to other Government agencies in accordance with current Aimy Regulation 70-31, dated
9 September 1966. Procedures for acquiring these Handbooks follow:
a. Activities within AMC and other DOD agencies order direct on an official
form from:
Commanding Officer
Letterkenny Aimy Depot, ATTN: AMXLE-ATD
Chambers burg , Pennsylvania 17201
b. Contractors who have Department of Defense contracts should submit their
requests through their contracting officer with proper justification to the address
listed in par. a.
c. Government agencies other than DOD having need for the Handbooks may submit
their requests directly to the address listed in par. a or to:
Commanding General
U. S. Armv Materiel Command
ATTN: AMCAM-ABS
Washington, D. C. 20315
d. Industries not having Government contracts (this includes colleges and
Universities) must forward their requests to:
Commanding General
U. S. Aimy Materiel Command
ATTN: AMCRD-TV
Washington, D. C. 20315
e. All foreign requests must be submitted through the Washington, D. C
Embassy to:
Assistant Chief of Staff for Intelligence
Foreign Liaison Office
Department of the Army
Washington, D. C. 20310
All requests, other than those originating within DOD, must be accompanied by a
valid justification.
Comments and suggestions on this handbook are welcomed and should be addressed
to Anny Research Office-Durham, Box CM, Duke Station, Durham, North Carolina 27706.
AMCP70G-177
VI
AMCP 706-177
mm minimum.
ml milliliter.
m/ s meters per second.
MW molecular weight.
NAVORD Bureau of Ordnance (ü. S. Navy)
NC nitrocellulose.
D
n index of refraction, with D band of sodium as light
20
source, at twenty degrees centigrade.
NDRC National Defense Research Committee.
NFOC National Fireworks Ordnance Corporation,
NG nitroglycerin.
NOL U. S. Naval Ordnance Laboratory, White Oak, Silver
Spring, Maryland.
NOTS U. S. Naval Ordnance Test Station, China Lake, Calif.
NRC National Research Council,
OB oxygen balance.
OCM Ordnance Committee Minutes.
OSRD Office of Scientific Research and Development
PA Picatinny Arsenal.
PATR Picatinny Arsenal Technical Report.
Phil Trans Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of
London.
Pogg Ann Poggendorf's Annalen der Physik.
Proc Roy Soc Proceedings of the Royal Society of London.
Rec trav chim Recueil des travaux chimiques des Pays-Bas.
RH relative humidity.
RI Report of Investigation.
SAE Society of Automotive Engineers,
SAP semi-armor-piercing.
s o1 solution.
Spec Specifications .
std dev standard deviation.
TM Technical Manual, Department of the Army,
TM/TO joint publication, as a TM and as a Department of the
Air Force Technical Order.
Trans Farad Soc Transactions of the Faraday Society
vac stab vacuum stability.
Z angew Chem Zeitschrift fur angewandte Chemie.
Z anorg Chem Zeitschrift für anorganische und allgemeine Chemie.
Z ges Schiess- Zeitschrift fur das gesamte Schiess und Sprengstoff-
Sprengstoffw wessen (München),
Z/sec atoms of oxygen per second.
V I I I
AMCP 706-177
2. ORIGIN. Compilation of data resulting in this handbook was undertaken by Picatinny Arsenal
personnel who desired to provide a manual tabulating the characteristics of explosives, based
on tests, with regard to current, and possible future, interest. The first resulting Picatinny
Arsenal publication was dated 20 June 19^9- Revision 1, PA Technical Report No. 17^0, dated
April 1958, with revisions, provides the data used herein.
3- SCOPE Tabulated data of tests on one hundred and ten explosive compounds or mixtures
include sensitivity to friction, impact, heat; performance characteristics or effectiveness
in weapons; physical and chemical properties; and method of preparation, synthesis or manufac-
ture, with comments on historical origin, and supplementary references.
h. REFERENCE NOTATIONS AND SOURCES. The references, as to sources of data or for more details
in methods of testing, have been listed, when available, at the end of each section devoted to
a given explosive compound, explosive mixture, or explosive ingredient. Where no reference is
given, it can be assumed that these data represent typical values obtained by standard proce-
dures. When available any reference should be consulted for more details in interpreting test
data.
Also there are listed Picatinny Arsenal Technical Reports which contain additional informa-
tion on the particular explosive. These report numbers are given in ascending order, in columns
corresponding to their terminal digits, and in accordance with the "Uniterm Index" prepared for
Picatinny Arsenal by Documentation Incorporated under Contract RAI-36-034-501-ORD-(P)-42 (1955)-
5. EXPLANATION CF TERMS AND MEIFCDS OF TESTING. Data are tabulated herein on three form-type
pages, in the following sequence of headings. Many of these terms are self-explanatory.
(2) "Composition."
"Reference publications (a through q), applying to this introduction, are listed at the end of
the introduction.
AMCP 706-177
height at which at least one of 10 trials results in explosion. For the EM apparatus, the unit
of height is the centimeter; for the PA apparatus, it is the inch. In the former, the explo-
sive is held between two flat, parallel hardened (C 63 + 2) steel surfaces; in the latter case,
it is placed in the depression of a small steel die-cup, capped by a thin brass cover, in the
center of which is placed a slotted-vented-cylindrical steel plug, slotted side down. In the
EM apparatus, the impact impulse is transmitted to the sample by the upper flat surface, in the
PA, by the vented plug. The main differences between the two tests are that the PA test (1)
involves greater confinement, (2) distributes the translational impulse over a smaller area
(due to the inclined sides of the die-cup cavity), and (3) involves a frictional component
(against the inclined sides).
The test value obtained with the PA apparatus depends, to a marked degree, on the sample
density. This value indicates the hazard to be expected on subjecting the particular sample
to an impact blow, but is of value in assessing a material's inherent sensitivity only if the
apparent density (charge weight) is recorded along with the impact test value. The values tabu-
lated herein were obtained on material screened between 50 and 100 mesh, U. S. Standard Screens
where single component explosives are involved, and through 50 mesh for the mixtures.
In the case of the EM apparatus, the procedure that was described for solids is used with
the following variations:
Approximately 0.5-pound of explosive is loaded in the same manner as it is loaded for actual
use: that is, cast, pressed, or liquid in a 3-inch pipe nipple (2-inch inside diameter, 1/16-
inch wall) closed on each end by a cap. The loaded item, in the standard test, contains a small
air space which can, if desired, be filled by inserting a wax plug. The loaded item is sub-
jected to the impact of a caliber .30 bullet fired perpendicularly to the long axis of the pipe
nipple, from a distance of 90 feet.
AMCP 706-177
A 0.02-gm sample (0.01-gm in the case of initiators) of explosive, loose loaded in a No. 8
blasting cap, is immersed for a short period in a Wood's metal bath. The temperature determined
is that which produces explosion, ignition or decomposition of the sample in 5 seconds, and the
behavior of the sample is indicated by "Explodes" or "Ignites" or "Decomposes" placed beside the
value. Where values were available for times other than 5 seconds, these have been included.
For 0.1-second values, no cap was used, but the explosive was placed directly on Wood's metal
bath, immediately after cleaning. The value 0.1 second is estimated, not determined, and repre-
sents an interval regarded as instantaneous to the observer's eye. Dashes indicate no action.
A 10-gm sample is heated for 48 hours at 75°C The sample after this exposure is observed
for signs of decomposition or volatility.
A 0.6-gm sample is heated for two 48-hour periods at 100°C. It is also noted whether expo-
sure at 100°C for 100 hours results in explosion.
The measure of the likelihood that a bare charge will catch fire when exposed to flames is
the index of flammability. The test is made by bringing an oxyhydrogen flame to bear on the
explosive. The maximum time of exposure which gives no ignition in 10 trials and the minimum
exposure which gives ignition in each of 10 trials are determined. The index of flammability
is 100 divided by the mean of the two times in seconds. The most flammable substances have high
indices, e.g., 250.
A 5- to 10-gm sample is exposed for hygroscopicity under the stated conditions, until equili-
brium is attained, or in cases where either the rate is extremely low, or very large amounts of
water are picked up, for the stated time. The sample, if solid, is prepared by sieving through
a 50 and on a 100 mesh screen.
(11) "Volatility."
A 10-gm sample is exposed for volatility under the stated conditions. The sample if solid
is prepared by sieving through a 50 and on a 100 mesh sieve.
The molecular weight (MW) of a mixture can be calculated from the equation
MW of mixture = 100
a + \> + c + n
mw-L mwg mw3 mwn
where a, b, c and n are the weight percents of the components, and mw]_, mwg, mvo and mwn their
corresponding molecular weights.
AMCP 706-177
The oxygen balance (OB) is calculated from the empirical formula of a compound in percentage
of oxygen required for complete conversion of carbon to carbon dioxide (or carbon monoxide) and
hydrogen to water. When metal is present the reactions are assumed to occur in the following
order:
C + H20 > 00 + H2
C02 + H2 » CO + H20
Procedure for calculating oxygenbalance is to determine the number of gramatoms of oxygen which
are excess or deficient for 100 grams of a compound. This number multiplied by the atomic weight
of oxygen gives
— molecular weight of compound = oxygen balance to C02 and H20, where X = atoms of carbon,
Y = atoms of hydrogen, Z = atoms of oxygen. The oxygen balance of a mixture is equal to the
sum of the percent composition times the oxygen balance for each component.
A 5-0-gm sample (1.0 goi for initiators), after having been carefully dried, is heated for
40 hours, in vacuo at the desired temperature.
A 0.4-gm sample of explosive, pressed at 3000 pounds per square inch into a No. 6 cap, is
initiated by lead azide, or mercury fulminate (or, if necessary, by lead azide and tetryl), in
a sand test bomb containing 200 gn of "on 30 mesh" Ottawa sand. The amount of azide, or of
tetryl, that must be used, to insure that the sample crushes the maximum net weight of sand,
is designated as its sensitivity to initiation and the net weight of sand crushed, finer than
AMCP 706-177
30 mesh, is termed the sand test value. The net weight of sand crushed is obtained by sub-
tracting from the total the amount crushed by the initiator when shot alone.
The sand test for liquids is made in accordance with the procedure given for solids except
that the following procedure for loading the test samples is substituted:
Cut the closed end from a No. 6 blasting cap and load one end of the resulting cylinder
with 0.20 gm of lead azide and O.25 gn of tetryl, using a pressure of 3000 psi for consoli-
dating each charge. With a pin, prick the powder train in one end of apiece of miner's black
powder fuse 8 or 9 inches long. Crimp to the pricked end a loaded cylinder, taking care that
the end of the fuse is held firmly against the charge in the cap. Crimp near the mouth of the
cap so as to avoid squeezing the charge. Transfer a weighed portion of 0.400 gn of the test
explosive t o an aluminum cap, taking precautions when the explosive is liquid to insert the
sample in such a manner that as little as possible adheres to the side walls of the cap, and
when a solid material is being tested use material fine enough to pass through a No. 100 U. S.
Standard Sieve. The caps used shall be of the following dimensions: length 2.00 inches, in-
ternal diameter 0.2^8-inch, wall thickness 0.025-inch. Press solid explosives, after insertion
into the aluminum cap, by means of hand pressure to an apparent density of approximately 1.2 gn
per cubic centimeter. This was done by exerting hand pressure on a wooden plunger until the
plunger had entered the cap to a depth of 3.93 centimeters. Following are the dimensions of
the interior of the cap: height 5-00 cm, area of cross section 0.312 square centimeters. In-
sert the cylinder containing the fuse and explosive charge of tetryl and lead azide into the
aluminum cap containing the test explosive for the determination of sand crushed.
This is sensitivity to initiation as described under the preceding heading. The minimum
detonating charge, in grams, required to detonate the explosive sample, is given.
The amount of sample under test which is necessary to raise the heavy ballistic mortar to
the same height to which it is raised by 10 gm of trinitrotoluene (TNT) is determined. The
sample is then rated, on a proportionate basis, as having a certain TNT value, i.e., as being
a certain percent as effective as TNT in this respect. The formula is
10
TNT value = , x 100.
sample weight
The ballistic mortar consists of a long compound supporting rod, at the end of which is sup-
ported a heavy short-nosed mortar. The mortar contains a chamber about 6 inches in diameter
and 1 foot long. A projectile occupies about 7 inches of the chamber and the sample to be
tested occupies a small portion of the remainder of the chamber. When the sample is detonated,
the projectile is driven into a sand bank, and the mortar swings through an angle which is
marked on paper by a pencil attached to the mortar. The angle thus indicates the height to
which the pendulum is raised by the explosion, and this latter represents the energy measured
by this test procedure.
A sample of the explosive to be tested (of the order of 10 gm) is exploded in a cavity, or
borehole, 25^nm in diameter and 125-mm deep, in a lead block 200^nm in diameter and 200-mm in
height. The borehole is made centrally in the upper face of each block, which is cast in a mold
from desilverized lead of the best quality. Although these tests have been made under a variety
AMCP 706-177
of conditions, where possible the data have been taken from or related to those of Reference f
(Naoum). Here a No. 8 blasting cap was used for initiation of the sample contained in glass.
The weight of sample used was adjusted to give, with the initiator, a total expansion of 250 to
300 cc, since within this range expansion and sample weight were linearly related under the con-
ditions of Naoum's test. Thus expansions for equivalent weights were readily calculated, and
the test value expressed in percent of the expansion of an equivalent weight of TMT.
(a) Method A - The charge is contained in a copper tube, having an internal diameter
of 3A-inch and l/l6-inch wall. This loaded tube is placed vertically on a square piece of
cold-rolled .steel plate, 5/8-inch thick; 4-inch and 3-lA_incl1 square plate gave the same re-
sults. The steel plate is in a horizontal position and rests in turn on a short length of
heavy steel tubing 1-1/2 inches ID and 3 inches 0D. The charge rests on the center of the
plate, and the centers of the charge, plate, and supporting tube are in the same line. A 20-gm
charge of the explosive under test is boostered by a 5-gm pellet of tetryl, in turn initiated
by a No. 8 detonator.
Plate dent test value, or relative brisance = Sample Dent Depth x 1QQ
Dent Depth for TNT at 1.61 gm/cc
The detonation rates reported in the tables contained herein were determined principally by
using the rotating drum camera, under the conditions stated, e.g., usually charges 1 inch in
diameter, 20 inches long, wrapped in cellulose acetate sheet, and initiated by a system designed
to produce high order stable detonation at the maximum rate under the particular conditions. A
typical initiating system for this consisted of four tetryl pellets 0.995 inch in diameter, 0.75
inch long, pressed to 1.50 gm/cc, with a Corps of Engineers special blasting cap placed in a
central hole in the end pellet.
The booster sensitivity test procedure is a scaled up modification of the Bruceton method
(unconfined charge). The source of the shock consists of two tetryl pellets, each 1.57 inches
diameter by 1.60 inches high, of approximately 100 gm total weight. The initial shock is de-
graded through wax spacers of cast Acrawax B, 1-5/8 inches diameter. The test charges are 1-5/8
inches diameter by 5 inches long. The value given is the thickness of wax in inches at the 50$
detonation point. The weight of tetryl pellet noted is the minimum which will produce detona-
tion with the spacer indicated.
Heats of combustion and explosion are generally determined on samples weighing of the order
of 1 to 2 gm, in standard calorimeter bombs such as the Parr or Emerson, approximately 400 cc
(for low loading density), or the Boas, approximately 45 cc (for high loading density). por
AMCP 706-177
heats of combustion the sample is burned under about 40 atmospheres o£ oxygen; for heats of
explosion, nitrogen, or one atmosphere of air is used.
A modified 60-mm., Mk%2, mortar projectile is loaded with the explosive to be tested, drilled
to the proper depth (about 1/2 inch), and a flat-based steel plug screwed into the projectile to
give a smooth close-fit between the plug base and the charge. The part of the plug outside the
projectile is rounded off in the form of a spherical section. The loaded projectile with fins
attached is fired from a five foot length of 2-3/8 inches ID x 3-3/8 inches 0D Shelby steel tub-
ing. The igniter and propelling charge, consisting of an igniter for a 2.36-inch rocket (bazoo-
ka), 5 gm of hi? black powuer, and a quantity of shotgun propellant sufficient to give the desired
velocity (read from a calibration chart) are conveniently loaded into the "gun" through a simple
breech plug. The velocities are measured electronically, and the reaction, inert or affected,
is determined by observation (e.g., whether or not flash occurs on impact). Within the range of
flight stability of the projectile, 200-1100 ft/sec, the 50$ point is located.
Bomb drops are made using bombs assembled in the conventional manner, as for service usage,
but containing either inert or simulated fuzes. The target is usually reinforced concrete.
The weight of each empty projectile and weight of water displaced by the explosive charge is
determined, and from this the specific gravity of the charge is calculated. All 3-inch and
90-mm projectiles are initiated by M20 Booster pellets, and those used with 3-inch HE, M42A1,
Lot KC-5 and 90-mm HE, M71, Lot WC-91 projectiles are controlled in weight and height as follows:
22.50 + 0.10 gm, and 0.480 to 0.485 inch.'
AMCP 706-177
The projectile assembled with fuze, actuated by a Blasting Cap, Special, Type II (Spec 49-
20) placed directly on a lead of comparable diameter, and booster, are placed in boxes con-
structed of half-inch pine. The 90-TETH projectiles are fragmented in boxes 21 x 10-1/2 x 10-1/2
inches and the 3-inch projectiles in boxes 15 x 9 x 9 inches outside dimensions. The box with
projectile is placed on about h feet of sand in a steel fragmentation tub, the detonator wires
are connected, and the box covered with approximately h feet more of sand. The projectile is
fired and the sand run onto a gyrating it-mesh screen on which the fragments are recovered.
Charges 10-1/8 inches long and 2 inches in diameter, containing a booster cavity, filled by
a 72-gm tetryl pellet (I-3/8 inches diameter, 2 inches long, average density 1.594) are fired
in a model projectile of Shelby seamless tubing, 2 inches ID, 3 inches OD, SAE 1020 steel, with
a welded-on cold rolled steel base. The projectile is so fired in a chamber, connected to a
corridor containing velocity stations, that a desired wedge of projectile casing fragments can
be observed. The fragment velocities are determined by shadow photographs, using flash bulbs,
and rotating drum cameras, each behind three slits. The drum cameras have a writing speed of
30 meters per second.
The blast pressures and impulses given were determined almost exclusively with tourmaline
gages, and the usual necessary specialized electrical circuits, shielded co-axial cables,
oscillographs, etc. In general, the data represent results of tests with large cased charges.
Unconfined charges 2 inches in diameter and 6 inches long, boostered by a 10-gm pressed
tetryl pellet, set in a 20-mm pellet (truncated cone) of cast 60/kO cyclotol, are shot against
3-inch homogeneous armor plate at a 1-3/16 inches standoff. The cones used are commercial Pyrex
glass funnels, sealed off at the start of the stem, 2 inches in diameter, 0.110 to 0.125 inch
wall thickness.
Unconfined charges I.63 inches in diameter and 6 inches long are tested at a standoff of
I.63 inches against stacks of h x k x 1 inch mild steel plates. M9A1 steel cones are used.
Results are averages of h trials.
(5) "Color."
(9) "Storage."
Ammunition and bulk explosives in storage represent varying degrees of hazard and compati-
bility. This has led to their being divided into a number of hazard classes and compatibility
groups as indicated in subparagraphs (b) and (c) below.
Ammunition and bulk explosives are divided into quantity-distance classes, Class 1 through
12, according to the damage expected if they explode or ignite (Reference: Army Materiel Command
Regulation, AMCR 385-100, AMC Safety Manual, chapter 17). All standard explosives in bulk are
included in four of these classes: Class 2, 2A, 9, and 12 (TM 9-1910/T0 llA-l-^).
Explosives and ammunition are grouped for compatibility with respect to the following factors:
2. Rate of deterioration.
3- Sensitivity to initiation.
h. Type of packing.
(d) Exudation.
d. Miscellaneous entries.
Where available and appropriate, the following or related data are given, in space at
the bottom of the third form, or on plain pages.
(1) Solubility.
The direct experimental measurement of the dynamic bulk modulus of a solid is difficult, and
few such measurements have been made. One apparatus has been developed at the Naval Ordnance
Laboratory and is described in detail in Reference q. Bulk modulus (its reciprocal is the com-
pressibility) is defined as the ratio of stress to strain when the stress is a pressure applied
equally on all surfaces of the sample and the strain is the resulting change in volume per unit
volume.
The 240-hour hydrolysis test is conducted as follows: A 5-gm sample of the dry nitrocellu-
lose is weighed accurately in a tare-weighed 250-co Pyrex flask having a ground glass connection
for a Pyrex condenser. Then 100 cc of distilled water is added to the nitrocellulose in the
flask and the flask fitted to the condenser. The flask is placed in a steam bath in which the
water is kept boiling constantly by means of electric hotplates. At the end of 240 hours the
mount of solid developed by the hydrolysis of the nitrocellulose is measured by an electromatic
pH method.
The samples are tested under two amounts of confinement, designated as unconfined and con-
fined. In the unconfined test, a sample of approximately 0.05 gn i s dumped into a shallow de-
pression in a steel block and flattened out with a spatula. In the confined tests (partly
confined), the sample of approximately 0.05 gn is introduced into soft-glass tube (~ 7 mm ID x
18 mm long) which fits over a metal peg. The volume of the space around the charge at zero gap
is ~ 0.15 cc; at a gap of 0.6 mm, it is-»» 0.4 cc. In addition to providing moderate confine-
ment, this system also minimizes dispersion of the sample by the test spark, and reduces the
effect of material being repelled from the needle point by electrostatic field effect.
When a test is to be made, the needle point electrode is screwed up until the gap between
electrodes is greater than the critical gap discharge at the test voltage. The sample is then
placed in position, the high-voltage terminal of the charged condensor is switched to the point
electrode by means of a mercury switch, and the electrode is screwed down until discharge occurs.
The spark energy (in joules), for zero probability of ignition, is determined.
Burning is the preferred method of destroying explosives. Initiating type explosives (in
quantity) are usually destroyed by detonation with demolition blocks. Destruction of explo-
sives by chemical decomposition can be effectively used where small laboratory quantities are
involved. Procedures given are standard for only lead azide, mercury fulminate and nitrogly-
cerin.
(9) References.
d. Departments of the Army and the Air Force Joint Technical Manual and Technical Order,
TM 9-1910/TO llA-1-3^, Military Explosives, April 1955.
f. Ph. Naoum, Z ges Schiess-Sprengetoffw. pp. 181, 229, 267 (27 June 1932).
g. G. J. Mueller, Equipment for the Study of the Detonation Process, PATR No. 1I+65,
k July 19^5.
h. NDRC Interim Report, Preparation and Testing of Explosives, Nos. PT-19 and PT-20,
February-April 19^.
i. Linnie E. Newman, PA Chemical Laboratory Report Nos. 127815 and 13Wf6, 11 January 1951.
'■For information regarding source of references, inquiries should be made to the Commander,
U.S. Army Research Office--Durham, ATTN: CRDARD-EH, Box CM, Duke Station, Durham, North Carolina
27706.
10
AMCP 70G-177
o. D. D. Sager, Study of Acid Adsorption and Hydrolysis of Cellulose Nitrate and Cellulose
Sulphate, PAIR No. 17*+, 12 January 1932.
q. C. S. Sandier, An Acoustic Technique for Measuring the Effective Dynamic Bulk Modulus
of Elasticity and Associated Loss Factor of Rubber and Plastics, NAVORD Report No. 1524, 1 Sep-
tember 1950.
W. S. Cramer, Bulk Compressibility Data on Several Explosives, NAVORD Report No. 4380,
15 September 1956.
11
AMCP 706-177
Amatol, 8o/20
Detonation Rate:
Flammability Index: Confinement None None
Condition Cast Cast
Hygroscopicity: % Charge Diameter, in. 1.0 1.0
30°C, 90%RH, 2 davs 61
Density, gm/cc l.h6 1.50
Volatility: Nil
Rate, meters/second ^500 5100
12
Amatol, 80/20 AMCP70G-177
Charge Wt, lb
Energy
13
AMCP 706-177 Amatol, Go/kO
Melting Point: °C
Detonation Rate:
Flammability Index: Confinement None
Condition Cast
Hygroscopicity: %
Charge Diameter, in. 1.0
Density, gm/cc 1.50
Volatility: Nil
Rate, meters/second 5760
14
Amatol, 60A0 AMCP 706-177
Underground:
Peak Pressure
Impulse
Energy
15
AMCP 706-177 Amatol, 50/50
Detonation Rate:
Flammability Index: Confinement None None
Condition Cast Cast
Hygroscopicity: % Nil Charge Diameter, in. 1.0 1.0
Density, gm/cc 1-55 1-55
Volatility:
Rate, meters/second 6430 6230
16
Amatol, 50/50 AMCP 706-177
90 mm HE, M71 Projectile, Lot WC-91 Glass Cones Steel Cones (g)
Density, gm/cc 1-55 Hole Volume 53
Charge Wt, lb 2.053 Hole Depth 69
17
AMCP 706-177 Amstols 80/20, 60/ho, 50/50
Preparation :
In preparing amatols the proper granulation of ammonium nitrate is required if the maximum
density of the cast amatol is desired. The ammonium nitrate should be dried so as to contain
not more than 0.25$ moisture. It should be heated to about 90°C before being added to the
appropriate weight of molten TNT contained in a melting vessel equipped with an agitator. Con-
tinue mixing to insure uniformity and load by pouring into shell or bombs.
Origin:
References . 2
(a) L. C. Smith and E. H. Eyster, Physical Testing of Explosives, Part 111, Miscellaneous
Sensitivity Tests, Performance Tests, OSRD Report 57^-fe> 27 December 19^-5 •
(c) D. P. McDougall, Methods of Physical Testing, OSRD Report No. 803, 11 August 19^2.
(d) Committee of Div 2 and 8, NDRC, Report on HBX and Tritonal. OSRD Report No. 5*1-06,
31 July 19^5•
(e) Philip C. Keenan and Dorothy Pipes, Table of Military High Explosives, Second Revision,
NAVORD Report No. 87-46, 26 July 194-6.
(f) R. W. Drake, Fragment Velocity and Panel Penetration of Several Explosives in Simulated
Shells, OSRD Report No. 5622, 2 January 1946.
(g) Eastern Laboratory, du Pont, Investigation of Cavity Effect, Final Report, 18 September
19^3, NDRC Contract W-672-ORD-5723.
(h) Also see the following Picatinny Arsenal Technical Reports on Amatols:
0123 456789
240 681 132 743 364 65 266 1207 5I+8 549
350 731 182 1173 69h 425 556 1^57 638 799
630 901 1302 1373 734 695 666 1797 838 929
950 1051 1352 1323 87^ 715 986 1827 1098 1129
1300 1311 1372 1^93 13^ 735 1376 2167 1148 1219
1530 1^51 1552 1783 11^5 1446 1388 1369
1651 1225 1636 1568 1559
1345 1796 1838
1^55
1885
(i) TM 9-1910/TO 11A-1--3*+, Milit ary Exphasives, Apr il 1955.
2
See footnote 1, page 10.
18
Ammonal AMCP 706-177
Melting Point: °C
19
AMCP70G-177 Ammonal
Energy
Origin:
Air, Confined:
Impulse Castable mixture developed in United States
during World War I.
Underwater:
Peak Pressure References:
Energy
Preparation:
20
Ammonium Nitrate AMCP 706-177
21
AMCP 706-177 Ammonium Nitrate
Heat of:
Armor Plate Impact lest:
Combustion, cal/gm 346
Explosion, cal/gm 346
60 mm Mortar Projectile:
Gas Volume, cc/gm 9°0 50% Inert, Velocity, ft/sec
Formation, cal/gm 1098 Aluminum Fineness
Fusion, cal/gm 18.23
500-lb General Purpose Bombs:
Specific Heat: cal/gm/°C (e)
°C °C Plate Thickness, inches
1%
1%
Burning Rate:
cm/sec
Bomb Drop lest:
Thermal Conductivity: ,
T7, 2000-lb Semi-Armor-Piercing Bomb vs Concrete:
cal/sec/cm/°C 2.9-3.9xl0"4
22
Ammonium Nitrate AMCP 706-177
Entropv: (g)
23
AMCP 706-177 Ammonium Nitrate
i Nitric
°C i °c _i C A °C i Acid °c 5
0 118 20 2.5 16.6 0.0 0 J+5.1 30.0 25' ~ 2~e%
20 192 40 5 27.0 0.39 15 73.0 21.7
ko 297 60 7.5 80.9 5-8 30 106 20.8
60 1*21 78 10.5 101.0 20.7 75 201 31.6
80 580 120.0 125
100 871
Preparat ion:
Origin:
First prepared by Glauber in 1Ö59 and first used as an explosive ingredient in 1867 when a
Swedish patent was granted to Ohlsson and Norrbin for a composite dynamite.
Ammonium nitrate is decomposed by strong alkalies with the liberation of ammonia, and by
sulfuric acid with the formation of ammonium sulfate and nitric acid.
3
References:
(a) Departments of the Army and the Air Force TM 9-1910/TO 11a-1-34, Military Explosives,
April 1955-
(c) D. P. MacDougall, Methods of Physical Testing, OSRD Report No. 803, 11 August 19^+2.
(d) L. C. Smith and E. G. Eyster, Physical Testing of Explosives, Part III - Miscellaneous
Sensitivity Tests; Performance Tests, UKRD Report No. 5746, 27 December 1945.
(f) R- J. Finkelstein and G. Gamow, Theory of the Detonation Process, NAV0RD Report No. 90-
46, 20 April 191+7.
(g) George Feick, The Dissociation Pressure and Free Energy of Formation of Ammonium Ni-
trate, Arthur D. Little, Inc., J Am Chem Soc, 76, 5858-60 (1954).
3
See footnote 1, page 10.
24
Aggoniug Nitrate AMCP 706-177
(-J-) Also see the following Picatinny Arsenal Technical Reports on Ammonium Nitrate:
012345678.9
240 681 182 743 364 695 596 907 548 799
350 731 1302 1323 98U lli+5 666 1117 638 1369
630 1051 1682 1783 109^ 1225 676 19^7 938 1A09
1290 1241 2183 1214 1^55 946 2167 1008
1720 1311 123'+ 1635 1106 1038
1391 130^ 1675 1696
1^31 1725
25
AMCP 706-177 Ammonium Perchlorate
Oxygen Balance:
Cl 30.2
CO, % +27.3
CO % +27.3
K 11.9
NSCIO^ Density: gm/cc 1.95
H 3-^
Melting Point: °C
0
54.5
E/H Ratio Freezing Point: °C
Detonation Rate:
Flammability Index: Confinement
Condition
Hygroscopicity: %
Charge Diameter, in.
Density, gm/cc
Volatility:
Rate, meters/second
26
AMCP 706-177
Ammonium Perchlorate
Solubility in Water
Air, Confined: gm/lOO cc saturated solution:
Impulse
0°C 12
Under Water: 25°C 20
Peak Pressure 6o°C 39
ioo°c aa
Impulse
Energy Preparation:
27
AMCP 706-177 Ammonium Perchlorate
Origin: (c)
References:
(a) W R. Tomlinson, Jr., Physical and Explosive Properties of Military Explosives, PAIR
No. 1372, 29 November 19^3-
(b) T. L. Davis, The Chemistry of Powder and Explosives, John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New
York, 19^3-
(c) J. ¥. Mellor, A Comprehensive Treatise on Inorganic and Theoretical Chemistry. Vol. 11,
Longmanns, Green and CÖ~| London, 1922, p. 396.
(d) Also see the following Picatinny Arsenal Technical Reports on Ammonium Perchlorate:
ax 2 A h £ 2
100 321 84 3 354 1095 1726 10^9
1783 604 1725 1969
854 2205
28
Baratol AMCP 706-177
29
AMCP 706-177 Baratol
Thermal Conductivity:
T7, 2000-lb Semi-Armor-Piercing Bomb vs Concrete:
cal/sec/cm/°C
30
Baratol AMCP70G-177
Energy
Preparation:
Air, Confined:
Impulse
The appropriate weight of barium nitrate
heated to about 90°C is aäded to molton TNT
Under Water: contained in a melting vessel equipped with
Peak Pressure an agitator. Continue mixing until uniform,
Impulse and load by pouring at the lowest practical
Energy
temperature.
Ori ni n:
Underground:
Peak Pressure Baratol, an explosive containing barium
Impulse nitrate and TNT, the proportions varied to
Energy
suit the required purposes, was developed
during World War I.
31
AMCP 706-177 Barat£)1
References:
(a) D. P. MacDougall, Methods of Physical Testing, OSRD Report No. 803, llAugust 19^2.
(b) L. C. Smith and E. G. Eyster, Physical Testing of Explosives, Part III - Miscellaneous
Sensitivity Tests: Performance Tests, OSRD Report No. 5746, 27 December 19^5-
(c) Also see the following Picatinny Arsenal Technical Reports on Baratol:
0 3 6 8
(d) C. Lenchitz, W. Beach and R. Valicky, Enthalpy Changes, Heat of Fusion and Specific
Heat of Basic Explosives, PATR No. 2504, January 1959.
5
See footnote 1, page 10.
32
Baronal AMCP 70G-177
33
AMCP 706-177 Baronal
Energy
Preparation:
Air, Confined:
Impulse
Procedure same as described under Baratol
except aluminum is added to the barium ni-
Under Water: trate-TNT molton mixture under agitation
Peak Pressure until uniformity in comparison is obtained.
Impulse
Booster Sensitivity Test:
Energy (c)
Condition Cast
Underground: Tetryl, gm 100
Peak Pressure Wax, in. for 50% Detonation 0.86
Density, gm/cc 2.32
impulse
Energy Heat of:
34
AMCP 706-177
Baronal
■References: °
(a) L. C. Smith and E. G. Eyster, Physical Testing of Explosives, Part III - Miscellaneous
■Sensitivity Tests; Performance Tests, Um) Report No. ij'^b, 2? December l$l+5".
(b) G. H. Messerly, The Rate of Detonation of Various Explosive Compounds, OSRD Report No.
1219, 22 February 19^3-
M. D. Hurwitz, The Rate of Detonation of Various Compounds and Mixtures, OSRD Report
No. 5611, 15 January X9I+S^
(c) D. P. MacDougall, Methods of Physical Testing, OSRD Report No. 803, 11 August 19^2.
(d) Arthur D. Little Report, Study of Pure Explosive Compounds, Part III, Correlation of
Composition of Mixture with Performance, Contract No. HA-19-020-0RD-12, 1 May 1950.
(e) S. J. Lowell, Propagation of Detonation in Long and Narrow Columns of Explosives, PAIR
No. 2138, February 1955^
35
AMCP 706-177 Black Powder
Detonation Rate:
Flammability Index: Confinement
36
Black Powder AMCP 706-177
25 50 60 65 70 75
FragmentVelocity: ft/sec 1.74 1.84 1.86 1.87 1.88 1.89
At 9 ft
At 25 y2 ft Storage:
Density, gm/cc
Method Dry
Energy
100°C Vacuum Stability Test,
Air, Confined: cc gas/Uo hrs:
Impulse
Initial Value 0-5
After 2 hours at 65°C 0.86
Underwater: After 2 hours at 65°C, 75$ RH 1.46
Peak Pressure
Sensitivity to Electrostatic
Impulse
Discharge Toulesj (k)
Energy
Unconfined >12-5
Confined O.fl
Underground:
Peak Pressure Compatibility with Metals:
Impulse Dry " Compatible with all metals when
Energy moisture content is less than 0.20$.
37
AMCP 706-177 Black Powder
Preparation:
Willow or alder charcoal, flour of sulphur and 2-3$ of water are placed in a tumbling barrel
and mixed for a short period (about 1/2 hour). The mixture is transferred to a "wheel mill" and
crystalline potassium nitrate containing 3-^$ moisture is added and the mixture is incorporated
for several hours. During the incorporation period the mixture is kept damp (2-3$ moisture) by
adding water at intervals. The mill cake is then pressed at 6000 psi between aluminum plates.
The pressed cakes are broken up between rubber or wood rolls. The material is screened and the
various particle sizes are separated as desired. The screened material is then transferred to
canvas trays and dried in hot air ovens at 6o°C. If it is desired to glaze the black powder,
the material before drying is polished by rotation in a tumbling barrel to give it a smooth
surface. It is next screened to remove the dust. The smooth particles are then placed in a
wooden barrel and rotated with graphite. The material is again screened to remove the excess
graphite, and dried. Material finer than #40 U. S. Sieve is not graphited.
WARNING
The batches of black powder must be of sufficient size to cover the bed of the "wheel mill."
If the wheels run off on the bare bed, explosions usually result.
Origin:
The exact date of the discovery of black powder is unknown. Historians attribute its dis-
cover)' to the Chinese, Hindus or Arabs. The Greeks used it during the 7th Century. Marcus
Graecus in the 9th Century and Roger Bacon in the 13th Century described compositions similar
to the present powder. Beginning with the 16th Century, the composition of black powder con-
taining potassium nitrate, charcoal and sulfur has remained unchanged with respect to the pro-
portionality (75/l5/lO) of the ingredients.
Black powder can be desensitized by leaching with water to dissolve the potassium nitrate.
The washings must be disposed of separately because the residue of sulfur and charcoal is com-
bustible but not explosive.
References:
(c) Also see the following Picatinny Arsenal Technical Reports on Black Powder:
:58
Black Powder
AMCP 706-177
39
AMCP 706-177 1^,4-Butanetriol Trinitrate (BTTN) Liquid
Detonation Rate:
Flammability Index: Confinement
Condition
Hygroscopicity: % (a) Charge Diameter, in.
100°F, 95% RH, 24 hrs 0.14
Density, gm/cc
Volatility:
Rate, meters/second
60 C, mg/cm /hr 46
40
AMCP 706-177
1,2,^-Butanetriol Trinitrate (BTTN) Liquid
Density, gm/cc
Method
Energy
41
4MCP 706-177
1,2,4-Butanetriol Trinitrate (BTTN) Liquid
To a cooled mixture of 73.8 gn of 100$ nitric acid, 46.2 gms of 106.2$ sulfuric acid and
60.0 gn of 96.1% sulfuric acid, 30 gms of the original (or redistilled) 1,2,4-butanetriol was
added drop-wise with agitation for a period of thirty minutes. The temperature of the reaction
mixture vras kept at 0°-5°C. When the agitation was completed, stirring v*as continued for one
and one-half hours. The mixture was poured into ice water, and the resulting oil suspension
was extracted with three 100 milliliter portions of ether. The combined ether extracts were
washed with water, then with a 5$ sodium bicarbonate solution and finally with water. The neu-
tralized extract was dried with anhydrous calcium chloride and then the ether was evaporated.
The yellow oil was dried in a vacuum desiccator over anhydrous calcium chloride until the mate-
rial was brought to constant weight.
Origin:
1,2,4-butanetriol vras first synthesized by Wagner and Ginsberg in 189^ by oxidizing allyl
carbinol with potassium permanganate under mild conditions (Ber 27, 2^37). Recently the U. S.
Rubber Laboratory, under the direction of P. Tawney, devised a new synthesis carried out with
allyl acetate and formaldehyde to give 1,2,4-butane triacetate which was readily hydrolysed to
butanetriol (U. S. Rubber Company Quarterly Report, May 1948). Working with pure 1,2,4-butane-
triol prepared by an improved technique of the Wagner method, the U. S. Naval Laboratory in
19^8 nitrated the butanetriol on a laboratory and a pilot plant scale (Reference a).
References:
(b) Also see the following Picatinny Arsenal Technical Reports on Butanetriol Trinitrate:
1755 and 1786.
8
See footnote 1, page 10.
42
Composition A-3 AMCP 706-177
43
AMCP 706-177 Composition A-3
Condition Pressed
Tetryl, gn 100
Wax, in. for 50$ Detonation 1.70
Density, gm/cc 1.62
Heat of:
Combustion, cal/gm 1210
44
. . , , AMCP 706-177
Composition A-3
Dry - Aluminum, stainless steel, mild steel, mild steel coated with acid-proof black paint
and mild steel plated with nickel or zinc are unaffected. Copper, magnesium, magnesium-aluminum
alloy, brass and mild steel plated with cadmium or copper are slightly affected.
Wet - Stainless steel is unaffected. Copper, aluminum, magnesium, brass, mild steel, mild
steel coated with acid-proof black paint and mild steel plated with copper, cadmium, nickel or
zinc are slightly affected.
Origin:
Developed by the British during World Wr II as RDX and beeswax. Subsequent changes in the
United States replaced beeswax with synthetic waxes, changed the granulation of RDX and improved
the method of manufacture.
RDX Composition A-3 (EDX/wax, 9l/9) is decomposed by adding it slowly to 25 times its weight
of boiling 5$ sodium hydroxide. Boiling of the solution is continued for one-half hour.
q
References:
(a) L. C. Smith and E. G. Irrster, Physical Testing of Explosives. Part III - Miscellaneous
Sensitivity Tests; Performance Tests. OSRD Report No. 5746, 27 December 19^5-
(b) D. P. MacDougall, Methods of Physical Testing OSRD Report No. 803, 11 August 1942.
(C) G- H- Messerly, Big Rate of Detonation of Various Explosive Compounds OSRD Report No.
1219, 22 February 19^3-
M D. Hurwitz, The Rate of Detonation of Various Compounds and Mixtures, OSRD Report
No. 56U, 15 January I9W.
(e) W F. MeGarry and T. W. Stevens, Detonation Rates of the More Important Military Explo-
sives at Several Different Temperatures, PAIR No. 2383, November 195b-
(f) Also see the following Picatinny Arsenal Technical Reports on RDX Composition A-3:
<Z12345_678.9
1380 1^51 1^92 1^93 1U2U 1325 1556 1687 1338 1639
1910 1761 2112 l6lk 1585 1936 1787 1388 2179
X&Zk 1595 1797 1728
215^ 1715 1838
1885
22 35
9
See footnote 1, page 10.
45
AMCP 706-177 Composition B
46
Composition B AMCP 706-177
Thermal Conductivity:
T7, 2000-lb Semi-Armor-Piercing Bomb vs Concrete:
cal/sec/cm/"C
47
AMCP 706-177 Composition B
Energy 116
Origin:
Air, Confined:
Impulse 75 RDX Composition B was developed by the
British between World War I and World War 11.
Under Water: It was standardized by the United States
Peak Pressure 110 early in World War 11.
Impulse 108
Effect of Temperature on
Energy 121 Rate of Detonation: (i)
48
AMCP 706-177
Dry - Magnesium, aluminum, magnesium-aluminum alloy, mild steel, stainless steel, mild steel
coated with acid-proof black paint and mild steel plated with zinc or nickel are unaffected.
Copper, brass and mild steel plated with copper or cadmium are slightly affected.
Wet - Aluminum and stainless steel are unaffected. Copper, brass, mild steel, mild steel
coated with acid-proof black paint and mild steel plated with cadmium, copper, nickel or zinc
are slightly affected. Magnesium and magnesium-aluminum alloy are more heavily affected.
Preparation:
Water wet RDX is added slowly with stirring to molten TNT melted in a steam-jacketed kettle
at a temperature of 100°C. Seme water is poured off and heating and stirring are continued un-
til all moisture is evaporated. Wat is then added and when thoroughly mixed, the composition
is cooled to a satisfactory pouring temperature. It is cast directly into ammunition components
or in the form of chips when Composition B is to be stored.
References :
(a) L. C. Smith and E. G. Eyster, Physical Testing of Explosives, Part III - Miscellaneous
Sensitivity Tests; Performance Tests, OSRD Report No. 5746, 27 December 1945.
(b) Philip C. Keenan and Dorothy Pipes, Table of Military High Explosives, Second Revision,
NAVORD Report No. 87-46, 26 July 19h6.
(c) D. P. MacDougall, Methods of Physical Testing, OSRD Report No. 803, 11 August 1942.
(e) Committee of Divisions 2 and 8, NDRC, Report on HBX and Tritonal, OSRD Report No 5406
31 July 19^5-
(f) W. E. Tomlinson, Jr., Blast Effects of Bomb Explosives, PA Tech Div Lecture, 9 April
1948.
(g) Eastern Laboratory, du Pont, Investigation of Cavity Effect, Sec 111, Variation of Cavi-
ty Effect with Explosive Composition, NDRC Contract Wb72-ORD-5723.
(h) Eastern Laboratory du Pont, Investigation of Cavity Effect, Final Report, E Lab du Pont,
Contract W-672-ORD-5723, 18 September 1943.
(i) W. F. McGarry and T. W. Stevens, Detonation Rates of the More Important Military Explo-
sives at Several Different Temperatures, FAIR No. 'd$>5, November, 195b.
(j) W. S. Cramer, Bulk Compressibility Data on Several High Explosives, NAVORD Report No.
1+380, 15 September 1956.
(k) Also see the following Picatinny Arsenal Technical Reports on EDX Composition B:
01231+56789
1360 1211 ll+02 1313 1224 1325 1466 1207 1338 1339
1530 IU51 1482 1^33 1424 1^35 11*76 11+37 1388 1379
2100 2131 1592 1803 191+1+ 1585 1556 11+57 11+38 1I+69
2160 2151 1983 2004 1595 1756 1737 11+58 1819
2190 2053 2104 1865 1956 1797 1688 2019
2063 1885 2236 2007 1728
2103 aE5 2ll+7 1828
2233 2125 1838
2155 1978
2-75 2008
2235 2138
2168
(1) C. Lenchitz, W. Beach and R. Valicky, Enthalpy Changes. Heat of Fusion and Specific Heat
of Basic Explosives, PATR No. 2504, January 1959.
50
Composition B, Desensitized AMCP70G-177
I* Condition
100°C Heat Test: 11**
Confined
% Loss, 1st 48 Hrs 0.05 0.12
Density, gm/cc
% Loss, 2nd 48 Hrs 0.19 0.18
Brisance, % TNT
Explosion in 100 Hrs None None
Detonation Rate:
Flammability Index: Confinement
Condition
Hygroscopicity: %
Charge Diameter, in.
30°C, 90$ RH 0.00 0.00
Density, gm/cc
Volatility: Nil Nil
Rate, meters/second
51
AMCP 706-177 Composition B, Desensitized.
Energy
52
AMCP 706-177
Composition C
Sample Wt, mg
53
AMCP 706-177 Conroosition C
Energy
Plasticity:
Air, Confined:
Impulse
Below 0°C Brittle (0°c)
0-^0°C Plastic
Under Water: Above 1+0°C Exudes (40°C)
Peak Pressure
Impulse References :
Energy
See references for Composition C-4.
Underground:
Peak Pressure
Impulse
Energy
54
AMCP 706-177
Composition C-2
1 Mercury Fulminote
5 Decomposes 285 Lead Azide 0.25
10 Tetryl 0.10
15
Ballistic Mortar, % TNT: (a) 126
20
Trauzl Test, % TNT:
75°C International Heat Test:
Plate Dent Test: (c)
% Loss in 48 Hrs
Method B
Condition Hand tamped
100°C Heat Test:
Confined ND
% Loss, 1st 48 Hrs 1.8
Density, gm/cc 1.52
% Loss, 2nd 48 Hrs 1.4
Brisance, % TNT 111
Explosion in 100 Hrs None
Detonation Rate: (d)
Flammability Index: 178 Confinement None
Condition Hand tamped
Hygroscopicity: % 30°C, 95/» RH 0.55 Charge Diameter, in. 1.0
Density, gm/cc 1-57
Volatility: 25°C, 5 days 0.00
Rate, meters/second 7660
55
AMCP 706-177 Composition C-2
Energy
Underground:
See references for Composition C-4.
Peak Pressure
Impulse
Energy
56
AMCP 706-177
Composition C-3
D
Impact Sensitivity, 2 Kg Wt: Boiling Point: C
Bureau of Mines Apparatus, cm 100+
Sample Wt 20 mg Refractive Index, n°0
Picatinny Arsenal Apparatus, in. lit _D
Sample Wt, mg 33
57
AMCP 706-177 Composition C-3
Plasticity:
Air, Confined:
Impulse Below 0°C Hard (-29°C)
0-4o°C Plastic
Under Water: Above 40°C Exudes (77°c)
Peak Pressure
Booster Sensitivity Test: (h)
Impulse
Energy Condition Pressed
Tetryl, gm 100
Underground: Wax, in. for 50$ Detonation 1.36
Peak Pressure Density, gm/cc 1.62
Impulse
References:
Energy
See references for Composition c-4.
58
Composition 04 AMCP 706-177
59
AMCP 706-177 Composition C-4
60
AMCP 706-177
Compositions C, C-2, C-3, C-4
Preparation:
In manufacturing Composition C-3J the mixed plasticizing agent is heated in a melting kettle
at 100°C. Water-wet RDX is added and heating and stirring are continued until all the water is
evaporated. This mixture is then cooled and hand pressed Into demolition blocks or special item
ammunition.
Composition C-4 is prepared by hand kneading and rolling, or in a Schrader Bowl mixer, RDX
of ^4 micron size or less with the polyisobutylene-plasticizer previously made up in ether. *ne
thoroughly blended explosive is dried in air at 6o°C and loosely packed by hand tamping to its
maximum density.
Origin:
Developed by the British during World War II as a plastic explosive which could be hand
shaped. It was standardized in the United States during World Wir II and subsequent development
led. to mixtures designated C-2, C-3 and C-4.
References:
(a) Committee of Div 2 and 8, NDRC, Report on HBX and Tritonal. OSRD No. 5406, 31 July I9I+5.
(b) Philip C Keenan and Dorothy Pipes, Table of Military High Explosives. Second Revision,
NAVORD Report No. 87-46, 26 July 1946.
(c) D. P. MacDougall, Methods of Physical Testing OSRD Report No. 803, 11 August 1942.
L. C. Smith and E. G. Eyster, Physical Testing of Explosives. Part III - Miscellaneous
Sensitivity Tests; Performance Tests, OSRD Repcrt No. 5746, 27 December I945.
(d) G- H. Messerly, Ihe Rate of Detonation of Various Explosive Compounds, OSRD Report No.
1219, 22 February 1943-
M. D. Hurwitz, The Rate of Detonation of Various Compounds and Mixtures, OSRD Report No.
56H, 15 January 1946.
(e) W. R. Tomlinson, Jr., Blast Effects of Bcmb Explosives, PA Tech Div Lecture, 9 April
1948.
(f) Eastern Laboratory, du Pont, Investigation of Cavity Effect, See III, Variation of Cavi-
ty Effect with Explosive Composition, NDRC Contract W&72-ÖRD-5723-
(g) Eastern Laboratory, du Pont, Investigation of Cavity Effect, Final Report, 18 September
1943, NDRC Contract W-672-0RD-5723-
61
AMCP 706-177
Compositions C, 0-2, C-3, C-4
(i) W. F. McGarry and T. W. Stevens, Detonation Rates of the More Important Military Explo-
sives at Several Temperatures, PAIR No. 2383? November 1956.
(j ) Also see the following Picatinny Arsenal Technical Reports on RDX Composition C:
013^56789
62
Copper Chlorotetrazole AMCP 706-177
Detonation Rate:
Flammability Index: Confinement
Condition
Hygroscopicity: % 30°C, 90%EH 3-11
Charge Diameter, in.
Density, gm/cc
Volatility:
Rate, meters/second
63
AMCP 706-177 Copper Chlorotetrazole
64
Copper Chlorotetrazole AMCP 706-177
■Preparation: (a)
HOHO
y>- NH„
HC1 I
N—N
N-
>" N = N+-C1- +2H„0
N N N—N
\
CC1 Cu++ C — Cl + N
H N
K N
Cu
N—N
CC1
I
N N
Origin:
The copper salt of 5-ehlorotetrazole was first described in 1929 by R. Stolle (with
E. Schick, F. Henke-Stark and L. Krauss) who prepared the compound by reaction of the diazo-
nium chloride of 5-aniinotetrazole with copper chloride (Ber 62A, 1123).
12
References:
L2
See footnote 1, page 10.
65
AMCP 706-177 Cyanuric Triazide
66
AMCP 706-177
Cyanuric Triazide
Air, Confined:
Impulse
Under Water:
Peak Pressure
Impulse
Energy
Underground:
Peak Pressure
Impulse
Energy
67
AMCP 706-177 Cyanuric Triazide
Preparation:
H
K
/\
Cl-C// \c-ci 3 3
1 11 + 3NaN — ^ 1 I + 3KaCl
N H N N
V V1
Cl N,
Recrystallization should be avoided as it leads to very large crystals which explode when
broken.
Origin:
Cyanuric Triazide was prepared in 1847 by Cahours from chlorine and methyl cyanate.
Later James improved the process (JCS ^1, 268 (1887) and in 1921 E. Ott patented the prepara-
tion from cyanuric chloride and sodium azide (Ref b) Taylor and Rinkenbach prepared cyanuric
triazide in a pure state and determined its properties (Ref c).
Initiating Efficiency:
Solubility:
Insoluble in water; readily soluble in hot ethanol, acetone, benzene, and ether.
Heat of:
References: 13
(a) A. H. Blatt, Compilation of Data on Organic Explosives, OSRD Report No. 2014,
29 February igkk.
68
Cyclonite* (RDX) AMCP 706-177
Oxygen Balance:
l6.3 0QN—N N — -22
CO, %
2.7 Hot 1 1
CHo
CO % 0.0
2 2
\/ Density: gm/cc Crystal 1.82
N 37-8 N
Melting Point: °C 204
0 43.2 W02
*Name given by Clarence J. Bain of Picatinny Arsenal. Germans call it Hexogen: Italians call
it Th; British, RDX.
69
AMCP 706-177 Cyclonite (RDX)
70
AMCP 706-177
Cyelonite (RDX)
71
AMCP 706-177 Cyclonlte (RDX)
0.015
30 0.005 0 0.040
50 0.025 20 0.105 20 7.3 40 0.09 20 0.02
70 0.076 40 0.240 40 11.5 60 0.20 kO 0.05
90 0.19 60 0.579 60 18. 80 0.41 60 0.13
100 0.28 78 1.195 80 0.30
100 0.65
Carbon
Ethvl acetate tetrachloride Methanol Ether THT
°C J_ °C J, °c i °C J_
0 0.02 20 "2TB ~2W Ü7I5 "2D" OT33 20 0.20
20 0.03 30 3-3 30 0.16 30 0.44 30 0.22
ko 0.065 ko U.l 1+0 0.19 ko 0.56 kO 0.24
60 0.22 50 5-6 50 0.25 50 0.74 50 0.26
80 0.5^
100 1.35
Tetra- Isopro-
c h1o roethane panol Isobutanol Chloroform Mesityloxide
°c i °C _i °C "Jo °c A
25 12.7 25 1.5 28 3.6 28 11.5 26 11
37 25 97 12.4 93 19 90 37 82 33
°C
"28"
95 14
72
AMCP 706-177
Cyclonite (RDX)
Solubility
Solvent
Boiling
Pointy Grade or
Solvent He Source* 28°C Heated Crystalline Form
73
AMCP 706-177 gyclonlte (RDX)
Preparation:
NO
2
/
CH2 CH2
(CE,),
1 b N.4 + I4HNO, + 2NH.NO. + 6(CH C0)„ 0 I 1
3 4 3 3 2 0oN-N N-N02
CH2
Ammonium nitrate and acetic anhydride are placed in a flask and, while the mixture is stirred
at 75°C, the following three liquids are introduced concurrently and proportionately: acetic an-
hydride, concentrated nitric acid, and a solution of hexamine in glacial acetic acid. The final
mixture is held for a short time at 75°C, diluted with water to 30% acetic acid, and simmered to
hydrolyze unstable reaction by-products, which are a mixture of various nitrated and acetylated
derivatives of hexamine fragments. After simmering, the slurry is cooled and the precipitated
cyclonite removed by filtration. The yield is 78% of the theoretical amount (2 moles) of cyclo-
nite melting at 199°C By dissolving the ammonium nitrate in the nitric acid, a continuous pro-
cess, based on 3 liquids, is possible.
The product is recrystallized from acetone, or cyclohexanone, to (a) remove acidity, (b)
control particle size and (c) to produce stable y^-HMX. The preparative procedure described
above, the Bachmann or Combination process, yields cyclonite containing 3-8%HMX.
Ori g in:
First prepared by Henning in 1899 (German Patent 104,280) and later by von Hertz (U. S.
Patent 1,402,693) in 1922 who recognized its value as an explosive. Not used on a large scale
in explosive ammunition until World Wr 11.
Cyclonite (RDX) is decomposed by adding it slowly to 25 times its weight of boiling 5/0 sodium
hydroxide. Boiling should be continued for one-half hour.
References:
(a) L- C. Smith and E. G. Eyster, Physical Testing of Explosives, Part III - Miscellaneous
Sensitivity Tests; Performance Tests, OSRD Report No. 57^6. 27 December 1945.
(b) Ph. Naoum, Z. ges Schiess Sprengstoffw, pp. 181, 229, 267 (27 June 1932).
(c) D. P. MacDougall, Methods of Physical Testing, OSRD Report No. 803, 11 August 1942.
(d) Philip C. Keenan and Dorothy Pipes, Table of Military High Explosives, Second Revision,
NAVORD Report No. 87-46, 26 July 1946.
1
^See footnote 1, page 10
74
„ , . , AMCP 706-177
Cyclonite (RDX)
(e) Annament Research Department (Woolwich), Solubility of RDX in Nitric Acid (ÄRD Expl Rpt
322/^3 September 19^3)-
B. T. Fedoroff et al, A Manual for Explosives Laboratories, Lefax Society Inc, Phila-
delphia, 1943-6.
(i) R. J. Finkelstein and G. Gamow, Theory of the Detonation Process, NAVORD Report No. 90-
46, 20 April 19^7.
(k) W. F. McGarry and T. W. Stevens, Detonation Rates of the More Important Military Explo-
sives at Several Different Temperatures, FAIK NO. ü'j/ö'i, November lyib.
(1) Also see the following Picatinny Arsenal Technical Reports on Cyclonite:
0123 4. 5678^
75
AMCP 706-177 Cyclotol, 75/25
Melting Point: °C
Detonation Rate:
Flammability Index: Confinement None None
Condition Cast Cast
Hygroscopicity: %
Charge Diameter, in. 1.0 1.0
Density, gm/cc 1.70 1.71
Volatility:
Rate, meters/second 8035 7936
76
AMCP 706-177
Cyclotol, 75/25
Thermal Conductivity:
T7, 2000-lb Semi-Armor-Piercing Bomb vs Concrete:
cal/sec/cm/°C
77
AMCP 706-177 Cyclotol, 75/25
Energy --
Preparation: See Composition B
Air, Confined: Origin: Developed by the British between World
Impulse Wars I and II and standardized in the United
States early in World War 11.
Under Water:
Black Modulus a t Room
Peak Pressure
Temperature (25°-30°c) :
Impulse
Dynes/cm2 x 10"^ 3-09
Energy Density, gm/cc 1.7^
Absolute Viscosity, poises:
Underground: Temp, 85^C 210**
Peak Pressure 90°C
Impulse
Efflux Viscosity, Saybolt Seconds:
Energy
Temp, 85°C 9-l4
78
Cyclotol, 70/30 AMCP 706-177
Melting Point: °C
Detonation Rate:
Flammability Index: Confinement None
Cast
Hygroscopicity: % Nil Charge Diameter, in. 1.0
79
AMCP 706-177 Cyclotol, 70/30
Energy
80
Cyclotol, 65/35 AMCP 706-177
Detonation Rate:
Flammability Index: Confinement None
Condition Cast
Hygroscopicity: % Nil
Charge Diameter, in. 1.0
Density, gm/cc 1.72
Volatility: Nil
Rate, meters/second 1915
81
AMCP 70G-177 Cyclotol, 65/35
Energy
Preparation: See Composition B
Air, Confined:
Impulse Origin: Developed by the British between
World Wars I and II and standardized in
the United States early in World War 11.
Underwater:
Peak Pressure
Eutectic Temperature. °C: 79
Impulse
Energy gn RDX/lOO gn TNT
79°C 4.16
95°C 5.85
Underground:
Peak Pressure Absolute Viscosity, -poises:*
Impulse
Energy Temp, 85°C 30.2
* 90°C 26.0
Heat of: •it
Composition using Spec Grade Ty-pe A,
Combustion, cal/gm 2755 Class A RDX.
Explosion, cal/gm 1205
* Gas Volume, cc/gm 8^5
Calculated from conroosition of mixture.
82
Cyclotol, Go/ho AMCP 706-177
Melting Point: °C
Irauzllest, % TNT:
75°C International Heat lest:
% Loss in 48 Hrs Plate Dent lest: O3)
Method B
Condition Cast
100°C Heat lest:
Confined N)
% Loss, 1st 48 Hrs
Density, gm/cc 1.72
% Loss, 2nd 48 Hrs
Brisance, % TNT 132
Explosion in 100 Hrs
Detonation Rate:
Flammability Index: Confinement None
Condition Cast
Hygroscopicity: % Nil Charge Diameter, in. 1.0
Density, gm/cc 1.72
Volatility: Nil
Rate, meters/second 7900
83
AMCP 706-177 Cyclotol, 6o/kO
90 mm HE, M71 Projectile, Lot WC-91: Glass Cones Steel Cones (e)
Density, gm/cc 1.65 Hole Volume 178 162
Charge Wt, lb 2.187 Hole Depth 125 lW>
84
Cyclotol, 75/25, 70/30, 65/35 AMCP 706-177
References:
(a) L- C. Smith and E. G. Eyster, Physical Testing of Explosives, Part III - Miscellaneous
Sensitivity Tests: Performance Tests. OSRD Report No. 5746, 27 December 1945.
(b) D. P. MacDougall, Methods of Physical Testing, OSRD Report No. 803, HAugust 1942.
(c) R. W. Drake, Fragment Velocity and Panel Penetration of Several Explosives in Simu-
lated Shells, OSRD Report No. 3622, 2 January 194b.
(d) V. Philipchuk, Free Air Blast Evaluation of RDX-TNT-A1, RDX-TNT, and TNT-Metal Systems,
National Northern Summary Report, NN-P-34, April 195t>>
(e) Eastern Laboratory, du Pont, Investigation of Cavity Effect. Section 111, Variation of
Cavity Effect with Composition, NDRC Contract W-b72-0KD-5723<
(f) W. S. Cramer, Bulk Compressibility Data on Several High Explosives, NAVORD Report No.
4380, 15 September 195&"^
(g) Also see the following Picatinny Arsenal Technical Reports on Cyclotols:
O123I+56 las
1290 1651 1482 1483 1824 1435 1476 1427 1398 1469
1530 1741 1793 1834 1585 1756 1507 1488 1509
1983 1944 1796 1747 1838 1709
2004 1876
(h) C. Lenchitz, W. Beach and E. Valicky, Enthalpy Changes, Heat of Fusion and Specific
Heat of Basic Explosives, PAIR No. 2504, January 1959. '
15
See footnote 1, page 10.
85
AMCP 706-177 Cvclotrimethylene Trinitrosamine
86
AMCP 70G-177
Cyclotrimethylene Trinitrosamine
87
AMCP 706-177 Cvclotrimethvlene Trinitrosamine
Sodium nitrite is dissolved in water and the solution or slurry is then poured into the
previously prepared amine-ammonia solution and totally dissolved by stirring. This solution
is chilled to below 0°C.
Into a mixed acid solution, previously prepared by dissolving concentrated nitric acid
in water and adding concentrated sulfuric acid, all chilled to -9 C, there is added the cold
amine-nitrite solution below the surface of the acid mixture. The addition is regulated to
take 20 to 30 minutes.
The resulting foamy head of cyclotrimethylene trinitrosamine is allowed to sit over the
icy spent liquor for 1/2 hour and is then collected on a sintered glass funnel and washed to
neutrality. The moist cyclotrimethylene trinitrosamine is removed from the funnel and air-
dried on filter paper. The dry crude product melts at 106° to 107°C. Recrystallization from
isoamyl alcohol gives a pure compound melting at 105° to 107°C.
Orinin:
Cyclotrimethylene trinitrosamine ws discovered in 1888 simultaneously by Griess and
Harrow (Ber 21 (1888), p. 2737) and by Mayer (Ber 21 (1888), p. 2883) when sodium nitrite
was allowed to react with hexamethylene tetramine in acid solution. This compound was later
studied by Duden and Scharff (Ann 288 (l895)> p. 218) and by Delepine who determined its heat
of formation, which was negative (Bull Soc chim (3) 1£ (1896), p. 1199). Because cyclotri-
methylene trinitrosamine could be made at first in very poor yield only, it was a long time
before it received consideration for practical application as an explosive. However, the
study of cyclotrimethylene trinitrosamine was continued and investigations were made as to
its behavior in mixtures with other substances (Prof. D. G. Romer "Report on Explosives,"
BIOSGP 2-HEC 57^2).
88
Cvclotrimethvlene Trinitrosamine AMCP 706-177
Temp.
Cyclotrimethylene Trinitrosamine loosely packed in covered wooden boxes for six years at
ambient temperature and protected from the sun:
£§£clotrimethylene Melting
irimtrosamine, 7b Point, C
10 74
20 68
30 62
40 55 t
42 55 (Eutectic) 1
50 61 1i
60 69
TO 77
95 95
89
AMCP 706-177 Cyclotrimethylene Trinitrosamine
Condition Pressed
5180 0.85
5760 1.00
6600 1.20
7330 1.40
7600 1.50
7800 1.57
References 16
(a) Arthur D. Little, Inc. Progress Report No. 106, Fundamental Development of High Explo-
«w, April 1955, Contract No. DAI-19-020-501-OKD(p)-33.
(b) Louis Medard and Maurice Dutour, "Etude Etes Proprietes De La Cyclotrimethylene
Trinitrosamine," Mem poudr, 37, \32h (1951*)-
(d) Also see the following Picatinny Arsenal Technical Reports on Cyclotrimethylene
Trinitrosamine: 1174, 2179.
90
DBX (Depth Bomb Explosive) AMCP70G-177
91
AMCP 706-177 DBX (Depth Bcmb Explosive)
1V4
IV2
1%
Burning Rate:
cm/sec
Bomb Drop Test:
Thermal Conductivity:
cal/sec/cm/"C 13.2 x io"1* T7, 2000-lb Semi-Armor-Piercing Bomb vs Concrete:
Density 1.75 gm/cc
Max Safe Drop, ft
Coefficient of Expansion:
5
Linear, %/°C -73°-T5°C 4.5 x IO" 500-lb General Purpose Bomb vs Concrete:
92
DBX (Depth Bcmb Explosive) AMCP 706-177
Energy 138
Preparation:
Air Confined:
Impulse
DBX can be manufactured by slowly adding
water-wet RDX to molten TNT melted in a steam-
Under Water: jacketed kettle equipped with a stirrer. Wien
Peak Pressure -- all the water has evaporated, ammonium nitrate
Impulse is added and with heating and stirring con-
tinued, grained aluminum is added. The mix-
Energy 136
ture is cooled with stirring continued to
maintain uniformity and when suitable for pour.
Underground: ing the mixture is cast. DBX can also be made
Peak Pressure by adding 21%ammonium nitrate and 18$ alumi-
Impulse num to h2"jo cyclotol or Composition B of 50/50
RDX/THT content plus 19$ of TUT previously
Energy
melted at about 10D C.
93
AMCP 706-177 DBX (Depth Bomb Explosive)
Origin:
DBX was developed and used by the United States and Great Britain during World Wr II.
References:
(a) L. C. Smith and E. G. Eyster, Physical Testing of Explosives, Part III - Miscellaneous
Sensitivity Tests; Performance Tests, OSRD Report No. 374b, 27 December 1945.
(b) D. P. MacDougall, Methods of Physical Testing, OSRD Report No. 803, 11 August 1942.
(c) G. H. Messerly, The Rate of Detonation of Various Explosive Compounds, OSRD Report No.
1219, 22 February 19^3-
M D- Hurwitz, The Rate of Detonation of Various Compounds and Mixtures, OSRD Report
No. 5611, 15 January W&.
(d) Philip C Keenan and Dorothy Pipes, Table of Military High Explosives, Second Revision,
NAVORD Report No. 87-46, 26 July 1946.
(f) Also see the following Picatinny Arsenal Technical Reports on DBX: 1585 and 1635.
17
See footnote 1, page 10.
94
l,3-Diamino-g,4,6-Trinitrobenzene (BA.MB) AMCP70S-177
Detonation Rate:
Flonmability Index: Confinement None
Condition Pressed
Hygroscopicity: %
Charge Diameter, in. 0.5
Density, gm/cc 1.65
Volatility:
Rate, meters/second 7500
95
AMCP 706-177 l,3-Diamino-2,tt-,6-Trinitrobenzene (rATOB)
Energy
Underground:
Peak Pressure
Impulse
Energy
96
AMCP 706-177
l,3-Diamino-2,4,6-Trinitrobenzene (pATTO)
Preparation:
Fifty grams (50 gm) of dry styphnic acid was added to 200 gn of anhydrous pyridine with
stirring. The resulting slurry was stirred for an additional 30 minutes. The yellow product,
dipyridinium styphnate, was collected by filtration and washed with approximately lOOmilli-
liters of diethyl ether. The product was dried over phosphorus (V) oxide, at room tempera-
ture, for 5 hours. Yield of 77 gn (94%), melting point l68° to 170°C (literature melting
point 173 C).
Origin:
Meisenheimer and Patzig in 1906 prepared IAMB in the form of yellow needles, MP 280 C
from 1,3,5-trinitrobenzene hydroxylamine and sodium methylate in methyl alcohol (Ber 39, 2540).
The product was slightly soluble in glacial acetic acid but poorly soluble in other solvents.
It decomposed into HHo and 2,4,6-trinitroresorcin when boiled with dilute NaCH or K0H (Beil 13,
60).
C. F. Van Duin obtained DA.TNB melting at 301°C by reacting a concentrated aqueous ammonia
solution with H-nitro-N,H,N-trimethyl-2,4,6-trinitrophenylenediamine-(l, 3) or with N-nitro-
N-methyl-K-phenyl-2,4,6-trinitrophenylenediamine-(l,3) (Rec trav chim 38, 89-100 (1919)) ■
Later Van Duin and Van Lennep reacted concentrated aqueous ammonia with 2,4,6-trinitro-3-
aminoanisole or 2,4,6-trlnitro-3-aminophenetol to obtain DATNB melting at 287° to 288°C (Rec
trav chim 39, 147-77 (1920)). In 1927 Lorang prepared the same compound by boiling 2,4,6-
trinitro-l,3-bis ( -nitroethyl ureido) benzene with water or by heating it with ammoniacal
alcohol in a tube at 100°C (Rec trav chim 46, 649) (Beil E 17, E II 33).
97
AMCP 706-177 1,3-mamino-g^,6-Trlnitrobenzene (uklSB)
A recent report describes the preparation of DA.TNB in two steps from commercially avail-
able starting materials. First m-nitroaniline was nitrated with HgSO^-HNOo acid mixture to
tetranitroaniline. The crude tetranitroaniline was converted by mefhanölic ammonia to
diaminotrinitro-benzene in a high degree of purity. A conversion of 100 parts of m-nitroani-
line into 110 parts of IATNB was obtained by this method, which can easily be carried out on
a commercial scale.
98
Diazodinitrophenol AMCP70G-177
% § 8
C
H
34.3
0.9
N
[Y°or*
JL Oxygen Balance:
00, %
CO %
-61
-15
0
0 38.1 Melting Point: °C 157
Detonation Rate:
Flammability Index: Confinement
Condition Pressed
Hygroscopicity: % 30°C, 90% RH O.Oit
Charge Diameter, in.
Density, gm/cc 0.9 1.5 1.6
Volatility: 50°C, 30 months Unaffected
Rate, meters/second ^00 6600 69OO
*Until it is established which p icramic acid (melting point l69°C) isomer is involved (Ref: J
Chem Soc, 2082, August 19^9) •
99
AMCP 706-177 Diazodinitrophenol
Air, Confined:
Solubility:
Impulse
Soluble in nitroglycerin, nitrobenzene,
aniline, pyridine, concentrated hydrochloric
Underwater: acid, and in most common organic solvents.
Peak Pressure
Impulse Heat of:
Energy
Combustion, cal/gm 3243
Explosion, cal/gm 820
Underground: 865
Gas Volume, cc/gm
Peak Pressure
Impulse Sensitivity to Electrostatic
Energy
Discharge, Joules: (b) 0.012
100
™ ...
Diazodim AMCP 706-177
Solubility at 50°C
Solvent i
Ethyl acetate 2.45
Methanol 1.25
Ethanol 2.43
Ethylenedichloride 0.79
Carbon tetrachloride trace
Chloroform 0.11
Benzene 0.23
Toluene 0.15
Petroleum ether Insoluble (ait 20°C)
Ethyl ether 0.08 (30°C)
Carbon disulfide trace (30°C)
ON _, H2N N N N
Ten gn of picramic acid is suspended in 120 cc of 55^ hydrochloric acid, and under efficient
agitation at about 0°C. 3.6 gn sodium nitrite in 10 cc water is dumped into the suspension.
Stirring is continued for 20 minutes, the product filtered off and washed thoroughly with ice
water. The dark brown product, if dissolved in acetone and precipitated in water, turns bril-
liant yellow.
Origin:
Discovered by Griess in 1858 (Annalen 106, 123: 113, 205 (1860) and studied extensively by
L. V. Clark (Ind Eng Chem 25, 663 (1933). Developed for commercial use in 1928. This com-
pound was patented in the United States by Professor William M. Dane.
Diazodinitrophenol is decomposed by adding the water-wet material to 100 times its weight
of 10$ sodium hydroxide. Nitrogen gas is evolved.
References: ^
(a) Philip C. Keenan and Dorothy Pipes, Table of Military High Explosives, Second Revision,
MAV0RD Report No. 87-46, 26 July 1946.
18
See footnote 1, page 10.
101
AMCP70G-177 _. .. .
t .
Diazodmitrophenol
,
(c) I» V. Clark, "Diazodinitrophenol, A Detonating Explosive," Ind Eng Chem 25, 663
(1933
Seidell, Solubilities of Inorganic and Organic Compounds, Van Hostrand and Co., N. Y.
(d) Also see the following Picatinny Arsenal Technical Reports on Diazodinitrophenol:
Ü 2 k 5. 1 a .2
150 1352 34 355 827 318 2179
610 214 1838
2120
102
Diethylene Glycol Dinitrate (DEGNJ Liquid AMCP70G-177
10:?
AMCP 706-177 Diethylene Glycol Dinitrate (PEGN) Liauid
Heat of:
Armor Plate Impact lest:
Combustion, cal/gm 2792
Explosion, cal/gm 8^1
60 mm Mortar Projectile:
Gas Volume, cc/gm 796 50% Inert, Velocity, ft/sec
Formation, cal/gm 2020 Aluminum Fineness
Fusion, cal/gm
500-lb General Purpose Bombs:
Specific Heat: cal/gm/°C
Plate Thickness, inches
1
IVi
1l/o
1%
Burning Rate:
cm/sec
Bomb Drop Test:
Thermal Conductivity:
cal/sec/cm/°C T7, 2000-lb Semi-Armor-Piercing Bomb YS Concrete:
Volume, %/°C
Height, ft
Trials
Hardness, Mohs' Scale:
Unaffected
Low Order
Young's Modulus:
High Order
E', dynes/cm2
E, lb/inch2
1000-lb General Purpose Bomb vs Concrete:
Density, gm/cc
Height, ft
Compressive Strength: lb/inch* Trials
Unaffected
Vapor Pressure: Low Order
"C mm Mercury High Order
20 0.0036
60 0.130
104
Diethylene Glycol Dinitrate (DEGN) Liquid AMCP 706-177
105
AMCP 70G-177 Piethylene Glycol Dinitrate (PEGN) Liquid
Origin:
First prepared and studied by Wm H. Rinkenbach in 1927 (Ind Eng Chem 19, 925 (1927) and
later by Rinkenbach and H. A. Aaronson (Ind Eng Chem 23, 160 (1931)) both of Picatinny Arsenal.
Used in propellant compositions by the Germans during World War 11.
structl by Chemical Decomposition:
References: ^
012 346Z.9
50 231 72 673 494 346 487 279
180 551 602 1^3 1624 1516 1^27 579
620 1391 1282 1616 1487 1^39
11+90 1421 1392 1786 1817
1990
9
See footnote 1, page 10.
106
AMCP 706-177
Bis(2,2-Dinltropropyl) Fumarate (DNPF)
Detonation Rate:
Flammability Index: Confinement
Condition
Hygroscopicity: % Charge Diameter, in.
Density, gm/cc 1.49
Volatility:
Rate, meters/second 6050
107
AMCP 706-177 Bis(2,2-Dinitropropyl) Fumarate PNPF)
108
Bis(2,2-Dinitropropyl) Fumarate (DNPF) AMCP 706-177
Preparation: (a> ^)
HC-C0C1 HC-C02CH2C(W02)2CH3
I, + 2CH,C(N0o)
D
5CHo0H A1C1, ||
HÜ-COCl * * =H> HC-C02CH2C(W02)2CE
Dinitropropanol was mixed with chloroform (1320 milliliters) and the mixture heated to
boiling. The distillate was collected in a water separator. At first the distillate was
cloudy and this was dried with calcium chloride before being returned to the system. When
no more water was collected in the water separator, the mixture 'was cooled to room tempera-
ture and the separator removed. Fumaryl chloride was introduced, followed by the aluminum
chloride which was added in four equal portions. Air was blown into the flask for a minute
to effect mixing, and the reaction sustained itself without the addition of heat for one hour.
Steam was gradually introduced so that the reflux temperature was reached 2-1/2 hours after
the beginning of the reaction. After 3 hours of reflux, the hot liquid was poured into a
bucket. As cooling took place the slurry was vigorously agitated until it finally set up at
room temperature. This material was broken up and mixed with dilute ice cold HC1. The solid
product was collected on a sintered funnel, washed with water and with hexane. The crude
material was recrystallized from methanol to give a product melting at 86°C (uncorrected),
but after storage for several days the melting point was 89 C.
References 20
(b) D. L. Kouba and H. D. McNeil, Jr., Hercules Report on High Explosives, Navy Contract
WOrd-11280, Task A, 26 May 195^.
109
AMCP 70G-177 Bis(2,2-Dlnltropropyl) Succinate (DNPS)
110
Bis(2,2-Dinitropropyl) Succinate (DNPS) AMCP 706-177
Underground:
Peak Pressure
Impulse
Energy
Ill
AMCP 706-177 Bls(2,2-Dlnltropropyl) Succinate (DNPS)
Preparation: (a)
,COOCH2C(NO2)2CH3
2CH3C(H02)2ai2oH + |H2C0C1
!H2C0C1
A1C1- F
CHpG00CHpC(W0p)„CH,
+ 2HC1
succinyl aluminum
dinitropropanol chloride chloride bis(2,2-dinitropropyl) succinate
References:
(a) M. E. Hill, Synthesis of New High Explosives, NAVORD Report No. 2965, !Aprill953.
21
See footnote 1, page 10.
112
2)2-Dinitropropyl-^,iJ,1+-Trini"tro"butyrate (DNPTB) AMCP 706-177
Detonation Rate:
Flammability Index: Confinement
Condition
Hygroscopicity: %
Charge Diameter, in.
Density, gm/cc 1.67
Volatility:
Rate, meters/second 7600
ll.'i
AMCP 70S-177 2,2-Dlnitropropyl-4,h,4-Trinitrobutyrate (PHPTB)
Energy
Underwater:
Peak Pressure 11 / 1 1U. u ^^ . u
Impulse Heat of Solution, 30°C:
Energy AH Solution, cal/gm
Mteria 1
Underground:
Peak Pressure Form III 29.5 8.1
Impulse
Form I 35.6 12.8
Form II 19-1 -9.1
Energy
Origin:
114
2,2-ranitropropyl-^A-Trinitrobutyrate (DNPTB) AMCP 706-177
Preparation: (a, b)
trinitrobutyryl aluminum
dinitropropanol chloride chloride
CH C(WO2)2CH2COOCH2C(NO2)3 + HC1
dinitropropyl trinitrobutyrate
Dinitropropanol, trinitrobutyryl chloride and aluminum chloride were slowly mixed in car-
bon tetrachloride at 6o°C. This mixture ws refluxed at 75°C for two hours. After the reac-
tion was completed, the mixture was cooled and the crystalline product separated and purified.
Water in the dinitropropanol was removed by azeotropic distillation before the acid chloride
was added. The purified product had a melting point of 95 to 96°C.
Three distinct crystallographic modifications of DWPTB have been observed. These poly-
morphs have been characterized by means of X-ray diffraction and microscopic observation.
Form I crystallizes from solution in carbon tetrachloride, chloroform, acetone, chloroform-
hexane, acetone-water, or methanol-water at room temperature. Prolonged standing of Form I
at room temperature under the mother liquor promotes a transition to Form 11. Upon solidi-
fication of molten DNPTB, Form II is always observed.
Both Forms I and III gave very erratic sensitivity values. The high temperature polymorph.
Form II of DNPTB, gave consistent sensitivity values.
22
References:
(b) W. B. Hewson, Hercules Report on High Explosives, Navy Contract WOrd-1128o, Task A,
18 October 195^-
(c) J. R. Holden and J. Wenograd, Physical Properties of an Experimental Castable Explo-
sive 2,2-Dinitropropyl 2,h.U-Trinitroljutyrate DNPTB. NAVORD Report No. 4427, 11 December 1956.
22,
See footnote 1, page 10.
115
AMCP 706-177 2,k-Dinitrotoluene (DNT)
Detonation Rate:
Flammability Index: Confinement
Condition
Hygroscopicity: % 25°C, 100$ RH 0.00 Charge Diameter, in.
Density, gm/cc
Volatility:
Rote, meters/second
116
2,it-Dinitrotoluene (DNT) AMCP 706-177
Energy
65.5°C KITest:
Air, Confined:
Impulse
Minutes 60+
Underground: cal/sec/cm/°C L
Peak Pressure Density 1-322 gm/cc 6.28 x 10"
Impulse
Energy
117
AMCP 706-177 2,4-Knitrotoluene (DNT)
Preparation:
See TNT.
30%
Ethyl Alcohol Nitroglycerin Water
£u ^ 2Z i
25 0.16 20 30 22 0.027
35 0.29 50 0.037
45 0.49 100 0.254
55 0.77
60 1.03
Orig in:
Occurs as 75% of the products obtained on the nitration of toluene, the remaining 25$ being
mainly 2,6-DNT and other isomers of DNT. Also occurs as an impurity in crude TNT obtained by
standard manufacturing process. Used in explosive mixtures at least since 1931-
References:
(a) L. C. Smith and E G. Eyster, Physical Testing of Explosives, Part III - Miscellaneous
Sensitivity Tests; Performance Tests, OSRD Report No. b/4b, 27 December 194-5•
(b) A. H. Blatt, Compilation of Data on Organic Explosives. OSRD Report No. 2014, 29 Febru-
ary 1944.
(d) Also see the following Picatinny Arsenal Technical Reports on DNT:
4 .5 £ 2 8 9
810 1351 72 43 394 1615 186 97 768 69
1830 1501 372 233 804 2125 1556 817 938 149
1651 922 343 1044 1816 837 1538 249
1781 1142 673 1084 1896 279
1821 1672 1023 1094 779
2031 1692 1663 1164 1749
2221 1743 1324
2013 1464
1524
1674
1754
2094
2
3see footnote 1, page 10.
118
Dipentaerythritol Hexanitrate (PPEHN) AMCP 706-177
119
AMCP 706-177 Dipentaerythritol Hexanitrate (DPEfflQ
2(H0-CHp)llC Dehydration
Underwater:
Peak Pressure (HO CH, 1 .IC 0 C(CH -OH^ ' t.
Impulse (OpNO-CHp)3C-0-C(CH2-0W02)3
Energy
Dipentaerythritol Hexanitrate is procured
in the pure state (melting point 72°C) by
Underground: fractional crystallization of crude PEIN
Peak Pressure from moist acetone.
Impulse Origin: Formed as an impurity in the prepa-
Energy ration of PETN. Properties first describee
by W. Frederick and W. Brun in 1930
(Berichte 63, 2861 (1930): Z. ges Schiess-
Sprengstoffw 27, 73-6, 125-7, 156-8 (1932))
Heat of:
Combustion, cal/gm 2260
120
Dipentaerythritol Hexanitrate (DPMN) AMCP 706-177
2
References:
(a) L. C Smith and E. G. Eyster, Physical Testing of F.xplosives P^rr TTT - Miscellaneous
Sensitivity Tests: Performance Tests. OSRD Report No. 57^6» 27 December 191+5.
(c) T. L. ISvis, The Chemistry nf Powder and F.xplosives John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New
York (19^3) pp. 218-283,
(d) S. Livingston, Characteristics of Explosives HMX and DPMN. PAIR No. 1561. 6 September
\9k 5.
2
See footnote 1, page 10.
121
AMCP 70S-177 Dynamite, Low Velocity, Picatinny Arsenal (LVD)
Detonation Rate:
Flammability Index:
Confinement None
Condition Hand tamped
H""CocCopicity: % 0.31
71 C, 95%RH, 30 davs Satisfactory Charge Diameter, in. 1.25
Density, gm/cc 0-9
Volatility:
Rote, meters/second 4397; or IMOO ft/sec
122
AMCP 706-177
Dynamite. Low Velocity, Picatinny Arsenal (LVD)
Energy
Sensitivity to Initiation:
Air, Confined: Stick dry, No. 6 Electric cap Positive
Impulse Stick dry, Corps of Engineers Positive
Stick wet, Corps of Engineers Positive
12H
AMCP 706-177 Dynamite, Low Velocity, Picatinny Arsenal (LVD)
Preparation:
To date this dynamite has been prepared on a laboratory scale, the details of which are
classified, It has been shown, however, to be machine loadable on a Hall packing machine,
Origin:
Nobel invented the original dynamite in 1866 and gave the name dynamite to mixtures of
nitroglycerin and kieselguhr. The strength of a dynamite was indicated by the percentage
of NG in the mixture. Later oxidants and combustibles were substituted for the kieselguhr,
and ammonium nitrate and/or nitrostarch replaced the NG, bringing into existence new types
of dynamites. World War II military operations required special demolition and cratering
explosives free from the objectionable characteristics of NG and many "dynamite substitutes"
were «äevelopeä for specific applications. The subject low velocity dynamite was developed in
1956 by Picatinny Arsenal (Ref a).
2
References: 5
(b) Also see the following Picatinny Arsenal Technical Reports on Dynamites:
25
See footnote 1, page 10.
124
AMCP 706-177
Dynamite. Medium Velocity. Hercules (MVP)
Unaffected 90
Sand, gm 52.6
1 Mercury Fulminate
5 Lead Azide 0.20
10 Tetryl 0.10
15
Ballistic Mortar, % TNT: 122
20
Trauzl Test, % TNT:
75°C International Heat Test: Plate Dent Test:
% Loss in 48 Hrs
Method
Condition
100°C Heat Test:
Confined
% Loss, 1st 48 Hrs 0.62
Density, gm/cc
% Loss, 2nd 48 Hrs 0.12
Brisance, % TNT
Explosion in 100 Hrs None
Detonation Rate:
Flammability Index: Confinement None
Condition Machine tamped
Hygroscopicity: % Charge Diameter, in. 1.50
71°C, 95$ RH, 30 days Satisfactory
Density, gm/cc 1 .1
Volatility: Rate, meters/second 6000-6600; or 20,000 ft/sec
125
AMCP 706-177 Dynamite, Medium Velocity, Hercules (MVP)
Density, gm/cc
Charge Wt, lb
126
Dynamite, Medium Velocity, Hercules (MVP) AMCP 70S-177
Prenaration:
Manufactured on standard dynamite line and packaged on a Hall packing machine. Details of
handling materials and techniques of manufacture are classified.
Orinin:
Military forces frequently require excavation, demolition, and cratering operations for
which standard high explosives are unsuitable. Commercial blasting explosives, except black
powder, are called dynamites although they may contain no nitroglycerin. The subject dynamite
substitute was developed in 1952 by the Hercules Powder Company (Ref a).
References: 26
(a) ¥. R. Baldwin, Jr., Blasting Explosives (Dynamite Substitute), Hercules Powder Company
Formal Progress Report, RI 2086, 15 August 1952, Army Contract DA.-36-03^-ORD-110.
2
°See footnote 1, page 10.
1.27
AMCP 706-177 EC Blank Fire
128
EC Blank Fire AMCP 706-177
129
AMCP 706-177 Edna toi, 55/45
Detonation Rote:
Flammability Index: Will not continue to burn Confinement None
Condition Cast
Hygroscopicity: % None Charge Diameter, in. 1.0
Density, gm/cc I.63
Volatility:
Rate, meters/second 73^0
130
Ednatol, 55/45 AMCP 706-177
131
AMCP 706-177 Ednatol, 55/45
Preparation:
Wet Haleite is added slowly to molton TNT heated at about 100°C in a steam jacketed melting
kettle equipped with a stirrer. Heating and stirring are continued until all moisture is
evaporated. Loading is done by pouring the mixture cooled to 85°C.
Origin:
Mixtures of Haleite (EDNA) and THT, designated Ednatol, were developed at Picatinny Arsenal
just prior to World War II.
28
References:
(a) L- C. Smith and E. G. Eyster, Physical Testing of Explosives, Part III - Miscellaneous
Sensitivity Tests: Performance Tests, OSRD Report No. 5746, 27 December 194"5~.
(b) Philip C Keenan and Dorothy C. Pipes, Table of Military High Explosives, Second Revi-
sion, NAVORD Report No. 87-46, 26 July 1946.
(c) D. P. MacDougall, Methods of Physical Testing. OSRD Report No. 803, 11 August 1942.
rf) Eastern Laboratory, du Pont, Investigation of Cavity Effect, Sec III, Variation of
Cavity Effect with Composition, NDRC Contract W-672-ORD-5723.
(g) Eastern Laboratory, du Pont, Investigation of Cavity Effect, Final Report, 18 Septem-
ber I943, NDRC Contract W-672-ORD-5723.
(h) Also see the following Picatinny Arsenal Technical Reports on Ednatol:
0123456789
1290 1291 1162 1193 1294 1325 1796 1457 1198 1279
l4oo 1451 1372 1363 1434 1395 1477 1388 1469
1420 1651 1482 1493 1885 1737 1838
1530 1797
132
Ethylene Glycol Di-Trinitrobutyrate (aura) AMCP 706-177
%
Oxygen Balance:
C 25.6
CO, % -34
H 2.6 CO % o
CH2CO2CH2CH2C(NO,)
Density: gm/cc Crystal I.63
N 17.1 |
CH„COpCH„CHoC(HO,)
d d d 6 Melting Point: °C 96
0 54.7
Detonation Rate:
Flommability Index: Confinement
Condition
Hygreseqpictty:; % Charge Diameter, in.
Density, gm/cc 1. 63
Volatility:
Rate, meters/second 73^0
133
AMCP 706-177 Ethylene Glycol Di-Trinitrobutyrate (GTNB)
Preparation- (a)
Air, Confined:
Impulse By the addition of nitroform to ethylene
glycol diacrylate. As the method of prepa-
Under Water: ration often leads to products difficult to
Peak Pressure purify, a preparation from ethylene glycol
and pure trinitrobutyric acid is in process.
Impulse
Energy Origin:
134
AMCP 706-177
Ethylene Glycol Di-Trinitrobutyrate (GTOB)
References:2?
(a) U. S. Rubber Company Progress Report No. 1^, Navy Contract NOrd-10129, 1 February 1951
to IMay 1951.
(b) U. S. Naval Ordnance Laboratory, Silver Spring, Maryland, Letter from Dr. 0. H. John-
son to Commanding Officer, Picatinny Arsenal, 8 April 1955 (ORDBB kjl.Q6/hk-3, Registry No.
39815); and NOL Letter from Dr. D. V. Sickman to Commanding Officer, Picatinny Arsenal,
29 November 1955 (ORDBB Vfl.86/159-1; Serial No. 02894)-
135
AMCP 706-177 Explosive D (Ammonium Pier ate)
136
Explosive D (Ammonium Picrate) AMCP 706-177
Sensitivity to Electrostatic
Air, Confined:
Impulse Discharge. Joules: W
Through 100 Mesh:
Underwater: Confined 6.0
Peak Pressure Unconfined 0.025
Impulse
Booster Sensitivity Test: (c)
Energy
Condition Pressed
Tetryl, gn 100
Underground: Wax, in. for 50$ Detonation 1.27
Peak Pressure Density, gm/cc 1.54
Impulse Heat of:
Energy
Combustion, cal/gm 2890
Explosion, cal/gm 800
Formation, cal/gm 395
137
AMCP 706-177 Explosive D (Ammonium Picrate)
Preparation:
Explosive D is manufactured by suspending picric acid in hot water and neutralizing it with
gaseous or liquid ammonia. As the picrate is formed, it goes into solution; on cooling, it
precipitates. An excess of ammonia leads to formation of the red form of ammonium picrate.
This should be avoided. The separated crystals are washed with cold water and dried.
Mercury
Storage Palnmaätt Tetryl CfusEe'
Ug (gm)
Years (gm) (gm)
0 0.06 23
3-5 50 0.25 23
2 * Normal 0.03 23
k * Normal 0.04 23
2 ** 50 0.24 23
After 3.5 years at 50°C.
** After 3.5 years at 50°C and 2 years at magazine temperature.
Water Ahjohol
!£ i °C
2 £c i
20 1.1 0 0.515 0 0.290
lOO 75 10 0.690 10 0.300
30 1.050 30 0.380
50 1.890 50 0.450
80 3.620 80 0.560
Origin:
First prepared by Marchand in 1841 and used by Brugere in admixture with potassium nitrate
as a propellant in 1869. Used as a high explosive after 1900.
References: 3°
(a) L. C. Smith and E. G. Eyster, Physical Testing of Explosives, Part III - Miscellaneous
Sensitivity Tests; Performance Tests, OSRD Report No. 5JX6, 27 December 1945.
138
T, . ■
Explosive r. /»
p ■
[Ammomui^ «■ * \
Picrate) AMCP 706-177
(b) D- P. MacDougall, Methods of Physical Testing. OSRD Report No. 803, 11 August 1942.
OI23IJ.5 §789
139
AMCP 706-177 Glycerol Monolactate Trinitrate (GLTN) Liquid
Detonation Rote:
Flammability Index: Confinement
Condition
Hygroscopicity: %
Charge Diameter, in.
2
Density, gm/cc
Volatility: 60°C, mg/cm /hr 28
Rate, meters/second
140
Glycerol Monolactate Trinitrate (GLTN) Liquid AMCP 706-177
Energy
Hydrolysis, $ Acid:
Air, Confined:
Impulse 10 days at 22°C 0.021
5 days at 6o°C 0.014
Underwater: Solubility in Water,
Peak Pressure gm/lOO qm, at:
Impulse 25°C <0.01
Energy 60°C < 0.015
Impulse 2: 1 Ether:Alcohol m
Energy Acetone OO
Heat of:
Combustion, cal/gm 2^07
141
AMCP 706-177 Gtycerql lylonqlactate Trinitrate (GLTN) Liquid
Preparation:
Glycerol monolactate (GML) is prepared by heating a glycerol lactic acid mixture containing
^ excess lactic acid at ll(rC for 112 hours with dry air bubbling through the liquid. The
product which contains 0.67$ free acid is carefully mixed with 6 parts of ko/60 HNOa/HoSQb.
maintained at 20°C, stirred for 1 hour, cooled to 5°C, and poured on ice. It is extracted
with ether, water-washed, adjusted to pH 7 by shaking with a sodium bicarbonate solution, and
again water-washed three times. It is then dried with calcium chloride, filtered and freed
of ether by bubbling with air until minimal loss in weight is obtained. The product has a
nitrate-nitrogen content of 13-^3$ (theoretical \k.Vfc H). Another batch, prepared from GML
obtained from glycerol-lactic acid cohtaining 6.5$ excess glycerol, had a nitrate-nitrogen
content of 1^.30$, dorresponding to a mixture containing 5»5$ nitroglycerin. It is not con-
sidered practicable to prepare the pure GLOT.
Origin:
The preparation of a nitrated ester of lactic acid and glycerol, by nitrating a glyceryl
lactate with nitric and sulfuric acids, for use in explosives, was reported in 1931 by Charles
Stine and Charles Burke (U. S. Patent 1,792,515).
Reference:
31
See footnote L, page L0.
142
Glycol Dinitrate (GDH) Liquid AMCP 706-177
d
C/H Ratio 0.092 freezing point: "C
Detonation Rota:
Flammability Index: Confinement Glass tube
Condition Liquid
Hygroscopicity: % 30°C, 90% RH 0.00
Charge Diameter, in. 10
Density, gm/cc 1.485
Volatility:
Rate, meters/second 7300 and 2050
143
AMCP 706-177 Glycol Dinitrate (GDN) Liquid
Energy
Impulse 0 0.0044
20 0.038
Energy
40 0.26
60 1.3
80 5-9
100 22.0
Heat of:
Combustion, cal/gm 1764
Formation, cal/gm ("b) 366
144
Glycol Dinitrate (GW) Liauid AMCP 706-177
Preparation:
HOC1 HO
CH = CH > HOCH CH Cl > HOCH CH OH
d
HaHCO
Origin:
Henry was the first to prepare and identify glycol dinitrate (Ber 3? 529 (l870) and Ann
chim phys [k ] 2J_, 2^3 (1872) but KekulS had previously nitrated ethylene and obtained an un-
stable oil which he supposed to be glycol nitrate-nitrate. N) immediate practical use wds
made of glycol diqitrate because glycol itself was relatively rare and expensive at the time.
It was 196k before a patent was granted covering the use of GDN as an explosive (DRP 179,789).
but it was seven years later before its actual use a^ an explosive was recorded (Mem poudr 16
(1911) p. 214). The principal physical properties of GDN were determined or recorded by Rink-
enbach (Ref b) .
References:
(a) Ph. Naoum, Nitroglycerin and Nitroglycerin Explosives, translation, E. M Symmes, The
Williams and Wilkins Company, Baltimore (192Ö), p. 224.
(b) Wm H. Rinkenbach, "The Properties of Glycol Dinitrate," Ind Eng Chan 18, 1195 (1926).
(c) Wm H. Rinkenbach, "Glycol Dinitrate in Dynamite Manufacture," Chan Met Eng, 34, 296
(1927). " —
(d) Wm H. Rinkenbach, Application of the Vacuum Stability Test to Nitroglycerin and Nitro-
glycerin Explosives, PAIR 1Ö24, 27 August 1946.
145
AMCP 706-177
H-6
Detonation Rate:
Flammability Index: (a, *)
Confinement None
Condition Cast
Hygroscopicity: % 30% 95%RH, 7 days 2 01
71°c; 95$ RH, 7 days i,'7T Charge Diameter, in. 1.0
Density, gm/cc
Volatility: 1-71
Rate, meters/second 7191
146
H-6 AMCP 706-177
Heat of:
Armor Plate Impact lest:
Combustion, cal/gm 3972
Explosion, cal/g m 923 60 mm Mortar Projectile:
Gas Volume, cc/gm 733 50% Inert, Velocity, ft/sec
Formation, cal/gm Aluminum Fineness
Fusion, cal/gm ?8 C (b) 10.25
500-ib General Purpose Bombs:
Specific Heat: cal/gm/°C (b)
Plate Thickness, inches
30°C 0.269
50°C 0.268 1
l'/4
w,
1%
Burning Rate:
cm/sec
Bomb Drop Test:
147
AMCP 70S-177 H-6
Air, Confined:
Impulse
Under Water:
Peak Pressure
Impulse
Energy
Underground:
Peak Pressure
Impulse
Energy
148
H-6 AMCP 706-177
(Reference e)
I One-Inch Column Two-Inch Column
! Explosive Simulated Altitude, Confined Unconfined Confined ' Unconfined
i Feet m/s ' m/s m/s i m/s
♦Confined charge in l/4" steel tube, AISI 1015 seamless, 1" diameter 18" long, and 2"
diameter 7" long. All means were determined from sets of five values unless otherwise
indicated by ( ). A 26 gm tetryl booster was used to initiate each charge.
2940 j 2991
gm/ce 1.51
References:
149
AMCP 706-177 Haleite (Ethylene Dinitramine) (EDNA)
Detonation Rate:
Flammability Index: 13°
Confinement Unconfined
Condition Pressed
Hygroscopicity: % 0.01
Charge Diameter, in. 1.0
150
AMCP 70S-177
Haleite (Ethylene Dinitramine) (EDNA)
Heat of:
Armor Plate Impact Test:
Combustion, cal/gm 2477
Explosion, cal/gm 12j6
60 mm Mortar Projectile:
Gas Volume, cc/gm 90o 50% Inert, Velocity, ft/sec
Formation, cal/gm 13^ Aluminum Fineness
Fusion, cal/gm
500-lb General Purpose Bombs:
Specific Heat: cal/gm/'C
Plate Thickness, inches
1
1 'A
1%
1%
Burning Rate:
cm/sec
Bomb Drop Test:
Thermal Conductivity:
T7, 2000-lb Semi-Armor-Piercing Bombvs Concrete:
cal/sec/cm/cC
151
AMCP 70S-177 Haleite (Ethylene Dinitramine) (ETNA)
Energy
Air, Confined:
Impulse
Under Water:
Peak Pressure
Impulse
Energy
Underground:
Peak Pressure
Impulse
Energy
152
Haleite (Ethylene Dinitramine) (EDNA) AMCP 706-177
Dry - Copper, brass, aluminum, mild steel, stainless steel, mild steel coated with acid-
proof black paint, and mild steel plated with copper nickel, cadmium or zinc are unaffected.
Magnesium and magnesium-aluminum alloy are slightly affected.
Wet - Copper, brass, mild steel coated with acid-proof black paint, and mild steel plated
with copper, cadmium, nickel or zinc are heavily corroded. Aluminum is slightly affected and
stainless steel is unaffected.
Hat) it cm
1st plate 55
2nd plate 55
Bi-pyramid 71
Bracydome 66
Sphenoid 46
Water Alcohol
2c i £c i
20 0.25 20 1.00
40 0.75 40 2.46
60 2.13 60 5.29
80 6.38 78 10. k
100 >20
Preparation:
(88%y ield)
CH2- NH CH2--NH
KH2
+ CO. —» \„ + H20
CH2 CH2--ffl
153
AMCP 706-177 Haleite (Ethylene Dinitramine) (EDUA)
- NH — H02
i"2"
CH -- NH — N02
+ C
°2
2
The raw materials used in this process are cheap and available; the first three reactions
proceed smoothly, rapidly and in good yield (70$ overall), and only the third requires high
pressures. The reaction of ethylenediamine with carbon dioxide at about 220°C and 820 atmos-
pheres has been worked out and is more satisfactory for the preparation of ethyleneurea than
the use of chlorethyl carbonate or urea and better than the reaction of acetic anhydride and
ethylenediamine to yield W,H'-diacetyl-ethylenedianiine which can be treated in a way similar
to the above to yield Haleite.
Ethyleneurea is very easily nitrated, with strong nitric acid (98$), 't ordinary temperature,
and in a very short time, and the dinitroethyleneurea produced appears ., ■<. ürolyze, yielding
Haleite, immediately after solution in water at 95°C Both the nitration and hydrolysis are
practically quantitative.
Origin:
First described in 1877 by Franchimont and Klobbie (Reo trav chim 7, 17 and 244) but it
was 1935 before its value as an explosive was recognized. Standardized during World War II
as a military explosive.
Haleite is decomposed by addition to hot, dilute sulfuric acid. Nitrous oxide, acetalde-
hyde and ethylene glycol are evolved. Haleite is also decomposed by addition to 5 times its
weight of 20$ sodium hydroxide.
References: •"
(a) L. C. Smith and E. G. Eyster, Physical Testing of Explosives. Part III - Miscellaneous
Sensitivity Tests; Performance Tests. OSRD Report No. 57^» 27 December 1945.
(c) D. P. MacDougall, Methods of Physical Testing. OSRD Report No. 803, 11 August 1942.
(e) R. J. Finkelstein and G. Gamow, Theory of the Detonation Process. NAVORD Report No.
90-46, 20 April 19^7-
33
See footnote 1, page 10.
154
AMCP 706-177
Haleite (Ethylene Dinitramine) (EDNA)
/q) Also see the following Picatinny Arsenal Technical Reports on Haleite:
OI23J5.678.9
1200 1231 1162 1113 4llj- 1255 786 897 1198 1279
1290 1^51 1232 1^93 1294 1325 1796 1737 1288 1319
1360 1651 1252 1923 1^ 1395 1797 1378 1379
1380 1352 1885 1937 1388 1469
1400 1372 1838 1^89
1600 2179
155
AMCP 70G-177 HBX-1
156
HBX-1 AMCP 706-177
50°C 0.264 1
1V+
Wi
1%
Burning Rate:
cm/sec
Bomb Drop Test:
Thermal Conductivity: 00 ,
J T7, 2000-lb Semi-Armor-Piercing Bomb vs Concrete:
cal/sec/cm/°C 35 C 0.97 x 10
157
AMCP 706-177 HBX-1
Air, Confined:
Impulse
Underwater:
Peak Pressure
Impulse
Energy
Underground:
Peak Pressure
impulse
Energy
158
HBX-3 AMCP70G-177
159
AMCP70G-177 HBX-3
50°C 0.25^ 1
1V4
IV2
1%
Burning Rate:
cm/sec
Bomb Drop Test:
160
TfRX-^ AMCP 706-177
Air, Confined:
Impulse
Underwater:
Peak Pressure
Impulse
Energy
Underground:
Peak Pressure
Impulse
Energy
161
AMCP 706-177 HBX-1; HEX-3
40 -0.06 -0.25
Ho* 1 with out OaOl 0.00 0.029 0.36 40
+0 2$ mo sture 0.25 1+0
+P, It
mo sture
mo sture
0.23
0.27
ko
40 -O.06 -O.29
IIDX 3 without CaClg 0.02 O.Ql+9 0.46 1*0
+8;2| moisture 0.26
1*0
' moisture 0.26
1*0
+0*6$ moisture 0.20
HBX-3 with silica gel 0.04 0.100 0.45 1*0 +0.09 +0.05
* All samples were ground to 20/l00 mesh size, 7 days before tests. Silica gel used was
Fisher Scientific Company, Lot 51*11*92, through 100 mesh U. S. Standard Sieve.
162
AMCP 706-177
HBX-l; HBX-3
Preparation:
HBX explosive mixtures are prepared by melting TNT in a steam-jacketed melt kettle equipped
with a mechanical stirrer. Water-wet RDX is added slowly with stirring and heating until all
the water is evaporated. Aluminum is added, and the composition is stirred until uniform.
D-2 wax and calcium chloride are then added. The desensitizer wax, also known as Composition
D-2, consists of &k^> paraffin and other waxes, 1^$ nitrocellulose and 2$ lecithin. The mixture
is cooled from approximately 95° to 100°C to a temperature considered suitable for casting
(the lowest practicable pour temperature). HBX can also be made by adding the calculated
amount of TNT to Composition B to obtain the desired proportion of RDX/TNT. The appropriate
weights of the other ingredients are added to complete the mixture.
Origin:
Developed during World War 11, as relatively insensitive mixtures, by adding 5$ desensiti-
zer to Torpex II, for high blast explosive applications.
References:
(d) S. R. Walton, Report on the Program to Develop an Improved HBX-Type Explosive, NAVORD
Report No. 1502, 26 July 195Ö.
(f) Also see the following Picatinny Arsenal Technical Reports on HX Explosives: 1756
2138, 2169.
163
AMCP70G-177 HEX-24
Composition:
Molecular Weight: 47.6
%
Potassium Perchlorate 32 Oxygen Balance:
(IT microns) CO, % -hz
Aluminum, atomized 48 CO % "14
(20 microns)
Snnarent 1-39
RDX (through 325 mesh) 16
Asphaltum "(through 100 mesh) -? i
Melting Point: "C
164
HEX-24 AMCP 706-177
Density, gm/cc
Charge Wt, lb
165
AMCP 706-177 HEX-48
Detonation Rote:
Flammability Index: Confinement
Condition
Hygroscopicity: %
Charge Diameter, in.
Density, gm/cc
Volatility:
Rate, meters/second
166
AMCP70G-177
HEX-^8
167
AMCP 706-177- HEX-48
2 150
195
The fragment penetration test records numbers of complete penetrations of aluminum panels
of various thicknesses at 2.5 feet from the static detonation. The total penetrations recorded
on the 2^ST-3 aluminum panels occurred with the projectile nose always pointed toward C° and
the base toward l80 .
The test data indicate that on the thicker panels, 0.040" and 0.051," the HEX-48 loaded
T215E1 projectile produced more complete fragment penetrations at ground and altitude than
MDX-2B loaded T282E1 and EX8 IVfcd 0 projectiles.
168
AMCP 706-177
HEX-24; HEX-^8
ti
The HEX compositions were prepared by blending the appropriate weight of the dry ingredients
in a Patterson-Kelly twin-shell blender for at least 30 minutes.
An alternate procedure for 100 to 200 gram batches used a "Cradle-Roll" mixing device.
This device consisted of a half-barrel type container constructed of wood and lined with an
electrical conductive material. A plastic roll was allowed to move over the ingredients by
remote control action of the container. The roll action prevented caking of the mix but had
no adverse effect on the particle size of the ingredients. The period of time required to
obtained a uniform and intimate mixture was approximately fifteen minutes.
Origin:
The development of "slow-burning" explosive mixtures which would produce increased blast
effects in enclosed or nearly enclosed spaces directed attention to their use for possible
military application. In 1950 Picatinny Arsenal developed a high capacity filler for 20mm
projectiles consisting of 85/10/5 RDX/aluminum/desensitizer which was more powerful than stan-
dard tetryl filler. However, in comparison with M0X type explosives, there was little doubt
as to the superior performance of the M0X mixture. HEX (high energy explosive) mixtures were
developed at Picatinny Arsenal in 1953 (Ref a) as superior high blast compositions suitable
for use in small Caliber projectiles.
References: 35
(b) 0. E. Sheffield, Properties of MOX-Type Explosive Mixtures, PATR No. 2205, October
1955-
(c) National Northern Corporation, Letter from Dr. C M Saffer, Jr., to Commanding
Officer, Picatinny Arsenal, 12 June 1957-
169
AMCP 706-177 2,i+,6,2',V,6'-Hexanitro-oxani lide (HNO)
170
2,4,6,2' ,k' ,6' -Hexanltro-oxanilide (HNO) AMCP 706-177
Energy
Air, Confined:
Impulse
Under Water:
Peak Pressure
Impulse
Energy
Underground:
Peak Pressure •
Impulse
Energy
171
AMCP 706-177 2,4,6,2' ,k' ,6'-Hexanitro-oxanilide fHHO)
Solvent
Preparation:
A 1.5 liter round bottom flask is equipped with a stirrer of the type which causes a down-
ward swirl. The flask is jacketed for hot and cold water. l8T grams of nitric acid of speci-
fic gravity 1.49 (commercial grade) is placed into the flask and 100 grams of sulphuric acid
is added to the nitric acid under agitation. The mixed acid is cooled to 10°C. 29.2 grams of
tetranitro-oxanilide is slowly added to the mixed acid under rapid agitation maintaining the
temperature at 8°-10°C. After the addition of the TNO is completed (approximately 25 minutes)
the temperature is raised to 85°C over a period of 2 hours and held at 85°-90°C for one hour.
The hexanitro-oxanilide (HNO) "slurry" is filtered on a Büchner funnel and purified as ex-
plained under "Tetranitro-oxanilide."
Origin:
References: 36
(a) L. Gowen and R. Dwiggens, Case Gun Ignition Studies, NAVORD Report No. 2321, 13 June
1952.
(b) D. Dubrow and J. Kristal, Substitution of Tetranitro Oxanilide and Hexanitro Oxanilide
for Tetranitro Carbazole, PA Pyrotechnic Research Laboratory Report 5^-TFl-öö, 20 December 195^-
(d) S. Livingston, Development of Improved Ignition Ty-pe Powders, PAIR No. 2267, July 1956-
172
beta-HMX fa) AMCP 706-177
Detonation Rate:
Flammability Index: Confinement
Condition
Hygroscopicity: %
Charge Diameter, in.
30°c, 95% RH (c) nnn
Density, gm/cc 1.84
Volatility:
Rate, meters/second 912^
173
AMCP 706-177 beta-HMX
Heat of:
Armor Plate Impact lest:
Combustion, cal/gm 2362
Explosion, cal/gm (e) 1356
60 mm Mortar Projectile:
Gas Volume, cc/gm 50% inert, Velocity, ft/sec
Formation, cal/gm (e) -60.5 Aluminum Fineness
Fusion, cal/gm
500-lb General Purpose Bombs:
Specific Heat: cal/gm/°C Reorystallized (g)
Plate Thickness, inches
-75 0.153 85 0.288
0 0.228 90 0.290 1
25 0.248 100 0.295 1V4
50 0.266 125 0.307
75 0.282 150 0.315 W-i
1%
Burning Rate:
cm/sec
Bomb Drop Test:
Thermal Conductivity:
cal/sec/cm/°C 17, 2000-lb Semi-Armor-Piercing Bomb vs Concrete:
174
beta-HMX AMCP 706-177
NO„
NCv
Two men are required to regulate the addition of reagents and control the temperature dur-
ing the initial stage addition; one man can complete the procedure. A 1-liter 5-necked flask
is used, the center neck for an efficient stirrer, one side neck for a thermometer, and the
other necks for burrettes and a gas outlet (to water trap). The flask is placed in a pan with
steam and cold water inlets, for temperature control.
The second stage reagents (60 cc of ^2.3/57-7; ammonium nitrate/98$ nitric acid and 150 1. cc
acetic anhydride) are then added simultaneously, continuously and equivalently over a 25--min-
ute period. The mixture is.., aged
..._,». v. 65
.... minutes,
„..,.„.,..,. poured
P.,.,.,.„ into
...... 1.5
..... liter
...... of
.,. water
,,.,.,.. and
.,,.„ simmered on a
steam bath for 12 hours. Cool, filter and dry the RDX-HMX precipitate (yield 73$ HMX).
The KDX is destroyed, leaving HMX, as follows: 1025 gn of the crude product are placed in
a solution of 15 gm sodium tetraborate decahy&rate in 5 liters of water, heated to boiling
with agitation, and 5 N NaOH added at the rate of 3 oc/min. When about 730 cc have been added
the pH increases sharply from a little over 8.7 to over 9.7 which corresponds to complete
destruction of the RDX. Filter the HMX from the hot mixture; yield 612 gm, mp 279.5°-280.5°C.
Recrystallization from nitromethane yields material melting at 28l°-282°C.
Origin:
Removal of RDX from HMX-RDX Mixtures and Recovery of a RDX-HMX Mixture (This procedure appears
suitable for use with mixtures containing tiOfo or more HMX):
175
AMCP 70G-177 toHMX
Procedure:
500 grams of HMX containing 12.25% RDX are placed in a 1500 cc beaker, 500 cc of acetone
is added and the slurry is agitated for several minutes at room temperature. Before complete
settling, the RDX-HMX-acetone solution is decanted.
To the residual HMX-RDX, another 500 cc of acetone is added. The slurry is heated on the
steambath and while boiling, agitated for several minutes. The boiling RDX-HMX-acetone solu-
tion is decanted. The residual HMX is now washed with cold acetone into a funnel. This HMX
is now taken up in 95$ alcohol, filtered and dried. Yield 353.9 gn or 70.78%.
All the acetone extracts are combined and evaporated to dryness. Yield 137.5 gn or 26.5%.
Yield Balance:
Total 100.00$
Various samples were analyzed for RXD content:
176
AM
beta-HMX CP 706-177
Color:
White
Storage :
Method Ery
Exudation None
References: 37
(b) W. E. Bachmann, The Preparation of HMX, OSRD Report No. 1981, 3 November X9k3
(C) S Livingston, Characteristics of Explosives HMX and DPMN, PAIR No. 1561, 6 September
19^!
R. J. Finkelstein and G. G&mow, Theory of the Detonation Process NAVORD Report No.
90-46' 20 April 19^7-
(e) 0. H. Johnson, HMX as a Military Explosive. NAVORD Report No. kjjl, 1 October 1956-
(f) Also see the following Picatinny Arsenal Technical Reports on HMX:
1 .3 6 7 9
37
See footnote 1, page 10.
177
AMCP 706-177 HTA.-3
Detonation Rate:
Flammability Index: Confinement None
Condition Cast
Hygroscopicity: %
Charge Diameter, in. 1.0
Density, gm/cc 1.90
Volatility:
Rate, meters/second 7866
178
HTA.-3 AMCP 706-177
Heat of:
Armor Plate Impact Test:
Combustion, cal/gm 36Ö7
Explosion, cal/gm 1190
60 mm Mortar Projectile:
Gas Volume, cc/gm 680 50% Inert, Velocity, ft/sec
Formation, cal/gm Aluminum Fineness
Fusion, cal/gm
500-lb General Purpose Bombs:
Specific Heat: cal/gm/°C
Plate Thickness, inches
32" to T1+0C 0.245
1
1V4
1 V-i
1%
Burning Rate:
cm/sec
Bomb Drop Test:
Thermal Conductivity:
T7, 2000-lb Semi-Armor-Piercing Bomb vs Concrete:
cal/sec/cm/°C
179
AMCP 706-177 HTA-3
Underground:
Peak Pressure
Impulse
Energy
180
AMCP 706-177
HTA.-3
Modulus of Elasticity:
lb/inch
Average 89,200
Low 76,300
Test specimen l/2" x l/2" cylinder (approximately 3 gm) pressed at 3 tons (6,000 lb)
total load or 30,000 psi with a 2 minute time of dwell.
Preparation:
References: ^°
(a) 1st Indorsement from Chief, Explosives Development Section, to Chief, Explosives
Research Section, Picatinny Arsenal, dated 12 May 19J8. Subject: "Prof
aperties of Octols
and HTA.-3."
(b) R' Brown and R. Velicky, Heat Capacity of HTA-3, Picatinny Arsenal General Laboratory
Report No. 58-H1-509, 5 May 1958.
38,
See footnote 1, page 10.
181
AMCP 706-177 Lead Azide
182
Lead Azide AMCP 706-177
183
AMCP 706-177 Lead Azide
Dry: Steel, iron, nickel, aluminum, lead, zinc, copper, tin, stainless steel, brass and
bronze were unaffected by six years' contact with dry lead azide at ambient temperature and
50°C. Monel, chrome-nickel and Inconel were unaffected under the same conditions' in two and
one-half years.
Wet: Copper and zinc are rapidly attacked by moist lead azide, while aluminum is not
attacked in 24 hours. Monel, chrome-nickel and Inconel are not attacked by lead azide (g$
moisture) after 29 months' exposure at ambient temperature and 50°C, and J-l magnesium-alumi-
num alloy is very slightly corroded.
Lead Azide
Lead Azide Lead Azide plus 20%
Lead Azide plus plus Ethyl Alba-
Sample Tested 25% Water 20% Water
Friction Pendulum Te;st:
(All IA dextrinated)
No. of Trials 1 10 12 10 4 1
Explosions 1 0 0 O 1 1
Cracklings 0 2 O 2 0
Unaffected 0 10 10 10 1 0
(All LA dextrinated)
PA Apparatus, inches h
Activation Energy: (c)
Kcal/mole 23.74
Induction Period, seconds 0.5-10
Initiating Efficiency, Grams Required to Give Complete Initiations of:
184
AMCP 706 177
Lead Azide "
2c i
20 0.05
Lead nitrate solution: This is prepared by dissolving iGk lbs lead nitrate and 8.25 lbs
dextrine in deioni'zed water, the solution allowed to settle, and sodium hydroxide added to
bring the solution to a pH of 5.4. The final concentration of the solution is then adjusted
to J.h% lead nitrate, 0.375% dextrine by addition of deionized water.
The lead azide is precipitated at a solution temperature of l6o°F, using 60 parts lead
nitrate and 50 parts sodium azide solution. The latter is added to the former in 23 minutes,
under agitation (no baffles are used in the precipitation vessel), the mixture cooled to room
temperature in 12 minutes, and allowed to settle 10 minutes. The mother liquor is decanted
and the remaining slurry washed before packing.
Origin:
First prepared in 1891 by T. Curtius (Ber 2h_, 33^-5-6) by adding lead acetate to a solution
of sodium or ammonium azide. F. Hyronimus (French Patent 384,792) should be credited with the
first attempt in 1907 to use lead azide with some success in the explosive industry. Its com-
mercial manufacture started in Europe before World Wa- II and in the United States since 1931
as military or commercial grade "dextrinated" lead azide.
(1) mixing with at least five times its weight of a 10$ solution of sodium hydroxide
and allowing the mixture to stand for 16 hours. Decant the supernatant solution of sodium
azide and drain into the soil.
(2) dissolving in a 10$ solution of ammonium acetate and adding a 10$ solution of
sodium or potassium bichromate until no more lead chromate is precipitated.
(3) wetting with 500 times its weight of water, slowly adding 12 times its weignt
of 25$ sodium nitrite, stirring, and then adding 14 times its weight of 36$ nitric or glacial
acetic acid. A red color produced by the addition of ferric chloride solution indicates Lead
Azide is still present.
185
AMCP 706-177 Lead Azide
(4) dissolving in 50 times its weight of 15$ eerie ammonium nitrate. The azide is
decomposed with the evolution of nitrogen.
References: 39
(a) Ph. Maoum, Z ges Schiess Sprengstoffw, 181, 229, 267 (27 June 1932).
(c) C. Lenchitz, Ice Calorimeter Determination of Enthalpy and Specific Heat of Eleven
Organometallic Compounds, PATR #2224, November 1955.
(d) Also see the following Picatinny Arsenal Technical Reports on Lead Azide:
0123^56789
550 561 832 393 53^ 255 326 567 628 609
580 861 852 1393 784 525 856 637 708 719
6ÜÜ 1451 882 1493 824 1325 866 657 748 749
760 1651 932 2093 944 1485 1316 707 788 769
.4 50 1132 2133 2164 i486 1737 838 849
1152 2204 1556 2227 1388 999
1352 1528 2179
1372 1838
2198
39
See footnote 1, page LO.
186
Lead 2, k-Dinitroresorclnate (LDNR) AMCP 706-177
187
AMCP 706-177 Lead gA-K-nitroresorcinate (LDNR)
Energy
Heat of:
Underwater:
Peak Pressure
Explosion, cal/gm 270
Impulse
Energy
Underground:
Peak Pressure
Impulse
Energy
188
Lead g,4-iariltroresorcinate (LDME) AMCP 706-177
Preparation:
OH
+ Pb(N03)2 Pb + 2HH0.
3
Origin:
2,l+-dinitroresorcin -was described in the 1881 edition of Beilstein (Beil VII, 885). The
same compound was described in more detail by Weselsky, Benedikt and Hubl in 1882 (M 11, 323)-
The lead salt of 2,4-dinitroresoreinol appears to have been prepared between World Wr I and
World War II by treating resorcinol with nitrous acid and oxidizing the resulting dinitroso-
resorcinol to dinitroresorcinol. Lead nitrate solution was then added to a solution of the
2,1+-dinitroresorcinol to which sodium carbonate had been added to form the soluble sodium salt
(J. D. Hopper, PAIR No. 480, March l^1*). The LDNR exists in two forms differing in physical
characteristics but possessing similar explosive properties. These forms are red and orange
in color (K. S. Warren, PAIR 1448, September 1944).
References:
(a) See the following Picatinny Arsenal Technical Reports on Lead 2,U-Dinitroresorcinat,e:
0 3 4 8 9
189
AMCP 706-177 Lead 4,6-Dinitroresorcinol Basic (LDNR Basic)
190
Lead ^,6-Dinitroresorcinol Basic (LDNR Basic-) AMCP 706-177
Energy
Under Water:
Peak Pressure
Impulse
Energy
Underground:
Peak Pressure
Impulse
Energy
191
AMCP 706-177 Lead ^6-Dinitroresorcinol Basic (LDNR Basic)
Preparation:
OH OH O-Pb-OH
0— Pb—OH
(a) One hundred grams of pure resorcin is fused in a porcelain casserole and immediately
poured on a glass plate. After cooling, the cake is ground in a mortar to pass a U. S. Stan-
dard No. 6 mesh screen. Four hundred grams of 98 percent nitric acid in a one pint capacity
Dewar jar is stirred mechanically while carbon dioxide snow is added in small pieces. When
the temperature falls to -20°C, 40 grams of the granulated resorcin is added in small quanti-
ties. Simultaneous addition of solid carbon dioxide as required prevents a rise of tempera-
ture of more than 5 degrees throughout the entire experiment. Five minutes after the last
portion of resorcin is introduced, the mixture is further cooled to minus 50°C, and finally
drowned with vigorous stirring in five times its volume of cracked ice, in water. This mix-
ture is allowed to stand for one hour and the product then filtered, washed, and partially
dried, weight 43.6 grams. The crude ^,6-MR is purified by first dissolving the product in
an aqueous 5 percent sodium hydroxide solution (17.4 grams of sodium hydroxide in 3^0 cc of
water). The resulting solution is then neutralized by gradually adding it to a boiling solu-
tion of 21.4 grams of 98 percent sulphuric acid in 150 cc of water. The resulting precipitate
of k-,6-UNR is filtered hot on a suction filter and air-dried. Yield, 27-5 grams (37.8 percent
of the theoretical).
(h) Five hundredths (0.05) mole (18.96 grams) of lead acetate is dissolved in 67 cc of
warm water, into which is gradually stirred 0.10 mole (4.0 grams) of sodium hydroxide dis-
solved in 67 cc of water. Stirring is continued for five minutes. After settling, the white
lead hydroxide is washed by decantation three times with 100 cc portions of distilled water,
and used immediately for the next operation.
(C) A O.0278 mole (5.56 grams) quantity of the ^jö-DNR prepared under (a) above, is dis-
persed in 270 cc of water by vigorously beating with a motor stirrer. After heating this
dispersion to 90°C, the 0.05 mole of lead hydroxide prepared above in slurry form is intro-
duced in small portions. Agitation is continued for three hours at 90°C. The basic lead
4,6-DNR is washed once by decantation, and again on the filter with alcohol. After drying
overnight in a desiccator charged with calcium chloride, the product weighs 15.6 grams.
Origin :
Roth the 2,k- and ^,6-dinitroresorcin were described in some detail by Weselsky, Benedikt
and Hübl in 1882 (M 11, 323). £ypke prepared the ^ö-dinitroresorcin in 1883 by hydrolyzing
the nitration product of resorcin diacetate (Ber l6, 551). A more direct and economical
method of preparation suitable for production scale manufacture was developed during World
Wr II by the British (Ministry of Supply Pouch Item W-154-21a, "Manufacture of 4,6-Dinitro-
resorcin and Lead 1+,6-Dinitroresorcinate"). This procedure consisted of preparing k,6-
dinitroresorcinol by direct nitration of granulated resorcin and allowing the product in slurry
to react with an excess of lead hydroxide at 90°C. This basic salt can be prepared in two
forms: (l) a micro-crystalline, yellow, low-density form and (2) a denser, brick-red form.
Both products have the same chemical composition and the same sensitivity to impact (PATR
lVtö, September 19 i*1*) .
192
AMCP 706-177
Lead Sty-phnate
193
AMCP 706-177 Lead Styphnate
Density, gm/cc
Charge Wt, lb
Energy
Heat of:
194
Lead Sty-phnate AMCP 706-177
Preparation:
on 0—
+Pt(CHQC00)o N02
OJJ NO„ 3 2 02H
PbH20 + 2CH COOH
OH o—
KO„ N0„
Dissolve 14.4gn lead nitrate and lcc of 36$ acetic acid in 320 cc distilled water. Dis-
solve h gn 2,^,6-trinitroresorcinol and 1.73 gn sodium carbonate in 80 cc distilled water.
Add the lead acetate solution to the trinitroresorcinol solution, under agitation, keeping
the temperature at 70°-75°C and continue stirring for 3 hours at this temperature. Cool to
20°C in 5 hours. Evaporate the solution to l/3 its volume, cool, filter and wash the product
well with water (to neutrality).
3 hours 0.02
6 hours 0.23
9 hours 0.23
Glycol Diacetate
Or
20-25 0.1
Origin:
First described in 191*1 by von Hurtz and found to be a relatively poor initiator by Wall-
baum in comparison to other primary explosives. (Z ges Schiess Sprengstoffw &, 126, 161, 197
(1939)), Moisak showed that lead styphnate could be used as an insulating (cover) material
for lead azide providing protection from mechanical and chemical influences and, at the same
time, increasing the detonating ability of the total charge (Transactions of Butlerov Inst
Chem Tech Kasan (Russia) 2, 8l-5 (1935)-
195
AMCP 706-177 Lead Styphnate
References: ^
(c) C Lenchitz, Ice Calorimeter Determination of Enthalpy and Specific Heat of Eleven
Organometallic Compounds, mm no. 2224, iNovemoer T933T
(d) Also see the following Picatinny Arsenal Technical Reports on Lead Sty-phnate:
19«
Mannitol Hexanitrate (Nitromannite) AMCP 706-177
197
AMCP 706-177 Mannitol Hexanitrate (Nitromannite)
Under Water:
HeMt nf- (e, t, z)
Peak Pressure
Impulse Combustion, cal/gm 1515 1525
Energy Explosion, cal/gm 1390 1^ 1468 1520
Formation, cal/gm 337 3U5 366
Underground:
Peak Pressure
Impulse
Energy
198
w ■ , ™- , AMCP 706-177
Maimitol TT
Hexanitrate (Nitromannile)
Solubility:
a. Insoluble in water.
a. Cool to below 0°C, 50 gn of 98#-100# nitric acid placed in a 300 milliliter Erlenmeyer
Pyrex flask provided with a thermometer and immersed in an ice-salt mixture.
c. After solution is complete, add 100 gn of concentrated sulfuric acid from a dropping
funnel, swirling the flask in an ice-salt mixture to keep the temperature below 0°C.
d. Filter the resulting porridge-like slurry through a filter paper previously hardened
by treatment with mixed acid.
e. Rinse the precipitate directly on the filter with water followed by dilute aqueous
sodium carbonate and finally with water. (The resulting crude mannitol hexanitrate gives
l8.2fo N as determined by the nitrometer.)
f. Dissolve the crude mannitol hexanitrate in boiling alcohol and filter through a water-
heated funnel.
g Bring the filtrate to boiling and gradually add hot water until the appearance of the
first turbidity .
h. Cool in an ice-salt bath, separate and dry the crystals. (Yield should be about 23
gn of material, melting at 112°-113°C and having 18.58$ N, the nitrogen being determined by
the nitrometer. Theoretical yield would be 24.8 gm.)
Origin:
Mannitol hexanitrate was discovered in 18^7 by Ascanio Sobrero who recommended it as a sub-
stitute for mercury fulminate in percussion caps (Comp rend, 1847, 121). it is the hexanitric
ester of d-mannitol which is widely distributed in nature, particularly in the plant Fraxinus
ornus. N. Sokoloff, a Russian chemist, investigated the explosive properties of HM and recom-
mended in 1878 a method of preparation. Mannitol hexanitrate was thoroughly studied by Berthe-
lot, Sarran and Vieille, Domonte, Menard, Strecker, Tichanowich (Ph. Naoum, Nitroglycerin and
Nitroglycerin Explosives, Baltimore, 1928, pp. 156, 2^7-250), and particularly Dy J. H. wigner
(Ber 36, 796 (1903)). More recent data have been reviewed by Guastalla and Racciu ("Modern
Explosives," Industria Chimica 8, 1093-1102 (1933)).
References:^2
(a) G. C. Hale, Abstract of Available Information on the Preparation and Explosive Proper-
ties of Hexanitromannite. PA Special Report No. 238, 30 July 1925.
199
AMCP 706-177 Mannitol Hexanitrate (Nitromannite)
(C) Ph. Naoum, Z ges Schiess - Sprengstoffw (Munich), pp. 181, 229, 267 (27 June 1932).
(f) A. Marshall, Explosives, Their Manufacture, Properties, Tests, and History, Vol 111,
London (1932) p. 39- Ph. Naoum, Nitroglycerin and Nitroglycerin Explosives, Baltimore, (1928),
pp. 156, 2*47-250.
(g) A. Schmidt, Z ges Schiess - Sprengstoffw 29, 262 (193*4) G. Fleury, L. Brissand and
P. Lhoste, "Structure and Stability of Nitric Esters," Conrp rend 224, 10l6-l8 (19*47).
W R. Tomlinson, Jr., Fundamental Properties of High-Explosives. Ihermodynamic Relations for
Use in the Estimation of Explosive Properties, PATR No. 1651, 22 April 1947.
(k) B. T Fedoroff, Handbook of Explosives and Related Items, Picatinny Arsenal (unpub-
lished) .
(m) Also see the following Picatinny Arsenal Technical Reports on Mannitol Hexanitrate:
2 4 £ 6
1352 24 85 6
64
200
Mercurv Fulminate AMCP 706-177
Detonation Rate:
Flammability Index: Confinement
Condition Pressed
Hygroscopicity: % 30°C, 90$ RH 0.02 Charge Diameter, in.
Density, gm/cc 2.0 3.0 4.0
Volatility:
Rate, meters/second 3500 4250 5000
201
AMCP 706-177 Mercury Fulminate
For TNT 5 5 10 12 15 20
For Subject HE 3.00 3.20 3.60 3.70 3.82 4.00
Loading Density: gm/cc
Fragment Velocity: ft/sec
At 9 ft
At 25% ft Storage:
Density, gm/cc
Method Wd
202
AMCP 706-177
Mercury Fulminate
Fulminate, gm
TUT 0..25
Tetryl 0..20
RDX 0. 19
PETN 0 .17
Compatibility wi.th Metals:
Dry: Reacts rapidly with aluminum and magnesium. Reacts slowly with copper, zinc, brass
and bronze. Iron and steel are not affected.
Wet: Reacts immediately with aluminum and magnesium. Reacts rapidly with copper, zinc,
brass and bronze. Iron and steel are not affected.
Mercuric fulminate readily decomposes in the presence of aqueous solutions, chlorides, car-
bonate and many other materials. Due to the presence of small amounts of mercury, formed by
exposure to light or elevated temperatures, it readily forms amalgams with copper, brass and
bronze, thus components containing these metals must be protectively coated if used with ful-
minate .
!£ i.
12 0.07
49 0.18
203
AMCP 706-177 Mercury Fulminate
Preparation:
NO N — OH
N0„ NO„
II
0 <r CH <- C - COOH <r- ■ CH —COOH
N I I II
N—OH N N —OH
C ""OH
I— Hg(ONC),
Five gn mercury is dissolved in 25 cc of nitric acid (sp gr 1.42) without agitation, and
this solution poured into 50 cc of 90$ ethyl alcohol, resulting in a vigorous reaction,
attended by evolution of white fumes and subsequent appearance of fulminate crystals. R6CJ
fumes then appear as precipitation of the product accelerates, and then white fumes again are
evolved as the reaction moderates. After about 20 minutes the reaction is over; water is
added, and the crystals are repeatedly washed, by decantation, with water to remove all acidi-
ty. The product is purified, rendered white, by solution in strong ammonium hydroxide, fol-
lowed by reprecipitation with 30$ acetic acid.
Origin:
Mercury fulminate was first prepared by John K. von Lowenstern (163O-I703) and in 1800 its
preparation and properties were first described in detail by Edward Howard in a paper presented
to the Royal Society of London (Phil Trans 20k (1800). it was 1867 before the compound was
used as an initiating agent, when Altred Nobel invented the blasting cap and used mercury ful-
minate to detonate nitroglycerin (British Patent 13^+5 (1867)).
Mercury fulminate is decomposed by adding it, while stirring, to at least 10 times its
weight of 20$ sodium thiosulfate. Some poisonous cyanogen gas my be evolved.
3
References:
(a) Ph. Naoum - Z ges Schiess-Sprengstoffw (Munich), pp. 181, 229, 267 (27 June 1932).
204
Mercury Fulminate AMCP 706-177
(c) Also see the following Picatinny Arsenal Technical Reports on Mercury Fulminate:
0123^56789
205
AMCP 706-177 'fetrlol Trinitrate (MEN) Liquid (or Trimethylolethane Trinitrate)
Detonation Rate:
Flammability Index: Confinement
Condition
Hygroscopicity: % 30°C, 90/o BH 0.07
Charge Diameter, in.
Density, gm/cc
2
Volatility: 6o°C, mg/em /hr 24
Rate, meters/second
206
Metriol Trinitrate (MTN) Liquid AMCP 706-177
207
AMCP 706-177 .. . . . w. .. . ,..„.,. T. .,
Metriol Winitrate (MTN) Liquid
Preparation:
Into a 5 liter round bottom flask is weighed 2700 gms of water. To this are added 267 gms
of 36^ formaldehyde and 60 gms of propionaldehyde. The mixture is stirred for a few seconds.
To the mixture is added 150 gms of calcium oxide previously slaked with 600 gms of water.
The mixture is heated in boiling water for four hours, and then allowed to cool spontaneously
overnight. After filtering off the insoluble calcium hydroxide, the solution is heated and
treated with a saturated aqueous solution of oxalic acid to precipitate all the calcium. The
precipitated calcium oxalate is filtered off, and the pale-yellow filtrate concentrated as
much as possible on the steam bath to a thick lemon-yellow syrup. After dissolving in abso-
lute alcohol, the solution is filtered and concentrated in the steam bath to about twice the
volume of the concentrated syrup. The solution is then chilled in a cold box to hasten cry-
stallization. After allowing it to warm up to just above 0°C, the mixture is filtered. The
resulting product is not sufficiently pure and is recrystallized from absolute alcohol. The
melting point of the product (40.3 gm) is then about 196°C (Hosaeus gives 199°C).
Metriol is nitrated by carefully mixing it with 3.5 parts of 65/35 HNOo/HgSG^ maintained
at 20 C, stirring for 30 minutes, cooling to 5°C, and pouring the reaction mixture on ice. It
is extracted with ether, water-washed, and adjusted to pH 7 by shaking with a sodium bicar-
bonate solution and again water-washed three times. It is then dried with calcium chloride,
filtered, and freed of ether by bubbling with dry air until minimal rate of loss in weight is
attained. The yield is 88%of the theoretical. The product has a nitrate-nitrogen content
of 16.35% (calculated: 16.47%). Its refractive index at 25°C is 1.1+752.
Origin:
MTN, according to Italian sources, was first prepared and patented by Bombrini-Parodi-
Delfino Company of Italy under the name "metriolo." A German Patent of 1927 also describes
the preparation and gives some properties. This compound 'was known in France before World
War II under the name of "Nitropentaglycerin" and Burlot and Thomas determined its heat of
combustion (Ref b) .
References: ^
(a) A. H. Blatt, Compilation of Data on Organic Explosives, OSRD Report No. 2014.
29 February 194k.
(c) Also see the following Picatinny Arsenal Technical Reports on Metriol Trinitrate:
1616 and I8l7.
208
Minol-2 AMCP 706-177
n30
Friction Pendulum Test:
Vacuum Stability lest:
Steel Shoe cc/40 Hrs, at
Fiber Shoe 90°C
100°C
Rifle Bullet Impact lest: Trials
120°C 2.1
% 135°C
Explosions
150°C
Partials
Burned 200 Gram Bomb Sand lest:
Unaffected Sand, gm
209
AMCP 706-177
Minol-2
Thermal Conductivity:
cal/sec/cm/°C 16.5 x 10 T7, 2000-lb Semi-Armor-Piercing Bomb vs Concrete:
Density, sm/cc 1.74
Coefficient of Expansion: Max Safe Drop, ft
Linear, %/°C
500-lb General Purpose Bomb vs Concrete
Volume, %/°C
Height, ft
Trials
Hardness, Mohs' Scale:
Unaffected
Low Order
Young's Modulus:
^) in
10 High Order
E', dynes/cm- 5.03 x 10
2
6
E, lb/inch 0.73 x 10
1000-lb General Purpose Bombvs Concrete:
Density, gm/cc 1.66
Height, ft
Compressive Strength: lb/inch2 (b) 1910-2070
Trials
Density, gm/cc 1.68 Unaffected
Vapor Pressure: Low Order
"C mm Mercury
High Order
210
Minol-2 AMCP 706-177
Energy 133
Preparation:
Air, Confined:
Impulse 90
Minol is a castable mixture consisting of
hO percent TNT, 40 percent ammonium nitrate,
Under Water: and 20 percent powdered aluminum and there-
Peak Pressure 108 fore can be prepared by adding the dry in-
Impulse 126 gredients to molten TNT a t 90 C under agita-
tion. Minol also can be prepared by adding
Energy
25 parts of aluminum to 100 parts of 50/50
amatol previously prepared.
Underground:
Peak Pressure 13^
Impulse 139
Energy 147
211
AMCP 706-177 Minol_2
Origin:
Minols are British ternary explosives developed during World Wr 11. There are three for-
malations:
•mi 48 4o 42
Ammonium Nitrate 42 40 38
Aluminum 10 20 20
References: 45
(a) L. C. Smith and E. G. Eyster, Physical Testing of Explosives. Part III - Miscellaneous
Sensitivity Tests; Performance Tests, OSRD Report No. 5746, 27 December 1945.
(b) Philip C. Keenan and Dorothy Pipes, Table of Military High Explosives, Second Revision,
mVOIffl Report No. 87-46, 26 July 1946.
(c) D« P. MacDougall, Methods of Physical Testing, OSRD Report No. 803, 11 August 1942.
(d) Or. H. Messerly, The Rate of Detonation of Various Explosive Compounds, OSRD Report No.
1219, 22 February 1943-
M. D. Hurwitz, The Rate of Detonation of Various Compounds and Mixtures, OSRD Report
No. 5611, 15 January 19W.
(f Committee of Div 2 and 8, NDRC, Report on HBX and Tritonal. OSRD No. 5406, 31 July 1945.
(g) W. R. Tomlinson, Jr., Blast Effects of Bomb Explosives, PA Technical Div Lecture,
9 April 1948.
(h) Also see the following Picatinny Arsenal Technical Reports on Minol-2: 1585 and 1635.
212
MOX-1 AMCP 706-177
Detonation Rate:
Flammability Index: Confinement
Condition
Hygroscopicity: %
Charge Diameter, in.
Density, gm/cc
Volatility:
Rate, meters/second
213
AMCP 706-177
MOX-1
Impulse Exudation
Energy
Heat of:
Air, Confined:
Impulse Combustion, cal/gm U087
Explosion, cal/gm 2087
Underwater: Gas volume, cc/gm 212
Peak Pressure
Performance Tests:
Impulse 20 mm T215E1 Projectile:
Energy
NFOC Pressure Cube 35
Underground: APG Blast Cube 40
Peak Pressure
Activation Energy:
Impulse
Energy kcal/mol 12.5
Temp, °C 300 to 38p
Time to ignition, seconds 1.78 x 10
214
MCK-2B AMCP 706-177
- Detonation Rate:
Flammability Index: Confinement
Condition
Hygroscopicity: % Charge Diameter, in.
Density, gm/cc
Volatility:
Rate, meters/second
215
AMCP 706-177 MCK-2B
216
M0X-2B AMCP 706-177
Ground V730
♦Confined charge in l/k" steel tube, AISI 1015 seamless, 1" diameter 18" long, and
2" diameter 7" long. All means were determined from sets of five values unless
otherwise indicated by ( ). A 26 p tetryl booster was used to initiate each charge.
1
Explosive \ Charge Diameter, Ground i 30,000 60,000 90,000 j
! Inches m/s j m/s m/s m/s !
M0X-2B, 1 2012 | *# ** ** i
density, .„„
gm/cc J 207 331^ 3351 3247
217
AMCP 706-177 MOX-3B
n30
100°C 0-57
Rifle Bullet Impact Test: Trials
120°C
% 135°C
Explosions
Partials 150°C
Detonation Rate:
Flammability Index: Confinement
Condition
Hygroscopicity: %
Charge Diameter, in.
Density, gm/cc
Volatility:
Rate, meters/second
218
MOX-TB AMCP 706-177
219
AMCP 706-177 MOX-te
Detonation Rate:
Flammability Index:
Confinement
Condition
Hygroscopicity: %
Charge Diameter, in.
Density, gm/cc
Volatility:
Rate, meters/second
220
M0X-4B AMCP 706-177
Air:
Compatibility Group Group I
Peak Pressure Bureau of Explosives
Impulse Class A
Energy
Heat of:
Air, Confined:
Impulse
Combustion, cal/gm U392
Explosion, cal/gm 709
Underwater: Gas volume, cc/gm 208
Peak Pressure
Impulse Performance Tests:
20 mm T21gEl Projectile:
Energy
221
AMCP 706-177
MOX-
Detonation Rate:
Flammability Index: Confinement
Condition
Hygroscopicity: %
Charge Diameter, in.
30°C, 90% BH, two weeks 0.79
Density, gm/cc
Volatility:
Rate, meters/second
222
MOX- AMCP 706-177
Air:
Compatibility Group Group I
Peak Pressure Bureau of Explosives
Impulse
Class A
Energy
Heat of:
Air, Confined:
Impulse
Combustion, cal/gm 4293
Explosion, cal/gm 750
Under Water: Gas volume, cc/gm 204
Peak Pressure
Impulse Activation Energy:
Energy
kca l/mo 1 Values not included
Temp, C due to erratic igni-
Underground: Time to ignition, tion under conditions
Peak Pressure seconds of test.
Impulse
Energy
223
AMCP 706-177 MOX-1; M0X-2B; MOX-3B; MOX-4B; MOX-6B
Preparation:
The various ingredients used in the preparation of MOX explosives are coated separately as
follows:
Dichromated Atomized Aluminum _ Seventy-five grams of chemically pure grade sodium dichro-
mate is dissolved in 1500 milliliters of water at 100°C under mechanical agitation. Six hun-
dred grams of the atomized aluminum powder is added gradually (2 to 3 minutes) and stirring
is continued for half an hour. The dichromated metal is filtered, washed with water (15 to 20
times) until the washings show only a slight cloudiness with silver nitrate. The water-wet
product is then dried in an oven at 50°C The dried material is hand-rolled to reduce any
conglomerates, and blended before use.
Wax-Coated RDX - Eighteen grams of molten Be Square Special Wat (manufacturer's l80 to
185 Fahrenheit grade amber) is added to 582 grams of finely divided RDX (water precipitated
from acetone solution) in a water slurry under mechanical agitation. The temperature of the
wax-RDX slurry is maintained above the melting point of the wax (about 90 C). The stirring
is continued for half an hour. After cooling to 50°C, the wax-coated RDX is recovered by
filtration in a Büchner funnel and dried in air. The RDX thus coated and presumed to be jfc
waxed RDX or a 97/3 RDX/wax mixture is hand-rolled to crush any conglomerates formed, and
blended by hand before use.
TNT-Coated Barium Nitrate " Thirty grams of TNT in alcohol solution is added to 270 grams
of barium nitrate in an alcohol slurry under agitation. The temperature of the TNT-barium
nitrate mixture is maintained at 80°C and stirring is continued until most of the alcohol is
evaporated. The coated material is spread in a thin layer on a tray to dry in air overnight.
The barium nitrate thus coated, with 10$ TNT is reduced t o an intimate mixture by hand-rolling
ard blending before use.
T31T-Coated Potassium Nitrate " The TNT-coated potassium nitrate is prepared by the same
procedure as is used for coating barium nitrate.
TNT-Coated RDX - Sixty grams of molten TNT are added to a water slurry of 5^0 grams of
finely divided RDX (water precipitated from acetone solution) under mechanical agitation.
The temperature of the TNT-RDX slurry is maintained at about 90°C and stirring is continued
for half an hour. After cooling to about 50°C, the TNT-coated RDX is recovered by filtration.
The RDX thus treated, and presumed to be 10$ coated or a 90/l0 RDX/TNT mixture, is further
blended by hand after rolling to crush any aggregates formed during the process.
The MOX explosive mixtures are prepared by blending the appropriate weights of the dry
Ingredients in a Patterson-Kelly twin-shell blender for at least 30 minutes.
Origin:
MOX type explosive mixtures were developed beginning in 1950 by National Northern, techni-
cal, division of the National Fireworks Ordnance Corporation, West Hanover, Massachusetts.
224
MOX-1: M0X-2B; M0X-3B; MOX-kB; MOX-6B AMCP 706-177
References:
(b) A. T. Wilson, Development of MOX Explosives: Various Oxidants in MOX, First Progress
Report NF0C-6, Navy Contract NOrd-12382, National Fireworks Ordnance Corporation, December 1952.
(e) A. 0. Mirarchi, Properties of Explosives: Theory of the MOX Explosion, First Progress
Report NFOC-10, Navy Contract NOrd-11393- National Fireworks Ordnance Corporation, December
1952.
(f) A. T. Wilson, Development of MOX Explosives: Various Oxidants in. MOX, Second Progress
Report HFOC-14, Bavy Contract ITOrd-13604, National Fireworks Ordnance Corporation, October
1953-
(g) A. ¥. O'Brien, Jr., C. W. Plummer, R. P. Woodburn and V. Philipchuk, Detonation
Velocity Determinations and Fragment Velocity Determinations of 'Varied Explosive Systems
and Conditions, National Northern Corporation Final Summary Renort OTC-F-13. February 1958
(Contract DA.I-19-020-501-ORD-(P)-58).
(hi P. Z. Kalanski, Air Blast Evaluation of M0X-2B Cased and Bare Charges, NAV0RD Report
No. 3755, 5 April 1956.
£i) Also see the following Picatinny Arsenal Technical Reports on MOX Explosives: 1935
1969, 220^, 2205.
A6
See footnote L, page 10.
225
AMCP 706-177 Nitrocellulose. 12.6% IT fHC,l
—
Composition: / Molecular Weight: (2?2.39)n
% H 0
Oxygen Balance:
C 26.46
H 2.78 H„C —| CO, % -35
K CO % 0.6
H 12.60 X H
0 58.16 0
X Density: gm/cc
X=0N02
H
—I n Melting Point: "C Decomposes
Detonation Rate:
Flammability Index: Confinement
Condition
Hygroscopicity: % 30°C, 90% KH 5
Charge Diameter, in.
Density, gm/cc
Volatility: 60°C, mg/cm2/hr 0.0
Rate, meters/second
226
Nitrocellulose, 13-^% N (NC) AMCP 706-177
0
X=ON02
58.74 0 K Density: gm/cc
Detonation Rate:
Flammability Index: Confinement
Condition
Hygroscopicity: % 30°C, 90/o RH ~ 2
Charge Diameter, in.
Density, gm/cc 1.20
Volatility: 60°C, mg/cm2/hr 0.0
Rate, meters/second 7300
227
AMCP 706-177 Nitrocellulose, 14.14% Tl (MC)
Detonation Rate:
Flammability Index: Confinement
Condition
Hygroscopicity: % 30°C, 90$ RH ~» 1
Charge Diameter, in.
o Density, gm/cc
Volatility: 60°C, mg/cm /hr 0,0
Rate, meters/second
228
Nitrocellulose (NC) AMCP 706-177
Energy
Heat of:
Air, Confined:
Impulse Combustion, cal/gm 21+09* 2313** 2228***
Explosion, cal/gm 855* 965** IO58***
Gas Volume, cc/gm 919* 883** 853***
Underwater:
Formation, cal/gm 617* 561** 513***
Peak Pressure
Impulse * 12.6$ N
Energy ** 13. ^% N
*** ~A.\h$ K
Underground:
Vapor Pressure:
Peak Pressure
Impulse __C mm Mercury
Energy
25 0.00
60 0.00
229
AMCP 706-177 Nitrocellulose (NC)
Nitration: Second cut cotton linters, previously dried to a moisture content of less than
0.5%, are nitrated by immersion in mixed acid under the following conditions:
During the nitration period the mixture is turned over occasionally to keep the acid homo-
geneous. The mixture is then filtered on a Büchner funnel with suction for about three min-
utes and then drowned rapidly with strong hand stirring in at least 50 volumes of cold water.
After the nitrocellulose has settled, most of the water is decanted and fresh water added.
The nitrocellulose-water mixture is boiled and the acidity adjusted to 0.25$ to 0.50$ as HgSOj,..
The sour boil is continued for at least 24 hours for pyrocellulose and at least 40 hours for
gun-cotton. Additional boiling with changes of water are made in accordance with the govern-
ing specification (JAW-U-2W).
Poaching: After washing the nitrocellulose from the beater, the mixture is filtered and
the product boiled for h hours with fresh water while stirring mechanically. From time to
time a little sodium carbonate solution is added to maintain the mixture faintly alkaline to
phenolphthalein. The water is decanted and the boiling continued. According to the specifi-
cation, the total boiling treatment with poaching is as follows:
230
Nitrocellulose (NO) AMCP 706-177
Washing: The nitrocellulose is then washed by mechanical agitation with water. A minimum
of two washes are given. If a sample taken after the water washes gives a minimum test of
35 minutes in the 65.5°C Heat Test and 30 minutes in the 13^-5°C Heat Test, the nitrocellulose
is satisfactorily stabilized. Otherwise additional washes should be given.
Orinin:
Cellulose occurs in nature. It is wood fiber, cell wall and the structural material of all
plants. Cotton fiber is pure cellulose. Nitrocellulose wds discovered about 18^7 by C. F.
Schonbein at Basel and R. Bottger at Frankfort-on-the-Main independently of each other when
cotton -was nitrated. T. J. Pelouze had nitrated paper earlier (1838) and was probably the
first to prepare nitrocellulose.
Pyroxylin or collodion, which is soluble in a mixture of ether and ethanol, contains from
8%to 12% nitrogen. It is used in the manufacture of celluloid and in composite blasting
explosives.
Nitrocellulose is decomposed by adding it, with st rring, to 5 times its weight of 10$
sodium hydroxide heated to T0°C. Stirring is continued for 15 minutes after all the nitro-
cellulose has been added.
References: '
231
AMCP 706-177 Nitrocellulose (NC)
10 41 72 13 4 125 86 167 8 19
390 101 332 33 24 475 576 327 198 29
420 231 402 43 114 485 586 407 208 69
660 351 422 133 17^ 495 796 717 278 169
730 551 542 233 194 555 916 787 388 279
960 831 572 253 334 705 1016 987 408 499
1020 851 652 273 374 965 1026 1187 588 659
1100 971 662 653 394 1065 1066 1197 718 669
1150 10 31 752 673 724 1125 1206 1267 758 709
1190 1041 802 683 804 1135 1256 1297 778 739
1210 1071 952 773 894 1205 1276 1327 808 779
1240 1151 1012 793 1024 1265 1306 l407 838 809
1300 1201 1032 963 1054 1275 1316 1427 858 909
1320 1221 1142 1023 1074 1365 1516 1447 1058 1119
1350 1231 1242 1233 1084 1375 1556 1487 1228 1159
1410 1331 1282 1273 1174 1745 1616 1587 1238 1249
1^30 1351 1362 1443 1274 1755 1786 1637 1248 1309
1490 1391 1392 1663 1304 1845 2056 1717 13W 1329
1580 1401 1642 1753 131k 1905 1817 1398 13^9
1660 1421 1812 1813 1384 1915 1827 1478 1399
1810 1501 1852 1863 1394 1955 1847 1528 1439
1830 1541 1912 1873 1454 2107 1638 1449
1990 1681 1992 1973 1674 2137 1678 1619
2210 1691 2022 1754 1838 1799
1731 2102 I8l4 1898 1809
1781 1824 1918 1869
1811 2144 2098 2119
1831 2208 2189
1841
1851
1931
1961
1991
2071
2101
2181
2201
232
Nitroglycerin (Liquid) AMCP 706-177
Detonation Rate:
Flammability Index: Confinement Glass Steel
Condition Liquid Liquid
Hygroscopicity: % 30°C, 90$ RH 0.06
Charge Diameter, in. 0.39 1.25
233
AMCP 706-177 Nitroglycerin (Liquid)
Heat of:
Combustion, cal/gm Armor Plate Impact Test:
1616
Explosion, cal/gm 1600
60 mm Mortar Projectile:
Gas Volume, cc/gm 715 50% Inert, Velocity, ft/sec
Formation, cal/gm 400 Aluminum Fineness
Fusion, cal/gm
Detonation, cal/gm 1486 500-lb General Purpose Bombs:
Specific Heat: cal/gm/°C
Plate Thickness, inches
Liquid 0.356
Solid 1
0.315
1 M
IM;
1%
Burning Rate:
cm/sec
Bomb Drop Test:
Thermal Conductivity:
cal/sec/cm/°C T7, 2000-lb Semi-Armor-Piercing Bomb vs Concrete:
Volume, %/°C
Height, ft
Trials
Hardness, Mohs' Scale:
Unaffected
Height, ft
Compressive Strength: lb/inch2
Trials
Unaffected
Vapor Pressure: Low Order
C. mm Mprriiry 2n mm Mercury High Order
20 0. 00025 60 0.0188
30 0. 00083 70 0.043
40 0.0024 80 3.098
50 0.0073 90 0.23
234
Nitroglycerin (Liquid) AMCP 706-177
Density, gm/cc
Method With acetone or other desensitizer,
generally not stored
Blast (Relative to TNT): Hazard Class (Quantity-Distance) Class 9
Energy
235
AMCP 706-177 Nitroglycerin (Liquid)
fc Centipoises
10 69.2
20 36.0
30 21.0
40 13.6
50 9.4
60 6.8
Fragmentation Test
20 mm HE, Mark 1, Projectile, Total No.
of Fragments for:
Nitroglycerin 22
Tetranitromethane IT
236
AMCP 706-177
Nitroglycerin (Liquid)
Ether
2: lather:Alcohol > 100
w
Ambient Acetone
Methanol Phenol
Acetone Pyridine
Ether Xylene
Ethyl acetate Nitrobenzene
Amyl acetate p-Nitrotoluene
Nfethyl nitrate Liquid DNT
Ethyl nitrate Chloroform
Nitroglycol Ethyl chloride
Tetranitrodiglycerine Ethyl bromide
Acetic acid Tetrachloroethylene
Benzene Dichloroethylene
Toluene Trimethyleneglycol Dinitrate
2
0 3.4 20 35 20 30 25 0.06
20 5.4
50
Preparation:
Glycerine is usually nitrated at 25°C, or below, by adding it very slowly to a well agitated
mixture of nitric and sulfuric acids, e.g., liO/59«5/0.5> nitric acid/sulfuric acid/water, us-
ing an acid/glycerine ratio of approximately 6. Agitation of the reaction mixture is accom-
plished by use of compressed air. A rapid temperature rise, or appearance of red fumes, auto-
matically requires dumping of the charge, immediately, into a drowning vessel filled with
water. After all the glycerine has been added to the nitrator, agitation and cooling are con-
tinued until the temperature drops to about 15°C, and the charge is then run into a separator
where the NG rises to the top, and is run off to the neutralizer. The nitroglycerin is
washed first with water, then with sodium carbonate, and finally with water. The resultant
NG when washed with water, produces washings which do not color phenolphthalein, and itself
is neutral to litmus paper.
237
AMCP 706-177
Nitroglycerin (Liquid)
Origin:
Nitroglycerin wds first prepared in 1846 or 1847 by Ascanio Sobrero, an Italian chemist
(Mem Acad Torino (2) 10, 195 (1847)). For several years after this discovery, nitroglycerin
attracted little interest as an explosive until Alfred Nobel in 1864 patented improvements in
its manufacture and method of initiation (British Patent 1813). Nobel gave the name dynamite
to mixtures of nitroglycerin and non-explosive absorbents, such as charcoal, siliceous earth
or Kieselguhr (British Patent 13^5 (l86f)). Later developments led to gelatine dynamites,
ammonia dynamites, and so called straight dynamites. The first propellants using nitrogly-
cerin were called Ballistite (Nobel, British Patent lVfl (1888))- and Cordite (Abel and Dewar,
British Patents $6lk and 11,664 (1889)).
Nitroglycerin is decomposed by adding it slowly to 10 times its weight of l8$> sodium sul-
fide (NaoS^f^O). Heat is liberated by this reaction; but this is not hazardous if stirring
is maintained during the addition of nitroglycerin and continued until solution is complete.
8
References:
(a) A. H. Blatt, Compilation of Data on Organic Explosives, OSRD Report No. 2014, 29 Feb-
ruary 1944.
(b) Ph. Naoum, Z ges Schiess-Sprengstoffw, pp. 181, 229, 267 (27 June 1932).
B. T. Fedoroff et al, A Manual for Explosive Laboratories, Vol I-IV, Lefax Society,
Inc., Philadelphia, 1943, 1946^
(e) Also see the following Picatinny Arsenal Technical Reports on Nitroglycerin:
48
See footnote 1, page 10.
238
Ni tronuanidine AMCP 706-177
H 3-9 HN= C
co% -15.4
Density: gm/cc Crystal 1.72
N .53.8 f
239
AMCP 706-177 Hitroguanldine
Charge Wt, lb
240
N itroguanidine AMCP 706-177
Preparation:
H2H NO — NH
1
C — HH HNO Dehydration , C =HH
H2M H2H
Four hundred gms of dry guanidine nitrate is added in small portions to 500 cc concentrated
sulfuric acid at 10°C, or below. As soon as all crystals have disappeared the milky solution
is poured into 3 liters of ice-water, and allowed to stand until crystallization is complete.
The product is filtered, rinsed with water, and recrystallized from about k liters of boiling
water, yield about 90%.
Origin:
Nitroguanidine was first prepared in 1877 by Jousselin, but it was 1900 before it found
use in propellant compositions. During World War I, nitroguanidine was used by the Germans
as an ingredient of bursting charge explosives.
References: "
(a) L. C. Smith and E. G. Eyster, Physical Testing of Explosives, Part III - Miscellaneous
Sensitivity Tests; Performance Tests., OSRD Report No. 5746, 27 December 19^5-
(c) D. P. MacDougall, Methods of Physical Testing, OSRD Report No. 803, 11 August 19^2.
(e) Departments of the Army and the Air Force TM 9-I9IO/TO 11A.-1-34, Military Explosives,
April 1955-
241
AMCP 706-177 Nitroguanidine
(f) Also see the following Picatinny Arsenal Technical Reports on Nitroguanidine:
012_367_89
242
Nitroisobutylglycerol Trinitrate (NIBTN) Liquid AMCP 706-177
0,110 -CH/
d d Melting Point: "C
0 61.5
Detonation Rate:
Flammability Index: Confinement Glass (1 mm wall)
Condition Liquid
Hygroscopicity: %
Charge Diameter, in. 0-39
Density, gm/cc 1.61+
Volatility: 0
25°C, m«/cm /24 hrs 0.127 x 10"3 Rate, meters/second 7860
243
AMCP70S-177 Nitroisobutylglycerol Trinitrate (NIBTN) Liquid
Energy
Solubility:
Air, Confined:
Impulse Soluble in methyl and ethyl alcohols, ace-
tone, ether, ethylenedichloride, chloroform
and benzene.
Underwater:
Peak Pressure
Insoluble in water, carbon disulphide,
Impulse and petroleum ether.
Energy
Toxicity:
Minutes 2
244
Nitroisobutylglycerol Trinitrate (NIB™) Liquid AMCP 706-177
Preparation:
Origin:
References:
(a) H. A. Aaronson, Study of Explosives Derived from Nitroparaffins, PATR No. 1125,
24 October 194l.
(b) M. Aubry, Me" poudr, £5, 197-204 (1932-33); CA 27, 4083 (1933).
(c) A Stettbacher, Nitrocellulose 5, 159-62, l8l-4, 203-6 (193*0; CA 29, 1250 (1935).
(d) W. de C Crater, U.S. Patent 2,112,749 (March 1938); CA 32, 3964 (1938).
(e) H. J. Hibshman, E. H. Pierson, and H. B. Haas, Ind Eng Chan 32, 427-9 (1940): CA 2A,
3235 (1940).
(f) A. Stettbacher, Zges Schiess Sprengstoffw 37, 62-4 (1942); CA 38, 255 (1944).
50
See footnote 1, page 10.
245
AMCP 706-177 Nitrostarch Demolition Explosive (NSX)
Detonation Rate:
Flammability Index:
Confinement
Condition
Hygroscopicity: % 30°C, 90/3 RH 2.1 Charge Diameter, in.
Density, gm/cc
Volatility:
Rate, meters/second
246
Nitrostarch Demolition Explosive (MSX) AMCP 70G-177
Impulse
Energy
Underground:
Peak Pressure
Impulse
Energy
247
AMCP 706-177 Nitrostarch Demolition Explosive (NSX)
Preparation: (b)
The nitration of starch proceeds with the formation of hexanitro starch according to the
following equation:
2c H + 6HWO
6 io°5 3'~*' c12H1i).Oit(oiio2)6 + 6H2O
Tapioca starch is considered the best for nitration purposes, although other starches give
fairly stable products. The starch, pretreated to remove oils, fats and water soluble im-
purities, is dried and screened. Feeding of the dried starch into stainless steel nitrators
containing mixed acid (62$-63$ HMOo and 37$-38$ HgSOi,.) is done slowly with constant agitation
of the mixture. The heat evolved must be controlled by cooling coils. The nitrated starch
is separated from the spent acid, washed with a large amount of water and centrifuged. Final
drying is on trays heated to 35°-40°C with air. This product is so sensitive even a static
discharge might cause explosion.
Orinin:
Nitrostarch was first prepared in 1833 by Branconnot, who called it xyloidine (Ann chim
phys £2] 52, 290 (1833)). T. J. Pelouze studied xyloidine further and reported its explosive
properties (Compt rend 7, 713 (1838). It found military use in the United States during
World Wars I and II as blasting explosives and as an ingredient of bursting charges and prim-
ing compositions.
References: 51
(a) W. R. Tomlinson, Jr., Physical and Explosive Properties of Military Explosives. PAIR
No. 1372, 29 November 19^3-
(b) G. D. Clift and B. T. Fedoroff, A Manual for Explosives Laboratories. Vol I, Lefax
Society, Inc., Philadelphia (1942).
(o) Also see the following Picatinny Arsenal Technical Reports on Nitrostarch Explosives:
1 2 4 7 a ü
8
1611 782 1034 1117 38 1269
2032 848
JC 1
See footnote 1, page 10.
248
AMCP 706-177
Octol, 70/30
Melting Point: °C
Detonation Rate:
Flammability Index: Confinement None
Condition Cast
Hygroscopicity: %
Charge Diameter, in. 1.0
Density, gm/cc 1.80
Volatility:
Rate, meters/second 8377
249
AMCP 706-177 I-3T
Octol, 70/30
Heat of:
Armor Plate Impact Test:
Combustion, col/gm 2722
Explosion, cal/gm 1074
60 mm Mortar Projectile:
Gas Volume, cc/gm 847 50% Inert, Velocity, ft/sec
Formation, cal/gm Aluminum Fineness
Fusion, cal/gm
500-lb General Purpose Bombs:
Specific Heat: cal/gm/°C
Plate Thickness, inches
U/2
1%
Burning Rate:
cm/sec
Bomb Drop Test:
Thermal Conductivity:
T7, 2000-lb Semi-Armor-Piercing Bomb vs Concrete:
cal/sec/cm/°C
250
Octol, 70/30 AMCP 706-177
Energy
Underground:
Peak Pressure
Impulse
Energy
251
AMCP 706-177 Octol. 70/30
*70/30 Octol confined charge in l/k" steel tube, AISI 1015 seamless, 1" diameter 18" long,
and 2" diameter 7" long. All means were determined from sets of five values unless other-
wise indicated by ( ). A 26 gn tetry booster was used to initiate each charge.
252
AMCP 706-177
Octol, 70/30
Tensile Strength:
, lb/inch^
Average (8 tests) I 169
High 204
Low 128
*Test specimen as per Picatinny Arsenal sketch XL-076B, at 21 C.
IVIOQUIUS 01 niasucirv:-
I lb/inch^ I
j Average (10 tests) 73,200
i High 79,300
Low 63,000
*Test specimen 1/2" x 1/271 cylinder '(approximately 3 gm) pressed at 3 tons (6,000 lb) total
load or 30,000 psi with a 2 minute time of dwell.
Density, gm/cc
1/2 - 2 1297
2 - 5 665
5
" 10 497
25 661
1 '»-
1+71
247
322
295
750 - 2500 12
Total Number 4467
253
AMCP 706-177 Octol, 75/25
Melting Point: °C
Detonation Rote:
Flammability Index: Confinement None
Condition Cast
Hygroscopicity: %
Charge Diameter, in. 1.0
Density, gm/cc 1.81
Volatility:
Rate, meters/second 8643
254
Octol, 75/25 AMCP 706-177
Thermal Conductivity:
T7, 2000-lb Semi-Armor-Piercina Bomb vi Concrete:
cai/sec/cm/"C
255
AMCP 706-177 Octoi, 75/25
Underground:
Peak Pressure
Impulse
Energy
*Test specimen 1/2" x l/2" cylinder (approxi-
mately 3 gm) pressed at 3 tons (6,000 lb)
total load or 30,000 psi with a 2 minute
time of dwell.
256
Octol, 75/25 AMCP 706-177
Composition B 4948
75/25 Cyclotol 1^908
75/25 Octol 5124
Modulus of Elasticity:
j rb/inchc
Average (10 tests) 62,100
High ! 75,900
Low ' 45,200
*Test specimen l/2" x l/2" cylinder (approximately 3 gm) pressed at 3 tons (6,000 lb) total
load or 30,000 psi with a 2 minute time of dwell.
257
AMCP 706-177 Octol, 70/30; Octol, 75/25
Preparation: T^
References: 5 2
(a) 1st Indorsement from Chief, Explosives Development Section, to Chief, Explosives
Research Section, Picatinny Arsenal, dated 12 May 1958. Subject: "Properties of Octols and
HTA-3."
258
PB-RDX AMCP 706-177
Detonation Rate:
Flammability Index: Confinement
Condition
Hygroscopicity: % Charge Diameter, in.
Density, gm/cc
* Test procedure described in PATR No. 2247,
May 1956- Rate, meters/second
259
AMCP 706-177 PB-RDX
Heat of:
Armor Plate Impact Test:
Combustion, cal/gm 3027
Explosion, cal/gm 9o3
60 mm Mortar Projectile:
Gas Volume, cc/gm 50% Inert, Velocity, ft/sec
Formation, cal/gm Aluminum Fineness
Fusion, cal/gm
500-lb General Purpose Bombs:
Specific Heat: cal/gm/°C
Plate Thickness, inches
1
1%
l]/2
1%
Burning Rate:
cm/sec
Bomb Drop Test:
Thermal Conductivity:
T7, 2000-lb Semi-Armor-Piercing Bomb vs Concrete:
cal/sec/cm/"C
*Pellets (Lot OAC-596-55) 0.750 inch diameter by 0.750 inch long, pressed at 30)000 psi with
30-second dwell.
260
PBJxDX AMCP 706-177
261
AMCP 706-177 PFLPTW
No. of Trials 1 8 5 6 2 11
Average Depth of Plate
Indentation, inches ** 0.082 0.090 0.087 0.080 0.080
No. of Failures 0 1 3 4 1 1 1
No. of Trials 3 8 9 4 3 5 2
Average Depth of Plate
Indentation, inches * 0.090 0.089 0.087 0.084 0.087 0.075
No. of Failures 0 0 2 3 2 3 2
No. of Trials 5 3 5 5 5 5 5
Average Depth of Plate
Indentation, inches ** 0.109 0.096 0.095 0.092 0.097 0.087 —_
No. of Failures 0 1 0 3 4 4 5
Pellets O.92 inch diameter. 0.375 inch height.
** Mild steel plate 5" x 5" x 1".
Pprfnrmanrp nf PR-RDV uc Rnnctpr (b, d)
Ten 2.75 inch HEAT Ml Rocket Heads were unaffected in performance by storage at 71°C for
28 days. Thus, PB-RDX was not desensitized by contact with TNT-bearing explosives. Tetryl,
similarly used, becomes desensitized when stored in bursting charges at elevated temperatures.
In addition, 108 modified M307A1 57 mm projectiles were fired for performance against
armor. Each round contained a PB£DX booster pellet. There WK no evidence in these firings
that the projectiles were inadequately boostered.
262
AMCP 706-177
PB£DX
Preparation:
The purchase description sheet for polystyrene-bonded RDX (X-PA-PD-1088, 25 October 1956)
requires that the PB-RDX shall be a mixture of RDX, coated and surrounded by a homogeneous
mixture of polystyrene and dioctylphthalate. The specified percentage of RDX shall consist
of a mixture of TST/oType B, Class A RDX and 2^ Type B, Class E RDX. The granulation of the
unpressed composition shall be as follows:
Through U. S. Standard i , 1
Sieve No. Minimum <p t Maximum $
6 : loo !
12 6o --
20 -- 2 ;
•^ -- 0
Two methods have been reported for the preparation of PB-RDX (Reference: L o Alamos Scien-
tific Laboratory, Contract W-7^05-Eng 36 with U.S. Atomic Energy Commission, Report No. IA-
1448). The earlier method employed a Baker-Perkins type mixer to blend the components. This
procedure gave a product with good pressing characteristics. However, the molding composition
was nonuniform in granulation and tended to be dusty. The slurry method of PB£DX preparation
gave a product which was uniform, free-flowing and dustless. In addition, PB4*DX granulated
by the slurry method exhibited satisfactory drying, handling and pressing characteristics.
The final procedure incorporating the better features found from the study of such variables
as solvents, solvent/plastic ratios, lacquer addition and temperature, agitation, RDX particle
size distribution, dispersants and rosin additive, was as follows (Reference c):
Forty-two and five-tenths grams (42.5 gm) of polystyrene and 8 cc dioctylphthalate were
dissolved in 200 cc toluene in a lacquer dissolver. Steam was introduced into the jacket
until the temperature reached 65°C. The lacquer was agitated constantly until it was ready
to be added to the granulator. This lacquer contained a l:k ratio of plastic-plasticizer to
toluene.
Four hundred and fifty grams (^50 gm) of RDX and 4500 grams of HgO (ratio 1:10) were added
to the granulator. The agitator was set for 400 rpm .and the temperature was raised to 75°C
by introducing steam into the jacket. The temperature differential between the lacquer solu-
tion and the HDX/water slurry was 5° to 10°C.
The lacquer solution was poured through the charging funnel into the granulator. As soon
as the lacquer was added, a solution of gelatin in water was added, and the mixture was agi-
tated until the lacquer was well dispersed in the RDX slurry (approximately 5 minutes). Granu-
lation took place at this point. Steam was introduced again into the jacket to distill the
solvent until the temperature reached 98°C Cooling water was then run into the jacket to
cool the batch to ^0°C. The coated material from the granulator was collected on a Büchner
funnel and dried in a tray at T0°C for 24 hours. Temperatures below T0°C did not furnish
enough heat, but a temperature of 80°C produced stickiness and caking of PB-RDX
Origin:
263
AMCP 706-177 p^
References: "
(b) A. J. Pascazio, The Suitability of a Bare PBX Booster Pellet in the 2.75 Inch Ml HEAT
Rocket Head, PAIR No. 2271, November 1955.
(c) J. L. Vermillion and R. C. Dubberly, Plastic-Bonded KDX, Its Preparation by the Slurry
Method, Holston Defense Corporation, Control No. 20-1-16 Series A (PAC1081), 5 March 1953.
(d) C J. Eichinger, Report on Cartridge HEAT 57 mm M307A1 (Mod) with Modified Copper
Liner, Aberdeen Proving Ground, Development and Proot Services, First Report on UC Project
TA3-5204, October 1957-
264
Pentaervthritol Winitrate (PETRINl AMCP 70G-177
Detonation Rate:
Flammability Index: Confinement
Condition
| Hygroscopicity: %
Charge Diameter, in.
Density, gm/cc
Volatility:
Rate, meters/second
265
AMCP 706-177 Pentaerythritol Trinitrate (PETRIN)
266
Pentaerythritol Trinitrate (PETRIN) AMCP 706-177
Preparation:
The earliest procedure used for the manufacture of PETRIN was that developed a t Alleghany
Ballistics Laboratory. In this process, called the "A process," 80$ HNO3 and the solid pen-
taerythritol were charged to the reactor and Qof H2S0^ was added slowly at a rate to permit
control of temperature at 0° to 5°C This mixture was held for a 2-l/2-hour reaction period,
then drowned in water and filtered to give a cake containing both the tri- and tetra-nitrates
of pentaerythritol. The cake was dissolved in acetone and neutralized in solution with am-
monium carbonate, after which the PETH was precipitated by the addition of water. After fil-
tration, the Put KIN was recovered from the filtrate by stripping off the solvent under vacuum.
Yields by this process averaged about hO<f0.
An improved process, called the 'B process," used the same primary reaction procedure but
a different work-up procedure. After the reaction holding period, water was added to dilute
the mixed acid and the batch was extracted in situ with methylene chloride. The organic
layer was separated, neutralized with aqueous sodium bicarbonate, and stripped of methylene
chloride under vacuum to yield the product directly. Yields by this process were about 50$
and quality of the product vsas much improved over that of the "A process."
The "C process," currently in use, involves essentially the simultaneous synthesis and
extraction of PETRIN from the reaction mixture. Methylene chloride approximately equal to
the total weight of the other components is added to the reaction mixture before the sulfuric
acid. After a suitable time following the addition of sulfuric acid, the solvent is removed
and replaced by fresh solvent one or more times. The combined extracts are neutralized and
concentrated. Because of their initially relatively large volume, PEIN must be removed by
filtration from the concentrated PETRIN solution before the final solvent is stripped. Yields
by this process have been 60$ to 65$.
Origin:
The nitration products of pentaerythritol or its derivatives containing not more than three
HOo groups were patented for use as explosives, propellants or ignition materials in 1936
(Cferman Patents 638,432 and 638,433; CA 31, 1212 (1937))-
267
AMCP 70G-177 Pentaerythritol Trinitrate (PETRIN)
References .
(a) Rohm and Haas Company, Redstone Arsenal Division, Process for the Manufacture of
Pentaerythritol Trinitrate Monoacrylate and Petrin Acrylate Propellants, 12 March 1956.
Co) E. Berlow, E. H. Barth and J. E. Snow, The Pentaerythritols, ACS Monograph No. 136,
P- 65, Reinhold Publishing Corporation, New YorK^ 195fc>.
(c) R- H. Pierson, An Infrared Spectrophotometric Method for Determination of Acetone
Content of Pentaerythritoltriniträte, U.S. Naval Ordnance Test Station Report NOTS 1877,
NAVORD Report No. 5649, 3 February 1958.
5
^See footnote 1, page 10.
268
Pentaerythritol Trinitroacrylate (PETRIN Acrylate) AMCP 706-177
(TrinitroxypentaerythritolAcrylate)
Detonation Rate:
Flammability Index: Confinement
Condition
Hygroscopicity: % Ni 1
Charge Diameter, in.
Density, gm/cc
Volatility:
Rate, meters/second
269
AMCP 706-177
Pentaerythritol Trinitroacrylate (PETRIN Acrylate)
Energy
Heat of:
Air, Confined:
Impulse
Combustion, cal/gm 2923
Explosion, cal/gm 791
Under Water:
Peak Pressure
Impulse
Energy
Underground:
Peak Pressure
Impulse
Energy
270
Pentaerythritol Trinitroacrylate (PETRIN Acrylate) AMCP 706-177
Preparation: (a)
H0CH2C(CH2N03)3 + CH2 = CHC0C1 + CgH^CH^
A significant improvement in yield (to about 7**$) and purity (approximately 98$) was
realized by the substitution of methanol for chloroform and crystallization of the product
from the solution without neutralization, residual acid being removed by washing the filter
cake with water.
Because of the high cost and hygroscopic nature of trifluoroacetic anhydride, a new pro-
cess, based on dimethylaniline and acrylyl chloride, was considered. This process is cur-
rently under development in the Rohm and Haas Chemical Processing facilities and is not con-
sidered optimum. Yields averaged 46%and product purities averaged 93.5%.
Composition NV1
PETRIN acrylate (> 97$ purity) , $ 3TX (binder) '
Triethylene glycol trinitrate, $ 11.8 (plasticizer)
Glycol diacrylate, f 2.9 (crosslinker)
Ammonium perchlorate, $ 51.0 (oxidizer)
Hydroquinone, j> 0.014 (polymerization inhibitor)
Measured specific impulse 238 Ib-sec/lb, at density of 1.3.
Reference:
(a) Rohm and Haas Company, Redstone Arsenal Division, Process for the Manufacture of
Pentaerythritol Tetranitrate Monoacrylate and Petrin Acrylate Propellants, 12 March 1956.
271
AMCP 706-177 Pentolite, 50/50; 10/9O
272
AMCP 706-177
Pentolite, 50/50; 10/90
1
VA
1M>
1%
Burning Rate:
cm/sec
Bomb Drop Test:
Thermal Conductivity:
T7, 2000-lb Semi-Armor-Piercing Bombvi Concrete:
cal/sec/cm/"C
273
AMCP 706-177 Pentolite. 50/50; 10/90
274
D . ... „/„, ,
n/m
Pciilohte. 50/50; 10/90
AMCP70G-177
Preparation:
Pentolite is manufactured by either the slurry method or coprecipitation of PETN and INT.
In the slurry method PETN, in water, is stirred and heated above 8(rC. TNT is added and when
molten, it coats the particles of PETN. The slurry is cooled with rapid stirring and the sepa-
rated granules are collected on a filter and dried below 75°C
In coprecipitation, PEIN and TUT are dissolved separately in acetone. The solutions are
mixed and the explosives are precipitated simultaneously by pouring the mixed solution into
cold water under vigorous agitation. The precipitated solid is collected on a filter and
dried in air.
Origin:
Standardized during World War 11, with the 50-50 PSTN/TNT mixture being the more important
for bursting charges and booster-surround charges.
References :^°
(a) L. C. Smith and E. G. Eyster, Physical Testing of Explosives, Part III ~ Miscellaneous
Sensitivity Tests: Performance Tests, OSRD Report No. >74b, ü'f December JWT-
(b) Philip C. Keenan and Dorothy Pipes, Table of Military High Explosives. Second Revision,
NAVORD Report No. 87-46, 26 July 1946.
(c) D. P. MacDougall, Methods of Physical Testing, OSRD Report No. 803, 11 August 1942.
(ei W R. Tomlinson. Jr., Blast Effects of Bcmb Explosives, PA Tech Div Lecture, 9 April
19^8.
(f) Eastern Laboratory, du Pont, Investigation of Cavity Effect, Sec 111, Variation of
Cavity Effect with Explosive Composition, flDRC Contract VbV^-ÖKD-5753.
(g) Eastern Laboratory, du Pont, Investigation of Cavity Effect, Final Report, Contract
W-672-ORD-5723, E. Lab, du Pont, 18 September 1943-
(h) W. F. McGarry and T. W. Stevens, Detonation Rates of the More Important Military Explo-
sives at Several Different Temperatures, mm INO. z.30.5, iNovemoer xyjo.
(i) Also see the following Picatinny Arsenal Technical Report on Pentolite:
OI2345678
1360 1291 1212 1133 1284 1325 11+36 1477 1388
1420 1451 1262 1193 2004 1466 1677 1598
1570 1651 1372 1213 1796 1737 1668
1363 1838
275
AMCP 706-177
PEIN (Pentaerythritol Tetranitrate)
Composition: 316
Molecular Weight: (C^HgN^O-^)
%
ONCL Oxygen Balance:
C 19.0 j 2
CO, % -10
H 2.5 fH2 co% 15
Detonation Rate:
Flammability Index: Will not continue to burn
Confinement None
Condition Pressed
Hygroscopicity: % 30°C, 90$ RH 0.0
Charge Diameter, in. 1.00
Density, gm/cc 1.70
Volatility: 0.0
Rate, meters/second 8300
27(>
AMCP 706-177
PETN (Pentaerythritol Tetranitrate)
Thermal Conductivity:
T7, 2000-lb Semi-Armor-Piercing Bomb v« Concrete:
cal/sec/cm/°C
277
AMCP 706-177
PETM (Pentaervthritol Tetranitrate)
3 inch HE, M42A1 Projectile, Lot KC-5: Class A - Detonating fuse and boosters
Class B _ Priming compositions
Density, gm/cc
Charge Wt, lb
Underground:
Peak Pressure
Impulse
Energy
278
FEIN (Pentaerythritol Tetranitrate) AMCP 706-177
Dry: Copper, brass, aluminum, magnesium, magnesium-aluminum alloy, stainless steel, mild
steel, mild steel coated with acid-proof black paint and mild steel plated with copper, cad-
mium, nickel or zinc are not affected.
Wet: Stainless steel is unaffected and aluminum only vary slightly so after prolonged
storage. Copper, brass, magnesium, magnesium-aluminum alloy, mild steel, mild steel coated
with acid-proof black paint and mild steel plated with cadmium, copper, nickel or zinc are
affected.
Unconfined 0.06
Confined 0.21
Trichlorethylene
or Alcohol Acetone Benzene Toluene
2c 2c 2c I
0 0.070 o lit. 37 0 0.150 0 0 .150
20 0.195 20 2U.95 20 0.450 20 0 .430
40 0.415 40 30.56 ko 1.160 40 0 .620
60 1.205 60 42.68 80 7.900 60 2 .490
80 5.850
100 15 .920
112 30. 900
/ -Ethoxy-ethyl-
Methyl acetate Ether acetate Chlorob enzene
£c i. £C 2n i
20 13 0 0.200 20 1.5 20 0. 35
30 IT 20 0.340 30 4.1 30 2 .8
40 22 34.7 0.450 ko 7-6 ho 6 .1
50 31 50 11.2 50 9. 2
60 14.2 60 12 .2
Carbon
Ethylenedichlori dc Methanol Tetrac hi oroethane tetrac hi oride
£c i. 2n A °G i °£ t
10 0.9 20 0.46 20 0.18 20 0.096
30 1.5 1+0 1.15 30 0.27 30 0.108
50 2.6 60 2.6 40 0.40 40 0.118
50 0.58 50 0.121
279
AMCP 706-177 PEIN (Pentaerythr itol1 Tetranitrate)
2c i 2c i 2c i. !£ i
15 0.02 20 0.27 20 0.09 80 19-3
20 O.Oi' 30 0.31 85 25.0
30 0.15 40 0.39 90 32.1
ho 0.36 50 0.52 95 39-5
50 0.46 100 48.6
105 58.2
Eutetic of the SYS;tem PETN-TNT is about 13$ PETN 110 70.0
and 87$ TNT at 76°C. 115 87.8
120 115
125 161
Preparation:
2. To 400 cc of strong white nitric acid, are added 100 gm of pentaerythritol (through
50 mesh), at 5°C or below, under good agitation. After addition is complete stirring, at
5 C, is continued for 15 minutes. The mixture is drowned in 3 liters of ice-water, filtered,
the product washed free of acid with water and then digested 1 hour in 1 liter of hot 0.5%
sodium carbonate solution. The product is filtered, and recrystallized from acetone.
Origin:
PETN was known as an explosive in 189^ when it Wds proposed as an addition to smokeless
powders to raise their flammability and ease of combustion (German Patent 81,664 (189^).
Modern methods of preparation are described by Vignon and Gerin (Compt rend 133; 590 (1901)
and German Patent 265,025 (1912) and A. Stettbacher (Z ges Schiess - Sprengstoffw 11, 112,
182 (I9l6) and 24, 259 (1929)). PETN was not used on a practical basis until after World War I.
280
FEIN (Pentaerythritol Tetranitrate) AMCP 706-177
References '?7
(a) L. C. Smith and E. G. oyster, Physical Testing of Explosives, Part III - Miscellaneous
Sensitivity Tests: Performance Tests, OSRD Report Wo. 5746, 27 December 1945.
(b) Ph. Naoum, Z ges Schiess - Sprengstoffw, pp. 181, 229, 267 (27 June 1932).
(c) D. P. MacDougall, Methods of Physical Testing, C6RD Report No. 803, 11 August 1942.
(i) W. S. Cramer, Bulk Compressibility Data on Several High Explosives, NAVORD Report No.
4380, 15 September 195^ '
(j) Also see the following Picatinny Arsenal Technical Reports on PETN:
OI23I1.56789
760 1041 772 843 904 1305 1246 407 318 1379
1170 1311 922 863 1274 1325 1276 527 838 1429
1260 1381 1182 1063 1284 1445 1316 857 1238 1489
1290 1451 1192 1133 1*H^ 1705 1376 1247 1318 1559
1300 1561 1212 1253 1885 1446 1517 1388 2179
1320 1611 1262 1343 2125 1456 1617 1568
1360 1651 1342 1493 1466 1737 1598
1380 1352 1533 1556 1797 1838
1390 1372 1796 2178
1430 1452
1450
1570
281
AMCP 706-177
Picramide ("A) (2,4;6-Trinitroanilijne)
Detonation Rate:
Flammability Index: Confinement None
Condition Pressed
Hygroscopicity: % Charge Diameter, in. 0.5
Density, gm/cc 1.72
Volatility:
Rate, meters/second 7300
282
Picramide (TNA) AMCP 706-177
Energy
Solubility:
Air, Confined:
Impulse
Insoluble in water, slightly soluble in
alcohol and ether. Soluble in hot glacial
Underwater: acetic acid, hot ethyl acetate and in benzene
Peak Pressure and acetone.
Impulse
Heat of:
Energy
Combustion, cal/gm (a) 2962
Underground: Explosion, cal/gm 564
Peak Pressure Formation, cal/gm (a) 131
Impulse
Energy
283
AMCP 70G-177 Picramide (TNA) (2^,6-^inltroajiillne)
Preparation:
Five grams of picryl chloride were dissolved in 180 milliliters of absolute methanol.
The solution was then saturated with anhydrous, gaseous ammonia. The time required was
approximately 30 minutes. The amino derivative precipitated in 78$ yield (3.6 gm) melting
at 190°C (literature MP l89°C).
Origin:
Picramide (2,it,6-trinitroaniline) was first prepared in 185^ by Pisani who treated picryl
chloride with ammonium carbonate (CR 39, 853). The use of picramide, as a brisant explosive,
was patended by Chemische Fabrik Griesheim 26 IVfy 1894 (German Patent 84,628). Meisenheimer
and Patzig reacted trinitrobenzene with hydroxylamine in cold alcohol solution to obtain
picramide (Ber 39> 253^ (1906)). Witt and Witte obtained the compound by nitrating a solu-
tion of aniline in glacial acetic acid or concentrated HoS(X at about 5°C with concentrated
HKO^ (Ber 41, 3091 (1908)). Holleman gives details of the prep ation from p-nitroaniline
and from aoetanilide (Rec trav chim h$, 112 (1930)).
Reference:58
(a) William H. Rinkenbach, "The Heats of Combustion and Formation of Aromatic Nitro
Compounds," J Am Chem Soc 52, 116 (1930).
58
See footnote 1, page 10.
284
Picratol, 52/48 AMCP70S-177
Melting Point: °C
285
AMCP 706-177 Picratol, 52/48
286
Picratol, 52/48 AMCP 706-177
References: ^9
(a) L. C. Smith and E. G. Eyster, Physical Testing, of Explosives, Part III " Miscellaneous
Sensitivity Tests; Performance Tests, OSRD Report No. 5746, 27 December 1945.
(b) D. P. MacDougall, Methods of Physical Testin«, OSRD Report No. 803, 11 August 1942.
(d) R< w- Drake, Fragment Velocity and Panel Penetration of Several Explosives in Simu-
lated Shells, OSRD Report No. 5622, 2 January 1946.
(e) Also see the following Picatinny Arsenal Technical Reports on Picratol:
0 5 £ 7 8 2
287
AMCP70G-177
Picric Acid
288
Picric Acid AMCP 706-177
289
AMCP 706-177 Picric Acid
Air, Confinedr
Impulse
Underwater:
Peak Pressure
Impulse
Energy
Underground:
Peak Pressure
Impulse
Energy
290
AMCP 706-177
P icric Acid
% i 2c i £c t £c i 2c i
0 0.85 0 4.5 0 ~2 20 *v 13 20 -3
20 1.17 20 6.9 20 9.6 60 '30 34.7 3.96
40 1.88 1*0 12.0 27.5
60 2.98 60 59
80 4.53
100 7.1
Carbon
Chloroform Ethyl acetate tetrachloride Pyi idine Acetone
o
!£ i r i £c I ^C 4 £c i
20 -2 20 42 20 V0.07 10 24 20 125
60 -6 30 50 6o ~0.1+ 30 37.5 30 137
1+0 58 50 58 40 164
50 69 50 208
Ü£ \ 2c t 2c i
0 14 10 6.4 0 2.4 20 0.12
20 19 30 9.8 20 3-3 30 0.16
itO 31 50 15.5 40 5.4
50 ltl 50 7.U
291
AMCP 70G-177 Picric Acid
Ihe two variables of greatest importance in this process are nitric acid concentration and
the effective concentration of benzene (i.e. , benzene dissolved in the oxynitration solution).
The optimal concentration of nitric acid is in the range 10.4 to 11.6 molar (or the equivalent
of 50$ to 55$ by weight for pure acid). The acid concentration greatly influences the over
all rate of reaction, below 10.4 molar the rate falls off rapidly, while above 10.4 molar the
rates of both the oxynitration reaction and various side reactions, such as direct nitration,
increase rapidly. The range mentioned above seems, in general, to give the lowest proportion
of neutral nitro-compounds to nitro-phenols with, at the same time, an adequate rate of oxyni-
tration. The oxynitration solution must be fortified frequently, or, preferably, continuously
with nitric acid. Strengths of nitric acid between 95$ and 98%are best, due to the smaller
increase in reaction volume than if weaker acid were used. The use of absolute nitric acid
requires that its direct contact with liquid benzene be avoided.
The effective concentration of benzene is probably the most critical variable affecting
the proportion of neutral nitro-compounds to nitrophenols and amounts of colored by-products.
Saturation of the oxynitration solution with benzene is undesirable and thus in batch processes
slow benzene addition is preferable to the addition of it in one portion; in continuous pro-
cesses where an excess of benzene is used the rate of agitation is important.
The concentration of mercuric nitrate catalyst does not appear to be a critical factor
over a fairly wide range. Concentrations of 0.37 to 0.5 mole of mercuric nitrate per liter
of oxynitration solution have been found to give satisfactory results in most cases.
A continuous process, known as the continuous solution process, works on the following
cycle. The oxynitration solution is saturated with benzene "by vigorous agitation with excess
benzene at room temperature, the saturated solution is separated from excess benzene and cir-
culated through a heated coil; it is then cooled to room temperature and agitated again, with
benzene, which extracts the organic product and resaturates the oxynitration solution. In
evaluating this process, the rate of formation of dinitrophenol per liter of reacting solution
in the coil is determined; 70 gn of dinitrophenol per liter per hour is representative perfor-
mance. The dinitrophenol is, of course, nitrated to picric acid.
Origin:
Picric Acid was first prepared in 1771 by Woulff who found the reaction of nitric acid
and indigo yielded a dye. Hausmann isolated Picric Acid in 1778 and studied it further
(Journal de physique 32, 165 (1788)). The preparation was studied by many chemists but in
1841 Laurent established its identity (Ann chim phys 111, 3, 221 (1841)). It was used as a
yellow dye until Turpin, in 1885, proposed Picric Acid as a bursting charge for high explosive
shell (French Patent 167,512). Tie British adopted Picric Acid as a military explosive in
1888 under the name of lyddite and other nations soon began to use it as the first melt-
loaded high explosive. Mixtures of other explosives and Picric Acid were developed until it
was gradually replaced by THT about 1900. Today Picric Acid is used for the manufacture of
Explosive D.
Picric Acid is decomposed by dissolving in 25 times its weight of a solution made from
lpart sodium hydroxide and 21 parts sodium sulfide (NagS^HgO) in 200 parts of water. Some
hydrogen sulfide and ammonia are evolved.
292
Picric Acid AMCP 706-177
References: 6°
(a) L- C. Smith and E. G. Eyster, Physical Testing of Explosives, Part III ~ Miscellaneous
Sensitivity Tests; Performance Tests, OSRD Report No. 5746, 27 December 19^5'
(b) Ph. Naoum, Z ges Schiess-Sprengstoffw, pp. 181, 229, 267 (27 June 1932).
(c) D. P. MacDougall, Methods of Physical Testing, OSRD Report No. 803, HAugust 19^2.
(d) G. H. Messerly, The Rate of Detonation of Various Explosive Compounds. OSRD Report
No. 1219, 22 February I9I+3.
M D. Hurwitz, The Rate of Detonation of Various Compounds and Mixtures, OSRD Report
No. 5611, 15 January 19^
(h) Also see' the following Picatinny Arsenal Technical Reports on Picric Acid:
12 ii^6 7 8 2
1651 132 1383 69h 65 266 13V7 1118 15^9
582 76k ij-25 556 1557
1172 874 1585 926
1352 976
1372
lhh6
1556
293
AMCP 706-177 PIPE
294
PIPE AMCP 706-177
Energy
Origin:
Air, Confined:
Impulse PIPE, a mechanical mixture of PETN and Gulf
Crown E Oil, was developed in the United States
during World War 11.
Under Water:
Peak Pressure References: 61
Impulse
(a) L. C. Smith and E. G. Eyster, Physical
Energy Testing of Explosives, Part Ill-Miscellaneous
Sensitivity Tests; Performance Tests, OSRD Re-
Underground: port No. 57^6) 27 December 1945.
Peak Pressure
(b) S. Livingston, Properties of Explosives
Impulse
RIPE, PIPE and PEP-3, Picatinny Arsenal Techni-
Energy cal Report 1517, 24 April 19^5-
Preparation:
61
See footnote 1, page 10.
295
AMCP 706-177 Plumbatol
296
Plumbatol AMCP 706-177
90 mm HE, M71 Projectile, Lot WC-91: Glass Cones Steel Cones (a)
Density, gm/cc Hole Volume 114
Charge Wt, lb Hole Depth 10 3
FragmentVelocity: ft/sec
At 9ft
At 251/2 ft Storage:
Density, gm/cc
Method Dry
&2
See footnote 1, page 10.
297
AMCP 70G-177 PLX (Liquid)
100 9?/i
Composition: Molecular Weight: —77
% # 61 61
Nitromethane 100 95 Oxygen Balance:
CO, % "39 -48
Ethylenediamine — 5
CO % -13 -21
is designated PLX (forPicati nny Liquid. Explo- Density: gm/cc 1.14 1.12
Explosions
%
0
i0 135°C
150°C
Partials 0 0
Burned 0 0 200 Gram Bomb Sand Test: 100 95/5
Unaffected 100 100 Sand, gm 8.1 50.6
298
AMCP70G-177
PLX (Liquid)
IV2
1%
Burning Rate:
cm/sec
Bomb Drop Test:
Thermal Conductivity:
T7, 2000-lb Semi-Armor-Piercing Bombvi Concrete:
cal/sec/cm/°C
299
AMCP 706-177 PLX (Liquid).
Energy
Air, Confined:
nimum Propagating 100 95/5
Impulse
Thickness, in: 0-5 5TÖS-
Visrnsity rpn ti pni ;p g ■ (e)
Underwater:
Peak Pressure Temp, 10 C 0.7^8
Impulse 25°C 0.625
Energy
ltO°C 0-533
Compatibility with Metals:
Underground:
Peak Pressure Stainless steel, mild steel and duriron
impulse not affected: corrodes brass.
Energy
300
AMCP 706 177
PLX (Liquid "
Origin:
Nitromethane has been known since 1872 (Kolbe, J prakt Chem (2) 5, k2J (1872), but was
available only as a laboratory product until it appeared as an industrial chemical in 19^-0.
A number of patents have been issued for nitromethane produced as a by-product of the nitra-
tion of propane (U. S. Patent 1,967,667 (193*0; British Patent Mt3,707 (1937); and Canadian
Patent 371,007 (1938).
The development of nitromethane liquid explosives was based on information that nitro-
methane is sensitized to initiation and propagation of detonation by the addition of various
amines. This study made at Picatinny Arsenal in 19^-5 indicated that mixtures of nitromethane
with 5$ of ethylenediamine, n-butyl-amine, or morpholine showed considerable promise for ap-
plication in mine-field clearance (L. H. Eriksen and J. W. Rowen, PAIR No. 1565, 17 September
19^5).
References.
(b) J. W. Williams. "A Study of the Physical Properties of Nitromethane," J Am Chem Soc
ill, 2bkk (1925).
(C) L. Medard, "Explosive Properties of Nitromethane," Mem poudr 33, 125 (1951).
(f) Also see the following Picatinny Arsenal Technical Reports on Nitromethane:
2.121£Z£9.
1660 1681 2113 1565 ■ 2016 17^7 1708 1619
1831
301
AMCP 706-177
Potassium Dlnitrobenzfuroxan (KDHBg)
302
Potassium Dinitrooenzfuroxan (KDHBF) AMCP 706-177
-50 0.217 1
0 0.217
25 0.217
iy4
50 0.217 i%
Burnine Rate:
cm/sec
■omb Drop Teer:
Thetmel Condwetivltys
T7, 2000-tb Semi-Armer-Pierclna lamb vs Concrete:
cal/sec/cm/°C
303
AMCP 706-177 Potassium Dinitrobenzfuroxan (KDNBF)
kcal/mol 82.6
Induction Period, sec 0.5-10
304
Potassium Dinitrobenzf uroxan (KDHBF) AMCP 706-177
Origin:
The potassium salt of 4,6-dinitrobenzfuroxan was first prepared in 1899 by von P. Drost
(Ann 307, 56 (1899)).
References: "^
(b) C. Lenchitz, Ice Calorimeter Determination of Enthalpy and Specific Heat of Eleven
Organometallic Compounds, PAIR No. 2224, November 1955.
(c) Also see -the following Picatinny Arsenal Technical Reports on Potassium Dinitro-
benzfuroxan:
1 3 6 a
2122 2093 2146 2179
64
See footnote 1, page 10.
305
AMCP 706-177 BSÄ-*
Detonation Rate:
Flammability Index: Confinement None
Condition Cast
Hygrosco icity: %
Charge Diameter, in. 1.0
30ÖC, 90%RH, 15 days 0.00
Density, gm/cc 1.64
Volatility:
Rate, meters/second 7655
306
PTX-1
AMCP 70G-177
Preparation:
Air, Confined:
Impulse The ternary explosive system consisting of
RDX, tetryl and TNT is prepared by adding the
appropriate weight of water-wet RDX to a tetry-
Underwater:
tol (ho/60) previously melted in a steam-
Peak Pressure
jacketed melt kettle. Heating and stirring
Impulse are continued until all the water is evaporated
Energy and the mixture is uniform in composition.
PTX-1 is also prepared by adding tetryl to RDX
Composition B.
Underground:
Peok Pressure Compatibility with Metals:
Impulse
DJ^C. Aluminum, mild steel not affected.
Energy
Wet: Aluminum, mild steel not affected.
Booster Sensitivity Test: (c)
Condition Pressed Cast
Tetryl, gm 100 100
Wax, in. for 50/o Detonation 1.94 1.82
Density, gm/cc 1.61 1.68
307
AMCP 706-177 PTX-1
Origin:
The possibility of employing ternary mixtures to obtain explosives having greater power
and higher brisance than binary mixtures was suggested by the analysis of Russian 76 mm.
armor piercing high explosive rounds (PATR No. 1311, 17 July 19^3) • The Russian'type ternary
explosives, based on the composition and laboratory studies of such mixtures, were indicated
to be effective pressed fillers. In conducting a preliminary study of castable ternary explo-
sive mixtures suggested by the Russian fillers, a mixture consisting of KDX/tetryl/MT, desig-
nated PTX-1 was developed which had explosive and physical properties offering considerable
advantage for military applications (PATR No. 1360, 27 October 19^3; and 1379, 11 January
1944).
A PTX-3 composition, prepared by the addition of Haleite to ho/60 tetrytol, also offered
promise but limited to applications where the charge would not be required to withstand stor-
age at 65°C without exudation.
5
References:
(a) L. C. Smith and E. G. Eyster, Physical Testing of Explosives, Part III - Miscellaneous
Sensitivity Tests; Performance Tests, ORD Report No. 57kb, 27 December 1945.
(b) D. P. MacDougall, Methods of Physical Testing, OSRD Report No. 803, 11 August 19^2.
(d) W. R. Tomlinson, Jr. , Blast Effects of Bomb Explosives, PA Tech Div Lecture,
9 April 19h8.
(e) Also see the following Picatinny Arsenal Technical Reports on PTX-1:
023679
308
PTX-2
AMCP 706-177
Detonation Rate:
Flammability Index: Confinement None
Condition Cast
Hygroscopicity- % Charge Diameter, in. 1.0
30°C, 90/» RH, 15 days 0.00
Density, gm/cc 1.70
Volatility:
Rate, meters/second 8065
309
AMCP 706-177 PTX-2
310
PTX_2 AMCP 706-177
Origi
The possibility of employing ternary mixtures to obtain explosives having greater power
and higher brisance than binary mixtures was suggested by the analysis of Russian 76 mm, armor-
piercing high explosive rounds (PATR No. 1311, 17 July 19^3). The Russian type ternary explo-
sives, based on the composition and laboratory studies of such mixtures, were indicated to be
effective pressed fillers. In conducting a preliminary study of castable ternary explosive
mixtures suggested by the Russian fillers, a mixture consisting of RDX/PETN/TMT, designated
RTX-2 was developed which had explosive and physical properties offering considerable advan-
tage for military applications (PATR No. 1360, 27 October 1943; and 1379, llJanuary 1944).
A PTX-4 composition, prepared by the addition of Haleite to 30/70 Pentolite, also offered
promise but because of border-line stability in accelerated stability tests, PTX-4 must be
proven by long term storage to be acceptable for use in standard ammunition.
References: °°
(a) L. C. Smith and E. G. Eyster, Physical Testing of Explosives, Part III - Miscellaneous
Sensitivity Tests; Performance Tests, OSRD Report No. 3746, 27 December 1945.
(b) D. P. MacDougall, Methods of Physical Testing, OSRD Report No. 803, 11 August 1942.
(c) L< C. Smith and S. R. Walton, A Consideration of RDX/Wax Mixtures as a Substitute for
Tetryl in Boosters, NOL Mam 10,303, 15 June T9W.
(d) W. R. Tomlinson, Jr., Blast Effects of Bomb Explosives, PA Tech Dlv Lecture, 9 April
194■8.
(e) Also see the following Picatinny Arsenal Technical Reports on PTX-2:
U2.2i.i689
6
^See footnote 1, page 10.
311
AMCP 706-177 WA-k
ÄÄnttt: °C 92
C/H Ratio Freezing Point: "C
Detonation Rate:
Flammability Index: Confinement None
Condition Cast
Hygroscopicity: % 30°C, 90/o RH 0.20 Charge Diameter, in. 1.0
Density, gm/cc 1.60
Volatility: 55°C, vacuo, 6 hrs
0.03 Rate, meters/second 7910
312
PVA-1+ AMCP 706-177
FragmentVelocity: ft/sec
At 9ft
At25V2 ft Storage:
Density, gm/cc
Method Dry
Energy
Impulse
Energy
Underground:
Peak Pressure
Impulse
Energy
313
AMCP 706-177 m_4
Preparation:
A practical method of preparing this composition was by the addition of a solution of the
coating agent to an aqueous RDX slurry. Based dn the quality of the product and the pellet
densities obtained, a procedure of adding an acetone solution of FVA + DBP to a hot water
slurry of RDX, under agitation, was adopted as standard.
References: 67
(a) See the following Picatinny Arsenal Technical Reports on PVA-4: 1532 and 163h.
67
See footnote 1, page 10.
314
FVN (Polyvinyl Nitrate) AMCP 706-177
315
AMCP 706-177 WH (Polyvinyl Nitrate)
Fragmentation Test:
Shaped Charge Effectiveness, TNT= 100:
For Subject HE
Principal Uses:
3 inch HE, M42A1 Projectile, Lot KC-5:
Density, gm/cc
Charge Wt, lb
316
FVN (Polyvinyl Nitrate) AMCP 70S-177
Preparation:
Polyvinyl alcohol is mixed with acetic anhydride. The mixture is cooled to -5 C and the
nitric acid is added slowly while the mass is being stirred. The temperature is controlled
by the rate of acid addition so that when all the acid has been added the temperature does
not rise above 20 C.
When the nitration is complete, the mixture is drowned by allowing a fine stream of the
syrupy liquid to flow from the nitrator and mix intimately with a large stream of water. This
causes the product to precipitate in a fine state.
Origin:
The first preparation of polyvinyl nitrate was reported in 1929 by solution of polyvinyl
alcohol in concentrated sulfuric acid and treatment with nitrating acid at a temperature not
over 50°C. (German Patent 537,303). Later patents issued relative to polyvinyl nitrate in-
cluded U. S. Patent 2,118,487 (1938) and German Patent 737,199 (19^3)-
317
AMCP 706-177 RIPE
Oxygen Balance:
RDX 85 00, % -70
CO % -35
Gulf Crown E Oil 15
Density: gm/cc Hand tantped 1.37
Detonation Rate:
Flammability Index: Confinement None
Condition Hand tamped
Hygrosoopioity: % 30°C, 90% EH 0.04
Charge Diameter, in. 1.0
Density, gm/cc 1.37
Volatility:
Rate, meters/second 7390
818
RIPE AMCP 706-177
Origin:
Air, Confined:
Impulse RIPE, a mechanical mixture of RDX and Gulf
Crown E Oil, was developed in the United States
Under Water: during World War II.
Peak Pressure
References:63
Impulse
(a) L. C. Smith and E. G. Eyster, Physical
Energy
Testing of Explosives, Part III - Miscellaneous
Sensitivity Tests; Performance Tests, OSRD Re-
Underground: port Wo. 5746, 27 December 1945.
Peak Pressure
(h) D. P. MacDougall, Methods of Physical
Impulse
Testing, OSRD Report No. 803, 11 August 1942.
Energy
Preparation: (c) Also see the following Picatinny Arsenal
Technical Reports on RIPE: 1713. 1695 and 1517-
RIPE is manufactured ty simple mechanical
mixing of RDX in oil.
319
AMCP 706-177 Silver Azide
Detonation Rate:
Flammability Index: Confinement
Condition
Hygroscopicity: % (b) 25°C, 100$ RH 0.0^1
Charge Diameter, in.
Density, gm/cc
Volatility: 75°C, 24 hrs 0.00
Rate, meters/second
320
Silver Azide AMCP70G-177
Energy
321
AMCP 706-177 Silver Azide
Preparation:
The silver nitrate solution is placed in a 200 cc cdnductive rubber beaker equipped with a
hard wood stirrer operated by an air motor. The sodium azide solution is placed in a separa-
tory funnel fastened in a ring stand above the beaker containing the silver nitrate, A long
cord (10 ft) is fastened to the stopcock of the separatory funnel so that the funnel can be
emptied by remote control. The silver nitrate solution ife now stirred very rapidly and the
sodium azide is slowly run into the nitrate solution. Stirring is continued for 5 minutes.
The contents of the beaker are filtered through folded filter paper and washed free of sodium
azide and silver nitrate with distilled water.
Silver azide should be stored under water in a conductive rubber container. This prepara-
tion td.ll yield approximately 7 grams.
The preparation should be conducted under a hood and behind a barricade. The product ob-
tained by the above procedure has a very fine particle size, almost colloidal. Very fine sil-
ver azide is safer to handle and is just as efficient and stable as the large, coarse crystal-
line material (Ref b). When a thin film of fine silver azide is precipitated on mercury ful-
minate, tetryl, etc., these substances are as efficient weight for weight as pure silver azide
(Ref g). White silver azide is less affected by light than mercury or lead azide (Ref h).
Long colorless crystals which explode on breaking are obtained from ammonium hydroxide.
Origin:
Silver azide was first prepared in 1890-1 by T. Curtius (Ber £3_, 3032: Ber 2k, 33I+U-5) by
passing hydrazoic acid (HN-,) into neutral silver nitrate solution. Taylor and Rinkenbach pre-
pared pure "collodial" aggregates and showed its sensitivity depends upon its particle size
(Army Ordnance 5_j 824 (1925). Silver azide was found in a detonator of foreign ammunition for
the first time in 19^5 (Ref i)i
References •.
(b) C. A. Taylor and Wm. H< Rinkenbach. " Silver Azide: An Initiator of Detonation," Army
Ordnance, Vol 5> p. 824 (1925).
69
See footnote 1, page 10.
322
Silver Azide AMCP 706477
(g) F. Blechta, Chim et Ind Special No. 921-5 (June 1933); C A. 28, 646.
(i) F. G. Haverlak, Examination of 120A5 MM HE Shell Italian (FMAMA6>1, PAIR No. 1515,
10 April 19^5-
323
AMCP 706-177 Tetracene
Detonation Rate:
Flammability Index: Confinement
Condition
Hygroscopicity: % 30°C, 90$ RH 0.77 Charge Diameter, in.
Density, gm/cc
Volatility:
Rate, meters/second
324
Tetracene AMCP 706-177
Initiating Efficiency:
Tetracene is not efficient in initiating
high explosives.
325
AMCP 706-177 Tetracene
Preparation:
Tetracene may also be prepared by placing aminoguanidine sulphate and sodium nitrite in a
large beaker and adding water heated to 30°C. The heat of reaction causes the mixture to boil;
after standing for two or three hours the separated tetracene is filtered off, washed thoroughly
and dried.
Ori a in:
Tetracene was first prepared in 1910 by Hoffman and Roth (Ber i+3, 682) who also studied its
chemical reactions and determined, its structure (Hoffman et al, Ber 2+3, 1087, 1866 (1910); Ber
hh, 2k96 (1911); and Ann 3Ö0, 131 (1911)). W. H. Rinkenbach and 0. Burton made an extensive
study of tetracene and described its manufacture and explosive properties (Army Ordnance 12,
120 (1931)).
Destruction by Chemical Decomposition:
Tetracene is decomposed by adding it to boiling water and continuing boiling for some time
to insure complete decomposition.
70
References:
(a) D. P. MacDougall, Methods of Physical Testing, OSRD Report No. 803, 11 August 19^2.
(c) Also see the following Picatinny Arsenal Technical Reports on Tetracene:
£13 4 7 8 9
326
AMCP 706-177
1 Mercury Fulminate
5 Decomposes ^70 Lead Azide 0.20
10 Tetryl 0.25
15
Ballistic Mortar, % TNT:
20
Trauzl Test,, % TNT:
75°C International Heat Test:
Plate Dent Test:
% Loss in 48 Hrs
Method
Condition
100°C Heat Test:
Confined
% Loss, 1st 48 Hrs 0.15
Density, gm/cc
% Loss, 2nd 48 Hrs 0.05
Brisance, % TNT
Explosion in 100 Hrs None
Detonation Rate:
Flammability Index: Confinement
Condition
Hygroscopicity: % 30°C, 90$ RH 0.01
Charge Diameter, in.
Density, gm/cc
Volatility:
Rate, meters/second
327
AMCP 706-177 Tetranitrocarbazole (TNC)
95°C o.lO
Underwater:
Peak Pressure Qualitative Solubilities:
Impulse
Solvent Solubility
Energy
Nitrobenzene Very soluble
Underground: Acetone Soluble
Peak Pressure Benzene Insoluble
Chloroform Insoluble
Impulse
Carbontetrachloride Insoluble
Energy Ether Insoluble
Ether, petroleum Insoluble
328
Tetranitrocarbazole (TNC)
AMCP 70G-177
Preparation:
Sulfonation: Fifty-six gms of carbazole is dissolved in 320 gms of HgSOL {96$, specific
gravity 1.84). The solution is agitated during the addition of the carbazole and the tempera-
ture maintained at 25°-35°C. After the addition of the carbazole is completed, the agitation
is continued and solution completed by raising the temperature to 80°-85°C and maintaining
this temperature €or one hour. The sulphate is now cooled to 20°C.
Nitration: The sulfonate solution is slowly added to 168 gms of HNOo (Plant grade specific
gravity 1.525 at 15°C) maintaining the temperature at 30° to 50°C. (Time required - 1 hour 25
minutes). The temperature is then gradually raised to 70° to T5°C and maintained for one hour
after which the temperature is raised to 85 to 90°C and held for one hour, then lowered to
room temperature before drowning.
Drowning: The nitration mixture is drowned by pouring it into 2 to 3 volumes of ice and
water.
Filtering: The separated light yellow product is filtered on a Büchner Funnel and washed
with water twice to remove most of the acid.
Purification: The TNC is placed in hot water (95° to 100°C) and boiled for five to ten
minutes with rapid agitation, allowed to settle then filtered and washed once. This proce-
dure is repeated twice, making a total of three "boilings." The final wash is acid free.
Drying: The TNC is spread in a thin layer and dried at 100° to 110°C for four hours.
Yield: 73-3$-
Melting Point of TNC as prepared: 280°C (compares to 296°C for pure 1,3,6,8-isomer in pre-
ceding data).
Origin:
The preparation of Tetranitrocarbazole (TNC) was first reported in 1880 by C. Graebe (Ann
202, 26 (l880))who nitrated carbazole with 9^ nitric acid. Similar procedures were followed
by R. Escales (Ber 37, 3596 (1904))and P. Zierch (Ber h2, 38OO 1909>X However, G. L. Ciami-
cian and P. P. Silber observed the formation of four isomeric TNC's when acetyl carbazole was
treated with fuming nitric acid (Gazz chim ital 12, 272 1882);). In 1912 and 1913 patents were
issued to the dyestuff manufacturer, Casella and Company, covering the preparation of polyni-
trocarbazoles (German Patent 268,173 and French Patent 464,538). The Casella process of
329
AMCP 706-177 Tetranitrocarbazole (TNC)
preparing polynitrocarbazoles by dissolving carbazole in sulfuric acid and treating the solu-
tion of sulfonic acids with strong nitrating agents is essentially the process used today in
the United States. The crude product, thus prepared, contains principally 1,3>6,8-TKC (W.
Borsche and B. G. B. Schölten Ber 50, 596 (1917) and about 10$ of the 1,2,6,8-OTC isomer
(D. B. Murphy et al J Am Chem Soo 75, 4289 (1953). THG was used in explosives by the Germans
during World Wr II.
71
References:
(c) D. B. Murphy et al, Long Range Basic Technical Research Leading to the Development of
Improved Ignition Type Powders - The Chemistry of Tetranitrocarbazole, PA Memorandum Report
No. 22, 2 September 1952.
(d) S. Livingston, Development of Improved Ignition Tvpc Powders. PATR No. 236Ö July 1956.
(e) Also see the following Picatinny Arsenal Technical Reports on Tetranitrocsrbazole:
0 2 2 4 7
330
2,^,2' ,k' -Tetranitro-oxanilide (TNO) AMCP 706-177
u-
NO,.,
Density: gm/cc
N 20.0
Detonation Rate:
Flammability Index: Confinement
Condition
Hygroscopicity: % 30°C, 90$ RH Trace Charge Diameter, in.
Density, gm/cc
Volatility:
Rate, meters/second
331
AMCP 706-177 2,k,2',k'-Tetranitro-oxanilide (TOO)
332
g,4,2',^'-Tetranitro-oxanilide (THO) AMCP 706-177
Method of Preparation:
0 0 NH
C-
-C +2 Heat (20CTC) I +2H20
I NH
OH on
HNO.
Plant grade
sp gr 1.51
Oxanilide:
Two parts of oxalic acid are mixed with one part of aniline in a round bottom flask. The
mixture is stirred and heated until the reaction is complete as evidenced by the cessation of
effervescence. The mass is cooled to room temperature, poured into several volumes of water
(21 -2i+°c), filtered on a Büchner funnel and washed free of oxalic acid with water and then
washed free of aniline with acetone. The oxanilide is air dried to remove the acetone and
then dried at 100°-110°C.
Tetranitro-oxanilide (TWO):
A 5 liter round bottom flask is equipped with a stirrer of a type which will produce a
downward "swirl." The flask is surrounded with a water jacket for hot and cold water. Fif-
teen hundred grams (1.5 kilograms) of 98%plant grade nitric acid is placed into the flask.
Five hundred (500) grams of oxanilide is slowly added to the acid under rapid agitation while
the temperature is maintained below l4-0°C. After the addition of the oxanilide is completed
(2-^-3 hrs), the agitation is continued 10-15 minutes. The temperature is then raised to 80°C
over a period of one hour and maintained at 80°-85°C for 3 hours. The acid slurry is then
cooled to room temperature and drowned by pouring over cracked ice. The product is filtered
on a Büchner funnel and washed with water until it is almost acid free. The filter cake is
placed in a beaker and sufficient water added to form a "slurry." Live steam is run into the
"slurry" under agitation for 10 minutes. The slurry is filtered and the residue washed. The
latter treatment of the "slurry" is repeated until the wash water is found to be neutral to
333
AMCP 706-177
2,4,2',4'-Tetranitro-oxaniliae (TNO)
litmus paper. The TNO is washed with alcohol, then acetone, air dried and finally dried at
ioo°-iio°c.
Yield = 90$ to 97.546 of theoretical.
Origin:
References: ~2
(a) S. Livingston, Development of Improved Ignition Type Powders, PAIR No. 2267, July 1956.
(b) D. Dubrow and J. Kristal, Substitution of Tetranitro Oxanilide and Hexanitro Oxanilide
for Tetranitro Carbazole, PA Pyrotechnic Research Laboratory Report 5^-TF 1-ÖÖ, 20 December
1954-
334
AMCP70G-177
Tetryl
335
AMCP 706-177 Tetryl
Heat of:
Armor Plate Impact Test:
Combustion, col/gm 2925
Explosion, col/gm 1080-1130
60 mm Mortar Projectile:
Gas Volume, cc/gm 760 50% Inert, Velocity, ft/sec
Formation, cal/gm -111 Aluminum Fineness
Fusion, ea I /am o (e) 22.2
Temperature, C 127
500-lb General Purpose Bombs:
Specific Heat: cal/gm/°C (e)
Plate Thickness, inches
-1ÖÖ 0.182
- 50 0.200 1
0 0.212
50 0.223
100 0.236 H/o
1%
Burning Rate:
cm/sec
Bomb Drop Test:
336
Tetryl AMCP 706-177
Underwater: 0 3 5 10 12 15 20
Peak Pressure 0.9 1.1+0 X.k'J 1.57 1.60 I.63 l.oT
Impulse
30
Energy
1.71
Preparation:
+ 2H20
Tetryl filtered from an acid containing 87$ sulfuric acid (or more) -13$ water, at ko C
(or over) may fire in 30 minutes to 1 hour and 30 minutes, if not drowned in water. A safe
nitration procedure, even on plant scale involves:
1. The concentration of sulfuric in the spent acid is maintained at a low level (approx
80/I.8/18.2 sulfuric/nitric/water).
The crude tetryl produced is recrystallized to remove impurities and occluded acid and to
control its granulation.
338
AMCP 706-177
Tetryl
Sensitiv itv of tetryl elec tros tati c dischara C- ioules ; throiugh 100 mesh: C i)
Unconfined 0.007
Confined 4.4
2c i £c i £c i °C i
0 0. 0050 0 0.,007 0 0 .188 0 0.320
20 0. 0075 20 0 .015 10 0. 330 10 0.425
40 0. 0110 40 0 .058 20 0 .418 20 0.563
80 0. 0810 60 0,■154 30 0. 1+93 30 0.76
100 0. 184 50 1.72
75 5-33
£c i 2C i 2c i. °C 1
0 0.28 0 0.009 25 4.5 20 75
20 0.39 10 0.015 75 45 30 95
4o 1.20 20 0.021 40 " 116
60 2.65 30 0.030 50 138
£c i £c i 2H i. °C 2
0 0.07 20 ~ 4o 20 7.8 20 8-!
20 0.12 30 10.0
40 0.26 40 12.5
60 0.67 50 16.0
80 1.50
86 1.76
Xylene TNT
2z i °_C i
20 3.3 80 82
30 4.4 100 149
40 5.4 120 645
50 6.0
Origin:
Tetryl ws first described in 1879 by Michler and Meyer (Ber 12, 1792), van Romburgh and
Martens studied its properties and proved its structure (Rec trav chim 2, 108 (1883); 6, 215
(1887); and Ber 19, 2126 (1886)). Tetryl was not used as an explosive until World W<r~I.
339
AMCP 706-177 Tetryi
References: '-*
(a) L. G. Smith and E. G. Eyster, Physical Testing of Explosives, Part III - Miscellaneous
Sensitivity Tests: Performance Tests, OSO Report No. 5746, 27 December 1945.
(b) Ph Naoum, Z, ges Schiess---Sprengstoffw, pp. 181, 229, 267 (27 June 1932).
(c) 3- P. MacDougall, Methods of Physical Testing, OSRD Report No. 803, HAugust 1942.
(-.A R. J. Finkelstein and G. Gamow, Theory of the Detonation Process, NAVORD Report No.
90-4S,; 20 April 1947.
(j) W. F. McGarry and T. W. Stevens, Detonation Rates of the More Important Military
Kxploslves at Several Different Temperatures, PATR No. 2303, November I956.
(•K\ Also see the following Picatinny Arsenal Technical Reports on Tetryi:
01 2 .3^^628 9
:vi()
Tetrytol, 8o/20 AMCP 70G-177
341
AMCP 706-177 Tetrytol, 8o/20
Energy
Air, Confined:
Impulse
Under Water:
Peak Pressure
Impulse
Energy
Underground:
Peak Pressure
Impulse
Energy
342
Tetrytol, 75/25 AMCP 706-177
Melting Point: °C 68
Detonation Rate:
Flammability Index: Will not continue to burn Confinement None
Condition Cast
Hygroscopicity: % 0.03 Charge Diameter, in. 1.0
Density, gm/cc 1.60
Volatility:
Rate, meters/second 7385
343
AMCP 706-177 Tetrytol, 75/25
90 mm HE, M71 Projectile, Lot WC-91: Glass Cones Steel Cones (d)
Density, gm/cc 1-59 Hole Volume 127
Charge Wt, lb 2.101 Hole Depth 120
344
Tetrytol, 70/.3P AMCP 706-177
1 Composition:
Molecular Weight:
%
Oxygen Balance:
Tetryl TO CO, % -55
CO % -13
TNT 30
Density: gm/cc Cast 1.60
Melting Point: °C 68
Boiling Point: °C
Impact Sensitivity, 2 Kg Wt:
Bureau of Mines Apparatus, cm
Sample Wt 20 mg Refractive Index, n£,
Picatinny Arsenal Apparatus, in. 11 _D
18
Sample Wt, mg
n30
345
AMCP 706-177
Tetrytol, 70/30
Air, Confined:
Impulse
Under Water:
Peak Pressure
Impulse
Energy
Underground:
Peak Pressure
Impulse
Energy
346
AMCP 70G-177
Tetrytol, 65/35
Melting Point: °C
Boiling Point: °C
Impact Sensitivity, 2 Kg Wt:
Bureau of Mines Apparatus, cm 28
Sample Wt 20 mg Refractive Index, n20
Picatinny Arsenal Apporotus, in. 11 nä
Sample Wt, mg 17
n?0
Friction Pendulum Test: Vacuum Stability Test:
Steel Shoe Cracks cc/40 Hrs, at
Fiber Shoe Unaffected 90°C
100°C 2.8
Rifle Bullet Impact Test: Trials 120°C 11+
% 135°C
Explosions 0
150°C
Partials 10
Burned 0 200 Gram Bomb Sand Test:
Sand, gm 52.6
Unaffected 90
347
AMCP 70S-177
Tetrytol, 65/35
(a) (e)
90 mm HE, M71 Projectile, Lot WC-91: Glass Cones Steel Cones
Density, gm/cc 1.61 Hole Volume 133 126
Charge Wt, lb 2.010 Hole Depth 120 119
Air, Confined:
Impulse
Underwater:
Peak Pressure
Impulse
Energy
Underground:
Peak Pressure
Impulse
Energy
348
, , AMCP 706-177
Tetrytol, 80/20, 75/25, 70/30, 65/35
rw Copper, brass, aluminum, magnesium, stainless steel, mild steel, mild steel coated
with acid proof black paint and mild steel plated with copper, cadmium, zinc or nickel are
unaffected. Magnesium-aluminum alloy is slightly affected.
Wet: Stainless steel and mild steel coated with acid-proof black paint are unaffected.
Copper, brass, aluminum, magnesium, magnesium-aluminum alloy, mild steel and tnild steel plated
with cadmium, copper, zinc or nickel are slightly affected.
Preparation:
Tetrytols are manufactured by heating TNT in a melting kettle, equipped with a stirrer,
until all the TNT is melted. The necessary amount oftetryl is added and heating snd stirring
are continued. The temperature is allowed to drop from 100°C until the mixture is of maximum
viscosity suitable for pouring. Part of the tetryl dissolves in TNT forming a eutectic mix-
ture which contains 55 percent tetryl. This mixture freezes at 67.5°C.
Origin:
Tetrytols were developed during World Wr II. The 70/30 tetryl/THT castable mixture is
the most important in military applications.
References: 7+
(a) L. C. Smith and E. G. Eyster, Physical Testing of Explosives, Past III, Miscellaneous
Sensitivity Tests, Performance Tests, OSRD Report No. 5746, 27 December 1945.
(b) D. p. MacDougall, Methods of Physical Testing. OSRD Report Ho. 803, 11 August 1942.
(c) L. C. Smith and S. R. Walton, A Consideration of RDX/Wax Mixtures as a Substitute for
Tetryl in Boosters, NOL Mano 10,303, 15 June 19^9.
(d) Eastern Laboratory, du Pont, Investigation of Cavity Effect, Sec III, Variation of
Cavity Effect with Explosive Composition, NDRC Contract W672-0RD-5723.
(e) Eastern Laboratory, du Pont, Investigation of Cavity Effect, Final Report, Easter:?
Lab, du Pont, 18 September 1943, M3C Contract W-672-ORD-5723.
(f) Also see the following Picatinny Arsenal Technical Reports on Tetrytol:
012356289
1260 1291 1372 1193 1285 1376 lVf7 1158 1379
1360 1311 1213 1325 1I+36 1737 1388
1420 11+51 1363 1885 1466 1797 1838
1500 1651 1^93 2125 1506
1530 1951
349
AMCP 706-177 TUT (Trinitrotoluene)
350
TNT (Trinitrotoluene) AMCP 706-177
351
AMCP 706-177
TNT (Trinitrotoluene)
Under Water; 3 5 10 15 20 30 50
Peak Pressur 100 1.35 lAO 1.1*5 I.52 I.55 I.59 1.6
Is
irvpu'se 100
rhermal Conductivity:
100 cal/sec/cm/°C
Hours at Temperature 16 16 24 72
Unconfined 0.06
Confined 4.4
inches
-40 IT
Room Ik
80 7
90 3
105-110 2 (5 expl in 20 trials)
Roan
Standard Iron Bomb: Temperature 105° to 110°C
No A i r Space
Trials 10 10
Explosions very low order 7
Air Space
Trials 10 10
Explosions 0 0
353
AMCP 706-177 TNT (Trinitrotoluene)
Density, gm/cc:
!£ State gm/ce
27 to 70 Flaked 1.65
80 Flaked 1.64
82 Liquid 1.48
87 Liquid 1.48
95 Liquid 1.V7
Solubility of TNT, gm/lOO gn (j), in: (f)
£c * £c i. 2C i 2n i
0 0.0100 0 57 0 13 0 28
20 0.0130 20 109 20 67 135
40
60
0.0285
0.0675
4o 228 kO 180 &°
60 600 60 478 60 367
80 ?2000 80 >170O
Carbon Trlchloro-
tetrachloride Ether Chloroform ethylene
± i £c i
0 0.20 0 1-73 0 6 25 3-5
0 O.65 20 3.29 20 19 55 60
1+0 1.75 ko 66
60 6.90 60 302
70 17.34
75 24-35
354
AMT 706-177
TNT (Trinitrotoluene)
Ethylene ^-Ethoxy-
Pyridine Methyl acetate d ichloride ethyl-acet ate
£c i 2c 2z i £c
20 140 20 73 20 34 20 29-5
40 250 40 135 40 123 40 49
60 640 50 280 60 460 50 96
70 1250
Tetrachloro- I sopropyl
ethane Aniline alcohol Ethanol
0
_C i.
20 18 10 6.1 20 0.76 0 0.62
40 50 30 11.5 40 1.96 20 1.25
50 100 50 29 50 2.95 40 2.85
70 74 60 8.4
80 130 70 15
Isobu tyl alco hol Carbon disulfide Chlorobenzene
£n i 2c i
0 0.20 0 0.14 20 55
20 0.61 20 0.44 30 51
40 1.41 40 1.4 40 79
50 2.35 50 116
Preparat ion
+ HN0„
In older processes trinitrotoluene (TNT) was slowly and laboriously nitrated in three
stages using successively stronger acids. Today, however, a single stage nitration is pos-
sible, in a short time (less than one hour) producing TNT at a cost of a little less than
6^/lb. In England, a two stage continuous process was developed during World Wr 11; in the
first counter current stage, toluene 'was nitrated to the mono stage mononitrotoluene (MNT);
in the second stage, also counter current, MMB was nitrated to TNT.
355
AMCP 706-177 THT (Trinitrotoluene)
It was the British work, on the kinetics of nitration of toluene to TNT, that first pointed
out the basic importance to nitration processes of the nitroxyl ion (NOg*), on the one hand,
and the role of the bisulfate ion (HSOij.-) and unionized sulfuric acid on the other. These
concepts were successful in explaining the maximum in nitration rate occurring at a sulfuric
acid content of 9"2$. This work, for instance, leads to the following equation for the rate of
formation of TWT from DNT:
Three Stage Process: Toluene (100 gm) is nitrated to the mono derivative by slowly adding
a mixture of 294 gn sulfuric acid (sp gr 1.84) and 1V7 gni nitric acid (sp gr 1.42) to it at
30°-^0°C, with good agitation. Acid addition requires 1-1.5 hour, and stirring at 30o-40°C
is continued 30 minutes longer. The mixture is cooled and the lower layer of spent acid
drawn off.
Half the crude mono is dissolved in 109 gm sulfuric acid (sp gr 1.84) with cooling, the
solution heated to 50°C and a mixture of 54.5 gm nitric acid (sp gr I.50) and 54.5 gn sul-
furic acid (sp gr 1.84) added, under agitation, at such a rate that the temperature is main-
tained between 90° and 100°C Acid addition requires 1 hour, and stirring at 90°-100°C is
continued 2 more hours.
While the dinitration mixture is still at 90°C, 1^5 gm fuming sulfuric acid (oleum con-
taining 15fo free SO,) is added slowly. A mixed acid of 92.5 gn each nitric acid (sp gr 1.50)
and 15$ oleum is slovl added, under good agitation at 100°-115°C over 1-J--2 hours, The mix-
ture is stirred at 100 -115°C for 2 more hours, cooled, filtered, and the TNT cake broken up
and washed with water. The TNT is washed 3-4 times with hot water (85°-95°C) with good agi-
tation. The product can be purified either by recrystallization from alcohol or by washing
it with 5 times its weight of 5$ sodium bisulfite solution at 90°C for |r hour with vigorous
stirring, washing with hot water until the washings are colorless, and cooling slowly-with
stirring to granulate the product.
Origin:
TNT was first prepared in 1863 by Wilbrand (Ann 128, 178), later by Beilstein and Kuhlberg
(Ber 3, 202 (1870) and also Tiemann (Ber 3, 217 (187ÖT, each using different methods of start-
ing materials. It was nearly 30 years later when Hausermann undertook its manufacture on an
industrial scale (Z angew Chem, 1891, p. 508; J Chem Ind, I89I, p. 1028). After 1901 TNT
began to be used extensively as a military explosive and Germany became the first nation to
adopt it as a standard shell filler (1902-1904). During World War I all the major powers of
the world were using TNT, with the quantity used limited only by the available supply of
toluene. Prior to World War II the development of synthetic toluene from petroleum made
available in the United States, an almost unlimited supply of this raw material. Because of
the general suitability of TNT for melt-loading and its extensive use in binary and ternary
explosive mixtures, TNT is considered the most important military explosive known today.
TNT is decomposed by adding it slowly, while stirring, to 30 times its weight of a solution
prepared by dissolving lpart of sodium sulfide (ifagS^HgO) in 6 parts of water.
References:7^
(a) D. P. MacDougall, Methods of Physical Testing, QSRD Report No. 803, 11 August 19^2.
356
TOT (Trinitrotoluene) AMCP 706-177
(b) Philip C. Keenan and Dorothy Pipes, Table of Military High Explosives, Second Revi-
sion, NAVORD Report No. 87-46, 26 July 1946.
(d) L. C. Smith and E. H. Eyster, Physical Testing of Explosives, Part III, Miscellaneous
Sensitivity Tests, Performance Tests, OSKD Report No. 5746, 27 December 1945.
(f) International Critical Tables and various other sources in the open literature.
(j) Committee of Div 2 and 8, NDRC, Report on HBX and Tritonal, 06RD No. 5406, 31 July
19^5-
(k) R. W. Drake, Fragment Velocity and Panel Penetration of Several Explosives in Simu-
lated Shells, OSPD Report No. 5622, 2 January 1946.
(1) W. J. McGarry and T. W. Stevens, Detonation Rates of the More Important Military
Explosives at Several Different Temperatures, PAIR No. ZS66, November ly^b.
(m) W. S. Cramer, Bulk Compressibility Data on Several High Explosives, NAVORD Report No.
4380, 15 September 195S:
(o) Also see the following Picatinny Arsenal Technical Reports on TNT:
.22234567.8.9
10 291 132 43 364 65 86 47 118 99
30 551 582 83 694 195 266 87 288 2i*9
240 731 782 133 87I+ 1*25 556 507 638 269
350 861 892 273 904 555 666 527 738 319
630 891 972 513 109^ 695 956 597 768 389
760 901 1072 643 llOU 735 986 707 838 499
810 971 1182 673 1124 805 1046 807 1088 709
1120 101*1 1192 743 1221+ 975 1146 817 1098 739
lll+O 1121 1272 853 1284 111*5 1276 837 1128 779
1170 1311 1292 863 129!* 1155 1376 1107 111*8 799
1260 1391 13^2 1063 130** 1225 11*1*6 lli*7 1158 889
1270 li+31 1352 1123 13lA 1285 11*66 1217 1188 929
1360 IU51 1372 1133 13^ 1305 11*76 121*7 1198 939
1400 lij-91 1402 1193 0.1*1.1* 1315 1556 1307 1228 1099
ll*6o 1651 1^52 121*3 1444 1395 1636 ll*17 1258 1109
1500 1821 lVT2 1323 lA54 ll*25 1756 ll*27 1308 1129
357
AMCP 706-177
TNT (Trinitrotoluene)
358
AMCP 706-177
Torpex
359
AMCP 706-177 Torpex
At 15°C 0.24
1%
Burning Rate:
cm/sec
Bomb Drop Test:
Volume, %/°C
Height, ft
Trials
Hardness, Mohs' Scale:
Unaffected
Low Order
Young's Modulus: \°) ,„
High Order
E, dynes/cm* 9-53 x 10
E, lb/inch2 1.38 x 10
1000-lb General Purpose Bomb YS Concrete:
Density, gm/cc 1-77
Height, ft
CompressiveStrength: lb/inch2 (b) 2100-2300 Trials
Density, gm/cc 1-77 Unaffected
Vapor Pressure: Low Order
°C mm Mercury High Order
360
Torpex AMCP 70S-177
Energy lk6
Effect of Temperature on
Air, Confined: Impact Sensitivity:
Impulse 116
Temp. PA Impact Test
U
Underwater: C 2 Kg Wt, inches
Peak Pressure 116
Impulse 127 25 15
32 7
Energy 153 KA 8
361
AMCP 70S-177
Torpex
Preparation:
Origin:
Torpex, a castable high explosive, was developed in England during World Wr II for use
as a filler in warheads, mines and depth bombs. Several variations in the composition of
torpex have been evaluated but the following are those used in service munitions:
Torpex 2 Torpex 2
unwaxed waxed Torpex 3
Wax: has the undesirable effect of (l)tending to coagulate the aluminum, thus giving a less
homogeneous and more viscous product, (2) lowering the density of the cast explosive from
1.72-1.75 to 1.66-1.70 for waxed torpex, and (3) lowering the compressive strength from 3700
psi to 1970 psi for waxed torpex. However, wax is used in service torpex for reasons of
safety, since there is evidence that its presence lowers the sensitivity of the explosive to
impact as measured by laboratory drop tests and bullet sensitivity tests of small charges
(Bureau of Ord Res Mano Rpt No. 24, January 19^5).
References: 7^
(a) Committee of Div 2 and 8, NDRC, Report on HBX and Tritonal, OSRD No. 5406, 31 July
1945-
0>) Philip C. Keenan and Dorothy C. Pipes, Table of Military High Explosives, Second Revi-
sion, NAV0RD Report No. 87-46, 26 July 1946.
(c) D. P. MacDougall, Methods of Physical Testing, OSRD Report No. 803, 11 August 19^2.
76
See footnote 1, page 10.
362
Torpex
AMCP 706-177
(d) G. H. Messerly, The Rate nf Detonation nf Varinns Explosive Compounds C*RD Report
No. 1219, 22 February 19W-
M. D. Hurwitz, The Rate of Detonation of Various Compounds and Mixtures. Q5RD Report
No. 56ll, 15 January 1946.
(e) W. R. Tomlinson, Jr., Blast Effects of Bomb Explosives. PA Tech Div Lecture, 9 April
19 h8.
(f) Eastern Laboratory, du Pont, Investigation nf Cavity Effect Sec 111 Variation nf
Cavity Effect with Explosive Composition, NDRC Contract W672-ORD-5723-
(g) Also see the following Picatinny Arsenal Technical Reports on Torpex:
OI235678
363
AMCP 706-177 l>3>5-Triamino-2,4,6-Trinitrobenzene (jMKB)
Composition:
Molecular Weight: (C^IL-N^O,-) 258
%
NH
C 27-9 , 2 Oxygen Balance:
CO, % -56
H 2.3 02H-p^N-N02 CO % -19
-
M 32.6 H2N ""^Y^ M2 Density: gm/cc Crystal 1-93
N0
0 37.2 2 Melting Point: °C 330 (b, e) 360 (a)
C/H Ratio 0.302 Freezing Point: "C
Detonation Rate:
Flammability Index:
Confinement None
Condition Pressed
Hygroscopicity: %
Charge Diameter, in. 0.5
364
I>3j5-Triamno-2,U,6-Trinitrobenzene (TATNB) AMCP 706-177
Energy
365
AMCP 706-177 1,3> g-'Prlamlno-g, k, 6-Trinitrobenzene (TkTNB)
Preparation- (a)
Absolute alcohol (200 milliliters) was saturated with ammonia and then 12.5 gn (0.028 mol)
of 1, 3,5-tribromo-2,4,6-trinitrotienzene, prepared according to Hill (NAVORD Report No. 3709,
2 February 1953), was added. The flask was stoppered and allowed to stand at room temperature
for a day. Additional ammonia was bubbled into the mixture, which wds then heated under reflux
for thirty minutes, filtered hot, and the insoluble product collected on a Büchner funnel.
The product was washed with water, alcohol, and dried. The h.J gai of material recovered was
recrystallized from nitrobenzene.
A disadvantage of the above method was that it could not be used for the preparation of
large quantities of TATNB. Since it did not seem feasible to develop a new method of prepara-
tion, an investigation was made of the reported amination reactions (see Origin below). An
attempt was made (Ref f) to find a modification which would produce high yields of a pure pro-
duct. The process which evolved from this study may be summarized as follows (Ref f): 1,3,5-
trichlorobenzene was nitrated "in one step" to 1, 3,5-trichloro-2,i)-,6-trinitrol3enzene in 85$
yield. The crude nitration product was aminated in benzene with ammonia gas to TAITffl, in
yields of at least 95%.
Origin:
TA.TMB was prepared for the first time in 1888 by C. L. Jackson and J. F. Wing, who found
the compound insoluble in alcohol, ether, chloroform, benzene, and glacial acetic acid; and
soluble in nitrobenzene and aniline (Amer Chem Journal 10, 282 (1888)). B. Flurscheim and
E. L. Holmes prepared TATKB from benzene free pentanitroaniline by gradually adding it to 10$
aqueous ammonia (J Chem Soc, Pt 2,3045 (1928)). After boiling, an orange-yellow powder melt-
ing above 300°C was obtained. This product corresponded to that described by Jackson and Wing.
These authors, as well as Palmer (Amer Chem Journal lM_, 3T8 (1892)), attempted to reduce TA.THB
to hexa-aminobenzene. Either decomposition occurred or a hydrochloride of penta-aminobenzene
was formed. Flurscheim and Holmes succeeded in reducing TATNB with phenylhydrazine by heating
them together up to 200°C (J Chem Soc, Pt 1,334 (1929)) (Beil 13, 301 and EII, lh-1).
References: "
(a) F. Taylor, Jr., Synthesis of New High Explosives 11, Derivatives of 1,3,5-Tribromo-
2,t<-,6-Trinltrobenzene, NAVORD Report No. 44U3, 1 November 1956.
(b) L. D. Hampton, Snail Scale Detonation Velocity Measurements from May 1951 to May 195^,
NAVORD Report No. 3731, June 195^-
(c) E. M. Fisher and E. A. Christian, Explosion Effects Data Sheets, NAVORD Report No.
2986, Ik June 1955-
366
Triethylene Glycol Dinitrate (TEGN) Liquid AMCP 70G-177
Oxygen Balance:
C 29-9 H2C
CO, % -89
.0 CO % -27
1
H 5- *- H CT
Density: gm/cc |0QC 1-33
N 11.7 1 1.32
H2CX
Melting Point: "C
0 53-0 /
IT r\ '
367
AMCP 706-177
Triethylene Glycol Dinitrate (TEGN) Liquid
368
Triethylene Glycol Dinitrate (TEGN) Liquid AMCP 706-177
Origin:
Lourenco prepared triethylene glycol in 1863 by heating glycol with ethylene bromide in a
sealed tube at 115°-120°C (Ann (3) 67, 275). Later in the same year Wurtz prepared triethy-
lene glycol by heating ethylene oxide with glycol at 100°C. By action of nitric acid triethy-
lene glycol was oxidized to (H200C-CH2-0-CH2)2 (Am (3) 69, 331, 351).
The Germans and Italians were the first to prepare and use TEGN during World War II as an
ingredient of rocket and propellant powders. The commercial production of TEGN in quantity
i s still difficult and its use as a plasticizer for nitrocellulose is being replaced by other
liquid nitrates.
Preparation:
The purified triethylene glycol (TEG) is nitrated by carefully stirring it into 2.5 parts
of 65/30/5 nitric acid/sulphuric acid/water maintained at 0 — 5°C. The rate of cooling is
sufficient that 300 gn of TEG can be added within 40 minutes. The mixture is stirred and
held at 0 + 5°C, for 30 additional minutes. It is then drowned by pouring onto a large quan-
tity of ice and extracted three times with ether. The combined extract is water-washed to a
pH of about k, shaken with an excess of sodium bicarbonate solution, and further washed with
156 sodium bicarbonate solution until the washings are colorless. The ethereal solution is
water-washed until it has the same pH value as distilled water. It is carefully separated
from excess water, treated with chemically pure calcium chloride to remove dissolved water,
and filtered. The ether is removed by bubbling with dry air until a minimal rate of loss in
weight is attained. The yield is 1.34 gn per gn TEG (84%of theoretical) and the nitrogen
content of different batches range from 11.60 to 11.69$ by the nitrometer method (calculated
H.67/0).
References: 78
3 5 6 7 8
78
See footnote 1, page 10.
369
AMCP 706-177 Trimonite
217
Composition: Molecular Weight*
Oxygen Balance;
Picric Acid 88 - 90 CO,, % -62
CO %
_
Mononitronaphthalene 12 10
Density: gm/cc Cast i.6o
Melting Point: "C 90
int: "C
n3Do
Friction Pendulum Test:
Vacuum Stability Test:
Steel Shoe cc/40 Hrs, at
Fiber Shoe 90°C
100°C
Rifle Bullet Impact Test: Trials
120°C 0.9
% 135°C
Explosions 0
Partials 0 150°C
Detonation Rate:
Flammability Index:
Confinement None
370
Trimonite AMCP70G-177
Energy
371
AMCP 706-177 Trimonite
Origin:
References: ™
2. 1 6 8
1352 1325 926 1098
1372 976 1838
79
See footnote 1, page 10.
372
2,2,2-'Erinitroethyl-4, k, U-lfrinitrotjutyrate (TNETB) AMCP70S-177
Detonation Rate:
Flammability Index: Confinement
Condition
Hygroscopicity: % 30°C; 90$ RH
Charge Diameter, in.
75 C, 5 months Nil (a)
Density, gm/cc 1.60 1.76
Volatility:
Rate, meters/second 7760 8290
373
AM CP 706-177 2,2,2-Trinitroethyl-4,^,^-Trinitrobutyrate (1TOE7B)
Heat of:
Armor Plate Impact Test:
Combustion, cal/gm 1685
Explosion, cal/gm
60 mm Mortar Projectile:
Gas Volume, cc/gm 50% Inert, Velocity, ft/sec
Formation, cal/gm 307 Aluminum Fineness
Fusion, cal/gm
Sublimation, cal/gm (est) 80^ 500-lb General Purpose Bombs:
Specific Heat: cal/gm/°C
Plate Thickness, inches
1
l]/4
1 Mi
1%
Burning Rate:
cm/sec
Bomb Drop Test:
Thermal Conductivity:
cal/sec/cm/°C T7, 2000-lb Semi-Armor-Piercing Bomb vs Concrete:
Vapor Pressure: e
( ) Low Order
°C mm Mercury High Order
65 3-3 x 104
75 1.3 x
65 4.2 X 10
100 2.3 x 10"!
120 1.4 X 10
374
2,2,2-Trinitroethyl-*)-,k,^-Trinitro'Dutyrate (TNETB) AMCP 706-177
375
AMCP 706-177 2,2,2-Trinitroethyl-^, k,^-M.nitro'butyrate (THETB)
Solvent Solubility
Water Insoluble
n-Hexane Insoluble
Carbon tetrachloride Insoluble
Ethanol 5 gm/lOO gn solvent
Chloroform 5 gm/lOO gn solvent
Benzene 10 gm/lOO gn solvent
Nitrom ethane Very soluble
Glacial acetic acid Very soluble
Ethyl acetate Very soluble
TNT 57
BTNES (bis(trinitroethyl) succinate) 80+
BTNEN (bis(trinitroethyl) nitramine) 68.5
TUB (trinitrobenzene) , 65
Compound A (Cij.HgN.0_ formed by
condensation of 1,1-dinitroethane) 77
Trinitroethyl trinitrobenzoate (2jj>) 80-5 (£)
Three polymorphic crystalline forms have been observed. Low temperature Form I goes through
a solid-solid transition at 89°C giving Form II. Form II has a melting point of 92.5° to 93°C
Ch cooling, Form II does not transform reversibly to Form I when 89°C is reached. However,
Form II will transform to Form I at room temperature, usually taking a few hours to do so.
Form III was observed, which appeared to be stable over a very narrow temperature range on
the order of 0.2° to 0.3°C near 92.5°C
Preparation- (d)
(HOg),CCH2CH2C00CH2C(H02)3 + HC1
2,2,2-t r i n itroethyl-lt, ^,4-trinitro- hydrochloric
butyrate acid
Laboratory experiments indicate that the present slow step involving overnight treatment
of h,k,h-trinitrobutyryl chloride with 2,2,2-trinitroethanol and aluminum chloride can be
replaced by a fast and simple esterification in sulfuric acid. Using 100$ sulfuric acid or
fortified H2S0r„ the ester can be prepared in yields of 95$ to 9% in 24 hours at 25°C, in
5 hours at 50°C, or in 3 hours at 65°C. Above 65°C the reaction time is less, but the yield
falls off" and a less pure product is obtained. The crude white crystalline product on recrys-
tallization from dilute methanol gives a material melting at 92° to 93°C.
376
2,2,2-Trinitroethyl-M^-^initrotutyrate (TNETB) AMCP 706-177
Prig'"- (e)
TNETB belongs to a new class of explosives characterized by trinitromethyl groups,
-C(NOO) The chemistry of this class of compounds was studied in Germany by Drs. Schenck
and Sc-h-rmmelschmidt, who discovered in 19^2-19^3 that trinitromethane or nitroform, HCCNOg)?)
was the source of new explosive derivatives. Dr. Schenck prepared the stable solid alcohol,
2,2,2-trinitroethanol, from nitroform and formaldehyde. Dr. Schimmelschmidt reacted nitroform
with unsaturated organic compounds, such as acrylic acid, and predicted in 19^3 that the ester
of ^,^,4-trinitrobutyric acid with trinitroethanol would be an interesting explosive.
In 19V7 the U. S. Navy began a program to explore these compounds. The initial task of in-
vestigating the chemistry of trinitroethanol was undertaken by the Hercules Powder Company
(Navy Contract NOrd-9925)' The U.S. Rubber Company studied the chemistry of nitroform (Navy
Contract NOrd-10,129). After preparation of the first laboratory samples of TNETB, consider-
able interest was aroused. In early 1950 the Naugatuck Chemical Division of U.S. Rubber Com-
pany was assigned to prepare 100 pounds of TNETB. The Bureau of Ordnance in July 1953 raised
the production to 800 pounds with the assistance of the Hercules Powder Company in augmenting
the production at Naugatuck (Navy Contract NOrd-11,280). TNETB is a high oxygen content
explosive.
References: 80
(b) Bureau of Mines Report No. 3107, Part IX, Ballistic Mortar Tests on Trinitroethyl
Trinitrobutyrate, 5 April 1950.
(d) U.S. Rubber Company Quarterly Progress Report No. 23, Synthesis of New Propellants
and Explosives, Navy Contracts N0rd-10-129 and -12,663, 19 August I953.
(f) M. E. Hill, Synthesis of New High Explosives, NAV0RD Report No. 2965, lApril 1953-
(g) Jacob Savitt, A Sensitivity Test for Castable Liquid Explosives, Including Results
for <6>
Soiime New Materials, NAVORD Report No. 2997, 22 October 1953-
80
See footnote 1, page 10.
377
AMCP 706-177 Trinitro Triazidobenzene
Detonation Rate:
Flammability Index: Confinement
Condition
Hygroscopicity: % 30 C, 90%RH 0.00 Charge Diameter, in.
Density, gm/cc
Volatility:
Rate, meters/second
378
AMCP 706-177
Trinitro Triazidobenzene
cm/sec 0.65
379
AMCP 706-177
Trinitro Triazidobenzene
Preparation: (e)
NH
H0M
Cl °2
H+ mixed
decomposition acid
Cl
C1
HaK.
NO„
Origin:
This initiating explosive was first prepared in 1923 by Turek who also perfected its manu-
facture .
References :8^
(a) S. Helf, Tests of Explosive Compounds Submitted by Arthur D. Little, Inc., PATR 1750,
24 October 1949-
(b) A. F. Belyaeva and A. E. Belyaeva CRa.s. USSR 52, 503-505 (1946) Chemical Abstracts
41, I+310.
A. E. Belyaeva and A. F. Belyaeva, Doklady Akad Ifeuk. USSR 56, 491-491+ (194-7).
(c) French Patent 893,941, 14 November 1944 (Chemical Abstracts 4_7, 8374).
(d) A. D. Yoffe, "Thermal Decomposition and Explosion of Azides," Proc. Roy Soc A208,
188-199 (1951).
(e) T. L. Davis, The Chemistry of Powder and Explosives, John Wiley and Sons, Inc.,
Nxv York (1943), p. 43(x
(f) 0. Turek, Chim et Ind 26, ?8l (1931); German Patent 498,050: British Patent 298,981.
81
See footnote 1, page 10.
380
Tripentaervthritol Octaniträte (IPEOJO AMCP 706-177
Detonation Rate:
Flammobility Index: Confinement None
Condition Pressed
Hygroscopicity: % Charge Diameter, in. 0.5
Density, gm/cc 1.56
Volatility:
Rate, meters/second 7650
381
AMCP 706-177 Tripentaerythritol Octanitrate (TPEOlQ
Heat of:
Armor Plate Impact Test:
Combustion, cal/gm 2Ö32
Explosion, cal/gm 1085
60 mm Mortar Projectile:
Gas Volume, cc/gm 762 50% Inert, Velocity, ft/sec
Formation, cal/gm Aluminum Fineness
Fusion, cal/gm
500-lb General Purpose Bombs:
Specific Heat: cal/gm/°C
Plate Thickness, inches
Specific Impulse:
Thermal Conductivity:
col/sec/cm/"C T7, 2000-lb Semi-Armor-Piercing Bomb YJ Concrete:
382
Tripentaerythritol Octanitrate (TPEOW) AMCP 706-177
Energy
Under Water: ^0 7o 90
Peak Pressure
Impulse 24 -O.OO8 +0.01 +0.0U
48 -0.02 -0.01 +0.02
Energy
ikk -0.0k -0.03 -0.02
192 -0.04 -0.02
Underground: 216 -0.004 -0.01 +0.03
Peak Pressure
Impulse Solubility:
Energy
Solvent Solubility
Water Insoluble
Alcohol Soluble
Chloroform Soluble
Acetone, hot Very soluble
Benzene, hot Very soluble
383
AMCP 706-177 Tripentaerythritol Octanitrate (PEON)
Twenty grams (0.054 mol) of nitration grade tripentaerythritol (TPE) (99%)minimum purity)
were slowly added, with stirring, to 160 gm (2.55 mol) of 99%nitric acid at a temperature of
-25 to 0°C. Qi equivalent weight basis, this quantity of 99% nitric acid corresponds to an
excess of 6.3 times the TPE used. After addition of the TPE, the reaction mixture was stirred
for about one hour at 0° to 5°C and poured into eight times its volume of cracked ice. The
product, when allowed to stand overnight, wds crushed under water; filtered with suction; and
washed copiously with water. It was then treated twice with about 5 times its weight of a if
ammonium carbonate solution, stirred for several hours, filtered and washed with water until
the final washings were neutral to litmus. The final product v\tB washed successively with
50 cc each of ethanol and ether. The material dried in air weighed 37.8 gm or 96$ of theory
based on TPE. It had a melting range of 71° to 74 C. Crystallization of the crude TPEON from
chloroform was found to be the most suitable method of obtaining pure TPEON.
Origin:
TPEON prepared by the reaction of tripentaerythritol and 99$ nitric acid at 0 to 10°C was
reported by Wyler in 19^5 (J. A. Wyler to Trojan Powder Company: U.S. Patent 2,389, 228,
20 November 19^5)•
384
Tripentaerythritol Octanitrate (TPEOM) AMCP 70G-177
References: ^2
(c) S. D. Brewer and H. Henkln, The Stability of PEIN and Pentolite, OSRD Report No. l4l4.
(d) E. Berlow, R- H. Barth and J. E. Snow, The Pentaervthritols. ACS Monograph No. 136,
Reinhold Publishing Corporation, New York, 1958!
385
AMCP 70S-177 M. tonal, 80/20
Sensitivity to Initiation:
Minimum Detonating Charge, gm
Mercury Fulminate
Lead Azide 0.20
Tetryl 0.10
386
Tritonal, 8o/20 AMCP 706-177
Thermal Conductivity:
-k 17, 2000-lb Semi-Armor-Piercing Bombvs Concrete:
cal/sec/cm/"C, (b) 11 x 10
Density, gm/cc 1-73
Max Safe Drop, ft
Coefficient of Expansion:
Linear, %/°C 500-lb General Purpose Bomb vs Concrete:
Seal Seal
Volume, %/°C Height, ft U,000 5,000
Trials 34 Ik
Hardness, Mohs' Scale: 32 lit
Unaffected
Low Order 0 0
Young's Modulus: (b)
High Order 2 0
B, dynes/cm2 6.67 x 10-10
E, lb/inch2 0.97 x 10^ 1000-lb General Purpose Bomb VJ Concrete:
Density, gm/cc 1.72 Seal
Height, ft 5,000
CompressiveStrength: lb/inch2 (b) 23^0 Trials 24
Density, gm/cc 1.75 23
Unaffected
387
AMCP 706-177 Tritonal, 8o/20
388
T + i ftn/or,
Tritonal. o0/20 AMCP 706-177
Origin:
The Addition of aluminum to increase the power of explosives was proposed by Escales in
1899 and patented by Roth in 1900 (German Patent 172,327). Some recent studies, directed
towards establishment of the optimum amount of aluminum in the TNT/Aluminum system, have shown
that (l)the blast effect increases to a maximum when the aluminum content is 30$ (Ref g);
the brisance, as measured by the Sand Test, passes through a maximum at about 17$ aluminum
(Ref h); in Fragmentation Tests, no maximum is observed, additions of aluminum causing a de-
crease in efficiency over the entire range from 0$ to 70$ aluminum (Ref i); and (4) the rate
of detonation of cast charges is continuously decreased by additions of aluminum up to 40$
(Ref j ) F°r all practical purposes it is concluded that the addition of 18$ to 20$ aluminum
to TNT improves its performance to a maximum. This conclusion is in agreement with that of
British workers who measured performance of aluminized TNT-mixtures based on extensive Lead
Block Test data (Ref k).
Tritonal, consisting of 80$ TNT and 20$ aluminum, was developed and standardized in the
United States during World War II for use in bombs.
References :83
(a) L. C. Smith and E. H. Eyster, Physical Testing of Explosives, Part 111, Miscellaneous
Sensitivity Tests; Performance Tests, CSRD Report No. 5746, 27 December 1945.
(b) Philip C. Keenan and Dorothy Pipes, Table of Military High Explosives. Second Revi-
sion, NAV0RD Report No. 87-46, 26 July 1946.
(c) D. P. MacDougall, Methods of Physical Testing, 0SRD Report No. 803, 11 August 1942.
(e) Committee of Div 2 and 8, NDRC, Report on HBX and Tritonal, OSRD No. 5406, 31 July 19^5•
(f) W. R. Tomlinson, Jr. , Blast Effects of Bomb Explosives. PA Tech Div Lecture, 9 April
19I+8.
(h) W. R. Tomlinson, Jr., Develop New High Explosive Filler for AP Shot. PAIR No. 1290,
First Progress Report, 19 May 1943-
(i) W. R. Tomlinson, Jr., Develop New High Explosive Filler for AP Shot, PAIR No. 1380,
Second Progress Report, 12 January 1944.
(j) L. S. Wise, Effect of Aluminum on the Rate of Detonation of TNT, PAIR No. 1550,
26 July 1945-
(k) Armament Research Dept, The Effect of Aluminum on the Power of Explosives, British
Report AC-6437, May 1944 (Explosives Report 577/44).
389
AMCP 70G-177 _Tritonal,
.. . Rn/on
00/20
(l) Also see the following Picatinny Arsenal Technical Reports on Tritonal:
2. 3 i 5 6 7 8
1530 1693 lW l635 1956 1737 2138
1560 2353 2127
2010
390
V<-ltex Wo^J+W* AMCP 706-177
Detonation Rate:
Flammability Index: Confinement
Condition
Hygroscopicity: % Charge Diameter, in.
Density, gm/cc
Volatility:
Rate, meters/second (calculated) 8500
391
AMCP 706-177 Veltex No. M8*
Hoot of:
Armor Plate Impact Test:
Combustion, cal/gm 2359
Explosion, cal/gm 1226
60 mm Mortor Projectile:
Gas Volume, cc/gm 50% Inert, Velocity, ft/sec
Formation, col/gm Aluminum Fineness
Fusion, col/gm
500-lb General Purpose Bombs:
Thermal Conductivity:
cal/sec/cm/"C T7, 2000-lb Semi-Armor-Piercing Bomb vs Concrete:
392
Veltex No. 448 AMCP 70S-177
Air, Confined:
Impulse
Underwater:
Peak Pressure
Impulse
Energy
Underground:
Peak Pressure
Impulse
Energy
393
AMCP 706-177 Veltex Wo. 448
Preparation:
The preparation of this class of explosive compositions is illustrated by the method used
for Veltex No. 448: Placs. 675 cc of water in a slurry kettle equipped with an agitator. Add
5.85 goi of 2-nItrodipher..ylaraine and agitate for several minutes to obtain dispersion. Then
add 93.7 gm of water-wt nitrocellulose (dry weight 67.5 gm) in small portions. Raise the
temperature to 1t8°C ana maintain this temperature, but continue the agitation. A mixture of
48.2 gm of nitroglycerin and 13-5 gm of triacetin is added over a 5-minute period, with the
mixing continuing for an additional 10 minutes at 48°C. Bie HMX (350 gm) is added over a
5-minute period with agitation continued for 30 minutes at 48°C. The slurry is cooled to
room temperature and filtered. The filter cake is dried to a moisture content between 8%and
12$. The incorporation of this mix is completed by rolling 50 gm portions at a temperature
of approximately 90°C. The finished colloid is then preheated on a heat table at 66°c. In-
crements of 25 gm each are pressed at 6700 psi for four minutes at 71°C A cylinder is then
built up by pressing together four 25 gn increments for a dwell time of 15 minutes.
Origin:
Veltex is the name given to a series of closely related nitrocellulose compositions pre-
pared in 1957 at Picatinny Arsenal by the solventless process used for propellants. These
compositions all contain a high percentage of solid high explosive. They were investigated
to determinate the suitability of the Holtex type explosive developed by Hispano Suiza of
Switzerland, France and Spain, but for which the composition was not reported (Ref a). Com-
positions similar to Veltex No. 448 and containing 60<?o to 80$ HMX, with either nitroglycerin
or triethyleneglycol dinitrate as colloiding agent for nitrocellulose, have also been prepared.
In general these compositions showed lower heat stability than that of conventional high ex-
plosive compositions.
Reference: ^
84
See footnote 1, page 10.
394
AMCP 706-177
(AMCRD-TV)
wk
k.
. R. HORNE
Chief of Staff
Colonel, GS
&Chief, HQ Admin Mgt Ofc
DISTRIBUTION:
Special
ENGINEERING DESIGN HANDBOOKS
Listed below are the Handbooks which have been published or are currently under preparation. Handbooks with publication
dates prior to 1 August 1962 were published as 20-series Ordnance Corps Pamphlets. ftJC Circular 310-38, 19 July 1963,
redesignated those publications as 706-series /WC Pamphlets (e.g., CRD? 20-138 was redesignated AMCP 706-138). All new,
reprinted, or revised Handbooks are being published as 706-series ftJC Pamphlets.
No. Title No.
AVCP 706- AVCP 706-
100 "Design Guidance for Producibility 201 "Rotorcraft Engineering, Part One, Preliminary
104 "Value Engineering Design
106 Elements of Armament Engineering, Part One, 202 "Rotorcraft Engineering, Part Two, Detail
Sources of Energy Design
107 Elements of Armament Engineering, Part Two, 203 "Rotorcraft Engineering, Part Three, Qualifica-
Ballistics tion Assurance
108 Elements of Armament Engineering, Part Three, 205 "Timing Systems and Components
Weapon Systems and Components 210 Fuzes
109 "Tables of the Cumulative Binomial Probabilities 211(C) Fuzes, Proximity, Electrical, Part One (U)
110 Experimental Statistics, Section 1, Basic Con- 212(S) Fuzes, Proximity, Electrical, Part Two (U)
cepts and Analysis of Measurement Data 213(S) Fuzes, Proximity, Electrical, Part Three (U)
111 Experimental Statistics, Section 2, Analysis of 214(S) Fuzes, Proximity, Electrical, Part Four (U)
Enumerative and Classificatory Data 215(C) Fuzes, Proximity, Electrical, Part Five (U)
112 Experimental Statistics, Section 3, Planning 235 "Hardening Weapon Systems Against RF Energy
and Analysis of Comparative Experiments 239{S) "Small Arms Ammunition (U)
113 Experimental Statistics, Section 4, Special 240( S) Grenades (U)
Topics 241(S) *Land Mines (U)
114 Experimental Statistics, Section 5, Tables 242 Design for Control of Projectile Flight
115 Environmental Series, Part One, Basic Environ- Characteristics {REPLACES -246)
mental Concepts 244 Ammunition, Section 1, Artillery Ammunition-
116 "Environmental Series, Part Two, Basic Environ- General, with Table of Contents, Glossary,
mental Factors and Index fo r Series
12a "Criteria for Environmental Control of Mobile 245(C) Ammunition, Section 2, Design for Terminal
Systems Effects (U)
121 ""Packaging and Pack Engineering 246 +Ammunition, Section 3, Design for Control of
123 "Hydraulic Fluids Flight Characteristics {REPLACED BT -242)
125 Electrical Wire and Cable 247 Ammunition, Section 4, Design for Projection
127 "Infrared Military Systems, Part One 248 -•-Ammunition, Section 5, Inspection Aspects of
128(S; "Infrared Military Systems, Part Two (U) Artillery Ammunition Design
130 Desigr for Air Transport and Airdrop of 249 Ammunition, Section 6, Manufacture of Metallic
Materiel Components of Artillery Ammunition
133 "Maintainability Engineering Theory and Practice 250 Guns--General
134 Maintainability Guide for Design 251 Muzzle Devices
135 Inventions, Patents, and Related Matters 252 Gun Tubes
136 Servomechanisms, Section 1, Theory 255 Spectral Characteristics of Muzzle Flash
137 Servomechanisms, Section 2, Measurement and 260 Automatic Weapons
Signai Converters 270 Propellant Actuated Devices
138 Servomechanisms, Section 3, Amplification 280 Design of Aerodynamically Stabilized Fr?e
139 Servomechanisms, Section 4, Power Elements and Rockets
System Design 281 (SRD) Weapon System Effectiveness (U)
140 Trajectories, Differential Effects, and Data 282 + Propulsion and Propellants (KEPLACEE BY -285)
f o r Projectiles 283 Aerodynamics
145 "Dynamics of a Tracking Gimbal System 284(C) Trajectories (U)
150 Interior Ballistics of Guns 285 Elements of Aircraft and Missile Propulsion
160(5) Elenierts of Terminal Ballistics, Part One, Kill {REPLACES -282)
Mechanisms and Vulnerability (U) 286 Structures
161(5) Elements of Terminal Ballistics, Part Two, 290(C) Warheads—General (I)
Collection and Analysis of Data Concerning 291 Surface-to-Air Missiles, Part One, System
Targets (U) Integration
162(SRD) Elements of Terminal Ballistics, Part Three, 292 Surface-to-Air Missiles, Part Two, Weapon
Application to Missile and Space Targets (U Control
165 Liquid-Filled Projectile Design 293 Surface-to-Air Missiles, Part Three, Computers
170(C) ""Armor and Its Application (U) 294i,S Surface-to-Air Missiles, Part Four, Missile
175 Solid Propellants, Part One Armament (U)
176(C) Solid Propellants, Part Two (U) 29b(S Surface-to-Air Missiles, Part Five, Counter-
177 Properties of Explosives of Military Interest measures (U)
178(C) ^Properties of Explosives of Military Interest 296 Surface-to-Air Missiles, Part Six, Structures
Section 2 (U) {REPLACED BY -177) and Power Sources
179 Explosive Trains 297(S Surface-to-Air Missiles, Part Seven, Sample
180 "Principles of Explosive Behavior Problem (U)
p
185 Military Pyrotechnics, Part One, Theory and 327 ire Control Systems—General
Appli cati on 329 Fire Control Computing Systems
Military Pyrotechnics, Part Two, Safety, 331 Compensating Elements
Procedures and Glossary 335(SRD) "Design Engineers' Nuclear Effects Manual,
Military Pyrotechnics, Part Three, Properties Volume I, Munitions and Weapon Systems (J)
of Materials Used in Pyrotechnic Compositions 336(SRD) "Design Engineers' Nuclear Effects Manual,
"Military Pyrotechnics, Part Four, Design of Volume II, Electronic Systems and Logistical
Ammunition for Pyrotechnic Effects Systems (U)
189 Military Pyrotechnics, Part Five, Bibliography 337(SRD) "Design Engineers' Nuclear Effects Manual,
190 *Anrsy Weapon System Analysis Volume III, Nuclear Environment (U)
191 *System Analysis and Cost-Effectiveness 338(SRD) "Design Engineers' Nuclear Effects Manual,
195 *Develapment Guide for Reliability, Part One, 'Jolume IV, Nuclear Effects (U)
Introduction, Background, and Planning for 340 Carriages and Mounts—General
Army Materiel Requirements 341 Cradles
196 "Development Guide for Reliability, Part Two, 342 Recoil Systems
Design for Reliability 343 Top Carriages
197 "Development Guide for Reliability, Part Three, 344 Bottom Carriages
Reliability Prediction 345 Equi1i brators
198 "Development Guide for Reliability, Part Four, 346 Elevating Mechanisms
Reliability Measurement 347 Traversing Mechanisms
"Development Guide for Reliability, Part Five, 350 Wheeled Amphibians
Contracting for Reliability 355 The Automotive Assembly
"Development Guide for Reliability, Part Six, 356 Automotive Suspensions
Mathematical Appendix and Glossary 357 Automotive Bodies and Hulls