Scribd
Upload
27 views

February 3, 2004 Chapter 3.2-3.6 Constraints On P-Markers, Generating P-Markers

This document summarizes key concepts from Chapter 3.2-3.6 of a linguistics text, including: 1) Phrase structure rules license syntactic structures by specifying immediate dominance and precedence relationships. This captures creativity and recursion in language. 2) "No crossing branches" means that trees representing syntactic structures must be acyclic graphs with a linear ordering of sisters. 3) Categories like particles and subordinating conjunctions pattern with prepositions in terms of complementation.

Uploaded by

M Asif Adeli
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
27 views

February 3, 2004 Chapter 3.2-3.6 Constraints On P-Markers, Generating P-Markers

This document summarizes key concepts from Chapter 3.2-3.6 of a linguistics text, including: 1) Phrase structure rules license syntactic structures by specifying immediate dominance and precedence relationships. This captures creativity and recursion in language. 2) "No crossing branches" means that trees representing syntactic structures must be acyclic graphs with a linear ordering of sisters. 3) Categories like particles and subordinating conjunctions pattern with prepositions in terms of complementation.

Uploaded by

M Asif Adeli
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 18

February 3, 2004

Chapter 3.2–3.6
Constraints on P-markers,
Generating P-markers
Overview

Some words on the conference

Review

‘No crossing branches’

Phrase structure rules

Recursion

Some further categories

Next time: An eye-tracking experiment


Review: Precedence
Which nodes precede VP? Immediately precede?
Why is precedence relevant?
S

NP M VP

N will V ADVP

Kim sleep ADV

soundly
Review: Dominance
Which nodes dominate V? Immediately dominate?
Why is dominance relevant?
S

NP M VP

N will V ADVP

Kim sleep ADV

soundly
Review: Kinship

How do we define sister nodes?

How do we define mother/daughter nodes?

How do we define granddaughter, niece etc?


Review: C-command
Which nodes c-command ADV?
Why is c-command relevant?
S

NP M VP

N will V ADVP

Kim sleep ADV

soundly
No crossing branches

‘If one node X precedes another node Y, then X and all


descendants of X must precede Y and all descendants of
Y. (A is a descendant of B iff A is dominated by B.)’
(p.121)

Equivalently: Phrase structure trees are directed acyclic


graphs, with a linear ordering defined on all sister nodes.
The words of a sentence represented by a tree must
appear in the order defined by that linear ordering.

How does this simplify the task of the language learner?

Why might one be tempted to posit crossing branches?


Phrase structure rules (1/3)

An explanatorily adequate grammar:


licenses some strings but not others
assigns a structure to every string it licenses

In this model (and many others) structures are licensed


by phrase structure rules.
Phrase structure rules (2/3)
Form: A BC
Licenses subtrees of this form: A

B C
Specify both immediate dominance and immediate
precedence.
Can be read as: An A can consist of a B followed by a C.
Or: A B followed by a C can constitute and A.
(B and C may then consist of various things.)
Why use ‘can’ instead of ‘must’ in those readings?
Phrase structure rules (3/3)

Abbreviations:
Optional elements in parentheses:
NP (D) N
Alternative elements grouped by curly braces:
PP


VP V
NP



Creativity of language

Phrase structure rules define abstract structures for


sentences.

Those abstract structures can correspond to many


sentences, depending on which lexical items fill in the
leaves of the tree.

This captures some of the creativity of language.

Examples?

What’s missing?
Recursion

Recursive rules capture the fact that any given sentence


can be arbitrarily long.

Individual rules can be recursive: A AB

Groups of rules can be recursive:


A BC
B DE
D AF

What are some examples of recursion in English?

What kind of rules should we capture them with?


Relationship to processing
What do people do in their heads when they create a
sentence to say?
Phrase structure rules can be applied ‘top-down’ (starting
from S, say) or ‘bottom-up’ (starting from the leaves).
This doesn’t mean the model claims that’s what people
are doing while speaking or listening.
A generative grammar is best seen as a declarative
statement of what’s admissible in the language.
How exactly that knowledge is deployed is a question for
a theory of performance.
Some further categories

Particle: He put his hat on.

Subordinating conjunction: The wind blew until he put


his hat on.

Are particles and subordinating conjunctions adverbs?


Particles and sub. conjs. as prepositions (1/2)

I haven’t seen him [since the party]/[since the party


began]/[since].

I’d never met her [before the party]/[before you held your
party]/[before].

You can have some chocolate [after your dinner]/[after


you’ve eaten your dinner]/[after].

cf: I know [the answer]/[you are innocent]/ .


Particles and sub. conjs. as prepositions (2/2)

He’s been difficult ever since (the party (began)).

He’d been feeling unwell a couple of weeks before (his


collapse/he collapsed).

There was a drugs raid immediately after (the party


(began)).
Subcategorization of prepositions

S/NP complement only:


He waited until her departure/until she left/*until.

NP complement only:
He left during the party/*during the party was still going
on/*during.

S complement only:
He collapsed while the party was in full swing/*while
the party/*while.

NB: Not unlike verbs.


Overview

Some words on the conference

Review

‘No crossing branches’

Phrase structure rules

Recursion

Some further categories

Next time: An eye-tracking experiment

You might also like