Final Defense in PR2
Final Defense in PR2
Final Defense in PR2
TUBAO, LA UNION
JU.LY, 2023
i
APPROVAL SHEET
National High School: Basis for Career Guidance Program”, prepared and submitted
by Judy Ann Lloren, Friza Ann Marie Niduaza, Shantyl Kate Refugia and Adrian
Charles Suguitan, in partial fulfillment of the Requirements in Research Project for the
Academic Track (Humanities and Social Sciences) was examined and passed on
Member Member
Chairman Adviser
Member Member
RODERICK E. LLOREN
Expert Evaluator
ii
Accepted and approved in partial fulfillment of the requirements of Academic
iii
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
The researchers wish to express their genuine gratitude and appreciation to the
Following, who in one way or another, contributed in the completion of this research
Work:
Mrs. Raquel C. Laroya, their research project teacher, for the unending patience
the Expert evaluator, Mrs. Lourdes J. Soriano, Mr. Franklin L. Padilla, Mrs.
Veronica F. Vargas, Mr. Manuel J. Degyan, and Mrs. Raquel D. de Guzman for
Their principal, Mr. Robert G. Estoesta, Ed. D., for his unconditional and
Unwavering support;
Their classroom adviser, Ms. Mia Angeles, who approved the conducted
All the researchers’ friends and family, supportive siblings who extended in the
And finally, to Our Almighty God through our Lord Jesus Christ for
continuously giving wisdom and knowledge, courage, determination, and good health
iv
DEDICATION
To the Almighty
-The Researchers
v
ABSTRACT
LLOREN, JUDY ANN I., NIDUAZA, FRIZA ANN MARIE C., REFUGIA,
Preference of Grade 10 Students in Tubao National High School Basis for Career
Guidance Program” Tubao National High School, Tubao, La Union, July 2023.
This research study was to know the problems encountered by the Grade 10 Students
students of Tubao National High School on their academic performance. The
questionnaire use had of two parts: 1) respondents’ profile and 2) problems encountered
by the respondents as to personal condition, study habits, home-related aspects,
school-related aspects and teacher-related aspects. The students’ responses were marked
then afterwards, analyzed using frequency counts and percentages, and average weighted
mean. The results of the study showed most of the respondents were 15-16 years old,
mostly males. The result showed that personal interest had a high impact of the
students’ problems. Along with socioeconomic status; parents factors; job opportunity;
academic performance; showed a high impact to contribute on the problems
encountered by the respondents. Based on the findings, recommendations were made.
Students must focus on their performance for them to be competent on various activities.
Teachers must know how to deal with their students. Furthermore, the must also apply
some learning styles like auditory, visual, kinesthetic, etc. in order for the students to
understand the lessons well.
viii
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
Title Page………………………………………………………………...........…………. i
Approval Sheet…………………………………………………………...........……..….. ii
Acknowledgement………………………………………………………...........……….. iv
Dedication………………………………………………………………................…….. v
Abstract………………………………………………………………...........……….….. vi
Table of Contents…………………………………………………….…………………..vii
List of Tables…………………………………………………………………...……….ix
List of Figures…………………………………………………………………...………ix
List of Appendices……………………………………………………………………….ix
CHAPTER
1 INTRODUCTION
Situation Analysis…………………………………………………..………….. 2
Theoretical Framework…………….…….……….…………….........…………6
viii
Definition of Terms…………………..……………………………….……….. 10
2 METHODOLOGY
Research Design………………………………….…...…………..…………… 12
Sources of Data………………………………………………….…….………..12
Data Analysis…………………………………………………………………...13
Categorization of Data……………………………………….……….………... 13
Summary…………………………………………………………...…………...23
Salient Findings………………………………………………………..………. 23
Conclusions……………………………………………………...…………….. 24
Recommendations……….…………………………………………...…………24
viii
LIST OF TABLES
LIST OF FIGURES
LIST OF APPENDICES
xi
Chapter 1
INTRODUCTION
Situation Analysis
With the implementation of the K-12 program, two additional years of high school
are added that cater to specialized subjects that will help in improving the Competencies of
students. The program covers kindergarten and twelve years of basic education (preside). Ra
10533 was a new law that the Government of the Philippines implemented that changes the
Development, published in 1990, states that high school students are at the exploration
stage, when they have made early decisions about their career choices. One significant
component of this new curriculum that offers new chances is senior high school. It provides
tracks that are relevant to the classes that the students would enroll in at the institution, such
as humanities and social sciences (HUMSS), accounting and business management (ABM),
The study of human behavior, societal development, and analyses of art, culture,
literature, and politics are the main foci of the HUMSS strands. It focuses more on
communication abilities and public speaking. This strand aims to build the confidence of the
1
students to step out of their comfort zones. It uses the interpersonal skills of every
student (Clemente, 1996). Possible careers under this strand Archaeologist, Teacher,
Consultant,
2
Anthropologist, Journalist, Geologist, Historian, Lawyer, Biologist, Artist,
financial and business management. It suits for the students who wants to be an entrepreneur
someday. This strand boost the skills and competencies of the students. According to
DEPED, ABM was the third strand in having the most enrolled students. The possible
careers under it are Sales Management, Human Resources, Marketing Director, Bookkeeper,
Students can engage with the digital world thanks to the ICT strand. It imparts
technical know-how and tool usage understanding (Karl Nucum, 2019). This theme is
(Clemete, 1996). The available vocations under this strand are Data Encoder, Junior
Web Designer, Software Developer, Web Developer, and it gives “National Certificates
This strand helps the students to understand the basic human necessities and to study
the well-being of humans and societies. It can improve the students’ cooking skills while at
3
the same time it requires money. The possible careers under this strand are interior Designer,
According to the research, making the right choice is equivalent to selecting the
strand that will work best for each student because one option could have an impact on their
future. In the research of Cervera et al. (2016), there are numerous factors that can influence
students’ strand selection. This may affect the learners’ decision-making as they select the
appreciated parental involvement and advice in the areas of career choice and occupational
development, according to a study by Bregman and Killen (1999). They are the ones who
will encourage or order their kids to choose a style that meets their standards (Rue, 1987).
They occasionally have a tendency to decide what their children will take because of family
tradition. According to a study by Boatwright et al. (1992), family plays a significant role in
determining the decision and guiding the right path of their children will pursue.
The importance of the study Is to aid the students to become more knowledgeable
about their chosen strand. They would also know the benefits of their strand and how to
avoid the problems that may be encountered. Furthermore, this study will be a building
blocks for the students to pursue their careers and take a step on their future.
One of the choices that each person must make is their career. In order for students to
fully comprehend the K–12 Basic Education Curriculum and develop into internationally
competitive learners, they needed a deeper grasp of the programs within it. A difficult
4
decision that requires careful thought is which career will be best for each student. Students
need to get an awareness of their personality and areas of interest in order to make the
optimal choice. This study was conducted by the researchers to help students better grasp the
need of making plans immediately and to lessen any mistakes they may make while
5
Framework of the Study
Theoretical Framework
1.) Developmental Theory of Career Development; 2.) Social Cognitive Career Theory.
This theories were taken to stand for choosing strand of the students of Grade 10 learners.
High school students are in the exploration stage of career development, which
entails crystallizing and clarifying their occupational preferences as well as making tentative
decisions about their career choice, according to Super's (1990) Developmental Theory of
parental influence, and peer influence—have an impact on a student's plans, decisions, and
job choice. The study made an effort to pinpoint and distinguish the various roles that these
Social cognitive career theory (SCCT) is a relatively new theory that is aimed at
explaining three interrelated aspects of career development: (1) how basic academic and
career interests develop, (2) how educational and career choices are made, and (3) how
academic and career success is obtained. The theory incorporates a variety of concepts (e.g.,
6
earlier career theories and have been found to affect career development. Developed
by Robert W. Lent, Steven D. Brown, and Gail Hackett in 1994, SCCT is based on
and motivational processes that has been extended to the study of many areas of
organizational development.
The INPUT consisted the following: respondent”s profile as to; age, sex, section,
and factors influencing G-10 students in choosing strand in senior high school. The
PROCESS included the analysis of the variables given. The OUTPUT included the student
development program that should be proposed to overcome the problems of the respondents.
7
Research Paradigm
Analysis of the
I. Respondent’s profile following variables:
as to; I. Respondent’s profile
a. Age as to;
b. Sex a. Age
c. Section b. Sex
8
STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM
This study aims to determine the Factors Influencing the Grade 10 students in
choosing Strands in Senior High School specially, it will seek to causes the following
questions:
a. Age
b. Sex
c. Section
2. What are the factors influencing the respondents to choose their strand?
9
Definition of Terms
In order to understand the contents of the study, the following terms were operationally
defined:
Academic Performance shows how well a student meets standards set out by local both the
Job Opportunities refers to a particular employment that the student believes fits into their
preferred strand.
Parents educational attainment the highest level of education that a person has successfully
completed.
Personal Interest before choosing the right strand for them, considers a student's
preferences or choices.
Respondent’s profile is taken into account in the study as it covers gender and age. Age
refers to the stage of life that students are typically in between the ages of 15 and 16 years,
17–18 years old and older than the age of 19. The physical difference between genders is
10
Importance of the Study
Selecting a strand to be taken in senior high is a crucial decision for students’, because their
futures inclined with it. With the help of their parents and peers also considering their
financial status and chosen careers, students come up a firm decision on what strand they
take should.
Teachers. The crucial information provided here can be used as a foundation for
the needs and characteristics of the students they are working with.
Students. As the study's intended audience, grade 12 students studying humanities and
social sciences will learn crucial details about the respondent's profile, including: age, sex,
section socioeconomic status of parents, parents' educational attainment, and will also
receive a that will give them advice and direction on selecting the strand they want to
pursue.
Administrator. They can use this study as a guide when developing educational policies
and initiatives for the students' advancement, and they can offer suggestions for teaching
methods to the teachers of the various subject areas to help the kids learn more.
Researchers. They will receive important programs or tactics that the respondents will
employ to deal with those issues, which they may utilize to enrich their future work on better
research studies. Additionally, this study will act as a repository of data for expert research.
11
Future Researchers. It serves as a background to their study and a basis in order for them
12
Chapter 2
METHODOLOGY
Research Design
descriptive research is describing the current condition or characteristics of the norms under
a study in a given time period. The respondents will be surveyed on their strand preferences
Sources of Data
The researchers chose the Grade-10 students of Tubao National National High
School as their respondents. A total of 211 respondents are the source on this research. To
determine the respondents, a slovins formula was used and they were chosen through
random sampling.
CURIE 42 42
OHM 40 40
HERTZ 45 45
MAXWELL 42 42
EDISON 42 42
13
Instrumentation and Data Collection
The researcher will used the survey questionnaire as their main instrument in
The questionnaire consist of two (2) parts-Part I of the questionnaire showed the
respondents’ profile as to: the respondent’s profile as to: Age, Sex, Section, Socio Economic
status of parents, Parents educational attainment. Part II the factors influencing G-10
The survey questionnaire used on this research was a Researcher’s made. And has
The overall findings of this study will used as a basis in coming out with the
recommendations for a proposed career guidance program for the Grade 10 students of
Data Analysis
The study used descriptive statistics tools such as frequency counts and percentage,
weighted mean for the factors influencing in choosing Senior High School Strand.
Categorization of Data
Giving the variables under study code numbers, data are grouped. The coding assisted the
14
STRAND PREFERENCES OF GRADE 10 LEARNERS
15
Chapter 3
PERCENTAG
PROFILE FREQUENCY TOTAL
E
HERT
CURIE EDISON MAXWELL OHM
Z
AGE
13-14 years old 3 3 1 1 0 8 4%
15-16 years old 35 38 42 39 39 193 91%
17 years old and
4 1 2 2 1 10 5%
above
TOTAL 42 42 45 42 40 211 100%
GENDER
MALE 23 18 21 22 20 104 49%
FEMALE 19 24 24 20 20 107 51%
TOTAL 42 42 45 42 40 211 100%
Table 1 presents the personal profile of the respondents as to age, and gender.
Age. As reflected on the table, there were 193 or 91% of the respondents aged 15-16
years old, and 8 or 3% of the respondents was 13-14 years old. Therefore there were more
16
According to Hedges (1978) who studied student age and academic success, “No
matter what the entrance age limit may be, the children who enter earliest have more
problem and achieve less than those of equal IQ who enter later.”
Gender. One hundred seven or 50% of the total population were females, while 104
or 49% were males. This means that there are more women rather than men.
“Standardized achievement tests also shows that females are better at spelling and
perform better on tests of literacy, writing, and general knowledge.” (National Center for
17
TABLE 2. Problems Encountered by the Respondents
Poblems WM Description
A. Personal Condition
1. My parents have stable income to support my studies 3.99 HI
2. I Have th freedom to choose my strand 4.52 VHI
3. Due to my socioeconomic status, I consider choosing a more practial stand 3.87 HI
4. My socioeconomic status matter when I decide on my future career path 4.17 HI
5. I consider my family's financial status when deciding on a future senior high strand 3.92 HI
AWM 4.09 HI
B.Parents Factor
1. My parents' opinions about my career decisions mattter 3.97 HI
2. I seek my parents' advice when deciding on something 4.15 HI
3. My parents give m a freedom to decide on my senior high school strand 4.15 HI
4. My parents support me in anything I do or choose 4.44 VHI
5. My final senior high strand decision depends on my parents 4.42 VHI
AWM 3.99 HI
C. Job Opportunities
1. Before deciding on a career path, I consider the available job opportunities 4.09 HI
2. I look for job opportunities that are aligned with each strand 4.01 HI
3. Job opportunities are important when deciding on future career path 4.42 VHI
4.My senior high strand decision most likely depends on the job opportunities aligned with them 4.04 HI
5. I incomporate my preference into my dream job 4.09 HI
AWM 4.13 HI
D. Academic Performances
1. I consider my grade as a basis for my future career path 4.04 HI
2. My grades are important in determining my future strand 4.16 HI
3. I go for something that acquires my academic strenghths 4.21 VHI
4. I challenge myself by choosing a strand I am not good at 3.47 HI
5. I relate my academic performance to anything I do 4.04 HI
AWM 3.98 HI
E. Personal Interest
1. My choices depends on my likes and interest 4.34 VHI
2. I have the freedom to choose my desire strand based on my interests 4.39 VHI
3. I do things willingly if I'm personslly interested in them 4.25 VHI
4. I'm at my best if I'm interested in what I'm doing 4.27 VHI
5. My interests matter when I'm making important choices 4.32 VHI
AWM 4.32 VHI
Legend:
4.21- 5.00 - Very High Impact (VHI) 1.81- 2.60 - Very Low Impact (VLI)
3.41- 4.20 - High Impact (HI) 1.00- 1.80 - No Impact (NI)
2.61- 3.40 - Low Impact (LI)
18
Table 2 showed the problems encountered by the respondents as to socioeconomic status,
Socioeconomic Status
As reflected on the table, a weighted mean of 4.52 was in “I have the freedom to
choose my strand.” while a weighted mean of 3.92 was in “I consider my Family’s financial
status when deciding on a future senior high strand.” In the same light, an average weighted
mean of 4.098 indicated that the socioeconomic status showed a high impact as a factors that
encompasses not just income but also educational attainment, financial security, and
subjective perceptions of social status and social class. Socioeconomic status can encompass
quality of life attributes as well as the opportunities and privileges afforded to people within
society.
Parents Factor
choose.”, while a weighted mean of 3.97 was in “My parent’s opinion about my career
decisions matter”. In relation to this, an average weighted mean of 3.997 indicated that this
characteristics of the primary caregiver, such as gender identity and personality, as well as
19
Job Opportunities
As reflected on the table, a weighted mean of 4.42 was in “Job opportunities are
important when deciding on a future career path.” while a weighted mean of 4.01 was in “I
look for job opportunities that are aligned with each strand.” In the same light,
an average weighted mean of 4.136 indicated that the job opportunities show a high
(NELS:88) to assess the determinants of college entry and found that, controlling for a host
The result implied that the right strand they want to choose, the higher the job
opportunities they might chose. In general, job opportunities contribute a high impact as a
Academic Performances
The weighted mean of 4.21 was in “I go for something that acquires my academic
strengths.”, while a weighted mean of 3.47 was in “I challenge myself by choosing a strand I
am not good at.”. In relation to this, an average weighted mean of 3.988 indicated that this
According to Mesfin Tadese, Alex Yeshaneh & Getaneh Baye Mulu, Education
plays a pivotal role in producing qualified human power that accelerates economic
development and solves the real problems of a community. Students are also expected to
spend much of their time on their education and need to graduate with good academic
20
results. However, the trend of graduating students is not proportional to the trend of enrolled
students and an increasing number of students commit readmission, suggesting that they did
The ambiance of the classrooms affects the respondents’ problems when it comes to
their performances. In relation, academic performances showed that this has a high impact
Personal Interest
As reflected on the table, a weighted mean of 4.39 was in “I have the freedom to
choose my desired strand based on my interest.” while a weighted mean of 4.32 was in “My
interest matters when I’m making important choices.” In the same light, an average
weighted mean of 4.320 indicated that the personal condition shows a very high impact in
choosing a strand.
is a powerful motivational process that energizes learning, guides academic and career
attention and affect toward a particular object or topic, and an enduring predisposition to
reengage over time. Integrating these two definitions, the four-phase model of interest
development guides interventions that promote interest and capitalize on existing interests.
evoking prior individual interest, problem-based learning, and enhancing utility value.
21
Promoting interest can contribute to a more engaged, motivated, learning experience for
students.
Among the five aspects, Personal Interest had the highest average weighted mean
computed. This implied that the students interest highly affected the students in choosing
their desired strand. This implied that personal interest has a very high impact to contribute
22
Table 3 showed the summary of the problems encountered by the respondents as to
personal interest. The result showed that the problems encountered by the respondents had
23
Chapter 4
Summary
This study determined the factors influences the strand preference of Grade 10.
respondents in terms of age and gender; and, 2)factors influencing strand preferences by the
The researchers made use of descriptive research design, and employed total
enumeration sampling to 211 students of Grade 10. The statistical tools used are frequency
counts and percentages to determine the respondents’ profile. Average weighted mean was
used to analyze the factors that influence the strand preferences by the respondents.
Salient Findings
Based on the analysis of the data collected, the following findings are presented:
1. Respondents’ profile showed that 91% of the respondents have the age bracket of 15-16
years old. There were 107 females and 104 males, 50% and 49%, respectively.
weighted mean of 4.0985 with a descriptive rating of high impact; parents factor, has an
average weighted mean of 3.9971 with descriptive rating of high impact, likewise, job
opportunities had an average weighted mean of 4.1364 with descriptive rating of high,
24
academic performances had an average weighted mean of 3.9886 with descriptive rating of
high impact, and 4.3203 average weighted mean with a descriptive rating of very high
impact under personal interest. In general, choosing strand by the respondents showed high
Conclusion
Based on the findings of the study, the following conclusions were drawn:
1. Majority of the respondents were 15-16 years old and there were more females than
males.
2. In terms of the choosing strand of the respondents on their strand preferences, it showed
that the academic performances greatly affects the academic success of the respondents,
moreover, socioeconomic status, parents factor, job opportunities and personal interest
Recommendation
Based from the conclusions drawn, the following recommendations were proposed:
1. Students must focus on their academic performances for them to be competent on various
2. Teachers must know how to deal with their students. Also, they must also guide the
25
CAREER GUIDANCE PROGRAM
26
Career
orientation:
Benefits from
Senior High
School- lecture
(invite speaker)
Students are Career Decision December- Class Advisers All Grade 10 Stud
expected to come Making: January Subject Teachers learners mor
up with a decision Guidance stre
for their senior -Interpretation of Counselor wea
high school course NCAE results School Head rela
offerings in -Correlational of NCA
relation to their NCAE Occ
NCAE results. Occupational Inte
Interest choice com
and the Track and wise
Strands in Senior deci
High. seni
-Come up with a scho
decision
considering their
families economic
status, scholarship
offered in schools
and other
academic aid
scholarship.
27
Literature Cited
Bregman, G., & Killen, M. (1999). Adolescents’ and young adults’ reasoning about
career choice and the role of parental influence. Journal of Research on Adolescence,
Cervera, M.A.T., Divino, D.F., &Verjom, S.J. (2016, March). Factors Affecting Grade
10 Students in Choosing Their Preffered Tracks for Senior High School. Academia.
https://www.academia.edu/35074962/Factors_Affecting_Grade_10_Students_in_Choos
ing_Their_Preferred_Tracks_for_Senior_High_School
Boatwright MA, Ching M, Parr A 1992. Factors that influence students’ decisions to
https://duke.academia.edu/MaryTBoatwright
Javarata, https://www.officialgazette.gov.ph/2013/05/15/republic-act-no-10533/
Clemente, N.
(n.d.).https://www.researchgate.net/publication/321965285_Why_I_Want_to_Teach_E
xploring_Factors_Affecting_Students'_Career_Choice_to_Become_Teachers
Nucum, Karl Nicole. (2018 October 5). Your Complete Guide to the Academic Track
high- school-academic-track/.
www.apa.org
28
Diana Lang and Marissa L. Diener ( Influences on Parenting)
https;//iastate.pressbooks.pub/parenting…
Pubmed.nccbi.nlm.gov>
29
APPENDICES
30
APPENDIX A
31
32
APPENDIX B
Survey Questionnaire
Dear Respondents,
entitled "Strand Preference of Grade 10 students of Tubao National High School: Basis for
questionnaire. Rest assured that all data gathered will be treated with utmost confidentiality
Respectfully yours,
33
APPENDIX C
Letter to the Respondents in Floating the Survey Questionnaire
Republic of the Philippines
Department of Education
Region I
Division of La Union
Tubao 2509
Direction: Please answer honestly and sincerely to the best of your knowledge all the
questions in this questionnaire. Put a check mark on the box provided for
Name(optional):____________________________________________
I. PERSONAL PROFILE
A. AGE
B. SEX
Male Female
34
C. SECTION
D. Socio Economic Status of Parent ___High Class ___Middle Class ___Low Class
Direction: Respondents to each statement as honestly as you can. Put a check mark on
LEGEND:
4- High Impact
3- Low Impact
1- No Impact
35
A. SOCIOECONOMIC STATUS
ITEMS 5 4 3 2 1
studies.
B. PARENTS FACTOR
ITEMS 5 4 3 2 1
matter.
something
36
3. My parents give me freedom to decide on my
choose.
my parents.
C. JOB OPPORTUNITIES
ITEMS 5 4 3 2 1
them.
37
5. I incorporate my preferences into my dream
job.
D. ACADEMIC PERFORMANCES
ITEMS 5 4 3 2 1
career path.
strand.
strengths.
good at.
do.
38
E. PERSONAL INTEREST
ITEMS 5 4 3 2 1
based on my interests.
in them.
doing.
choices.
39
Friza Ann Marie C. Niduaza
Educational Background
I. Secondary Level
Tubao, La Union
2021-2023
2017-2021
2010-2017
Special Skills:
Portrait Artist
40
Judy Ann Lloren I.
Educational Background
Tubao, La Union
2021-2023
2017-2021
2011-2017
Special Skills:
41
Adrian Charles C. Suguitan\
Educational Background
V. Secondary Level
Tubao, La Union
2021-2023
2017-2021
2011-2017
Special Skills:
Dancing
42
Shantyl Kate A. Refugia
Contact Number:09309541360
Email Address:[email protected]
Educational Background
Tubao, La Union
2021-2023
2017-2021
Special Skills:
43
44