INTERNATIONAL OIML R 80-2

RECOMMENDATION Edition 2017 (E)

Road and rail tankers with level gauging

Part 2: Metrological controls and tests

Camions et wagons citernes avec mesurage de niveau

Partie 2: Contrôles métrologiques et essais

OIML R 80-2 Edition 2017 (E)

ORGANISATION INTERNATIONALE
DE MÉTROLOGIE LÉGALE

INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATION
OF LEGAL METROLOGY
 OIML R 80-2:2017 (E)

Contents

Foreword ................................................................................................................................................4
1 Scope ......................................................................................................................................5
2 Terms and definitions ..........................................................................................................5
3 Metrological control .............................................................................................................5
3.1 General ............................................................................................................................. 5
4 Type evaluation ....................................................................................................................6
4.1 Examination for type evaluation ...................................................................................... 6
4.2 Testing during type evaluation ......................................................................................... 8
4.3 Testing in the scope of initial verification ...................................................................... 10
4.4 Subsequent verification .................................................................................................. 15
5 Performance tests for type evaluation of measuring systems .........................................18
5.1 General ........................................................................................................................... 18
5.2 Reference conditions ...................................................................................................... 18
5.3 Environmental classification .......................................................................................... 18
5.4 Performance tests ........................................................................................................... 20
Annex A Example of a test stand for the determination of the immersion depth
of a float by the reference float method ............................................................................40
A.1 Description of the test stand ........................................................................................... 40
A.2 Calibrating the test setup with a reference float ............................................................. 40
A.3 Determination of the immersion depth of the float ........................................................ 41
A.4 Immersion depth offset................................................................................................... 41
Annex B Tank calibration .................................................................................................................42
B.1 General ........................................................................................................................... 42
B.2 External conditions......................................................................................................... 42
B.3 Minimum measured quantity (MMQ) ............................................................................ 42
B.4 Determination of the pipe volume .................................................................................. 42
Annex C Determination of the pipe volume .....................................................................................43
C.1 Test on the pipework volumes for delivery by gravity .................................................. 43
C.2 Test on delivery via collector ......................................................................................... 43
Annex D Examples for the tests listed in 4.2–4.4 .............................................................................44
D.1 Preparations for the volumetric test of the individual measuring compartments ........... 44
D.2 Testing of a measuring compartment using a volume standard ..................................... 44
D.3 Test of the temperature sensors ...................................................................................... 45
D.4 Test of the compartment using a reference meter .......................................................... 46
D.5 Test of the inclination correction ................................................................................... 46
D.6 Influence of internal pressure ......................................................................................... 48

3
OIML R 80-2:2017 (E)

Foreword

The International Organization of Legal Metrology (OIML) is a worldwide, intergovernmental

organization whose primary aim is to harmonize the regulations and metrological controls applied by
the national metrological services, or related organizations, of its Member States. The main categories
of OIML publications are:
• International Recommendations (OIML R), which are model regulations that establish the
metrological characteristics required of certain measuring instruments and which specify
methods and equipment for checking their conformity; the OIML Member States shall
implement these Recommendations to the greatest possible extent;
• International Documents (OIML D), which are informative in nature and intended to
harmonize and improve work in the field of the metrology;
• International Guides (OIML G), which are also informative in nature and which are
intended to give guidelines for the application of certain requirements to legal metrology;
• International Basic Publications (OIML B), which define the operating rules of various
OIML structures and systems.
OIML Draft Recommendations, Documents and Guides are developed by Project Groups linked to
Technical Committees or Subcommittees which comprise representatives from OIML Member States.
Certain international and regional institutions also participate on a consultation basis. Cooperative
agreements have been established between the OIML and certain institutions, such as ISO and the
IEC, with the objective of avoiding contradictory requirements. Consequently, manufacturers and
users of measuring instruments, test laboratories, etc. may simultaneously apply OIML publications
and those of other institutions.
International Recommendations, Documents, Guides and Basic Publications are published in English
(E) and translated into French (F) and are subject to periodic revision.
Additionally, the OIML publishes or participates in the publication of Vocabularies (OIML V) and
periodically commissions legal metrology experts to write Expert Reports (OIML E). Expert
Reports are intended to provide information and advice, and are written solely from the view of the
CIML. Thus, they do not necessarily represent the views of OIML.
This publication – reference OIML R 80-2, edition 2017 – was developed by Project Group 6 in OIML
TC 8/SC 1 Static volume and mass measurement. It was approved for final publication by the CIML in
2017 and will be submitted to the International Conference on Legal Metrology in 2020 for formal
sanction.
OIML publications may be downloaded from the OIML website in the form of PDF files. Additional
information on OIML Publications may be obtained from the Organization’s headquarters:
Bureau International de Métrologie Légale
11, rue Turgot - 75009 Paris - France
Telephone: 33 (0)1 48 78 12 82
Fax: 33 (0)1 42 82 17 27
E-mail: [email protected]
Internet: www.oiml.org

4
 OIML R 80-2:2017 (E)

1 Scope
OIML R 80-2 is applicable to the type evaluation of complete road and rail tankers with level gauging
and also for type evaluation of the following separate components:
 the measuring tank;
 the level gauging device; and
 the indicating device.
Initial and subsequent verifications in accordance with OIML R 80-2 are applicable to complete road
and rail tankers with level gauging, as defined in OIML R 80-1.
OIML R 80-2 sets out details of the test program, principles, equipment and procedures to be used for
type evaluation, initial and subsequent verification testing.
National regulations may require some of the provisions in this Recommendation to apply to ancillary
devices as well.

2 Terms and definitions

The terms defined in OIML R 80-1 apply. In addition, the definitions below apply to the terms used.

cut-off point
level at which the level gauge sensor is able to measure the minimum filling height at the maximum
inclination of the tank
Note: Below this level a measurement of the filling height cannot be guaranteed.
residual volume
liquid content of the compartment including pipework at the cut-off point level

3 Metrological control
3.1 General
3.1.1 In general (depending on national or regional legislation), legal metrological control can
consist of type approval, initial and subsequent verification, and metrological supervision.
3.1.2 The essential elements of a measuring system in the scope of this Recommendation mainly
concern those listed below and may be subject to separate type evaluation:
 measuring tank;
 level gauging device;
 indicating device.
3.1.3 The results of metrological control may be used for purposes of safety control.

5
OIML R 80-2:2017 (E)

4 Type evaluation
4.1 Examination for type evaluation
4.1.1 Documentation
The application for type evaluation of a road or rail tanker shall include the following documentation:
 the documentation as prescribed in OIML R 80-1, 6.2;
 a description giving the technical characteristics and the principle of operation;
 a description of the electronic devices with drawings, diagrams and general software
information explaining their characteristics and operation;
 operating instructions;
 documentation or other evidence that supports the assumption that the design and
characteristics of the measuring instrument comply with the requirements of this
Recommendation; and
 drawings representing
o a general assembly of the road or rail tanker,
o a general assembly of the measuring tank, including its compartments,
o a general assembly and function of the level gauging system,
o auxiliary and ancillary installations, as appropriate,
o details of the dome, reinforcing elements and discharge device(s),
o identification plate,
o location of seals and verification marks,
o if available, type evaluation certificate for the measuring compartment/tank, and
o if available, type evaluation certificate gauge measuring device.
4.1.2 Selection of specimens
The body responsible for type evaluation decides the number of specimens necessary for the type
evaluation tests.
If the applicant is seeking approval for several versions or measuring ranges, the body responsible for
type evaluation decides which version(s) and range(s) shall be supplied.
Several tests may be carried out in parallel on different specimens. In this case, the body responsible
for type evaluation decides which version or measuring range will be subjected to a specific test.
If a specimen does not pass a specific test and, as a result, has to be modified or repaired, the applicant
shall carry out this modification to all the instruments supplied for test. If the testing laboratory has
sound reasons to fear that the modification has a negative influence on tests that already had a positive
result, these tests shall be repeated.
4.1.3 Evaluation of the measuring tanks
The (type) evaluation of tanks for road or rail tankers includes the following operations:
 external inspection;
 leak test;
 pressure test, if required;
 calibration;
 check on temperature dilatation of the tank;
 check on shape invariability;
 check on invariability of capacity in service;
 check on correct filling;

6
 OIML R 80-2:2017 (E)

 check on complete discharge;

 check on sensitivity and expansion volume;
 check of ancillary devices and of the inclination correction (if any); and
 check on rest volumes.
Note 1: Each tank/compartment is unique and therefore shall be calibrated individually. Typically,
the calibration and – depending on the actual case – some of the other tests listed will need to
be carried out during the initial verification as well.
Note 2: Where tests have been performed for safety issues, the results of any of these tests may be
taken into account in this evaluation.
If a pressure test is required, its execution shall precede the volumetric calibration.
4.1.4 Evaluation of level gauges
The type evaluation of the level gauge measuring system includes the following examinations, if
applicable:
 applied units of measurement;
 accuracy classes and their symbols;
 measuring ranges;
 scale intervals or resolution;
 performance tests;
 presentation of the measured value;
 adjustment facilities;
 protection against fraud;
 checking facilities;
 durability provisions;
 software aspects;
 durable recording of measuring results;
 printing device;
 storage of measurement results;
 inscriptions;
 instruction manual; and
 sealing and stamping.
Note: A separate type evaluation certificate for the level gauge measuring system may be issued.
4.1.5 Type approval certificate
The following information shall appear on the type approval certificate:
 name and address of the issuing authority and name of the responsible person;
 name and address of the applicant of the type approval certificate;
 name and address of the manufacturer, if not the same as the applicant;
 metrological principle and technical characteristics;
 type approval mark;
 date of issue and period of validity;
 information on the location of markings concerning type approval, initial verification and
sealing (e.g. a picture or drawing);
 list of documents accompanying the type approval certificate;
 specific remarks;

7
OIML R 80-2:2017 (E)

 version and signature of the metrological part of the evaluated software, if applicable, and
 sufficient information to perform the tests during initial and subsequent verification.
4.1.6 Modification of an approved type
The applicant requesting approval of the type shall inform the body responsible for the evaluation
about any modification or addition which concerns the metrological part of an approved type.
Modifications and additions shall be subject to a supplementary type evaluation and approval when
they will, or are likely to, influence the measurement results or the measuring system’s regulatory
conditions of use.
The body having approved the initial type shall decide to which extent the examinations and tests
described below shall be carried out on the modified type in relation to the nature of the modification.
Note: The manufacturer shall present written evidence (of this fact) issued by approval body, when
introducing the product on the market.
If the body having approved the initial type judges that the modifications or additions are not likely to
influence the measurement results, this body shall allow in writing the modified measuring systems to
be presented for initial verification without requesting a supplementary type approval.

4.2 Testing during type evaluation

4.2.1 General test considerations
As a rule, tests are carried out on the complete measuring system. Simulation of any part of the system
tested is to be avoided. If this is not possible, for instance for components which cannot be tested
either partially or with the whole system, all parts of the measuring system that can be affected by the
influence quantity shall play an active role in the measurements.
If the size or configuration of the measuring system does not lend itself to testing as a whole unit, or if
only a separate device of the measuring instrument is concerned, the tests, or certain tests, shall be
carried out on the devices (modules) separately, provided that, in the case of tests with the devices in
operation, these devices are included in a simulated setup, sufficiently representative of its normal
operation.
For components of the measuring system that cannot be fully tested within the whole system (e.g.
temperature sensors), it is recommended to test them separately and to document the test results in a
suitable way and in accordance with the applicable national regulations.
4.2.2 Testing of volume-conversion and temperature-measuring devices
Analogue temperature sensors and conversion devices may be tested independently from each other.
A conversion device may be tested by simulation of the sensor. In this case, the requirements of
R 80-1, 5.1.5 are met if the error of the temperature sensor does not exceed 3/5 of the MPE specified
in this subclause and the error of the conversion device does not exceed 2/5 of this MPE.
The functioning of the volume conversion software shall be checked at least at three temperatures for
each product or product group by using simulated temperatures and liquid levels. Recommended test
points are: at the minimum temperature (or a value near 0 °C), at the reference temperature and at the
maximum temperature of the product. The test volume shall be at least 10 000 litres.
For this test the MPE requirement as defined for static measuring systems (referred to as A in Table 2
of OIML R 80-1) will be met if maximum errors and faults on the indications of quantities of liquid
applicable to calculators, positive or negative, each are less than or equal to one-tenth of the
requirements in line A of Table 2.
During the type evaluation, the correct functioning of the checking facilities shall be checked.

8
 OIML R 80-2:2017 (E)

4.2.3 Testing of inclination sensors

The inclination sensors shall be examined for a matrix-like type of inclination within the range the
measuring system is intended to be used for, in both longitudinal and transverse directions, as well as
in all possible (i.e. four) simultaneous inclinations in both directions. The result of these examinations
shall be such that the requirements of OIML R 80-1, 5.5.4 are met.
Note: Experience has shown that for the common tank shapes these requirements will be met if the
deviation of the inclination indication is not greater than 0.1° in any of the directions to be
tested.
The recommended number of test points is 9. The maximum deviation at all of these points shall be
recorded in the test report.
4.2.4 Testing of floats
4.2.4.1 General
For type evaluation, at least one float of each type shall be tested at reference conditions. All floats
shall be tested at least with a liquid having a density close to the minimum, as well as a liquid close to
the maximum. These are to be selected within the density range of the liquids for which the float is
intended and permitted to be used.
These liquids shall include the liquid generally used for tank calibration (typically water) if the density
of this liquid is not the same or close to the maximum density.
The respective immersion depth shall be in the intended height range of the float (cylindrical area).
For measuring systems fitted with corresponding corrections, the change of the immersion depth
within the permissible density range of each intended liquid is determined by calculation against the
dimensions and weight of the float.
The immersion depth of the float shall be calculated at the maximum and minimum permissible
density of each liquid. The deviation between the immersion depth at the maximum and minimum
permissible density of each liquid shall not exceed the value given in Table 8 of OIML R 80-1.
For measuring systems not fitted with corresponding corrections, the immersion depth is determined at
least with two liquids, one having a density close to the minimum and one having a density close to
the maximum density. The selected liquids’ densities shall lie within the permissible density range for
which the float is intended and permitted to be used, and shall include the liquid generally used for
tank calibration, typically water.
If the liquid is different from the liquid close to the maximum density, the immersion depth shall be
calculated against the dimensions and weight of the float. This deviation between the immersion depth
at the maximum and minimum permissible densities of the intended liquids shall be included in the
uncertainty evaluation of the level measurement.
The expanded uncertainty shall not exceed values given in Table 6 of OIML R 80-1.
At type evaluation, one float should be defined as the reference float for further use in initial
verification and in the event that it is necessary to replace a float during use.
To avoid influences on the metrological properties, the floats need no additional marking after testing
when fulfilling the requirements.
4.2.4.2 Testing of the float construction at type evaluation
4.2.4.2.1 Chemical resistance
The manufacturer shall submit documentation proving the adequate chemical resistance of the float
material. This documentation shall include the evaluation of the typical fluids and conditions for its
later use. These fluids and conditions shall not have any influence on the specified physical
characteristics of the float.

9
OIML R 80-2:2017 (E)

4.2.4.2.2 Pressure resistance

If the float is specified to be used for tanks having a working pressure not exceeding 0.05 MPa, the
float shall be exposed for a time period of 10 minutes to a pressure of 0.075 MPa. In all other cases the
float shall be exposed for a time period of 10 minutes to 1.5 times the intended working pressure of the
tank. The float shall withstand this pressure test without deformation, cracks or change of the physical
characteristics.
4.2.4.2.3 Adaption of the float to the rod
It shall be verified that during later use, the float is free to move up to its maximum inclination and
will not become stuck on the level gauge rod.
4.2.4.2.4 Temperature influence on immersion depth
The influence of the liquid temperature on establishing the immersion depth of the float shall be tested
where it cannot be proven by numerical calculation that the liquid temperature has no significant
influence on the accuracy of the whole system.
The immersion depth of the float shall not change by more than the value given in Table 8 of OIML
R 80-1.
An example of a test stand for the determination of the immersion depth of a float using the reference
float method is given in the informative Annex A.
4.2.5 Testing of the dipstick pipes for ultrasonic systems
The accuracy of the mechanical dimensions of the reference marks of the dipstick pipe(s) shall be
verified, for example by clamping each of the pipes into a gauge and comparing the distance of the
reference marks at the reference edges of the gauge with the values marked on the gauge. The
deviations shall not exceed the values given in Table 4 of OIML R 80-1.
4.2.6 Testing of computer or controller
The evaluation of the conversion device shall be part of the type evaluation procedure. Its accuracy,
the correct functioning of the checking facilities, etc. shall be verified.
4.2.7 Testing of an indicating device
The proper operation of the checking facilities of the indicating devices shall be verified, for instance
by connecting/disconnecting the indicating device.

4.3 Testing in the scope of initial verification

4.3.1 General
It is recommended that, before its first use, an initial verification takes place on the instrument to show
that it is in conformity with the type evaluation certificate.
Initial verification can only be performed on a calibrated tank. Prior to initial verification, the
calibration of the tank, leak tests and pressure tests shall have been performed and documented.
Note: The tank calibration procedure is described in informative Annex B.
Concerning the leakage and pressure compliance tests, documented evidence on compliancy with the
regulations for safe transport of portable tanks by road or rail may be considered sufficient.
All test equipment used shall have the required accuracy and must, to the extent possible, be traceable
to the SI.
The use of simulators or computer-aided measuring facilities is permitted.
It shall be ensured that all components (e.g. valve control) operate as designed.

10
 OIML R 80-2:2017 (E)

4.3.2 Pre-verification of components

Components of the measuring system which can only be tested on specific locations (e.g. at the
manufacturer’s site) or which require a large effort to test on site may be pre-verified. For pre-verified
components no additional tests on site are necessary.
Each of the following components shall fulfil the specified and/or described construction details and
properties applicable to any components which have been verified during type evaluation and laid
down in the type approval certificate.
Unless otherwise stated, components subjected to a pre-verification test shall be marked and, if
necessary, sealed.
For the following components, if applicable and decided to be tested at the manufacturer’s premises
the following examinations and tests shall be performed:
a) Temperature sensor:
• Property to be tested: accuracy at three different temperatures;
• Aspect to be registered/documented:
o statement concerning the fulfilling of the required accuracy by the liquid
temperature range of the measuring system; or
o statement on whether the test results show that the required accuracy
specifications for the temperature sensor as laid down in the type approval
certificate of the measuring system are met.
b) Inclination sensor:
• Aspect to be examined: correct mounting orientation stated on the housing;
• Property to be tested: accuracy in longitudinal and transversal directions and in all
possible simultaneous inclinations in both directions;
• Aspects to be registered/documented:
o results of the accuracy measurements;
o zero-degree deviation, if any;
o statement on whether the test results show that the required accuracy
specifications for the inclination sensor as laid down in the type approval
certificate of the measuring system are met.
c) Float:
• Aspect to be examined: the dimensions and weight of the float shall be checked to be
within the permissible tolerances specified in the type approval certificate;
• Property to be tested: the immersion depth offset of the individual float shall be
determined in relation to the reference float of the same or equivalent type;
• Aspects at least to be recorded in an accompanying document:
o serial number;
o test fluid;
o immersion depth offset;
o method of determination of the immersion depth offset; and
o other individual characteristics;

11
OIML R 80-2:2017 (E)

• Further aspects to be recorded in the test report:

o all test results;
o statement on whether the test results show that the required specifications for
the float as laid down in the type approval certificate of the measuring system
are met.
Note 1: Knowledge of the immersion depth offset of the float is necessary only to prevent a
complete new calibration of the tank or compartment after replacing the float. This
offset DDfloat can be determined by comparing the indications of the reference float
(Index m) and of the float to be tested (Index float): DDfloat = Dfloat – Dm (see Annex A).
Note 2: To avoid influences on the metrological properties, the floats need not be marked.
d) Dipsticks for float systems for full compartment delivery:
• Property to be tested: accuracy at 10 points regularly distributed on its measuring range
in both directions using a filling height simulator;
• Required accuracy: the maximum permissible error on height measurement (MPEh) is
given by the following formula:
MPEh = 5 ⋅ S ⋅ (A – B)
where A and B are the MPE values as specified in Table 2 of OIML R 80-1 presented in
the applicable row referred to as A or B respectively presented in the applicable
accuracy class column, and where S concerns the sensitivity given in Table 5 of OIML
R 80-1;
• Aspects to be recorded in the test report: statement on whether the test results show that
the required specifications for the dipstick are met.
e) Dipsticks for float systems for partial compartment delivery:
• Property to be tested: accuracy at three different heights using a filling height
simulator;
• Required accuracy: the expanded uncertainty associated with the measurement result
shall be less than the values given in Table 6 of OIML R 80-1;
• Aspects to be recorded in the test report: statement on whether the test results show that
the required specifications for the dipstick are met.
f) Ultrasonic level sensor:
• Property to be tested: accuracy of the level measurement;
• Test method: a shortened reference pipe is used which contains a well-defined reference
echo mark in the level measuring tube at a distance of 350–500 mm from the sensor.
The reference tube shall be attached to the sensor subjected to the testing. The
arrangement shall be immersed in de-ionized, gas-free water, while taking care to
remove any gas bubbles which may have been trapped in the tubes. The sensor is
connected to a reference controller;
• Required accuracy: the deviation between the level reading obtained from the controller
and the distance of the echo mark shall be less than the required accuracy value
specified in the type approval certificate of the measuring system;
• Aspects to be recorded in the test report: statement on whether the test results show that
the required accuracy for the ultrasonic level sensor is met.

12
 OIML R 80-2:2017 (E)

g) Ultrasonic dipstick pipe:

• Aspect to be examined: mechanical dimensions of the reference marks of the dipstick
pipe;
• Aspects to be recorded in the test report: statement on whether the examination results
show that the required specifications for the dipstick pipe as laid down in the type
approval certificate of the measuring system are met.
4.3.3 Testing of non-pre-verified components
If components of the measuring system have not been pre-verified, the corresponding tests shall be
performed during its initial verification.
4.3.4 Testing of the complete measuring system
4.3.4.1 Visual inspection
Prior to the testing the following details shall be checked:
 external and internal appearance of the tank or damage to the compartment;
 completeness of markings, etc. on the identification plate;
 compliance with the specifications of the type examination certificate including the version of
the software (modules) and signatures used, if appropriate;
 stored values of the metrologically relevant parameters as defined in the type examination
certificate;
 all sealing points according the sealing plan; and
 presence and completeness of the measuring system documentation.
4.3.4.2 Accuracy tests
The following tests provide the basis for testing the accuracy of a dipstick measuring system.
Where additional tests are required to show compliance with R 80-1, these shall be defined in the type
approval certificate.
4.3.4.2.1 Test of the volume in normal position
Test the volume in normal position (inclination between 0° ± 0.2°).
A test volume value is chosen which shall be no larger than twice the minimum measured quantity
(MMQ) of the measuring system. The tank compartment shall be filled up to at least 90 % of its
nominal volume. The compartment shall be emptied step by step, each step comprising the amount of
the test volume. The last step shall comprise a complete emptying of the tank. If the volume of this last
step is smaller than the test volume, the tank shall be further filled up using standard capacity
measure(s) to deliver the test volume. If such a standard capacity is not available, the operation may
also be performed by volume stacking.
Taking into account the requirement in OIML R 80-1, 5.1.3.3, the permissible deviation is:
 twice the percentage as given for the applicable accuracy class of the measuring system for a
test volume equal to the MMQ;
 plus or minus the percentage as applicable for the accuracy class of the measuring system for
a test volume equal to or larger than twice the MMQ.
Note 1: This test can also be performed by using an appropriate volumetric liquid meter.
Note 2: This test can also be performed by using a vessel on an appropriate weighing instrument and
by using water as the test liquid.

13
OIML R 80-2:2017 (E)

4.3.4.2.2 Establishing the residual volume

The residual volume shall be established, if not already done during the accuracy test.
To test the correct setup of the residual volume, a completely empty compartment and its associated
pipework is filled with the nominal volume of the standard capacity measure (see OIML R 120 [1]).
The compartment shall be discharged completely and the indicated delivered volume shall be within
the accuracy as stated in Table 1 of OIML R 80-1 for the applicable accuracy class. This volume
consists of a metered part by the level gauge sensor and the fixed part of the residual volume.
Note: This test can also be carried out by using an appropriate volumetric liquid meter.
4.3.4.2.3 Leak test of the tank
The tank shall be leak-tested according to R 80-1, 5.2.2.2.
4.3.4.2.4 Testing of the inclination dependency of the volume
Each tank compartment shall be filled to a liquid level within 15 % to 30 % and within 70 % to 90 %
of its nominal compartment volume.
Their volumes shall be determined in each of the following orientations:
Positioned with an inclination compared to the horizontal plane:
 in the longitudinal direction between +2° and +3° (front side up);
 in the longitudinal direction between –2° and –3° (back side up);
 in the transversal direction between +2.5° and +5° (right side up); and
 in the transversal direction between –2.5° and –5° (left side up),
while maintaining the inclination in the respectively perpendicular angle within ± 0.5°.
The error of the volume during these tests shall not exceed 3/5 of the MPE of the volume in the normal
position (see OIML R 80-1, 5.1.7.2).
4.3.4.2.5 Test of the influence of adjacent compartments
To test the influence of adjacent compartments, a compartment is filled to 30 % of the nominal
capacity and subsequently the adjacent compartment is filled to 90 % of its nominal capacity. The
indication of the volume of liquid in the first compartment shall not change by more than 1/3 of the
MPE when the adjacent compartment is filled or emptied (see OIML R 80-1, 5.2.2.4).
4.3.4.3 Determining the error of the level height measurement
This test is applicable to the level gauging device which displays only height (or ullage).
 Property to be tested and method: Each level gauging system is checked at 3 points regularly
distributed on its measuring range in both directions by comparison with a mechanical
dipstick.
 Required accuracy: The MPE on height measurement (MPEh) after installation is given by the
following formula:
MPEh = 10 ⋅ S ⋅ (A – B)

where A and B are the MPE values as specified in Table 2 of OIML R 80-1 presented in the applicable
row referred to as A or B respectively presented in the applicable accuracy class column, and where S
concerns the sensitivity given in Table 5 of OIML R 80-1.
If the dipstick already satisfies the pre-verification test (see 4.3.2) the level gauging device may be
verified, after installation, at one point (level) situated close to the nominal capacity by comparison
with a mechanical dipstick.

14
 OIML R 80-2:2017 (E)

4.3.4.4 Tests on the computer or controller

During initial verification, the software (modules) used as well as their signature shall be checked for
compliance with the versions stated in the type approval certificate.
If present, the protection function (e.g. electronic sealing) for the data of legal relevance shall be
checked.
4.4 Subsequent verification
4.4.1 General
Subsequent verification is subject to national regulations. The following actions are recommended:
4.4.1.1 Visual inspection
The visual inspection comprises the inspection of the following items:
For the measuring tank:
 external damage;
 any damage to a measuring compartment inside the tank, if suspected, only after the
compartment has been sufficiently cleaned to allow for a safe inspection; and
 compliance with the type approval certificate.

For the level gauging system:

 compliance of the parameters or signature(s) relevant to verification with those at the time of
initial verification;
 compliance of the version of the software (modules) used as well as of their signature with
the type approval certificate or supplements;
 availability of the measuring system documentation;
 identification of the incorporated components;
 mechanical damage of the level sensors;
 presence of the measuring system type plate;
 availability of operating instructions.
4.4.1.2 Volumetric test using a volume standard
In Annex D an example of the principle of testing is described.
It will be sufficient, however, to prove that the results of three measurements of the same amount,
taken at filling states of approximately 90 % and 50 %, after completely emptying the compartment,
are within ± 0.5 % of the measured quantity.
If during one or several of these tests the above mentioned margin is exceeded, further deliveries of
the same amount may be performed until 80 % of the minimum delivered quantity of the compartment
under test is reached or exceeded. The deviation between the sum of these successive measurements
and the sum of the volume standard readings shall be within ± 0.5 %.
Checking of the temperature sensor according to Annex D.3 shall be carried out simultaneously with
these tests.
4.4.1.3 Volumetric test using a reference meter
The test is carried out as described in Annex D.4. The testing quantities shall be equal to the minimum
measured quantity.
4.4.1.4 Check of pipework volumes for measuring systems with collector
The pipework system, including the collector, is subjected to a simplified test which consists of the
second test step described in Annex C, preceded by an initial flushing as described.

15
OIML R 80-2:2017 (E)

4.4.1.5 Check of the inclination correction

The test shall be carried out as described in Annex D.5 but only at one level near 30 % or 70 % of the
nominal volume of each compartment.
4.4.1.6 Sealing
Missing or damaged seals shall be renewed only by authorized personnel, possibly based on the user’s
application.
All seals which have been broken during repair shall be documented and renewed.
4.4.2 Recommended actions after replacement of components for measuring systems for full
compartment delivery/receipt
When any components of a measuring system under legal control are replaced, the actions below are
recommended.
4.4.2.1 Actions on replacement of the controller or computer
 separate test of the new device according to 4.2.6;
 entry of the new data into the measuring system document.
4.4.2.2 Actions on replacement of a simple indicating device
 separate test of the indicating device according to 4.2.7
4.4.2.3 Actions on replacement of dipsticks for float systems
 comparison with a mechanical dipstick at a level close to nominal capacity;
 entry of the new data into the measuring system document.
4.4.2.4 Actions on replacement of a sensor/float
 comparison with a mechanical dipstick at a level close to nominal capacity;
 entry of the new data into the measuring system document.
4.4.3 Recommended actions after replacement of components for measuring systems for
partial compartment delivery/receipt
When any components of a measuring system under legal control are replaced, the actions below are
recommended.
4.4.3.1 Actions on replacement of the controller or computer
 separate test of the new device according to 4.2.6;
 entry of the new data into the measuring system document;
 single volume measurement by the verification authority with the quantity of the MMQ
delivered from the random compartment, check of the indicated and corrected volume;
 comparison and evaluation of parameters.
4.4.3.2 Actions on replacement of a simple indicating device
 Separate test of the indicating device according to 4.2.7.
4.4.3.3 Actions on replacement of dipsticks for float systems
 separate test of the new dipstick for the float system according to 4.3.2;
 entry of the new dipstick correction values into the level gauging system;
 entry of the new data into the measuring system documentation;
 single volume measurement by the verification authority, quantity of about 1 to 2 times the
MMQ delivered from the compartment fitted with the new dipstick, check of the volume at
working conditions, unless otherwise specified in the type approval certificate;
 comparison and evaluation of parameters.

16
 OIML R 80-2:2017 (E)

4.4.3.4 Actions on replacement of a sensor/float

 separate test of the new float according to 4.3.2;
 entry of the new float correction values into the level gauging system;
 entry of the new data into the measuring system documentation;
 single volume measurement by the verification authority, quantity of about 1 to 2 times the
MMQ delivered from the compartment fitted with the new float, check of the volume at
working conditions, unless otherwise specified in the type approval certificate;
 comparison and evaluation of parameters.
4.4.3.5 Actions on replacement of dipsticks for ultrasound systems
 separate test of the new dipstick for ultrasound systems according to 4.3.2;
 entry of the new correction values into the level gauging system;
 entry of the new data into the measuring system documentation, if applicable;
 single volume measurement by the verification authority, quantity of about 1 to 2 times the
MMQ delivered from the compartment fitted with the new dipstick, check of the volume at
working conditions, unless otherwise specified in the type approval certificate;
 comparison and evaluation of parameters.
4.4.3.6 Actions on replacement of a temperature sensor
 separate test of the new temperature sensor according to 4.3.2;
 entry of the new sensor parameters into the parameter list;
 entry of the new data into the measuring system documentation;
 temperature measurement by the verification authority during delivery of a random quantity
from the relevant compartment;
 recording and comparison of the delivery temperature with a certified thermometer,
comparison and evaluation of parameters.
4.4.4 Recommended actions after repair of or corrections to the measuring system
After a new calibration table has been compiled for one or several tank compartments (recalibration of
a tank or compartment, e.g. after repair of the tank or a deformation after an accident), the verification
of the measuring system is no longer valid.
During the next verification, all re-calibrated measuring compartments shall be tested as for initial
verification. The re-examination of the pipework volumes may be dispensed with if these have not
changed. Prior to the due date the compartments for which no new calibration tables have been
compiled1 need not be subsequently verified due to the repair. After the repaired compartments have
been checked, the measuring system may need to be provided with a seal stating the original period of
validity of the verification if applicable and depending on national legislation.
If the repair was carried out within the scope of a subsequent verification, the repaired compartments
will be treated as in initial verification and the other compartments as in subsequent verification.

1
Which therefore refers to compartments which have not been part of the repair.

17
OIML R 80-2:2017 (E)

5 Performance tests for type evaluation of measuring systems

5.1 General
This subclause defines the program of performance tests intended to verify that measuring systems
perform and function as intended in a specified environment and under specified conditions. Each test
indicates, where appropriate, the reference conditions for determining the intrinsic error.
These tests supplement any other prescribed test.
When the effect of one influence quantity is being evaluated, all other influence quantities shall be
held relatively constant, at values close to reference conditions.
5.2 Reference conditions
Ambient temperature: 15 ºC to 35 ºC
Relative humidity: 25 % to 75 %
Atmospheric pressure: 84 kPa to 106 kPa
Mains (power supply) voltage: Nominal voltage (Unom)
Mains (power supply) frequency: Nominal frequency (fnom)
During each test, the temperature shall not vary by more than 5 ºC and the relative humidity shall not
vary by more than 10 % within the reference range.
The test laboratory shall have the ability to authorize different reference conditions as long as these
conditions are fully documented with an explanation of why the alternate reference conditions were
used, the implications of the alternate reference conditions, and the effects on the testing results.
5.3 Environmental classification
For each performance test, typical test conditions are indicated which correspond to the climatic,
mechanical and electromagnetic environmental conditions to which the tankers are usually exposed.
The following environmental conditions according to OIML D 11 [2] General requirements for
measuring instruments - environmental classification are considered applicable:
Climatic environment: Class H3
This class applies to instruments or parts of instruments used in open air locations, excluding those in
extreme climate zones such as polar and desert environments.
Mechanical environment: Class M3
This class applies to locations where the level of vibration and shock is high or very high, e.g. where
measuring instruments are directly mounted on machines, conveyor belts, etc.
Electromagnetic environment: Class E3
This class applies to electronic measuring instruments powered by the battery of a vehicle and exposed
to electromagnetic disturbances which correspond to those likely to be found in any environment not
considered hazardous for the general public.
Note: In the exception that a system may be powered by AC mains, the OIML D 11 class E2 applies
as well.
According to these classifications, the test levels as presented in Table 1 shall be applied.

18
 OIML R 80-2:2017 (E)

Table 1 Summary of performance tests

Kind of R 80-2
Evaluation
performance Test description subclause 1)
tests
Climatic Dry heat 5.4.1 I MPE
Cold 5.4.2 I MPE
Damp heat, cyclic (condensing) 5.4.3 D NSFa
Mechanical Vibration (random) 5.4.4 I MPE
Electrical, Radiated electromagnetic fields 5.4.5 D NSFd
general
Conducted currents generated by RF EM fields 5.4.6 D NSFd
Electrostatic discharge 5.4.7 D NSFd
Power frequency magnetic field 5.4.8 D NSFd
Bursts (transients) on signal, data and control lines 5.4.9 D NSFd
Electrical, AC mains voltage variations 5.4.10 I MPE
AC mains
Surges on AC lines 5.4.11 D NSFd
voltage3)
AC mains voltage dips, short interruption and voltage variations 5.4.12 D NSFd
Bursts (transients) on AC mains 5.4.13 D NSFd
Electrical, Low voltage of internal battery 5.4.14 I MPE
internal
battery 4)
Electrical, Voltage variations 5.4.15.1 I MPE
power from
Electrical transient conduction along supply lines 5.4.15.2 D NSFd
external 12 V
and 24 V Electrical transient conduction via lines other than supply lines 5.4.15.3 D NSFd
road vehicle
batteries 5)

1)
I - Influence factor
D - Disturbance
MPE - Maximum permissible error
NSFa - No significant fault shall occur after the disturbance
NSFd - No significant fault shall occur during the disturbance
2)
Test levels are in accordance with OIML D 11 and IEC standards mentioned in the subclauses
of 5.4.
3)
only applicable for systems powered by AC mains.
4)
only applicable for systems powered by internal battery.
5)
only applicable for systems powered by road vehicle battery.
The thermal conditions in which measuring systems and ancillary devices are used vary considerably.
These are highly dependent on the place on earth, ranging from arctic to tropical regions. Therefore,
no classes combining low and high temperature limits have been described in this Recommendation.

19
OIML R 80-2:2017 (E)

Note: National (or regional) legislation will generally set the lower and upper temperature limits
(taking into account the test levels in 5.4.1and 5.4.2). The manufacturer is required to indicate
the rated operating conditions (in this case the temperature range) of the equipment under test
(EUT). The type evaluation body will choose the testing levels by taking into account the
manufacturer’s specifications as well as the higher and lower temperature test levels options
presented above.
5.4 Performance tests
The following tests need only be carried out where, as a result of the physical principle of the
measuring system or a part of it, a significant influence may be expected.
If a test is not carried out the reason shall be noted in the test report.
Note: The test procedures have been given in condensed form, for information only, and are adapted
from the referenced IEC publications. Before conducting the test, the applicable publication
should be consulted.

20
 OIML R 80-2:2017 (E)

5.4.1 Dry heat

Table 2

Applicable standards IEC 60068-2-1 [5], IEC 60068-3-1 [4]

Test method Exposure to low temperature
Applicability General.
Verification of compliance with the provisions 5.7.1.1 of
Object of the test
R 80-1 under conditions of low ambient air temperature.
The test comprises exposure of the EUT to the specified low temperature
under “free air” conditions for a 2-hour period after the EUT has reached
temperature stability.
The change in temperature shall not exceed 1 °C/min during heating up
and cooling down.
The absolute humidity of the test atmosphere shall not exceed 20 g/m3.
When testing is performed at temperatures below 35 °C, the relative
humidity shall not exceed 50 %.
Test procedure in brief The EUT shall be tested:
- at the reference temperature of 20 °C after 1 hour conditioning,
- at the specified low temperature, 2 hours after temperature
stabilization,
- after 1 hour recovery of the EUT at the reference temperature of
20 °C.
During the tests, the EUT shall be in operation.
Simulated inputs are permitted.
Tests shall be performed at a fixed level
One of the following test levels may be specified:
Test level index 1 2 3 4 5
Temperature 30 °C 40 °C 55 °C 70 °C 85 °C
Number of cycles One cycle
All functions shall operate as designed.
Permitted maximum
deviation All errors measured during the application of the influence shall be
within the maximum permissible errors.

21
OIML R 80-2:2017 (E)

5.4.2 Cold

Table 3

Applicable standards IEC 60068-2-1 [5], IEC 60068-3-1 [4]

Test method Exposure to low temperature
Verification of compliance with the provisions 5.7.1.1 of
Object of the test
R 80-1 under conditions of low ambient air temperature.
The test comprises exposure of the EUT to the specified low temperature
under “free air” conditions for a 2-hour period after the EUT has reached
temperature stability.
The change of temperature shall not exceed 1 °C/min during heating up
and cooling down.

The EUT shall be tested:

Test procedure in brief - at the reference temperature of 20 °C after 1 hour conditioning,
- at the specified low temperature, 2 hours after temperature
stabilization,
- after 1 hour recovery of the EUT at the reference temperature of
20 °C.
During the tests, the EUT shall be in operation.
Simulated inputs are permitted.
Tests shall be performed at a fixed level
One of the following test levels may be specified:
Test level index 1 2 3 4
Temperature +5 °C –10 °C –25 °C –40 °C
Number of cycles One cycle
All functions shall operate as designed.
Permitted maximum
deviation All errors measured during the application of the influence shall be
within the maximum permissible errors.

22
 OIML R 80-2:2017 (E)

5.4.3 Damp heat, cyclic (condensing)

Table 4

Applicable standards IEC 60068-2-30 [6], IEC 60068-3-4 [7]

Test method Exposure to damp heat with cyclic temperature variation
Applicability Applicable only for instruments used outdoors.
Verification of compliance with the provisions in 5.7.1.2 of R 80-1 under
Object of the test
conditions of high humidity combined with cyclic temperature changes.
The test comprises exposure of the EUT to cyclic temperature variation
between 25 °C and the appropriate upper temperature of 55 °C,
maintaining the relative humidity above 95 % during the temperature
changes and during the phases at the low temperature, and at or above
93 % at the upper temperature phases.
Condensation is expected to occur on the EUT during the temperature rise.
The 24-hour cycle comprises:
- temperature rise during 3 hours,
- temperature maintained at upper value until 12 hours from the start
of the cycle,
- temperature lowered to lower temperature level within a period of
Test procedure in brief 3 to 6 hours, the declination (rate of fall) during the first hour and
a half being such that the lower temperature level would be
reached in a 3 hour period,
- temperature maintained at the lower level until the 24 h period is
completed.
The stabilizing period before and recovery period after the cyclic exposure
shall be such that the temperature of all parts of the EUT is within 3 °C of
its final value.
During the tests, the EUT shall be in operation.
Simulated inputs are permitted.
After the application of the disturbance and recovery the EUT shall be
tested at a fixed level.
Duration Two cycles
During the application of the disturbance, the power supply of the EUT is
Restrictions
in switch-off mode.
After the application of the disturbance and recovery, all functions shall
Permitted maximum operate as designed.
deviation
All errors shall be within the maximum permissible errors.

23
OIML R 80-2:2017 (E)

5.4.4 Vibration (random)

Table 5

Applicable standards IEC 60068-2-47 [8], IEC 60068-2-64 [9], (IEC 60068-3-8 [10])
Test method Exposure to random vibration
Applicability General.
Verification of compliance with the provisions in 5.7.1.1 of R 80-1 under
Object of the test
conditions of random vibration.
The test comprises exposure of the EUT to vibration.
The EUT shall be tested in three, mutually perpendicular axes mounted
on a rigid fixture by its normal mounting means.
Test procedure in brief
After the application of the disturbance and recovery the EUT shall be
tested at a fixed level.

Total frequency range 10 – 150 Hz

Total RMS level 7 m·s-2
ASD level 10–20 Hz 1 m2·s-3
ASD level 20–150 Hz –3 dB/octave
Number of axis 3
For each of the orthogonal directions, the vibration exposure time shall
Duration per axis
be 2 minutes.
During the application of the influence quantity the power supply of the
Restrictions
EUT is in switch-off mode.
After the application of the disturbance, all functions shall operate as
Permitted maximum designed.
deviation All errors shall be within the maximum permissible errors after the
influence factor is removed.

24
 OIML R 80-2:2017 (E)

5.4.5 Radiated radio frequency electromagnetic fields

Table 6

Applicable standards IEC 61000-4-3 [11]; IEC 61000-4-20 [12]

Test method Exposure to radiated radio frequency electromagnetic fields
Only applicable for electronic measuring instruments containing active
Applicability
electronic circuits.
Verification of compliance with the provisions in 5.7.1.2 of R 80-1 under
Object of the test
conditions of exposure to electromagnetic fields.
The EUT is exposed to electromagnetic fields with the required field
strength and the field uniformity as defined in the referred standard.
The level of field strength specified refers to the field generated by the
unmodulated carrier wave.
The EUT shall be exposed to the modulated wave field. The frequency
sweep shall be made only pausing to adjust the RF signal level or to switch
RF-generators, amplifiers and antennas if necessary. Where the frequency
range is swept incrementally, the step size shall not exceed 1 % of the
preceding frequency value.
Test procedure in brief The dwell time of the amplitude modulated carrier at each frequency shall
not be less than the time necessary for the EUT to be exercised and to
respond, but shall in no case be less than 0.5 s.
Adequate EM fields can be generated in facilities of different types and
setups, the use of which is limited by the dimensions of the EUT and the
frequency range of the facility.
The expected most critical frequencies (e.g. clock frequencies) shall be
analyzed separately.
During the tests, the EUT shall be in operation. Simulated inputs are
permitted. Tests shall be performed at a fixed level.
Frequency range (26) 80 – 3000 MHz
Test parameter levels Amplitude 10 V/m
Modulation 80 % AM, 1 kHz, sine wave
During the disturbance, either significant faults do not occur or checking
Permitted maximum
facilities detect a malfunction and act upon it in accordance with 5.7.3 of
deviation
R 80-1 when significant faults occur.
- IEC 61000-4-3 only specifies test levels above 80 MHz. For
frequencies in the lower range the test method for conducted radio
frequency disturbances is generally applicable (test 3.4.6).
Notes - For EUT having no mains or other cabling available to allow for the
execution of the conducted radio frequency test, the lower limit of
radiation test shall be 26 MHz
- In all other cases, both 3.4.5 and 3.4.6 shall apply.

25
OIML R 80-2:2017 (E)

5.4.6 Conducted (common mode) currents generated by RF EM fields

Table 7

Applicable standard IEC 61000-4-6 [13]

Injection of RF currents representing exposure to RF electromagnetic
Test method
fields
Only applicable for electronic measuring instruments containing active
Applicability electronic circuits and equipped with external electrical wiring (mains
power, signal, data and control lines).
Verification of compliance with the provisions in 5.7.1.2 of R 80-1 while
Object of the test
exposed to electromagnetic fields.

An RF EM current, simulating the influence of EM fields shall be coupled

or injected into the power ports and I/O ports of the EUT using
coupling/decoupling devices as defined in the referred standard.
The characteristics of the test equipment consisting of an RF generator,
Test procedure in brief (de-)coupling devices, attenuators, etc. shall be verified before connecting
the EUT.
During the tests, the EUT shall be in operation.
Simulated inputs are permitted.
Tests shall be performed at a fixed level

Frequency range 0.15 – 80 MHz

Test parameter levels RF amplitude 10 V (e.m.f.)
Modulation 80 % AM, 1 kHz, sine wave
During the disturbance, either significant faults do not occur or checking
Permitted maximum
facilities detect a malfunctioning and act upon it in accordance with 5.7.3
deviation
of R 80-1 when significant faults occur.
- If the EUT is composed of several elements, the tests shall be
performed at each extremity of the cable if both of the elements are
part of the EUT.
Notes
- For the frequency range 26 – 80 MHz, the testing laboratory can either
carry out tests according to 3.4.5 or according to 3.4.6. But in case of
dispute, the results according to 3.4.6 shall prevail.

26
 OIML R 80-2:2017 (E)

5.4.7 Electrostatic discharge

Table 8

Applicable standard IEC 61000-4-2[14]

Test method Exposure to electrostatic discharge (ESD)
Applicability Applicable to all electronic measuring instruments.
Verification of compliance with the provisions in 5.7.1.2 of R 80-1 in
Object of the test case of direct exposure to electrostatic discharges or such discharges
in the neighborhood of the EUT.
The test comprises exposure of the EUT to electrical discharges.
An ESD generator as defined in the referred standard shall be used
and the test setup shall comply with the dimensions, materials used
and conditions as specified in the referred standard. Before starting
the tests, the performance of the generator shall be verified.
At least 10 discharges per preselected discharge location shall be
applied. For EUTs not equipped with a ground terminal, the EUT
shall be fully discharged between discharges. The time interval
between successive discharges shall be at least 1 second.
Contact discharge is the preferred test method. Air discharge is far
less defined and reproducible and therefore shall be used only where
Test procedure in brief contact discharge cannot be applied.
Direct application: In the contact discharge mode to be carried out on
conductive surfaces, the electrode shall be in contact with the EUT
before activation of the discharge. In such a case the discharge spark
occurs in the vacuum relays of the contact discharge tip.
On insulated surfaces only the air discharge mode can be applied. The
EUT is approached by the charged electrode until a spark discharge
occurs.
During the tests, the EUT shall be in operation.
Simulated inputs are permitted. Tests shall be performed at a fixed
level.
Air discharges 8 kV
Test parameter levels
Contact discharges 6 kV
At each test point, at least ten direct discharges shall be applied at
intervals of at least ten seconds between discharges, during the same
measurement or simulated measurement.
Number of test cycles
For indirect discharges, a total of ten discharges shall be applied on
the horizontal coupling plane and a total of ten discharges on the
vertical coupling plane.
During the disturbance, either significant faults do not occur or
Permitted maximum
checking facilities detect a malfunctioning and act upon it in
deviation
accordance with 5.7.3 of R 80-1 when significant faults occur.

27
OIML R 80-2:2017 (E)

5.4.8 Power frequency magnetic field

Table 9

Applicable standard IEC 61000-4-8[15]

Test method Exposure to power frequency electromagnetic fields (50 Hz or 60 Hz)
Applicability General.
Verification of compliance with the provisions in 5.7.1.2 of R 80-1
Object of the test
under conditions of power frequency magnetic field (50 Hz or 60 Hz).
The test comprises exposure of the EUT in each of the 3 orthogonal
Test procedure in brief
directions to a power frequency magnetic field (50 Hz or 60 Hz).
Continuous field 30 A/m
Test parameter levels
Short duration (1 s up to 3 s) 300 A/m
The duration of the exposure to the continuous field will need to be
Note dependent on the response time of the EUT. An interval needs to be
chosen that is sufficiently long for the measuring instrument to
respond.
During the disturbance, either significant faults do not occur or
Permitted maximum
checking facilities detect a malfunctioning and act upon it in
deviation
accordance with 5.7.3 of R 80-1 when significant faults occur.

28
 OIML R 80-2:2017 (E)

5.4.9 Burst (transients) on signal, data and control lines

Table 10

Applicable standard IEC 61000-4-4 [16]

Test method Introducing transients on signal, data and control lines
Only applicable for electronic measuring instruments containing active
electronic circuits which during operation are permanently or temporarily
Applicability connected to external electrical signal, data and/or control lines.
This test is not applicable to equipment powered by a road vehicle
battery.
Verification of compliance with the provisions in 5.7.1.2 of
Object of the test R 80-1 during conditions where electrical bursts are superimposed on I/O
and communication ports.
A burst generator as defined in the referred standard shall be used. The
characteristics of the generator shall be verified before connecting the
EUT.
The test comprises exposure of the EUT to bursts of voltage spikes for
which the output voltage on a 50 Ω and 1000 Ω load are defined in the
referred standard.
Both positive and negative polarity of the bursts shall be applied.
The duration of the test shall not be less than 1 min for each amplitude
Test procedure in brief and polarity.
A capacitive coupling clamp as defined in the standard shall be used for
coupling the bursts into the I/O and communication lines.
The bursts are applied during all the time necessary to perform the test;
for that purpose more bursts than indicated above may be necessary.
During the tests, the EUT shall be in operation.
Simulated inputs are permitted.
Tests shall be performed at a fixed level.
Amplitude peak value 1 kV
Test parameter level
Repetition rate 5 kHz
Tests on signal lines are applicable only for I/O signal, data and control
Restrictions ports, with a cable length exceeding 3 m (as specified by the
manufacturer).
During the disturbance, either significant faults do not occur or checking
Permitted maximum
facilities detect a malfunctioning and act upon it in accordance with 5.7.3
deviation
of R 80-1 when significant faults occur.

29
OIML R 80-2:2017 (E)

5.4.10 AC mains voltage variation

Table 11

Applicable standards IEC/TR3 61000-2-1 [17], IEC 61000-4-1 [18]

Test method Applying low and high level AC mains power voltage (single phase)
Applicability Applicable for measuring instruments which are temporarily or permanently
connected to an AC mains power network while in operation.
This test is not applicable to equipment powered by a road vehicle battery
Object of the test Verification of the compliance with the provisions in 5.7.1.1 of R 80-1
under conditions of varying AC mains power voltage.
Test procedure in brief The test comprises exposure of the EUT to the specified power supply
condition for a time period sufficient for achieving temperature stability and
subsequently performing the required measurements.
Upper limit Unom1 + 10 %
Mains voltage
Lower limit Unom2 – 15 %
Permitted maximum All functions shall operate as designed and all the errors measured during
deviation the application of the influence factor shall be within the maximum
permissible errors.
Notes For three-phase mains power supplies, the voltage variation is applicable for
each of the phases successively.
The values of Unom are those marked on the measuring instrument. If a
range is specified, Unom1 concerns the highest and Unom2 the lowest value in
the range. If only one nominal mains voltage value (Unom) is specified then
Unom1 = Unom2= Unom

30
 OIML R 80-2:2017 (E)

5.4.11 Surges on AC lines

Table 12

Applicable standard IEC 61000-4-5 [19]

Test method Introducing electrical surges on the mains power lines
Applicability Applicable for measuring instruments which are temporarily or permanently
connected to an AC mains power network while in operation.
This test is not applicable to equipment powered by a road vehicle battery
Object of the test Verification of compliance with the provisions in 5.7.1.2 of R 80-1 during
conditions where electrical surges are superimposed on the mains voltage.
Test procedure in brief A surge generator as defined in the referred standard shall be used. The
characteristics of the generator shall be verified before connecting the EUT.
The test comprises exposure of the EUT to surges for which the rise time,
pulse width, peak values of the output voltage/current on high/low
impedance load and minimum time interval between two successive pulses
are defined in the referred standard.
At least 3 positive and 3 negative surges shall be applied.
On AC mains supply lines the surges shall be synchronized with the AC
supply frequency and shall be repeated such that the injection of surges on all
4 phase shifts: 0°, 90°, 180° and 270° with the mains frequency is covered.
The injection network circuit depends on the applicable conductor and is
defined in the referred standard.
2.0 kV line to line
Test parameter levels Amplitude (peak value)
1.0 kV line to ground
Permitted maximum After the disturbance, either significant faults do not occur or checking
deviation facilities detect a malfunctioning and act upon it in accordance with 5.7.3 of
R 80-1 when significant faults occur.

31
OIML R 80-2:2017 (E)

5.4.12 AC mains voltage dips, short interruptions and variations

Table 13

Applicable standards IEC 61000-4-11 [20], IEC 61000-6-1 [21], IEC 61000-6-2 [22]
Test method Introduction of short-time reductions in mains voltage using the test setup
defined in the applicable standard
Applicability Applicable for measuring instruments with rated input current less than 16 A
per phase which are temporarily or permanently connected to an AC mains
power network while in operation.
This test is not applicable to equipment powered by a road vehicle battery
Object of the test Verification of compliance with the provisions in 5.7.1.2 of R 80-1 under
conditions of short time mains voltage reductions.
Test procedure in brief A test generator shall be used which is suitable to reduce the amplitude of the
AC mains voltage for the required period of time.
The performance of the test generator shall be verified before connecting the
EUT.
The mains voltage reduction tests shall be repeated 10 times with intervals of at
least 10 s between the tests.
Test parameter levels
Reduction to 0 %
Test a
Duration 0.5 cycles
Reduction to 0 %
Test b
Duration 1 cycles

Voltage Reduction to 40 %
Test c
dips Duration 10/12 (1) cycles
Reduction to 70 %
Test d (1)
Duration 25/30 cycles
Reduction to 80 %
Test e
Duration 250/300 (1) cycles
Reduction to 0 %
Short interruptions
Duration 250/300 (1) cycles
(1)
Notes Values applicable for 50 Hz / 60 Hz respectively
Permitted maximum During the disturbance either significant faults do not occur or checking
deviation facilities detect a malfunctioning and act upon it in accordance with 5.7.3 of
R 80-1 when significant faults occur.

32
 OIML R 80-2:2017 (E)

5.4.13 Bursts (transients) on AC mains

Table 14

Applicable standard IEC 61000-4-4 [16]

Test method Introducing transients on mains power lines
Applicability Applicable for measuring instruments which are temporarily or permanently
connected to mains power network while in operation.
This test is not applicable to equipment powered by a road vehicle battery
Object of the test Verification of compliance with the provisions in 5.7.1.2 during conditions
where electrical bursts are superimposed on the mains voltage.
Test procedure in brief A burst generator as defined in the referred standard shall be used. The
characteristics of the generator shall be verified before connecting the EUT.
The test comprises exposure of the EUT to bursts of voltage spikes for
which the output voltage on 50 Ω and 1 000 Ω load are defined in the
referred standard.
Both positive and negative polarity of the bursts shall be applied.
The duration of the test shall not be less than 1 min for each amplitude and
polarity. The injection network on the mains shall contain blocking filters to
prevent the burst energy being dissipated in the mains.
Test parameter levels Amplitude (peak value) 2 kV
Repetition rate 5 kHz
Permitted maximum During the disturbance either significant faults do not occur or checking
deviation facilities detect a malfunctioning and act upon it in accordance with 5.7.3 of
R 80-1 when significant faults occur.

33
OIML R 80-2:2017 (E)

5.4.14 Low voltage of internal battery (not connected to mains power)

Table 15

Applicable standards No standard is available

Test method Applying minimum supply voltage
Applicability Applicable to all measuring instruments supplied by internal battery.
Object of the test Verification of compliance with the provisions in 5.7.1.1 of R 80-1 during low
battery voltage.
Test procedure The test comprises exposure of the EUT to the specific low battery level
condition during a period sufficient for achieving temperature stability and for
performing the required measurements. The maximum internal impedance of
the battery and the minimum battery supply voltage level (Umin) shall be
specified by the manufacturer of the instrument.
If an alternative power supply source is used instead of the internal battery, for
instance in bench testing, the internal impedance of the specified type of battery
shall also be simulated.
The alternative power supply shall be capable of delivering sufficient current at
the applicable supply voltage.
The test sequence is as follows:
Let the power supply stabilize at a voltage as defined within the rated operating
conditions and apply the measurement and/or loading condition.
Record:
1) The data defining the actual measurement conditions including date, time and
environmental conditions;
2) the actual power supply voltage.
Perform measurements and record the error(s) and other relevant performance
parameters.
Verify compliance with 5.7.1.1 of R 80-1.
Repeat the above procedure with actual supply voltage at Umin and again at
0.9 Umin.
Verify compliance with the requirements.
Lower limit of the The lowest voltage at which the EUT functions properly according to the
voltage specifications.
Number of cycles At least one test cycle for each functional mode.
Permitted maximum All functions shall operate as designed and all the errors measured during the
deviation application of the influence factor shall be within the maximum permissible
errors.

34
 OIML R 80-2:2017 (E)

5.4.15 Tests for power from road vehicle batteries

5.4.15.1 Voltage variations

Table 16

Applicable standard ISO 16750-2 [23]

Test method Variation in supply voltage
Applicable to all measuring instruments supplied by the internal battery of
Applicability
a vehicle and charged by use of a combustion engine driven generator.
Verification of compliance with the provisions in 5.7.1.1 of R 80-1 under
Object of the test conditions of high voltage (for example while charging) and low battery
voltage.
The test comprises exposure of the EUT to the specified maximum and
minimum power supply voltage conditions for a period of time sufficient
Test procedure in brief
for achieving temperature stability and performing the required
measurements at these conditions.
Nominal battery voltage
Unom = 12 V Unom = 24 V
(Unom)
Test parameter levels
Lower limit 9V 16 V
Upper limit 16 V 32 V
At both the upper supply voltage level and the lower supply voltage level:
Permitted maximum
- all functions shall operate as designed;
deviation
- all errors shall be within the maximum permissible errors.

35
OIML R 80-2:2017 (E)

5.4.15.2 Electrical transient conduction along supply lines

Table 17

ISO 7637–2 [24]

Applicable standard 5.6.2: Test pulse 2a + 2b
5.6.3: Test pulse 3a + 3b
Test method Electrical transient conduction along supply lines
Applicable to all measuring instruments which while in operation are
Applicability supplied by the internal battery of a vehicle which may at the same time
be charged by use of a combustion engine driven generator.
Verification of compliance with the provisions in 5.7.1.2 of R 80-1
under the following conditions:
- transients due to a sudden interruption of current in a device
connected in parallel with the device under test due to the
Object of the test inductance of the wiring harness (pulse 2a);
- transients from DC motors acting as generators after the ignition is
switched off (pulse 2b);
- transients on the supply lines which occur as a result of the
switching processes (pulses 3a and 3b).
The test comprises exposure of the EUT to disturbances on the power
voltage by direct coupling into the supply lines.
Test procedure in brief During the tests, the EUT shall be in operation.
Simulated inputs are permitted. Tests shall be performed at a fixed
level.
Pulse voltage level Us
Test pulse
Test parameter levels Unom = 12 V Unom = 24 V
2a +50 V +50 V
2b +10 V +20 V
3a –150 V –200 V
3b +100 V +200 V
Test pulse 2b is only applicable when the electrical power circuitry of
the measuring instrument can be interrupted by the master switch of the
car and as a consequence is not permanently connected to the battery of
Notes
the car. This test will therefore be applicable in all situations where the
manufacturer of the measuring instrument has not specified that the
instrument is to be connected directly to the battery.
During the disturbances 2a, 3a and 3b and after the disturbance 2b,
Permitted maximum either significant faults do not occur or checking facilities detect a
deviation malfunctioning and act upon it in accordance with 5.7.3 of R 80-1 when
significant faults occur.

36
 OIML R 80-2:2017 (E)

5.4.15.3 Electrical transient conduction via lines other than supply lines

Table 18

ISO 7637–3 [25]

Applicable standard
4.5: CCC method for the fast transient test pulses 3a and 3b
Test method Electrical transient conduction along lines other than supply lines
Only applicable to analogue I/O cabling of modular measuring
Applicability
instruments installed in vehicles.
Verification of compliance with the provisions in 5.7.1.2 of R 80-1
Object of the test under conditions of transients which occur on other lines than supply
lines as a result of the switching processes (pulses a and b).
The test comprises exposure of the EUT to bursts of voltage spikes by
capacitive and inductive coupling via lines other than supply lines.
Test procedure in brief
During the tests, the EUT shall be in operation.
Simulated inputs are permitted.
Pulse voltage Us
Test pulse
Test parameter levels Unom = 12 V Unom = 24 V
3a –60 V –80 V
3b +40 V +80 V
During the disturbance, either significant faults do not occur or
Permitted maximum
checking facilities detect a malfunctioning and act upon it in
deviation
accordance with 5.7.3 of R 80-1 when significant faults occur.

37
OIML R 80-2:2017 (E)

Bibliography

[1] OIML R 120:2010: Standard capacity measures for testing measuring systems for liquids other
than water.
[2] OIML D 11:2013: General requirements for measuring instruments – Environmental
conditions.
[3] IEC 60068-2-2 (2007-07): Environmental testing. Part 2: Test methods. Test B. Dry heat.
[4] IEC 60068-3-1 (2011-08): Environmental testing. Part 3: Supporting documentation and
guidance. Section 1: Cold and dry heat tests.
[5] IEC 60068-2-1 (2007-03): Environmental testing. Part 2: Test methods. Test A. Cold.
[6] IEC 60068-2-30 (2005-08): Environmental testing. Part 2: Test methods. Test Db: Damp heat,
cyclic (12 + 12 hour cycle).
[7] IEC 60068-3-4 (2001-08): Environmental testing. Part 3: Supporting documentation and
guidance. Section 4: Damp heat tests.
[8] IEC 60068-2-47 (2005-04): Environmental testing. Part 2: Test methods. Section 47: Mounting
of specimens for vibration, impact and similar dynamic tests.
[9] IEC 60068-2-64 (2008-04): Environmental testing. Part 2: Test methods. Section 64: Test Fh:
Vibration, broad-band random and guidance.
[10] IEC 60068-3-8 (2003-08): Environmental testing. Part 3: Supporting documentation and
guidance. Section 8: Selecting amongst vibration tests
[11] IEC 61000-4-3 (2010-04): Basic EMC Publication – Electromagnetic compatibility (EMC).
Part 4: Testing and measurement techniques. Section 3: Radiated, radio-frequency,
electromagnetic field immunity test.
[12] IEC 61000-4-20 (2010-08): Basic EMC Publication – Electromagnetic compatibility (EMC).
Part 4: Testing and measurement techniques. Section 20: Emission and immunity testing in
transverse electromagnetic (TEM) waveguides.
[13] IEC 61000-4-6 (2013-10/cor1:2015): Basic EMC Publication – Electromagnetic compatibility
(EMC) Part 4: Testing and measurement techniques, Section 6: Immunity to conducted
disturbances, induced by radio frequency fields.
[14] IEC 61000-4-2 (2008-12): Basic EMC Publication - Electromagnetic compatibility (EMC)
Part 4: Testing and measurement techniques, Section 2: Electrostatic discharge immunity test.
[15] IEC 61000-4-8 (2009-09): Basic EMC Publication - Electromagnetic compatibility (EMC)
Part 4: Testing and measurement techniques. Section 8: Power frequency magnetic field
immunity test.
[16] IEC 61000-4-4 (2012-04): Basic EMC Publication - Electromagnetic compatibility (EMC)
Part 4: Testing and measurement techniques. Section 4: Electrical fast transient/burst immunity
test.
[17] IEC/TR 61000-2-1 (1990-05): Electromagnetic compatibility (EMC). Part 2: Environment.
Section 1: Description of the environment - Electromagnetic environment for low frequency
conducted disturbances and signaling in public power supply systems
[18] IEC TR 61000-4-1 (2016-04): Basic EMC publication - Electromagnetic compatibility (EMC).
Part 4: Testing and measurement techniques. Section 1: Overview of IEC 61000-4 series.
[19] IEC 61000-4-5 (2014-05): Basic EMC publication - Electromagnetic compatibility (EMC).
Part 4: Testing and measurement techniques. Section 5: Surge immunity test.

38
 OIML R 80-2:2017 (E)

[20] IEC 61000-4-11 (2004-03): Basic EMC publication - Electromagnetic compatibility (EMC).
Part 4: Testing and measuring techniques. Section 11: Voltage dips, short interruptions and
voltage variations immunity tests.
[21] IEC 61000-6-1 (2016-08): Basic EMC publication - Electromagnetic compatibility (EMC).
Part 6: Generic standards. Section 1: Immunity for residential, commercial and light-industrial
environments.
[22] IEC 61000-6-2 (2016-08): Basic EMC publication - Electromagnetic compatibility (EMC).
Part 6: Generic standards. Section 2: Immunity for industrial environments.
[23] ISO 16750-2 (2012): Road vehicles – Environmental conditions and testing for electrical and
electronic equipment; Part 2: Electrical loads.
[24] ISO 7637-2 (2011): Road vehicles - Electrical disturbance from conducting and coupling.
Part 2: Electrical transient conducting along supply lines only.
[25] ISO 7637-3 (2016): Road vehicles - Electrical disturbance by conducting and coupling - Part 3:
Passenger cars and light commercial vehicles with nominal 12 V supply voltage and
commercial vehicles with 24 V supply voltage - Electrical transient transmission by capacitive
and inductive coupling via lines other than supply lines.
[26] OIML G 1-100:2008 Evaluation of measurement data – Guide to the expression of uncertainty
in measurement. Joint Committee for Guides in Metrology JCGM, Edition 2008, Corrected
Version 2010

39
OIML R 80-2:2017 (E)

Annex A
Example of a test stand for the determination of the immersion depth
of a float by the reference float method
(Informative)

A.1 Description of the test stand

A test setup for measuring the float immersion depth is shown in Figure A1. Two level gauges of the
same type of later use are affixed in a liquid-tight container with a support for each level float fixed at
the bottom of the container. Spacers are used and necessary for a good reference surface for the floats.
The level gauge is used to measure the level of the float under the same conditions as in later use.

Figure A1: Test setup for measuring the float immersion depth

A.2 Calibrating the test setup with a reference float

The value LA1 has to be determined while the float is resting on the support, by reading the level value
indicated by the level gauge. Subsequently the container is filled with the test fluid. After the fluid
level is stabilized the value LA2 can be taken from the level gauge. The immersion depth can now be
calculated using the equation:
Dm = Lh − LA2

40
 OIML R 80-2:2017 (E)

The level gauge 2 has to be checked in the same way and should give the same results for the
immersion depth Dm. The immersion depth of the reference float is calibrated and is used as a master
float.

A.3 Determination of the immersion depth of the float

The level gauge 1 together with the reference float now serves as the master for determining the
immersion depth of the floats used in the measuring system. The level gauge 2 is now used for the
float that has to be calibrated. The values LA1 and LB1 are taken when the container is empty. The
values LA2 and LB2 are taken after filling the container with test fluid. The immersion depth of the float
Dfloat can be calculated by:
Dfloat = Dm + LB2 − LA2

A.4 Immersion depth offset

The immersion depth offset of the float to be tested is determined as follows:
DDfloat = Dfloat − Dm

41
OIML R 80-2:2017 (E)

Annex B
Tank calibration

(Informative)

B.1 General
B.1.1 Each tank/compartment is unique and has to be calibrated. If the tank consists of several
compartments every compartment has to be calibrated. An empty compartment can be used to store
the liquid of the compartment for calibration.
B.1.2 Each tank/compartment has to be calibrated together with the corresponding level sensor
system according to R 80-1, 5.5. The expanded uncertainty of the determination of the volume of
liquid in the tank for initial verification shall not exceed one-third of the MPE according to R 80-1,
Table 2. The expanded uncertainty shall be estimated according to the Guide to the expression of
uncertainty in measurement [26] applying a coverage factor k=2.
B.1.3 Using calibration data based on construction documents or tanks/compartments of similar
construction is not acceptable.

B.2 External conditions

For the purpose of calibration, the tank has to be fixed with supports on the ground in its normal
position. During the calibration any movement or inclination of the tank has to be avoided. The tank
has to be filled with liquid up to the nominal volume. During the calibration process, a tank capacity
table with pairs of level/volume values for the tank shall be established and stored.

B.3 Minimum measured quantity (MMQ)

The minimum measured quantity (MMQ) shall be specified for each measuring compartment in
accordance with 5.1.7 of R 80-1 unless stated otherwise in the type approval certificates for the level
gauging system or for the measuring tank. The MMQ according to 5.1.7.2 of R 80-1 may be specified
within the process of the tank calibration. The thus determined MMQ may still be amended but at the
latest during the initial verification (for example if the measurement results appear to exceed the error
limits).

B.4 Determination of the pipe volume

During these tests the pipe volume for the tank/each compartment also has to be determined (see
Annex C concerning the testing of different constructed systems). All these tests have to be in
compliance with the manufacturer’s documentation.
The calibration data together with the pipe volume have to be stored in the measuring system. The data
for the inclination correction also have to be stored in the system. These data are calculated from the
construction documents of the tank shape. No additional calibration is needed to determine the
inclination correction data.
Note: Manufacturers of level gauge metering systems generally employ special tailored calibration
facilities for their type of level gauge measuring systems. If level gauge metering systems are
not calibrated according to manufacturers’ recommendations or if wrong inclination correction
data are used, the measuring system will fail the initial verification.

42
 OIML R 80-2:2017 (E)

Annex C
Determination of the pipe volume

(Informative)

C.1 Test on the pipework volumes for delivery by gravity

The volumes of the pipework between the valve at the bottom of each of the measuring compartments
and the applicable transfer points which need to be stored as metrologically relevant values of the
measuring system are to be tested as follows.
The measuring compartment and the pipework are filled with the fluid via the loading connection until
the valve at the bottom of the compartment is completely flooded. After all the air has been removed
from the pipe, the valve shall be closed and the pipework shall be emptied via the transfer point. The
requirements in 5.1.5 of R 80-1 can also be met in the case of a complete drainage of the system, if the
difference between this quantity and the value stored in the measuring system is (similar to the
requirements in 5.2.2.4 of R 80-1) less than one third of the minimum specified volume deviation Emin
(see 2.45 of R 80-1) of the compartment.

C.2 Test on delivery via collector

For the execution of this test, the compartment of the measuring container having the smallest
minimum measured quantity shall be selected. The available delivery paths (full and/or empty hose(s))
shall each be tested separately following the two-step procedure described in C 2.1 and C 2.2, each
time delivering a test volume of 1 000 L or the minimum delivery quantity of the selected
compartment, whichever is smaller.
Before commencing these tests an initial flushing needs to be performed. For the purpose of this initial
flushing, the applicable compartment is filled with at least 200 L and subsequently emptied through
the collector and the selected delivery path. The exact quantities used and indicated during flushing are
irrelevant to the outcome of this test.

C.2.1 Measuring systems with gas separator or level sensor for the cut-off point
After the flushing, the compartment is filled with a quantity of liquid of twice the test volume. In a
first step, the test volume is discharged through the originally empty collector line using the same
delivery path as during the initial flushing, using a volume standard or reference meter. In the second
step, the remaining product is delivered through the same delivery path until the system stops. The
MPE for this deviation is ± 0.5 % of the minimum measured quantity of the compartment used for the
test.

C.2.2 Measuring systems with level sensor for the pipework system
After flushing, the test volume plus approximately half the volume of the collector pipework is filled
into the compartment. After that, the test volume (not including the added volume for the pipework)
shall be delivered into/through the volume standard or reference meter.
In the second step, the test volume minus the pipework volume which had been added before, is filled
into the compartment, and subsequently delivered into/through the standard/reference meter, until the
system shuts off.
The MPE for these deviations is ± 0.5 % of the minimum measured quantity of the compartment used
for the tests.

43
OIML R 80-2:2017 (E)

Annex D
Examples for the tests listed in 4.2–4.4

(Informative for measuring systems for partial delivery

and accuracy class 0.5)

D.1 Preparations for the volumetric test of the individual measuring

compartments
Each measuring compartment of the measuring tank shall be separately tested by gradual, step by step
discharge.
If possible, tests shall be performed with a product for which the measuring system is intended
(preferably fuel oil or diesel oil). Initially, the compartment shall be filled with about 90 % of the
permissible loading quantity and connected to a volume standard or reference meter via the gravity
outlet of the compartment (if present). The filling quantity should be selected such that it is sufficient
for all testing steps as well as the initial flushing (if required) so that pumping back of product can be
avoided.
Note: The initial flushing ensures that the pipes and hoses are filled completely.

D.2 Testing of a measuring compartment using a volume standard

The volume standards used shall have a volume of less than twice the minimum measured quantity of
the smallest compartment to be tested.
The test can be carried out at any flow rate, but needs to be sufficiently small (especially for the last
discharge steps) to prevent air from entering the pipe system by way of swirl formation.
Each filling step consists of a delivery during which the volume standard is filled from the respective
measuring compartment. After each delivery, the delivery temperature, the operating volume and the
converted volume are observed and recorded from both the indication of the level gauging system and
the measured standard volume of the volume standard, and documented. Subsequently, the errors are
calculated (see example). The compartment shall be completely emptied during the test. If the residual
quantity cannot be measured with the volume standard, gravimetric methods may be used. In this case,
the verification of the converted volume may be dispensed with. For the assessment, it may be
necessary to add the volumes of several steps so that at least 0.8 times the minimum delivery is
obtained. The MPE shall be applied to these summation values (see example).

44
 OIML R 80-2:2017 (E)

Example: Volumetric test

Nominal loading volume of tank compartment: 15 000 L

Minimum measured quantity of tank compartment = 1/10 of loading volume: 1 500 L
Nominal volume of volume standard used: 1 000 L
Maximum permissible error
Minimum specified volume deviation Emin = 2 × 0.3 %·V ≤ 2 × Vmin: ± 9 L
Maximum permissible error for V > 2 × Vmin: 0.3 %·V

Compart- Error for volume between Error for volume

Indica-
No. of
ment
tion of Indica- Error of actual 1 × and 2 × MMQ (from > 2 × MMQ (from
contents measurement sum of two individual sum of three individual
measure- level tion of
before measurements) measurements)
ment gauging standard
measure-
system Absolute Relative Absolute Relative Absolute Relative
ment
L L L L % L % L %
1 15 015 1 000 1 002.4 –2.4 –0.24
2 14 015 1 001 1 000.2 +0.8 +0.08 –1.6 –0.08
3 13 014 1 003 1 000.1 +2.9 +0.29 +3.7 +0.18 +1.3 +0.04
4 12 011 1 004 1 002.5 +1.5 +0.15 +4.4 +0.22 +5.2 +0.17
5 11 007 997 1 002.5 –5.5 –0.55 –4.0 –0.20 –1.1 –0.04
6 10 010 996 998.9 –2.9 –0.29 –8.4 –0.42 –6.9 –0.23
7 9 014 999 1 000.6 –1.6 –0.16 –4.5 –0.23 –10 –0.33
check: check:
values shall values
be ≤ 9 L shall be
≤ 0.3 %

Note: In the example, the error determined for measurement No. 6 is – 0.42 %, but the 8.4 L are
smaller than the minimum specified volume deviation.
In measurement No. 7, the MPE for the minimum measured quantity is exceeded. The compartment
shall be rejected.

D.3 Test of the temperature sensors

The temperature sensors shall be tested during the delivery by determining the mean temperature of
the delivered product for a quantity of at least 1 000 L and comparing it with the mean temperature
calculated by the system. As an alternative, the temperature can also be measured and directly
compared in a place next to the temperature sensor. The deviation shall not exceed ± 0.5 °C. Testing
of the temperature sensors may be done during the volume tests of the respective measuring
compartments.
The temperature sensors shall be tested during the delivery by determining the mean temperature of
the delivered product for a quantity of at least 1 000 L and comparing it with the mean temperature
calculated by the system. As an alternative, the temperature can also be measured and directly

45
OIML R 80-2:2017 (E)

compared in a place next to the temperature sensor. The deviation shall not exceed ± 0.5 °C. Testing
of the temperature sensors may be done during the volume tests of the respective measuring
compartments.

D.4 Test of the compartment using a reference meter

The standard used may be a reference meter suitable for the product used for testing. Prior to the first
measurement, the meter shall be tested using a volume standard. During testing, the flow rates used
shall comply with the specification of the reference meter.
The test procedure is the same as in D.2, except that the volume steps may now be equal to the
minimum measured quantity of the compartment under test.

D.5 Test of the inclination correction

This test shall be performed for each measuring compartment, once with a filling volume of approx.
15 to 30 % and once with approx. 70 to 90 % of its nominal volume. It is recommended to
simultaneously test all compartments in two runs, with an arbitrary combination and sequence of
filling states. The center of gravity of the partially loaded truck should be carefully checked for each
loading state.
The first measurement for each filling state shall be performed in normal position, i.e. within ± 0.2° in
the longitudinal and in the transverse direction. After a settling time of approx. 5 min, the filling
volumes of all compartments shall be read. They are the reference values for the subsequent tests in
inclined positions.
Then the tank is successively brought into the following positions:
 in the longitudinal direction, inclined by + 2° to + 3° (“front up”);
 in the longitudinal direction, inclined by – 2° to – 3° (“rear up”);
 in the transverse direction, inclined by + 2.5° to + 5° (“right up”);
 in the transverse direction, inclined by – 2.5° to – 5° (“left up”),
whereby the inclination shall not be greater than ± 0.5° in the direction not considered.
After a settling time of approx. 5 min, the filling volumes of all compartments shall be read.
For each of the filling states, and for each of the measuring compartments, the volume indication in
each of the four inclined positions shall be equal to the reference values determined in normal position
within ± 0.3 % of the minimum measured quantity of the respective compartment (see example
below).

46
 OIML R 80-2:2017 (E)

Example: Inclined position test

Tanker with three compartments

• compartment volume 10 000 L each
• minimum measured quantity (1/5 of the permissible compartment volume): 2 000 L per
compartment
• maximum permissible errors for inclined position test (± 0.3 % of minimum measured quantity):
±6L

Procedure:
(1) filling of compartments 1 and 3 with 2 000 L of fuel oil each and compartment 2 with
8 000 L of fuel oil
(2) horizontal alignment of tank and recording of reference measurement values
(3) inclination of tank front upwards, recording of measurement values
(4) inclination of tank rear upwards, recording of measurement values
(5) inclination of tank right upwards and recording of measurement values
(6) inclination of tank left upwards and recording of measurement values
(7) evaluation of the recorded measurement results
(8) filling up of compartments 1 and 3 with 8 000 L of fuel oil each and emptying of
compartment 2 to 2 000 L of fuel oil
(9) horizontal realignment of tank and recording of reference measurement values
(10) repetition of measurement at inclinations “front upwards”, “rear upwards”, “right upwards”
and “left upwards” and recording of the measurement results
(11) evaluation of the recorded measurement results.

47
OIML R 80-2:2017 (E)

D.6 Influence of internal pressure

(1) tank under test

(2) vent
(3) pressure gauge
(4) ball valve
(5) separation valve
(6) pump
(7) standard capacity measure

While ensuring by means of vent 2 that there are no air pockets, the pressure is increased by means of
pump 6 up to pmax (indicated on pressure gauge 3). Valve 5 is then closed and, by opening valve 4,
water is gradually withdrawn and its volume is measured using the volumetric measure 7. The volume
is indicated on the graduated rule of the measure 7, and the corresponding pressure is read from
pressure gauge 3.
The calculated volume changes △Vi are recorded in tabular form:

Pressure in tank p Increase of tank volume DV

(bar) (L)
p1 ΔV1
p2 ΔV2
.... ….
pmax DVmax

or presented in the form of a graph dependency ΔV = ΔV(p).

48