Level of Preparedness of Public Elementary School Teachers To Modular Learning Modality in The New Learning Landscape: Basis For Action Plan
Level of Preparedness of Public Elementary School Teachers To Modular Learning Modality in The New Learning Landscape: Basis For Action Plan
Level of Preparedness of Public Elementary School Teachers To Modular Learning Modality in The New Learning Landscape: Basis For Action Plan
Keywords: preparedness, new normal education, anxiety, coping mechanism, public school
relationship to their anxiety and coping mechanisms in Learners’ rights to education remain protected and
public elementary schools in Munai, Lanao del Norte non-negotiable. The ultimate objectives and goals of
during the school year 2020-2021. Specifically, it education remain the same but the processes through
sought to answer the following questions: which the goals can be achieved. These should be re-
imagined and done in a different way. It has already
1. Is there a significant relationship between the affected 32.1 million learners across levels including
teachers’ level of anxiety and coping mechanisms? technical-vocational education and training. As
education stakeholders redesign their respective
2. Is there a significant relationship between the learning continuity plans, they considered that
teachers’ level of anxiety and coping mechanisms and learners, teachers, and schools come from diverse
their level of preparedness in modular learning? situations and contexts; thus, a one-size-fits-all
approach would disadvantage others since the
dynamics have indeed changed. Curriculum goals are
Literature Review
not expected to be achieved using the same timelines,
modalities, or platforms.
Blended learning is also known as the integration of
face-to-face and online instruction. According to The learning delivery modalities that schools can
Graham et al. (2018), it is widely adopted and utilized adopt may be one or a combination of the following,
across higher education. Some scholars referred to it as depending on the COVID-19 restrictions and the
the new traditional model or the “new normal” particular context of the learners in the school or
delivery of instruction. This pertains to a learning locality. Cahapay (2020) mentioned that online
delivery that combines face-to-face with any or a mix distance learning is one of the new alternative learning
of online distance learning, modular distance learning, options of the Department of Education. This features
and TV or Radio-based Instruction. Blended learning the teacher as facilitator. It engages learners’ active
would enable the schools to limit face-to-face learning. participation through the use of various technologies.
It would ensure social distancing and decrease the This can be accessed through the internet while they
volume of people outside the home at any given time. are geographically remote from each other during
instruction. The internet is used to facilitate learner-
As defined in DepEd Order 21, s. 2019, instructional teacher and peer-to-peer communication. Online
flexibility as adaptations in terms of the time and learning allows live synchronous instruction. It
duration, the place or method of instruction. Available requires participants to have good and stable internet
pedagogies and learning resources can be used at the connection and is more interactive than the other types
outset. As a response to the crisis, DepEd and its of distance learning methods. The responses are also
partners modify existing flexible learning methods. real time. The learners may download materials from
These partners are the in-school and off-school the internet, attend webinars and virtual classes, and
approaches, the Enhanced Instructional Management complete and submit assignments online. The DepEd
by teachers, parents and community, Alternative Commons and LR Portal fall in this category.
Learning System (ALS), the open high school
programs, and homeschooling. They also developed Meanwhile, radio-based and television-based
new flexible learning options to suit present demands instruction were also implemented where learners have
including the unprecedented number of students, different capacities to stay engaged in lessons.
teachers, and families who would migrate from formal Education stakeholders believe that what helps sustain
education to flexible learning programs. They also their satisfaction and attention are creative and
designed instructional frameworks that show how diversified platforms and strategies, use of
aspects of education delivery would be workable and combination of print and broadcast, and digital media
that these new programs may be developed locally or with different levels of interactivity to sustain student
nationally. participation. It goes without saying that
developmentally appropriate principles must guide the
According to Sintema (2020), COVID-19 pandemic selection of these platforms and strategies. Printed
has altered human engagements, resource allocations, media includes learning materials such as textbooks
and system allocations. It presents a different direction and learners’ modules which have been modified for
for priorities and future plans. Education is constrained home learning situations while broadcast media
to navigate the world of teaching and learning using includes radio and television (Llego, 2020).
this. Amidst these changing dynamics, meeting the
educational needs of learners remains the priority. Remote learning takes place whenever a student and a
teacher or sources of information are separated by low-technology learning options. For radio/television
distance or time. They are not confined in a physical broadcast, distance learning, and print-based learning,
learning space such as a classroom. It can be done a home environment plays a vital role in the learning
asynchronous or synchronous. While remote learning processes of students at any level (UNESCO, 2020).
does use web-based platforms, the range of learning Tria (2020) mentioned that parents or guardians of
delivery goes far beyond this. It includes learning kits children in basic education play a vital role in
delivered to homes, TV broadcast, radio programs, preparing a conducive learning space. Parental
WIFI-connected devices, and micro-content deliveries supervision is crucial in establishing routines for
(e.g., texting, and messaging through applications like students to finish their learning tasks at home. For
Whats App, Viber, or FB Messenger). Regardless of rural and spacious communities, infrastructures can be
modalities to be used on the field, what is important is safe learning spaces for students who do not have
for the paradigm of education delivery to evolve, access to high-technology. In delivering instruction,
because the face-to-face norm may no longer be a schools should work with barangay units that have
viable teaching-learning option in the near future communication facilities.
(Ferri et al., 2020).
Teaching is a challenging profession and is regarded as
Parents are primarily the health and safety guardians of a highly stressful job. Indeed, teachers experience
their children. They should inform their family about extreme stress due to their various tasks and
COVID-19. They should also train them to acquire responsibilities. Researchers explained that stress has
new habits like regular hand washing, face mask negative impacts on classroom performance, job
wearing, physical distancing, and proper food satisfaction, and teacher attrition. There are a lot of
handling. Additionally, whether schools use print, instances where teachers are placed in a position of
radio or television, or web-based technologies; most highly stressful responsibilities for the actions of
distance learning programs rely on parents to take the young individuals in a school setting. Add to this is the
role of tutors. Their indigenous and personal burden of choosing the right learning activities that
knowledge can be supported with flexible learning would lead to the attainment of the educational goals is
programs that their natural capacity to nurture and also noted (Archibong & Out, 2020).
teach children would result in meaningful learning
interactions. The following suggestions aim to help Stress is a phenomenon that has an impact on people
parents fulfill the above responsibilities (Owusu et al., and affecting their behaviors, job performances, and
2020). communication with their co-workers. It is an
undetermined reaction demonstrated by physique
As mentioned by Li et al., (2020), since instruction and against pressure. Stress, regardless of giving or not
assessment need to be flexible, the learning giving pleasure or pain, signifies a non-special reaction
environment must be flexible as well. Provided of the body toward any request implied on it for its
learning options should appropriately respond to the adaptation. With a general definition, stress is a
learners’ context. The learning environment may be in physiological and psychological reaction of an
the school, at home, or in the community, and it should individual toward him/herself and the external
consider time and space for learning. Infrastructure for environment as a result of being affected by the
modern schools are not only limited to physical spaces involved environment and working conditions. Stress
but also includes ICT infrastructures that are relevant does not occur automatically. It is developed by the
to support teaching, learning, and administration in effect of the transformations that occurred in
schools. The provision of technological infrastructure individuals' environments (Akhlaq et al., 2010).
is crucial for learning continuity and efficiency of
services especially during a global health crisis. When Stressors are commonly associated with a variety of
implemented properly, technology can boost personal, social, and physical events, including
engagement and produce significant gains in student interpersonal experiences in schools or classrooms.
achievement. However, two important elements should The human body, however, cannot differentiate
be emphasized to achieve this outcome: 1) the pre- between the various types of stressors. This explains
requisites of adequate technological infrastructure, and why physical stress cannot be separated from mental
2) teachers’ competence in utilizing appropriate stress, just as personal stress cannot be separated from
pedagogical approaches using technology. professional stress. Because individual responses to
and discernments of similar situations vary
However, in the event where schools do not have significantly. Factors responsible for stress in one
technological infrastructures, they may utilize flexible, person may also be responsible for sparking
exercise, social resources, avoidance, reading, hobbies, among teachers. Part II presented the level of
movement, and meditation. These coping strategies preparedness among teachers in blended learning. The
used by teachers affect their outlook on the situation, scoring range of the questionnaire was scored using
thereby altering the perception of stress. To alter the the Likert scale, where four (4) was the highest and
perception of stress, teachers may invoke inward or one (1) was the lowest to get quantitative data on the
outward coping strategies. Inward strategies, such as stress and coping mechanisms and level of
concentrating on something narrow in the field of preparedness in blended learning. For the stress and
stimuli around oneself, including seeking stillness and coping mechanisms of teachers, the scoring range was
focus. Outward strategies, such as exercise, involve 4- extremely stressful, 3-highly stressful, 2-less
seeking connections, distractions, and movement. stressful, and 1-never stressful. For the level of
Although there are many common coping strategies preparedness in modular learning, the scoring range
available. Most teachers rely on social support, active was 4- always, 3-oftentimes, 2-rarely, and 1-never.
planning, restorative experiences, and suppression of
competing behaviors. Active planning, although a part Data Gathering Procedures
of the normal workload, allows teachers to take their
mind off stress and focus on their work. The process of Before conducting the study, the researcher performed
active planning involves concentrating efforts, the standard research protocol. The researcher
developing a plan, taking some action, coming up with requested consent and approval from the adviser for
strategies, trying to take steps, and doing what has to careful assessment and review of the manuscript and
be done to keep their attention on the students rather the appropriateness of the survey questionnaires. The
than the stressor. researcher then submitted a letter to the Division
Superintendent of Lanao del Norte, Edilberto L.
Oplenaria, CESO V, to allow her to distribute the
Methodology survey questionnaires to the respective schools of
Munai District.
Research Design
After all permits were signed, the researcher presented
the signed letters to the respective school heads of the
This study utilized descriptive correlation design since
schools. Likewise, an informed consent form from the
it tried to determine the relationship between the
anxiety and coping mechanisms and level of school was given to the respondents. The researcher
preparedness of teachers in blended learning. personally conducted the distribution and retrieval of
questionnaires during the agreed schedules. Social
Respondents distancing and other protocols implemented were
followed such as wearing masks and face shields.
The respondents of the study were seventy-nine (79) Respondents were assured of the ethics of research and
public elementary school teachers in Munai District. confidentiality of their responses.
The study employed purposive sampling method due
to its inclusion of the entire elementary teachers in
Results and Discussion
Munai District. The distribution of respondents were
listed below.
The significant relationship between the teachers’
Research Instruments
level of anxiety and coping mechanisms
The study utilized survey questionnaire on anxiety
Table 1. Relationship Between the Teachers’ Level of
adapted from the study of Ekundayo and Kolawole
Anxiety and Coping Mechanisms
(2013) and Osagie (2018). Meanwhile, the
questionnaire on the level of preparedness of teachers
in modular learning was self-made. The questionnaires
were subjected to pilot testing prior to the actual data
gathering. The study distributed the questionnaires to
thirty (30) selected teacher-participants from Munai
National High School.
teachers using the Pearson correlation analysis. Results school administrators should create a plan focusing
disclosed that the coping mechanisms of the teachers management for teachers to enhance their efficiency
were not significantly correlated to their level of amidst the flexible learning set up. (2) It is
preparedness in the new normal (r=0.180, p>0.05). recommended that teachers should equip themselves
This implied that the teachers’ preparedness in the with stress management skills through outdoor
different instructional modalities were not influenced activities and attending webinars to strengthen their
by their coping mechanisms. However, the specific readiness on blended learning. (3) It is recommended
physical coping mechanism was significantly that barangay officials should provide any assistance
associated to their level of preparedness in terms of in bridging the gaps between education and mental
modules (r=0.230, p<0.05), radio-based (r=0.286, health. (4) It is recommended that future researchers
p<0.05), television-based (r=0.199, p<0.05) and the should provide further information in the improvement
total measure (r=0.283, p<0.05). Teachers believed of strategies and approaches needed in the
that better physical coping strategies against anxiety development of procedures.
could lead to better preparation in modules, radio-
based, and television-based instruction. The specific References
emotional coping mechanisms was not significantly
associated to the teachers’ level of preparation in
Aydin, B. & Kaya, A. (2016). Sources of stress for teachers working
modules, radio-based, and television-based instruction in private elementary schools and methods of coping with stress.
(p>0.05). But the specific environmental coping Universal Journal of Educational Research 4(12A): 186-195, 2016.
mechanisms was significantly related to their level of
Akhlaq, M., Amjad, B. M., Mehmood, K., Hassan, S. & Malik, S.
preparedness in terms of modules (r=0.225, p<0.05)
(2010). An evaluation of the effects of stress on the job
and there was an association between spiritual coping
performance of secondary school teachers. Journal of Law and
mechanisms and modules instruction (r=0.305, Psychology. ISSN: 2078-1083.
p<0.01). Thus, the null hypothesis of no significant
relationship between the coping mechanisms and level Alhija, F. (2014). Teacher stress and coping: the role of personal
and jobncharacteristics. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences
of preparedness of the teachers was rejected. Despite
185 ( 2015 ) 374.
the coping mechanisms presented, this result entailed
that the teachers’ preparedness in the different Ambayon, C. (2020). Modular-Based Approach and Students’
instructional modalities was not influenced by their Achievement in Literature. International Journal of Education &
Literacy Studies. ISSN: 2202-9478.
coping mechanisms which implied that teachers were
needed to be ready and perform their duties, despite Anoba, J. L. D. & Cahapay, M. B. (2020). The readiness of teachers
their coping strategies to alleviate their anxieties on blended learning transition for post-covid-19 period: An
caused by the education reforms. assessment using parallel mixed method. PUPIL: International
Journal of Teaching, Education and Learning, 4(2), 295-316.
The following were the recommendations drawn based DepEd Order No. 14, s. 2020. (Guidelines on the required health
on the results of the study: (1) It is recommended that standards in basic education offices and schools).
Ekundayo, H., & Kolawole, A. (2013). Stress among secondary student. Eur. J. Educ. Stud. 2020.
school teachers in E k i t i State, Nigeria.
D O I: 1 0 . 5 9 0 1 / j e s r . 2 0 1 3 . v 3 n 2p3 1 1 . Rogers, P., (2014).Theory of change. UNICEF.
Ferguson, A. (2017). Teacher stress and social support usage. Brock Sintema, E. J. (2020). Effect of covid-19 on the performance of
Education Journal, 26(2), 2017. grade 12 students: Implications for stem education. Eurasia Journal
of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 16(7).
Ferrie, F., Grifoni, P., Guzzo, T. & (2020). Online learning and
emergency remote teaching: Opportunities and challenges in Tahir, F. (2011). Effectiveness of teaching stress on academic
emergency situations. International Journal of Educational performance of college teachers in Pakistan. Educational
Technology in Higher Education. Psychology, 1(3), 123-129.
Graham, C., Dziuban, C., Moskal, P., Norberg, A., & Sicilia, N. Tan, J. (2017). Factors affecting stress among faculty members of
(2018. Blended learning: The new normal and emerging public universities in the Philippines: A multiple regression
technologies. International Journal of Educational Technology in analysis. International Journal of Psychological Studies; Vol. 9, No.
Higher Education. DOI 10.1186/s41239-017. 3; 2017.
Guevarra, R., & Cimanes, R. (2017). Stress coping mechanism and Tria, J. Z. (2020). The COVID-19 pandemic through the lens of
its impact to their age among senior high school students at education in the Philippines: The new normal. Pedagogical
Parañaque National High School-Baclaran. International Journal Research.
for Innovative Research in Multidisciplinary field. ISSN – 2455-
0620 Volume - 3, Issue – 7. Toquero, C. M. (2020). Challenges and opportunities for higher
education amid the covid-19 pandemic: The Philippine context.
Li, X., Yang, Y., Chu, S. K. W., Zainuddin, Z., & Zhang, Y. (2020). Pedagogical Research.
Applying blended synchronous teaching and learning for Tupas,F. & Laguda, M. (2020). Blended learning – an approach in
flexible learning in higher education: An action research study at a Philippine basic education curriculum in new normal: a review of
university in Hong Kong. Asia Pacific Journal of Education. current literature. Universal Journal of Educational Research,8(11),
5505 - 5512.
Llego, MA. (2020). DepEd learning delivery modalities for school
year 2020-2021. TeacherPh.
Affiliations and Corresponding Information
Mazo, G. (2015). Causes, effects of stress, and the coping
mechanism of the bachelor of science in information technology
Irma P. Jamael
students in a Philippine university. Journal of Education and
Learning. Vol. 9(1) pp. 71-78.
Pendulonan Integrated School,
Department of Education - Philippines
Osagie, C. (2018). Stressors, effects and coping strategies among
teachers in secondary schools in Edo State, Nigeria. International
Joel Q. Galibo, PhD
Journal of Research, ISSN-2350-0530(O),ISSN-2394-3629(P).
St. Peter’s College - Philippines
Owusu-Fordjour, C., Koomson, C.K., & Hanson, D. (2020). The
impact of Covid-19 on learning-the perspective of the Ghanaian