Analysis and Design of Three-Phase AC-to-DC Converters With High Power Factor and Near-Optimum Feedforward
Analysis and Design of Three-Phase AC-to-DC Converters With High Power Factor and Near-Optimum Feedforward
Analysis and Design of Three-Phase AC-to-DC Converters With High Power Factor and Near-Optimum Feedforward
net/publication/3217514
Analysis and design of three-phase AC-to-DC converters with high power factor
and near-optimum feedforward
CITATIONS READS
64 3,025
2 authors, including:
Ming-Tsung Tsai
Southern Taiwan University of Science and Technology
43 PUBLICATIONS 362 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
All content following this page was uploaded by Ming-Tsung Tsai on 17 June 2014.
Abstract— This paper presents a three-phase pulsewidth- be roughly catalogued into three groups, termed the hysteresis
modulated ac-to-dc converter with unity power factor and current control, the ramp comparison control, and the predicted
near-optimum dynamic regulation. A general mathematical current control [1]. The hysteresis current control has a fast
model of the converter has been established to lead to a
comprehensive analysis. The averaged small-signal technique is dynamic response and no dc offset. It is easy to implement,
used to obtain the near-optimum feedforward compensator, thus but the switching frequency depends on the load parameters
resulting in the output impedance, and the audio susceptibility and comparator tolerance band, and usually results in a higher
become zero, that is, the output voltage of the converter presented switching frequency than other techniques. According to the
in this paper is independent of variations of the dc load current
and the utility voltage. The proposed procedure of analysis is drawbacks, some modified strategies are deduced, including
simple and effective, and it is also easy to implement. Finally, the variable tolerance band by multiplying the reference signal
the theoretical formulations are verified both by simulated and instead of fixed band, using both wide and narrow hysteresis
experimental results in a 5-kW laboratory prototype system. bands, a space-vector-based hysteresis (which is suitable for
Index Terms— Converter, current-mode control, feedforward three-phase systems) to decrease the switching frequency, and
compensator, power balance. so on [3], [10], [11]. The ramp comparison control has several
advantages, such as a well-defined harmonic spectrum due to
I. INTRODUCTION the operation in constant switching frequency, an optimum
switch pattern, etc. However, this method has an inherent
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(b)
Fig. 1. (a) Main circuit of the three-phase ac-to-dc voltage-source converter.
(6) (b) Switching pattern in one switching period.
where (1)–(5) are the input equations, and the (6) is the
output equation. In combination with switching states, the
input equations can be rewritten in a matrix form as
(7)
where
(8)
(10)
Even though this matrix form equation is detailed and This mathematical model is a general model which usually
clear, it is, yet, complicated to analyze. Some refinement applies to various forms of pulsewidth modulation ac-to-
may be necessary. Since the proposed converter is operated dc switch-mode rectifiers. It provides an exact solution if
in current-mode control with voltage-source type, the system the switching function is defined. It is also valid in the
state variables should be focused at the converter input currents computer simulation. However, it is time variant, nonlinear,
and dc-bus voltage. Thus, some state variables, such as the and includes switching functions, such that it can give only
source line current variables and line voltage variables a piecewise solution. Therefore, it is difficult to evaluate
, can be neglected. Therefore, a simplified scheme the closed-form solutions, including steady-state and dynamic
shown as the subblock in Fig. 1(a) is adopted to reduce the performance of the system.
complication. It includes the interrelated equations of Reference [17] has shown three techniques implemented
, and , thus we step by step to solve this problem, including the Fourier
have analysis to obtain the low-frequency model and the high-
frequency model, the transformation to a rotating frame of
(11) reference which is synchronized with the utility voltage to
take a time-invariant but nonlinear model, and the small-signal
(12) linearization to disturb the system with a small area around
the steady-state operation point.
(13) This procedure presents, indeed, a comprehensive analysis
of the converter under these control conditions, including
(14) steady-state solution, dynamic response, and harmonic aspects.
It can provide a theoretical view for the system model.
For a balanced three-phase system without a neutral line, the Nevertheless, there are two state variables (the dc-bus voltage
sums of the phase currents and phase voltages are equal to and the converter input current) which must be controlled, and
zero, that is, the closed-form block diagram includes a minor current loop.
(15) Thus, it extends the complication of the algorithm and causes
complex expressions. These expressions do not provide a valid
(16)
simplification for engineers in the design procedure.
Thus, the term can be obtained as follows: In opposition to this, if the system response in the minor
current loop is independent of the outer voltage loop, then
the analysis is simplified. If the system response in the minor
(17)
loop (current loop) is faster than the outer loop (voltage loop),
this viewpoint will become reasonable to separately consider
Therefore, these equations can be represented as the matrix- those two terms. A faster minor current loop can be taken by
form differential equation as follows: using a high-voltage margin (ratio of the dc-bus voltage to
the value of the phase voltage), or reducing the value of the
(18)
commutator , or improving the parameters of the current
where loop controller. Then, we can consider that the minor loop
has reached the steady-state when proceeding with the output
(19) loop. Thus, a simplification in the design procedure can be
(20) obtained. This design strategy is adopted in this paper and
will be shown later.
(21)
III. CONTROL SYSTEM DESIGN
A. Current Regulator
If we consider only the model of the minor (current) loop,
then we have the following differential equations:
(22) (24)
(25)
(26)
(a) (b)
(c)
Fig. 2. (a) The control block diagram of the current loop. (b) Frequency response of the closed-loop transfer function of the current loop. (c) Frequency
response of the loop-gain of the current loop.
signals, denoted as and , are smaller than the shown in Fig. 2(a), where is the gain of the pulsewidth
carrier of a triangular wave, then the corresponding switches modulator and is represented as
SW1, SW2, and SW3 are ON, otherwise they are OFF. An
example of this switching pattern in phase is shown in (30)
Fig. 1(b).
Based on the state-space averaging technique, we derive
To improve the control performance of the current loop, the
the low-frequency model equation for the current loop, while
current regulator and the noise filter are chosen as
the high-frequency components are ignored. Thus, the average
voltage in one switching period is
(31)
(27)
(32)
where is the peak value of the triangular wave. Similarly,
we have For example, if mH, V,
V, and volts/ampere, then based on the root-
(28) locus method and the Bode-diagram method, the parameters
of the current loop controller are chosen as
(29) Hz, kHz,
kHz, and Hz.
Here, three independent current loop regulators are used. If Fig. 2(b) and (c) shows the frequency responses of the
we consider the source voltage and as disturbances, the current regulator. From these figures, the bandwidth is known
control block diagram of the current loop, including the current to be about 3 kHz, the gain margin is 12 dB and the phase
regulator and a noise filter , can be constructed, as margin is 48 . Note that the phase shift of the reference current
TSAI AND TSAI: THREE-PHASE AC-TO-DC CONVERTERS WITH HIGH POWER FACTOR AND NEAR-OPTIMUM FEEDFORWARD 539
and output current is nearly zero, that is, the output current is
nearly in phase with the utility phase voltage.
B. Voltage Regulator
Here, we prepare to introduce a simple design concept,
termed the power balance concept, instead of a comprehen-
sive analysis of the voltage loop control. However, it must
be pointed out again that the proposed control concept is
constrained on the basis that the dynamic of the voltage
loop control is slower than the main frequency, otherwise the
current will be distorted. The dynamic equation of the dc-bus
voltage is shown as follows:
(33)
Fig. 4. Simplified functional block diagram of the proposed three-phase ac-to-dc converter.
the desired dc output voltage, the feedforward compensator Then, the output voltage can be expressed as
can be represented intuitively as
(69)
(57)
that is, the output voltage of the converter is independent of
variations in the load current and the input line voltage.
where is a scaling factor. For derivation of the small-
From the viewpoint of control, the voltage regulator
signal model, let
must be chosen so as to minimum the influence of the audio
(58) susceptibility and the dc-bus output impedance, while the
steady-state error of the dc-bus output voltage should also be
then, we have as small as possible. Here, a PI controller is chosen for the
voltage regulator, that is
(59)
(70)
Thus, the complete averaged small-signal model of the voltage
loop, including the feedforward compensator, is established. Then, the control function becomes
Fig. 3 shows the result, where
(71)
(60)
where
(61) (72)
(62)
(73)
Then, the output voltage can be refined as
(63) (74)
where (75)
(64) The above equations show that the system bandwidth is
affected by the voltage regulator , the input voltage,
(65) the output voltage, and the load current. It appears that a large
input voltage leads to a wider system bandwidth, and a larger
(66) output voltage decreases the system bandwidth.
Since the main function of the system is to force the input
(67) current to be sinusoidal and in phase with the input line
From the above equations, it is easy to prove that the proposed voltage, the bandwidth of the voltage regulation loop should
three-phase ac-to-dc converter has near-optimum dynamic be smaller than the line frequency. A suitable bandwidth is in
the interval of (1/3, 1/2) line frequency. Therefore, the control
regulation if
parameters and can be so chosen such that the bandwidth
(68) is in such interval. Fig. 4 shows the simplified functional block
diagram of the proposed three-phase PWM converter.
TSAI AND TSAI: THREE-PHASE AC-TO-DC CONVERTERS WITH HIGH POWER FACTOR AND NEAR-OPTIMUM FEEDFORWARD 541
(a)
(a)
(b)
(b)
(c)
(c)
Fig. 5. Simulated transient response for step load variation without the Fig. 6. Simulated transient response for step load variation with the feed-
feedforward compensator. forward compensator.
(a)
(b)
(c)
(a)
Fig. 8. Simulated transient response for step line voltage variation with the
feedforward compensator.
(b)
Fig. 10. Experimental transient response for step load variation with the
feedforward compensator.
REFERENCES
W. I. (Charles) Tsai was born in Tainan, Taiwan,
[1] D. M. Brod and D. W. Novotny, “Current control of VSI-PWM in- R.O.C., in 1963. He received the M.S. and Ph.D. de-
verters,” IEEE Trans. Ind. Applicat., vol. IA-21, pp. 562–570, July/Aug. grees in electrical engineering from National Cheng-
1984. Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan, R.O.C., in 1989
[2] J. Holtz, “Pulsewidth modulation—A survey,” IEEE Trans. Ind. Elec- and 1995, respectively.
tron., vol. 39, pp. 410–420, Oct. 1992. He is currently the Research and Development
[3] M. P. Kazmierkowski and M. A. Dzieniakowski, “Review of current Director of UPS, DELTA Electronics Corporation,
regulation techniques for three-phase PWM inverter,” in Conf. Rec. Tainan, Taiwan, R.O.C. His major research interests
IEEE ISIE, 1993, pp. 448–456. include uninterruptible power supply systems, soft-
[4] Y. Guo, X. Wang, H. C. Lee, and B. T. Ooi, “Pole-placement control switched power converters, active power filters,
of voltage regulated PWM rectifiers through real-time multiprocessing,” and residential photovoltaic power conditioning sys-
in Proc. IEEE IECON’91, 1991, pp. 513–518. tems.