Synthesis Topic
Synthesis Topic
SYNTHESIS
ISSUE : Endless increases in oil prices (See Attachment A) PARTICULAR CONCERNS : The following concerns will be addressed: 1. Reasons of price increase 2. Laws and other Regulations governing oil companies 3. Financial aspect of selected oil companies and its contribution to government 4. Burden vs. Benefit 5. Proposed solution (suspending or lowering VAT) See Attachment B BACKGROUND :
National news always includes the issues of continuous and frequent price increases in petroleum products which seemed to be a great burden for all. Based on the news update of the Philippine Daily Inquirer, it is already 15th time since the beginning of the year that oil firms had raised fuel prices, adding up to a total increase of over P11.45 per liter for premium gasoline and P10.10 a liter for diesel. Most of us are not aware of the rationale behind this price hike which results to our resistance (e.g. rally, etc.). With this concern, it is currently appropriate to learn and study this problem. Moreover, an opinion from the same publication addressed 2 possible solutions which may be considered to lighten the burden of the people. The first option is to temporarily lower the petroleum VAT by 9 percent, and the second is to temporarily suspend VAT on petroleum, entirely. Being accountancy students, it seems that with our background in accounting and taxation together with proper research, the rationale of these options can be clearly identified. Thus, this will be a good avenue to better understand the problem and possible solutions. QUESTIONS :
The paper will answer majority, if not all, of the following questions: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. LIMITATIONS What are the reasons of oil price hike? How does the government regulate the increase in petroleum products? How to compute for the appropriate oil price increase rate? How this inflation affects the financial status of oil companies? How much income did the government derive from this inflation? What are the benefits received by the people? Are these benefits enough to compensate the burden of this price increase? What is the rationale of suspending or lowering VAT to solve this problem? What other alternatives will be recommended for this problem? :
The first option is to temporarily lower the petroleum VAT by 9 percent, and the second is to temporarily suspend VAT on petroleum, entirely. Either way, there will be administrative implications. The software must be reprogrammed and BIR processes must be followed. The government, together with some economists, argue that the suspension of VAT will mean loss of income needed to support vital projects. However, it has been reported that an estimated P4.5 billion (and increasing) in windfall was gained by the government on the oil price increases. Add this amount to the Pantawid Program budget and we may be able to fund the loss of income that the suspension of VAT will cause. For years, drivers of both the private and public utilities, including the operators, have paid the VAT and maybe just this once, government should allow them to rest, even for a while, and make these taxes work for them. It cannot be denied that the government has generated revenue from VAT on petroleum for the longest time. It is also apparent that government is willing to do something to address the problem. What we can only do is to choose the best option. Juan de la Cruz must be able to enjoy the benefits of the taxes they paid. To me, the suspension of VAT is a solid, fair and just alternative. The beneficiaries will directly receive the help given by the government without any intervention. Whatever alternative will be chosen, the choice must be made in the earliest possible time. Lowering or suspending the VAT on petroleum will require the nod of Congress and of course the President. Processes must be started for Juan de la Cruz to be able to survive his current predicament. However, the situation should not be used to discredit the President. In this situation, every sector loses something. What we are looking for is an alternative which will lessen the loss for us, the stakeholders, the bosses. Proper consultation is a must. The article reflects the personal opinion of the author and does not reflect the official stand of the Management Association of the Philippines. The author is a tax partner of Endriga, Manangu, Aguilar & Associates, CPAs, Tax and Management Consultants. Feedback at map@