4ES1 01 Pef 20190822
4ES1 01 Pef 20190822
4ES1 01 Pef 20190822
Summer 2019
Paper 1: Reading and Writing (4ES1_01)
Paper Background:
The Reading and Writing Paper is divided into six parts as follows:
Part 1
Matching Information to Paragraphs
In general, students found this part of the paper accessible and most
students followed the instructions in terms of how to address the task.
● However, some students are crossing more than one box in response
to a question and not indicating which of these responses is the
correct one. In cases such as these, where there is more than one
response given, even if the correct response has been given, this will
be marked incorrect.
Part 2
Short Answer Questions
In some cases, the short answer questions in this part of the paper proved
challenging for students. The instructions ask students to use no more than
three words in their response, to source their responses from one point in
the text and to not answer in complete sentences.
● Some students are providing responses that are over three words
long and in some cases responding in full sentences. students will not
be rewarded for these responses even if the correct answer (up to
three words) is included in the response given as students have
exceeded the word limit.
● In some cases, students are repeating elements of the question and
then adding their response. students are not required to repeat any
of the question in their response.
● What students write in response to the short answer questions should
come from only one point in the source text. students are not
expected to formulate a response by putting together words found in
different parts of the source text.
● As students are taking their responses directly from the source text,
minor spelling errors only are acceptable.
● students sometimes struggle with what to write once they have
located a possible response within the text and this often results in
them writing too much or reformulating information in the source
text.
Examples Of Performance:
● Question 12
Question: According to Ella, what is the usual appearance of the
River Mole?
Response: tranquil
This information appears in the first paragraph: ‘The spot –
tranquil in all my previous visits was now a rushing, fast-flowing
river.’
Some students included the words ‘the spot’ in their response (the
spot – tranquil) and this was accepted as a correct response. The
response ‘tranquil water’ was also accepted even though this is a
reformulation of the text.
● Question 15
Question: According to Ella, what is she no longer really aware of
when she swims?
Response: (the) cold
The target response appears in the third paragraph: ‘But I barely
notice the cold anymore.’
Some students gave ‘notice the cold’ as a response and this was
accepted as it is correct. ‘Cold weather’ appears later in the same
paragraph and was also a correct response. Other students
reformulated the text or used vocabulary not in the source text
and gave responses such as ‘the cold water’ and ‘the cold
temperature’ which were also accepted as correct responses. It is
not necessary for students to reformulate the text to arrive at
their responses or to introduce vocabulary not present in the text.
● Question 20
Question: What is Ella grateful for in terms of working for herself?
Response: flexible hour(s)
This response appears in the sixth paragraph: ‘Being
self-employed, I can work flexible hours which I am very
grateful for..’.
Some students wrote ‘work flexible hours’ which is a correct
response. Others reformulated the text slightly to give ‘working
flexible hours’ and ‘flexible working (hours)’ which were also
accepted as correct responses.
Part 3
True/False/Not Given Questions
In general, students successfully followed the instructions for these
questions, indicating True/False or Not Given for each of the questions.
fill questions should be directly lifted from one point in the source
text. For this reason, only minor spelling errors are accepted.
● students sometimes struggle with what to write once they have
located a possible response within the text and this often results in
them writing too much or reformulating information in the source
text.
● students also have to consider the ‘grammatical fit’ of their responses
in the given sentences. For this section of questions, where students
had managed to find the correct answer to the question, but have
omitted or added, for example, an article, or made a response
singular or plural, which impacted on grammatical fit, the response
was rewarded.
Examples Of Performance:
● Question 31
Question: In 1988 the first __________ for a Passive House was
revealed.
Response: working (model)
This information appears in the first paragraph: ‘two scientists
came up with a working model and made it public in 1988’.
Other responses to this question included ‘idea’, ‘two scientists’
and ‘designs’ which were incorrect according to the information
contained in the source text.
● Question 38
Question: In the UK the __________ is growing rapidly.
Response: self-build industry
The target response appears in the sixth paragraph: ‘The
self-build industry is thriving in the UK..’.
Some students responded to this question with ‘self-build’ which is
also a correct answer. Others reformulated the text slightly and
wrote ‘self-building industry’ which was also accepted as a correct
response.
● Question 40
Question: Once a Passive Houses has been built, __________ of
the property is not expensive.
Response: (long-term) maintenance
The response appears in the seventh paragraph: ‘Building a house
like this means future generations will benefit from both the low
energy required to run it and the fact that long-term
maintenance is not costly.’
Some students responded with ‘energy’ and ‘energy required’
which were not correct in terms of grammatical fit. ‘Running costs’
was also given as a response. This phrase is not present in the
text and is also not a grammatical fit.
Summary Completion
In general, students found this part of the paper accessible and most
students followed the instructions in terms of how to address the task.
Advice to centres:
● Prepare students for the reading tasks by familiarising them with
the style of the paper and with the types of questions they can
expect to find.
● Advise students to follow the instructions in the rubric when
answering questions and to adhere to the word/number limit.
● Advise students that they should only use words/numbers taken
directly from the text.
● Advise students that when completing sentence completion and
short answer questions, the words they need run together in the
text and students do not need to do any reformulation of the text.
● students should consider the grammatical fit of their answers in
sentence completion questions.
● students should make sure they copy words from the text
correctly when providing their answers.
● Remind students that the order of the questions for each task type
in Parts 2 and 3 follow the order of the source text. For example,
if the response to Q11 is at the end of the first paragraph then the
answer to Q12 has to come at some point after this, and not
before the answer to Q11.
Part 4
students found Part 4 to be an accessible writing task, as would be
expected, with it being an informal email to a friend. Part 4 was
successfully responded to by the majority of students. The style and
register necessary for a written communication with a friend were
confidently applied, with a good range of vocabulary and grammar. The
majority of students made effective use of paragraphing and cohesive
devices.
A number of responses for Part 4 were over the 100 word limit, as some
students gave much fuller and more detailed responses than was necessary.
In some cases, lengthy introductory paragraphs made it difficult for the
student to then respond to the task bullets in 100 words. Where
information about one or more of the bullet points was given after the 100
word limit, this content could not be credited.
students who were least successful in this part of the paper were those who
had misinterpreted the task (some wrote about meeting a famous person
and others wrote to a second friend explaining the project they were doing
with the first friend), those who did not adhere to the word count and those
who wrote lengthy introductions. In some cases the language used in the
introduction did not suit the rest of the response. The use of irrelevant
language impacts on how the response communicates and on cohesion.
When marking this task, the focus is placed on the main body of the
response. It is not necessary for students to recreate an email/letter format
with the use of address, date, to, from and subject etc. This task simply
starts informally with, for example, Hi Mary.. and closes equally informally
with, for example, ‘Hope to see you soon, Susan’ or another similar informal
expression.
When doing a word count for this task, examiners are asked to look at the
main body of the response. The word count commences with the greeting
at the beginning, e.g, Hi Mary and concludes with the closing phrase, e.g,
See you soon, Susan. The word count does not include anything written
before the opening phrase, e.g, addresses, dates, to, from and subject.
Part 5
students also found Part 5 to be an accessible writing task due to the topic.
This was a new task type (semi-formal letter) and it was well-responded to
by students. In general, students were able to positively demonstrate their
understanding of the style and register needed to write a semi-formal letter
of complaint, and responded to this task well. A wide range of vocabulary
was used and students attempted to use a variety of grammar structures.
Many students were able to write a concise letter of complaint, remaining
below the word count whilst providing a very effective response to this
writing task. However, as in previous years, come students exceeded the
word limit for this task.
In few cases, students did not write about buying a coat as the task
requested. Instead, they wrote about items such as necklaces, or other
items of clothing. Also, some students used a report or article format
instead of the required semi-formal letter format.
Part 6
This year, as well as being able to gain 20 marks for writing the summary,
students were also rewarded for reading and identifying the five pieces of
information asked for in the first two bullet points. The third bullet point
asked students to make predictions on the topic in question.
● give three advantages for drivers of driverless cars
● state two concerns about driverless cars
● give your predictions about how cars and the way they are driven
will change in the future
As with previous years, the summarising task was the most challenging for
students. A number of students successfully extracted the required
information from the text and were able to present this information using
their own words, linking their ideas effectively and making good use of
paragraphing.
Where students had copied directly and entirely from the source text, or
done so and used isolated words or phrases of their own, these responses
were not awarded any marks for lexis or grammar, but were credited for
communicative quality, effective organisation and for the reading element of
the task.
This year, possibly due to students being familiar with the concept of the
text, there were a number of responses where students had added their
own ideas and interpretations. As a consequence, students included
irrelevant information and strayed from summarising the actual details
given in the source text. In addition, there were some students who gave
their own opinions on driverless cars. On a general note, for the first two
bullet points, students are not expected to include material which does not
summarise information given in the source text.
Students are not penalised for including more information from the source
text than requested by the bullet points. The only requirement is that the
bullet points are covered adequately within the student’s response and
within the word limit. However, the additional information provided should
be related to the task bullets and not for example, a general summary of
the whole text, which indicates that students are unable to pick out task
relevant information.
In general, writing a short introduction and a good conclusion, which now
takes the form of student predictions for the future, makes for a more
cohesive response and one that communicates more successfully.
Advice to centres:
● Work with students on a range of writing tasks: letters and emails
(informal) and reports, articles and letters (semi-formal) to develop
their understanding of appropriate style and register.
● Develop student summarising skills using appropriate texts.
● Remind students that they need to try and use their own words for
the summarising task in order to access the full range of marks.
● Advise students to respond to all the bullet points as they lose marks
for not doing so.
● Remind students that if they go beyond the given word limit and
address any of the bullet points outside the word limit, they will not
be rewarded for this material.
● Remind students to focus on including information from the source
text when addressing the first two bullet points in the summarising
task and to include their own ideas and interpretations for the third
bullet point.
Pearson Education Limited. Registered company number 872828
with its registered office at 80 Strand, London, WC2R 0RL, United Kingdom