Pedi PN RISC
Pedi PN RISC
Correspondence to: Objectives: To evaluate the correlation between the Respiratory Index of Severity (RISC)
Dr Kalyani Pillai, scoring system and the World Health Organization (WHO) interpretation of chest
Professor of Pediatrics, radiographs, and to evaluate the RISC scoring system in the diagnosis and assessment of
severity of pneumonia in children against chest X-ray. Methods: 241 children presenting to
Amala Institute of Medical Sciences,
a tertiary care center with a clinical diagnosis of pneumonia that necessitated a chest
Amala Nagar, Thrissur 680 555, radiograph to be taken, were enrolled. The RISC scoring was done for all participants by a
Kerala. [email protected] single pediatrician and chest X-ray graded by a single radiologist as per the WHO
Received: August 29, 2019; interpretation of chest radiographs. Results: There was a statistically significant positive
Initial review; February 01, 2020; correlation (P=0.02) between the two scores. RISC score of >1 had a sensitivity of 80.3%,
Accepted: August 09, 2020. and score ≥3 had a specificity of 88.3%, positive predictive value of 61.3% and negative
predictive value of 76.8% for diagnosis and to predict severity of pneumonia. Conclusion:
In a resource-limited setting, RISC scoring can be used to diagnose and predict the severity
of childhood pneumonia.
Keywords: Community-acquired pneumonia, Severity, X-ray chest.
T
he Respiratory Index of Severity (RISC) scoring 2018. The study was approved by the institutional ethics
was formulated in South Africa to provide a committee and informed consent from parents was taken
standardized means of quantifying severity of prior to enrollment. Consecutive patients aged 1 month to 12
respiratory illness among children during years, who visited the pediatric OPD and/or got admitted in
epidemiologic studies [1]. This score has a negative score the pediatric ward with a clinical diagnosis of pneumonia by
for wheezing, which potentially excludes children with the treating doctor, and which necessitated a chest
wheezing, a probable drawback of the Integrated radiograph to be taken, were enrolled for the study. Exclusion
Management of Childhood Illness (IMCI) developed by criteria were subjects with documented congenital heart
the World Health Organization (WHO). disease, chronic respiratory illness, congenital lung
problems, immunosuppressive conditions or known to have
The gold standard for diagnosis of pneumonia is the
neuromuscular disorders with respiratory system
chest X-ray (CXR). In an attempt to improve the consistency
involvement.
of CXR interpretation between epidemio-logical studies, the
WHO standardized the interpretation of CXRs for the For calculation of sample size, prevalence of lower acute
diagnosis of pneumonia in children [2,3]. The CXR respiratory infection was taken as 28% [5]. At significance
interpretation exercise was done and validated under WHO level of 5%, with 20% relative precision, and power of the
[4]. If the RISC scoring system correlates well with CXR, this study 80%, sample size was calculated as 240. To allow for
scoring system could be of use in resource-poor settings potential recruitment failure rate, 285 children were assessed
where CXR is not routinely available. The aim of the study for eligibility for enrollment in the study.
was to evaluate the correlation between the RISC scoring
A detailed history was taken and respiratory system
system and the WHO interpretation of chest radiographs. It
examination done for all subjects, and RISC scoring for HIV
also aims to evaluate the RISC scoring system in the
non-infected children [1] was done by the principal
diagnosis and assessment of severity of pneumonia in
investigator. Variables in the the RISC score represent known
children by validating it against the CXR.
risk factors for severe outcomes of pneumonia in children,
METHODS with a maximum score of 8 points.
This descriptive study was undertaken at a semi-urban CXR scoring was done by a single radiologist, as per the
tertiary care hospital in India from 1 February, 2018 to 31 July, WHO interpretation of chest radiographs [2,4] .
Statistical analysis: Analysis was done using Spearman rho Table I Clinical Profile, Respiratory Index of Severity
(ñ) correlation to assess the correlation between RISC score (RISC) score, and Chest X-ray Score of Children With
and WHO CXR score. We divided the children into two Physician-Diagnosed Pneumonia (N=241)
groups by using the WHO CXR score of 3 (lobar pneumonia Characteristics No (%)
on X-ray) as a cut off. Group A with CXR score <3 were
Male 142 (58.9
clinically suspected by physician but CXR was not
suggestive of pneumonia, and group B with CXR score ≥3, Age
clinically suspected by physician and also CXR suggestive 1mo-1 y 96 (39.8)
of pneumonia. By plotting the receiver operating 1y-5y 112 (46.5)
characteristic (ROC) curve, we calculated specificity and 5-12 y 33 (13.7)
sensitivity to determine the appropriate RISC score to Symptoms
diagnose and predict the severity of pneumonia. Analysis Fever 205 (85)
was done by Statistical Software Package for Social Sciences URI symptoms 223 (92)
Version 23 (SPSS 23) Breathlessness 40 (16.5)
Feed refusal 219 (90.8)
RESULTS Immunization as per NIS 239 (99.2)
A total of 285 children with physician-diagnosed pneumonia Disease severity based on treatment
were assessed for eligibility to be enrolled in the study (Fig. Outpatient treatment 90 (37.3)
1). Out of these, 20 were excluded based on exclusion criteria Admission as inpatient 140 (58.1)
and 18 were excluded as a CXR was not taken/available. A Pediatric intensive care unit admission 11 (4.6)
total of 241 children were finally included in the study. CXR score
1 141(58.5)
Baseline clinical characteristics are presented in Table I. 2 39 (16.1)
Of the study subjects 34 (14.1%) had a RISC score ≥3 and 61 3 42 (17.1)
(25.3%) had a CXR score ≥3. 4 16 (6.5)
5 3 (1.2)
There was a statistically significant positive correlation
between RISC score and WHO CXR score (r=0.144, RISC score
P=0.025). The ROC curve was plotted (Fig. 2). Taking WHO 1 59 (24.6)
CXR score of ≥3 (lobar pneumonia score 3) as severe 2 148 (61.2)
pneumonia, a RISC score of >1 had a sensitivity of 80.3% and 3 6 (2.5)
4 26 (10.9)
specificity of 26.1%, suggesting it is a moderate screening
≥5 2 (0.8)
test for pneumonia. A RISC score of ≥3 had a sensitivity of
21.3% and specificity of 88.3% for diagnosis and to predict URI-Upper respiratory tract infection.
severity of pneumonia (Table II).
DISCUSSION
There are hardly any scoring systems which are validated for
Physician diagnosed pneumonia community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) in Indian children
assessed for eligibility
that would have high utility in resource-limited settings. We
↓ demonstrated a statistically signi-ficant correlation between
Excluded, n= 20 n=285 RISC scoring system [1] and the WHO interpretation of
* More than 1 episode of wheeze, n=15 chest radiographs [2].
* Nephrotic syndrome on steroids, n=3
* Congenital heart disease, n=2 Limitations of the study were that RISC score is not
↓ useful to differentiate between types of pneumonia based on
n=265
etiology. RISC score is not useful to monitor resolution of
No chest X-ray symptoms. A negative score for wheeze (-2) may encourage
done, n=18 ↓ false negatives. When developing detection tests, a balance
n=247 must be chosen between risks of false negatives and false
RISC scoring not fully done ↓ positives.
as child not co-operative, n=6 n=241
The major scoring systems designed to predict mortality
risk and serve as guides for admission in community-
Fig. 1 Study flow chart. acquired pneumonia (CAP) are for adults [6], and such scores