Clearstone II Appendix III

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 233

Appendix III

Combustion Analysis and Efficiency Testing Results

The compiled combustion data were input into a database to facilitate thecalculation of the·
required parameters.. Measured ftiel and ex~aust gas compositions were used to determine the air-
to-fuel and exhaust,.to-fuel ratios. Species mole balances and the following simple combustion
relation were used:

Fuel + a' Air ~ b· Flue + d· H20

A carbon mole balance was used to determine b, a nitrogen balance to determine a and a
hydrogen balance to determine d. These coefficients were then used to determine the flow rates of
the unknown streams from the known flow.

Combustion efnciency is defined as the total enthalpy contained in the reactants minus the total
enthalpy contained in the products divided by the energy content of the fuel. This inay be written
as follows:

(m. FUEL' hiFUEL


. :-m. AIR'.hi . hi)
AIR - m FLUE' FLUE

mFUEL ·LHV .
m is the molar flow rate of the stream (Le., fuel, air, or flue gas) (kmole/h),
hi is the heat of formation of the stream (MJ/kmole), and
LHV is·the lower heating value of the fuel gas stream (MJ/kmole)

For ideal operation, combustion efficiencies calculated with this equation are expected to be in
the range of95 to 98 percent.

While combustion efficiency is useful in demonstrating how much. of the energy in the fu~l is
converted to heat, it does not provide a complete description of how effectively th~ equipment is
utilizing this energy. An· energy balance on a typical reciprocating engine yields the following
(based on manufacturers'heat load data):

• Energy from Fuel 100%


• Useful Work 30 to 35 %
• Jacket Water and Oil Cooler 15 to 40 0/0
• Radiation 3.5to 7.5 %

..
• Turbocharger After Cooler
Exhaust
1 to 6 %
20 to 35 %

The heat loads forjacket water, oil cooler,turbocharger after cooler and radiation are typically
determined by design or safe operatIng conditions. Heat lost to exhaust is a function of
combustion efficiency and the quantity of combustion air that is required for efficient operation.
Useful work is whatever is left over after all losses nave. been .accol-mted. Since heat losses to
jacket water, oil cooler, turbocharger after cooler and radiation are typically fixed by design, the
amount of'heat lost up the stack is a good indication of whether or not the unit is being operated
in an efficient manner.

134
The situation is similar, although less complicated, for heaters/boilers and gas turbin~ engines.
For heaters and boilers:

• Energy from Fuel 100%


• Useful Work· 70 to 85 %
It Radiation 2 to 5 0/0
• Exhaust 15 to 25 %

And for gas turbines:

• Energy from Fuel 100 %


• UsefulWork 30 to 40 %
• Radiation 2to 5%
• Exhaust 60 to 70 %

Stack heat losses have been calculated using a simplified heat balance. The equation used is:

. Stack Losses
FractIOn of Heat Lost = - - - - -
.Heat Input
where

Heat Input = Energy Content ofFuel + Sensible Heat in Fuel


+ Sensible Heat in Combustion Air

Stack Losses = Energy Content ofthe Exhaust Gas


+ Convective Stack Losses
+ Sensible Heat in the Exhaust Gas·

The costs associated with the improper operation of combustion units are made up of two
components: the value of any unburned fuel in the exhaust gas and the incremental fuel
associated with operatingat excessive air-to,;,fuel ratios. The former is determined by calculating
the heating value of the unburned or partially burned components of the exhaust gas and
assigning a value per GJofenergy equal to that of natural gas.

The cost associated with too much excess air is determined by comparing the measured air-to;'fuel
ratio with typical manufacturers' values. The loss is then calculated by determining the amount of
heat required to heat the excess air from ambient temperature to the exhaust stack temperature.

The optimum air-to-fuel ratio varies significantly for reciprocating engines according to make and
model of unit. Accordingly, specific manufacturers' values were used wherever possible. In the
absence of manufactures 'data,. average values for the types of units tested Were used. For heaters
and boilers, 15 percent excess air was assumed to be sufficient for proper operation.

135
------ COMBUSTION ANALYSIS: INPUT DATA ------

. COMPANY: DATE:
LOCATION: Site # 3 TEST BY: Operator
SOURCE: CM-13 PAGE: 1

THE FUEL GAS ANALYSIS:

Component Mole Fraction

methane 0.9.60040
ethane 0.018300
propane 0.000950
isoputane 0.000020
n-butane 0.000040
n-heptane 0.000010
nitrogen 0.020460
carbon dioxide 0.000200

Total 1.000020

OPERATING CONDITIONS (Measured):


Barometric pressure (kPa) 97.500

Gas Stream Temperature Flow @ STP Relative


Humidity I
(m"3/s) (% )

Ambient Air 32.8 0.0


Fuel 32.8 N/1\ 0.0
Combustion Air 32.8 N/A. 0.0
Flue Gas 513.3 N/A N/A
Radiator Air (In) N/A ·N/A N/A
Radiator Air (Out) N/A N/A N/A
Crank Case Exhaust N/A

Type of equipment En·gine_ Recip.:-LowNOx


Nominal rated power output (kW) 708
Assumed equipment efficiency (%) 30.0
Assumed percent loading (%) 100.0
Cost of the fuel gas ($/GJ) 6.78

STACK GAS ANALYSIS:

Component Concentration Unit

Oxygen 5.0 Percent

136
Carbon Monoxide 158 PPM
Total Combustible (*) o PPM
Unburnt Fuel (calculated) o PPM
. Nitric: Oxide 4687 PPM
~itrogen Dioxide 321 . PPM
Sulphur Dioxide
_________________
~ ~ L
o PPM _

(*) CO +THC expressed as a CH4 equivalent

137
------ COMBUSTION ANALYSIS: RESULTS. ------
------------------------------~--------------------------~-------------

COMPANY: DATE:
LOCATION: Site # 3 TEST BY: Operator
SOURCE: CM-13 PAGE: 2

FUEL GAS CHARACTERISTICS:


Molecular weight (kg/krno1) 16.58
Quality (inlet condition)
1~00000
Gross Heating Value (MJ/m A 3) 37.7
Net Heating .Value (MJ/m A 3) 33.4
Theoretical combustion air requirement (kmo1 air/krnol fuel) 9.5

MATERIAL BALANCE:

Stream Flow Rate Unit

Fuel 6.60 1000 std. mA 3/day


Air 85.63 1000 std. mA 3/day
Stack Gas 92.29 1000 std. mA 3/day

EXCESS AIR:

Actual (% ) 37.0
Recommended (% ) 44.0 to 66.0

ENERGY BALANCE:
Gross input energy (kW) 2912.6
Net input energy (kW) 2376.1

AVOIDABLE ENERGY LOSSES:

% net energy Loss Rate Loss Value


input (kW) ($/year)

Unburnt Fuel 0.1 2.0 432


Recoverable Heat
in Flue Gas (*) 28.3 672.9 143879

UNAVOIDABLE ENERGY LOSSES:


--~---------~---------------~-------------------------~--------~-------

% net energy Loss Rate


input (kW)

Unrecoverable Heat
in Flue Gas 14.1 335.6

138
--------------------_._------------~-~--------------~- ------------------

(*) The amount of potential recoverable heat was estimated by cooling


the flue gas to 10 DC above its dew point and no less than the
temperature of 15 DC. The unrecoverable portion is the energy
still
left in the flue gas at that temperature.

139
~-----COMBUSTION A~ALYSIS: RESULTS ------
-~-------~------------------------------------~------~-----~-~------~--

COMPANY: DATE:
LOCATION: Site # 3 TEST BY: Operator
SOURCE: CM-13 PAGE: 3
-----------------------------------------~--------~-------------~------

EFFICIENCIES:
Apparent Thermal Efficiency (%) 57.5
Carbon Combustion Efficiency (%) 99.8

STACK GAS CHARACTERISTICS:


Molecular weight (kg/Janol) 27.95
Dew temperature (oC) 52.2

EMISSION FACTORS FOR VARIOUS COMPONENTS (ng/J) (*):

Component Flue Gas

Carbon Monoxide 69
Carbon Dioxide 49230
Nitric Oxide 2205
Nitrogen Dioxide 232
Total Oxide~ of Nitrogen 2436

(*) Based on gross heating value of the fuel at 15°C and 101.325
kPa

140
------ COMBUSTION ANALYSIS: INPUT DATA -------
--~---------~---------------------------~--~-----~-------~------------~

COMPANY: Company DATE:


LOCATION: Site # 3 TEST 'BY: Operator
SOURCE: CM~14 PAGE: 1

THE FUEL GAS ANALYSIS:


----_.-.------_-:_-------------------------':""""._-------_ ..... ---'----'--

Component Mole Fraction


~-~-~-----~----------~-----~----~-----~---------------
-----
methane 0.960040
ethane 0.018300
propane 0.000950
isobutane 0.000020
n-butane 0.000040
n-heptane 0.000010
nitrogen 0.02'0460
carbon dioxide 0.000200

Total 1.000020

OPERATING CONDITIONS (Measured):


Barometric pressure (kPa) 97.500

Gas Stream Temperature Flow @ STP Relative


Humidity
(mI\3/s) ,(% )

Ambient Air 30.6 0.0


Fuel 30.6 N/A 0.0
Combustion Air 30.6 N/A 0.0
Flue Gas 497.8 N/A N/A
Radiator Air (In) N/A N/A N/A
Radiator Air (Out) N/A N/A N/A
Crank Case Exhaust N/A
---------------------------------------------~--------
-----------------

Type of equipment Engine_Recip_LowNOx


Nominal rated power output (kW) 708
Assumed equipment efficiency (%) 30.0
Assumed percent loading (%) 100.0
Cost of the fuel, gas ($/GJ) 6.78

STACK GAS ANALYSIS:

Component Concentration Unit

'Oxygen 9.9 Percent


Carbon Monoxide 186 PPM
Total Combustible (*) o PPM

141
Unburnt Fuel (calculated) o PPM
Nitric Oxide ·2592 PPM
Nitrogen Dioxide 149 PPM
Sulphur Dioxide o PPM

(*) CO + THC e~pressed as a CH4 equivalent

142
-~---- COMBUSTION ANALYSIS: RESULTS ------

. COMPANY: Company DATE:


LOCATION: Site # 3 TEST BY: Operator
SOURCE: CM:"'14 PAGE: 2
------~---------~---------------~-------------------~----~--~---~------

FUEL GAS CHARACTERISTICS:


Molecular weight (kg/kmol) 16 . 58
Quality (inlet condition)
1.00000
Gross Heating Value (MJ/m A 3) 37.7
Net Heating Value (MJ/m A 3) 33.4
Theoretical combustion air requirement (kInol air/kmol fuel) 9.5

MATERIAL BALANCE:

Stream Flow Rate Unit

Fuel 4.49 1000 std. mA 3/day


Air 85.63 1000 std. mA 3/daY
Stack Gas 90.17 1000 std. mA 3/day

EXCESS AIR:

·Actual (% ) 101.3
Recommended (% ) 44.0 to 66.0
./
ENERGY BALANCE:
Gross input energy (kW) 1968.2
Net input energy (kW) 1777.5

AVOIDABLE ENERGY LOSSES:


-------------------~---------~-------~------~----------------------~---

% net energy Loss Rate Loss Value


input (kW) ($/year)

------
High Excess Air 6.0 10·6.3 22720
Unburnt Fuel 0.1 2.3 497
Recoverable Heat
in Flue Gas (* ) 35.6 632.0 .135125

UNAVOIDABLE ENERGY LOSSES:


--------~-----------------------------------------------~---~----------

% net energy Loss Rate


input (kW)

Unrecoverable Heat

143
in Flue'Gas 3.0

(*) The amount of potential recoverable heat was estimated by cooling


the flue ~as'to 10 DC above its dew point and no less than the
temperature of 15 DC. The unrecoverable portion is the energy
still
left in the flue gas at that temperature.

144
.,..----- COMBUSTION ANALYSIS: RESULTS - .... ----
~-----------------------------~--~---------------~----
-----------------

COMPANY: Company DATE:


LOCATION: Site # 3 TEST BY: Operator
SOURCE: CM~14 PAGE: 3
---~----------~~------------~------------------------- -----------------

EFfICIENCIES:
Apparent Thermal Efficiency(%) 61.3
Carbon Combustion Efficiency (%) 99.6

STACK GAS CHARACTERISTICS:


Molecular weight (kg/kmo1) 28.22
Dew temperature (OC) 45.0

EMISSION FACTORS FOR VARIOUS COMPONENTS (ng/J) (*):


----------------~------------------------~-----------~
-----------------

Component Flue Gas


-------------_._---~------------~---~----------------~
------------------

Carbon Monoxide 117


Carbon Dioxide 49155
Nitric Oxide 1751
Nitrogen Dioxide 154
Total Oxides of Nitrogen 1905
-------------------------------------~------------~---
-----------------

(*) Based on gross heating value ,of the fuel at 1-5 °c and 101.325
kPa

145
------ COMBUSTION ANALYSIS: .INPUT DATA ------
--------~._---------------------------------~~--------------~-~--------~

COMPANY: Company DATE:


LOCATION: Site .# 3 TEST BY: Operator
SOURCE: CM,...9 PAGE: 1

THE FUEL GAS ANALYSIS:


-------~--~------------~------------------------------
-----
Component Mole Fraction

methane 0.960040
ethane 0.018300
propane 0.0.00950
isobutane 0.000020
n-butane 0.000040
n-heptane 0.000010
nitrogen 0.020460
carbon dioxide 0.000200
--~--------------------~-----~-~----------------------
-----
Total 1.000020

OPERATING CONDITIONS (Measured):


Barometric pressure (kPa) 97.500

Gas Stream Temperature Flow @ STP Relative


Humidity
(%)

Ambient Air 33.9 0.0


Fuel 33.9 N/A 0.0
Combustion Air 33.9 N/A 0.0
Flue Gas 478.3 N/A N/A
Radiator Air (In) N/A N/A N/A
Radiator Air (Out) N/A N/A N/A
Crank Case Exhaust N/A

Type of equipment Engine~Recip_Normal


Nominal rated power output (kW) 485
Assumed equipment efficiency (%) 30.0
Assumed percent loading(%) 100.0
Cost of the fuel gas ($/GJ) 6.78

STACK GAS ANALYSIS:

Component Concentration Unit

Oxygen 0.2 Percent


Carbon Monoxide 1044 PPM
Total Combustible (*) o PPM

146
Unburnt Fuel (calculated) o PPM
Nitric Oxide 2775 PPM
Nitrogen Dioxide 20 PPM
Sulphur Dioxide o PPM
-----------~--------------------~--------------------- -----
(~) CO + THC expressed as a CH4 equivalent

147
------ COMBUSTION ANALYSIS: ·RESULTS ------
~~----~~-~-------------~~----~--------~-----------------------_._------~

COMPANY: Company DATE:


LOCATION: Site # 3 TEST BY: Operator
SOURCE: CM'"""9 PAGE: 2
------------------------ --- -'- - - - -, - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - .- - - - - - - - - - - - - - _.- - - - - --

FUEL GAS CHARACTERISTICS:


Molecular weight (kg/krnol) 16.58
Quality (inlet conqition)
1.00000
Gross Heating Value (MJ/m A 3) 37.7
Net Heating Value (MJ/m A 3) 33.4
Theoretical combustion air requirement (krnol air/krnol fuel) 9.5

MATERIAL BALANCE:

Stream Flow Rate Unit

Fuel 4.11 1000 std. mA 3/day


Air 39.53 1000 std. m~3/day
Stack Gas 43.71 1000 std. m~3/day

EXCESS AIR:

Actual (% ) 1.5
Recorrirnended (% ) 2.0 to 12.0

ENERGY BALANCE:
Gross input energy (kW) 1794.5
Net input energy (kW) 1620.0

AVOIDABLE ENERGY LOSSES:

% net energy .Loss Rate Loss Value


input (kW) ($/year)

Unburnt Fuel 0.4 6.3 1352.


Recove~able Heat
in Flue Gas (*) 18.1 293.7 62797

UNAVOIDABLE ENERGY LOSSES:

% net energy Loss Rate


input (kW)

Unrecoverable He~t
in Flue Gas 2.2 35.6

148
(*) The amount of potential recoverable heat·was estimated by cooling
the flue gas to 10 DC above its dew point arid no less than the
D
temperature of lS C. The l1nrecoverable portion is the energy
still
left in· the flue gas at that temperature.

149
------ COMBUSTION ANALYSIS: RESULTS ------

COMPANY: Company DATE:


LOCATION: Site # 3 TEST BY: Operator
SOURCE: CM~9 ,PAGE: 3

EFFICIENCIES:
Apparent Thermal Efficiency (%) 79.3
Carbon Combustion Efficiency (%) 98.9

STACK GAS CHARACTERISTICS:


Molecular weight (kg/kmol) 27:65
Dew temperature (oC) 58.0

'EMISSION FACTORS FOR VARIOUS COMPONENTS (ng/J) (*):


---------------~---~-------~------------------~------------------~-----

Component Flue Gas


------~------------~--------------~---------------------~--------------

Carbon Monoxide 349


Carbon Dioxide' 48791
Nitric Oxide 993
Nitrogen Dioxide 11
Total Oxides of Nitrogen 1004

(*) Based on gross heating value of the fuel at 15°C and 101.325
kPa

150
~~~~-- COMBUSTION ANALYSIS: INPUT DATA ------

COMPANY: Company DATE:


LOCATION: . Site # 3 TEST BY: Operator
SOURCE: CM-:-19 PAGE: 1

THE FUEL GAS ANALYSIS:


--~------------------------------~--------------------
-----
Component Mole Fraction

methane 0.960040
ethane 0.018300
propane 0.000950
isobutane 0.000020
n-butane 0.000040
n-heptane 0.000010
nitrogen 0.020460
carbon dioxide 0.000200

Total 1.000020

OPERATING CONDITIONS (Measured):


Barometric pressure (kPa) 97.500

Gas Stream Temperature Flow @ STP Relative


Humidity
(%)
---~---~---------------------------~------------------
-----------------

Ambient Air 33.9 0.0


Fuel 33.9 N/A 0.0
Combustion Air 33.9 N/A 0.0
Flue Gas 467.2 N/A N/A
Radiator Air {In) N/A N/A N/A
Radiator Air (Out) N/A N/A N!A
Crank Case Exha~st N/A _ _ .i-';"

-----~--------------------.------~----------~---------
------------------

Type of equipment Engine Recip_Normal


Nominal rated power output (kW) 820
Assumed equipment efficiency (%) ·30.0
Assumed percent loading (%) 100.0
Cost of the fuel gas ($)GJ) 6 ..78

STACK GAS ANALYSIS:


---~---------------~--------------------------~-------
-----
Component Concentration Unit

Oxygen 0.1 Percent


Carbon. Monoxide 1214 PPM
Total Combustible (*) o PPM

151
Unburnt Fuel (calculated) o PPM
Ni·tric Oxide 2355 PPM
Nitrogen Dioxide 8 PPM
Sulphur Dioxide o PPM
------------~~-------------------~----------~--------- -----
.( *) CO + THC expres$ed as a CH4 equivalent

152
-~---- COMBUSTION ANALYSIS: RESULTS ------
------------------~------~---~----~-------------------
-----------------

.COMPANY: Cornpa,ny DATE:


LOCATION: Site # 3 TEST BY: Operator
SOURCE: CM-19 PAGE: 2

FUEL GAS CHARACTERISTICS:


Molecular weight (kg/kmol) 16.58
Quality (inlet condition)
1.00000
Gross Heating Value (MJ/m A 3) 37.7
Net Heating Value (MJ/m A 3) 33.4
Theoretical combustion air requirement (kmol air/kmol fuel) 9.5

MATERIAL BALANCE:

Stream Flow Rate . Unit

Fuel 7.. 00 1000 std. mA 3/day


Air 66.90 1000 std. mA 3/day
Stack Gas 74.02 1000 std. mA 3/day

EXCESS AIR:

Actual (% ) 0.8
Recommended (% ) 2.0 to 12.0

ENERGY BALANCE:
Gross lnput energy (kW) 3057.9
Net input energy (kW) 2760.5

AVOIDABLE ENERGY LOSSES:


---------------------~--------~-------~-----~---------
-----------------

% net energy Loss Rate Loss Value


input (kW) ($/year)

Unburnt Fuel 0.5 12.5 2663


Recoverable Heat
in Flue Gas (*) 17.5 483.2 103306

UNAVOIDABLE ENERGY LOSSES:


--------------------~--------~--------------------~------------~-------

% net energy Loss Rate


input (kW)

Unrecoverable Heat
in Flue Gas 2.2 ·60.4

153
---~------~------------~---------~---------------------~--~------------

(*) The amount of potential recoverable heat was estimated by cooling.


the flue gas to 10°C above its dew point and no less than the
temperature of 15 °c. The unrecoverable portion is the energy
still
left in the flue gas at that temperature.

154
-'----- COMBUSTION ANALYSIS: RESULTS ------

. COMPANY: Company DATE:


LOCATION: Site # 3 TEST BY: Operatbr
SOURCE: CM:"'19 PAGE: 3
-----------~-----------,-~-------~-----------------~-- ------------------

EFFICIENCIES:
Apparent Thermal Efficiency (%) 79.9
Carbon Combustion Efficiency (%) 98.7

STACK GAS CHARACTERISTICS:


Molecular weight (kg/kmal) 27.64
Dew temperature (oC) 58.1

.EMISSION FACTORS FOR VARIOUS COMPONENTS (ng/J) (*):

Component Flue Gas

Carbon Monoxide' 403


Carbon Dioxide 48706
Nitric Oxide 837
Nitrogen Dioxide 4
Total Oxides of Nitrogen 842

( *) Based on gross heating value of the fuel at 15°C and 101.325


I I
kPa

155
------ COMBUSTION ANALYSIS: INPUT DATA ------
~---------------------------~------------------------------------~-----

COMPANY: Company DATE:


LOCATION: Site # 3 TEST BY: Operator
SOURCE: CM-12 PAGE: 1

THE FUEL GAS ANALYSIS:


-----------------~-----------------~----------------~----~-
Component Mote Fraction

methane 0.960040
ethane 0.018300
propane 0.000950
isobutane 0.000020
n...,.butane 0.000040
n-heptane 0.000010
nitrogen 0.020460
carbon dioxide 0.000200

Total 1.000020
~------------------~--------------~------------------~
-----

OPERATING CONDITIONS (Measured):


Barometric pressure (kPa) 97.500
-----------_._--------------~----------------------------------~-----~--

Gas Stream Temperature Flo.w @ STP Relat.ive


Humidity
(m"3/s) (%)

Ambient Air 30.0 0.0'


Fuel 30.0 N/A 0.0
Combustion Air 30.0 N/A 0.0
Flue Gas 533.9 N/A N/A
Radiator Air (In) N/A N/A N/A
Radiator Air (Out) N/A N/A N/A
Crank Case Exhaust N/A

Type of equipment Engine_Recip_Normal


Nominal rated power output (kW) 814
Assumed equipment efficiency (%) 30.0
Assumed percent loading (%) 100;0
Cost of the fuel g~s ($/GJ) 6.78

STACK GAS' ANALYSIS:

Component Concentration Unit

Oxygen 0.3 Percent


Carbon Monoxide 7365. PPM
Total Comb~stible .( *) o PPM

156
Unburnt Fuel (calculated) o PPM
Nitric Oxide 2823 PPM
Nitrogen Dioxide 9 PPM
Sulphur Dioxide o PPM
-------------------'-------------~------------~------- ------

(*) CO + THC e~pressed as a CH4 equivalent

157
------ COMBUSTION ANALYSIS: RESULTS ------

COMPANY: Company DATE:


LOCATION: Site # 3 TEST BY: Operator
SOURCE: CM;...12 PAGE: 2

FUEL GAS CHARACTERISTICS: \


Molecular weight (kg/kmol) 16.58
Quality (inlet condition)
1.00000
Gross Heat~ng Value (MJ/m A } ) 37.7
Net Heating Value (MJ/m A 3) 33.4
Theoretical combustion air requirement (kmol air/kmol fuel) 9!5

MATERIAL BALANCE:

Stream Flow Rate Unit

Fuel 6.98 1000 std. mA 3/day


Air 66.41 1000 std. mA 3/day
Stack Gas 73.74 1000 std. mA 3/day

EXCESS AIR:

.Actual (% ) 0.4
Recommended (% ) . 2.0 to 12.0

ENERGY BALANCE:
Gross input energy (kW) 3065.6
Net input energy (kW) 2490.7

AVOIDABLE ENERGY LOSSES:

% net energy Loss Rate Loss Value


input (kW) ($/year)
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
. ,

Unburnt Fuel 3.0 75.3 16097


Recoverable Heat
in Fiue Gas (*) 22.7 565.5 120903

·UNAVOIDABLE ENERGY LOSSES:

% net energy Loss Rate


input (kW)

Unrecoverable Heat
in Flue Gas 14.2 352.9

158
(*) The amount of potential .recoverable heat was estimated by cooling
the flue gas to 10 DC abov~ its dew point and no less than the
temperature of 15 DC. The unrecoverable portion is tpe energy
still
left in the flue gas at that temperature.

159
~----- COMBUSTION ANALYSIS: RESULTS ------
-------------------------------~-----------~--------------~---------~--

COMPANY: Company DATE:


LOCATION: Sit'e #3 TEST BY: Operator
SOURCE: CM-12 PAGE: 3

EFFICIENCIES:
Apparent Thermal Efficiency (%) 60.1
Carbon Combustion Efficiency (%) 92.2

STACK GAS CHARACTERISTICS:


Molecular weight (kg/kmol) 27.55
Dew temperature,' (oC) 58.1

EMISSION FACTORS FOR VARIOUS COMPONENTS (ng/J) (*):


---------------------------~------------------------~-
-----------------

Component Flue Gas

Carbon Monoxide 2442


Carb.on Dioxide 45502
Nitric Oxide' 1003
Nitrogen Dioxide 5
Total Oxides of Nitrogen' 1008
-------------------~----------------------------------
-----------------

(*) Based on gross heating value of the fuel ~t15 °c and 101.325
kPa

160
------ COMBUSTION ANALYSIS: INPUT DATA ------
-----I--------------------------~-------------~--------------------~---

COMPANY: Company DATE:


LOCATION: Site # 3 TEST BY: Operator
SOURCE: CM-:-203 PAGE: 1

THE FUEL GAS ANALYSIS:


---------------------------------~--------------------
-----
Component Mole Fraction

methane 0.960040
ethane 0.018300
propane 0.000950
isobutane 0.000020
n-butane 0;000040
n-heptane 0.000010
nitrogen 0.020460
carbon dioxide 0.000200

Total 1.000020

OPERATING CONDITIONS (Measured):


Barometric pressure (kPa) 97.500
-----~--------------------------------------------------~-----------~--

Gas Stream Temperature Flow @ STP Relative


Humidity
(%)

Ambient Air 30.0 0.0


Fuel 30.,0 N/A 0.0
Combustion Air 30.0 N/A 0.0
Flue Gas 440.0 N/A . N/A
Radiator Air' (In) N/A N/A N/A
Radiator Air (Out) N/A N/A N/A
Crank Case Exhaust N/A
---------------------~---~------~----------~----------
-----------------

Type of equipment Engine_Recip_Normal


Nominal rated power output (kW)' 895
Assumed equipment efficiency (%) 30.0'
Assumed percent loading (%) 100.0
Cost of the fuel gas ($/GJ) 6.78

STACK GAS ANALYSIS:

Component Concentration Unit

Oxygen 0.2 Percent


Carbon Monoxide 224 PPM
Total Combustible (*) o PPM

161
Unburnt Fu~l (c~lculated) o . PPM
Nitric Oxide 2800 PPM
Nitrogen Dioxide 11 PPM
Sulphur Dioxide o PPM
. -----~----------~--~~----~-------~-------------------- -----
(*) CO + T~C expressed as a CH4 equivalent

162
------ COMBUSTION ANALYSIS: RESULTS ------
-----------------~-----~------~-'-~--------------------~-------------~--

COMPANY: Company DATE:


LOCATION: Site # 3 TEST BY~ Operator
SOURCE: CM":"'203 PAGE: 2

FUEL GAS CHARACTERISTICS:


Molecular weight (kg/kmol) 16.58
Quality (inlet condition)
1.00,000
Gross Heating Value (MJ/m A 3) 37.7
Net Heatihg Value (MJ/m A 3) 33.4
Theoretical combustion air requirement (kmol air/kmol fuel) 9.5

MATERIAL BALANCE:

Stream Flow Rate Unit

Fuel 7.57 1000 std. mA 3/day


Air 72.98 1000 std. mA 3/day
Stack Gas 80.64 lOGO std. mA 3/day

EXCESS AIR:

Actual (% ) 1.8
Recommended (% ) 2.0 to 12.0

ENERGY BALANCE:
Gross input energy (kW) 3301.0
Net input energy (kW) 2979.5

AVOIDABLE ENERGY LOSSES:

% net energy Loss 'Rate Loss Value


input (kW) ($/year)

Unburnt Fuel 2.5 535


Recoverable Heat
in Flue Gas (*) 16.'4 488.6 104478

UNAVOIDABLE ENERGY LOSSES:

% net energy Loss Rate


input (kW)

'Unrecoverable Heat
in Flue Gas 2.2 65.6

163
-~--~------~---.-~----------~------------------------- ------------------

(*) The amount of potential recoverable heat was' estimated by cooling


the flue gas to 10°C above its dew point and no less than the
temperature of'15 DC. The unrecoverable portion is the energy
still
left in the flue gas at that temperature.

164
-~---- COMBUSTION ANALYSIS: RESULTS ------
,
~--~---------------------------------------~----------
-----------------
.

. COMPANY: Company DATE:


LOCATION: -Site # 3 TEST BY: Operator
SOURCE: CM-203 , PAGE: 3
-~-~---------------------~---~--~-------------------------------~------

EFFICIENCIES:
Apparent Thermal Efficiency (%) 81.3
Carbon Combustion Efficiency (%) 99.8

STACK GAS CHARACTERISTICS:


Molecular weight (kg/kInol) 27.67
Dew temperature ( DC) 57.9

EMISSION FACTORS FOR VARIOUS COMPONENTS (ng/J) (*):

Component Flue Gas

Carbon Monoxide 75
Carbon Dioxide 49221 .
Nitric Oxide 1003
Nitrogen Dioxide 6
Total Oxides of Nitrogen 1009

(*) Based on gross heating value of the fue+ at 15°C apd 101.325
kPa

165
------ COMBUSfION ANALYSIS: INPUT DATA ----~-

COMPANY: Company DATE:


LOCATION: Site # 3 TEST BY: Operator
SOURCE: CM-202 PAGE: 1
---------------~-------~-----~---------------------------------~-------

THE FUEL GAS ANALYSIS:


----~-~--------------------------~--------------------
-----

Component Mole Fraction

methane 0.960040
ethane 0.018300
propane 0.000950
isobutane 0.000020
n-blitane 0.000040
n-heptane 0.000010
nitrogen 0.020460
carbon dioxide 0.000200

Total 1.000020

OPERATING CONDITIONS (Measured):


Barometric pressure (kPa) 97.500

Gas Stream Temperature Flow.@ STP


Humidity
(m"3/s) ( %}

Ambient Air 30.0 0.0


Fuel 30.0 N/A 0.0
Combustion Air 30!O N/A 0'.0
Flue Gas 432.2 N/A N/A
Radiator Air (In) N/A N/A N/A
Radiator Air (Out) N/A N/A N/A
Crank Case Exh~ust N/A'
-------~--------~-----~--~---------------------------------------~-----

Type of equipment Engine_Recip_Normal


Nominal rated power output (kW) 895
Assumed equipment efficiency (%) 30.0
Assumed percent loading (%) 100.0
Cost of the fuel gas ($/GJ) 6.78

STACK GAS ANALYSIS:

Component Concentration Unit

Oxygen 0.1 Percent


Carbon Monoxide 2747 PPM
Total Combustible (*) o PPM

166
Unburnt Fuel (c~lculated) PPM
Nitric Oxide °2994 PPM
Nitrogen Dioxide 14 PPM
Sulphur Dioxide 0, 12PM
------------------------_~_------------------_~~_----- -----
(*) CO + THC expressed as a CH4 e~uivalent

167
------ COMBUSTION. ANALYSIS: RESULTS ------

COMPANY: Company DATE:


LOCATION: Site # 3 TEST BY: Operator
SOURCE: CM-202 PAGE: 2

FUEL GAS CHARACTERISTICS: \


Molecular weight (kg/Janol) 16.58
Quality (inlet condition)
1.00000
Gross Heating Value (MJ/m A } ) 37.7
Net Heating Value (MJ/m A 3) 33.4
Theoretical combustion air requirement (krnol air/Janol fuel) 9.5

MATERIAL BALANCE:

Stream Flow Rate Unit

Fuel 7.66 1000 std. mA 3/day


Air 72.98 1000 std. mA 3/day
Stack Gas 80.83 1000 std. mA 3/day

EXCESS AIR:

Actual (% ) 0.6
Recommended (% ) 2.0 to 12.0

ENERGY BALANCE:
Gross input energy (kW) 3339.0
Net input energy (kW) 3013.8

AVOIDABLE ENERGY LOSSES:


--------------~---------------------------~-----~---~---------~~-------

% net energy Loss Rate Loss Value


input (kW) ($/year)

Unburnt Fuel 1.0 30.8 6581


Recoverable Heat
in Flue Gas (*) 15.9 478.4 102296

UNAVOIDABLE ENERGY LOSSES:


----------------~------------~-----------------------~--~-------------~

% net energy Loss Rate


input (kW)

Unrecoverabie Heat
in Flue Gas 2.2 66.0

168
------------~~---------------------------~----~--------------~---------

(*) The amount of potential recoverable heat was estimated by cooling


the flue gas to 10°C above its qew point and no less thahthe
temperature of 15°C. The unrecoverable portion is the energy
still
left in the flue gas at that temperature.

169
COMBUSTION ANALYSIS: RESULTS------
-------~------------------~--------7--------------------------------~--

COMPANY: Company DATE:


LOCATION: Site #3 TEST BY: Operator
SOURCE: CM-202 PAGE: 3

EFFICIENCIES:
Apparent Thermal Efficiency "( %) 80.9
Carbon Combustion Kfficiency (%) 97.1

STACK GAS CHARACTERISTICS:


Molecular weight (kg/kmol) 27.62
Dew temperature (oC) 58.1

EMISSION FACTORS FOR VARIOUS COMPONENTS (ng/J) (*):


----- .__ ~ ---- - __. - - - - _._ - - - __ - 0- _

Component Flue Gas

Carbon Monoxide 910


Carb()n Dioxide 47908
Nitric Oxide 1063
Nitrogen Dioxide 8
Total Oxides of Nitrogen '1071

(*) Based on gross heating value of the fuel at 15°C and 101.325
kPa

170
------ COMBUSTION ANALYSIS: INPUT DATA ------
-~-----------------~--~--------------~------------~------~---~---------
" ,

COMPANY: Company "DATE:


LOCATION: Site # 3" Test BY: Operator
SOURCE: CM:"'4 "PAGE: 1
---------------~----------------~-------~-------------~---------~------

THE FUEL GAS ANALYSIS:

Component Mole Fraction


, "

---------------------------~---------~---------------- -----

methane 0.960040
ethane 0.018300
'propane 0.000950
isobutane 0.000020
n-butane 0.000040
n-heptane 0.000010
nitrogen 0.020460
carbon dioxide 0.000200

Total 1.000020
---------------------------------~--------------------
-----

OPERATING CONDITIONS (Measured):


Barometric pressure (kPa) 97.500

Gas Stream Temperature Flow @ STP Relative


Humidity
(mI\3/s) (%)

Ambient Air 27.2 0.0


Fuel 27.2 N/A 0.0
Combustion Air 27.2 N/A 0.0
Flue Gas 447.8 N/A N/A
Radiator Air (In) N/A N/A N/A
Radiator Air (Out) N/A N/A N/A
Crank Case Exhaust N/A

Type of equipment Engine_Recip_LowNOx


Nominal rated power outp~t {kW) 746
Assumed equipment efficiency (%) 30.0
Assumed percent loading (%) 100.0
Cost of the fuel gas ($/GJ) 6.78

STACK GAS ANALYSIS:

Component Concentration Unit

Oxygen 10.7 Percent


Carbon Monoxide 118 PPM
Total Combustible (*) o PPM

171
Unburnt Fuel (calculated) o PPM
Nitric Oxide 254 PPM
Nitrogen Dioxide 62 PPM
Sulphur Dioxide
. .
o P'PM
----~--~----------~---------~--------------------~-~-- -----

(*) CO + THC expressed as a CH4 equivalent

172
-'----- COMBUSTION ANALYSIS: RESULTS ------
--------------------------------------------------~---
-------"----------

COMPANY: Company DATE:


LOCATION: Site # 3 T~st BY: Operator'
SOURCE: CM-4 PAGE: 2
-------~---------------------------~-----.----~------------~-~----------

FUEL GAS CHARACTERISTICS:


Molecular weight (kg/kmol) 16.58
Quality (~nlet condition)
1.,00000
Gross Heating Value (MJ/m A 3) 37.7
Net Heating Value (MJ/m A 3) 33.4
Theoretical combustion a'ir requirement (kmal air/kmol fuel) 9.5

MATERIAL BALANCE:
---~-----------------~-----------------~--------~----- -----.
Stream Flow Rate Unit

Fuel 4.42 1000 std. mA 3/day


Air 90.14 1000 std. mA 3/day
Stack Gas 94.61 1000 std. mA 3/day

EXCESS AIR:

Actual (% ) 115.3
Recommended (% ) 44.0 to 66.0

ENERGY BALANCE.:
Gross input energy (kW) 1934.0
Net input energy (kW) 1746.3

AVOIDABLE ENERGY LOSSES:

% net energy Los's Rate Loss Value


input (kW) ($/year)
----------------------------------------------~----------------------~-
------
High Excess Air 7.5 130.6 27922
Unburnt Fuel 0.1 1.5 331
Recoverable Heat
in Flue Gas (* ) 33.5 584.5 124969

UNAVOIDABLE ENERGY LOSSES:

% net energy Loss Rate


input (kW)

Unrecoverable Heat

173
in Flue Gas 3.1 54.7

(*) The amount of potential recoverable heat was estimated by cooling


the flue gas to 10 DC above its dew point and no less than the
temperature of 15 DC. The unrecoverable portion is the energy
still
left iri the flue gas at that temperature.

174
\

-~---- COMBUSTION ANALYSIS: RESULTS ------

COMPANY: COmpany DATE:


LOCATION: Site # 3 Test BY: Operator
SOURCE: CM~4 PAGE: 3
_____ ~ ~ ~---~--~------ 0 -

EFFICIENCIES:
Apparent Thermal Efficiency (%) 63.3
Carbon CornbustionEfficiency (%) 99.7

STACK GAS CHARACTERISTICS:


Molecular weight (kg/krnol) 28.26
Dew temperature (oC) 43.8

. EMISSION. FACTORS FOR VARIOUS COMPONENTS (ng/ J) (*):


-------------------,----------~-----------------------------~--------~--

Component Flue Gas

Carbon Monoxide 79
Carbon Dioxide 49214
Nitric Oxide 183
Nitrogen Dioxide 68
Total Oxides of Nitrogen 25-1

(*) Based on gross heating value of the fue~ at 15°C apd 101.325
kPa

175
------ COMBUSTION ANALYSIS: INPUT DATA,----~-

COMPANY: Company DATE:


LOCATION: Site # 3 Test BY: Operator
SOURCE: CM-5 PAGE: 1
--------,-----~------~--------~-----~-----~----------- ------------------

THE FUEL GAS ANALYSIS:


----~--~---------------------------~------~--~------~- -----
Component Mole FJ::'action

methane 0.960040
ethane 0.018300
propane 0.000950
isobutane 0.00'0020
n-butane 0.00004,0
n-heptane 0.000010
nitrogen 0.020460
carbon dioxide 0.000200

Total 1.000020

OPERATING CONDITIONS (Measured):


Barometric pressure (kPa) 97.500
-----------~----------------------------~-------------
-----------------

Gas ptream Temperature Flow @ STP Relat.ive


Humidity
(%)
------------------------~---------------------.------- ------------------

Ambient Air 26.1 0.0


Fuel 26.1 N/A 0.0
Combustion Air 26.1 N/A 0.0
Flue Gas 447.8 N/A N/A
Radiator Air (In) N/A N/A N/A
Radiator Air (Out) N/A N/A N/A
Crank Case Exhaust N/A

Type of equipment Engine-:.Recip_LotvNOx


Nominal rated power output (kW). 746
Assumed equipment efficiency (%) 30.0
Assumed percent loading (%) 100.0
Cost of the fuel gas ($/GJ) 6.78

STACK GAS ANALYSIS:

Component Concentration Unit

Oxygen 8.2 Percent


Carbon Monoxide 150 PPM
Total Combustible (*) o PPM

176
UnburntFuel (calculated) o PPM
Nitric Oxide 1925 PPM
Nitrogen Dioxide 184 PPM
Sulphur Dioxide o PPM

(*) CO .+ THC expressed as a CH4 equivalent

177
----:--- COMBUSTION ANALYSIS: RESULTS ------
-----------------------------------~-~----------------
-----------------

COMPANY: Company DATE:


LOCATION: Site # 3 Test BY: Operator
SOURCE: CM-5 PAGE: 2
----~-----------------------------------------------------------~------

FUEL GAS CHARACTERISTICS:


Molecular weight (kg/kmol) 16.58
Quality (inlet condition)
1.obooo .
Gross Heating Value (MJ/~A3) 37.7
Net Heating Value (MJ/m A3) 33.4
Theoreticaicombustion air requirement (kmol air/kmol fuel) 9~5

MATERIAL BALANCE:

Stream Flow Rate Unit

Fuel 5.52 1000 std. mA3/day


Air 90.14 1000 std. mA3/day
Stack Gas 95.71 1000 std. mA3/day

EXCESS AIR:

Actual (% ) 72.4
Recommended (% ) 44.0 to 66.0

ENERGY BALANCE.:
Gross input energy (kW) 2408.9
Net input energy (kW) 2174.5

AVOIDABLE ENERGY LOSSES:

% net energy Loss Rate Loss Value


input . (kW) ($/year)

------
High Exces.s Air 1.0 21.3 4559
Unburnt Fuel 0.1 2.0 426
Recoverable Heat
in Flue Gas (* ) 27.2 590.6 126276
----_._--------------------------------~------~-------
------------------

UNAVOIDABLE ENERGY LOSSES:

% net energy Loss Rate


input (kW)

Unrecoverable Heat

178
in·Flue Gas 2.8 61.7

(*) The amount of potential recoverable heat was estimated by cooling


the flue gas to ~~ DC above its dew point and no less ihan the .
temperature of 15 DC. The unrecoverable portion is the energy
still '
left in the flue gas at that temperature.

179
COMBUSTION ANALYSIS: RESULTS ------
------------------------~-------------~---------------
---------,--------

COMPANY: Company DATE:


LOCATION: Site # 3 Test BY: Operator
SOURCE: CM:-5 PAGE: 3
,
-----~----------------~------------------------------- -----------------
.

EFFICIENCIES:
Apparent Thermal Efficiency (%) 69 ..9
Carbon Combustion Efficiency (%) 99.7

STACK GAS CHARACTERISTICS:


Molecular weight (kg/kmol) 28.13
Dew temperature (DC) 47.9

EMISSION FACTORS FOR VARIOUS COMPONENTS (ng/J) (*):

Component Flue Gas


~~~------~----------------------.-~-------------------
------------------

Carbon Monoxide 82
Carbon Dioxide 49210
Nitric Oxide 1123
Nitrogen Dioxide 165
Totil Oxid~s of Nitrogen 1288

(*) Based on gross heating value Of the fuel at 15 DC and 101.325


kPa I

180
-----'-COMBUSTION ANALYSIS: INPUT DATA ------

COMPANY: Company DATE:


LOCATION: Site # .3 TEST BY: Operator
SOURCE: CM-7 PAGE: 1

THE FUEL GAS A"N:ALYSIS:

Component Mole Fraction

methane 0.960040
ethane 0.018300
propane 0.000950
isobutane 0.000020
n-butane 0.000040
n-heptane 0.000010
nitrogen 0.020460
carbon dioxide 0.000200
-----------~------~-----------------~------------~----
-----
Total 1.000020

OPERATING CONDITIONS (Measured):


Barometric pressure (kPa) 97.500

Gas Stream Temperature Flow @ STP Relative


Humidity
(% )

Ambient Air 30.0 0.0


Fuel 30.0 N/A 0.0
Combustion Air 30.0 N/A 0.0
Flue Gas 548.9 N/A N/A
Radiator Air (In) N/A N/A N/A
Radiator Air (Out) N/A N/A N/A
Crank Case Exhaust N/A

Type of equipment Engine_~ecip_Normal


Nominal rated power output (kW) 1193
Assumed equipment efficiency (%) 30.0
Assumed percent loading (%) 100.0
Cost of ~he fuel gas ($/GJ) 6. 78 /

STACK GAS ANALYSIS:

Component Concentration Unit

Oxygen 0.2 Percent


Carbon Monoxide 3887 PPM
Total Combustible (*) o PPM

181
Unburnt Fuel (calculated) o PPM
·Ni tric Oxide 2423 PPM
Nitrogen Dioxide 15 PPM
'Sulphur Dioxide o PPM

(*) CO + THC expressed as a CH4 equivalent

182
-~---- COMBUSTION ANALYSIS: RESULTS ------

COMPANY: Company DATE:


LOCATION: Site # 3 TEST BY: Operator
SOURCE: CM-:-7 PAGE: 2
--------------~--------------------------~------------ -----------------

FUEL GAS CHARACTERISTICS:


Molecular weight (kg/kmol) 16.58
Quality (inlet condition)
1.00000
Gross Heating Value (MJ/m A 3) 37.7
Net Heating Value (MJ/m A 3) 33~4
Theoretical combustion air requirement (kmol air/kmol fuel) 9.5

MATERIAL BALANCE:

Stream Flow Rate Unit


------------------------------------T--~--------~-----
-,----
Fuel 10.20 1000 std. mA 3/day
Air 97.31 1000 ~td~ mA 3/day
Stack Gas 107.82 1000 std. mA 3/day

EXCESS AIR:

Actual (% ) 0.7
Recommended (% ) 2.0 to 12.0

ENERGY BALANCE:
Gross input energy (kW) 4478.8
Net input energy (kW) 3638.9

AVOIDABLE ENERGY LOSSES:

% net energy Loss Rate Loss Value


input (kW) ($/year)

Unburnt Fuel 1.6 58.1 12423


Recoverable Heat
in Flue Gas (*) 23.6 857.0 183240

UNAVOIDABLE ENERGY LOSSES:

% net energy Loss Rate


input (kW)

Unrecoverable Heat
in Flue Gas 14.2 515.8

183
(*) The amount of potential rec9verable heat was'estim~ted by cooling
the flue gas to 10°C above its dew point and no less than the
temperature of 15 °C .. The unrecoverable portion is the energy
still
left in the flue gas at that temperature.

184
------ COMBUSTION ANALYSIS: RESULTS ------

COMPANY: Company DATE:


LOCATION: S'ite # 3 TEST BY:· Operator
SOURCE: CM-7 PAGE: 3
. ,
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

EFFICIENCIES:
Apparent Thermal Efficiency (%) 60.7
Carbon Combustion Efficiency (%) 95.9

STACK GAS CHARACTERISTICS:


Molecular weight (kg/kraol) 27.61
Dew temperature (oC) 58.1

EMISSION FACTORS FOR VARIOUS COMPONENTS (ng!J) (*):

Component Flue Gas

Carbon Monoxide 1290


Carbon Dioxide 47312
Nitric Oxide 861
Nitrogen Dioxide 8
Total Oxides of Nitrogen 870
-------~--------------------------------------------------~------------

(*) Based on" gross heating value ~f the fue~ at 15 °Capd 101.325
kPa

185
~----- COMBUSTION ANALYSIS: INPUT DATA ------

COMPANY: Company DATE:


LOCATION: Site # 3 TEST BY: Operator
SOURCE: CM-5 PAGE.: 1
---------------------------------------------"--------------------------
. I .

THE FUEL GAS ANALYSIS:

Component Mole FractiOn

me'thane 0.960040
ethane 0.018300
propane o. ,000950
isobutane 0.000020
n-butane 0.000040
n-heptane 0.000010
nitrogen 0.020460
carbon dioxide . 0.000200
---------------~-----~-------~------------------------
-----
Total 1.000020

OPERATING CONDITIONS (Measured):


Barometric pressure (kPa) 97.500

Gas Stream Temperature Flow @ STP Relative


Humidity
(m"3/s) (%)

Ambient Air 21.7 0.0


Fuel 21.7 N/A 0.0
Combustion Air 21.7 N/A 0.0
Flue Gas 547.2 N/A N/A
Radiator Air (In) N/A N/A N/A
Radiator Air (Out) N/A N/A N/A
Crank Case Exhaust N/A
--------------------------------------------~----------~---------------

Type of equipment Engine_Recip_Normal


Nominal rated power output (kW) 1193
Assumed equipment efficiency (%) 30.0
Assumed percent loading ('%) 100.0
Cost of the fuel gas ($/GJ) 6.78

STACK GAS ANALYSIS:

Component Concentration Unit

Oxygen 0.2 Percent


Carbon Monoxide 1794 PPM
Total Combustible (*) o PPM

186
Unburnt Fuel (calculated) o PPM
Nitric Oxide 2516 PPM
Nitrogen Dioxide 20 PPM
SUlphur Dioxide o PPM

(*) CO +THC exp~essed as a CH4 equivalent

187
------ COMBUSTION ANALYSIS: RESULTS------

COMPANY: Company DATE:


LOCATION: Site # 3 TEST BY: Operator
SOURCE: CM-5 . PAGE: 2

FUEL GAS CHARACTERISTICS:


Molecular weight (kq/kmol) 16.58
Quality (inlet condition)
1.00000
Gross Heating Value (MJ/m A 3) 37.7
Net Heating Value (MJ/m A 3) 33.4
Theoretical combustion air. requirement (kmol air/kmol fuel) 9.5

MATERIAL BALANCE:

Stream Flow Rate Unit


---------~--------~~-----------------------------~--------~
Fuel 10.14 1000 std. mA 3/day
Air 97.31 1000 std. mA 3/day
Stack Gas 107.65 1000 std. mA 3/day

EXCESS AIR:

Actual (% ) 1.3 (.
Recommended (% ) 2.0 to 12.0

ENERGY BALANCE:
Gross input energy (kW) 4439.8
Net input ene~gy (kW) 3604.9

AVOIDABLE ENERGY LOSSES:

% net energy Loss Rate Loss Value


input (kW) ($/year)

Unburnt Fuel 0.7 26.8 5724


Recoverable Heat
in Flue Gas (*) 23.7 853.3 182453
----------~------------------------------------~------
-----------------

UNAVOIDABLE ENERGY LOSSES:

% net energy Loss Rate


input (kW)

Unrecoverable Heat
in Flue Gas 14.2

188
(*) The' amount of potential recoverable heat waS estimated by cooling
the flue gas to 10°C above its dew point and no less than the
temperature of 15 °e. The unrecoverable portion is the energy
still
left in the flue gas at that temperature.

189
----"-- COMBUSTION ANALYSIS: RESULTS ------

COMPANY: Company DATE:


LOCATION: Site # 3 TEST BY: Operator
SOURGE: CM-5 PAGE: 3

EFFICIENCIES:.
Apparent Th~rmal Efficiency (%) 61.4
Carbon Combustion Efficiency (%) 98.1

STACK GAS CHARACTERISTICS: .


Molecular weight (kg/kmol) 27.64
pew temperature (oC) 58.0

EMISSION FACTORS FOR VARIOUS COMPONENTS (ng/J) (*):

Component Flue Gas

Carbon Monoxide 598


Carb.on Dioxide 48399
Nitric Oxide 898
Nitrogen Dioxide 11
Total Oxides of Nitrogen 909

(*) Based on gross heating value of the fuel at 15 °c an~ 101.325


kPa

190
COMBUSTION ANALYSIS: INPUT DATA ------

COMPANY: Company DATE:


LOCATION: Site # 3 TEST BY: Operator
SOURCE: CM-4 PAGE: 1

THE FUEL GAS ANALYSIS:


-------------------------------------~---------------~
-----
Component Mole Fraction
~-~-------~----~-----------.-----------.------~-------
-------
methane 0.960040
ethane 0.018300
propane 0.000950
isobutane 0.000020
n-butane 0.000040
n-heptane 0.000010
nitrogen 0.020460
carbon dioxide 0.000200

Total 1.000020
-----------------~--------~-----~~--------------------
-----

OPERATING CONDITIONS (Measured):


Barometric pressure (kPa) 97.500

Gas Stream Temperature Flow @ STP Relative


Humidity
I
(% )
------------------------------------------------------------------------
"

Ambient Air 21.7 0.0


Fuel 21.7 N/A 0.0
Combustion Air 21.7 N/A 0.0
Flue Gas 510.0 N/A N/A
Radiator Air (In) N/A N/A N/A
Radiator Air (Out) N/A" N/A N/A
Crank Case Exhaust N/A

Type of equipment Engine_ Recip_N"ormal


Nominal rated power output (kW) 89?
Assumed "equipment efficiency "( %) 30.0
"Assumed percent loading (%) 100.0
Cost of the fuel gas (~/GJ) 6.78

STACK GAS ANALYSIS:

Component Concentration Unit

Oxygen 0.2 Percent


Carbon Monoxide 2029 PPM
Total Combustible (*) o PPM

191
Unburnt Fuel (calculated) o PPM
Nitric Oxide 2467 PPM
Nitrogen Dioxide 17 PPM
Sulphur Dioxide o PPM
------------------~---------------------------~------- -----
(*) CO + THC expressed as a CH4 equivalent

192
.,..----- COMBUSTION ANALYSIS: RESULTS ---.---
-----~-----~--------------------------------------~---
-----------------

COMPANY: Company DATE:


LOCATION: Site # 3 TEST BY: Operator
SOURCE: CM-:-4 PAGE: 2

FUEL GAS CHARACTERISTICS:


Molecular weight (kg/krnol) 16.58
Quality (inlet condition)
1.00000
Gross Heating Value (MJ/m A 3) 37.7
Net Heatibg Value (MJ/m A 3) 33.4
Theoretical combustion air requirement (kmol air/krnol fuel) 9.5

MATERIAL BALANCE:

Stream Flow Rate Unit


---------------------------------~--------------~-----
-----
Fuel 7.61 1000 std. mA 3/day
Air 72.98 1000 std~ mA 3/day
Stack Gas 80.75 1000 ·std. rnA 3/ day

EXCESS AIR:

Actual (% ) 1.2
Recommended (% ) 2.0 to 12.'0

ENERGY BALANCE:
Gross input energy (kW) 3309.7
Net input energy' (kW) 2986.4

AVOIDABLE ENERGY LOSSES:

% net energy Loss Rate Loss Value


input (kW) ($/year)
-------------------------------------------------'----
---~--------------

Unburnt Fuel 0.8 22.7 4857


Recoverable Heat
in Flue Gas (*) 19.7 587.1 125520
---------~---------------~-----~----------------------
-----------------

UNAVOIDABLE ENERGY LOSSES:

% net energy Loss Rate


input (kW)

Unrecoverable Heat
in Flue Gas 2.2 65.8

193
(*) The amount of potential recoverable heat was' estimated by cooling
the flue gas to 10 DC above its dew point and no less than the
temperature of'15 DC. The unre~overableportion is .the energy
still
left in the flue gas at that temperature.

194
.,..----- COMBUSTION ANALYSIS: RESULTS -"'-----

COMPANY: Company DATE:


LOCATION: Site # 3 TEST BY: Operator
SOURCE: CM-4 PAGE: 3
--------------~-----~--------------------------------- --------_._-------

EFFICIENCIES:
Apparent Thermal Efficiency (%) 77.4
Carbon Combustion Efficiency (%) 97.8

STACK GAS CHARACTERISTICS:


Molecular weight (kg/krnol) 27.64
Dew temperature (oC) 58.0

EMISSION FACTORS FOR VARIOUS COMPONENTS (ng/J) (*):

Component Flue Gas

Carbon Monoxide 676


Carbon Dioxide 48277
Nitric Oxide 880
Nitrogen Dioxide 9
Total Oxides of Nitrog~n 890

(*) Based on gross heating value ,of the" fuel at 15°C and 101.325
kPa

195
-:----- COMBUSTION ANALYSIS: INPUT DATA

COMPANY: Company DA,TE:


. LOCATION: Site # 3 TEST BY: Operator
SOURCE: CM:-3 PAGE: 1

THE FUEL GAS ANALYSIS":


-------~--~~----~----------------------------~------~- -----
Component Mole Fraction

methane 0.960040
ethane 0.018300
propane 0.000950
isobutane 0.000020
n-butane 0.000040
ri-heptane 0.000010
nitrogen 0.020460
carbon dioxide 0.000200

Total 1.000020

OPERATING CONDITIONS (Measured):


Barometric pressure (kPa) 97.500

Gas Stream Temperature Flow @ STP Relative


Humidity
(%)

Ambie"nt Air 22.2 0.0


Fuel 22.2 N/A 0.0
Combustion Air 22.2 N/A 0.0
Flue Gas 510.0 N/A N/A
Radiator Air (In) ·N/A N/A N/A
Radiator Air (Out) N/A N/A N/A
Crank Case Exhaust N/A

Type of equipment Ehgine_Recip_Normal


Nominal rated power o~tput (kW) 597
Assumed equipment efficiency (%) 30.0
Assumed percent loading (~) 100.0
Cost of the fuel gas ($/GJ) 6.78

STACK GAS ANALYSIS:


-------------~------------------------------------~---
-----
Component Concentration Unit

Oxygen 0.1 Percent


Carbon Monoxide 9190 PPM
Total Combustible (*) o PPM

196
Unburnt Fuel (calculated) o PPM
Nitric Oxide . , 2526 PPM
Nitrogen Dioxide 15 PPM
Sulphur Dioxide o PPM
~---------~-----~-----------~--------~------------~--- -----
(*) CO + THC expressed as a CH4 equivalent

197
----~- COMBUSTION ANALYSIS: RESULTS ------
-~------~~--------------------------------------------
-----------------

COMPANY: Company DATE:


LOCATION: Site # 3. TEST BY: Operator
SOURCE: CM-3 PAGE: 2
--------------------~----------------------------------------------~---

FUEL GAS CHARACTERISTICS:


Molecular weight (kg/kmol) 16.58
Quality (inlet condition)
1.00000
Gross Heating Value (MJ/m A 3) 37.7
Net Heating Value (MJ/m A 3) 33.4
Theoretical combustion air requirement (krnol air/kmol fuel) 9.5

MATERIAL BALANCE:

Stream Flow Rate Unit

Fuel 5.20 1000 std. mA 3/day


Air 48.65 1000 std. mA 3/day
Stack Gas 54.16 1000 std. mA 3/day

EXCESS AIR:

Actual (% ) -1.2
Recommended (% ) 2.0 to 12.0

ENERGY BALANCE:
Gross input energy (kW) 2275.7
Net input energy (kW) 1847.5

AVOIDABLE ENERGY LOSSES:

% net energy Loss Rate Loss Value


input (kW) ($/year)

Unburnt Fuel 3.7 69.0 14752


Recoverable Heat
in Flue Gas (*) 21.2 392.4 83892

UNAVOIDABLE ENERGY LOSSES:

% net energy Loss Rate


input (kW)

Unrecoverable Heat
in Flue Gas 14.2 262.7

198
(*) The amount of potential recoverable heat was estimated by cooling
the flue gas to lO DC above its dew point and no less than the
temperature of 15 DC. The unrecoverable portion is the energy
still
left in the flue gas at that temperature.

199
------ COMBUSTION ANALYSIS: RESULTS ------

COMPANY: Company DATE:


. LOCATION: Site # 3 TEST BY: Operator
SOURCE: CM:-3 PAGE: 3

EFFICIENCIES:
Apparent Thermal Efficiency (%) 60.8
Carbon, Combustion Efficiency (%) 90.4

STACK GAS CHARACTERISTICS:


Molecular weight (kg/lanol) 27.51
Dew temperature (oC) 58.4

EMISSION FACTORS FOR VARIOUS COMPONENTS (ng/J) (*):


--------~------------------~----------------------------------------~--
. r

Component Flue Gas

Carbon Monoxide 3006


Carbon Dioxide 44616
Nitric Oxide 885
Nitrogen Dioxide 8 .
Total Oxides of Nitrogen 893

(*) Based on gross h~~ting value of the fuel at 15°C and 101.325
kPa

200
-~---- COMBUSTION ANALYSIS: INPUT DATA ------

COMPANY: Compq.ny DATE:


LOCATION: Site # 3 TEST BY: Operator.
SOURCE: CM-2 PAGE: 1

THE FUEL GAS ANALYSIS:


-------------~-----~-------------~------------~------------
Component Mole Fraction

methane 0.960040
ethane 0.018300
propane 0.000950
isobutane 0.000020
n-butane 0.000040
n-heptane 0.000010
nitrogen 0.020460
carbon dioxide 0.000200

Total 1.000020

OPERATING CONDITIONS (Measured):


Barometric pressure (kPa) 97.500

\
Gas Stream Temperature Flow @ STP Relative
Humidity
( °C) (%)

Ambient Air 22.2 0.0


Fuel 22.2 N/A 0.0
Combustion Air 22.2 N/A 0.0
Flue Gas 531.1 N/A N/A
Radiator Air (In) N/A N/A N/A
Radiator Air (Out~ N/A N/A N/A
Crank Case Exhaust N/A

Type of equipment Engine_Recip_Normal


Nominal rated power output (kW) 597
Assumed equipment efficiency (%) 30.0
Assumed percent loading (%) 100.0
Cost of the fuel gas ($/GJ) 6.78

STACK GAS ANALYSIS:

Component Concentration Unit

Oxygen 0.3 Percent


Carbon Monoxide 8170 PPM
Total Combustible (*) o PPM

201
Unburnt Fuel (calculated) o PPM
Nitric Oxide 2050 PPM
Nitrogen Dioxide 21 PPM
Sulphur Dioxide o PPM
---------------------~-----------------------------~-- -----
(*) CO + THC expressed as a CH4 equivalent

202
------COMBUSTION ANALYSIS : RESULTS ---'---

COMPANY: Company DATE:


LOCATION: Site # 3 TEST BY: Operator
SOURCE: CM~2 PAGE: 2
---------------------------------------------------~------------~------

FUEL GAS CHARACTERISTICS:


Molecular weight (kg/kmol)
Quality (inlet condition)
1.00000
Gross Heating Value (MJ/m A 3) 37.7
Net Heating Value (MJ/m A 3) 33.4
Theoretical combustion air requirement (kmol air/kmol fuel) 9.5

MATERIAL BALANCE:

Stream Flow Rate Unit

Fuel 5.14 1000 std. mA 3/day


Air 48.65 ' 1000 std. mA 3/day
Stack Gas 54.06 1000 std. mA 3/day

EXCESS AIR:

Actual (% ) -0.0
Recommended (% ) 2.0 to 12.0

ENERGY BALANCE:
Gross input energy (kW) 2248.8
Net input energy (kW) 1825.8

AVOIDABLE ENERGY LOSSES:

% net energy Loss Rate Loss Value


input (kW) ($/year)
---~------------------------------~-----------------------~------------

Unburnt Fuel 3.4 61.2 13092


Recoverable Heat
in Flue Gas (*) 22.6 411.8

UNAVOIDABLE ENERGY LOSSES: '

% net energy Loss Rate


input (kW)
--------~------_._---------------------------------------~--------------

Unrecoverable Heat
in Flue Gas 14.2 259.6

203
(*) The amount of potential recoverable heat was estimated by cooling
the flue gas to 10°C above its dew point and no less than the
temperature of 15°C. The unrecoverable portion is the energy
still
left in the flue gas at that temperature.

204
~-----COMBUSTION ANALYSIS: RESULTS ------
--------------------------~-----------------------~----------------~---

COMPANY: Company DATE:


LOCATION: Site # 3 TEST BY: Operator
SOURCE: CM-2 PAGE: 3
------------------~--------~-~-----~---------~-------------------~-----

EFFICIENCIES:
Apparent Thermal Efficiency (%) 59.9
Carbon Combustion Efficiency (%) 91.4

STACK GAS CHARACTERISTICS:


Molecular we'ight (kg/krnol) 27.54
Dew temperature (oC) 58.2

EMISSION FACTORS FOR VARIOUS COMPONENTS (ng/J) (*):


----------_._~------~--------~----------~-~------~----------~--------~--

Component Flue Gas


------------------------------------------------------
, . , -----~-----------

Carbon Monoxide 2700


Carbon Diox.ide 45096
Nitri~ Oxide 726
Nitrogen Dioxide 11
Total Oxides of Nitrogen 737

(*) Based on gross heating value of the fuel at 15 °t and 101.325


kPa

205
------ COMBUSTI,ON ANALYSIS: INPUT DATA 7""- .... - - -

COMPANY: Company DATE:


LOCATION: Site # 3 TEST BY: Operator
SOURCE: CM,...l PAGE: 1

THE FUEL GAS ANALYSIS:


-------~--~-~----------------~------------------------ -----
Component Mole Fraction

methane 0.960040
ethane 0.018300
propane 0.000950
isobutane 0.000020
n';"butane 0.000040
n-heptane 0.000010
nitrogen 0.020460
carbon dioxide 0.000200

Total 1.000020

OPERATING CONDITIONS (Measured):


Barometric pressure (kPa) 97.500

Gas Stream ,Temperature Flow @ STP Relative


Humidity
(m"3/s) (%)

Ambient Air 22.8 0.0


Fuel 22.8 N/A 0.0
Combustion Air 22.8 N/A 0.0
Flue Gas 510.0 N/A N/A
Radiator Air (In) N/A N/A N/A
Radiator Air (Out) N/A N/A N/A
Crank Case Exhaust N/A

Type of equipment 'Ehgine_ Recip_Normal


Nominal rated power output (kW) 283
Assumed 'equipment efficiency (%) 30.0
Assumed percent loading (%) 100.0
Cost of the fuel gas ($/GJ) 6.78

STACK GAS ANALYSIS:

Component Concentration J,Jnit,

Oxygen 0.4 Percent


Carbon Monoxide 7145 PPM
Total Combustible (*) o PPM

206
Unburnt Fuel (calculated) o PPM
Nitric Oxide ' 2026 PPM
Nitrogen Diox~de 22 PPM
Slilphur Dioxide o PPM
-----------~------------~---~---------------------~--- -----
(*) CO+ THC expressed as a CH4 equivalent

207
------ COMBUSTION ANALYSIS: RESULTS ------

COMPANY: Company DATE:


LOCATION: Site # 3 TEST BY: Operator
SOURCE: CM-I . PAGE:

FUEL GAS CHARACTERISTICS:


Molecular weight (kg/kmol) 16.58
Quality (inlet condition)
1.00000
Gross Heating Value (MJ/m A 3) 37.7
Net Heating .Value (MJ/m A 3) 33.4
Theoretical combustion air requirement (kmol air/kmol fuel) 9.5

MATERIAL BALANCE:

Stream Flow Rate 'Unit

Fuel 2.42 1000 std. mA 3/day


Air 23.11 1000 std. mA 3/day
Stack Gas 25.65 1000 std. mA 3/day

EXCESS AIR:

Actual (% ) 0.8
Recommended (% ) 2.0 to 12.0

ENERGY BALANCE:
Gross input energy (kW) 1052.8
Net input energy (kW) 950.0

AVOIDABLE ENERGY LOSSES:

% net energy Loss Rate Loss Va,lue


input (kW) ($/.year)

Unburnt Fuel 2.7 25.4 5432


Recoverable Heat
in Flue Gas '( *) 19.6 185.9 39755

UNAVOIDABLE ENERGY LOSSES:

% net energy Loss Rate


input (kW)

Unrecoverable Heat
in Flue Gas 2.2 20.9

208
(*) The amount of potential reco~era6le heat was estimatedb~ cboling
the flue gas to 10 DC above its dew point and no less than the
temperature of 15 DC. The unrecoverable portion is the energy
still
left in the fiue gas at that temperature.
.... ----- COMBUSTION ANALYSIS: RESULTS ...:-----
~--------~--------------~-----------------------------
-----------------

COMPANY: Company DATE:


. LOCATION: Site # 3 TEST BY: Operator
SOURCE: CM:-1 PAGE: 3

EFFICIENCIES:
Apparent Thermal Efficiency (%) 75.6
Carbon Combustion Efficiency (%) 92.4

STACK GAS CHARACTERISTICS:


Molecular weight (kg/kmol) 27.56
Dew temperature (oC) 58.0

EMISSION FACTORS FOR VARIOUS COMPONENTS (ng/J) C*):


------~-~---------------------------~---------~---------~---------~----

Component Flue Gas

Carbon Monoxide 2·377


Carbon Dioxide 45604
Nitric Oxide 722
Nitrogen Dioxide 12
Total Oxides of Nitrogen 734 .
--------------------------~--~--------------~------~------------~--.----

(*) Based on gross heating value of the fuel at 15°C and 101.325
kPa

210
------ COMBUSTION ANALYSIS: INPUT DATA ----~~

COMPANY: DATE:
LOCATION: Site #4 TEST BY: Dave/Jeff
SOURCE: North Injection Compressor PAGE: 1

THE FUEL GAS ANALYSIS:

Component Mole Fraction

methane 0.688320
ethane 0.065760
propane 0.002390
isobutane 0.000270
n-butane 0.000770
isopentane 0.001980
n-pentane 0.001540
n-hexane 0.000560
n-heptane 0.000070
nitrogen 0.238340

'J:'otal 1.000000

OPERATING CONDITIONS (Measured):


Barometric pressure (kPa) 101.100

Gas Stream Temperature Flow @ STP Relative


Humidity
(% )

Ambient Air 26.7 0.0


Fuel 26.7 N/A 0.0
Combustion Air 26.7 N/A 0.0
Flue Gas 254.6 N/A N/A
Radiator Air (In) N/A N/A N/A
Radiator Air (Out) N/A N/A N/A
Crank Case Exhaust N/A

Type of equipment Engine_Recip_Normal


Nominal rated power output (kW) 1864
Assumed equipment efficiency (%) 30.d
Assumed percent loading (%) 100.0
Cost of the fuel gas ($/GJ) 6.78

STACK GAS ANALYSIS:

Component Concentration Unit

Oxygen 14.5 Percent


Carbon Monoxide o PPM
Total Combustible (*) 6488 PPM
Unburnt Fuel (calculated) 6488 PPM
Nitric Oxide o PPM
Nitrogen Dioxide o PPM

211
Sulphur Dioxide o PPM

(*) co + THe expressed as a CH4 equivalent

212
------COMBUSTION ANALYSIS: RESULTS ------

COMPANY: DATE:
LOCATION: Site #4 TEST BY: Dave/Jeff
SOURCE: North Injection Compressor PAGE: 2
--- --~- ---'- -.- - - ------ - --- - --..;..... --- -- - - -- - - -;,.".,. -- ---- -- --- - - -- -- - --- -- -- - ---

FUEL GAS CHARACTERISTICS:


Molecular weight (kg/kInol) 20.17'\
Quality (inlet condition)
1~00000
Gioss Heating Value (MJ/m A 3) 31.5
N~t Heating Value (MJ/m 3)
A
28,.0
Theoretical combustion air requirement (kmol air/kmol fuel) 7.9

MATERIAL BALANCE:
----------------------~--------------~-----~----~--~-- -----
Stream Flow Rate Unit
-~--------..;.....-----~----~-------------------------~------
-----
Fuel 6.37 1000 std. mA 3/day
Air 152.06 1000 std. mA 3/day
Stack Gas 158.67 1000 std. m 3/dayA

EXCESS AIR:

Actual (% ) 202.1
Recommended (% ) 2.0 to 12.0

ENERGY BALANCE:
Gross input energy (kW) 2331.1
Net input energy (kW) 2146.1

AVOIDABLE ENERGY LOSSES:

% net energy Loss Rate Loss Value


input (kW) ($/year)

High Excess Air 15.0 321.4 68717


Unburnt Fuel 17".4 372.4 79627
Recoverable Heat
in Flue Gas (*) 23,.5 503.5 107659

UNAVOIDABLE ENERGY LOSSES:

% net energy Loss Rate


input (kW)

Unrecoverable Heat
in Flue Gas 3.2 69.1

(*) The amount of potential recoverable heat was estimated by cooling


the flue gas to 10 DC above its dew point and no less than the
tempe'rature of 15 DC. The unrecoverable portion is the energy
stillleft in the flue gas at that temperature.,

213
------ COMBUSTION ANALYSIS: RESULTS. ------

COMPANY: DATE:
LOCATION: Site #4 TEST BY: Dave/Jeff
SOURCE: North Injection Compressor PAGE: 3

EFFICIENCIES:
Apparent Thermal Efficiency (%) 56.0
Carbon Combustion Efficiency (%) 83.8

STACK GAS CHARACTERISTICS:


Molecular weight (kg/krnol) 28.46
'Dew temperature (oC) 34.6

EMISSION FACTORS FOR VARIOUS COMPONENTS (ng/J) (*):

Component Flue Gas


- - - -'- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - _...:.. - - - - _....:. - - - - - - - ---- ------- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - --
Carbon Dioxide 42267
Methane 2398
Ethane 429.5
Total VOC 103
Total Hydrocarbons 2931

(*) Based on gross heating value of the fuel at 15°C and 101.325 kPa

214
------ COMBUSTION ANALYSIS: INPUT DATA ------

COMPANY: DATE:
LOCATION: Site #4 TEST ~Y: Dave/Jeff
.SOURCE: Injection Compressor #1 . PAGE: 1
--------------------~-----------------~--------------- -----------------

THE' FUEL GAS ANALYSIS:


-----------------~-----~------------------------------
-----
Component Mole Fraction

methane· 0.688320
ethane 0.065760
propane 0.002390
isobutane 0.000270
n-butarie 0.000770
isopentane 0.001980
n-pentane 0.001540
n-hexane 0.000560
n-heptane 0.000070
nitrogen 0.238340

Total 1.000000

OPEHATINGCONDITIONS (Measured):
Barometric pressure (kPa) 101.100

Gas Stream Temperature Flow @ STP Relative


Humidity
(mI\3/s) (%)
-----------~----------------------------------~-------
-----------------
Arribient Air 26.7 0.0
Fuel 26.7 N/A 0.0
Combustion Air 26.7 N/A 0.0
Flue Gas 115.0 N/A N/A
Radiator Air (In) N/A N/A N/A
Radiator Air (Out) N/A N/A N/A
Crank Case Exhaust N/A

Type of equipmerit Engine_Recip_Normal


Nominal rated power output (kW) 1864
Assumed equipment efficiency (%) 30.0
Assumed percent loading (%) 100.0
Cost of the fuel gas ($/GJ) 6.78

STACK GAS ANALYSIS:

Component Concentration Unit

Oxygen 15.2 Percent


Carbon Monoxide o PPM
Total Combustible (*) o PPM
Unburnt Fuel (calculated) o PPM
Nitric Oxide o PPM
Nitrogen Dioxide o PPM
Sulphur Dioxide o PPM

215
(*) co + THC expressed as a CH4 equivalent

216
------ COMBUSTION ANALYSIS: RESULTS ------
-------------------------~--~--------------------~------------------~--
COMPANY: DATE:
LOCATION: Site #4 TEST BY: Dave/Jeff
SOURCE: . Inj ection Compressor #1 PAGE: 2

FUEL GAS CHARACTERISTICS:


Molecular weight (kg/kmol)
Quality {inlet condition)
1.00000
Gross Heating Value (MJ/m A 3) 31.5
Net Heatin~ Value (MJ/m A 3) 28.0
Theoretical combustion air requirement (kmol air/kmol fuel) 7.9

MATERIAL BALANCE:

Stream Flow Rate Unit


- - - - - - - - - - - - - ~ - - "':"'"".- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 0:-- - - --

Fuel 4.86 1000 std. mA 3/day


Air 152.06 1000 std. mA 3/day
Stack Gas 157.14 1000 std. mA 3/day

EXCESS AIR:

Actual (% ) 295.9
Recommended (% ) 2.0 to 12.0

ENERGY BALANCE:
Gross input energy (kW) 1898.7
Net input energy (kW) 1607.5

AVOIDABLE ENERGY LOSSES:


-----------------------------------~---------------~--
-----------------
% net energy Loss Ra·te' Loss Value
input (kW) ($/year)

High Excess Air 8.7 140.1 299.64


Recoverable Heat
in Flue Gas (*) 10.4 167.6 35835

UNAVOIDABLE ENERGY LOSSES:


------------------------------------------------------
------------~----

% net energy Loss Rate


input (kW)
-------------------------~---------~------------------ -----------------
Unrecoverable Heat
in Flue Gas 12.1 194.1

(*) The amount of potential recoverable heat was estimated by cooling


the flue gas to 10 DC above its dew point and no less than the
temperature of 15 DC. The unrecoverable portion is the energy
still left in the flue gas at that temperature.

217
----~- COMBUSTION ANALYSIS: RESULTS -~----

COMPANY: DATE:
LOCATION: Site #4 TEST ~Y: Dave/Jeff
SOURCE: Injection Compressor #1 PAGE: 3
----------------------------------------~~---~--------~-~--------~-----

EFFICIENCIES:
Apparent Thermal Efficiency (%) 77.5
Carbon Combustion Efficiency (%) 100.0

STACK GAS CHARACTERISTICS:


Molecular weight (kg/kmol) 28.54
Dew temperature (oC) 33.0

EMISSION FACTORS FOR VARIOUS COMPONENTS (ng/J) (*):

Component Flue Gas

Carbon Dioxide 50417

(*) Based on .gross heating value of the fuel at 15°C and 101.325 kPa

218
"'-~---- COMBUSTION ANALYSIS: INPUT DATA ------
------------------------_._----------------------~----
-----------------­
"

COMPANY: DATE:
,LOCATION: Site #4 TEST BY: Dave/Jeff
SOURCE: East Solar Turbine PAGE: 1

THE FUEL GAS ANALYSIS:

Component Mole Fraction

methane 0.688320
ethane 0.065760
propane 0.002390
isobutane 0.000270
n-butane 0.000770
isopentane 0.001980
n-pentane 0.001540
p-hexane 0.000560
n-heptane 0.000070
nitrogen 0.238340

Total 1.000000

OPERATING CONDITIONS (Measured):


Barometric pressure (kPa) 101.100

Gas Stream Temperature' Flow @ STP Relative


Humidity
(% )

Ambient Air 26.7 0.0


Fuel 26.7 0.1 0.0
Combustion Air 26.7 N/A 0.0
Flue Gas 283.3 N/A N/A
Radiator Air (In) N/A N/A N/A
Radiator Air' (Out) N/A' N/A N/A
Crank Case Exhaust N/A

Type of equipment Turbine


Nominal rated power output (kW) 895
Assumed equipment efficiency (%) 12.6
Assumed percent loading (%) 43.5
Turbine Pressure Ratio 17.9
Turbine Fuel Pressure (kPa) 1810
Cost of the fuel gas ($/GJ) 6.78

STACK GAS ANALYSIS:

Component Concentration Unit

Oxygen 16.4 Percerit


Carbon Monoxide o PPM
Total Combustible (*) o PPM
Unburnt Fuel (calculated) o PPM

219
Nitric Oxide o PPM
Nitrogen Dioxide o PPM
Sulphur Dioxide o PPM
--------------~---~------------------~-~---------~---- -----
(*) CO + THC expressed as a CH4 equivalent

220
------ COMBUSTION ANALYSIS: RESULTS ~----~

COMPANY: DATE:
LOCATION: Site #4 TEST BY: Dave/Jeff
SOURCE: East Solar Turbine . PAGE: 2

FUEL GAS CHARACTERISTIcs:


Molecular weight (kg/kmoi) 20.17
Quality (inlet condition)
1.-00000
Gross Heating Value (MJ/m~3t 31.5
Net Heating Value (MJ/m A 3) 28.0
Theoretis:;al combustion air requirement (kmolair/kmol fuel) 7.9

MATERIAL BALANCE:

Stream Flow Rate Unit


. .
-----------------------------------------------------------,
Fuel 8.50 1000 std. mA 3Jday
Air 341.48 1000 std. mA 3/day
Stack Gas 350.36 1000 std. mA 3/day

EXCESS AIR:

Actual (% .) 408.6
Recommended (% ) 360 to 690

ENERGY BALANCE:
Gross input energy (kW) 5027.0
Net input energy (kW) 4732.8

AVOIDABLE ENERGY LOSSES:

% net energy Loss Rate Loss Value


input (kW) ($/year)

Recoverable Heat
in Flue. Gas * )
I (
.,
27.2 1287.1 275193
------------------------------------------------------
-~---------------

UNAVOIDABLE ENERGY LOSSES:


~._--------------------------------------~------------
------------------
% net energy Loss .Rate
input (kW)

Unrecoverable Heat
in Flue'Gas 2.6 122.0

(*) The amount of potential recoverable heat was estimated by cooling


the flue gas to 10°C above its dew point and no less than the
temperature of 15 °C. The unrecoverable portion is the energy
still
left in the flue gas at that temperature.

221
------ COMBUSTION ANALYSIS: RESULTS --~---

COMPANY: DATE:
LOCATION: Site #4 TEST BY: Dave/Jeff
SOURCE: E~st Solar Turpine PAGE: 3
---~------------------------~-------------------~-~--- --,---------------

EFFICIENCIES:
Apparent Thermal Efficiency (%) 70.2
Carbon Combustion Efficiency (%) 100.0

STACK GAS CHARACTERISTICS:


Molecular weight (kg/kmol) 28.61
Dew temperature (oC) 28.8

EMISSION FACTORS FOR VARIOUS COMPONENTS (ng/J) (*):

Component Flue Gas


-~---------------------------------------------------------~~----------
, Carbon Dioxide 50417

(*) Based on gross heating value of the fuel at 15°C and 101.325 kPa

222
------ COMBUSTION ANALYSIS: INPUT DATA ------
------------------------~-----------------------~-----
-----------------
COMPANY:· DATE:
LOCATION: Site #4 TEST BY: Dave/Jeff
SOURCE: West Solar Turbine PAGE: 1
---------~--------------------~~-----------~---------- -----------------

THE FUEL GAS ANALYSIS:

Component Mole Fraction

rnethane 0.688320
ethane 0.065760
propane 0.002390
isobutane 0.000270
n-butane 0.000770
isopentane 0.001980
n-'-pentane 0.001540
n-hexane 0.000560
n-heptane 0.000070
nitrogen 0.238340
-------------------------------------------------~----
-----
Total 1.000000

OPERATING CONDITIONS (Measured):


Barometric pressure (kPa) 101.100

Gas Stream Temperature Flow @ STP Relative


Humidity
(%)

Ambient Air 26.7 0.0


Fuel 26.7 0.1 0.0
Combustion Air 26.7 N/A 0.0
Flue Gas 285.0 N!A N/A
Radiator Air (In) N/A N/A N/A
Radiator Air (Out) N/A N/A N/A
Crank Case Exhaust N/A

Type of equipment Turbine


Nominal rated power output (kW) 895
Assumed equipment efficiency (%) 12.6
Assumed percent loading (%) 43.5
Turbine Pressure Ratio 17.9
Turbine Fuel Pressure (kPa) 1810
Cost of. the fuel gas ($/GJ) 6.78

STACK GAS ANALYSIS:

·Component Concentration Unit

Oxygen 17.5 Percent


Carbon Monoxide o PPM
Total Combustible (*) o PPM
Unburnt Fuel (calculated) o PPM

223
Nitric Oxide o PPM
Nitrogen Dioxide o PPM
SUlphur Dioxide 0, PPM

(*) co + THC expressed asa CH4 equivalent

224
~----- COMBUSTION ANALYSIS: RESULTS' --~-~-

COMPANY: DATE:
LOCATION: Site #4 TEST BY: Dave/Jeff
SOURCE: West qolar Turbine . PAGE: 2

FUEL GAS CHARACTERISTICS:


Molecular weight (kg/kmol) 20.17
Quality (inlet condition)
1.00000
Gross Heating Value (MJ/m A 3Y 31.5
Net Heating Value (MJ/m A 3) 28.0
Theoretical combustion air requirement (kmol air/kmol fuel) 7.9

MATERIAL BALANCE:

Stream Flow Rate Unit

FUE;;l 8.50 1000 std. mA 3/day


Air 446.82 1000 std. mA 3/day
Stack Gas 455.70 1000 std. mA 3/day

EXCESS AIR:

Actual ('% ) 565.5


Recommended (% ) 360 to 690

ENERGY BALANC~:
Gross input energy (kW) 5628.9
Net input energy (kW) 5334.6

AVOIDABLE ENERGY LOSSES:

% net energy Loss Rate Loss Value


input (kW) ($/year)
---~-----------------~---------------_._--------------
-----------------_.
Recoverable Heat
in Flue Gas (*) 32.0 1709.6 365527
. .
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

UNAVOIDABLE ENERGY LOSSES:

% net energy Loss Rate


input (kW)

Unrecoverable Heat
in Flue Gas 2.4 128.5

(*) The amount of potential recoverable heat was estimated by cooling


the fiue gas to 10 DC above its dew point and no less than the
temperature of 15 DC. The unrecoverable portion is the energy
stillleft in the flue gas at that temperature.

225
------ COMBUSTION ANALYSIS: RESULTS ------
---------~~---------------------------------------~-~------~-----------
COMPANY: DATE:
LOCATION: . Site #4 TEST BY: Dave/Jeff
SOURCE: West Solar Turbine PAGE: 3

EFFICIENCIES:
Apparent Thermal Efficiency (%) 65.5
Carbon Combustion Efficiency (%) 100.0

STACK GAS CHARACTERISTICS:


Molecular weight (kg/kInol) 28 .• 6'6
Dew temperature (oC) 24.3

EMISSION FACTORS FOR VARIOUS COMPONENTS (ng/J) (*):

component Flue Gas

Carbon Dioxide 50417


------~--------------~--------------------------------
-----------------
(*) Based on gross heating value of the fuel at 15°C and 101.325 kPa

226
------ COMBUSTION ANALYSIS: INPUT DATA ----.--

COMPANY: DATE:
LOCATION: Site 14 TEST BY: Dave/Jeff
SOURCE: Inlet Compressor {2nd from N end) PAGE:

THE FUEL GAS ANALYSIS:

Component Mole Fraction


~-~-----------------~------------~---------------------~---
methane 0.688320
ethane 0.065760
propane 0.002390
isobutane 0.000270
h-butane 0.000770
isopentane 0.00i980
n-pep.tane 0.001540
n-hexane 0.000560
n-heptane 0.000070
nitrogen 0.238340

Total 1.000000

OPERATING CONDITIONS (Measured):


Barometric pressure (kPa) 101.100

Gas Stream Temperature Flow @ STP Relative


Humidity
(m"'3/s) (%)

Ambient Air 26.7 0.0


Fuel 26.7 N/A 0.0
Combustion Air 26.7 N/A 0.0
Flue Gas 415.2 N/A N/A
Radiator Air (In) N/A N/A N/A
Radiator Air (Out) N/A N/A N/A
Crank Case Exhaust N/A

Type of equipment Engine_Recip_Normal


Nominal rated power output (kW) 447
Assumed equipment efficiency (%) 30.0
Assumed percent loading (%) 100.0
Cost of the fuel gas ($/GJ) 6.78

STACK GAS ANALYSTS:

Component Concentration Unit

Oxygen . 16.5 Percent


Carbon Monoxide o PPM
Total Combustible (*) o PPM
Unburnt ~uel (calculated) b PPM
Nitric Oxide o PPM
Nitrogen Dioxide o PPM
Sulphur Dioxide o PPM

227
-------------------~--------------------------~------- -----
(*) co + THC expressed as a CH4 equivalent

228
------ COMBUSTION ANALYSIS: RESULTS ------
--------------------------~--~------~-----------~~'------------------~--
COMPANY: DATE:
LOCATION: Site #4 TEST BY: Dave/Jeff
SOURCE: Inlet Compressor (2nd fromN end)PAGE: 2
----------------------~---------------~--------------- -----------------

FUEL GAS CHARACTERISTICS:


Molecular weight (kg/lanol)
Quali ty( inlet condition)
1.00000
Gross Heating Value (MJ/m A 3) 31.5
Net Heating Value (MJ/m A 3) 28.0
Theoretical combustion air requirement (lanol alr/kmol fuel) 7.9

MATERIAL BALANCE:

Stream Flow Rate Unit

Fuel 0.90 1000 std. mA 3/day


Air 36.49 1000 std. mA 3/day
Stack Gas 37.44 1000 ~td. mA 3/day

EXCESS AIR:

Actual (% ). 412.4
Recommended (% ) 2.0 to 12.0

ENERGY BALANCE:
Gross input energy (kW) 337.8
Net input energy (kW) 306.6

AVOIDABLE ENERGY LOSSES:

% net energy Loss Rate Loss Value


input (kW) ($/year)

High Excess Air 54.2 166.2 35525


Recoverable Heat
in Flue Gas (*) 70.2 215.1 45991

UNAVOIDABLE ENERGY LOSSES:


--~------------------~-----~--------------------------~-----------~----
% net energy Loss Rate
input (kW)
--------------------~-------------------------------------------~------

Unrecoverable Heat
in Flue Gas 4.2 13.0

(*) The amount of potential recoverable heat was estimated by cooling


the flue gas to 10°C above its dew point and no less than the
temperature of 15 °c. The unrecoverable portion is the energy
stillleft in the flue gas at that temperature.

229
~----- COMBUSTION ANALYSIS: RESULTS ----~-
----~---------------------------------------------~----------------~---
COMPANY: DATE:
LOCATION: Site #4 TEST BY: Dave/Jeff
SOURCE: Inlet Compressor (2nd from N end) PAGE: 3
.------------------------.~-------~------------~------ -------------------

EFFICIENCIES:
Apparent Thermal Efficiency (%) 25.6
Carbon Combustion Efficiency (%) 100.0

STACK GAS CHARACTERISTICS:


Molecular weight (kg/kmol) 28.61
Dew temperature (oC) 28.6

EMISSION FACTORS FOR VARIOUS COMPONENTS (ng/J) (*):

Component Flue Gas


------------~------------------------------------------------~---------
Carbon Dioxide 50417
------------------------------------------------------
---_._-----------~

(*) Based on gross heating value of the fuel at 15°C and 101.325 kP~

230
~----- COMBUSTION ANALYSIS: INPUT DATA ------
------------------------------------------~--~--------
-----------------

COMPANY: DATE:
LOCATION: Site #S North Plant TEST BY: . Operator
SOURCE: C-23 PAGE: 1
-----------------------------------------------~--------------~--------

THE FUEL GAS ANALYSIS:


----~----------~-----~--~--------~--------------------
-----
Component Mole Fraction

methane 0.975620
ethane 0.004300
propane 0.00020eJ
nitrogen 0.019880

Total 1.000000

OPERATING CONDITIONS (Measured):


Barometric pressure (kPa) 89.300

Gas Stream Temperature Flow @ STP Belative


Humidity
(mI\3/s) (%)

Ambient Air 29.0 0.0


Fuel 29.0 N/A 0.0
Combustion Air 29.0 N/A 0.0
Flue Gas 373.0 N/A N/A
Radiator Air (In) N/A N/A N/A
Radiator Air (Out) N/A N/A N/A
Crank Case Exhaust N/A

Type of equipment Engine_Recip_LowNOx


Nominal rated power output (kW) 895
Assumed equipment efficiency (%) 30.0
Assumed percent loading (%) 100.0
Cost of the fuel gas ($/GJ) 6.78

STACK GAS ANALYSIS:


----------------~-----------~-~------~----------------
-----

Component Concentration Unit

Oxygen 14.3 Percent


Carbon Monoxide 1200 PPM
Total Combustible (*) o PPM
Unburnt Fuel (calculated) o PPM
Nitric Oxide 1122 PPM
Nitrogen Dioxide 56 PPM
Sulphur Dioxide o PPM

231
(*) co + THC expressed as a CH4 equivalent

232
------ COMBUSTION ANALYSIS: RESULTS ------

COMPANY: DATE:
LOCATION: Site #5 Notth Plant TEST BY: Operator
SOURCE: C-23 PAGE: 2
--------------------------------~--------------------- -----------------

FUEL GAS CHARACTERISTICS:


Molecular weight (kg/kInol) 16.35
Quality (inlet condition)
1.00000
Gross Heating Value (MJ/m A 3) 37.3
Net Heating Value (MJ/m A 3) 33.0
Theoretical combustion air requirement (kmol air/kmol fuel) 9.4

MATERIAL BALANCE:

Stream Flow Rate Unit

Fu.el 6.96, 1000 std.m A 3/day


Air 219.46. 1000 std. mA 3/day
Stack Gas 226.56 1000 std. mA 3/day

EXCESS AIR:

Actual (% ) 236.8
Recommended (% 44.0 to 66.0

ENERGY BALANCE:
Gross input energy (kW) 3029.4
Net input energy (kW) 2736.1

AVOIDABLE ENERGY LOSSES:

% net energy Loss Rate Loss Value


input (kW) ($/year)

------
High Excess Air 20.9 571.3 122159
Unburnt Fuel 1.4 37.7 8058
Recoverable Heat
in Flue Gas (* ) 41.7 1139.6 243662

UNAVOIDABLE ENERGY LOSSES:

% net energy Loss Rate


input (kW)

Unrecoverable Heat

233
in Flue Gas 3.6 97.6
----------------~---------~------~-----------~----~--------~-------~---

234
------ COMBUSTION ANALYSIS: RESULTS ------

COMPANY: DATE:
LOCATION: Site #5 North Plant. TEST BY: Operator
SOURCE: C-23 PAGE: 3
--------------------------------~--------------------- -----------------

EFFICIENCIES:
Apparent Thermal Ef.ficiency (%) 53.4
Carbon Combustion Efficiency (%) 96.0

STACK GAS CHARACTERISTICS:


Molecular weight (kg/kmol) 28.45
Dew temperature (oC) 34.2

EMISSION FACTORS FOR VARIOUS COMPONENTS (ng/J) (*):


------------------------------------------------------
~~---~-----------

Component Flue Gas


-----------------------------~-------------------~----
-----------------'

Carbon Monoxide 1241


Carbon Dioxide 47186
Nitric Oxide 1243
Nitrogen Dioxide 95
Total Dxides of Nittogen 1338

(*) Based on gross heating value of th~ fuel at 15°C apd 101.325
kPa

235
------ COMBUSTION ANALYSIS: INPUT DATA ------

COMPANY: DATE:
LOCATION: Site #5 North Plant TEST BY: .Operator
SOURCE: C-24 . PAGE: 1

THE FUEL GAS ANALYSIS:

Component Mole Fraction


--------------------------------~----------------~----
-----
methane 0.975620
ethane ·0.004300
propane 0.000200
nitrogen 0.019880
-~--~------------------~-------------------~----------
-----
Total 1.000000

OPERATING CONDITIONS (Measured):


Barometric pressure (kPa) 89.300

Gas Strec;lm Temperature F.low @ STP Relative


Humidity
(m"3/s)

Ambient Air 37.0 0.0


Fuel 37.0 N/A 0.0
Combustion Air 37.0 N/A 0.0
Flue Gas 381.5 N/A N/A
Radiator Air (In) N/A N/A N/A
Radiator Air (Out) N/A N/A N/A
crank Case Exhaust N/A
---------------------------~-------------------------------~-----------

Type of equipment Engine_Recip_LowNOx


Nominal rated power output (kW) 895
Assumed equipment efficiency (%) 30.0
Assumed percent loading. (%) 100.0
Cost of the fuel gas ($/GJ) 6.78

STACK GAS ANALYSIS:

Component Concentration Unit

Oxygen 13.6 Percent


Carbon Monoxide 1580 PPM
Total Combustible (*) o PPM
Unburnt Fuel (calculated) o PPM
Nitric Oxide 1017 PPM
Nitrogen Dioxide 50 PPM
Sulphur Dioxide o PPM

236
(*) co + THC expressed ~s a CH4 equivalent

237
------ COMBUSTION ANALYSIS: RESULTS -~----
-------------_._----------------------------~---~----- ------------------

COMPANY: DATE:
LOCATION: Site #5 North Plant TEST BY: Operator
SOURCE: C-24 PAGE: 2

FUEL GAS CHARACTERISTICS: \

Molecular weight (kg/kmol) 16.35


Quality (inlet condition) .
1.00000
Gross Heating Value (MJ/m A 3) 37.3
Net .Heating Value (MJ/m A 3) 33.0
Theoretical combustion air requirement (kmolair/kmoi fuel) 9.4

MATERIAL BALANCE:

Stream Flow Rate Unit

Fuel 6.96 1000 std. mA 3/day.


Air 197.39 1000 std. mA 3/day
Stack Gas 204.51 1000 std. mA 3/day

EXCESS AIR:

Actual (% ) 202.9
Recommended (% 44.0 to 66.0

ENERGY BALANCE:
Gross input energy (kW) 3048.8
Net input energy (kW) 2755.5

AVOIDABLE ENERGY LOSSES:

% net energy Loss Rate Loss Value


input (kW) ($/year)

------
High Exc:ess Air 16.7 459.5 98244
Unburnt Fuel 1.6 44.8 9578
Recoverable Heat
in Flue Gas (*) 38.2 1053.4 225230

UNAVOIDABLE ENERGY LOSSES:

% net energy Loss Rate


input (kW)

Unrecoverable Heat

238
in Flue Gas 3.4 93.9
---------------~---------~-----------------------~-------~-------------

. (*) The amount at potential recoverable he~t wa~ estimated by cooling


the flue gas to 10 DC above its dew point and no less than the
temperature of 15 DC. The unrecoverable portion is the energy
still
left in the flue gas at that temperature.

239
------ COMBUSTION ANALYSIS: RESULTS. ------

COMPANY: DATE:
LOCATION: Site #5 North Plant TEST BY: .Operator
SOURCE: C-24 l:'AGE: 3

EFFICIENCIES:,
Apparent Thermal Efficien9Y (%) 56.7
Carbon Combustion Efficiency (%) 95.3

STACK GAS CHARACTERISTICS:


Molecular weight (kg/kmol) 28.40
Dew temperature (oC) 36.1

EMISSION FACTORS FOR VARIOUS COMPONENTS (ng/J) (*):

Component Flue Gas

Carbon Monoxide 1475


Carbon Dioxide 46819
Nitrlc Oxide 1017
Nitrogen Dioxide 77
Total Oxides of Nitrogen 1094

(*.) Based on gross heating value of the fuel at 15°C and 101.325
kPa

240
------ COMBUSTION ANALYSIS: INPUT DATA --~---
-------------------~----------~--~-------------------- -----------------

COMPANY: DATE:
LOCATION: Site #5 North Plant TEST BY: operator
SOURCE: C:-27 PAGE: 1

THE FUEL GAS ANALYSIS:

Component Mole Fraction

methane 0.975620
ethane 0;004300
propane 0.·000200
nitrogen 0.019880

Total 1.000000
-------------------------------------------------~---~
-----

OPERATING CONDITIONS (Measured):


Barometric p~essure (kPa) 89.300

Gas Stream Temperature Flow @ STP Relative


Humidity
(m"'3/s) (%)

Ambient Air 28.0 0.0


Fuel 28.0 N/A 0.0
Combustion Air 28.0 N/A 0.0
Flue Gas 364.0 N/A N/A
Radiator Air (In) N/A N/A N/A
Radiator Air (Out) N/A N/A N/A
Crank Case Exhaust N/A

Type of equipment Engirie_RecipLowNOx


Nominal rated power output (kW) 895
Assumed equipment efficiency (%) 30.0
Ass.umed percent loading (%) 100.0
Cost of the fuel gas ($/GJ) 6.78

STACK GAS ANALYSIS:

Component Concentration Unit

Oxygen 14.9 Percent


Carbon Monoxide 980 PPM
Total Combustible (*) o PPM
Unburnt Fuel (calculated) o PPM
Nitric Oxide 1027 PPM
Nitrogen Dioxide 51 PPM
Sulphur Dioxide· o PPM

241
------~--------~---~----~--~-------------------------- -----
(*) co + THe expressed as a CH4 ~quivalent

242
..,------ COMBUSTION ANALYSIS: RESULTS" ------

COMPANY: DATE:
LOCATION: Site #5 North Plant TEST BY: Operator
SOURCE: C-27 PAGE: 2

FUEL GAS CHARACTERISTICS:


Molecular weight (kg/kmol) 16.35
Quality (inlet condition)
1.00000
Gross Heating Value (MJ/m A 3) 37.3
Net Beatihg Value (MJ/m~3) 33.0
Theoretical combustion air requirement (kmol air/kmol fuel) 9.4

MATERIAL BALANCE:

Stream Flow Rate Unit

Fuel 6.96 1000 std. mA 3/day


Air 241.95 1000 std~ mA 3/day
Stack Gas 249.04 1000 std. mA 3/day

EXCESS AIR:

Actual (% ) 271.3
Recommended (% ) 44.0 to 66".0

ENERGY BALANCE:
Gross input energy (kW) 3030.4
Net input energy (kW) 2737.0

AVOIDABLE ENERGY LOSSES:


---------~---------------------~----------------------
-----------------

% net energy Los'sRate Loss Value


input (kW) ($/year)
---------~---------------------------------------------_._----------~---
------
High Excess Air 24.5 670.1 143281
Unburnt Fuel 1.2 33.8 7234
Recoverable Heat
in Flue Gas (* ) 44.6 1220.8 261024
----------------------------------~-~------.-~--------
------------------

UNAVOIDABLE ENERGY LOSSES:


----------~------------~------------------------------
-----------------

% net energy Loss Rate


input (kW)
------------------------------~--------------------------------------~-

Unrecoverable Heat

243
in Flue Gas 3.7 100.9
----------.---------------------.;.---_._------.~--------
--------------------

(*) The amount of potential recoverable heat was estimated by cooling


the flue gas to 10 DC abo~e its dew point and no less than the
temperature of 15°C. The un'recoverable portion is the energy
still
left in the flue gas at that temperature.

244
-~--~- COMBUSTION ANALYSIS: RESULTS ------
------------------------~---~~-----------------~------
, -----------------
.

COMPANY: DATE:
LOCATION: Site #5 North Plant TEST BY: Op'erator
. SOURCE: C-27 PAGE: 3
--------------------------------~--------------------- -----------------

EFFICIENCIES:
Apparent Thermal Efficiency (%) 50.5
Carbon Combustion Efficiency (%) 96.4

STACK GAS CHARACTERISTICS:


Molecular weight (kg/kInol) 28.49
Dew temperature (oC) 32.5

EMISSION FACTORS FOR VARIOUS COMPONENTS (ng/J) (*):


-----------_._--------------------------------------~------~~-----------

Component Flue Gas


-------------------------------------------------~--------------------~

Carbon Monoxide 1114


Carbon Dioxide 47386
Nitric Oxide 1251
Nitrogen Dioxide 95
Total Oxides of Nitiogen 1346

(*) Based on gross heating value of the fuet at 15°C apd 101.325
kPa

245
------ COMBUSTION ANALYSIS: INPUT DATA ----~-

COMPANY: DATE:
LOCATION: Site #5 North Plant TEST BY: OpE?rator
SOURCE: C-34 PAGE: 1

THE FUEL GAS ANALYSIS:

Component Mole Fraction


-~-----------------~~-----------~--------------~------
-----
methane 0.975620
ethane 0.004300
propane 0.000200
nitrogen 0.019880

Total i.oooooo

OPERATING CONDITIONS (Measured):


Barometric pressure (kPa) 89~300

Gas Stream Temperature Flow @ STP Relative


Humidity

------
Ambient Air 35.0 0.0
Fuel 35.0 N/A 0.0
Combustion Air 35.0 N/A 0.0
Flue Gas 344.1 N/A N/A
Radiator Air (In) N/A N/A N/A
Radiator Air (Out) N/A N/A N/A
Crank Case Exhaust N/A
-----------~----------------------------~------~----~-
-----------------

Type of equipment Engine_Recip_LowNOx


Nominal rated power output (kW) 987
Assumed equipment efficiency (%) 30.0
Assumed percent loading (%) 100.0
Cost of the fuel gas ($/GJ) 6.78

STACK GAS ANALYSIS:

Component Concentration Unit

Oxygen 13.6 Percent


Carbon Monoxide 1620 PPM
Total Combustible (*) o PPM
Unburnt Fuel (calculated) o PPM
Nitric Oxide 1034 PPM
Nitrogen Dioxide 51 PPM
Sulphur Dioxide o PPM

246
(*) co + THC ,expressed as a CH4 equivalent

247
------ COMBUSTION ANALYSIS: RESULTS ------

COMPANY: DATE:
. LOCATION: Site #5 North Plant TEST BY: Operator
SOURCE: C-34 PAGE: 2

FUEL GAS CHARACTERISTICS: I


Moleculql:' weight (kg/Janol) 16.35
Quality (inlet condition)
1.00000
Gros~ Heating Value (MJ/m A 3) 37.3
Net Heating Value (MJ/m A 3) 33.0
Theoretical combustion air requirement (kmol air/Janol fuel) 9 .• 4

MATERIAL BALANCE:

Stream Flow Rate Unit

Fuel 7.67 1000 std. mA 3/day


Air 217.59 1000 std. mA 3/day
Stack Gas 225.46 1000 std. mA 3/day

EXCESS AIR:

Actual (% ). 202.9
Recommended (% ) 44.0 to 66.0

ENERGY BALANCE:
Gross input energy (kW) 3354.7
Net input energy ~kW) 3031.3

AVOIDABLE ENERGY LOSSES:

% net energy Loss Rate Loss Value


input (kW) ($/year)

------
High Excess Air 14.9 452.4 96738
Unburnt Fuel 1.7 50.6 10826
Recoverable Heat
in Flue Gas ( *) 33.9 1027.0 219581

UNAVOIDABLE ENERGY LOSSES:

% net energy Loss Rate


input (kW)

Unrecoverable Heat

248
in Flue Gas 3.4 103.5
-------------------------~--------------------------~-~----------------

. (*) The amount of potential recoverable heat was· estimated by cooling


the flue gas to 10 DC above its dew point and no less thah the
temperature of 15 .DC. The unrecoverable portion is the energy
still
left in the flue gas at that temperature.

249
------ COMBUSTION ANALYSIS: RESULTS ------
--------------~----------~---------------------~------
-----------------

COMPANY: DATE:
LOCATION: Site #5 North Plant TEST BY: Operator
SOURCE: C-34 PAGE: 3

EFFICIENCIES:
Apparent Thermal Efficiency (%) 61.0
Carbon Combustion Efficiency (%) 95.2

STACK GAS CHARACTERISTICS:


Molecular weight (kg/kmol) 28.40
Dew temperature (oC) 36.1

EMISSION FACTORS FOR VARIOUS COMPONENTS (ng/J) (*):

Component Flue Gas

Carbon Monoxide 1512


Carbon Dioxide 46760
Nitric Oxide 1034
Nitrogen Dioxide 78
~otal Oxides of Nitrogen 1112

(*) Based on gross heating value of the fuel at 15°C and 101.325
kPa

250
------ COMBUSTION ANALYSIS: INPUT DATA ------
------------------------~----------------------------- .
----------------- "

COMPANY: DATE:
LOCATION: Site #5 North Plant TEST BY:· Operator
SOURCE: C-37 PAGE: 1
--------------------------------~----_._-------------- ------------------

THE FUEL GAS ANALYSIS:


---------------------------~-----------~---------------~---

Component Mole Fraction

methane 0.975620
ethane 0.004300
propane 0.000200
nitrogen 0.019880

Totai 1.000000

OPERATING CONDITIONS (Measured):


Barometric pressure (kPa) 89.300
---------------------------------~----------------------------------~--

Gas St:r-eam Temperature . Flow @ STP Relative


Humidity
(m"3/s) (%)

Ambient Air 28.0 p.o


Fuei 28.0 N/A 0.0
Combustion Air 28.0 N/A 0.0
Flue Gas "367.6 N/A N/A
Radiator Air (In) N/A N/A N/A
Radiator Air (Out) N/A N/A N/A
Crank Case Exhaust N/A

Type of equipment Engine_Recip_LowNOx


Nominal rated power output (kW) 987
Assumed equipment efficiency (%) 30.0
Assumed percent loading (%) 100.0
Cost of the fuel gas ($/GJ) 6.78

STACK GAS ANALYSIS:

Component Concentration Unit

Oxygen 14.6 Percent


Carbon Monoxide 970 PPM
Total Combustible (*) o PPM
Unburnt Fuel (calculated) o PPM
Nitric Oxide 999 PPM
Nitrogen Dioxide 49 PPM
Sulphur Dioxide o PPM

251
(*) co + THC expressed as a CH4 equivalent

252
------ COMBUSTION ANALYSIS: RESULTS ------

COMPANY: DATE:
LOCATION: Site #5 North Plant TEST BY: 'Operator
SOURCE: C-37. PAGE: .
2
--------------~---------_._--------------------------- ------------------

FUEL GAS CHARACTERISTICS:


Molecular weight (kg/kmol) 16.35
Quality (inlet condition)
1.00000
Gross Heating Value (MJ/m A 3) 37.3
Net Heating Value (Mj/m A 3) 33.0
Theoretical combustion air requirement (kmol air/kmol fuel) 9.4

MATERIAL BALANCE:

Stream Flow Rate Unit

Fuel 7.67 1000 std. mA 3/day


Air 253.81 1000 std. mA 3/day
Stack Gas 261.61 1000 std. mA 3/day

EXCESS AIR:

Actual (% ) 253.3
Recommended (% ) 44.0 to 66.0

ENERGY BALANCE:
Gross input energy (kW) 3338.5
Net .input energy (kW) 3015.2

AVOIPABLE ENERGY LOSSES:

% net energy Loss Rate Loss Value


input (kW) ($/year)
---------------~--------------------~--~--------------._~---------------
------
High Excess Air 22.6 681.4 145694
Unburnt Fuel 1.2 35.2 7522
Recoverable Heat
in Flue Gas (* ) 43.0 1295.3 276962
--....;. - ---- -7- - - ~ -- - - - - -- - - - - - ';"'" - -- - - - - _.:... - -~ --- - - - - - - - - - - - - _._ ...... - - - - - - -- --.---

UNAVOIDABLE ENERGY LOSSES:

% net energy Loss Rate


input (kW)
-~---~------------------------7----------------------- -----------------

Unrecoverable Heat

253
in Flue Gas 3.6 109.4

(*) The amount of potential recoverable heat was estimated by cooling


the flue gas to 10 DC above its dew point and no less than the
temperature of 15 DC. The unrecoverable portion is the energy
still
left in the flue gas at that temperature.

254
--:---- COMBUSTION ANALYSIS: RESULTS ------
----------------------------~~---------------~--------
-----------------

COMPANY: DATE:
LOCATION: Site #5 North Plant TEST BY: Operator
SOURCE: C-37 PAGE: :3
--------------------------------~---------------~----- -----------------

EFFICIENCIES:
Apparent Thermal Efficiency (%) 52.2
Carbon Combustion Efficiency (%) 96.6.

STACK GAS CHARACTERISTICS:


Molecular weight (kg/kmol) .28.47
Dew temperature ( DC) 33.4

EMISSION FACTORS FOR VARIOUS COMPONENTS (ng/J) (*):


------------~---~---------------------------~--------------~------------

Component Flue Gas


------------------------------------------------------
~---~-----------_.

Carbon Monoxide 1051


Carbon Dioxide 47486
Nit+:,ic Oxide 1159
Nitrogen Dioxide 87
Total Oxides of Nitrogen' 1246
------~~------------------------------------------~--~------------~----

(*) Based on gross heating value of the fue~ at 15 DC apd 101.325


kPa

255
------ COMBUSTION ANALYSIS: INPUT DATA ------

COMPANY: DATE:
LOCATION: Site #5 North Plant TEST BY: Operator
SOURCE: C-38 PAGE: 1

THE FUEL GAS ANALYSIS:

Component Mole Fraction


-----------------------------~---------------------~--
-----

methane 0.975620
ethane 0.004300
propane 0 .. 000200
nitrogen 0.019880
--~-----------------~---------------------------------
-----
Total 1.000000

OPERATING CONDITIONS (Measured):


Barometric pre$sure (kPa) 89.300
~-----~-----------------------------------------------
-----------------

Gas Stream Temperature Flow @ STP Relative


Humidity
(m"3/s) (%)
----------------~-----~---~----------~------------~---
-----------------

Ambient Air 28.0 0.0


Fuel 28.0 N/A 0.0
Combustion Air 28.0 N/A 0.0
Flue Gas 328.9 N/A N/f..
Radiator Air (In) N/A N/A N/A
Radiator Air (Out) N/A N/A N/A
Crank Case Exhaust N/A

Type of equipment . Engine_Recip_LowNOx


Nominal rated power output (kW) 990
Assumed equipment efficiency (%) 30.0
Assumed percent loading (%) 100.0
Cost of the fuel gas ($/GJ) 6.78

STACK GAS ANALYSIS:


--------------------------------------------------~------~-
Component Concentration Unit

Oxygen 13.0 Percent


Carbon Monoxide 2160 . PPM
Total Combustible (*) o PPM
Unburnt Fuel (calculated) o PPM
Nitric Oxide 1735 PPM
Nitrogen Dioxide 86 PPM
Sulphur Dioxide o PPM

256
(*) co + THC expre~sed as ~ CH4 equivalerit

257
------ COMBUSTION ANALYSIS: RESULTS ------
------~---~------~------~-------------------------~------------~~------

COMPANY: DATE:
LOCATION: Site #5 North Plant TEST BY: Operator
SOURCE: C-38 PAGE: 2

FUEL GAS CHARACTERISTICS:


Moleclllar weight (kg/Janol) 16.35
Quality (inlet conqition)
1.00000
Gross Heating Value (MJ/m A 3) 37.3
Net Heating Value (MJ/m A 3) 33.0
Theoretical combustion air requirement (Janol qir/Janol fuel) 9~4

MATERIAL BALANCE:
------------------------------------~----------------- -----
Stream Flow Rate Unit

Fuel 7.70 1000 std~ mA 3/day


Air 201.86 1000 std. mA3/day
Stack Gas 209.79 1000 std. mA 3/day

EXCESS AIR:

Actual (~ ) 179.9
Recommended (% ) 44.0 to 66.0

ENERGY BALANCE:
Gross input energy (kW) 3341.2
Net input energy (kW) 3016. '6

AVOIDABLE ENERGY LOSSES:

% net energy Loss Rate Loss Value


input, (kW) ($/year)

------
High Excess Air 12.2 367.1 78486
Unburnt Fuel 2.1 62.8 13432
Recoverable Heat
in Flue Gas (*) 29.9 902.4 192942

UNAVOIDABLE ENERGY LOSSES:

% net energy Loss Rate


input (kW)
--~--------------------------------------------~----------~------------

Unrecoverable Heat

258
in Flue Gas 3.3 100.8

259
------ COMBUSTION ANALYSIS: RESULTS ------
----------------------~-----~-----------------~---------------------~--

'COMPANY: DATE:
LOCATION: Site #5 North Plant TEST BY: Operator
SOURCE: C-38 PAGE: 3
----------.-------------------------------------------------------------
I '

EFFICIENCIES:
Apparent Thermal Efficiency (%) 64.7
C?rbon Combustion Efficiency (%) 94.0

STACK GAS CHARACTERISTICS:


Molecular weight (kg/Janol) 28.36
Dew temperature (oC) 37.5

EMISSION FACTORS FOR VARIOUS COMPONENTS (ng/J) (*):


------------------~----------~----~------_.~-----------------~-------~--

Component Flue Gas

Carbon Monoxide 186'9


Carbon Dioxide 46199
Nitric Oxide 1609
Nitrogen Dioxide 122
Total Oxides of Nitrogen 1731

(*) Based on gross heating value of the fuel at 15°C and 101.325
kPa

260
------ COMBUSTION A~ALYSIS: INPUT DATA -----~
.
-----~------------------~------------------~-----------------------~-~-
-

-COMPANY: DATE:
LOCATION: Site #5 North Plant TEST BY: Operator
.sOURCE: C-39 PAGE: 1

THE FUEL GAS ANALYSIS:

Component Mole Fraction

methane 0.975620
ethane 0.004300
propane 0.000200
nitrogen 0.019880

Total 1.000000

OPERATING CONDITIONS (Measured):_


Barometric pressure (kPa) 89.300
---------------------------------~-----,-----------------------------~--

Gas Stream Temperature Relative


Humidity
(DC) (m"3/s) (%)

Ambient Air 28.0 p.o


Fuel 28.0 N/A 0.0
Combustion Air 28.0 N/A 0.0
Flue Gas 353.2 N/A N/A
Radiator Air (In) N/A N/A N/A
Radiator Air (Out) N/A N/A N/A
Crank Case Exhaust N/A

Type of equipment Engine_Recip~LowNOx


Nominal rated power output (kW) 987
Assumed equipment efficien~y (%) 30.0
Assumed percent loading (%) 100.0
Cost of the fuel gas ($/GJ) 6.78

STACK GAS ANALYSIS:

Component, Concentration Unit

Oxygen 12.5 Percent


Carbon Monoxide 2310 PPM
Total Combustible (*) o PPM
Unburnt Fuel (calculated) o PPM
Nitric Oxide 1485 PPM
Nitrogen Dioxide 74 PPM
Sulphur Dioxide o PPM

261
(*) co + THCexpressed as a CH4 equivalent

262
~----- COMBUSTION ANALYSIS: RESULTS ------

COMPANY: DATE:
LOCATION: Site #5 North Plant TEST BY: Operator
SOURCE: C-39 PAGE: 2
------~-------~------------------------------------------------~-------

FUEL GAS CHARACTERISTICS:


Molecular weight (kg/kmol) 16.35
Quality (inlet condition)
1.00000
Gross Heating Value {MJ/m A 3) 37.3
Net Heating Value (MJ/m A 3) 33.0
Theoreticalcornbustion air requirement, (kmol air /kmol fuel) 9.4

MATERIAL BALANCE:

Stream Flow Rate Unit

Fuel 7.67 1000 std. mA 3/day


Air 188.34 1000 std~ mA 3/day
Stack Gas 196.25 1000 std. mA 3/day

EXCESS AIR:

Actual (% ) 162.2
Recommended (% ) 44.0 to 66.0

ENERGY BALANCE:
Gross input energy (kW) 3326.2
Net input energy (kW) 3002.8

AVOIDABLE ENERGY LOSSES:


----------------------------------------------~---~---
-----------------

% net energy Loss'Rate Loss Value


input (kW) ($/year)

------
High Excess Air 11.1 334.5 71530
Unburnt Fuel 2.1 62.8 13437
Recoverable Heat
in Flue Gas (*) 30.6 918.1 196307

UNAVOIDABLE ENERGY LOSSES:

% net energy Loss Rate


input (kW)
-----~--~--------------------------------------------- ----.-------------

Unrecoverable Heat

263
in Flue Gas 3.3 97.8

(-.I<) The amount of potential recoverable heat was estimated by cooling


the flue gas to lOcC above its dew point and no less than the
temperature of 15 cC. The unrecoverable portion is the energy
still
left in the flue gas at that temperature.

264
--:----- COMBUSTION ANALYSIS: RESULTS ------

COMPANY: DATE:
LOCATION: Site #5 North Plant TEST BY: Operator
SOURCE: C-3.9 PAGE: 3
. ,
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

EFFICIENCIES:
Apparent Thermal Efficiency (%) 64.1
CarbonCornbustion Efficiency (%) 94.0

STACK GAS CHARACTERISTICS:


Molecular weight (kg/kmol) 28.33
Dew temperature ( DC) 38.6

EMISSION FACTORS FOR VARIOUS COMPONENTS (ng/J) (*):


----------------~--~------------~--~------------------
-----------------

Component Flue Gas

Carbon Monoxide 1877


Carbon Dioxide 46187
Nitric Oxide 1293
Nitrogen Dioxide 99
Total Oxides of Nitrogen 1391
--------~-~---------------~-------------------------------~------------

{*) Based on gross heating value of the fue~ at 15°C apd 101.325
kPa

265
------ COMBUSTION ANALYSIS: INPUT DATA ----~-
--------------------------~---------------------------------~----------

COMPANY: DATE:
LOCATION: Site #5 North Plant TEST BY: Operator
SOURCE: C-40 PAGE: 1
--------------~~---------~~~--------------------------------~----------

THE FUEL GAS ANALYSIS:

Component Mole Fraction

methane 0.975620
ethane 0.004300
propane 0.000200
nitrogen 0.019880

Total 1.000000

OPERATING CONDITIONS (Measured):


Barometric pressure (kPa) 89~300

Gas Stream Temperature Flow @ STP ReJ.ative


Humidity
(m"3/s) (%)
--------------------------------~----~---,---~-----~--~------------~---~

Ambient Air 28.0 0.0


Fuel 28.0 N/A 0.0
Combustion Air 28.0 N/A 0.0
Flue Gas 355.7 N/A N/A
Radiator Air (In) N/A' N/A N/A
Radiator Air (Out) N/A N/A N/A
Crank Case Exhaust N/A

Type of equipment Engine_Recip~LowNOx


Nominal rated power output (kW) 987
Assumed equipment efficiency (%) 30.0
Assumed percent loading (%) 100.0
Cost of the fuel gas ($/GJ) 6.78

STACK GAS ANALYSIS:

Component Concentration Unit

Oxygen 14.6 Percent


Carbon Monqxide 970 PPM
Total Combustible (*) o PPM
Unburnt Fuel (calculated) o PPM
Nitric Oxide 999 PPM
Nitrogen Dioxide 49 PPM
Sulphur Dioxide o PPM

266
(*) co + THC expressed as.a CH4 equivalent

267
~---~~ COMBUSTION ANALYSIS: RESULTS ------
--------------------------~-----------------------~---
-----------------

COMPANY: DATE:
LOCATION: Site #5 North Plant TEST BY: Operator
SOURCE: C-40 PAGE: 2
-------------------_~_---_~_-----------------------_~---------_~-------

FUEL GAS CHARACTERISTICS:


Molecular weight (kg/kmol) 16.35
Quality (inlet condition)
1.00000
Gross Heating Value (MJ/m A 3) 37.3
Net Heating Value (MJ/m A 3) 33.0
Theoretical combustion air requirement (kmo~ air/kmol fuel) 9.4

MATERIAL BALANCE:
------------~-------------_~_---------~-.------------- ------

Stream Flow Rate Unit

Fuel 7.67 1000 std. rn A 3/day


Air 253.81 1000 std. mA 3/day
Stack Gas 261.61 1000 ~td~ mA 3/day

EXCESS AIR:

Actual (% ) 2.53.3
Recormnended (% ) 44.0 to 66.0

ENERGY BALANCE:
Gross input energy (kW) 3338.5
Net input energy (kW) 3015.2

AVOIDABLE ENERGY LOSSES:

% net energy Loss .Rate Loss Value


input (kW) ($/year)

------
High Excess Air 21.8 656.8 140428
Unburnt Fuel 1.2 35.2 7522
Recoverable Heat
in Flue Gas (*) . 41.3 1246.2 266457
---~-------------_~_-----------------------------~-~_----------~-------

UNAVQIDABLE ENERGY LOSSES:

% net energy Loss Rate


input (kW)

Unrecoverable Heat

268
in Flue Gas 3.6 109.4
-----,-------------~----------------------~-----------
------------------

269
------ COMBUSTION ANALYSIS: RESULTS -'-----

COMPANY: DATE:
LOCATION: Site #5 North Plant TEST BY: Operator
SOURCE: C-40· PAGE: 3

EFFICIENCIES:
Apparent Thermal Efficiency (%) 53.9
Carbon Combustion Efficiency (%) 96.6

STACK GAS CHARACTERISTICS:


Molecular weight (kg/krnol') 28.47
Dew temperature (oC) 33.4

EMISSION FACTORS FOR VARIOUS COMPONENTS (ng/J) (*):

.Component Flue Gas

Carbon Monoxide 1051


Carbon Dioxide 47486
Nitric Oxide 1159
Nitrogen Dioxide 87
Total Oxides of Nitrogen 1246
, ,
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

(*) Based on gross heating value of the fuel at 15°C and 101.325
kPa

270
-~---- COMBUSTION ANALYSIS: INPUT DATA ------

COMPANY: DATE:
LOCATION:' Site #5 Middle Plant TEST BY: operator
SOURCE: C-12 PAGE: 1
--------------------------------~--~------------------ -----------------

THE FUEL GAS ANALYSIS:

Component Mole Fraction

methane 0.975620
ethane 0.004300
propane 0.000200
nitrogen 0.019880

Total 1.000000

OPERATING CONDITIONS (Measured):


Barometric pressure (kPa) 89.300
---------------------------------~----------------------------------~--

Gas Stream Temperature Flow @ STP Relative


Humidity
(oC) (mI\3/s) (%)

Ambient Air 28.0 p.O


Fuel 28.0 N/A 0.0
Combustion Air 28.0 NiA 0.0
Flue Gas 369.7 N/A N/A
Radiator Air (In) N/A N/A N/A
Radiator Air (Out) N/A N/A N/A
Crank Case Exhaust N/A

Type of equipment Engine_Recip_LowNOx


Nominal rated power output (kW) 1312
Assumed equipment efficiency (%) 30.0
Assumed percent loading (%) 100.0
Cost of the fuel gas ($/GJ) 6.78

STACK GAS ANALYSIS:

Component Concentration unit

Oxygen 14.6 Percent


Carbon Monoxide , 870 PPM
Total Combustible (*) o PPM'
Unburnt Fuel (calculated) o PPM
Nitric Oxide 965 PPM
Nitrogen Dioxide 48 PPM
Sulphur Dioxide o PPM

271
(*) co + THC expressed as q CH4 equivalent

272
COMBUSTION ANALYSIS: REBULTS ------

COMPANY: DATE:
LOCATION: Site" #5 Middle Plant TEST" BY: Operator
SOURCE: C-12 PAGE: 2
-----~-------~~-------------------------~---------~--~-----------------

FUEL GAS CHARACTERISTICS:


Molecular weight (kg'; krnol) 16.35
Quality (inlet condition)
1.00000
Gross Heating Value (MJ/m A 3) 37.3
Net HeatihgValue (MJ/m A 3) 33.0
Theoretical combustion air requirement (krnolair/krnol fuel) 9.4
MATERIAL BALANCE:

Stream Flow Rate Unit

Fuel 10.20 1000 std. mA 3/day


Air 337.77 iooo std, mA 3/day
Stack Gas 348.14 1000 std. mA 3/day
. . . .
------------------------------------------------------------

EXCESS AIR:

Actual (% ) 253.4
Recommended (% ) 44.0 to 66.0

ENERGy BALANCE:
Gross "input energy (kW) 4441.3
Net input energy (kW) 4011.1

AVOIDABLE ENERGY LOSSES:

% net energy Loss"Rate Loss Value


input (kW) ($/year)
---------------~-~---------------~--------------~------~--------------_.
------
High Excess Air 22.8 913.2 195250
Unburnt Fuel 1.0 42.0 8978
Recoverable Heat
in Flue Gas (* ) 43.3 1735.9 371158
--------~-~----------~----~----------------------------,~-----------~---

UNAVOIDABLE ENERGY LOSSES:

% net energy Loss Rate


input (kW)

Unrecoverable Heat

273
in Flue Gas 3.6 145.6

(*) The amount of potential recoverable he,3.t was estimated by cooling


the flue gas to lOoe above its dew point and no less than the
temperature of 15 °e . Th.e unrecoverable portion is the energy
still .
left in the flue gas at that temperature.

274
~----- COMBUSTION ANALYSIS: RESULTS ------

COMPANY: DATE:
LOCATION: Site #5 Middle Plant TEST BY: Operator
SOURCE: C-12 PAGE: 3
~---------------~--------~-------------------------------------~----~--

EFFICIENCIES:
Apparent Thermal Efficiency (%) 52.0
Carbon Combustion Efficiency (%) 97.0

STACK GAS CHARACTERISTICS:


Molecular weight (kg/kmol) 28.47
Dew temperature (oC) 33'.4

EMISSION FACTORS FOR VARIOUS COMPONENTS (ng/J) (*):

Component Flue Gas

Carbon Monoxide 943


Carbon Dioxide 47655
Nitric Oxide 1120
Nitrogen Dioxide 85
Total Oxides of Nitrogen 1206

(*) Based on gross heating value of the fuel at 15°C and 101.325
kPa

275
~----- COMBUSTION ANALYSIS: INPUT DATA -----~
-;-------~------------------------------------~--------------~~--------

COMPANY: DATE:
LOCATJON: Site #5 Middle Plant TEST BY: Operator
SOURCE: C-ll PAGE: 1
---------~-~------------------------------~----------- -----------------'

THE FUEL GAS ANALYSIS;


--------~-~-----------------------~--~----------------
-----
Component Mole Fraction

methane 0.975620
ethane 0.004300
pr.opane 0.000200
nitrogen 0.019880

Total 1.000000

OPERATING CONDITIONS (Measured):


Barometric pressure (kPa) 89.300
-----------~---------------~-------~-------------------------------~---

Gas Stream Temperature Flow @ S'l'P Relative


Humidity
(m/\3/s) (%)

Ambient Air 29.0 0.0


Fuel 29~0 N/A 9. 0
Combustion Air 29.0 N/A 0.0
Flue Gas 371.3 N/A N/A
Radiator Air (In) N/A N/A N/A
Radiator Air (Out) N/A N/A N/A
Crank Case Exhaust N/A

Type of equipment Engine_Recip_LowNOx


Nominal rated power output (kW) 1312
Assumed equipment efficiency (%) 30.0
Assumed percent l.oading (%) 100.0
Cost of the fuel gas ($!GJ) 6.78

STACK GAS ANALYSIS:

Component Concentration Unit

Oxygen 12.5 Percent


Carbon Monoxide .2310 PPM
Total Combustible (*) o PPM
Unburnt Fuel (calculated) o PPM
Nitric Oxide 1485 PPM
Nitrogen Dioxide 74 PPM
Sulphur Dioxide o PPM

276
-~----~-------~------------~--------------------------~~---
(*) co + THC expresse~ as a CH4 equivalent

277
------ COMBUSTION ANALYSIS: RESULTS ------

COMPANY: DATE:
LOCATION: Site #5 Middle Plant TEST BY: Operator
SOURCE: C-11 PAGE: 2
------------~----------------------------------~---------~-------------

FUEL GAS CHARACTERISTICS:


Molecular weight (kg/kmol) 16.35
Quality (inlet condition)
1.00000
Gross Heating Value (MJ/m A3) 37.3
Net Heating Value (MJ/m A3) 33.0
Theoretical combustion air requirement (kmol air/kmol fuel) 9.4

MATERIAL BALANCE:

Stream Flow Rate Unit

Fuel , 10.20 1000 std. mA3/day


Air 250.55 1000 std. mA3/day
Stack Gas 261.07 -1000 std. mA~/day

EXCESS AIR:

Actual (% ) 162.2
Recommended (% ) 44.0 to 66.0

ENERGY BALANCE:
Gross input energy (kW) 4428.7
Net input energy (kW) 3998.5

AVOIDABLE ENERGY LOSSES:

% net energy Loss Rate Loss Value


input '(kW) ($/year)

------
High Excess Air 11.7 469.5 100375
Uhburnt Fuel 2.1 83.6 17875
Recoverable Heat
in Flue Gas (* ) 32.4 1297.0 277309

UNAVOIDABLE ENERGY LOSSES:

% net energy Loss Rate


~nput (kW)

Unrecoverable Heat

278
in Flue Gas 3.3 130.1

(*) The amount of potential recoverable h~at was estimated by coolitig


the £lue ga~ to 10 d C above its dew point and no less th~n the
temperature of 15 cC. The unrecoverable portion is the energy
still .
left in the flue gas at that temperature.

.279
------ COMBUS.TION ANALYSIS: RE·SULTS ------

COMPANY: DATE:
LOCATION: Site #5 Middle Plant TEST BY: Operator
·SOURCE: C-11 PAGE: 3

EFFICIENCIES:
Apparent Thermal Efficiency (%) 62.2
Carbon Combustion Efficiency (%) 94.0

STAcK GAS CHARACTERISTICS:


Molecular weight (kg/kmol) 28.33
pew temperature (oC) 38.6

EMISSION FACTORS FOR VARIOUS COMPONENTS (ng/J) (*):

Component Flue G.as

Carbon Monoxide 1877


Carbon Dioxide 46187
Nitric Oxide 1293
Nitrogen Dioxide 99
Total Oxides of Nitrogen 1391

(*) Based on gross heating value ·of the fuel at 15°C and 101.325
kPa

280
------ COMBUSTION ANALYSIS: INPUT DATA ------

. COMPANY: DATE:
LOCATION: Site #5 Middle Plant TEST BY: Operator
SOURCE: C-IO PAGE: 1
------------~-------------------,~---------------------------------~----

THE FUEL GAS ANALYSIS:


-----------------~-----------------------~----~-~-----
-----
Component Mole Fraction

methane 0.975620
ethane 0.004300
propane 0.000200
nitrogen 0.019880

Total 1.000000

OPERATING CONDITIONS (Measured):


Barofuetric pressure (kPa) 89.300
------------------------------------------------------
--------------~--

Gas Stream Temperature Flow @ STP Relative


Humidity
(m"3/s) (% )

Ambient Air 32.0 p.o


Fuel 32.0 N/A 0.0
Combustion Air 32.0 N/A 0.0
Flue Gas 350.4 N/A N/A
Radiator Air (In) N/A N/A N/A
Radiator Air (Out) N/A N/A N/A
Crank Case Exhaust N/A
------~-----~-_._-------------------~-----------------
------------------

Type of equipment Engine_Recip_LowNOx


Nominal rated power output (kW) 1312
Assumed equipment. efficiency (%) 30.0
Assumed percent loading (%) 100.0
Cost of the fuel gas ($/GJ) 6.78

STACK GAS ANALYSIS:

Component Concentration Unit

Oxygen 1.4 .0 Perceht


Carbon Monoxide 1480 PPM
Total Combustible (*) o PPM
Unburnt Fuel {calculated) o PPM
Nitric Oxide 1458 PPM
N~trogen Dioiide 72 PPM
Sulphur Dioxide o PPM

281
--------------------~--------------~-------~---------- -----
(*) co + THC expressed as a CH4 equivalent

282
-~---- COMBUSTION ANALYSIS: RESULTS ------
------------------------~-----------------------~----------~-----------

COMPANY: DATE:
LOCATION: Site #~~iddle Plant TEST BY: Operator
SOURCE: C-10 PAGE: 2

FUEL GAS CHARACTERISTICS:


Molecular weight (kg/krnol) 16.35
Quality (inlet condition)
1.00000
Gross Heating Value (MJ/m A 3) 37 .. 3
Net Heating Value (MJ/m A 3) 33.0
Theoretical combustion air requirement (krnol air/krnol fuel) 9.4

MATERIAL BALANCE:

Stream Flow Rate Unit

Fuel 10.20 1000 std. mA 3/day


Air 307.90 1000 std. mA 3/day
Stack Gas 318.35 1000 std. mA 3/day
---------~---~-----~-----------------------------~----
-----

EXCESS AIR:

Actual .(% ) 222.2


Recommended (% ) 44.0 to 66.0

ENERGY BALANCE:
Gross input energy (kW) 4454.2
Net input energy (kW) 4024.0

AVOIDABLE ENERGY LOSSES:

% net energy Loss Rate Loss Value


input (kW) ($/year)

------
High Excess Air 17.6 707.7 151310
Unburnt Fuel 1.6 65.3 13965
Recoverable Heat
in Flue Gas (* ) 36.9 1484.9 317500

UNAVOIDABLE ENERGY LOSSES:

% net energy Loss Rate


input (kW)

Unrecoverable Heat

283
"in Flue Gas 3.5 140.9

(*) The amount of potential recoverable heat was estimated by cooling


the flue gas to 10 ~c above its dew point and no less than the
temperature of 15°C. The unrecoverable portion is the. energy
still
left in the flue gas at that temperature.

284
,...----- COMBUSTION ANALYSIS: RESULTS ------

COMPANY: DATE:
LOCATION: Site #5 Middle Plant TEST BY: Operator
SOURCE: C-I0 PAGE: 3

EFFICIENCIES:
Apparent Thermal Efficiency (%) 58.0
Carbon Combustion Efficiency (%) .95.3

STACK GAS CHARACTERISTICS:


Molecular weight (kg/kmol) 28.43
Dew temperature (DC) 35.0

EMISSION FACTORS FOR VARIOUS COMPONENTS (ng!.J) (*):

Component Flue Gas

Carbon Monoxide 1467


Carbon Dioxide 46832
Nitric Oxide 1548
Nitrogen Dioxide 117
Total Oxides of Nitrogen 1665

(*) Based on gross heating v~lue of the fuel at 15 DC and 101.325


kPa

285
------ COMBUSTION ANALYSIS: INPUT DATA ------

COMPANY: DATE:
LOCATION: Site #5 Middle Plant TEST BY: Operator
SOURCE: C-9 PAGE: 1

THE FUEL GAS ANALYSIS:

Component Mole Fraction

methane 0.975620
'ethane 0.004300
propane 0.000200
nitrogen 0.019880

Total 1.000000

OPERATING CONDITIONS (Measured):


Barometric pressure (kPa) 89.300
---------------------~-----------~----------------------~-----~--------

Gas Stream Temperature Flow @ STP Relative


Humidity
(%)

Ambient Air 28.0 0.0


Fuel 28.0 N/A 0.0
Combustion Air 28.0 N/A 0.0
Flue Gas 425.7 N/A .N/A
Radiator Air (In) N/A N/A N/A
Radiator Air (Out) N/A N/A N/A
Crank Case Exhaust N/A

Type of equipment Engine_Recip_LowNOx


Nominal rated power output (kW) 999
Assumed 'equipment efficiency (%) 30.0
Assumed percent loading (%) 100.0
Cost of the fuel gas ($/GJ) 6.78

STACK GAS ANALYSIS:

Component Concentration Unit

Oxygen 13.0 Percent


Carbon Monoxide 2800 PPM
Total Combustible (*) o PPM
Unburnt Fu~l (calculated) o PPM
Nitric Oxide 1804 PPM
Nitrogen Dioxide 90 PPM
Sulphur Dioxide o PPM

286
(*) co + THC expressed as a CH4 equivalent

287
------ COMBUSTlON ANALYSIS: RESULTS ------,

COMPANY: DATE:
LOCATION: Site #5 Middle Plant TEST BY: Operator
SOURCE: C-9 PAGE: 2

FUEL GAS CHARACTERISTICS:


Molecular weight (kg/kmol) 16.35
Quality (inlet condition)
1.00000
Gross Heating Value (MJ/m A 3) 37.3
Net Heating Value (MJ/m A 3) 33.0
Theoretical combustion air requirement (kmol air/kmol fuel) 9.4

MATERIAL BALANCE:
------------~-------------------------------~-----~--- -----

Stream Flow Rate Unit


------~----------------------------~-----------------------
Fuel '7,.77 1000 std. mA 3/day
Air 203.05 1000 std. m~3/day
Stack Gas 211.12 1000 std. mA 3/day

EXCESS AIR:

Actual ,(% ) 179.0


Recommended (% ) 44.0 to 66.0

ENERGY BALANCE:
Gross input energy (kW) 3371.3
Net input energy (kW) 3043.7

AVOIDABLE ENERGY LOSSES:

% net energy Loss Rate Loss Value


input (kW) ($/year)

------
High Excess Air 16.1 491.3 105046
Unburnt Fuel 2.7 81.9 17522
Recoverable Heat
in Flue Gas (* ) 40.6 1235.4 264145

UNAVOIDABLE ENERGY LOSSES:

% net energy Loss Rate


input (kW)
--------------------------------------~-----------------------------~--

Unrecoverable Heat

288
in Flue Gas 3.3 101.6

289
-'------ COMBUSTION ANALYSIS: .RESULTS ------

COMPANY: DArE:
LOCATION: Site #5 Middle Plant TEST BY: Op~rator
SOURCE: C-9 PAGE: 3
---------------------------------------~----------~--- -----------------

EFFICIENCIES:
Apparent Thermal Efficiency (%) 53.'4
Carbon Combustion Efficiency (%) 92.3

STACK GAS CHARACTERISTICS:


Molecular weight (kg/kmol) 28.35
Dew temperature (oC) 37.5

EMISSION FACTORS FOR VARIOUS COMPONENTS (ng/J) (*):

Component Flue Gas


--~.---------------------------------------------------~----------------

Carbon Monoxide 2417


Carbon Dioxide 45339
Nitric Oxide 1668
Nitrogen Dioxide 128
Total Oxides of Nitrogen 1796
------------------------------------~-----------------
-----------------,

(*) Based on gross heating value of the fuel at 15°C and 101.325
kPa

290
COMBUSTION ANALYSIS: INPUT DATA ------

COMP'ANY: DATE:
LOCATION: Site #5 Middle Plant TEST BY: Operator
SOURCE: C-7 PAGE: 1
--------------~----------~-~-------------------------- -----------------

THE FUEL GAS ANALYSIS:

Component ,Mole Fraction

methane 0.975620
ethane 0.004300
propane 0.000200
nitrogen 0.019880
---------~--------------------------~-----------------
-----
Total 1.000000

OPERATING CONDITIONS (Measured):


Barometric pressure (kPa) 89.300

Gas Stream Temperature Flow @ STP Relative


Humidity
(m/\3/s) (%)
------------~------------------------~----------------
-----------------

Ambient Air 29.0 o~o


Fuel 29.0 N/A 0.0
Combustion Air 29.0 N/A 0.0
Flue Gas 365.5 N/A N/A
Radiator Air (In) N/A N/A N/A
Radiator Air (Out) N/A N/A N/A
Crank Case Exhaust N/A

Type of equipment Engine~Recip_LoWNOX


Nominal rated power out.put(kW) 999
Assumed equipment efficiency (%) 30.0
Assumed percent loading (%) 100.0
Cost of the fuel gas ($/GJ) 6.78

STACK GAS ANALYSIS:

Component Concentration Unit

bxygen 14.3 Percent


Carbon Monoxide 1200 PPM
Total Combustible (*) o PPM
Unburnt Fuel (calculated) o PPM
Nitric Oxide 1122 PPM
Nitrogen Dioxide 56 PPM
Sulphur Dioxide o PPM

291
~---------------------------~---------------~--------- -----
(*) co + THe expressed a~ a CH4 equivalent

292
-.:.,----COMBUSTION ANALYSIS: RESULTS ------
-------------------------~-------------------~--------
. .
-----------------

. COMPANY: DATE:
LOCATION: Site #5 Middle Plant TEST BY: Operator
SOURCE: C-7. PAGE: 2

FUEL GAS CHARACTERISTICS:


Molecular weight (kg/kmol) 16.35
Quality (inlet condition)
1.0000Q
Gross Heating Value (Mj/m A 3) 37.3
Net Heating Value (MJ/m A 3) 33.0
Theoreticai combustion air requirement (kffiol air/kmol fuel) 9.4

MATERIAL. BALANCE:

Stream Flow Rate Unit

Fuel 7.77 1000 std. mA 3/day


A;ir 245.06 1000 std. mA 3/d q y
Stack Gas 252.99 1000 std. mA 3/day

EXCESS AIR:

Actual (% ) 236.8
Recommended (% ) 44.0 to 66.0

ENERGY BALANCE:
Gross input energy (kW) 3382.9
Net input energy (kW) 3055.3

AVOIDABLE ENERGY LOSSES:

% net energy Loss Rate Loss Value


input (kW) ($/year)

------
High ExcE?ss Air 20.4 623.5 133323
Unburnt Fuel 1.4 42.1 8999
Recoverable Heat
in Flue Gas (* ) 40.7 1242.3 .265630

UNAVOIDABLE ENERGY LOSSES:

% net energy Loss Rate


input (kW)

Un~ecoverable He~t

293
in Flue Gas 3.6' 109.0

(*) The amount of potential recoverable heat was estimated by cooling


the flue gas to 10°C above its d~w point and no less than the
temperature of 15°C. The 'unrecoverable portion is the energy
still
left in the flue gas at that temperature.

294
~----- COMBUSTION ANALYSIS: RESULTS ------
-----------------------------~-----_._----------------
------------------

COMPANY: DATE:
LOCATION: Site #5 Middle Plant TEST BY: Operator
SOURCE: C-7 PAGE: 3
--------------~------------~-------------------------------~------------

EFFICIENCIES:
Apparent Thermal Efficiency (%) 54.4
Carbon Combustion Efficiency (%) 96.0

STACK GAS CHARACTERISTICS:


Molecular weight (kg/kmol) 28.45
Dew temperature (DC) 34.2

EMISSION FACTORS FOR VARIOUS COMPONENTS (ng/J) (*):

Component Flue Gas

Carbon Monoxide 1241


Carbon Dioxide 47186
Nitric Oxide 1243
Nitrogen Dioxide 95
Total Oxides of Nitrogen 1338

(*) Based on gross heating value pf the fuel at 15 DC and 101.325


kPa

295
------ COMBUSTION ANALYSIS: INPUT DATA ------

COMPANY: DATE:
LOCATION: Site #5 Middle Plant TEST BY: Operator,
SOURCE: C:...g PAGE: 1
-----------~-----------~---~---~---,------------------------~-----------

THE FUEL GAS ANALYSIS:


-------~--~----------------------------------------~--
-----
Comporient Mole Fraction

mE;thane 0.975620
ethane 0.004300
propane 0.000200
nitrogen 0.019880
--~-------------------~-------------------------------
-----

Total 1.000000

OPERATING CONDITIONS (Measured):


Barometric pressure (kPa) 89.300 .
---------------------------------~---------~------------------~----~---

Gas Stream Temperature Flow @ STP Relative


Humidity
(mI\3/s) (% )
--------------------------~------------------------~-- -----------------

Ambient Air 29.0 0.0


Fuel 29.0 , N/A 0.0
Combustion Air 29.0 N/A 0.0
Flue Gas 379.3 N/A N/A
Radiator Air (Ln) N/A N/A N/A
Radiator Air (Out) N/A N/A N/A
Crank Case Exhaust N/A
'\

Type of equipment, Engine_Recip_LowNOx


Nominal rated. power output (kW) 895
Assumed equipment efficiency (%) 30.0
Assumed percent loading (%) 100.0
Cost of the fuel gas ($/GJ) 6'.78

STACK GAS ANALYSIS:

Compon~nt Concentration Unit

Oxygen 12.5 Percent


Carbon Monoxide 2310 PPM
Total Combustible (*) o PPM
Unburnt Fuel (calculated) o PPM
Nitric Oxide 1485 PPM
Nitrogen Dtoxide 74 PPM
Sulphur Dioxide o , PPM

296
---------~-------------------~---~~--------------~---- -----

(*) co + THC expressed as a CH4 equivalent

297
------ COMBUSTION ANALYSIS: RESULTS ------

COMPANY: DATE:
LOCATION: Site #5 Middle Plant TEST BY: Operator
SOURCE: C-8 PAGE: . 2
--------------------~-------~------------------------- -----------------

FUEL GAS CHARACTERISTICS:


Molecular weight (kg/kmol) 16.35
Quality (inlet condition)
1.00000
Gross Heating Value (MJ/m A 3) 37.3
Net Heating Value (MJ/m A 3) 33.0
Theoretical combust'ion air requirement (kmol air/kmol fuel) 9.4

MATERIAL BALANCE:

Stream Flow Rate Unit

Fuel 6.96 1000 std. rn A 3/day


Air 170.83 1000 std. rn A 3/day
Stack Gas 178.00 1000 std. mA 3/day

EXCESS AIR: .

Actual (% ) 162.2
Recommended (% ) 44.0 to 66.0

ENERGY BALANCE:
Gross input energy (kW) 3019.6
Net input energy (kW) 2726.3

AVOIDABLE ENERGY LOSSES:

% net energy Loss.Rate Loss Value


input (kW) ($/year)

------
High Excess Air 12.0 327.8 70089
Unburnt Fuel 2.1 57.0 12188
Recoverable. Heat
in Flue Gas (* ) 33.3 907.0 193926

UNAVOIDABLE ENERGY LOSSES:

% net'energy Loss Rate


input (kW)
--------------------------------------~------------------~-------------

Unrecoverable Heat

298
in Flue Gas 3.3 88.7

299
-.,----- COMBUSTION ANALYSIS: RESULTS ------

COMPANY: DATE:
LOCATION: Site #5 Middle Plant TEST BY: Operator
SOURCE: C-8 PAGE: 3
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
I

EFFICIENCIES:
Apparent Thermal Efficiency (%) 61.4
Carbon Combustion Efficiency (%) 94.0

STACK GAS CHARACTERISTICS:


Molecular weight (kg/kmol) 28.33
Dew temperature (OC) 38.6

EMISSION FACTORS FOR VARIOUS COMPONENTS (ng/J) C*):


I
--------------------------------------------~------~-- -----------------

Component Flue Gas

Carbon Monoxide 1877


. Carbon Dioxide' 46187
Nitric Oxide 1293
Nitrogen Dioxide 99
Total Oxides of Nitrogen 1391

(*) Based on gross heating value of the fuel at 15°C and 101.325
kPa '

300
------ COMBUSTION ANALYSIS: INPUT DATA ------
---------------------------------------~---------~------~---------~----

COMPANY: DATE:
LOCATION: Site #5 Middle Plant TEST BY: Operator
SOURCE: 'C-6 PAGE: 1

THE FUEL GAS ANALYSIS:

Component Mole Fraction

methane 0.975620
ethane 0.004300
propane 0.000200
nitrogen 0.019880

Total 1.000000

OPERATING CONDITIONS (Measured):


Barometric pressure (kPa) 89.300
----------------------------------~-------------------
-----------------

Gas Stream Temperature Flow @ STP Relative


Humidity
(% )

Ambient Air 35.0 9. 0


Fuel 35.0 N/A 0.0
Combustion Air 35.0 N/A 0.0
Flue Gas 373.1 N/A N/A
Radiator Air ( ) N/A N/A N/A
Radiator Air (Out) N/A N/A N/A
Crank Case Exhaust N/A

Type of equipment Engine_Recip_LowNOx


Nominal rated power output (kW) 895
Assumed equipment efficiency (%) 30.0
Assumed percent loading (%) 100.0
Cost of the fuel gas ($/GJ) 6.78

STACK GAS ANALYSIS:

Component Concentration Unit

Oxygen 13.6 Percent


Carbon Monoxide 1620 PPM
Total Combustible (*) o PPM
Unburnt Fuel (calculated) o .. PPM
Nitric Oxide 1034 PPM
Nitrogen Dioxide 1085 PPM
Sulphur Dioxide o PPM

301
(*) co + THC expressed as a CH4 equivalent

302
------ COMBUSTION ANALYSIS: RESULTS ------

COMPANY: DATE:
LOCATION: Site #5 Middle Plant TEST BY: Operator
SOURCE: C-6 PAGE: 2

FUEL GAS CHARACTERISTICS:


Molecular weight (kg/kmol) 16.35
Quality (inlet condition)
1.00'000
Gross Heating Value (MJ/m~3) 37.3
Net Heating Value (MJ/m A 3) 33.0
Theoretical combustion air requirement (kmol air/kmol fuel) 9.4

MATERIAL BALANCE:

Stream Flow Rate Unit


---~~------~------------------------------------------
-----
Fuel 6.96 1000 std. m~3/day
Air 200.06 1000 std~ m~3/day
Stack Gas 207.08 1000 std. m~3/~ay

EXCESS AIR:

Actual (% ) 207.0
Recommended (% ) 44.0 to 66.0

ENERGY BALANCE:
Gross input energy (kW) 3043.6
Net input energy (kW) 2750.3

AVOIDABLE ENERGY LOSSES:

% net energy Loss Rate Loss Value


input (kW) ($/year)

------
High Excess Air 16.9 463.9 99182
Unburnt Fuel 1.7 46.5 9944
Recoverable Heat
in Flue Gas (* ) 37.8 1039.4 222245
---------'-------------------------------------~---~-----~--------------

UNAVOIDABLE ENERGY LOSSES:·

% net energy Loss Rate


input (kW)

Unrecoverable Heat

303
in F~ue Gas 3.4 94.4

(*) The ~mouht of potential recoverable heat was estimated by cooling


the flue gas t6 10 DC above its'dew point and no less than the
temperature of 1~ DC,. The unrecoverable portion is the energy
still
left in the flue gas at that temperature.

."

304
------ COMBUSTION ANALYSIS: RESULTS ------
----------------------------~~------------------------
, " -----------------

COMPANY: DATE:
LOCATION: Site #5 Middle Plant TEST BY: Operator
SOURCE: C-6 PAGE: 3

EFFICIENCIES:
Apparent Thermal Efficiency(%) 57.1
Carbon Cbmbustion Efficiency (%) 95.1

STACK GAS CHARACTERISTICS:


Molecular weight (kg/kmol) 28.42
Dew temperature ( °C) 35.8

EMISSION FACTORS FOR VARIOUS COMPONENTS. (ng/J) (*):'


-~--------~-----~----------------------~-------------------~-----------

Component Flue Gas

Carbon Monoxide 1531


Carbon Dioxide 46730
Nitric Oxide 1047
Nitrogen Dioxide 1685
Total Oxides of Nitrogen 2732

(*) Based on gross heating value of the fuet at 15°C apd 101.325
kPa

305
----~- COMBUSTION ANALYSIS: INPUT DATA ----~-

COMPANY: DATE:
LOCATION: ~it~ #5 Middle Plant TEST BY: Operator
SOURCE: C-5 PAGE: 1

THE FUEL GAS ANALYSIS:

Component Mole Fraction


--------------------------------~~---------------~----
-----
methane 0.975620
ethane 0.004300
propane 0.000200
nitrogen 0.019880

Total 1.000000

OPERATING CONDITIONS (Measured):


Barometric pressure (kPa) 89;300

Gas Stream Temperature Flow @ STP Relative


Humidity
(m"3Is) (%)

Ambient Air 28.0 0.0


Fqel 28.0 N/A 0.0
Combustion Air 28.0 N/A 0.0
Flue Gas 331.3 N/A N/A
Radiator Air (In) N/A N/A N/A
Radiato+ Air (Out) N/A N/A N/A
Crank Case Exhaust N/A
--------------~----------------------------------------~---------------

Type of equipment Engine~Recip_LowNOx


Nominal rated power output (kW) 999
As.sumed equipment efficiency (%) 30.0
Assumed percent loading (%) 100.0
Cost of the fuel gas ($/GJ) 6.78

STACK GAS ANALYSIS:

Component Concentration Unit

Oxygen 14.9 Percent


Carbon Monoxide 980 PPM
Total Combustible (*) o PPM
Unburnt Fuel (calculated) o PPM
Ni tric Oxide . 1027 PPM.
Nitrogen Dioxide 51 PPM
Sulphur Dioxide '0 PPM

306
--------------~------------~------------~---~--------- -----
(*) co + THC expressed as a CH4 equivalent

307
------ COMBUSTION ,ANALYSIS: RESULTS ------

COMPANY: DATE:
LOCATION: Site #5 Middle Plant TEST BY: operator
SOURCE: C-5 PAGE: 2

FUEL GAS CHARACTERISTICS:


Molecular weight (kg/kmol) 16.35
Quality (inlet condition)
1.00000
Gross Heating Value (MJ/m A 3) 37.3
Net Heating Value (MJ/m A 3) 33.0
Theoretical combustion. air requirement (kmol air/kmol fuel) 9.4

MATERIAL BALANCE:

Stream Flow Rate Unit


----------~-------~----------------------------~------
-----
Fuel 7.77 1000 std. mA 3/day
Air 270.18 1000 std. mA 3/day
Stack Gas 278.09 1000 std~ mA 3/day

EXCESS AIR:

Actual (% ) 271.3
Recommended (% ) 44.0 to 66.0

ENERGY BALANCE:
Gross input energy (kW) 3383.9
Net input energy (kW) 3056.4

AVOIDABLE ENERGY LOSSES:

% net energy Loss Rate Loss Value


input (kW) ($/year)

------
High Excess Air 22.0 673.0 143903
Unburnt Fuei 1.2 37.8 8078
Recoverable ~e~t
in Flue Gas (*) 39.9 1219.7 260784

UNAVOIDABLE ENERGY LOSSES:

% net energy Loss Rate


input (kW)

Unrecoverable Heat

308
-in Flue Gas 3.7 112.7

(*) The amount of potential recoverable heat was estimated by cooling


the flue gaS to 10 DC above its dew point and ~o less th~n the
temperature -of 15 DC, The unrecoverable portion is the energy·
still
left in the flue gas at that temperature.

309
------ COMBUSTION ANALYSIS: RESULTS ------

COMPANY: DArE:
LOCATION: Site #5 Middle Plant TEST BY: Operator
SOURCE: C-5 PAGE: 3
----------------------------~-----------------------------------~------

EFFICIENCIES:
Apparent Thermal Efficiency (%) 55 . .2
Carbon Combustion Efficiency (%) 96.'4

STACK GAS CHARACTERISTICS:


Molecular weight (kg/kmol) 28.49
Dew temperature (oC) 32.5

EMISSION FACTORS FOR VARIOUS COMPONENTS (ng/J) (*):

Component Flue Gas

Carbon Monoxide lli4


Carbon Dioxide 47386
Nitric Oxide 1251
Nitrogen Dioxide 95
Tqtal Oxides of Nitrogen 1346

(*) Based on gross heating value of the fuel at 15°C and 101.325
kPa

310
;...----- COMBUSTION ANALYSIS: INPUT DATA --- .... --
.
-------------------------~-------~-----~------------------~------------
.

. COMPANY: DATE:
LOCATION: Site #5 Middle Plant TEST· BY: operator
SOURCE: C-!.3 PAGE: 1
, .
-----------------------------------------------~------ -----------------

THE FUEL GAS ANALYSIS:

Component Mole Fraction

methane 0.975620
ethane 0.004300
propane 0.000200
nitrogen 0.019880
---~~---~--------------------------~----~-------------
-----
Total 1.000000
----------------------------~-------------------------
-----

OPERATING CONDITIONS (Measured):


Barometric pressure (kPa) 89.300
--,---------------------------------------------------
---------------~--

Gas Stream Temperature Flow @ STP Relative


Humidity
(mI\3/s) (%)

Ambient Air 28.0 9. 0


Fuel 28.0 N/A 0.0
Combustion Air 28.0 N/A 0.0
Flue Gas 289.9 N/A N/A
Radiator Air (In) N/A N/A N/A
Radiator Air (Out) N/A N/A N/A
Crank Case Exhaust N/A

Type of equipment Engine_Recip_LowNOx


Nominal rated power output (kW) 999
Assumed equipment efficiency (%) 30.0
Assumed percent loading (%) 100.0
Cost of the fuel gas ($/GJ) 6.78

STACK GAS ANALYSIS:

Component Concentration Unit

Oxygen 14.6 Percent


Carbon Monoxide 970 PPM
Total Combustible (*). o PPM
Unburnt Fuel (calculated) o PPM
Nitric Oxide 999 PPM
Nitrogen Dioxide 49 PPM
Sulphur Dioxide o PPM

311
(*) co + THC expressed as a CH4 equivalent

312
~~---- COMBUSTION ANALYSIS: RESULTS

COMPANY: DATE:
LOCATION: Site #5 Middle Plant TEST BY: Operator
SOURCE: C-3 PAGE: 2

FUEL GAS CHARACTERISTICS:


Molecular weight (kg/krnol) 16.35 .
Quality (inlet condition)
1.00000
Gross Heating Value (MJ/m A 3) 37.3
Net Heatirig ~alue (MJ/m A 3) 33.0
Theoretical combustion air requirement (krnol air/krnol fuel) 9.4

MATERIAL BALANCE:

Stream Flow Rate Unit'

Fuel 7.77 1000 std. mA 3/day


Air 257.07 1000 std~ mA 3/day
S.tack Gas 264.97 1000 std. mA 3/day

EXCESS AIR:

Actual (% ) 253.3
Recommended (% ) 44.0 to 66'.0

ENERGY BALANCE:
Gross input energy (kW) 3381.4
Net input energy (kW) 3053.9

AVOIDABLE ENERGY LOSSES:

% net energy Loss Rate Loss Value


input (kW) ($/year)
-----~----~---------------------------------------------~--------------
------
High Excess Air 17.3 527.8 112848
Unburrit Fuel 1.2 35.6 7618
Recoverable Heat
in Flue Gas (* ) 32.4 988.3 211305

UNAVOIDABLE ENERGY LOSSES:

% net energy Loss Rate


input (kW)

Unrecoverable Heat

313
in Flue Gas 3.6 110.8

(*) The 'amount of potential recoverable heat was estimated by cooling


the ,flue gas td 10°C above its de0 poitit and no less than the
temperature of 15°C. The unrecoverable portion is the energy
still
left in the flue gas at that temperature.

314
------ COMBUSTION ANALYSIS: RESULTS -~----

COMPANY: DATE:
LOCATION: Site #5 Middle Plant TEST BY: Operator
SOURCE: C-3 PAGE: 3

EFFICIENCIES:
Apparent Thermal Efficiency (%) 62.8
Carbon Combustion Efficiency (%) 96.6

STACK GAS CHARACTERISTICS:


Molecular weight (kg/kmol) 28.47
Dew temperature (OC) 33.4

EMISSION FACTORS FOR VARIOUS COMPONENTS (ng/J) (*):


------------------------------~-----------------~------~---~-----------

Component. Flue Gas


--------------------------~--------------------------~-----~-----------

Carbon Monoxide 1051


Carbon Dioxide 47486
Nitric Oxide 1159
Nitrogen Dioxide 87
Total Oxides of Nitrogen 1246

(*) Based on gross heating vaiue of the fuel ~t 15°C and 101.325
kPa

315
------ COMBUSTION ANALYSIS: INPUT DATA------
-~-------~--------------~-------------------~--------~----------~------

. COMPANY: DATE:
LOCATION: Site #5 Middle Plant TEST BY: Operator
SOURCE: C-2 PAGE: 1
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
. .

THE FUEL GAS ANALYSIS:

Component Mole Fraction

methane 0.975620
ethane 0.004300
propane 0.000200
nitrogen 0.019880
---~------------------------------~------------~------
-----

Total 1.. 000000

OPERATING CONDITIONS (Measured):


Barometric pressure (kPa) 89.3DO
------------------------------------------------------
-------------~---

Gas Stream Temperature Flow @ STP Relative


Hiimidity
(% )

Ambient Air 24.0 0.0


Fuel 24.0 N/A 0.0
Combustion Air 24.0 N/A 0.0
Flue Gas 393.2 N/A N/A
Radiator Air (In) N/A N/A N/A
Radiator Air (Out) N/A N/A N/A
Crank Case Exhaust N/A
--------------------------------------~-------------~--------~---------

Type of equipment Engine Recip_LowNOx


Nominal rated power output (kW) 895
Assumed equipment efficiency (%) 30.0
Assumed percent loading (%) 100.0
Cost of the fuel gas ($/GJ) 6·.78

STACK GAS ANALYSIS:

ComponE;!nt Concentration Unit


----------------~------------~------------------------
-----
Oxygen 13.0 Percent
Carbon Monoxide 2210 PPM
Total Combustible (*) o PPM
UnbMrnt Fuel (calculated) o PPM
Nitric Oxide 1472 PPM
Nitrogen Dioxide 73 PPM
Sulphur Dioxide o PPM.

316
---------------------------------------------~------------~
(*) co + THC expressed as a CH4 equivalent

317
------ COMBUSTION ANALy'SIS: RESULTS. ------

COMPANY: DATE:
LOCATION: Site #5 Middle Plant TEST BY: Operator
SOURCE: C-2 PAGE: 2
--------------------~-------------------------~---------------~--------

FUEL GAS CHARACTERISTICS:


Molecular weight (kg/kmol) 16.35
Quality (inlet condition)
1.00000
Gross Heating Value (MJ/m A 3) 37.3
Net Heating Value (MJ/m A 3) 33.0
Theoretical combustion air requirement (kmol air/kmol fuel) 9.4

MATERIAL BALANCE:

Stream Flow Rate Unit

Fuel· 6.96 1000 std. mA 3/day


Air 182.01 1000 std. mA 3/day
Stack Gas 189.19 1000 std~ m 3/dayA

-----------~-----~------------------------------------
-----

EXCESS AIR:

Actual (% ) 179.3
Recommended (% ) 44.0 to 66.0

ENERGY BALANCE:
Gross input energy (kW) 3008.1
Net input energy (kW) 2714.7

AVOIDABLE ENERGY LOSSES:


---~----------~-~-------------------------------------
-----------------

% net energy Loss Rate Loss Value


input (kW) ($/y-ear)

------
High Excess Air 15.0 407.7 87176
Unburnt Fuel 2.1 58.0 12393
Recoverable Heat
in Flue 'Gas (* ) 37.1 1008.0 215519

UNAVOIDABLE ENERGY LOSSES:

% net energy Loss Rate


input (kW)

Unrecoverable .Heat

318
in Flue Gas 3.4 91.0

(*) The amount of p6tential recoverable heat was estimat~d bycoolirig


the flue g~s to 10 DC above its dew pQintand no less ihan the "
temperature of 15 DC. The unrecoverabl"e po:);'tion is the energy
still
left in the flue gas at that temperature.

319
------ COMBUSTION ANALYSIS: RESULTS . . . -----
---------~---~---------------------------------------~
-----------------

COMPANY: DATE:
LOCATION: Site #5 Middle Plant TEST BY: Operator
SOURCE: C-2 PAGE: 3
-----~------------------------------------------------ -----------------

EFFICIENCIES:
Apparent Thermal Efficiency (%) 57.4
Carbon Combustion Efficiency (%) 93.9

STACK GAS CHARACTERISTICS:


.Molecular weight (kg/kmol) 28.36
Dew temperature (oC) 37.5

EMISSION FACTORS FOR VARIOUS COMPONENTS (ng/J) (*):

Component Flue Gas

Carbon Monoxide 1909


Carbon Dioxide 46137
Nitric Oxide 1362
Nitrogen Dioxide 104
Total Ox~des of Nitrogen 1465

(*) Based on gross heating value of the fuel at 15°C and 101.325
kPa

320
-~---~ COMBUSTION ANALYSIS: INPUT DATA ------
-----------------------~~---~~------------------~~--------------~--~---

COMPANY: DATE:
LOCATION: Site #5 Middle Plant TEST BY: operator
SOURCE: C-1 PAGE: i

THE FUEL GAS ANALYSIS:

Component Mole Fraction

methane 0.975620
ethane 0.004300
propane 0.000200
nitrogen 0.019880

Total 1.000000

OPERATING CONDITIONS (Measured):


Baro~etric pressure (kPa) 89.300

Gas Stream Temperature Flow @ STP Relative


Humidity
(OC) (mI\3/s) (%)
-------~----------------~-----------------------------
-----------------

Ambient Air 28.0 p.o


Fuel 28.0 N/A 0.0
Combustion Air 28.0 N/A 0.0
Flue Gas 403.6 N/A N/A
Radiator Air (In)' N/A N/A: N/A
Radiator Air (Out) N/A N/A N/A
Crank Case Exhaust N/A
---------_._------------------------------------~-----
------------------

Type of equipment Engine_Recip_LoWNOx


Nominal rated power output (kW) 895
Assumed equipment efficiency (%) 30.0
Assumed pe~cept loading (%) 100.0
Cost of the fuel gas ($/GJ) 6.78

STACK GAS ANALYSIS:

Component Concentration Unit

Oxygen 13.0 Percent


Carbon Monoxide' 2160 PPM
Total Combustible (*) o PPM
Unburnt Fuel (calculated) o PPM
Nitric Oxide 1735 PPM
Nitrogen Dioxide 86 PPM
Sulphur Dioxide o PPM

321
-~------'-----------------------------------~-~------7 ------
(*) co + THC expressed as a CHA equivalent
-.:...---- COMBUSTION ANALYSIS: RESULTS -..,..,...---
-~~----------------------~----------------------~----- -----------------'

COMPANY: DATE:
LOCATION: Site #5 Middle Plant TEST BY: Operator
SOURCE: C-l PAGE: 2
--------------~-----------~-----~-----------~--~--------~-------~------

FUEL GAS CHARACTERISTICS:


Molecular weight (kg/kmol) 16.35
Quality (inlet condition)
1.00000
Gross Heating Value (MJ/m A 3) 37.3
Net Heating Value (MJ/m A 3) 33.0
Theoretical combustion air requirement (kmol air/kmol fuel) 9.4

MATERIAL BALANCE:

Stream Flow Rate Unit

Fuel 6.96 1000 std. mA 3/day


Air 182.40 1000 std. mA 3/d q y
Stack Gas 189.57 1000 std. mA 3/day

EXCESS AIR:

Actual (% ) 179.9 '


Recommended (% ) 44.0 to 66.0

ENERGY BALANCE:
Gross input energy (kW) 3019.1
Net input energy (kW) 2725.8

AVOIDABLE ENERGY LOSSES:


-----------------~-------------------_._------------------------~---~---

% net ~nergy Loss Rate Loss Value


input (kW) ($/year)

------
High Excess Air 15.3 417.6 89290
Unburnt Fuel 2.1 56.8 12137
Recoverable Heat
in Flue Gas. (* ) 38.2 1041.8 ~22752

UNAVOIDABLE ENERGY LOSSES:


------------------------------------~--~--------------
-----------------

% net energy Loss Rate


input (kW)

Unrecoverable Heat

323
in Flue Gas 3.3

324
------ COMBUSTION ANALYSIS: RESULTS ------
----------~-------------------------------~-----------------------~----

COMPANY: DATE: '


LOCATION: ~ite i5 Middle Plant TEST BY: Operator
SOURCE: C-l PAGE: 3
-~-----------------------~---------------'------------ ------------------

EFFICIENCIES:
Apparent Thermal Efficiency (%) 56.4
Carbon Combustion Efficiency (%) 94.0

STACK GAS CHARACTERISTICS:


Molecular weight (kg/kmol) 2'8.36
Dew temperature (oC) 37.5

EMISSION FACTORS FOR VARIOUS COMPONENTS (ng/J) (*):

Component Flue Gas

Carbon Monoxide 1869


Carbon Dioxide 4619'9
Nitric Oxide 1609
Nitrogen Dioxide 122
Total Oxides of Nitrogen 1731
-------------------------------------~---------~----------------~------

(*) Based on gross heating value ,of the fuel at 15°C and 101.325
kPa

325
------ COMBUSTION ANALYSIS: INPUT DATA ---~--

COMPANY: DATE:
LOCATION: Site #5 Middle Plant TEST BY: operator
SOURCE: C-17 PAGE: 1

THE FUEL GAS ANALYSIS:

Component Mole Fraction

methane 0.975620
ethane 0.004300
propane 0.000200
nitrogen 0.019880
----------------------~-----------~-------------------
-----
Total 1.000000

OPERATING CONDITIONS (Measured):


Barometric pressure (kPa) 89.300

Gas Stream Temperature Flow @ STP Relative


Humi'dity
(mI\3/s) (%)

Ambient Air 2€J.0 0.0


Fuel 26.0 N/A Q.O
Combustion Air 26.0 N/A 0.0
Flue Gas 504.4 N/A N/A
Radiator Air (In) N/A N/A N/A
Radiator Air (Out) N/A . N/A N/A
Crank Case ,Exhaust N/A

Type of equipment Engine~Recip~Normal


Nominal rated power output (kW) 895
Assumed equipment- efficiency (%) 30.0
Assumed percent loading (%) 100.0
Cost of the fuel gas ($/GJ) 6.78

STACK GAS ANALYSIS:

Component Concentration Unit

Oxygen 0.5 Percent


Carbon M9noxide 12390 PPM
Total Combustible (*) o PPM
Unburnt Fuel (calculated) o PPM
Nitric Oxide 2347 PPM
Nitrogen Dioxide 117 PPM
Sulphur Dioxide o PPM

326
(*) co + THC expressed as a CH4 e'quivalent

327
------ COMBUSTION ANALYSIS: INPUT DATA ------

COMPANY: DATE:
LOCATION: Site #5 South Plant TEST BY: Operator
SOURCE: C-30. PAGE: 1

THE FUEL GAS ANALYSIS:

Component Mole Fraction


---------~--~-------------------~---------------------
-----
methane 0.975620
ethane 0.004300
propane 0.000200
nitrogen 0.019880

Total 1.000000

OPERATING CONDITIONS (Measured):


Barometric pressure (kPa) 89.300

Gas Stream Temperature Flow @ STP Relative


Humidity
(m"3/s) (% )

Ambient Air 20.0 0.0


Fuel 20.0 N/A 0.0
Combustion Air 20.0 N/A 0.0
Flue Gas 580.5 N/A N/A
Radiator Air (In) N/A N/A N/A
Radiator Air (Out) N/A N/A N/A
Crank Case Exhaust N/A

Type of equipment En9ine_Recip_LowNOx


Nominal rated power output (kW) 1976
Assumed equipment efficiency (%) 30.0
Assumed percent loading (%) 100. O'
Cost of the fuel gas ($/GJ) 6.78

STACK GAS ANALYSIS:

Component Concentration Unit

Oxygen 13.1 Percent


Carbon Monoxide 130 PPM
Total Combustible (*) o PPM
UnburntFuel (c~lculated) o PPM
Nitric Oxide 286 PPM
Nitrogen Dioxide o PPM

328
Sulphur Dioxide o PPM

(*) co + THC expressed as a cH4 equivalent

329
-~---- COMBUSTION ANALYSIS: RESULTS ------

COMPANY: DATE:
LOCATION: Site #5 South Plant TEST BY: Operator
SOURCE: C-30 .PAGE: 2
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
I •

FUEL GAS CHARACTERISTICS:


Molecular weight (kg/kmol) 16.35
Quality (inlet condition)
1.00000
Gross Heating Value (MJ/m A 3) 37.3
Net Heating Value (MJ/m A 3) 33.0
Theoretical combustion air requirement (kmol air/kmol fuel) 9.4
MATERIAL BALANCE:

Stream Flow Rate Unit

Fuel 8.98 1000 std.· mA 3/day


Air 238.88 1000 std. m~3/day
Stack Gas 247.90 1000 std.m A 3/day

EXCESS AIR:

Actual (% ) 183.9
Recommended (% ) ·44.0 to 66.0

ENERGY BALANCE: . I

Gross input energy (kW) 3870.3


Net input energy (kW) 3491.6

AVOIDABLE ENERGY LOSSES:

% net energy Loss Rate Loss Value


input (kW) ($/yeaT)

------
High Exces.s Air 24.3 849.9 181729
Unburnt Fuel 0.1 4.5 955
Recoverable Heat
in Flue Gas (* ) 59.8 2089.6 446786

UNAVOIDABLE ENERGY LOSSES:

% net energy Loss Rate


input (kW)
-------------------------------------------~-------------------------~-

Unrecoverable Heat

330
in Flue Gas 3.4 118.3
-~----------------------------~--------------------.--
------------------

(*) The amount of potential recoverable heat was estimated by cooling


the flue gas to 10 °e above its dew point and no less tOhan the 0

temperature of 15 °e. The unrecoverable portion is the energy


still
left in the flue gas at that temperature.

0
331
"';--'--- COMBUSTION ANALY.SIS: .RESULTS ------
------~--~--------------~----~------------------------~----------------

COMPANY: DATE:
LOCATION: Site #5 South Plant TEST BY: Operator
SOURCE: C-30 PAGE: 3
------~------------------------~--~.------------------ ------------------

EFFICIENCIES:
Apparent Thermal Efficiency (%). 36.6
Carbon Combustion Efficiency (%) 99.6

STACK GAS CHARACTERISTICS:


Molecular weight (kg/kmol) 28.39
Dew temperature (oC) 37.2

EMISSION FACTORS FOR VARIOUS COMPONENTS (ng/J) (*):


----------~-------~--------------------~--------------
-----------------

Component Flue Gas


-~~~--~-----------------~--------------~--------------
-----------------

.Carbon Monoxide 114


Carbon .Dioxide 48957
Nitric Oxide 269
Total Oxides of Nitrogen 269

(*) Based on gross heating value of the fuel at 15°C and 101.325
kPa

332
------ COMBUSTION ANALYSIS: INPUT DATA ------
--------------------------~---------------------I------------~---------

COMPANY: DATE:
LOCATION: Site #5 South Plant TEST BY: Operator
SOURCE: C-31 PAGE:. 1
, .
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

THE FUEL GAS ANALYSIS:


---~---------------~--------------------------~-------
-----
Component Mole Fraction

methane 0.975620
E::thane 0.004300
propane 0.000200
nitrogen 0.019880

Total 1.000000

OPERATING CONDITIONS (Measured):


Baro~etric.pressure (kPa) 89.30D
--~-----------------------------------------------------------~-------~-
-----'-
Gas Stream Temperature Flow @ STP Relative
Humidity
(% )
-------_._-------------~------------------------------ ------------------

Ambient Air 20.0 p.o


Fuel 20.0 N/A 0.0
Combustion Air 20.0 N/A 0.0
Flue Gas 570.0 N/A N/A
R~diator Air (In) N/A N/A N/A
Radiator Air (Out) N/A N/A N/A
'Crank Case Exhaust N/A

Type of equipment Engine_Recip_LowNOx


Nominal rated power output (kW) 1976
Assumed equipment efficiency (%) 30.0
Assumed percent loading (%) 100.0
Cost of the fuel gas ($/GJ) 6.78

STACK GAS ANALYSIS:

Component Concentration Unit

Oxygen 12.4 Percent


Carbon Monoxide 140 PPM
Total Combustible (*) o PPM
Unburnt Fuel (calculated) o PPM
Nitric Oxide 45 PPM
Nitrogen Dioxide o PPM
Sulphur Dioxide o PPM

333
(*) co + THC expreBsed as a CH4 equivalent

334
------ COMBUSTION ANALYSIS: RESULTS ----~-

COMPANY: DATE:
LOCATION: Site #5 South Plant .TEST BY: Operator
SOURCE: C-3l PAGE: 2
----~---------~~------------------~-----------~------- -----------------

FUEL GAS CHARACTERISTICS:


Molecular weight (kg/krnol) 16.35
Quality (inlet condition)
1.00000
Gross Heating Value (MJ/m~3) 37.3
Net Heating Value (MJ/m~3) 33.0
Theoretical combustion a'irrequirement (kmolair /krnol fuel) 9.4

MATERIAL BALANCE:

Stream Flow Rate Unit


------------------------------------------------~-----~-~--
Fuel 9.83 1000 Btd. m~3/day
Air 238.88 1000 std. m~3/day
Stack Gas 248.75 1000 std. m~3/day

EXCESS AIR:

Actual (% ) 159.5
Recommended (% ) 44.0 to 66.0

ENERGY BALANCE:
Gross input energy (kW) 4232.€5
Net input energy (kW) 3818.2

AVOIDABLE ENERGY LOSSES:

% net energy Loss Rate Loss Value


input (kW) ($/year)

------
High Excess Air 18.9 722.7 154525
Unburnt Fuel 0.1 4.8 1032
Recoverable Heat
in Flue Gas' (*) 53.8 2052.3 438821
-------------------------------~-----------------------~---------------

UNAVOIDABLE ENERGY LOSSES:


----------------------------------------'-------------
-------~----------

% net energy Loss Rate


input (kW)

Unrecoverable Heat

335
in Flue Gas 3.3 124.8
---------~----~---------~-----------------------------
-----------------

(*) The amount of potential recoverable heat was estimated by cooling


the flue gas t6 10 DC above its dew point and no less than the
temperature of 15 DC. The unrecoverable portion is the energy
still .
left in the flue gas at that temperature.

336
--....:--.;.. COMBUSTION ANALYSIS : RESULTS -'--:----

COMPANY: DATE:
LOCATION: Site #5 South Plant TEST' BY: Operator
SOURCE: C-31 PAGE: 3'

EFFICIENCIES:
Apparent Thermal Efficiency (%) 42.9
Carbon Combustion Efficiency (%) 99.6

STACK GAS CHARACTERISTICS:


Molecular weight (kg/krno!) 28.35
Dew temperature (oC) 38.8

EMISSION FACTORS FOR VARIOUS COMPONENTS (ng/J) (*):

Component Flue Gas

Carbon Monoxide 113


Carbon Dioxide 48960
Nitric Oxide 39
Total Oxides of Nitrogen 39

(*) Based on gross heating value of the fuel at 15°C and 101.325
kPa

337
------ COMBUSTION ANALYSIS: INPUT DATA ------
~---------------------------------------~-------------
-----------------

COMPANY: j)ATE:
LOCATION: Site #5 Middle Plant TEST BY: .Operator
SOURCE: C-22 PAGE: 1

THE FUEL GAS ANALYSIS:

Component Mole Fraction

methane 0.975620
ethane 0.004300
propane 0.000200
nitrogen 0.019880

Total 1.000000

OPERATING CONDTTIONS (Measured):


Barometric pr~ssure (kPa) 89~300
~---------------------~-------------------------------
-----------------

Gas Stream Temperature Flow @ STP Relative


Humidity
(mI\3/s)

Ambient Air 20.0 0.0


Fuel 20.0 N/A 0.0
Combustion Air 20.0 N/A 0.0
Flue Gas 588.0 N/A N/A
Radiator Air (In) N/A N/A N/A
Radiator Air (Out) . N/A N/A N/A
Crank Case Exhaust N/A
------------------------------------------~---------~-
-----------------

Type of equipment Engine~Recip_Normal


Nominal rated power output (kW) 895
Assumed equipment efficiency (%) 30.0
Assumed percent loading (%) 100.0
Cost of the fuel gas ($/G~) 6.78

STACK GAS ANALYSIS:


-----------------------~--------------------------~------~-

Component Concentration Unit

Oxygen 0.5 Percent.


Carbon Monoxide 14590 PPM
Total Combustible (*) o PPM
Unburnt Fuel (calculat~d) o PPM
Nitric Oxide 2348 PPM
Nitrogen Dioxide 117 PPM
Sulphur Dioxide o PPM

338
------~--~----~-----------------~--------------------- -----
(*)CO + THC expresse~ as a CH4 equivalent

339
----~- COMBUSTION ANALYSIS: RESULTS ------

COMPANY: DATE:
LOCATION: Site #5 Middle Plant TEST BY: Operator
SOURCE: C-22 PAGE: 2
------------------7-~------~-----~---------------------------------~~--

FUEL GAS CHARACTERISTICS:


Molecular weight (kg/kmol) 16.35
Quality (inlet condition)
1.00000
Gross Heating Value (MJ/m A 3) 37.3
Net Heating Value (MJ/m A 3) 33.0
Theoret~cal combustion air .requirement (kmol air/kmol fuel) 9.4

MATERIAL BALANCE:

Stream Flow Rate Unit

Fuel· 7.83 1000 std. mA 3!day


Air 72.98 1000 std. mA 3/day
Stack Gas 81.42 1000 std~ mA 3/day

EXCESS AIR:

Actual (% ) -0.5
Recommended (% ) 2.0 to 12.0

ENERGY BALANCE:
Gross input energy (kW) 3387.8
Net input energy (kW) 2747.5

AVOIDABLE ENERGY LOSSES:


----------------~-------------------------------------~--~-------------

% net energy Loss Rate Loss Value


input (kW) ($/year)

Unburnt Fuel 6.0 164.7 35212


Recoverable. Heat
in Flue Gas(*) 25.5 701.9 150067

UNAVOIDABLE ENERGY LOSSES:

% net energy Loss Rate


input (kW)

Unrecoverable Heat
in Flue Gas 14.2 390.5

340
~------~---------------------------~-~------------------------~--~-----

(*) The amorint of potential recoverable heat wa~ estimated by cooling


the flue gas tolD DC above its dew point and no lsss than the
temperature of 15 DC. The unrecoverable portion is the energy
still
,left in the flue gas at thc;3.t temperature.

341
------ COMBUSTION ANALYSIS: RESULTS ------

COMPANY: DATE:
LOCATION: Site #5 Middle Plant TEST BY: Operator
SOURCE: C-22 PAGE: 3

EFFICIENCIES:
Apparent Thermal Efficiency (%) 54.2
Carbon Combustion Efficiency (%) 84.6

STACK GAS CHARACTERISTICS:


Molecular weight (kg/kmol) 27.43
Dew temperature (oC) .56.4

EMI$SION FACTORS FOR VARIOUS COMPONENTS (ng/J) (*):

Component Flue Gas

Carbon Monoxide 4816


Carbon Dioxide 41569
Nitric Oxide 830
Nitrogen bioxide 63
Total Oxides of Nitrogen 894

(*) Based on gross heating value of the fuel at 15°C and 101.325
kPa

342
-~---- COMBUSTION ANALYS~S: INPUT DATA ---~--
----------------------~-~-----------------------~----- -----------------

-COMPANY: DATE:
LOCATION: Site #5 Middle Plant TEST BY: Operator
SOURCE: C-17 PAGE: 1

THE FUEL GAS ANALYSIS:


-~-------------~---------------------~-,-------~-~-~--
------
Component Mole Fraction

methane 0.975620
ethane 0.004300
propane 0.000200
nitrogen 0.019880

Total 1.000000

OPERATING CONDITIONS (Measured):


Barometric pressure (kPa) 89.300

Gas Stream Temperature Flow @ STP Relative


Humidity
( °C) (mI\3/s) (%)

Ambient Air 26.0 p.o


Fuel 26.0 N/A 0.0
Combustion Air 26.0 N/A 0.0
Flue Gas 504.4 N/A N/A
Radiator Air (In) N/A N/A N/A
Radiator Air .(Out) N/A N/A N/A
Crank Case Exhaust N/A

Type of equipment Engine_Recip_Normal


Nominal rated power output (kW) 895
Assumed equipment efficiency (%) 30.0
Assumed percent loading (%) 100.0
Cost of the fuel gas ($/GJ) 6.78

STACK GAS ANALYSIS:

. Component Concentration Unit

Oxygen 0.5 Percent


Carbon Monoxide 12390 PPM
Total Combustible (*) o PPM
Unburnt Fuel (calculated) o PPM.
Nitric Oxide 2347 PPM
Nitrogen Dioxide 117 PPM
Sulphur Dioxide o PPM

343
-----------------------------------~-------~------------~--
(*) co + THC expressed as a CH4 equivalent

344
------ COMBUSTION ANALYSIS: RESULTS ------

COMPANY: DATE:
LOCATION: Site ,#5 Middle Plant TEST BY: Operator
SOURCE: C-17 PAGE: 2
-~-------------------~------------------------7------- -----------------

FUE~ GAS CHARACTERISTICS:


Molecular weight (kg/kmol) 16.35
Quality (inlet condition)
1.00000
Gross Heating Value (MJ/m A 3) 37.3
Net Heating Value (MJ/m A 3) 33.0
Theoretical combustion air requirement (kmol air/kmol fuel) 9.4

MATERIAL BALANCE:,

Stream Flow Rate Unit

Fuel 7.79 1000 std. mA 3/day


Air 72.98 1000 std. mA 3/day
Stack Gas 81.29 1000 std. mA 3/day

EXCESS AIR:

Actual (% ) 0.1
Recommended (% ) 2.0 to 12.0

ENERGY BALANCE:
Gross input energy (kW) 3375.4
Net input energy (kW) 2738.9

AVOIDABLE ENERGY LOSSES:

% net energy Loss 'Rate Loss Value


input (kW) ($/year)
------------------------------------------------------
-~------~---~,----

Unburnt Fuel 5.1 139.6 29852


Recoverable Heat
in Flue Gas (*) 21.2 581.8 124400

UNAVOIDABLE ENERGY LOSSES:

% net energy Loss Rate


input (kW)

Unrecoverable Heat
in Flue Gas 14.2 388.3

345
-------~------~------------~-------------------------------~-----------

346
------ COMBUSTION ANALYSIS: RESULTS ------

COMPANY: DATE:
LOCATION: Site #5 Middle Plant TEST BY: Operator
SOURCE: C-17 PAGE: 3

EFFICIENCIES:
Apparent Thermal E~ficiency (%) 59.5
Carbon Combustion Efficiency (%) 86.9

STACK GAS CHARACTERISTICS:


Molecular weight (kg/kmol) 27.47
Dew temperature (oC) 56.3

EMISSION FA!=TORS FOR VARIOUS COMPONENTS (ng/J) (*):

Component Flue Gas

Carbon Monoxide 4107


Carbon Dioxide 42683
Nitric Oxide 833
Nitrogen Dioxide 64
Total Oxides of Nitrogen 897
, ,

--------------------~--------------------------------- -----------------

(*) Based on gross heating vaiu~ ,of the fuel at 15°C and 101.325
kPa

347
------ COMBUSTrON ANALYSIS: INPUT DATA --~---
--------------------------~--------------------------~ -----------------

COMPANY: DA'rE:
LOCATION: Site #5 Middle Plant TEST BY: Op~rator
SOURCE: C-19 PAGE: 1

THE FUEL GAS ANALYSIS:

Component Mole Fraction


----- - ----- -"- - - - - - - - -:- - - - - - - - - - - ----- - --- - - - - -:- - - - - - - - - - - - - --
methane 0.975620
ethane 0.004300
propane 0.000200
nitrogen 0.019880
---~---------------~----~-----~----------------~------
-----

Total 1.000000
~---~--~~-~-----~---~-----------.-------~------------------~

OPERATING CONDITIONS (Measured):


Barometric pressure (kPa) 89.300
----------------------------------,------~-----~-------------~-~--------

Gas Strea,m Temperature Flow @ STP Relative


Humidity
(% )

Ambient Air 27.0 0.0


Fuel 27.0 N/A 0.0
Combustion Air 27.0 N/A 0.0
Flue Gas 584.5 N/A N/A
Radiator Air (In) N/A N/A N/A
Radiator Air (Out) N/A N/A N/A
Crank Case Exhaust N/A

Type of equipment Engine_Recip Normal


Nominal rated power output (kW) 895
Assumed equipment efficiency (%) 30.0
Assumed percent loading (%) 100.0
Cost of the fuel gas ($/GJ) 6'.78

STACK GAS ANALYSIS:

Component Concentration Unit

Oxygen 0.5 Percent


Carbon Monoxide 8680 PPM
Total Combustible (*) o PPM
Unburnt Fuel (calculated) o PPM
Nitric Oxide 2449 PPM
Nitrogen Dioxide 122 PPM
Sulphur Dioxide o PPM

348
-~-------~-----------------------------~-------------~ -----

(*) co + THC expressed as a CH4 eq~ivalent

349
------ COMBUSTION ANALYSIS: RESULTS ------
l-----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMPANY: DATE:
LOCATION: Site #5 Middle Plant TEST BY: Operator
SOURCE: C-19 PAGE: 2

FUEL GAS CHARACTERISTICS:


MoleculaJ; weight (kg/kmol) 16.35
Quality (inlet condition)
1~00000
Gross Heating Value (MJ/m A 3) ·37.3
~et Heating Value (MJ/m A 3) 33.0
,Theoretical combustion air requirement (kmol air/kmol fuel) 9.4

MATERIAL BALANCE:

Stream Flow Rate Unit

Fuel 7.71 1000 std. mA 3/day


Air 72.98 1000 std. mA 3/day
Stack Gas 81.06 1000 std4 mA 3/day

EXCESS AIR:

Actual (% ) 1.1
Recommended (% ) 2.0 to 12.0

ENERGY BALANCE:
Gross input energy (kW) 3342.8
Net input energy (kW) 2712.9

AVOIDABLE ENERGY LOSSES:

% net energy Loss Rate Loss Value


input (kW) ($/year)

Unburnt Fuel 3.6 97.5 20854


Recoverable Heat
in Flue Gas (*) 25.6 695.7 148754

UNAVOIDABLE ENERGY LOSSES:

% net energy Loss Rate


input (kW)

Unrecoverable Heat
in Flue Gas 14.2 384.5

350
351
----.,..- COMBUSTION ANALYSIS: RESULTS ------

COMPANY: DATE:
LOCATION: Site #5 Middle Plant TEST BY: Operator
SOURCE: C-19 PAGE: 3

EFFICIENCIES:
Apparent Thermal Efficiency (%) 56.6
Carbon Combustion E;:fficiency (%) 90.7

STACK GAS CHARACTERISTICS:


Molecular weight (kg/kmol) 27.53
Dew temperature (oC) 56.2

EMISSION FACTORS FOR VARIOUS COMPONENTS (ng/ J)' (*):

. Component Flue Gas

Carbon Monoxide 2899


Carbon Dioxide 44582
Nitric Oxide 876
Nitrogen Dioxide 67
Total Ox{des of Nitrogen 943

(* ) Based on gross heating value of the fuel at 15°C and 101'.325


I I
kPa

352
------ COMBUSTIONANALYS~S:INPUTDATA ------
------~----~-------------~---~-------------------~----
-----------------

. COMPANY: DATE:
LOCATION: Site *5 Middle Plant TEST BY: Operator
SOURCE: Bot Oil Heater PAGE: i
. ,
-------------------------------------------~---------- -----------------

THE FUEL GAS ANALYSIS:


---------------------------------------~---~--~-------~---~
Component Mole Fraction

methane 0.975620
ethane 0.004300
propane 0.000200
nitrogen 0.019880

Total 1.000000
--------------------------~-----~-----~---------------
-----

OPERATING CONDITIONS (Measured):


Barometric pressure (kPa) 89.300
, .
-------------------------------------------------~---- -----------------

Gas Stream Temperature Flow @ STP Relative


Humidity
(OC) (m"3/s) (%)
-------~-------------------------------------------------------~-------

Ambient Air 25.0 p.o


Fuel 25.0 N/A 0.0
Combustion Air 25.0 N/A 0.0
Flue Gas 315.6 N/A N/A
Radiator Air (In) N/A N/A N/A
Radiator Air (Out) N/A N/A N/A
Crank Case Exhaust NjA
------------------_._---------------~-----------------
------------------

Type of equipment Boiler Natural


Nominal rated power output (kW) 791
Assumed equipment efficiency (%) 82.0
Assumed percent loading (%) 100.0
Co~tof the fuel gas ($/GJ) 6.78

STACK GAS ANALYSIS:


--------------~-----------~---------------------------
-----

Component Concentration Unit

Oxygen 7.8 Percent


Carbon Monoxide 10 PPM
Total Combustible (*) o PPM
Unburnt Fuel (calculated) o PPM
Nitric Oxide 63 PPM
Nitrogen Dioxide 3 PPM
Sulphur Dioxide o PPM

353
----~------------------------------~-------~---------- -----
(*1 CO+ THe expressed as a CH4 equivalent

- 354
-"----- COMBUSTION ANALYSIS: RESULTS ------
-~--------------------------------------------------------------------~

COMPANY: DATE:
LOCATION: Site #5 Middle Plant TEST BY: Operator
SOURCE: Hot Oil Heater PAGE: 2

FUEL GAS CHARACTERISTICS:


MoleCular wei<jht . (kg/kmol) 16.35
Quality (inlet condition)
1.0000b .
Gross Heating Value (MJ/m A 3) 37.3
Net Heating Value (MJ/m A 3) 33.0
Theoretical combustion air requirement (kInol air/kInol fuel) 9.4

MATERIAL BALANCE:

. Stream Flow Rate Unit


----------------------------------~---------------------~--
Fuel 1.56 1000 std. mA 3/day
Air 24.22 1000 std. mA 3/day
Stack Gas 25.79 1000 std. mA 3/day

EXCESS AIR:

Actual (% ) 65.5
Recommended (% ) 10 to 15

ENERGY BALANCE:
Gross input energy (kW) 674.0
Net input energy (kW) 608.1

AVOIDABLE ENERGY LOSSES:

% net energy Loss Rate Loss Value


input (kW) ($/year)

------
High Excess Air 5.2 31.8 6803
Unburnt Fuel 0.0 0.0 8
Recoverable Heat
in Flue Gas (*) 17.1 103.8 22190

UNAVOIDABLE ENERGY LOSSES:


-------------------------------------------------~----
------_._---------

% net energy Loss Rate


input (kW)

Unrecoverable Heat

355
in Flue Gas 2.7
-~--------~---------------~---------------------------~-----~----------

356
------ COMBUSTION ANALYSIS: RESULTS ~-----
------~----------------~--~-------~---------------~--- -----------------

COMPANY: DATE:
LOCATION: Site #5 Middle Pla.nt TEST BY: Operator
SOURCE: Hot Oil Heater PAGE: 3
--------------~---~--------~-----------------------~-- -----------------

EFFICIENCIES:
~pparent Thermal'Efficiency (%) 80.2
Carbon Combustion Efficiency (%) 100.0

STACK GAS CHARACTERISTICS:


Molecular weight (kg/kmol) 28.09
Dew temperature (OC) 47.0

EMISSION FACTORS FOR VARIOUS COMPONENTS (ng/J) (*):

Component Flue Gas


------~---~-----------------------------------------~---~--------------

Carbon Monoxide 5
Carbon Dioxide 49128
Nitric Oxide' 35
Nitrogen Dioxide 3
Total Oxides of Nitrogen 38

(*) Based on grOss heating value of the fuel at 15°C and 101.325
kPa

357
------ COMBUSTION.ANALYSIS: INPUT DATA ------
-~-~-----~------~-------------------------------------
-----------------

COMPANY: DATE:
LOCATION: Site #5 Middle Plant TEST BY: Operator
SOURCE: B-Ol PAGE: 1

THE FUEL GAS ANALYSIS:


-------~---~------------------------------------------
-----
Component Mole Fraction

methane 0.975620
ethane 0.004300
propane 0.000200
nitrogen 0.019880

Total 1.000000
--------------------~-------------------------------------~

OPERATING CONDITIONS (Measured):


Barometric pressure (kPa) .89.300

Gas Stream Temperature Flow @ STP Relative


Humidity
(m"3/s) (%)

Ambient Air 25.0 0.0


Fuel 25.0 N/A I . 0.0
Combustion Air 25.0 N/A 0.0
-Flue Gas 260.0 N/A N/A
Radiator Air (In) N/A N/A N/A
Radiator Air (Out) N/A N/A N/A
Crank Case Exhaust N/A

Type of equipment Boiler Natural


Nominal rated power output (kW) 29281
Assumed equipment efficiency (%) 82.0
Assumed percent loading (%) 100.0
Cost of the fuel gas ($/GJ) 6.78

STACK GAS ANALYSIS:

Component Concentration Unit

Oxygen 6.8 Percent


Carbon Monoxide o PPM
Total Combustible (*) o PPM
Unburnt Fuel (calculated) o PPM
Nitric Oxide o PPM
Nitrogen Dioxide o PPM
Sulphur Dioxide o PPM -

358
------~-------~------------~----~-----------------~------~-
(*) co + THC expressed as a CH4 equivalent

I.

359
------ COMBUSTION ANALYSIS: RESULTS ---~--

-----------~--------~-----~--------------------~------------~----------

COMPANY: DATE:
LOCATION: Site #5 Middle Plant TEST BY: . Operator
SOURCE: B..,.Ol. PAGE: 2
-------------~----~-~------------------_._-----------~----~-------------

FUEL GAS CHARACTERISTICS:


Molecular weight . (kg/kmol) 16.35
Quality (inlet condition)
1~00000
Gross Heating Value (MJ/m A 3) 37.3
Net Heating Value (MJ/m A 3) 33.0
Theoretical combustion air requirement (kmol air/kmal fuel) 9.4

MATERIAL BALANCE:
--------~---~--------------------------------~-------- -----
Stream Flow Rate Unit
------------------------------~---------------------------~
Fuel 62.82 1000 std. mA 3/day
Air 897.12 1000 std. mA 3/day
Stack Gas 960.09 1000 std~ mA 3/day

EXCESS AIR:

Actual (% ) 52.4
Recommended (% ) 10 to 15

ENERGY BALANCE:
Gross input energy (kW) 27227.9
Net input energy (kW) 24578.9

AVOIDABLE ENERGY LOSSES:

% net energy Loss Rate Loss Value


input (kW) ($/year)
-------------~---------------------------------------------------------

High Excess Air 3.1 763.1 163154


Recoverable. Heat
in Flue Gas (*) 12.2 2999.6 641351

UNAVOIDABLE ENERGY LOSSES:

% net energy Loss Rate


input (kW)

Unrecoverable Heat
in Flue Gas 2.6 630.6

360
(*) The amount of potential recoverable heat was estimated by cooling
the flue gas to .10 °e above its dew point and no less than the
temperature of 15 °e. The unrecoverable portion is the .energy
still
left in the flue gas at that temperature.

361
--'----- COMBUSTION ANALYSIS: RESULTS'------
-----~-------~-~-~------~----~-------~------------~------------~-------

COMPANY: DATE:
LOCATION: S{te #5 Middle piant TEST BY: Operator
SOURCE: B-01 PAGE: 3
----------------~------~----~----~--~---~--------~-------~------~-~----

EFFICIENCIES:
Apparent Thermal Ef;ficiency (%) 85.2
Carbon Combustion Efficiency (%,) 100.0

STACK GAS CHARACTERISTICS:


Molecular weight (kg/kInol) 28.03
Dew temperature (oC) 48.5

EMISSION FACTORS FOR VARIOUS COMPONENTS (ng/J) (*):

Component Flue Gas

Carbon Dioxide , 49136

(*) Based on gross heating value 6f the fuel at 15°C and 101.325
kPa

362
..,..----- COMBUSTION ANALYSIS: INPUT DATA -..,..----

COMPANY: DATE:
LOCATION: Site #5 Middle Plant TEST BY: Operator
SOURCE: B-02 PAGE: 1

THE FUEL GAS ANALYSIS:

Component Mole Fraction


-----~._----------------~----~-----------~-----~------
------
methane 0.975620
ethane 0.004300
propane 0.000200
nitrogen 0.019880
-----------------------------------------------------------
I

Total 1.000000 /
-----------------------------------------------------------
\

OPERATING CONDITIONS (Measured):


Barometric pressure (kPa) 89.300

Gas Stream Temperature Flow @ STP Relative


Humidity
(m"'3/s) (%)
----------------------~-------------------------------
-----------------

Ambient Air 25.0 0.0


Fuel 25.0 N/A 0.0
Combustion Air 25.0 N/A 0.0
Flue Gas 260.0 N/A N/A
Radiator Air (In) N/A N/A N/A
Radiator Air (Out) N/A N/A N/A
Crank Case Exhaust N/A

Type of equipment Boiler Natural


Nominal rated power output (kW) 29281
Assumed equipment efficiency (%) 82.0
Assumed percent loading (%) 100.0
Cost of the fuel gas ($/GJ) 6.78

STACK GAS ANALYSIS:

Component Concentration Unit


-------------------------------~-----------~----------
-----

Oxygen 4.5 Percent


Carbon Monoxide o PPM
T'otal Combustible (*) o PPM
Unburnt Fuel (calculated) o PPM
Nitric Oxide o PPM
Nitrogen Dioxide o PPM
Sulphur Dioxide' o PPM

363
---------------~----~~-~---~------------------------------~
(*) co + THC expressed as ~ CH4 equivalent

364
'-~---- COMBUSTION ANALYSIS : RESULTS ------
-~--~--~---------~~------~~--~------------------------
-----------------

COMPANY: DATE:
LOCATION: Site #5 Middle Plant TEST BY: Operator
SOURCE: B-02 PAGE: 2
---------------~----------------~--------------------- -----------------

FUEL GAS CHARACTERISTICS:


Molecular weight (kg/kmol) 16.35
Quality (inl~t condition)
1.00000
Gross Heating Value (MJ/m A 3) 37~3
Net Heating Value (MJ/m A 3) 33.0
Theoretical combustion air requirement (kmol air/kmol fuel) 9~4

MATERIAL BALANCE:
------------~--------------------------~----~--~---~-- -----
Stream Flow Rate Unit
Fuel 73.65 1000 std. mA 3/day
Air 897.12 1000 std~ mA 3/day
Stack Gas 970.95 1000 std. mA 3/day

EXCESS AIR:

Actual (% ) 30.0
Recommended (% ) 10 to 15

ENERGY BALANCE:
Gross input energy (kW) 31877.4
Net input energy (kW) 28771.7

AVOIDABLE ENERGY LOSSES:

% net energy Loss Rate Loss Value


input (kW) ($/year)

High Excess Air 1.2 358.9 76746


Recoverable Heat
in Flue Gas (*) 10.5 3012.2 644046
-~-~~----------------~--------------------------------
-----------------

UNAVOIDABLE ENERGY LOSSES:

% net energy Loss Rate


input (kW)

Unrecoverable Heat
in Flue Gas 2.4 685.9

365
366

You might also like