Clearstone II Appendix III
Clearstone II Appendix III
Clearstone II Appendix III
The compiled combustion data were input into a database to facilitate thecalculation of the·
required parameters.. Measured ftiel and ex~aust gas compositions were used to determine the air-
to-fuel and exhaust,.to-fuel ratios. Species mole balances and the following simple combustion
relation were used:
A carbon mole balance was used to determine b, a nitrogen balance to determine a and a
hydrogen balance to determine d. These coefficients were then used to determine the flow rates of
the unknown streams from the known flow.
Combustion efnciency is defined as the total enthalpy contained in the reactants minus the total
enthalpy contained in the products divided by the energy content of the fuel. This inay be written
as follows:
mFUEL ·LHV .
m is the molar flow rate of the stream (Le., fuel, air, or flue gas) (kmole/h),
hi is the heat of formation of the stream (MJ/kmole), and
LHV is·the lower heating value of the fuel gas stream (MJ/kmole)
For ideal operation, combustion efficiencies calculated with this equation are expected to be in
the range of95 to 98 percent.
While combustion efficiency is useful in demonstrating how much. of the energy in the fu~l is
converted to heat, it does not provide a complete description of how effectively th~ equipment is
utilizing this energy. An· energy balance on a typical reciprocating engine yields the following
(based on manufacturers'heat load data):
..
• Turbocharger After Cooler
Exhaust
1 to 6 %
20 to 35 %
The heat loads forjacket water, oil cooler,turbocharger after cooler and radiation are typically
determined by design or safe operatIng conditions. Heat lost to exhaust is a function of
combustion efficiency and the quantity of combustion air that is required for efficient operation.
Useful work is whatever is left over after all losses nave. been .accol-mted. Since heat losses to
jacket water, oil cooler, turbocharger after cooler and radiation are typically fixed by design, the
amount of'heat lost up the stack is a good indication of whether or not the unit is being operated
in an efficient manner.
134
The situation is similar, although less complicated, for heaters/boilers and gas turbin~ engines.
For heaters and boilers:
Stack heat losses have been calculated using a simplified heat balance. The equation used is:
. Stack Losses
FractIOn of Heat Lost = - - - - -
.Heat Input
where
The costs associated with the improper operation of combustion units are made up of two
components: the value of any unburned fuel in the exhaust gas and the incremental fuel
associated with operatingat excessive air-to,;,fuel ratios. The former is determined by calculating
the heating value of the unburned or partially burned components of the exhaust gas and
assigning a value per GJofenergy equal to that of natural gas.
The cost associated with too much excess air is determined by comparing the measured air-to;'fuel
ratio with typical manufacturers' values. The loss is then calculated by determining the amount of
heat required to heat the excess air from ambient temperature to the exhaust stack temperature.
The optimum air-to-fuel ratio varies significantly for reciprocating engines according to make and
model of unit. Accordingly, specific manufacturers' values were used wherever possible. In the
absence of manufactures 'data,. average values for the types of units tested Were used. For heaters
and boilers, 15 percent excess air was assumed to be sufficient for proper operation.
135
------ COMBUSTION ANALYSIS: INPUT DATA ------
. COMPANY: DATE:
LOCATION: Site # 3 TEST BY: Operator
SOURCE: CM-13 PAGE: 1
methane 0.9.60040
ethane 0.018300
propane 0.000950
isoputane 0.000020
n-butane 0.000040
n-heptane 0.000010
nitrogen 0.020460
carbon dioxide 0.000200
Total 1.000020
136
Carbon Monoxide 158 PPM
Total Combustible (*) o PPM
Unburnt Fuel (calculated) o PPM
. Nitric: Oxide 4687 PPM
~itrogen Dioxide 321 . PPM
Sulphur Dioxide
_________________
~ ~ L
o PPM _
137
------ COMBUSTION ANALYSIS: RESULTS. ------
------------------------------~--------------------------~-------------
COMPANY: DATE:
LOCATION: Site # 3 TEST BY: Operator
SOURCE: CM-13 PAGE: 2
MATERIAL BALANCE:
EXCESS AIR:
Actual (% ) 37.0
Recommended (% ) 44.0 to 66.0
ENERGY BALANCE:
Gross input energy (kW) 2912.6
Net input energy (kW) 2376.1
Unrecoverable Heat
in Flue Gas 14.1 335.6
138
--------------------_._------------~-~--------------~- ------------------
139
~-----COMBUSTION A~ALYSIS: RESULTS ------
-~-------~------------------------------------~------~-----~-~------~--
COMPANY: DATE:
LOCATION: Site # 3 TEST BY: Operator
SOURCE: CM-13 PAGE: 3
-----------------------------------------~--------~-------------~------
EFFICIENCIES:
Apparent Thermal Efficiency (%) 57.5
Carbon Combustion Efficiency (%) 99.8
Carbon Monoxide 69
Carbon Dioxide 49230
Nitric Oxide 2205
Nitrogen Dioxide 232
Total Oxide~ of Nitrogen 2436
(*) Based on gross heating value of the fuel at 15°C and 101.325
kPa
140
------ COMBUSTION ANALYSIS: INPUT DATA -------
--~---------~---------------------------~--~-----~-------~------------~
Total 1.000020
141
Unburnt Fuel (calculated) o PPM
Nitric Oxide ·2592 PPM
Nitrogen Dioxide 149 PPM
Sulphur Dioxide o PPM
142
-~---- COMBUSTION ANALYSIS: RESULTS ------
MATERIAL BALANCE:
EXCESS AIR:
·Actual (% ) 101.3
Recommended (% ) 44.0 to 66.0
./
ENERGY BALANCE:
Gross input energy (kW) 1968.2
Net input energy (kW) 1777.5
------
High Excess Air 6.0 10·6.3 22720
Unburnt Fuel 0.1 2.3 497
Recoverable Heat
in Flue Gas (* ) 35.6 632.0 .135125
Unrecoverable Heat
143
in Flue'Gas 3.0
144
.,..----- COMBUSTION ANALYSIS: RESULTS - .... ----
~-----------------------------~--~---------------~----
-----------------
EFfICIENCIES:
Apparent Thermal Efficiency(%) 61.3
Carbon Combustion Efficiency (%) 99.6
(*) Based on gross heating value ,of the fuel at 1-5 °c and 101.325
kPa
145
------ COMBUSTION ANALYSIS: .INPUT DATA ------
--------~._---------------------------------~~--------------~-~--------~
methane 0.960040
ethane 0.018300
propane 0.0.00950
isobutane 0.000020
n-butane 0.000040
n-heptane 0.000010
nitrogen 0.020460
carbon dioxide 0.000200
--~--------------------~-----~-~----------------------
-----
Total 1.000020
146
Unburnt Fuel (calculated) o PPM
Nitric Oxide 2775 PPM
Nitrogen Dioxide 20 PPM
Sulphur Dioxide o PPM
-----------~--------------------~--------------------- -----
(~) CO + THC expressed as a CH4 equivalent
147
------ COMBUSTION ANALYSIS: ·RESULTS ------
~~----~~-~-------------~~----~--------~-----------------------_._------~
MATERIAL BALANCE:
EXCESS AIR:
Actual (% ) 1.5
Recorrirnended (% ) 2.0 to 12.0
ENERGY BALANCE:
Gross input energy (kW) 1794.5
Net input energy (kW) 1620.0
Unrecoverable He~t
in Flue Gas 2.2 35.6
148
(*) The amount of potential recoverable heat·was estimated by cooling
the flue gas to 10 DC above its dew point arid no less than the
D
temperature of lS C. The l1nrecoverable portion is the energy
still
left in· the flue gas at that temperature.
149
------ COMBUSTION ANALYSIS: RESULTS ------
EFFICIENCIES:
Apparent Thermal Efficiency (%) 79.3
Carbon Combustion Efficiency (%) 98.9
(*) Based on gross heating value of the fuel at 15°C and 101.325
kPa
150
~~~~-- COMBUSTION ANALYSIS: INPUT DATA ------
methane 0.960040
ethane 0.018300
propane 0.000950
isobutane 0.000020
n-butane 0.000040
n-heptane 0.000010
nitrogen 0.020460
carbon dioxide 0.000200
Total 1.000020
-----~--------------------.------~----------~---------
------------------
151
Unburnt Fuel (calculated) o PPM
Ni·tric Oxide 2355 PPM
Nitrogen Dioxide 8 PPM
Sulphur Dioxide o PPM
------------~~-------------------~----------~--------- -----
.( *) CO + THC expres$ed as a CH4 equivalent
152
-~---- COMBUSTION ANALYSIS: RESULTS ------
------------------~------~---~----~-------------------
-----------------
MATERIAL BALANCE:
EXCESS AIR:
Actual (% ) 0.8
Recommended (% ) 2.0 to 12.0
ENERGY BALANCE:
Gross lnput energy (kW) 3057.9
Net input energy (kW) 2760.5
Unrecoverable Heat
in Flue Gas 2.2 ·60.4
153
---~------~------------~---------~---------------------~--~------------
154
-'----- COMBUSTION ANALYSIS: RESULTS ------
EFFICIENCIES:
Apparent Thermal Efficiency (%) 79.9
Carbon Combustion Efficiency (%) 98.7
155
------ COMBUSTION ANALYSIS: INPUT DATA ------
~---------------------------~------------------------------------~-----
methane 0.960040
ethane 0.018300
propane 0.000950
isobutane 0.000020
n...,.butane 0.000040
n-heptane 0.000010
nitrogen 0.020460
carbon dioxide 0.000200
Total 1.000020
~------------------~--------------~------------------~
-----
156
Unburnt Fuel (calculated) o PPM
Nitric Oxide 2823 PPM
Nitrogen Dioxide 9 PPM
Sulphur Dioxide o PPM
-------------------'-------------~------------~------- ------
157
------ COMBUSTION ANALYSIS: RESULTS ------
MATERIAL BALANCE:
EXCESS AIR:
.Actual (% ) 0.4
Recommended (% ) . 2.0 to 12.0
ENERGY BALANCE:
Gross input energy (kW) 3065.6
Net input energy (kW) 2490.7
Unrecoverable Heat
in Flue Gas 14.2 352.9
158
(*) The amount of potential .recoverable heat was estimated by cooling
the flue gas to 10 DC abov~ its dew point and no less than the
temperature of 15 DC. The unrecoverable portion is tpe energy
still
left in the flue gas at that temperature.
159
~----- COMBUSTION ANALYSIS: RESULTS ------
-------------------------------~-----------~--------------~---------~--
EFFICIENCIES:
Apparent Thermal Efficiency (%) 60.1
Carbon Combustion Efficiency (%) 92.2
(*) Based on gross heating value of the fuel ~t15 °c and 101.325
kPa
160
------ COMBUSTION ANALYSIS: INPUT DATA ------
-----I--------------------------~-------------~--------------------~---
methane 0.960040
ethane 0.018300
propane 0.000950
isobutane 0.000020
n-butane 0;000040
n-heptane 0.000010
nitrogen 0.020460
carbon dioxide 0.000200
Total 1.000020
161
Unburnt Fu~l (c~lculated) o . PPM
Nitric Oxide 2800 PPM
Nitrogen Dioxide 11 PPM
Sulphur Dioxide o PPM
. -----~----------~--~~----~-------~-------------------- -----
(*) CO + T~C expressed as a CH4 equivalent
162
------ COMBUSTION ANALYSIS: RESULTS ------
-----------------~-----~------~-'-~--------------------~-------------~--
MATERIAL BALANCE:
EXCESS AIR:
Actual (% ) 1.8
Recommended (% ) 2.0 to 12.0
ENERGY BALANCE:
Gross input energy (kW) 3301.0
Net input energy (kW) 2979.5
'Unrecoverable Heat
in Flue Gas 2.2 65.6
163
-~--~------~---.-~----------~------------------------- ------------------
164
-~---- COMBUSTION ANALYSIS: RESULTS ------
,
~--~---------------------------------------~----------
-----------------
.
EFFICIENCIES:
Apparent Thermal Efficiency (%) 81.3
Carbon Combustion Efficiency (%) 99.8
Carbon Monoxide 75
Carbon Dioxide 49221 .
Nitric Oxide 1003
Nitrogen Dioxide 6
Total Oxides of Nitrogen 1009
(*) Based on gross heating value of the fue+ at 15°C apd 101.325
kPa
165
------ COMBUSfION ANALYSIS: INPUT DATA ----~-
methane 0.960040
ethane 0.018300
propane 0.000950
isobutane 0.000020
n-blitane 0.000040
n-heptane 0.000010
nitrogen 0.020460
carbon dioxide 0.000200
Total 1.000020
166
Unburnt Fuel (c~lculated) PPM
Nitric Oxide °2994 PPM
Nitrogen Dioxide 14 PPM
Sulphur Dioxide 0, 12PM
------------------------_~_------------------_~~_----- -----
(*) CO + THC expressed as a CH4 e~uivalent
167
------ COMBUSTION. ANALYSIS: RESULTS ------
MATERIAL BALANCE:
EXCESS AIR:
Actual (% ) 0.6
Recommended (% ) 2.0 to 12.0
ENERGY BALANCE:
Gross input energy (kW) 3339.0
Net input energy (kW) 3013.8
Unrecoverabie Heat
in Flue Gas 2.2 66.0
168
------------~~---------------------------~----~--------------~---------
169
COMBUSTION ANALYSIS: RESULTS------
-------~------------------~--------7--------------------------------~--
EFFICIENCIES:
Apparent Thermal Efficiency "( %) 80.9
Carbon Combustion Kfficiency (%) 97.1
(*) Based on gross heating value of the fuel at 15°C and 101.325
kPa
170
------ COMBUSTION ANALYSIS: INPUT DATA ------
-~-----------------~--~--------------~------------~------~---~---------
" ,
---------------------------~---------~---------------- -----
methane 0.960040
ethane 0.018300
'propane 0.000950
isobutane 0.000020
n-butane 0.000040
n-heptane 0.000010
nitrogen 0.020460
carbon dioxide 0.000200
Total 1.000020
---------------------------------~--------------------
-----
171
Unburnt Fuel (calculated) o PPM
Nitric Oxide 254 PPM
Nitrogen Dioxide 62 PPM
Sulphur Dioxide
. .
o P'PM
----~--~----------~---------~--------------------~-~-- -----
172
-'----- COMBUSTION ANALYSIS: RESULTS ------
--------------------------------------------------~---
-------"----------
MATERIAL BALANCE:
---~-----------------~-----------------~--------~----- -----.
Stream Flow Rate Unit
EXCESS AIR:
Actual (% ) 115.3
Recommended (% ) 44.0 to 66.0
ENERGY BALANCE.:
Gross input energy (kW) 1934.0
Net input energy (kW) 1746.3
Unrecoverable Heat
173
in Flue Gas 3.1 54.7
174
\
EFFICIENCIES:
Apparent Thermal Efficiency (%) 63.3
Carbon CornbustionEfficiency (%) 99.7
Carbon Monoxide 79
Carbon Dioxide 49214
Nitric Oxide 183
Nitrogen Dioxide 68
Total Oxides of Nitrogen 25-1
(*) Based on gross heating value of the fue~ at 15°C apd 101.325
kPa
175
------ COMBUSTION ANALYSIS: INPUT DATA,----~-
methane 0.960040
ethane 0.018300
propane 0.000950
isobutane 0.00'0020
n-butane 0.00004,0
n-heptane 0.000010
nitrogen 0.020460
carbon dioxide 0.000200
Total 1.000020
176
UnburntFuel (calculated) o PPM
Nitric Oxide 1925 PPM
Nitrogen Dioxide 184 PPM
Sulphur Dioxide o PPM
177
----:--- COMBUSTION ANALYSIS: RESULTS ------
-----------------------------------~-~----------------
-----------------
MATERIAL BALANCE:
EXCESS AIR:
Actual (% ) 72.4
Recommended (% ) 44.0 to 66.0
ENERGY BALANCE.:
Gross input energy (kW) 2408.9
Net input energy (kW) 2174.5
------
High Exces.s Air 1.0 21.3 4559
Unburnt Fuel 0.1 2.0 426
Recoverable Heat
in Flue Gas (* ) 27.2 590.6 126276
----_._--------------------------------~------~-------
------------------
Unrecoverable Heat
178
in·Flue Gas 2.8 61.7
179
COMBUSTION ANALYSIS: RESULTS ------
------------------------~-------------~---------------
---------,--------
EFFICIENCIES:
Apparent Thermal Efficiency (%) 69 ..9
Carbon Combustion Efficiency (%) 99.7
Carbon Monoxide 82
Carbon Dioxide 49210
Nitric Oxide 1123
Nitrogen Dioxide 165
Totil Oxid~s of Nitrogen 1288
180
-----'-COMBUSTION ANALYSIS: INPUT DATA ------
methane 0.960040
ethane 0.018300
propane 0.000950
isobutane 0.000020
n-butane 0.000040
n-heptane 0.000010
nitrogen 0.020460
carbon dioxide 0.000200
-----------~------~-----------------~------------~----
-----
Total 1.000020
181
Unburnt Fuel (calculated) o PPM
·Ni tric Oxide 2423 PPM
Nitrogen Dioxide 15 PPM
'Sulphur Dioxide o PPM
182
-~---- COMBUSTION ANALYSIS: RESULTS ------
MATERIAL BALANCE:
EXCESS AIR:
Actual (% ) 0.7
Recommended (% ) 2.0 to 12.0
ENERGY BALANCE:
Gross input energy (kW) 4478.8
Net input energy (kW) 3638.9
Unrecoverable Heat
in Flue Gas 14.2 515.8
183
(*) The amount of potential rec9verable heat was'estim~ted by cooling
the flue gas to 10°C above its dew point and no less than the
temperature of 15 °C .. The unrecoverable portion is the energy
still
left in the flue gas at that temperature.
184
------ COMBUSTION ANALYSIS: RESULTS ------
EFFICIENCIES:
Apparent Thermal Efficiency (%) 60.7
Carbon Combustion Efficiency (%) 95.9
(*) Based on" gross heating value ~f the fue~ at 15 °Capd 101.325
kPa
185
~----- COMBUSTION ANALYSIS: INPUT DATA ------
me'thane 0.960040
ethane 0.018300
propane o. ,000950
isobutane 0.000020
n-butane 0.000040
n-heptane 0.000010
nitrogen 0.020460
carbon dioxide . 0.000200
---------------~-----~-------~------------------------
-----
Total 1.000020
186
Unburnt Fuel (calculated) o PPM
Nitric Oxide 2516 PPM
Nitrogen Dioxide 20 PPM
SUlphur Dioxide o PPM
187
------ COMBUSTION ANALYSIS: RESULTS------
MATERIAL BALANCE:
EXCESS AIR:
Actual (% ) 1.3 (.
Recommended (% ) 2.0 to 12.0
ENERGY BALANCE:
Gross input energy (kW) 4439.8
Net input ene~gy (kW) 3604.9
Unrecoverable Heat
in Flue Gas 14.2
188
(*) The' amount of potential recoverable heat waS estimated by cooling
the flue gas to 10°C above its dew point and no less than the
temperature of 15 °e. The unrecoverable portion is the energy
still
left in the flue gas at that temperature.
189
----"-- COMBUSTION ANALYSIS: RESULTS ------
EFFICIENCIES:.
Apparent Th~rmal Efficiency (%) 61.4
Carbon Combustion Efficiency (%) 98.1
190
COMBUSTION ANALYSIS: INPUT DATA ------
Total 1.000020
-----------------~--------~-----~~--------------------
-----
191
Unburnt Fuel (calculated) o PPM
Nitric Oxide 2467 PPM
Nitrogen Dioxide 17 PPM
Sulphur Dioxide o PPM
------------------~---------------------------~------- -----
(*) CO + THC expressed as a CH4 equivalent
192
.,..----- COMBUSTION ANALYSIS: RESULTS ---.---
-----~-----~--------------------------------------~---
-----------------
MATERIAL BALANCE:
EXCESS AIR:
Actual (% ) 1.2
Recommended (% ) 2.0 to 12.'0
ENERGY BALANCE:
Gross input energy (kW) 3309.7
Net input energy' (kW) 2986.4
Unrecoverable Heat
in Flue Gas 2.2 65.8
193
(*) The amount of potential recoverable heat was' estimated by cooling
the flue gas to 10 DC above its dew point and no less than the
temperature of'15 DC. The unre~overableportion is .the energy
still
left in the flue gas at that temperature.
194
.,..----- COMBUSTION ANALYSIS: RESULTS -"'-----
EFFICIENCIES:
Apparent Thermal Efficiency (%) 77.4
Carbon Combustion Efficiency (%) 97.8
(*) Based on gross heating value ,of the" fuel at 15°C and 101.325
kPa
195
-:----- COMBUSTION ANALYSIS: INPUT DATA
methane 0.960040
ethane 0.018300
propane 0.000950
isobutane 0.000020
n-butane 0.000040
ri-heptane 0.000010
nitrogen 0.020460
carbon dioxide 0.000200
Total 1.000020
196
Unburnt Fuel (calculated) o PPM
Nitric Oxide . , 2526 PPM
Nitrogen Dioxide 15 PPM
Sulphur Dioxide o PPM
~---------~-----~-----------~--------~------------~--- -----
(*) CO + THC expressed as a CH4 equivalent
197
----~- COMBUSTION ANALYSIS: RESULTS ------
-~------~~--------------------------------------------
-----------------
MATERIAL BALANCE:
EXCESS AIR:
Actual (% ) -1.2
Recommended (% ) 2.0 to 12.0
ENERGY BALANCE:
Gross input energy (kW) 2275.7
Net input energy (kW) 1847.5
Unrecoverable Heat
in Flue Gas 14.2 262.7
198
(*) The amount of potential recoverable heat was estimated by cooling
the flue gas to lO DC above its dew point and no less than the
temperature of 15 DC. The unrecoverable portion is the energy
still
left in the flue gas at that temperature.
199
------ COMBUSTION ANALYSIS: RESULTS ------
EFFICIENCIES:
Apparent Thermal Efficiency (%) 60.8
Carbon, Combustion Efficiency (%) 90.4
(*) Based on gross h~~ting value of the fuel at 15°C and 101.325
kPa
200
-~---- COMBUSTION ANALYSIS: INPUT DATA ------
methane 0.960040
ethane 0.018300
propane 0.000950
isobutane 0.000020
n-butane 0.000040
n-heptane 0.000010
nitrogen 0.020460
carbon dioxide 0.000200
Total 1.000020
\
Gas Stream Temperature Flow @ STP Relative
Humidity
( °C) (%)
201
Unburnt Fuel (calculated) o PPM
Nitric Oxide 2050 PPM
Nitrogen Dioxide 21 PPM
Sulphur Dioxide o PPM
---------------------~-----------------------------~-- -----
(*) CO + THC expressed as a CH4 equivalent
202
------COMBUSTION ANALYSIS : RESULTS ---'---
MATERIAL BALANCE:
EXCESS AIR:
Actual (% ) -0.0
Recommended (% ) 2.0 to 12.0
ENERGY BALANCE:
Gross input energy (kW) 2248.8
Net input energy (kW) 1825.8
Unrecoverable Heat
in Flue Gas 14.2 259.6
203
(*) The amount of potential recoverable heat was estimated by cooling
the flue gas to 10°C above its dew point and no less than the
temperature of 15°C. The unrecoverable portion is the energy
still
left in the flue gas at that temperature.
204
~-----COMBUSTION ANALYSIS: RESULTS ------
--------------------------~-----------------------~----------------~---
EFFICIENCIES:
Apparent Thermal Efficiency (%) 59.9
Carbon Combustion Efficiency (%) 91.4
205
------ COMBUSTI,ON ANALYSIS: INPUT DATA 7""- .... - - -
methane 0.960040
ethane 0.018300
propane 0.000950
isobutane 0.000020
n';"butane 0.000040
n-heptane 0.000010
nitrogen 0.020460
carbon dioxide 0.000200
Total 1.000020
206
Unburnt Fuel (calculated) o PPM
Nitric Oxide ' 2026 PPM
Nitrogen Diox~de 22 PPM
Slilphur Dioxide o PPM
-----------~------------~---~---------------------~--- -----
(*) CO+ THC expressed as a CH4 equivalent
207
------ COMBUSTION ANALYSIS: RESULTS ------
MATERIAL BALANCE:
EXCESS AIR:
Actual (% ) 0.8
Recommended (% ) 2.0 to 12.0
ENERGY BALANCE:
Gross input energy (kW) 1052.8
Net input energy (kW) 950.0
Unrecoverable Heat
in Flue Gas 2.2 20.9
208
(*) The amount of potential reco~era6le heat was estimatedb~ cboling
the flue gas to 10 DC above its dew point and no less than the
temperature of 15 DC. The unrecoverable portion is the energy
still
left in the fiue gas at that temperature.
.... ----- COMBUSTION ANALYSIS: RESULTS ...:-----
~--------~--------------~-----------------------------
-----------------
EFFICIENCIES:
Apparent Thermal Efficiency (%) 75.6
Carbon Combustion Efficiency (%) 92.4
(*) Based on gross heating value of the fuel at 15°C and 101.325
kPa
210
------ COMBUSTION ANALYSIS: INPUT DATA ----~~
COMPANY: DATE:
LOCATION: Site #4 TEST BY: Dave/Jeff
SOURCE: North Injection Compressor PAGE: 1
methane 0.688320
ethane 0.065760
propane 0.002390
isobutane 0.000270
n-butane 0.000770
isopentane 0.001980
n-pentane 0.001540
n-hexane 0.000560
n-heptane 0.000070
nitrogen 0.238340
'J:'otal 1.000000
211
Sulphur Dioxide o PPM
212
------COMBUSTION ANALYSIS: RESULTS ------
COMPANY: DATE:
LOCATION: Site #4 TEST BY: Dave/Jeff
SOURCE: North Injection Compressor PAGE: 2
--- --~- ---'- -.- - - ------ - --- - --..;..... --- -- - - -- - - -;,.".,. -- ---- -- --- - - -- -- - --- -- -- - ---
MATERIAL BALANCE:
----------------------~--------------~-----~----~--~-- -----
Stream Flow Rate Unit
-~--------..;.....-----~----~-------------------------~------
-----
Fuel 6.37 1000 std. mA 3/day
Air 152.06 1000 std. mA 3/day
Stack Gas 158.67 1000 std. m 3/dayA
EXCESS AIR:
Actual (% ) 202.1
Recommended (% ) 2.0 to 12.0
ENERGY BALANCE:
Gross input energy (kW) 2331.1
Net input energy (kW) 2146.1
Unrecoverable Heat
in Flue Gas 3.2 69.1
213
------ COMBUSTION ANALYSIS: RESULTS. ------
COMPANY: DATE:
LOCATION: Site #4 TEST BY: Dave/Jeff
SOURCE: North Injection Compressor PAGE: 3
EFFICIENCIES:
Apparent Thermal Efficiency (%) 56.0
Carbon Combustion Efficiency (%) 83.8
(*) Based on gross heating value of the fuel at 15°C and 101.325 kPa
214
------ COMBUSTION ANALYSIS: INPUT DATA ------
COMPANY: DATE:
LOCATION: Site #4 TEST ~Y: Dave/Jeff
.SOURCE: Injection Compressor #1 . PAGE: 1
--------------------~-----------------~--------------- -----------------
methane· 0.688320
ethane 0.065760
propane 0.002390
isobutane 0.000270
n-butarie 0.000770
isopentane 0.001980
n-pentane 0.001540
n-hexane 0.000560
n-heptane 0.000070
nitrogen 0.238340
Total 1.000000
OPEHATINGCONDITIONS (Measured):
Barometric pressure (kPa) 101.100
215
(*) co + THC expressed as a CH4 equivalent
216
------ COMBUSTION ANALYSIS: RESULTS ------
-------------------------~--~--------------------~------------------~--
COMPANY: DATE:
LOCATION: Site #4 TEST BY: Dave/Jeff
SOURCE: . Inj ection Compressor #1 PAGE: 2
MATERIAL BALANCE:
EXCESS AIR:
Actual (% ) 295.9
Recommended (% ) 2.0 to 12.0
ENERGY BALANCE:
Gross input energy (kW) 1898.7
Net input energy (kW) 1607.5
217
----~- COMBUSTION ANALYSIS: RESULTS -~----
COMPANY: DATE:
LOCATION: Site #4 TEST ~Y: Dave/Jeff
SOURCE: Injection Compressor #1 PAGE: 3
----------------------------------------~~---~--------~-~--------~-----
EFFICIENCIES:
Apparent Thermal Efficiency (%) 77.5
Carbon Combustion Efficiency (%) 100.0
(*) Based on .gross heating value of the fuel at 15°C and 101.325 kPa
218
"'-~---- COMBUSTION ANALYSIS: INPUT DATA ------
------------------------_._----------------------~----
-----------------
"
COMPANY: DATE:
,LOCATION: Site #4 TEST BY: Dave/Jeff
SOURCE: East Solar Turbine PAGE: 1
methane 0.688320
ethane 0.065760
propane 0.002390
isobutane 0.000270
n-butane 0.000770
isopentane 0.001980
n-pentane 0.001540
p-hexane 0.000560
n-heptane 0.000070
nitrogen 0.238340
Total 1.000000
219
Nitric Oxide o PPM
Nitrogen Dioxide o PPM
Sulphur Dioxide o PPM
--------------~---~------------------~-~---------~---- -----
(*) CO + THC expressed as a CH4 equivalent
220
------ COMBUSTION ANALYSIS: RESULTS ~----~
COMPANY: DATE:
LOCATION: Site #4 TEST BY: Dave/Jeff
SOURCE: East Solar Turbine . PAGE: 2
MATERIAL BALANCE:
EXCESS AIR:
Actual (% .) 408.6
Recommended (% ) 360 to 690
ENERGY BALANCE:
Gross input energy (kW) 5027.0
Net input energy (kW) 4732.8
Recoverable Heat
in Flue. Gas * )
I (
.,
27.2 1287.1 275193
------------------------------------------------------
-~---------------
Unrecoverable Heat
in Flue'Gas 2.6 122.0
221
------ COMBUSTION ANALYSIS: RESULTS --~---
COMPANY: DATE:
LOCATION: Site #4 TEST BY: Dave/Jeff
SOURCE: E~st Solar Turpine PAGE: 3
---~------------------------~-------------------~-~--- --,---------------
EFFICIENCIES:
Apparent Thermal Efficiency (%) 70.2
Carbon Combustion Efficiency (%) 100.0
(*) Based on gross heating value of the fuel at 15°C and 101.325 kPa
222
------ COMBUSTION ANALYSIS: INPUT DATA ------
------------------------~-----------------------~-----
-----------------
COMPANY:· DATE:
LOCATION: Site #4 TEST BY: Dave/Jeff
SOURCE: West Solar Turbine PAGE: 1
---------~--------------------~~-----------~---------- -----------------
rnethane 0.688320
ethane 0.065760
propane 0.002390
isobutane 0.000270
n-butane 0.000770
isopentane 0.001980
n-'-pentane 0.001540
n-hexane 0.000560
n-heptane 0.000070
nitrogen 0.238340
-------------------------------------------------~----
-----
Total 1.000000
223
Nitric Oxide o PPM
Nitrogen Dioxide o PPM
SUlphur Dioxide 0, PPM
224
~----- COMBUSTION ANALYSIS: RESULTS' --~-~-
COMPANY: DATE:
LOCATION: Site #4 TEST BY: Dave/Jeff
SOURCE: West qolar Turbine . PAGE: 2
MATERIAL BALANCE:
EXCESS AIR:
ENERGY BALANC~:
Gross input energy (kW) 5628.9
Net input energy (kW) 5334.6
Unrecoverable Heat
in Flue Gas 2.4 128.5
225
------ COMBUSTION ANALYSIS: RESULTS ------
---------~~---------------------------------------~-~------~-----------
COMPANY: DATE:
LOCATION: . Site #4 TEST BY: Dave/Jeff
SOURCE: West Solar Turbine PAGE: 3
EFFICIENCIES:
Apparent Thermal Efficiency (%) 65.5
Carbon Combustion Efficiency (%) 100.0
226
------ COMBUSTION ANALYSIS: INPUT DATA ----.--
COMPANY: DATE:
LOCATION: Site 14 TEST BY: Dave/Jeff
SOURCE: Inlet Compressor {2nd from N end) PAGE:
Total 1.000000
227
-------------------~--------------------------~------- -----
(*) co + THC expressed as a CH4 equivalent
228
------ COMBUSTION ANALYSIS: RESULTS ------
--------------------------~--~------~-----------~~'------------------~--
COMPANY: DATE:
LOCATION: Site #4 TEST BY: Dave/Jeff
SOURCE: Inlet Compressor (2nd fromN end)PAGE: 2
----------------------~---------------~--------------- -----------------
MATERIAL BALANCE:
EXCESS AIR:
Actual (% ). 412.4
Recommended (% ) 2.0 to 12.0
ENERGY BALANCE:
Gross input energy (kW) 337.8
Net input energy (kW) 306.6
Unrecoverable Heat
in Flue Gas 4.2 13.0
229
~----- COMBUSTION ANALYSIS: RESULTS ----~-
----~---------------------------------------------~----------------~---
COMPANY: DATE:
LOCATION: Site #4 TEST BY: Dave/Jeff
SOURCE: Inlet Compressor (2nd from N end) PAGE: 3
.------------------------.~-------~------------~------ -------------------
EFFICIENCIES:
Apparent Thermal Efficiency (%) 25.6
Carbon Combustion Efficiency (%) 100.0
(*) Based on gross heating value of the fuel at 15°C and 101.325 kP~
230
~----- COMBUSTION ANALYSIS: INPUT DATA ------
------------------------------------------~--~--------
-----------------
COMPANY: DATE:
LOCATION: Site #S North Plant TEST BY: . Operator
SOURCE: C-23 PAGE: 1
-----------------------------------------------~--------------~--------
methane 0.975620
ethane 0.004300
propane 0.00020eJ
nitrogen 0.019880
Total 1.000000
231
(*) co + THC expressed as a CH4 equivalent
232
------ COMBUSTION ANALYSIS: RESULTS ------
COMPANY: DATE:
LOCATION: Site #5 Notth Plant TEST BY: Operator
SOURCE: C-23 PAGE: 2
--------------------------------~--------------------- -----------------
MATERIAL BALANCE:
EXCESS AIR:
Actual (% ) 236.8
Recommended (% 44.0 to 66.0
ENERGY BALANCE:
Gross input energy (kW) 3029.4
Net input energy (kW) 2736.1
------
High Excess Air 20.9 571.3 122159
Unburnt Fuel 1.4 37.7 8058
Recoverable Heat
in Flue Gas (* ) 41.7 1139.6 243662
Unrecoverable Heat
233
in Flue Gas 3.6 97.6
----------------~---------~------~-----------~----~--------~-------~---
234
------ COMBUSTION ANALYSIS: RESULTS ------
COMPANY: DATE:
LOCATION: Site #5 North Plant. TEST BY: Operator
SOURCE: C-23 PAGE: 3
--------------------------------~--------------------- -----------------
EFFICIENCIES:
Apparent Thermal Ef.ficiency (%) 53.4
Carbon Combustion Efficiency (%) 96.0
(*) Based on gross heating value of th~ fuel at 15°C apd 101.325
kPa
235
------ COMBUSTION ANALYSIS: INPUT DATA ------
COMPANY: DATE:
LOCATION: Site #5 North Plant TEST BY: .Operator
SOURCE: C-24 . PAGE: 1
236
(*) co + THC expressed ~s a CH4 equivalent
237
------ COMBUSTION ANALYSIS: RESULTS -~----
-------------_._----------------------------~---~----- ------------------
COMPANY: DATE:
LOCATION: Site #5 North Plant TEST BY: Operator
SOURCE: C-24 PAGE: 2
MATERIAL BALANCE:
EXCESS AIR:
Actual (% ) 202.9
Recommended (% 44.0 to 66.0
ENERGY BALANCE:
Gross input energy (kW) 3048.8
Net input energy (kW) 2755.5
------
High Exc:ess Air 16.7 459.5 98244
Unburnt Fuel 1.6 44.8 9578
Recoverable Heat
in Flue Gas (*) 38.2 1053.4 225230
Unrecoverable Heat
238
in Flue Gas 3.4 93.9
---------------~---------~-----------------------~-------~-------------
239
------ COMBUSTION ANALYSIS: RESULTS. ------
COMPANY: DATE:
LOCATION: Site #5 North Plant TEST BY: .Operator
SOURCE: C-24 l:'AGE: 3
EFFICIENCIES:,
Apparent Thermal Efficien9Y (%) 56.7
Carbon Combustion Efficiency (%) 95.3
(*.) Based on gross heating value of the fuel at 15°C and 101.325
kPa
240
------ COMBUSTION ANALYSIS: INPUT DATA --~---
-------------------~----------~--~-------------------- -----------------
COMPANY: DATE:
LOCATION: Site #5 North Plant TEST BY: operator
SOURCE: C:-27 PAGE: 1
methane 0.975620
ethane 0;004300
propane 0.·000200
nitrogen 0.019880
Total 1.000000
-------------------------------------------------~---~
-----
241
------~--------~---~----~--~-------------------------- -----
(*) co + THe expressed as a CH4 ~quivalent
242
..,------ COMBUSTION ANALYSIS: RESULTS" ------
COMPANY: DATE:
LOCATION: Site #5 North Plant TEST BY: Operator
SOURCE: C-27 PAGE: 2
MATERIAL BALANCE:
EXCESS AIR:
Actual (% ) 271.3
Recommended (% ) 44.0 to 66".0
ENERGY BALANCE:
Gross input energy (kW) 3030.4
Net input energy (kW) 2737.0
Unrecoverable Heat
243
in Flue Gas 3.7 100.9
----------.---------------------.;.---_._------.~--------
--------------------
244
-~--~- COMBUSTION ANALYSIS: RESULTS ------
------------------------~---~~-----------------~------
, -----------------
.
COMPANY: DATE:
LOCATION: Site #5 North Plant TEST BY: Op'erator
. SOURCE: C-27 PAGE: 3
--------------------------------~--------------------- -----------------
EFFICIENCIES:
Apparent Thermal Efficiency (%) 50.5
Carbon Combustion Efficiency (%) 96.4
(*) Based on gross heating value of the fuet at 15°C apd 101.325
kPa
245
------ COMBUSTION ANALYSIS: INPUT DATA ----~-
COMPANY: DATE:
LOCATION: Site #5 North Plant TEST BY: OpE?rator
SOURCE: C-34 PAGE: 1
Total i.oooooo
------
Ambient Air 35.0 0.0
Fuel 35.0 N/A 0.0
Combustion Air 35.0 N/A 0.0
Flue Gas 344.1 N/A N/A
Radiator Air (In) N/A N/A N/A
Radiator Air (Out) N/A N/A N/A
Crank Case Exhaust N/A
-----------~----------------------------~------~----~-
-----------------
246
(*) co + THC ,expressed as a CH4 equivalent
247
------ COMBUSTION ANALYSIS: RESULTS ------
COMPANY: DATE:
. LOCATION: Site #5 North Plant TEST BY: Operator
SOURCE: C-34 PAGE: 2
MATERIAL BALANCE:
EXCESS AIR:
Actual (% ). 202.9
Recommended (% ) 44.0 to 66.0
ENERGY BALANCE:
Gross input energy (kW) 3354.7
Net input energy ~kW) 3031.3
------
High Excess Air 14.9 452.4 96738
Unburnt Fuel 1.7 50.6 10826
Recoverable Heat
in Flue Gas ( *) 33.9 1027.0 219581
Unrecoverable Heat
248
in Flue Gas 3.4 103.5
-------------------------~--------------------------~-~----------------
249
------ COMBUSTION ANALYSIS: RESULTS ------
--------------~----------~---------------------~------
-----------------
COMPANY: DATE:
LOCATION: Site #5 North Plant TEST BY: Operator
SOURCE: C-34 PAGE: 3
EFFICIENCIES:
Apparent Thermal Efficiency (%) 61.0
Carbon Combustion Efficiency (%) 95.2
(*) Based on gross heating value of the fuel at 15°C and 101.325
kPa
250
------ COMBUSTION ANALYSIS: INPUT DATA ------
------------------------~----------------------------- .
----------------- "
COMPANY: DATE:
LOCATION: Site #5 North Plant TEST BY:· Operator
SOURCE: C-37 PAGE: 1
--------------------------------~----_._-------------- ------------------
methane 0.975620
ethane 0.004300
propane 0.000200
nitrogen 0.019880
Totai 1.000000
251
(*) co + THC expressed as a CH4 equivalent
252
------ COMBUSTION ANALYSIS: RESULTS ------
COMPANY: DATE:
LOCATION: Site #5 North Plant TEST BY: 'Operator
SOURCE: C-37. PAGE: .
2
--------------~---------_._--------------------------- ------------------
MATERIAL BALANCE:
EXCESS AIR:
Actual (% ) 253.3
Recommended (% ) 44.0 to 66.0
ENERGY BALANCE:
Gross input energy (kW) 3338.5
Net .input energy (kW) 3015.2
Unrecoverable Heat
253
in Flue Gas 3.6 109.4
254
--:---- COMBUSTION ANALYSIS: RESULTS ------
----------------------------~~---------------~--------
-----------------
COMPANY: DATE:
LOCATION: Site #5 North Plant TEST BY: Operator
SOURCE: C-37 PAGE: :3
--------------------------------~---------------~----- -----------------
EFFICIENCIES:
Apparent Thermal Efficiency (%) 52.2
Carbon Combustion Efficiency (%) 96.6.
255
------ COMBUSTION ANALYSIS: INPUT DATA ------
COMPANY: DATE:
LOCATION: Site #5 North Plant TEST BY: Operator
SOURCE: C-38 PAGE: 1
methane 0.975620
ethane 0.004300
propane 0 .. 000200
nitrogen 0.019880
--~-----------------~---------------------------------
-----
Total 1.000000
256
(*) co + THC expre~sed as ~ CH4 equivalerit
257
------ COMBUSTION ANALYSIS: RESULTS ------
------~---~------~------~-------------------------~------------~~------
COMPANY: DATE:
LOCATION: Site #5 North Plant TEST BY: Operator
SOURCE: C-38 PAGE: 2
MATERIAL BALANCE:
------------------------------------~----------------- -----
Stream Flow Rate Unit
EXCESS AIR:
Actual (~ ) 179.9
Recommended (% ) 44.0 to 66.0
ENERGY BALANCE:
Gross input energy (kW) 3341.2
Net input energy (kW) 3016. '6
------
High Excess Air 12.2 367.1 78486
Unburnt Fuel 2.1 62.8 13432
Recoverable Heat
in Flue Gas (*) 29.9 902.4 192942
Unrecoverable Heat
258
in Flue Gas 3.3 100.8
259
------ COMBUSTION ANALYSIS: RESULTS ------
----------------------~-----~-----------------~---------------------~--
'COMPANY: DATE:
LOCATION: Site #5 North Plant TEST BY: Operator
SOURCE: C-38 PAGE: 3
----------.-------------------------------------------------------------
I '
EFFICIENCIES:
Apparent Thermal Efficiency (%) 64.7
C?rbon Combustion Efficiency (%) 94.0
(*) Based on gross heating value of the fuel at 15°C and 101.325
kPa
260
------ COMBUSTION A~ALYSIS: INPUT DATA -----~
.
-----~------------------~------------------~-----------------------~-~-
-
-COMPANY: DATE:
LOCATION: Site #5 North Plant TEST BY: Operator
.sOURCE: C-39 PAGE: 1
methane 0.975620
ethane 0.004300
propane 0.000200
nitrogen 0.019880
Total 1.000000
261
(*) co + THCexpressed as a CH4 equivalent
262
~----- COMBUSTION ANALYSIS: RESULTS ------
COMPANY: DATE:
LOCATION: Site #5 North Plant TEST BY: Operator
SOURCE: C-39 PAGE: 2
------~-------~------------------------------------------------~-------
MATERIAL BALANCE:
EXCESS AIR:
Actual (% ) 162.2
Recommended (% ) 44.0 to 66.0
ENERGY BALANCE:
Gross input energy (kW) 3326.2
Net input energy (kW) 3002.8
------
High Excess Air 11.1 334.5 71530
Unburnt Fuel 2.1 62.8 13437
Recoverable Heat
in Flue Gas (*) 30.6 918.1 196307
Unrecoverable Heat
263
in Flue Gas 3.3 97.8
264
--:----- COMBUSTION ANALYSIS: RESULTS ------
COMPANY: DATE:
LOCATION: Site #5 North Plant TEST BY: Operator
SOURCE: C-3.9 PAGE: 3
. ,
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
EFFICIENCIES:
Apparent Thermal Efficiency (%) 64.1
CarbonCornbustion Efficiency (%) 94.0
{*) Based on gross heating value of the fue~ at 15°C apd 101.325
kPa
265
------ COMBUSTION ANALYSIS: INPUT DATA ----~-
--------------------------~---------------------------------~----------
COMPANY: DATE:
LOCATION: Site #5 North Plant TEST BY: Operator
SOURCE: C-40 PAGE: 1
--------------~~---------~~~--------------------------------~----------
methane 0.975620
ethane 0.004300
propane 0.000200
nitrogen 0.019880
Total 1.000000
266
(*) co + THC expressed as.a CH4 equivalent
267
~---~~ COMBUSTION ANALYSIS: RESULTS ------
--------------------------~-----------------------~---
-----------------
COMPANY: DATE:
LOCATION: Site #5 North Plant TEST BY: Operator
SOURCE: C-40 PAGE: 2
-------------------_~_---_~_-----------------------_~---------_~-------
MATERIAL BALANCE:
------------~-------------_~_---------~-.------------- ------
EXCESS AIR:
Actual (% ) 2.53.3
Recormnended (% ) 44.0 to 66.0
ENERGY BALANCE:
Gross input energy (kW) 3338.5
Net input energy (kW) 3015.2
------
High Excess Air 21.8 656.8 140428
Unburnt Fuel 1.2 35.2 7522
Recoverable Heat
in Flue Gas (*) . 41.3 1246.2 266457
---~-------------_~_-----------------------------~-~_----------~-------
Unrecoverable Heat
268
in Flue Gas 3.6 109.4
-----,-------------~----------------------~-----------
------------------
269
------ COMBUSTION ANALYSIS: RESULTS -'-----
COMPANY: DATE:
LOCATION: Site #5 North Plant TEST BY: Operator
SOURCE: C-40· PAGE: 3
EFFICIENCIES:
Apparent Thermal Efficiency (%) 53.9
Carbon Combustion Efficiency (%) 96.6
(*) Based on gross heating value of the fuel at 15°C and 101.325
kPa
270
-~---- COMBUSTION ANALYSIS: INPUT DATA ------
COMPANY: DATE:
LOCATION:' Site #5 Middle Plant TEST BY: operator
SOURCE: C-12 PAGE: 1
--------------------------------~--~------------------ -----------------
methane 0.975620
ethane 0.004300
propane 0.000200
nitrogen 0.019880
Total 1.000000
271
(*) co + THC expressed as q CH4 equivalent
272
COMBUSTION ANALYSIS: REBULTS ------
COMPANY: DATE:
LOCATION: Site" #5 Middle Plant TEST" BY: Operator
SOURCE: C-12 PAGE: 2
-----~-------~~-------------------------~---------~--~-----------------
EXCESS AIR:
Actual (% ) 253.4
Recommended (% ) 44.0 to 66.0
ENERGy BALANCE:
Gross "input energy (kW) 4441.3
Net input energy (kW) 4011.1
Unrecoverable Heat
273
in Flue Gas 3.6 145.6
274
~----- COMBUSTION ANALYSIS: RESULTS ------
COMPANY: DATE:
LOCATION: Site #5 Middle Plant TEST BY: Operator
SOURCE: C-12 PAGE: 3
~---------------~--------~-------------------------------------~----~--
EFFICIENCIES:
Apparent Thermal Efficiency (%) 52.0
Carbon Combustion Efficiency (%) 97.0
(*) Based on gross heating value of the fuel at 15°C and 101.325
kPa
275
~----- COMBUSTION ANALYSIS: INPUT DATA -----~
-;-------~------------------------------------~--------------~~--------
COMPANY: DATE:
LOCATJON: Site #5 Middle Plant TEST BY: Operator
SOURCE: C-ll PAGE: 1
---------~-~------------------------------~----------- -----------------'
methane 0.975620
ethane 0.004300
pr.opane 0.000200
nitrogen 0.019880
Total 1.000000
276
-~----~-------~------------~--------------------------~~---
(*) co + THC expresse~ as a CH4 equivalent
277
------ COMBUSTION ANALYSIS: RESULTS ------
COMPANY: DATE:
LOCATION: Site #5 Middle Plant TEST BY: Operator
SOURCE: C-11 PAGE: 2
------------~----------------------------------~---------~-------------
MATERIAL BALANCE:
EXCESS AIR:
Actual (% ) 162.2
Recommended (% ) 44.0 to 66.0
ENERGY BALANCE:
Gross input energy (kW) 4428.7
Net input energy (kW) 3998.5
------
High Excess Air 11.7 469.5 100375
Uhburnt Fuel 2.1 83.6 17875
Recoverable Heat
in Flue Gas (* ) 32.4 1297.0 277309
Unrecoverable Heat
278
in Flue Gas 3.3 130.1
.279
------ COMBUS.TION ANALYSIS: RE·SULTS ------
COMPANY: DATE:
LOCATION: Site #5 Middle Plant TEST BY: Operator
·SOURCE: C-11 PAGE: 3
EFFICIENCIES:
Apparent Thermal Efficiency (%) 62.2
Carbon Combustion Efficiency (%) 94.0
(*) Based on gross heating value ·of the fuel at 15°C and 101.325
kPa
280
------ COMBUSTION ANALYSIS: INPUT DATA ------
. COMPANY: DATE:
LOCATION: Site #5 Middle Plant TEST BY: Operator
SOURCE: C-IO PAGE: 1
------------~-------------------,~---------------------------------~----
methane 0.975620
ethane 0.004300
propane 0.000200
nitrogen 0.019880
Total 1.000000
281
--------------------~--------------~-------~---------- -----
(*) co + THC expressed as a CH4 equivalent
282
-~---- COMBUSTION ANALYSIS: RESULTS ------
------------------------~-----------------------~----------~-----------
COMPANY: DATE:
LOCATION: Site #~~iddle Plant TEST BY: Operator
SOURCE: C-10 PAGE: 2
MATERIAL BALANCE:
EXCESS AIR:
ENERGY BALANCE:
Gross input energy (kW) 4454.2
Net input energy (kW) 4024.0
------
High Excess Air 17.6 707.7 151310
Unburnt Fuel 1.6 65.3 13965
Recoverable Heat
in Flue Gas (* ) 36.9 1484.9 317500
Unrecoverable Heat
283
"in Flue Gas 3.5 140.9
284
,...----- COMBUSTION ANALYSIS: RESULTS ------
COMPANY: DATE:
LOCATION: Site #5 Middle Plant TEST BY: Operator
SOURCE: C-I0 PAGE: 3
EFFICIENCIES:
Apparent Thermal Efficiency (%) 58.0
Carbon Combustion Efficiency (%) .95.3
285
------ COMBUSTION ANALYSIS: INPUT DATA ------
COMPANY: DATE:
LOCATION: Site #5 Middle Plant TEST BY: Operator
SOURCE: C-9 PAGE: 1
methane 0.975620
'ethane 0.004300
propane 0.000200
nitrogen 0.019880
Total 1.000000
286
(*) co + THC expressed as a CH4 equivalent
287
------ COMBUSTlON ANALYSIS: RESULTS ------,
COMPANY: DATE:
LOCATION: Site #5 Middle Plant TEST BY: Operator
SOURCE: C-9 PAGE: 2
MATERIAL BALANCE:
------------~-------------------------------~-----~--- -----
EXCESS AIR:
ENERGY BALANCE:
Gross input energy (kW) 3371.3
Net input energy (kW) 3043.7
------
High Excess Air 16.1 491.3 105046
Unburnt Fuel 2.7 81.9 17522
Recoverable Heat
in Flue Gas (* ) 40.6 1235.4 264145
Unrecoverable Heat
288
in Flue Gas 3.3 101.6
289
-'------ COMBUSTION ANALYSIS: .RESULTS ------
COMPANY: DArE:
LOCATION: Site #5 Middle Plant TEST BY: Op~rator
SOURCE: C-9 PAGE: 3
---------------------------------------~----------~--- -----------------
EFFICIENCIES:
Apparent Thermal Efficiency (%) 53.'4
Carbon Combustion Efficiency (%) 92.3
(*) Based on gross heating value of the fuel at 15°C and 101.325
kPa
290
COMBUSTION ANALYSIS: INPUT DATA ------
COMP'ANY: DATE:
LOCATION: Site #5 Middle Plant TEST BY: Operator
SOURCE: C-7 PAGE: 1
--------------~----------~-~-------------------------- -----------------
methane 0.975620
ethane 0.004300
propane 0.000200
nitrogen 0.019880
---------~--------------------------~-----------------
-----
Total 1.000000
291
~---------------------------~---------------~--------- -----
(*) co + THe expressed a~ a CH4 equivalent
292
-.:.,----COMBUSTION ANALYSIS: RESULTS ------
-------------------------~-------------------~--------
. .
-----------------
. COMPANY: DATE:
LOCATION: Site #5 Middle Plant TEST BY: Operator
SOURCE: C-7. PAGE: 2
MATERIAL. BALANCE:
EXCESS AIR:
Actual (% ) 236.8
Recommended (% ) 44.0 to 66.0
ENERGY BALANCE:
Gross input energy (kW) 3382.9
Net input energy (kW) 3055.3
------
High ExcE?ss Air 20.4 623.5 133323
Unburnt Fuel 1.4 42.1 8999
Recoverable Heat
in Flue Gas (* ) 40.7 1242.3 .265630
Un~ecoverable He~t
293
in Flue Gas 3.6' 109.0
294
~----- COMBUSTION ANALYSIS: RESULTS ------
-----------------------------~-----_._----------------
------------------
COMPANY: DATE:
LOCATION: Site #5 Middle Plant TEST BY: Operator
SOURCE: C-7 PAGE: 3
--------------~------------~-------------------------------~------------
EFFICIENCIES:
Apparent Thermal Efficiency (%) 54.4
Carbon Combustion Efficiency (%) 96.0
295
------ COMBUSTION ANALYSIS: INPUT DATA ------
COMPANY: DATE:
LOCATION: Site #5 Middle Plant TEST BY: Operator,
SOURCE: C:...g PAGE: 1
-----------~-----------~---~---~---,------------------------~-----------
mE;thane 0.975620
ethane 0.004300
propane 0.000200
nitrogen 0.019880
--~-------------------~-------------------------------
-----
Total 1.000000
296
---------~-------------------~---~~--------------~---- -----
297
------ COMBUSTION ANALYSIS: RESULTS ------
COMPANY: DATE:
LOCATION: Site #5 Middle Plant TEST BY: Operator
SOURCE: C-8 PAGE: . 2
--------------------~-------~------------------------- -----------------
MATERIAL BALANCE:
EXCESS AIR: .
Actual (% ) 162.2
Recommended (% ) 44.0 to 66.0
ENERGY BALANCE:
Gross input energy (kW) 3019.6
Net input energy (kW) 2726.3
------
High Excess Air 12.0 327.8 70089
Unburnt Fuel 2.1 57.0 12188
Recoverable. Heat
in Flue Gas (* ) 33.3 907.0 193926
Unrecoverable Heat
298
in Flue Gas 3.3 88.7
299
-.,----- COMBUSTION ANALYSIS: RESULTS ------
COMPANY: DATE:
LOCATION: Site #5 Middle Plant TEST BY: Operator
SOURCE: C-8 PAGE: 3
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
I
EFFICIENCIES:
Apparent Thermal Efficiency (%) 61.4
Carbon Combustion Efficiency (%) 94.0
(*) Based on gross heating value of the fuel at 15°C and 101.325
kPa '
300
------ COMBUSTION ANALYSIS: INPUT DATA ------
---------------------------------------~---------~------~---------~----
COMPANY: DATE:
LOCATION: Site #5 Middle Plant TEST BY: Operator
SOURCE: 'C-6 PAGE: 1
methane 0.975620
ethane 0.004300
propane 0.000200
nitrogen 0.019880
Total 1.000000
301
(*) co + THC expressed as a CH4 equivalent
302
------ COMBUSTION ANALYSIS: RESULTS ------
COMPANY: DATE:
LOCATION: Site #5 Middle Plant TEST BY: Operator
SOURCE: C-6 PAGE: 2
MATERIAL BALANCE:
EXCESS AIR:
Actual (% ) 207.0
Recommended (% ) 44.0 to 66.0
ENERGY BALANCE:
Gross input energy (kW) 3043.6
Net input energy (kW) 2750.3
------
High Excess Air 16.9 463.9 99182
Unburnt Fuel 1.7 46.5 9944
Recoverable Heat
in Flue Gas (* ) 37.8 1039.4 222245
---------'-------------------------------------~---~-----~--------------
Unrecoverable Heat
303
in F~ue Gas 3.4 94.4
."
304
------ COMBUSTION ANALYSIS: RESULTS ------
----------------------------~~------------------------
, " -----------------
COMPANY: DATE:
LOCATION: Site #5 Middle Plant TEST BY: Operator
SOURCE: C-6 PAGE: 3
EFFICIENCIES:
Apparent Thermal Efficiency(%) 57.1
Carbon Cbmbustion Efficiency (%) 95.1
(*) Based on gross heating value of the fuet at 15°C apd 101.325
kPa
305
----~- COMBUSTION ANALYSIS: INPUT DATA ----~-
COMPANY: DATE:
LOCATION: ~it~ #5 Middle Plant TEST BY: Operator
SOURCE: C-5 PAGE: 1
Total 1.000000
306
--------------~------------~------------~---~--------- -----
(*) co + THC expressed as a CH4 equivalent
307
------ COMBUSTION ,ANALYSIS: RESULTS ------
COMPANY: DATE:
LOCATION: Site #5 Middle Plant TEST BY: operator
SOURCE: C-5 PAGE: 2
MATERIAL BALANCE:
EXCESS AIR:
Actual (% ) 271.3
Recommended (% ) 44.0 to 66.0
ENERGY BALANCE:
Gross input energy (kW) 3383.9
Net input energy (kW) 3056.4
------
High Excess Air 22.0 673.0 143903
Unburnt Fuei 1.2 37.8 8078
Recoverable ~e~t
in Flue Gas (*) 39.9 1219.7 260784
Unrecoverable Heat
308
-in Flue Gas 3.7 112.7
309
------ COMBUSTION ANALYSIS: RESULTS ------
COMPANY: DArE:
LOCATION: Site #5 Middle Plant TEST BY: Operator
SOURCE: C-5 PAGE: 3
----------------------------~-----------------------------------~------
EFFICIENCIES:
Apparent Thermal Efficiency (%) 55 . .2
Carbon Combustion Efficiency (%) 96.'4
(*) Based on gross heating value of the fuel at 15°C and 101.325
kPa
310
;...----- COMBUSTION ANALYSIS: INPUT DATA --- .... --
.
-------------------------~-------~-----~------------------~------------
.
. COMPANY: DATE:
LOCATION: Site #5 Middle Plant TEST· BY: operator
SOURCE: C-!.3 PAGE: 1
, .
-----------------------------------------------~------ -----------------
methane 0.975620
ethane 0.004300
propane 0.000200
nitrogen 0.019880
---~~---~--------------------------~----~-------------
-----
Total 1.000000
----------------------------~-------------------------
-----
311
(*) co + THC expressed as a CH4 equivalent
312
~~---- COMBUSTION ANALYSIS: RESULTS
COMPANY: DATE:
LOCATION: Site #5 Middle Plant TEST BY: Operator
SOURCE: C-3 PAGE: 2
MATERIAL BALANCE:
EXCESS AIR:
Actual (% ) 253.3
Recommended (% ) 44.0 to 66'.0
ENERGY BALANCE:
Gross input energy (kW) 3381.4
Net input energy (kW) 3053.9
Unrecoverable Heat
313
in Flue Gas 3.6 110.8
314
------ COMBUSTION ANALYSIS: RESULTS -~----
COMPANY: DATE:
LOCATION: Site #5 Middle Plant TEST BY: Operator
SOURCE: C-3 PAGE: 3
EFFICIENCIES:
Apparent Thermal Efficiency (%) 62.8
Carbon Combustion Efficiency (%) 96.6
(*) Based on gross heating vaiue of the fuel ~t 15°C and 101.325
kPa
315
------ COMBUSTION ANALYSIS: INPUT DATA------
-~-------~--------------~-------------------~--------~----------~------
. COMPANY: DATE:
LOCATION: Site #5 Middle Plant TEST BY: Operator
SOURCE: C-2 PAGE: 1
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
. .
methane 0.975620
ethane 0.004300
propane 0.000200
nitrogen 0.019880
---~------------------------------~------------~------
-----
316
---------------------------------------------~------------~
(*) co + THC expressed as a CH4 equivalent
317
------ COMBUSTION ANALy'SIS: RESULTS. ------
COMPANY: DATE:
LOCATION: Site #5 Middle Plant TEST BY: Operator
SOURCE: C-2 PAGE: 2
--------------------~-------------------------~---------------~--------
MATERIAL BALANCE:
-----------~-----~------------------------------------
-----
EXCESS AIR:
Actual (% ) 179.3
Recommended (% ) 44.0 to 66.0
ENERGY BALANCE:
Gross input energy (kW) 3008.1
Net input energy (kW) 2714.7
------
High Excess Air 15.0 407.7 87176
Unburnt Fuel 2.1 58.0 12393
Recoverable Heat
in Flue 'Gas (* ) 37.1 1008.0 215519
Unrecoverable .Heat
318
in Flue Gas 3.4 91.0
319
------ COMBUSTION ANALYSIS: RESULTS . . . -----
---------~---~---------------------------------------~
-----------------
COMPANY: DATE:
LOCATION: Site #5 Middle Plant TEST BY: Operator
SOURCE: C-2 PAGE: 3
-----~------------------------------------------------ -----------------
EFFICIENCIES:
Apparent Thermal Efficiency (%) 57.4
Carbon Combustion Efficiency (%) 93.9
(*) Based on gross heating value of the fuel at 15°C and 101.325
kPa
320
-~---~ COMBUSTION ANALYSIS: INPUT DATA ------
-----------------------~~---~~------------------~~--------------~--~---
COMPANY: DATE:
LOCATION: Site #5 Middle Plant TEST BY: operator
SOURCE: C-1 PAGE: i
methane 0.975620
ethane 0.004300
propane 0.000200
nitrogen 0.019880
Total 1.000000
321
-~------'-----------------------------------~-~------7 ------
(*) co + THC expressed as a CHA equivalent
-.:...---- COMBUSTION ANALYSIS: RESULTS -..,..,...---
-~~----------------------~----------------------~----- -----------------'
COMPANY: DATE:
LOCATION: Site #5 Middle Plant TEST BY: Operator
SOURCE: C-l PAGE: 2
--------------~-----------~-----~-----------~--~--------~-------~------
MATERIAL BALANCE:
EXCESS AIR:
ENERGY BALANCE:
Gross input energy (kW) 3019.1
Net input energy (kW) 2725.8
------
High Excess Air 15.3 417.6 89290
Unburnt Fuel 2.1 56.8 12137
Recoverable Heat
in Flue Gas. (* ) 38.2 1041.8 ~22752
Unrecoverable Heat
323
in Flue Gas 3.3
324
------ COMBUSTION ANALYSIS: RESULTS ------
----------~-------------------------------~-----------------------~----
EFFICIENCIES:
Apparent Thermal Efficiency (%) 56.4
Carbon Combustion Efficiency (%) 94.0
(*) Based on gross heating value ,of the fuel at 15°C and 101.325
kPa
325
------ COMBUSTION ANALYSIS: INPUT DATA ---~--
COMPANY: DATE:
LOCATION: Site #5 Middle Plant TEST BY: operator
SOURCE: C-17 PAGE: 1
methane 0.975620
ethane 0.004300
propane 0.000200
nitrogen 0.019880
----------------------~-----------~-------------------
-----
Total 1.000000
326
(*) co + THC expressed as a CH4 e'quivalent
327
------ COMBUSTION ANALYSIS: INPUT DATA ------
COMPANY: DATE:
LOCATION: Site #5 South Plant TEST BY: Operator
SOURCE: C-30. PAGE: 1
Total 1.000000
328
Sulphur Dioxide o PPM
329
-~---- COMBUSTION ANALYSIS: RESULTS ------
COMPANY: DATE:
LOCATION: Site #5 South Plant TEST BY: Operator
SOURCE: C-30 .PAGE: 2
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
I •
EXCESS AIR:
Actual (% ) 183.9
Recommended (% ) ·44.0 to 66.0
ENERGY BALANCE: . I
------
High Exces.s Air 24.3 849.9 181729
Unburnt Fuel 0.1 4.5 955
Recoverable Heat
in Flue Gas (* ) 59.8 2089.6 446786
Unrecoverable Heat
330
in Flue Gas 3.4 118.3
-~----------------------------~--------------------.--
------------------
0
331
"';--'--- COMBUSTION ANALY.SIS: .RESULTS ------
------~--~--------------~----~------------------------~----------------
COMPANY: DATE:
LOCATION: Site #5 South Plant TEST BY: Operator
SOURCE: C-30 PAGE: 3
------~------------------------~--~.------------------ ------------------
EFFICIENCIES:
Apparent Thermal Efficiency (%). 36.6
Carbon Combustion Efficiency (%) 99.6
(*) Based on gross heating value of the fuel at 15°C and 101.325
kPa
332
------ COMBUSTION ANALYSIS: INPUT DATA ------
--------------------------~---------------------I------------~---------
COMPANY: DATE:
LOCATION: Site #5 South Plant TEST BY: Operator
SOURCE: C-31 PAGE:. 1
, .
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
methane 0.975620
E::thane 0.004300
propane 0.000200
nitrogen 0.019880
Total 1.000000
333
(*) co + THC expreBsed as a CH4 equivalent
334
------ COMBUSTION ANALYSIS: RESULTS ----~-
COMPANY: DATE:
LOCATION: Site #5 South Plant .TEST BY: Operator
SOURCE: C-3l PAGE: 2
----~---------~~------------------~-----------~------- -----------------
MATERIAL BALANCE:
EXCESS AIR:
Actual (% ) 159.5
Recommended (% ) 44.0 to 66.0
ENERGY BALANCE:
Gross input energy (kW) 4232.€5
Net input energy (kW) 3818.2
------
High Excess Air 18.9 722.7 154525
Unburnt Fuel 0.1 4.8 1032
Recoverable Heat
in Flue Gas' (*) 53.8 2052.3 438821
-------------------------------~-----------------------~---------------
Unrecoverable Heat
335
in Flue Gas 3.3 124.8
---------~----~---------~-----------------------------
-----------------
336
--....:--.;.. COMBUSTION ANALYSIS : RESULTS -'--:----
COMPANY: DATE:
LOCATION: Site #5 South Plant TEST' BY: Operator
SOURCE: C-31 PAGE: 3'
EFFICIENCIES:
Apparent Thermal Efficiency (%) 42.9
Carbon Combustion Efficiency (%) 99.6
(*) Based on gross heating value of the fuel at 15°C and 101.325
kPa
337
------ COMBUSTION ANALYSIS: INPUT DATA ------
~---------------------------------------~-------------
-----------------
COMPANY: j)ATE:
LOCATION: Site #5 Middle Plant TEST BY: .Operator
SOURCE: C-22 PAGE: 1
methane 0.975620
ethane 0.004300
propane 0.000200
nitrogen 0.019880
Total 1.000000
338
------~--~----~-----------------~--------------------- -----
(*)CO + THC expresse~ as a CH4 equivalent
339
----~- COMBUSTION ANALYSIS: RESULTS ------
COMPANY: DATE:
LOCATION: Site #5 Middle Plant TEST BY: Operator
SOURCE: C-22 PAGE: 2
------------------7-~------~-----~---------------------------------~~--
MATERIAL BALANCE:
EXCESS AIR:
Actual (% ) -0.5
Recommended (% ) 2.0 to 12.0
ENERGY BALANCE:
Gross input energy (kW) 3387.8
Net input energy (kW) 2747.5
Unrecoverable Heat
in Flue Gas 14.2 390.5
340
~------~---------------------------~-~------------------------~--~-----
341
------ COMBUSTION ANALYSIS: RESULTS ------
COMPANY: DATE:
LOCATION: Site #5 Middle Plant TEST BY: Operator
SOURCE: C-22 PAGE: 3
EFFICIENCIES:
Apparent Thermal Efficiency (%) 54.2
Carbon Combustion Efficiency (%) 84.6
(*) Based on gross heating value of the fuel at 15°C and 101.325
kPa
342
-~---- COMBUSTION ANALYS~S: INPUT DATA ---~--
----------------------~-~-----------------------~----- -----------------
-COMPANY: DATE:
LOCATION: Site #5 Middle Plant TEST BY: Operator
SOURCE: C-17 PAGE: 1
methane 0.975620
ethane 0.004300
propane 0.000200
nitrogen 0.019880
Total 1.000000
343
-----------------------------------~-------~------------~--
(*) co + THC expressed as a CH4 equivalent
344
------ COMBUSTION ANALYSIS: RESULTS ------
COMPANY: DATE:
LOCATION: Site ,#5 Middle Plant TEST BY: Operator
SOURCE: C-17 PAGE: 2
-~-------------------~------------------------7------- -----------------
MATERIAL BALANCE:,
EXCESS AIR:
Actual (% ) 0.1
Recommended (% ) 2.0 to 12.0
ENERGY BALANCE:
Gross input energy (kW) 3375.4
Net input energy (kW) 2738.9
Unrecoverable Heat
in Flue Gas 14.2 388.3
345
-------~------~------------~-------------------------------~-----------
346
------ COMBUSTION ANALYSIS: RESULTS ------
COMPANY: DATE:
LOCATION: Site #5 Middle Plant TEST BY: Operator
SOURCE: C-17 PAGE: 3
EFFICIENCIES:
Apparent Thermal E~ficiency (%) 59.5
Carbon Combustion Efficiency (%) 86.9
--------------------~--------------------------------- -----------------
(*) Based on gross heating vaiu~ ,of the fuel at 15°C and 101.325
kPa
347
------ COMBUSTrON ANALYSIS: INPUT DATA --~---
--------------------------~--------------------------~ -----------------
COMPANY: DA'rE:
LOCATION: Site #5 Middle Plant TEST BY: Op~rator
SOURCE: C-19 PAGE: 1
Total 1.000000
~---~--~~-~-----~---~-----------.-------~------------------~
348
-~-------~-----------------------------~-------------~ -----
349
------ COMBUSTION ANALYSIS: RESULTS ------
l-----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMPANY: DATE:
LOCATION: Site #5 Middle Plant TEST BY: Operator
SOURCE: C-19 PAGE: 2
MATERIAL BALANCE:
EXCESS AIR:
Actual (% ) 1.1
Recommended (% ) 2.0 to 12.0
ENERGY BALANCE:
Gross input energy (kW) 3342.8
Net input energy (kW) 2712.9
Unrecoverable Heat
in Flue Gas 14.2 384.5
350
351
----.,..- COMBUSTION ANALYSIS: RESULTS ------
COMPANY: DATE:
LOCATION: Site #5 Middle Plant TEST BY: Operator
SOURCE: C-19 PAGE: 3
EFFICIENCIES:
Apparent Thermal Efficiency (%) 56.6
Carbon Combustion E;:fficiency (%) 90.7
352
------ COMBUSTIONANALYS~S:INPUTDATA ------
------~----~-------------~---~-------------------~----
-----------------
. COMPANY: DATE:
LOCATION: Site *5 Middle Plant TEST BY: Operator
SOURCE: Bot Oil Heater PAGE: i
. ,
-------------------------------------------~---------- -----------------
methane 0.975620
ethane 0.004300
propane 0.000200
nitrogen 0.019880
Total 1.000000
--------------------------~-----~-----~---------------
-----
353
----~------------------------------~-------~---------- -----
(*1 CO+ THe expressed as a CH4 equivalent
- 354
-"----- COMBUSTION ANALYSIS: RESULTS ------
-~--------------------------------------------------------------------~
COMPANY: DATE:
LOCATION: Site #5 Middle Plant TEST BY: Operator
SOURCE: Hot Oil Heater PAGE: 2
MATERIAL BALANCE:
EXCESS AIR:
Actual (% ) 65.5
Recommended (% ) 10 to 15
ENERGY BALANCE:
Gross input energy (kW) 674.0
Net input energy (kW) 608.1
------
High Excess Air 5.2 31.8 6803
Unburnt Fuel 0.0 0.0 8
Recoverable Heat
in Flue Gas (*) 17.1 103.8 22190
Unrecoverable Heat
355
in Flue Gas 2.7
-~--------~---------------~---------------------------~-----~----------
356
------ COMBUSTION ANALYSIS: RESULTS ~-----
------~----------------~--~-------~---------------~--- -----------------
COMPANY: DATE:
LOCATION: Site #5 Middle Pla.nt TEST BY: Operator
SOURCE: Hot Oil Heater PAGE: 3
--------------~---~--------~-----------------------~-- -----------------
EFFICIENCIES:
~pparent Thermal'Efficiency (%) 80.2
Carbon Combustion Efficiency (%) 100.0
Carbon Monoxide 5
Carbon Dioxide 49128
Nitric Oxide' 35
Nitrogen Dioxide 3
Total Oxides of Nitrogen 38
(*) Based on grOss heating value of the fuel at 15°C and 101.325
kPa
357
------ COMBUSTION.ANALYSIS: INPUT DATA ------
-~-~-----~------~-------------------------------------
-----------------
COMPANY: DATE:
LOCATION: Site #5 Middle Plant TEST BY: Operator
SOURCE: B-Ol PAGE: 1
methane 0.975620
ethane 0.004300
propane 0.000200
nitrogen 0.019880
Total 1.000000
--------------------~-------------------------------------~
358
------~-------~------------~----~-----------------~------~-
(*) co + THC expressed as a CH4 equivalent
I.
359
------ COMBUSTION ANALYSIS: RESULTS ---~--
-----------~--------~-----~--------------------~------------~----------
COMPANY: DATE:
LOCATION: Site #5 Middle Plant TEST BY: . Operator
SOURCE: B..,.Ol. PAGE: 2
-------------~----~-~------------------_._-----------~----~-------------
MATERIAL BALANCE:
--------~---~--------------------------------~-------- -----
Stream Flow Rate Unit
------------------------------~---------------------------~
Fuel 62.82 1000 std. mA 3/day
Air 897.12 1000 std. mA 3/day
Stack Gas 960.09 1000 std~ mA 3/day
EXCESS AIR:
Actual (% ) 52.4
Recommended (% ) 10 to 15
ENERGY BALANCE:
Gross input energy (kW) 27227.9
Net input energy (kW) 24578.9
Unrecoverable Heat
in Flue Gas 2.6 630.6
360
(*) The amount of potential recoverable heat was estimated by cooling
the flue gas to .10 °e above its dew point and no less than the
temperature of 15 °e. The unrecoverable portion is the .energy
still
left in the flue gas at that temperature.
361
--'----- COMBUSTION ANALYSIS: RESULTS'------
-----~-------~-~-~------~----~-------~------------~------------~-------
COMPANY: DATE:
LOCATION: S{te #5 Middle piant TEST BY: Operator
SOURCE: B-01 PAGE: 3
----------------~------~----~----~--~---~--------~-------~------~-~----
EFFICIENCIES:
Apparent Thermal Ef;ficiency (%) 85.2
Carbon Combustion Efficiency (%,) 100.0
(*) Based on gross heating value 6f the fuel at 15°C and 101.325
kPa
362
..,..----- COMBUSTION ANALYSIS: INPUT DATA -..,..----
COMPANY: DATE:
LOCATION: Site #5 Middle Plant TEST BY: Operator
SOURCE: B-02 PAGE: 1
Total 1.000000 /
-----------------------------------------------------------
\
363
---------------~----~~-~---~------------------------------~
(*) co + THC expressed as ~ CH4 equivalent
364
'-~---- COMBUSTION ANALYSIS : RESULTS ------
-~--~--~---------~~------~~--~------------------------
-----------------
COMPANY: DATE:
LOCATION: Site #5 Middle Plant TEST BY: Operator
SOURCE: B-02 PAGE: 2
---------------~----------------~--------------------- -----------------
MATERIAL BALANCE:
------------~--------------------------~----~--~---~-- -----
Stream Flow Rate Unit
Fuel 73.65 1000 std. mA 3/day
Air 897.12 1000 std~ mA 3/day
Stack Gas 970.95 1000 std. mA 3/day
EXCESS AIR:
Actual (% ) 30.0
Recommended (% ) 10 to 15
ENERGY BALANCE:
Gross input energy (kW) 31877.4
Net input energy (kW) 28771.7
Unrecoverable Heat
in Flue Gas 2.4 685.9
365
366