Narcotic Analgesia in Appendicitis
Narcotic Analgesia in Appendicitis
Narcotic Analgesia in Appendicitis
53350/pjmhs22168131
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
ABSTRACT
Aim: To study that narcotic analgesia administration in patients of acute appendicitis does not delay the diagnosis and does not
interfere with the decision to operate in these patients.
Study design: A randomized cross-over study.
Setting and duration of study: Study was done at surgery department of Combined military hospital Lahore over a period of
two years from March 2019-2021.
Methodology: It was a double-blind randomized crossover study. A total of 100 patients, who were confirmed as acute
appendicitis by clinical examination, were included. All the male and female patients of age 16 years and above were included in
the study. The patients were divided in two groups each having 50 patients. The drugs were labelled as drug A and drug B. Drug
A was morphine and drug B was placebo. Each drug was given to both the groups by crossover with an interval of 30 minutes
and the components of physical examination were analyzed for both groups. The pain score was calculated by the visual
analogue scale (VAS) for both the groups at both intervals. The p-value was calculated by using student’s t-test. The frequency
and percentages of the decision to operate were calculated. The data was tabulated and then analyzed on SPSS version 23.
Results: The pain score was calculated for both groups of male and females. The pain score difference was calculated in both
groups and then p-value was calculated which came out to be significant. The frequencies of the decision to be operated were
also calculated in both the groups and the results showed that there was no effect of narcotic analgesia on the decision to
operate in patients with clinically diagnosed acute appendicitis
Conclusion: The use of morphine analgesia in the patients of acute appendicitis does not alter the diagnostic efficacy of the
patients of acute appendicitis.
Keywords: Acute abdominal pain, acute appendicitis, Narcotic analgesia, Visual analog scale (VAS)
Those having a previous appendectomy were excluded. After Another systematic review of the randomized controlled trials
taking ethical approval from Ethical Review Board and a proper were done from 1980-2013 to identify the effect of narcotic
informed consent, all the patients were assessed on a visual analgesia on the appendectomy decision. And it was concluded
analog scale for pain from 0-10cm. The patients were divided in that opioid analgesia had no effect on the decision to operate in
two groups each having 50 patients. The drugs were labelled as acute appendicitis in children also, hence proving our point of
drug A and drug B. Drug A was morphine 0.1 mg/kg of the body discussion as well. However it was recommended that further more
weight and drug B was placebo. Each drug was given to the both trials are needed in this regard13.
groups by crossover with an interval of 30 minutes and the Another systematic review from years 1929-2011 was
components of physical examination were analyzed for both carried out to see the same effect of narcotic analgesia on the
groups. A doctor on duty was assigned to perform the duty to diagnostic accuracy. It included 84 papers from very renowned
examine the groups before the administration and after 30 minutes databases like PubMed, Cochrane etc. and the conclusion was
of administration of drugs also. The pain score was calculated by that narcotic analgesia did not affect the diagnostic accuracy of
the VAS scale for both the groups at both intervals. The p-value appendicitis14.
was calculated by using student’s-test. Also, the frequency and Another systematic review published in Cochrane database
percentages of the decision to operate were calculated. The data suggested that several trials were included from 1996-2009 to see
was tabulated and then analyzed on SPSS 23 for statistical the effects of narcotic analgesia on the decision to operate. Total
analysis. eight trials were included in the review and the conclusion was that
opioid or narcotic analgesia did not affect the surgical decision of
RESULTS acute appendicitis in any age and gender15.
As per the results of our study as well it was observed that
The results were based on the two factors. First, the pain scoring narcotic analgesia of any type did not alter the diagnostic accuracy
was done and then p- value was calculated by applying t-test. 60 and the decision to operate in the patients of acute appendicitis.
female patients and 40 male patients were divided in two equal Hence the use of narcotic analgesia will not be affected due to the
groups receiving morphine as a drug and placebo. Pain scoring on fear of the change in the decision of appendectomy.
visual analog scale was performed before the administration of
these two drugs and then 30 minutes after administration of the
CONCLUSION
both drugs. The pain score difference was calculated in both
groups and then p-value was calculated which came out to be It is concluded that use of morphine analgesia in the patients of
significant (Table 1). acute appendicitis, does not alter the diagnostic efficacy of the
patients of acute appendicitis. Further, more researches and data
Table 1: Pain scoring by VAS scale: collaboration can be made to make a universally acceptable
Characteristics Pain score Pain score Difference p- standard for the use of narcotic analgesia in the patients of acute
before adm. after adm of scores value appendicitis.
Females (n=60) Conflict of interest: Nil
Morphine(n=30) 6.00 3.50 2.5 0.001
Placebo(n=30) 5.50 4.00 1.5 0.001
Males (n=40) REFERENCES
Morphine(n=20) 5.00 3.00 2.00 0.001 1. Moris D, Paulson EK, Pappas TN. Diagnosis and management of acute
Placebo(n=20) 5.50 4.12 1.38 0.001 appendicitis in adults: a review. JAMA. 2021;326(22):2299-311.
2. Snyder MJ, Guthrie M, Cagle Jr SD. Acute appendicitis: efficient diagnosis and
After that we calculated the frequencies of both the groups management. American family physician. 2018;98(1):25-33.
3. Krzyzak M, Mulrooney SM. Acute appendicitis review: background, epidemiology,
regarding the ones who were decided to be operated and the one diagnosis, and treatment. Cureus. 2020;12(6).
who were discharged at the elimination of symptoms clinically. Out 4. Talan DA, Di Saverio S. Treatment of acute uncomplicated appendicitis. New
of 60 total females, 42 were decided to be operated while 18 were England Journal of Medicine. 2021;385(12):1116-23.
5. Hernandez MC, Finnesgard EJ, Aho JM, Zielinski MD, Schiller HJ. Reduced opioid
discharged after the symptoms were not there. Similarly, out of prescription practices and duration of stay after TAP block for laparoscopic
total 40 males, 28 were decided to be operated, while 12 were appendectomy. Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery. 2020;24(2):418-25.
discharged after the symptoms got better (Table 2). Hence, the 6. Sevensma K, Schleichert T, Schwickerath C, Shoemaker A, Miller C. A
randomized double blinded study to determine the effectiveness of utilizing
results showed that there is no effect of narcotic analgesia on the intraperitoneal bupivacaine: Does it reduce postoperative opioid use following
decision to operate in patients with clinically diagnosed acute laparoscopic appendectomy? The American Journal of Surgery. 2019;217(3):479-
appendicitis. 82.
7. Fugazzola P, Coccolini F, Tomasoni M, Stella M, Ansaloni L. Early appendectomy
vs. conservative management in complicated acute appendicitis in children: a
Table 2: Frequency of decision to operate: meta-analysis. Journal of Pediatric Surgery. 2019;54(11):2234-41.
Clinically diagnosed Decided to Discharged without 8. Suwanwongse K, Shabarek N. Successful conservative management of acute
cases operate appendectomy appendicitis in a coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patient. Cureus.
Females (n=60) 42 18 2020;12(4).
9. Komo T, Kohashi T, Aoki Y, Hihara J, Oishi K, Tokumoto N, et al. Successful
Morphine (n=30) 21 9 surgical management of non-perforating acute appendicitis with septic
Placebo (n=30) 21 9 disseminated intravascular coagulation: A case report and review of the literature.
Males (n=40) 28 12 International journal of surgery case reports. 2019;55:103-6.
Morphine (n=20) 14 6 10. Zavras N, Vaos G. Management of complicated acute appendicitis in children: Still
Placebo (n=20) 14 6 an existing controversy. World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery.
2020;12(4):129.
11. Al Awayshih MM, Nofal MN, Yousef AJ. Evaluation of Alvarado score in
DISCUSSION diagnosing acute appendicitis. The Pan African Medical Journal. 2019;34.
12. Gavriilidis P, de’Angelis N, Tobias A. To use or not to use opioid analgesia for
A meta-analysis established in 2019 to see the effect of narcotic acute abdominal pain before definitive surgical diagnosis? A systematic review
and network meta-analysis. Journal of Clinical Medicine Research.
analgesia on diagnostic accuracy. It included all the data from last 2019;11(2):121.
30 years from all the renowned databases. The meta-analysis 13. Poonai N, Paskar D, Konrad SL, Rieder M, Joubert G, Lim R, et al. Opioid
described that the use of any type of analgesia does not alter the analgesia for acute abdominal pain in children: A systematic review and
meta‐analysis. Academic Emergency Medicine. 2014;21(11):1183-92.
diagnostic accuracy and the decision of the appendectomy. Hence 14. Falch C, Vicente D, Häberle H, Kirschniak A, Müller S, Nissan A, et al. Treatment
the decision to do the appendectomy was not at all affected by the of acute abdominal pain in the emergency room: a systematic review of the
use of the analgesia12. As our study also showed, that there is no literature. European Journal of Pain. 2014;18(7):902-13.
15. Manterola C, Vial M, Moraga J, Astudillo P. Analgesia in patients with acute
significant effect of the narcotic analgesia on decision to operate in abdominal pain. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2011(1).
acute appendicitis patients.