United States Bankruptcy Court District of New Jersey Caption in Compliance With D.N.J. LBR 9004-1 (B) Cole Schotz P.C

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 17

Case 22-19361-MBK Doc 923 Filed 05/17/23 Entered 05/17/23 08:58:36 Desc Main

Document Page 1 of 17

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT


DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
Caption in Compliance with D.N.J. LBR 9004-1(b)

COLE SCHOTZ P.C.


Michael D. Sirota, Esq. (NJ Bar No. 014321986)
Warren A. Usatine, Esq. (NJ Bar No. 025881995)
Court Plaza North, 25 Main Street
Hackensack, New Jersey 07601
(201) 489-3000
[email protected] Order Filed on May 17, 2023
[email protected] by Clerk
U.S. Bankruptcy Court
District of New Jersey
KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP
KIRKLAND & ELLIS INTERNATIONAL LLP
Joshua A. Sussberg, P.C. (admitted pro hac vice)
Christine A. Okike, P.C. (admitted pro hac vice)
601 Lexington Avenue
New York, New York 10022
(212) 446-4800
[email protected]
[email protected]

HAYNES AND BOONE, LLP


Richard S. Kanowitz, Esq. (NJ Bar No. 047911992)
Kenric D. Kattner, Esq. (admitted pro hac vice)
30 Rockefeller Plaza, 26th Floor
New York, New York 10112
(212) 659-7300
[email protected]
[email protected]

Attorneys for Debtors and Debtors in Possession


In re: Chapter 11

BLOCKFI INC., et al., Case No. 22-19361 (MBK)

Debtors.1 (Jointly Administered)

ORDER (I) AUTHORIZING THE DEBTORS TO (A) HONOR


WITHDRAWALS FROM WALLET ACCOUNTS, (B) UPDATE THE USER
INTERFACE TO PROPERLY REFLECT TRANSACTIONS AND ASSETS
AS OF THE PLATFORM PAUSE, AND (C) CONDUCT ORDINARY COURSE
RECONCILIATION OF ACCOUNTS, AND (II) GRANTING RELATED RELIEF

DATED: May 17, 2023


Case 22-19361-MBK Doc 923 Filed 05/17/23 Entered 05/17/23 08:58:36 Desc Main
Document Page 2 of 17

The relief set forth on the following pages, numbered four (4) through seven (7), is

ORDERED.
Case 22-19361-MBK Doc 923 Filed 05/17/23 Entered 05/17/23 08:58:36 Desc Main
Document Page 3 of 17
(Page | 3)
Debtors: BLOCKFI INC., et al.
Case No. 22-19361 (MBK)
Caption of Order: ORDER (I) AUTHORIZING THE DEBTORS TO (A) HONOR
WITHDRAWALS FROM WALLET ACCOUNTS, (B) UPDATE THE
USER INTERFACE TO PROPERLY REFLECT TRANSACTIONS AND
ASSETS AS OF THE PLATFORM PAUSE, AND (C) CONDUCT
ORDINARY COURSE RECONCILIATION OF ACCOUNTS, AND (II)
GRANTING RELATED RELIEF

Upon the Debtors’ Motion for Entry of an Order (I) Authorizing the Debtors to (A) Honor

Withdrawals from Wallet Accounts, (B) Update the User Interface to Properly Reflect

Transactions and Assets as of the Platform Pause, and (C) Conduct Ordinary Course

Reconciliation of Accounts, and (II) Granting Related Relief (the “Motion”),1 where the

above-captioned debtors and debtors in possession (collectively, the “Debtors”), seek entry of an

order (this “Order”) (a) authorizing the Debtors to (i) honor client withdrawals solely from the

Wallet Accounts as of the Platform Pause Time Stamp, (ii) update the User Interface to properly

reflect transactions and assets held in clients’ accounts as of the Platform Pause Time Stamp, and

(iii) conduct ordinary course reconciliation of client accounts, and (b) granting related relief, all as

more fully set forth in the Motion; and upon the First Day Declaration; and the declaration filed in

support of the Motion; and the Court having jurisdiction to consider the Motion and the relief

requested therein pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 157 and 1334 and the Standing Order of Reference to

the Bankruptcy Court Under Title 11 of the United States District Court for the District of New

Jersey, entered July 23, 1984, and amended on September 18, 2012 (Simandle, C.J.); and this

Court having found that venue of this proceeding and the Motion in this district is proper pursuant

to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1408 and 1409; and this Court having found that the relief requested in the Motion

is in the best interests of the Debtors’ estates, their creditors, and other parties in interest; and this

Court having found that the Debtors’ notice of the Motion was appropriate under the circumstances

1 Capitalized terms used but not otherwise defined herein have the meanings ascribed to them in the Motion.
Case 22-19361-MBK Doc 923 Filed 05/17/23 Entered 05/17/23 08:58:36 Desc Main
Document Page 4 of 17
(Page | 4)
Debtors: BLOCKFI INC., et al.
Case No. 22-19361 (MBK)
Caption of Order: ORDER (I) AUTHORIZING THE DEBTORS TO (A) HONOR
WITHDRAWALS FROM WALLET ACCOUNTS, (B) UPDATE THE
USER INTERFACE TO PROPERLY REFLECT TRANSACTIONS AND
ASSETS AS OF THE PLATFORM PAUSE, AND (C) CONDUCT
ORDINARY COURSE RECONCILIATION OF ACCOUNTS, AND (II)
GRANTING RELATED RELIEF

and no other notice need be provided; and this Court having reviewed the Motion and having heard

the statements in support of the relief requested therein at a hearing before this Court on May 8,

2023 (the “Hearing”); and this Court having determined and articulated on the record at a hearing

on May 11, 2023, that the legal and factual bases set forth in the Motion, the Stipulated Facts (Dkt.

No. 842), the Amended Declaration of Amit Cheela (Dkt. No. 822), and the exhibits to each,

establish just cause for the relief granted herein; and upon all of the proceedings had before the

Court and after due deliberation and sufficient cause appearing therefor IT IS HEREBY

ORDERED THAT:

1. The Motion is GRANTED as set forth herein.

2. The digital assets held in the Custodial Omnibus Wallets as of the Platform Pause

Time Stamp are not property of the Debtors’ estate.

3. The Debtors are authorized to take any actions to update the User Interface and

Company-Facing Interface to accurately reflect the transactions and related balance of digital

assets as of the Platform Pause Time Stamp, including those held in the Custodial Omnibus Wallets

and represented in the Client Wallet Accounts. With respect to BlockFi International, the

foregoing shall be carried out subject to entry of an order authorizing such relief in the parallel

Bermuda JPL Proceedings currently pending in the Supreme Court of Bermuda.

4. The Debtors are authorized, but not directed, to distribute the digital assets

contained in the Custodial Omnibus Wallets and represented in the Client Wallet Accounts as of

the Platform Pause Time Stamp, subject to further order of the Court with respect to preference

4
Case 22-19361-MBK Doc 923 Filed 05/17/23 Entered 05/17/23 08:58:36 Desc Main
Document Page 5 of 17
(Page | 5)
Debtors: BLOCKFI INC., et al.
Case No. 22-19361 (MBK)
Caption of Order: ORDER (I) AUTHORIZING THE DEBTORS TO (A) HONOR
WITHDRAWALS FROM WALLET ACCOUNTS, (B) UPDATE THE
USER INTERFACE TO PROPERLY REFLECT TRANSACTIONS AND
ASSETS AS OF THE PLATFORM PAUSE, AND (C) CONDUCT
ORDINARY COURSE RECONCILIATION OF ACCOUNTS, AND (II)
GRANTING RELATED RELIEF

claims under chapter 5 of the Bankruptcy Code and any setoff rights; provided, however, that

distributions of the digital assets contained in the Custodial Omnibus Wallets and represented in

the Client Wallet Accounts as of the Platform Pause Time Stamp to BlockFi International clients

from the International Vault Wallets shall be honored subject to entry of an order authorizing such

withdrawals in the parallel Bermuda JPL Proceedings currently pending in the Supreme Court of

Bermuda.

5. For the avoidance of doubt, all complete or partial withdrawals or distributions from

the Client Wallet Accounts shall be subject to the ordinary withdrawal fees provided for under the

BlockFi Wallet Terms of Service and the cost of facilitating the withdrawals shall be mitigated

insofar as reasonably practicable by the Debtors.

6. For the avoidance of doubt, nothing contained herein shall be construed (i) as a

determination, implication, admission, or waiver of any rights or causes of action with respect to

any potential preference or avoidance actions under chapter 5 of the Bankruptcy Code; (ii) to

permit withdrawal from any Wallet Account owned or controlled by any (a) employee of the

Debtors or (b) “insider” of the Debtors as such term is defined in the Bankruptcy Code, 11 U.S.C.

§ 101(31); or (iii) pending further order of the Court, to permit withdrawal from (x) any Wallet

Account that received transfers from other non-Wallet BlockFi accounts during the ninety (90)

days prior to the Petition Date, or (y) any Wallet Account belonging to any person that the Debtors

reasonably believe may be subject to any avoidance actions under chapter 5 of the Bankruptcy

Code or other rights of setoff belonging to the Debtors’ estates.

5
Case 22-19361-MBK Doc 923 Filed 05/17/23 Entered 05/17/23 08:58:36 Desc Main
Document Page 6 of 17
(Page | 6)
Debtors: BLOCKFI INC., et al.
Case No. 22-19361 (MBK)
Caption of Order: ORDER (I) AUTHORIZING THE DEBTORS TO (A) HONOR
WITHDRAWALS FROM WALLET ACCOUNTS, (B) UPDATE THE
USER INTERFACE TO PROPERLY REFLECT TRANSACTIONS AND
ASSETS AS OF THE PLATFORM PAUSE, AND (C) CONDUCT
ORDINARY COURSE RECONCILIATION OF ACCOUNTS, AND (II)
GRANTING RELATED RELIEF

7. The Debtors are authorized to conduct reconciliatory practices in the ordinary

course consistent with prepetition practices. Reconciliatory practices for BlockFi International

shall be carried out subject to entry of an order authorizing such relief in the parallel Bermuda JPL

Proceedings currently pending in the Supreme Court of Bermuda.

8. Notwithstanding the actual or threatened suspension or termination of any

transmission licenses by any U.S. state or governmental entity, any transfers or disbursements

made pursuant to this Order shall not be deemed an implication, admission, or determination that

the Debtors are operating with a suspended or terminated license, nor shall the Debtors or their

insurance providers be liable for any associated fines or penalties, including, but not limited to,

penalties related to the Arch Insurance Company money transmitter bonds or otherwise.

9. For the avoidance of doubt, the approximately $7,423,926 worth of digital assets

that were requested to be transferred from clients’ Client Wallet Accounts to their BIAs or to their

BlockFi private client accounts during the Platform Pause Period did not include any requests from

BlockFi’s U.S. clients to transfer digital assets from Client Wallet Accounts to BIAs, which was

prohibited on BlockFi’s platform as of February 14, 2022 in connection with BlockFi’s settlement

agreement with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.

10. Notwithstanding the relief granted in this Order and any actions taken pursuant to

such relief, nothing in this Order shall be deemed: (a) an admission as to the validity of any

particular claim against the Debtors; (b) a waiver of the Debtors’ rights to dispute any particular

claim on any grounds; (c) a promise or requirement to pay any particular claim; (d) an implication

6
Case 22-19361-MBK Doc 923 Filed 05/17/23 Entered 05/17/23 08:58:36 Desc Main
Document Page 7 of 17
(Page | 7)
Debtors: BLOCKFI INC., et al.
Case No. 22-19361 (MBK)
Caption of Order: ORDER (I) AUTHORIZING THE DEBTORS TO (A) HONOR
WITHDRAWALS FROM WALLET ACCOUNTS, (B) UPDATE THE
USER INTERFACE TO PROPERLY REFLECT TRANSACTIONS AND
ASSETS AS OF THE PLATFORM PAUSE, AND (C) CONDUCT
ORDINARY COURSE RECONCILIATION OF ACCOUNTS, AND (II)
GRANTING RELATED RELIEF

or admission that any particular claim is of a type specified or defined in this Order or the Motion;

(e) a determination, implication, or admission as to the status as property of the estate of any assets

held in BIA; (f) a request or authorization to assume any agreement, contract, or lease pursuant to

section 365 of the Bankruptcy Code; (g) a waiver or limitation of the Debtors’ rights under the

Bankruptcy Code or any other applicable law; or (h) a concession by the Debtors that any liens

(contractual, common law, statutory, or otherwise) satisfied pursuant to the Motion are valid, and

the Debtors expressly reserve their rights to contest the extent, validity, or perfection or seek

avoidance of all such liens. Any payment made pursuant to this Order is not intended and should

not be construed as an admission as the validity of any particular claim or a waiver of the Debtors’

rights to subsequently dispute such claim.

11. The Debtors are authorized to take all actions necessary to effectuate the relief

granted pursuant to this Order in accordance with the Motion.

12. The requirement set forth in Local Rule 9013-1(a)(3) that any motion be

accompanied by a memorandum of law is hereby deemed satisfied by the contents of the Motion

or otherwise waived.

13. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in the Motion, this Order, or any findings

announced at the hearing, nothing in the Motion, this Order, or announced at the hearing constitutes

a finding under the federal securities laws as to whether crypto tokens or transactions involving

7
Case 22-19361-MBK Doc 923 Filed 05/17/23 Entered 05/17/23 08:58:36 Desc Main
Document Page 8 of 17
(Page | 8)
Debtors: BLOCKFI INC., et al.
Case No. 22-19361 (MBK)
Caption of Order: ORDER (I) AUTHORIZING THE DEBTORS TO (A) HONOR
WITHDRAWALS FROM WALLET ACCOUNTS, (B) UPDATE THE
USER INTERFACE TO PROPERLY REFLECT TRANSACTIONS AND
ASSETS AS OF THE PLATFORM PAUSE, AND (C) CONDUCT
ORDINARY COURSE RECONCILIATION OF ACCOUNTS, AND (II)
GRANTING RELATED RELIEF

crypto tokens are securities, and the right of the United States Securities and Exchange

Commission to challenge transactions involving crypto tokens on any basis are expressly reserved.

14. This Court retains exclusive jurisdiction with respect to all matters arising from or

related to the implementation, interpretation, and enforcement of this Order.

8
Case 22-19361-MBK Doc 923 Filed 05/17/23 Entered 05/17/23 08:58:36 Desc Main
Document Page 9 of 17

Redline
Case 22-19361-MBK Doc 923 Filed 05/17/23 Entered 05/17/23 08:58:36 Desc Main
Document Page 10 of 17

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT


DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
Caption in Compliance with D.N.J. LBR 9004-1(b)

COLE SCHOTZ P.C.


Michael D. Sirota, Esq. (NJ Bar No. 014321986)
Warren A. Usatine, Esq. (NJ Bar No. 025881995)
Court Plaza North, 25 Main Street
Hackensack, New Jersey 07601
(201) 489-3000
[email protected]
[email protected]

KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP


KIRKLAND & ELLIS INTERNATIONAL LLP
Joshua A. Sussberg, P.C. (admitted pro hac vice)
Christine A. Okike, P.C. (admitted pro hac vice)
601 Lexington Avenue
New York, New York 10022
(212) 446-4800
[email protected]
[email protected]

HAYNES AND BOONE, LLP


Richard S. Kanowitz, Esq. (NJ Bar No. 047911992)
Kenric D. Kattner, Esq. (admitted pro hac vice)
30 Rockefeller Plaza, 26th Floor
New York, New York 10112
(212) 659-7300
[email protected]
[email protected]

Proposed Attorneys for Debtors and Debtors in Possession


In re: Chapter 11

BLOCKFI INC., et al., Case No. 22-19361 (MBK)

Debtors.1 (Jointly Administered)

Hearing Date and Time:

ORDER (I) AUTHORIZING THE DEBTORS TO (A) HONOR


WITHDRAWALS FROM WALLET ACCOUNTS, (B) UPDATE THE USER
INTERFACE TO PROPERLY REFLECT TRANSACTIONS AND ASSETS
AS OF THE PLATFORM PAUSE, AND (C) CONDUCT ORDINARY COURSE
RECONCILIATION OF ACCOUNTS, AND (II) GRANTING RELATED RELIEF

1 The Debtors in these chapter 11 cases, along with the last four digits of each Debtor’s federal tax identification
number, are: BlockFi Inc. (0015); BlockFi Trading LLC (2487); BlockFi Lending LLC (5017); BlockFi Wallet
LLC (3231); BlockFi Ventures LLC (9937); BlockFi International Ltd. (N/A); BlockFi Investment Products LLC
(2422); BlockFi Services, Inc. (5965); and BlockFi Lending II LLC (0154). The location of the Debtors’ service
address is 201 Montgomery Street, Suite 263, Jersey City, NJ 07302.
Case 22-19361-MBK Doc 923 Filed 05/17/23 Entered 05/17/23 08:58:36 Desc Main
Document Page 11 of 17

The relief set forth on the following pages, numbered threefour (34) through sixseven (67),

is ORDERED.

2
Case 22-19361-MBK Doc 923 Filed 05/17/23 Entered 05/17/23 08:58:36 Desc Main
Document Page 12 of 17

Upon the Debtors’ Motion for Entry of an Order (I) Authorizing the Debtors to (A) Honor

Withdrawals from Wallet Accounts, (B) Update the User Interface to Properly Reflect

Transactions and Assets as of the Platform Pause, and (C) Conduct Ordinary Course

Reconciliation of Accounts, and (II) Granting Related Relief (the “Motion”),1 ofwhere the

above-captioned debtors and debtors in possession (collectively, the “Debtors”), forseek entry of

an order (this “Order”) (a) authorizing the Debtors to (i) honor client withdrawals solely from the

Wallet Accounts as of the Platform Pause Time Stamp, (ii) update the User Interface to properly

reflect transactions and assets held in clients’ accounts as of the Platform Pause Time Stamp, and

(iii) conduct ordinary course reconciliation of client accounts, and (b) granting related relief, all as

more fully set forth in the Motion; and upon the First Day Declaration; and the declaration filed in

support of the Motion; and the Court having jurisdiction to consider the Motion and the relief

requested therein pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 157 and 1334 and the Standing Order of Reference to

the Bankruptcy Court Under Title 11 of the United States District Court for the District of New

Jersey, entered July 23, 1984, and amended on September 18, 2012 (Simandle, C.J.); and this

Court having found that venue of this proceeding and the Motion in this district is proper pursuant

to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1408 and 1409; and this Court having found that the relief requested in the Motion

is in the best interests of the Debtors’ estates, their creditors, and other parties in interest; and this

Court having found that the Debtors’ notice of the Motion was appropriate under the circumstances

and no other notice need be provided; and this Court having reviewed the Motion and having heard

the statements in support of the relief requested therein at a hearing before this Court on May 8,

2023 (the “Hearing”); and this Court having determined and articulated on the record at a hearing

on May 11, 2023, that the legal and factual bases set forth in the Motion, the Stipulated Facts (Dkt.

1 Capitalized terms used but not otherwise defined herein have the meanings ascribed to them in the Motion.

3
Case 22-19361-MBK Doc 923 Filed 05/17/23 Entered 05/17/23 08:58:36 Desc Main
Document Page 13 of 17
(Page | 4)
Debtors: BLOCKFI INC., et al.
Case No.: 22-19361 (MBK)
Caption of Order: ORDER (I) AUTHORIZING THE DEBTORS TO (A) HONOR
WITHDRAWALS FROM WALLET ACCOUNTS, (B) UPDATE THE
USER INTERFACE TO PROPERLY REFLECT TRANSACTIONS AND
ASSETS AS OF THE PLATFORM PAUSE, AND (C) CONDUCT
ORDINARY COURSE RECONCILIATION OF ACCOUNTS, AND (II)
GRANTING RELATED RELIEF

No. 842), the Amended Declaration of Amit Cheela (Dkt. No. 822), and the exhibits to each,

establish just cause for the relief granted herein; and upon all of the proceedings had before the

Court and after due deliberation and sufficient cause appearing therefor IT IS HEREBY

ORDERED THAT:

1. The Motion is GRANTED on a basis as set forth herein.

2. The digital assets held in the Custodial Omnibus Wallets as of the Platform Pause

Time Stamp are not property of the Debtors’ estate.

3. The Debtors are authorized to take any actions to update the User Interface and

Company-Facing Interface to accurately reflect the transactions and related balance of digital

assets as of the Platform Pause Time Stamp, including those held in the Custodial Omnibus Wallets

and represented in the Client Wallet Accounts. With respect to BlockFi International, the

foregoing shall be carried out subject to entry of an order authorizing such relief in the parallel

Bermuda JPL Proceedings currently pending in the Supreme Court of Bermuda.

4. 2. The Debtors are authorized to honor client withdrawal requests solely from the,

but not directed, to distribute the digital assets contained in the Custodial Omnibus Wallets and

represented in the Client Wallet Accounts as of the Platform Pause Time Stamp in accordance with

the BlockFi Wallet Terms of Service, subject to further order of the Court with respect to

preference claims under chapter 5 of the Bankruptcy Code and any setoff rights; provided,

however, that the withdrawal requests of thedistributions of the digital assets contained in the

Custodial Omnibus Wallets and represented in the Client Wallet Accounts as of the Platform Pause

4
Case 22-19361-MBK Doc 923 Filed 05/17/23 Entered 05/17/23 08:58:36 Desc Main
Document Page 14 of 17
(Page | 5)
Debtors: BLOCKFI INC., et al.
Case No.: 22-19361 (MBK)
Caption of Order: ORDER (I) AUTHORIZING THE DEBTORS TO (A) HONOR
WITHDRAWALS FROM WALLET ACCOUNTS, (B) UPDATE THE
USER INTERFACE TO PROPERLY REFLECT TRANSACTIONS AND
ASSETS AS OF THE PLATFORM PAUSE, AND (C) CONDUCT
ORDINARY COURSE RECONCILIATION OF ACCOUNTS, AND (II)
GRANTING RELATED RELIEF

Time Stamp to BlockFi International clients from the International Vault Wallets shall be honored

subject to entry of an order authorizing such withdrawals in the parallel Bermuda JPL Proceedings

currently pending in the Supreme Court of Bermuda.

5. For the avoidance of doubt, all complete or partial withdrawals or distributions from

the Client Wallet Accounts, including Trade-Only Assets, shall be subject to the ordinary

withdrawal fees provided for under the BlockFi Wallet Terms of Service and the cost of facilitating

the withdrawals shall be mitigated insofar as reasonably practicable by the Debtors.

6. For the avoidance of doubt, nothing contained herein shall be construed (i) as a

determination, implication, admission, or waiver of any rights or causes of action with respect to

any potential preference or avoidance actions under chapter 5 of the Bankruptcy Code; (ii) to

permit withdrawal from any Wallet Account owned or controlled by any (a) employee of the

Debtors or (b) “insider” of the Debtors as such term is defined in the Bankruptcy Code, 11 U.S.C.

§ 101(31); or (iii) pending further order of the Court, to permit withdrawal from (x) any Wallet

Account that received transfers from other non-Wallet BlockFi accounts during the ninety (90)

days prior to the Petition Date, or (y) any Wallet Account belonging to any person that the Debtors

reasonably believe may be subject to any avoidance actions under chapter 5 of the Bankruptcy

Code or other rights of setoff belonging to the Debtors’ estates.

3. The Debtors are authorized to dollarize the Trade-Only Assets as soon as reasonably

practicable after a client makes a withdrawal request of such Trade Only Assets. Withdrawal of

5
Case 22-19361-MBK Doc 923 Filed 05/17/23 Entered 05/17/23 08:58:36 Desc Main
Document Page 15 of 17
(Page | 6)
Debtors: BLOCKFI INC., et al.
Case No.: 22-19361 (MBK)
Caption of Order: ORDER (I) AUTHORIZING THE DEBTORS TO (A) HONOR
WITHDRAWALS FROM WALLET ACCOUNTS, (B) UPDATE THE
USER INTERFACE TO PROPERLY REFLECT TRANSACTIONS AND
ASSETS AS OF THE PLATFORM PAUSE, AND (C) CONDUCT
ORDINARY COURSE RECONCILIATION OF ACCOUNTS, AND (II)
GRANTING RELATED RELIEF

the Trade-Only Assets of BlockFi International shall be conducted subject to entry of an order

authorizing such withdrawals in the parallel Bermuda JPL Proceedings currently pending in the

Supreme Court of Bermuda.

4. The Debtors are authorized to take any actions reasonably necessary to accurately reflect

that the Attempted Platform Pause Transactions did not actually occur, so that the User Interface

properly reflects the digital assets in the Wallet Accounts as of the Platform Pause Time Stamp.

With respect to Attempted Platform Pause Transactions for BlockFi International, this shall be

carried out subject to entry of an order authorizing such relief in the parallel Bermuda JPL

Proceedings currently pending in the Supreme Court of Bermuda.

7. 5. The Debtors are authorized to conduct reconciliatory practices in the ordinary

course consistent with prepetition practices. Reconciliatory practices for BlockFi International

shall be carried out subject to entry of an order authorizing such relief in the parallel Bermuda JPL

Proceedings currently pending in the Supreme Court of Bermuda.

8. 6. Notwithstanding the actual or threatened suspension or termination of any

transmission licenses by any U.S. state or governmental entity, any transfers or disbursements

made pursuant to this Order shall not be deemed an implication, admission, or determination that

the Debtors are operating with a suspended or terminated license, nor shall the Debtors or their

insurance providers be liable for any associated fines or penalties, including, but not limited to,

penalties related to the Arch Insurance Company money transmitter bonds or otherwise.

6
Case 22-19361-MBK Doc 923 Filed 05/17/23 Entered 05/17/23 08:58:36 Desc Main
Document Page 16 of 17
(Page | 7)
Debtors: BLOCKFI INC., et al.
Case No.: 22-19361 (MBK)
Caption of Order: ORDER (I) AUTHORIZING THE DEBTORS TO (A) HONOR
WITHDRAWALS FROM WALLET ACCOUNTS, (B) UPDATE THE
USER INTERFACE TO PROPERLY REFLECT TRANSACTIONS AND
ASSETS AS OF THE PLATFORM PAUSE, AND (C) CONDUCT
ORDINARY COURSE RECONCILIATION OF ACCOUNTS, AND (II)
GRANTING RELATED RELIEF

9. For the avoidance of doubt, the approximately $7,423,926 worth of digital assets

that were requested to be transferred from clients’ Client Wallet Accounts to their BIAs or to their

BlockFi private client accounts during the Platform Pause Period did not include any requests from

BlockFi’s U.S. clients to transfer digital assets from Client Wallet Accounts to BIAs, which was

prohibited on BlockFi’s platform as of February 14, 2022 in connection with BlockFi’s settlement

agreement with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.

10. 7. Notwithstanding the relief granted in this Order and any actions taken pursuant

to such relief, nothing in this Order shall be deemed: (a) an admission as to the validity of any

particular claim against the Debtors; (b) a waiver of the Debtors’ rights to dispute any particular

claim on any grounds; (c) a promise or requirement to pay any particular claim; (d) an implication

or admission that any particular claim is of a type specified or defined in this Order or the Motion;

(e) a determination, implication, or admission as to the status as property of the estate of any assets

held in BIA; (f) a request or authorization to assume any agreement, contract, or lease pursuant to

section 365 of the Bankruptcy Code; (fg) a waiver or limitation of the Debtors’ rights under the

Bankruptcy Code or any other applicable law; or (gh) a concession by the Debtors that any liens

(contractual, common law, statutory, or otherwise) satisfied pursuant to the Motion are valid, and

the Debtors expressly reserve their rights to contest the extent, validity, or perfection or seek

avoidance of all such liens. Any payment made pursuant to this Order is not intended and should

not be construed as an admission as the validity of any particular claim or a waiver of the Debtors’

rights to subsequently dispute such claim.

7
Case 22-19361-MBK Doc 923 Filed 05/17/23 Entered 05/17/23 08:58:36 Desc Main
Document Page 17 of 17
(Page | 8)
Debtors: BLOCKFI INC., et al.
Case No.: 22-19361 (MBK)
Caption of Order: ORDER (I) AUTHORIZING THE DEBTORS TO (A) HONOR
WITHDRAWALS FROM WALLET ACCOUNTS, (B) UPDATE THE
USER INTERFACE TO PROPERLY REFLECT TRANSACTIONS AND
ASSETS AS OF THE PLATFORM PAUSE, AND (C) CONDUCT
ORDINARY COURSE RECONCILIATION OF ACCOUNTS, AND (II)
GRANTING RELATED RELIEF

11. 8. The Debtors are authorized to take all actions necessary to effectuate the relief

granted pursuant to this Order in accordance with the Motion.

12. 9. The requirement set forth in Local Rule 9013-1(a)(3) that any motion be

accompanied by a memorandum of law is hereby deemed satisfied by the contents of the Motion

or otherwise waived.

13. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in the Motion, this Order, or any findings

announced at the hearing, nothing in the Motion, this Order, or announced at the hearing constitutes

a finding under the federal securities laws as to whether crypto tokens or transactions involving

crypto tokens are securities, and the right of the United States Securities and Exchange

Commission to challenge transactions involving crypto tokens on any basis are expressly reserved.

14. 10. This Court retains exclusive jurisdiction with respect to all matters arising from

or related to the implementation, interpretation, and enforcement of this Order.

You might also like