Planning Finals Reviewer
Planning Finals Reviewer
Planning Finals Reviewer
David Ricardo
• Economic rent: the difference between the produce Transportation cost for the product delivered to the market
obtained by the employment of two equal quantities of capital will be lowest of all if the processing plant is located at the
and labor source of the raw material.
: the payment over and above what is necessary to stay in
business Weber’s Weight-Gaining Case
The final product is heavier than the raw materials that
Alfred Weber requires transport
CONCEPTUAL ELEMENTS
Ranking/Order of Central Places
● HIGHER ORDER - Larger number of central
functions; bigger market area CRITICISMS
● LOWER ORDER -Lesser number of central ● An Isotropic Surface is rarely found in real world
functions; smaller market area. ● Behavior of consumer & seller are not always rational
● Humans are not always an optimizer rather a satisfier
Ranking/Order of Goods and Services ● The hexagonal pattern of the central place is rarely
● LOW ORDER - Those everyday use (Convenience found
Stores, Sari-Sari Stores) ● The theory is suitable primarily for agricultural regions
● MEDIUM ORDER - Those needed frequently but not because modern factors such as communication,
every day (Drugstores, Banks, Barber Shops) transport, etc. have reduced the distance between
● HIGH ORDER - Those needed occasionally buyer & seller
(Furniture Shops, Legal or Medical Services) ● The fixed value of K gives a poor approximation of
reality and all take
TWO BASIC CONCEPTS ● place together in real-world in urban areas
1. THRESHOLD - Minimum number of people required to
support any good or service outlet established at central place STRENGTH
2. RANGE - Maximum distance that a consumer is willing to ● clear and systematic explanation of the distribution
travel to obtain certain goods or services of cities and towns in a region.
If the good is to be produced and is to continue in production ● explain the economic relationships between different
RANGE > THRESHOLD sized settlements.
● Helps urban planners and policymakers to understand
ASSUMPTIONS the spatial organization of urban areas
● An even (flat) terrain ● framework for analyzing and predicting the behavior
● Evenly distributed population of consumers and producers in different settlements
● Evenly distributed resources ● has been found to be applicable in many different
● Similar purchasing power regions and countries around the world
● Preference for the nearest market
● Equal transportation cost (proportional to distance) WEAKNESSES
● Perfect competition ● Assumes a uniform and isotropic plain, which does
not exist in reality
SHAPE ● Ignores the impact of political and historical factors
on the spatial organization of urban areas
● Does not consider the impact of cultural or social
factors on the location and distribution of urban
settlements.
● Assumes that consumers will always choose the
closest and most convenient place to obtain goods
and services
● Does not account for the impact of technology on the
spatial distribution of settlements
THREE PRINCIPLES IN THE ARRANGEMENT
Hexagons of lower orders are nested within hexagons of
higher orders which is known as the Nested Pattern of —--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hierarchy
LOCATION THEORY
Christaller identified fixed relation between 2 connecting Johann Heinrich von Thünen
levels of hierarchy (Towns and Cities) that is the K value
Johann Heinrich von Thünen was born on June 24, 1783, in
K indicates the number of complementary area of lower order the Kingdom of Prussia was a practical, serious-minded,
Prussian landowner who was actively engaged in managing
his estates and economics. He is best known for his theory on
location in his book Der isolierte Staat or The Isolated State
(1826). He died on September 22, 1850, in Tellow,
Mecklenburg
LOCATION THEORY
Von Thünen’s theory of location is based on profitable or
commercial agriculture, which means that farmers are solely
focused on making a profit. Another important aspect of Von
Thünen’s theory is that it is one of the first to treat spatial
economics seriously. An important note to be made in von
Thünen’s location theory model is that he envisaged it before
the industrial revolution, which occurred in 1760. He was
mostly investigative on why farmers produce certain crops in
certain areas. His model explains that it is because of the cost
of land and transportation of the market that products are
produced in particular locations relative to that product’s
perishability, labor, and cost to transport.
- Transportation is “on the hoof”
Assumptions : Von Thünen developed a mathematical way to see the basics
1. The city is located centrally within an "isolated state" of the Theory of marginal productivity. He summarized it in a
2. The Isolated State is surrounded by wilderness. formula which
3. The land is completely flat and has no rivers or mountains.
R = Y(p-c)-YFm
4. Soil quality and climate are consistent
Where,
5. Farmers in the Isolated State transport their own goods to
R = land rent
market via oxcart, across land, directly to the central city .
Y = yield per unit of land
There are no roads
p = market price per unit of commodity
6. Farmers behave rationally to maximize profits. (Economic
c = production expenses per unit of commodity
man)
F = freight rate (per agricultural unity; per mile)
m = distance to market
Simplified Version
● First Ring (dairy farming)
Economic Rent - A formula that shows the advantage of a
- Fruit, vegetables, milk, and other dairy
piece of land over another.
products
- Perishable products
- Quickly transported before products LR = Y(m-c)-Ytd
- spoil
● Second Ring (forests) Where,
- Timber and Firewood LR = location rent per unity of land
- Very heavy and difficult to transport Y = yield per unit of land
● Third Ring (grains and field crops) m = market price per unit of land
- Crops (grains) c = production cost per unit of product
- Takes a long time to spoil and can take t = transport rate per unit of distance
longer to reach the city d = distance to market
● Fourth Ring (ranching and livestock)
- Livestock, meat 3 Distinct Aspects of Von Thunen's Model
● Land Values
- This aspect of von Thunen’s model shows that prices
go up when a particular piece of land is nearer or has
better access to the market. Values of land could get
so high that only farmers who can produce the
greatest yield could afford the land.
● Land Use Intensity
- Farmers on farmland nearer or adjacent to the central
market should use the land much more intensely to
be able to produce high revenues to afford being
situated there. This results in higher person-hour for
central farms, thereby requiring larger hired-labor
forces.
● Transportation Costs
- The further away a product is from the market, the
higher the transportation cost. However, the cost of
land is then decreased since it is more peripheral
compared to if the land is closer to the urban center
The transport cost varies with the bulk and the perishability of Strength
the product. The crop with the highest locational rent for the ● Influence on agricultural, economic, and urban
unit of land will always be grown, since, it gives the greatest geography
returns and all farmers attempt to maximize their profit. Two ● Economic hardships imprint patterns on thelandscape
crops may have the same production costs and yields but Weakness
differences in transport costs (per ton/kilometre) and market ● The model was abstract
prices influence the decision making of the farmers. If ● Absence of rivers, hillsides, mountains, climate, and
commodity A is more costly to transport per ton/kilometre and soil classifications
it has a higher market price, A will be grown closer to the Outdated
market than B. ● The model was obsolete
● Labor or transportation were old-fashioned
The Bid Rent Model ● No mention of cars, roads, railroads, and such
Diagram shows the comparison between Von Thünen's Land Lack of Social Components
Use Model and the Bid Rent Curve Theory of William Alonso. ● Recreation rather than production
The diagram shows the relationship between the land rent and ● Exclusion of certain farm products for cultural reasons
distance from the market, and the values according to different ● Government or private ownership of productive land
land use. for non-agricultural purposes
● Security issues such as areas controlled by rebel
groups
● Government price controls
FINAL MODEL
Zone I: Perishability products such as fresh milk and
vegetables
- Figure A represents what the agricultural land use
Zone II: Bulky product such as wood
would be if the most basic assumptions were applied,
Zone III: Crop farming mainly rye
namely the market located in New York (or
Zone IV: Used of seven-year crop rotation where rye occupied
BostWash), crops being ranked by comparative
only oneseventh of the land. Crops such as rye, barley, oats,
rent-paying abilities, and considering ubiquitous
pastures, and fallow. Products like rye, butter, cheese, and
geographical characteristics. Although this
occasionally, live animals
representation has some level of concordance with
Zone V: Three-field system, one-third of the land was used for
reality, it inaccurately portrays agricultural land use in
field crops (rye), another one-third for the pasture, and the rest
the United States.
left fallow.
- Figure B includes one supplementary assumption that
Zone VI: Livestock farming
considers climate variations, where the north is colder
than the south. This constraint has a significant
impact on agricultural land use as even if for a
location a crop would have a higher rent-paying
ability, another crop would be grown because climatic
conditions forbid it. The resulting agricultural land use
has a much higher level of correspondence with
reality.
—--------------------------------------------------------------------------------