Hi Fi Usability Test Tigo Corrected
Hi Fi Usability Test Tigo Corrected
Hi Fi Usability Test Tigo Corrected
Tigo App
We will gather enough data By usability testing, we will be We will prioritise the issues
and inputs from the able to find the bugs and based on how they can affect
participants so that need full technical issues which may our product. If the issue is very
decisions can be made for the have been skipped by our serious, it should be given high
product success. eyes. priority first, and if the issue is
negligable, it should be at the
bottom of the priority list.
Methodology
Participants were selected from first qualitative online surveys.
Participants are mosty friends & classmate who loves adventures and movies..
The test was carried out both online and remotely.
The sessions took place beetween 30 aug 2022 to 2 aug 2022.
The time alloted for each session was between 10 to 15 minutes.
Participant Profiles
Our pool of 5 testers consisted of young adults aged between 19-21 years old. The majority of our testers were
male(80%) and no one ever heard of Tigo app it was an new kind of app for them. Professionally, our testers came
from a variety of career backgrounds but most of them are are perfect candidate for our app.
Positive Negative
"Really like the map feature where I "Everything is good, but there should
can easily find locations near me." be an option to send media on chat."
Sentimental Chart
Enjoyability
Confusion
0 25 50 75 100
Bugs and issues
No option to send media in chat.
No Option to skip login or signup.
No view more button in home page options.
Findings and recommendations
Findings
60% of the people loved the map feature.
20% of the people were facing issues with sending multimedia in chat.
Recommendations
20% of the people suggested there should be an option to send multimedia in chat.
20% their should be an option to skip login or signin.
Disclaimer
The sample size may not be representative of all people that may use
the product.
While moderation began with a set agenda, questions and tasks
administered varied from participant to participant.
Human error and misinterpretations of qualitative feedback affected the
results to slight but varying degrees.
A series of common product bugs and errors occurred (listed in section
above).
Thank You.