Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 374 views

    Josh Mandel Divorce Documents

    Uploaded by

    D.J. Byrnes
    This judgment entry from the Court of Common Pleas in Ashland County, Ohio regards a motion to restrict public access to case documents in the dissolution of marriage case of Joshua and Ilana Mandel (Case No. 20-DIS-054). The court grants the motion based on clear and convincing evidence that restricting access outweighs the presumption of public access in order to protect the safety, security, and privacy of the individuals involved. The court orders that redacted versions of nine case documents be placed on the public docket and the original unredacted versions be sealed.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Josh Mandel Divorce Documents

    Uploaded by

    D.J. Byrnes
    374 views130 pages
    This judgment entry from the Court of Common Pleas in Ashland County, Ohio regards a motion to restrict public access to case documents in the dissolution of marriage case of Joshua and Ilana Mandel (Case No. 20-DIS-054). The court grants the motion based on clear and convincing evidence that restricting access outweighs the presumption of public access in order to protect the safety, security, and privacy of the individuals involved. The court orders that redacted versions of nine case documents be placed on the public docket and the original unredacted versions be sealed.

    Original Description:

    Get dumped then, Josh Mandel!

    Original Title

    Josh Mandel divorce documents

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    This judgment entry from the Court of Common Pleas in Ashland County, Ohio regards a motion to restrict public access to case documents in the dissolution of marriage case of Joshua and Ilana Mandel (Case No. 20-DIS-054). The court grants the motion based on clear and convincing evidence that restricting access outweighs the presumption of public access in order to protect the safety, security, and privacy of the individuals involved. The court orders that redacted versions of nine case documents be placed on the public docket and the original unredacted versions be sealed.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    374 views130 pages

    Josh Mandel Divorce Documents

    Uploaded by

    D.J. Byrnes
    This judgment entry from the Court of Common Pleas in Ashland County, Ohio regards a motion to restrict public access to case documents in the dissolution of marriage case of Joshua and Ilana Mandel (Case No. 20-DIS-054). The court grants the motion based on clear and convincing evidence that restricting access outweighs the presumption of public access in order to protect the safety, security, and privacy of the individuals involved. The court orders that redacted versions of nine case documents be placed on the public docket and the original unredacted versions be sealed.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    of 130

    FILED 01/17/2023 11:23 AM DEBORAH A.

    MYERS CLERK OF COURTS ASHLAND, OHIO


    Case: 20-DIS-054

    IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS, ASHLAND COUNTY, OHIO


    DOMESTIC RELATIONS DIVISION

    JOSHUA MANDEL,

    First Petitioner, CASE NO. 20-DIS-054

    And

    ILANA MANDEL,

    Second Petitioner. JUDGMENT ENTRY

    This matter came before the Court for a hearing on November 16, 2022,

    pursuant to the parties’ joint motion to file all pleadings under, filed April 24, 2020, as

    well as a supplemental motion to restrict access filed October 24, 2022. All parties and

    their respective counsel participated by remote video utilizing Zoom, all parties testified

    under oath, and a record of the hearing was made utilizing a digital recording

    application.

    The Court originally granted the April 24, 2020 motion, but the original order was

    vacated at the direction of the Supreme Court of Ohio, and remanded for further

    proceedings. The November 16, 2022 hearing was conducted in accordance with the

    directives of the Supreme Court and the decision below is based on this Court’s

    consideration of the testimony of the parties in support of their April 24, 2020 and

    October 24, 2022 motions.

    Hon. Ronald P. Forsthoefel, Judge, Common Pleas Court of Ashland County, Ohio
    Upon consideration of the testimony of the parties, and in accordance with the

    requirements of Sup.R. 45(E), the Court finds by clear and convincing evidence that the

    presumption of allowing public access to the information restricted by this judgment

    entry is outweighed by a higher interest in protecting the safety, security, protection, and

    privacy of the individuals whose personal identification and residence information is

    directed to be redacted in all pleadings identified herein, including the name, address

    and dates of birth the of the second petitioner and the parties’ children, parenting time

    schedules, and any financial account and/or asset identifiers. The Court finds the

    October 24, 2022 motion well taken and grants the same in the manner set forth below.

    The April 24, 2020 motion is moot and denied as such.

    The Court hereby ORDERS that the following pleadings, as redacted and

    attached hereto, shall be added to the docket in this matter, and shall replace, for the

    purpose of public access, the original, unredacted original copies of the attached

    pleadings, which shall be sealed and restricted from public access, subject to the

    provisions of Sup.R. 45. Nothing contained in this judgment entry is intended to impact

    or affect the existing restrictions as to all documents which are not “case documents”

    [as defined by Sup.R. 44(C)(1)(h)], and otherwise already restricted from public access,

    or the requirement that Form 18 be filed and remain under seal pursuant to local rule

    and Sup.R. 44(C)(2)(b):

    1. DRH Form filed April 24, 2020

    2. Petition for Dissolution filed April 24, 2020

    3. Parenting Proceeding Affidavits filed April 24, 2020

    4. Waivers of Paternity Testing filed April 24, 2020

    Hon. Ronald P. Forsthoefel, Judge, Common Pleas Court of Ashland County, Ohio Page 2 of 3
    5. Separation Agreement, pre-decree, filed April 24, 2020

    6. Shared Parenting Plan, pre-decree, filed April 24, 2020

    7. Decree of Dissolution filed June 18, 2020

    8. Shared Parenting Decree filed June 18, 2020

    9. Nunc Pro Tunc Shared Parenting Decree filed July 7, 2020

    It is so ordered.

    ________________________________
    Ronald P. Forsthoefel, Judge

    Hon. Ronald P. Forsthoefel, Judge, Common Pleas Court of Ashland County, Ohio Page 3 of 3
    IN

    09:40 am, Jul 07, 2020


    DEBORAH A. MYERS
    CLERK OF COURTS
    ASHLAND COUNTY, OHIO

    You might also like